![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | ← | Archive 39 | Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | Archive 43 | → | Archive 45 |
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
I am a little surprised by your message. It was I who was accused of something, I don't think it unreasonable for me to ask about it. Considering I was the one being talked about I fail to see how I "inserted" myself. I suppose I could have opened another thread, but it was rather relevant don't you think? If another admin had responded to the comment I likely would not have. HighInBC Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}} 15:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC) I have moved my request to another thread. As for the watchlist, it is not why I went there. I went there to ask for the accusation to be substantiated, only to find another persona asking the very same thing. HighInBC Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}} 15:51, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
I have given you a word instead of a block more times than I can count, I generally get abuse as a response. As for your e-mail, if you think I violated the expectations of an editor or an administrator I welcome you to gather evidence and present it against me at the relevant forum. Frankly if any of your accusations against me had any merit I think you would have done that already. You already know from past discussions I disagree with your interpretation of that incident so I will not reiterate that here. If you really do wish to discuss the e-mail issue yet again you are welcome on my talk page. I am having a very reasonable discussion with Ritchie333 and I prefer to keep it separate from discussions in which we have already determined we do not agree on. HighInBC Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}} 19:15, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
With respect I disagree. I also think that an interaction ban will fail the laugh test, look at my talk page archives and you will see that Cassianto has no objection to talking at length with me when it suits him. I have been polite and patient with this user. You have provided me with a pile of diffs where I am explaining Wikipedia policy in a polite fashion. I have at worst exposed a bit of cheek on occasion to a user who does not hesitate to show naked hostility. I have gone out of my way for weeks now to not be the admin that deals with Cassianto. Look here: User_talk:HighInBC/Archive 78#SMcCandlish where I outright refuse to be the one to deal with their one of their more recent tiffs with another user. I have been taking a very intentional break for a long time now mostly due to the level of abuse I get when I do respond. I am one of 6 administrators who has felt the need to block Cassianto. I have done 2 out of 10 of their blocks, 20%. I am also responsible for 1 out of 5 of their unblocking, also 20%(me directly unblocking, I also supported unblocking for at least one of their unblocks). You say my way of communicating does not work, but none of the many admins who have dealt with Cassianto have gotten them to change their behaviour. If you pay close attention you will see that Cassianto is not exactly avoiding me. They have quoted me out of context to support positions they know I do not support, they have accused me of abusing my admin tools. That is just in the last couple of days. You stepped in here when I asked about that abuse of admins tools. WP:ADMINACCT says I need to take that sort of accusation seriously, but you rebuked me for that. If anyone ever makes such an accusation against you I hope that you follow up on it. I don't think your view will enjoy consensus if put to the test. That being said I am really sick of the whole situation. Perhaps admin #7 or admin #8 will be more suitable for the task. HighInBC Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}} 20:53, 6 July 2016 (UTC) HighInBC, As I pointed out to you before, you couldn't take action against Cassianto in the Mcandlish matter, given how of a tendentious troll he has been recently. Any action you took against Cassianto would have been flipped fairly quickly once the diffs were lain out at ANI. (There are a stack of edits where Mcandlish has been trying to bait people recently and this pointless and pointy nonsense from this evening is just the latest. If anyone needs a word in their ear to find a different toy to play with, it is the baiter... – SchroCat ( talk) 21:47, 6 July 2016 (UTC) Yes, Chillum has a clear grudge against Cassianto which is getting disruptive. It seems have extended to me now. I noticed Chillum of all people deleted Jazz in der Kirche which I started and didn't even have a chance to be expanded. Has an article on de:Jazz in der Kirche. Again seems a very strange cooincidence that Chillum was the one who deleted it. I would guess as revenge for me opposing his Canadian "friend" at RFA ;-)♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:05, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Well it had existed for a few years, I'm sure you could have waited another couple of hours until it was expanded. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
I really did not expect you to accuse me of bad faith Ritchie. Whatever disagreements we have about how things should be managed I did not expect you to accuse me of abusively using my tools. That article had no substantive edits since 2011 and its entire contents could be written on a fortune cookie slip. It was the textbook definition of A7 and I immediately welcomed the author to recreate it and I offered the text to them. If you want to see dastardly deeds hard enough you will see them. It really hurts to think that you would believe I am some guy getting his jollies deleting articles. How many people do you think I am in a feud with? I am taking a wiki-break, I am sick of making an honest effort and getting kicked in the teeth for it. HighInBC Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}} 21:54, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
|
Gerda, if you pick through the nuclear warfare below this message, you will find an unloved stub - I don't know how you are on jazz or if Mönchengladbach is a nice place to visit, but if you could expand Jazz in der Kirche even a little, I think both myself and Dr. Blofeld would be eternally grateful and share a DYK barnstar with you. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:02, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie - just letting you know you can remove the protection of Janatha Garage. I just blocked the main editor causing the disruption as a confirmed sock account.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
I am e-mailing regarding creating a Wikipedia page. Our organisation, a multi-award winning charity, works on sensitive issues such as Violence against Women and Girls (VAWG)and Counter-terrorism and therefore requires pre-emptive page protection rather than create a page and then request page protection.
I have been informed that the official position of Wikipedia is that you never do preemptive protection. However, I was also told that there have been some rare circumstances where it has been done. I was told by the Wikipedia information team that we don't quite fit those circumstances but rather than simply turn us down they pointed us to the place where protection is requested.
I was also told by the Wikipedia information team that as a technical matter they don't think there is a way to create protection ab initio. However, if one of your editors with expertise in protection policy is sympathetic to our request, we can coordinate with them and ensure that the protection is added within minutes of the initial creation.
Kind regards,
JAN Trust — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.23.30.202 ( talk) 05:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks Melanie. I will let the Director of our organization know.
Ritchie - We have not yet created our page on Wikipedia. I was asking whether or not you could enact page protection pre-emptively (either before we create our page or immediately after). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.23.30.202 ( talk) 19:22, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you Ritchie for your help. Another question - If we were to create a page, does Wikipedia alert you every time your page is edited and if so how (for example, by e-mail?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.23.30.202 ( talk) 08:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
On 11 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Wikipedian of the Year Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight has cited cultural anthropologist Margaret Mead as an influence on her writing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The DYK project ( nominate) 12:36, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Template:Did you know nominations/Annette Lyon. Some matters were brought up by another user that have delayed the nomination from moving forward. Just a courtesy notice for you in case you're interested in the matter.
North America
1000 13:50, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Whitehall you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk) 09:01, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Pentonville Road you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk) 11:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
With regard to your reversion of my edit, the article infobox lists the film as a French / Belgian / West German co-production. This is supported by the given BFI reference and by IMDb, so I believe the categorisation is appropriate. Jellyman ( talk) 10:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The article
Whitehall you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Whitehall for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk) 11:41, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The article
Pentonville Road you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Pentonville Road for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk) 15:02, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
I don't know what's got into everybody today, but there is far too much anger and bitterness bouncing around on this usually merry talk page. Whatever it is, please let's just get it out of our system now, and focus on articles. I've got a bit more of the Survey of London to mine through on Pentonville Road, and perhaps it's time to GA review another one of Gerda Arendt's Bach cantatas, if she has any on the pile. What about everyone else? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie - thanks for your updated text on the thread. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 18:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello!
I noticed that you temporarily banned the editing for Tehran Imam Khomeini Airport a couple of days ago in order to stop the "edit war". The war has yet not ended and it still results in a number of confusing reverts and edits. I kindly wonder if you have any chance to watch that page again and take any necessarily actions to stop the behaviour. Thanks in advance. Best Regards, AminC99 ( talk) 22:38, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Why did you say that "A7 doesn ot apply to hospitals at [4] >? I see no such provision in WP:CSD, and not reason not to treat them as any other organization. Have i overlook some discussion of the issue? DGG ( talk ) 09:27, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Over the past several years, you've made it clear that you're not a fan of my edits. However your complaints ( [5] and [6]) on ANI about me correctly leaving a templated message upon nomination of an article for CSD have reached a new low and in my opinion are defacto proof that you are holding a grudge against me. Given this bias, I would appreciate it if you would refrain from interacting with me including commenting on my actions going forward unless they directly involve you. Toddst1 ( talk) 22:15, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Xin chào, làm sao có thể gỡ quyền Hành chính viên và Kiểm định viên vậy bạn?
Hello, how remove powers Bureaucrat and CheckUser? ㅡ Manly Boys 00:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie. Hope you are doing well. I saw you declined the CSD for this page, but the reason why I nominated it for A7 is because A. The creator of the page was the person himself (I had a look on google to see if this person was really notable and it came up with a Twitter account with the same name as the account who created the article and B. Most, if not all the sources listed have no mention of this person. There is no indication that this person is notable. Should i take this to AfD or retag it? Thanks! Class455fan1 ( talk) 12:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333, thought you might like to know, there is a still active afd on the above article - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoolz. ps. luv your kitty pics:)
Coolabahapple (
talk) 20:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello Ritchie. The block you recently gave me has expired. May I remove the section? According to WP:BLANKING, it says that "A number of important matters may not be removed by the user—they are part of the wider community's processes:
Declined unblock requests regarding a currently active block," etc.
However, the block is expired. Does that mean I can remove the block in addition to the unblock request? Dat Guy Talk Contribs 15:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for catching Robert Smith (Medal of Honor) -- Checking the source, this is indeed the Medal of Honor, the highest US military award--those who received it are always notable. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Notability guide. DGG ( talk ) 17:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
{{
Uw-hasty}}
that you can put on over-eager taggers.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont) 16:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Could you undelete my RFA please? If it's incorrectly formatted, please let me know how to correct that. Nevertheless, I am qualified for the position, being one of the pioneer Wikipedia editors. JoeM ( talk) 17:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Your IP experiment makes me more conscious and careful of what should I do when reverting edits! Please accept my apology for giving you these tasty fresh strawberries. Thank you! NgYShung huh? 08:38, 21 August 2016 (UTC) |
/info/en/?search=Talk:JetBlue#Merge_proposal
This should be closed and made a merge. 3-1 favors it. Logic also favors it. If someone took a tremendous effort and expanded it, such as including traffic data and how Jet Blue was losing premium passengers and how the Jet Blue seat is revolutionary (if it actually is), then maybe I might be swayed. But the current article is just two things, that Jet Blue offers flat bed seats on a few flights and there's a lot of promotional material in the article, such that it is like an ad. Admiral James T Kirk ( talk) 04:58, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
About deletion: PROS. I am trying to became writer and I was trying to make all missing profile of : Houston companies list
Because I don't know anything , most of mine article send for speedy deletion. Please help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Houston-media ( talk • contribs) 18:10, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
provides enterprise revenue and profit realization software solutions. It needs to neutrally document what the company does and why it's important, not a sales brochure. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:47, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | ← | Archive 39 | Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | Archive 43 | → | Archive 45 |
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
I am a little surprised by your message. It was I who was accused of something, I don't think it unreasonable for me to ask about it. Considering I was the one being talked about I fail to see how I "inserted" myself. I suppose I could have opened another thread, but it was rather relevant don't you think? If another admin had responded to the comment I likely would not have. HighInBC Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}} 15:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC) I have moved my request to another thread. As for the watchlist, it is not why I went there. I went there to ask for the accusation to be substantiated, only to find another persona asking the very same thing. HighInBC Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}} 15:51, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
I have given you a word instead of a block more times than I can count, I generally get abuse as a response. As for your e-mail, if you think I violated the expectations of an editor or an administrator I welcome you to gather evidence and present it against me at the relevant forum. Frankly if any of your accusations against me had any merit I think you would have done that already. You already know from past discussions I disagree with your interpretation of that incident so I will not reiterate that here. If you really do wish to discuss the e-mail issue yet again you are welcome on my talk page. I am having a very reasonable discussion with Ritchie333 and I prefer to keep it separate from discussions in which we have already determined we do not agree on. HighInBC Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}} 19:15, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
With respect I disagree. I also think that an interaction ban will fail the laugh test, look at my talk page archives and you will see that Cassianto has no objection to talking at length with me when it suits him. I have been polite and patient with this user. You have provided me with a pile of diffs where I am explaining Wikipedia policy in a polite fashion. I have at worst exposed a bit of cheek on occasion to a user who does not hesitate to show naked hostility. I have gone out of my way for weeks now to not be the admin that deals with Cassianto. Look here: User_talk:HighInBC/Archive 78#SMcCandlish where I outright refuse to be the one to deal with their one of their more recent tiffs with another user. I have been taking a very intentional break for a long time now mostly due to the level of abuse I get when I do respond. I am one of 6 administrators who has felt the need to block Cassianto. I have done 2 out of 10 of their blocks, 20%. I am also responsible for 1 out of 5 of their unblocking, also 20%(me directly unblocking, I also supported unblocking for at least one of their unblocks). You say my way of communicating does not work, but none of the many admins who have dealt with Cassianto have gotten them to change their behaviour. If you pay close attention you will see that Cassianto is not exactly avoiding me. They have quoted me out of context to support positions they know I do not support, they have accused me of abusing my admin tools. That is just in the last couple of days. You stepped in here when I asked about that abuse of admins tools. WP:ADMINACCT says I need to take that sort of accusation seriously, but you rebuked me for that. If anyone ever makes such an accusation against you I hope that you follow up on it. I don't think your view will enjoy consensus if put to the test. That being said I am really sick of the whole situation. Perhaps admin #7 or admin #8 will be more suitable for the task. HighInBC Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}} 20:53, 6 July 2016 (UTC) HighInBC, As I pointed out to you before, you couldn't take action against Cassianto in the Mcandlish matter, given how of a tendentious troll he has been recently. Any action you took against Cassianto would have been flipped fairly quickly once the diffs were lain out at ANI. (There are a stack of edits where Mcandlish has been trying to bait people recently and this pointless and pointy nonsense from this evening is just the latest. If anyone needs a word in their ear to find a different toy to play with, it is the baiter... – SchroCat ( talk) 21:47, 6 July 2016 (UTC) Yes, Chillum has a clear grudge against Cassianto which is getting disruptive. It seems have extended to me now. I noticed Chillum of all people deleted Jazz in der Kirche which I started and didn't even have a chance to be expanded. Has an article on de:Jazz in der Kirche. Again seems a very strange cooincidence that Chillum was the one who deleted it. I would guess as revenge for me opposing his Canadian "friend" at RFA ;-)♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:05, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Well it had existed for a few years, I'm sure you could have waited another couple of hours until it was expanded. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
I really did not expect you to accuse me of bad faith Ritchie. Whatever disagreements we have about how things should be managed I did not expect you to accuse me of abusively using my tools. That article had no substantive edits since 2011 and its entire contents could be written on a fortune cookie slip. It was the textbook definition of A7 and I immediately welcomed the author to recreate it and I offered the text to them. If you want to see dastardly deeds hard enough you will see them. It really hurts to think that you would believe I am some guy getting his jollies deleting articles. How many people do you think I am in a feud with? I am taking a wiki-break, I am sick of making an honest effort and getting kicked in the teeth for it. HighInBC Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}} 21:54, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
|
Gerda, if you pick through the nuclear warfare below this message, you will find an unloved stub - I don't know how you are on jazz or if Mönchengladbach is a nice place to visit, but if you could expand Jazz in der Kirche even a little, I think both myself and Dr. Blofeld would be eternally grateful and share a DYK barnstar with you. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:02, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie - just letting you know you can remove the protection of Janatha Garage. I just blocked the main editor causing the disruption as a confirmed sock account.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
I am e-mailing regarding creating a Wikipedia page. Our organisation, a multi-award winning charity, works on sensitive issues such as Violence against Women and Girls (VAWG)and Counter-terrorism and therefore requires pre-emptive page protection rather than create a page and then request page protection.
I have been informed that the official position of Wikipedia is that you never do preemptive protection. However, I was also told that there have been some rare circumstances where it has been done. I was told by the Wikipedia information team that we don't quite fit those circumstances but rather than simply turn us down they pointed us to the place where protection is requested.
I was also told by the Wikipedia information team that as a technical matter they don't think there is a way to create protection ab initio. However, if one of your editors with expertise in protection policy is sympathetic to our request, we can coordinate with them and ensure that the protection is added within minutes of the initial creation.
Kind regards,
JAN Trust — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.23.30.202 ( talk) 05:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks Melanie. I will let the Director of our organization know.
Ritchie - We have not yet created our page on Wikipedia. I was asking whether or not you could enact page protection pre-emptively (either before we create our page or immediately after). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.23.30.202 ( talk) 19:22, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you Ritchie for your help. Another question - If we were to create a page, does Wikipedia alert you every time your page is edited and if so how (for example, by e-mail?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.23.30.202 ( talk) 08:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
On 11 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Wikipedian of the Year Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight has cited cultural anthropologist Margaret Mead as an influence on her writing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The DYK project ( nominate) 12:36, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Template:Did you know nominations/Annette Lyon. Some matters were brought up by another user that have delayed the nomination from moving forward. Just a courtesy notice for you in case you're interested in the matter.
North America
1000 13:50, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Whitehall you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk) 09:01, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Pentonville Road you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk) 11:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
With regard to your reversion of my edit, the article infobox lists the film as a French / Belgian / West German co-production. This is supported by the given BFI reference and by IMDb, so I believe the categorisation is appropriate. Jellyman ( talk) 10:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The article
Whitehall you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Whitehall for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk) 11:41, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The article
Pentonville Road you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Pentonville Road for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Dr. Blofeld --
Dr. Blofeld (
talk) 15:02, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
I don't know what's got into everybody today, but there is far too much anger and bitterness bouncing around on this usually merry talk page. Whatever it is, please let's just get it out of our system now, and focus on articles. I've got a bit more of the Survey of London to mine through on Pentonville Road, and perhaps it's time to GA review another one of Gerda Arendt's Bach cantatas, if she has any on the pile. What about everyone else? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie - thanks for your updated text on the thread. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 18:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello!
I noticed that you temporarily banned the editing for Tehran Imam Khomeini Airport a couple of days ago in order to stop the "edit war". The war has yet not ended and it still results in a number of confusing reverts and edits. I kindly wonder if you have any chance to watch that page again and take any necessarily actions to stop the behaviour. Thanks in advance. Best Regards, AminC99 ( talk) 22:38, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Why did you say that "A7 doesn ot apply to hospitals at [4] >? I see no such provision in WP:CSD, and not reason not to treat them as any other organization. Have i overlook some discussion of the issue? DGG ( talk ) 09:27, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Over the past several years, you've made it clear that you're not a fan of my edits. However your complaints ( [5] and [6]) on ANI about me correctly leaving a templated message upon nomination of an article for CSD have reached a new low and in my opinion are defacto proof that you are holding a grudge against me. Given this bias, I would appreciate it if you would refrain from interacting with me including commenting on my actions going forward unless they directly involve you. Toddst1 ( talk) 22:15, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Xin chào, làm sao có thể gỡ quyền Hành chính viên và Kiểm định viên vậy bạn?
Hello, how remove powers Bureaucrat and CheckUser? ㅡ Manly Boys 00:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie. Hope you are doing well. I saw you declined the CSD for this page, but the reason why I nominated it for A7 is because A. The creator of the page was the person himself (I had a look on google to see if this person was really notable and it came up with a Twitter account with the same name as the account who created the article and B. Most, if not all the sources listed have no mention of this person. There is no indication that this person is notable. Should i take this to AfD or retag it? Thanks! Class455fan1 ( talk) 12:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333, thought you might like to know, there is a still active afd on the above article - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoolz. ps. luv your kitty pics:)
Coolabahapple (
talk) 20:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello Ritchie. The block you recently gave me has expired. May I remove the section? According to WP:BLANKING, it says that "A number of important matters may not be removed by the user—they are part of the wider community's processes:
Declined unblock requests regarding a currently active block," etc.
However, the block is expired. Does that mean I can remove the block in addition to the unblock request? Dat Guy Talk Contribs 15:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for catching Robert Smith (Medal of Honor) -- Checking the source, this is indeed the Medal of Honor, the highest US military award--those who received it are always notable. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Notability guide. DGG ( talk ) 17:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
{{
Uw-hasty}}
that you can put on over-eager taggers.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont) 16:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Could you undelete my RFA please? If it's incorrectly formatted, please let me know how to correct that. Nevertheless, I am qualified for the position, being one of the pioneer Wikipedia editors. JoeM ( talk) 17:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Your IP experiment makes me more conscious and careful of what should I do when reverting edits! Please accept my apology for giving you these tasty fresh strawberries. Thank you! NgYShung huh? 08:38, 21 August 2016 (UTC) |
/info/en/?search=Talk:JetBlue#Merge_proposal
This should be closed and made a merge. 3-1 favors it. Logic also favors it. If someone took a tremendous effort and expanded it, such as including traffic data and how Jet Blue was losing premium passengers and how the Jet Blue seat is revolutionary (if it actually is), then maybe I might be swayed. But the current article is just two things, that Jet Blue offers flat bed seats on a few flights and there's a lot of promotional material in the article, such that it is like an ad. Admiral James T Kirk ( talk) 04:58, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
About deletion: PROS. I am trying to became writer and I was trying to make all missing profile of : Houston companies list
Because I don't know anything , most of mine article send for speedy deletion. Please help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Houston-media ( talk • contribs) 18:10, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
provides enterprise revenue and profit realization software solutions. It needs to neutrally document what the company does and why it's important, not a sales brochure. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:47, 29 July 2016 (UTC)