![]() | This is an archive of past discussions with RightCowLeftCoast. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 > |
All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - ... (up to 100) |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page 2nd Infantry Division (United States) has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): (?<![^\s:])[^\s\]\[\{\}\\\|^\/`<>@:]+@\w+(?!\.htm)(?:\.\w+){1,3} (links: mailto:mcox@atpco.com). It appears that you inserted an e-mail address to 2nd Infantry Division (United States). Wikipedia pages should not contain personal information. For more information, please read Wikipedia:Biography of Living People, specifically the section about personal information.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! -- XLinkBot ( talk) 13:50, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
I replaced your fact tag with a ref. Wording for duties, and where it was deactivated at could use some work if you're up to it. Paranormal Skeptic ( talk) 16:07, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
The subject clearly passes WP:PROF. Please read WP:BEFORE before you nominate other articles for deletion. I fixed up the stub. Bearian ( talk) 20:35, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
I dropped a warning on the IP's talk page. If it continues (two more times), we can take it to wp:aiv. Since the IP has only been used for vandalism, it might get as much as a one year block. Celestra ( talk) 14:04, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
The article List of people from Chula Vista, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
UserPrJ 27
talk
06:03, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
I will discuss this matter on the article's talk page. Thankyou, UserPrJ 27 talk 06:20, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
I've taken up the apparent block evasion at WP:ANI. In general, you don't need to use a friendly welcome for users who are obviously just here to disrupt. I usually use a {{ welcome-anon-vandal}} for similar circumstances. If you are wondering whether this is that same same individual, click the 'Geolocate' link in the box at the bottom of their talk page. The individual that is causing this disruption will show up as an AT&T dsl account from San Luis Obispo. Cheers, Celestra ( talk) 17:21, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to WikiProject California!
I noticed you recently added yourself to our Participants' list, and I wanted to welcome you to our project. Our goal is to facilitate collaboration on California-related articles, and everyone is welcome to join. Here are some suggested activities:
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page, or feel free to ask me on my talk page.
Again, welcome! - Optigan13 ( talk) 05:23, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 05:04, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
I am going to be submitting it for Featured list in a couple of weeks (once I do some work to it) and too many images are discouraged and considered unencyclopedic. Its just not necessary for theh information we are trying to get out. -- Kumioko ( talk) 02:32, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
I have no clue what whipopulation means either, I have to admit it's a bit silly to me. South Bay ( talk) 13:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
in future, i would ask that you be a more judicious about executing reverts of an entire edit when only one item or portion is in question. you're not a novice to wp policy, and you should know better. -- emerson7 22:46, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
I understand the motive for your request, but I'd advise you to reconsider the way you ask such things. You come across as very rude and holier-than-thou. Regards Buckshot06( prof) 00:47, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
cites apart from yours in proper cite format. Would you mind altering yours to match the wiki convention?,' demonstrating continued work with the subject, I would have probably reacted quite differently. My 2 cents. Buckshot06( prof) 03:55, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
I didn't add Scott Lost to the list of Filipino Americans, all I did was change the word "Guerilla" (in Pro Wrestling Guerrilla) to "Guerrilla". I seriously have no idea whether he has Filipino roots or not. TheFBH ( talk) 22:50, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey there. I didn't remove her from the list. Someone else did without explanation. [1]. I merely reinstated her. ---- Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 22:40, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
As you requested, I added the reference and citation to the Gen Wainwright page that supports the text that Gen MacArthur opposed Wainwright receiving the MoH. I should have done that last night. I somehow stumbled on the page - can't remember why - and just quickly added the text. I have read this in numerous books, but I was only able to find one this morning. This book, which I recently read, includes the text of the message that MacArthur sent to General Marshall opposing the award to Gen Wainwright. I include excerpts here:
The citation proposed does not repeat does not represent the truth... I do not repreat do not recommend him for the Medal of Honor.
In my opinion, Wainwright and General Edward King, especially King, never received the credit they deserved for the defense of the Philippines. While MacArthur sat in his cave issuing "decrees" they had actual command of the fighting that took place. Thomas R. Fasulo ( talk) 15:19, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
It should be very close. I have pretty much retired from WP so I recommend you go ahead and nominate it and take the credit. I think most of the content work is done but there is still undoubtedly some fine tuning that needs to be done.-- Kumioko ( talk) 23:18, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Roger Davies talk 11:53, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
The
September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
02:39, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Can we have a discussion on the name here instead of the article's talk page because JL 09 has been trolling me for the past few days.-- ᜊᜓᜅ ᜅ᜔ ᜑᜎᜋᜅ᜔ ᜋᜑᜒᜏᜄ ( ᜂᜐᜉ) Baybayin 06:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
I never thought that he was "American", but despite the concerns raised about his citizenship on his talk page, editors have nonetheless included him in the categories of "American singer-songwriters" "American male singers" etc. I'm indifferent now as to whether or not he's included in the List of Filipino Americans, but it just goes to show that the definition of what is and what isn't considered "American" is more difficult to define than I had previously thought. ---- Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 22:10, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Saw your message at WT:MILHIST. Looks like vandalism to Template:Campaignbox Iraq War. Should be fixed now. -- saberwyn 08:07, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Thought I'd reply here to avoid further complicating the thread. When facilitating complex discussions on WP, I've found that if discussion seems to be running down without any resolution, summarising progress (in for example a new sub-thread under a level 3 heading) can help to keep everyone focused on the topics under discussion, and can identify areas where there are misunderstandings as well as gradually winnowing out those where there's agreement. It also makes judging consensus easier, if there's a a need for some form of adjudication at any point. Also, if you want to poll at any point, don't be put off by my comments; the discussion has been very productive so far but sometimes polling can be a useful final phase once most of the objections have been heard and addressed. Just my 2p-worth ;) EyeSerene talk 13:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
I'm kinda lazy. I know that if I leave proper verifiable citation, someone else wiki it. I'm sorry that you are a bit annoyed but if you leave it for a while, it get magically fixed. :) Vapour ( talk) 11:09, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Edit conflict is annoying so you have a go first. I'll come back to it when you are done. Vapour ( talk) 12:06, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
I read your comments and regardless of your vote of "delete", I want to thank you for the kind words. Hey, thank you for serving also. Tony the Marine ( talk) 04:33, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
An honorary doctorate is always considered a notable award, so I consider that Gina de Venecia is notable. Her husband's notability does not enter into this. She is notable herself. -- Eastmain ( talk) 12:01, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello, on international parental abduction in Japan:
-It has often occurred while both parents are *still* living in Japan. This is very common and well known. Your definition that one parent, who is a Japanese citizen and resides outside of Japan and then returns to Japan, does not cover the numerous cases of international parental abduction that occurs while both parents are still living in Japan.
For example:
The Amy Kalmus story: http://crnjapan.net/The_Japan_Childrens_Rights_Network/per-ak.html
There's also a recent news broadcast about another case: http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/world/2009/10/13/lah.japan.custody.morrey.lg.cnn?iref=videosearch
Again, these cases are VERY common and well documented. I can send you more links if you not convinced.
In addition, international parental abduction in Japan also encompasses abduction by non-parents such as Japanese grandparents. One famous case is the Paul Toland case (please google his name). His Japanese mother-in-law now has custody of his daughter. This is not a rare case. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.242.213.140 ( talk) 16:07, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, there. I would like to thank you for your effort to uphold wikipedia policy and standard. Without your demand for verification, I would never have researched this topic in the way I did. Cheers! Vapour ( talk) 10:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Not quite sure. " Self-help (law)" is considered illegal in almost all jurisdiction. Plus, Japan use primary caregiver doctrine as main criteria for deciding the welfare of child. Therefore, if the father abduct children from primary caregiver without use of the force, he could still be charged as it is detrimental to the welfare of children. Another thing I should mention is that the writer of article (Ms Lah) has a bad rep in Japanese version of blogspher (2Chan) for being persistently critical of Japan. The fact that she holds a very strong Korean identity and that she "[thinks] about the larger question of being Korean every single moment." doesn't help. I have no idea why CNN placed her as Tokyo instead of Seoul correspondence. Personally, I'm inclined to suspect that she took the quote out of context. Anyway, who am I to judge. I'm a Japanese and I do feel that most Western reporting about this made quite few false implications. That CNN quote is pretty much in line with the perspective that Japanese abnormality is the cause. Vapour ( talk)
I responded in the talk page. Please note that the sentence also doesn't fit in the paragraph, irregardless of its accuracy. Wikilot49 ( talk) 23:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC)wikilot49
I am seeking to include both Vanessa Hudgens and Norah Jones' photos in the Asian Americans infobox, and I am requesting you to support thsat decision. I believe that the presence of their photos in the Filipino American and Indian American infoboxes warrant the inclusion in the article. I would also like to point out that I am currently blocked but this rule ([ does not mean that obviously helpful edits (such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism) must be reverted just because they were made by a banned user,]) allows me to continue to edit anonymously. - 23prootie ( talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.108.50.2 ( talk) 17:42, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.
If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up
here, read up on the rules
here, and discuss the contest
here!
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
20:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
The
October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
20:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello, RightCowLeftCoast. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.— Ash ( talk) 14:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Per this edit, {{ talkheader}} is used primarily for "active talk pages that attract commentary from inexperienced editors". For example, it is commonly added to talk pages that generate traffic from IP's. Viriditas ( talk) 05:42, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
I noticed an exclusion of Vietnamese in the Asian American infobox. They have a opulation of over 1 million, maybe you could check that out.-- 23prootie ( talk), 5 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.95.9.201 ( talk)
Due to lack of support of consensus during the previous consensus period, or lack of nomination all together a new period of time shall be openned up for nomination for those categories that did not already have a nominee, or woes nominiee did not receive support. This new nomination period shall be open immediatly and last until 24 December 2009. If only one individual is nominated in a category, their nomination will stand as having received consensus of active editors and will be approved. If more than one individual is nominated in a category, a consensus period shall be opened for that category. All nominees should be politically neutral as has been previously agreed to.
If this is User:23prootie, I must remind you that you are banned, regardless of how right or wrong that block maybe. I suggest you appeal your ban. Furthermore, per policy, I am not going to serve as a meatpuppet, in fear of being banned or blocked myself. Nothing against you, but I hope you understand.
As for the content that you wish to propose, the categories that remain were approved by consensus based on population totals. Although I myself recognize Taiwanese Americans as a subcategory of Chinese Americans, the category for representation was not agreed to when the process started, so would have to be reassessed after this current process completes itself. Furthermore, new round of nominations for representees in categories where one has been approved is not yet open, and will not be taken, or at least considered by myself, intil the current process completes itself. -- RightCowLeftCoast ( talk) 02:42, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Elockid appears to be trying to own the Asian American talk page and is accusing me of being 23prootie. I feel offended and saddened by that gesture. I do not understand why there is controversy there. I only thought that I was just a passer-by trying to help. Could you tell this Elockid to leave me alone. I believe that he is quite annoying.-- 124.104.42.21 ( talk) 23:28, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
If everyone can please take discussions not involving myself to the appropriate ANI section, or the appropriate article's talk page, I would greatly appreciate it. -- RightCowLeftCoast ( talk) 02:16, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
I must really apologize for hacking your talk page. I hope you except my apology and that it doesn't come off as negative perceptions towards me. I was trying to prevent further disruption and socking which is something I'm heavily involved in. If you're interested in knowing, the IP was blocked for 1 week for block evasion as a duck. Again, sorry for hacking your talk page. Elockid ( Talk· Contribs) 02:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the time to look at the situation on the Scouting article! —Largo Plazo ( talk) 23:55, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, however, due to academic pressures I still don't use this often. Well, gotta replace the message with something else now. ★ Dasani★ 09:00, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
I inadvertnalty emoved material, I have now reinserted it. Slatersteven ( talk) 14:17, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi RCLC. One of the disputants relisted the dispute after your 3O opinion. Just FYI, I've removed the relisting and posted a notice at Talk:Muslim_conquest_of_Persia#Making_.27Religion.27_section_more_objective saying to follow the "What happens next?" section in the FAQ. Regards, — TRANSPORTERMAN ( TALK) 01:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Two articles you nominated for GA status, Jose Calugas and Francis B. Wai have been reviewed and have been placed on hold pending the resolution of those comments. Skinny87 ( talk) 15:51, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
The
November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
19:38, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 December 14#Category:International Christian Leadership. The category is similar to Category:Members of the Family also known as the Fellowship which you recently commented on. -- Kevinkor2 ( talk) 09:40, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
The
December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
04:23, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
When are going to close the nominations for Asian Americans? -- [[User:Buhay Tao|Buhay Tao (ᜊᜓᜑᜌ᜔ ᜆᜂ)]] ([[User talk:Buhay Tao|Buhay Tao (ᜊᜓᜑᜌ᜔ ᜆᜂ)]]) ( talk) 19:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
The
January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
04:36, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up
here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the
coordinator academy course and in the
responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
22:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
The
February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
23:09, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Voting for the
Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
22:16, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
The
March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
22:30, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
The
April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
19:57, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
The
May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
21:36, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
You had previously participated in a deletion discussion for this subject, at its first AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Dickson. It has been nominated for deletion, again. The discussion is taking place, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Dickson (2nd nomination). Thank you for your time, -- Cirt ( talk) 21:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The California Star | |
Thank you for all your help on Chula Vista and California related pages Spongie555 ( talk) 17:35, 3 July 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members |
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 19:33, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
I dont know if your still on your wikibreak but i could use some help with the Chula Vista page. I think we need a sports section and expand more stuff. Spongie555 ( talk) 04:20, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy |
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 21:53, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
|
|
A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound |
Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants |
|
To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 23:43, 7 September 2010 (UTC) |
I dont know if your still on retirement but we should try to get Chula Vista article to FA for its centennial on October 17,2011. Spongie555 ( talk) 04:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.
With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team, Roger Davies talk 19:33, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
|
The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals |
|
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 20:24, 23 October 2010 (UTC) |
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 22:52, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 23:12, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions with RightCowLeftCoast. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 > |
All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - ... (up to 100) |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page 2nd Infantry Division (United States) has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): (?<![^\s:])[^\s\]\[\{\}\\\|^\/`<>@:]+@\w+(?!\.htm)(?:\.\w+){1,3} (links: mailto:mcox@atpco.com). It appears that you inserted an e-mail address to 2nd Infantry Division (United States). Wikipedia pages should not contain personal information. For more information, please read Wikipedia:Biography of Living People, specifically the section about personal information.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! -- XLinkBot ( talk) 13:50, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
I replaced your fact tag with a ref. Wording for duties, and where it was deactivated at could use some work if you're up to it. Paranormal Skeptic ( talk) 16:07, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
The subject clearly passes WP:PROF. Please read WP:BEFORE before you nominate other articles for deletion. I fixed up the stub. Bearian ( talk) 20:35, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
I dropped a warning on the IP's talk page. If it continues (two more times), we can take it to wp:aiv. Since the IP has only been used for vandalism, it might get as much as a one year block. Celestra ( talk) 14:04, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
The article List of people from Chula Vista, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
UserPrJ 27
talk
06:03, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
I will discuss this matter on the article's talk page. Thankyou, UserPrJ 27 talk 06:20, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
I've taken up the apparent block evasion at WP:ANI. In general, you don't need to use a friendly welcome for users who are obviously just here to disrupt. I usually use a {{ welcome-anon-vandal}} for similar circumstances. If you are wondering whether this is that same same individual, click the 'Geolocate' link in the box at the bottom of their talk page. The individual that is causing this disruption will show up as an AT&T dsl account from San Luis Obispo. Cheers, Celestra ( talk) 17:21, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to WikiProject California!
I noticed you recently added yourself to our Participants' list, and I wanted to welcome you to our project. Our goal is to facilitate collaboration on California-related articles, and everyone is welcome to join. Here are some suggested activities:
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page, or feel free to ask me on my talk page.
Again, welcome! - Optigan13 ( talk) 05:23, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 05:04, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
I am going to be submitting it for Featured list in a couple of weeks (once I do some work to it) and too many images are discouraged and considered unencyclopedic. Its just not necessary for theh information we are trying to get out. -- Kumioko ( talk) 02:32, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
I have no clue what whipopulation means either, I have to admit it's a bit silly to me. South Bay ( talk) 13:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
in future, i would ask that you be a more judicious about executing reverts of an entire edit when only one item or portion is in question. you're not a novice to wp policy, and you should know better. -- emerson7 22:46, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
I understand the motive for your request, but I'd advise you to reconsider the way you ask such things. You come across as very rude and holier-than-thou. Regards Buckshot06( prof) 00:47, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
cites apart from yours in proper cite format. Would you mind altering yours to match the wiki convention?,' demonstrating continued work with the subject, I would have probably reacted quite differently. My 2 cents. Buckshot06( prof) 03:55, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
I didn't add Scott Lost to the list of Filipino Americans, all I did was change the word "Guerilla" (in Pro Wrestling Guerrilla) to "Guerrilla". I seriously have no idea whether he has Filipino roots or not. TheFBH ( talk) 22:50, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey there. I didn't remove her from the list. Someone else did without explanation. [1]. I merely reinstated her. ---- Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 22:40, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
As you requested, I added the reference and citation to the Gen Wainwright page that supports the text that Gen MacArthur opposed Wainwright receiving the MoH. I should have done that last night. I somehow stumbled on the page - can't remember why - and just quickly added the text. I have read this in numerous books, but I was only able to find one this morning. This book, which I recently read, includes the text of the message that MacArthur sent to General Marshall opposing the award to Gen Wainwright. I include excerpts here:
The citation proposed does not repeat does not represent the truth... I do not repreat do not recommend him for the Medal of Honor.
In my opinion, Wainwright and General Edward King, especially King, never received the credit they deserved for the defense of the Philippines. While MacArthur sat in his cave issuing "decrees" they had actual command of the fighting that took place. Thomas R. Fasulo ( talk) 15:19, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
It should be very close. I have pretty much retired from WP so I recommend you go ahead and nominate it and take the credit. I think most of the content work is done but there is still undoubtedly some fine tuning that needs to be done.-- Kumioko ( talk) 23:18, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Roger Davies talk 11:53, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
The
September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
02:39, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Can we have a discussion on the name here instead of the article's talk page because JL 09 has been trolling me for the past few days.-- ᜊᜓᜅ ᜅ᜔ ᜑᜎᜋᜅ᜔ ᜋᜑᜒᜏᜄ ( ᜂᜐᜉ) Baybayin 06:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
I never thought that he was "American", but despite the concerns raised about his citizenship on his talk page, editors have nonetheless included him in the categories of "American singer-songwriters" "American male singers" etc. I'm indifferent now as to whether or not he's included in the List of Filipino Americans, but it just goes to show that the definition of what is and what isn't considered "American" is more difficult to define than I had previously thought. ---- Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 22:10, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Saw your message at WT:MILHIST. Looks like vandalism to Template:Campaignbox Iraq War. Should be fixed now. -- saberwyn 08:07, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Thought I'd reply here to avoid further complicating the thread. When facilitating complex discussions on WP, I've found that if discussion seems to be running down without any resolution, summarising progress (in for example a new sub-thread under a level 3 heading) can help to keep everyone focused on the topics under discussion, and can identify areas where there are misunderstandings as well as gradually winnowing out those where there's agreement. It also makes judging consensus easier, if there's a a need for some form of adjudication at any point. Also, if you want to poll at any point, don't be put off by my comments; the discussion has been very productive so far but sometimes polling can be a useful final phase once most of the objections have been heard and addressed. Just my 2p-worth ;) EyeSerene talk 13:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
I'm kinda lazy. I know that if I leave proper verifiable citation, someone else wiki it. I'm sorry that you are a bit annoyed but if you leave it for a while, it get magically fixed. :) Vapour ( talk) 11:09, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Edit conflict is annoying so you have a go first. I'll come back to it when you are done. Vapour ( talk) 12:06, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
I read your comments and regardless of your vote of "delete", I want to thank you for the kind words. Hey, thank you for serving also. Tony the Marine ( talk) 04:33, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
An honorary doctorate is always considered a notable award, so I consider that Gina de Venecia is notable. Her husband's notability does not enter into this. She is notable herself. -- Eastmain ( talk) 12:01, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello, on international parental abduction in Japan:
-It has often occurred while both parents are *still* living in Japan. This is very common and well known. Your definition that one parent, who is a Japanese citizen and resides outside of Japan and then returns to Japan, does not cover the numerous cases of international parental abduction that occurs while both parents are still living in Japan.
For example:
The Amy Kalmus story: http://crnjapan.net/The_Japan_Childrens_Rights_Network/per-ak.html
There's also a recent news broadcast about another case: http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/world/2009/10/13/lah.japan.custody.morrey.lg.cnn?iref=videosearch
Again, these cases are VERY common and well documented. I can send you more links if you not convinced.
In addition, international parental abduction in Japan also encompasses abduction by non-parents such as Japanese grandparents. One famous case is the Paul Toland case (please google his name). His Japanese mother-in-law now has custody of his daughter. This is not a rare case. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.242.213.140 ( talk) 16:07, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, there. I would like to thank you for your effort to uphold wikipedia policy and standard. Without your demand for verification, I would never have researched this topic in the way I did. Cheers! Vapour ( talk) 10:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Not quite sure. " Self-help (law)" is considered illegal in almost all jurisdiction. Plus, Japan use primary caregiver doctrine as main criteria for deciding the welfare of child. Therefore, if the father abduct children from primary caregiver without use of the force, he could still be charged as it is detrimental to the welfare of children. Another thing I should mention is that the writer of article (Ms Lah) has a bad rep in Japanese version of blogspher (2Chan) for being persistently critical of Japan. The fact that she holds a very strong Korean identity and that she "[thinks] about the larger question of being Korean every single moment." doesn't help. I have no idea why CNN placed her as Tokyo instead of Seoul correspondence. Personally, I'm inclined to suspect that she took the quote out of context. Anyway, who am I to judge. I'm a Japanese and I do feel that most Western reporting about this made quite few false implications. That CNN quote is pretty much in line with the perspective that Japanese abnormality is the cause. Vapour ( talk)
I responded in the talk page. Please note that the sentence also doesn't fit in the paragraph, irregardless of its accuracy. Wikilot49 ( talk) 23:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC)wikilot49
I am seeking to include both Vanessa Hudgens and Norah Jones' photos in the Asian Americans infobox, and I am requesting you to support thsat decision. I believe that the presence of their photos in the Filipino American and Indian American infoboxes warrant the inclusion in the article. I would also like to point out that I am currently blocked but this rule ([ does not mean that obviously helpful edits (such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism) must be reverted just because they were made by a banned user,]) allows me to continue to edit anonymously. - 23prootie ( talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.108.50.2 ( talk) 17:42, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.
If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up
here, read up on the rules
here, and discuss the contest
here!
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
20:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
The
October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
20:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello, RightCowLeftCoast. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.— Ash ( talk) 14:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Per this edit, {{ talkheader}} is used primarily for "active talk pages that attract commentary from inexperienced editors". For example, it is commonly added to talk pages that generate traffic from IP's. Viriditas ( talk) 05:42, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
I noticed an exclusion of Vietnamese in the Asian American infobox. They have a opulation of over 1 million, maybe you could check that out.-- 23prootie ( talk), 5 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.95.9.201 ( talk)
Due to lack of support of consensus during the previous consensus period, or lack of nomination all together a new period of time shall be openned up for nomination for those categories that did not already have a nominee, or woes nominiee did not receive support. This new nomination period shall be open immediatly and last until 24 December 2009. If only one individual is nominated in a category, their nomination will stand as having received consensus of active editors and will be approved. If more than one individual is nominated in a category, a consensus period shall be opened for that category. All nominees should be politically neutral as has been previously agreed to.
If this is User:23prootie, I must remind you that you are banned, regardless of how right or wrong that block maybe. I suggest you appeal your ban. Furthermore, per policy, I am not going to serve as a meatpuppet, in fear of being banned or blocked myself. Nothing against you, but I hope you understand.
As for the content that you wish to propose, the categories that remain were approved by consensus based on population totals. Although I myself recognize Taiwanese Americans as a subcategory of Chinese Americans, the category for representation was not agreed to when the process started, so would have to be reassessed after this current process completes itself. Furthermore, new round of nominations for representees in categories where one has been approved is not yet open, and will not be taken, or at least considered by myself, intil the current process completes itself. -- RightCowLeftCoast ( talk) 02:42, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Elockid appears to be trying to own the Asian American talk page and is accusing me of being 23prootie. I feel offended and saddened by that gesture. I do not understand why there is controversy there. I only thought that I was just a passer-by trying to help. Could you tell this Elockid to leave me alone. I believe that he is quite annoying.-- 124.104.42.21 ( talk) 23:28, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
If everyone can please take discussions not involving myself to the appropriate ANI section, or the appropriate article's talk page, I would greatly appreciate it. -- RightCowLeftCoast ( talk) 02:16, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
I must really apologize for hacking your talk page. I hope you except my apology and that it doesn't come off as negative perceptions towards me. I was trying to prevent further disruption and socking which is something I'm heavily involved in. If you're interested in knowing, the IP was blocked for 1 week for block evasion as a duck. Again, sorry for hacking your talk page. Elockid ( Talk· Contribs) 02:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the time to look at the situation on the Scouting article! —Largo Plazo ( talk) 23:55, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, however, due to academic pressures I still don't use this often. Well, gotta replace the message with something else now. ★ Dasani★ 09:00, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
I inadvertnalty emoved material, I have now reinserted it. Slatersteven ( talk) 14:17, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi RCLC. One of the disputants relisted the dispute after your 3O opinion. Just FYI, I've removed the relisting and posted a notice at Talk:Muslim_conquest_of_Persia#Making_.27Religion.27_section_more_objective saying to follow the "What happens next?" section in the FAQ. Regards, — TRANSPORTERMAN ( TALK) 01:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Two articles you nominated for GA status, Jose Calugas and Francis B. Wai have been reviewed and have been placed on hold pending the resolution of those comments. Skinny87 ( talk) 15:51, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
The
November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
19:38, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 December 14#Category:International Christian Leadership. The category is similar to Category:Members of the Family also known as the Fellowship which you recently commented on. -- Kevinkor2 ( talk) 09:40, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
The
December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
04:23, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
When are going to close the nominations for Asian Americans? -- [[User:Buhay Tao|Buhay Tao (ᜊᜓᜑᜌ᜔ ᜆᜂ)]] ([[User talk:Buhay Tao|Buhay Tao (ᜊᜓᜑᜌ᜔ ᜆᜂ)]]) ( talk) 19:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
The
January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
04:36, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up
here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the
coordinator academy course and in the
responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
22:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
The
February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
23:09, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Voting for the
Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
22:16, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
The
March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
22:30, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
The
April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
19:57, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
The
May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
21:36, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
You had previously participated in a deletion discussion for this subject, at its first AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Dickson. It has been nominated for deletion, again. The discussion is taking place, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Dickson (2nd nomination). Thank you for your time, -- Cirt ( talk) 21:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The California Star | |
Thank you for all your help on Chula Vista and California related pages Spongie555 ( talk) 17:35, 3 July 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members |
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 19:33, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
I dont know if your still on your wikibreak but i could use some help with the Chula Vista page. I think we need a sports section and expand more stuff. Spongie555 ( talk) 04:20, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy |
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 21:53, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
|
|
A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound |
Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants |
|
To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 23:43, 7 September 2010 (UTC) |
I dont know if your still on retirement but we should try to get Chula Vista article to FA for its centennial on October 17,2011. Spongie555 ( talk) 04:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.
With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team, Roger Davies talk 19:33, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
|
The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals |
|
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 20:24, 23 October 2010 (UTC) |
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 22:52, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 23:12, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |