This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | Archive 39 | Archive 40 | Archive 41 |
Could you tell me which part of the article has been copied? The entire article has been written citing sources. i had also given proper secondary sources for each part. Instead of flat out deletions it would be helpful to the community if there could be some productive discussion. I have made a snabox entry - /info/en/?search=User:DGJ/sandbox. Please let me know what corrections/alterations are needed. Thank You.— Preceding unsigned comment added by DGJ ( talk • contribs) 02:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Ok. Thank You. Please let me what corrections are needed.
DGJ (
talk) 14:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello again. I finished the edits needed for the article.
/info/en/?search=User:DGJ/sandbox . Kindly go through it and let me know if it's ready for publishing. Thank You.
DGJ (
talk) 12:27, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, RegentsPark. I have looked at the draft and its sources, and I have a number of pieces of information and advice to offer to
DGJ, but I don't have time to write them out now. Since you have become involved in this, I'll let you know when I do post my comments.
JBW (
talk) 14:34, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Are pages like this covered under ARBIPA sanctions? -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 00:00, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
For the fast service. Jehochman Talk 17:51, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello RegentsPark. JBW has suggested further changes in the article. If anymore are needed, please let me know.
Thank You
DGJ ( talk) 18:08, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
first of all happy new year hope you are doing absolutely fine. please check the Sengupta article where trangabellam and ekdalian removed my well-sourced content. I provided the source on the talk page of that article. thank you Miller110 ( talk) 21:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Why did you remove the source information? 2409:4053:2D83:2120:0:0:5789:560C ( talk) 02:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
I added the information according to the source so why did you remove it? i will protest against you 2409:4053:2D83:2120:0:0:5789:560C ( talk) 02:33, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Any update would be appreciated DGJ ( talk) 03:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Can you please review the article on Royal Indian Air Force for any errors. Cookersweet ( talk) 15:42, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
No problem. 👍 Cookersweet ( talk) 20:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
User:AuthenticSources2546 has been making disruptive edits to the above mentioned pages. They're a newly created id and I suspect they're a sockpuppet of a previously banned user. They've been deleting citations from the same pages and replacing them with blog posts. They've also removed the protection template from the Bhoi dynasty page. Please look into it. Solarson919 ( talk) 16:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
As per kc panigrahi bhoi rulers were of either karana or gopala descent as ramachandra Deva 1 was associated with yaduvamsa he doesn't mention the word khandayat with regards to their origin u guys can check this detail from the citation itself that is present in that article...also n patnaik is not a historian he is an anthropologist I've given the link in talk page for u guys to check his qualification ....his book also contradicts with other sources that are cited in the bhoi dynasty page as he claims that govind vidhyadhara was installed on the throne because gajapati prataprudra Deva had no heirs which is not true according to other reliable sources that are already present in the article as per the other sources prataprudra Deva did have heirs namely his son kaluadeva and his younger brother both were installed on the throne but were murdered by Govinda vidhyadhar....check the citation by n patnaik then comment..also the shakti cult source which mentions them to be of karana writer caste lineage was present in this article from the very start still u say that the sources didn't comply with the Wikipedia terms and policies ...the reality is you are just distorting this article by presenting the citations present in that page in their distorted form...I say it again bhoi dynasty page is vandalised by solarson919..good luck distorting history AuthenticSources2546 ( talk) 05:07, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Also KC Panigrahi was a highly qualified historian from Odisha his analysis should always be taken as the authority over others. AuthenticSources2546 ( talk) 05:16, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
1. One historian can't be taken as "authority" over others. 2. According to Wikipedia policy, if multiple sources say many things about a topic, all views should be represented in th article concerned. And you shouldn't have removed the user protection template from the Bhoi dynasty page
Solarson919 ( talk) 05:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
You're just a vandaliser let the admin check my points of argument ...they are all to the point even u know that.. AuthenticSources2546 ( talk) 05:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
1)u say historian kc panigrahi claims bhoi rulers to be of khandayat descent which as per his book is not true he says bhoi rulers were of either karana or gopal descent he nowhere mentions the word khandayat..admin can check the citation given in that page itself. 2)u say n patnaik is a historian which he is not he is an anthropologist admin can check the link given by me regarding n patnaik's qualification in the talk page. 3)shakti cult source was present on that page from the very start still someone said it doesn't comply with Wikipedia terms and policies..admin can check the history of bhoi dynasty page to confirm whether I'm right or wrong.3) regarding sources which mentioned them to be of writer caste lineage ,all these sources are isbn certified and if these sources don't comply with wikipedia terms and policies then u must remove the n patnaik source as well since it also has isbn certificate on it.4)n patnaik source contradicts with other sources already present in the article as he claims govind vidhyadhar the minister of prataprudra Deva was installed on the throne because prataparudra had no heirs which is not true as per other sources prataprudra did have heirs who were installed on the throne namely his son and his younger brother but both of them were murdered by govind vidhyadhar this event is not present in his book he directly claims that vidhyadhar was installed on the throne because prataprudra had no heirs.admin can check the sources which are already present in the article regarding this event.5)since someone mentioned that sources from political website cannot be sited then u must remove n patnaik source as well as he is also associated with bjd the political party of odisha...look through the points given above and then draw your conclusion.
AuthenticSources2546 ( talk) 05:55, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
This user solarson has got some serious issues he's constantly vandalising bhoi dynasty page removing valuable sources also claiming n patnaik to be a historian and saying kc panigrahi mentions the word khandayat with regards to bhoi rulers lineage this is a clear form of vandalism done for some hidden motive , humble request to the admin to look into the above matter ... I've already given my points of argument in the talk page of bhoi dynasty look into it and then decide who's right or wrong....also the current page edited by me is the most accurate form of representation of all the information provided by different citations which are already present in the article contrary to what solarson919 is doing he is representing the information provided in the sources in their distorted form to fulfill his own personal agenda...admin plz look into it.. AuthenticSources2546 ( talk) 19:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Satyendranath Tagore was a composer, writer, linguist and first ICS Officer. The page (Satyendranath Tagore) was created many years ago, but surprisingly the page was removed from the Wikipedia by someone. Please publish it. See a link here. Wikifulness ( talk) 12:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Ok.Thanks. Wikifulness ( talk) 15:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
A block is prob. warranted: see this thread. TrangaBellam ( talk) 19:45, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
I think Trangabellam asked you to warn another wikipedia editor.but instead of him/her you warned me at my talk page.please confirm It,what I have done wrong? I didn't revert anything and edited the baidya article as advised by senior editor Trangabellam.thanks Nobita456 ( talk) 20:07, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
I think you gave me wrong warning.I didn't revert any thing. Nobita456 ( talk) 19:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement § Just another Wikipedian editor. TrangaBellam ( talk) 14:05, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for messaging me and letting me know on my talk page. However, based on my recent discussion with this person, he seems to have no interest in correcting the intentional damage that his efforts are causing. His refusal to respond to my reply to his message further leaves me to believe this. Anytime someone searches up "Subhas Chandra Bose", the first thing they will see is Netaji's name being tied with "anti-Semitism", "authoritarianism", and "military incompetence", none of which are true and can easily be disproven. I appeal to the admins to look into my side, we may even have a discussion, because this is unacceptable and Wikipedia should not be exploited to suit one's own disdain and ignorance towards a top leader in India's freedom struggle, no matter how controversial he may be. Not even Hitler's Wikipedia knowledge panel is this degrading or biased. I would love to discuss with you further on Discord or Twitter DMs. Pranath vir ( talk) 03:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Asking you for a favour.If some editers revert my sourced content and say I can't cite them even they are WP:RS what should I do? I even initiate a talk page discussion but they didn't agree with me and then I put them on that article under WP:NPOV.but they revert them.I mean in that case what should I do? Nobita456 ( talk) 22:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi RegentsPark, thanks for protecting the talkpage. I'm pretty sure there's some sort of alarm set for when the protection re-expires, but so it goes. If possible, could you also block [3] and [4] who were missed. It's probably also worth noting that this is not Eiskrahablo, but WP:LTA/INTSF. Best, CMD ( talk) 22:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
I had too many tabs open, and mistakenly welcomed an IP range ( here), instead of the intended IP 94.252.4.105 ( talk · contribs), thus precipitating the spam you removed from my UTP. Sorry for the mixup, and thanks for the intervention.
P.S. Didn't even realize you could create a Talk page or leave a message for a range; how does that even make any sense? Maybe the mw software should prevent that? Should I add something to WP:VPT about it? Mathglot ( talk) 22:31, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Can we please remove the puran story and myths in caste-related articles? These purans has no value, even modern historians mentioned these purans as a tool of castism.sitush made some rules before and I think it is high time for you to make some decisions. please I am urging you not to let these purans in those sensitive caste articles. we should focus on the history of those castes. Baidya is a prime example in this case. Nobita456 ( talk) 22:28, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
last but not the least PURANS are myths and should not be considered in this sensitive caste article. Safron710. And in that context, on another talk page, TrangaBellam said here
I have not cited Brh. P. or Ch. Ma. or Bv. P. but modern scholars who have cited them in the context of the subject of this article. (talk) 14:15, 26 July 2021. The entire article is based on scholarly sources. No Puran has been referenced directly. Puranas were India's way of writing very old history and they were taken literally(historically). As a friendly suggestion, I recommend that you find opposing sources rather than trying delete sourced academic content. Ekdalian's page says that he lives in Bengal hence I think he might be able to help with the sources or may have more context. Thanks LukeEmily ( talk) 00:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC) ( talk page stalker)
References
Sir this article would require protection in my opinion [5], [6] . This IP made similar unsourced changes (Lithuania related) in this and this, the former got protected. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 07:26, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
I was wondering about Popular Prakashan, specifically the source used here (obviously not a wikipedia mirror!). -- RegentsPark ( comment) 21:38, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I had posted on the Arbitration request page [7] but on second thoughts I am putting my question here as it is not a statement. Why can't the defendant put his side of the story and behavioral issues of the other party? One side can implicate the other and the defendant has a 500 word limit to reply which gets exhausted just by the response to the allegations. What is the right way for the defendant to bring to light the bad behavior of the accuser? Hemantha had asked a question along these lines in the section above. But no admin responded yet. I am genuinely curious about this answer since such a filing is considered retaliatory. Based on what I am seeing these rules of "Arbitration request" appear to be skewed and provide a first mover advantage to the filing party. And no doubt the filing parties are using it to their full advantage. Why won't they? The filing party seems to think there is no risk in filing these twisted arbitration requests. Venkat TL ( talk) 21:08, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) I wasn't seeking anybody to get "blocked". I just needed the haranguing to stop. The badgering you guys had done last week took a heavy toll on my work life as well as my health. All this for trying to cotribute to the best of my ability to a page that was in absolutely miserable shape when I started. This is not the way Wikipedia is supposed to work. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 23:45, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Hey regendspark I edited many articles also except Baidya please see Baisha saha and other surname articles which I cleaned up. currently I am not editing in Baidya article I am working on Bengali Kayastha to get a consensus and will edit after that, Thanks. Nobita456 ( talk) 13:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Good morning Regendspark. I proposed to add a medieval varna status subsection in the Bengali Kayastha article ( we already have Colonial and modern varna status subsections in that article). fellow editors Chanchaldm and Satnam agreed with me regarding that and suggested we should add the purans and literature views also which is important for their origin matter see 1 2 even lukeEmily agreed initially and said my edits are well-sourced. But only Ekdalin is not wanting to add that section. I even initiated an RFC but the response was close to nothing. so in that case what we should do? Purans and Literature views are present in Baidya article also. Please tell Ekdalin not to revert my relevant and sourced content. Nobita456 ( talk) 07:50, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
The article Talwinder Singh Parmar that you have previously semiprotected seems to need further protection from vandalism. Fachidiot ( talk) 17:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
@ RegentsPark: can you look at the page Kaur, a user by the name "online sikhi siphai" keeps adding inappropriate information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Navjottt ( talk • contribs) 08:09, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
I looked at this source [1] that you removed considering it as self published source in article Kaur. After reading about the publisher, they say that "we're neither traditional publishing, nor are we self-publishing." [8] Thoughts? MehmoodS ( talk) 13:22, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
References
Not up to any good. TrangaBellam ( talk) 05:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi RegentsPark. Could you kindly protect the Abhiraka article, which is subject to slow-edit warring? Thank you! पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 15:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello RegentsPark,
I just banned a user from the German Wikipedia who tried to sell his account on ebay. Discussing the event, we noticed that someone is offering your account here (amidst others, but they are not admins, even though the offer suggests otherwise — @ Elli, Jorrojorro, Pschaeffer, Slavuta33, and RHB100: those seem to be yours). Probably it's a fake, but you should know anyway. Greetings, -- Gardini ( talk) 13:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Shigar Fort - check edit history and my recent removal. The copy-vio stayed for over seven years. TrangaBellam ( talk) 18:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaiti Narula: Too many newbies for comfort with the discussion being advertised at Twitter. TrangaBellam ( talk) 16:37, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi RegentsPark! Could you consider protecting Gautama Buddha, and take the necessary steps with User:Usoejw9. Thank you! पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 10:24, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, RegentsPark! Can you take necessary steps with User: पाटलिपुत्र? I've given a reliable source yet he reverted it. This was the source which he reverted.
References
And this is the same source some wiki editors are agreeing with. But when I proved that Buddha was a Hindu by birth from the same source given by पाटलिपुत्र, he reverted it. Usoejw9 ( talk) 05:50, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Check out the talk-page. Walls of text are being hurled at each other and I spotted at-least a couple of BLP violations (check Packer&Tracker's comments on Eaton/Talbot). TrangaBellam ( talk) 07:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello RegentsPark, need help in protecting this page as it has been persistently disrupted by user Amruth7676 who keeps removing and altering information as well as removing citation. Can you please take action against such persistent disruptive editing please? MehmoodS ( talk) 12:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
I was looking to contribute to the page Gaurav Arya, seems to be lot of action on creation and deletion. What is the take finally? I can create it again with relevant content and citations. Amitized ( talk) 06:23, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
What's up at Waliur Rahman (fellow)? I cannot make sense of the multiple moves and an ongoing AfD but it appears that the article was hijacked for someone eponymous by an editor, borderline incompetent. Will appreciate another pair of eyes. TrangaBellam ( talk) 16:53, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
is best known as the leader of Bengal's first rebellion against the British East India Company [...] and is regarded as a hero in the history of Bengal) but I cannot find any reliable source in English or Dutch that speaks of the subject, even trivially, except this (p. 245) single line. (One Abu Torab, Fauzdar of "Chakla Bhushna", is mentioned in some sources but they are not identical; the Fauzdar Torab was killed by a Sitaram in around 1714.) TrangaBellam ( talk) 17:30, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
BrownSugar57 for Makarand Paranjape. Continuing to restore BLP violations without any discussion at article-t/p or user-t/p. The article's history is intriguing and ECPing might be a good idea. TrangaBellam ( talk) 20:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, RegentsPark, as you are interested and involved for long time in south asia related topics. Some new users are deteriorating the articles related to Koeri caste with their own user generated image with serious technical issues. Can you please protect the page. Heba Aisha ( talk) 13:19, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi RegentsPark. Some massive deletion of content is going on at Eastern Ganga dynasty. Obviously some content is poorly sourced, but there is also properly sourced content (for example a map I added sourced from Schwartzberg, Joseph E.) which is being indiscriminately deleted. Also, the contributor is probably sock-pupetting (User:Sangramz and User:RamiDeva). Is there a way the article could be protected and the contributor dealt with? Best regards पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 11:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello RegentsPark - a new user account Abhigyaaningle is causing disruption on various pages, with removing citation and altering the quotes within the citation template. Also, this user caused disruption as IP before with similar edits. Like here Abhigyaaningle added this unsourced edit [10] which is exact same edit added by IP 59.88.74.200 [11]. You can also see how this user altered the quotes within the citation templates [12]. Please take action against this user for causing such disruptions on pages. Doesn't seem like he is here to improve encylopedia. One more thing I noticed, the other IP this user could have used or atleast associated with are IP 117.*.*.* which was temporarily blocked. Here is Abhigyaaningle requesting edit on semi protected page [13] and here is same request by 117.206.165.239 [14] MehmoodS ( talk) 12:52, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi RegentPark! Would it be possible to have some temporary protection on this article? Thank you! पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 03:44, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | Archive 39 | Archive 40 | Archive 41 |
Could you tell me which part of the article has been copied? The entire article has been written citing sources. i had also given proper secondary sources for each part. Instead of flat out deletions it would be helpful to the community if there could be some productive discussion. I have made a snabox entry - /info/en/?search=User:DGJ/sandbox. Please let me know what corrections/alterations are needed. Thank You.— Preceding unsigned comment added by DGJ ( talk • contribs) 02:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Ok. Thank You. Please let me what corrections are needed.
DGJ (
talk) 14:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello again. I finished the edits needed for the article.
/info/en/?search=User:DGJ/sandbox . Kindly go through it and let me know if it's ready for publishing. Thank You.
DGJ (
talk) 12:27, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, RegentsPark. I have looked at the draft and its sources, and I have a number of pieces of information and advice to offer to
DGJ, but I don't have time to write them out now. Since you have become involved in this, I'll let you know when I do post my comments.
JBW (
talk) 14:34, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Are pages like this covered under ARBIPA sanctions? -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 00:00, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
For the fast service. Jehochman Talk 17:51, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello RegentsPark. JBW has suggested further changes in the article. If anymore are needed, please let me know.
Thank You
DGJ ( talk) 18:08, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
first of all happy new year hope you are doing absolutely fine. please check the Sengupta article where trangabellam and ekdalian removed my well-sourced content. I provided the source on the talk page of that article. thank you Miller110 ( talk) 21:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Why did you remove the source information? 2409:4053:2D83:2120:0:0:5789:560C ( talk) 02:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
I added the information according to the source so why did you remove it? i will protest against you 2409:4053:2D83:2120:0:0:5789:560C ( talk) 02:33, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Any update would be appreciated DGJ ( talk) 03:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Can you please review the article on Royal Indian Air Force for any errors. Cookersweet ( talk) 15:42, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
No problem. 👍 Cookersweet ( talk) 20:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
User:AuthenticSources2546 has been making disruptive edits to the above mentioned pages. They're a newly created id and I suspect they're a sockpuppet of a previously banned user. They've been deleting citations from the same pages and replacing them with blog posts. They've also removed the protection template from the Bhoi dynasty page. Please look into it. Solarson919 ( talk) 16:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
As per kc panigrahi bhoi rulers were of either karana or gopala descent as ramachandra Deva 1 was associated with yaduvamsa he doesn't mention the word khandayat with regards to their origin u guys can check this detail from the citation itself that is present in that article...also n patnaik is not a historian he is an anthropologist I've given the link in talk page for u guys to check his qualification ....his book also contradicts with other sources that are cited in the bhoi dynasty page as he claims that govind vidhyadhara was installed on the throne because gajapati prataprudra Deva had no heirs which is not true according to other reliable sources that are already present in the article as per the other sources prataprudra Deva did have heirs namely his son kaluadeva and his younger brother both were installed on the throne but were murdered by Govinda vidhyadhar....check the citation by n patnaik then comment..also the shakti cult source which mentions them to be of karana writer caste lineage was present in this article from the very start still u say that the sources didn't comply with the Wikipedia terms and policies ...the reality is you are just distorting this article by presenting the citations present in that page in their distorted form...I say it again bhoi dynasty page is vandalised by solarson919..good luck distorting history AuthenticSources2546 ( talk) 05:07, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Also KC Panigrahi was a highly qualified historian from Odisha his analysis should always be taken as the authority over others. AuthenticSources2546 ( talk) 05:16, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
1. One historian can't be taken as "authority" over others. 2. According to Wikipedia policy, if multiple sources say many things about a topic, all views should be represented in th article concerned. And you shouldn't have removed the user protection template from the Bhoi dynasty page
Solarson919 ( talk) 05:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
You're just a vandaliser let the admin check my points of argument ...they are all to the point even u know that.. AuthenticSources2546 ( talk) 05:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
1)u say historian kc panigrahi claims bhoi rulers to be of khandayat descent which as per his book is not true he says bhoi rulers were of either karana or gopal descent he nowhere mentions the word khandayat..admin can check the citation given in that page itself. 2)u say n patnaik is a historian which he is not he is an anthropologist admin can check the link given by me regarding n patnaik's qualification in the talk page. 3)shakti cult source was present on that page from the very start still someone said it doesn't comply with Wikipedia terms and policies..admin can check the history of bhoi dynasty page to confirm whether I'm right or wrong.3) regarding sources which mentioned them to be of writer caste lineage ,all these sources are isbn certified and if these sources don't comply with wikipedia terms and policies then u must remove the n patnaik source as well since it also has isbn certificate on it.4)n patnaik source contradicts with other sources already present in the article as he claims govind vidhyadhar the minister of prataprudra Deva was installed on the throne because prataparudra had no heirs which is not true as per other sources prataprudra did have heirs who were installed on the throne namely his son and his younger brother but both of them were murdered by govind vidhyadhar this event is not present in his book he directly claims that vidhyadhar was installed on the throne because prataprudra had no heirs.admin can check the sources which are already present in the article regarding this event.5)since someone mentioned that sources from political website cannot be sited then u must remove n patnaik source as well as he is also associated with bjd the political party of odisha...look through the points given above and then draw your conclusion.
AuthenticSources2546 ( talk) 05:55, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
This user solarson has got some serious issues he's constantly vandalising bhoi dynasty page removing valuable sources also claiming n patnaik to be a historian and saying kc panigrahi mentions the word khandayat with regards to bhoi rulers lineage this is a clear form of vandalism done for some hidden motive , humble request to the admin to look into the above matter ... I've already given my points of argument in the talk page of bhoi dynasty look into it and then decide who's right or wrong....also the current page edited by me is the most accurate form of representation of all the information provided by different citations which are already present in the article contrary to what solarson919 is doing he is representing the information provided in the sources in their distorted form to fulfill his own personal agenda...admin plz look into it.. AuthenticSources2546 ( talk) 19:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Satyendranath Tagore was a composer, writer, linguist and first ICS Officer. The page (Satyendranath Tagore) was created many years ago, but surprisingly the page was removed from the Wikipedia by someone. Please publish it. See a link here. Wikifulness ( talk) 12:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Ok.Thanks. Wikifulness ( talk) 15:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
A block is prob. warranted: see this thread. TrangaBellam ( talk) 19:45, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
I think Trangabellam asked you to warn another wikipedia editor.but instead of him/her you warned me at my talk page.please confirm It,what I have done wrong? I didn't revert anything and edited the baidya article as advised by senior editor Trangabellam.thanks Nobita456 ( talk) 20:07, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
I think you gave me wrong warning.I didn't revert any thing. Nobita456 ( talk) 19:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement § Just another Wikipedian editor. TrangaBellam ( talk) 14:05, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for messaging me and letting me know on my talk page. However, based on my recent discussion with this person, he seems to have no interest in correcting the intentional damage that his efforts are causing. His refusal to respond to my reply to his message further leaves me to believe this. Anytime someone searches up "Subhas Chandra Bose", the first thing they will see is Netaji's name being tied with "anti-Semitism", "authoritarianism", and "military incompetence", none of which are true and can easily be disproven. I appeal to the admins to look into my side, we may even have a discussion, because this is unacceptable and Wikipedia should not be exploited to suit one's own disdain and ignorance towards a top leader in India's freedom struggle, no matter how controversial he may be. Not even Hitler's Wikipedia knowledge panel is this degrading or biased. I would love to discuss with you further on Discord or Twitter DMs. Pranath vir ( talk) 03:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Asking you for a favour.If some editers revert my sourced content and say I can't cite them even they are WP:RS what should I do? I even initiate a talk page discussion but they didn't agree with me and then I put them on that article under WP:NPOV.but they revert them.I mean in that case what should I do? Nobita456 ( talk) 22:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi RegentsPark, thanks for protecting the talkpage. I'm pretty sure there's some sort of alarm set for when the protection re-expires, but so it goes. If possible, could you also block [3] and [4] who were missed. It's probably also worth noting that this is not Eiskrahablo, but WP:LTA/INTSF. Best, CMD ( talk) 22:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
I had too many tabs open, and mistakenly welcomed an IP range ( here), instead of the intended IP 94.252.4.105 ( talk · contribs), thus precipitating the spam you removed from my UTP. Sorry for the mixup, and thanks for the intervention.
P.S. Didn't even realize you could create a Talk page or leave a message for a range; how does that even make any sense? Maybe the mw software should prevent that? Should I add something to WP:VPT about it? Mathglot ( talk) 22:31, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Can we please remove the puran story and myths in caste-related articles? These purans has no value, even modern historians mentioned these purans as a tool of castism.sitush made some rules before and I think it is high time for you to make some decisions. please I am urging you not to let these purans in those sensitive caste articles. we should focus on the history of those castes. Baidya is a prime example in this case. Nobita456 ( talk) 22:28, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
last but not the least PURANS are myths and should not be considered in this sensitive caste article. Safron710. And in that context, on another talk page, TrangaBellam said here
I have not cited Brh. P. or Ch. Ma. or Bv. P. but modern scholars who have cited them in the context of the subject of this article. (talk) 14:15, 26 July 2021. The entire article is based on scholarly sources. No Puran has been referenced directly. Puranas were India's way of writing very old history and they were taken literally(historically). As a friendly suggestion, I recommend that you find opposing sources rather than trying delete sourced academic content. Ekdalian's page says that he lives in Bengal hence I think he might be able to help with the sources or may have more context. Thanks LukeEmily ( talk) 00:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC) ( talk page stalker)
References
Sir this article would require protection in my opinion [5], [6] . This IP made similar unsourced changes (Lithuania related) in this and this, the former got protected. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 07:26, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
I was wondering about Popular Prakashan, specifically the source used here (obviously not a wikipedia mirror!). -- RegentsPark ( comment) 21:38, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I had posted on the Arbitration request page [7] but on second thoughts I am putting my question here as it is not a statement. Why can't the defendant put his side of the story and behavioral issues of the other party? One side can implicate the other and the defendant has a 500 word limit to reply which gets exhausted just by the response to the allegations. What is the right way for the defendant to bring to light the bad behavior of the accuser? Hemantha had asked a question along these lines in the section above. But no admin responded yet. I am genuinely curious about this answer since such a filing is considered retaliatory. Based on what I am seeing these rules of "Arbitration request" appear to be skewed and provide a first mover advantage to the filing party. And no doubt the filing parties are using it to their full advantage. Why won't they? The filing party seems to think there is no risk in filing these twisted arbitration requests. Venkat TL ( talk) 21:08, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) I wasn't seeking anybody to get "blocked". I just needed the haranguing to stop. The badgering you guys had done last week took a heavy toll on my work life as well as my health. All this for trying to cotribute to the best of my ability to a page that was in absolutely miserable shape when I started. This is not the way Wikipedia is supposed to work. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 23:45, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Hey regendspark I edited many articles also except Baidya please see Baisha saha and other surname articles which I cleaned up. currently I am not editing in Baidya article I am working on Bengali Kayastha to get a consensus and will edit after that, Thanks. Nobita456 ( talk) 13:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Good morning Regendspark. I proposed to add a medieval varna status subsection in the Bengali Kayastha article ( we already have Colonial and modern varna status subsections in that article). fellow editors Chanchaldm and Satnam agreed with me regarding that and suggested we should add the purans and literature views also which is important for their origin matter see 1 2 even lukeEmily agreed initially and said my edits are well-sourced. But only Ekdalin is not wanting to add that section. I even initiated an RFC but the response was close to nothing. so in that case what we should do? Purans and Literature views are present in Baidya article also. Please tell Ekdalin not to revert my relevant and sourced content. Nobita456 ( talk) 07:50, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
The article Talwinder Singh Parmar that you have previously semiprotected seems to need further protection from vandalism. Fachidiot ( talk) 17:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
@ RegentsPark: can you look at the page Kaur, a user by the name "online sikhi siphai" keeps adding inappropriate information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Navjottt ( talk • contribs) 08:09, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
I looked at this source [1] that you removed considering it as self published source in article Kaur. After reading about the publisher, they say that "we're neither traditional publishing, nor are we self-publishing." [8] Thoughts? MehmoodS ( talk) 13:22, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
References
Not up to any good. TrangaBellam ( talk) 05:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi RegentsPark. Could you kindly protect the Abhiraka article, which is subject to slow-edit warring? Thank you! पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 15:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello RegentsPark,
I just banned a user from the German Wikipedia who tried to sell his account on ebay. Discussing the event, we noticed that someone is offering your account here (amidst others, but they are not admins, even though the offer suggests otherwise — @ Elli, Jorrojorro, Pschaeffer, Slavuta33, and RHB100: those seem to be yours). Probably it's a fake, but you should know anyway. Greetings, -- Gardini ( talk) 13:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Shigar Fort - check edit history and my recent removal. The copy-vio stayed for over seven years. TrangaBellam ( talk) 18:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaiti Narula: Too many newbies for comfort with the discussion being advertised at Twitter. TrangaBellam ( talk) 16:37, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi RegentsPark! Could you consider protecting Gautama Buddha, and take the necessary steps with User:Usoejw9. Thank you! पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 10:24, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, RegentsPark! Can you take necessary steps with User: पाटलिपुत्र? I've given a reliable source yet he reverted it. This was the source which he reverted.
References
And this is the same source some wiki editors are agreeing with. But when I proved that Buddha was a Hindu by birth from the same source given by पाटलिपुत्र, he reverted it. Usoejw9 ( talk) 05:50, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Check out the talk-page. Walls of text are being hurled at each other and I spotted at-least a couple of BLP violations (check Packer&Tracker's comments on Eaton/Talbot). TrangaBellam ( talk) 07:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello RegentsPark, need help in protecting this page as it has been persistently disrupted by user Amruth7676 who keeps removing and altering information as well as removing citation. Can you please take action against such persistent disruptive editing please? MehmoodS ( talk) 12:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
I was looking to contribute to the page Gaurav Arya, seems to be lot of action on creation and deletion. What is the take finally? I can create it again with relevant content and citations. Amitized ( talk) 06:23, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
What's up at Waliur Rahman (fellow)? I cannot make sense of the multiple moves and an ongoing AfD but it appears that the article was hijacked for someone eponymous by an editor, borderline incompetent. Will appreciate another pair of eyes. TrangaBellam ( talk) 16:53, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
is best known as the leader of Bengal's first rebellion against the British East India Company [...] and is regarded as a hero in the history of Bengal) but I cannot find any reliable source in English or Dutch that speaks of the subject, even trivially, except this (p. 245) single line. (One Abu Torab, Fauzdar of "Chakla Bhushna", is mentioned in some sources but they are not identical; the Fauzdar Torab was killed by a Sitaram in around 1714.) TrangaBellam ( talk) 17:30, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
BrownSugar57 for Makarand Paranjape. Continuing to restore BLP violations without any discussion at article-t/p or user-t/p. The article's history is intriguing and ECPing might be a good idea. TrangaBellam ( talk) 20:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, RegentsPark, as you are interested and involved for long time in south asia related topics. Some new users are deteriorating the articles related to Koeri caste with their own user generated image with serious technical issues. Can you please protect the page. Heba Aisha ( talk) 13:19, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi RegentsPark. Some massive deletion of content is going on at Eastern Ganga dynasty. Obviously some content is poorly sourced, but there is also properly sourced content (for example a map I added sourced from Schwartzberg, Joseph E.) which is being indiscriminately deleted. Also, the contributor is probably sock-pupetting (User:Sangramz and User:RamiDeva). Is there a way the article could be protected and the contributor dealt with? Best regards पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 11:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello RegentsPark - a new user account Abhigyaaningle is causing disruption on various pages, with removing citation and altering the quotes within the citation template. Also, this user caused disruption as IP before with similar edits. Like here Abhigyaaningle added this unsourced edit [10] which is exact same edit added by IP 59.88.74.200 [11]. You can also see how this user altered the quotes within the citation templates [12]. Please take action against this user for causing such disruptions on pages. Doesn't seem like he is here to improve encylopedia. One more thing I noticed, the other IP this user could have used or atleast associated with are IP 117.*.*.* which was temporarily blocked. Here is Abhigyaaningle requesting edit on semi protected page [13] and here is same request by 117.206.165.239 [14] MehmoodS ( talk) 12:52, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi RegentPark! Would it be possible to have some temporary protection on this article? Thank you! पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 03:44, 8 May 2022 (UTC)