This is Peoplelikeyoulikeme's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
![]() |
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
S0091 (
talk)
20:58, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
|
Hi! Thank you for adding to the Félix González-Torres article, grateful for more editors adding to it! I would just note that the Manual of Style for visual arts lays out some helpful guidelines for what to include in biographies of artists. Specifically, I think we may have passed the limit on the number of individual exhibitions the artist had both during his lifetime and posthumously. Obviously a lot of them are important and should be kept, but the general rule of thumb is to only include up to or around 5 solo exhibitions and the most widely known/historically notable group exhibitions in a dedicated exhibitions section (ie Whitney Biennial, Venice Biennale, etc.). Other notable exhibitions should be incorporated as sequential prose in the career section, with explanations about the subject's artistic style and evolution in the context those events.
Additionally, I think the extensive lists in the intro section are not useful and muddy up the introduction - all that information can be included in the body of the article as prose.
Thank you again for adding to the article! Just wanted to flag these edits before I execute them so you aren't surprised. 19h00s ( talk) 20:12, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
97198 ( talk) 02:39, 16 January 2023 (UTC)An article you recently created,
NYC Transgender Oral History Project, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from
reliable,
independent sources in order to show it meets
WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
13:06, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Deluge Books—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Materialscientist (
talk)
21:38, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Just wanna say, love it. Fantastically written and documented. Excellent stuff, couldn’t have done it better myself. Snokalok ( talk) 00:27, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Whitney Mallett, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
GPL93 (
talk)
21:33, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. Thank you for your work on Sean DeLear. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Very nice stub article. I actually met Sean a few times back in the scene in LA in the 80s.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Onel5969 TT me 15:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello Peoplelikeyoulikeme! Your additions to
Dan Thawley have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 13:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brock Colyar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Bearcat ( talk) 16:13, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Dan Thawley, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from
reliable,
independent sources in order to show it meets
WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
11:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Bapari, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 18:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bapari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
CNMall41 ( talk) 21:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Rattia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Oaktree b ( talk) 00:23, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 02:39, 14 May 2023 (UTC) Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Fire Island Art Residency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 15:30, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Rachel Tashjian, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 21:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Amber Later, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from
reliable,
independent sources in order to show it meets
WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
12:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Why should this source not be used? In that she clearly states why she quit acting. Besides it seems you don't understand sentence cases. "Acting Career" and "Leaks and Image Ownership" show this. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Angalis Field, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 22:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Bob Glück, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources - most of the sources are minor websites or publisher sources (and Facebook is not a RS). (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). The article also appears very similar to text in one of the sources (the Poetry Foundation profile) - potentially a copyright issue. I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Paul W (
talk)
09:39, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Rachel Tashjian".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BoND until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count) 19:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Angalis Field".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Whitney Mallett, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 10:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
She has quit acting, please stop removing this. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:50, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:NYC Transgender Oral History Project, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 20:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Dan Thawley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 00:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " NYC Transgender Oral History Project".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh ( talk) 20:13, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Please do not introduce
links in actual articles to
draft articles, as you did to
Dodie Bellamy,
Kevin Killian and
New Narrative. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the
Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
12:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Amber Later, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 13:07, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Reading Beans ( talk) 20:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Zora (platform), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 20:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zora (platform) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.TLA (talk) 08:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks!
Drmies (
talk)
16:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Peoplelikeyoulikeme! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at
Ser Serpas that may not have been. "
Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.
Geardona (
talk to me?)
23:09, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. Thank you for your work on Gherardo Felloni. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 22:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Michael Bullock (writer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CurryTime7-24 ( talk) 04:57, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Collina Strada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 00:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " Dan Thawley".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit 13:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Your edit to
DeForrest Brown Jr. has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
C F A
💬
18:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I work with the CopyPatrol tool to find potential copyright violations. Some of what you added to the article DeForrest Brown Jr. appears to have been copied from the New Yorker. In the future, please be careful to put content in your own words before adding it to Wikipedia. The following page might help: WP:FIXCLOSEPARA. I have gone through the article and fixed the issues, but I just wanted to let you know about the potential issue and give you a chance to ask any questions you might have. It seems like you are really interested in building an encyclopedia and I want to make sure you have the tools you need to do that. Have a great day! SomeoneDreaming ( talk) 18:02, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
You have been previously notified about our copyright policy but have pasted a good chunk of a copyrighted New Yorker piece into a Wikipedia article. This is not acceptable. Continued copyright violations will result in you being
blocked from editing. --
Whpq (
talk)
18:20, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Your edit to
Late August, Early September has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
Even if you cite it, you still cannot copy large chunks of text from copyrighted works. SomeoneDreaming ( talk) 19:43, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
This is Peoplelikeyoulikeme's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
![]() |
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
S0091 (
talk)
20:58, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
|
Hi! Thank you for adding to the Félix González-Torres article, grateful for more editors adding to it! I would just note that the Manual of Style for visual arts lays out some helpful guidelines for what to include in biographies of artists. Specifically, I think we may have passed the limit on the number of individual exhibitions the artist had both during his lifetime and posthumously. Obviously a lot of them are important and should be kept, but the general rule of thumb is to only include up to or around 5 solo exhibitions and the most widely known/historically notable group exhibitions in a dedicated exhibitions section (ie Whitney Biennial, Venice Biennale, etc.). Other notable exhibitions should be incorporated as sequential prose in the career section, with explanations about the subject's artistic style and evolution in the context those events.
Additionally, I think the extensive lists in the intro section are not useful and muddy up the introduction - all that information can be included in the body of the article as prose.
Thank you again for adding to the article! Just wanted to flag these edits before I execute them so you aren't surprised. 19h00s ( talk) 20:12, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
97198 ( talk) 02:39, 16 January 2023 (UTC)An article you recently created,
NYC Transgender Oral History Project, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from
reliable,
independent sources in order to show it meets
WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
13:06, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Deluge Books—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Materialscientist (
talk)
21:38, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Just wanna say, love it. Fantastically written and documented. Excellent stuff, couldn’t have done it better myself. Snokalok ( talk) 00:27, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Whitney Mallett, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
GPL93 (
talk)
21:33, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. Thank you for your work on Sean DeLear. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Very nice stub article. I actually met Sean a few times back in the scene in LA in the 80s.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Onel5969 TT me 15:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello Peoplelikeyoulikeme! Your additions to
Dan Thawley have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 13:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brock Colyar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Bearcat ( talk) 16:13, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Dan Thawley, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from
reliable,
independent sources in order to show it meets
WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
11:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Bapari, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 18:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bapari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
CNMall41 ( talk) 21:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Rattia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Oaktree b ( talk) 00:23, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 02:39, 14 May 2023 (UTC) Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Fire Island Art Residency, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 15:30, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Rachel Tashjian, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 21:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Amber Later, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from
reliable,
independent sources in order to show it meets
WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
12:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Why should this source not be used? In that she clearly states why she quit acting. Besides it seems you don't understand sentence cases. "Acting Career" and "Leaks and Image Ownership" show this. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Angalis Field, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 22:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Bob Glück, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources - most of the sources are minor websites or publisher sources (and Facebook is not a RS). (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). The article also appears very similar to text in one of the sources (the Poetry Foundation profile) - potentially a copyright issue. I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Paul W (
talk)
09:39, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Rachel Tashjian".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BoND until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count) 19:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Angalis Field".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Whitney Mallett, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 10:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
She has quit acting, please stop removing this. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:50, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:NYC Transgender Oral History Project, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 20:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Dan Thawley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 00:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " NYC Transgender Oral History Project".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh ( talk) 20:13, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Please do not introduce
links in actual articles to
draft articles, as you did to
Dodie Bellamy,
Kevin Killian and
New Narrative. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the
Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
12:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Amber Later, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 13:07, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Reading Beans ( talk) 20:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Zora (platform), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 20:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zora (platform) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.TLA (talk) 08:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks!
Drmies (
talk)
16:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Peoplelikeyoulikeme! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at
Ser Serpas that may not have been. "
Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.
Geardona (
talk to me?)
23:09, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. Thank you for your work on Gherardo Felloni. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 22:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Michael Bullock (writer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CurryTime7-24 ( talk) 04:57, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Collina Strada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 00:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Peoplelikeyoulikeme. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " Dan Thawley".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit 13:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Your edit to
DeForrest Brown Jr. has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
C F A
💬
18:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I work with the CopyPatrol tool to find potential copyright violations. Some of what you added to the article DeForrest Brown Jr. appears to have been copied from the New Yorker. In the future, please be careful to put content in your own words before adding it to Wikipedia. The following page might help: WP:FIXCLOSEPARA. I have gone through the article and fixed the issues, but I just wanted to let you know about the potential issue and give you a chance to ask any questions you might have. It seems like you are really interested in building an encyclopedia and I want to make sure you have the tools you need to do that. Have a great day! SomeoneDreaming ( talk) 18:02, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
You have been previously notified about our copyright policy but have pasted a good chunk of a copyrighted New Yorker piece into a Wikipedia article. This is not acceptable. Continued copyright violations will result in you being
blocked from editing. --
Whpq (
talk)
18:20, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Your edit to
Late August, Early September has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
Even if you cite it, you still cannot copy large chunks of text from copyrighted works. SomeoneDreaming ( talk) 19:43, 10 July 2024 (UTC)