Archives |
Hi, you have commented on my recent report on User:Rjecina on the admin noticeboard. The situation has turned a lot worse since then so I am currently filing another report against him. He is accusing me of everything evil (socket puppet, vandal, disruptive) and other users too. Please, I would really appreciate if you left a comment on what your take is on this issue. You can find a link to the report on my talk page. Thanks.-- Bizso ( talk) 02:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Shubinator ( talk) 04:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
The
February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
23:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for voting in my request for adminship. I have added more to my answers and hope this provides more clarification. Wikiwoohoo ( talk) 00:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! Not really sure what it was for though (unless it was just general). - Rjd0060 ( talk) 16:16, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
You might like to think seriously about standing for coordship in the upcoming elections. You are active in the project, know your way around, and are clearly a hard-worker; you'll be an asset :) – Roger Davies talk 05:40, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Heh. Would something involving meerkats be more to your liking? Bettia (bring on the trumpets!) 20:29, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Well, it's all done and dusted, and my RfA has passed successfully with 83 support votes, 0 oppose votes and 2 neutrals. Many thanks for your support - bring on the trumpets mop!
Bettia
(bring on the trumpets!)
16:17, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
C21K talk 23:29, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I responded to your claim that an IP was connected to Malleus. Please, please, in the future, look at the Whois before making such accusations in such a heated time as this. It does not help you. It does not help the community. Ottava Rima ( talk) 01:15, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up
here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
19:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
wanna !vote on WT:WIAFA? Ling.Nut.Public ( talk) 09:15, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi. It is clear to me that this article should be renamed to M10 Tank Destroyer.(I think that's what you want too.) M10 Tank Destroyer is the main name. The name M10 Wolverine name should also be kept as an alternate name, as it is definitely legit. Wallie ( talk) 20:32, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Good Luck on the Election for Coordinator! Based on What I see you would make a Good Coordinator. Have A Great Day! Lord R. T. Oliver The Olive Branch 21:39, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
-
down
load |
sign! has given you a
bubble tea! Bubble teas promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!
Spread the bubbliness of bubble teas by adding {{ subst:bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please
vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
01:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrator's noticeboard#Incivil personal attacks from Malleus Fatuorum. Thank you. Ipatrol ( talk) 21:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Although i probably should have discussed this first, i just went and redirected the stub stub templates accompanying these to a more uniform Template:London-transport-stub to end some confusion between transport systems (which includes the DLR). Although it hasn't done it yet, that should make these categories empty. Simply south ( talk) 22:29, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your input over at Talk:FYROM. I use "the former" because the term has its origins in a 1993 UN resolution, which I prefer to quote verbatim. You're probably right that Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is more common, but I'm a purist. · ΚΕΚΡΩΨ· 16:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
I am rather upset at some comments you have made on WP:RFA that have little to do with the candidate.
You refer to a mere mention of a book on atheism as "offensive" and "a negative emotion". This perpetuates a harmful negative stereotype about atheism. I am not upset at you for being religious, but for the stance you take toward people who are not, and your opinion that atheists are not even allowed to mention the existence of their views in a discussion where other religious views would be okay.
I wish you would re-examine your comments, perhaps mentally substituting the references to religion and lack of it with something else that doesn't hit so close to home for you, like sports teams or music genres.
If I can take the potentially-offensive step of mentioning the existence of a text, I'd like to point you to nakedpastor.com, a site I read sometimes. It is written by a Christian pastor, but it is largely about examining your faith and coexisting with those who disagree. rspεεr ( talk) 06:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much indeed for being brave enough to stand in the election. It was unfortunate that this year there was a very strong field indeed though, despite that, you managed to attract more votes than both Woody and me in the August 2007 election. With a slightly higher profile, you should be able to romp home next time around. Roger Davies talk 10:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
The Invisible Barnstar | ||
Please accept this barnstar for your very many significant and helpful contributions to the project. Because you invariably keep to the background without seeking recognition or reward, your work is even more appreciated. Thank you, Roger Davies talk 10:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC) |
I think you meant to strike your oppose, but it still is in the count. It would probably be good to either "out indent" or clarify that you still oppose. Maybe it is obvious what's intended, but I couldn't tell. Thanks!
Hobit (
talk) 21:22, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, it is obvious, I just can't read.
Hobit (
talk)
01:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Archives |
Hi, you have commented on my recent report on User:Rjecina on the admin noticeboard. The situation has turned a lot worse since then so I am currently filing another report against him. He is accusing me of everything evil (socket puppet, vandal, disruptive) and other users too. Please, I would really appreciate if you left a comment on what your take is on this issue. You can find a link to the report on my talk page. Thanks.-- Bizso ( talk) 02:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Shubinator ( talk) 04:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
The
February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
23:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for voting in my request for adminship. I have added more to my answers and hope this provides more clarification. Wikiwoohoo ( talk) 00:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! Not really sure what it was for though (unless it was just general). - Rjd0060 ( talk) 16:16, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
You might like to think seriously about standing for coordship in the upcoming elections. You are active in the project, know your way around, and are clearly a hard-worker; you'll be an asset :) – Roger Davies talk 05:40, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Heh. Would something involving meerkats be more to your liking? Bettia (bring on the trumpets!) 20:29, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Well, it's all done and dusted, and my RfA has passed successfully with 83 support votes, 0 oppose votes and 2 neutrals. Many thanks for your support - bring on the trumpets mop!
Bettia
(bring on the trumpets!)
16:17, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
C21K talk 23:29, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I responded to your claim that an IP was connected to Malleus. Please, please, in the future, look at the Whois before making such accusations in such a heated time as this. It does not help you. It does not help the community. Ottava Rima ( talk) 01:15, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up
here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
19:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
wanna !vote on WT:WIAFA? Ling.Nut.Public ( talk) 09:15, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi. It is clear to me that this article should be renamed to M10 Tank Destroyer.(I think that's what you want too.) M10 Tank Destroyer is the main name. The name M10 Wolverine name should also be kept as an alternate name, as it is definitely legit. Wallie ( talk) 20:32, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Good Luck on the Election for Coordinator! Based on What I see you would make a Good Coordinator. Have A Great Day! Lord R. T. Oliver The Olive Branch 21:39, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
-
down
load |
sign! has given you a
bubble tea! Bubble teas promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!
Spread the bubbliness of bubble teas by adding {{ subst:bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please
vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
01:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrator's noticeboard#Incivil personal attacks from Malleus Fatuorum. Thank you. Ipatrol ( talk) 21:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Although i probably should have discussed this first, i just went and redirected the stub stub templates accompanying these to a more uniform Template:London-transport-stub to end some confusion between transport systems (which includes the DLR). Although it hasn't done it yet, that should make these categories empty. Simply south ( talk) 22:29, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your input over at Talk:FYROM. I use "the former" because the term has its origins in a 1993 UN resolution, which I prefer to quote verbatim. You're probably right that Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is more common, but I'm a purist. · ΚΕΚΡΩΨ· 16:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
I am rather upset at some comments you have made on WP:RFA that have little to do with the candidate.
You refer to a mere mention of a book on atheism as "offensive" and "a negative emotion". This perpetuates a harmful negative stereotype about atheism. I am not upset at you for being religious, but for the stance you take toward people who are not, and your opinion that atheists are not even allowed to mention the existence of their views in a discussion where other religious views would be okay.
I wish you would re-examine your comments, perhaps mentally substituting the references to religion and lack of it with something else that doesn't hit so close to home for you, like sports teams or music genres.
If I can take the potentially-offensive step of mentioning the existence of a text, I'd like to point you to nakedpastor.com, a site I read sometimes. It is written by a Christian pastor, but it is largely about examining your faith and coexisting with those who disagree. rspεεr ( talk) 06:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much indeed for being brave enough to stand in the election. It was unfortunate that this year there was a very strong field indeed though, despite that, you managed to attract more votes than both Woody and me in the August 2007 election. With a slightly higher profile, you should be able to romp home next time around. Roger Davies talk 10:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
The Invisible Barnstar | ||
Please accept this barnstar for your very many significant and helpful contributions to the project. Because you invariably keep to the background without seeking recognition or reward, your work is even more appreciated. Thank you, Roger Davies talk 10:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC) |
I think you meant to strike your oppose, but it still is in the count. It would probably be good to either "out indent" or clarify that you still oppose. Maybe it is obvious what's intended, but I couldn't tell. Thanks!
Hobit (
talk) 21:22, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, it is obvious, I just can't read.
Hobit (
talk)
01:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)