This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Thanks for uploading File:Danielle Savre.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq ( talk) 20:47, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
On 27 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Final Destination 3, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the DVD release of Final Destination 3 has a feature called "Choose Their Fate" that acts as an interactive movie, allowing viewers to alter the course of the film's story and the fate of the characters? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Final Destination 3. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Final Destination 3), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Vanamonde ( talk) 00:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The Guild of Copy Editors has implemented a limit of three (3) copy edit requests at a time for any one editor on the Requests page. You recently posted a fourth request. Can you please remove one of your requests and wait until one of your other requests is done before posting a new one?
Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience. (Also, please let me know if I am in error with this message.) – Jonesey95 ( talk) 14:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Chris Redfield has been completed.
I archived the first URL on the Wayback Machine archive to show you the citation format. You'll want to archive the rest of the article's URLs as time allows to avoid it developing "dead links".
Good luck with the FAN when you get to it.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 18:58, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
@ Twofingered Typist: Thank you for c/e the article. As for the references I have actually archived all of them (the GA reviewer suggested I do so). Should I include the archive links to every reference? PanagiotisZois ( talk) 19:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
{{
cite news}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help); Unknown parameter |trans_title=
ignored (|trans-title=
suggested) (
help)
Thanks for uploading File:Ecstasia Sanders.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 11:17, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Gladiolus Amicitia.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:18, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Boogeyman 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber ( talk) 13:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
The article Boogeyman 2 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Boogeyman 2 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber ( talk) 12:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Just wanted to say great work on getting Boogeyman 2 up to a GA. I'm always excited when wiki articles (especially obscure genre films) get this kind of attention. Great work! Andrzejbanas ( talk) 13:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Frankly, I didn't understand why the page was tagged {{ Use dmy dates}} and Kailash29792 changed the date format while I was copyediting the lead. Since a stable date format (among other things) is important for a copyedit, I'm moving on to another request until you two work things out. All the best, Mini apolis 17:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Nurse - Dead by Daylight.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:55, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Your reason to revert change: "While the film says Flight 180 occured six years ago that's actually a mistake. The first film takes place in 2000, this one in 2005." The film states explicitly in the dialogue that it's six years since the flight, so that's conclusive. Any other argument is original research. Besides, what do you base this on, the date on the tombstone saying 2005? That's more likely the mistake, since it's screen writers over prop masters. Here's another evidence for you: the first film was released in 2000, this one in 2006, so that line simply reflected it. Provide a source with more authority over the film than the script itself or I'll revert back. Kumagoro-42 10:51, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, PanagiotisZois. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Final Destination 3 at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with FA and all the best, Mini apolis 20:38, 27 April 2017 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nitro+chiral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:13, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
The second round of the competition has now closed, with just under 100 points being required to qualify for round 3. YellowEvan just scraped into the next round with 98 points but we have to say goodbye to the thirty or so competitors who didn't achieve this threshold; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Our top scorers in round 2 were:
Vivvt submitted the largest number of DYKs (30), and MBlaze Lightning achieved 13 articles at ITN. Carbrera claimed for 11 GAs and Argento Surfer performed the most GARs, having reviewed 11. So far we have achieved 38 featured articles and a splendid 132 good articles. Commendably, 279 GARs have been achieved so far, more than double the number of GAs.
So, on to the third round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
On 4 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Boogeyman 2, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite its title, Boogeyman 2 does not actually feature the mythical creature as the main antagonist? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Boogeyman 2. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Boogeyman 2), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter ( talk) 05:34, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, PanagiotisZois. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Boogeyman 2 at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Paradoxasauruser ( talk) 01:22, 9 May 2017 (UTC) |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Clear Rivers you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant ( talk) 18:20, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello PanaZ, Just wanted to let you know that I like your work on the article for Boogeyman 2. I was wondering if you could help me procure some sources for me on a couple of articles? Not regarding the second one since I want to start by working on just one at the moment, if you could check the talk page on Earth vs. the Spider (2001 film), I posted something around the lines of that I needed someone to find me some sources for information on the film (I explained this in more detail on the article's talk page). If you are willing to help me with this please let me know and post links to possible sources on my talk page. Again, many thanks!-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 14:58, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks man!-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 17:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Thanks for uploading File:Danielle Savre.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq ( talk) 20:47, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
On 27 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Final Destination 3, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the DVD release of Final Destination 3 has a feature called "Choose Their Fate" that acts as an interactive movie, allowing viewers to alter the course of the film's story and the fate of the characters? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Final Destination 3. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Final Destination 3), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Vanamonde ( talk) 00:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
The Guild of Copy Editors has implemented a limit of three (3) copy edit requests at a time for any one editor on the Requests page. You recently posted a fourth request. Can you please remove one of your requests and wait until one of your other requests is done before posting a new one?
Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience. (Also, please let me know if I am in error with this message.) – Jonesey95 ( talk) 14:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Chris Redfield has been completed.
I archived the first URL on the Wayback Machine archive to show you the citation format. You'll want to archive the rest of the article's URLs as time allows to avoid it developing "dead links".
Good luck with the FAN when you get to it.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 18:58, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
@ Twofingered Typist: Thank you for c/e the article. As for the references I have actually archived all of them (the GA reviewer suggested I do so). Should I include the archive links to every reference? PanagiotisZois ( talk) 19:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
{{
cite news}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help); Unknown parameter |trans_title=
ignored (|trans-title=
suggested) (
help)
Thanks for uploading File:Ecstasia Sanders.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 11:17, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Gladiolus Amicitia.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:18, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Boogeyman 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber ( talk) 13:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
The article Boogeyman 2 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Boogeyman 2 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber ( talk) 12:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Just wanted to say great work on getting Boogeyman 2 up to a GA. I'm always excited when wiki articles (especially obscure genre films) get this kind of attention. Great work! Andrzejbanas ( talk) 13:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Frankly, I didn't understand why the page was tagged {{ Use dmy dates}} and Kailash29792 changed the date format while I was copyediting the lead. Since a stable date format (among other things) is important for a copyedit, I'm moving on to another request until you two work things out. All the best, Mini apolis 17:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Nurse - Dead by Daylight.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:55, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Your reason to revert change: "While the film says Flight 180 occured six years ago that's actually a mistake. The first film takes place in 2000, this one in 2005." The film states explicitly in the dialogue that it's six years since the flight, so that's conclusive. Any other argument is original research. Besides, what do you base this on, the date on the tombstone saying 2005? That's more likely the mistake, since it's screen writers over prop masters. Here's another evidence for you: the first film was released in 2000, this one in 2006, so that line simply reflected it. Provide a source with more authority over the film than the script itself or I'll revert back. Kumagoro-42 10:51, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, PanagiotisZois. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Final Destination 3 at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with FA and all the best, Mini apolis 20:38, 27 April 2017 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nitro+chiral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:13, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
The second round of the competition has now closed, with just under 100 points being required to qualify for round 3. YellowEvan just scraped into the next round with 98 points but we have to say goodbye to the thirty or so competitors who didn't achieve this threshold; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Our top scorers in round 2 were:
Vivvt submitted the largest number of DYKs (30), and MBlaze Lightning achieved 13 articles at ITN. Carbrera claimed for 11 GAs and Argento Surfer performed the most GARs, having reviewed 11. So far we have achieved 38 featured articles and a splendid 132 good articles. Commendably, 279 GARs have been achieved so far, more than double the number of GAs.
So, on to the third round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
On 4 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Boogeyman 2, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite its title, Boogeyman 2 does not actually feature the mythical creature as the main antagonist? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Boogeyman 2. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Boogeyman 2), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter ( talk) 05:34, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, PanagiotisZois. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Boogeyman 2 at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Paradoxasauruser ( talk) 01:22, 9 May 2017 (UTC) |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Clear Rivers you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant ( talk) 18:20, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello PanaZ, Just wanted to let you know that I like your work on the article for Boogeyman 2. I was wondering if you could help me procure some sources for me on a couple of articles? Not regarding the second one since I want to start by working on just one at the moment, if you could check the talk page on Earth vs. the Spider (2001 film), I posted something around the lines of that I needed someone to find me some sources for information on the film (I explained this in more detail on the article's talk page). If you are willing to help me with this please let me know and post links to possible sources on my talk page. Again, many thanks!-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 14:58, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks man!-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 17:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)