![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 95 | Archive 96 | Archive 97 | Archive 98 | Archive 99 | Archive 100 | → | Archive 105 |
Archive 86:January 2022
Hi Onel, hope your doing good. Looks like we’ll have to just start an AfD or a talk page discussion regarding Oscars article.
Happy new year! The Optimistic One ( talk) 22:11, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
I'm writing it here in case you don't get pings from Talk:Anti-Russian_violence_in_Chechnya_(1991–1994) for some reason. You mentioned WP:BRD in your revert. I had provided my reasoning for restoring the article before making any changes, so you are welcome to participate in the discussion there. Alaexis ¿question? 13:04, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Valereee. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Gyoniku soseji, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
—valereee ( talk) 18:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
I will look for more information, but this is not an easy one to find. Having it published will raise its notability and bring it to the attention of other qualified readers for improvement. BTW: I posted this story twice by mistake (within minutes of each other). I was not sure how to fix it, so a second one may be out there. Thanks for your help. Lord Milner ( talk) 18:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
There is only one primary source that I'm aware of for Old Flat State Forest. It is an authoritative source. Why do you think there would or should be more authoritative sources for a small state forest? Froglife94 ( talk) 00:32, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Where did that arbitrary rule come from? There are not 3 authoritative sources for this article, as I've stated. Froglife94 ( talk) 21:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969. As you've reverted my move of these pages, could you or an admin please handle this? The Love of the Actress Sumako should redirect to The Love of Sumako the Actress, not vice versa, because the former is the common title in film literature. At its now reverted present state, it's incorrect. Thanks, Robert Kerber ( talk) 15:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Waysidesc ( talk) 19:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Waysidesc (
talk)
23:13, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
The sense why an article with sources about the romani people in montenegro is redirected to the romani page, I don't understand nor anyone else who is familiar with the matter.
The other romani groups in the balkans, such as north macedonia, bulgaria, serbia, kosovo and bosnia also have their own page. You could have added that the article could be improved but not revert to the general page of the romani people. Both are totally different.
-- Nalanidil ( talk) 21:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
No answer is also an answer...
Oh now I see when I read the history through all the work on the page that some people have already tried to write about the roma pople from montenegro like me, and it was redirected every time by the same users to the general page of the romani... If it doesn't fit some users here in the english wikipedia, well then...they are enough other languages here in wikipedia to create the page about the roma people in montenegro.
Nalanidil ( talk) 23:11, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello One15969
Many thanks for reviewing this article. This is an article on a living physician (doctor) who over last four decades has done yeoman service to the community of his city, has done great service to local Red Cross Society, Resurrected and maintained Museums and Memorials for those (including his freedom fighter father of renown) involved in the Indian Independence Movement against the British, Guided close to 250 + students in their MD Doctoral Dissertations as a Senior Professor of General Medicine and attended to the rehabilitation schemes of prison inmates at Bellary city at present with innovative ideas and schemes. His family (not just his illustrious father) have all served prison sentences under the British till Independence in 1947 and have later graced the political landscape both at Central and State level. I have collected enough number of online links to newspaper reportings and full length feature articles mentioning both father (Tekur Subramanyam) as well as his son (Tekur Ramanath). I have updated some Bibliography links today. I deeply resent the accusation about Conflicts of Interest and the like. I was neither his direct student (in Medicine) nor am I his relative (by blood). Nor Am I paid to write this. The reference / citation section looks slim because in an Eastern/ Indian Context, especially in cities outside the remit of the big metropolitan ones, very little gets recorded for posterity in print - even less so of people concerning themselves with social causes! I think it is high time Editors of Wikipedia STOP taking a quintessentially western approach to evaluating 'notability' and 'verifiable citations'.! It is frankly insulting to Eastern social workers and people in the public arena (like doctors) to have to 'prove' their worth to be written about in Wikipedia, when western pornstars have no problem getting full pages in their names. Please return the article to its LIVE setting. Short of us going to streets of Bellary city and interviewing people with a camera about Tekur Ramanath, it is virtually impossible to transcribe this man's dedication and life long efforts at social service on to a website!
Bugs2beatles 14:19, 6 January 2022 (UTC) Bugs2beatles
![]() | |
in friendship |
---|
Thank you for your good wishes! - Happy new year, in friendship! - One of my pics was on the Main page (DYK) and even made the stats. - In this young year, I enjoyed meetings with friends in real life, and wish you many of those. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:57, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for commenting on the Durborough lemma that has been published on Wikipedia. I did a previous draft that has sources from my blog but that version was changed because of comments on these sources. So the draft can be ignored and will not be edited any longer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ron van Dopperen ( talk • contribs) 13:20, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Wow, thanks for doing all those. Have a good day. Caro7200 ( talk) 15:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for the reviews! Princess of Ara 18:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Yo. When I was browsing my phone, I saw that Habersetzer entry was brought to main page. The entry was original sent to draftspace by user Scope Creep. I recently put it waiting for draft review - and I was under impression it was cleared. Then you sent it to Draftspace again with the comments missing. What happened? -- TrickShotFinn ( talk) 17:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, can you please explain why you reverted my edit on Bad Gyal discography? She has got a long career. Now the section Bad Gyal#Discography is too long. I am mad because it took me days!, entire days making it just to be reverted by a 500,000-edit user simply citing "WP:SPLIT". 7szz ( talk) 01:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
IMO— I found your apparently knee-jerk revert:
I bring this to your attention, so that you might not continue with activity that can be so easily interpreted as either silly or rude. But otherwise, warm regards. WurmWoode T 04:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Why do you find Flag flying days in Poland to have to be a draft? It isn't, it is an article which is absolutely ready for the usual namespace. Please explain yourself, or I will move it back to the normal space without further ado. Ove Raul ( talk) 12:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi User:Onel5969, thanks for reviewing Felix Horetzky which I had created. You tagged the article with the "refimprove" template. Please explain to me what you missing. The article uses in a very transparent way (I think) all sources available about this musician. There are nine footnotes/references in this rather short article, and they are correct and exact. To quote directly from those sources (if that is what you want) would disturb the flow of reading with no benefit for the article whatsoever. I am therefore inclined to remove the template you have placed without changing the article, but would like to hear from you beforehand. Thanks. – Aklein62 ( talk) 15:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For reviewing a bunch of pages, old, and new. It's most likely a time consuming task, just sitting there, taking a brief look at the article, and pressing a button or not. But I don't know how reviewing articles (As in marking them as reviewed) works so it could be much more involved. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:06, 12 January 2022 (UTC) |
Hi, I'm Tamingimpala. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Ace Edition, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Tame ( talk) 19:07, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks so much for your review and comments on the artical Adina Kamien. It has just been edited again by me, unrelated information has been removed and now, the 34 footnotes cover the information. Also, you have commented on a possible WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. This is irrelevant because I do not get paid by anyone for the Wikipedia entry or any other entries I created on Wikipedia (mainly in Hebrew). As it says on my user page, I am a research student in the Art History dept. of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. I am editing mostly pages on that topic, as part of an unpaid fellowship in the Israel Museum, which aims to make information about art accessible. For that reason, the talk page of Adina Kamien shows that the entry is a part of a project in the Israel Museum. If you recommend adding any comment to the entry in light of this, I will gladly do so. I made an effort to create and improve the entry. Therefore, I would be very happy and highly appreciative if you could go through it again, and also approve it for publication. the draft has been submitted. Thank you in advance Shirhoo — Preceding undated comment added 14:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
How do I see your review of the plane crash article you reviewed on Jan. 8 that I made, and if I can't, can you tell me how good it was? KingAviationKid ( talk) 18:35, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
2022 Winter Olympics Parade of Nations, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
18:13, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
With the release of the 25th season, the specials have been confirmed to have been the 24th season. There is a page for every season, there should be one for the 24th season too. Zvig47 ( talk) 21:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, can you help me with some guidance on how I can get more 'citiations from reliable, independent sources'? And I don't see any COI issue in this article as I am not being paid by the subject. He happens to be an officer retired from the Army. I can verify all the information in the article to be true. Unfortunately, there aren't too many people who are editors on WP who would be able to independently verify that Information. It is a technicality that there aren't enough editors who know the subject. Can you please offer some guidance? Thanks in advance. Jonathanvarunbenjamin ( talk) 06:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi there. I can appreciate why you reversed my recent change to this article on the grounds of 'Not enough in-depth coverage to meet GNG', and I have no great interest in improving the stub. However, the reason I had made the change was to solve the problem of a circular reference within the Beth Rogan article. Your change has now reintroduced that problem. Perhaps you could fix it? Masato.harada ( talk) 16:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Hey, on my article Erin Saoirse Adair you said, i have to add references from independent sites. I have some reliable secondary sources like the Ottawa Citizen, the Fulcrum, CKCU-FM and Rogers TV. Best regards KatastrophenKommando ( talk) 16:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you removed my Kheerat Panesar Wikipedia page, and I really don't understand why that has happened? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChelseaFox'sBae2022 ( talk • contribs) 17:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi but I don't believe what you are saying is true. The character is on a soap opera that is watched by approximately 5 million people. Not only that but the character has been involved in 2 prominent storylines that has been watched by a huge amount of viewers, as well as the fact that the actor who portrays the role has received an award for his services within the Asian British television society, which I believe voids your opinion. Other pages within the show such as Naomi Julien or Lorna Cartwright do not deserve to be up then since their characters have not had any real world notability either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChelseaFox'sBae2022 ( talk • contribs) 19:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
I noticed, that the way of communicating became more and more rough in both Wikipedia's. Many qualified people quit contributing articles to wikipedia for it is impossible to satisfy anyone. I quit to contribute to german and britisch Wikipedia any articles about heavy metal. I deleted all my drafts. I like the british people and I love to visit them, I love british landscapes and the british way of life and cornish cream tea or britsh beef, I like Iron Maiden and Paul Day, but it is waste of time to contribute anything to Wikipedia. Please delete this article or improve it - but do not mark it! Greetings from Germany and Yrs. sincerely - KEEP IT HARD AND HEAVY! Bockpeterteuto ( talk) 22:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Onel5969 Why was the page I created deleted? What corrections should be made to the article? My page - /info/en/?search=Draft:Iliev_Roman_Lazarevich I would be grateful if you could help me edit the article correctly Thank you. Seorbm ( talk) 07:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Hope you are doing well. Thank you for taking out time and checking the article /info/en/?search=Draft:Lisa_Camillo which I moved to the article space but was reverted by you. I moved it just because I felt it was ready. I checked the previous comments and they were all about adding reliable/notable references and when I researched the topic, I found a lot of coverage about her including some renowned channels like Al Jazeera, The Australian, SBS. So I did relevant editing, removed the unsourced text, added references and moved it to the article space. I will be thankful if you check it again as I have resubmitted the article for review through AFC. Jamalahmadpk ( talk) 14:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Okay, seventeen days. Anyway, we have multiple reliable mainstream sources stating the album is hotly anticipated ( A.V. Club, Paste, Pitchfork). If it were some tiny indie band from BFE I'd agree it's too soon, but Animal Collective that is not. DigitalIceAge ( talk) 18:28, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Recently we have had some disputes about content on Benkan. Is it acceptable to have the content commented out and only uncomment it as sources are introduced? MaitreyaVaruna ( talk) 22:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Why she did not meet the notability? I give the article many independent secondary sources and the sources give her full coverage that makes her notable enough. – Ctrlwiki ( talk) 13:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969! You recently placed a "too many" primary sources tage on the article. Currently, 75% (i.e., 30 out of 40) of the sources are non-primary. What percentage would you deem acceptable? Thanks! It's me...Sallicio! 14:17, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello onel5969 Sir, Please Review the Rajeshwari Datta's article, your review will encourage me to edit and create more article. Thanks and regards. Sams321 ( talk) 01:10, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I am trying to find a solution as how to replace the redirect with an article, as I feel this topic deserves an article. Can you help me on how to raise a concern about the AFD discussion. Thank you. Matu11 ( talk) 14:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
I noticed you reverted my changes to Calm Down Cologne. Can I ask what makes this album non-notable vs their previous album Always Be Happy, But Stay Evil? It got coverage from a variety of publications like JazzTimes, Downbeat, and Allmusic. B14709 ( talk) 16:10, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi. You reverted my creation of the page "identity type". Your terse comment was "not enough sourcing to pass wp:verify". First, the newly created page had citations. As many citations as the page it was redirected to! I have added more citation, in the hope of satisfying you.
FYI, the other types of type theory already have their own pages: empty type, unit type, product type, sum type, inductive types, etc.. AND the identity type is a focus of on going research in type theory. Homotopy Type Theory and Cubical Type Theory are completely focused on this type. It deserves its own page.
If you revert again, please put a lengthy comment on the identity type talk page, so that I can understand your complaints.
Mdnahas ( talk) 19:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I notice that you moved Moinak Dutta to Draft:Moinak_Dutta_2. There is already an identical, so far as I can see, draft at Draft:Moinak_Dutta, which has been sent for review and quite rightly rejected. I'm not sure WP really needs both drafts, but I don't know what the procedure is in this situation? To be honest, I found the main-space version this morning and was about to prod it as it's supported only by unreliable sources and I couldn't find anything better with Google, but I felt a bit bad about doing so because the editor who created it has only created one other article, and that's been sent to AfD today. I still feel Moinak Dutta probably isn't notable, and neither draft has much hope of making it into WP unless the reviewer is having a sleepy day. The article also seems maybe promotional. What should I have done? Elemimele ( talk) 13:04, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
The organization Shrimad Rajchandra Love and Care is an NGO that currently has 108 centers around the world - with active projects. It is a legitimate organization that requires its own independent page because its activities are separate from the spiritual activities carried out by its sister organization.
Redirecting it would be a mistake. There are thousands of articles written over the past 10 years in multiple countries by multiple world leaders about Shrimad Rajchandra Love and Care. Please revert it back to the way it was. I was trying to rename it to Shrimad Rajchandra Love and Care but because I'm a newb, I wasn't able to properly do it. I am not copying & pasting data. All the data is uniquely written, you can cross check with plagiarism software. Thank you for understanding. Dmehta81 ( talk) 14:56, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Sure, can you tell me how to create it in draft, I'll do that and also how do I invite other editors to edit the page? I'm aware that you require journal articles for pages, and one of the entities Shrimad Rajchandra Hospital, part of their umbrella organization has conducted medical experiments that have been referenced in independent primary medical journals in 2020-21. But for the main organization, are news articles not considered primary? In the case of other NGOs that I've noticed - several exist that have little to no consistent initiatives. I became aware of Shrimad Rajchandra Love and Care because of their global reach and presence. I've seen firsthand some of the activities like free books distribution to tribals, some others like setting up free food refrigerators in Dubai, delivering food to stranded laborers in India at the beginning of COVID - just to name a few. Listing the NGO helps it gain credibility. So that was the goal. Would the Guidestar rating not be a primary source that Wiki accepts? Please help. Dmehta81 ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 09:03, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Onel,
You erroneously deleted our page for infringing copyright. A copyleft (Creative Commons) license notice is clearly visible on the website which you claim our page infringes and this notice *was* present prior to the time of speedy deletion.
Regarding content veracity: Our page's various statements make reference to other stable Wikipedia pages which make the same or similar statements (e.g. about Internet Exchange Points) as well as third party sources which are (1) credible globally and (2) credible in Uganda. Note that it can be difficult to include references to globally renown sources about Uganda's Internet infrastructure due to Uganda's relative obscurity in the global Internet ecosystem.
There are also numerous other pages related to Internet Exchange Points which make similar statements with a similar (or lesser) array of sources:
I hope it is now clear that (a) our page does not infringe anyone's copyright and that (b) its contents meet or exceed the standards Wikipedia has applied to other articles on the same subject matter.
Regards,
Kyle Spencer (
talk)
11:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Unless you and/or Wikipedia intend to apply the same standards to all similar pages, it is hard to interpret your moderation as fair. This particular Wikipedia page was created as part of an effort to better document Uganda's telecommunications ecosystem and its history. If you have a specific complaint about specific verbiage within the page, feel free to suggest specific modifications. I also recommend that you educate yourself about
Internet Exchange Points (IXPs) before taking any further action on pages related to this subject.
In the near future I will implement an even more permissive copyleft license on our website and augment the Wikipedia page with additional sources that render the COI accusation even more irrelevant than it already is. If you delete the page again, revert it to draft, or block my account, I will escalate using Wikipedia's dispute resolution mechanisms.
Kyle Spencer (
talk)
16:49, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
A discussion you may be interested in has been opened regarding whether athletes meeting a sport-specific guideline must demonstrate GNG at AfD. JoelleJay ( talk) 22:40, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Don't add redirect in Garh Raipur High School as it doesn't break Wikipedia rules. I have added references from reliable sources. Arijit Kisku ( talk) 00:22, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969 -- I declined this G11 as I thought the content might be salvageable but the more I look at it the less I like it. It appears to be a good-faith student editor ( JayKassis), rather than a paid contribution, but I suspect the student has now moved on. I would not oppose a prod on this. @ Ian (Wiki Ed): for another opinion. Regards, Espresso Addict ( talk) 02:05, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969 , Please take your 2 minute on this article Draft:Sheetal Tiwari. Thanks. PangolinPedia ( talk) 03:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Please don't move to draftspace the articles that I created. These are ready for mainspace. -- Hajoon0102 💬 01:21, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Article of a singer Naresh Narayan X0BiT111 ( talk) 01:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Hey Onel5969, this is Derivator2017 here, I guess you're familiar with me. Just here to say that I really a appreciate you for reviewing my articles. It's always a pleasure to have your articles reviewed by a veteran editor. However, it apparently seems like not everyone enjoys seeing me on this platform. I have recently created an article, Yara International School and it was placed on AfD for the third time by the same editor under the pretext of notability, despite me providing around 70 references this time and out of which 3 to 4 sources clearly make the article eligible for existence. Kindly review my article and place your opinion in the deletion discussion page, and if you think this article meets the GNG, please vote to keep it. Warm regards. Derivator2017 ( talk) 12:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello - if I've understood the history correctly you have moved " /info/en/?search=Draft:Dorset_%26_Wilts_2_Central" which I created to Drafts. The reason given is that it doesn't have sources / references but there is a hyperlink on the page to the RFU Results website which shows this league exists and the teams involved etc. The only began in September 2021 so it is new - there are no previous winners or other third party information sources - this is community rugby in England, it doesn't get articles on well known websites or media attention. I don't know how else to prove it's genuine. The /info/en/?search=English_rugby_union_system page includes dozens of pages identical to this one, the only difference is most leagues have been in existence for some time. I would appreciate it if the page could be reinstated. Thank you in advance for your time / assistance.
Hi, I have noticed you reviewing my several articles. Thanks! I have a question regarding the approval mechanism. Sometimes, someone reviews a newly created article and the creator receives a notification, "The page has been reviewed", then the articles goes live on google. But sometimes, no one reviews an article, but it still becomes live within 30 - 40 days. What's the mechanism here? Sorry to bother you but I'm just curious. Insight 3 ( talk) 13:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Your username is one I see so very often in my notifications. I have created quite a large number of articles, many of which you've reviewed, and I plan on creating even more. In retrospect, some of the articles I published on the mainspace have had quite a few issues. I was wondering if you had any tips for me as I don't want to be churning out sub-par articles. Are there any common mistakes you've noticed while reviewing my pages? Are there any minor things I could do to make the reviewal process more easy, and to make sure every article I create is top notch? I appreciate your time! Mooonswimmer 19:36, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is
Draft:Sanjib Baruah. The discussion is about the topic
Draft:Sanjib Baruah. Thank you.
Can you give me an example of what sort of sources you'd want for this? I'm not sure what additional information I could add to the article. Thematthewmurray ( talk) 16:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi onel5969, Hope you are well. I noticed you redirected the page Osita Oparaugo to Ogelle which happen to be his company page. I understand the reasons why you did this the first time which I have now made the necessary edit to by removing unsourced content and also cited not less than 3 references from independent, reliable sources which talk about him in-depth. Kindly revisit this and approve for mainspace as the article passes WP:GNG Thank you. Kojomo ( talk) 18:48, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
As a contributor to the List of Judy Justice episodes (unpaid, no affiliation to the show), I strongly oppose your copyvio-revdel modification, especially given that 1) you did not engage with other contributors as described in WP:DR, 2) you did not read the corresponding Talk page where I had already pointed out the issue of contributors copying verbatim episode summaries (and indicating problematic ones), and 3) you provided no explanation as to your modification (I am thus left to assume it is due to episode summaries). I have added a section on the corresponding Talk page, which I encourage you to join so that we can appropriately resolve this issue without wiping weeks of people's work. Webenji ( talk) 03:28, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Onel5969, I would have to wholeheartedly agree with Webenji. I'm quite appalled by your drastic moves, wild accusations and total failure to communicate. I would go so far as to argue that your actions border on uncivil and vandalism, accusing us to be paid editors and removing entire pages without bothering to discuss. You didn't even follow policy when you did it, which is further glaring. You know better than to ignore communication. Please explain yourself. JudgeJudyCourthouse25 ( talk) 07:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969, could you kindly help me to understand why you have put an undisclosed paid tag to Ruwanthi Gajadeera page. I consulted many Wikipedia veterans and read some GA and VGA as well as joined discussions on Wikipedia Teahouse to improve my writing especially in terms of NPOV, if you check the page history you will see how the page narrative improved over time and how I considered all the feedback that was given to me. It has always been on my bucket list to contribute a page to Wikipedia and I thought of creating a page for a local fashion designer in Sri Lanka as she brought a lot of international attention to Sri Lanka recently with her international accolades. I didn’t receive any money for this contribution nor for any edits I’ve done on Wiki in the past. If you could point Liyamu21 ( talk) 08:18, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Good morning from little Coreca, I am writing to greet you and to know how you are. I'm doing pretty well for now, I've had a little bit to do in real life leaving out the commitments on Wikipedia, anyway I wanted to ask you how we can solve the Dado Coletti thing. Far be it from me to be a paid user or conflicts of interest. I love, respect and collaborate with various editions, dispassionately but with a lot of seriousness and dedication. I am not perfect with English and some other languages I admit, but I really want to learn day after day, article after article. Well, waiting for your news, thank you and greetings from the great little community of Coreca. Thanks again for your input and warning. See you soon!-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 03:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
For your helpful feedback, sometimes I think myself very proficient in policy then again I am reminded that there are editors more advanced, and you have just proved that by the feedback you gave me. I’m thankful I’ve had the chance to not just learn under you during my early days but also that I have the privilege to watch you edit. Celestina007 ( talk) 22:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC) |
I genuinely have to ask, how is a model who has been on the cover of American Vogue no less, lacking in notability? That's strange. Trillfendi ( talk) 23:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
I've updated the Ricardo Lombana article which you had issues with and expanded it so it should be acceptable to stay now I hope! Thanks for giving me the kick to get it done :) Lankyant ( talk) 02:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
About the notability of John Millan: I have cited books, and added a link to his portrait in the British Museum. The quote shows Millan was respected by other booksellers of his day. His successor, Thomas Egerton, was the first to publish Jane Austen's novels.
The entry on World Cat, Millan, John -1782 lists:
The book Millan's Lists of the Parliament. Containing The Lords with their Posts, ... Counties, Cities, etc., their members, etc lists members of the government, as does Wikipedia today: List of MPs elected in the 2019 United Kingdom general election.
Wikipedia is created by volunteers who work on it as and when they can, and I will add this in due course. The page already has links, including to the British Museum - and citations.
Also, there is far less source material available for the 18th century than for more recent times. Unless someone was wealthy, few records remain. This means that there will be fewer references, but this does not mean someone lacks notability. As with Wikipedia needing a host, the books would not exist without printers and publishers. Kylenano ( talk) 10:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Would showing that FT8 is by far the most popular ham radio HF mode be enough for it to have its own article? -- Qslcard ( talk) 06:13, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
The overview of RS reads, "Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves." When a source has a contributor policy like that found at author guide for LWN, that shows a lack of true editorial oversight. While it's not as devoid of oversight as something like WP, which is handled by volunteers, it's not the type of source which would equal something like a peer-reviewed journal. Onel5969 TT me 11:30, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Sasikala also called as VKs sir 2409:4072:6C98:DE22:0:0:5F48:EB00 ( talk) 11:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Every claim in the article is carefully and and accurately sourced. Can you please explain what is wrong with the article? Dovidroth ( talk) 13:38, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 95 | Archive 96 | Archive 97 | Archive 98 | Archive 99 | Archive 100 | → | Archive 105 |
Archive 86:January 2022
Hi Onel, hope your doing good. Looks like we’ll have to just start an AfD or a talk page discussion regarding Oscars article.
Happy new year! The Optimistic One ( talk) 22:11, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
I'm writing it here in case you don't get pings from Talk:Anti-Russian_violence_in_Chechnya_(1991–1994) for some reason. You mentioned WP:BRD in your revert. I had provided my reasoning for restoring the article before making any changes, so you are welcome to participate in the discussion there. Alaexis ¿question? 13:04, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Valereee. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Gyoniku soseji, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
—valereee ( talk) 18:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
I will look for more information, but this is not an easy one to find. Having it published will raise its notability and bring it to the attention of other qualified readers for improvement. BTW: I posted this story twice by mistake (within minutes of each other). I was not sure how to fix it, so a second one may be out there. Thanks for your help. Lord Milner ( talk) 18:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
There is only one primary source that I'm aware of for Old Flat State Forest. It is an authoritative source. Why do you think there would or should be more authoritative sources for a small state forest? Froglife94 ( talk) 00:32, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Where did that arbitrary rule come from? There are not 3 authoritative sources for this article, as I've stated. Froglife94 ( talk) 21:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969. As you've reverted my move of these pages, could you or an admin please handle this? The Love of the Actress Sumako should redirect to The Love of Sumako the Actress, not vice versa, because the former is the common title in film literature. At its now reverted present state, it's incorrect. Thanks, Robert Kerber ( talk) 15:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Waysidesc ( talk) 19:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Waysidesc (
talk)
23:13, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
The sense why an article with sources about the romani people in montenegro is redirected to the romani page, I don't understand nor anyone else who is familiar with the matter.
The other romani groups in the balkans, such as north macedonia, bulgaria, serbia, kosovo and bosnia also have their own page. You could have added that the article could be improved but not revert to the general page of the romani people. Both are totally different.
-- Nalanidil ( talk) 21:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
No answer is also an answer...
Oh now I see when I read the history through all the work on the page that some people have already tried to write about the roma pople from montenegro like me, and it was redirected every time by the same users to the general page of the romani... If it doesn't fit some users here in the english wikipedia, well then...they are enough other languages here in wikipedia to create the page about the roma people in montenegro.
Nalanidil ( talk) 23:11, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello One15969
Many thanks for reviewing this article. This is an article on a living physician (doctor) who over last four decades has done yeoman service to the community of his city, has done great service to local Red Cross Society, Resurrected and maintained Museums and Memorials for those (including his freedom fighter father of renown) involved in the Indian Independence Movement against the British, Guided close to 250 + students in their MD Doctoral Dissertations as a Senior Professor of General Medicine and attended to the rehabilitation schemes of prison inmates at Bellary city at present with innovative ideas and schemes. His family (not just his illustrious father) have all served prison sentences under the British till Independence in 1947 and have later graced the political landscape both at Central and State level. I have collected enough number of online links to newspaper reportings and full length feature articles mentioning both father (Tekur Subramanyam) as well as his son (Tekur Ramanath). I have updated some Bibliography links today. I deeply resent the accusation about Conflicts of Interest and the like. I was neither his direct student (in Medicine) nor am I his relative (by blood). Nor Am I paid to write this. The reference / citation section looks slim because in an Eastern/ Indian Context, especially in cities outside the remit of the big metropolitan ones, very little gets recorded for posterity in print - even less so of people concerning themselves with social causes! I think it is high time Editors of Wikipedia STOP taking a quintessentially western approach to evaluating 'notability' and 'verifiable citations'.! It is frankly insulting to Eastern social workers and people in the public arena (like doctors) to have to 'prove' their worth to be written about in Wikipedia, when western pornstars have no problem getting full pages in their names. Please return the article to its LIVE setting. Short of us going to streets of Bellary city and interviewing people with a camera about Tekur Ramanath, it is virtually impossible to transcribe this man's dedication and life long efforts at social service on to a website!
Bugs2beatles 14:19, 6 January 2022 (UTC) Bugs2beatles
![]() | |
in friendship |
---|
Thank you for your good wishes! - Happy new year, in friendship! - One of my pics was on the Main page (DYK) and even made the stats. - In this young year, I enjoyed meetings with friends in real life, and wish you many of those. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:57, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for commenting on the Durborough lemma that has been published on Wikipedia. I did a previous draft that has sources from my blog but that version was changed because of comments on these sources. So the draft can be ignored and will not be edited any longer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ron van Dopperen ( talk • contribs) 13:20, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Wow, thanks for doing all those. Have a good day. Caro7200 ( talk) 15:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for the reviews! Princess of Ara 18:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Yo. When I was browsing my phone, I saw that Habersetzer entry was brought to main page. The entry was original sent to draftspace by user Scope Creep. I recently put it waiting for draft review - and I was under impression it was cleared. Then you sent it to Draftspace again with the comments missing. What happened? -- TrickShotFinn ( talk) 17:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, can you please explain why you reverted my edit on Bad Gyal discography? She has got a long career. Now the section Bad Gyal#Discography is too long. I am mad because it took me days!, entire days making it just to be reverted by a 500,000-edit user simply citing "WP:SPLIT". 7szz ( talk) 01:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
IMO— I found your apparently knee-jerk revert:
I bring this to your attention, so that you might not continue with activity that can be so easily interpreted as either silly or rude. But otherwise, warm regards. WurmWoode T 04:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Why do you find Flag flying days in Poland to have to be a draft? It isn't, it is an article which is absolutely ready for the usual namespace. Please explain yourself, or I will move it back to the normal space without further ado. Ove Raul ( talk) 12:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi User:Onel5969, thanks for reviewing Felix Horetzky which I had created. You tagged the article with the "refimprove" template. Please explain to me what you missing. The article uses in a very transparent way (I think) all sources available about this musician. There are nine footnotes/references in this rather short article, and they are correct and exact. To quote directly from those sources (if that is what you want) would disturb the flow of reading with no benefit for the article whatsoever. I am therefore inclined to remove the template you have placed without changing the article, but would like to hear from you beforehand. Thanks. – Aklein62 ( talk) 15:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For reviewing a bunch of pages, old, and new. It's most likely a time consuming task, just sitting there, taking a brief look at the article, and pressing a button or not. But I don't know how reviewing articles (As in marking them as reviewed) works so it could be much more involved. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:06, 12 January 2022 (UTC) |
Hi, I'm Tamingimpala. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Ace Edition, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Tame ( talk) 19:07, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks so much for your review and comments on the artical Adina Kamien. It has just been edited again by me, unrelated information has been removed and now, the 34 footnotes cover the information. Also, you have commented on a possible WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. This is irrelevant because I do not get paid by anyone for the Wikipedia entry or any other entries I created on Wikipedia (mainly in Hebrew). As it says on my user page, I am a research student in the Art History dept. of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. I am editing mostly pages on that topic, as part of an unpaid fellowship in the Israel Museum, which aims to make information about art accessible. For that reason, the talk page of Adina Kamien shows that the entry is a part of a project in the Israel Museum. If you recommend adding any comment to the entry in light of this, I will gladly do so. I made an effort to create and improve the entry. Therefore, I would be very happy and highly appreciative if you could go through it again, and also approve it for publication. the draft has been submitted. Thank you in advance Shirhoo — Preceding undated comment added 14:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
How do I see your review of the plane crash article you reviewed on Jan. 8 that I made, and if I can't, can you tell me how good it was? KingAviationKid ( talk) 18:35, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
2022 Winter Olympics Parade of Nations, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
18:13, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
With the release of the 25th season, the specials have been confirmed to have been the 24th season. There is a page for every season, there should be one for the 24th season too. Zvig47 ( talk) 21:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, can you help me with some guidance on how I can get more 'citiations from reliable, independent sources'? And I don't see any COI issue in this article as I am not being paid by the subject. He happens to be an officer retired from the Army. I can verify all the information in the article to be true. Unfortunately, there aren't too many people who are editors on WP who would be able to independently verify that Information. It is a technicality that there aren't enough editors who know the subject. Can you please offer some guidance? Thanks in advance. Jonathanvarunbenjamin ( talk) 06:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi there. I can appreciate why you reversed my recent change to this article on the grounds of 'Not enough in-depth coverage to meet GNG', and I have no great interest in improving the stub. However, the reason I had made the change was to solve the problem of a circular reference within the Beth Rogan article. Your change has now reintroduced that problem. Perhaps you could fix it? Masato.harada ( talk) 16:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Hey, on my article Erin Saoirse Adair you said, i have to add references from independent sites. I have some reliable secondary sources like the Ottawa Citizen, the Fulcrum, CKCU-FM and Rogers TV. Best regards KatastrophenKommando ( talk) 16:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you removed my Kheerat Panesar Wikipedia page, and I really don't understand why that has happened? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChelseaFox'sBae2022 ( talk • contribs) 17:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi but I don't believe what you are saying is true. The character is on a soap opera that is watched by approximately 5 million people. Not only that but the character has been involved in 2 prominent storylines that has been watched by a huge amount of viewers, as well as the fact that the actor who portrays the role has received an award for his services within the Asian British television society, which I believe voids your opinion. Other pages within the show such as Naomi Julien or Lorna Cartwright do not deserve to be up then since their characters have not had any real world notability either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChelseaFox'sBae2022 ( talk • contribs) 19:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
I noticed, that the way of communicating became more and more rough in both Wikipedia's. Many qualified people quit contributing articles to wikipedia for it is impossible to satisfy anyone. I quit to contribute to german and britisch Wikipedia any articles about heavy metal. I deleted all my drafts. I like the british people and I love to visit them, I love british landscapes and the british way of life and cornish cream tea or britsh beef, I like Iron Maiden and Paul Day, but it is waste of time to contribute anything to Wikipedia. Please delete this article or improve it - but do not mark it! Greetings from Germany and Yrs. sincerely - KEEP IT HARD AND HEAVY! Bockpeterteuto ( talk) 22:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Onel5969 Why was the page I created deleted? What corrections should be made to the article? My page - /info/en/?search=Draft:Iliev_Roman_Lazarevich I would be grateful if you could help me edit the article correctly Thank you. Seorbm ( talk) 07:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Hope you are doing well. Thank you for taking out time and checking the article /info/en/?search=Draft:Lisa_Camillo which I moved to the article space but was reverted by you. I moved it just because I felt it was ready. I checked the previous comments and they were all about adding reliable/notable references and when I researched the topic, I found a lot of coverage about her including some renowned channels like Al Jazeera, The Australian, SBS. So I did relevant editing, removed the unsourced text, added references and moved it to the article space. I will be thankful if you check it again as I have resubmitted the article for review through AFC. Jamalahmadpk ( talk) 14:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Okay, seventeen days. Anyway, we have multiple reliable mainstream sources stating the album is hotly anticipated ( A.V. Club, Paste, Pitchfork). If it were some tiny indie band from BFE I'd agree it's too soon, but Animal Collective that is not. DigitalIceAge ( talk) 18:28, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Recently we have had some disputes about content on Benkan. Is it acceptable to have the content commented out and only uncomment it as sources are introduced? MaitreyaVaruna ( talk) 22:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Why she did not meet the notability? I give the article many independent secondary sources and the sources give her full coverage that makes her notable enough. – Ctrlwiki ( talk) 13:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969! You recently placed a "too many" primary sources tage on the article. Currently, 75% (i.e., 30 out of 40) of the sources are non-primary. What percentage would you deem acceptable? Thanks! It's me...Sallicio! 14:17, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello onel5969 Sir, Please Review the Rajeshwari Datta's article, your review will encourage me to edit and create more article. Thanks and regards. Sams321 ( talk) 01:10, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I am trying to find a solution as how to replace the redirect with an article, as I feel this topic deserves an article. Can you help me on how to raise a concern about the AFD discussion. Thank you. Matu11 ( talk) 14:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
I noticed you reverted my changes to Calm Down Cologne. Can I ask what makes this album non-notable vs their previous album Always Be Happy, But Stay Evil? It got coverage from a variety of publications like JazzTimes, Downbeat, and Allmusic. B14709 ( talk) 16:10, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi. You reverted my creation of the page "identity type". Your terse comment was "not enough sourcing to pass wp:verify". First, the newly created page had citations. As many citations as the page it was redirected to! I have added more citation, in the hope of satisfying you.
FYI, the other types of type theory already have their own pages: empty type, unit type, product type, sum type, inductive types, etc.. AND the identity type is a focus of on going research in type theory. Homotopy Type Theory and Cubical Type Theory are completely focused on this type. It deserves its own page.
If you revert again, please put a lengthy comment on the identity type talk page, so that I can understand your complaints.
Mdnahas ( talk) 19:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I notice that you moved Moinak Dutta to Draft:Moinak_Dutta_2. There is already an identical, so far as I can see, draft at Draft:Moinak_Dutta, which has been sent for review and quite rightly rejected. I'm not sure WP really needs both drafts, but I don't know what the procedure is in this situation? To be honest, I found the main-space version this morning and was about to prod it as it's supported only by unreliable sources and I couldn't find anything better with Google, but I felt a bit bad about doing so because the editor who created it has only created one other article, and that's been sent to AfD today. I still feel Moinak Dutta probably isn't notable, and neither draft has much hope of making it into WP unless the reviewer is having a sleepy day. The article also seems maybe promotional. What should I have done? Elemimele ( talk) 13:04, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
The organization Shrimad Rajchandra Love and Care is an NGO that currently has 108 centers around the world - with active projects. It is a legitimate organization that requires its own independent page because its activities are separate from the spiritual activities carried out by its sister organization.
Redirecting it would be a mistake. There are thousands of articles written over the past 10 years in multiple countries by multiple world leaders about Shrimad Rajchandra Love and Care. Please revert it back to the way it was. I was trying to rename it to Shrimad Rajchandra Love and Care but because I'm a newb, I wasn't able to properly do it. I am not copying & pasting data. All the data is uniquely written, you can cross check with plagiarism software. Thank you for understanding. Dmehta81 ( talk) 14:56, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Sure, can you tell me how to create it in draft, I'll do that and also how do I invite other editors to edit the page? I'm aware that you require journal articles for pages, and one of the entities Shrimad Rajchandra Hospital, part of their umbrella organization has conducted medical experiments that have been referenced in independent primary medical journals in 2020-21. But for the main organization, are news articles not considered primary? In the case of other NGOs that I've noticed - several exist that have little to no consistent initiatives. I became aware of Shrimad Rajchandra Love and Care because of their global reach and presence. I've seen firsthand some of the activities like free books distribution to tribals, some others like setting up free food refrigerators in Dubai, delivering food to stranded laborers in India at the beginning of COVID - just to name a few. Listing the NGO helps it gain credibility. So that was the goal. Would the Guidestar rating not be a primary source that Wiki accepts? Please help. Dmehta81 ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 09:03, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Onel,
You erroneously deleted our page for infringing copyright. A copyleft (Creative Commons) license notice is clearly visible on the website which you claim our page infringes and this notice *was* present prior to the time of speedy deletion.
Regarding content veracity: Our page's various statements make reference to other stable Wikipedia pages which make the same or similar statements (e.g. about Internet Exchange Points) as well as third party sources which are (1) credible globally and (2) credible in Uganda. Note that it can be difficult to include references to globally renown sources about Uganda's Internet infrastructure due to Uganda's relative obscurity in the global Internet ecosystem.
There are also numerous other pages related to Internet Exchange Points which make similar statements with a similar (or lesser) array of sources:
I hope it is now clear that (a) our page does not infringe anyone's copyright and that (b) its contents meet or exceed the standards Wikipedia has applied to other articles on the same subject matter.
Regards,
Kyle Spencer (
talk)
11:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Unless you and/or Wikipedia intend to apply the same standards to all similar pages, it is hard to interpret your moderation as fair. This particular Wikipedia page was created as part of an effort to better document Uganda's telecommunications ecosystem and its history. If you have a specific complaint about specific verbiage within the page, feel free to suggest specific modifications. I also recommend that you educate yourself about
Internet Exchange Points (IXPs) before taking any further action on pages related to this subject.
In the near future I will implement an even more permissive copyleft license on our website and augment the Wikipedia page with additional sources that render the COI accusation even more irrelevant than it already is. If you delete the page again, revert it to draft, or block my account, I will escalate using Wikipedia's dispute resolution mechanisms.
Kyle Spencer (
talk)
16:49, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
A discussion you may be interested in has been opened regarding whether athletes meeting a sport-specific guideline must demonstrate GNG at AfD. JoelleJay ( talk) 22:40, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Don't add redirect in Garh Raipur High School as it doesn't break Wikipedia rules. I have added references from reliable sources. Arijit Kisku ( talk) 00:22, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969 -- I declined this G11 as I thought the content might be salvageable but the more I look at it the less I like it. It appears to be a good-faith student editor ( JayKassis), rather than a paid contribution, but I suspect the student has now moved on. I would not oppose a prod on this. @ Ian (Wiki Ed): for another opinion. Regards, Espresso Addict ( talk) 02:05, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969 , Please take your 2 minute on this article Draft:Sheetal Tiwari. Thanks. PangolinPedia ( talk) 03:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Please don't move to draftspace the articles that I created. These are ready for mainspace. -- Hajoon0102 💬 01:21, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Article of a singer Naresh Narayan X0BiT111 ( talk) 01:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Hey Onel5969, this is Derivator2017 here, I guess you're familiar with me. Just here to say that I really a appreciate you for reviewing my articles. It's always a pleasure to have your articles reviewed by a veteran editor. However, it apparently seems like not everyone enjoys seeing me on this platform. I have recently created an article, Yara International School and it was placed on AfD for the third time by the same editor under the pretext of notability, despite me providing around 70 references this time and out of which 3 to 4 sources clearly make the article eligible for existence. Kindly review my article and place your opinion in the deletion discussion page, and if you think this article meets the GNG, please vote to keep it. Warm regards. Derivator2017 ( talk) 12:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello - if I've understood the history correctly you have moved " /info/en/?search=Draft:Dorset_%26_Wilts_2_Central" which I created to Drafts. The reason given is that it doesn't have sources / references but there is a hyperlink on the page to the RFU Results website which shows this league exists and the teams involved etc. The only began in September 2021 so it is new - there are no previous winners or other third party information sources - this is community rugby in England, it doesn't get articles on well known websites or media attention. I don't know how else to prove it's genuine. The /info/en/?search=English_rugby_union_system page includes dozens of pages identical to this one, the only difference is most leagues have been in existence for some time. I would appreciate it if the page could be reinstated. Thank you in advance for your time / assistance.
Hi, I have noticed you reviewing my several articles. Thanks! I have a question regarding the approval mechanism. Sometimes, someone reviews a newly created article and the creator receives a notification, "The page has been reviewed", then the articles goes live on google. But sometimes, no one reviews an article, but it still becomes live within 30 - 40 days. What's the mechanism here? Sorry to bother you but I'm just curious. Insight 3 ( talk) 13:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Your username is one I see so very often in my notifications. I have created quite a large number of articles, many of which you've reviewed, and I plan on creating even more. In retrospect, some of the articles I published on the mainspace have had quite a few issues. I was wondering if you had any tips for me as I don't want to be churning out sub-par articles. Are there any common mistakes you've noticed while reviewing my pages? Are there any minor things I could do to make the reviewal process more easy, and to make sure every article I create is top notch? I appreciate your time! Mooonswimmer 19:36, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is
Draft:Sanjib Baruah. The discussion is about the topic
Draft:Sanjib Baruah. Thank you.
Can you give me an example of what sort of sources you'd want for this? I'm not sure what additional information I could add to the article. Thematthewmurray ( talk) 16:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi onel5969, Hope you are well. I noticed you redirected the page Osita Oparaugo to Ogelle which happen to be his company page. I understand the reasons why you did this the first time which I have now made the necessary edit to by removing unsourced content and also cited not less than 3 references from independent, reliable sources which talk about him in-depth. Kindly revisit this and approve for mainspace as the article passes WP:GNG Thank you. Kojomo ( talk) 18:48, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
As a contributor to the List of Judy Justice episodes (unpaid, no affiliation to the show), I strongly oppose your copyvio-revdel modification, especially given that 1) you did not engage with other contributors as described in WP:DR, 2) you did not read the corresponding Talk page where I had already pointed out the issue of contributors copying verbatim episode summaries (and indicating problematic ones), and 3) you provided no explanation as to your modification (I am thus left to assume it is due to episode summaries). I have added a section on the corresponding Talk page, which I encourage you to join so that we can appropriately resolve this issue without wiping weeks of people's work. Webenji ( talk) 03:28, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Onel5969, I would have to wholeheartedly agree with Webenji. I'm quite appalled by your drastic moves, wild accusations and total failure to communicate. I would go so far as to argue that your actions border on uncivil and vandalism, accusing us to be paid editors and removing entire pages without bothering to discuss. You didn't even follow policy when you did it, which is further glaring. You know better than to ignore communication. Please explain yourself. JudgeJudyCourthouse25 ( talk) 07:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969, could you kindly help me to understand why you have put an undisclosed paid tag to Ruwanthi Gajadeera page. I consulted many Wikipedia veterans and read some GA and VGA as well as joined discussions on Wikipedia Teahouse to improve my writing especially in terms of NPOV, if you check the page history you will see how the page narrative improved over time and how I considered all the feedback that was given to me. It has always been on my bucket list to contribute a page to Wikipedia and I thought of creating a page for a local fashion designer in Sri Lanka as she brought a lot of international attention to Sri Lanka recently with her international accolades. I didn’t receive any money for this contribution nor for any edits I’ve done on Wiki in the past. If you could point Liyamu21 ( talk) 08:18, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Good morning from little Coreca, I am writing to greet you and to know how you are. I'm doing pretty well for now, I've had a little bit to do in real life leaving out the commitments on Wikipedia, anyway I wanted to ask you how we can solve the Dado Coletti thing. Far be it from me to be a paid user or conflicts of interest. I love, respect and collaborate with various editions, dispassionately but with a lot of seriousness and dedication. I am not perfect with English and some other languages I admit, but I really want to learn day after day, article after article. Well, waiting for your news, thank you and greetings from the great little community of Coreca. Thanks again for your input and warning. See you soon!-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 03:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
For your helpful feedback, sometimes I think myself very proficient in policy then again I am reminded that there are editors more advanced, and you have just proved that by the feedback you gave me. I’m thankful I’ve had the chance to not just learn under you during my early days but also that I have the privilege to watch you edit. Celestina007 ( talk) 22:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC) |
I genuinely have to ask, how is a model who has been on the cover of American Vogue no less, lacking in notability? That's strange. Trillfendi ( talk) 23:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
I've updated the Ricardo Lombana article which you had issues with and expanded it so it should be acceptable to stay now I hope! Thanks for giving me the kick to get it done :) Lankyant ( talk) 02:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
About the notability of John Millan: I have cited books, and added a link to his portrait in the British Museum. The quote shows Millan was respected by other booksellers of his day. His successor, Thomas Egerton, was the first to publish Jane Austen's novels.
The entry on World Cat, Millan, John -1782 lists:
The book Millan's Lists of the Parliament. Containing The Lords with their Posts, ... Counties, Cities, etc., their members, etc lists members of the government, as does Wikipedia today: List of MPs elected in the 2019 United Kingdom general election.
Wikipedia is created by volunteers who work on it as and when they can, and I will add this in due course. The page already has links, including to the British Museum - and citations.
Also, there is far less source material available for the 18th century than for more recent times. Unless someone was wealthy, few records remain. This means that there will be fewer references, but this does not mean someone lacks notability. As with Wikipedia needing a host, the books would not exist without printers and publishers. Kylenano ( talk) 10:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Would showing that FT8 is by far the most popular ham radio HF mode be enough for it to have its own article? -- Qslcard ( talk) 06:13, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
The overview of RS reads, "Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves." When a source has a contributor policy like that found at author guide for LWN, that shows a lack of true editorial oversight. While it's not as devoid of oversight as something like WP, which is handled by volunteers, it's not the type of source which would equal something like a peer-reviewed journal. Onel5969 TT me 11:30, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Sasikala also called as VKs sir 2409:4072:6C98:DE22:0:0:5F48:EB00 ( talk) 11:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Every claim in the article is carefully and and accurately sourced. Can you please explain what is wrong with the article? Dovidroth ( talk) 13:38, 31 January 2022 (UTC)