![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 80 | ← | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | Archive 86 | Archive 87 | Archive 88 | → | Archive 90 |
Archive 74:January 2021
I did not create the page Pär Sundberg, which you proposed for deletion. You did send me a message about it, though. This page has never been known by me. Did something go wrong? Joostgriffioen ( talk) 00:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC) Joostgriffioen
Onel5969,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–
Davey2010
Talk
00:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
We can expand this article by referring to the German wiki.-- Htmlzycq ( talk) 16:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
tag from
Kimberly Ritchie, which you proposed for deletion. Hi there! I'm a marine biologist and even though the page wasn't descriptive enough, Kimberly Ritchie's name is associated with coral microbiomes and I think an article on her would be beneficial to readers. If the author can expand on what makes her research significant, having this wiki page will be a useful link to the pages on coral holobionts and microbiomes. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}}
back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!
Mochamedusae (
talk)
18:06, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Regarding you revert in this edit.
That page was created by a new user who moved the page UP10TION discography to Tweiulfse because they were trying to move UP10TIon discography to UP10TION discography. I know that the page history shows that it was created by an experienced editor but it is clearly a test page created by a new user. Apologies if my explanation didn't make any sense. EN- Jungwon 15:27, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you added a copyvio-revdel tag to my article, does that mean that my article can get deleted? Limorina ( talk) 14:28, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I saw you just converted the PE With Joe article to a redirect due to lack of notability. I disagree with this. While I agree the article didn't have sufficent coverage currently, the topic certainly has reliable, third party sources. Reputable sources such as the Independent, The Evening Standard, the BBC, the Telegraph, the Financial Times and Sky Sports have covered the topic. Therefore, I think the article should be reverted back to an article and tweaked to include these reliable sources. Have a nice day :)! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Squid45 ( talk • contribs) 13:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Have you looked at how many references there are to Norwegian Institute for Nature Research ? Why misled the public with link to article that has nothing to do with this subject ? There are many similar articles: Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute Norwegian Geotechnical Institute Norwegian Institute for Air Research Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research Norwegian Institute for Crop Research Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies Norwegian Institute for Social Research Norwegian Institute for Strategic Studies Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research Norwegian Institute for Water Research to name just a few ... Please provide more arguments for your action. Thanks ! User:Abune ( talk) 14:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC) P.S. Close to 4000 (3783) publications !!! many has been cited in Wikipedia if you look at links !!! according to https://www.researchgate.net/institution/Norwegian_Institute_for_Nature_Research "The Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) is Norway’s leading institution for applied ecological research, with expertise on the genetic, population, species, ecosystem and landscape level, in terrestrial, freshwater and coastal marine environments. NINA addresses a wide variety of interdisciplinary issues involving both ecologists and social scientists, and plays an important role in European and other international research cooperation." according to https://www.fondationsegre.org/norwegian-institute-for-nature-research/ User:Abune ( talk) 14:26, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
https://www.researchgate.net/institution/Norwegian_Institute_for_Nature_Research ? will you consider that sufficient ? User:Abune ( talk) 16:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Once I update list of references to satisfy WP:GNG, WP:ORGDEPTH I'm going to restore this article. Will take a day, two or entire week depending on how busy I'm in "real life". Take care ! User:Abune ( talk) 16:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for offering. Either way works for me ! I’m here since 2006 or so ... User:Abune ( talk) 18:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
tag from
Ibero-American Cultural Centre, which you proposed for deletion. There are now more reliable references. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}}
back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!
Miguel913 (
talk)
18:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
I wished to discuss with you about the edits you made to Star Gold. I have reverted them and wish to discuss this minute conflict with you. I have made this article based on the article of its sister-channel: Star Bharat. I have used similar content, and would like to state that it is one of the most prominent channels in India at present.
I have also made sufficient edits to make sure that it isn't promotional. So please view the article and kindly reply.-- Atlantis77177 ( talk) 04:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Once again, Thanks a lot Sir for your utmost generosity. These flowers are a small return to give you for my gratitude. Thanks a million for giving your review on the article Kaatelal & Sons.-- Aleyamma38 ( talk) 04:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Heyup
I'm trying to work out what Sofia Barclay would have to do to become notable. From my view, she's had several major roles (including as Selina in the BBC drama Defending the Guilty, who is a pivotal role) and has a major role in the upcoming Text for You. That would pass NACTOR, surely? The role of Adela Zal in NYPD Blue would add to that.
Stui ( talk) 15:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
She is the granddaughter of David Barclay, although I'm really not sure who her parents are. I'm not sure why the redirect was there, either, but it looks like the person who created the page did so as a sort of "these people are linked so I'm making the page in case they're notable at some point" hedge.
The TV show is 6 eps long (admittedly half as long as Fawlty Towers) and I believe it has been recommissioned (although Covid is making it hard to do).
Ultimately, I think she's getting somewhere in the acting world, and the presence of the original page for three years clearly hasn't done any harm. It seemed prudent to fill it out with actual information rather than having an irrelevant redirect.
Stui ( talk) 16:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, just a head's up. You PROD'd this one but the creator removed it without comment or adding a source. Spiderone 08:44, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Onel, I don't know if you're cursed or something, but I keep seeing your name in the page histories of redirects changed into articles. This time I've seen:
Have a look at them, Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 06:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for joining the Organized Labour project. I've been a participant in the project since 2006 and am helping with a revival of it. As part this we are introducing a new membership system, which will help with communications among participants. This involves creating a membership file for each participant within your user space (you can see an example of my membership card here: User:Goldsztajn/WikiProjectCards/WikiProject Organized Labour). This system is already in operation within a number of wikiprojects (such as Women in Red and Medicine). You will not have to do anything, myself or someone else from the project will create the relevant file within your userspace. However, I am conscious that it is not polite to change an editor's user space without notice. If I don't hear from you in the negative, I will go ahead with making the change after the 18th of January. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Many thanks for supporting the project, in solidarity, -- Goldsztajn ( talk) 11:09, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, please explain why you reverted my edits for Zee Bangla programmes. As the programming shows was huge in number, i created a separate page. Also the was redirect by giving an improper reason. As per Star Jalsha, i created programming list. Please sir let the details be in separate one. Kboomika33 ( talk) 11:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm writing to you because you recently removed a bunch of content from Apple ID for Advertisers citing two Copyvios reports. I humbly disagree with your interpretation of these reports. To spare your page from walls of text, I stated my position on Talk:Apple_ID_for_Advertisers. For now, I returned the content back. Feel free to delete it again, but preferably with more sound explanation this time. Anton.bersh ( talk) 18:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Gerard Way discography, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: User was not banned/blocked when this page was created. Thank you. Barkeep49 ( talk) 18:51, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I see you just converted the MLL-PLL merger article to a redirect (to Premier Lacrosse League). I disagree with this. The article had multiple reliable, third party sources. Additionally, the topic meets all other notability guidelines and represents a pivotal event in the history of professional lacrosse, parallel to other major sports mergers. Therefore, I think the article should be reverted back to its independent form. ThatWikiAl ( talk) 21:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)ThatWikiAl
No, stub templates don't make an article "categorized" for the purposes of evicting the {{ uncategorized}} template. (Notice that the stub template even explicitly says that stub categories aren't enough.) Stub templates are grouping articles by a maintenance state, and are for internal editing purposes rather than end-user reader browsing purposes, and are meant to be temporary because they're supposed to be removed when the article expands past stub length — so even if a page has 100 stub templates on it, it still isn't categorized until it also has at least one true, permanent end-user content category directly declared on the page in [[Category:This thing]] format. (And no, just copying over the stub categories so that they're being declared on the page in addition to the invocation of the stub template isn't the magic ticket, either — the page still isn't properly categorized if all of its categories have the word "stubs" in them.) Bearcat ( talk) 22:56, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello. In case you did not see it, I left a note for you here. I think that your assertion that the article does not meet GNG is very much incorrect. It has multiple articles, devoted to the subject, by RSs such as the FT, the NYT, the NY Post, and the NY Daily News. Its a premier example of an article satisfying GNG. I would urge you, if you still maintain that in your view it does not (which I admit surprises me greatly), that you take it to AfD. But I expect you will if you do so see that editors in general do not sure your view as to what satisfies GNG. Stay safe. -- 2603:7000:2143:8500:9D0F:6A81:4224:6C2A ( talk) 23:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Sorry that I just made you do a lot of clicking with those redirect reviews lol. Have this kitten as a solace :)
Curbon7 ( talk) 00:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I just wanted to ask. Why did you move Draft:Pande Eftimov to draftspace? Even when you moved it, there were a number of reliable Bulgarian and Macedonian news references in the article. Silver seren C 03:49, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Recently, I noticed that you have completely deleted the geography section of some articles on the rivers of Quebec (eg: Rivière du Monument, Petite rivière du Monument ...). Let's put in perspective that a lot of research and writing work has been done to inform the public well about the description of the rivers. The writing of these sections is based on generally accepted methods. These sections of articles are well sourced by the Atlas of Canada (Toporama) which is published by the federal government; this involves using the geographic instrumentation available on the site. The information published is accurate and properly informs the public. Anyone can access the Atlas of Canada (Toporama) through the Internet and check by using the geographic tools. For the public, it is not necessary to have a doctorate in geography. With regret these erasures impoverish the encyclopedia.-- Veillg1 ( Veillg1) 10:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
The album The Absurdity of Human Existence is from an established artist ( Danz CM) and soon to be released. Please leave it alone and respect my work. Thanks. Deepblue1 ( talk) 14:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
You should've told me before moving my article to a draft page. Now there's no use telling me when you've already done it. It seems you didn't check the external links as a source for references. You could have left a template box indicating that article needs more references instead of outright moving it to a draft. Never mind though, I'm too tired for editing it all over again. I feel like I've wasted my valuable time. Since you've moved it to a draft, now the onus is on you to expand it. Good luck and have a nice day/night! — Hemant Dabral ( 📞 • ✒) 23:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
I'm working on citing the stubs and expanding the articles regarding the politburo and the Central Committee. Please stop until you see my work is finished! :) -- Ruling party ( talk) 17:01, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Semaphore signal (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 16:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey, hope you're having a good day! I'm on PROD patrol and noticed your prodding of Yu Wensheng, an article that looks borderline for notability at a glance. I'm very careful about AfDs and PRODs about non-Anglophone subjects where the nominator/proposer doesn't speak the relevant language, because of the consequences for WP:BEFORE, but I don't want to remove the PROD without assuming and possibly cast unintentional aspersions. Can you read Chinese or understand spoken Mando/Canto (both seem potentially relevant to a mainland subject involved with HK)? If I missed any language userboxes on your page, all apologies! Vaticidalprophet ( talk) 16:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969, can you tell me the specific issue with citation? I'm working on the cite that you restored the redirection back to, and it most likely has the same citation issues in other sections. There's so much to do there that the format of citations was not my #1 problem. The primary issue is that its subsections should have pages of their own, as there are too many of these subsections for it to be navigable. Rybkovich ( talk) 18:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for good wishes! - Happy Wikipedia 20, - proud of a little bit on the Main page today, and 5 years ago, and 10 years ago, look: create a new style - revive - complete! I sang in the revival mentioned. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 18:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
... and today Jerome Kohl, remembered in friendship -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Success Principles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
signed, Rosguill talk 18:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
I was trying to help my uncle set up a page for the Arnold Schoenberg Institute which used to be at USC, before my grandfather's archives were moved to the Arnold Schönberg Center in Vienna. You deleted it right away. Can you please let me work on it? There are plenty of sources. It is a different entity than the Center in Vienna. -- Randols ( talk) 02:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, and best wishes for 2021. This is to request you to remove the PROD tag. I am working on the article. I have more material, which I will add over the coming days. I am also hoping that other editors will help me with the History. Before starting the page, I looked up some existing articles on roads, and I believe this road is as notable as many of them. I just need a little time. Thanks a lot! Amuk ( talk) 05:33, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for your time. I see you've recently erased the entire Takkoku article which I worked on. I felt that was a little drastic, but what did you find wrong with it and is there anyway I can fix this and learn to prevent future mistakes? Thank you. Malcolm L. Mitchell ( talk) 18:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Valerii Makovetskyi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. SmartSE ( talk) 22:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
I Don't Knew How To Protect Pages So I Am Asking You
Please Protect This Pages From Heavy IP Vandalism
Please Protect This Pages Heavy Vandalism Is Been Made In This Pages By Some IP Users Dev Adhi ( talk) 06:19, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10 Lives until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
FalconK ( talk) 05:47, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
An article that been involved with ( 1983 Upper Voltan coup d'état attempt) has content that is proposed to be removed and moved to another article ( 1983 Upper Voltan coup d'état). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 17:41, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey Onel. Sorry to bug you, your talk page looks pretty busy. I'm interested in doing New Page Patrol School and I was wondering if you'd be interested in taking me on as a student. I've got about 2800 edits. I'm a pending changes reviewer (done about 300 approves, maybe a similar number of reverts) and I feel I have a pretty decent grasp of many of the core policies, including RS and NPOV. Now I'd like to shore up one of my weak areas, which is notability/deletion. NPP looks like a great way to learn about deletion, help out in a backlogged area, and master something complex. I'm currently furloughed due to COVID, so I'm available pretty much all the time on weekdays. I am wiki addicted, I am editing a lot ;) Time zone is USA Pacific. Happy to communicate off wiki, Skype screen share, whatever your training method is. Look forward to speaking further. Thank you. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 10:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Just as a heads up, I'm moving this back to mainspace. 18abruce was able to add the team that qualified the athlete. He played six games with Czech Extraliga team. I told the user in the future to make it clear as day for us on this player's and how they pass WP:NHOCKEY to avoid this in the future. Cheers Sulfurboy ( talk) 14:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
I noticed that you undid my revision, just to put a redirect on the article 2018 Northeast Conference Men's Soccer Tournament. That was unnecessary and there is no good reason for it, as there are articles with information for tournaments from other years. Having actual information and scores from the tournament are a lot better than just a redirect link, so please don't put a redirect on it. - Ajax.amsterdam.fan ( talk) 16:50, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I improved the Tatsuki Fujimoto page. Could you let me know if it is ready to be moved back to mainspace? Cheers. - Xexerss ( talk) 18:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, me again. Can you also please move Asagiro to a draft page to allow me to work on a better article? Thanks. Malcolm L. Mitchell ( talk) 20:00, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello O. I've just learned that reflinks has been resurrected. It has a couple enhancements like being able to ask it to fix more than 20 refs at a time. You do have to click on the interactive feature to make it work properly. You might already know this but, since this was the second best thing to happen today, I wanted to let you know about it just in case. Cheers!! MarnetteD| Talk 19:15, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969. Just letting you know that I have contested the speedy deletion tag you recently put on the Bejay Mulenga page as it is Not unambiguously promotional. If you have any advice on improving the article, please do share. Much appreciated. Cornelius Henson ( talk) 22:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Could you take a look at some more of his recent creations and send back a few to incubate in draftspace that aren't ready, such as ones that don't say their native range? Abductive ( reasoning) 02:12, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Why is the article Sorrels Field being nominated for deletion? - Ajax.amsterdam.fan ( talk) 15:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
I have updated the draft with references from the Moroccan official website for amateur football leagues. All league tables and results table have their own source reference below each table. Please review as soon as you can. Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vegeta228 ( talk • contribs) 19:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Please see Talk:America's Frontline Doctors. RobP ( talk) 01:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The page cited as the infringement appears to be a weird cache/mirror of Wikipedia's Tea Party Patriots page, from which the article was properly split. ViperSnake151 Talk 01:57, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Let's not argue, re whether or not lothlorien has enough notability. It DOES its one of the premier historical houses that is well known throughout the university and the biggest co-operative system in the USA. BUT I see you have a trigger finger for deleting content. Both times you deleted/redirected content, that others have put in A LOT of time into. I'm sure this is not the first time this point has been made to you. A civil way to do this would have been been for you to make your objection to the editor prior to the deletion. You failed to do this twice. So yes, your redirection has been undone. If you still want to the article to be re-directed you can formally bring up your objection to be considered by others. Rybkovich ( talk) 03:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
I started a draft about Michael Weirsky. Can you please make it a full article that is a good article or featured article, please? I would prefer it to be featured article. /info/en/?search=Draft:Michael_Weirsky — Preceding unsigned comment added by LotteryGeek ( talk • contribs) 00:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
We urgently need a Wikipedia article on the famous neuorscientist, Mikhail Lebedev. Can you please finish the article on Mikhail Lebedev this weekend? It needs to be nominated as a good or featured article within 30 days. I Already started. Please see Draft:Mikhail Lebedev (neuorscientist). — Preceding unsigned comment added by LotteryGeek ( talk • contribs) 01:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Today, you proposed to delete the article "Claude Mélançon", a Canadian naturalist who worked in the popularization of natural sciences. The references indicated initially were sufficient; however, other references have been added. I have worked hard to write this article well. Given the notoriety of this character, the proposal to erase this article is clearly exaggerated. Especially that anyone can refer on the Internet to his work of life. Please delete this unnecessary notice. -- Veillg1 ( talk) 02:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, you reverted my edits today on Jake Puckerman and I was wondering if you could give an explanation why? You said that the article had "Zero real world notability," but all of the other main characters on Glee have their own character pages, as well as some recurring characters. If it was a problem with the way it was written, I would have rather you reached out to me rather than deleting the work. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Fiscus Brady!! ( talk) 06:29, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, can I ask you something? Why did you turn this page into a redirect link? I'm new to Wikipedia, so can you point what criteria this article didn't fulfill from WP:NSONG? Thank you. Byy2 ( talk) 09:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for answering my question! Byy2 ( talk) 01:31, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you recently turned the Wikimedia Incubator page to a redirect. I think that it might be better to turn it back to the article again and let others have the ability to keep contributing to it. I don't entirely agree with the redirect, so can you please let me know what you think and what we should do about that page? Thanks. 54nd60x ( talk) 23:54, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Comparing the "source" to a March 2020 (9 months before the source was written) revision of 2010's charts also shows a match - looks like reverse copyvio to me. Cabayi ( talk) 18:02, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Just to let you know, you were listed at a arbitration request which has been since removed as premature by me. It can be viewed at this permalink. Thanks, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:51, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments, I would like to know how to express that the page is a translation from the Hebrew article on this topic, see here. The topic here is related to the sabbatical year in Israeli which will begin this September 2021 and is relevant to the contemporary life in Israel. I have been asked to explain some of the complexities of the Jewish laws pertaining to letting the agriculture grow wild - untouched - for the sabbatical year, and to review how the farmers can make living during that year. Thank you for your help in making this article better and sharing this topic to the English speaking public. Would it help to add more articles in English? I only found this one which spoke against this movement. Drkup(IMJ) (talk) 19:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, i saw you deleted the page i created and you made a redirect, why? Borteddd ( talk) 22:42, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, may I ask what do you mean with "This article does not cite any sources"? First version of the article had a lot of quotes with sources, but they were deleted by another editor. Look here: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:Cuisine_of_Odessa&oldid=997197198
Should I restore them again? Please, will you be kind to explain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wizard85 ( talk • contribs) 16:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Update March 3, 2021 Hi, I added 38 references to all significant dishes. Will you be so kind to check it and approve the article, if possible. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wizard85 ( talk • contribs) 16:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for deleting my Antim: The Final Truth Redirecting. I think that article is notable. What do i have to do to restore that article? Do i have to cite more sources?
Hyderabadi Wikipedian (
talk)
13:43, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Buiu (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 16:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I was quite surprised by the redirect of my article. The article meets the notability requirements in more than one way and I worked on this article with another experienced Wikipedia editor. I have other published album articles that follow the same format as this one. This redirect is confusing readers. Cheryl Fullerton ( talk) 00:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
This is what Wikipedia says meets the notability criteria. This album meets more than ONE of the criteria.
"Specific to recordings, a recording may be notable if it meets at least one of these criteria:
Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble who created it. This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries[note 2] except for the following: Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about the recording, and all advertising that mentions the recording, including manufacturers' advertising. Articles in a school or university newspaper (or similar), in most cases. The single or album has appeared on any country's national music chart. The recording has been certified gold or higher in at least one country. The recording has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award. The recording was performed in a medium that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article. Read the policy and notability guideline on subjects notable only for one event, for further clarifications). The recording was in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network. The recording has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or television network. Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography."
Hello,
I'm expanding the article with new sources, such as the LA Times, Salt Lake City Desseret, and others. I hope those sources are considered reliable. Also, AllMusic is considered a source for most music articles I see on Wikipedia. Is there a reason that you didn't consider it to be a good source? Also, Guitar Nine, is it considered reliable? Now, if you could help me indirect the redirect, I would be most appreciative. Regards,
Cheryl Fullerton (
talk)
20:13, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you reverted my relocation of the article “Fila (hat)” which was previously entitles “Aso Oke Hat”. I have reversed your reversion and ask that you leave the article in it’s, now correct, place.
I relocated this article because Fila is the correct term for this garment and it is never referred to as an “Aso Oke Hat” except on Wikipedia or in a few blog posts referencing this incorrectly titled article.
Fila are made with various fabrics, including aso oke, and to refer to all fila as “aso oke hats” is and incorrect, anacronistic and actually offensive. It is clearly a non-Nigerian, non-Yoruba, outsider looking in type of term which has no relevance in Yoruba, or Nigerian society or culture.
I am a subject matter expert on this subject, being Yoruba and Nigerian.
Ajisekanla ( talk) 11:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Could you please take another look? I added references to the official Switzerland Tourism website as well as outdooractive.com (Europe's largest outdoor web platform), I guess those should be reliable sources. -- MRB ( talk) 16:18, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
User @ Rosguill: removed my last post because it was uncivil. He was right to do so. You, however, have no right to delete those articles and move them to draft.
Reasons
Rosguill said I shouldn't say you deserved to be blocked BUT that's what I feel you deserve. This might just be temporary anger—very probably is—but I'm feeling it for a very good reason. You should think how you're edits affect other users who contribute in their spare time to improve WP's coverage. Edits like you're—like you did my deleting my articles from main space—kill my joy. That should really get you to think. -- Ruling party ( talk) 21:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
And there are more!
I would rather that you wrote me a message saying "Please add sources or I have to delete them" rather than moving those articles to draft. But maybe you're right. Maybe I would complain in that too. If so, I won't do it in the future. -- Ruling party ( talk) 23:56, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello User: Onel5969, I do not agree with your reset. I'm new to the enWP. Where can we clarify whether this article will be kept? BR, Asurnipal ( talk) 13:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Hii am user Behera Sahab, I noticed that you are redirected the page of Laudi Khela as per AFD, but there is more and reliable sources. Ao Please I request to you please visit this sources , before new redirecting. Thanks Behera Sahab ( talk) 16:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Since you put a notability tag at AMSCOL, you might want to see my comments at Talk:AMSCOL. (I thought it was best to have any discussion there). Adpete ( talk) 05:32, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969 I have noticed you have moved my A.P. Mine E.P. Mark VI article to draft space due to a lack of sources. I see why you did this and agree with you the article should have had more sources.All my other mine articles have been checked for at least two sources and those that did not have this had them added in. In future two sources will be the minimum for my articles. So I have implemented your feedback and will do so in future thanks for taking the time to assess my article! Anonymous contributor 1707 ( talk) 13:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC).
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SDSU Sports Deck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 80 | ← | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | Archive 86 | Archive 87 | Archive 88 | → | Archive 90 |
Archive 74:January 2021
I did not create the page Pär Sundberg, which you proposed for deletion. You did send me a message about it, though. This page has never been known by me. Did something go wrong? Joostgriffioen ( talk) 00:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC) Joostgriffioen
Onel5969,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–
Davey2010
Talk
00:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
We can expand this article by referring to the German wiki.-- Htmlzycq ( talk) 16:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
tag from
Kimberly Ritchie, which you proposed for deletion. Hi there! I'm a marine biologist and even though the page wasn't descriptive enough, Kimberly Ritchie's name is associated with coral microbiomes and I think an article on her would be beneficial to readers. If the author can expand on what makes her research significant, having this wiki page will be a useful link to the pages on coral holobionts and microbiomes. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}}
back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!
Mochamedusae (
talk)
18:06, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Regarding you revert in this edit.
That page was created by a new user who moved the page UP10TION discography to Tweiulfse because they were trying to move UP10TIon discography to UP10TION discography. I know that the page history shows that it was created by an experienced editor but it is clearly a test page created by a new user. Apologies if my explanation didn't make any sense. EN- Jungwon 15:27, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you added a copyvio-revdel tag to my article, does that mean that my article can get deleted? Limorina ( talk) 14:28, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I saw you just converted the PE With Joe article to a redirect due to lack of notability. I disagree with this. While I agree the article didn't have sufficent coverage currently, the topic certainly has reliable, third party sources. Reputable sources such as the Independent, The Evening Standard, the BBC, the Telegraph, the Financial Times and Sky Sports have covered the topic. Therefore, I think the article should be reverted back to an article and tweaked to include these reliable sources. Have a nice day :)! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Squid45 ( talk • contribs) 13:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Have you looked at how many references there are to Norwegian Institute for Nature Research ? Why misled the public with link to article that has nothing to do with this subject ? There are many similar articles: Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute Norwegian Geotechnical Institute Norwegian Institute for Air Research Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research Norwegian Institute for Crop Research Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies Norwegian Institute for Social Research Norwegian Institute for Strategic Studies Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research Norwegian Institute for Water Research to name just a few ... Please provide more arguments for your action. Thanks ! User:Abune ( talk) 14:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC) P.S. Close to 4000 (3783) publications !!! many has been cited in Wikipedia if you look at links !!! according to https://www.researchgate.net/institution/Norwegian_Institute_for_Nature_Research "The Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) is Norway’s leading institution for applied ecological research, with expertise on the genetic, population, species, ecosystem and landscape level, in terrestrial, freshwater and coastal marine environments. NINA addresses a wide variety of interdisciplinary issues involving both ecologists and social scientists, and plays an important role in European and other international research cooperation." according to https://www.fondationsegre.org/norwegian-institute-for-nature-research/ User:Abune ( talk) 14:26, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
https://www.researchgate.net/institution/Norwegian_Institute_for_Nature_Research ? will you consider that sufficient ? User:Abune ( talk) 16:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Once I update list of references to satisfy WP:GNG, WP:ORGDEPTH I'm going to restore this article. Will take a day, two or entire week depending on how busy I'm in "real life". Take care ! User:Abune ( talk) 16:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for offering. Either way works for me ! I’m here since 2006 or so ... User:Abune ( talk) 18:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
tag from
Ibero-American Cultural Centre, which you proposed for deletion. There are now more reliable references. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}}
back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!
Miguel913 (
talk)
18:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
I wished to discuss with you about the edits you made to Star Gold. I have reverted them and wish to discuss this minute conflict with you. I have made this article based on the article of its sister-channel: Star Bharat. I have used similar content, and would like to state that it is one of the most prominent channels in India at present.
I have also made sufficient edits to make sure that it isn't promotional. So please view the article and kindly reply.-- Atlantis77177 ( talk) 04:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Once again, Thanks a lot Sir for your utmost generosity. These flowers are a small return to give you for my gratitude. Thanks a million for giving your review on the article Kaatelal & Sons.-- Aleyamma38 ( talk) 04:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Heyup
I'm trying to work out what Sofia Barclay would have to do to become notable. From my view, she's had several major roles (including as Selina in the BBC drama Defending the Guilty, who is a pivotal role) and has a major role in the upcoming Text for You. That would pass NACTOR, surely? The role of Adela Zal in NYPD Blue would add to that.
Stui ( talk) 15:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
She is the granddaughter of David Barclay, although I'm really not sure who her parents are. I'm not sure why the redirect was there, either, but it looks like the person who created the page did so as a sort of "these people are linked so I'm making the page in case they're notable at some point" hedge.
The TV show is 6 eps long (admittedly half as long as Fawlty Towers) and I believe it has been recommissioned (although Covid is making it hard to do).
Ultimately, I think she's getting somewhere in the acting world, and the presence of the original page for three years clearly hasn't done any harm. It seemed prudent to fill it out with actual information rather than having an irrelevant redirect.
Stui ( talk) 16:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, just a head's up. You PROD'd this one but the creator removed it without comment or adding a source. Spiderone 08:44, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Onel, I don't know if you're cursed or something, but I keep seeing your name in the page histories of redirects changed into articles. This time I've seen:
Have a look at them, Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 06:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for joining the Organized Labour project. I've been a participant in the project since 2006 and am helping with a revival of it. As part this we are introducing a new membership system, which will help with communications among participants. This involves creating a membership file for each participant within your user space (you can see an example of my membership card here: User:Goldsztajn/WikiProjectCards/WikiProject Organized Labour). This system is already in operation within a number of wikiprojects (such as Women in Red and Medicine). You will not have to do anything, myself or someone else from the project will create the relevant file within your userspace. However, I am conscious that it is not polite to change an editor's user space without notice. If I don't hear from you in the negative, I will go ahead with making the change after the 18th of January. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Many thanks for supporting the project, in solidarity, -- Goldsztajn ( talk) 11:09, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, please explain why you reverted my edits for Zee Bangla programmes. As the programming shows was huge in number, i created a separate page. Also the was redirect by giving an improper reason. As per Star Jalsha, i created programming list. Please sir let the details be in separate one. Kboomika33 ( talk) 11:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm writing to you because you recently removed a bunch of content from Apple ID for Advertisers citing two Copyvios reports. I humbly disagree with your interpretation of these reports. To spare your page from walls of text, I stated my position on Talk:Apple_ID_for_Advertisers. For now, I returned the content back. Feel free to delete it again, but preferably with more sound explanation this time. Anton.bersh ( talk) 18:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Gerard Way discography, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: User was not banned/blocked when this page was created. Thank you. Barkeep49 ( talk) 18:51, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I see you just converted the MLL-PLL merger article to a redirect (to Premier Lacrosse League). I disagree with this. The article had multiple reliable, third party sources. Additionally, the topic meets all other notability guidelines and represents a pivotal event in the history of professional lacrosse, parallel to other major sports mergers. Therefore, I think the article should be reverted back to its independent form. ThatWikiAl ( talk) 21:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)ThatWikiAl
No, stub templates don't make an article "categorized" for the purposes of evicting the {{ uncategorized}} template. (Notice that the stub template even explicitly says that stub categories aren't enough.) Stub templates are grouping articles by a maintenance state, and are for internal editing purposes rather than end-user reader browsing purposes, and are meant to be temporary because they're supposed to be removed when the article expands past stub length — so even if a page has 100 stub templates on it, it still isn't categorized until it also has at least one true, permanent end-user content category directly declared on the page in [[Category:This thing]] format. (And no, just copying over the stub categories so that they're being declared on the page in addition to the invocation of the stub template isn't the magic ticket, either — the page still isn't properly categorized if all of its categories have the word "stubs" in them.) Bearcat ( talk) 22:56, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello. In case you did not see it, I left a note for you here. I think that your assertion that the article does not meet GNG is very much incorrect. It has multiple articles, devoted to the subject, by RSs such as the FT, the NYT, the NY Post, and the NY Daily News. Its a premier example of an article satisfying GNG. I would urge you, if you still maintain that in your view it does not (which I admit surprises me greatly), that you take it to AfD. But I expect you will if you do so see that editors in general do not sure your view as to what satisfies GNG. Stay safe. -- 2603:7000:2143:8500:9D0F:6A81:4224:6C2A ( talk) 23:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Sorry that I just made you do a lot of clicking with those redirect reviews lol. Have this kitten as a solace :)
Curbon7 ( talk) 00:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I just wanted to ask. Why did you move Draft:Pande Eftimov to draftspace? Even when you moved it, there were a number of reliable Bulgarian and Macedonian news references in the article. Silver seren C 03:49, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Recently, I noticed that you have completely deleted the geography section of some articles on the rivers of Quebec (eg: Rivière du Monument, Petite rivière du Monument ...). Let's put in perspective that a lot of research and writing work has been done to inform the public well about the description of the rivers. The writing of these sections is based on generally accepted methods. These sections of articles are well sourced by the Atlas of Canada (Toporama) which is published by the federal government; this involves using the geographic instrumentation available on the site. The information published is accurate and properly informs the public. Anyone can access the Atlas of Canada (Toporama) through the Internet and check by using the geographic tools. For the public, it is not necessary to have a doctorate in geography. With regret these erasures impoverish the encyclopedia.-- Veillg1 ( Veillg1) 10:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
The album The Absurdity of Human Existence is from an established artist ( Danz CM) and soon to be released. Please leave it alone and respect my work. Thanks. Deepblue1 ( talk) 14:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
You should've told me before moving my article to a draft page. Now there's no use telling me when you've already done it. It seems you didn't check the external links as a source for references. You could have left a template box indicating that article needs more references instead of outright moving it to a draft. Never mind though, I'm too tired for editing it all over again. I feel like I've wasted my valuable time. Since you've moved it to a draft, now the onus is on you to expand it. Good luck and have a nice day/night! — Hemant Dabral ( 📞 • ✒) 23:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
I'm working on citing the stubs and expanding the articles regarding the politburo and the Central Committee. Please stop until you see my work is finished! :) -- Ruling party ( talk) 17:01, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Semaphore signal (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 16:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey, hope you're having a good day! I'm on PROD patrol and noticed your prodding of Yu Wensheng, an article that looks borderline for notability at a glance. I'm very careful about AfDs and PRODs about non-Anglophone subjects where the nominator/proposer doesn't speak the relevant language, because of the consequences for WP:BEFORE, but I don't want to remove the PROD without assuming and possibly cast unintentional aspersions. Can you read Chinese or understand spoken Mando/Canto (both seem potentially relevant to a mainland subject involved with HK)? If I missed any language userboxes on your page, all apologies! Vaticidalprophet ( talk) 16:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969, can you tell me the specific issue with citation? I'm working on the cite that you restored the redirection back to, and it most likely has the same citation issues in other sections. There's so much to do there that the format of citations was not my #1 problem. The primary issue is that its subsections should have pages of their own, as there are too many of these subsections for it to be navigable. Rybkovich ( talk) 18:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for good wishes! - Happy Wikipedia 20, - proud of a little bit on the Main page today, and 5 years ago, and 10 years ago, look: create a new style - revive - complete! I sang in the revival mentioned. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 18:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
... and today Jerome Kohl, remembered in friendship -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Success Principles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
signed, Rosguill talk 18:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
I was trying to help my uncle set up a page for the Arnold Schoenberg Institute which used to be at USC, before my grandfather's archives were moved to the Arnold Schönberg Center in Vienna. You deleted it right away. Can you please let me work on it? There are plenty of sources. It is a different entity than the Center in Vienna. -- Randols ( talk) 02:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, and best wishes for 2021. This is to request you to remove the PROD tag. I am working on the article. I have more material, which I will add over the coming days. I am also hoping that other editors will help me with the History. Before starting the page, I looked up some existing articles on roads, and I believe this road is as notable as many of them. I just need a little time. Thanks a lot! Amuk ( talk) 05:33, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for your time. I see you've recently erased the entire Takkoku article which I worked on. I felt that was a little drastic, but what did you find wrong with it and is there anyway I can fix this and learn to prevent future mistakes? Thank you. Malcolm L. Mitchell ( talk) 18:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Valerii Makovetskyi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. SmartSE ( talk) 22:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
I Don't Knew How To Protect Pages So I Am Asking You
Please Protect This Pages From Heavy IP Vandalism
Please Protect This Pages Heavy Vandalism Is Been Made In This Pages By Some IP Users Dev Adhi ( talk) 06:19, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10 Lives until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
FalconK ( talk) 05:47, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
An article that been involved with ( 1983 Upper Voltan coup d'état attempt) has content that is proposed to be removed and moved to another article ( 1983 Upper Voltan coup d'état). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 17:41, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey Onel. Sorry to bug you, your talk page looks pretty busy. I'm interested in doing New Page Patrol School and I was wondering if you'd be interested in taking me on as a student. I've got about 2800 edits. I'm a pending changes reviewer (done about 300 approves, maybe a similar number of reverts) and I feel I have a pretty decent grasp of many of the core policies, including RS and NPOV. Now I'd like to shore up one of my weak areas, which is notability/deletion. NPP looks like a great way to learn about deletion, help out in a backlogged area, and master something complex. I'm currently furloughed due to COVID, so I'm available pretty much all the time on weekdays. I am wiki addicted, I am editing a lot ;) Time zone is USA Pacific. Happy to communicate off wiki, Skype screen share, whatever your training method is. Look forward to speaking further. Thank you. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 10:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Just as a heads up, I'm moving this back to mainspace. 18abruce was able to add the team that qualified the athlete. He played six games with Czech Extraliga team. I told the user in the future to make it clear as day for us on this player's and how they pass WP:NHOCKEY to avoid this in the future. Cheers Sulfurboy ( talk) 14:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
I noticed that you undid my revision, just to put a redirect on the article 2018 Northeast Conference Men's Soccer Tournament. That was unnecessary and there is no good reason for it, as there are articles with information for tournaments from other years. Having actual information and scores from the tournament are a lot better than just a redirect link, so please don't put a redirect on it. - Ajax.amsterdam.fan ( talk) 16:50, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I improved the Tatsuki Fujimoto page. Could you let me know if it is ready to be moved back to mainspace? Cheers. - Xexerss ( talk) 18:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, me again. Can you also please move Asagiro to a draft page to allow me to work on a better article? Thanks. Malcolm L. Mitchell ( talk) 20:00, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello O. I've just learned that reflinks has been resurrected. It has a couple enhancements like being able to ask it to fix more than 20 refs at a time. You do have to click on the interactive feature to make it work properly. You might already know this but, since this was the second best thing to happen today, I wanted to let you know about it just in case. Cheers!! MarnetteD| Talk 19:15, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969. Just letting you know that I have contested the speedy deletion tag you recently put on the Bejay Mulenga page as it is Not unambiguously promotional. If you have any advice on improving the article, please do share. Much appreciated. Cornelius Henson ( talk) 22:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Could you take a look at some more of his recent creations and send back a few to incubate in draftspace that aren't ready, such as ones that don't say their native range? Abductive ( reasoning) 02:12, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Why is the article Sorrels Field being nominated for deletion? - Ajax.amsterdam.fan ( talk) 15:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
I have updated the draft with references from the Moroccan official website for amateur football leagues. All league tables and results table have their own source reference below each table. Please review as soon as you can. Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vegeta228 ( talk • contribs) 19:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Please see Talk:America's Frontline Doctors. RobP ( talk) 01:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The page cited as the infringement appears to be a weird cache/mirror of Wikipedia's Tea Party Patriots page, from which the article was properly split. ViperSnake151 Talk 01:57, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Let's not argue, re whether or not lothlorien has enough notability. It DOES its one of the premier historical houses that is well known throughout the university and the biggest co-operative system in the USA. BUT I see you have a trigger finger for deleting content. Both times you deleted/redirected content, that others have put in A LOT of time into. I'm sure this is not the first time this point has been made to you. A civil way to do this would have been been for you to make your objection to the editor prior to the deletion. You failed to do this twice. So yes, your redirection has been undone. If you still want to the article to be re-directed you can formally bring up your objection to be considered by others. Rybkovich ( talk) 03:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
I started a draft about Michael Weirsky. Can you please make it a full article that is a good article or featured article, please? I would prefer it to be featured article. /info/en/?search=Draft:Michael_Weirsky — Preceding unsigned comment added by LotteryGeek ( talk • contribs) 00:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
We urgently need a Wikipedia article on the famous neuorscientist, Mikhail Lebedev. Can you please finish the article on Mikhail Lebedev this weekend? It needs to be nominated as a good or featured article within 30 days. I Already started. Please see Draft:Mikhail Lebedev (neuorscientist). — Preceding unsigned comment added by LotteryGeek ( talk • contribs) 01:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Today, you proposed to delete the article "Claude Mélançon", a Canadian naturalist who worked in the popularization of natural sciences. The references indicated initially were sufficient; however, other references have been added. I have worked hard to write this article well. Given the notoriety of this character, the proposal to erase this article is clearly exaggerated. Especially that anyone can refer on the Internet to his work of life. Please delete this unnecessary notice. -- Veillg1 ( talk) 02:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, you reverted my edits today on Jake Puckerman and I was wondering if you could give an explanation why? You said that the article had "Zero real world notability," but all of the other main characters on Glee have their own character pages, as well as some recurring characters. If it was a problem with the way it was written, I would have rather you reached out to me rather than deleting the work. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Fiscus Brady!! ( talk) 06:29, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, can I ask you something? Why did you turn this page into a redirect link? I'm new to Wikipedia, so can you point what criteria this article didn't fulfill from WP:NSONG? Thank you. Byy2 ( talk) 09:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for answering my question! Byy2 ( talk) 01:31, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you recently turned the Wikimedia Incubator page to a redirect. I think that it might be better to turn it back to the article again and let others have the ability to keep contributing to it. I don't entirely agree with the redirect, so can you please let me know what you think and what we should do about that page? Thanks. 54nd60x ( talk) 23:54, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Comparing the "source" to a March 2020 (9 months before the source was written) revision of 2010's charts also shows a match - looks like reverse copyvio to me. Cabayi ( talk) 18:02, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Just to let you know, you were listed at a arbitration request which has been since removed as premature by me. It can be viewed at this permalink. Thanks, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:51, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments, I would like to know how to express that the page is a translation from the Hebrew article on this topic, see here. The topic here is related to the sabbatical year in Israeli which will begin this September 2021 and is relevant to the contemporary life in Israel. I have been asked to explain some of the complexities of the Jewish laws pertaining to letting the agriculture grow wild - untouched - for the sabbatical year, and to review how the farmers can make living during that year. Thank you for your help in making this article better and sharing this topic to the English speaking public. Would it help to add more articles in English? I only found this one which spoke against this movement. Drkup(IMJ) (talk) 19:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, i saw you deleted the page i created and you made a redirect, why? Borteddd ( talk) 22:42, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, may I ask what do you mean with "This article does not cite any sources"? First version of the article had a lot of quotes with sources, but they were deleted by another editor. Look here: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:Cuisine_of_Odessa&oldid=997197198
Should I restore them again? Please, will you be kind to explain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wizard85 ( talk • contribs) 16:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Update March 3, 2021 Hi, I added 38 references to all significant dishes. Will you be so kind to check it and approve the article, if possible. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wizard85 ( talk • contribs) 16:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for deleting my Antim: The Final Truth Redirecting. I think that article is notable. What do i have to do to restore that article? Do i have to cite more sources?
Hyderabadi Wikipedian (
talk)
13:43, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Buiu (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 16:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I was quite surprised by the redirect of my article. The article meets the notability requirements in more than one way and I worked on this article with another experienced Wikipedia editor. I have other published album articles that follow the same format as this one. This redirect is confusing readers. Cheryl Fullerton ( talk) 00:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
This is what Wikipedia says meets the notability criteria. This album meets more than ONE of the criteria.
"Specific to recordings, a recording may be notable if it meets at least one of these criteria:
Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble who created it. This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries[note 2] except for the following: Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about the recording, and all advertising that mentions the recording, including manufacturers' advertising. Articles in a school or university newspaper (or similar), in most cases. The single or album has appeared on any country's national music chart. The recording has been certified gold or higher in at least one country. The recording has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award. The recording was performed in a medium that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article. Read the policy and notability guideline on subjects notable only for one event, for further clarifications). The recording was in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network. The recording has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or television network. Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography."
Hello,
I'm expanding the article with new sources, such as the LA Times, Salt Lake City Desseret, and others. I hope those sources are considered reliable. Also, AllMusic is considered a source for most music articles I see on Wikipedia. Is there a reason that you didn't consider it to be a good source? Also, Guitar Nine, is it considered reliable? Now, if you could help me indirect the redirect, I would be most appreciative. Regards,
Cheryl Fullerton (
talk)
20:13, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you reverted my relocation of the article “Fila (hat)” which was previously entitles “Aso Oke Hat”. I have reversed your reversion and ask that you leave the article in it’s, now correct, place.
I relocated this article because Fila is the correct term for this garment and it is never referred to as an “Aso Oke Hat” except on Wikipedia or in a few blog posts referencing this incorrectly titled article.
Fila are made with various fabrics, including aso oke, and to refer to all fila as “aso oke hats” is and incorrect, anacronistic and actually offensive. It is clearly a non-Nigerian, non-Yoruba, outsider looking in type of term which has no relevance in Yoruba, or Nigerian society or culture.
I am a subject matter expert on this subject, being Yoruba and Nigerian.
Ajisekanla ( talk) 11:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Could you please take another look? I added references to the official Switzerland Tourism website as well as outdooractive.com (Europe's largest outdoor web platform), I guess those should be reliable sources. -- MRB ( talk) 16:18, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
User @ Rosguill: removed my last post because it was uncivil. He was right to do so. You, however, have no right to delete those articles and move them to draft.
Reasons
Rosguill said I shouldn't say you deserved to be blocked BUT that's what I feel you deserve. This might just be temporary anger—very probably is—but I'm feeling it for a very good reason. You should think how you're edits affect other users who contribute in their spare time to improve WP's coverage. Edits like you're—like you did my deleting my articles from main space—kill my joy. That should really get you to think. -- Ruling party ( talk) 21:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
And there are more!
I would rather that you wrote me a message saying "Please add sources or I have to delete them" rather than moving those articles to draft. But maybe you're right. Maybe I would complain in that too. If so, I won't do it in the future. -- Ruling party ( talk) 23:56, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello User: Onel5969, I do not agree with your reset. I'm new to the enWP. Where can we clarify whether this article will be kept? BR, Asurnipal ( talk) 13:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Hii am user Behera Sahab, I noticed that you are redirected the page of Laudi Khela as per AFD, but there is more and reliable sources. Ao Please I request to you please visit this sources , before new redirecting. Thanks Behera Sahab ( talk) 16:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Since you put a notability tag at AMSCOL, you might want to see my comments at Talk:AMSCOL. (I thought it was best to have any discussion there). Adpete ( talk) 05:32, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969 I have noticed you have moved my A.P. Mine E.P. Mark VI article to draft space due to a lack of sources. I see why you did this and agree with you the article should have had more sources.All my other mine articles have been checked for at least two sources and those that did not have this had them added in. In future two sources will be the minimum for my articles. So I have implemented your feedback and will do so in future thanks for taking the time to assess my article! Anonymous contributor 1707 ( talk) 13:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC).
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SDSU Sports Deck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.