![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Hi there. When edits are obvious vandalism, for example this one, it would be more appropriate to remove the vandalism and to not add the fact tag. And on a related note, good job with the reversions! Anti venin 08:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For repeatedly reverting vandalism on my user page and tireless, outstanding work with Huggle. Anti venin 09:49, 9 March 2009 (UTC) |
Just letting you know, it is not appropriate to use I10 on images. Thanks, — neuro (talk) 21:19, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
My apologies for the entirely inappropriate vandalism warning on your userpage, sorry. Cool3 ( talk) 21:49, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my talk page. This guy is a real problem. He's taken to personal attacks and threats here and on French wikipedia, where he is suspended. Vincent ( talk) 05:05, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
An ip is again and agian reverting edits on this page.Shouldn't request for page protection. User:Yousaf465 ( talk)
![]() |
Mmm - Milk! | |
Hard work |
I got a warning on my talk page regarding an edit of bloods. I am assuming it was issued by mistake since Huggle interface could be tricky sometimes. ∏∪βiατεch 05:59, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
I am currently studying a degree in medical genetics at the University of Leicester and have been researching and questioning the chromosome number in meiosis. Using the term quaploid refers to x4 that of haploid cells, as this is what a replicated diploid is after interphase. The term is totally logically and even helps to understanding such process. It is acceptable and should be used, like that of diploid and haploid. The term diploid would not have been seen in scientific journals when first applied but now widely accepted, quaploid will be too. Fannysyouraunt2 ( talk) 10:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
I'd really like to see that article be more readable, too. The long history of that article is that it was started by an editor with a quite fringe POV on the topic, and has been hard to improve because of that.
However, there is a general principle not to change Harvard-style citations to footnotes, or vice-versa, one the style has been established. I changed them back.
I am going to see if I can improve the article some right now. If you could leave a short list of the parts you find worst on the talk page, that would be extremely helpful. — Carl ( CBM · talk) 23:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for cleaning up the Australian Maths and Science School's wikipedia page. There has been repeated vandalism on the school's page, and this has been repeatedly fixed.
However, because of repeated vandalism and reverting, the school's principal has incorrectly been changed to 'Associate Professor Jim Davies' (Jim Davies is the name of the year 12 captain) instead of Rick Astley.
I do not have the knowledge or experience to fix this myself, and if you would take the time to correct your mistake, that would be much appreciated.
Cheers,
Antony Kjiavaris Year 10 co-ordinator —Preceding unsigned comment added by Offbeatdnb ( talk • contribs) 03:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Odie5533. I left a message for you at Template talk:Future product#Small version.
And I have since updated the second example (the "Complex example") at Template:Ambox#Usage, since I realised this "small=left" stuff probably is pretty confusing. You might want to take a look at that example.
Oh, and thanks for liking the small style! I am very happy that people suggested it and got a consensus for it.
-- David Göthberg ( talk) 01:17, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Readability, mostly. Tables like that take up a lot of room with code and can be difficult to sort through. To prevent casual editors from malforming the table accidentally or intentionally, I shunted it off to a separate page. (I did a similar thing for set costs in Star Trek: The Motion Picture#Design.) Cheers, Der Wohltempierte Fuchs ( talk) 20:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
If you read this, you'll learn more. Basically, the page is a FL, so all images need to have full information. For example, this image says it is more than 70 years old but doesn't have a publication date and says the source is another wikipedia project. this one says it's PD because the author has been dead 70 years, but it doesn't name the author. And so on and so on. -- Scorpion 0422 20:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
I don't understand why you did this modification: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Scilab&diff=281051911&oldid=280407476 Thx S —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sylvestre ( talk • contribs) 11:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, please provide more details and I will do my best to fix them. I agree that it is a bit chatty and informal, but it didn't quite read as an advertisement; at least to me. User A1 ( talk) 12:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
-- Odie5533 ( talk) 13:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
2. Use of peacock words
If you are content with the changes, please could you either remove the tag, make some modifications, or reply with some suggestions. User A1 ( talk) 10:12, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Could you remove File:JohnLAndersonSignature.png? While I understand that signatures are not protected by copyright, the signatory is concerned about unauthorized use of his signature, and would appreciate its removal. It's being removed from the source page as well.
And thanks for all your work on the IIT Wikipedia pages. Iithhs ( talk) 16:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Can you come over to Talk:Aspartame controversy and be specific about what you feel is missing from the Ramazzini studies section? Is it an issue of WP:WEIGHT? Certainly, the Soffritti studies have had more detractors than they have had supporters. I know there is often a lot of drama there, but I'm pretty sure we've been making progres. Thanks. -- SV Resolution( Talk) 18:43, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
I want to know if you could create nested menu's in snipmanager. I also would like to know what program if any(for my own interest) you used to code it. Thank you. Smallman12q ( talk) 02:02, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The da Vinci Barnstar | |
I hereby award Odie5533 with The da Vinci Barnstar for outfitting his Snippet Manager user script with a ribbon GUI and for the script in general which has made adding templates 10x easier. Thanks!!! Smallman12q ( talk) 23:56, 17 May 2009 (UTC) |
I also would like to suggest that you look at a javascript compressor as more templates and code will be added...you could decrease the size by more than 25%. compression comparison, CSS compressor, dynamic tools, compressor, white space compactor, yahoo, more Again, I would like to thank you for your continued support and response. Cheers!! Smallman12q ( talk) 22:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
//{'title':'Reference name:', 'code':'ref', 'help':'Add a reference name.'}
var insertText;
var testforref = form0]['prepend'
if(testforref.search("<ref>") != -1)//it is a ref
{
if(inputs1].value.length > 0)//first one should always be ref name //split
insertText = "<ref name = " + inputs1].value + ">" + testforref.slice(5,-1);//tale out <ref>
else
insertText = "<ref>" + form0]['prepend'];
}
else//not a ref
{
insertText = form0]['prepend'];
}
var i = 1;
for (i in inputs) {
var inp = inputsi];
if (inp.value && inp.value.length > 0) {
insertText += '|' + inp.className + '=' + inp.value;
}
}
insertText += form0]['append'];
insertTags(insertText, '', '');
}
I'm not sure if the code will run, but the idea to reserve the 1 row in the array for reference name if its a reference. Let me know if it can implemented. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smallman12q ( talk • contribs) 01:32, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
'code':'%ref'
e.g. {'title':'Reference name:', 'code':'%ref', 'help':'Add a reference name.'}
. Also, it doesn't matter if you put it as the first field or not. --
Odie5533 (
talk) 03:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)In order to make adding templates easier, the parameter creation should be automated as much as possible. I have noticed that most of the documentation for templates follows an order which can be seen as follows which comes from Template:Cite_video_game.
<a name="Required_parameters" id="Required_parameters"></a>
<h4><span class="mw-headline">Required parameters</span></h4>
<ul>
<li><b>title</b>: Title of the game.</li>
<li><b>developer</b>: Developer of the game.</li>
</ul>
<a name="Optional_parameters" id="Optional_parameters"></a>
<h4><span class="mw-headline">Optional parameters</span></h4>
<ul>
<li><b>date</b>: Full date of publication of the specified version, in <a href="/wikipedia/en/wiki/ISO_8601" title="ISO 8601">ISO 8601</a> YYYY-MM-DD format, eg. <i>2006-02-17</i>. Must not be wikilinked.</li>
<li><b>publisher</b>: Publisher, if applicable to translation/edition</li>
<li><b>language</b>: language of publication</li>
<li><b>isolang</b>: If <i><code>language</code></i> is different than "English", add the <a href="/wikipedia/en/wiki/ISO_639" title="ISO 639">ISO 639</a> code for the language to automatically add a <a href="/wikipedia/en/wiki/Category:Language_icons" title="Category:Language icons">language icon</a> in front of the ref</li>
<li><b>version</b>: version, if applicable</li>
<li><b>platform</b>: platform, if applicable to the reference. (If citing something that is the same across all versions, this is unnecessary)</li>
<li><b>quote</b>: the quote that is used as the reference</li>
</ul>
I have managed to somewhat automate the "prepend" line with my own script(it doesn't work in greasemonkey), but I'm not very good at coding in javascript anymore. Each option is in bold and has its own line. There is a very logical pattern, but I don't quite have the skill to code it at the moment. (From what I see, it should be a very short script, I just don't know the functions and objects to use.) I hope I'm not becoming a nuisance, but I believe that providing a better method of filling in and using templates would be a major boon to wikipedians. Thank you. Smallman12q ( talk) 01:41, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
/{{{([^}\|]+)[^}]*}}}/
and find the parameters. --
Odie5533 (
talk) 02:43, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
[Python source removed] I've made it into a loop...and added a template link. It currently catches the code/parameters, but not the help. It's a start. Thanks again!!! Smallman12q ( talk) 00:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Could you add Infobox Person? Thanks, The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 23:36, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Class of Heroes at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --
TitanOne (
talk) 05:43, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Mifter ( talk) 02:35, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 02:35, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
I received the following message from you:
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Omar Bravo. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Odie5533 (talk) 19:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Just to let you know... I never made such an edit. In fact, I've never been to that page before receiving the above message
MistWing SilverTail —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.55.102.20 ( talk) 03:51, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
I think frameworks and especially PHP frameworks proliferation is becoming unacceptable as people is using Wikipedia to spam their products. This - List of web application frameworks - is a good start to find this kind of articles, however the amount of articles to check is huge, could you help me? Is there a place where I can ask help for this?
Thank you.
-- Ekerazha ( talk) 08:43, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for revert on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 04:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on 4 classification of color because the criteria you used, A3, is solely for articles which contain "no content whatsoever, or [consist] only of external links, category tags, a "see also" section, a rephrasing of the title, an attempt to correspond with the person or group named by its title, chat-like comments and/or images." Since the article contained material which was none of those A3 doesn't apply.
I agree with you that deletion is desirable though, so I've added a WP:PROD.
Cheers, Olaf Davis ( talk) 08:30, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing vandalism to my userpage. Grim23 ★ 19:00, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
True, being bold can get you mixed results. For example, Dave the Barbarian (character) was solely in-universe, and I redirected without opposition. But Red (song) had required AfD. In the end though, those that work save a lot of time and editor resources. And if another editor really disagrees with my decision, then in the collaborative nature, an AfD is a good thing, makes the decision more concrete. So, I've never had a bad experience with it. Cheers! Scapler ( talk) 05:49, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Oh well, I guess WP:ILIKEIT sometimes wins over writing an encyclopedia with real information; debate reminded me of WP:POKEMON. I have found a lot of South Park, King of the Hill, etc. articles with no real-world information, but I am discouraged to try to fix that, because there seem to be a lot of people who think every aspect of their favorite show is notable. Sigh..... Cheers! Scapler ( talk) 17:47, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Technically, it wasn't my first. I just forgot I didn't log in. (Reffering to the Lancelot and Guinevere page argument... lol) Goku1st ( talk • contribs) 20:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
The quote from the cartoon character Larry King calling Watson and 'incompetent media whore' is why the episode was called Whale Whores. I'm restoring a shorter quote to the plot. Alatari ( talk) 07:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Please stop removing sourced information. Alatari ( talk) 03:43, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 23:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
You argued persuasively to keep this article; could you take a whack at putting it into proper form? -- Orange Mike | Talk 14:48, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Odie, I noticed that you recently marked the template {{ merged-from}} as deprecated, and I just wanted to ask when/why that decision was made. Since I've used this one before I probably need to know why {{ Copied}} is better. Also, in case you need to update it, Help:Merging and moving pages still lists it as an option. Thanks,
-- Joren ( talk) 07:51, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
The season 7 debate has been closed so I can't answer there, but 'Benderama' is listed as an unscheduled episode for season 6 on the season 6 page. Look harder. Omega cyber turnip ( talk) 00:37, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ―Œ ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣ 04:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
For what it is worth, I think you are misapplying policy when you cite WP:GNG to justify deletion when more specific guidelines support inclusion. For a music band, for example, deletion debates are readily settled by referencing WP:BAND instead of WP:GNG, with the most straightforward criterion for inclusion being "Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart." It is not even two-thirds of the way through this month, and http://stats.grok.se/ says It's a Black President, Huey Freeman has already received more than 7000 hits. So why delete, when the specific inclusion policy that applies is Wikipedia:Notability_(serial_works) and it states that "An episode of a television series is likely to be notable if it has achieved one of the following conditions:" and one of those conditions is "The episode has been critically reviewed from a reliable secondary source" (my emphasis). That condition had been unequivocally satisfied. I do not understand your priorities here when there are so many other TV episode articles on Wiki that do not satisfy the clear specific inclusion condition and are significantly lower traffic. Bdell555 ( talk) 21:27, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the notice. I appreciate the heads up. On one hand I disagree (partly because I created it, and partly because I'm an inclusionist). On the other hand, in the 4 years since this was created, we've probably advanced further on defining what should, and shouldn't, be here. I'll have to research this. Perhaps Clouds of Saturn should be merged to McCollum ... but what should McCollum be merged to ... I hate to loose content completely. Nfitz ( talk) 20:40, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
I'm finally getting a chance to look at this. Doesn't he satisty WP:AUTHOR? He seems to meet criteria 3. The person has created a collective body of work, that has been the subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.. His work in the late 1990s and 2000s doesn't do much, but his work in the 1980s and early of 1990s was widely reviewed in various publications at the time. As for "The Clouds of Saturn" surely it should simply be merged into Michael McCollum. Nfitz ( talk) 05:38, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
I found this site [1] which has a downloadable database of reviews from Analog. There should be reviews for him, but I don't have these magazines. If you or someone else has access, they might prove his notability:
-- Odie5533 ( talk) 17:05, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. Could I get you to comment on this discussion? Thanks :) -- œ ™ 08:48, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Odie, I have reviewed your nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Desktop Dungeons and there is a small issue that I noticed. Could you read my comments at the nomination page and reply there? Thanks. Crisco 1492 ( talk) 12:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 3 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fisher's Ghost (film), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1924 Australian silent film Fisher's Ghost was not shown in Sydney because it was deemed "too gruesome"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fisher's Ghost (film).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thank you from me and the wiki Victuallers ( talk) 08:03, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Odie, I have reviewed your nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Myth III: The Wolf Age and want your feedback on yet another ALT before approving it. I will also be adding box art to the article. Please reply at the nomination page. Thanks! Crisco 1492 ( talk) 07:34, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Is there a reason I can't provide more information about the library, and not have it removed? I'm not sure how public information such as our hours, location, and mission statement are biased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JCarlsonUPL ( talk • contribs) 14:34, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 6 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Desktop Dungeons, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a clone of Desktop Dungeons was released for the iPhone before the developers had even finished the game? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Desktop Dungeons.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
I blocked the IP who just vandalized your user page for 31 hours. Would you like me to protect your user page? There's not really any reason for anyone other than you to edit it, and especially not IP editors. They would still be able to edit your talk page in case they had questions of complaints, but at least it would keep the unnecessary vandalism. Qwyrxian ( talk) 06:56, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Good morning. I do not know who you are, but would like to know why you have edited my page by deleting several things I added yesterday. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olmos64 ( talk • contribs) 07:18, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thanks for helping me against vandalism! Avoided ( talk) 14:48, 7 September 2011 (UTC) |
how can "pull it" mean evacuate firefighters , when there were none in the building , and why not then " pull THEM" not "pull IT" ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.219.229.7 ( talk) 15:04, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello Odie5533! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 23:46, 7 September 2011 (UTC) |
![]() | On 8 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Myth III: The Wolf Age, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the developers of Myth III: The Wolf Age turned their Fear & Loathing into Vengeance for the modding community? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Myth III: The Wolf Age.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:03, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Doesn't an article start with the original owners? I have been trying with difficulty to get some information set up and to bring it out in the open for the Void. I mentioned it is still in development and whenever I get some players in they will most likely add more info to the WIKI page here. How do I remove the Scheduled for Deletion? And I would like to see where it says that a page cannot be written by their "owners" as a rule. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Foofah ( talk • contribs) 08:54, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi - it actually appears to be in transliterated Urdu , and about a place in Punjab, Pakistan. I don't think that's going to save it from deletion, however! -- Shirt58 ( talk) 05:12, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 11 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article University of Lomé, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the University of Lomé is the largest university in the African country of Togo with a student body of roughly 40,000? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/University of Lomé.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 16:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
I'm looking through the stuff you mentioned and there is one point I'd like to follow up on. You asked if the game could be completed without saving the princess. I can say that it can, but I would have to cite the game itself (or leave it uncited with the assumption that its the game the article is talking about). The story changes slightly. I'm not sure given how unlikely that is to occur, if that would be considered something that would require a secondary source. If so, there is no RS that covers that; if not, like I said, I can use the game itself. 陣 内 Jinnai 19:44, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 17 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article How to Train Your Dragon (franchise), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that DreamWorks plans to produce at least three films in the How to Train Your Dragon franchise? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/How to Train Your Dragon (franchise).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers ( talk) 00:03, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey saw you helped fix the FC Twin page. Very cool. I'm trying to help. I'm adding all the games I test personally so hopefully we can make the page a little more detailed and accurate!! Anyway I am assuming you're a gamer as well. Yes?
Akasha&Alucard ( talk) 02:36, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Well I tested the majority of them personally, and others I watched get tested on YouTube and such. How do I provide a citation for the lists? I'd hate to have all my work be deleted. Is there an easier way to talk here than using this thing? Very frustrating trying to get used to it lol. Akasha&Alucard ( talk) 00:07, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 21 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Go Vacation, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that if Go Vacation players get bored of scuba diving they can throw pies at each other? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Go Vacation.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 08:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Man, you suck. This whole wiki shit is absolute crap.
Hi! I started a thread on WP:RSN more than a week ago regarding the reliability of Patrin and Hammer to Nail for their usage in articles on indi cinema and the Roma. I have got only one response so far, but that is from an editor already involved with Korkoro. What is your say on this? morelM William 05:22, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Odie, thanks for the message! Do you know if there is a way for me to move that page ? I'm not clear what WP's mechanism is for creating pages, and have no idea how to move them, but I'd really like to know.
By the by, what did you think of the idea? ( eg having a list of might-not-be-credible sources ) Was the idea clear, did the description make sense to you? thanks, Jjk ( talk) 16:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Congratulations on placing in the September Dab Challenge. Thank you for taking the time to improve the inter-article navigation within our project. Just wanted to let you know that your efforts do not go unnoticed and are appreciated. ( Guyinblack25 talk 18:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC))
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Hi there. When edits are obvious vandalism, for example this one, it would be more appropriate to remove the vandalism and to not add the fact tag. And on a related note, good job with the reversions! Anti venin 08:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For repeatedly reverting vandalism on my user page and tireless, outstanding work with Huggle. Anti venin 09:49, 9 March 2009 (UTC) |
Just letting you know, it is not appropriate to use I10 on images. Thanks, — neuro (talk) 21:19, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
My apologies for the entirely inappropriate vandalism warning on your userpage, sorry. Cool3 ( talk) 21:49, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my talk page. This guy is a real problem. He's taken to personal attacks and threats here and on French wikipedia, where he is suspended. Vincent ( talk) 05:05, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
An ip is again and agian reverting edits on this page.Shouldn't request for page protection. User:Yousaf465 ( talk)
![]() |
Mmm - Milk! | |
Hard work |
I got a warning on my talk page regarding an edit of bloods. I am assuming it was issued by mistake since Huggle interface could be tricky sometimes. ∏∪βiατεch 05:59, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
I am currently studying a degree in medical genetics at the University of Leicester and have been researching and questioning the chromosome number in meiosis. Using the term quaploid refers to x4 that of haploid cells, as this is what a replicated diploid is after interphase. The term is totally logically and even helps to understanding such process. It is acceptable and should be used, like that of diploid and haploid. The term diploid would not have been seen in scientific journals when first applied but now widely accepted, quaploid will be too. Fannysyouraunt2 ( talk) 10:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
I'd really like to see that article be more readable, too. The long history of that article is that it was started by an editor with a quite fringe POV on the topic, and has been hard to improve because of that.
However, there is a general principle not to change Harvard-style citations to footnotes, or vice-versa, one the style has been established. I changed them back.
I am going to see if I can improve the article some right now. If you could leave a short list of the parts you find worst on the talk page, that would be extremely helpful. — Carl ( CBM · talk) 23:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for cleaning up the Australian Maths and Science School's wikipedia page. There has been repeated vandalism on the school's page, and this has been repeatedly fixed.
However, because of repeated vandalism and reverting, the school's principal has incorrectly been changed to 'Associate Professor Jim Davies' (Jim Davies is the name of the year 12 captain) instead of Rick Astley.
I do not have the knowledge or experience to fix this myself, and if you would take the time to correct your mistake, that would be much appreciated.
Cheers,
Antony Kjiavaris Year 10 co-ordinator —Preceding unsigned comment added by Offbeatdnb ( talk • contribs) 03:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Odie5533. I left a message for you at Template talk:Future product#Small version.
And I have since updated the second example (the "Complex example") at Template:Ambox#Usage, since I realised this "small=left" stuff probably is pretty confusing. You might want to take a look at that example.
Oh, and thanks for liking the small style! I am very happy that people suggested it and got a consensus for it.
-- David Göthberg ( talk) 01:17, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Readability, mostly. Tables like that take up a lot of room with code and can be difficult to sort through. To prevent casual editors from malforming the table accidentally or intentionally, I shunted it off to a separate page. (I did a similar thing for set costs in Star Trek: The Motion Picture#Design.) Cheers, Der Wohltempierte Fuchs ( talk) 20:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
If you read this, you'll learn more. Basically, the page is a FL, so all images need to have full information. For example, this image says it is more than 70 years old but doesn't have a publication date and says the source is another wikipedia project. this one says it's PD because the author has been dead 70 years, but it doesn't name the author. And so on and so on. -- Scorpion 0422 20:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
I don't understand why you did this modification: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Scilab&diff=281051911&oldid=280407476 Thx S —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sylvestre ( talk • contribs) 11:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, please provide more details and I will do my best to fix them. I agree that it is a bit chatty and informal, but it didn't quite read as an advertisement; at least to me. User A1 ( talk) 12:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
-- Odie5533 ( talk) 13:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
2. Use of peacock words
If you are content with the changes, please could you either remove the tag, make some modifications, or reply with some suggestions. User A1 ( talk) 10:12, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Could you remove File:JohnLAndersonSignature.png? While I understand that signatures are not protected by copyright, the signatory is concerned about unauthorized use of his signature, and would appreciate its removal. It's being removed from the source page as well.
And thanks for all your work on the IIT Wikipedia pages. Iithhs ( talk) 16:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Can you come over to Talk:Aspartame controversy and be specific about what you feel is missing from the Ramazzini studies section? Is it an issue of WP:WEIGHT? Certainly, the Soffritti studies have had more detractors than they have had supporters. I know there is often a lot of drama there, but I'm pretty sure we've been making progres. Thanks. -- SV Resolution( Talk) 18:43, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
I want to know if you could create nested menu's in snipmanager. I also would like to know what program if any(for my own interest) you used to code it. Thank you. Smallman12q ( talk) 02:02, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The da Vinci Barnstar | |
I hereby award Odie5533 with The da Vinci Barnstar for outfitting his Snippet Manager user script with a ribbon GUI and for the script in general which has made adding templates 10x easier. Thanks!!! Smallman12q ( talk) 23:56, 17 May 2009 (UTC) |
I also would like to suggest that you look at a javascript compressor as more templates and code will be added...you could decrease the size by more than 25%. compression comparison, CSS compressor, dynamic tools, compressor, white space compactor, yahoo, more Again, I would like to thank you for your continued support and response. Cheers!! Smallman12q ( talk) 22:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
//{'title':'Reference name:', 'code':'ref', 'help':'Add a reference name.'}
var insertText;
var testforref = form0]['prepend'
if(testforref.search("<ref>") != -1)//it is a ref
{
if(inputs1].value.length > 0)//first one should always be ref name //split
insertText = "<ref name = " + inputs1].value + ">" + testforref.slice(5,-1);//tale out <ref>
else
insertText = "<ref>" + form0]['prepend'];
}
else//not a ref
{
insertText = form0]['prepend'];
}
var i = 1;
for (i in inputs) {
var inp = inputsi];
if (inp.value && inp.value.length > 0) {
insertText += '|' + inp.className + '=' + inp.value;
}
}
insertText += form0]['append'];
insertTags(insertText, '', '');
}
I'm not sure if the code will run, but the idea to reserve the 1 row in the array for reference name if its a reference. Let me know if it can implemented. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smallman12q ( talk • contribs) 01:32, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
'code':'%ref'
e.g. {'title':'Reference name:', 'code':'%ref', 'help':'Add a reference name.'}
. Also, it doesn't matter if you put it as the first field or not. --
Odie5533 (
talk) 03:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)In order to make adding templates easier, the parameter creation should be automated as much as possible. I have noticed that most of the documentation for templates follows an order which can be seen as follows which comes from Template:Cite_video_game.
<a name="Required_parameters" id="Required_parameters"></a>
<h4><span class="mw-headline">Required parameters</span></h4>
<ul>
<li><b>title</b>: Title of the game.</li>
<li><b>developer</b>: Developer of the game.</li>
</ul>
<a name="Optional_parameters" id="Optional_parameters"></a>
<h4><span class="mw-headline">Optional parameters</span></h4>
<ul>
<li><b>date</b>: Full date of publication of the specified version, in <a href="/wikipedia/en/wiki/ISO_8601" title="ISO 8601">ISO 8601</a> YYYY-MM-DD format, eg. <i>2006-02-17</i>. Must not be wikilinked.</li>
<li><b>publisher</b>: Publisher, if applicable to translation/edition</li>
<li><b>language</b>: language of publication</li>
<li><b>isolang</b>: If <i><code>language</code></i> is different than "English", add the <a href="/wikipedia/en/wiki/ISO_639" title="ISO 639">ISO 639</a> code for the language to automatically add a <a href="/wikipedia/en/wiki/Category:Language_icons" title="Category:Language icons">language icon</a> in front of the ref</li>
<li><b>version</b>: version, if applicable</li>
<li><b>platform</b>: platform, if applicable to the reference. (If citing something that is the same across all versions, this is unnecessary)</li>
<li><b>quote</b>: the quote that is used as the reference</li>
</ul>
I have managed to somewhat automate the "prepend" line with my own script(it doesn't work in greasemonkey), but I'm not very good at coding in javascript anymore. Each option is in bold and has its own line. There is a very logical pattern, but I don't quite have the skill to code it at the moment. (From what I see, it should be a very short script, I just don't know the functions and objects to use.) I hope I'm not becoming a nuisance, but I believe that providing a better method of filling in and using templates would be a major boon to wikipedians. Thank you. Smallman12q ( talk) 01:41, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
/{{{([^}\|]+)[^}]*}}}/
and find the parameters. --
Odie5533 (
talk) 02:43, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
[Python source removed] I've made it into a loop...and added a template link. It currently catches the code/parameters, but not the help. It's a start. Thanks again!!! Smallman12q ( talk) 00:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Could you add Infobox Person? Thanks, The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 23:36, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Class of Heroes at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --
TitanOne (
talk) 05:43, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Mifter ( talk) 02:35, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 02:35, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
I received the following message from you:
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Omar Bravo. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Odie5533 (talk) 19:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Just to let you know... I never made such an edit. In fact, I've never been to that page before receiving the above message
MistWing SilverTail —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.55.102.20 ( talk) 03:51, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
I think frameworks and especially PHP frameworks proliferation is becoming unacceptable as people is using Wikipedia to spam their products. This - List of web application frameworks - is a good start to find this kind of articles, however the amount of articles to check is huge, could you help me? Is there a place where I can ask help for this?
Thank you.
-- Ekerazha ( talk) 08:43, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for revert on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 04:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on 4 classification of color because the criteria you used, A3, is solely for articles which contain "no content whatsoever, or [consist] only of external links, category tags, a "see also" section, a rephrasing of the title, an attempt to correspond with the person or group named by its title, chat-like comments and/or images." Since the article contained material which was none of those A3 doesn't apply.
I agree with you that deletion is desirable though, so I've added a WP:PROD.
Cheers, Olaf Davis ( talk) 08:30, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing vandalism to my userpage. Grim23 ★ 19:00, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
True, being bold can get you mixed results. For example, Dave the Barbarian (character) was solely in-universe, and I redirected without opposition. But Red (song) had required AfD. In the end though, those that work save a lot of time and editor resources. And if another editor really disagrees with my decision, then in the collaborative nature, an AfD is a good thing, makes the decision more concrete. So, I've never had a bad experience with it. Cheers! Scapler ( talk) 05:49, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Oh well, I guess WP:ILIKEIT sometimes wins over writing an encyclopedia with real information; debate reminded me of WP:POKEMON. I have found a lot of South Park, King of the Hill, etc. articles with no real-world information, but I am discouraged to try to fix that, because there seem to be a lot of people who think every aspect of their favorite show is notable. Sigh..... Cheers! Scapler ( talk) 17:47, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Technically, it wasn't my first. I just forgot I didn't log in. (Reffering to the Lancelot and Guinevere page argument... lol) Goku1st ( talk • contribs) 20:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
The quote from the cartoon character Larry King calling Watson and 'incompetent media whore' is why the episode was called Whale Whores. I'm restoring a shorter quote to the plot. Alatari ( talk) 07:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Please stop removing sourced information. Alatari ( talk) 03:43, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 23:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
You argued persuasively to keep this article; could you take a whack at putting it into proper form? -- Orange Mike | Talk 14:48, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Odie, I noticed that you recently marked the template {{ merged-from}} as deprecated, and I just wanted to ask when/why that decision was made. Since I've used this one before I probably need to know why {{ Copied}} is better. Also, in case you need to update it, Help:Merging and moving pages still lists it as an option. Thanks,
-- Joren ( talk) 07:51, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
The season 7 debate has been closed so I can't answer there, but 'Benderama' is listed as an unscheduled episode for season 6 on the season 6 page. Look harder. Omega cyber turnip ( talk) 00:37, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ―Œ ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣ 04:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
For what it is worth, I think you are misapplying policy when you cite WP:GNG to justify deletion when more specific guidelines support inclusion. For a music band, for example, deletion debates are readily settled by referencing WP:BAND instead of WP:GNG, with the most straightforward criterion for inclusion being "Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart." It is not even two-thirds of the way through this month, and http://stats.grok.se/ says It's a Black President, Huey Freeman has already received more than 7000 hits. So why delete, when the specific inclusion policy that applies is Wikipedia:Notability_(serial_works) and it states that "An episode of a television series is likely to be notable if it has achieved one of the following conditions:" and one of those conditions is "The episode has been critically reviewed from a reliable secondary source" (my emphasis). That condition had been unequivocally satisfied. I do not understand your priorities here when there are so many other TV episode articles on Wiki that do not satisfy the clear specific inclusion condition and are significantly lower traffic. Bdell555 ( talk) 21:27, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the notice. I appreciate the heads up. On one hand I disagree (partly because I created it, and partly because I'm an inclusionist). On the other hand, in the 4 years since this was created, we've probably advanced further on defining what should, and shouldn't, be here. I'll have to research this. Perhaps Clouds of Saturn should be merged to McCollum ... but what should McCollum be merged to ... I hate to loose content completely. Nfitz ( talk) 20:40, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
I'm finally getting a chance to look at this. Doesn't he satisty WP:AUTHOR? He seems to meet criteria 3. The person has created a collective body of work, that has been the subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.. His work in the late 1990s and 2000s doesn't do much, but his work in the 1980s and early of 1990s was widely reviewed in various publications at the time. As for "The Clouds of Saturn" surely it should simply be merged into Michael McCollum. Nfitz ( talk) 05:38, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
I found this site [1] which has a downloadable database of reviews from Analog. There should be reviews for him, but I don't have these magazines. If you or someone else has access, they might prove his notability:
-- Odie5533 ( talk) 17:05, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. Could I get you to comment on this discussion? Thanks :) -- œ ™ 08:48, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Odie, I have reviewed your nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Desktop Dungeons and there is a small issue that I noticed. Could you read my comments at the nomination page and reply there? Thanks. Crisco 1492 ( talk) 12:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 3 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fisher's Ghost (film), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1924 Australian silent film Fisher's Ghost was not shown in Sydney because it was deemed "too gruesome"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fisher's Ghost (film).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thank you from me and the wiki Victuallers ( talk) 08:03, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Odie, I have reviewed your nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Myth III: The Wolf Age and want your feedback on yet another ALT before approving it. I will also be adding box art to the article. Please reply at the nomination page. Thanks! Crisco 1492 ( talk) 07:34, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Is there a reason I can't provide more information about the library, and not have it removed? I'm not sure how public information such as our hours, location, and mission statement are biased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JCarlsonUPL ( talk • contribs) 14:34, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 6 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Desktop Dungeons, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a clone of Desktop Dungeons was released for the iPhone before the developers had even finished the game? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Desktop Dungeons.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
I blocked the IP who just vandalized your user page for 31 hours. Would you like me to protect your user page? There's not really any reason for anyone other than you to edit it, and especially not IP editors. They would still be able to edit your talk page in case they had questions of complaints, but at least it would keep the unnecessary vandalism. Qwyrxian ( talk) 06:56, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Good morning. I do not know who you are, but would like to know why you have edited my page by deleting several things I added yesterday. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olmos64 ( talk • contribs) 07:18, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thanks for helping me against vandalism! Avoided ( talk) 14:48, 7 September 2011 (UTC) |
how can "pull it" mean evacuate firefighters , when there were none in the building , and why not then " pull THEM" not "pull IT" ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.219.229.7 ( talk) 15:04, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello Odie5533! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 23:46, 7 September 2011 (UTC) |
![]() | On 8 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Myth III: The Wolf Age, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the developers of Myth III: The Wolf Age turned their Fear & Loathing into Vengeance for the modding community? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Myth III: The Wolf Age.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:03, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Doesn't an article start with the original owners? I have been trying with difficulty to get some information set up and to bring it out in the open for the Void. I mentioned it is still in development and whenever I get some players in they will most likely add more info to the WIKI page here. How do I remove the Scheduled for Deletion? And I would like to see where it says that a page cannot be written by their "owners" as a rule. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Foofah ( talk • contribs) 08:54, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi - it actually appears to be in transliterated Urdu , and about a place in Punjab, Pakistan. I don't think that's going to save it from deletion, however! -- Shirt58 ( talk) 05:12, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 11 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article University of Lomé, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the University of Lomé is the largest university in the African country of Togo with a student body of roughly 40,000? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/University of Lomé.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 16:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
I'm looking through the stuff you mentioned and there is one point I'd like to follow up on. You asked if the game could be completed without saving the princess. I can say that it can, but I would have to cite the game itself (or leave it uncited with the assumption that its the game the article is talking about). The story changes slightly. I'm not sure given how unlikely that is to occur, if that would be considered something that would require a secondary source. If so, there is no RS that covers that; if not, like I said, I can use the game itself. 陣 内 Jinnai 19:44, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 17 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article How to Train Your Dragon (franchise), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that DreamWorks plans to produce at least three films in the How to Train Your Dragon franchise? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/How to Train Your Dragon (franchise).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers ( talk) 00:03, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey saw you helped fix the FC Twin page. Very cool. I'm trying to help. I'm adding all the games I test personally so hopefully we can make the page a little more detailed and accurate!! Anyway I am assuming you're a gamer as well. Yes?
Akasha&Alucard ( talk) 02:36, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Well I tested the majority of them personally, and others I watched get tested on YouTube and such. How do I provide a citation for the lists? I'd hate to have all my work be deleted. Is there an easier way to talk here than using this thing? Very frustrating trying to get used to it lol. Akasha&Alucard ( talk) 00:07, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 21 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Go Vacation, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that if Go Vacation players get bored of scuba diving they can throw pies at each other? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Go Vacation.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 08:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Man, you suck. This whole wiki shit is absolute crap.
Hi! I started a thread on WP:RSN more than a week ago regarding the reliability of Patrin and Hammer to Nail for their usage in articles on indi cinema and the Roma. I have got only one response so far, but that is from an editor already involved with Korkoro. What is your say on this? morelM William 05:22, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Odie, thanks for the message! Do you know if there is a way for me to move that page ? I'm not clear what WP's mechanism is for creating pages, and have no idea how to move them, but I'd really like to know.
By the by, what did you think of the idea? ( eg having a list of might-not-be-credible sources ) Was the idea clear, did the description make sense to you? thanks, Jjk ( talk) 16:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Congratulations on placing in the September Dab Challenge. Thank you for taking the time to improve the inter-article navigation within our project. Just wanted to let you know that your efforts do not go unnoticed and are appreciated. ( Guyinblack25 talk 18:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC))