Hi, I appreciate the work you are doing creating articles for Frederica von Stade albums, but please note that they fail the notability criteria for albums at WP:NALBUMS – they need independent sources such as critical reviews from established music magazines (not blogs). Ms. von Stade is extremely famous, of course, but that doesn't mean all her albums are entitled to an article. If all you can find is the liner notes of the album, then that's an indication that they don't pass WP:NALBUM and will be redirected to Ms von Stade's article instead. Richard3120 ( talk) 02:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
{{re|Person's user name}}
or {{ping|Person's user name}}
– this will come up as a message at the top of the page (where the bell is) when they next log in, notifying them that they have a message. The exception to this is that you don't need to add this code if you are writing on the talk page of the person you are notifying... Wikipedia automatically notifies the person that they have a message on their talk page anyway, so it's redundant. So for example you will have received a notification that someone (me) has written on your talk page, without me having to notify you manually, and if you want to reply to this message and let me know that you've replied, start your message with {{re|Richard3120}}
. You'll also see I've indented the replies using colons, which makes it easier to see when someone different is writing.Regarding the edit summary of your edit at Le nozze di Figaro (Georg Solti recording): the guideline at MOS:ELLIPSIS suggests that square brackets should only be used when needed to clarify that they are not part of the quotation; otherwise, they are not to be used. -- Michael Bednarek ( talk) 05:10, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Good work on your article Chérubin (Pinchas Steinberg recording).
![]() |
The article Roly Drower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:N
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
∯WBG
converse
15:18, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for addressing the copy via concerns in your articles. Good work! I hope you will continue to create album articles in future. I also wanted to let you know that there is nothing preventing you from participating in the AFD discussion pages on the articles you created. I suggest reading through others comments in the AFDs and any relevant policies (such as WP:NALBUM) to understand what sort of language people use before commenting in case you choose to participate. Hope to see you around at WP:WikiProject Opera. 4meter4 ( talk) 15:28, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Path slopu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Dardanus (Raymond Leppard recording) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
help desk.
PATH
SLOPU
16:44, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Werther (Colin Davis recording). Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges.
PATH
SLOPU
16:45, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Frederica von Stade chante Monteverdi & Cavalli (recording), you may be
blocked from editing.
PATH
SLOPU
16:47, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi Niggle1892. Just letting you know that it's frowned upon to vote more than once in an AFD conversation. If you have additional evidence to add as to why something should be kept, "comment" is the proper term to use once you have already voted. Best wishes. 4meter4 ( talk) 13:39, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi greetings, I'd like to give you a suggestion. It seems that you are removing the messages from the talk you have read. It is better to archive the talk page rather than removing the threads. Best.-- PATH SLOPU 14:35, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
What about of this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.170.126.199 ( talk) 20:18, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Niggle1892
Can you do Don Giovanni (Herbert von Karajan January 1985 recording)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.32.27.135 ( talk) 18:43, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Well, I’m waiting for Don Giovanni (Herbert von Karajan January 1985 recording). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.236.17.153 ( talk) 19:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
So, I’m still waiting for Don Giovanni (Herbert von Karajan January 1985 recording) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.77.112.64 ( talk) 19:11, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Don't worry, you can order that on amazon.com [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.77.112.64 ( talk) 17:54, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
I just waiting for Don Giovanni (Herbert von Karajan January 1985 recording). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.32.24.12 ( talk) 15:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Niggle1892
Thank you for creating On the Town (Michael Tilson Thomas recording).
User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for this new article. In most cases the title of the article should include "(Michael Tilson Thomas album)" but the conventions might be different for classical recordings.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
--- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 22:22, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Great job with Glyndebourne Festival Opera: a Gala Evening! Regards, SshibumXZ ( talk · contribs). 15:17, 12 January 2020 (UTC) |
Hello, Niggle1892
Thank you for creating New Year's Eve Concert 1992: Richard Strauss Gala.
User:Cwmhiraeth, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
A comprehensive and well-written article.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:57, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello Niggle1892, we haven't spoken for a while... I'm sorry you had issues back in September with an editor nominating your articles for deletion – I wasn't deliberately ignoring you at the time, I was on holiday and not logging in to Wikipedia, and so I didn't see all the kerfuffle until I got back home. But as you saw, the deletion nominations were shot down pretty quickly, as I thought they would be... as I said before, once an article has two or three good quality sources in it, very few editors will vote to recommend deletion, although they may suggest improvements.
Looking at New Year's Eve Concert 1992: Richard Strauss Gala, one thing I wanted to make you aware of is that the first five references are to other Wikipedia articles, and this is not allowed – see WP:CIRCULAR. You will need to replace these with other reliable sources that back up the statements in the text. But your articles are generally well written, so please carry on... I see that you have won the approval of at least one experienced and well-respected editor above! Richard3120 ( talk) 18:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, but this will not do. 200k on a singer, including every single detail recounted in lively prose--we are here for biographies, not for book-length documents. Drmies ( talk) 23:07, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
@ Gerda Arendt: As you see, I've taken at least some of your good advice! But as for doing any further work on Frederica von Stade in userspace, draftspace or anywhere else, never say never, but I can't imagine returning to the article any time soon. I've already spent so much time on it that I've fallen months behind in every other part of my life: I have a foot-high stack of correspondence to attend to, dozens of magazines to read, a shelf of Blu-rays still in their cellophane, dozens of films in my television's hard drive waiting for me to watch them. (My von Stade addiction is as nothing compared to my love of fantasy and science fiction books, films and television shows, which is why I borrowed my username from Leaf by Niggle by J. R. R. Tolkien (b. 1892)!) If I do ever attempt any more Flicka-ology, it'll probably be safely beyond the reach of Softlavender's and Drmies's chainsaws in a discography-cum-biography e-book for Amazon's Kindle. (With lots of pictures! And original research! And primary sources! And English that doesn't read like the label of a sauce bottle! And many other things that on Wikipedia are verboten.) I can already imagine Frederica von Stade: a life in music's first review, bitterly complaining that the shameless author has simply lifted much of his awful book from FvS's excellent Wikipedia bio. Niggle1892 ( talk) 16:13, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
@ Gerda Arendt: I've done as you suggested and copied my last revision of FvS into my userspace, though I almost wish I hadn't – now I'm tempted to add my planned section on "Voice and art" after promising myself that I'd never touch the article again! Maybe after I've finished working my way through that heap of letters (which will take a long, long time, as one of them is my annual tax form – eek!).
I'm ever so touched by your gentle invitation to join you in your own work here, but – at the risk of sounding paranoid – I genuinely wonder whether my adding to other articles mightn't do more harm than good. I really do seem to bring trouble wherever I go. Last year, after Softlavender had nominated almost all my FvS discographic articles for deletion, I was silly enough to point out to her that someone else had created an article about one of FvS's Mahler LPs many years ago without anyone objecting, whereupon she of course nominated that one for deletion too. She then trawled through my contribution history and found a page that I'd created about a poet called Roly Drower, and sought a nomination for deletion for that article also from her old pal Drmies. That in turn led to Drmies's having a look at FvS, and deleting much of its section on her personal life. When I told him that the section that he'd removed was shorter than its equivalent in the GA Patrick Moore, he then – you no doubt begin to get the picture – went and tore great chunks out of that article too. So it seems to me that the more you care about an article, the more you should want me to keep a million miles away from it. Gute nacht! Niggle1892 ( talk) 22:00, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia has a guideline that says we should not copy and paste an article and host it our own user space indefinitely. See WP:COPYARTICLE.
If you have an article in your sandbox it's assumed you are working on it with the intention of introducing the material to mainspace in some form. Thanks. Binksternet ( talk) 03:36, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Berlioz and Debussy. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 18#Berlioz and Debussy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Aza24 (
talk)
17:42, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People's Choir of Oakland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Star Mississippi 19:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Joyce DiDonato (cropped).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for adding recordings for the singer but please add a reference, - this article is linked from the Main page, where every bit needs to be sourced ;) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 23:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
You recently reverted an edit I made on Ian Holm claiming the source was not reliable. I disagree and would like you to reconsider your edit. There is even an entry for the source I quoted right here on Wikipedia, Find a Grave. If there has been a discussion related to findagrave.com which caused it to be declared unreliable, could you provide the link to that discussion? I can't find it. Thank you. — Myk Streja (beep) 14:41, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Can you do a Gounod's Faust recording of 1958? 176.32.17.209 ( talk) 17:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Look /info/en/?search=Draft:Faust_(Andr%C3%A9_Cluytens_1958_recording) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.32.17.209 ( talk) 18:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
On 12 February 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Seiji Ozawa, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 05:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
What about of Leonard Bernstein recording of Bizet's Carmen? 176.32.19.44 ( talk) 17:43, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
@176.32.19.44 :Hello again! And thank you very much for your message. The book that I'm working on is still taking up too much of my time for me to be able to create new articles of any substance, but I'm always very flattered by your interest and support. Perhaps in a year or two...! Very best wishes. Niggle1892 ( talk) 18:59, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I appreciate the work you are doing creating articles for Frederica von Stade albums, but please note that they fail the notability criteria for albums at WP:NALBUMS – they need independent sources such as critical reviews from established music magazines (not blogs). Ms. von Stade is extremely famous, of course, but that doesn't mean all her albums are entitled to an article. If all you can find is the liner notes of the album, then that's an indication that they don't pass WP:NALBUM and will be redirected to Ms von Stade's article instead. Richard3120 ( talk) 02:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
{{re|Person's user name}}
or {{ping|Person's user name}}
– this will come up as a message at the top of the page (where the bell is) when they next log in, notifying them that they have a message. The exception to this is that you don't need to add this code if you are writing on the talk page of the person you are notifying... Wikipedia automatically notifies the person that they have a message on their talk page anyway, so it's redundant. So for example you will have received a notification that someone (me) has written on your talk page, without me having to notify you manually, and if you want to reply to this message and let me know that you've replied, start your message with {{re|Richard3120}}
. You'll also see I've indented the replies using colons, which makes it easier to see when someone different is writing.Regarding the edit summary of your edit at Le nozze di Figaro (Georg Solti recording): the guideline at MOS:ELLIPSIS suggests that square brackets should only be used when needed to clarify that they are not part of the quotation; otherwise, they are not to be used. -- Michael Bednarek ( talk) 05:10, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Good work on your article Chérubin (Pinchas Steinberg recording).
![]() |
The article Roly Drower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:N
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
∯WBG
converse
15:18, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for addressing the copy via concerns in your articles. Good work! I hope you will continue to create album articles in future. I also wanted to let you know that there is nothing preventing you from participating in the AFD discussion pages on the articles you created. I suggest reading through others comments in the AFDs and any relevant policies (such as WP:NALBUM) to understand what sort of language people use before commenting in case you choose to participate. Hope to see you around at WP:WikiProject Opera. 4meter4 ( talk) 15:28, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Path slopu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Dardanus (Raymond Leppard recording) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
help desk.
PATH
SLOPU
16:44, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Werther (Colin Davis recording). Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges.
PATH
SLOPU
16:45, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Frederica von Stade chante Monteverdi & Cavalli (recording), you may be
blocked from editing.
PATH
SLOPU
16:47, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi Niggle1892. Just letting you know that it's frowned upon to vote more than once in an AFD conversation. If you have additional evidence to add as to why something should be kept, "comment" is the proper term to use once you have already voted. Best wishes. 4meter4 ( talk) 13:39, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi greetings, I'd like to give you a suggestion. It seems that you are removing the messages from the talk you have read. It is better to archive the talk page rather than removing the threads. Best.-- PATH SLOPU 14:35, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
What about of this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.170.126.199 ( talk) 20:18, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Niggle1892
Can you do Don Giovanni (Herbert von Karajan January 1985 recording)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.32.27.135 ( talk) 18:43, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Well, I’m waiting for Don Giovanni (Herbert von Karajan January 1985 recording). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.236.17.153 ( talk) 19:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
So, I’m still waiting for Don Giovanni (Herbert von Karajan January 1985 recording) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.77.112.64 ( talk) 19:11, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Don't worry, you can order that on amazon.com [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.77.112.64 ( talk) 17:54, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
I just waiting for Don Giovanni (Herbert von Karajan January 1985 recording). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.32.24.12 ( talk) 15:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Niggle1892
Thank you for creating On the Town (Michael Tilson Thomas recording).
User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for this new article. In most cases the title of the article should include "(Michael Tilson Thomas album)" but the conventions might be different for classical recordings.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
--- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 22:22, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Great job with Glyndebourne Festival Opera: a Gala Evening! Regards, SshibumXZ ( talk · contribs). 15:17, 12 January 2020 (UTC) |
Hello, Niggle1892
Thank you for creating New Year's Eve Concert 1992: Richard Strauss Gala.
User:Cwmhiraeth, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
A comprehensive and well-written article.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:57, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello Niggle1892, we haven't spoken for a while... I'm sorry you had issues back in September with an editor nominating your articles for deletion – I wasn't deliberately ignoring you at the time, I was on holiday and not logging in to Wikipedia, and so I didn't see all the kerfuffle until I got back home. But as you saw, the deletion nominations were shot down pretty quickly, as I thought they would be... as I said before, once an article has two or three good quality sources in it, very few editors will vote to recommend deletion, although they may suggest improvements.
Looking at New Year's Eve Concert 1992: Richard Strauss Gala, one thing I wanted to make you aware of is that the first five references are to other Wikipedia articles, and this is not allowed – see WP:CIRCULAR. You will need to replace these with other reliable sources that back up the statements in the text. But your articles are generally well written, so please carry on... I see that you have won the approval of at least one experienced and well-respected editor above! Richard3120 ( talk) 18:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, but this will not do. 200k on a singer, including every single detail recounted in lively prose--we are here for biographies, not for book-length documents. Drmies ( talk) 23:07, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
@ Gerda Arendt: As you see, I've taken at least some of your good advice! But as for doing any further work on Frederica von Stade in userspace, draftspace or anywhere else, never say never, but I can't imagine returning to the article any time soon. I've already spent so much time on it that I've fallen months behind in every other part of my life: I have a foot-high stack of correspondence to attend to, dozens of magazines to read, a shelf of Blu-rays still in their cellophane, dozens of films in my television's hard drive waiting for me to watch them. (My von Stade addiction is as nothing compared to my love of fantasy and science fiction books, films and television shows, which is why I borrowed my username from Leaf by Niggle by J. R. R. Tolkien (b. 1892)!) If I do ever attempt any more Flicka-ology, it'll probably be safely beyond the reach of Softlavender's and Drmies's chainsaws in a discography-cum-biography e-book for Amazon's Kindle. (With lots of pictures! And original research! And primary sources! And English that doesn't read like the label of a sauce bottle! And many other things that on Wikipedia are verboten.) I can already imagine Frederica von Stade: a life in music's first review, bitterly complaining that the shameless author has simply lifted much of his awful book from FvS's excellent Wikipedia bio. Niggle1892 ( talk) 16:13, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
@ Gerda Arendt: I've done as you suggested and copied my last revision of FvS into my userspace, though I almost wish I hadn't – now I'm tempted to add my planned section on "Voice and art" after promising myself that I'd never touch the article again! Maybe after I've finished working my way through that heap of letters (which will take a long, long time, as one of them is my annual tax form – eek!).
I'm ever so touched by your gentle invitation to join you in your own work here, but – at the risk of sounding paranoid – I genuinely wonder whether my adding to other articles mightn't do more harm than good. I really do seem to bring trouble wherever I go. Last year, after Softlavender had nominated almost all my FvS discographic articles for deletion, I was silly enough to point out to her that someone else had created an article about one of FvS's Mahler LPs many years ago without anyone objecting, whereupon she of course nominated that one for deletion too. She then trawled through my contribution history and found a page that I'd created about a poet called Roly Drower, and sought a nomination for deletion for that article also from her old pal Drmies. That in turn led to Drmies's having a look at FvS, and deleting much of its section on her personal life. When I told him that the section that he'd removed was shorter than its equivalent in the GA Patrick Moore, he then – you no doubt begin to get the picture – went and tore great chunks out of that article too. So it seems to me that the more you care about an article, the more you should want me to keep a million miles away from it. Gute nacht! Niggle1892 ( talk) 22:00, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia has a guideline that says we should not copy and paste an article and host it our own user space indefinitely. See WP:COPYARTICLE.
If you have an article in your sandbox it's assumed you are working on it with the intention of introducing the material to mainspace in some form. Thanks. Binksternet ( talk) 03:36, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Berlioz and Debussy. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 18#Berlioz and Debussy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Aza24 (
talk)
17:42, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People's Choir of Oakland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Star Mississippi 19:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Joyce DiDonato (cropped).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for adding recordings for the singer but please add a reference, - this article is linked from the Main page, where every bit needs to be sourced ;) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 23:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
You recently reverted an edit I made on Ian Holm claiming the source was not reliable. I disagree and would like you to reconsider your edit. There is even an entry for the source I quoted right here on Wikipedia, Find a Grave. If there has been a discussion related to findagrave.com which caused it to be declared unreliable, could you provide the link to that discussion? I can't find it. Thank you. — Myk Streja (beep) 14:41, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Can you do a Gounod's Faust recording of 1958? 176.32.17.209 ( talk) 17:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Look /info/en/?search=Draft:Faust_(Andr%C3%A9_Cluytens_1958_recording) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.32.17.209 ( talk) 18:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
On 12 February 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Seiji Ozawa, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 05:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
What about of Leonard Bernstein recording of Bizet's Carmen? 176.32.19.44 ( talk) 17:43, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
@176.32.19.44 :Hello again! And thank you very much for your message. The book that I'm working on is still taking up too much of my time for me to be able to create new articles of any substance, but I'm always very flattered by your interest and support. Perhaps in a year or two...! Very best wishes. Niggle1892 ( talk) 18:59, 30 June 2024 (UTC)