Archives: no archives yet ( create) |
|
Hello, LikeLakers2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Special Talk:UnusedFiles, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 22:23, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
GILO
ACCIDENT &
EMERGENCY 22:23, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Special Talk:UnusedFiles, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to a
mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that
administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{
hangon}}
to the page and state your reasoning on the article's
talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
DASHBot (
talk) 00:00, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE
A tag has been placed on GarfieldRoX5697, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to a
mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the
the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
DASHBot (
talk) 06:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
I noted you copy edited a rather obvious piece of vandalism rather than removing it. Just be a bit more careful next time. Nev1 ( talk) 22:17, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
For attempting to trout Jimbo Wales. =D CycloneGU ( talk) 13:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi. At last count, you have made a grand total of eight edits to actual encyclopedia entries, eleven edits to user pages, and 53 edits to user talk pages (not including the additional few edits of your alternative account). As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and neither social network nor a chat room, I strongly suggest that you focus on building our content lest you want to encounter a block in the future. Some leniency is extended to newer users, but after a while, it is expected that every account contribute to both the community and the educational content.
Just an FYI. Please ping me if you have any questions or concerns. / ƒETCH COMMS / 02:35, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Windows Product Activation dialog.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fleet Command ( talk) 08:43, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Fleet Command ( talk) 18:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
mabdul 16:19, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
-- Luke Talk 18:14, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
In a word, no. Sorry, but I haven't a clue how. I'm more of an up front delete the spam type of admin. I will admit to not even knowing what cascading is or does. (No-one asked me about this at my RfA...) You'd be better off with one of the more behind the scenes people like User:Fæ or User:Gfoley4. In the meantime, I will try to find out more about it, in case someone else asks. My thanks for the userbox, by the way. I looked in your userboxes to see if there was something to nick, and thought, 'That reminds me of something'. Then went to check and found it there. Even more sorry now I can't help with the cascading. Peridon ( talk) 19:54, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Regarding this post, would it change your mind if you knew that the individual who posted the question had provided Anderson with material for the Signpost article? This article was entirely about Wikipedia's coverage of the topic from which this individual was banned and about the process that led to the topic-banning of the individual and others from the area. User:Smatprt seems to have forgotten to mention his involvement in the creation of the Signpost article when looking for opinions about whether he was violating the ban by commenting in a thread about that article. And, of course, in adding a link to that article to Jimbo's talk page, he is again violating the topic ban. If you disagree, you can comment at the AE thread I have opened on the matter. (And, yes, I was the editor whose revert Smatprt objected to.)-- Peter cohen ( talk) 15:23, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
In response to your note here: I intended to use a level 3 warning template. Per this, "It is not always necessary for an editor engaging in vandalism to receive a full 4 warnings before they can be reported or blocked ... in cases of obvious bad faith vandalism, it may be appropriate to use a level 3 warning". Based on the edits and the username, I decided that this guy was just trolling the page, and I cut to the chase. Regards, Lothar von Richthofen ( talk) 18:55, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Not that I dispute the revision of the vandalism on the Detroit Waza article. However your edit summary says that an ACL isn't a body part. I just thought I'd point out that in sports a torn ACL is the term for a tear in the Anterior cruciate ligament. Quite a common injury in football and soccer actually. Shootmaster 44 ( talk) 20:03, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello LikeLakers2. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User talk:Ksmdr, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly an attack page or negative, unsourced BLP. Thank you. -- DQ (t) (e) 02:27, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Shoopdawhoop-fireurlazer-iphone-87945.185x185.1259579964.65832.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor ( talk) 16:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
ww2censor ( talk) 17:00, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 19:08, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 20:14, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted my changes to MathType (as User:FleetCommand had earlier), with the change comment 'Reverted 1 edit by Quietbritishjim (talk): "Vast removal of verifiable contents and extensive use of weasel words" <-- FleetCommand is correct, you know. He had good reason to do'.
My answer is, "no, I don't know!", because FleetCommand wouldn't tell me what his reasons were. Even after he said he wasn't going to revert me again, I still asked where he thought I had used weasel words, because I am genuinely interested in feedback about my edits and improving the article. I tried my best to assume good faith, and desperately tried to discuss the content of the article, but aside from his initial vague comment he refused to take part (instead just accusing me of "trolling", "edit-warring", and a couple of other insults).
Now you've reverted all my edits again, but perhaps you'll engage in more constructive conversation? If you really think my edits are problematic, can you please discuss them on the talk page? I have numbered my changes to help the discussion. I would especially like to hear where you think I used weasel words. Aside from that, I can't believe that you think that all my changes are bad: some of them are just simple things (like removing duplicated content (4) or turning lists into prose (6,7)), and some correct factually inaccurate statements (5,8). I already conceded on (2). Please head over there and let me know what you think. Thanks. Quietbritishjim ( talk) 11:12, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Blimey, you reply quickly! Thanks. I'll leave it a couple of days in case someone sees my message on Talk:MathType, then I'll update the article. I might have spent more time than I like on this, but I did learn some stuff in the process, especially formulas using Google charts API. Quietbritishjim ( talk) 16:18, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Dude, THANK YOU. I know Sinebot is doing its job, getting ridiculous pay, but I know that I forgot. I've only been a user for, like, 1.5 months. Sometimes I forget. P.S: That's the second time I got that, so I'm kinda annoyed.-- Solowing106 ( talk) 04:44, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
In here you said that I'm violating 3RR. Where did you see me make 3RR? Ksmdr ( talk) 09:38, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi there. I was given this to revdelete at the same time as the other diff. Please read this to learn why I did not do the same twice - in particular the word "grossly". — Joseph Fox 19:52, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi it would not matter if the IP asked to delete their own talk page or someone else did. The reason is that others should be able to read the warnings in the history. If the warnings are old, say over a year old then we could delete, but the ones here were new, and potentially relevent to the person or persons who use that IP address. There may be other reasons to delete a talk page such as disclosure of information by a minor, or by accident, copyright violation or spam. For the more sensitive reasons you can email an admin or use IRC to prevent drawing the public's attention to the content. A user in good standing can also have the WP:right to vanish when they can get their talk page and user pages deleted. But this right does not apply to anonymous IPs. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 22:36, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
That was an obvious vandalism only account because of the username and edits. Vandalism only accounts do not need any warnings. The editor was blocked by an admin as a vandalism only account. Joe Chill ( talk) 00:10, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
,
Hey, LikeLakers2. I noticed Graeme Bartlett's post above. It applies to your suggestion to Shroffameen too: his user talk page is actually the only userspace page he normally can't have deleted. See WP:DELTALK. The rationale for this is that other users have posted on the page — which they normally haven't done on the rest of his userpages — and may need their own posts for evidence of something or other, or simply for copyright reasons. Perhaps you'd like to consider adding a note about this to Shroffameen? Regards, Bishonen | talk 12:52, 18 August 2011 (UTC).
,
Why did you add the "you may edit this page" text to Jimbo's userpage if you plan to revert any good-faith edits people make? Jebus989 ✰ 18:21, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey, Solowing here, buddy. What vandalism? And where? please respond. Hurry!-- Solowing106 ( talk) 05:30, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Oh hey just checked out the page history. Did it have that part about me making stuff up about Wielvakia, almost crashing into a cactus, not hurting a fly?
If so, that was me, not logged on. I can see how you would think that was vandalism. If I were someone else, I'd think the same thing. Those, I meant to put there.
Sorry buddy. Everyone makes mistakes.
If not, send me details.
from,
Solowing106 (
talk) 05:38, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
I have you on my watchllist too. And
Freedomtiger's page.
See you.
-- Solowing106 ( talk) 18:29, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
I looked at your comments regarding Valentin Demenyenko and I see no WP:CSD on this. I also suggest you look at WP:ATHLETE since this does qualify under the rules given his competitions at the ICF Canoe Sprint World Championships. I would also suggest making threats to other users over articles that are legitimate and should not be deleted. Chris ( talk) 19:54, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Acerca de la renuncia de Hernan Gomez como seleccionador de colombia, es bien conocido que aunque está cerca de concretarse la llegada de Martino, aún no se ha confirmado. Esto se hará esta semana, Saludos
HECTOR WANTS TO KNOW WHO ARE YOU? GOODBYE USER FROM HECTOR'S HOME COMPUTER CAL 2000-2012 -- Solowing106 ( talk) 04:06, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, that's my home computer. But still, who are you? From Hector Neeleman, AKA Solowing106 ( talk) 04:07, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
Thanks! :)
Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Syed_Kazim&oldid=446536121 Syed Kazim ( Talk | Contribs) 04:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC) |
13:06, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Please see WP:TPO... specifically the first sentence. Thanks. Srobak ( talk) 21:29, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
For giving me a barnstar! :D Ezekiel53746 ( talk) 21:43, 26 August 2011 (UTC) |
It makes sense that "RFC" would stand for "Redirect from CamelCase," but {{ RFC}} was never used to mean that, nor do I think anyone ever interpreted it to mean that. (The RFC template has been around for several years and has always been used in the Requests for Comment process.) As far as I can see, it's needless disambiguation. hare j 01:07, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Solowing106 ( talk) 04:57, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
I am only posting this on your page because I am required to.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Srobak ( talk) 14:02, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
It is clear that both you and Srobak are in the wrong in this situation; however, there are two major mistakes you made and you should strive not to make them again. Please read Wikipedia:Don't restore removed comments. Your behavior on Srobak's talk page was wholly unacceptable. In addition, in the course of your discussion you (intentionally?) fanned the flames. When you get into a dispute like the one you got into, it is often more helpful to back down and seek advice rather than furthering the problem. Ryan Vesey Review me! 14:51, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
I noticed your speedy deletion tag on Ksmdr's talk page. In the future, if a similar situation arises, remove the offending content and replace it with a welcome message. If the content is especially bad, find an administrator and ask them to do a revision deletion. Ryan Vesey Review me! 12:35, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello LikeLakers2, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead, use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 10:19, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
OMG... Why are people doing this to my warnings? I'm part of wikiproject templates! It's no fair! D: Ezekiel! Talk to meh. See what I'm doin'. 20:12, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Dude, It's Hector Neeleman of Wielvakia. Aka, Solowing106 ( talk) 22:35, 30 August 2011 (UTC). I'm saying bye, since I'll probably be blocked out by DS. Me and you had good times. See ya.
It's time to kick the tires and set the fires...
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dougweller ( talk) 13:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello LikeLakers2! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 19:30, 8 September 2011 (UTC) |
Hello, I noticed you and User:Ezekiel53746 have an apparent friendship on Wikipedia. As you may or may not know, he is about to start a mentorship programme with me as his guide. As part of this agreement, I have asked that Ezekiel cuts down on his using user talk pages as a place to chit-chat. A bit of chat won't hurt anyone, but as he is on a tightrope and could well be blocked again, I am asking if you would be willing to help me by also agreeing not to use Ezekiel's talk page for that purpose. Thanks, Strange Passerby ( talk • cont) 06:56, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for all the help w/ pointing out the template for the non admin thing and also for fixing my userboxes. =). -- Kangaroopowah ( talk) 18:42, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Barts1a | Talk to me | Yell at me 23:29, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Any specific reason why you find it necessary to have every single page of yours opted in for angry mode? You're taking up 50% of the angry mode page at the moment. Might it be easier and better for general vandalism detection if you just had your various userpages semiprotected? N419 BH 03:27, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
I noticed someone said you have a friendship with Ezekiel. Would you also define your relationship with Solowing that way? tilde tilde tilde tilde 67.1.95.119 ( talk) 04:48, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello LikeLakers2. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of User talk:Sockpuppeteer, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: You're not allowed to do so. Thank you. -- Σ talk contribs 23:39, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Why did you tag an IP address with "Stop, this is not a human" here: [1]. I have no idea what that is supposed to mean. -- Jayron 32 18:32, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey!
Accept my apologies for creating shortcuts WP:Ram and WT:Ram, I didn't go through the policy and I realized my mistake!
Thanks for the cleanup, keep the good work!
Cheers,
Ram ( talk • contribs) 05:33, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello LikeLakers2, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of User:American--Mexican--xD, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G2 does not apply to pages in the user namespace. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 19:47, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Please stop spamming my wall. Thanks Colofac ( talk) 13:16, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Per a suggestion from Demiurge1000 ( talk · contribs) on IRC, I politely request that you please stop posting on my talk page. Thanks. LikeLakers2 ( talk | Sign my guestbook!) 14:07, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
This is most assuredly NOT OK. The next time you bait a blocked user like that, you may find yourself wearing a matching block. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! ( talk) 15:26, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
When you comment or even decline a request at UAA, you don't need to mark it as a (Non-administrator comment) - it doesn't really matter! Warmly, Kudu ~I/O~ 13:46, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Per this AN/I thread and its previous incarnation, you and Srobak are given a mutual ban from interacting with each other for a period of one year. Direct responses to Srobak and comments about Srobak, direct or indirect, will violate this interaction ban. lifebaka ++ 15:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Apologies for not informing you of this matter. I appreciate the understanding you displayed in your comments at ANI. Quite frankly, you have given us absolutely no reason for concern, but interaction bans must be a two way street - otherwise the first party can antagonize, and the second cannot respond - and the users of concern in this matter need to stop discussing you and your past with them. This ANI did not start with a concern about your activities, nor does its resolution express concern about you. Again, my apologies for the oversight in not informing you when it became clear that you would be effected. If you have anything to add in this matter, or any concerns or questions about the ANI discussion or resolution, please feel free to post at the AN/I thread. Van Isaac WS contribs 02:24, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Yes, that was my mistake. I hadn't protected it correctly, and your removal of the protection notice brought that to my attention. Thanks. Ground Zero | t 15:56, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of
edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on
Template:WikiProject Flag Template. Users are expected to
collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Toddst1 ( talk) 22:19, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Per WP:BLANKING editors are allowed to remove warnings including block notices from their talk page.
You are WAY over 3RR on a number of pages today. While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits and if you are reverting someone's edit you are expected to know the relevant policies.
If I seen any more of this I will block you immediately. Toddst1 ( talk) 22:37, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
This is completely unacceptable, uncivil behavior. Given that behavior which led to your edit warring on Rino among other edit wars today, you have lost rollback privileges after 24 days. Toddst1 ( talk) 22:58, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for cleaning up after those edits. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 00:19, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
This is a notification that you have stepped over your bounds at SPI with the following three edits:
Please read what you are allowed to do and cease from such edits like above. -- DQ (t) (e) 01:26, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
-- John of Reading ( talk) 09:04, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
I thought maybe cascading protection would protect all the templates listed there, but apparently that's only for transcluded templates. No time to do all of them individually, so I'll have to let another admin take care of it. Dreadstar ☥ 04:44, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
The criterion for speedy a7 is much lower than lack of notability , it is having no possible claim to importance. Saying someone is on a sports team with an article in Wikipedia is a claim to possible importance; the proper course for a team whose members don't meet WP:N, is to use WP:PROD. DGG ( talk ) 22:50, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Archives: no archives yet ( create) |
|
Hello, LikeLakers2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Special Talk:UnusedFiles, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 22:23, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
GILO
ACCIDENT &
EMERGENCY 22:23, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Special Talk:UnusedFiles, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to a
mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that
administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{
hangon}}
to the page and state your reasoning on the article's
talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
DASHBot (
talk) 00:00, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE
A tag has been placed on GarfieldRoX5697, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to a
mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the
the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
DASHBot (
talk) 06:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
I noted you copy edited a rather obvious piece of vandalism rather than removing it. Just be a bit more careful next time. Nev1 ( talk) 22:17, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
For attempting to trout Jimbo Wales. =D CycloneGU ( talk) 13:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi. At last count, you have made a grand total of eight edits to actual encyclopedia entries, eleven edits to user pages, and 53 edits to user talk pages (not including the additional few edits of your alternative account). As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and neither social network nor a chat room, I strongly suggest that you focus on building our content lest you want to encounter a block in the future. Some leniency is extended to newer users, but after a while, it is expected that every account contribute to both the community and the educational content.
Just an FYI. Please ping me if you have any questions or concerns. / ƒETCH COMMS / 02:35, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Windows Product Activation dialog.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fleet Command ( talk) 08:43, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Fleet Command ( talk) 18:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
mabdul 16:19, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
-- Luke Talk 18:14, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
In a word, no. Sorry, but I haven't a clue how. I'm more of an up front delete the spam type of admin. I will admit to not even knowing what cascading is or does. (No-one asked me about this at my RfA...) You'd be better off with one of the more behind the scenes people like User:Fæ or User:Gfoley4. In the meantime, I will try to find out more about it, in case someone else asks. My thanks for the userbox, by the way. I looked in your userboxes to see if there was something to nick, and thought, 'That reminds me of something'. Then went to check and found it there. Even more sorry now I can't help with the cascading. Peridon ( talk) 19:54, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Regarding this post, would it change your mind if you knew that the individual who posted the question had provided Anderson with material for the Signpost article? This article was entirely about Wikipedia's coverage of the topic from which this individual was banned and about the process that led to the topic-banning of the individual and others from the area. User:Smatprt seems to have forgotten to mention his involvement in the creation of the Signpost article when looking for opinions about whether he was violating the ban by commenting in a thread about that article. And, of course, in adding a link to that article to Jimbo's talk page, he is again violating the topic ban. If you disagree, you can comment at the AE thread I have opened on the matter. (And, yes, I was the editor whose revert Smatprt objected to.)-- Peter cohen ( talk) 15:23, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
In response to your note here: I intended to use a level 3 warning template. Per this, "It is not always necessary for an editor engaging in vandalism to receive a full 4 warnings before they can be reported or blocked ... in cases of obvious bad faith vandalism, it may be appropriate to use a level 3 warning". Based on the edits and the username, I decided that this guy was just trolling the page, and I cut to the chase. Regards, Lothar von Richthofen ( talk) 18:55, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Not that I dispute the revision of the vandalism on the Detroit Waza article. However your edit summary says that an ACL isn't a body part. I just thought I'd point out that in sports a torn ACL is the term for a tear in the Anterior cruciate ligament. Quite a common injury in football and soccer actually. Shootmaster 44 ( talk) 20:03, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello LikeLakers2. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User talk:Ksmdr, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly an attack page or negative, unsourced BLP. Thank you. -- DQ (t) (e) 02:27, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Shoopdawhoop-fireurlazer-iphone-87945.185x185.1259579964.65832.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor ( talk) 16:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
ww2censor ( talk) 17:00, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 19:08, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 20:14, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted my changes to MathType (as User:FleetCommand had earlier), with the change comment 'Reverted 1 edit by Quietbritishjim (talk): "Vast removal of verifiable contents and extensive use of weasel words" <-- FleetCommand is correct, you know. He had good reason to do'.
My answer is, "no, I don't know!", because FleetCommand wouldn't tell me what his reasons were. Even after he said he wasn't going to revert me again, I still asked where he thought I had used weasel words, because I am genuinely interested in feedback about my edits and improving the article. I tried my best to assume good faith, and desperately tried to discuss the content of the article, but aside from his initial vague comment he refused to take part (instead just accusing me of "trolling", "edit-warring", and a couple of other insults).
Now you've reverted all my edits again, but perhaps you'll engage in more constructive conversation? If you really think my edits are problematic, can you please discuss them on the talk page? I have numbered my changes to help the discussion. I would especially like to hear where you think I used weasel words. Aside from that, I can't believe that you think that all my changes are bad: some of them are just simple things (like removing duplicated content (4) or turning lists into prose (6,7)), and some correct factually inaccurate statements (5,8). I already conceded on (2). Please head over there and let me know what you think. Thanks. Quietbritishjim ( talk) 11:12, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Blimey, you reply quickly! Thanks. I'll leave it a couple of days in case someone sees my message on Talk:MathType, then I'll update the article. I might have spent more time than I like on this, but I did learn some stuff in the process, especially formulas using Google charts API. Quietbritishjim ( talk) 16:18, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Dude, THANK YOU. I know Sinebot is doing its job, getting ridiculous pay, but I know that I forgot. I've only been a user for, like, 1.5 months. Sometimes I forget. P.S: That's the second time I got that, so I'm kinda annoyed.-- Solowing106 ( talk) 04:44, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
In here you said that I'm violating 3RR. Where did you see me make 3RR? Ksmdr ( talk) 09:38, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi there. I was given this to revdelete at the same time as the other diff. Please read this to learn why I did not do the same twice - in particular the word "grossly". — Joseph Fox 19:52, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi it would not matter if the IP asked to delete their own talk page or someone else did. The reason is that others should be able to read the warnings in the history. If the warnings are old, say over a year old then we could delete, but the ones here were new, and potentially relevent to the person or persons who use that IP address. There may be other reasons to delete a talk page such as disclosure of information by a minor, or by accident, copyright violation or spam. For the more sensitive reasons you can email an admin or use IRC to prevent drawing the public's attention to the content. A user in good standing can also have the WP:right to vanish when they can get their talk page and user pages deleted. But this right does not apply to anonymous IPs. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 22:36, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
That was an obvious vandalism only account because of the username and edits. Vandalism only accounts do not need any warnings. The editor was blocked by an admin as a vandalism only account. Joe Chill ( talk) 00:10, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
,
Hey, LikeLakers2. I noticed Graeme Bartlett's post above. It applies to your suggestion to Shroffameen too: his user talk page is actually the only userspace page he normally can't have deleted. See WP:DELTALK. The rationale for this is that other users have posted on the page — which they normally haven't done on the rest of his userpages — and may need their own posts for evidence of something or other, or simply for copyright reasons. Perhaps you'd like to consider adding a note about this to Shroffameen? Regards, Bishonen | talk 12:52, 18 August 2011 (UTC).
,
Why did you add the "you may edit this page" text to Jimbo's userpage if you plan to revert any good-faith edits people make? Jebus989 ✰ 18:21, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey, Solowing here, buddy. What vandalism? And where? please respond. Hurry!-- Solowing106 ( talk) 05:30, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Oh hey just checked out the page history. Did it have that part about me making stuff up about Wielvakia, almost crashing into a cactus, not hurting a fly?
If so, that was me, not logged on. I can see how you would think that was vandalism. If I were someone else, I'd think the same thing. Those, I meant to put there.
Sorry buddy. Everyone makes mistakes.
If not, send me details.
from,
Solowing106 (
talk) 05:38, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
I have you on my watchllist too. And
Freedomtiger's page.
See you.
-- Solowing106 ( talk) 18:29, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
I looked at your comments regarding Valentin Demenyenko and I see no WP:CSD on this. I also suggest you look at WP:ATHLETE since this does qualify under the rules given his competitions at the ICF Canoe Sprint World Championships. I would also suggest making threats to other users over articles that are legitimate and should not be deleted. Chris ( talk) 19:54, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Acerca de la renuncia de Hernan Gomez como seleccionador de colombia, es bien conocido que aunque está cerca de concretarse la llegada de Martino, aún no se ha confirmado. Esto se hará esta semana, Saludos
HECTOR WANTS TO KNOW WHO ARE YOU? GOODBYE USER FROM HECTOR'S HOME COMPUTER CAL 2000-2012 -- Solowing106 ( talk) 04:06, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, that's my home computer. But still, who are you? From Hector Neeleman, AKA Solowing106 ( talk) 04:07, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
Thanks! :)
Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Syed_Kazim&oldid=446536121 Syed Kazim ( Talk | Contribs) 04:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC) |
13:06, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Please see WP:TPO... specifically the first sentence. Thanks. Srobak ( talk) 21:29, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
For giving me a barnstar! :D Ezekiel53746 ( talk) 21:43, 26 August 2011 (UTC) |
It makes sense that "RFC" would stand for "Redirect from CamelCase," but {{ RFC}} was never used to mean that, nor do I think anyone ever interpreted it to mean that. (The RFC template has been around for several years and has always been used in the Requests for Comment process.) As far as I can see, it's needless disambiguation. hare j 01:07, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Solowing106 ( talk) 04:57, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
I am only posting this on your page because I am required to.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Srobak ( talk) 14:02, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
It is clear that both you and Srobak are in the wrong in this situation; however, there are two major mistakes you made and you should strive not to make them again. Please read Wikipedia:Don't restore removed comments. Your behavior on Srobak's talk page was wholly unacceptable. In addition, in the course of your discussion you (intentionally?) fanned the flames. When you get into a dispute like the one you got into, it is often more helpful to back down and seek advice rather than furthering the problem. Ryan Vesey Review me! 14:51, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
I noticed your speedy deletion tag on Ksmdr's talk page. In the future, if a similar situation arises, remove the offending content and replace it with a welcome message. If the content is especially bad, find an administrator and ask them to do a revision deletion. Ryan Vesey Review me! 12:35, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello LikeLakers2, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead, use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 10:19, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
OMG... Why are people doing this to my warnings? I'm part of wikiproject templates! It's no fair! D: Ezekiel! Talk to meh. See what I'm doin'. 20:12, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Dude, It's Hector Neeleman of Wielvakia. Aka, Solowing106 ( talk) 22:35, 30 August 2011 (UTC). I'm saying bye, since I'll probably be blocked out by DS. Me and you had good times. See ya.
It's time to kick the tires and set the fires...
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dougweller ( talk) 13:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello LikeLakers2! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 19:30, 8 September 2011 (UTC) |
Hello, I noticed you and User:Ezekiel53746 have an apparent friendship on Wikipedia. As you may or may not know, he is about to start a mentorship programme with me as his guide. As part of this agreement, I have asked that Ezekiel cuts down on his using user talk pages as a place to chit-chat. A bit of chat won't hurt anyone, but as he is on a tightrope and could well be blocked again, I am asking if you would be willing to help me by also agreeing not to use Ezekiel's talk page for that purpose. Thanks, Strange Passerby ( talk • cont) 06:56, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for all the help w/ pointing out the template for the non admin thing and also for fixing my userboxes. =). -- Kangaroopowah ( talk) 18:42, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Barts1a | Talk to me | Yell at me 23:29, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Any specific reason why you find it necessary to have every single page of yours opted in for angry mode? You're taking up 50% of the angry mode page at the moment. Might it be easier and better for general vandalism detection if you just had your various userpages semiprotected? N419 BH 03:27, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
I noticed someone said you have a friendship with Ezekiel. Would you also define your relationship with Solowing that way? tilde tilde tilde tilde 67.1.95.119 ( talk) 04:48, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello LikeLakers2. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of User talk:Sockpuppeteer, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: You're not allowed to do so. Thank you. -- Σ talk contribs 23:39, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Why did you tag an IP address with "Stop, this is not a human" here: [1]. I have no idea what that is supposed to mean. -- Jayron 32 18:32, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey!
Accept my apologies for creating shortcuts WP:Ram and WT:Ram, I didn't go through the policy and I realized my mistake!
Thanks for the cleanup, keep the good work!
Cheers,
Ram ( talk • contribs) 05:33, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello LikeLakers2, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of User:American--Mexican--xD, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G2 does not apply to pages in the user namespace. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 19:47, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Please stop spamming my wall. Thanks Colofac ( talk) 13:16, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Per a suggestion from Demiurge1000 ( talk · contribs) on IRC, I politely request that you please stop posting on my talk page. Thanks. LikeLakers2 ( talk | Sign my guestbook!) 14:07, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
This is most assuredly NOT OK. The next time you bait a blocked user like that, you may find yourself wearing a matching block. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! ( talk) 15:26, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
When you comment or even decline a request at UAA, you don't need to mark it as a (Non-administrator comment) - it doesn't really matter! Warmly, Kudu ~I/O~ 13:46, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Per this AN/I thread and its previous incarnation, you and Srobak are given a mutual ban from interacting with each other for a period of one year. Direct responses to Srobak and comments about Srobak, direct or indirect, will violate this interaction ban. lifebaka ++ 15:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Apologies for not informing you of this matter. I appreciate the understanding you displayed in your comments at ANI. Quite frankly, you have given us absolutely no reason for concern, but interaction bans must be a two way street - otherwise the first party can antagonize, and the second cannot respond - and the users of concern in this matter need to stop discussing you and your past with them. This ANI did not start with a concern about your activities, nor does its resolution express concern about you. Again, my apologies for the oversight in not informing you when it became clear that you would be effected. If you have anything to add in this matter, or any concerns or questions about the ANI discussion or resolution, please feel free to post at the AN/I thread. Van Isaac WS contribs 02:24, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Yes, that was my mistake. I hadn't protected it correctly, and your removal of the protection notice brought that to my attention. Thanks. Ground Zero | t 15:56, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of
edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on
Template:WikiProject Flag Template. Users are expected to
collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Toddst1 ( talk) 22:19, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Per WP:BLANKING editors are allowed to remove warnings including block notices from their talk page.
You are WAY over 3RR on a number of pages today. While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits and if you are reverting someone's edit you are expected to know the relevant policies.
If I seen any more of this I will block you immediately. Toddst1 ( talk) 22:37, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
This is completely unacceptable, uncivil behavior. Given that behavior which led to your edit warring on Rino among other edit wars today, you have lost rollback privileges after 24 days. Toddst1 ( talk) 22:58, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for cleaning up after those edits. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 00:19, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
This is a notification that you have stepped over your bounds at SPI with the following three edits:
Please read what you are allowed to do and cease from such edits like above. -- DQ (t) (e) 01:26, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
-- John of Reading ( talk) 09:04, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
I thought maybe cascading protection would protect all the templates listed there, but apparently that's only for transcluded templates. No time to do all of them individually, so I'll have to let another admin take care of it. Dreadstar ☥ 04:44, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
The criterion for speedy a7 is much lower than lack of notability , it is having no possible claim to importance. Saying someone is on a sports team with an article in Wikipedia is a claim to possible importance; the proper course for a team whose members don't meet WP:N, is to use WP:PROD. DGG ( talk ) 22:50, 1 October 2011 (UTC)