![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 |
Dear Krish! Can you find a poster of movie Chehere: A Modern Day Classic? Thank you! -- 217.66.152.6 ( talk) 15:04, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Dostana (2008 film) at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
SL93 (
talk)
01:03, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
This is my fourth attempt at a featured list. Feel free to leave comments if any. :) Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 18:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Krrish 3 (2013 film) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Krrish poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:23, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Alex Parrish you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Numerounovedant --
Numerounovedant (
talk)
17:01, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for doing the review. I will have the QPQ in a few days.
On another note, do you mind changing your signature? The pipe character |
is messing up the template, so could you use |
instead? This character produces the same output, which is a pipe character. It would be much appreciated.
Regards, epicgenius ( talk) 01:57, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
On 2 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dostana (2008 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2008 film Dostana inspired several fashion trends in India, with Priyanka Chopra's silver sari, worn in the song "Desi Girl", becoming very popular? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dostana (2008 film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Dostana (2008 film)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Quantico (season 1) has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 20:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
| Hello, Krish!. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Quantico (TV series) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with GA and all the best, Mini apolis 15:59, 5 August 2017 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading File:Krrish poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:34, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Krrish 3 (2013 film) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Quantico (TV series) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Adamstom.97 --
Adamstom.97 (
talk)
23:01, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
The article
Quantico (TV series) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Quantico (TV series) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Adamstom.97 --
Adamstom.97 (
talk)
07:22, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
The article
Quantico (TV series) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Quantico (TV series) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Adamstom.97 --
Adamstom.97 (
talk)
23:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() | |
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:10, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
— Yash talk stalk 05:57, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
The article
Alex Parrish you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Alex Parrish for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Numerounovedant --
Numerounovedant (
talk)
11:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Congratulations Daan0001 ( talk) 19:39, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
On 4 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Quantico (TV series), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after appearing in more than 50 films, Priyanka Chopra's first-ever audition was for the American television series Quantico? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Quantico (TV series). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Quantico (TV series)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saiwyn Quadras is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saiwyn Quadras until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CelenaSkaggs ( talk) 21:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
On 17 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alex Parrish, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that by portraying Alex Parrish in Quantico, Priyanka Chopra became the first South Asian to headline an American network drama series? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alex Parrish. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Alex Parrish), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 12:03, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
In undoing an edit by Mchoudhury11 to Gunday from over a month ago, you undid painstaking copyediting (which you requested) by me and edits by a number of others. Old edits must be revised manually. Since I don't have much time available for copyediting, I'm done here. Mini apolis 20:32, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
| Hello, Krish!. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Gunday at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Tdslk ( talk) 17:54, 7 October 2017 (UTC) |
I'll have a look at Anjaana Anjaani for you over the next couple of days. Twofingered Typist ( talk) 13:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anne Hathaway on screen and stage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Anjaana Anjaani has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 14:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
I would appreciate your comments in this FLC, Krish.
—
Ssven2
Looking at you, kid
08:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Anjaana Anjaani you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Pavanjandhyala --
Pavanjandhyala (
talk)
06:21, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
The article
Anjaana Anjaani you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Anjaana Anjaani for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Pavanjandhyala --
Pavanjandhyala (
talk)
17:41, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
| Hello, Krish!. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Dil Dhadakne Do at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 ( talk) 03:07, 21 October 2017 (UTC) |
| Hello, Krish!. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Bajirao Mastani at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! This will take me several days to complete. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 ( talk) 03:18, 28 October 2017 (UTC) |
I must commend your effort on expanding the article on this film. A "Themes and influences" section would be quite useful (Like what material/films was SLB and the cast inspired by/what films and literary works were they similar to). You can use Mughal-e-Azam, Pather Panchali and Mother India as references if you wish.
—
Ssven2
Looking at you, kid
07:41, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
It is under WP:FAR. Would you be willing to make comments there? -- Kailash29792 (talk) 05:38, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
I was wondering why you haven't nominated this list for FLC yet? BTW, please leave your comments here if interested. Yashthepunisher ( talk) 12:33, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Krish. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Quantico episodes – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for November 27. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 21:38, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the Aitraaz article has been scheduled as today's featured article for December 9, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 9, 2017.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 18:03, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
| Hello, Krish!. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Ventilator (film) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 ( talk) 01:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC) |
| Hello, Krish!. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Quantico (season 2) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Chers, Baffle gab1978 ( talk) 04:47, 16 November 2017 (UTC)) |
Please review
this FLC .You seem to frequently put up other articles at FLC and will probably have a good knowledge of them-To ping
me add {{ping|
Force Radical}} OR [[
User:Force Radical]]
10:28, 25 November 2017 (UTC) To ping
me add {{ping|
Force Radical}} OR [[
User:Force Radical]]
10:28, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Gunday you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Yashthepunisher --
Yashthepunisher (
talk)
17:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
The article
Gunday you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Gunday for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Yashthepunisher --
Yashthepunisher (
talk)
15:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Ventilator (film) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ssven2 --
Ssven2 (
talk)
15:41, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
The article
Ventilator (film) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Ventilator (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ssven2 --
Ssven2 (
talk)
07:02, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Krish!. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello again! I hope that you are having a wonderful week so far. I was wondering if you could possibly help me with my current FAC? I have decided to return to the FAC process, but I went with projects that I feel be rather easy to put through the reviews in comparison to Sévérine. I would be more than happy to review anything in return for your help. Either way, good luck with your current work and your future projects. Aoba47 ( talk) 02:34, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
This edit made you famous! Check this out! 86.99.14.238 ( talk) 15:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Bajirao Mastani you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
HindWIKI --
HindWIKI (
talk)
11:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
C'mon, Krish... this? When in a neutral encyclopedia do we describe a film as "huge box office flop"? Can I please challenge you to find a more neutral way to phrase the content you've changed? Thanks man, and it's nothing personal. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
We wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2018! |
Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas, and a Happy, Glorious, Prosperous New Year! God bless!
![]() |
The article
Bajirao Mastani you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Bajirao Mastani for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
HindWIKI --
HindWIKI (
talk)
10:41, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
On 1 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gunday, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Gunday (2014) became one of the lowest-rated films on IMDb following a vote brigading social-media campaign by Bangladeshis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gunday. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Gunday), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 00:03, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Bajirao Mastani at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Regards,
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (
talk •
mail)
08:48, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Dil Dhadakne Do you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ssven2 --
Ssven2 (
talk)
17:21, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The article
Dil Dhadakne Do you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Dil Dhadakne Do for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ssven2 --
Ssven2 (
talk)
14:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
May all your endeavours have a fruitful beginning and prosperous ending!
—
Ssven2
Looking at you, kid
09:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello there!
Your efforts on Bajirao Mastani and other articles are much appreciated - and so is your evident admiration for the talented Ms. Chopra, whose stature won't be diminished because she received lesser billing on WP when another actress plays the titular role. Please remember though that you must adhere to WP policy, and no article is your own property. Right now, you shouldn't change the page unless consensus is reached on the matter at hand. This is a two-year issue, and there's evidence that several editors think differently. A talk page discussion, which you didn't care to take part in, is open, and you are more than welcome to stop by. If consensus is reached, it's another story. I did offer to settle the issue by having the cast section reflect the film credits. But discussion is essential. You yourself once wrote in one edit summary "first talk then add" and therefore you should practice that yourself when more than one editor differs. Keep up the good work. Shahid • Talk2me 13:22, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
On 23 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bajirao Mastani, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2015 Indian epic historical romance film Bajirao Mastani spent eleven years in development hell before being revived in 2014? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bajirao Mastani. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Bajirao Mastani), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 13:01, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
My friend and fellow editor,
Numerounovedant, has nominated the article for FAC. Do let him know if you are willing to post comments at the second FAC. Thank you.
—
Ssven2
Looking at you, kid
08:59, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, about this, I have not watched the film and am not a fan of it. However, it is important to mention that the film had special screenings, during which reviews were positive and the theatrical release response was negative. That would be more comprehensive than simply saying response was mixed. For example, the IB Times source and Gulf News source are in direct conflict with each other, saying the opposite of each other. King Prithviraj II ( talk) 10:21, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
I am not crazy about the film and am not against having those words in the leading paragraph, but please add references right next to that sentence so that people can look those up. I'm not saying you made up those reviews; I just don't know where to look because that sentence does not point to any references. RagaBhakta ( talk) 23:35, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Would you like to review the article for its GA? Its my first GA nomination.
King Prithviraj II (
talk)
11:25, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Anticipating reply to your dyk request. Btw.. it was v good Whispyhistory ( talk) 21:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
On 10 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dil Dhadakne Do, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the song "Gallan Goodiyaan" from the 2015 Indian comedy-drama Dil Dhadakne Do was apparently filmed in a single five-minute take? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dil Dhadakne Do. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Dil Dhadakne Do), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 01:07, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
What exactly happened that caused him to snap? And his refusal to reply to your question (which was not a PA) makes me wonder if something is not quite right. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 04:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
How many favourite actresses do I have? I have written 9 FAs on leading actresses so far. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 09:36, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Also, to respond to Kailash's message, I did not snap. My edits were purely tongue-in-cheek, hence my comparing my "breakdown" to Meryl Streep's annual Oscar nomination. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 10:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Re: this, I'm pretty sure I've brought this up before, but we do not regurgitate subjective declarations made by trade mags. If a film was declared a "steaming pile of shit" by some mainstream source, we wouldn't publish that as an indisputable fact, because it breaches the formal, neutral tone we strive for at this encyclopedia. WP:NPOV is the salient policy and maybe also WP:UNDUE. Rotten Tomatoes uses "fresh" and "rotten" labels, but because we're discriminating editors, we don't just say "The film was declared rotten" because we understand that these are hyperbolic labels and may not be representative of every perspective on the film, and because the labels lack neutral nuance. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 07:49, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
I consider taking Bajirao Mastani to RfC, so that more editors judge the issue from an objective POV. What do you say? Shahid • Talk2me 19:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Dear Krish, okay you removed the warning. Please take things in the right proportions, how does WP even have the power to affect you so much? You're taking everything too close to heart, and as result you're behaving rather unconsciously. Let's try to work it out like mature people, I expect nothing less than professionalism from someone who is responsible for all of this. It's just a movie page on WP! It's just Deepika Padukone's performance, so she's getting the big bucks and you are getting nervous because of someone not agreeing with you? How come? Shahid • Talk2me 16:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Can someone help me with deleting my account permanently? I have had enough on this site. I have given so many years to this site yet some editors behave as if they own the articles. I have suffered so much because of unwanted hate created by many editors. So I would like the administrator to delete my account permanently. The negativity on this site is affecting my life and I am on a verge of mental breakdown. Please delete this account. I don't want to contribute on wikipedia and I'm sure nobody gives a fuck about my contributions and hard work. Krish | Talk 16:30, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Re:"It's like a depressing day you can't figure out how to overcome." Try watching Enchanted, Forrest Gump, or English Vinglish. There are some great stress busters our there Krish. Please do not let this affect yourself so much. Take a break, maybe binge watch all them this weekend, that's what I'd do. Vedant Talk 17:13, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Good luck with your off-Wikipedia projects. I have a great deal of respect for your work on here. You are a much better contributor than I am and I have a lot to learn from your work. I am glad that I got to read and learn from your contributions on here. Aoba47 ( talk) 06:27, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the Aitraaz article has been scheduled as today's featured article for April 4, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 4, 2018, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:49, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Rockstar (2011 film), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 01:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not here for you to vent and display your personal frustrations. I recommend you learn that soon. How about you not edit the article if you don't like it? Bye. -- Alex TW 05:31, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Parineeti Chopra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Film Award – Special Jury Award / Special Mention (Feature Film) ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:19, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
User:Krish!/My films list, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Krish!/My films list and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
User:Krish!/My films list during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Razer(
talk)
17:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Please, for the love of God, stay out of my hair. Such edit summaries is not helpful for either you or me. Let me edit in peace without having to deal with your personal opinions on me or other actors. I humbly request you. -- Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 16:14, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Ian.thomson (
talk)
21:37, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
So this biased administrator Ian.thomson BLOCKED me and not Krimuk2.0? Krish | Talk 22:22, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
stop talking about or to the other user, right now. I'm right inclined to block the next person who mentions the other user.
What about the double standards? Krish | Talk 22:56, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
The three-revert rule states:
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule often attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Fourth reverts just outside the 24-hour period may also be taken as evidence of edit-warring, especially if repeated or combined with other edit-warring behavior. See below for exemptions. . Answer me Ian.thomson. Krish | Talk 22:59, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Krish! ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Now looking back I think I was also at fault with my behavior but I do not deserve to be blocked for indefinite time (earlier it was 3 Days). I have done plenty of work here and want to do more. Please unblock me. I will try to be more civil. Krish Talk 23:18, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have to convince us we can be confident you'll never again engage in personal attacks or edit-warring. This totally fails to convince me. Yamla ( talk) 23:27, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Krish! ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I do not deserve to be blocked for indefinite time (earlier it was 3 Days). I have done plenty of work here and want to do more. Please unblock me. That another administrator said they would unblock me if I promised to never ever again engage in personal attacks and edit-warring. So yes! I totally promise. I will never ever again engage in personal attacks and edit-warring. I will always discuss first or seek help from other people regarding some edits. Krish
Decline reason:
Checkuser-confirmed sock puppetry in addition to anon IP editing which amounts to socking.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk)
17:24, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
That another administrator said they would unblock me if I promised to never ever again engage in personal attacks and edit-warring- that's not actually what anyone said. Yamla said
You have to convince us we can be confident you'll never again engage in personal attacks or edit-warring. Your inability to follow what others say is one of the reasons why I increased the block (so you'll want to read WP:IDHT as well). Ian.thomson ( talk) 18:21, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Krish!. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — Berean Hunter (talk) 17:22, 8 July 2018 (UTC) |
Krish! ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Seriously? Sockpuppet allegations? LMAO. On what basis? Plus why would I create an account called BollywoodSeductress and won't use for what you are accusing me "of bad behavior"? Don't you think I would have done something bad with that account? I have not done disruptive editing using IPs either. I want to tell you that since the last year I have been using a shared network (my workplace) and sometimes I have used Internet cafes while doing some document work related to my job. Never ever I have done disruptive editing using another account and never will. I done done so much work her and worked hard on over 50 articles, 44 of which are featured/good content. I have a subject of much hate and abuse from my fellow wikipedians from time to time through IPs (check my talk/user page history) but have never indulged in abusing them back. I am here solely for my love for films and few actors and ost of my edits are related to that. I really don't want to leave this place because I really like writing articles here. So kindly look at the matter. EdJohnston and Berean Hunter. Krish | Talk 07:59, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Unfortunately, we cannot unblock you at this time. There are simply too many coincidences surrounding the sockpuppets. I do not believe that any further unblock requests would have a chance of being successful at this point - and as such, I am revoking your ability to edit this page. If you have further appeals, you may make them via WP:UTRS, but I would strongly suggest that you take some time away from the project, and review the standard offer. SQL Query me! 22:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The wikipedia rules are against this block even considering those accounts are mine.That is probably the stupidest argument I've seen to get out of a block from someone who wasn't actively trolling. WP:BLOCK EVASION explains why we would block those accounts. Even if that was not a policy, common sense would indicate that if we're going to block a person, we need to block any sockpuppets they make or else the block is worthless. Frankly, I don't see why we don't revoke your talk page access, because even if you're not actively trolling, the resulting behavior might as well be the same. Ian.thomson ( talk) 15:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Quanticocast.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
hey!!! I've seen your work on Priyanka Chopra article. Great work i must say... and i have translated that article in Punjabi Language. Now it is second largest article in Punjabi language. Jagseer S Sidhu ( talk) 10:01, 6 August 2019 (UTC) |
You have been checkuser blocked by Berean Hunter, and so cannot be unblocked by me.
Also, your emails don't really show that you know what went wrong. You say that you learned from your mistakes, but you don't say what those mistakes are or what you learned from them.
You need to point to specific behaviors on your part and explain the problem with them, and how you plan to avoid them in the future.
Ian.thomson ( talk) 21:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Krish, I have changed the block to allow you talk page access so that you may appeal. Please review the above advice on this page before doing so. I have received your email but prefer that you do your appealing publicly.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk)
00:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Please note that while blocked, the user has continued to use IPs ( /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/196.207.91.174 and /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/27.61.86.70), accusing others of "hypocrisy" and "bias", which is what got him in trouble in the first place. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 09:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
But I reject YOUR first claim/theory, I have not edited this one ( /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/196.207.91.174). Maybe someone wrote that anonymous post just in case if I tried to come back for unblock after six months? Who knows? Maybe that person wrote other several posts? I don't know but anything is possible. Or just that one post to use against me? If I had written that anonymous post, don't you think I would have gone after your other articles and abused you or attacked you but It was not me as I had then just started my job from 9 July 2018 and didn't edit anything until 24 August 2019 to describe the situation for the betterment of the editors. I stand firm on my words above that I logged in to my account after a very long time after getting blocked and I have not used any IPs before that one edit on 24 August 2019, after more than a year. Krish | Talk 13:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Krish! ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was blocked in July 2018 for edit warring and not complying with the request of an administrator. I was told to come back after six months and appeal gain but I am here after more than a year. I completely agree with the administrators' action against me as my behavior was problematic and against Wikipedia guidelines. That time I was wrong and the block was justified. I admit I was involved in edit wars that could have been avoided on my part by dealing with them calmly and I should not have used personal attack to prove my point and should have listened to other users, and other administrators. I know all these things are against Wikipedia guidelines and I often used to overreact in heat of the moment which I shouldn't have. After taking a break for a whole year from Wikipedia, I learned several things thanks to my job (I graduated from college in 2018 and accepted one of the job offers) that has made me more calm, collaborative and a better person. While working I realized one don't need to shout or scream to prove their points instead one should listen to others and deal calmly. I have also learned that other people's POV are also important and they should be respected as well. My job has been a huge learning experience of my life. I think I am in a great position right now, personally and professionally, which was missing earlier and lead to frustration and over-reaction (during college days). Learning from mistakes and not repeating them has been my new motto since the last year and I have followed it nicely. I hope to get back to Wikipedia and edit and contribute like I earlier used to but this time in a very calm, positive and civil way. I have contributed so much to Wikipedia (2 FAs, 22 FLs, 1 FT and 22 GAs) and want to contribute more. I hope it's a new beginning. Krish | Talk 08:18, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You've engaged in sock puppetry and block evasion, not just a bit of edit warring from a year ago. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 09:22, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your email has been received. Please hold on. (I don't really like communicating by email, and rarely check it, hence the delay). Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 01:53, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
I think you should read the totality of the content on this page. I think you should then read the strong objection posted by Berean Hunter here. I think you should then sit in contemplation of the information and write a thorough unblock request that addresses all of the issues that led to your block, that acknowledges what was problematic about those choices you made, and that outlines a plan for how to avoid the problems in the future. At which point, I, or some other admin will open a discussion at WP:AN or WP:ANI to review the matter. I am busy IRL, so I may not be as responsive as you might prefer, but I will get to it as soon as I can if another person hasn't. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:02, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Krish! ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for 72 hours in July 2018 for edit warring and not complying with the request of an administrator. And then indefinitely for sock-puppetry, editing through different accounts, created during temporary blocks when I was in college. I only used those accounts only for the sole purpose to edit articles and never for supporting myself or something of that sort. I was wrong on my part. I shouldn't have and hence got rightly blocked. So I was told to come back after six months and appeal gain. I waited for a year and then I sent emails to many Administrators for appeal (as my TPA access was revoked; so had to email) but didn't get any response. During this time, I did an innocent IP edit (still wrong on my part as that time I thought it was allowed for constructive edit; later I learned it was not allowed) on 24 August 2019 to help discuss a situation. Then I was told to wait for another six months for the standard offer and here I am. I completely agree with the administrators' action against me as my behavior was problematic and against Wikipedia guidelines. That time I was wrong and the block was justified. I admit I was involved in edit wars that could have been avoided on my part by dealing with them calmly and I should not have used personal attack to prove my point and should have listened to other users, and other administrators. I know all these things are against Wikipedia guidelines and I often used to overreact in heat of the moment which I shouldn't have. After taking a break for a whole year from Wikipedia, I learned several things thanks to my job (I graduated from college in 2018 and accepted one of the job offers) that has made me more calm, collaborative and a better person. While working I realized one don't need to shout or scream to prove their points instead one should listen to others and deal calmly. I have also learned that other people's POV are also important and they should be respected as well. My job has been a huge learning experience of my life. I think I am in a great position right now, personally and professionally, which was missing earlier and lead to frustration and over-reaction (during college days). Learning from mistakes and not repeating them has been my new motto since the last year and I have followed it nicely. I hope to get back to Wikipedia and edit and contribute like I earlier used to but this time in a very calm, positive and civil way. I have contributed so much to Wikipedia (2 FAs, 22 FLs, 1 FT and 22 GAs) and want to contribute more. I hope it's a new beginning. I won't be repeating any of my past mistakes and I deserve a chance to grow. I have learned from my mistakes and I am a better person and editor now. Krish | Talk 19:45, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Accept reason:
You have been unblocked following a successful appeal request at WP:AN. Please take care to read core Wikipedia content and conduct policies (especially WP:SOCK) before resuming to edit. The community has displayed an willingness to trust your intentions, I hope you keep that trust. Good luck and happy editing! Best, qedk ( t 桜 c) 13:48, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 |
Dear Krish! Can you find a poster of movie Chehere: A Modern Day Classic? Thank you! -- 217.66.152.6 ( talk) 15:04, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Dostana (2008 film) at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
SL93 (
talk)
01:03, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
This is my fourth attempt at a featured list. Feel free to leave comments if any. :) Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 18:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Krrish 3 (2013 film) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Krrish poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:23, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Alex Parrish you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Numerounovedant --
Numerounovedant (
talk)
17:01, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for doing the review. I will have the QPQ in a few days.
On another note, do you mind changing your signature? The pipe character |
is messing up the template, so could you use |
instead? This character produces the same output, which is a pipe character. It would be much appreciated.
Regards, epicgenius ( talk) 01:57, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
On 2 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dostana (2008 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2008 film Dostana inspired several fashion trends in India, with Priyanka Chopra's silver sari, worn in the song "Desi Girl", becoming very popular? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dostana (2008 film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Dostana (2008 film)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Quantico (season 1) has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 20:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
| Hello, Krish!. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Quantico (TV series) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with GA and all the best, Mini apolis 15:59, 5 August 2017 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading File:Krrish poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:34, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Krrish 3 (2013 film) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Quantico (TV series) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Adamstom.97 --
Adamstom.97 (
talk)
23:01, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
The article
Quantico (TV series) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Quantico (TV series) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Adamstom.97 --
Adamstom.97 (
talk)
07:22, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
The article
Quantico (TV series) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Quantico (TV series) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Adamstom.97 --
Adamstom.97 (
talk)
23:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() | |
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:10, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
— Yash talk stalk 05:57, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
The article
Alex Parrish you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Alex Parrish for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Numerounovedant --
Numerounovedant (
talk)
11:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Congratulations Daan0001 ( talk) 19:39, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
On 4 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Quantico (TV series), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after appearing in more than 50 films, Priyanka Chopra's first-ever audition was for the American television series Quantico? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Quantico (TV series). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Quantico (TV series)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saiwyn Quadras is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saiwyn Quadras until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CelenaSkaggs ( talk) 21:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
On 17 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alex Parrish, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that by portraying Alex Parrish in Quantico, Priyanka Chopra became the first South Asian to headline an American network drama series? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alex Parrish. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Alex Parrish), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 12:03, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
In undoing an edit by Mchoudhury11 to Gunday from over a month ago, you undid painstaking copyediting (which you requested) by me and edits by a number of others. Old edits must be revised manually. Since I don't have much time available for copyediting, I'm done here. Mini apolis 20:32, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
| Hello, Krish!. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Gunday at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Tdslk ( talk) 17:54, 7 October 2017 (UTC) |
I'll have a look at Anjaana Anjaani for you over the next couple of days. Twofingered Typist ( talk) 13:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anne Hathaway on screen and stage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Anjaana Anjaani has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 14:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
I would appreciate your comments in this FLC, Krish.
—
Ssven2
Looking at you, kid
08:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Anjaana Anjaani you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Pavanjandhyala --
Pavanjandhyala (
talk)
06:21, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
The article
Anjaana Anjaani you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Anjaana Anjaani for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Pavanjandhyala --
Pavanjandhyala (
talk)
17:41, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
| Hello, Krish!. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Dil Dhadakne Do at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 ( talk) 03:07, 21 October 2017 (UTC) |
| Hello, Krish!. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Bajirao Mastani at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! This will take me several days to complete. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 ( talk) 03:18, 28 October 2017 (UTC) |
I must commend your effort on expanding the article on this film. A "Themes and influences" section would be quite useful (Like what material/films was SLB and the cast inspired by/what films and literary works were they similar to). You can use Mughal-e-Azam, Pather Panchali and Mother India as references if you wish.
—
Ssven2
Looking at you, kid
07:41, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
It is under WP:FAR. Would you be willing to make comments there? -- Kailash29792 (talk) 05:38, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
I was wondering why you haven't nominated this list for FLC yet? BTW, please leave your comments here if interested. Yashthepunisher ( talk) 12:33, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Krish. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Quantico episodes – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for November 27. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 21:38, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the Aitraaz article has been scheduled as today's featured article for December 9, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 9, 2017.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 18:03, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
| Hello, Krish!. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Ventilator (film) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 ( talk) 01:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC) |
| Hello, Krish!. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Quantico (season 2) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Chers, Baffle gab1978 ( talk) 04:47, 16 November 2017 (UTC)) |
Please review
this FLC .You seem to frequently put up other articles at FLC and will probably have a good knowledge of them-To ping
me add {{ping|
Force Radical}} OR [[
User:Force Radical]]
10:28, 25 November 2017 (UTC) To ping
me add {{ping|
Force Radical}} OR [[
User:Force Radical]]
10:28, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Gunday you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Yashthepunisher --
Yashthepunisher (
talk)
17:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
The article
Gunday you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Gunday for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Yashthepunisher --
Yashthepunisher (
talk)
15:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Ventilator (film) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ssven2 --
Ssven2 (
talk)
15:41, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
The article
Ventilator (film) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Ventilator (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ssven2 --
Ssven2 (
talk)
07:02, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Krish!. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello again! I hope that you are having a wonderful week so far. I was wondering if you could possibly help me with my current FAC? I have decided to return to the FAC process, but I went with projects that I feel be rather easy to put through the reviews in comparison to Sévérine. I would be more than happy to review anything in return for your help. Either way, good luck with your current work and your future projects. Aoba47 ( talk) 02:34, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
This edit made you famous! Check this out! 86.99.14.238 ( talk) 15:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Bajirao Mastani you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
HindWIKI --
HindWIKI (
talk)
11:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
C'mon, Krish... this? When in a neutral encyclopedia do we describe a film as "huge box office flop"? Can I please challenge you to find a more neutral way to phrase the content you've changed? Thanks man, and it's nothing personal. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
We wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2018! |
Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas, and a Happy, Glorious, Prosperous New Year! God bless!
![]() |
The article
Bajirao Mastani you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Bajirao Mastani for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
HindWIKI --
HindWIKI (
talk)
10:41, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
On 1 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gunday, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Gunday (2014) became one of the lowest-rated films on IMDb following a vote brigading social-media campaign by Bangladeshis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gunday. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Gunday), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 00:03, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Bajirao Mastani at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Regards,
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (
talk •
mail)
08:48, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Dil Dhadakne Do you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ssven2 --
Ssven2 (
talk)
17:21, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The article
Dil Dhadakne Do you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Dil Dhadakne Do for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Ssven2 --
Ssven2 (
talk)
14:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
May all your endeavours have a fruitful beginning and prosperous ending!
—
Ssven2
Looking at you, kid
09:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello there!
Your efforts on Bajirao Mastani and other articles are much appreciated - and so is your evident admiration for the talented Ms. Chopra, whose stature won't be diminished because she received lesser billing on WP when another actress plays the titular role. Please remember though that you must adhere to WP policy, and no article is your own property. Right now, you shouldn't change the page unless consensus is reached on the matter at hand. This is a two-year issue, and there's evidence that several editors think differently. A talk page discussion, which you didn't care to take part in, is open, and you are more than welcome to stop by. If consensus is reached, it's another story. I did offer to settle the issue by having the cast section reflect the film credits. But discussion is essential. You yourself once wrote in one edit summary "first talk then add" and therefore you should practice that yourself when more than one editor differs. Keep up the good work. Shahid • Talk2me 13:22, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
On 23 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bajirao Mastani, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2015 Indian epic historical romance film Bajirao Mastani spent eleven years in development hell before being revived in 2014? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bajirao Mastani. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Bajirao Mastani), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 13:01, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
My friend and fellow editor,
Numerounovedant, has nominated the article for FAC. Do let him know if you are willing to post comments at the second FAC. Thank you.
—
Ssven2
Looking at you, kid
08:59, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, about this, I have not watched the film and am not a fan of it. However, it is important to mention that the film had special screenings, during which reviews were positive and the theatrical release response was negative. That would be more comprehensive than simply saying response was mixed. For example, the IB Times source and Gulf News source are in direct conflict with each other, saying the opposite of each other. King Prithviraj II ( talk) 10:21, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
I am not crazy about the film and am not against having those words in the leading paragraph, but please add references right next to that sentence so that people can look those up. I'm not saying you made up those reviews; I just don't know where to look because that sentence does not point to any references. RagaBhakta ( talk) 23:35, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Would you like to review the article for its GA? Its my first GA nomination.
King Prithviraj II (
talk)
11:25, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Anticipating reply to your dyk request. Btw.. it was v good Whispyhistory ( talk) 21:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
On 10 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dil Dhadakne Do, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the song "Gallan Goodiyaan" from the 2015 Indian comedy-drama Dil Dhadakne Do was apparently filmed in a single five-minute take? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dil Dhadakne Do. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Dil Dhadakne Do), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 01:07, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
What exactly happened that caused him to snap? And his refusal to reply to your question (which was not a PA) makes me wonder if something is not quite right. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 04:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
How many favourite actresses do I have? I have written 9 FAs on leading actresses so far. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 09:36, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Also, to respond to Kailash's message, I did not snap. My edits were purely tongue-in-cheek, hence my comparing my "breakdown" to Meryl Streep's annual Oscar nomination. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 10:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Re: this, I'm pretty sure I've brought this up before, but we do not regurgitate subjective declarations made by trade mags. If a film was declared a "steaming pile of shit" by some mainstream source, we wouldn't publish that as an indisputable fact, because it breaches the formal, neutral tone we strive for at this encyclopedia. WP:NPOV is the salient policy and maybe also WP:UNDUE. Rotten Tomatoes uses "fresh" and "rotten" labels, but because we're discriminating editors, we don't just say "The film was declared rotten" because we understand that these are hyperbolic labels and may not be representative of every perspective on the film, and because the labels lack neutral nuance. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 07:49, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
I consider taking Bajirao Mastani to RfC, so that more editors judge the issue from an objective POV. What do you say? Shahid • Talk2me 19:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Dear Krish, okay you removed the warning. Please take things in the right proportions, how does WP even have the power to affect you so much? You're taking everything too close to heart, and as result you're behaving rather unconsciously. Let's try to work it out like mature people, I expect nothing less than professionalism from someone who is responsible for all of this. It's just a movie page on WP! It's just Deepika Padukone's performance, so she's getting the big bucks and you are getting nervous because of someone not agreeing with you? How come? Shahid • Talk2me 16:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Can someone help me with deleting my account permanently? I have had enough on this site. I have given so many years to this site yet some editors behave as if they own the articles. I have suffered so much because of unwanted hate created by many editors. So I would like the administrator to delete my account permanently. The negativity on this site is affecting my life and I am on a verge of mental breakdown. Please delete this account. I don't want to contribute on wikipedia and I'm sure nobody gives a fuck about my contributions and hard work. Krish | Talk 16:30, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Re:"It's like a depressing day you can't figure out how to overcome." Try watching Enchanted, Forrest Gump, or English Vinglish. There are some great stress busters our there Krish. Please do not let this affect yourself so much. Take a break, maybe binge watch all them this weekend, that's what I'd do. Vedant Talk 17:13, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Good luck with your off-Wikipedia projects. I have a great deal of respect for your work on here. You are a much better contributor than I am and I have a lot to learn from your work. I am glad that I got to read and learn from your contributions on here. Aoba47 ( talk) 06:27, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the Aitraaz article has been scheduled as today's featured article for April 4, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 4, 2018, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:49, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Rockstar (2011 film), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 01:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not here for you to vent and display your personal frustrations. I recommend you learn that soon. How about you not edit the article if you don't like it? Bye. -- Alex TW 05:31, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Parineeti Chopra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Film Award – Special Jury Award / Special Mention (Feature Film) ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:19, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
User:Krish!/My films list, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Krish!/My films list and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
User:Krish!/My films list during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Razer(
talk)
17:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Please, for the love of God, stay out of my hair. Such edit summaries is not helpful for either you or me. Let me edit in peace without having to deal with your personal opinions on me or other actors. I humbly request you. -- Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 16:14, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Ian.thomson (
talk)
21:37, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
So this biased administrator Ian.thomson BLOCKED me and not Krimuk2.0? Krish | Talk 22:22, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
stop talking about or to the other user, right now. I'm right inclined to block the next person who mentions the other user.
What about the double standards? Krish | Talk 22:56, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
The three-revert rule states:
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule often attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Fourth reverts just outside the 24-hour period may also be taken as evidence of edit-warring, especially if repeated or combined with other edit-warring behavior. See below for exemptions. . Answer me Ian.thomson. Krish | Talk 22:59, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Krish! ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Now looking back I think I was also at fault with my behavior but I do not deserve to be blocked for indefinite time (earlier it was 3 Days). I have done plenty of work here and want to do more. Please unblock me. I will try to be more civil. Krish Talk 23:18, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have to convince us we can be confident you'll never again engage in personal attacks or edit-warring. This totally fails to convince me. Yamla ( talk) 23:27, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Krish! ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I do not deserve to be blocked for indefinite time (earlier it was 3 Days). I have done plenty of work here and want to do more. Please unblock me. That another administrator said they would unblock me if I promised to never ever again engage in personal attacks and edit-warring. So yes! I totally promise. I will never ever again engage in personal attacks and edit-warring. I will always discuss first or seek help from other people regarding some edits. Krish
Decline reason:
Checkuser-confirmed sock puppetry in addition to anon IP editing which amounts to socking.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk)
17:24, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
That another administrator said they would unblock me if I promised to never ever again engage in personal attacks and edit-warring- that's not actually what anyone said. Yamla said
You have to convince us we can be confident you'll never again engage in personal attacks or edit-warring. Your inability to follow what others say is one of the reasons why I increased the block (so you'll want to read WP:IDHT as well). Ian.thomson ( talk) 18:21, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Krish!. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — Berean Hunter (talk) 17:22, 8 July 2018 (UTC) |
Krish! ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Seriously? Sockpuppet allegations? LMAO. On what basis? Plus why would I create an account called BollywoodSeductress and won't use for what you are accusing me "of bad behavior"? Don't you think I would have done something bad with that account? I have not done disruptive editing using IPs either. I want to tell you that since the last year I have been using a shared network (my workplace) and sometimes I have used Internet cafes while doing some document work related to my job. Never ever I have done disruptive editing using another account and never will. I done done so much work her and worked hard on over 50 articles, 44 of which are featured/good content. I have a subject of much hate and abuse from my fellow wikipedians from time to time through IPs (check my talk/user page history) but have never indulged in abusing them back. I am here solely for my love for films and few actors and ost of my edits are related to that. I really don't want to leave this place because I really like writing articles here. So kindly look at the matter. EdJohnston and Berean Hunter. Krish | Talk 07:59, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Unfortunately, we cannot unblock you at this time. There are simply too many coincidences surrounding the sockpuppets. I do not believe that any further unblock requests would have a chance of being successful at this point - and as such, I am revoking your ability to edit this page. If you have further appeals, you may make them via WP:UTRS, but I would strongly suggest that you take some time away from the project, and review the standard offer. SQL Query me! 22:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The wikipedia rules are against this block even considering those accounts are mine.That is probably the stupidest argument I've seen to get out of a block from someone who wasn't actively trolling. WP:BLOCK EVASION explains why we would block those accounts. Even if that was not a policy, common sense would indicate that if we're going to block a person, we need to block any sockpuppets they make or else the block is worthless. Frankly, I don't see why we don't revoke your talk page access, because even if you're not actively trolling, the resulting behavior might as well be the same. Ian.thomson ( talk) 15:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Quanticocast.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
hey!!! I've seen your work on Priyanka Chopra article. Great work i must say... and i have translated that article in Punjabi Language. Now it is second largest article in Punjabi language. Jagseer S Sidhu ( talk) 10:01, 6 August 2019 (UTC) |
You have been checkuser blocked by Berean Hunter, and so cannot be unblocked by me.
Also, your emails don't really show that you know what went wrong. You say that you learned from your mistakes, but you don't say what those mistakes are or what you learned from them.
You need to point to specific behaviors on your part and explain the problem with them, and how you plan to avoid them in the future.
Ian.thomson ( talk) 21:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Krish, I have changed the block to allow you talk page access so that you may appeal. Please review the above advice on this page before doing so. I have received your email but prefer that you do your appealing publicly.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk)
00:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Please note that while blocked, the user has continued to use IPs ( /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/196.207.91.174 and /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/27.61.86.70), accusing others of "hypocrisy" and "bias", which is what got him in trouble in the first place. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 09:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
But I reject YOUR first claim/theory, I have not edited this one ( /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/196.207.91.174). Maybe someone wrote that anonymous post just in case if I tried to come back for unblock after six months? Who knows? Maybe that person wrote other several posts? I don't know but anything is possible. Or just that one post to use against me? If I had written that anonymous post, don't you think I would have gone after your other articles and abused you or attacked you but It was not me as I had then just started my job from 9 July 2018 and didn't edit anything until 24 August 2019 to describe the situation for the betterment of the editors. I stand firm on my words above that I logged in to my account after a very long time after getting blocked and I have not used any IPs before that one edit on 24 August 2019, after more than a year. Krish | Talk 13:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Krish! ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was blocked in July 2018 for edit warring and not complying with the request of an administrator. I was told to come back after six months and appeal gain but I am here after more than a year. I completely agree with the administrators' action against me as my behavior was problematic and against Wikipedia guidelines. That time I was wrong and the block was justified. I admit I was involved in edit wars that could have been avoided on my part by dealing with them calmly and I should not have used personal attack to prove my point and should have listened to other users, and other administrators. I know all these things are against Wikipedia guidelines and I often used to overreact in heat of the moment which I shouldn't have. After taking a break for a whole year from Wikipedia, I learned several things thanks to my job (I graduated from college in 2018 and accepted one of the job offers) that has made me more calm, collaborative and a better person. While working I realized one don't need to shout or scream to prove their points instead one should listen to others and deal calmly. I have also learned that other people's POV are also important and they should be respected as well. My job has been a huge learning experience of my life. I think I am in a great position right now, personally and professionally, which was missing earlier and lead to frustration and over-reaction (during college days). Learning from mistakes and not repeating them has been my new motto since the last year and I have followed it nicely. I hope to get back to Wikipedia and edit and contribute like I earlier used to but this time in a very calm, positive and civil way. I have contributed so much to Wikipedia (2 FAs, 22 FLs, 1 FT and 22 GAs) and want to contribute more. I hope it's a new beginning. Krish | Talk 08:18, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You've engaged in sock puppetry and block evasion, not just a bit of edit warring from a year ago. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 09:22, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your email has been received. Please hold on. (I don't really like communicating by email, and rarely check it, hence the delay). Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 01:53, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
I think you should read the totality of the content on this page. I think you should then read the strong objection posted by Berean Hunter here. I think you should then sit in contemplation of the information and write a thorough unblock request that addresses all of the issues that led to your block, that acknowledges what was problematic about those choices you made, and that outlines a plan for how to avoid the problems in the future. At which point, I, or some other admin will open a discussion at WP:AN or WP:ANI to review the matter. I am busy IRL, so I may not be as responsive as you might prefer, but I will get to it as soon as I can if another person hasn't. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:02, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Krish! ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for 72 hours in July 2018 for edit warring and not complying with the request of an administrator. And then indefinitely for sock-puppetry, editing through different accounts, created during temporary blocks when I was in college. I only used those accounts only for the sole purpose to edit articles and never for supporting myself or something of that sort. I was wrong on my part. I shouldn't have and hence got rightly blocked. So I was told to come back after six months and appeal gain. I waited for a year and then I sent emails to many Administrators for appeal (as my TPA access was revoked; so had to email) but didn't get any response. During this time, I did an innocent IP edit (still wrong on my part as that time I thought it was allowed for constructive edit; later I learned it was not allowed) on 24 August 2019 to help discuss a situation. Then I was told to wait for another six months for the standard offer and here I am. I completely agree with the administrators' action against me as my behavior was problematic and against Wikipedia guidelines. That time I was wrong and the block was justified. I admit I was involved in edit wars that could have been avoided on my part by dealing with them calmly and I should not have used personal attack to prove my point and should have listened to other users, and other administrators. I know all these things are against Wikipedia guidelines and I often used to overreact in heat of the moment which I shouldn't have. After taking a break for a whole year from Wikipedia, I learned several things thanks to my job (I graduated from college in 2018 and accepted one of the job offers) that has made me more calm, collaborative and a better person. While working I realized one don't need to shout or scream to prove their points instead one should listen to others and deal calmly. I have also learned that other people's POV are also important and they should be respected as well. My job has been a huge learning experience of my life. I think I am in a great position right now, personally and professionally, which was missing earlier and lead to frustration and over-reaction (during college days). Learning from mistakes and not repeating them has been my new motto since the last year and I have followed it nicely. I hope to get back to Wikipedia and edit and contribute like I earlier used to but this time in a very calm, positive and civil way. I have contributed so much to Wikipedia (2 FAs, 22 FLs, 1 FT and 22 GAs) and want to contribute more. I hope it's a new beginning. I won't be repeating any of my past mistakes and I deserve a chance to grow. I have learned from my mistakes and I am a better person and editor now. Krish | Talk 19:45, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Accept reason:
You have been unblocked following a successful appeal request at WP:AN. Please take care to read core Wikipedia content and conduct policies (especially WP:SOCK) before resuming to edit. The community has displayed an willingness to trust your intentions, I hope you keep that trust. Good luck and happy editing! Best, qedk ( t 桜 c) 13:48, 29 February 2020 (UTC)