This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 40 | ← | Archive 44 | Archive 45 | Archive 46 | Archive 47 | Archive 48 | → | Archive 50 |
Good afternoon Miss Katie, I have some questions to ask you, if you don't mind Alexis Ivanov ( talk) 21:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
I told you I have nothing more to say about it. Katie talk 03:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
I've explained myself already. If you want to go to AN, go right ahead. Don't threaten me again. Katie talk 18:42, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Okay, since you can't seem to get the message by me being polite, I'll be blunt. Stop it. Either go edit an article and contribute to the encyclopedia, or take your complaint to AN. I've told you at least three times now that my reply to LouisAragon was all I have to say on this subject, and I mean it. The block is expired and to my knowledge you didn't appeal it while it was in place, so there's nothing more to do. I think you have constructive contributions to make, but unless you can drop the stick your experience is going to be sub-optimal. I am no one's victim, and I won't tolerate harassment from you or anyone else, and that's what this is becoming. Don't post here again about this. Katie talk 21:54, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I wanted to leave a comment in support of RickinBaltimore's request for adminship, but I see the page is protected, I think he would make a great administrator because he is very good at identifying socks and IP hopping vandals. 107.77.235.24 ( talk) 19:40, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
|
Good day Katie, I have sent an unlbock request on my Talk Page. I have realized all my mistake and listen to the past advice of a wikipedia adminstrator that i should make an unblock request from the master account.-- 105.112.35.84 ( talk) 14:16, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 19, September–October 2016
by
Nikkimaria,
Sadads and
UY Scuti
19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
The final round of the 2016 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2016 WikiCup top three finalists:
In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:
Over the course of the 2016 WikiCup the following content was added to Wikipedia (only reporting on fixed value categories): 17 Featured Articles, 183 Good Articles, 8 Featured Lists, 87 Featured Pictures, 40 In The News, and 321 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2017 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan ( talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 ( talk · contribs · email)
Hello Katie! Long time no talk. We've interacted many times in the past and you have been super helpful to me on many ocassions. I saw that you recently commented on a couple of WP:ANI cases. I'm curious, if I asked you to look at one that I am involved in, would the be considered WP:CANVASING? I want an honest opinion. I'm NOT just looking for someone to back me up. I trust your judgement and you have, as I said, been helpful to me in the past. This has included correcting me/reprimanding me when I am wrong. If, AND ONLY IF, you see it appropriate, I would appreciate your comments on the matter. Hoping you are well! -- Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 03:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to confirm the genuiety of a Nigeria professional player known as Atilola Abdulsalam Tunde so you can undo the deletion date April 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hassantaiwo ( talk • contribs) 22:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Katie, not sure if you saw that I'd sent the issue to AfD. Regardless of the outcome, it's helpful to have a consolidated discussion on record for when future issues arise. Cheers, OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Katie, It appears that you confirmed that the users at this sockpuppet investigation are sockpuppets. I'm wondering what the next steps are.... Are sockpuppets blocked from editing?
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Camairaen
Thank you. BringthePaine ( talk) 16:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Hey! We never discussed R.E.M.! By the way, congrats on the OS/CU toys! Montanabw (talk) 08:42, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
The two IPs which were inexplicably reverting my edits, and removing cited material, have been found to be sockpuppets, and may possibly have a connection to User:Xoil as well. They are not partaking in any way a discussion about the issue, and they were simply just vandalizing material by removing cited sources to push a POV. I am request for the page to be unprotected or reduced to semi-protection of some sort to permit limited editing by registered users. Thank you. ItaloCelt84 ( talk) 18:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
More bovine excrement after your CU, blocked again. — Spaceman Spiff 04:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Pardon me if I have the wrong page but this is where it has directed me ..... As a ex winlation person I'd like to know where u get ur information?? My contact information {redacted} — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.197.98.185 ( talk) 07:53, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Trylie created their very own Category - " Category:Trylie's Flag Templates" which is full of their "More..." flag templates, including Template:More colored flags... I'm fine going through and tagging them for discussion or speedy delete but wasn't sure which avenue would be more appropriate from a WP-policy/guideline point of view. Thx in advance for any insights, Shearonink ( talk) 03:27, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Having spotted you having a headache with the whole Alexis Ivanov thing at ANI, plus for stepping in to satisfy the requirements of WP:CUBL at the report by 'GhostTownsMapper', I just wanted to say, you're doing a good job. :) MM (WhatIDo WHATIDO?) (Now THIS... I did.) 19:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC) |
Urgent. - NQ (talk) 22:43, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Would you mind training me as a SPI clerk please? -- Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ ( talk) 23:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Just a heads-up: Samwright ( talk · contribs) looks like a duck of the genus Daniel Kobe Ricks Jr, given that two of the deleted articles have been recreated by that brand-new account. I wasn't sure whether to add this to the SPI and ping you there, but since the investigation is closed I posted here instead - let me know if you prefer to keep it to the SPI page. Cheers, -- bonadea contributions talk 18:33, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi KrakatoaKatie,
could you please restore the article Eugene Fallah Kparkar? I would like to be able to read its text, in order to create its equivalent on French Wikipedia. NAH 17:15, 11 November 2016 (UTC).
Thanks for the CUs. By the way, in case you're bored on this lovely Friday night, I just G5'd a large stack of sock articles. Best, GAB gab 03:36, 12 November 2016 (UTC) |
I'm frank Hooke and I created a page Adams bodomo using the account samwright but after few hours the page got blocked by you. I'm asking you to please unblock both the account and article. 45.211.197.78 ( talk) 17:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Samwright 45.211.197.78 ( talk) 17:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Katie. When you closed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yevoc4 you tagged the user pages of the accounts as sockpuppets. You also tagged User:Adamspy1, which is actually an account that doesn't exist. I assume this was a mistake, so I have deleted the page. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 17:18, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
hi this is my first talk in wiki.So I want to know how can message ....help me
Sunresh ( talk) 20:12, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
I came across the subject of Flowers' profile on Twitter. He is not ultra-famous, but for people who follow American Football, he is best known for being a draft bust and committing an exceedingly large amount of holding penalties. Furthermore, you threatening to have my editing abilities removed is improper and in poor form. I have sources. How many are required, in your opinion? [1]
Do you want a list of articles where he shoved a reported for asking him about his penalties and poor play? [2]
Would you prefer the edit to say something to the effect of "Flowers is widely considered a bust." Billywhack ( talk) 22:48, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Where in the world do you get all your energy and enthusiasm from? Sometimes I get tired just watching you. You've practically single-handedly reduced the number of cases at SPI to almost nothing. The pickings have gotten so slim I've been "forced" to clerk, which is ironic because when we had a major backlog, I felt I had to clerk to help reduce the backlog. I guess it happens at both ends.
Anyway, kudos!-- Bbb23 ( talk) 19:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Nice to meet you. What made you become an RN and work in that field? I wondered how you have time to work on wikipedia abd what drives you to write. I want to get advise on how to become what you are in eiki. I have always liked research and telling the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.18.148.38 ( talk) 04:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Katie. I noticed that you had gained access to en-admins
around the same time I did. Are you able to join the channel successfully? I still get a "This channel is invite-only" message... Am I missing a step? Thanks in advance!
Reh
man
12:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Sorry for the trouble i caused. I am here so that i can contribute something.i apologize if i did something wrong.It will not be repeated in future.thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helpforwikipedia ( talk • contribs) 02:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
...it could be nothing, but considering the recent ANI thread, might be worth having a quick look at this: [1] Mike1901 ( talk) 11:27, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi KrakatoaKatie.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins). MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
I was pinged by coalnation which when you declined the request you unintentional pinged me, is there a way i can have me not be pinged via unblock request and/or blocked users? --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 21:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for protecting my talk page and dealing with the IP-hopping vandal attacking it! Scjessey ( talk) 03:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi! I just discovered that a rangeblock from a few days ago, Special:Block/2600:3C00:0:0:0:0:0:0/30, is blocking all the edits from dashboard.wikiedu.org. Specifically, the dashboard's IPv6 address is 2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fe08:7973 (and 45.56.98.206 for IPv4). It's a linode server, so I'm guessing that it got caught based on some other bad actors using a linode server. Can I remove the block, or can you narrow it so that it excludes that address? Thanks!-- ragesoss ( talk) 18:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Hey Katie. I finally had some time to make a dig in the revision history of the Alania article, as something was reeking for quite some time. Basically, I'm 99% sure that IP 31.146.248.126 is operated for illegitimate means by user "Lashalakerbaia". I've listed all evidence here, on the talk page of the article in question. Could you perhaps take a look at it? Bests - LouisAragon ( talk) 05:02, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
hello, I was wondering if you are able to edit the main page in the on this day section to include the end of the Battle of the Somme which I think should be on the main page as it was an important even in world war one. thank you for reading Teabagishere ( talk) 09:34, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Katie,
Would you mind taking a look at the unblock request on the above page? Although the accounts weren't created how they should have been, the CU data would seem to support the claim that they were created for an edit-a-thon. Cheers — DoRD ( talk) 13:24, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
|
Hi Katie, this May I had requested for rollback permission at PERM and you had advised me that you will reconsider if I apply after a few months for the same. This is the sixth running month since then and I have put in quite a bit of reverting experience between that time and now. You can see my reverts and undos to review the same. May I request you to consider granting the rollback flag now? Thanks and best. Lourdes 14:51, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, KrakatoaKatie. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
| |
---|---|
Two new topics for our online editathons |
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 40 | ← | Archive 44 | Archive 45 | Archive 46 | Archive 47 | Archive 48 | → | Archive 50 |
Good afternoon Miss Katie, I have some questions to ask you, if you don't mind Alexis Ivanov ( talk) 21:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
I told you I have nothing more to say about it. Katie talk 03:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
I've explained myself already. If you want to go to AN, go right ahead. Don't threaten me again. Katie talk 18:42, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Okay, since you can't seem to get the message by me being polite, I'll be blunt. Stop it. Either go edit an article and contribute to the encyclopedia, or take your complaint to AN. I've told you at least three times now that my reply to LouisAragon was all I have to say on this subject, and I mean it. The block is expired and to my knowledge you didn't appeal it while it was in place, so there's nothing more to do. I think you have constructive contributions to make, but unless you can drop the stick your experience is going to be sub-optimal. I am no one's victim, and I won't tolerate harassment from you or anyone else, and that's what this is becoming. Don't post here again about this. Katie talk 21:54, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I wanted to leave a comment in support of RickinBaltimore's request for adminship, but I see the page is protected, I think he would make a great administrator because he is very good at identifying socks and IP hopping vandals. 107.77.235.24 ( talk) 19:40, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
|
Good day Katie, I have sent an unlbock request on my Talk Page. I have realized all my mistake and listen to the past advice of a wikipedia adminstrator that i should make an unblock request from the master account.-- 105.112.35.84 ( talk) 14:16, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 19, September–October 2016
by
Nikkimaria,
Sadads and
UY Scuti
19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
The final round of the 2016 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2016 WikiCup top three finalists:
In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:
Over the course of the 2016 WikiCup the following content was added to Wikipedia (only reporting on fixed value categories): 17 Featured Articles, 183 Good Articles, 8 Featured Lists, 87 Featured Pictures, 40 In The News, and 321 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2017 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan ( talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 ( talk · contribs · email)
Hello Katie! Long time no talk. We've interacted many times in the past and you have been super helpful to me on many ocassions. I saw that you recently commented on a couple of WP:ANI cases. I'm curious, if I asked you to look at one that I am involved in, would the be considered WP:CANVASING? I want an honest opinion. I'm NOT just looking for someone to back me up. I trust your judgement and you have, as I said, been helpful to me in the past. This has included correcting me/reprimanding me when I am wrong. If, AND ONLY IF, you see it appropriate, I would appreciate your comments on the matter. Hoping you are well! -- Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 03:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
I want to confirm the genuiety of a Nigeria professional player known as Atilola Abdulsalam Tunde so you can undo the deletion date April 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hassantaiwo ( talk • contribs) 22:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Katie, not sure if you saw that I'd sent the issue to AfD. Regardless of the outcome, it's helpful to have a consolidated discussion on record for when future issues arise. Cheers, OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Katie, It appears that you confirmed that the users at this sockpuppet investigation are sockpuppets. I'm wondering what the next steps are.... Are sockpuppets blocked from editing?
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Camairaen
Thank you. BringthePaine ( talk) 16:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Hey! We never discussed R.E.M.! By the way, congrats on the OS/CU toys! Montanabw (talk) 08:42, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
The two IPs which were inexplicably reverting my edits, and removing cited material, have been found to be sockpuppets, and may possibly have a connection to User:Xoil as well. They are not partaking in any way a discussion about the issue, and they were simply just vandalizing material by removing cited sources to push a POV. I am request for the page to be unprotected or reduced to semi-protection of some sort to permit limited editing by registered users. Thank you. ItaloCelt84 ( talk) 18:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
More bovine excrement after your CU, blocked again. — Spaceman Spiff 04:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Pardon me if I have the wrong page but this is where it has directed me ..... As a ex winlation person I'd like to know where u get ur information?? My contact information {redacted} — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.197.98.185 ( talk) 07:53, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Trylie created their very own Category - " Category:Trylie's Flag Templates" which is full of their "More..." flag templates, including Template:More colored flags... I'm fine going through and tagging them for discussion or speedy delete but wasn't sure which avenue would be more appropriate from a WP-policy/guideline point of view. Thx in advance for any insights, Shearonink ( talk) 03:27, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Having spotted you having a headache with the whole Alexis Ivanov thing at ANI, plus for stepping in to satisfy the requirements of WP:CUBL at the report by 'GhostTownsMapper', I just wanted to say, you're doing a good job. :) MM (WhatIDo WHATIDO?) (Now THIS... I did.) 19:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC) |
Urgent. - NQ (talk) 22:43, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Would you mind training me as a SPI clerk please? -- Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ ( talk) 23:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Just a heads-up: Samwright ( talk · contribs) looks like a duck of the genus Daniel Kobe Ricks Jr, given that two of the deleted articles have been recreated by that brand-new account. I wasn't sure whether to add this to the SPI and ping you there, but since the investigation is closed I posted here instead - let me know if you prefer to keep it to the SPI page. Cheers, -- bonadea contributions talk 18:33, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi KrakatoaKatie,
could you please restore the article Eugene Fallah Kparkar? I would like to be able to read its text, in order to create its equivalent on French Wikipedia. NAH 17:15, 11 November 2016 (UTC).
Thanks for the CUs. By the way, in case you're bored on this lovely Friday night, I just G5'd a large stack of sock articles. Best, GAB gab 03:36, 12 November 2016 (UTC) |
I'm frank Hooke and I created a page Adams bodomo using the account samwright but after few hours the page got blocked by you. I'm asking you to please unblock both the account and article. 45.211.197.78 ( talk) 17:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Samwright 45.211.197.78 ( talk) 17:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Katie. When you closed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yevoc4 you tagged the user pages of the accounts as sockpuppets. You also tagged User:Adamspy1, which is actually an account that doesn't exist. I assume this was a mistake, so I have deleted the page. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 17:18, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
hi this is my first talk in wiki.So I want to know how can message ....help me
Sunresh ( talk) 20:12, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
I came across the subject of Flowers' profile on Twitter. He is not ultra-famous, but for people who follow American Football, he is best known for being a draft bust and committing an exceedingly large amount of holding penalties. Furthermore, you threatening to have my editing abilities removed is improper and in poor form. I have sources. How many are required, in your opinion? [1]
Do you want a list of articles where he shoved a reported for asking him about his penalties and poor play? [2]
Would you prefer the edit to say something to the effect of "Flowers is widely considered a bust." Billywhack ( talk) 22:48, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Where in the world do you get all your energy and enthusiasm from? Sometimes I get tired just watching you. You've practically single-handedly reduced the number of cases at SPI to almost nothing. The pickings have gotten so slim I've been "forced" to clerk, which is ironic because when we had a major backlog, I felt I had to clerk to help reduce the backlog. I guess it happens at both ends.
Anyway, kudos!-- Bbb23 ( talk) 19:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Nice to meet you. What made you become an RN and work in that field? I wondered how you have time to work on wikipedia abd what drives you to write. I want to get advise on how to become what you are in eiki. I have always liked research and telling the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.18.148.38 ( talk) 04:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Katie. I noticed that you had gained access to en-admins
around the same time I did. Are you able to join the channel successfully? I still get a "This channel is invite-only" message... Am I missing a step? Thanks in advance!
Reh
man
12:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Sorry for the trouble i caused. I am here so that i can contribute something.i apologize if i did something wrong.It will not be repeated in future.thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helpforwikipedia ( talk • contribs) 02:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
...it could be nothing, but considering the recent ANI thread, might be worth having a quick look at this: [1] Mike1901 ( talk) 11:27, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi KrakatoaKatie.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins). MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
I was pinged by coalnation which when you declined the request you unintentional pinged me, is there a way i can have me not be pinged via unblock request and/or blocked users? --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 21:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for protecting my talk page and dealing with the IP-hopping vandal attacking it! Scjessey ( talk) 03:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi! I just discovered that a rangeblock from a few days ago, Special:Block/2600:3C00:0:0:0:0:0:0/30, is blocking all the edits from dashboard.wikiedu.org. Specifically, the dashboard's IPv6 address is 2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fe08:7973 (and 45.56.98.206 for IPv4). It's a linode server, so I'm guessing that it got caught based on some other bad actors using a linode server. Can I remove the block, or can you narrow it so that it excludes that address? Thanks!-- ragesoss ( talk) 18:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Hey Katie. I finally had some time to make a dig in the revision history of the Alania article, as something was reeking for quite some time. Basically, I'm 99% sure that IP 31.146.248.126 is operated for illegitimate means by user "Lashalakerbaia". I've listed all evidence here, on the talk page of the article in question. Could you perhaps take a look at it? Bests - LouisAragon ( talk) 05:02, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
hello, I was wondering if you are able to edit the main page in the on this day section to include the end of the Battle of the Somme which I think should be on the main page as it was an important even in world war one. thank you for reading Teabagishere ( talk) 09:34, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Katie,
Would you mind taking a look at the unblock request on the above page? Although the accounts weren't created how they should have been, the CU data would seem to support the claim that they were created for an edit-a-thon. Cheers — DoRD ( talk) 13:24, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
|
Hi Katie, this May I had requested for rollback permission at PERM and you had advised me that you will reconsider if I apply after a few months for the same. This is the sixth running month since then and I have put in quite a bit of reverting experience between that time and now. You can see my reverts and undos to review the same. May I request you to consider granting the rollback flag now? Thanks and best. Lourdes 14:51, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, KrakatoaKatie. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
| |
---|---|
Two new topics for our online editathons |
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging