![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
Hi Chanakya,
Hope you are doing good. I have noticed a discordancy about a sentence in Ram Mandir article. There is a sentence in that article, It is located at the site of Ram Janmabhoomi, the hypothesized birthplace of Rama, a principal deity of Hinduism. Actually, it is surprising to see that in the article on city of Bethlehem, the world 'hypothized' is not used when mentioning about Jesus of Nazereth. Here is the copied sentence from that article, In the New Testament, the city is identified as the birthplace of Jesus of Nazareth. So, accordingly I tried to modify the sentence in this way, It is located at the site of Ram Janmabhoomi, the birthplace of Rama as per Valmiki Ramayana. Rama is a principal deity of Hinduism and considered as the seventh incarnation of Vishnu. [1] However, an editor has reverted this edit. You helped me in improving the Turquoise throne article and can you do something to modify the sentence removing the word hypothized in Ram Mandir article while respecting the guidelines of Wikipedia? Thank you very much friend. Take care. Bsskchaitanya ( talk) 10:13, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
In matters of religion, we almost always say "believed" and nobody finds it necessary to ask, who believes?- What? No, that's the central question of atleast a few hundred (even more?) texts on the sociology of religion. I agree with V93 that "supposed" is the best word. TrangaBellam ( talk) 00:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Bsskchaitanya ( talk) 14:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)In the cross-examination before the HC, Bhan admitted that only he and Sharma had gone to Ayodhya prior to the study. He admitted having no knowledge of Puranas and said, “We were given only six weeks time for the entire study. Pressure was being repeatedly exerted; so, we submitted our report without going through the record of the excavation work by B B Lal. This was the point the bench focussed on to refuse attaching any value to the four historians' report."
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
I mentioned you at Talk:Mohammed_Zubair_(journalist)#Moving_Mohammed_Zubair_(journalist)_to_Mohammed_Zubair_(fact-checker) as you created Mohammed Zubair as a redirect back in 2022. Totally botched the ping, hence this note. Thank you! Ravensfire ( talk) 17:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
[2] 👈
Please stop this type of cold messages in my talk page. I have removed your content only twice.If I am in an edit war it should be the same for you as you have also reverted my edit with reliable source twice . I don't plan on any edit war. Also, we are already discussing in the talk page Talk:Thangjing Hill 🐲 ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) 16:10, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
The term "revert" is defined as any edit (or administrative action) that reverses or undoes the actions of other editors, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material, and whether performed using undo, rollback, or done so completely manually.. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 20:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Nepal–Sikh war, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
19:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Can you stop the baseless accusations of edit warring when I am only establishing the WP:STABLE version? If you want to make these changes, seek consensus on the talk page. Wikipedia policy clearly states that WP:BEBOLD edits (such as yours) can be reverted, in particular to a WP:STABLE version, and in such cases, the proposed edits should be discussed on the talk page first. It doesn't matter that you personally think that such edits are "policy based": a dispute is a dispute. There are a small number of exceptions (see WP:3RRNO) but outside these, you are supposed to seek consensus on the talk page, not engage in an edit war.
Note: I am NOT asking for the page to reflect my other suggested edit (right -> far-right). I am only asking it to remain at the WP: STABLE lead until such time as consensus is reached at the talk page to change it. Brusquedandelion ( talk) 17:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
TrangaBellam ( talk) 18:00, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
|
Just a positive message :) TakuyaYagami ( talk) 19:54, 20 March 2024 (UTC) |
To the Anti-Hindu sentiment article, under the India section, I want to add this: " Waris Pathan has been charged for his 15 Crore Muslims can outweigh 100 crore Hindus remark but has apologised on Twitter for the same." [1] Can I? - Haani40 ( talk) 03:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC) Haani40 ( talk) 03:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
References
Hello Kautilya3, I hope this message finds you well. I just came accross the Nageshvara Jyotirlinga article and it was edited to whole different temple and not the one which is commonly consider jyotirlinga in Dwarka, Gujarat. I request to review the article and can you make sure that it was did with the proper Wikipedia rules and not just by random. Curious man123 ( talk) 10:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
I have created a draft article here. I want to add it with that title as a section in the Second Modi ministry article but will it pass muster?- Haani40 ( talk) 14:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
|
some Baklava for you:)- Haani40 ( talk) 15:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |
Hi, I noticed that you reversed an edit by me and your reasoning was that I didn't include references and said to contact you on your talk page if you made a mistake. You made a mistake. I just rearranged information in chronological order for better readability and neither added nor removed any information, therefore no references are needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:589:C402:54C0:C940:C8C5:B34F:D8B7 ( talk) 17:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:StoneToss on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Can this be used in the 2024 Indian general election article about the BJP's initiatives or will any sentence I add citing that be removed for being, "promotional"?- Haani40 ( talk) 12:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
References
The article Usanas Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable per WP:NORG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention --
User4edits (
T)
13:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Elissa Slotkin on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Please add Capitals00 to the complaint at the AE noticeboard along with Abhishek0831996. He has reverted you again, see this.- Haani40 ( talk) 19:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Can I add the first sentence mentioned here to the "Aftermath" section of the 2024 Bangalore Cafe bombing article?- Haani40 ( talk) 13:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Can anyone respond to this?- Haani40 ( talk) 15:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
based on movie reviews and that sentence should be removed (in my opinion).- Haani40 ( talk) 15:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)..... criticised it for distortion of facts, depicting narratives favouring the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party due to the upcoming elections and for ignoring the views of the Kashmiris.
Can I add the first sentence mentioned here to the, "Dilution debate" section of the Homeopathic dilutions article?- Haani40 ( talk) 17:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
This may interest you.- Haani40 ( talk) 15:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Is this a reliable source to write that Kejriwal took money from the Ford foundation?- Haani40 ( talk) 15:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Haani40 ( talk) 15:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Arvind Kejriwal is therefore not a political threat but a security threat to this country, his main objective being to destabilize India to perpetuate US agenda
Can I add the first sentence mentioned here to the, "Controversies" section of the Arvind Kejriwal article with a sub-heading, "Security threat allegation"?- Haani40 ( talk) 18:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Can the first sentence mentioned in this sandbox be added to the, "Relevant opinions" section of the Two-nation theory article?- Haani40 ( talk) 01:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
which is not the same. It is saying something like they were already 2 different nations, while what I want to add is more accurate (see my sandbox).- Haani40 ( talk) 09:54, 4 April 2024 (UTC)The theory rested on the view that Muslim Indians and Hindu Indians were two separate nations due to being from different religious communities.[1][38] It asserted that India was not a nation. It also asserted that Hindus and Muslims of the Indian subcontinent were each a nation, despite great variations in language, culture and ethnicity within each of those groups.
A new user has changed the meaning of a paragraph with this edit. Is it justified? What can I do?- Haani40 ( talk) 19:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
I found your restoration of BLP-violating content at Burjor Avari surprising given your tenure and knowledge of policy. I know that you're aware aware of the requirement for such content to be supported by reliable sources, so please include your sources if you intend to restore it. Thank you, -- Ponyo bons mots 19:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Is this a reliable source for the Arvind Kejriwal article?- Haani40 ( talk) 02:18, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
How to change my user name slightly (I just want to change 40 to 39)? Will I lose my extended confirmed user rights if I do so?- Haani40 ( talk) 07:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
I see that there is no mention of the Maratha Empire in the article about India (neither in the lead nor in the History section) but the lead of the Maratha Empire article reads,
The Maratha Kingdom was expanded into a full-fledged Empire in the 18th Century under the leadership of Peshwa Bajirao I. [note 1]
- so should we not mention that India was ruled by the Marathas and that the English East India Company seized control of Bengal in the Battle of Plassey and then defeated the Marathas in the second and third Anglo-Maratha wars and established Company rule in India?- Haani40 ( talk) 16:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- so should that not be mentioned in the lead of that article?- Haani40 ( talk) 17:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)The Marathas are credited to a large extent for ending Mughal rule in India. [3] [4] [5]
References
I think you should mention the edit wars or proposed, "Request for Comments" going on in the Aksai Chin, Jammu and Kashmir (princely state), Sino-Indian border dispute and India articles at WP:IN.- Haani40 ( talk) 15:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
I added a sentence
here at the
RSN Singh article. Now to that sentence if I add, "..... in which he alleges that the CM of Delhi is a security threat as he received money from the Ford Foundation
" will it be a
WP:BLP violation?-
Haani40 (
talk)
05:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Have a look at these changes. May be a case of POV. Skimming through I've seen atleast one instance of WP:OR in the second para - Bhutan and North Bengal are not mentioned in the accompanying source, Secondly the map [3] used doesn't have sources. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 12:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam in South Asia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Users123users ( talk) 13:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
This is the link.-
Haani40 (
talk)
21:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, you can find the sector distribution among the infographics. I will make sure to use a better link Ly.n0m ( talk) 01:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:Sikh monarchs has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 12:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:List of states with limited recognition on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:Assassinated Baloch journalists has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 12:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
I was going to leave you a message concerning this editor, but I see you've already "interacted" with them. Their addition of "India" and "Indian" to multiple articles appears to be POV. I will leave it in your capable hands. Stay safe, Kautilya3.-- Kansas Bear ( talk) 23:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Kautilya3. Thank you for your work on Sixth Schedule to the Constitution of India. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Category:Analysts of Ayodhya dispute has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 04:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like to validate three temple destruction incidents and their sources with you to ensure their suitability for inclusion in the section on
Persecution of Hindus>Present-day South Asia>Pakistan>Post 1971:
1)
. (14 July 2023)
2)
.(16 July 2023)
3)
.(April 2024) Have a wonderful and blessed day!
TRinket Lad (
talk)
12:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Cite error: There are <ref group=note>
tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=note}}
template (see the
help page).
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
Hi Chanakya,
Hope you are doing good. I have noticed a discordancy about a sentence in Ram Mandir article. There is a sentence in that article, It is located at the site of Ram Janmabhoomi, the hypothesized birthplace of Rama, a principal deity of Hinduism. Actually, it is surprising to see that in the article on city of Bethlehem, the world 'hypothized' is not used when mentioning about Jesus of Nazereth. Here is the copied sentence from that article, In the New Testament, the city is identified as the birthplace of Jesus of Nazareth. So, accordingly I tried to modify the sentence in this way, It is located at the site of Ram Janmabhoomi, the birthplace of Rama as per Valmiki Ramayana. Rama is a principal deity of Hinduism and considered as the seventh incarnation of Vishnu. [1] However, an editor has reverted this edit. You helped me in improving the Turquoise throne article and can you do something to modify the sentence removing the word hypothized in Ram Mandir article while respecting the guidelines of Wikipedia? Thank you very much friend. Take care. Bsskchaitanya ( talk) 10:13, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
In matters of religion, we almost always say "believed" and nobody finds it necessary to ask, who believes?- What? No, that's the central question of atleast a few hundred (even more?) texts on the sociology of religion. I agree with V93 that "supposed" is the best word. TrangaBellam ( talk) 00:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Bsskchaitanya ( talk) 14:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)In the cross-examination before the HC, Bhan admitted that only he and Sharma had gone to Ayodhya prior to the study. He admitted having no knowledge of Puranas and said, “We were given only six weeks time for the entire study. Pressure was being repeatedly exerted; so, we submitted our report without going through the record of the excavation work by B B Lal. This was the point the bench focussed on to refuse attaching any value to the four historians' report."
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
I mentioned you at Talk:Mohammed_Zubair_(journalist)#Moving_Mohammed_Zubair_(journalist)_to_Mohammed_Zubair_(fact-checker) as you created Mohammed Zubair as a redirect back in 2022. Totally botched the ping, hence this note. Thank you! Ravensfire ( talk) 17:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
[2] 👈
Please stop this type of cold messages in my talk page. I have removed your content only twice.If I am in an edit war it should be the same for you as you have also reverted my edit with reliable source twice . I don't plan on any edit war. Also, we are already discussing in the talk page Talk:Thangjing Hill 🐲 ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) 16:10, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
The term "revert" is defined as any edit (or administrative action) that reverses or undoes the actions of other editors, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material, and whether performed using undo, rollback, or done so completely manually.. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 20:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Nepal–Sikh war, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
19:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Can you stop the baseless accusations of edit warring when I am only establishing the WP:STABLE version? If you want to make these changes, seek consensus on the talk page. Wikipedia policy clearly states that WP:BEBOLD edits (such as yours) can be reverted, in particular to a WP:STABLE version, and in such cases, the proposed edits should be discussed on the talk page first. It doesn't matter that you personally think that such edits are "policy based": a dispute is a dispute. There are a small number of exceptions (see WP:3RRNO) but outside these, you are supposed to seek consensus on the talk page, not engage in an edit war.
Note: I am NOT asking for the page to reflect my other suggested edit (right -> far-right). I am only asking it to remain at the WP: STABLE lead until such time as consensus is reached at the talk page to change it. Brusquedandelion ( talk) 17:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
TrangaBellam ( talk) 18:00, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
|
Just a positive message :) TakuyaYagami ( talk) 19:54, 20 March 2024 (UTC) |
To the Anti-Hindu sentiment article, under the India section, I want to add this: " Waris Pathan has been charged for his 15 Crore Muslims can outweigh 100 crore Hindus remark but has apologised on Twitter for the same." [1] Can I? - Haani40 ( talk) 03:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC) Haani40 ( talk) 03:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
References
Hello Kautilya3, I hope this message finds you well. I just came accross the Nageshvara Jyotirlinga article and it was edited to whole different temple and not the one which is commonly consider jyotirlinga in Dwarka, Gujarat. I request to review the article and can you make sure that it was did with the proper Wikipedia rules and not just by random. Curious man123 ( talk) 10:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
I have created a draft article here. I want to add it with that title as a section in the Second Modi ministry article but will it pass muster?- Haani40 ( talk) 14:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
|
some Baklava for you:)- Haani40 ( talk) 15:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |
Hi, I noticed that you reversed an edit by me and your reasoning was that I didn't include references and said to contact you on your talk page if you made a mistake. You made a mistake. I just rearranged information in chronological order for better readability and neither added nor removed any information, therefore no references are needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:589:C402:54C0:C940:C8C5:B34F:D8B7 ( talk) 17:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:StoneToss on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Can this be used in the 2024 Indian general election article about the BJP's initiatives or will any sentence I add citing that be removed for being, "promotional"?- Haani40 ( talk) 12:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
References
The article Usanas Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable per WP:NORG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention --
User4edits (
T)
13:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Elissa Slotkin on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Please add Capitals00 to the complaint at the AE noticeboard along with Abhishek0831996. He has reverted you again, see this.- Haani40 ( talk) 19:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Can I add the first sentence mentioned here to the "Aftermath" section of the 2024 Bangalore Cafe bombing article?- Haani40 ( talk) 13:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Can anyone respond to this?- Haani40 ( talk) 15:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
based on movie reviews and that sentence should be removed (in my opinion).- Haani40 ( talk) 15:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)..... criticised it for distortion of facts, depicting narratives favouring the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party due to the upcoming elections and for ignoring the views of the Kashmiris.
Can I add the first sentence mentioned here to the, "Dilution debate" section of the Homeopathic dilutions article?- Haani40 ( talk) 17:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
This may interest you.- Haani40 ( talk) 15:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Is this a reliable source to write that Kejriwal took money from the Ford foundation?- Haani40 ( talk) 15:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Haani40 ( talk) 15:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Arvind Kejriwal is therefore not a political threat but a security threat to this country, his main objective being to destabilize India to perpetuate US agenda
Can I add the first sentence mentioned here to the, "Controversies" section of the Arvind Kejriwal article with a sub-heading, "Security threat allegation"?- Haani40 ( talk) 18:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Can the first sentence mentioned in this sandbox be added to the, "Relevant opinions" section of the Two-nation theory article?- Haani40 ( talk) 01:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
which is not the same. It is saying something like they were already 2 different nations, while what I want to add is more accurate (see my sandbox).- Haani40 ( talk) 09:54, 4 April 2024 (UTC)The theory rested on the view that Muslim Indians and Hindu Indians were two separate nations due to being from different religious communities.[1][38] It asserted that India was not a nation. It also asserted that Hindus and Muslims of the Indian subcontinent were each a nation, despite great variations in language, culture and ethnicity within each of those groups.
A new user has changed the meaning of a paragraph with this edit. Is it justified? What can I do?- Haani40 ( talk) 19:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
I found your restoration of BLP-violating content at Burjor Avari surprising given your tenure and knowledge of policy. I know that you're aware aware of the requirement for such content to be supported by reliable sources, so please include your sources if you intend to restore it. Thank you, -- Ponyo bons mots 19:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Is this a reliable source for the Arvind Kejriwal article?- Haani40 ( talk) 02:18, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
How to change my user name slightly (I just want to change 40 to 39)? Will I lose my extended confirmed user rights if I do so?- Haani40 ( talk) 07:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
I see that there is no mention of the Maratha Empire in the article about India (neither in the lead nor in the History section) but the lead of the Maratha Empire article reads,
The Maratha Kingdom was expanded into a full-fledged Empire in the 18th Century under the leadership of Peshwa Bajirao I. [note 1]
- so should we not mention that India was ruled by the Marathas and that the English East India Company seized control of Bengal in the Battle of Plassey and then defeated the Marathas in the second and third Anglo-Maratha wars and established Company rule in India?- Haani40 ( talk) 16:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- so should that not be mentioned in the lead of that article?- Haani40 ( talk) 17:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)The Marathas are credited to a large extent for ending Mughal rule in India. [3] [4] [5]
References
I think you should mention the edit wars or proposed, "Request for Comments" going on in the Aksai Chin, Jammu and Kashmir (princely state), Sino-Indian border dispute and India articles at WP:IN.- Haani40 ( talk) 15:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
I added a sentence
here at the
RSN Singh article. Now to that sentence if I add, "..... in which he alleges that the CM of Delhi is a security threat as he received money from the Ford Foundation
" will it be a
WP:BLP violation?-
Haani40 (
talk)
05:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Have a look at these changes. May be a case of POV. Skimming through I've seen atleast one instance of WP:OR in the second para - Bhutan and North Bengal are not mentioned in the accompanying source, Secondly the map [3] used doesn't have sources. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 12:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam in South Asia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Users123users ( talk) 13:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
This is the link.-
Haani40 (
talk)
21:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, you can find the sector distribution among the infographics. I will make sure to use a better link Ly.n0m ( talk) 01:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:Sikh monarchs has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 12:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:List of states with limited recognition on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:Assassinated Baloch journalists has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 12:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
I was going to leave you a message concerning this editor, but I see you've already "interacted" with them. Their addition of "India" and "Indian" to multiple articles appears to be POV. I will leave it in your capable hands. Stay safe, Kautilya3.-- Kansas Bear ( talk) 23:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Kautilya3. Thank you for your work on Sixth Schedule to the Constitution of India. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Category:Analysts of Ayodhya dispute has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 04:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like to validate three temple destruction incidents and their sources with you to ensure their suitability for inclusion in the section on
Persecution of Hindus>Present-day South Asia>Pakistan>Post 1971:
1)
. (14 July 2023)
2)
.(16 July 2023)
3)
.(April 2024) Have a wonderful and blessed day!
TRinket Lad (
talk)
12:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Cite error: There are <ref group=note>
tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=note}}
template (see the
help page).