This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 40 | ← | Archive 45 | Archive 46 | Archive 47 | Archive 48 | Archive 49 | Archive 50 |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I just wanted to let you know that I've seen several of your comments about me on Wikipediocracy and I want you to know that I accept and intend to learn from, and listen to the criticism. I understand you feel a certain way about how things transpired, and you are entitled to. I will also say that there are many users with whom I've interacted that appreciated my volunteer work for the project. I never claimed to be infallible and I understand that I've made mistakes and many of my actions were wrong. Andrevan @ 23:04, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox. A few weeks ago Anthony Bradbury deleted a page I had previously contributed to, Big Green Egg, as G11. I asked them to restore it to my user space so I could fix the G11 issues and get the article back into the mainspace, but they appear to be on a wikibreak. Can you restore that page for me? Mr Ernie ( talk) 13:55, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Do you happen to have a moment for a copyvio revdel request on Richard Duncan (athlete)? It's pretty obvious in the history which one needs to be taken care of. Thanks! Tony Fox (arf!) 18:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Not gonna lie. I had a real laugh out loud moment with the supporting comment you made a few minutes ago! Sideswipe9th ( talk) 03:43, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I generally prefer to just leave messages on noticeboards instead of notifying specific admins about them. However, as you're the creator of WP:RADAR, I figured you might have some knowledge on this. Would you mind taking a look at a possible case at this discussion at ANI? If you don't feel like anything should be done then feel free to ignore it as it should be archived fairly soon, but it just struck me as an odd case. Thanks FozzieHey ( talk) 21:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
I just noticed Neelix ( talk · contribs) has been indefinitely blocked, and appears to be banned.
Now personally, I've got no objections to that at all, except I'm trying to find the discussion that enacted it all. I remember an Arbcom case where I commented on, but I think that was withdrawn. Am I just looking in the wrong place? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:48, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
I hope it's okay but I saw what I considered to be a misplaced comma, and a comma where a semicolon is needed.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:12, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).
|
|
Hi there, Beeblebrox, and thanks for drawing attention to List of women innovators and inventors by country. As a result, the article has been considerably improved and has attracted wider attention. If time permits, I'll try to undertake similar improvements on some of our other lists of women. I was interested to see that you have been working on List of people from Anchorage which might benefit from similar improvements, especially in connection with women and the indigenous populations. I was sorry to see some of your other lists had been deleted, especially those on works of fiction. Perhaps listings by century simply proved to be too long. We have had similar problems with lists of American women writers. Now that you have begun to take an interest in women, I would be delighted to see you start work on new biographies or perhaps suggest some names members of WikiProject Women in Red could work on (if possible with links to reliable sources). There must be lots of deserving women in Alaska who have not yet been covered. Please let me know if I can be of any assistance. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 11:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi, sorry to bother you again but would you mind taking a look at this ANI discussion if you've got the time to do so? Thanks FozzieHey ( talk) 22:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi. While the Portal:Iceland request is obviously premature for arbitration, the order in which our dispute-resolution procedures are to be used is not necessarily intuitive for editors who have not been involved in many disputes. This may be especially true for an editor who spends much of his wiki-time on another project that does not have an ArbCom. In that context, I'd ask you to consider withdrawing your reference to trout-slapping that editor. While the "trout-slapping" meme has certain pop-cultural connotations to us, I am not sure the humorous aspect of the phrase will translate for everyone—especially when it is used by a sitting arbitrator in a vote comment. Regards, Newyorkbrad ( talk) 19:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
I see you are willing to do self-requested blocks with no access to talk page or email. Are you willing to block me until June 25? I have to take a 6-week biochemistry course and I don't want Wikipedia to distract me. Scorpions13256 ( talk) 02:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Just wanted to leave a note of appreciation for your well-reasoned close on the whole Celestina007 mess. Hopefully they won't lose track of the damage that might have occurred during that user's role as unofficial gatekeeper for all Nigerian content as well. Intothat darkness 20:41, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
That was one of the most challenging threads I've seen on ANI and I think you did a commendable job at summarizing and closing. I especially appreciate the high-note in your final paragraph, thank you! Schazjmd (talk) 21:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC) |
I'm going to spend more words writing about an issue I have with the close than in appreciation of it, but please know that I do appreciate your closing the Celestina ANI thread.
You're more aware than most about my belief that Wikipedians who show competence from day 1 might have just read our ample documentation rather than automatically being a returning sock to be found. But the idea that an editor who has 8 edits over 6.5 years (and only 5 before this filining) and who has never interacted with Celestina before starting this thread is the same as an editor who makes contributions without registering an account - such as this IP I've puilled from my watchlist - feels like we're in WP:PACT territory. Being right that there is troubling editing from Celestina doesn't mean we need to assume that they reported it for benign "help Wikipedia" reasons. That said, I do commend you taking the time to read through that very long thread and highlighting so many of the salient points. You definitely did the community service in those efforts. Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 22:19, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
I was thinking of closing the ANI thread tomorrow if no one else had, so thank you for getting there first. Newyorkbrad ( talk) 02:01, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
I'm glad your feeling better
Hello, Beeblebrox,
You blocked sockpuppets User:HiRachel420 and User:HiRachel420 and I think they might have returned as User:Wearenatsap. They are focused on the same article Elevations RTC and publicizing abuses that happened there. There isn't an SPI case so I'm just reporting it to you since you blocked them. Thanks for any help you can provide. Liz Read! Talk! 04:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox -- Saw you were active at the moment. I wonder if I could bother you to take a quick look at the account TomCaunce3; they seem to be here for promotional purposes relating to a possible relative "Christopher Caunce Insurance Broker" and the house they live in; see the talk page of the linked article. I don't usually work in user conduct and anyway would consider myself involved. Thanks, Espresso Addict ( talk) 21:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm starting to get back to Wikipedia and I mainly access Wikipedia from various military post and from my university both of which have multiple IPs. So I would like to request this right as I can be trusted with it as I have had it in the past and have never abused it. TucsonDavidU.S.A. 22:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).
|
|
This is the most accurate description I've read, and actually agree with it. Don't know why I'm engaging. Suppose as someone whose less involved these days I thought pointing out that the 7-day-pillory-by-a-self-selected-appellate-court idea never had consensus would save some pain down the road if people tried to force it to open again. TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:56, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Respected Sir, if I'm an autoconfirmed user, then why this is not showing under my id name on edits? Regards --- Tbengalieditor 🚀 ( talk) 19:14, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Ok Sir. actually in the list of auto confirmed user and also in some other cases I have seen that in mobile version there the access level of the user is written, like - one who is 'new page reviewer', under his name the post usually shows. That's why I Messaged You. Regards - Tbengalieditor 🚀 ( talk) 03:12, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello Beeblebrox, by closing that ANI discussion on TenPoundHammer, you did not render a decision for Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Another TPH Deletion Issue, where I believe the support : oppose was 20:1. May I know what is the reason a decision was not made in accordance to the community's wishes? starship .paint ( exalt) 09:18, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox. Since you've already been helping out Jenna CIA-ICA, perhaps you wouldn't mind taking a look at her "edit request" at Talk:Canadian Institute of Actuaries#Changes_requested_2. She didn't use {{ Edit request}} which means her request may go unnoticed by those who typically help with COI-related edit request. FWIW, I added {{ COI}} to the article because her May 13 expansion of the article probably should've in itself been an edit request per se, and thus should've been given a closer look before being added to the article. I did ask about the article at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Business#Canadian Institute of Actuaries and Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Canadian Institute of Actuaries after tagging it to try and get others involved, but perhaps you wouldn't mind also taking a look. If there's no problem with the content, feel free to remove the template; however, further major expansions should probably be proposed on the article talk page first to give others a chance to assess them before they end up in the article. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 21:47, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking Big Ayeh. There are two other accounts with overlapping topic areas and name similarities that I am certain are the same person: Big Aryeh Gh (oldest) and Big Ayeh Gh. Both are stale but I wonder if it's worth blocking them both too, should this person be tempted to use one or both as sockpuppets? -- Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 22:24, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).
|
Interface administrator changes
|
user_global_editcount
is a new variable that can be used in
abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (
T130439)This meatball came to IRC to threaten us too. I still can't even figure out what he's trying to say he even owns much less what legal authority he thinks he has. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:28, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
The user made personal attacks against me first. Are you going to warn them too? LittleJerry ( talk) 17:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Please tell user @ Cullen328: to stay in their lane. You had already issued me a warning on the above LittleJerry and the issue was resolved. Cullen328 then proceeds to issue a second warning, for no reason and then allow LittleJerry to continue the argument on Cullen328's talk page. Been a member for 12 years, this has never been an issue before. The warning from you was sufficient. The warning from Cullen328 was not needed and neither was his harassment or subsequent bullying after I pointed this out to them. I don't know if there is an admin review for removal but Cullen328 belongs in it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakobees ( talk • contribs)
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Beeblebrox! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy 15th anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! Chris Troutman ( talk) 12:50, 21 July 2022 (UTC) |
Dear Just Step Sideways/Archive 47,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman ( talk) 12:50, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Schnikes, y'all are old. Tide rolls 17:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello Beeblebrox - I just want you to be aware that a newly registered editor has taken the name ZaphodBeeblebrox2 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Blue Riband► 13:35, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Nine years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:20, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).
Neocorelight ( Talk) 00:50, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Hey there,
You asked for me to be contributing a lot more on my previous RfP for pending change reviewer before popping back in to request again. Was good feedback. Been back at it in a significant way, wanted to touch base and see if you would please consider granting now?
Thanks Mr.weedle ( talk) 21:57, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello.I made an edit on a page, but I was not logged in Wikipedia at that time, and my IP address was recorded. Please hide it. Thank you. پخش مطلب ( talk) 08:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi.good time. The page is List of governors of Alaska. Latest edition. Thank you. -- پخش مطلب ( talk) 18:44, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Way back on May 9, 2021, you tagged the above account as a sock but you didn't block them. I noticed because of an article tagged for deletion that Jaylon edited today.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 22:29, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
But 7 RfAs last year and to be on pace for ~12 this year suggests that things aren't healthy either. There is a huge gap between what we have now and what we had when RfA was truly NBD. I continue believe there's some middle ground to be had. Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 22:38, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).
Good evening Beeblebrox. Would you be willing to remove all edits from Pregnancy of unnamed 10-year old Ohio girl in 2022 containing name of arrestee, such as this and this? -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 00:47, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Hey, I cannot talk on the USA talk page, where should I discuss the hoisting of the Secretary of State under the government tag? Hi3d 2 ( talk) 16:21, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello there Beeblebrox. A few editors and I have been discussing recently at WP:RESPONDER-RFC about a possible role that can give temporary blocks on persistent vandals. I saw that you were involved in similar "limited block" proposals way back in 2013-2015, and we were interested if you could give your opinion. I know this is perhaps the millionth time you've commented on an unbundling proposal, but could you just give us your thoughts and concerns if possible? Thanks, CollectiveSolidarity ( talk) 14:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Beeblebrox. You deleted this page in 2016 as a Neelix redirect. Would you mind if I restore it? I was going to create it myself with the same target ( Uab Meto language, our only article about something called "AOZ") before I even noticed the deleted history. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 09:30, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 40 | ← | Archive 45 | Archive 46 | Archive 47 | Archive 48 | Archive 49 | Archive 50 |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I just wanted to let you know that I've seen several of your comments about me on Wikipediocracy and I want you to know that I accept and intend to learn from, and listen to the criticism. I understand you feel a certain way about how things transpired, and you are entitled to. I will also say that there are many users with whom I've interacted that appreciated my volunteer work for the project. I never claimed to be infallible and I understand that I've made mistakes and many of my actions were wrong. Andrevan @ 23:04, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox. A few weeks ago Anthony Bradbury deleted a page I had previously contributed to, Big Green Egg, as G11. I asked them to restore it to my user space so I could fix the G11 issues and get the article back into the mainspace, but they appear to be on a wikibreak. Can you restore that page for me? Mr Ernie ( talk) 13:55, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Do you happen to have a moment for a copyvio revdel request on Richard Duncan (athlete)? It's pretty obvious in the history which one needs to be taken care of. Thanks! Tony Fox (arf!) 18:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Not gonna lie. I had a real laugh out loud moment with the supporting comment you made a few minutes ago! Sideswipe9th ( talk) 03:43, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I generally prefer to just leave messages on noticeboards instead of notifying specific admins about them. However, as you're the creator of WP:RADAR, I figured you might have some knowledge on this. Would you mind taking a look at a possible case at this discussion at ANI? If you don't feel like anything should be done then feel free to ignore it as it should be archived fairly soon, but it just struck me as an odd case. Thanks FozzieHey ( talk) 21:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
I just noticed Neelix ( talk · contribs) has been indefinitely blocked, and appears to be banned.
Now personally, I've got no objections to that at all, except I'm trying to find the discussion that enacted it all. I remember an Arbcom case where I commented on, but I think that was withdrawn. Am I just looking in the wrong place? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:48, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
I hope it's okay but I saw what I considered to be a misplaced comma, and a comma where a semicolon is needed.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:12, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).
|
|
Hi there, Beeblebrox, and thanks for drawing attention to List of women innovators and inventors by country. As a result, the article has been considerably improved and has attracted wider attention. If time permits, I'll try to undertake similar improvements on some of our other lists of women. I was interested to see that you have been working on List of people from Anchorage which might benefit from similar improvements, especially in connection with women and the indigenous populations. I was sorry to see some of your other lists had been deleted, especially those on works of fiction. Perhaps listings by century simply proved to be too long. We have had similar problems with lists of American women writers. Now that you have begun to take an interest in women, I would be delighted to see you start work on new biographies or perhaps suggest some names members of WikiProject Women in Red could work on (if possible with links to reliable sources). There must be lots of deserving women in Alaska who have not yet been covered. Please let me know if I can be of any assistance. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 11:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi, sorry to bother you again but would you mind taking a look at this ANI discussion if you've got the time to do so? Thanks FozzieHey ( talk) 22:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi. While the Portal:Iceland request is obviously premature for arbitration, the order in which our dispute-resolution procedures are to be used is not necessarily intuitive for editors who have not been involved in many disputes. This may be especially true for an editor who spends much of his wiki-time on another project that does not have an ArbCom. In that context, I'd ask you to consider withdrawing your reference to trout-slapping that editor. While the "trout-slapping" meme has certain pop-cultural connotations to us, I am not sure the humorous aspect of the phrase will translate for everyone—especially when it is used by a sitting arbitrator in a vote comment. Regards, Newyorkbrad ( talk) 19:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
I see you are willing to do self-requested blocks with no access to talk page or email. Are you willing to block me until June 25? I have to take a 6-week biochemistry course and I don't want Wikipedia to distract me. Scorpions13256 ( talk) 02:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Just wanted to leave a note of appreciation for your well-reasoned close on the whole Celestina007 mess. Hopefully they won't lose track of the damage that might have occurred during that user's role as unofficial gatekeeper for all Nigerian content as well. Intothat darkness 20:41, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
That was one of the most challenging threads I've seen on ANI and I think you did a commendable job at summarizing and closing. I especially appreciate the high-note in your final paragraph, thank you! Schazjmd (talk) 21:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC) |
I'm going to spend more words writing about an issue I have with the close than in appreciation of it, but please know that I do appreciate your closing the Celestina ANI thread.
You're more aware than most about my belief that Wikipedians who show competence from day 1 might have just read our ample documentation rather than automatically being a returning sock to be found. But the idea that an editor who has 8 edits over 6.5 years (and only 5 before this filining) and who has never interacted with Celestina before starting this thread is the same as an editor who makes contributions without registering an account - such as this IP I've puilled from my watchlist - feels like we're in WP:PACT territory. Being right that there is troubling editing from Celestina doesn't mean we need to assume that they reported it for benign "help Wikipedia" reasons. That said, I do commend you taking the time to read through that very long thread and highlighting so many of the salient points. You definitely did the community service in those efforts. Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 22:19, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
I was thinking of closing the ANI thread tomorrow if no one else had, so thank you for getting there first. Newyorkbrad ( talk) 02:01, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
I'm glad your feeling better
Hello, Beeblebrox,
You blocked sockpuppets User:HiRachel420 and User:HiRachel420 and I think they might have returned as User:Wearenatsap. They are focused on the same article Elevations RTC and publicizing abuses that happened there. There isn't an SPI case so I'm just reporting it to you since you blocked them. Thanks for any help you can provide. Liz Read! Talk! 04:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox -- Saw you were active at the moment. I wonder if I could bother you to take a quick look at the account TomCaunce3; they seem to be here for promotional purposes relating to a possible relative "Christopher Caunce Insurance Broker" and the house they live in; see the talk page of the linked article. I don't usually work in user conduct and anyway would consider myself involved. Thanks, Espresso Addict ( talk) 21:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm starting to get back to Wikipedia and I mainly access Wikipedia from various military post and from my university both of which have multiple IPs. So I would like to request this right as I can be trusted with it as I have had it in the past and have never abused it. TucsonDavidU.S.A. 22:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).
|
|
This is the most accurate description I've read, and actually agree with it. Don't know why I'm engaging. Suppose as someone whose less involved these days I thought pointing out that the 7-day-pillory-by-a-self-selected-appellate-court idea never had consensus would save some pain down the road if people tried to force it to open again. TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:56, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Respected Sir, if I'm an autoconfirmed user, then why this is not showing under my id name on edits? Regards --- Tbengalieditor 🚀 ( talk) 19:14, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Ok Sir. actually in the list of auto confirmed user and also in some other cases I have seen that in mobile version there the access level of the user is written, like - one who is 'new page reviewer', under his name the post usually shows. That's why I Messaged You. Regards - Tbengalieditor 🚀 ( talk) 03:12, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello Beeblebrox, by closing that ANI discussion on TenPoundHammer, you did not render a decision for Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Another TPH Deletion Issue, where I believe the support : oppose was 20:1. May I know what is the reason a decision was not made in accordance to the community's wishes? starship .paint ( exalt) 09:18, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox. Since you've already been helping out Jenna CIA-ICA, perhaps you wouldn't mind taking a look at her "edit request" at Talk:Canadian Institute of Actuaries#Changes_requested_2. She didn't use {{ Edit request}} which means her request may go unnoticed by those who typically help with COI-related edit request. FWIW, I added {{ COI}} to the article because her May 13 expansion of the article probably should've in itself been an edit request per se, and thus should've been given a closer look before being added to the article. I did ask about the article at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Business#Canadian Institute of Actuaries and Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Canadian Institute of Actuaries after tagging it to try and get others involved, but perhaps you wouldn't mind also taking a look. If there's no problem with the content, feel free to remove the template; however, further major expansions should probably be proposed on the article talk page first to give others a chance to assess them before they end up in the article. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 21:47, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking Big Ayeh. There are two other accounts with overlapping topic areas and name similarities that I am certain are the same person: Big Aryeh Gh (oldest) and Big Ayeh Gh. Both are stale but I wonder if it's worth blocking them both too, should this person be tempted to use one or both as sockpuppets? -- Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 22:24, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).
|
Interface administrator changes
|
user_global_editcount
is a new variable that can be used in
abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (
T130439)This meatball came to IRC to threaten us too. I still can't even figure out what he's trying to say he even owns much less what legal authority he thinks he has. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:28, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
The user made personal attacks against me first. Are you going to warn them too? LittleJerry ( talk) 17:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Please tell user @ Cullen328: to stay in their lane. You had already issued me a warning on the above LittleJerry and the issue was resolved. Cullen328 then proceeds to issue a second warning, for no reason and then allow LittleJerry to continue the argument on Cullen328's talk page. Been a member for 12 years, this has never been an issue before. The warning from you was sufficient. The warning from Cullen328 was not needed and neither was his harassment or subsequent bullying after I pointed this out to them. I don't know if there is an admin review for removal but Cullen328 belongs in it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakobees ( talk • contribs)
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Beeblebrox! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy 15th anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! Chris Troutman ( talk) 12:50, 21 July 2022 (UTC) |
Dear Just Step Sideways/Archive 47,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman ( talk) 12:50, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Schnikes, y'all are old. Tide rolls 17:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello Beeblebrox - I just want you to be aware that a newly registered editor has taken the name ZaphodBeeblebrox2 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Blue Riband► 13:35, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Nine years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:20, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).
Neocorelight ( Talk) 00:50, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Hey there,
You asked for me to be contributing a lot more on my previous RfP for pending change reviewer before popping back in to request again. Was good feedback. Been back at it in a significant way, wanted to touch base and see if you would please consider granting now?
Thanks Mr.weedle ( talk) 21:57, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello.I made an edit on a page, but I was not logged in Wikipedia at that time, and my IP address was recorded. Please hide it. Thank you. پخش مطلب ( talk) 08:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi.good time. The page is List of governors of Alaska. Latest edition. Thank you. -- پخش مطلب ( talk) 18:44, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Way back on May 9, 2021, you tagged the above account as a sock but you didn't block them. I noticed because of an article tagged for deletion that Jaylon edited today.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 22:29, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
But 7 RfAs last year and to be on pace for ~12 this year suggests that things aren't healthy either. There is a huge gap between what we have now and what we had when RfA was truly NBD. I continue believe there's some middle ground to be had. Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 22:38, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).
Good evening Beeblebrox. Would you be willing to remove all edits from Pregnancy of unnamed 10-year old Ohio girl in 2022 containing name of arrestee, such as this and this? -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 00:47, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Hey, I cannot talk on the USA talk page, where should I discuss the hoisting of the Secretary of State under the government tag? Hi3d 2 ( talk) 16:21, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello there Beeblebrox. A few editors and I have been discussing recently at WP:RESPONDER-RFC about a possible role that can give temporary blocks on persistent vandals. I saw that you were involved in similar "limited block" proposals way back in 2013-2015, and we were interested if you could give your opinion. I know this is perhaps the millionth time you've commented on an unbundling proposal, but could you just give us your thoughts and concerns if possible? Thanks, CollectiveSolidarity ( talk) 14:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Beeblebrox. You deleted this page in 2016 as a Neelix redirect. Would you mind if I restore it? I was going to create it myself with the same target ( Uab Meto language, our only article about something called "AOZ") before I even noticed the deleted history. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 09:30, 24 September 2022 (UTC)