This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks! SilkTork * SilkyTalk 16:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Please see [1]. Thanks. -- ALLSTAR echo 17:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey man, you there? Hop on AIM when you get a chance, okay? I got a question for you. Glass Cobra 17:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I think the cooling-off period was effective (there is a mostly polite discussion going on now on the talk page). Given the importance of the page it would be good to unprotect it as soon as possible. Thanks. Notmyrealname 19:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
BLP guidelines say that administrators "may protect or semi-protect the page after removing the disputed material." Are you taking the position that the final edit prior to protecting the page did not insert disputed material? Seems like several editors have disputed that this material in the "Early Life" section is sourced, neutral, and on-topic (see the RfC). Do you have any recommendation about how we should proceed now? Thanks. Ferrylodge ( talk) 03:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. I made an editprotected request here, but it was rejected. Then, I took this issue back to the BLP Noticeboard, here, but there's been no response yet. I strongly believe that the disputed sentence is highly misleading. None of the reliable sources provide this information without also clarifying that the Mormon Church hasn't condoned polygamy since the 1800s. Ferrylodge ( talk) 05:41, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
There are many articles on Wikipedia which contain only "happy" "positive" facts as opposed to the entire picture. Can you please explain to me why Censors and Public Relations people always get the upper-hand? Facts are not always pleasant! That is life! 76.105.183.246 02:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, like the revision you just did to the Nancy Cantor article. Furthermore, you never gave a reason. You admins and registered users DO NOT have a greater right to YOUR WATERED DOWN, CENSORED Version of Wikipedia. 76.105.183.246 02:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
We are having different thinking. Vandalism in Byzantine articles has not been for blocking but changing text in article Serbia with words "Vidak Is The Best :)" is in my thinking reason for blocking user without warning ... Rjecina 04:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Marlith T/ C has given you a kitten! Kittens promote Wikilove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Share the WikiLove and civility with everyone and keep up the excellent editing! Send kittens to others by adding {{ subst:Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thank you! Hope you're well :) ~ Riana ⁂ 05:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks from me too! Just what I needed, honestly. Was afraid someone was complaining about my spree of sock banz0ring and semi'ed targeted pages!! :P hugs ~ Eliz 81 (C) 07:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. FYI, I protected User:!! and only just now saw that you had previously declined protection at WP:RFPP. I protected because it is on my watchlist and I noticed people kept changing it for some unknown reason. The user is gone and I assume wanted his page kept the way it is so I protected. You're welcome to unprotect if you want. — Wknight94 ( talk) 14:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
There is a thread here that may be of interest to you. Just thought you should know... Cheers, Black Falcon ( Talk) 19:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Rights to keep the article: :'(
Jmlk17, the editor you are, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that you satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space. Your opinions on yourself are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at User:LaraLove/Editor for deletion#Jmlk17 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit during the discussion but should not remove the nomination (unless you wish not to participate); such removal will not end the deletion discussion (actually it will). Thank you, and have a good sense of humor :). Glass Cobra 00:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Please undo that; this article didn't meet the requirements for a speedy deletion. Do you think every convicted felon in Florida gets a two page article in the New York Times? -- Kendrick7 talk 01:32, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Just an FYI that a page that you had previously been involved with discussion-wise has returned from deletion: Radio Links Hollywood SpikeJones ( talk) 14:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
With regards to you protection to the Bosnian Mujahideen page. Please have a look at the history of the Bosnian Genocide article which is also under mediation and consider if it too needs protection. -- Philip Baird Shearer ( talk) 19:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Can I ask why the request was denied? I am not asking for it to be completely protected, just IP accounts. - NeutralHomer T: C 05:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Of course... glad to help anytime! :) Jmlk 1 7 07:04, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Please do not be trigger happy before I even explain myself. Read the talk page please. This is not about a person I know, it is about a quite popular journalist and YouTube reviewer. Don't threaten to block me before I can even explain myself please. Thank you.-- Wick3dd ( talk) 11:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that you protected the above page on the 30th November. This is the second time the page has been locked over the same content dispute on an essentially minor point. Neither version of the page is especially objectionable, or even incorrect. It is simply a matter of how much detail should be included. This is a long standing dispute with the parties essentially deadlocked with absolutely no consensus likely. I did not see that you set a date for the page to be unlocked. Reading the policy on page protection I see that in the case of an edit dispute this is supposed to be temporary, with a set expiry date, and that repeated page protection should not be used for the same dispute. Can you please advise when the page will be unprotected as there are quite a number of people interested in editing the rest of it. Sandpiper ( talk) 11:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
I know you used to have some really nice pictures and other things on your userpage. Do you think you could go into your userpages edit history and copy all of it onto my sandbox. I really liked how it was before you put that editor deletion thing up. Thanks and happy editing! Swirlex ( talk) 18:41, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Blocked User:Giovanni Giove has called for WP:CANVASS against 13 users on english wikipedia and 6 articles. This call is writen on Italian wikipedia ( [3]). To tell truth I do not know why I am on this list but .... Can you please give advice about this situation ?? --- Rjecina ( talk) 20:33, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
I see that you are an admin here, and I am potentially interested in becoming an also becoming an admin. Because of this, I would like to ask you a few questions about adminship and becoming an admin:
You can reply below or on my talk page if you wish. Thanks in advance! Malinaccier ( talk) 02:36, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey there. I definitely do enjoy being an admin; it let's me feel like I can give a bit more back around here. I was nominated by another admin for my Rfa, but self-noms are perfectly alright. As for the admin coach, I definitely recommend one. I had one, and also coached 2 successful candidates to adminship. Hope this helps! :) Jmlk 1 7 05:31, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello. You declined my request to semi-protect that page, putting a standard answer "There is not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection at this time". That's an insufficient claim, while at the same time I'm getting tired of reverting vandalism on that page on daily basis. I'm probably the only user who watch for that article, thus reverting the edits is almost solely my responsibility. In this case, semi-protection would be an an easy and effective way to solve the situation. Julius Sahara ( talk) 07:43, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi there
I guess we were both looking at the same protection request, because I submitted mine a minute after yours. [4] I'm not sure if you want to keep my protection, or revert to your protection. Either way is fine with me. -- Rifleman 82 ( talk) 08:00, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Please be aware of the following statement in WP:CSD#G4:
Please stop using G4 as a reason for deleting articles which were re-created after being speedied. Od Mishehu 08:53, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help reverting 68.90.62.202. My 'undo' finger was starting to get stiff! -- Kralizec! ( talk) 08:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
In reply to your question [6], that will be determined [7] here shortly. :-) -- Kralizec! ( talk) 15:28, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
hey I wanna run for admin can I have a mop plz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kill the Non-Notable Articles ( talk • contribs) 02:24, December 9, 2007
I'm curious as to why you fully protected the userpage for only administrators to edit when it was an IP address sockpuppeting. Wouldn't semi-protection accomplish the same thing? — Save_Us_ 229 11:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Could we get this page protected again? It seems the vandalism is persisting...for some reason people cannot seem to understand why the Timbaland version of the song gets its own chronology.... Nouse4aname ( talk) 09:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
I replied to your reply! Ariel ♥ Gold 00:30, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Setting new lows in thank-you spam:
Janitor's new tools
Spam must stop -- will
new mop act?
Ooops, .com
blocked
New admin, new tools
Earnest newbie furrows brow
Fare thee well
Main Page
New mess all about
Sorcerer's Apprentice mop
Not supporter's fault
A. B. so grateful
Wikipedia trembles
Watch out
DRV
A. B. wonders why
Copyright always confused
Fair use, farewell, bye
Qatar is
blocked
Shucks those
range blocks are tricky!
Will get it straight soon.
Dear RfA friend,
I will learn, chaos will fade
Thanks so much ...
A. B.
Thanks so much for your support in my RfA. More importanly, I hope things are going OK off Wikipedia.
--
A. B.
(talk) 22:53, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my RfA, which was successful with a vote of 33/7/4.
Special thanks go to Epbr123 for nominating me and Pedro for the offer of help.
I am honoured by the trust placed in me by the community. I hope to repay this by the wise use of the tools, which I intend to use gradually. Mop & bucket is on the Christmas list - honest. Keith D ( talk) 00:29, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Dear Jmlk,
Thank you for your participation in my request for adminship, which ended successfully with a final tally of (52/10/1). I was impressed by the thoughtful comments on both sides, and the RFA process in general. The extra buttons do look pretty snazzy, but I'll be careful not to overuse them. If you have advice to share or need assistance with anything, feel free to drop me a message or email. Thank you and good day! Cordially, Credits - This RFA thanks was inspired by Carlosguitar's RFA thanks and LaraLove's RFA thanks, which were both inspired by The Random Editor's RFA thanks, which was in turn inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. |
The article List of Alpha Kappa Alpha sisters has been nominated by user Miranda as a Featured lists. Please see List of Alpha Kappa Alpha sisters; then post your Support of the nomination or provide comments. Happy Holidays!!-- Ccson ( talk) 15:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
-- Michael Greiner 19:01, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello Jmlk17, it seems you may not have taken the time to download one of the MP3s and have a listen to it before deciding to delete the article [Radio Links Hollywood].
Am I correct?
I was hopping you would take the time to download one and see that it might be a good addition to Wikipedia's data base.
I am still working on updating the website so it is more user friendly. This should be approved in a bit: sample
Lori Lerner's material is unique. She is hired by film studios to produce unique MP3 clips. Her clips are provided to radio stations across the country as a free service.
What do you think? Should I cease trying to get this article accepted? It's just that I'm not understanding exactly why it isn't being accepted. Thank you for your consideration, Courtens ( talk) 00:25, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
<font=3> Thanks for your support, my
request for adminship passed 62/0/0 yesterday!
I want to thank Snowolf and Dincher for nominating me, those who updated the RfA tally, and everyone for their support and many kind words. I will do my best to use the new tools carefully and responsibly (and since you are reading this, I haven't yet deleted your talk page by accident!). Please let me know if there is anything I can do to be of assistance, and keep an eye out for a little green fish with a mop on the road to an even better encyclopedia. Thanks again and take care, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 18:09, 15 December 2007 (UTC) |
---|
explain why we don't protect the main page? it seems like that should be one protected, as it is the first page people see when they visit wikipedia Ctjf83 talk 03:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
You've been invited. Glass Cobra 05:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
What were your reasons for deleting the article for Faerland Terrace Assisted Living Facility? I find it quite ridiculous, and even more so, the article was a work in progress. Please explain your actions.
Cmosetick ( talk) 10:08, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
You're probably not aware of this, but I sent Goodshoped an email as to my blanking his talk page and replacing it with a message, and he told me it was okay to do so. Best, -- Gp75motorsports REV LIMITER 16:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Regarding this [Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Amon_Amarth_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29], I received a request on my talk page, to reconsider my past denial of a RFPP. Bearian ( talk) 22:55, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello Jmlk, I've reversed your major edit concerning the Avalanche 'current roster'. You should take your idea to the Wikipedia: WikiProject Ice Hockey first, before making such big changes. GoodDay ( talk) 01:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey there. When I say "My next task is becoming an admin, so I can have my hand further in the cookie jar", all I mean by that is one of the reasons for my RfA is sysop abilities would give me more to do. Sometimes I go to my watchlist, with too little time to research and expand an article, and there isn't anything to revert either. I have acquired the habit of checking out the community portal and occasionally find a couple things there. Being an admin would allow me the ability to take care of some admin backlogs, of any kind. -- Reaper X 04:04, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
why'd you delete A City Warning? They meet WP:BAND. I'm a big fan. City warming ( talk) 11:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Okay. You'll have to add this to the first line of your userpage since it is fully protected: {{User:Jmlk17/Status}}.
Then, add this to your monobook.js:
Once you get that added, I can tweak the placement so it isn't so far to the left, I didn't want it overlapping the admin icon on your userpage. And, once you add that code (and refresh) at the top right, where your links for prefs, watchlist, contribs, etc are, you will see three words: "in", "busy", and "out". Clicking on those will automatically load the status page and change your status.
I think I've done all the other work, and all you'll have to do is add the monobook.js code, but let me know if it isn't working once you do that and I'll check it again. Sweet dreams! (I've set you "away") :) Ariel ♥ Gold 12:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Dear Sir, re: Deletion of "St. Thomas College of Teacher Education, Pala"
You have deleted this post, if you can restore this topic is highly appreciable. This is not related to any person or group of person.
They are one of the pioneer institutions in the field of teacher education. It was started in 1957 and based in South India. They are accredited at the 4 star level by NAAC (National Assessment and Accreditation Council). I am working as a Web Consultant for them. Regards,-- Sumeshbabu ( talk) 12:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
I am Rachael Bell's attorney and U.S. representative. I do not understand why you deleted her entry. Ms. Bell has a "highly recommended" new CD "Colour Me Blue" reviewed on SoulTracks.com, the number 1 soul music website in the U.S. and has made numerous other recent TV and radio appearances here. All of the information that was listed was factual and independently verifiable. You have other musicians on Wikipedia who have accomplished far less, and in addition, you have another "Rachael Bell" entry for a 17-year old UK resident who was arrested for throwing a house party without her parents permission!! With all due respect, how can you have that "Rachael Bell" on here and delete the other, who has actually accomplished something? Please reconsider your decision.
R. Patryk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.26.54.11 ( talk) 16:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of White House Museum. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- W.marsh 16:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
I editted the Merrill page and made sure all the contents are factuals. The facts that EEOC mainatins the ML conduct has been with reckless disregard and malice are in the text of the law suit. Not sure who you are but when you are linking words like "July" and "Iranian" I suspect what kind of intention you have!!!! It's absurd or down right stupid to link (highlight) a world like "JULY"!!
What is the motive here?!!!
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks! SilkTork * SilkyTalk 16:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Please see [1]. Thanks. -- ALLSTAR echo 17:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey man, you there? Hop on AIM when you get a chance, okay? I got a question for you. Glass Cobra 17:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I think the cooling-off period was effective (there is a mostly polite discussion going on now on the talk page). Given the importance of the page it would be good to unprotect it as soon as possible. Thanks. Notmyrealname 19:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
BLP guidelines say that administrators "may protect or semi-protect the page after removing the disputed material." Are you taking the position that the final edit prior to protecting the page did not insert disputed material? Seems like several editors have disputed that this material in the "Early Life" section is sourced, neutral, and on-topic (see the RfC). Do you have any recommendation about how we should proceed now? Thanks. Ferrylodge ( talk) 03:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. I made an editprotected request here, but it was rejected. Then, I took this issue back to the BLP Noticeboard, here, but there's been no response yet. I strongly believe that the disputed sentence is highly misleading. None of the reliable sources provide this information without also clarifying that the Mormon Church hasn't condoned polygamy since the 1800s. Ferrylodge ( talk) 05:41, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
There are many articles on Wikipedia which contain only "happy" "positive" facts as opposed to the entire picture. Can you please explain to me why Censors and Public Relations people always get the upper-hand? Facts are not always pleasant! That is life! 76.105.183.246 02:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, like the revision you just did to the Nancy Cantor article. Furthermore, you never gave a reason. You admins and registered users DO NOT have a greater right to YOUR WATERED DOWN, CENSORED Version of Wikipedia. 76.105.183.246 02:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
We are having different thinking. Vandalism in Byzantine articles has not been for blocking but changing text in article Serbia with words "Vidak Is The Best :)" is in my thinking reason for blocking user without warning ... Rjecina 04:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Marlith T/ C has given you a kitten! Kittens promote Wikilove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Share the WikiLove and civility with everyone and keep up the excellent editing! Send kittens to others by adding {{ subst:Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thank you! Hope you're well :) ~ Riana ⁂ 05:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks from me too! Just what I needed, honestly. Was afraid someone was complaining about my spree of sock banz0ring and semi'ed targeted pages!! :P hugs ~ Eliz 81 (C) 07:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. FYI, I protected User:!! and only just now saw that you had previously declined protection at WP:RFPP. I protected because it is on my watchlist and I noticed people kept changing it for some unknown reason. The user is gone and I assume wanted his page kept the way it is so I protected. You're welcome to unprotect if you want. — Wknight94 ( talk) 14:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
There is a thread here that may be of interest to you. Just thought you should know... Cheers, Black Falcon ( Talk) 19:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Rights to keep the article: :'(
Jmlk17, the editor you are, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that you satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space. Your opinions on yourself are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at User:LaraLove/Editor for deletion#Jmlk17 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit during the discussion but should not remove the nomination (unless you wish not to participate); such removal will not end the deletion discussion (actually it will). Thank you, and have a good sense of humor :). Glass Cobra 00:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Please undo that; this article didn't meet the requirements for a speedy deletion. Do you think every convicted felon in Florida gets a two page article in the New York Times? -- Kendrick7 talk 01:32, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Just an FYI that a page that you had previously been involved with discussion-wise has returned from deletion: Radio Links Hollywood SpikeJones ( talk) 14:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
With regards to you protection to the Bosnian Mujahideen page. Please have a look at the history of the Bosnian Genocide article which is also under mediation and consider if it too needs protection. -- Philip Baird Shearer ( talk) 19:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Can I ask why the request was denied? I am not asking for it to be completely protected, just IP accounts. - NeutralHomer T: C 05:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Of course... glad to help anytime! :) Jmlk 1 7 07:04, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Please do not be trigger happy before I even explain myself. Read the talk page please. This is not about a person I know, it is about a quite popular journalist and YouTube reviewer. Don't threaten to block me before I can even explain myself please. Thank you.-- Wick3dd ( talk) 11:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that you protected the above page on the 30th November. This is the second time the page has been locked over the same content dispute on an essentially minor point. Neither version of the page is especially objectionable, or even incorrect. It is simply a matter of how much detail should be included. This is a long standing dispute with the parties essentially deadlocked with absolutely no consensus likely. I did not see that you set a date for the page to be unlocked. Reading the policy on page protection I see that in the case of an edit dispute this is supposed to be temporary, with a set expiry date, and that repeated page protection should not be used for the same dispute. Can you please advise when the page will be unprotected as there are quite a number of people interested in editing the rest of it. Sandpiper ( talk) 11:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
I know you used to have some really nice pictures and other things on your userpage. Do you think you could go into your userpages edit history and copy all of it onto my sandbox. I really liked how it was before you put that editor deletion thing up. Thanks and happy editing! Swirlex ( talk) 18:41, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Blocked User:Giovanni Giove has called for WP:CANVASS against 13 users on english wikipedia and 6 articles. This call is writen on Italian wikipedia ( [3]). To tell truth I do not know why I am on this list but .... Can you please give advice about this situation ?? --- Rjecina ( talk) 20:33, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
I see that you are an admin here, and I am potentially interested in becoming an also becoming an admin. Because of this, I would like to ask you a few questions about adminship and becoming an admin:
You can reply below or on my talk page if you wish. Thanks in advance! Malinaccier ( talk) 02:36, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey there. I definitely do enjoy being an admin; it let's me feel like I can give a bit more back around here. I was nominated by another admin for my Rfa, but self-noms are perfectly alright. As for the admin coach, I definitely recommend one. I had one, and also coached 2 successful candidates to adminship. Hope this helps! :) Jmlk 1 7 05:31, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello. You declined my request to semi-protect that page, putting a standard answer "There is not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection at this time". That's an insufficient claim, while at the same time I'm getting tired of reverting vandalism on that page on daily basis. I'm probably the only user who watch for that article, thus reverting the edits is almost solely my responsibility. In this case, semi-protection would be an an easy and effective way to solve the situation. Julius Sahara ( talk) 07:43, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi there
I guess we were both looking at the same protection request, because I submitted mine a minute after yours. [4] I'm not sure if you want to keep my protection, or revert to your protection. Either way is fine with me. -- Rifleman 82 ( talk) 08:00, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Please be aware of the following statement in WP:CSD#G4:
Please stop using G4 as a reason for deleting articles which were re-created after being speedied. Od Mishehu 08:53, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help reverting 68.90.62.202. My 'undo' finger was starting to get stiff! -- Kralizec! ( talk) 08:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
In reply to your question [6], that will be determined [7] here shortly. :-) -- Kralizec! ( talk) 15:28, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
hey I wanna run for admin can I have a mop plz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kill the Non-Notable Articles ( talk • contribs) 02:24, December 9, 2007
I'm curious as to why you fully protected the userpage for only administrators to edit when it was an IP address sockpuppeting. Wouldn't semi-protection accomplish the same thing? — Save_Us_ 229 11:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Could we get this page protected again? It seems the vandalism is persisting...for some reason people cannot seem to understand why the Timbaland version of the song gets its own chronology.... Nouse4aname ( talk) 09:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
I replied to your reply! Ariel ♥ Gold 00:30, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Setting new lows in thank-you spam:
Janitor's new tools
Spam must stop -- will
new mop act?
Ooops, .com
blocked
New admin, new tools
Earnest newbie furrows brow
Fare thee well
Main Page
New mess all about
Sorcerer's Apprentice mop
Not supporter's fault
A. B. so grateful
Wikipedia trembles
Watch out
DRV
A. B. wonders why
Copyright always confused
Fair use, farewell, bye
Qatar is
blocked
Shucks those
range blocks are tricky!
Will get it straight soon.
Dear RfA friend,
I will learn, chaos will fade
Thanks so much ...
A. B.
Thanks so much for your support in my RfA. More importanly, I hope things are going OK off Wikipedia.
--
A. B.
(talk) 22:53, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my RfA, which was successful with a vote of 33/7/4.
Special thanks go to Epbr123 for nominating me and Pedro for the offer of help.
I am honoured by the trust placed in me by the community. I hope to repay this by the wise use of the tools, which I intend to use gradually. Mop & bucket is on the Christmas list - honest. Keith D ( talk) 00:29, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Dear Jmlk,
Thank you for your participation in my request for adminship, which ended successfully with a final tally of (52/10/1). I was impressed by the thoughtful comments on both sides, and the RFA process in general. The extra buttons do look pretty snazzy, but I'll be careful not to overuse them. If you have advice to share or need assistance with anything, feel free to drop me a message or email. Thank you and good day! Cordially, Credits - This RFA thanks was inspired by Carlosguitar's RFA thanks and LaraLove's RFA thanks, which were both inspired by The Random Editor's RFA thanks, which was in turn inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. |
The article List of Alpha Kappa Alpha sisters has been nominated by user Miranda as a Featured lists. Please see List of Alpha Kappa Alpha sisters; then post your Support of the nomination or provide comments. Happy Holidays!!-- Ccson ( talk) 15:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
-- Michael Greiner 19:01, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello Jmlk17, it seems you may not have taken the time to download one of the MP3s and have a listen to it before deciding to delete the article [Radio Links Hollywood].
Am I correct?
I was hopping you would take the time to download one and see that it might be a good addition to Wikipedia's data base.
I am still working on updating the website so it is more user friendly. This should be approved in a bit: sample
Lori Lerner's material is unique. She is hired by film studios to produce unique MP3 clips. Her clips are provided to radio stations across the country as a free service.
What do you think? Should I cease trying to get this article accepted? It's just that I'm not understanding exactly why it isn't being accepted. Thank you for your consideration, Courtens ( talk) 00:25, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
<font=3> Thanks for your support, my
request for adminship passed 62/0/0 yesterday!
I want to thank Snowolf and Dincher for nominating me, those who updated the RfA tally, and everyone for their support and many kind words. I will do my best to use the new tools carefully and responsibly (and since you are reading this, I haven't yet deleted your talk page by accident!). Please let me know if there is anything I can do to be of assistance, and keep an eye out for a little green fish with a mop on the road to an even better encyclopedia. Thanks again and take care, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 18:09, 15 December 2007 (UTC) |
---|
explain why we don't protect the main page? it seems like that should be one protected, as it is the first page people see when they visit wikipedia Ctjf83 talk 03:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
You've been invited. Glass Cobra 05:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
What were your reasons for deleting the article for Faerland Terrace Assisted Living Facility? I find it quite ridiculous, and even more so, the article was a work in progress. Please explain your actions.
Cmosetick ( talk) 10:08, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
You're probably not aware of this, but I sent Goodshoped an email as to my blanking his talk page and replacing it with a message, and he told me it was okay to do so. Best, -- Gp75motorsports REV LIMITER 16:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Regarding this [Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Amon_Amarth_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29], I received a request on my talk page, to reconsider my past denial of a RFPP. Bearian ( talk) 22:55, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello Jmlk, I've reversed your major edit concerning the Avalanche 'current roster'. You should take your idea to the Wikipedia: WikiProject Ice Hockey first, before making such big changes. GoodDay ( talk) 01:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey there. When I say "My next task is becoming an admin, so I can have my hand further in the cookie jar", all I mean by that is one of the reasons for my RfA is sysop abilities would give me more to do. Sometimes I go to my watchlist, with too little time to research and expand an article, and there isn't anything to revert either. I have acquired the habit of checking out the community portal and occasionally find a couple things there. Being an admin would allow me the ability to take care of some admin backlogs, of any kind. -- Reaper X 04:04, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
why'd you delete A City Warning? They meet WP:BAND. I'm a big fan. City warming ( talk) 11:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Okay. You'll have to add this to the first line of your userpage since it is fully protected: {{User:Jmlk17/Status}}.
Then, add this to your monobook.js:
Once you get that added, I can tweak the placement so it isn't so far to the left, I didn't want it overlapping the admin icon on your userpage. And, once you add that code (and refresh) at the top right, where your links for prefs, watchlist, contribs, etc are, you will see three words: "in", "busy", and "out". Clicking on those will automatically load the status page and change your status.
I think I've done all the other work, and all you'll have to do is add the monobook.js code, but let me know if it isn't working once you do that and I'll check it again. Sweet dreams! (I've set you "away") :) Ariel ♥ Gold 12:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Dear Sir, re: Deletion of "St. Thomas College of Teacher Education, Pala"
You have deleted this post, if you can restore this topic is highly appreciable. This is not related to any person or group of person.
They are one of the pioneer institutions in the field of teacher education. It was started in 1957 and based in South India. They are accredited at the 4 star level by NAAC (National Assessment and Accreditation Council). I am working as a Web Consultant for them. Regards,-- Sumeshbabu ( talk) 12:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
I am Rachael Bell's attorney and U.S. representative. I do not understand why you deleted her entry. Ms. Bell has a "highly recommended" new CD "Colour Me Blue" reviewed on SoulTracks.com, the number 1 soul music website in the U.S. and has made numerous other recent TV and radio appearances here. All of the information that was listed was factual and independently verifiable. You have other musicians on Wikipedia who have accomplished far less, and in addition, you have another "Rachael Bell" entry for a 17-year old UK resident who was arrested for throwing a house party without her parents permission!! With all due respect, how can you have that "Rachael Bell" on here and delete the other, who has actually accomplished something? Please reconsider your decision.
R. Patryk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.26.54.11 ( talk) 16:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of White House Museum. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- W.marsh 16:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
I editted the Merrill page and made sure all the contents are factuals. The facts that EEOC mainatins the ML conduct has been with reckless disregard and malice are in the text of the law suit. Not sure who you are but when you are linking words like "July" and "Iranian" I suspect what kind of intention you have!!!! It's absurd or down right stupid to link (highlight) a world like "JULY"!!
What is the motive here?!!!