This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello! Your submission of Reporting of lolicon images on Wikimedia Commons at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 01:18, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jinnai. Wehwalt and I believe that all your concerns have been addressed at the FAC for Kennedy half dollar. It has also been copyedited by a member of the GOCE. Thanks for reviewing it!- RHM22 ( talk) 01:36, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi
Thanks very much!
I enjoyed doing that one, and the unexpected bstar was the icing on the cake :¬) Chaosdruid ( talk) 05:56, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Greetings! You were listed as owning this guide book on the reference library page. If it's not any trouble, could you tell me if the book included anything on the manga one-shot Glass Wings? While a review would be nice, my main aim is to find a reliable source for the magazine it was serialized in. Regards, WhiteArcticWolf ( talk) 19:48, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to help you achieve your (noble) goal of getting either or both of these articles to FA status before the anniversary. However, I fear that our (brief) history may get in the way. What do you think? -- Nczempin ( talk) 18:22, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 02:49, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Oh hey. I managed to miss the PROD for this game, which I know to be articleworthy. It received a two-page review in Pelit, a large gaming magazine and a reliable source. If Pelit was on the job for a Sierra title, chances are infitesimal that no other magazine was.
Prior obligations mean that it'll take me a couple of days to find that article from my magazine stacks and integrate it into the article. I decided to be rude and restore the article right away, since waiting might have gotten the newly created redlinks de-linked. Once an article is cut away from the web of links, reconnecting it is both labor-intensive and incredibly irritating.
If I have not added the review by the end of the weekend, I'll have screwed up and deserve censure. -- Kiz o r 20:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
In fan service, is the word used in The Otaku Encyclopedia by Anno droll or drool? -- Malkinann ( talk) 23:17, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
This to let you know that an edit of yours has been mentioned at ANI. Cheers, -- JN 466 17:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, just wanted to let you know File:WikiProject Square Enix Dragon Quest logo.svg lives at Commons, not here, so if you want it deleted you should make the request at Commons. Cheers, -- JaGa talk 19:50, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Jinnai! I am ja:User:Kanjy, a Bureaucrat at Japanese Wikipedia. Today I usurped ja:User:Jinnai for you as per your request. Cheers! -- Kanjy ( talk) 15:32, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
I've found that a lot of good articles and probably a lot of featured articles (I haven't check them yet) are abusing the use of copyrighted images on Wikipedia (for example, I've seen several articles that use three images to visualize content in the article even though the first image demonstrates everything that the other two images are trying to do). Would you be interested in helping fix this problem? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 18:40, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jinnai. I have addressed your comments at the FAC for Trade dollar (United States coin). Thanks for taking the time to review it!- RHM22 ( talk) 03:23, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jinnai. Why did you remove the table that summarizes the classes? You didn't like it? Was it too much incomplete? There's an identical table in Final Fantasy character jobs, and many users are contributing to it about the videogames they played. It comes just out of logic: three traditional or "pure" class-types (Fighters, Wizards and Healers), plus three "hybrid" ones that are Fighters with magic, Full-range magicians and Mixed classes, all sorted from "pure attackers with no magic" to "strong healers with little offense". Please let me know. Cheers :-) -- Abacos ( talk) 09:42, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
I was pretty brutal. I'm going to try to shorten the derivative releases part with the same zeal. But I figured I'd stop and give you a chance to revert or re-add anything if I've been too brutal. I still ultimately trust that you think there's a good reason for this guideline. I'm just a skeptical sympathizer :) ... so my efforts to keep it really short reflect the idea that we don't need to say much. Shooterwalker ( talk) 14:56, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
... on our FAC editorial in the Bugle, including your comments, here. The idea for this editorial was to give a lot of brief statements by a lot of people to convey the idea that there's broad support for the idea that anyone can (and more should) review at FAC. After we see if the editorial has any effect, we can try to do something less scattershot in another editorial. Please let me know if you are (or aren't) happy with any effect this might have at FAC. - Dank ( push to talk) 19:44, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jinnai - Last year, the FAR process instituted a new first step. This requires editors to notify in advance the talk page of the article they are planning to nominate for review. Because this wasn't done on your recent nomination of Halo 3, I have removed the review from the FAR page, hidden the banner on the article talk page, and placed a notification on the article talk page. If there is no work done on the article in the next week or two, please feel free to reverse my actions, or ping me and I will do so. Thank you, and please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer ( talk) 01:06, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
While you may be busy, I was hoping that you could give Glass Joe a copyedit and/or provide a comment on its FAC. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 03:41, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jinnai,
I stongly disagree that the episode list for the Sakura Wars TV series should be included in the main Sakura Wars article, at in its current form. The article only barely mentions the anime in the lead, and otherwise is entirely about the games. As it currently stands, the episode list appears completely out of place. There also is currently no explanation for what the list is in the article, so that someone who doesn't know it is a list of the TV series episodes would have no idea what it is. Furthermore, the episode list is currently unsourced. Even if the list were sourced and cleaned up, it would belong in an article on the TV series, not this article which is mainly about the parent game series. WP:PRESERVE says to retain additions if they would belong in the finished article, but I don't think it means to retain out of place additions that would belong in a different, as yet unwritten article (and anyway, the episode list will still be present in the history if someone wants to use it to create a new article later). If you really think that the list must be retained somewhere visible (though I don't really think it should be until someone gets around to writing the Sakura Wars TV article), then perhaps you could undo the redirect from List of Sakura Wars episodes and add an explanation to the lead section to that list to make it clear what it is a list of the Sakura Wars TV series episodes (as opposed to the OAV episodes). Even better in my opinion would be to write an article on the Sakura Wars TV series and include the list there, since the TV series would certainly pass the notability guidelines with multiple reviews from reliable sources. Calathan ( talk) 05:37, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
– MuZemike 14:19, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Hey, you have time to take another look at how the article is shaping up? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 16:28, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I saw that you were a supporter of Launch getting her own section on the List of Dragon Ball characters from the consensus from a few years ago discussing which Dragon Ball characters should be kept. Since Launch failed to get one back then I have started a new consensus to try to get her section back on the list. I was wondering if you can help by going to Talk:List_of_Dragon_Ball_characters#Launch and put down your vote. Thanks and I would appreciate it. - SuperTiencha ( talk) 16:17, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
It breaks the template. Period. Star Wars: Rogue Squadron gets all messed up after you do that edit. I will take the time to find out what you're doing that messing it up. Thanks. -- Torsodog Talk 04:47, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi
Just to let you know I have completed the copyedit. Chaosdruid ( talk) 03:47, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Hey, you haven't been on for a few days, but whenever you get back I've addressed your concerns at the FF13 FAC. Thanks! -- Pres N 19:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi
I am a little confused, so have asked MuzeMike to try and help sort out any problems before a copyedit.
The discussion is here: User_talk:MuZemike#Dragon_Quest_and_Warrior Chaosdruid ( talk) 00:20, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Jinnai. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Dragon Quest at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! |
Been invited to be part of the discussion to share your opinion whether List of LGBT characters in film, radio, and TV fiction should be deleted or not. this discussion is here. Bread Ninja ( talk) 02:18, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
I'll take another look tomorrow or the day after. Cheers, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 22:49, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Template:Cite GameFAQs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Odie5533 ( talk) 16:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey Jin, have you seen the most recent edit on the talk page about the multiple article names?-- Sexy Kick 04:15, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
I'm not sure if you've seen my question in the discussion - could you please tell me where it is "highly discouraged" that interwiki links be used in mainspace? I've been looking around and can't find anywhere where it is discouraged - only H:ILL, where it is encouraged. Thanks for any assistance. -- Malkinann ( talk) 03:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
As the person in question has apparently won an award, this could mean that she would pass WP:ANYBIO. The Japanese link assists to disambiguate her from any other person by that name.-- Malkinann ( talk) 21:59, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Casshan has this weird romanization thing going on, so I thought you would know what to do for his name in the article Tatsunoko vs. Capcom: Ultimate All-Stars#Playable characters. English name in-game is this, in Japanese its that. Those are the only sources I can find on the matter. Regards, « ₣M₣ » 22:54, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey Jinnai, here are the scans:
And here's the reference:
I included the Mother section from Chapter 4 since it discusses Dragon Quest a bit. Just let me know if you need anything else. Cheers! - sesu prime 00:39, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jinnai - Would you have a few minutes to revisit your comments at the FAR for Halo 3 (review page at WP:Featured article review/Halo 3/archive1)? The FAR appears to be getting close to being able to close, but it would be great to get any final comments you have, and if you feel the article can now be kept or if it still needs more work. Thanks, Dana boomer ( talk) 12:30, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Dedicated Wikipedia Contributor Award | |
For all your amazing contributions. We're so glad you're here! ★Pinkstrawberry02★ ( talk) 01:00, 19 September 2011 (UTC) |
Please reply on Pinkstrawberry02's talk page, or if you still would like to reply here, just send them a {{ talkback}} and reply here. Thanks.
Questions are posted at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/draft#Featured editor: Jinnai. Thanks. ( Guyinblack25 talk 16:32, 19 September 2011 (UTC))
You're most definitely welcome. You deserve it. ;) Pinkstrawberry02™ talk 21:50, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to say Thanks for pointing out WP:AND - I think if we'd been fully aware of that policy several years ago (or perhaps it didn't exist then? *shrug*), we could probably have just gone straight from "Sega Mega Drive/Sega Genesis" to some variant of this new proposed solution, and probably saved ourselves a lot of headaches. Thanks for bringing it up and the comparison with the Pokemon games, and for your well-reasoned argument on it. I'll admit my misgivings are a bit far-fetched and indicative of my tendency to way overanalyze things. :)
I do honestly support this idea, and I felt it would help to turn it into a full proposal. I certainly don't want it to seem like I'm taking credit for your idea. I find myself hoping it passes. — KieferSkunk ( talk) — 03:04, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Then Harry Potter books and movies needs to go as Harry Potter 1, Harry Potter 2', etc. And if you say no then your hypocriting what you say about Sailor Moon cause Harry Potter 1, Harry Potter 2, etc. are common names for the Harry Potter books and movies but yet we don't put them like that. I'm sorry but it seems to me people need to pick and choice their battles here. If Harry shouldn't go by that then neither should those Sailor Moon chapters and they should move cause like I said it's hypocritical to not do it to all. JamesAlan1986 * talk 14:47, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Well the only other page I can think of is. Kondansha Comics USA but they too (I think I haven't looked for awhile) for some reason post them in short instead of what's on the book itself. JamesAlan1986 * talk 15:15, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
I got 5 in total now. lol! JamesAlan1986 * talk 15:25, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Scratch that I'm such a blonde! LOL! The manga is the primary source. Well two amazon.com pages from Japan and the import say that it's Pretty Guardian Sailor Moon. JamesAlan1986 * talk 17:03, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
How's this? JamesAlan1986 * talk 03:15, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
When I went to Barnes and Noble (that's where I bought my copies of both Codename Sailor V and Sailor Moon) I almost burst into tears cause I thought they didn't have it (cause I looked for it in Sailor Moon) but then I saw Pretty Guardian Sailor Moon and I knew it was the new manga. Commercially and store wise I learned that they will not be putting it as Sailor Moon but as Pretty Guardian Sailor Moon as that's the title of the book regardless of common use names. But I'm starting to wonder about the amazon thing and I got a theory. Technically the manga was never originally translated right as the new ones are (the official site claims this) and I have a feeling that that new one was posted prior to it's release as Sailor Moon, Vol. 1 instead of Pretty Guardian Sailor Moon based off what is posted on the official site (though they are using both names) but in Japan it has a different name. Usually when Amazon.com gets them they change them to their proper names instead of a slang name, so to speak. I think if it's given time Amazon.com will change the name to separate from customers getting confusing between the original release and the re-issue. JamesAlan1986 * talk 04:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Pokemon Blue and Red Pokemon Red and Blue.
Just pointing out the search results here. The most common combination of titles, at least according to a google test, is pretty clearly "Red and Blue". Also this probably could've used some discussion. Just saying.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 03:14, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Eh, you're right. 15 minutes isn't long enough for a real review, I was just guesstimating because of the relatively short length of the prose compared to say, an FA candidates'.
Anyways, I'll give Dragon Warrior a copy edit, hopefully today or tomorrow. I'm not the best at copyediting, but I'll do what I can.
Thanks for the review! – Drilnoth ( T/ C) 13:27, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Can I get your opinion on this? I think I made a decent argument about making compromises on here when it comes to the whole "common name" argument. But it doesn't hurt to have a second and third opinion. Please read it thoroughly and take into consideration what I am saying before throwing a big opposition. LOL! JamesAlan1986 * talk 11:23, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
I asked a member of the team and I haven't gotten a response yet. Is there anymore comments you can add for the benefit of the article? GamerPro64 23:50, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 07:30, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Rock on man. JORGENEV 07:42, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Resident evil 4 chainsaw controller.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sir Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 00:16, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Making factually unsupported statements of derogatory opinion about other editors, like "unlike what you think COMMONNAME is not absolute" [2] is a violation of civility. For the record, that's not what I think. Anyway, "comment on content, not on the contributor".
Please retract accordingly. -- Born2cycle ( talk) 17:51, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
RE. Wikipedia talk:Notability#Articles need multiple sources
Jinnai, apologies if I was not clear, but I think you misunderstoon what I wrote.
Benin is a country.
But I am talking about the creation of articles about several small places which are in that country.
Lougba is not a county; it's not a city; and there is doubt as to whether it is a town; it does not seem to be on any maps.
Dr. Blofeld has created that article, and lots more, based on a 1-line entry in a census - which lists "Lougba" as an arrondissement, which is a small governmental region. Chzz ► 10:14, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
I think we're ready for the next stage of dispute resolution - noone else is participating in the discussion at the noticeboard. -- Malkinann ( talk) 01:48, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Sailor Moon (English adaptation)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 5 December 2011.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee.
17:03, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Sailor Moon (English adaptation), in which you were listed as a party, has been accepted by the Mediation Committee. The case will be assigned to an active mediator within two weeks, and mediation proceedings should begin shortly thereafter. Proceedings will begin at the case information page, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Sailor Moon (English adaptation), so please add this to your watchlist. Formal mediation is governed by the Mediation Committee and its Policy. The Policy, and especially the first two sections of the "Mediation" section, should be read if you have never participated in formal mediation. For a short guide to accepted cases, see the "Accepted requests" section of the Guide to formal mediation. You may also want to familiarise yourself with the internal Procedures of the Committee.
As mediation proceedings begin, be aware that formal mediation can only be successful if every participant approaches discussion in a professional and civil way, and is completely prepared to compromise. Please contact the Committee if anything is unclear.
For the Mediation Committee,
AGK [
•
21:52, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Hello—Sunray and I will be your mediators. We will be sharing the job of mediation, so anything shared with one of us should be expected to be shared with the other, unless specifically requested otherwise. As you may or may not also know, discussions during formal mediation are privileged, meaning that they cannot be used against you later; for example, if the case is referred to arbitration. This allows participants to speak freely and candidly about the issues.
To start off the case, we've decided to invite participants to share, privately, their perspectives with the mediators, Feezo and Sunray. We'd like to hear your thoughts on what the major issues are, what the ideal result of mediation would be, and what alternatives might be acceptable. Other relevant thoughts are of course welcome. Send these by email with the form at Special:EmailUser/Feezo.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 00:38, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jinnai,
It looks like your edit to Template:WikiProject Anime and manga earlier today removed spaces before some wikilinks, causing words to run together (e.g. "the project page" was changed to "the project page"). Can you please try to fix that? I don't have any experience editing templates, but I could try to fix it myself if you want. Calathan ( talk) 21:58, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
This may help in the meantime http://translate.google.com -- Jondel ( talk) 05:45, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Just FYI, United States v. Wong Kim Ark is being considered a second time for Featured Article status ( here). — Richwales ( talk) 04:25, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
And as a summary, the fictional media itself is the only source you need when you are discussing characters' biographies or opinions. And you should not have labeled the revert as vandalism, particularly because I rewrote it to get rid of your grammatical errors and the statement that you accused of being original research when it clearly is not original research as it is a direct report of the fictional media.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 07:21, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Since you responded to my thread on the talk page at WP:FAC, I was wondering if you accept c/e requests? Best and happy holidays, Jona yo! Selena 4 ever 21:38, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 06:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
We've initiated the discussion for the Sailor Moon mediation here. Sunray ( talk) 02:51, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at GoingBatty's talk page. GoingBatty ( talk) 20:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
If you are going to use asterisks in commenting, please remember not to put an extra carriage return between the last person's and your comment. It just breaks the whole asterisk format.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 20:18, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
If you have an issue with a minor thing I did in a massive edit, don't press the god damn revert button to undo everything I did. If you could please point out what specifically in my massive copy editing edit was bad, we might be able to fix it.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 04:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
And another issue, these things do not need citations as they come from the episode. I do not know why you tagged anything as citation needed when it is an event from the show itself. Morooka says "you are going on my personal shitlist". Why is a {{ cn}} tag needed for that? And the word "cartoonish" should not need an inline citation either. It is a physical descriptor.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 04:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Jinnai; Probably not, sorry. While bishoujo is certainly better than bishojo, I still am of the opinion that there is currently no clear bias against bishōjo, and therefore we should stick with the form specified in Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles)#Romanization. - JRBrown ( talk) 01:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
FYI, SandyGeorgia has "restarted" the FAC discussion "for a fresh look" on where everyone stands on this article. — Rich wales 02:53, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Its best for the reviewer to do this, hence why I'm here. Can you move our conservation to its talk page and link to it, or collapse the conversation if you feel that's better. edit: Actually, if the conversation is still ongoing then it could wait until its finished. Thanks, « ₣M₣ » 17:35, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Could you copy-edit episode 13 and 14's summaries? Tintor keeps removing my attempts to show that it is linked to episode 14 (removing Yuuta's sighting of Nanako in her costume and Nanako seeing Shu Nakajima). I believe you are much better at determining what is and is not valid content than he is, at the rate he's going.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 02:54, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
i invite you to this discussion, due to you being part of the discussion before hand that never got resolved. the discussion is here Lucia Black ( talk) 17:42, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Jinnai, just a note to tell you that I've finished the copy-edit of the above article you requested; I'm sorry you waited so long. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 ( talk) 00:57, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
This might intrest you: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#AnimeCons.com AnimeCons.com is being questioned as a reliable source and it is used in alot of articles. There has also been a recent push to clean up WP:A&M/ORS . -- Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 00:53, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Jinnai. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click
HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 01:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC) |
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 5, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2012
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 19:25, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yin-Yang! X-Change Alternative (box cover art).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:24, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 5, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2012
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2012, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 21:29, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
In this issue:
--The Olive Branch 19:10, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi! Remember the Son Goku name debate? I decided to do a search on his name. I was able to find quite a few secondary English sources that use "Son Goku." Please see Talk:Goku#Reliable_sources_in_English_using_.22Son_Goku.22 - Thanks WhisperToMe ( talk) 02:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 5, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2012
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2012, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 15:44, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Best wishes for the New Year! | ||
Wishing you and yours a joyous, healthful, and productive 2013! Please accept a belated thank you for the well wishes upon my retirement as FAC delegate this year, and apologies for the false alarm of my first—and hopefully last—retirement; the well wishes extended me were most kind, but I decided to return, re-committed, when another blocked sock was revealed as one of the factors aggravating the FA pages this year. Maintaining standards in featured content requires vigilance, dedication and knowledge of people like you, who are needed; reviews are always welcome at
FAC,
FAR and
TFA requests.
Somehow, somehow we never ever seem to do nothin' completely nice and easy, but here's hoping that 2013 will see a peaceful road ahead and a return to the quality and comaraderie that defines the
FA process, with the help of many dedicated Wikipedians! |
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 5, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2012
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2012, the project has:
|
Content
|
Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of
WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members).
So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.-- Dom497 ( talk) This message was sent out by -- EdwardsBot ( talk) 14:45, 9 June 2013 (UTC) |
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2013
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2013, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 15:50, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2013
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2013, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 05:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2014
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2014, the project has:
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
anime and manga
Thank you for quality articles on
anime and
manga, such as
School Rumble and
List of Popotan soundtracks, based on knowledge of Japanese and experience, for tagging, assessing and reviewing, - you are an
awesome Wikipedian!
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2014
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2014, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2014
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2014, the project has:
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2015
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1
2015, the project has:
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:46, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2015
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2015, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
anime and manga
Thank you for quality articles on
anime and
manga, such as
School Rumble and
List of Popotan soundtracks, based on knowledge of Japanese and experience, for tagging, assessing and reviewing, - you are an
awesome Wikipedian!
A year ago, you were the 984th recipient of my Pumpkin Sky Prize, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:03, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 3 — 3nd Quarter, 2015
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2015, the project has:
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Pinkstrawberry02™
talk is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2013
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2013, the project has:
|
Content
|
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2013
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2013, the project has:
|
Content
|
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2014
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1
2014, the project has:
|
Content
|
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2015
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2015, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
I'm so sorry to hear about what has happened. Thanks for everything you have done for Wikipedia and everything you have done to help individual editors. My deepest condolences to your family and close friends. Vaya con dios! Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 05:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
I'm shocked to hear that you passed away all those years ago. I've always wondered had happened to you since you stopped editing so suddenly, and it never occurred to me that this was the reason. Rest in peace. -- クラ ウド 668 08:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
I would like this death was just an April's Fool, but apparently you passed away. You did some amazing works in wikipedia. I would have liked working with you. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 15:20, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
I never got the chance to work with this Wikipedian, but I heard of their contributions and send my heartfelt condolances to their family and friends, and all fellow Wikipedians who knew Jinnai and got the chance to collaborate with them. -- ProtoDrake ( talk) 15:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello! Your submission of Reporting of lolicon images on Wikimedia Commons at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 01:18, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jinnai. Wehwalt and I believe that all your concerns have been addressed at the FAC for Kennedy half dollar. It has also been copyedited by a member of the GOCE. Thanks for reviewing it!- RHM22 ( talk) 01:36, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi
Thanks very much!
I enjoyed doing that one, and the unexpected bstar was the icing on the cake :¬) Chaosdruid ( talk) 05:56, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Greetings! You were listed as owning this guide book on the reference library page. If it's not any trouble, could you tell me if the book included anything on the manga one-shot Glass Wings? While a review would be nice, my main aim is to find a reliable source for the magazine it was serialized in. Regards, WhiteArcticWolf ( talk) 19:48, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to help you achieve your (noble) goal of getting either or both of these articles to FA status before the anniversary. However, I fear that our (brief) history may get in the way. What do you think? -- Nczempin ( talk) 18:22, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 02:49, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Oh hey. I managed to miss the PROD for this game, which I know to be articleworthy. It received a two-page review in Pelit, a large gaming magazine and a reliable source. If Pelit was on the job for a Sierra title, chances are infitesimal that no other magazine was.
Prior obligations mean that it'll take me a couple of days to find that article from my magazine stacks and integrate it into the article. I decided to be rude and restore the article right away, since waiting might have gotten the newly created redlinks de-linked. Once an article is cut away from the web of links, reconnecting it is both labor-intensive and incredibly irritating.
If I have not added the review by the end of the weekend, I'll have screwed up and deserve censure. -- Kiz o r 20:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
In fan service, is the word used in The Otaku Encyclopedia by Anno droll or drool? -- Malkinann ( talk) 23:17, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
This to let you know that an edit of yours has been mentioned at ANI. Cheers, -- JN 466 17:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, just wanted to let you know File:WikiProject Square Enix Dragon Quest logo.svg lives at Commons, not here, so if you want it deleted you should make the request at Commons. Cheers, -- JaGa talk 19:50, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Jinnai! I am ja:User:Kanjy, a Bureaucrat at Japanese Wikipedia. Today I usurped ja:User:Jinnai for you as per your request. Cheers! -- Kanjy ( talk) 15:32, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
I've found that a lot of good articles and probably a lot of featured articles (I haven't check them yet) are abusing the use of copyrighted images on Wikipedia (for example, I've seen several articles that use three images to visualize content in the article even though the first image demonstrates everything that the other two images are trying to do). Would you be interested in helping fix this problem? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 18:40, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jinnai. I have addressed your comments at the FAC for Trade dollar (United States coin). Thanks for taking the time to review it!- RHM22 ( talk) 03:23, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jinnai. Why did you remove the table that summarizes the classes? You didn't like it? Was it too much incomplete? There's an identical table in Final Fantasy character jobs, and many users are contributing to it about the videogames they played. It comes just out of logic: three traditional or "pure" class-types (Fighters, Wizards and Healers), plus three "hybrid" ones that are Fighters with magic, Full-range magicians and Mixed classes, all sorted from "pure attackers with no magic" to "strong healers with little offense". Please let me know. Cheers :-) -- Abacos ( talk) 09:42, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
I was pretty brutal. I'm going to try to shorten the derivative releases part with the same zeal. But I figured I'd stop and give you a chance to revert or re-add anything if I've been too brutal. I still ultimately trust that you think there's a good reason for this guideline. I'm just a skeptical sympathizer :) ... so my efforts to keep it really short reflect the idea that we don't need to say much. Shooterwalker ( talk) 14:56, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
... on our FAC editorial in the Bugle, including your comments, here. The idea for this editorial was to give a lot of brief statements by a lot of people to convey the idea that there's broad support for the idea that anyone can (and more should) review at FAC. After we see if the editorial has any effect, we can try to do something less scattershot in another editorial. Please let me know if you are (or aren't) happy with any effect this might have at FAC. - Dank ( push to talk) 19:44, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jinnai - Last year, the FAR process instituted a new first step. This requires editors to notify in advance the talk page of the article they are planning to nominate for review. Because this wasn't done on your recent nomination of Halo 3, I have removed the review from the FAR page, hidden the banner on the article talk page, and placed a notification on the article talk page. If there is no work done on the article in the next week or two, please feel free to reverse my actions, or ping me and I will do so. Thank you, and please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer ( talk) 01:06, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
While you may be busy, I was hoping that you could give Glass Joe a copyedit and/or provide a comment on its FAC. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 03:41, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jinnai,
I stongly disagree that the episode list for the Sakura Wars TV series should be included in the main Sakura Wars article, at in its current form. The article only barely mentions the anime in the lead, and otherwise is entirely about the games. As it currently stands, the episode list appears completely out of place. There also is currently no explanation for what the list is in the article, so that someone who doesn't know it is a list of the TV series episodes would have no idea what it is. Furthermore, the episode list is currently unsourced. Even if the list were sourced and cleaned up, it would belong in an article on the TV series, not this article which is mainly about the parent game series. WP:PRESERVE says to retain additions if they would belong in the finished article, but I don't think it means to retain out of place additions that would belong in a different, as yet unwritten article (and anyway, the episode list will still be present in the history if someone wants to use it to create a new article later). If you really think that the list must be retained somewhere visible (though I don't really think it should be until someone gets around to writing the Sakura Wars TV article), then perhaps you could undo the redirect from List of Sakura Wars episodes and add an explanation to the lead section to that list to make it clear what it is a list of the Sakura Wars TV series episodes (as opposed to the OAV episodes). Even better in my opinion would be to write an article on the Sakura Wars TV series and include the list there, since the TV series would certainly pass the notability guidelines with multiple reviews from reliable sources. Calathan ( talk) 05:37, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
– MuZemike 14:19, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Hey, you have time to take another look at how the article is shaping up? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 16:28, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I saw that you were a supporter of Launch getting her own section on the List of Dragon Ball characters from the consensus from a few years ago discussing which Dragon Ball characters should be kept. Since Launch failed to get one back then I have started a new consensus to try to get her section back on the list. I was wondering if you can help by going to Talk:List_of_Dragon_Ball_characters#Launch and put down your vote. Thanks and I would appreciate it. - SuperTiencha ( talk) 16:17, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
It breaks the template. Period. Star Wars: Rogue Squadron gets all messed up after you do that edit. I will take the time to find out what you're doing that messing it up. Thanks. -- Torsodog Talk 04:47, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi
Just to let you know I have completed the copyedit. Chaosdruid ( talk) 03:47, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Hey, you haven't been on for a few days, but whenever you get back I've addressed your concerns at the FF13 FAC. Thanks! -- Pres N 19:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi
I am a little confused, so have asked MuzeMike to try and help sort out any problems before a copyedit.
The discussion is here: User_talk:MuZemike#Dragon_Quest_and_Warrior Chaosdruid ( talk) 00:20, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Jinnai. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Dragon Quest at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! |
Been invited to be part of the discussion to share your opinion whether List of LGBT characters in film, radio, and TV fiction should be deleted or not. this discussion is here. Bread Ninja ( talk) 02:18, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
I'll take another look tomorrow or the day after. Cheers, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 22:49, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Template:Cite GameFAQs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Odie5533 ( talk) 16:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey Jin, have you seen the most recent edit on the talk page about the multiple article names?-- Sexy Kick 04:15, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
I'm not sure if you've seen my question in the discussion - could you please tell me where it is "highly discouraged" that interwiki links be used in mainspace? I've been looking around and can't find anywhere where it is discouraged - only H:ILL, where it is encouraged. Thanks for any assistance. -- Malkinann ( talk) 03:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
As the person in question has apparently won an award, this could mean that she would pass WP:ANYBIO. The Japanese link assists to disambiguate her from any other person by that name.-- Malkinann ( talk) 21:59, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Casshan has this weird romanization thing going on, so I thought you would know what to do for his name in the article Tatsunoko vs. Capcom: Ultimate All-Stars#Playable characters. English name in-game is this, in Japanese its that. Those are the only sources I can find on the matter. Regards, « ₣M₣ » 22:54, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey Jinnai, here are the scans:
And here's the reference:
I included the Mother section from Chapter 4 since it discusses Dragon Quest a bit. Just let me know if you need anything else. Cheers! - sesu prime 00:39, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jinnai - Would you have a few minutes to revisit your comments at the FAR for Halo 3 (review page at WP:Featured article review/Halo 3/archive1)? The FAR appears to be getting close to being able to close, but it would be great to get any final comments you have, and if you feel the article can now be kept or if it still needs more work. Thanks, Dana boomer ( talk) 12:30, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Dedicated Wikipedia Contributor Award | |
For all your amazing contributions. We're so glad you're here! ★Pinkstrawberry02★ ( talk) 01:00, 19 September 2011 (UTC) |
Please reply on Pinkstrawberry02's talk page, or if you still would like to reply here, just send them a {{ talkback}} and reply here. Thanks.
Questions are posted at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/draft#Featured editor: Jinnai. Thanks. ( Guyinblack25 talk 16:32, 19 September 2011 (UTC))
You're most definitely welcome. You deserve it. ;) Pinkstrawberry02™ talk 21:50, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to say Thanks for pointing out WP:AND - I think if we'd been fully aware of that policy several years ago (or perhaps it didn't exist then? *shrug*), we could probably have just gone straight from "Sega Mega Drive/Sega Genesis" to some variant of this new proposed solution, and probably saved ourselves a lot of headaches. Thanks for bringing it up and the comparison with the Pokemon games, and for your well-reasoned argument on it. I'll admit my misgivings are a bit far-fetched and indicative of my tendency to way overanalyze things. :)
I do honestly support this idea, and I felt it would help to turn it into a full proposal. I certainly don't want it to seem like I'm taking credit for your idea. I find myself hoping it passes. — KieferSkunk ( talk) — 03:04, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Then Harry Potter books and movies needs to go as Harry Potter 1, Harry Potter 2', etc. And if you say no then your hypocriting what you say about Sailor Moon cause Harry Potter 1, Harry Potter 2, etc. are common names for the Harry Potter books and movies but yet we don't put them like that. I'm sorry but it seems to me people need to pick and choice their battles here. If Harry shouldn't go by that then neither should those Sailor Moon chapters and they should move cause like I said it's hypocritical to not do it to all. JamesAlan1986 * talk 14:47, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Well the only other page I can think of is. Kondansha Comics USA but they too (I think I haven't looked for awhile) for some reason post them in short instead of what's on the book itself. JamesAlan1986 * talk 15:15, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
I got 5 in total now. lol! JamesAlan1986 * talk 15:25, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Scratch that I'm such a blonde! LOL! The manga is the primary source. Well two amazon.com pages from Japan and the import say that it's Pretty Guardian Sailor Moon. JamesAlan1986 * talk 17:03, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
How's this? JamesAlan1986 * talk 03:15, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
When I went to Barnes and Noble (that's where I bought my copies of both Codename Sailor V and Sailor Moon) I almost burst into tears cause I thought they didn't have it (cause I looked for it in Sailor Moon) but then I saw Pretty Guardian Sailor Moon and I knew it was the new manga. Commercially and store wise I learned that they will not be putting it as Sailor Moon but as Pretty Guardian Sailor Moon as that's the title of the book regardless of common use names. But I'm starting to wonder about the amazon thing and I got a theory. Technically the manga was never originally translated right as the new ones are (the official site claims this) and I have a feeling that that new one was posted prior to it's release as Sailor Moon, Vol. 1 instead of Pretty Guardian Sailor Moon based off what is posted on the official site (though they are using both names) but in Japan it has a different name. Usually when Amazon.com gets them they change them to their proper names instead of a slang name, so to speak. I think if it's given time Amazon.com will change the name to separate from customers getting confusing between the original release and the re-issue. JamesAlan1986 * talk 04:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Pokemon Blue and Red Pokemon Red and Blue.
Just pointing out the search results here. The most common combination of titles, at least according to a google test, is pretty clearly "Red and Blue". Also this probably could've used some discussion. Just saying.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 03:14, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Eh, you're right. 15 minutes isn't long enough for a real review, I was just guesstimating because of the relatively short length of the prose compared to say, an FA candidates'.
Anyways, I'll give Dragon Warrior a copy edit, hopefully today or tomorrow. I'm not the best at copyediting, but I'll do what I can.
Thanks for the review! – Drilnoth ( T/ C) 13:27, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Can I get your opinion on this? I think I made a decent argument about making compromises on here when it comes to the whole "common name" argument. But it doesn't hurt to have a second and third opinion. Please read it thoroughly and take into consideration what I am saying before throwing a big opposition. LOL! JamesAlan1986 * talk 11:23, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
I asked a member of the team and I haven't gotten a response yet. Is there anymore comments you can add for the benefit of the article? GamerPro64 23:50, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 07:30, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Rock on man. JORGENEV 07:42, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Resident evil 4 chainsaw controller.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sir Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 00:16, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Making factually unsupported statements of derogatory opinion about other editors, like "unlike what you think COMMONNAME is not absolute" [2] is a violation of civility. For the record, that's not what I think. Anyway, "comment on content, not on the contributor".
Please retract accordingly. -- Born2cycle ( talk) 17:51, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
RE. Wikipedia talk:Notability#Articles need multiple sources
Jinnai, apologies if I was not clear, but I think you misunderstoon what I wrote.
Benin is a country.
But I am talking about the creation of articles about several small places which are in that country.
Lougba is not a county; it's not a city; and there is doubt as to whether it is a town; it does not seem to be on any maps.
Dr. Blofeld has created that article, and lots more, based on a 1-line entry in a census - which lists "Lougba" as an arrondissement, which is a small governmental region. Chzz ► 10:14, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
I think we're ready for the next stage of dispute resolution - noone else is participating in the discussion at the noticeboard. -- Malkinann ( talk) 01:48, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Sailor Moon (English adaptation)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 5 December 2011.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee.
17:03, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Sailor Moon (English adaptation), in which you were listed as a party, has been accepted by the Mediation Committee. The case will be assigned to an active mediator within two weeks, and mediation proceedings should begin shortly thereafter. Proceedings will begin at the case information page, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Sailor Moon (English adaptation), so please add this to your watchlist. Formal mediation is governed by the Mediation Committee and its Policy. The Policy, and especially the first two sections of the "Mediation" section, should be read if you have never participated in formal mediation. For a short guide to accepted cases, see the "Accepted requests" section of the Guide to formal mediation. You may also want to familiarise yourself with the internal Procedures of the Committee.
As mediation proceedings begin, be aware that formal mediation can only be successful if every participant approaches discussion in a professional and civil way, and is completely prepared to compromise. Please contact the Committee if anything is unclear.
For the Mediation Committee,
AGK [
•
21:52, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Hello—Sunray and I will be your mediators. We will be sharing the job of mediation, so anything shared with one of us should be expected to be shared with the other, unless specifically requested otherwise. As you may or may not also know, discussions during formal mediation are privileged, meaning that they cannot be used against you later; for example, if the case is referred to arbitration. This allows participants to speak freely and candidly about the issues.
To start off the case, we've decided to invite participants to share, privately, their perspectives with the mediators, Feezo and Sunray. We'd like to hear your thoughts on what the major issues are, what the ideal result of mediation would be, and what alternatives might be acceptable. Other relevant thoughts are of course welcome. Send these by email with the form at Special:EmailUser/Feezo.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 00:38, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jinnai,
It looks like your edit to Template:WikiProject Anime and manga earlier today removed spaces before some wikilinks, causing words to run together (e.g. "the project page" was changed to "the project page"). Can you please try to fix that? I don't have any experience editing templates, but I could try to fix it myself if you want. Calathan ( talk) 21:58, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
This may help in the meantime http://translate.google.com -- Jondel ( talk) 05:45, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Just FYI, United States v. Wong Kim Ark is being considered a second time for Featured Article status ( here). — Richwales ( talk) 04:25, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
And as a summary, the fictional media itself is the only source you need when you are discussing characters' biographies or opinions. And you should not have labeled the revert as vandalism, particularly because I rewrote it to get rid of your grammatical errors and the statement that you accused of being original research when it clearly is not original research as it is a direct report of the fictional media.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 07:21, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Since you responded to my thread on the talk page at WP:FAC, I was wondering if you accept c/e requests? Best and happy holidays, Jona yo! Selena 4 ever 21:38, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 06:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
We've initiated the discussion for the Sailor Moon mediation here. Sunray ( talk) 02:51, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at GoingBatty's talk page. GoingBatty ( talk) 20:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
If you are going to use asterisks in commenting, please remember not to put an extra carriage return between the last person's and your comment. It just breaks the whole asterisk format.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 20:18, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
If you have an issue with a minor thing I did in a massive edit, don't press the god damn revert button to undo everything I did. If you could please point out what specifically in my massive copy editing edit was bad, we might be able to fix it.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 04:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
And another issue, these things do not need citations as they come from the episode. I do not know why you tagged anything as citation needed when it is an event from the show itself. Morooka says "you are going on my personal shitlist". Why is a {{ cn}} tag needed for that? And the word "cartoonish" should not need an inline citation either. It is a physical descriptor.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 04:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Jinnai; Probably not, sorry. While bishoujo is certainly better than bishojo, I still am of the opinion that there is currently no clear bias against bishōjo, and therefore we should stick with the form specified in Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles)#Romanization. - JRBrown ( talk) 01:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
FYI, SandyGeorgia has "restarted" the FAC discussion "for a fresh look" on where everyone stands on this article. — Rich wales 02:53, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Its best for the reviewer to do this, hence why I'm here. Can you move our conservation to its talk page and link to it, or collapse the conversation if you feel that's better. edit: Actually, if the conversation is still ongoing then it could wait until its finished. Thanks, « ₣M₣ » 17:35, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Could you copy-edit episode 13 and 14's summaries? Tintor keeps removing my attempts to show that it is linked to episode 14 (removing Yuuta's sighting of Nanako in her costume and Nanako seeing Shu Nakajima). I believe you are much better at determining what is and is not valid content than he is, at the rate he's going.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 02:54, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
i invite you to this discussion, due to you being part of the discussion before hand that never got resolved. the discussion is here Lucia Black ( talk) 17:42, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Jinnai, just a note to tell you that I've finished the copy-edit of the above article you requested; I'm sorry you waited so long. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 ( talk) 00:57, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
This might intrest you: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#AnimeCons.com AnimeCons.com is being questioned as a reliable source and it is used in alot of articles. There has also been a recent push to clean up WP:A&M/ORS . -- Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 00:53, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Jinnai. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click
HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 01:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC) |
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 5, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2012
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 19:25, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yin-Yang! X-Change Alternative (box cover art).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:24, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 5, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2012
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2012, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 21:29, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
In this issue:
--The Olive Branch 19:10, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi! Remember the Son Goku name debate? I decided to do a search on his name. I was able to find quite a few secondary English sources that use "Son Goku." Please see Talk:Goku#Reliable_sources_in_English_using_.22Son_Goku.22 - Thanks WhisperToMe ( talk) 02:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 5, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2012
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2012, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 15:44, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Best wishes for the New Year! | ||
Wishing you and yours a joyous, healthful, and productive 2013! Please accept a belated thank you for the well wishes upon my retirement as FAC delegate this year, and apologies for the false alarm of my first—and hopefully last—retirement; the well wishes extended me were most kind, but I decided to return, re-committed, when another blocked sock was revealed as one of the factors aggravating the FA pages this year. Maintaining standards in featured content requires vigilance, dedication and knowledge of people like you, who are needed; reviews are always welcome at
FAC,
FAR and
TFA requests.
Somehow, somehow we never ever seem to do nothin' completely nice and easy, but here's hoping that 2013 will see a peaceful road ahead and a return to the quality and comaraderie that defines the
FA process, with the help of many dedicated Wikipedians! |
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 5, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2012
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2012, the project has:
|
Content
|
Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of
WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members).
So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.-- Dom497 ( talk) This message was sent out by -- EdwardsBot ( talk) 14:45, 9 June 2013 (UTC) |
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2013
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2013, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 15:50, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2013
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2013, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 05:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2014
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2014, the project has:
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
anime and manga
Thank you for quality articles on
anime and
manga, such as
School Rumble and
List of Popotan soundtracks, based on knowledge of Japanese and experience, for tagging, assessing and reviewing, - you are an
awesome Wikipedian!
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2014
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2014, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2014
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2014, the project has:
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2015
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1
2015, the project has:
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:46, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2015
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2015, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
anime and manga
Thank you for quality articles on
anime and
manga, such as
School Rumble and
List of Popotan soundtracks, based on knowledge of Japanese and experience, for tagging, assessing and reviewing, - you are an
awesome Wikipedian!
A year ago, you were the 984th recipient of my Pumpkin Sky Prize, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:03, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 3 — 3nd Quarter, 2015
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2015, the project has:
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Pinkstrawberry02™
talk is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2013
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2013, the project has:
|
Content
|
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2013
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2013, the project has:
|
Content
|
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2014
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1
2014, the project has:
|
Content
|
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2015
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2015, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
I'm so sorry to hear about what has happened. Thanks for everything you have done for Wikipedia and everything you have done to help individual editors. My deepest condolences to your family and close friends. Vaya con dios! Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 05:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
I'm shocked to hear that you passed away all those years ago. I've always wondered had happened to you since you stopped editing so suddenly, and it never occurred to me that this was the reason. Rest in peace. -- クラ ウド 668 08:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
I would like this death was just an April's Fool, but apparently you passed away. You did some amazing works in wikipedia. I would have liked working with you. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 15:20, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
I never got the chance to work with this Wikipedian, but I heard of their contributions and send my heartfelt condolances to their family and friends, and all fellow Wikipedians who knew Jinnai and got the chance to collaborate with them. -- ProtoDrake ( talk) 15:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)