![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hiya,
I see what happened there with reflinks / EC,
I was just tidying up post-AFC creation / after chatting with the user in live help,
I will leave you to it (to avoid EC); I'll check back on the article some time later. Cheers, Chzz ► 17:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
FYI Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marquis de la Eirron -- PBS ( talk) 01:13, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi i'm new here so i really don't know how this works, so about the articles that a changed, actually, some people changed the contries of come morrocan cities to "Western Sahara", but western sahara is not even a country, for now is a separatist group! so correct me if i'm wrong but what you're asking me to do is to make a commant in the small box under the article after a made an edit? thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moamem ( talk • contribs) 20:32, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
hi jeff, i noticed a couple of IPs were vandalising the Fernando Garibay article. i am not sure how to rollback their changes. WookieInHeat ( talk) 20:52, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
That info came from the Japanese Wikiapedia. 72.184.129.252 ( talk) 01:18, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi. When you get a chance could you please restore the Reavis High School site to the way it looked around July 2010. There has been a group of vandals that trashed out the site and I had removed and tried to clean it up but there is too much work and I do not know how to restore it back to the way it looked in July. Thank You so much in this important matter to me and many others. Chico 9 ( talk) 02:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
That is actually what the announcers said at the game, how do i cite that? It is just a speculation but i found that a lot of the articles are bare when it comes to football players. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.71.111.106 ( talk) 05:01, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
You are telling me to not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, on the John Birch Society article.
That's why I've removed the biased description that was originally there. The original (and now current version) describes the John Birch Society ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Birch_Society) as a "radical right-wing" organization. I have removed "radical right-wing" because that description introduces bias and it is not compatible with Wikipedia's neutral point of view. A neutral point of view would look like this: "The John Birch Society is an American conservative political organization".
Please do not introduce bias into this article and please do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you have with this edit.
Jcncnc ( talk) 23:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Then we need to indicate that all the verifiable and reliable sources that call the John Birch Society a "radical right-wing" organization are all on the political left. That needs to be stated in order to insure a neutral point of view. Jcncnc ( talk) 19:20, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
hi again jeff, i wanted to thank you for giving warnings/welcomes to some of the users i have reverted. i'm just getting into vandalism patrolling and am still picking up on wiki policies. another admin pointed out i should issue warnings/welcomes when i revert a users contributions and will be doing so from now on. thanks again WookieInHeat ( talk) 18:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
I keep updating the information due to discrepancies and mass exodus of principals and vice principals in the district, but you keep reverting back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.172.67.48 ( talk) 01:49, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
How do you change the font style of your signature? Wayne Olajuwon chat 21:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Could I do that on WP:Sandbox? Wayne Olajuwon chat 21:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! Wayne Olajuwon chat 01:38, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted an editing i made. The editing was about "ikechukwu ndefo" and the information on wikipedia is false and it gives a false representation of him. I don't know why you decided to revert it but please undo what you did. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chichi beybuh ( talk • contribs) 09:29, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Sometimes I don't know what articles to edit and how do I have a lot edits and vandalism reverts like you have so I can become an administrator and have access to to the rollback feature that most users have even though I don't what articles to edit, sometimes.? Wayne Olajuwon chat 18:59, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
I only tried Special:RecentChanges. I clicked Special:Random a long time ago. Wayne Olajuwon chat 14:22, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
re: deletion of blaine l. reininger and activity on tuxedomoon page.
Damn. you people are vicious. I just stuck my foot in the door and you tried to bite it off within 30 seconds. don't think i want to come back, even if this article is about me and the band i started.
blaine —Preceding unsigned comment added by Misscolorado ( talk • contribs) 07:49, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
I am truly Joe_Gazz84 on the Admin Tools Wiki. --Joe Gazz84 user• talk• contribs• Editor Review 01:49, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
I now have Huggle but I need 11 more vandalism reverts in order for Huggle to work when I get the rollback feature. Wayne Olajuwon chat 15:10, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Where did you get all the information you have on your huggle page. Wayne Olajuwon chat 15:13, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay. Wayne Olajuwon chat 14:51, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
How do you revert edits by more than one user? Wayne Olajuwon chat 21:30, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay. Wayne Olajuwon chat 21:35, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey Jeff. There's not really much point in slapping a uw-username on the talk page of an indef'd editor and you wiped my block notice when you did it. I assume you didn't mean to, but try to be careful. You might like User:NuclearWarfare/Mark-blocked script.js, which makes all links to a links to a blocked editors user or talk page appear with a line through them and italicised if they're indef'd. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:07, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I've just noticed you talking to that IP about Rafael Cavalcante, since I have the IP on watchlist. Just to let you know that the IP is correct. Though not conventionally sourced, all mixed martial artists have an external link to sherdog at the bottom of their page. On that page, you can find the proof of Cavalcante being a light heavyweight fighter. All the best! Paralympiakos (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey Jeff,
I'm trying to figure out why you are removing my edits to DART's Wiki page. I'm also wondering why you are planning on blockinm me from editing it, from this computer at least :). How is am image biased? How does this violate any terms of use? Do you think the people researching DART do not deserve to know their most valuable assett is not safe in their parking lots? Do you not think they would find it productive to know that they are taking a huge financial risk simply by parking in these lots. I think they have the right to know. When I was researching DART it would have been a godsend for someone to of done what I am trying to. I would have saved thousands, and they could too. Is that not productive? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.96.192.34 ( talk) 20:04, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello G, I did a stupid thing I have been working on the article I posted and did not mean to make it live In fact, there's already an article on the subject, the artist Keith Coventry, on Wikipedia and I was planning to integrate it with the existing one and was using 'Coventries' as temp file name for my reference only before I did so. But I sent it live - and then I made it blank thinking, as you surmised, that it would delete it. I have looked at the guide notes on this, but wondered if you could suggest the best thing to do. I would really like to incorporate what I have written into existing wiki entry as I have worked very hard on it. Viccol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Viccol1 ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for showing me I can retrieve the information, but I am still left with the problem that I have created a page - Coventries - that I have no need for. I suppose I have to go through the procedure outlined to remove it, yes? Can you assure me this will not mean I will be banned from making Wikipedia entries? Viccol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Viccol1 ( talk • contribs) 20:53, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
If someone removes most of the information that is on article about somebody which includes removing categories even if they put an edit summary is that edit still vandalism? Wayne Olajuwon chat 20:32, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay, Thanks! Wayne Olajuwon chat 21:08, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Also, why sometimes Huggle doesn't let me revert vandalism? Wayne Olajuwon chat 21:10, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay and thanks for the information! Wayne Olajuwon chat 21:19, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Jeff,
My name is Pete Canalichio and I have been trying to contribute to the content on the "brand licensing" wiki page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brand_licensing. The current content is from a legal perspective and we would like to provide a "brand" perspective to the information.
I have several years of experience in brand licensing and have authored several copyright modules on the topic. I had referenced one of these modules - "Introduction to Brand Licensing" in the content that I added in.
Here is the summary of the edits I provided: Gave a definition of brand licensing from a business perspectives. Included sections on why companies license brands, expectations of licensors and licensees, explained the brand licensing process including the licensed product process flow and the royalty payments process flow.
Here is a link to the history of edits we have made: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Brand_licensing&action=history
We'd appreciate any help in improving the current content on the page.
Thanks, Pcanalichio ( talk) 00:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Pete
I just nominated an article that you have contributed to: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Most Hated Family in America. Wolfview ( talk) 16:15, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
How do you remove Twinkle? Wayne Olajuwon chat 00:05, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Oh, okay. Wayne Olajuwon chat 00:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Your AFD comment here mentioned reliable source coverage. I have worked on the article, expanded it, and added coverage from secondary sources. (I am still in the process of research on it, have over 50 more sources to go through) Perhaps you could revisit? Thank you for your time. -- Cirt ( talk) 05:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Thank you, very much, for your kind words at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Most Hated Family in America about my work on the article. Much appreciated. Cheers, -- Cirt ( talk) 14:54, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
If a user blanks a page without an edit summary, even if it's for deletion, is it also vandalism? Wayne Olajuwon chat 20:34, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay and Huggle isn't letting me log in because of an unknown error. Wayne Olajuwon chat 22:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay. Wayne Olajuwon chat 01:00, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Sure, i will. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.202.219.154 ( talk) 01:56, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Please read the links a placed in Paladino's article I'm not making this stuff up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nydied ( talk • contribs) 01:44, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
I am pretty sure the two are the same person - as they refer to the same "sources" and "material" - though the "Nydied" one is getting past any reasonable behavior! Collect ( talk) 02:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
I'm waiting to talk where are you? -- Nydied ( talk) 02:27, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Nydied [3], [4], [5], [6] (last is revert as he had questioned cite for him being founder of company - I furnished the cite, and he then edits the same sentence to "was at one time" known - which certainy appears to be a revert and not a simple edit (his adding tags etc. do not count for sure). 4RR in barely over an hour. Not to mention his poor taste on my talk page at [7] after I told him not to post on my talk page. Collect ( talk) 02:49, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Jeff. Not sure if anyone has mentioned this to you, but there is something strange happening as a result of a combination of WikEd (gadget available to all editors) and your Edit PageNotice for this page. I was here reverting some strange vandalism (which was redacted once, but somehow showed up again) when I noticed that I was unable to edit your page. Clicking edit on the whole page, or on a section, would result in the same thing - the page displays with the edit notice, but then the edit box is disabled. When I temporarily deleted your edit notice I was able to edit the page. Also, when I temporarily disable WikEd gadget I am also able to edit - so it's some combination of those two. Problem happens on both IE and Firefox for me.
I thought it might be related to the IP addr you have commented out in your page notice (which is blocked by my company firewall as a malicious site) but even if I remove that IP the same problem still happens. In any case, maybe it's just an issue on my side but you may want to play around with your page notice if others are mentioning the same problem to you.
Regards, 7 06:44, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Note to anyone considering protecting this page: I think it is only fair to newbies I contact that I keep this page open for editing by all, even if that means it gets vandalized sometimes. With 132 people watching it, it shouldn't stay vandalized for long. — Jeff G. ツ 14:01, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Another problem with Huggle is that doesn't let me revert vandalism on some articles. Why is that happening? Wayne Olajuwon chat 00:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay. Wayne Olajuwon chat 15:47, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Is this edit vandalism? Wayne Olajuwon chat 22:53, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay and users make mistakes when they make edits because they're human. Wayne Olajuwon chat 23:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
See here. I blocked the IP. If you want the revision deleted, say the word and it's gone, but if it was me, I'd frame it or something! ;) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:12, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Jeff. This looks to me like the Corenbot has plaed a copyvio on a page that is a duplicate resulting form a wrong recreation instead of a move. The original page was first named Vidyodaya school (with a small 's'). Perhaps you could have a look at this mixup as I'm not sure what to do with it, then I'll know for next time I come across a case like this. Thanks.-- Kudpung ( talk) 01:23, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
I'm not harassing Jeangabin. 72.185.171.33 ( talk) 01:43, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob ( talk) 23:37, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:RE. Since you had some involvement with the Template:RE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer ( talk) 10:52, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Is there a way to revert more than one users edits on Huggle because the edits are mostly reverted by one user? Wayne Olajuwon chat 20:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hiya,
I see what happened there with reflinks / EC,
I was just tidying up post-AFC creation / after chatting with the user in live help,
I will leave you to it (to avoid EC); I'll check back on the article some time later. Cheers, Chzz ► 17:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
FYI Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marquis de la Eirron -- PBS ( talk) 01:13, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi i'm new here so i really don't know how this works, so about the articles that a changed, actually, some people changed the contries of come morrocan cities to "Western Sahara", but western sahara is not even a country, for now is a separatist group! so correct me if i'm wrong but what you're asking me to do is to make a commant in the small box under the article after a made an edit? thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moamem ( talk • contribs) 20:32, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
hi jeff, i noticed a couple of IPs were vandalising the Fernando Garibay article. i am not sure how to rollback their changes. WookieInHeat ( talk) 20:52, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
That info came from the Japanese Wikiapedia. 72.184.129.252 ( talk) 01:18, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi. When you get a chance could you please restore the Reavis High School site to the way it looked around July 2010. There has been a group of vandals that trashed out the site and I had removed and tried to clean it up but there is too much work and I do not know how to restore it back to the way it looked in July. Thank You so much in this important matter to me and many others. Chico 9 ( talk) 02:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
That is actually what the announcers said at the game, how do i cite that? It is just a speculation but i found that a lot of the articles are bare when it comes to football players. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.71.111.106 ( talk) 05:01, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
You are telling me to not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, on the John Birch Society article.
That's why I've removed the biased description that was originally there. The original (and now current version) describes the John Birch Society ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Birch_Society) as a "radical right-wing" organization. I have removed "radical right-wing" because that description introduces bias and it is not compatible with Wikipedia's neutral point of view. A neutral point of view would look like this: "The John Birch Society is an American conservative political organization".
Please do not introduce bias into this article and please do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you have with this edit.
Jcncnc ( talk) 23:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Then we need to indicate that all the verifiable and reliable sources that call the John Birch Society a "radical right-wing" organization are all on the political left. That needs to be stated in order to insure a neutral point of view. Jcncnc ( talk) 19:20, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
hi again jeff, i wanted to thank you for giving warnings/welcomes to some of the users i have reverted. i'm just getting into vandalism patrolling and am still picking up on wiki policies. another admin pointed out i should issue warnings/welcomes when i revert a users contributions and will be doing so from now on. thanks again WookieInHeat ( talk) 18:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
I keep updating the information due to discrepancies and mass exodus of principals and vice principals in the district, but you keep reverting back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.172.67.48 ( talk) 01:49, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
How do you change the font style of your signature? Wayne Olajuwon chat 21:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Could I do that on WP:Sandbox? Wayne Olajuwon chat 21:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! Wayne Olajuwon chat 01:38, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted an editing i made. The editing was about "ikechukwu ndefo" and the information on wikipedia is false and it gives a false representation of him. I don't know why you decided to revert it but please undo what you did. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chichi beybuh ( talk • contribs) 09:29, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Sometimes I don't know what articles to edit and how do I have a lot edits and vandalism reverts like you have so I can become an administrator and have access to to the rollback feature that most users have even though I don't what articles to edit, sometimes.? Wayne Olajuwon chat 18:59, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
I only tried Special:RecentChanges. I clicked Special:Random a long time ago. Wayne Olajuwon chat 14:22, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
re: deletion of blaine l. reininger and activity on tuxedomoon page.
Damn. you people are vicious. I just stuck my foot in the door and you tried to bite it off within 30 seconds. don't think i want to come back, even if this article is about me and the band i started.
blaine —Preceding unsigned comment added by Misscolorado ( talk • contribs) 07:49, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
I am truly Joe_Gazz84 on the Admin Tools Wiki. --Joe Gazz84 user• talk• contribs• Editor Review 01:49, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
I now have Huggle but I need 11 more vandalism reverts in order for Huggle to work when I get the rollback feature. Wayne Olajuwon chat 15:10, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Where did you get all the information you have on your huggle page. Wayne Olajuwon chat 15:13, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay. Wayne Olajuwon chat 14:51, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
How do you revert edits by more than one user? Wayne Olajuwon chat 21:30, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay. Wayne Olajuwon chat 21:35, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey Jeff. There's not really much point in slapping a uw-username on the talk page of an indef'd editor and you wiped my block notice when you did it. I assume you didn't mean to, but try to be careful. You might like User:NuclearWarfare/Mark-blocked script.js, which makes all links to a links to a blocked editors user or talk page appear with a line through them and italicised if they're indef'd. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:07, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I've just noticed you talking to that IP about Rafael Cavalcante, since I have the IP on watchlist. Just to let you know that the IP is correct. Though not conventionally sourced, all mixed martial artists have an external link to sherdog at the bottom of their page. On that page, you can find the proof of Cavalcante being a light heavyweight fighter. All the best! Paralympiakos (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey Jeff,
I'm trying to figure out why you are removing my edits to DART's Wiki page. I'm also wondering why you are planning on blockinm me from editing it, from this computer at least :). How is am image biased? How does this violate any terms of use? Do you think the people researching DART do not deserve to know their most valuable assett is not safe in their parking lots? Do you not think they would find it productive to know that they are taking a huge financial risk simply by parking in these lots. I think they have the right to know. When I was researching DART it would have been a godsend for someone to of done what I am trying to. I would have saved thousands, and they could too. Is that not productive? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.96.192.34 ( talk) 20:04, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello G, I did a stupid thing I have been working on the article I posted and did not mean to make it live In fact, there's already an article on the subject, the artist Keith Coventry, on Wikipedia and I was planning to integrate it with the existing one and was using 'Coventries' as temp file name for my reference only before I did so. But I sent it live - and then I made it blank thinking, as you surmised, that it would delete it. I have looked at the guide notes on this, but wondered if you could suggest the best thing to do. I would really like to incorporate what I have written into existing wiki entry as I have worked very hard on it. Viccol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Viccol1 ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for showing me I can retrieve the information, but I am still left with the problem that I have created a page - Coventries - that I have no need for. I suppose I have to go through the procedure outlined to remove it, yes? Can you assure me this will not mean I will be banned from making Wikipedia entries? Viccol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Viccol1 ( talk • contribs) 20:53, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
If someone removes most of the information that is on article about somebody which includes removing categories even if they put an edit summary is that edit still vandalism? Wayne Olajuwon chat 20:32, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay, Thanks! Wayne Olajuwon chat 21:08, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Also, why sometimes Huggle doesn't let me revert vandalism? Wayne Olajuwon chat 21:10, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay and thanks for the information! Wayne Olajuwon chat 21:19, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Jeff,
My name is Pete Canalichio and I have been trying to contribute to the content on the "brand licensing" wiki page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brand_licensing. The current content is from a legal perspective and we would like to provide a "brand" perspective to the information.
I have several years of experience in brand licensing and have authored several copyright modules on the topic. I had referenced one of these modules - "Introduction to Brand Licensing" in the content that I added in.
Here is the summary of the edits I provided: Gave a definition of brand licensing from a business perspectives. Included sections on why companies license brands, expectations of licensors and licensees, explained the brand licensing process including the licensed product process flow and the royalty payments process flow.
Here is a link to the history of edits we have made: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Brand_licensing&action=history
We'd appreciate any help in improving the current content on the page.
Thanks, Pcanalichio ( talk) 00:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Pete
I just nominated an article that you have contributed to: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Most Hated Family in America. Wolfview ( talk) 16:15, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
How do you remove Twinkle? Wayne Olajuwon chat 00:05, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Oh, okay. Wayne Olajuwon chat 00:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Your AFD comment here mentioned reliable source coverage. I have worked on the article, expanded it, and added coverage from secondary sources. (I am still in the process of research on it, have over 50 more sources to go through) Perhaps you could revisit? Thank you for your time. -- Cirt ( talk) 05:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Thank you, very much, for your kind words at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Most Hated Family in America about my work on the article. Much appreciated. Cheers, -- Cirt ( talk) 14:54, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
If a user blanks a page without an edit summary, even if it's for deletion, is it also vandalism? Wayne Olajuwon chat 20:34, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay and Huggle isn't letting me log in because of an unknown error. Wayne Olajuwon chat 22:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay. Wayne Olajuwon chat 01:00, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Sure, i will. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.202.219.154 ( talk) 01:56, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Please read the links a placed in Paladino's article I'm not making this stuff up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nydied ( talk • contribs) 01:44, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
I am pretty sure the two are the same person - as they refer to the same "sources" and "material" - though the "Nydied" one is getting past any reasonable behavior! Collect ( talk) 02:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
I'm waiting to talk where are you? -- Nydied ( talk) 02:27, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Nydied [3], [4], [5], [6] (last is revert as he had questioned cite for him being founder of company - I furnished the cite, and he then edits the same sentence to "was at one time" known - which certainy appears to be a revert and not a simple edit (his adding tags etc. do not count for sure). 4RR in barely over an hour. Not to mention his poor taste on my talk page at [7] after I told him not to post on my talk page. Collect ( talk) 02:49, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Jeff. Not sure if anyone has mentioned this to you, but there is something strange happening as a result of a combination of WikEd (gadget available to all editors) and your Edit PageNotice for this page. I was here reverting some strange vandalism (which was redacted once, but somehow showed up again) when I noticed that I was unable to edit your page. Clicking edit on the whole page, or on a section, would result in the same thing - the page displays with the edit notice, but then the edit box is disabled. When I temporarily deleted your edit notice I was able to edit the page. Also, when I temporarily disable WikEd gadget I am also able to edit - so it's some combination of those two. Problem happens on both IE and Firefox for me.
I thought it might be related to the IP addr you have commented out in your page notice (which is blocked by my company firewall as a malicious site) but even if I remove that IP the same problem still happens. In any case, maybe it's just an issue on my side but you may want to play around with your page notice if others are mentioning the same problem to you.
Regards, 7 06:44, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Note to anyone considering protecting this page: I think it is only fair to newbies I contact that I keep this page open for editing by all, even if that means it gets vandalized sometimes. With 132 people watching it, it shouldn't stay vandalized for long. — Jeff G. ツ 14:01, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Another problem with Huggle is that doesn't let me revert vandalism on some articles. Why is that happening? Wayne Olajuwon chat 00:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay. Wayne Olajuwon chat 15:47, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Is this edit vandalism? Wayne Olajuwon chat 22:53, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay and users make mistakes when they make edits because they're human. Wayne Olajuwon chat 23:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
See here. I blocked the IP. If you want the revision deleted, say the word and it's gone, but if it was me, I'd frame it or something! ;) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:12, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Jeff. This looks to me like the Corenbot has plaed a copyvio on a page that is a duplicate resulting form a wrong recreation instead of a move. The original page was first named Vidyodaya school (with a small 's'). Perhaps you could have a look at this mixup as I'm not sure what to do with it, then I'll know for next time I come across a case like this. Thanks.-- Kudpung ( talk) 01:23, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
I'm not harassing Jeangabin. 72.185.171.33 ( talk) 01:43, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob ( talk) 23:37, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:RE. Since you had some involvement with the Template:RE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer ( talk) 10:52, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Is there a way to revert more than one users edits on Huggle because the edits are mostly reverted by one user? Wayne Olajuwon chat 20:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC)