This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Thanks for uploading File:1979RunningLiketheWind 20101001.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 21:05, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:1978TogetherForever 20101001.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 21:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:1977CarolinaDreams 20101001.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 21:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:1976LongHardRide 20101001.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 21:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:1975SearchinForARainbow 20101001.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 21:07, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

HI. I reverted an edit you made recently to the Cut the Cake (album) article. I describe my rationale in that article's Talk page Talk:Cut_the_Cake_(album). There's certainly plenty of room for debate / discussion about how to best format album track listings in Wikipedia articles although this might be a subject best taken up at the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums page if you are interested in getting clarification or getting changes made to track listing guidelines. Pugetbill ( talk) 18:19, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as 6 inch (15.2 cm) /47 Mark 6 and 8 guns, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_6-50_mk8.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:6 inch (15.2 cm) /47 Mark 6 and 8 guns and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, 6 inch (15.2 cm) /47 Mark 6 and 8 guns, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:6 inch (15.2 cm) /47 Mark 6 and 8 guns with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:6 inch (15.2 cm) /47 Mark 6 and 8 guns. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:6 inch (15.2 cm) /47 Mark 6 and 8 guns saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Benea ( talk) 21:56, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as 6 inch (15.2 cm) /53 Mark 12, 14, 15 and 18 guns, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_6-53_mk12.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:6 inch (15.2 cm) /53 Mark 12, 14, 15 and 18 guns and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, 6 inch (15.2 cm) /53 Mark 12, 14, 15 and 18 guns, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:6 inch (15.2 cm) /53 Mark 12, 14, 15 and 18 guns with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:6 inch (15.2 cm) /53 Mark 12, 14, 15 and 18 guns. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:6 inch (15.2 cm) /53 Mark 12, 14, 15 and 18 guns saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Benea ( talk) 21:57, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Because of our policies, we are not able to accept content that might be fine to display on a noncommercial site. All content imported to Wikipedia must be free for commercial reuse and modification in compliance with our licenses. Please see Wikipedia:Copy-paste. Thanks. -- Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 23:50, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Hhfjbaker, I thought I'd drop a few notes on your talk page with some help on writing articles :o)

First of all, it may be best for you to do a bit of reading, starting with the Wikipedia manual of style, which will give you a lot of information about how Wikipedia prefers its articles to be written. It's not as hard to follow as it might look; quite a bit of the information there probably won't be vital for you at first.

Second, I recommend you make a user sandbox - which is just an area you can use to practise in, and to make notes in, and to get things ready in. If you click this red link: user:Hhfjbaker/Sandbox, that will let you create that page (it gives you an edit window to start work in). Anything, anywhere, on the help and information pages which gives you an example, try it out in your sandbox until you're familiar with it.

For your article, the next thing you want to do is start collecting as much information as you can about it. Google searches (particularly in Books and Scholar) will be your best friend for this! Once you've found the information, the next most important thing is to start writing up each fact in your own words (very important, this), and make a note at the same time of exactly where that information came from. Build in the references as you go along; I'm going to copy in, down below this, a whole heap of help on doing references, which was produced by one of our best teachers ( Chzz).

Here's another place that you'll find incredibly useful - citation templates which you can copy and paste into your sandbox, between <ref></ref> tags; you just fill in the blanks from your sources into the template, and you'll end up with nicely formatted inline citations :o) It all helps. Remember to add a references section to your sandbox (make a new line, and put ==References== on it, and type {{reflist}} on the next line, so that you can see how your citations look as you do them. Remember to save your page often! You don't want to lose your work.

Hopefully this will give you a good start and make life easier for you.

One last thing to keep as a motto: "It's better to write one good, well-referenced, nicely-presented article than it is to create fifty unreferenced one-line stubs!" Pesky ( talk … stalk!) 09:54, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Simple references

These require two parts;

a)

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>

b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}";

== References ==
{{reflist}}

(an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections)

To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Hhfjbaker/reftest and try it out.

Named references

Chzz was born in 1837. <ref name=MyBook>
"The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. 
</ref> 

Chzz lives in Footown.<ref name=MyBook/>

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates

You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation
 | last = Smith
 | first = John
 | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century
 | publication-date = 2001
 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]]
 | page = 125
 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4
}}
</ref>

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

Hi there Hhfjbaker! I've just come across one of your articles, and noticed that you had to create titles for your url links manually, or were using bare urls as references.

You might want to consider using this tool - it makes your life a whole heap easier, by filling in complete citation templates for your links. All you do is install the script on Special:MyPage/common.js, or or Special:MyPage/vector.js, then paste the bare url (without [...] brackets) between your <ref></ref> tabs, and you'll find a clickable link called Reflinks in your toolbox section of the page (probably in the left hand column). Then click that tool. It does all the rest of the work (provided that you remember to save the page! It doesn't work for everything (particularly often not for pdf documents), but for pretty much anything ending in "htm" or "html" (and with a title) it will do really, really well. Happy editing! Pesky ( talk … stalk!) 09:54, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! This will help a lot. Cheers!

Hi. In Ramones discography, you recently added links to the disambiguation pages Brain Drain and Road to Ruin ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as 6 inch (15.2 cm) /47 Mark 16 guns, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_6-47_mk16.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:6 inch (15.2 cm) /47 Mark 16 guns and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, 6 inch (15.2 cm) /47 Mark 16 guns, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:6 inch (15.2 cm) /47 Mark 16 guns with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:6 inch (15.2 cm) /47 Mark 16 guns. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:6 inch (15.2 cm) /47 Mark 16 guns saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Benea ( talk) 22:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited USS Pensacola (CA-24), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Santa Cruz and Midway ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:52, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Frank Ormond Soden ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bar

Harold Balfour, 1st Baron Balfour of Inchrye ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Shefford

Hector Daniel ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Transvaal

John Doyle (aviator) ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wynberg

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:01, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

When you make edits to an article without including an Edit summary, as you did on Sydney Pope, you are hiding edits from your fellow editors. In my case, it means you have rendered my Watchlist useless for tracking vandals, unless I trudge through the tiresome process of chasing down your edit summaries one by one. In short, you make extra work for me.

Could you please include edit summaries, per standard WP practice, in the future?

Georgejdorner ( talk) 00:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Shucks! I meant to do it on the final version after I made sure it worked, sorry!

Hi. When you recently edited Rosemary Forbes Kerry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Groton ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:11, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited 20th Regiment Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Bartlett ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 03:57, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

I enjoyed your contribution to the 36th Division page, but I'm wondering if that information wouldn't be more appropriate on a page for the battalion with a pointer to it from the division page. That section alone is very detailed and as such takes up as much space as the current division Combat Chronicle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RTO Trainer ( talk • contribs) 21:49, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

I was thinking that it may eventually become its own article, but I do not have time to write it. I think that as a temporary measure, this added section is sufficient. Hhfjbaker ( talk) 21:01, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Be careful: Your good faith edit at the above article could be interpreted as vandalism. Please refer to the sourced article and do not add commentary in your choice of words. This should be considered as a warning if you revert. Crtew ( talk) 16:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC) Professor Tew, when I first saw the link I clicked it and the version of that article that I saw said her reporting in Syria "controversial" and called her reporting in Libya "clueless" as cited before. That article led me to her Wikipedia article. I cannot see the article anymore. I've looked for it in some of the web archives. I cannot find it. I've noted more edits to her page by you. Are you sure that you are acting in good faith in your edits? I was.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Masters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Fe ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:10, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for adding this information. I corrected the date from February 1861 to June 8, 1861. In the paragraph above the footnote in the Temple book, he is merely describing how Scott County was the proportional leader in the June 8 referendum, whereas Sevier County had been the leader in the February referendum. Bms4880 ( talk) 21:01, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 05:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC) --- Hmmm. I do not ever remember editing this page. I am, a Robert Palmer fan, but I do not remember this edit at all.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Hhfjbaker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Hhfjbaker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Hhfjbaker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi Hhfjbaker. Could you please stop re-adding the content to the article, and focus on the talk page discussion instead? BLP requires that there be consensus before it's restored. Given this is part of a larger controversy involving Carlson that is currently in the news, it's especially important that we don't simply echo the scandal. Thank you. -- Ronz ( talk) 18:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC) Fine

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your addition to Littleton, Massachusetts has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa ( talk) 15:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Late Start requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. b uidh e 20:55, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Justin D Cooper II requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lapablo ( talk) 21:02, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello Hhfjbaker and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{ WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
• If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 05:02, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Your addition to Naval Striking and Support Forces NATO has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Money emoji💵 ^{Talk💸 Help out at CCI!} 17:21, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

I wrote using a personal copy of the official command history from when I was there for the period up to the end of the Cold War. Hhfjbaker ( talk) 17:48, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Second Battle of Chattanooga into Lightning Brigade (US Army of the Cumberland 1863). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{ copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa ( talk) 13:14, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Would you be so kind as to double-check the copying notes on the page now? I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks! Hhfjbaker ( talk) 16:59, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 6th Regiment Vermont Volunteer Infantry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Winchester ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:52, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Your addition to 1st Regiment Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa ( talk) 15:51, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

I am adding and editing the article now. Mea culpa, I didn't include PD notice on a couple of references. Of note, Acton Memorial Library does not hold the copyright on the text it has posted as they are from two of the three PD ref's I listed. Hhfjbaker ( talk) 16:15, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Is there a way to save a draft of an article?? Did I miss a feature somewhere? Hhfjbaker ( talk) 16:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello Hhfjbaker - Recently you changed the name of 5th New York Cavalry to 5th Regiment New York Volunteer Cavalry. That was the original name of the article, but peer review (scroll down to @ Kges1901:) wanted it changed. Now you have changed it back. Please have the American Civil War task force should come to some type of agreement on how to title these articles. I will have the 18th Pennsylvania Cavalry done in a few months. I will use whatever naming style the task force decides is appropriate, but I do not want to have to deal with name changes again. TwoScars ( talk) 17:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

• Adding on, I'd recommend that you stop moving these articles. You haven't established a consensus for why the articles should be moved. Kges1901 ( talk) 17:10, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Okay, I cannot find it now, but I could have sworn I saw a post at American Civil War task force say format should be [ordinal] Regiment [state] Volunteer [branch], that is, there was a consensus. I thought the discussion was whether to include United States or U.S. before Volunteers. It seemed a no-brainer to me as it fit with style guides/conventions I have seen for years. Also, should Wikipedia not use the official, period title when in use? We use 94th Aero Squadron even though its peers that stayed on were renamed Pursuit Squadrons and later Fighter Squadrons. Why shouldn't historians use the nomenclature of the time period and then use more modern convention within the article? In historical scholarship, the convention (as of 2008 - UMass Lowell was the same as 1978-1982 college, using period nomenclature). Has this completely changed in the last twelve years? I will halt moving for now, but I really don't see the justification. Let me know what you think, please. Hhfjbaker ( talk) 17:31, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

• • That post was the consensus in 2010. The consensus has changed much since then, based on WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME, which says that, "where a formal name is not commonly employed by historians, the most common name used in historical literature." So in the case of American Civil War regiments, the majority of historians do not use the 19th century word order, and that is why the consensus has shifted to, for example, titles such as 215th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment. As to your example of the 94th Aero, that is because historians call it the 94th Aero when talking about its World War I history since it would be anachronistic and confusing to call it the 94th Fighter. Kges1901 ( talk) 17:59, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
    • Hmmm. "The name should generally be either the official name used by the armed forces to which the unit or base belongs" In all official records of Union Army in federal and state archives, [ordinal] Regiment [state] Volunteer [branch] is used. That seems to agree with the format I put forward. I see it commonly used in books/articles and then a shorthand is used, e.g., 20th Regiment Maine Volunteer Infantry initially and 20th Maine in following mentions Hhfjbaker ( talk) 18:08, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

• But, the point is that the formal name is not commonly employed by historians. This is the exception to the general rule, as worded. In most books from the last 25 years about Civil War battles, regiments tend to be referred to in the format of, for example "74th Indiana" or "74th Indiana Infantry" in text, dispensing with even mentioning the 19th century official designation. For example, see books by Gordon C. Rhea [1], Peter Cozzens [2], Stephen W. Sears [3], Allen C. Guelzo [4], and Larry J. Daniel [5], among many others. Kges1901 ( talk) 18:29, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Yes, but that's only the last 25 years. So that trumps Catton and other historians from the time of the Centennial, or the veterans themselves in their memoirs? Hhfjbaker ( talk) 18:42, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

• It does. Wikipedia usage reflects shifts in terminology. That's why we don't call the Union Army article the 'Federal Army', the Civil War the 'War of the Rebellion', or the Confederates Secessionists (all of which might be terms used by veterans of the conflict). For the record, Catton in Mr. Lincoln's Army uses the short names of the regiments. Kges1901 ( talk) 19:43, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Va bene. Thanks. Hhfjbaker ( talk) 19:45, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

What about moving them to [ordinal] [state] [branch] Regiment, U.S. Volunteers ? Like 215th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment, U.S. Volunteers? Hhfjbaker ( talk) 22:38, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

• No, that version does not appear to be commonly used in secondary sources. And in the Civil War, US Volunteers often referred to Federally-raised volunteer regiments formed from Confederate POWs. Furthermore, I've written many state regiment histories and have never seen USV after the state title, which makes including USV in titles of state regiments entirely incorrect (neither used by historians nor by contemporaries). I think USV on belt buckles probably denoted the Federal origin of such items rather than anything related to unit tiles. Kges1901 ( talk) 10:39, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Roger that Hhfjbaker ( talk) 15:06, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Similar comment to the above. I noticed you renamed the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Massachusetts regiments. I was part of the conversation referenced above in the Civil War Task Force (a conversation which I can't find presently) about naming back in 2010. What you stated above about [ordinal] Regiment [state] Volunteer [branch] is, as you pointed out, absolutely the correct naming convention used in the 19th century. And should, in my opinion, absolutely be used for the "official" name of the unit and the name of the page. This is, as I recall, where we came down on the matter and, you'll notice with maybe a couple exceptions, is how the Massachusetts infantry units are named. We also agreed that there was a difference between the "official" name for the page and the "common name" i.e. "21st Massachusetts" and that was fine. "21st Massachusetts" would be appropriate for the body of the text but not the name of the page. I know it's a small thing, but seeing "regiment" at the end of unit name just is like nails on a chalkboard to me. It's not correct. Can you hold on changing any further until we've got some consensus on this? Historical Perspective 2 ( talk) 12:07, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

• Didn't realize Regiment was left off. Will correct. Hhfjbaker ( talk) 15:04, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Um. That's not what I meant. What I was saying is that the proper name of the unit ought to remain the page name. Which is what was agreed upon many years ago. So, "21st Regiment Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry" for the page name and in the body of the text "21st Massachusetts." I have to admit I'm left scratching my head as to why you would rename a whole series of articles without touching base without coming to a consensus. And why the date in parenthesis for 2nd Massachusetts? To be consistent would there then need to be a date next to every Civil War unit? I think you're plowing ahead here where there should be some discussion. Historical Perspective 2 ( talk) 16:27, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Comment What's happening here is that I wrote the opposite of what you said here given the designation, and HHfjbaker is doing the opposite of what he did originally. At this point, it would be best if a firm consensus is reached on Civil War article titles and we can have a discussion about it on WT:MILHIST to avoid further page moves which I think detract from actual improvement of articles. Kges1901 ( talk) 16:40, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Agreed. HHfjbaker, please slow down a moment. I think the quantity of pages being renamed without consensus or even consistency constitutes vandalism. Historical Perspective 2 ( talk) 16:49, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

• Vandalism? Really? Why not I just remove the word Regiment between the ordinal and the state where I had renamed since you two disagree? (I did all the New England states) You both seem to agree on that.

I may have jumped the gun with "vandalism," sorry. It was just a whole lot of page name changes that seemed to be happening very fast without any discussion behind it. See comments on WT:MILHIST. The upshot from my perspective being that the name changes are fine except the ones with dates. Kges1901 pointed out what you were trying to do there but it's better done with a hatnote. So, pending any further discussion, I'd suggest changing the names of the articles that you added years to. Historical Perspective 2 ( talk) 20:11, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

• Kges1901 Historical Perspective 2 TwoScars Alright, we seem all to be in tune. I will revert the ones I changed and change no more. Hhfjbaker ( talk) 20:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, HHfjbaker. Could I ask that you stop reformatting the source sections on the Massachusetts regiments articles by converting them to the long vertical format? For one, I think this falls under the category of "if it ain't broke don't fix it." But the larger problem is that it makes viewing bibliographies while editing more difficult. Especially in articles with long source lists. The condensed, horizontal format is the convention for literally every historical page I've ever seen. And in the rare instance when somebody adds a source in vertical format, someone comes along and changes it to horizontal. Would appreciate this very much. Historical Perspective 2 ( talk) 11:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

• Will put hem back/convert them to that format. Hhfjbaker ( talk) 16:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Ah, I see what you mean. Sorry completely misunderstood. Misread "editing." Hhfjbaker ( talk) 16:42, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Please stop reformatting the references sections. Your last edit on the 6th Massachusetts broke all the SFN links built in to the notes. Check WP:SFN if you're not familiar with that. Allows the reader to click on the citation and then click from the note to the reference all using internal links. I really can't see any reason for reformatting reference sections which are perfectly fine as is. Unless there is a really good reason for changing the formatting, please leave it be. Your changes are disruptive and actually make the articles more difficult to edit--and in this case cause a loss of functionality. If it ain't broke.... Historical Perspective 2 ( talk) 19:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

So, It needs to be called Reference then instead of bibliography from how I read the Template:Sfn page, right? Hhfjbaker ( talk) 20:01, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

No. The citation template needs to have a "last" field. Not "authorname." Why are you converting the citations from "first" and "last" to "authorname"? What is gained by this? Not a rhetorical question, I'm really wondering. Because what is lost is the SFN link. Historical Perspective 2 ( talk) 20:36, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Okay, got it. I was mistakenly following what I thought was standard as I have been adding content to various articles. Hhfjbaker ( talk) 20:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Also, your use of PD-notice is not correct. That is for very old and obscure sources which do not fit in to any existing citation templates. Meaning really oddball stuff. The sources in the Massachusetts regiments articles are standard 19th century texts which fit perfectly well into the cite book template. Here's the wording from Template:PD-notice "This template should be placed at the end of a citation if the article incorporates text from that source that is not under copyright and there is no source specific template listed in Category:Attribution templates." Does not apply here and should not be used. Historical Perspective 2 ( talk) 20:51, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

But these are all public domain documents. Does one not need ti identify them? Hhfjbaker ( talk) 21:08, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

• Belay my last. I wasn't interpreting the template correctly. Hhfjbaker ( talk) 21:15, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

		The Invisible Barnstar
		For keeping your light hidden under a bushel for so long but then jumping right in and making a difference, I award you this recognition. Excellent work on several articles lately, especially your current work on Lightning Brigade (US Army of the Cumberland 1863), a subject beyond my ken until today. Nice to know you're on the team. BusterD ( talk) 15:58, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 55th Ohio Volunteer Infantry Regiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Stacey ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:35, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for using {{ copied}} on pages such as Talk:Battle of Brownsville, but please review its documentation and check your edits that use it. The "from_oldid" and "diff" parameters refer to the *URL* of the copied/copying edits, respectively, as I found out, the date parameter should be in UTC and ideally in a more common date format than ISO 8601, and you shouldn't sign copied templates. I've fixed up your most recent talk page edits. Graham 87 15:13, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks! Hhfjbaker ( talk) 16:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Battle of Fort Esperanza into 13th Maine Volunteer Infantry Regiment. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{ copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa ( talk) 17:56, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

• Yes, when I am finished with the 13th Maine, I will copy the copy boxes on its talk pages to the source pages. Hhfjbaker ( talk) 21:58, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
  • The talk page template is optional; the edit summary is mandatory. Thanks,— Diannaa ( talk) 13:59, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 113th Illinois Volunteer Infantry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jacob Miller ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:59, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

I'm fixing many of your recent creations' references. I would suggest installing Svick's script per these insructions. And then that would notify you of issues in articles like 21st Regiment Ohio Volunteer Infantry. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 17:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 54th Ohio Volunteer Infantry Regiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Jones ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:19, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

21st Ohio Volunteer Infantry ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mark Wood

8th Regiment Missouri Volunteer Infantry ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to William Reed

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:22, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on 6th New York Volunteer Cavalry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.civilwararchive.com/Unreghst/unnycav2.htm, http://files.usgwarchives.net/ny/state/military/civilwar/service/regiment004-007.txt, and https://web.cortland.edu/woosterk/genweb/ny_cav.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ Amkgp ✉ 06:42, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Original text is from Dyer 1908 for those sites, ergo PD. Hhfjbaker ( talk) 14:10, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on 6th New York Volunteer Cavalry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://files.usgwarchives.net/ny/state/military/civilwar/service/regiment004-007.txt. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Celestina007 ( talk) 12:55, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

• Original text is from Dyer 1908 for those sites, ergo PD. Hhfjbaker ( talk) 14:11, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Earlier today I posted a suggestion on the 10th Massachusetts Battery talk page regarding naming for Massachusetts battery articles. I also posted a "heads up" regarding my suggestion on Massachusetts battery articles created by other editors. In short, I'm suggesting, per the "common name" rule, that these articles be named "Nth Massachusetts Battery." Nice and simple. This is what they're commonly called in current historical works. These posts were all an attempt to make sure there's consensus--or at least no objections--before I went ahead and renamed articles. Could you take a look on hold off on renaming other articles for a bit? Thanks. Historical Perspective 2 ( talk) 17:52, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Roger that. I trust you if you say that's more common. You've been right before. Thanks. Hhfjbaker ( talk) 18

48, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of American Civil War Medal of Honor recipients: M–P, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 8th Illinois Volunteer Infantry Regiment ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:17, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I see from your user page that your relatively new to the Milhist group. First, let me say welcome. The group can always benefit from enthusiastic, knowledgeable editors.

Secondly, I've noticed that you've been making a number of edits to articles that I either created or significantly improved over several years as a member of Milhist, including bios for U.S. Medal of Honor winners and profiles of American Civil War regiments - a number of which I improved from stub/start class to B-class, and which I took through Milhist's fairly rigorous review process (so these articles were already in fairly good shape).

While several of your changes were fine, there is one you've been making repeatedly that is not (adding multiple flag icons to the infoboxes of these articles). Being so new to Milhist, you're probably not aware that this issue has come up several times, and that Milhist made a group decision that flag icons should not be added to infoboxes because it creates too much clutter in an area of the article where space is limited.

In addition, the Wikipedia Manual of Style: Icons is very clear on this point: "Generally, flag icons should not be used in Infoboxes ... they are unnecessarily distracting."

So, I wanted to reach out to ask you if you've advised the Milhist group that you were planning to make all of these edits. (In general, an article tweak here or there is fine, and a flag icon here or there is also not a big deal, but when you plan to make such a major stylistic change on such a large scale, it's best to run things past the Milhist group to secure consensus before embarking on your project.)

Does Milhist know you've been adding all of those flag icons to existing articles? If not, please hold off on any further icon additions until you've brought the issue up in the Milhist discussion group. Thanks in advance for your cooperation. 47thPennVols ( talk) 03:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

No, I missed that part of the Wikipedia Manual of Style: Icons. I will refrain in the future. Hhfjbaker ( talk) 21:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

I just double-checked, and yes I may have gone overboard with multiple USMC icons on that page, it looks like I'm still okay with adding an icon for the unit with which they won the MoH. Hhfjbaker ( talk) 21:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Hey there! You've done some very good work on ACW units and I noticed you had done quite a lot of sourcing in April on the 92nd Illinois. I have recently merged 92nd Infantry and 92nd Mounted Infantry articles and performed a text and source merge. I was wondering if you'd look the result over and streamline the timeline and correct any errors I made. I can't imagine you'd have inserted all those sources unless you had plans to expand the page. If I can be of any assistance I'd be glad to help. BusterD ( talk) 19:52, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Okay if I wait until Monday? Hhfjbaker ( talk) 22:16, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Sure. Big weekend. I just thought you'd have a better set of eyes for it. Thanks for all you do. BusterD ( talk) 22:23, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Looks good. I converted the references to ^[1] format. I also want to add the detailed service from Dyer at some point - unless, do you want to do it? Hhfjbaker ( talk) 01:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

I agree it looks better under your careful hand. I'm really tied up in RL this week so my edits are down. If you have time, feel free. BusterD ( talk) 03:30, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Va bene. Many thanks! Hhfjbaker ( talk) 14:37, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of American Civil War Medal of Honor recipients: T–Z, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 6th Missouri Infantry ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:24, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of American Civil War Medal of Honor recipients: G–L, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Bull Run.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:11, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 02:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D & Hawkeye7 look at two aspects of 20th Century warfare Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Unknown Soldiers

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

SPID: 27735

BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----

hQGMA5hD6+hWqpPMAQv/TeSttDCB3MEWQ6C1m+VPnZt4uOEVeYVufIjc9EyLIv6/ vEUWH3E/crY+0o7i2/GliLp9kUvB5DQJ1hk/5AasgWGuOFFw5+6aA+ywajU9T2Rn gGQ26wS7ZDYWoehRuYKnlhLXQRh+bcrsYtb+7iMFAsQbhgEWnL1MoeQotGox+8dU 0SmRG0XhJrQIi8JMdXPUxHOnzA44nTMhdw6AI8jomZyJ4Zts5TU8PDrSVp/JfDzh FoPuDk4uS67KPLsxkc+2DKm9yI5TO7QSBnjhqwvNXyfZD1V6pEnPe3lFJjWgPfUI KVS2bmhSX67qOZQjXlVqwEc+E5aNQEMrtf7TmCNrJUHiCf8Tgs7lxUvdwqSPnzB/ CHlP0tWocx3QTQf+x/HDoF0Ctfmh927djlWSyN2qwJesHKOitTIdCv+4UmNSNj/0 EAhGSuT9Jv+lMEP2mgXteCRJxx/m/+iF7jmoSGVDPCSdpU0R9uqw4r7SBmdIeQ8b o5ZPWBjLPg0O34D+vyiY0ukBTGXlwgSGrxuOq6V+1vZO2nzZ8tknkbRZb0TCSDlx L67yP6BSICMql/mRFvHcVE7GfS/UkSZ4z5qFPb8R9KJc5/8kYNyGNBTtXFfaGuZ3 1MY6J/Yl497zHE2cdHnBAuUCFnG6IYod8xpzAcNEmr6ISS2yJltAhbyXULVFj79C k5/N0asMFrinKZt3SJ0wE1iD3OR+4pqs6F7yI2+noPHcMl5i+KH3N5bHqQ2itsFl TP7TU4IKkJ9YhFz6HFu6IQJ3u6iCG1GKSHhDG9Oyf2svBV0Umr8UCrM9lAjczrrM 5cnXBmQgrZYWkqX/St3YVWPVUacsMLbkXg9TL4whx4CBjlCYcV9HNbOOtM/IBSZq vmcVZBQzLeBEN8sbg1PZVgxrVFP/3Xh+AZMHbMbry+3owVjtaWdIj8bIxTF7M1fb NyiqHokabUSmkbkrng2aS1j9AfTLC+QxUWSp3RCWAgt0CyGQkRMYWgqjUihhHzVG puAbf82hXAfVOdw7zrVXr4qtC629rXZ4mYBoye2IgMTqi/WTXyUoucrYno85aFCt Y4AZ4FBtS1IDtyaEjCHM8DmtpxBcNt/f9tm+XF8I2De6YYmRNn9PQtiXTwNU/n9M MbZDEY7ooOsV9qcoNTMLK1h4GmeVJaQpVhmvsfIdENVnh9sSMvJi6lEcr5rwe1mp acC+1yWMG2FXfoYnoLIb9AWlAKDAQhKBoZuNd/86SRjK6K9wHNkOBrLGjXXhZoQG i3q/ip01IQucpgU6q61eybV+t1Yy/F/rX/XYNjEHOTr8nE5eIcVF0uGCq2L51pxo TQGvJE7E9xf+H+fRkZI8InxiNRkIFf0bGdv2PRgVaSxy/eAE3Fp3eftW0RD8YBXt ZNgybL9d/1QzRidCKu2Rj91CzGEoPNGCMn/a1FWv3d0rXCZpbSTmZKpmAuTrxU3F QrvKtZsn2QuYr/EkEqOQ0fCjDgOx5WUHFTiiuVQlXOT2N2atfAHVuC77lufEPvms KpzRrAqXaAgd/+FzUWwBm8mFHJos09RbdKN8Z75jRFHEyyXVBY5YlxxemfRDRhwt +gRPtsRm7g0zeoXSwMAJ0y4Ipmh4ATGpXNhgyzl25dU7xDPAedFK185Zaa1ei7Gz 386ys6QKvElmmx4ii4V+OjdVmV3LXXvoKjt4LE6KB3TlZafDTTf8JKGMFIxISbTb gQ== =KQB+

END PGP MESSAGE-----

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the war in Ukraine

Donner60 ( talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20}} to your friends' talk pages.

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history " Military Historian of the Year" and " Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks Australian artillery in World War I Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on no-win scenarios

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Works on the Gallipoli Campaign, Battle of Perryville and US 1st Infantry Division

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Works on the Gallipoli Campaign, Battle of Perryville and US 1st Infantry Division

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on female computers, Nick-D on the Israeli Defence Forces

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Montgomery's doctrine and Nick-D on Mussolini's wars

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick- D and Hawkeye7 look at intelligence gathering, doctrine and strategy

I saw you'd taken some time between edits so it's great to see you so productive today! Happy editing! BusterD ( talk) 20:24, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I had to remind myself that work in the Sandbox needed to be added to the actual article. Thanks! Hal Boo ( talk) 20

29, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on RAAF aircraft, Hawkeye7 on mission command and nuclear secrecy

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Commonwealth armies and an Australian spy, Nick-D on the American Revolutionary War and RAAF mine laying Op-ed: RobDuch on United States coastal defenses

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia and the UK in Iraq and Afghanistan Op-ed: Nick-D on writing about military procurement

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on British conscription and German warship raiders

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

SPID: 39586

BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----

hQGMA8Wo2EpyHocMAQv9EAsjiVurDQWuTzu1ebdavBgjFcOAlO/J/7FSydtjx9pr AuYLA1fkdUWVi2PZG7T6cY8mFR5O4N90w1qJKK/PBw5bHelGYrFBaCkX38jnAKPt hnsU6xxWR3DOf2KWKLS+Q45mHhQ87cpBCQS5bB4kt5N4X4TO5xaiZYKOlpIWpN04 RuXk6SLkFoEPbSj7AwFFLNE+hyhWT8KvOKPeN0IONYuPaG8Y8FO3smswUA4p6gTQ XZSX0viPq9rY/MteA59WgqbM/fz+V1bo2QRx4ioxXGI5EEdyO65ArFxKU4z48BAF hRlc+kUDPxeNNR+vOUOqcR6uXpmINM5K+bwLMHD++0HjU4XLfMeS6IRrvEhiImLd LU8yzm30Ff15rmD0afsYEpdVPYQVAUn/lQ4fYTBGIv1e6e/F7YCvRTwJVlPGuM0g 4+pzy1NZznf44spHBtbYR1m3vFkzNaXjTnLFMGVc/0zB6lZd7PtCF7Q4zVX39fY8 RiIifLfDfBR4Y7BT8TIu0ukBYFriBX9j8RIagdtK3A4fkUZqZJIgKRdaeSeClzWq YMoYNvxq53u8/o9PZfRIEmpO0XmqFsREZ9C093DHq7Suo7kCj7tyCZfp8W6syJ5Z 4l9MAw+KcinufI/jHkooUyFsB7BHNho6bCXlulhKcrkqN5OZqEhgYZeg2zdi4fRw i9Zri6BBehu39TXxdOEUcGjC59JB8vC8kkSjtYfH2ymqulYrXYvddsP9ItoXORHL VN/K69xDV9tpcNO2wssZpav0A96okfM5mKwg3rxBM9Y/PhEDFCaNpd8oVGKHYTZs dicHNlwsxQP2cAeJiVPMXLAdDJ4EfKDzpBoOXmLBGEcv43MkMHwhAFmejPTCjtOZ S1DHBmq7jTwy2zc7xJ24ZXtLo5C0y1asgSYzIUSeFj8yhwP72UE4p8UGZOcMEtdD zocjrP9mAF6mqkp2hphY5/5BEndkaJG59gb5snBkWsDF7+9/Ih7nKl03L33XYkCi q2jNpq592n+ADcAmzLVCoWpq/LUcbmC36YStY1iHPS6MnFgjIwSSmBMCfTswo1Sr DqoLRSUTcUHGYkXRYK7JXPEJ1AeHkH8hruuQJUbh5rNFTZBzOVARzHp5tfwIrogD SOio+SM7ZZfyXOA3z0nu08o5o3ZE/OgyE/VhsvyzhFMqrLE9cADwXsW0PVwoL+EX h8CcBqCqJiEIG6B8mFK8qQswhSvYpWth9UZRpIgTXHj5UsVYSOK7e7NQQzQ2580s XgWXzDQ+0b1YWvBKDe6f4Sd8nu72SCKYJeYAEdD9h28cZs0GjD9N7nMP3LsyeNeO 0LAQ9KecQK8YU+esGLAC+nbN1CATSM9uejbDDzSQtIkvCRd8CE9TNHG3Ur53WDfg 7XNqUOtZV2k8pfVC6R7iVkJitUY1bdc1gE8rFHPaYyYkt/WG6EV87fr23C9+wgfY Md8onlJkeQ13JAtamKo2omis4muN0FqzEMFC4lAaT94OOxDMU8gpzTpEEo6lGW/V FtUqvvof+XTbMoM3ttrvR679MNezAS2+KwRtMfm31dKJxlDBAf9k2TXYywcz2YEz BOi/udfEJFjYcua96EujwRZl31bNwS5wnHSQuURYPnoJsKBYOuafQCdKKYD6iOyv 5FLvyoPKPnueqQ+jKjbn =RvVi

END PGP MESSAGE-----

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Canadian junior officers in World War II

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 ( talk) 14:30, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Franklin–Nashville campaign Review essay: Military History Wikiproject Coordinators' reading list

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect David Ayers and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 20#David Ayers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Smartyllama ( talk) 14:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. I will watch out for that. The ISSN's need to be either dashed or un-dashed, but not long-dashed. One of the tools I use does not understand that. Good to know. Another tool that I have fixes those back. Now I understand where they come from. AManWithNoPlan ( talk) 17:14, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Roger that, thanks! Boo Boo ( talk) 17:38, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Army in Somalia Review essay: Hog Farm on American Civil War sites in the South and Midwest

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D on World War II in Europe

Hello, I see on your user page that you use JSTOR and I'd like to know more about your experience. By my calculations, a good 70 % of the main JSTOR content is now available for everyone at Internet Archive Scholar, with full text search provided e.g. at https://scholar.archive.org/ . The service is still in beta, but I've used it for some source-finding and it seems quite usable to me; I wonder whether that's just my experience. If you have a chance, the next time you'd be looking for a source on Google Scholar or JSTOR or similar, to perform the same search on IA scholar instead, I'd be curious to hear how it ends up. Thanks, Nemo 19:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

I like both, but when using the Wikipedia Library, it seems easier to filter searches in JSTOR vs Internet Archive Scholar (IAS). IAS seems to be getting better, but when you have reached the threshold for The Wikipedia Library, you can get access to JSTOR and other online resources for free. Boo Boo ( talk) 22:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Hitler as a military leader

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on military logistics and rebuilding Nagasaki