This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
diff User is indef-banned anyway. And has a bunch of spam links on his page. -- 205.155.48.5 18:21, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Please look at the original article for white male, which was clearly Non-neutral POV. What I added was not a biased view. Examine the pages for other groups- african american, etc. These are written to reflect achievements of the group, without a negative depiction. The page for white male that was originally in place is blatantly a liberal non-neutral POV, it lacks facts about any achievements whatsoever (which are the prominent feature for all other group pages) and it lists statements such as denying discrimination against white men which are at best speculative, and at worst, bigoted. If Wikipedia is uninterested in facts, then I would ask that at least white men be treated with equal respect from a humanistic POV as has been carried out for the pages of all other groups of peoples.
Thelonelywafflekid05 23:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC) if your not an admin then how come your deleting my buddy melodic horror??
that is CALLED FREEDOM OF SPEECH. poor melodic horror.
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page!-- Just James T/ C 11:47, 22 September 2007 (UTC) |
I putt a poland numbers and a sorce of pdf poland census!Ther is allsou no macedonian who declare him self as serbian orthodox you can see macedonian national census!So please putt my artycle back Thanks Makedonij 22 Sepzember 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my page deletion
I not vanduhlize kkz?
u liek mudkipz?
71.107.133.106 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) This IP user goes crazy. I should have extended to block duration to 2 days. This is the first time I've ever encounter such a stubborn. BTw, thanks for reverting my talk page. Best wishes! @pple complain 16:26, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
for moving that comment. I had a broken "click here to leave me a message" which pointed to the user page, not my talk page, but I've fixed it now. — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 19:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
OK, done. Evercat 20:51, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
I, AngelOfSadness, hereby award Gscshoyru this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for his all of his anti-vandalism efforts and for reverting vandalism off my talkpage and userpage so many times that this barnstar alone will not be enough of a thank you. :D AngelOfSadness talk 22:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks for your continuous efforts in reverting my pet stalker. I don't know what the obsession is with advertising my mySpace or real name. If I had anything to hide I would've made sure that my details were not as accessible on Google. The JPS talk to me 22:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed all the people vandalizing your userpage, and I wanted to let you know that you should be able to go to an admin and request permanent semi-protection to prevent vandalism, as
I did with my user page. It really does help, and reduces work load (now I just have to worry about my talk page).
--
FastLizard4 (
Talk•
Links•
Sign)
22:40, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
If the Citations for Kikyo are not "good" for you, then shouldn't the citations for InuYasha, Koga AND Sesshomaru be taken off too? Slotedpig put those citations there and mine are the same as his. So if mine are n't good enough, his aren't good enough either, since they are the same. Kagome 85 —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 14:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Can you please remove the Citations for InuYasha, Koga and Sesshomaru then? And could you please send a message to Slotedpig as to why they are not "good enough"? I have removed those citations in the past and Slotedpig came back and said I was vandalising and repeatedly put them back up. I am not asking you to do any work for me, it is just maybe Slotedpig will listen to you. Maybe instead you could remove the citations for them and say why they are not "good enough" in your edit note. I do not quite understand why the citations are not good enough, but it seems you do, so that is why I am asking you to do this. Thank you. Kagome 85 —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 22:09, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for all the help. I appreciate it. Thanks for the pointers too by the way. Kagome 85 22:19, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Just wondering from looking at your profile, how do you get the pictures? Do you know how to make something like "This person likes the anime InuYasha" ? Thanks. Kagome 85 22:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick revert on my userpage. Your work is greatly appreciated. -- TeaDrinker 15:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Can i just be another person to offer their thanks for all the good work you do at reverting vandalism, especially on my talk page. You already have a few barnstars so i give you something useful :
. Enjoy! Woodym555 15:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello, i noticed that you beleive the warn i gave User:86.140.177.115 was un-just and that the user did not diserve a final warn. I would first like to state that i agree with you in some aspects, first being that IP's do (at times) get treated rather unfairly, but it is a bais that is based on facts, more IP's vandalize than user accounts. In my own defense the reason i warned the user with a final warn was due to the fact that s/he had been warned with level 1,2,and 3 vandal warns prior to my warn. I thank you for your comments, and i greatly incourge more of them. Thank you, and happy vandal fighting! Tiptoety 18:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with CadillacDTS, and for reverting his/her edits. Here, have a
Jac16888 has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
-- Jac16888 22:07, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
For ignoring the three-revert rule and refusing to let the integrity of Kimbo Slice be compromised. east. 718 at 01:38, September 25, 2007 |
Hi there,
You deleted an external link I posted on making tofu. If it would be deleted, I think a couple of the others would need to be deleted as well since there is no substantial difference. One is a video of how to make a kind of soft 'instant' tofu. The one I linked shows how to make more traditional 'cubed' pressed tofu. I'm not attached to the link being there, but want to figure out what the rational is as I looked at all the other links before posting that one. You guidance would be much appreciated. Annalou
Hello,
On what basis did you remove Energy Medicine University from the Energy Medicine page? There are other schools listed in Wikipedia, it seemed directly related. It is a private graduate school fully authorized to grant Masters and Doctorate degrees from the State of California. I believed that this article would be a relevant place to put an external link to a university directly related to Energy Medicine. Both Donna Eden and David Feinstein who are in the references are professors at this institution. I am a grad student there, so I have researched this place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Annalou ( talk • contribs) 16:42, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Gschoyru, I read all the policies you pointed out which were helpful. I am a newbie, and thought that the 'external links' was a place I could add something useful and get my toes wet before trying anything else. Have a good one! Annalou 02:22, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Hersfold (
t/
a/
c) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for the reverts to my user page. It's always appreciated. :-) Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 22:25, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Tiptoety 22:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Did you look at the talk page?? You will see that this an attempt to assert policy. Eusebeus 04:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Alansohn Eusebeus 04:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
With all due respect I not only made several separate edits to Islam in the United States I also explained them on the talk page. Those who are reverting all of these edits in one fell swoop are not engaging any of these explanations. That is pretty disrespectful. Am I to assume that they will? Also, why should we discuss many different edits made to different ends all at the same time just because someone has chosen to revert them all at once? Finally I didn't blank anything so please be more careful on your edit summaries. All I'm asking is that you look into this a bit more before making those kinds of pronouncements. Thanks. PelleSmith 03:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting vandalism off my userpage...again :D AngelOfSadness talk 17:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
If you are calling National Geographic and University of Illinois as not reliable sources, then prove it they are not and tell me how you made such a conclusion, if your excuses are acceptable then I will agree with you. Thanks USER:SIKICITURK —Preceding unsigned comment added by SikiciTurk ( talk • contribs) 02:51, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Looks like we're attacking vanadalism on the same page at the same time. Sorry for the Twinkle Report. -- Tckma 16:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
hey um srry for vandilizing and srry to all the people of wikipedia for vandilizing —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdstan512 ( talk • contribs)
I was not adding my opinion or commentry. I simply replaced facts that are supported by the references quoted. The information was originally put there by others, not me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.70.31 ( talk) 16:10, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Gentelman I am surprised by your action. Being Paksitani I think I know more about our names. I have given the full name, the name he is quoted too. Syed is his family name. What is the problem in seeing the family name of a person? I am not a new here. And givng family name or full name is normal. Waiting for your comments about this...
Khalid Islamabad —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khalid Mahmood ( talk • contribs) 16:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I think I may have gotten carried away, just a bit. But I have been using the talk page. I'm trying to reason with users whether sources are reliable or not.
What annoys me is when users claim that the "dispute has been resolved" in order to unprotect the page. One the page is unprotected they come back and engage in the same edit warring that occurred before the page was protected.
I'd like it if you could join the talk page of the article and help us in determining who is a reliable source, and who isn't. Bless sins 20:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Heh, no problem. Nice template, by the way. :) *Cremepuff 222* 22:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Blanking the talk page wasn't all that this user did. Look at this strange edit. futurebird 01:14, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
HeY.. Want to ask why you keep changing the page. Do you even know this person? Well to let you know i know this guy very well. GUESS YOU DON'T. Also the case you keep bringing up. That case was solved. He was NOT guilty. I request you please not to change this page. PLEASE!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolshamas 01 ( talk • contribs) 12:57, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello. first i'd like to say sorry for the mess with the Ashanti Empire article. Let me explain. I went to the old Empire of Ashanti page and tried to change the title (move it) to Ashanti Empire. When I tried, I got a message saying it could not be done since there was a page already existing by that name. that page was a redirect to the empire of ashanti so I just copied the contents from the empire of ashanti page into the existing ashanti empire page and made the former a redirect to the latter. i know that's confusing as hell and i probably just goofed things up. sorry about that. if there's a way i can fix this let me know. i just felt the article should be titled Ashanti Empire to keep its naming style consistent with the other other empire pages ( Roman Empire, Mali Empire, etc). holla Scott Free 15:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
You think this would show up in the news. But it doesn't so don't be so quick to assume its vandalism when someone says that a fake war is fake.
Thanks Gscshoyru for putting some order here. We sure need external output. Cheers! Tazmaniacs 11:54, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your hard work fighting vandals! delldot talk 17:40, 3 October 2007 (UTC) |
Thank you for reverting my blunder in adding a NEW and legitimate reference to recent fuel cell news to the Fuel Cell references. I spent an hour trying to figure out how to add a reference correctly, and obviously failed.
However, the reference is still valid, and important, so when I do figure out how to do it right, please don't revert it.
In regards to your reversion of the External Reference on the Direct Methanol Fuel Cell that I added correctly, that was a valid, and extremely useful reference to the predominant source of hydrocarbon membranes. Hydrocarbon membranes are supplanting Nafion for DMFCs, and they are totally under-represented in this Wiki article. I may fix that some day soon, but in the mean time, Wiki users deserve to be pointed at this reference, as much as the other external references in the list.
TIA. HighConcept 20:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
This post is in regards to the edit in the Z transform page deletion that was reverted, that was an incorrect metaphor, and since it is nonsense, and you do not know what a Z transform is, it should be deleted. So I will delete again, and you will not revert it. Thank you for your time, which I know is valuable because you are spending a Friday morning editing wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rbehrns ( talk • contribs) 16:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
I have semi-protected the page for a month. Usually I wouldn't do this with such a level of vandalism, but as it's the same user IP-hopping, I've no problem with it. ELIMINATORJR 15:24, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
I have the feeling it is going to need more moderation. I have added a request for comments to the talk section to try to develop consesus on whether or not ancient authors should be included as "early examples of scientific racism," or if they are simply early examples of ethnocentrism as I believe, and do not belong on the page, sourced or not.
Even if consensus is built to determine that ancient authors belong listed here, there are certain outrageous statements being made which must remain deleted. One in particular, which you restored a few days ago, actually states that:
"Europeans thus have by nature a strong, courageous character and "endurance in body and soul" due to living in rigorous, cold, wintry climates. This theory is known nowadays in genetics, race-realist and anthropological circles as the "cold winter theory of intelligence"
This offensive, absolutely false pseudo-science has no place in the article. Brando130 16:35, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Please stop edit warring on the Erotica article. 151.197.111.178 21:06, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to point out to you that your recent edit to Shadow-X reverted a positive contribution to that page. I realize it was an easy mistake to make, because that editor had been making a bunch of edits that were vandalism, but I'm just letting you know so that you are more careful in the future. That editor was immature, but you might want to check out what he posted in his talk page about your revert. Have a good day!!! 144.92.58.224 20:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Erotica. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. I can change my IP 16:00, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Done. Academic Challenger 05:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
hey man i was targeting nobody in particular if anybody has a problem with me my email is on my profile just drop me a line or get very nasty i have a vampirefreaks.com morbid_angel66623 drop me a line there
Hail Satan 18:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
ahh, yes quite i understand now thank you
Hail Satan
18:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert on my bots reports page! :) Lloydpick 23:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
I removed the text per WP:V and WP:BLP as there was no sourcing for this. IMO, the editor should stay blocked though until they retract that legal threat.-- Isotope23 talk 13:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
"When you're done dealing with another vandal's piece of fun"...
I hope that you are not referring to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by M5891 ( talk • contribs) 16:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
It seems that I have been mistaken. You see my changes have erroneously been referred to as vandalism so I just assumed that was the case. I apologize for the misunderstanding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by M5891 ( talk • contribs) 17:00, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage, both today, and the last vandalism a couple of weeks ago, it seems i have a guardian angel watching over me(or a least my user page haha). I'm still trying to work out how i upset today's since that was their only edit, very odd. Anyway, cheers -- Jac16888 20:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
An emergency shut-off switch is on my talk page in the event there is a problem with this bot. -- TakwerbotX 03:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page :) I have reported the human to the admins. Cheers! Domthedude001 03:29, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you so much for always having my "back" so to speak, for keeping an eye on my talk page when I'm not around. Honestly, I appreciate it so much, and you're just such an awesome editor and vandal fighter, I can't count how many times you've "beaten me" to the revert, lol. I just want you to know how much you are appreciated, and how much good you do. You rock! Ariel ♥ Gold 21:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Sorry ill be calm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.95.17.164 ( talk) 23:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Wow, that would mean I was either exceptionally bendy, or very well-endowed. Either way, it's a theoretical compliment. Crazy kids... - CobaltBlueTony 16:00, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
I moved this from your userpage for you: "The HMer attacked me. Advise the user to stay put rather than post out of ignorance. SLY111SLY111" . Woodym555 16:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
How can I add her quotes so they come across as more neutral - she made them lol :P
Fable1984 04:46, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I'm sorry. In future any wikipedia edits I make will be far more subtle and unbiased. I'm over the tantrum thing now.... thank you :p Fable1984 05:21, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert to my bots report page, its much appreciated :) Lloydpick 10:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
hi! im new here... was trying to add info for airsoft and i dont really know how to add a reference since i dont have one... coz these are all from my experiences as a player... pls help me out... thanks Obakpogi 00:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
awww mannn... :) thats ok.... thanks for the help anyways :) 203.167.97.51 02:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I've seen you around, and I noticed that. I started using this username when I was... 13? I just haven't bothered to change it, it's the handle too many people know me by. Thanks for the compliments. :) shoy 03:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the Painesville, Ohio train wreck again. Look at my talk page to see what the IP had to say about it...I must say, a unique response. Nyttend 05:18, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
...for the cleanup on my userpage. Kreepy krawly reposted on my talkpage. All fine now. LessHeard vanU 15:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Our group has now recognized 2 Institutional Vandals, and this is a message to tell you that you are the second identified, and all actions by this user are being databased for trend identification. It is unfortunate you would choose to sideline such an important issue, but there are other ways this issue will be brought back to the main forum. It will amuse us to observe what we call an IV Admin use Admin tools to bury embarassing topics. This just proves our point, and the world will soon discover that Wikipedia, as important as it is, can no longer function as it was intended, or as it should, because of the shortsighted and illogical actions of a few entrenched users with unique controls. Such is life. Kreepy krawly 20:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
This user will not become privy to the meaning of "X" manual, as that indication is for the non-Wikipedians, or "X's," who are following the developments of acrimony related to the original string: Trivia is what Wikipedia does best; Wikipedia has become bigger than itself. Please stay away from the Kreepy krawly talk page. This needs to be the end of this. Kreepy krawly 21:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I would like to see proof of it. This is not an "attack on an editor". I just want an explanation. Lairtnogaw 20:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Liartnogaw
What are you talking about? I have been on for not even 5 minutes. My brother was probably using my account again. Lairtnogaw 20:43, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Lairtnogaw
It's really hard to stop my brother when he's a professional hacker. Nothing stops him from figuring out all of my passwords. He uses a Java C++ password randomizing program to figure out my password, and no, he does not live in the same house as me. Lairtnogaw 20:48, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Lairtnogaw
I don't know how he does everything, but my brother can do just about anything wih computers. He once changed my uncle's security questions for his e-mail as a prank.Klonky 21:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Lairtnogaw —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lairtnogaw ( talk • contribs) I was just wondering, are you that 15-year-old guy with the 2 Phd's from Harvard Medical?Klonky 21:17, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Lairtnogaw
ok nvm then —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lairtnogaw ( talk • contribs) 21:20, 14 October 2007 (UTC) I just created an extra protection program on my computer that needs an 8-digit code, 6 passwords, and 10 correctly answered security questions to be overridden, and terminates any Java programs. keyloggers won't work anymore, and this problem will be taken care of once and for all.Lairtnogaw 21:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Lairtnogaw —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lairtnogaw ( talk • contribs)
I didn't vandalize the Disney Channel. The user that did caused Cluebot to reverted it to an already vandalized state. Sorry for the mixup :P Fractions 22:54, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Just to note, the editing situation on Mary (mother of Jesus) has involved the cooperative editing of 3 suspected sockpuppets (along with 1 anonymous user with a similar editing history) persistently towards the same end. The user(s?) edit to varying degrees, but most commonly want to change "relations" to "sex", for whatever reason. This is pointless, because both terms are general and essentially interchangeable- and as none of these sockpuppets have ever provided an edit summary, or posted on a talk page, it doesn't seem like this editor cares much to express reason. My main objection here to the "sex" word change is that it's entirely unnecessary, and unsupported. Not to mention, entirely redundant, as the "Ancient Non-Christian Sources" section already details the exact same thing with specificity.
Take a look at the edit histories:
With this in mind, I'm very skeptical of anything these suspected puppets tries to add (one should note that the puppeteer is currently banned indefinitely), and considering the fact that the edits seem unproductive anyway, I'll continue to oppose these changes with a discerning eye. I'd like to make a sockpuppet report, but I'm a little green in that area (I feel as if the evidence is sufficient for a checkout, but I could be wrong).-- C.Logan 01:48, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about that. 70.112.86.215 01:55, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting vandalism off my userpage and wow are you popular today (judging by the last two discussions on your talkpage) AngelOfSadness talk 22:53, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey.
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thanks once again for reverting vandalism to User:CounterVandalismBot/Report, its much appreciated, so to show the appreciation, here's a nice barn star :) Lloydpick 13:11, 16 October 2007 (UTC) |
You're quite right: I should've examined the edit more carefully. I'm aware editors can remove vandalism warnings -- if I recall, it's to be interpreted as an acknowledgement of the warning. It just struck me that judging by the rubbish the editor was adding to articles, he was one of those vandals likely to end up being blocked, and restoring the warnings was just a convenience for the blocking admin. Thanks! -- Rrburke( talk) 20:54, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
I think it's a bad idea to debate with the accused within Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/South Philly. Answering legit questions is a good thing, but responding to (the inevitable) defensive comments just makes the report longer, and less likely to be read by an admin. WP:SSP is fairly backlogged now, so avoiding extraneous chat is a courtesy to whoever is doing this work.
No biggie. Just a suggestion. / edg ☺ ★ 04:32, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Can you please explain why you keep on removing the Controversy section of Antisemitism of Richard Dawkins. This is not properly discussed on the talk section and no real reason is given for its removal. The section is based on an unbiased, factual and unemotive event.
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marfan8 ( talk • contribs) 04:52, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo 04:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
you said 'Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted.' Can I ask you based on what did you determind that it wasn't contructive? My edits of disinformation werent constructive or didnt "appeare" constructive yet distructive disinformation about an ethnic group is allowed and reverted back? NangOnamos 05:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
I have been constantly responding back to all the questions of this user but he/she keeps on blanking and deleting the page. The whole article is referenced. The user asks me for further references. The ethnicity he is talking about . I am from that ethnicity to. I have refernced all the information. The user then questioned the authencity of the publishers articles. The references are all from known newspapers in South Asia. I have asked him to provide references to the alternations that this user proposes. Till now not a single reference has been produced.Can you please refrain him from deleting parts of the article until we get to a consensus on the discussion page.-- Khanhamzakhan 07:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
A wikipedia abuse report has been filed on this IP vandal here. I was told about it a few minutes ago and I thought you would like to know about the report as they have attacked you too and you reverted many of their edits. AngelOfSadness talk 20:27, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting what you thought was vandalism to my userpage... unfortunately, that was me editing while logged out (hit up the IP's user or talk page). I appreciate the effort though. east. 718 at 10:56, 10/18/2007
I am factored out the medical details to a new page, so it is not a loss of cited information. See the use of {{ main}} at the top of that section. The medical details and the family struggle were inconclusive: the situation at the start and finish of the 1997-2002 phase was about the same. That section only needs a summary a the details can pile up on a specialized subpage. Primarily, it ia matter of overall article size for the main article: 100 Kbyte articles do not become Featured Articles because the previous editors failed to sort out the historical Importance of different parts of the story. For the 1997-2002, we just need the overall prognosis and maybe a count of how many dozens of times the family members were in court.-- Blindedservant 22:20, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Oh, that's nothing. I had an entire attack page created in mainspace entirely full of GIANT BOLD CAPITALS AND CHILDISH INSULTS. Rather flattering, really. shoy 12:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey Gscshoyru,
Sorry, we are new to wikipedia and are not familiar with all the rules. Could you explain to us why it is that Slippy Toad, who is a toad, was removed from the toad wikipedia article?
Thank you, looking forward to your reply! Slippy'sshipisunderrepair —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slippy'sshipisunderrepair ( talk • contribs) 21:02, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you Gscshoyru,
I think I understand now. What makes someone notable enough for inclusion in the toad article?
Slippy'sshipisunderrepair —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slippy'sshipisunderrepair ( talk • contribs) 21:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you Gscshoyru,
You have been very helpful. I will remember this.
Slippy'sshipisunderrepair —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slippy'sshipisunderrepair ( talk • contribs) 21:22, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
I, AngelOfSadness, hereby present this Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar to Gscshoyru in recognition of his speedy vandalism reverts on my userpages and his infinite anti vandalism efforts AngelOfSadness talk 22:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks for jumping in and helping with this guy. When I looked at the recent changes, saw his name, and the picture he had uploaded, I had a suspicion he was up to no good. That is, in my experience, the shortest time span between account creation, beginning to vandalize, and being blocked, I've ever seen. It's a pleasure to see such great teamwork. Cheers! --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 15:32, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. Pity others couldn't be as courteous as you. Do you realise that in a matter of seconds after you put up the speedy deletion notice someone deleted the article? How am I supposed to reply in time? Concernedcitizen102 19:33, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
I ran across the bizarre series of discussions involving this fellow (I am assuming), and decided to see what a Google search might turn up, and found this: [ [3]] It is now several months old, but if this blog post is accurate, it indicates that KK was behaving abusively for a long time before he was (they were?) caught and blocked. Still, I have to wonder what the point of all of it was... I got the impression that he was mentally ill. I suppose we will never know. Thanks for your time. --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 00:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
I've added a reference. Give me the 30 seconds to add it next time; I was midedit when you reverted. :) Sсοττ5834 talk 01:08, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Please stop your edit warring on erotica and work towards consensus. South Philly 01:18, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
←Sorry to overwrite so much. I had that written and was just waiting for some diffs to come in. I have them now, but my computer crashed twice collecting them, to it took a while. SP reports without diffs tend to get ignored. Hopefully, we've not already been passed over. Can you check to see the changes I made work for you? If so, it would be helpful for you to add a note that I was helping with the report, so the examining Admin doesn't interpret the edit history as funny business.
Thanks for your help with this. / edg ☺ ★ 04:04, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Erotica. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. South Philly 03:24, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Erotica. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. South Philly 21:36, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
I know this may sound like a ridiculous question, but do you happen to know if User:216.95.17.12 is some sort of reoccurring vandal going after you? I'm just curious why he chose to attack your user page so fast? See all the discussion at WP:AN. He's blocked anyways. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 23:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Yep. He looked like he had gone quiet, and about the time I delisted him, he struck again. Two more anon IPs have shown up; I've blocked both of those without giving a warning. Fool me once... — C.Fred ( talk) 23:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
I deleted the category of "hard rock" because I have NEVER been in the category of hard rock. I am goth/industrial/elctoronic/synthpop. Neither of my two record labels would have ever put me in that category because they don't even sign hard rock bands. I also deleted a link because the link contained yet more incorrect album credits. My frustration is because I don't believe it is right for someone to tag me as a vandal when they didn't even BOTHER to look at the credits clearly written on my albums. Will my edits remain for the category, links, and especially the info.? I'm frustrated because I thought I fixed all the completely wrong credit info. on my 3 albums this summer. Then tonight I see that it's all back from the dead, so I fix it all again only to see it get reverted and I'm called a vandal on top of it all. I wrote my 3 albums. I spent 10 years of my life writing songs and touring. How would you feel if you saw someone write that someone else wrote your songs because they didn't even bother to look at the album credits (and then they call you a vandal for fixing it TWICE!!!) —Preceding unsigned comment added by H88569 ( talk • contribs) 13:34, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you recently reverted a edit at One Night Stand (2007). Can you look at this. Thanks, Davnel03 15:44, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome! Yes, I did not check to see if there was other vandalism in the citing xources article. I just fixed the vandalism i found. Prussian-Hussar 16:35, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Why have you attacked me rather than problem editor Dreamguy? Does this mean nothing?: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DreamGuy 2. Dreamguy has been tyrannising over other editors for months and you attack his victims! No doubt you will now block me for standing up to wiki-bullies as admins usually do. Colin4C 19:24, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits appeared to be constructive and has not been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
The Special Barnstar | ||
Amazing job fighting vandalism, you could be one of the best out there! Cheers, Je t Lover ( Report a mistake) 22:46, 22 October 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks for the message. I am pretty new to contributing to wikipedia. Can you clarify what you wanted me to do? Thank you for being courteous and knowledgable. Robert cone 23:14, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
please be nice. Leadwind 02:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Just dropping by to say thanks for the revert on my talkpage. It's much appreciated. Keep up the great work :-) Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 18:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Thankyou once again for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. Many thanks, and happy editing! Lra drama 18:15, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Lradrama has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Protection level reduced to semi. Good job on the reporting! Dreadstar † 19:27, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Watch out. Not all his edits were vandalism. I've since reverted you. Have a nice day, 72.139.97.176 22:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
You and
User talk:ZHUMAS214 seem to be just reverting each other. In fact I think you hit the
WP:3RR. Is there some way that this can be defused. His additions do have some references, although they are sparse for the amount of text added. Perhaps tag the section with a {{
refimprovesect}}
and give him a chance to find more stuff to back up what he says. Of course if what he has added is a copyvio, can this be shown?--
NrDg
04:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you again for reverting vandalism off my user talkpage. It was, like always, very much appreciated AngelOfSadness talk 17:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Multiple academic citations have been deleted by user Saedirof who has replaced hevaily referenced sections with some tales of his own. This is not acceptable. As for the deletion tag it was not placed by an admin. Shakti 25 23:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
[User:Feeder2|Feeder2] was making a point regarding my user page comment. It is still somewhat the truth but I am working to make it a better place. Anyway, keep up the good work! Spryde 00:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page, its much appreciated! Lloydpick 00:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC) |
Please allow the laborer page to remain as is in its current condition. The difficulty in obtaining properly cited sources for a subject such as construction which is historically nonacademic and or undocumented is obvious. In the construction field knowledge is passed down through generations from journeyman to apprentice. It is only today with the advent of Wikipedia that this knowledge can be widely shared across regions without the need to physically work with someone.
Unfortunately Wikipedia has a very good policy to edit uncited information. Please allow an exception in this case and in other construction pages in recognition of the special nature of the field. I assure you the information presented on the laborers page is accurate, precise, relevant and correct.
It is your good judgment to allow this content since you have the authority to decide if information is to be preserved or censored. The link to the Laborers' International Union of North America (LIUNA) you deemed irrelevant is the organization representing nearly one million laborers internationally, I believe this link is very relevant. The other information on the page though seemingly inconsequential is also very relevant to the field of laboring.
My personal experience, research and education in the construction field is not sufficient to provide cited sources as these are few and often created for inconsistent purposes. I assure you that if possible I will generate some cited sources myself if only for the reason of preserving content on Wikipedia.
Once again, please preserve the laborers page. 128.12.170.194 01:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC) Granite07 01:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
explain to me how ronald being a happy clown is not legit. isn't he not? And might i suggest you change your name because when ever i say it i have to form a big ball of phlem or mucus to pronouce it correctly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hermannnn21 ( talk • contribs) 01:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I just discerned and have been enticed by the above argument. However Gscshoyru, you should recognize his sourcing, and if that does not appease the requirments, then I shall look online until I find a citing that says Ronald Mcdonald is a happy clown (a secondary source of course). I would also like to point out that the accounts that he set up were probably on different IP addressess. Some people can easily circumvent ridiculous blocking like the kind you try to fruitlessly implement. I have absolutly no connection to the above stated, however I will, in his favor, find a secondary source that cites Ronald Mcdonald as a "very happy clown" and inevitably, you will have to accept it. If you try to accuse me of being the same person I will report. I did however just create this account to throw in my two cents.
Thanks for your laborious reading, for I know the compurgative language I use is over your head,
Jon —Preceding unsigned comment added by JunJawat ( talk • contribs) 02:01, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
(jon turns and bows) —Preceding unsigned comment added by JunJawat ( talk • contribs) 02:05, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Unfortunately, it's the lot of the vandal-fighters ..take a gander at this, multiple sock accounts created in advance back on April 22nd...true advanced planning... Dreadstar † 02:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
You may not be stupid, but nor are you noted for your intelligence. I possess a major in computer sciences from USC and a minor in European Studies. What am i doing trying to cause trouble on wikipedia. I think you associates are full of your selfs and are extremely egotistical. Give up your frivoulous blocking, because I possess an illegal device that allows me to compile and create IP addressess to use for things other than this.
Give up your frivolous effort. Its useless.
You seem to have taken this an entirely different direction. I am sorry if you disagree with the edits made to laborer. What do you suggest we do for a solution that you find acceptable. I have not placed my own research into the laborer page as it is only a way to relax between work. I am a researcher at Stanford University Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering with the Construction Engineering Management program and take my work very seriously. You are obviously much more knowledgeable about wikipedia protocol and etiquette so please provide some beneficial advice as to what you prefer as sources. I assume you are not opposed to the formatting changes only the content. Could you also be more specific as to which sources are not acceptable, most were from very respected institutions and researchers. Granite07 02:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I read those and as best anyone could tell the sources used on laborer conformed Granite07 02:22, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I have 6 more papers to grade tonight and with your help it has taken all day. I was only updating the laborers site between every couple papers as a break.
Can I please restore the laborers page and I will correct the deficiencies over the next few weeks. Interesting enough I created the page so it is all my opinions and thoughts. I do want your help understanding what the expectation is for sources, web sourced, trade union sourced, government sourced, and academically sourced, I used all four.
I also make edits to the heavy equipment page, it also does not conform, or any of the other construction pages. It does not seem realistic to delete the entire construction section of wikipedia. I understand my field is not the most academic but we do use a bit of math and CS.
Ok, I do have a proxy connection to jstor and other sites for my day job here. I will find other sources, the laborers union is almost third party. They are not selling anything.
Granite07 02:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
ASCE is a recognized Journal, the most prestigious in my field in fact! Where else would I source from? It is what we all aspire to publish in. Granite07 02:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
you should look up kaizen, continuous improvement, it is a concept they teach here. I guess it is hard to reconform to different rules, but I can create large batches and update if you prefere rather than many small batches. Granite07 02:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
do improve. I've shown you how to make your own personal workspace, have fun, and try updating the current article when your fixed-up one fits policy. Gscshoyru 02:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
...for the revert! Dppowell 02:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
The Purple Barnstar | ||
For suffering the slings and arrows and pies and midget cars and squirt-guns and (you get the point) collateral damage from the Clown Wars. Dreadstar † 07:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC) (Defender of Clownage) |
I am 88.87.6.72 but I forgot to log in. I wanted to delete some of MY oppinions in Talk:Blaqk_Audio which I consider to be not on the topic or the page doesn't need them... Xr 1 09:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps you should also block the other parties involved in this "edit war" as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.84.187.178 ( talk) 12:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
As per this: Gurch doesn't seem involved here; is the warning a mistake? Gscshoyru 13:21, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Please stop in to the talk page related to Fathers' Rights Movement before making any additional edits. I am working to remove bias from the article and am providing credible citations. In addition, I am discussing changes on the talk page. If you have questions about the edits, please discuss them on the talk page rather than deleting changes. Rogerfgay 15:46, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Nice editing man!
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
I, Alfred, award this barnstar to Gscshyru for his hard work against vandalism and on an extra note, thanks for the tip you gave me! :) Gunnerdevil4 01:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC) |
Shorthand for "Thanks for having my back, I have yours, lol". Good job! Ariel ♥ Gold 12:03, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thank you for preventing vandalism on Wikipedia pages. Very nice job! Keep up the good work! Ilyushka88 19:10, 26 October 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo 01:54, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
I did not remove material from talk page that was "Beltran" and now I have to restore it. El Jigue 208.65.188.149 19:37, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Amazing you are accusing me of removing the material that I inserted. That is not logical. El Jigue 208.65.188.149 20:02, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
In case you are curious, the script removal was due to User:Prckay1 trying to keep people from knowing he edits at User:99.224.49.238 (although him being autoblocked there makes it sort of obvious). It's going to be quite difficult to argue that they aren't the same person now. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 19:42, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry. New4321 19:55, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
For the revert. :) Acalamari 02:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
I must respectfully disagree with your removal of my paragraph on the vast hoax surrounding Drake's will. I caefully cross-referenced this to the perpetrator, who has his own article in Wikipedia which discusses the matter in depth, and included another reference to an article discussing The New Yorker piece on this scam. Thus, it is clearly referenced two different ways. If these links are satisfactory please return it; it's an amazing example of public gullibility. Richard Weil 04:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
You have no right to remove the factually get conflict article from my edit unprotected page. You suggested you placed it on another page. This is not your right to touch my talk page. -- Sagbliss 17:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
...it's gotten to the point where I can't do RC patrol anymore because of you and DerHexer. You're also the reason WP:AIV is backlogged so often. There's only one way to remedy this... interested in running for admin? :D east.718 at 19:23, 10/28/2007
Expand me! |
---|
|
On the Talk Page, I presented an argument for reinstatement. If you still believe that your reversions were the best course of action, then please provide support for that view.
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! Tiptoety 00:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
What the hell are you talking about?!Apples99 16:02, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm actually inclined to agree on this one. You're one of our best vandal fighters, Gscshoyru, but maybe a little too quick on the trigger this time. ;) Glass Cobra 16:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{ subst:Vangel}}! Triwbe 21:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Triwbe 21:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
The Zen Garden Award
Zen Garden Award for Infinite Patience | ||
This is for you as you already have many barnstars for stopping vandalsim. I noticed the Geography portal had gone and was panicing about how I was supposed to get it back and which version it should go back to. Next thing I knew, you and come along and fixed it which, of course calmed me down. While this award may not strictly have be given for infinate patience, it is for giving a newbie peace and I'm sure that's allowed. Thank you :) Nengscoz41620 02:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC) |
Hello, Gscshoyru! Happy Halloween! Cheers, Je t Lover ( Report a mistake) 00:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Please read the Wikipedia guidelines carefully.
I'm afraid I have reported you for edit warring. In future, please use the talk page before editing. 219.90.167.51 03:26, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for fixing my edit to Alison's talk page. -- Kyok o 04:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. The Preity Zinta article has recently achieved A-class status. Due to the wealth of support I have decided to now nominate for an FA class article which I believe and judging by the comments of others is pretty much up to. In my view it is better than some existing FA actor articles. I would therefore be very grateful if you could give it a final review in your own time and leave your comments and views at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Preity Zinta. Thankyou, your comments are always valuable. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 10:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
I reverted him twice. To block him myself would risk being improper. IrishGuy talk 18:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For all your anti-vandlism work. Tiddly-Tom 19:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC) |
AngelOfSadness
talk has given you a cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Cheers for the talkpage revert. :D AngelOfSadness talk 23:47, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
For that revert. :) Acalamari 03:29, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my page! I now give the two of you the RickK anti-vandalism barnstar! - Go od sh op ed 23:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC) |
Yes, it does suck. I have to wait until I'm autoconfirmed again. EoL talk 00:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
For the barnstar, and for jumping in when the editor needed clarification and I had already bolted. -- Vary | Talk 01:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, could you please assist in reverting the vandalism of Animal ? I would do it myself but I would prefer an experienced Wikipedia editor restore it to the most correct version. 165.145.220.201 12:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Why are the facts being reverted on the X-Files page? The new X-Files movie has been officially confirmed by Twentieth Century Fox, yet the article is constantly being reverted back to a state whereby readers will assume that the new movie is simply speculative, when in fact it isn't. I have repeatedly attempted to clarify the situation and article yet for some reason a few members would prefer that the content and facts remain unclear! The new movie has been officially confirmed! It is not speculative, so why not make that clear on the WIKIPEDIA ENCYCLOPEDIA? 210.54.245.44 22:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the vandal watch on my talk page. Arthur 01:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
i lost my password, how do i set a new one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.98.237 ( talk • contribs)
How do I set up a userpage like yours, with the pictures and saying things about the user? Niartnogaw 20:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about the unconstructive editing. I was worried about spanish wiki users not being able to understand..
Is there a way I could help with this in another area? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SayUnclePal ( talk • contribs) 20:35, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
...for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Jauerback 20:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry that the FBI and numerous major news organizations are not good enough for you, exactly what type of source meets your high standards? Honestly, you show a lot of bias here, and it's pretty obvious. There are some Banditos and groupies that wish to sugar coat (would that be coke or meth?) their history (you seem to fall into this group), but the fact is, the article is not accurate and it's people like you that are allowing this to continue. I *will* take it to arbitration if when I add a section on "Illegal Activities" you or your associates remove it without proper discussion and valid reasons. Proxy User 22:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
71.62.216.87 has been trying to insert himself into an ARBCOM, working diligently to try to provoke reactions from parties. You again came to help.
FWIW Bzuk 15:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC).
Blocked now. What was that all about???? [6] - Alison ❤ 20:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Is User:Minaturelovegod the same guy? He seems to have exceedingly similar editing patterns. Glass Cobra 21:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Please, do send me an e.mail at the following address MXSLA@yahoo.co.uk and explain to me why are you spoiling the article about the SATAMKAR family. Do you have a better knowledge about this subject (Bene Israel) that I have after 17 years of researches ? Does it bother you to have the name Satamkar written in Marathi. Which rights do you have on the photographs, some of them are my PRIVATE PROPERTY and others have been given to me ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mxsla ( talk • contribs) 03:14, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
That bot was being retarded so I wrote some stuff. I would like it if you please tell me what I did wrong. Thank You What ever it is Idid not want to trouble for me Ilovebirtbikes 13:06, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 13:06, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
You are totally wrong. What are you the wikipolice. Look that bot was wrong. Ilovebirtbikes 13:12, 11 November 2007 (UTC)IlovedirtbikesIlovebirtbikes 13:12, 11 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilovebirtbikes ( talk • contribs)
Look I have nothing against that user. So I dont know where you got that i thought he was nasty. Because i never thought that. please get you information right next time and dont acuse someone of saying something they haven't. you sure are acting like the police Ilovebirtbikes 13:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 13:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
the way you put it you made it sound like you said I called him nasty Ilovebirtbikes 13:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 13:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
What? I dont understand Ilovebirtbikes 13:51, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 13:51, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. lets drop the whole sudject on me changing the user page. okay? Ilovebirtbikes 13:54, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 13:54, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes I do. Ilovebirtbikes 14:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 14:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
y r u reverting my edits.
Also u call urself an advanced mathematician but sum to infinity of 1/i^2 is C2 (AS maths) AVA rulez 14:15, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Can I Block People? Ilovebirtbikes 22:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 22:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks just wondering Ilovebirtbikes 22:35, 11 November 2007 (UTC)IlovedirtbikesIlovebirtbikes 22:35, 11 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilovebirtbikes ( talk • contribs)
WHY are you sending me something about DAVID Ilovebirtbikes 22:39, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 22:39, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
I understand but why did you send the article to me of all people. Do you lke blaming me for things? Ilovebirtbikes 12:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 12:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
What do you mean I made the page!? I cant even find the page about David F. Ilovebirtbikes 12:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 12:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
No problem, CHQ beat me to the block button by about three seconds. east.718 at 02:04, 11/12/2007
Would you like me to nominate you to be an admin? NHRHS2010 talk 03:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
You posted on my discussion i should not attack others pages. This is fine with me, but please tell Dragonflysixtyseven and other administrators to attack all the edits that I have made on Wikipedia and my pages. Thank You. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Camoq ( talk • contribs) 03:26, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I'm sure it was unintentional, but you reverted a legitimate edit to Mars and labeled it as vandalism. The user who made the edit was attempting to fix a "broken" link in the reference section. It's usually a good idea to check the edits before reverting. Kindest regards, AlphaEta T / C 14:28, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
for reverting vandalism on my userpage! By the way, I find the editing pattern of that IP quite intriguing for a newcomer - what do you think? Of course, it could just be somebody who took offence. No more bongos 18:16, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the helpful info. 76.16.120.27 01:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC) Thank you. Niartnogaw 01:54, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
It is NOT me that is in a "revert war" (and I object to your characterization of it as such). There is ample evidence that POV issues exist. By continuing to remove the POV tag you are in fact VANDALIZING the article. Please stop, or I will make a formal complaint. 75.172.38.233 02:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I have opened a sockpuppetry case against User:WiccaWeb and his puppets (including 75.172.38.233 and Proxy User) for their actions on the article and its talk page. Thought you should know. Also, please accept my thanks for patrolling this article. Have a wiki day! Mmoyer 03:54, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Proxy User, et al, have been asked to provide concrete evidence of POV no fewer than eight times and can or will not do so. Though I applaud your patience and clear Good Faith in dealing with them, perhaps it is time for WP:DNFTT. Cheers! Mmoyer 22:43, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Um, I would think that digg would be a reliable source for events pertaining to digg. And as far as notability? I assumed that the actual size and scope of the hoax, not to mention the importance of the hoax's subject, would make it notable. Wikilost 00:34, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
[7] NHRHS2010 talk 01:44, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
I gave an f'n source. It proves notability. Um, why do you keep removing it? Tilting their heads slightly to the left 14:31, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Hopefully this helps. -- Flyguy649 talk 01:39, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm seeing what else we can do about this clown hater. Dreadstar † 21:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
I've stumbled across something that reminds me of the viral marketing campaign 'Ethan Haas was wrong' and I'm not sure if it is notable enough for a wikipedia article. Also, I am not experienced enough at all to make an aricle about it. Here's some of the links I've found about something called "The List Incorporated"... http://whatistli.blogspot.com/ and http://LYBRI3RPI.blogspot.com/. So if you think it's notable enough for an article feel free to make one. -Benji coses.art@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benji williamson ( talk • contribs) 08:27, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you were the one who introduced me to the requirement of citation for a claim that has been challenged. Am I off base here: Talk:Sam#Primarily_a_male_given_name in thinking that the claim I have disputed should not be returned until it is sourced?
Am I wrong? Or am I just encountering stubbornness? I tried being bold, I got reverted, so I tried discussion and referring to policy and I got reverted. Well I don't want to edit war, but I do dispute the fact in question as being dubious at best. I really do not want the readers of Wikipedia to be misinformed. Sam Barsoom ( talk) 16:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
I have been a resident in Clearview, Wa for 20+ years. I think that I am able to use myself as a resource for the information I am posting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khorn12345 ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for the revert on my user page. Clearly, that anonymous user is confused about how things work around here, so I will not take offense at his actions. At any rate, I appreciate the revert, and the message you left on his talk page. Cheers! --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 17:20, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! -- Cheeser1 ( talk) 20:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
A request for comments has been filed concerning the conduct of RodentofDeath ( talk · contribs). You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/RodentofDeath. / edg ☺ ☭ 20:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
I am currently in negotiations with The JPS ( talk · contribs) that may interest you. 91.108.194.137 ( talk) 23:39, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the heads up, thank you for resolving the problem too. Timothy Neilen ( talk) 04:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support. LanceBarber ( talk) 04:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your comment at the talk page of the user who made personal attacks in response my deletion of his trivial edit. If that sort of thing bothered me I would not have become a Wikipedian! Viewfinder ( talk) 10:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
i understand where the template goes now. sorry for the stupid mistake. i thought i did put it on the talk page. i asked for further clarification on the COI page but i no longer need it. thanks for your help. RodentofDeath ( talk) 18:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
I don't know if this is the right place to put this, (Your page is very hard to navigate around), but I need your attention. I have to require information I have lost... —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThegreatWakkorati ( talk • contribs) 10:35, 28 November 2007
Hello G, there is a person who is removing what I write on his talk page and on another persons talk page. His user name is Baegis. He removed it on his talk page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Baegis and at another person page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Orangemarlin Is he allowed to remove what I write many times like he did? Thank you-- Persianhistory2008 ( talk) 00:22, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Admining at this time of night is never a good idea and you have my sincere apologies for the incorrect block placed on your account by myself. Please feel free to trout as necessary. Regards, GDonato ( talk) 00:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for intruding, but I'd like to suggest that you let the guy you converse with at Talk:Pi have his misconceptions in peace. He's either a semi-clever troll or an honest crank, but in either case it's a waste of time to try to make him see the light. Otherwise, I imagine, you will soon need to prove in detail that any corner of an equilateral triangle is 60 degrees, and so on and so forth all the way down to the parallel postulate, which your opponent will then denounce as a shallow lie that orthodox mathematicians perpetrate for various ill-defined but clearly nefarious purposes. At some point one just has to stop responding, perhaps citing Goodwin's law. – Henning Makholm 04:31, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I have filed a request for mediation on the Human Trafficking in Angeles article and you are invited to comment. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Human_trafficking_in_Angeles_City. Susanbryce 15:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Hy,you have 4 sources of Macedonians in Hellas(Greece) on discussion page,can you please put the numbers on the article of ethnic of ethnic Macedonians.I will soon put in new sources of macedonians in World. Thanks Makedonij 18:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
What a collection of Barnstars! I'm flabbergasted, intimidated, in awe..
Thanks for stopping by my user page. You left such a polite message that at first I believed it was machine generated :-) You write that contributors should take pains to produce references (I'm paraphrasing). How can I argue with that? In this case though I'm somewhat at a loss..
To begin, I'm not quite sure whether you were refering to my >>nignog<< remark, or was it the philological addition? Since the philological included an example (a reference of sorts), I guess it was the nignog. Unfortunately here, as with many other topics, it can be difficult to produce a formal reference apart from years of living experience - in this case in the UK. [Hmm. Come to think of it I do believe I heard the term used in a film; but it was an ephemeral piece, and I'll be darned if I can remember the title].
Perhaps I can encourage you to discover an insouciant sympathy for my position by inviting you to reconsider many of the natural day-to-day elements of the social life where you live. Take, say, an idiosyncratic way which small town chinese storekeepers might have of greeting an unfamiliar customer (not sure why I thought of that, except that its common enough to be a familiar part of life, while, still being recondite enough to pose a challenge in finding a reference). Whether or not small town chinese storekeepers have characteristic ways about them where you live (Ni hao. Cash cash no take checques..) I believe you can imagine something of this sort which everyone in your community would recognise and agree with, but which can be vexingly difficult to formally reference.
Hopefully this makes my point..
Stop by anytime and let me know what you think.. Warm regards, -- Philopedia 01:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Now that's one persistent sock. Maybe this needs to be taken to check user for a range block. Spellcast 02:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Hmmm. Actually, I did not make changes to another editor's post, but I have no explanation for what happened. I did get an edit conflict notice, but I thought I handles it properly. No clue.-- Cberlet ( talk) 03:47, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for rv vandalism of my page, Jimfbleak ( talk) 07:24, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
I don't think this an irrelevent change? I'm commenting in agreement of a preexisting topic about deleting of nonnotable content.
I'm stating my reasons why I agree with the author on the freaking talk page. You have absoultely no reason to stop me from stating my opinion on a preexisting discussion about whether or not how pages are deleted is fair on the talk page.
Please explain howyou can delete my comment without reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.25.41.35 ( talk • contribs)
And how is it that you can ban someone by IP address? Does this not then prohibit free access to Wiki due to public/work computers that share internet access?
Thank you for reverting vandalism to my user page. :-) Best regards, Hús ö nd 20:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
And for your other excellent anti-vandal work. :D delldot talk 07:09, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
A user you gave a final warning has just vandalized the Canada article. I don't know how to take the next steps for blocking.-- Gregalton ( talk) 22:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting vandalism to my talk page. Vandal's indef blocked now. Regards, Hús ö nd 21:58, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello Gscshoyru. I've been witnessing your superb work here on Wikipedia and wonder if you would be interested in becoming an administrator. If you are, and if you need a nominator, I hereby offer myself for the task. Best regards, Hús ö nd 17:57, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my userpage! Keep up the good work! :) - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 22:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello Gscshoyru, you have helped edit some of my work when I first started out on Wikipedia, and was hoping you could review my latest article I have added on the Toloy Foundation Charity. Im looking for guidence and suggestions on how I could improve the article and my editing skills. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuloy_Foundation. Your advice would be appreciated, kindest regards. Susanbryce ( talk) 19:57, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Gscshoyru, appreciate that, due to some earlier difficulties I had on articles, Im actively trying to seek out several experienced Editors who can review my work in the future and offer some guidence. If you can think of anyone that can be of help in reviewing some of my work, pls let me know, kindest regards. Susanbryce ( talk) 20:14, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
First of all I did not use Twinkle. Second of all you should try reading my reasons for editing: "Proselytising is not a defensible use of Wikipedia resources" and that is what that userbox is doing. That userbox has already been deleted in the past (see Template:User evol-4). 172.165.79.155 ( talk) 01:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Also see Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/userbox templates concerning beliefs and convictions. 172.165.79.155 ( talk) 01:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
{{deleteduserbox}}
')It should be deleted. As for a couple of my other edits why would you transclude a userbox with parameters if one without parameters already exists? And why would you keep a barely used template? 172.165.79.155 ( talk) 01:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
User:Johnpseudo, you will be
blocked from editing.
Gscshoyru (
talk)
02:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Note that the IP user quacks rather clearly to be User:PatPeter evading a block. I've blocked the IP accordingly. Per rules on block/ban evasion, please feel free to revert all the IPs edits. - jc37 03:04, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
How is it vandalism? 172.164.199.13 ( talk) 17:32, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
And you know that damn well, get your head out of your ass. Step down from your pedestal and stop vandalizing Wikipedia. 172.166.222.171 ( talk) 18:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
diff User is indef-banned anyway. And has a bunch of spam links on his page. -- 205.155.48.5 18:21, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Please look at the original article for white male, which was clearly Non-neutral POV. What I added was not a biased view. Examine the pages for other groups- african american, etc. These are written to reflect achievements of the group, without a negative depiction. The page for white male that was originally in place is blatantly a liberal non-neutral POV, it lacks facts about any achievements whatsoever (which are the prominent feature for all other group pages) and it lists statements such as denying discrimination against white men which are at best speculative, and at worst, bigoted. If Wikipedia is uninterested in facts, then I would ask that at least white men be treated with equal respect from a humanistic POV as has been carried out for the pages of all other groups of peoples.
Thelonelywafflekid05 23:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC) if your not an admin then how come your deleting my buddy melodic horror??
that is CALLED FREEDOM OF SPEECH. poor melodic horror.
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page!-- Just James T/ C 11:47, 22 September 2007 (UTC) |
I putt a poland numbers and a sorce of pdf poland census!Ther is allsou no macedonian who declare him self as serbian orthodox you can see macedonian national census!So please putt my artycle back Thanks Makedonij 22 Sepzember 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my page deletion
I not vanduhlize kkz?
u liek mudkipz?
71.107.133.106 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) This IP user goes crazy. I should have extended to block duration to 2 days. This is the first time I've ever encounter such a stubborn. BTw, thanks for reverting my talk page. Best wishes! @pple complain 16:26, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
for moving that comment. I had a broken "click here to leave me a message" which pointed to the user page, not my talk page, but I've fixed it now. — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 19:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
OK, done. Evercat 20:51, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
I, AngelOfSadness, hereby award Gscshoyru this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for his all of his anti-vandalism efforts and for reverting vandalism off my talkpage and userpage so many times that this barnstar alone will not be enough of a thank you. :D AngelOfSadness talk 22:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks for your continuous efforts in reverting my pet stalker. I don't know what the obsession is with advertising my mySpace or real name. If I had anything to hide I would've made sure that my details were not as accessible on Google. The JPS talk to me 22:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed all the people vandalizing your userpage, and I wanted to let you know that you should be able to go to an admin and request permanent semi-protection to prevent vandalism, as
I did with my user page. It really does help, and reduces work load (now I just have to worry about my talk page).
--
FastLizard4 (
Talk•
Links•
Sign)
22:40, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
If the Citations for Kikyo are not "good" for you, then shouldn't the citations for InuYasha, Koga AND Sesshomaru be taken off too? Slotedpig put those citations there and mine are the same as his. So if mine are n't good enough, his aren't good enough either, since they are the same. Kagome 85 —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 14:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Can you please remove the Citations for InuYasha, Koga and Sesshomaru then? And could you please send a message to Slotedpig as to why they are not "good enough"? I have removed those citations in the past and Slotedpig came back and said I was vandalising and repeatedly put them back up. I am not asking you to do any work for me, it is just maybe Slotedpig will listen to you. Maybe instead you could remove the citations for them and say why they are not "good enough" in your edit note. I do not quite understand why the citations are not good enough, but it seems you do, so that is why I am asking you to do this. Thank you. Kagome 85 —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 22:09, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for all the help. I appreciate it. Thanks for the pointers too by the way. Kagome 85 22:19, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Just wondering from looking at your profile, how do you get the pictures? Do you know how to make something like "This person likes the anime InuYasha" ? Thanks. Kagome 85 22:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick revert on my userpage. Your work is greatly appreciated. -- TeaDrinker 15:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Can i just be another person to offer their thanks for all the good work you do at reverting vandalism, especially on my talk page. You already have a few barnstars so i give you something useful :
. Enjoy! Woodym555 15:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello, i noticed that you beleive the warn i gave User:86.140.177.115 was un-just and that the user did not diserve a final warn. I would first like to state that i agree with you in some aspects, first being that IP's do (at times) get treated rather unfairly, but it is a bais that is based on facts, more IP's vandalize than user accounts. In my own defense the reason i warned the user with a final warn was due to the fact that s/he had been warned with level 1,2,and 3 vandal warns prior to my warn. I thank you for your comments, and i greatly incourge more of them. Thank you, and happy vandal fighting! Tiptoety 18:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with CadillacDTS, and for reverting his/her edits. Here, have a
Jac16888 has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
-- Jac16888 22:07, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
For ignoring the three-revert rule and refusing to let the integrity of Kimbo Slice be compromised. east. 718 at 01:38, September 25, 2007 |
Hi there,
You deleted an external link I posted on making tofu. If it would be deleted, I think a couple of the others would need to be deleted as well since there is no substantial difference. One is a video of how to make a kind of soft 'instant' tofu. The one I linked shows how to make more traditional 'cubed' pressed tofu. I'm not attached to the link being there, but want to figure out what the rational is as I looked at all the other links before posting that one. You guidance would be much appreciated. Annalou
Hello,
On what basis did you remove Energy Medicine University from the Energy Medicine page? There are other schools listed in Wikipedia, it seemed directly related. It is a private graduate school fully authorized to grant Masters and Doctorate degrees from the State of California. I believed that this article would be a relevant place to put an external link to a university directly related to Energy Medicine. Both Donna Eden and David Feinstein who are in the references are professors at this institution. I am a grad student there, so I have researched this place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Annalou ( talk • contribs) 16:42, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Gschoyru, I read all the policies you pointed out which were helpful. I am a newbie, and thought that the 'external links' was a place I could add something useful and get my toes wet before trying anything else. Have a good one! Annalou 02:22, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Hersfold (
t/
a/
c) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for the reverts to my user page. It's always appreciated. :-) Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 22:25, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Tiptoety 22:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Did you look at the talk page?? You will see that this an attempt to assert policy. Eusebeus 04:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Alansohn Eusebeus 04:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
With all due respect I not only made several separate edits to Islam in the United States I also explained them on the talk page. Those who are reverting all of these edits in one fell swoop are not engaging any of these explanations. That is pretty disrespectful. Am I to assume that they will? Also, why should we discuss many different edits made to different ends all at the same time just because someone has chosen to revert them all at once? Finally I didn't blank anything so please be more careful on your edit summaries. All I'm asking is that you look into this a bit more before making those kinds of pronouncements. Thanks. PelleSmith 03:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting vandalism off my userpage...again :D AngelOfSadness talk 17:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
If you are calling National Geographic and University of Illinois as not reliable sources, then prove it they are not and tell me how you made such a conclusion, if your excuses are acceptable then I will agree with you. Thanks USER:SIKICITURK —Preceding unsigned comment added by SikiciTurk ( talk • contribs) 02:51, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Looks like we're attacking vanadalism on the same page at the same time. Sorry for the Twinkle Report. -- Tckma 16:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
hey um srry for vandilizing and srry to all the people of wikipedia for vandilizing —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdstan512 ( talk • contribs)
I was not adding my opinion or commentry. I simply replaced facts that are supported by the references quoted. The information was originally put there by others, not me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.70.31 ( talk) 16:10, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Gentelman I am surprised by your action. Being Paksitani I think I know more about our names. I have given the full name, the name he is quoted too. Syed is his family name. What is the problem in seeing the family name of a person? I am not a new here. And givng family name or full name is normal. Waiting for your comments about this...
Khalid Islamabad —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khalid Mahmood ( talk • contribs) 16:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I think I may have gotten carried away, just a bit. But I have been using the talk page. I'm trying to reason with users whether sources are reliable or not.
What annoys me is when users claim that the "dispute has been resolved" in order to unprotect the page. One the page is unprotected they come back and engage in the same edit warring that occurred before the page was protected.
I'd like it if you could join the talk page of the article and help us in determining who is a reliable source, and who isn't. Bless sins 20:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Heh, no problem. Nice template, by the way. :) *Cremepuff 222* 22:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Blanking the talk page wasn't all that this user did. Look at this strange edit. futurebird 01:14, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
HeY.. Want to ask why you keep changing the page. Do you even know this person? Well to let you know i know this guy very well. GUESS YOU DON'T. Also the case you keep bringing up. That case was solved. He was NOT guilty. I request you please not to change this page. PLEASE!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolshamas 01 ( talk • contribs) 12:57, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello. first i'd like to say sorry for the mess with the Ashanti Empire article. Let me explain. I went to the old Empire of Ashanti page and tried to change the title (move it) to Ashanti Empire. When I tried, I got a message saying it could not be done since there was a page already existing by that name. that page was a redirect to the empire of ashanti so I just copied the contents from the empire of ashanti page into the existing ashanti empire page and made the former a redirect to the latter. i know that's confusing as hell and i probably just goofed things up. sorry about that. if there's a way i can fix this let me know. i just felt the article should be titled Ashanti Empire to keep its naming style consistent with the other other empire pages ( Roman Empire, Mali Empire, etc). holla Scott Free 15:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
You think this would show up in the news. But it doesn't so don't be so quick to assume its vandalism when someone says that a fake war is fake.
Thanks Gscshoyru for putting some order here. We sure need external output. Cheers! Tazmaniacs 11:54, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your hard work fighting vandals! delldot talk 17:40, 3 October 2007 (UTC) |
Thank you for reverting my blunder in adding a NEW and legitimate reference to recent fuel cell news to the Fuel Cell references. I spent an hour trying to figure out how to add a reference correctly, and obviously failed.
However, the reference is still valid, and important, so when I do figure out how to do it right, please don't revert it.
In regards to your reversion of the External Reference on the Direct Methanol Fuel Cell that I added correctly, that was a valid, and extremely useful reference to the predominant source of hydrocarbon membranes. Hydrocarbon membranes are supplanting Nafion for DMFCs, and they are totally under-represented in this Wiki article. I may fix that some day soon, but in the mean time, Wiki users deserve to be pointed at this reference, as much as the other external references in the list.
TIA. HighConcept 20:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
This post is in regards to the edit in the Z transform page deletion that was reverted, that was an incorrect metaphor, and since it is nonsense, and you do not know what a Z transform is, it should be deleted. So I will delete again, and you will not revert it. Thank you for your time, which I know is valuable because you are spending a Friday morning editing wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rbehrns ( talk • contribs) 16:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
I have semi-protected the page for a month. Usually I wouldn't do this with such a level of vandalism, but as it's the same user IP-hopping, I've no problem with it. ELIMINATORJR 15:24, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
I have the feeling it is going to need more moderation. I have added a request for comments to the talk section to try to develop consesus on whether or not ancient authors should be included as "early examples of scientific racism," or if they are simply early examples of ethnocentrism as I believe, and do not belong on the page, sourced or not.
Even if consensus is built to determine that ancient authors belong listed here, there are certain outrageous statements being made which must remain deleted. One in particular, which you restored a few days ago, actually states that:
"Europeans thus have by nature a strong, courageous character and "endurance in body and soul" due to living in rigorous, cold, wintry climates. This theory is known nowadays in genetics, race-realist and anthropological circles as the "cold winter theory of intelligence"
This offensive, absolutely false pseudo-science has no place in the article. Brando130 16:35, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Please stop edit warring on the Erotica article. 151.197.111.178 21:06, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to point out to you that your recent edit to Shadow-X reverted a positive contribution to that page. I realize it was an easy mistake to make, because that editor had been making a bunch of edits that were vandalism, but I'm just letting you know so that you are more careful in the future. That editor was immature, but you might want to check out what he posted in his talk page about your revert. Have a good day!!! 144.92.58.224 20:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Erotica. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. I can change my IP 16:00, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Done. Academic Challenger 05:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
hey man i was targeting nobody in particular if anybody has a problem with me my email is on my profile just drop me a line or get very nasty i have a vampirefreaks.com morbid_angel66623 drop me a line there
Hail Satan 18:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
ahh, yes quite i understand now thank you
Hail Satan
18:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert on my bots reports page! :) Lloydpick 23:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
I removed the text per WP:V and WP:BLP as there was no sourcing for this. IMO, the editor should stay blocked though until they retract that legal threat.-- Isotope23 talk 13:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
"When you're done dealing with another vandal's piece of fun"...
I hope that you are not referring to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by M5891 ( talk • contribs) 16:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
It seems that I have been mistaken. You see my changes have erroneously been referred to as vandalism so I just assumed that was the case. I apologize for the misunderstanding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by M5891 ( talk • contribs) 17:00, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage, both today, and the last vandalism a couple of weeks ago, it seems i have a guardian angel watching over me(or a least my user page haha). I'm still trying to work out how i upset today's since that was their only edit, very odd. Anyway, cheers -- Jac16888 20:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
An emergency shut-off switch is on my talk page in the event there is a problem with this bot. -- TakwerbotX 03:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page :) I have reported the human to the admins. Cheers! Domthedude001 03:29, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you so much for always having my "back" so to speak, for keeping an eye on my talk page when I'm not around. Honestly, I appreciate it so much, and you're just such an awesome editor and vandal fighter, I can't count how many times you've "beaten me" to the revert, lol. I just want you to know how much you are appreciated, and how much good you do. You rock! Ariel ♥ Gold 21:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Sorry ill be calm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.95.17.164 ( talk) 23:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Wow, that would mean I was either exceptionally bendy, or very well-endowed. Either way, it's a theoretical compliment. Crazy kids... - CobaltBlueTony 16:00, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
I moved this from your userpage for you: "The HMer attacked me. Advise the user to stay put rather than post out of ignorance. SLY111SLY111" . Woodym555 16:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
How can I add her quotes so they come across as more neutral - she made them lol :P
Fable1984 04:46, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I'm sorry. In future any wikipedia edits I make will be far more subtle and unbiased. I'm over the tantrum thing now.... thank you :p Fable1984 05:21, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert to my bots report page, its much appreciated :) Lloydpick 10:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
hi! im new here... was trying to add info for airsoft and i dont really know how to add a reference since i dont have one... coz these are all from my experiences as a player... pls help me out... thanks Obakpogi 00:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
awww mannn... :) thats ok.... thanks for the help anyways :) 203.167.97.51 02:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I've seen you around, and I noticed that. I started using this username when I was... 13? I just haven't bothered to change it, it's the handle too many people know me by. Thanks for the compliments. :) shoy 03:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the Painesville, Ohio train wreck again. Look at my talk page to see what the IP had to say about it...I must say, a unique response. Nyttend 05:18, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
...for the cleanup on my userpage. Kreepy krawly reposted on my talkpage. All fine now. LessHeard vanU 15:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Our group has now recognized 2 Institutional Vandals, and this is a message to tell you that you are the second identified, and all actions by this user are being databased for trend identification. It is unfortunate you would choose to sideline such an important issue, but there are other ways this issue will be brought back to the main forum. It will amuse us to observe what we call an IV Admin use Admin tools to bury embarassing topics. This just proves our point, and the world will soon discover that Wikipedia, as important as it is, can no longer function as it was intended, or as it should, because of the shortsighted and illogical actions of a few entrenched users with unique controls. Such is life. Kreepy krawly 20:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
This user will not become privy to the meaning of "X" manual, as that indication is for the non-Wikipedians, or "X's," who are following the developments of acrimony related to the original string: Trivia is what Wikipedia does best; Wikipedia has become bigger than itself. Please stay away from the Kreepy krawly talk page. This needs to be the end of this. Kreepy krawly 21:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I would like to see proof of it. This is not an "attack on an editor". I just want an explanation. Lairtnogaw 20:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Liartnogaw
What are you talking about? I have been on for not even 5 minutes. My brother was probably using my account again. Lairtnogaw 20:43, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Lairtnogaw
It's really hard to stop my brother when he's a professional hacker. Nothing stops him from figuring out all of my passwords. He uses a Java C++ password randomizing program to figure out my password, and no, he does not live in the same house as me. Lairtnogaw 20:48, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Lairtnogaw
I don't know how he does everything, but my brother can do just about anything wih computers. He once changed my uncle's security questions for his e-mail as a prank.Klonky 21:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Lairtnogaw —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lairtnogaw ( talk • contribs) I was just wondering, are you that 15-year-old guy with the 2 Phd's from Harvard Medical?Klonky 21:17, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Lairtnogaw
ok nvm then —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lairtnogaw ( talk • contribs) 21:20, 14 October 2007 (UTC) I just created an extra protection program on my computer that needs an 8-digit code, 6 passwords, and 10 correctly answered security questions to be overridden, and terminates any Java programs. keyloggers won't work anymore, and this problem will be taken care of once and for all.Lairtnogaw 21:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Lairtnogaw —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lairtnogaw ( talk • contribs)
I didn't vandalize the Disney Channel. The user that did caused Cluebot to reverted it to an already vandalized state. Sorry for the mixup :P Fractions 22:54, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Just to note, the editing situation on Mary (mother of Jesus) has involved the cooperative editing of 3 suspected sockpuppets (along with 1 anonymous user with a similar editing history) persistently towards the same end. The user(s?) edit to varying degrees, but most commonly want to change "relations" to "sex", for whatever reason. This is pointless, because both terms are general and essentially interchangeable- and as none of these sockpuppets have ever provided an edit summary, or posted on a talk page, it doesn't seem like this editor cares much to express reason. My main objection here to the "sex" word change is that it's entirely unnecessary, and unsupported. Not to mention, entirely redundant, as the "Ancient Non-Christian Sources" section already details the exact same thing with specificity.
Take a look at the edit histories:
With this in mind, I'm very skeptical of anything these suspected puppets tries to add (one should note that the puppeteer is currently banned indefinitely), and considering the fact that the edits seem unproductive anyway, I'll continue to oppose these changes with a discerning eye. I'd like to make a sockpuppet report, but I'm a little green in that area (I feel as if the evidence is sufficient for a checkout, but I could be wrong).-- C.Logan 01:48, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about that. 70.112.86.215 01:55, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting vandalism off my userpage and wow are you popular today (judging by the last two discussions on your talkpage) AngelOfSadness talk 22:53, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey.
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thanks once again for reverting vandalism to User:CounterVandalismBot/Report, its much appreciated, so to show the appreciation, here's a nice barn star :) Lloydpick 13:11, 16 October 2007 (UTC) |
You're quite right: I should've examined the edit more carefully. I'm aware editors can remove vandalism warnings -- if I recall, it's to be interpreted as an acknowledgement of the warning. It just struck me that judging by the rubbish the editor was adding to articles, he was one of those vandals likely to end up being blocked, and restoring the warnings was just a convenience for the blocking admin. Thanks! -- Rrburke( talk) 20:54, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
I think it's a bad idea to debate with the accused within Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/South Philly. Answering legit questions is a good thing, but responding to (the inevitable) defensive comments just makes the report longer, and less likely to be read by an admin. WP:SSP is fairly backlogged now, so avoiding extraneous chat is a courtesy to whoever is doing this work.
No biggie. Just a suggestion. / edg ☺ ★ 04:32, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Can you please explain why you keep on removing the Controversy section of Antisemitism of Richard Dawkins. This is not properly discussed on the talk section and no real reason is given for its removal. The section is based on an unbiased, factual and unemotive event.
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marfan8 ( talk • contribs) 04:52, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo 04:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
you said 'Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted.' Can I ask you based on what did you determind that it wasn't contructive? My edits of disinformation werent constructive or didnt "appeare" constructive yet distructive disinformation about an ethnic group is allowed and reverted back? NangOnamos 05:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
I have been constantly responding back to all the questions of this user but he/she keeps on blanking and deleting the page. The whole article is referenced. The user asks me for further references. The ethnicity he is talking about . I am from that ethnicity to. I have refernced all the information. The user then questioned the authencity of the publishers articles. The references are all from known newspapers in South Asia. I have asked him to provide references to the alternations that this user proposes. Till now not a single reference has been produced.Can you please refrain him from deleting parts of the article until we get to a consensus on the discussion page.-- Khanhamzakhan 07:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
A wikipedia abuse report has been filed on this IP vandal here. I was told about it a few minutes ago and I thought you would like to know about the report as they have attacked you too and you reverted many of their edits. AngelOfSadness talk 20:27, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting what you thought was vandalism to my userpage... unfortunately, that was me editing while logged out (hit up the IP's user or talk page). I appreciate the effort though. east. 718 at 10:56, 10/18/2007
I am factored out the medical details to a new page, so it is not a loss of cited information. See the use of {{ main}} at the top of that section. The medical details and the family struggle were inconclusive: the situation at the start and finish of the 1997-2002 phase was about the same. That section only needs a summary a the details can pile up on a specialized subpage. Primarily, it ia matter of overall article size for the main article: 100 Kbyte articles do not become Featured Articles because the previous editors failed to sort out the historical Importance of different parts of the story. For the 1997-2002, we just need the overall prognosis and maybe a count of how many dozens of times the family members were in court.-- Blindedservant 22:20, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Oh, that's nothing. I had an entire attack page created in mainspace entirely full of GIANT BOLD CAPITALS AND CHILDISH INSULTS. Rather flattering, really. shoy 12:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey Gscshoyru,
Sorry, we are new to wikipedia and are not familiar with all the rules. Could you explain to us why it is that Slippy Toad, who is a toad, was removed from the toad wikipedia article?
Thank you, looking forward to your reply! Slippy'sshipisunderrepair —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slippy'sshipisunderrepair ( talk • contribs) 21:02, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you Gscshoyru,
I think I understand now. What makes someone notable enough for inclusion in the toad article?
Slippy'sshipisunderrepair —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slippy'sshipisunderrepair ( talk • contribs) 21:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you Gscshoyru,
You have been very helpful. I will remember this.
Slippy'sshipisunderrepair —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slippy'sshipisunderrepair ( talk • contribs) 21:22, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
I, AngelOfSadness, hereby present this Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar to Gscshoyru in recognition of his speedy vandalism reverts on my userpages and his infinite anti vandalism efforts AngelOfSadness talk 22:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks for jumping in and helping with this guy. When I looked at the recent changes, saw his name, and the picture he had uploaded, I had a suspicion he was up to no good. That is, in my experience, the shortest time span between account creation, beginning to vandalize, and being blocked, I've ever seen. It's a pleasure to see such great teamwork. Cheers! --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 15:32, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. Pity others couldn't be as courteous as you. Do you realise that in a matter of seconds after you put up the speedy deletion notice someone deleted the article? How am I supposed to reply in time? Concernedcitizen102 19:33, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
I ran across the bizarre series of discussions involving this fellow (I am assuming), and decided to see what a Google search might turn up, and found this: [ [3]] It is now several months old, but if this blog post is accurate, it indicates that KK was behaving abusively for a long time before he was (they were?) caught and blocked. Still, I have to wonder what the point of all of it was... I got the impression that he was mentally ill. I suppose we will never know. Thanks for your time. --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 00:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
I've added a reference. Give me the 30 seconds to add it next time; I was midedit when you reverted. :) Sсοττ5834 talk 01:08, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Please stop your edit warring on erotica and work towards consensus. South Philly 01:18, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
←Sorry to overwrite so much. I had that written and was just waiting for some diffs to come in. I have them now, but my computer crashed twice collecting them, to it took a while. SP reports without diffs tend to get ignored. Hopefully, we've not already been passed over. Can you check to see the changes I made work for you? If so, it would be helpful for you to add a note that I was helping with the report, so the examining Admin doesn't interpret the edit history as funny business.
Thanks for your help with this. / edg ☺ ★ 04:04, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Erotica. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. South Philly 03:24, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Erotica. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. South Philly 21:36, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
I know this may sound like a ridiculous question, but do you happen to know if User:216.95.17.12 is some sort of reoccurring vandal going after you? I'm just curious why he chose to attack your user page so fast? See all the discussion at WP:AN. He's blocked anyways. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 23:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Yep. He looked like he had gone quiet, and about the time I delisted him, he struck again. Two more anon IPs have shown up; I've blocked both of those without giving a warning. Fool me once... — C.Fred ( talk) 23:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
I deleted the category of "hard rock" because I have NEVER been in the category of hard rock. I am goth/industrial/elctoronic/synthpop. Neither of my two record labels would have ever put me in that category because they don't even sign hard rock bands. I also deleted a link because the link contained yet more incorrect album credits. My frustration is because I don't believe it is right for someone to tag me as a vandal when they didn't even BOTHER to look at the credits clearly written on my albums. Will my edits remain for the category, links, and especially the info.? I'm frustrated because I thought I fixed all the completely wrong credit info. on my 3 albums this summer. Then tonight I see that it's all back from the dead, so I fix it all again only to see it get reverted and I'm called a vandal on top of it all. I wrote my 3 albums. I spent 10 years of my life writing songs and touring. How would you feel if you saw someone write that someone else wrote your songs because they didn't even bother to look at the album credits (and then they call you a vandal for fixing it TWICE!!!) —Preceding unsigned comment added by H88569 ( talk • contribs) 13:34, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you recently reverted a edit at One Night Stand (2007). Can you look at this. Thanks, Davnel03 15:44, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome! Yes, I did not check to see if there was other vandalism in the citing xources article. I just fixed the vandalism i found. Prussian-Hussar 16:35, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Why have you attacked me rather than problem editor Dreamguy? Does this mean nothing?: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DreamGuy 2. Dreamguy has been tyrannising over other editors for months and you attack his victims! No doubt you will now block me for standing up to wiki-bullies as admins usually do. Colin4C 19:24, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits appeared to be constructive and has not been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
The Special Barnstar | ||
Amazing job fighting vandalism, you could be one of the best out there! Cheers, Je t Lover ( Report a mistake) 22:46, 22 October 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks for the message. I am pretty new to contributing to wikipedia. Can you clarify what you wanted me to do? Thank you for being courteous and knowledgable. Robert cone 23:14, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
please be nice. Leadwind 02:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Just dropping by to say thanks for the revert on my talkpage. It's much appreciated. Keep up the great work :-) Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 18:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Thankyou once again for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. Many thanks, and happy editing! Lra drama 18:15, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Lradrama has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Protection level reduced to semi. Good job on the reporting! Dreadstar † 19:27, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Watch out. Not all his edits were vandalism. I've since reverted you. Have a nice day, 72.139.97.176 22:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
You and
User talk:ZHUMAS214 seem to be just reverting each other. In fact I think you hit the
WP:3RR. Is there some way that this can be defused. His additions do have some references, although they are sparse for the amount of text added. Perhaps tag the section with a {{
refimprovesect}}
and give him a chance to find more stuff to back up what he says. Of course if what he has added is a copyvio, can this be shown?--
NrDg
04:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you again for reverting vandalism off my user talkpage. It was, like always, very much appreciated AngelOfSadness talk 17:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Multiple academic citations have been deleted by user Saedirof who has replaced hevaily referenced sections with some tales of his own. This is not acceptable. As for the deletion tag it was not placed by an admin. Shakti 25 23:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
[User:Feeder2|Feeder2] was making a point regarding my user page comment. It is still somewhat the truth but I am working to make it a better place. Anyway, keep up the good work! Spryde 00:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page, its much appreciated! Lloydpick 00:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC) |
Please allow the laborer page to remain as is in its current condition. The difficulty in obtaining properly cited sources for a subject such as construction which is historically nonacademic and or undocumented is obvious. In the construction field knowledge is passed down through generations from journeyman to apprentice. It is only today with the advent of Wikipedia that this knowledge can be widely shared across regions without the need to physically work with someone.
Unfortunately Wikipedia has a very good policy to edit uncited information. Please allow an exception in this case and in other construction pages in recognition of the special nature of the field. I assure you the information presented on the laborers page is accurate, precise, relevant and correct.
It is your good judgment to allow this content since you have the authority to decide if information is to be preserved or censored. The link to the Laborers' International Union of North America (LIUNA) you deemed irrelevant is the organization representing nearly one million laborers internationally, I believe this link is very relevant. The other information on the page though seemingly inconsequential is also very relevant to the field of laboring.
My personal experience, research and education in the construction field is not sufficient to provide cited sources as these are few and often created for inconsistent purposes. I assure you that if possible I will generate some cited sources myself if only for the reason of preserving content on Wikipedia.
Once again, please preserve the laborers page. 128.12.170.194 01:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC) Granite07 01:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
explain to me how ronald being a happy clown is not legit. isn't he not? And might i suggest you change your name because when ever i say it i have to form a big ball of phlem or mucus to pronouce it correctly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hermannnn21 ( talk • contribs) 01:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I just discerned and have been enticed by the above argument. However Gscshoyru, you should recognize his sourcing, and if that does not appease the requirments, then I shall look online until I find a citing that says Ronald Mcdonald is a happy clown (a secondary source of course). I would also like to point out that the accounts that he set up were probably on different IP addressess. Some people can easily circumvent ridiculous blocking like the kind you try to fruitlessly implement. I have absolutly no connection to the above stated, however I will, in his favor, find a secondary source that cites Ronald Mcdonald as a "very happy clown" and inevitably, you will have to accept it. If you try to accuse me of being the same person I will report. I did however just create this account to throw in my two cents.
Thanks for your laborious reading, for I know the compurgative language I use is over your head,
Jon —Preceding unsigned comment added by JunJawat ( talk • contribs) 02:01, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
(jon turns and bows) —Preceding unsigned comment added by JunJawat ( talk • contribs) 02:05, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Unfortunately, it's the lot of the vandal-fighters ..take a gander at this, multiple sock accounts created in advance back on April 22nd...true advanced planning... Dreadstar † 02:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
You may not be stupid, but nor are you noted for your intelligence. I possess a major in computer sciences from USC and a minor in European Studies. What am i doing trying to cause trouble on wikipedia. I think you associates are full of your selfs and are extremely egotistical. Give up your frivoulous blocking, because I possess an illegal device that allows me to compile and create IP addressess to use for things other than this.
Give up your frivolous effort. Its useless.
You seem to have taken this an entirely different direction. I am sorry if you disagree with the edits made to laborer. What do you suggest we do for a solution that you find acceptable. I have not placed my own research into the laborer page as it is only a way to relax between work. I am a researcher at Stanford University Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering with the Construction Engineering Management program and take my work very seriously. You are obviously much more knowledgeable about wikipedia protocol and etiquette so please provide some beneficial advice as to what you prefer as sources. I assume you are not opposed to the formatting changes only the content. Could you also be more specific as to which sources are not acceptable, most were from very respected institutions and researchers. Granite07 02:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I read those and as best anyone could tell the sources used on laborer conformed Granite07 02:22, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I have 6 more papers to grade tonight and with your help it has taken all day. I was only updating the laborers site between every couple papers as a break.
Can I please restore the laborers page and I will correct the deficiencies over the next few weeks. Interesting enough I created the page so it is all my opinions and thoughts. I do want your help understanding what the expectation is for sources, web sourced, trade union sourced, government sourced, and academically sourced, I used all four.
I also make edits to the heavy equipment page, it also does not conform, or any of the other construction pages. It does not seem realistic to delete the entire construction section of wikipedia. I understand my field is not the most academic but we do use a bit of math and CS.
Ok, I do have a proxy connection to jstor and other sites for my day job here. I will find other sources, the laborers union is almost third party. They are not selling anything.
Granite07 02:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
ASCE is a recognized Journal, the most prestigious in my field in fact! Where else would I source from? It is what we all aspire to publish in. Granite07 02:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
you should look up kaizen, continuous improvement, it is a concept they teach here. I guess it is hard to reconform to different rules, but I can create large batches and update if you prefere rather than many small batches. Granite07 02:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
do improve. I've shown you how to make your own personal workspace, have fun, and try updating the current article when your fixed-up one fits policy. Gscshoyru 02:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
...for the revert! Dppowell 02:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
The Purple Barnstar | ||
For suffering the slings and arrows and pies and midget cars and squirt-guns and (you get the point) collateral damage from the Clown Wars. Dreadstar † 07:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC) (Defender of Clownage) |
I am 88.87.6.72 but I forgot to log in. I wanted to delete some of MY oppinions in Talk:Blaqk_Audio which I consider to be not on the topic or the page doesn't need them... Xr 1 09:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps you should also block the other parties involved in this "edit war" as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.84.187.178 ( talk) 12:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
As per this: Gurch doesn't seem involved here; is the warning a mistake? Gscshoyru 13:21, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Please stop in to the talk page related to Fathers' Rights Movement before making any additional edits. I am working to remove bias from the article and am providing credible citations. In addition, I am discussing changes on the talk page. If you have questions about the edits, please discuss them on the talk page rather than deleting changes. Rogerfgay 15:46, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Nice editing man!
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
I, Alfred, award this barnstar to Gscshyru for his hard work against vandalism and on an extra note, thanks for the tip you gave me! :) Gunnerdevil4 01:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC) |
Shorthand for "Thanks for having my back, I have yours, lol". Good job! Ariel ♥ Gold 12:03, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thank you for preventing vandalism on Wikipedia pages. Very nice job! Keep up the good work! Ilyushka88 19:10, 26 October 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo 01:54, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
I did not remove material from talk page that was "Beltran" and now I have to restore it. El Jigue 208.65.188.149 19:37, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Amazing you are accusing me of removing the material that I inserted. That is not logical. El Jigue 208.65.188.149 20:02, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
In case you are curious, the script removal was due to User:Prckay1 trying to keep people from knowing he edits at User:99.224.49.238 (although him being autoblocked there makes it sort of obvious). It's going to be quite difficult to argue that they aren't the same person now. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 19:42, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry. New4321 19:55, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
For the revert. :) Acalamari 02:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
I must respectfully disagree with your removal of my paragraph on the vast hoax surrounding Drake's will. I caefully cross-referenced this to the perpetrator, who has his own article in Wikipedia which discusses the matter in depth, and included another reference to an article discussing The New Yorker piece on this scam. Thus, it is clearly referenced two different ways. If these links are satisfactory please return it; it's an amazing example of public gullibility. Richard Weil 04:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
You have no right to remove the factually get conflict article from my edit unprotected page. You suggested you placed it on another page. This is not your right to touch my talk page. -- Sagbliss 17:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
...it's gotten to the point where I can't do RC patrol anymore because of you and DerHexer. You're also the reason WP:AIV is backlogged so often. There's only one way to remedy this... interested in running for admin? :D east.718 at 19:23, 10/28/2007
Expand me! |
---|
|
On the Talk Page, I presented an argument for reinstatement. If you still believe that your reversions were the best course of action, then please provide support for that view.
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! Tiptoety 00:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
What the hell are you talking about?!Apples99 16:02, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm actually inclined to agree on this one. You're one of our best vandal fighters, Gscshoyru, but maybe a little too quick on the trigger this time. ;) Glass Cobra 16:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{ subst:Vangel}}! Triwbe 21:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Triwbe 21:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
The Zen Garden Award
Zen Garden Award for Infinite Patience | ||
This is for you as you already have many barnstars for stopping vandalsim. I noticed the Geography portal had gone and was panicing about how I was supposed to get it back and which version it should go back to. Next thing I knew, you and come along and fixed it which, of course calmed me down. While this award may not strictly have be given for infinate patience, it is for giving a newbie peace and I'm sure that's allowed. Thank you :) Nengscoz41620 02:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC) |
Hello, Gscshoyru! Happy Halloween! Cheers, Je t Lover ( Report a mistake) 00:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Please read the Wikipedia guidelines carefully.
I'm afraid I have reported you for edit warring. In future, please use the talk page before editing. 219.90.167.51 03:26, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for fixing my edit to Alison's talk page. -- Kyok o 04:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. The Preity Zinta article has recently achieved A-class status. Due to the wealth of support I have decided to now nominate for an FA class article which I believe and judging by the comments of others is pretty much up to. In my view it is better than some existing FA actor articles. I would therefore be very grateful if you could give it a final review in your own time and leave your comments and views at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Preity Zinta. Thankyou, your comments are always valuable. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 10:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
I reverted him twice. To block him myself would risk being improper. IrishGuy talk 18:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For all your anti-vandlism work. Tiddly-Tom 19:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC) |
AngelOfSadness
talk has given you a cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Cheers for the talkpage revert. :D AngelOfSadness talk 23:47, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
For that revert. :) Acalamari 03:29, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my page! I now give the two of you the RickK anti-vandalism barnstar! - Go od sh op ed 23:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC) |
Yes, it does suck. I have to wait until I'm autoconfirmed again. EoL talk 00:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
For the barnstar, and for jumping in when the editor needed clarification and I had already bolted. -- Vary | Talk 01:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, could you please assist in reverting the vandalism of Animal ? I would do it myself but I would prefer an experienced Wikipedia editor restore it to the most correct version. 165.145.220.201 12:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Why are the facts being reverted on the X-Files page? The new X-Files movie has been officially confirmed by Twentieth Century Fox, yet the article is constantly being reverted back to a state whereby readers will assume that the new movie is simply speculative, when in fact it isn't. I have repeatedly attempted to clarify the situation and article yet for some reason a few members would prefer that the content and facts remain unclear! The new movie has been officially confirmed! It is not speculative, so why not make that clear on the WIKIPEDIA ENCYCLOPEDIA? 210.54.245.44 22:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the vandal watch on my talk page. Arthur 01:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
i lost my password, how do i set a new one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.98.237 ( talk • contribs)
How do I set up a userpage like yours, with the pictures and saying things about the user? Niartnogaw 20:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about the unconstructive editing. I was worried about spanish wiki users not being able to understand..
Is there a way I could help with this in another area? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SayUnclePal ( talk • contribs) 20:35, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
...for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Jauerback 20:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry that the FBI and numerous major news organizations are not good enough for you, exactly what type of source meets your high standards? Honestly, you show a lot of bias here, and it's pretty obvious. There are some Banditos and groupies that wish to sugar coat (would that be coke or meth?) their history (you seem to fall into this group), but the fact is, the article is not accurate and it's people like you that are allowing this to continue. I *will* take it to arbitration if when I add a section on "Illegal Activities" you or your associates remove it without proper discussion and valid reasons. Proxy User 22:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
71.62.216.87 has been trying to insert himself into an ARBCOM, working diligently to try to provoke reactions from parties. You again came to help.
FWIW Bzuk 15:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC).
Blocked now. What was that all about???? [6] - Alison ❤ 20:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Is User:Minaturelovegod the same guy? He seems to have exceedingly similar editing patterns. Glass Cobra 21:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Please, do send me an e.mail at the following address MXSLA@yahoo.co.uk and explain to me why are you spoiling the article about the SATAMKAR family. Do you have a better knowledge about this subject (Bene Israel) that I have after 17 years of researches ? Does it bother you to have the name Satamkar written in Marathi. Which rights do you have on the photographs, some of them are my PRIVATE PROPERTY and others have been given to me ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mxsla ( talk • contribs) 03:14, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
That bot was being retarded so I wrote some stuff. I would like it if you please tell me what I did wrong. Thank You What ever it is Idid not want to trouble for me Ilovebirtbikes 13:06, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 13:06, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
You are totally wrong. What are you the wikipolice. Look that bot was wrong. Ilovebirtbikes 13:12, 11 November 2007 (UTC)IlovedirtbikesIlovebirtbikes 13:12, 11 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilovebirtbikes ( talk • contribs)
Look I have nothing against that user. So I dont know where you got that i thought he was nasty. Because i never thought that. please get you information right next time and dont acuse someone of saying something they haven't. you sure are acting like the police Ilovebirtbikes 13:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 13:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
the way you put it you made it sound like you said I called him nasty Ilovebirtbikes 13:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 13:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
What? I dont understand Ilovebirtbikes 13:51, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 13:51, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. lets drop the whole sudject on me changing the user page. okay? Ilovebirtbikes 13:54, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 13:54, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes I do. Ilovebirtbikes 14:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 14:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
y r u reverting my edits.
Also u call urself an advanced mathematician but sum to infinity of 1/i^2 is C2 (AS maths) AVA rulez 14:15, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Can I Block People? Ilovebirtbikes 22:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 22:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks just wondering Ilovebirtbikes 22:35, 11 November 2007 (UTC)IlovedirtbikesIlovebirtbikes 22:35, 11 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilovebirtbikes ( talk • contribs)
WHY are you sending me something about DAVID Ilovebirtbikes 22:39, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 22:39, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
I understand but why did you send the article to me of all people. Do you lke blaming me for things? Ilovebirtbikes 12:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 12:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
What do you mean I made the page!? I cant even find the page about David F. Ilovebirtbikes 12:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Ilovedirtbikes Ilovebirtbikes 12:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
No problem, CHQ beat me to the block button by about three seconds. east.718 at 02:04, 11/12/2007
Would you like me to nominate you to be an admin? NHRHS2010 talk 03:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
You posted on my discussion i should not attack others pages. This is fine with me, but please tell Dragonflysixtyseven and other administrators to attack all the edits that I have made on Wikipedia and my pages. Thank You. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Camoq ( talk • contribs) 03:26, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I'm sure it was unintentional, but you reverted a legitimate edit to Mars and labeled it as vandalism. The user who made the edit was attempting to fix a "broken" link in the reference section. It's usually a good idea to check the edits before reverting. Kindest regards, AlphaEta T / C 14:28, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
for reverting vandalism on my userpage! By the way, I find the editing pattern of that IP quite intriguing for a newcomer - what do you think? Of course, it could just be somebody who took offence. No more bongos 18:16, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the helpful info. 76.16.120.27 01:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC) Thank you. Niartnogaw 01:54, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
It is NOT me that is in a "revert war" (and I object to your characterization of it as such). There is ample evidence that POV issues exist. By continuing to remove the POV tag you are in fact VANDALIZING the article. Please stop, or I will make a formal complaint. 75.172.38.233 02:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I have opened a sockpuppetry case against User:WiccaWeb and his puppets (including 75.172.38.233 and Proxy User) for their actions on the article and its talk page. Thought you should know. Also, please accept my thanks for patrolling this article. Have a wiki day! Mmoyer 03:54, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Proxy User, et al, have been asked to provide concrete evidence of POV no fewer than eight times and can or will not do so. Though I applaud your patience and clear Good Faith in dealing with them, perhaps it is time for WP:DNFTT. Cheers! Mmoyer 22:43, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Um, I would think that digg would be a reliable source for events pertaining to digg. And as far as notability? I assumed that the actual size and scope of the hoax, not to mention the importance of the hoax's subject, would make it notable. Wikilost 00:34, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
[7] NHRHS2010 talk 01:44, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
I gave an f'n source. It proves notability. Um, why do you keep removing it? Tilting their heads slightly to the left 14:31, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Hopefully this helps. -- Flyguy649 talk 01:39, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm seeing what else we can do about this clown hater. Dreadstar † 21:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
I've stumbled across something that reminds me of the viral marketing campaign 'Ethan Haas was wrong' and I'm not sure if it is notable enough for a wikipedia article. Also, I am not experienced enough at all to make an aricle about it. Here's some of the links I've found about something called "The List Incorporated"... http://whatistli.blogspot.com/ and http://LYBRI3RPI.blogspot.com/. So if you think it's notable enough for an article feel free to make one. -Benji coses.art@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benji williamson ( talk • contribs) 08:27, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you were the one who introduced me to the requirement of citation for a claim that has been challenged. Am I off base here: Talk:Sam#Primarily_a_male_given_name in thinking that the claim I have disputed should not be returned until it is sourced?
Am I wrong? Or am I just encountering stubbornness? I tried being bold, I got reverted, so I tried discussion and referring to policy and I got reverted. Well I don't want to edit war, but I do dispute the fact in question as being dubious at best. I really do not want the readers of Wikipedia to be misinformed. Sam Barsoom ( talk) 16:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
I have been a resident in Clearview, Wa for 20+ years. I think that I am able to use myself as a resource for the information I am posting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khorn12345 ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for the revert on my user page. Clearly, that anonymous user is confused about how things work around here, so I will not take offense at his actions. At any rate, I appreciate the revert, and the message you left on his talk page. Cheers! --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 17:20, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! -- Cheeser1 ( talk) 20:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
A request for comments has been filed concerning the conduct of RodentofDeath ( talk · contribs). You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/RodentofDeath. / edg ☺ ☭ 20:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
I am currently in negotiations with The JPS ( talk · contribs) that may interest you. 91.108.194.137 ( talk) 23:39, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the heads up, thank you for resolving the problem too. Timothy Neilen ( talk) 04:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support. LanceBarber ( talk) 04:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your comment at the talk page of the user who made personal attacks in response my deletion of his trivial edit. If that sort of thing bothered me I would not have become a Wikipedian! Viewfinder ( talk) 10:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
i understand where the template goes now. sorry for the stupid mistake. i thought i did put it on the talk page. i asked for further clarification on the COI page but i no longer need it. thanks for your help. RodentofDeath ( talk) 18:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
I don't know if this is the right place to put this, (Your page is very hard to navigate around), but I need your attention. I have to require information I have lost... —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThegreatWakkorati ( talk • contribs) 10:35, 28 November 2007
Hello G, there is a person who is removing what I write on his talk page and on another persons talk page. His user name is Baegis. He removed it on his talk page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Baegis and at another person page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Orangemarlin Is he allowed to remove what I write many times like he did? Thank you-- Persianhistory2008 ( talk) 00:22, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Admining at this time of night is never a good idea and you have my sincere apologies for the incorrect block placed on your account by myself. Please feel free to trout as necessary. Regards, GDonato ( talk) 00:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for intruding, but I'd like to suggest that you let the guy you converse with at Talk:Pi have his misconceptions in peace. He's either a semi-clever troll or an honest crank, but in either case it's a waste of time to try to make him see the light. Otherwise, I imagine, you will soon need to prove in detail that any corner of an equilateral triangle is 60 degrees, and so on and so forth all the way down to the parallel postulate, which your opponent will then denounce as a shallow lie that orthodox mathematicians perpetrate for various ill-defined but clearly nefarious purposes. At some point one just has to stop responding, perhaps citing Goodwin's law. – Henning Makholm 04:31, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I have filed a request for mediation on the Human Trafficking in Angeles article and you are invited to comment. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Human_trafficking_in_Angeles_City. Susanbryce 15:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Hy,you have 4 sources of Macedonians in Hellas(Greece) on discussion page,can you please put the numbers on the article of ethnic of ethnic Macedonians.I will soon put in new sources of macedonians in World. Thanks Makedonij 18:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
What a collection of Barnstars! I'm flabbergasted, intimidated, in awe..
Thanks for stopping by my user page. You left such a polite message that at first I believed it was machine generated :-) You write that contributors should take pains to produce references (I'm paraphrasing). How can I argue with that? In this case though I'm somewhat at a loss..
To begin, I'm not quite sure whether you were refering to my >>nignog<< remark, or was it the philological addition? Since the philological included an example (a reference of sorts), I guess it was the nignog. Unfortunately here, as with many other topics, it can be difficult to produce a formal reference apart from years of living experience - in this case in the UK. [Hmm. Come to think of it I do believe I heard the term used in a film; but it was an ephemeral piece, and I'll be darned if I can remember the title].
Perhaps I can encourage you to discover an insouciant sympathy for my position by inviting you to reconsider many of the natural day-to-day elements of the social life where you live. Take, say, an idiosyncratic way which small town chinese storekeepers might have of greeting an unfamiliar customer (not sure why I thought of that, except that its common enough to be a familiar part of life, while, still being recondite enough to pose a challenge in finding a reference). Whether or not small town chinese storekeepers have characteristic ways about them where you live (Ni hao. Cash cash no take checques..) I believe you can imagine something of this sort which everyone in your community would recognise and agree with, but which can be vexingly difficult to formally reference.
Hopefully this makes my point..
Stop by anytime and let me know what you think.. Warm regards, -- Philopedia 01:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Now that's one persistent sock. Maybe this needs to be taken to check user for a range block. Spellcast 02:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Hmmm. Actually, I did not make changes to another editor's post, but I have no explanation for what happened. I did get an edit conflict notice, but I thought I handles it properly. No clue.-- Cberlet ( talk) 03:47, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for rv vandalism of my page, Jimfbleak ( talk) 07:24, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
I don't think this an irrelevent change? I'm commenting in agreement of a preexisting topic about deleting of nonnotable content.
I'm stating my reasons why I agree with the author on the freaking talk page. You have absoultely no reason to stop me from stating my opinion on a preexisting discussion about whether or not how pages are deleted is fair on the talk page.
Please explain howyou can delete my comment without reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.25.41.35 ( talk • contribs)
And how is it that you can ban someone by IP address? Does this not then prohibit free access to Wiki due to public/work computers that share internet access?
Thank you for reverting vandalism to my user page. :-) Best regards, Hús ö nd 20:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
And for your other excellent anti-vandal work. :D delldot talk 07:09, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
A user you gave a final warning has just vandalized the Canada article. I don't know how to take the next steps for blocking.-- Gregalton ( talk) 22:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting vandalism to my talk page. Vandal's indef blocked now. Regards, Hús ö nd 21:58, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello Gscshoyru. I've been witnessing your superb work here on Wikipedia and wonder if you would be interested in becoming an administrator. If you are, and if you need a nominator, I hereby offer myself for the task. Best regards, Hús ö nd 17:57, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my userpage! Keep up the good work! :) - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 22:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello Gscshoyru, you have helped edit some of my work when I first started out on Wikipedia, and was hoping you could review my latest article I have added on the Toloy Foundation Charity. Im looking for guidence and suggestions on how I could improve the article and my editing skills. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuloy_Foundation. Your advice would be appreciated, kindest regards. Susanbryce ( talk) 19:57, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Gscshoyru, appreciate that, due to some earlier difficulties I had on articles, Im actively trying to seek out several experienced Editors who can review my work in the future and offer some guidence. If you can think of anyone that can be of help in reviewing some of my work, pls let me know, kindest regards. Susanbryce ( talk) 20:14, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
First of all I did not use Twinkle. Second of all you should try reading my reasons for editing: "Proselytising is not a defensible use of Wikipedia resources" and that is what that userbox is doing. That userbox has already been deleted in the past (see Template:User evol-4). 172.165.79.155 ( talk) 01:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Also see Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/userbox templates concerning beliefs and convictions. 172.165.79.155 ( talk) 01:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
{{deleteduserbox}}
')It should be deleted. As for a couple of my other edits why would you transclude a userbox with parameters if one without parameters already exists? And why would you keep a barely used template? 172.165.79.155 ( talk) 01:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
User:Johnpseudo, you will be
blocked from editing.
Gscshoyru (
talk)
02:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Note that the IP user quacks rather clearly to be User:PatPeter evading a block. I've blocked the IP accordingly. Per rules on block/ban evasion, please feel free to revert all the IPs edits. - jc37 03:04, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
How is it vandalism? 172.164.199.13 ( talk) 17:32, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
And you know that damn well, get your head out of your ass. Step down from your pedestal and stop vandalizing Wikipedia. 172.166.222.171 ( talk) 18:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)