This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
CBS Copyright © 1974 Loving You Thomas J Mitchell. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.101.3.64 ( talk) 14:20, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Hmm? Could you please elaborate on how or what won't help? - Laniala ( talk) 19:56, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
When I initially put together this list four years ago, I was inspired by Gerry A.'s episode guide:
http://www.oocities.org/mrbeaverfalls/guide.html
Notice how he has all the episodes listed in production order? I wanted to do the same thing. Hell, most, if not all Mr. Belvedere airings in syndication, were in production order. Plus, I prefer using that kind of formatting for the episode guide, than the typical table format. I think it makes the list of each episode much more linear, and easier to understand.
Ergo, the only way I think you and I can resolve this dispute is this: To let me keep the formatting, and production order arrangement, and for you to delete any tidbits that you feel may be either too trivial, and/or not enough research.
What do you say to that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vnisanian2001 ( talk • contribs) 05:56, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Hui (secret society) is dab'd from Hui people, but I messed up when I tried to put one there. Does it need it?
-- Pawyilee ( talk) 15:48, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I'm happy to delete your sub-pages, but they don't need so many tags: for anything in your own user space {{ db-user}} (or, even shorter, {{ db-u1}}) is sufficient. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 18:59, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
George, I know I told you that I would try to look over your drafts this week. Unfortunately, I have several pressing issues with which to deal IRL right now. It may be a while longer before I have the chance to review them, but I promise I'll get to it! Thanks for your patience. Joefromrandb ( talk) 03:07, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Your edit summary, which stated "per talk with Lemonade51, List of Cheers episodes#ep207. Clearly, even with accolades, this episode's inherent notability and notability itself are not strong enough for a stand-alone article" implied that he agreed with the decision that it should be redirected, when in fact he stated that "I intended to expand the article at the time of creating it but unfortunately never had the time to do so." at User_talk:Lemonade51#Woody_Interruptus. Although he consented, I think he disagreed. He included sources, which it sounds like he intends to incorporate. Basically, I interpret his statement as saying that he believes that the episode has inherent notability. Given its significant awards, it should be a stand-alone article in my eyes. What was your point with the redirect. It is one of the most highly decorated episodes in television.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 22:35, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
I have moved the season/episode drives and updated Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/to do.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 14:37, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish by "anchoring" the names of pricing games? Thanks. JTRH ( talk) 17:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Desperate Women has been nominated for speedy deletion as an obviously unnecessary disambiguation page, as it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either:
See Criteria G6. Senator2029 ( talk) 13:41, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
On 3 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Inch by Inch (film), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that one reviewer called the subway scene of the gay pornographic film Inch by Inch a blend of " realism and 'classical cinema'"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Inch by Inch (film).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Discussed here. So will be reverting. -- Lemonade51 ( talk) 20:33, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
As a recent contributor to List of Friends episodes you are invited to a discussion at Talk:List of Friends episodes#Disputed changes, which is discussing recent changes that involve replacement of transclusion with custom tables. Thank you. -- AussieLegend ( talk) 01:53, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
On 5 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Boys in the Bar, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the coming out of real-life gay former baseball player Glenn Burke inspired the Cheers episode " The Boys in the Bar"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Boys in the Bar.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Panyd The muffin is not subtle 08:04, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
I really didn't want to confuse the issue for The Rambling Man any further so I thought I'd bring this here. At the FLC discussion, there were concerns over bolding the episode titles, so I was going to change "|Title=
" in the episode lists to "|AltTitle=
" until the template was fixed. This was mainly because The Rambling Man didn't seem to want to wait for the template changes and was using non-compliance with
MOS:BOLD as a reason not to use the template. However, when I looked at the versions of the article using the custom tables that were acceptable to those at the FLC,
[1]
[2] none of the episode titles were inside quotes, so I decided to use "|RTitle=
" instead, naturally assuming that's what was preferred. Matthewedwards then said the titles had to be in quotes,
[3] and I explained why I hadn't done so
here. This is the diff that The Rambling Man provided on the episode list's talk page. --
AussieLegend (
talk)
05:23, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
George, I have no problem reopening and relisting RMs when the nominator or anyone else asks me too. But, I do hesitate to weigh-in with any interim rationale other than the request for doing so. The assumption for relisting always is the thought that further discussion may change to current level of consensus or lack thereof, although it rarely does. I also refrain from reclosing any RM that I reopen. Another admin will have to evaluate this one. -- Mike Cline ( talk) 16:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Please familiarise yourself with page protection best practices before making further requests at WP:RFPP. I've declined all three of your requests today. Protection is usually not used pre-emptively, and talkpages are only protected in exceptional circumstances (and these do not include a perceived lack of usefulness in commentary or random suspicions of sockpuppetry for which you have no proof); additionally, protection should never be used to "encourage" an IP editor to register—they have every right to edit without an account. Maxim (talk) 19:23, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
In your message on my talk page, you asked: "What must this image be?" I don't understand the question. — Quicksilver T @ 21:22, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
On 13 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The One Hundredth, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Phoebe Buffay's childbirth scenes in the Friends episode " The One Hundredth" were created using actual childbirth footage, dolls, and real-life triplets coated with grape jelly? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The One Hundredth.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 08:03, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Josh Byrne Brendan Lambert Step by Step.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:43, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Magog the Ogre ( talk) 02:23, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi there George Ho, thanks very much for your helpful formatting! Quick query, could you please clarify at your comment here, if the proposal happens to not be withdrawn, if your stance should be read as "Keep" or just "withdraw" ? Thank you for your time, — Cirt ( talk) 18:05, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
I think it might by time for you to leave this user alone. If you have serious concerns, file an RfC/U and see if you can get someone else to certify it, but your interactions on his talk page are starting to look like borderline harassment. I know you have several mentors. Perhaps now would be a good time to ask them what they think about your interactions with JHunterJ. AniMate 17:05, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
In Talk:The End of the Innocence (album), he calls Noetica's comments rhetoric; was he correct saying that? Also, look at WT:Disambiguation. Also, look at his comments in Talk:It's Great to Be Alive (film). What do you think? -- George Ho ( talk) 17:49, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Moreover, Talk:All That Jazz (film) proves that sometimes consensus changes within one day after JHunterJ made closure on first move. -- George Ho ( talk) 17:52, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Was Hunter right or wrong about making comments about Noetica's comments without some explicit proof, such as calling them "hypocritical", "Orwellian", and stuff in WT:Disambiguation? -- George Ho ( talk) 18:53, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
OK, in my opinion, this "discussion" is heading in the "not-so-fruitful" direction.
If you think that an RfC should be started concerning JhunterJ's closures, then start one, and see what the rest of the community thinks. (See Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct for more info on starting one.)
If you have would like jhunterj to explain/clarify a closure, then ask him about that close specifically. Otherwise, I think User:AniMate has a point that maybe you should steer clear of jhunterj at this point.
I of course welcome others' thoughts on this. - jc37 19:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Must I take this first to either WP:village pump (proposal) or WP:village pump (idea lab)? The proposal is becoming obscure and unnoticed lately. -- George Ho ( talk) 04:17, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
— David Levy 00:42, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
THIS NOTICE MUST BE DISREGARDED. THE ARTICLE IS KEPT BECAUSE THE SUBJECT OF THIS ARTICLE IS ASSERTED TO BE NOTABLE. Thank you, George Ho ( talk) 19:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Bu liao qing (song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit
the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact
one of these administrators to request that the administrator
userfy the page or email a copy to you.
Ankit Maity
Talk
Contribs
06:52, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
I'm new :waves: I need some help. I need a neutral 3rd part to resolve an editing issue here with Hullaballoo Wolfowitz here --> Jessicka My point: "Art Slant, [4] Juxtapoz, [5][ Supacute, [6] Coagula Art Journal, [7] & Hi- Fructose [8] are all reputable 3rd party Art sources. Saying these articles are written by friends is purely speculation on your part. Jessicka's wiki page clearly states that she's an artist. Listing past art shows with 3rd party references is just like listing the albums she's released as a musician in her discography. Both are wiki relevant & significant"
{{
trout}}
In recognition of your siding with a long-term disruptive user without, apparently, taking the few moments necessary to properly review the situation.
Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (
talk)
18:32, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
LET'S WAIT UNTIL REPORT IN WP:BLPN IS RESOLVED. -- George Ho ( talk) 06:13, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
I don't think the statistics prove anything, as the rationale said. Shall I take this to the WP:AN then? -- George Ho ( talk) 09:02, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Re: the double DYK? submission that you moved to May 28th with this edit: It appears your move was in error since both articles were moved to mainspace on May 31st, Sarkinite with this edit and Arsenoclasite with this edit. I admit I am puzzled by your stated rationale of "Under DYK rules, even history logs of editing under userspace count." since the editing history of Sarkinite shows that it only existed as a draft prior to being moved into article-space on May 31 (the date that the nominator had first placed the nomination in). If I've misunderstood something about your rationale or the situation, please let me know here. Thanks, Shearonink ( talk) 15:09, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
On 2 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Titanic 2020: Cannibal City, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Titanic 2020: Cannibal City is a sequel to the apocalyptical fiction, Titanic 2020? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Titanic 2020: Cannibal City. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 08:05, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
I want to summarize this in the Sam Malone article: http://www.grudge-match.com/History/sam-fonz.shtml. -- George Ho ( talk) 00:17, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Lunigiana revolt at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Secretlondon ( talk) 19:58, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1973 Susan Strasberg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — innotata 15:11, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
On 13 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bloke (word), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the use of bloke, a slang term for a man, has inspired "First Bloke", a male variant of " First Lady"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bloke (word). If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 08:05, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
An arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Perth. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Perth/Evidence. Please add your evidence by August 18, 2012, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Perth/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Lord Roem ( talk) 18:09, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, George, having had a poke around after posting on AN, I thought I'd drop a note on your talk page. If you need someone to just bounce ideas off or to get an interpretation of something, feel free to drop a question on my talk page. I'm not the most familiar with all the little subtleties of policies but I'd be happy to give you my take on things if you think I'll be of help. Blackmane ( talk) 17:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for approving the hook. But I still don't understand the April Fools comment, or even if it is an insult. Am I stupid? Smetanahue ( talk) 18:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
oh yeah i have a slow connection so your talk page takes a long time to load. i don't know if you know that. :) ~~`~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnJeanBartiste ( talk • contribs) 08:20, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Manfred von Richthofen (General) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Note: George, I'm sorry; I thought you would have noticed the latest comment. I should have posted this here long ago. BlueMoonset ( talk) 20:38, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
On 25 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lunigiana revolt, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the anarchist Lunigiana revolt was quashed by the use of summary executions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lunigiana revolt. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Yngvadottir ( talk) 16:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Below are messages of blocked user, JohnJeanBartiste, who is suspected as a sockpuppet of Bouket. Please either skip or proceed with caution. -- George Ho ( talk) 20:27, 26 June 2012 (UTC) |
thank you for the welcome. i didnt know about archive but i will look into it. i use wikipedia for research mostly and whenever something is in there that is inaccurate i remove it because that is a major problem. beyond my ken seems to think this isnt a valid way to contribute to the site. is that true? at the same time he removed some of my actual contributions and has a problem with my account being new. JohnJeanBartiste ( talk) 05:56, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
sorry, i don't know what to say. i felt that ken was stalking me so it is strange that he thinks i was stalking him? i never saw him before today and he went through my contributions and undid many of them. he says they didn't have references but some did. and you know he put in that fake death date for that guy. so he wasn't paying attention but i wish i knew why he got angry at me to begin with. i'm sorry to cause all this trouble, i don't know what to do now. i feel he will revert every change i do now. but thank you so much for your help. i am a little confused about something. in ken's comment he said he removed what some of my contributions because they didn't have references. i think they did but will have to check again. if they didn't i am sure they are easy to find through google because that is how i knew to add it. i am not sure how him removing those things i added is different from me removing things from a page because the references did not confirm they were true. i am being sincere so if i am missing something, i hope it is not too problematic for you to explain what it is. JohnJeanBartiste ( talk) 06:32, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
i know i said a lot so if you want i can just find one change i am confused about and we can discuss that. but now i am wary of making any changes anymore. JohnJeanBartiste ( talk) 06:33, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thank you. there are some other changes i think were ok but i want to ask you about them if you don't mind. if there is something wrong with them, maybe i am missing something. JohnJeanBartiste ( talk) 06:45, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
i will never contact ken again. the only reason i did was because out of nowhere he reverted a lot of my edits with no explanation. you can see it in his contribs. JohnJeanBartiste ( talk) 06:47, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Keep away from me, Bouket/JJB, you've already been warned by at least three administrators. Proceed at your own risk. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 08:19, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
On 27 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Manfred von Richthofen (general), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that General Manfred von Richthofen, like the air ace who was named after him and was his great-nephew, was awarded the " Blue Max" for his service in World War I? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Manfred von Richthofen (General). If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Yngvadottir ( talk) 16:03, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
— David Levy 16:25, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Awun ( talk) 16:42, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
I saw you moved recent edits from the talkpage of Template:Very long. I will not speculate on the question whether you did this to prevent visitor of the Rfc to see the previous discussion where you withdraw your proposal. I will just say that you should not archive recent discussions. And on a template talkpage "recent" can be a lot longer than on talkpage of certain articles, so I restored all 2012 content. Debresser ( talk) 22:23, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
On 7 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Show Where Sam Shows Up, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the bartender and the psychiatrist were good ol' mates in Boston and are still good ol' mates in Seattle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Show Where Sam Shows Up. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 00:06, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
George, I was wondering why your name was listed as the nominator of this DYK with a DYKnom template, since it looks like Figureskatingfan self-nominated the article, including creating the initial template. I didn't want to remove the DYKnom template without checking with you first. Thanks. (I'll check back here for any response; no need to leave anything on my talk page.) BlueMoonset ( talk) 15:12, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Siawase ( talk) 21:36, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
I have nominated Bloke (word) for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloke (word) per my close at Talk:Bloke#Bloke is broke., a discussion in which you participated. Cunard ( talk) 19:43, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
The point is that nobody can possibly have an image of the character that doesn't originate with the network, as the chances of a WP editor getting on set and being permitted to take a nonfree photo of the actor in character are so small that we don't worry about them. We permit nonfree images of characters to be used instead of out-of-character images of the actor; see featured article Jack Sparrow for an example. Either we use an image from the network, or we go against previous practise and reduce the quality of the article by demanding only an image of the actor himself, or we seriously damage the article by using no image at all. Nyttend ( talk) 17:34, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. You were involved with Template:Did you know nominations/Patrick Awuah Jr. Can you revisit the nomination so we can move it along? :) Thanks. -- LauraHale ( talk) 03:24, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi! I don't think I asked you before so here I go:
There is a lot of files in Category:Public domain files ineligible for copyright (and sub categories) there should be checked. It may result in a lot of Ffd and Puf work. It should be easy once you know what to do but it will take a lot of time.
I was thinking that step 1 would be to find decide if the file is usefull. If not it should be nominated for deletion. If it is usefull next step is to find out if it has the right license or it should be fair use. If it is free then the description should be fixed (links to the relevant article(s) would also be nice) and the file could be marked as ok for Commons.
If you want to give it a try I suggest that you check 10, 20 or 50 files and then I check your work. If it looks ok you could get a free pass (if you need that?) to work on those files and send files to Ffd or Puf untill you have send 20(?) files to Ffd/Puf. If that looks good you could add another 20 and if they are also ok you could add 50 etc... We could ofcourse also send hundreds of files there but last time I did that many users complained there were to many at one time... -- MGA73 ( talk) 17:38, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Redirects are not subject to the file-dependent speedy deletion criteria. Nyttend ( talk) 18:00, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Christopher Castile Beethoven Ted Newton 1993.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.
Skier Dude (
talk)
04:09, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
The photo was removed by vandal. Please disregard this notice. -- George Ho ( talk) 04:16, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
On 1 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Showdown (Cheers), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that, after low first-run viewership, the Nielsen ratings of Cheers improved during the summer between the finale of the first season and the second season premiere? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:03, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Zai shui yi fang (1975 album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. mabdul 23:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
any news ones due for creation with notability? Woody's wedding (long episode) and the proposal and SMalone v. Chambers? Give me a heads up if your up for any. Lihaas ( talk) 12:55, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Dream Team (pornographic film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Secretlondon ( talk) 21:57, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ace Attorney Gyakuten Saiban DS.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:02, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
I actually disagree with the nomination for deletion. I think the image of the two actresses on the series, taken with the importance of the storyline has to the series contributes to explaining the article via a visual representation. FrickFrack 02:51, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
CBS Copyright © 1974 Loving You Thomas J Mitchell. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.101.3.64 ( talk) 14:20, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Hmm? Could you please elaborate on how or what won't help? - Laniala ( talk) 19:56, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
When I initially put together this list four years ago, I was inspired by Gerry A.'s episode guide:
http://www.oocities.org/mrbeaverfalls/guide.html
Notice how he has all the episodes listed in production order? I wanted to do the same thing. Hell, most, if not all Mr. Belvedere airings in syndication, were in production order. Plus, I prefer using that kind of formatting for the episode guide, than the typical table format. I think it makes the list of each episode much more linear, and easier to understand.
Ergo, the only way I think you and I can resolve this dispute is this: To let me keep the formatting, and production order arrangement, and for you to delete any tidbits that you feel may be either too trivial, and/or not enough research.
What do you say to that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vnisanian2001 ( talk • contribs) 05:56, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Hui (secret society) is dab'd from Hui people, but I messed up when I tried to put one there. Does it need it?
-- Pawyilee ( talk) 15:48, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I'm happy to delete your sub-pages, but they don't need so many tags: for anything in your own user space {{ db-user}} (or, even shorter, {{ db-u1}}) is sufficient. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 18:59, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
George, I know I told you that I would try to look over your drafts this week. Unfortunately, I have several pressing issues with which to deal IRL right now. It may be a while longer before I have the chance to review them, but I promise I'll get to it! Thanks for your patience. Joefromrandb ( talk) 03:07, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Your edit summary, which stated "per talk with Lemonade51, List of Cheers episodes#ep207. Clearly, even with accolades, this episode's inherent notability and notability itself are not strong enough for a stand-alone article" implied that he agreed with the decision that it should be redirected, when in fact he stated that "I intended to expand the article at the time of creating it but unfortunately never had the time to do so." at User_talk:Lemonade51#Woody_Interruptus. Although he consented, I think he disagreed. He included sources, which it sounds like he intends to incorporate. Basically, I interpret his statement as saying that he believes that the episode has inherent notability. Given its significant awards, it should be a stand-alone article in my eyes. What was your point with the redirect. It is one of the most highly decorated episodes in television.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 22:35, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
I have moved the season/episode drives and updated Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/to do.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 14:37, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish by "anchoring" the names of pricing games? Thanks. JTRH ( talk) 17:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Desperate Women has been nominated for speedy deletion as an obviously unnecessary disambiguation page, as it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either:
See Criteria G6. Senator2029 ( talk) 13:41, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
On 3 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Inch by Inch (film), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that one reviewer called the subway scene of the gay pornographic film Inch by Inch a blend of " realism and 'classical cinema'"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Inch by Inch (film).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Discussed here. So will be reverting. -- Lemonade51 ( talk) 20:33, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
As a recent contributor to List of Friends episodes you are invited to a discussion at Talk:List of Friends episodes#Disputed changes, which is discussing recent changes that involve replacement of transclusion with custom tables. Thank you. -- AussieLegend ( talk) 01:53, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
On 5 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Boys in the Bar, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the coming out of real-life gay former baseball player Glenn Burke inspired the Cheers episode " The Boys in the Bar"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Boys in the Bar.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Panyd The muffin is not subtle 08:04, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
I really didn't want to confuse the issue for The Rambling Man any further so I thought I'd bring this here. At the FLC discussion, there were concerns over bolding the episode titles, so I was going to change "|Title=
" in the episode lists to "|AltTitle=
" until the template was fixed. This was mainly because The Rambling Man didn't seem to want to wait for the template changes and was using non-compliance with
MOS:BOLD as a reason not to use the template. However, when I looked at the versions of the article using the custom tables that were acceptable to those at the FLC,
[1]
[2] none of the episode titles were inside quotes, so I decided to use "|RTitle=
" instead, naturally assuming that's what was preferred. Matthewedwards then said the titles had to be in quotes,
[3] and I explained why I hadn't done so
here. This is the diff that The Rambling Man provided on the episode list's talk page. --
AussieLegend (
talk)
05:23, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
George, I have no problem reopening and relisting RMs when the nominator or anyone else asks me too. But, I do hesitate to weigh-in with any interim rationale other than the request for doing so. The assumption for relisting always is the thought that further discussion may change to current level of consensus or lack thereof, although it rarely does. I also refrain from reclosing any RM that I reopen. Another admin will have to evaluate this one. -- Mike Cline ( talk) 16:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Please familiarise yourself with page protection best practices before making further requests at WP:RFPP. I've declined all three of your requests today. Protection is usually not used pre-emptively, and talkpages are only protected in exceptional circumstances (and these do not include a perceived lack of usefulness in commentary or random suspicions of sockpuppetry for which you have no proof); additionally, protection should never be used to "encourage" an IP editor to register—they have every right to edit without an account. Maxim (talk) 19:23, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
In your message on my talk page, you asked: "What must this image be?" I don't understand the question. — Quicksilver T @ 21:22, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
On 13 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The One Hundredth, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Phoebe Buffay's childbirth scenes in the Friends episode " The One Hundredth" were created using actual childbirth footage, dolls, and real-life triplets coated with grape jelly? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The One Hundredth.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 08:03, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Josh Byrne Brendan Lambert Step by Step.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:43, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Magog the Ogre ( talk) 02:23, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi there George Ho, thanks very much for your helpful formatting! Quick query, could you please clarify at your comment here, if the proposal happens to not be withdrawn, if your stance should be read as "Keep" or just "withdraw" ? Thank you for your time, — Cirt ( talk) 18:05, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
I think it might by time for you to leave this user alone. If you have serious concerns, file an RfC/U and see if you can get someone else to certify it, but your interactions on his talk page are starting to look like borderline harassment. I know you have several mentors. Perhaps now would be a good time to ask them what they think about your interactions with JHunterJ. AniMate 17:05, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
In Talk:The End of the Innocence (album), he calls Noetica's comments rhetoric; was he correct saying that? Also, look at WT:Disambiguation. Also, look at his comments in Talk:It's Great to Be Alive (film). What do you think? -- George Ho ( talk) 17:49, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Moreover, Talk:All That Jazz (film) proves that sometimes consensus changes within one day after JHunterJ made closure on first move. -- George Ho ( talk) 17:52, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Was Hunter right or wrong about making comments about Noetica's comments without some explicit proof, such as calling them "hypocritical", "Orwellian", and stuff in WT:Disambiguation? -- George Ho ( talk) 18:53, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
OK, in my opinion, this "discussion" is heading in the "not-so-fruitful" direction.
If you think that an RfC should be started concerning JhunterJ's closures, then start one, and see what the rest of the community thinks. (See Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct for more info on starting one.)
If you have would like jhunterj to explain/clarify a closure, then ask him about that close specifically. Otherwise, I think User:AniMate has a point that maybe you should steer clear of jhunterj at this point.
I of course welcome others' thoughts on this. - jc37 19:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Must I take this first to either WP:village pump (proposal) or WP:village pump (idea lab)? The proposal is becoming obscure and unnoticed lately. -- George Ho ( talk) 04:17, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
— David Levy 00:42, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
THIS NOTICE MUST BE DISREGARDED. THE ARTICLE IS KEPT BECAUSE THE SUBJECT OF THIS ARTICLE IS ASSERTED TO BE NOTABLE. Thank you, George Ho ( talk) 19:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Bu liao qing (song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit
the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact
one of these administrators to request that the administrator
userfy the page or email a copy to you.
Ankit Maity
Talk
Contribs
06:52, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
I'm new :waves: I need some help. I need a neutral 3rd part to resolve an editing issue here with Hullaballoo Wolfowitz here --> Jessicka My point: "Art Slant, [4] Juxtapoz, [5][ Supacute, [6] Coagula Art Journal, [7] & Hi- Fructose [8] are all reputable 3rd party Art sources. Saying these articles are written by friends is purely speculation on your part. Jessicka's wiki page clearly states that she's an artist. Listing past art shows with 3rd party references is just like listing the albums she's released as a musician in her discography. Both are wiki relevant & significant"
{{
trout}}
In recognition of your siding with a long-term disruptive user without, apparently, taking the few moments necessary to properly review the situation.
Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (
talk)
18:32, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
LET'S WAIT UNTIL REPORT IN WP:BLPN IS RESOLVED. -- George Ho ( talk) 06:13, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
I don't think the statistics prove anything, as the rationale said. Shall I take this to the WP:AN then? -- George Ho ( talk) 09:02, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Re: the double DYK? submission that you moved to May 28th with this edit: It appears your move was in error since both articles were moved to mainspace on May 31st, Sarkinite with this edit and Arsenoclasite with this edit. I admit I am puzzled by your stated rationale of "Under DYK rules, even history logs of editing under userspace count." since the editing history of Sarkinite shows that it only existed as a draft prior to being moved into article-space on May 31 (the date that the nominator had first placed the nomination in). If I've misunderstood something about your rationale or the situation, please let me know here. Thanks, Shearonink ( talk) 15:09, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
On 2 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Titanic 2020: Cannibal City, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Titanic 2020: Cannibal City is a sequel to the apocalyptical fiction, Titanic 2020? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Titanic 2020: Cannibal City. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 08:05, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
I want to summarize this in the Sam Malone article: http://www.grudge-match.com/History/sam-fonz.shtml. -- George Ho ( talk) 00:17, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Lunigiana revolt at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Secretlondon ( talk) 19:58, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1973 Susan Strasberg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — innotata 15:11, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
On 13 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bloke (word), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the use of bloke, a slang term for a man, has inspired "First Bloke", a male variant of " First Lady"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bloke (word). If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 08:05, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
An arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Perth. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Perth/Evidence. Please add your evidence by August 18, 2012, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Perth/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Lord Roem ( talk) 18:09, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, George, having had a poke around after posting on AN, I thought I'd drop a note on your talk page. If you need someone to just bounce ideas off or to get an interpretation of something, feel free to drop a question on my talk page. I'm not the most familiar with all the little subtleties of policies but I'd be happy to give you my take on things if you think I'll be of help. Blackmane ( talk) 17:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for approving the hook. But I still don't understand the April Fools comment, or even if it is an insult. Am I stupid? Smetanahue ( talk) 18:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
oh yeah i have a slow connection so your talk page takes a long time to load. i don't know if you know that. :) ~~`~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnJeanBartiste ( talk • contribs) 08:20, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Manfred von Richthofen (General) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Note: George, I'm sorry; I thought you would have noticed the latest comment. I should have posted this here long ago. BlueMoonset ( talk) 20:38, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
On 25 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lunigiana revolt, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the anarchist Lunigiana revolt was quashed by the use of summary executions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lunigiana revolt. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Yngvadottir ( talk) 16:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Below are messages of blocked user, JohnJeanBartiste, who is suspected as a sockpuppet of Bouket. Please either skip or proceed with caution. -- George Ho ( talk) 20:27, 26 June 2012 (UTC) |
thank you for the welcome. i didnt know about archive but i will look into it. i use wikipedia for research mostly and whenever something is in there that is inaccurate i remove it because that is a major problem. beyond my ken seems to think this isnt a valid way to contribute to the site. is that true? at the same time he removed some of my actual contributions and has a problem with my account being new. JohnJeanBartiste ( talk) 05:56, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
sorry, i don't know what to say. i felt that ken was stalking me so it is strange that he thinks i was stalking him? i never saw him before today and he went through my contributions and undid many of them. he says they didn't have references but some did. and you know he put in that fake death date for that guy. so he wasn't paying attention but i wish i knew why he got angry at me to begin with. i'm sorry to cause all this trouble, i don't know what to do now. i feel he will revert every change i do now. but thank you so much for your help. i am a little confused about something. in ken's comment he said he removed what some of my contributions because they didn't have references. i think they did but will have to check again. if they didn't i am sure they are easy to find through google because that is how i knew to add it. i am not sure how him removing those things i added is different from me removing things from a page because the references did not confirm they were true. i am being sincere so if i am missing something, i hope it is not too problematic for you to explain what it is. JohnJeanBartiste ( talk) 06:32, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
i know i said a lot so if you want i can just find one change i am confused about and we can discuss that. but now i am wary of making any changes anymore. JohnJeanBartiste ( talk) 06:33, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thank you. there are some other changes i think were ok but i want to ask you about them if you don't mind. if there is something wrong with them, maybe i am missing something. JohnJeanBartiste ( talk) 06:45, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
i will never contact ken again. the only reason i did was because out of nowhere he reverted a lot of my edits with no explanation. you can see it in his contribs. JohnJeanBartiste ( talk) 06:47, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Keep away from me, Bouket/JJB, you've already been warned by at least three administrators. Proceed at your own risk. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 08:19, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
On 27 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Manfred von Richthofen (general), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that General Manfred von Richthofen, like the air ace who was named after him and was his great-nephew, was awarded the " Blue Max" for his service in World War I? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Manfred von Richthofen (General). If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Yngvadottir ( talk) 16:03, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
— David Levy 16:25, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Awun ( talk) 16:42, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
I saw you moved recent edits from the talkpage of Template:Very long. I will not speculate on the question whether you did this to prevent visitor of the Rfc to see the previous discussion where you withdraw your proposal. I will just say that you should not archive recent discussions. And on a template talkpage "recent" can be a lot longer than on talkpage of certain articles, so I restored all 2012 content. Debresser ( talk) 22:23, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
On 7 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Show Where Sam Shows Up, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the bartender and the psychiatrist were good ol' mates in Boston and are still good ol' mates in Seattle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Show Where Sam Shows Up. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 00:06, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
George, I was wondering why your name was listed as the nominator of this DYK with a DYKnom template, since it looks like Figureskatingfan self-nominated the article, including creating the initial template. I didn't want to remove the DYKnom template without checking with you first. Thanks. (I'll check back here for any response; no need to leave anything on my talk page.) BlueMoonset ( talk) 15:12, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Siawase ( talk) 21:36, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
I have nominated Bloke (word) for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloke (word) per my close at Talk:Bloke#Bloke is broke., a discussion in which you participated. Cunard ( talk) 19:43, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
The point is that nobody can possibly have an image of the character that doesn't originate with the network, as the chances of a WP editor getting on set and being permitted to take a nonfree photo of the actor in character are so small that we don't worry about them. We permit nonfree images of characters to be used instead of out-of-character images of the actor; see featured article Jack Sparrow for an example. Either we use an image from the network, or we go against previous practise and reduce the quality of the article by demanding only an image of the actor himself, or we seriously damage the article by using no image at all. Nyttend ( talk) 17:34, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. You were involved with Template:Did you know nominations/Patrick Awuah Jr. Can you revisit the nomination so we can move it along? :) Thanks. -- LauraHale ( talk) 03:24, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi! I don't think I asked you before so here I go:
There is a lot of files in Category:Public domain files ineligible for copyright (and sub categories) there should be checked. It may result in a lot of Ffd and Puf work. It should be easy once you know what to do but it will take a lot of time.
I was thinking that step 1 would be to find decide if the file is usefull. If not it should be nominated for deletion. If it is usefull next step is to find out if it has the right license or it should be fair use. If it is free then the description should be fixed (links to the relevant article(s) would also be nice) and the file could be marked as ok for Commons.
If you want to give it a try I suggest that you check 10, 20 or 50 files and then I check your work. If it looks ok you could get a free pass (if you need that?) to work on those files and send files to Ffd or Puf untill you have send 20(?) files to Ffd/Puf. If that looks good you could add another 20 and if they are also ok you could add 50 etc... We could ofcourse also send hundreds of files there but last time I did that many users complained there were to many at one time... -- MGA73 ( talk) 17:38, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Redirects are not subject to the file-dependent speedy deletion criteria. Nyttend ( talk) 18:00, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Christopher Castile Beethoven Ted Newton 1993.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.
Skier Dude (
talk)
04:09, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
The photo was removed by vandal. Please disregard this notice. -- George Ho ( talk) 04:16, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
On 1 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Showdown (Cheers), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that, after low first-run viewership, the Nielsen ratings of Cheers improved during the summer between the finale of the first season and the second season premiere? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:03, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Zai shui yi fang (1975 album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. mabdul 23:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
any news ones due for creation with notability? Woody's wedding (long episode) and the proposal and SMalone v. Chambers? Give me a heads up if your up for any. Lihaas ( talk) 12:55, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Dream Team (pornographic film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Secretlondon ( talk) 21:57, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ace Attorney Gyakuten Saiban DS.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:02, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
I actually disagree with the nomination for deletion. I think the image of the two actresses on the series, taken with the importance of the storyline has to the series contributes to explaining the article via a visual representation. FrickFrack 02:51, 14 December 2012 (UTC)