Hello, welcome to my talk page. To leave a new message, click here. Please try to keep it relatively organized by signing your posts, posting new topics on the bottom of the page, making relevant headings about your topic and using subheadings, not new headings, for replies. I will almost always reply on this page to messages. I reserve the right to make minor changes of formatting (headings, bolding, etc.) but not content in order to preserve the readablilty of this page. I will delete without comment rude and/or insulting comments, trolling, threats, comments from people with a history of insults and incivility, and comments posted to the top of this page. Also, I'm much more informal than this disclaimer implies. Thank you. Rock on.
Before you rant, please read tips for the angry new user.
Archives: 3-8/04 | 9-11/04 | 11/04-2/05 | 2-4/05 | 5-7/05 | 8-10/05 | 11/05-2/06 | 3-7/06 | 8/06-1/07 | 2/07-12/07 | 1/08-5/08 | 6/08-2/09 | 2/09-09/09 | 10/09-2/10
If you have any thoughts on this matter, you might want to participate in [ [1]].-- Happysomeone ( talk) 21:44, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Hey. As one of the users who seem to have dealt with at least two of the suspected socks listed on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Showtime2009, you might be aware of other accounts fitting the pattern described in the case. Thanks, Prolog ( talk) 13:50, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Gamaliel,
On Rodhullandemu's talk page, you will find a few recent exchanges between him & me concerning the deletion of a link from the LHO entry's External links section. The link in question is to the 10/20/2009 Jim Fetzer/Jim Marrs article entitled, "The Dartmouth JFK-Photo Fiasco," which can be found at numerous Internet sites.
Being a new Wikipedia user, I am curious as to why this particular link has been scrubbed. My latest exchange with Rodhullandemu, just moments ago, suggests asking you for more info in this regard.
Can you please provide specific details concerning the deletion of this link? If not, could you please suggest someone who would? Also, being a new Wikipedia user, any help in regard to the means of communication with other Wikipedia editors is appreciated.
Thanks,
Monticello1826 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monticello1826 ( talk • contribs) 20:10, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
On Meanie Morgans page I corrected what was not a neutral quote but was very biased and put out of context to show a negative image of her imho...I added the whole Quote to put it in context and feel that if you changed it it was in a biased way.Many wiki pages have very biased or added controversy pages to them that are lies and many others are putting Positive spin and fail to mention the many controversies and in Olbermanns case his HATE Mongering bigotry. I am just saying wiki is far from neutral and very biased by many of it's admins. You may not admit it but it is the truth!!! Kind of like the MSM and not to be trusted as an honest source and taken with a grain of salt. Just my 2 cents and I will not try and correct any of the other lies and half truths that I see as apparently they will just be put back with the current SPIN! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.148.168.43 ( talk) 02:00, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Have a Happy Day, Gamaliel. :D Malke 2010 23:59, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Albums considered the greatest ever, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albums considered the greatest ever. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 06:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Scottmckenziestainedglassreflections.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 15:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi, since I've seen your name in the admin boards in discussions on Fox News and Media Matters, I thought you might like to contribute to the Talk:FNC - intro should include controversy and/or one before at Revisiting "most trusted". The current lead discussion has only received replies from several editors there who've demonstrated what i think is a lack of objectivity --they were all in the previous thread arguing against MMfA as reliable source. Three others who seem more neutral have not chimed in, i feel, because they are regularly patronized, insulted and otherwise dismissed. For the poll section, I've submitted an RFC to get outside opinion. Thanks. PrBeacon ( talk) 23:32, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Template:Vfdvoting has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
The Evil IP address (
talk) 16:54, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Advice or intervention would be appreciated. (i.e., stop me before I revert again) Another editor wants to dilute the existing intro w/o consensus; I'm trying to maintain the status quo until any revision is made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimintheatl ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for uploading File:Mcp.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 06:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
User has asked for an unblock of his IP - seems to have been caught up in a range block you initiated. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:36, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Dear Gamaliel,
Way back when we had a disagreement regarding Helen Thomas, this weird lady I'd seen on TV making outrageously biased statements. I wanted to insert her political creed as a self-avowed liberal after her infamous "I was born a liberal. I'll be one 'til I die. What else should a reporter be?" quote, and you thought this was wrong/bad. Fair enough, I let your edits and deletions stand, backed off and moved on.
And now, this same woman goes out and says Israel is evil, that Jews should go back to Poland and Germany, and so on. God it feels good to be vindicated. All apologies are accepted, feel free to leave them here.
Best regards,
-Johan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.226.133.96 ( talk) 11:24, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
I have no idea what one thing has to do with the other, but please spare me a tedious explanation and return to silently nursing a grudge about something that I'd long since forgotten about. Gamaliel ( talk) 03:41, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
I don't think full protection was necessary; the edit-warring was coming from anons. Maybe consider changing it to semi? I think the regular users should be able to hammer out a suitably neutral version, especially once Etheridge's press release comes out this afternoon.— Chowbok ☠ 16:56, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Dear Gamaliel, I'm here because I see that you provided the art/photo in the infobox for the Skull and Roses album article. Being that I'm honestly ignorant of fair use, I go to an expert like yourself :) my question is: could a photo of the band be allowed under the same license? And do you have any photos that might work? They have used the one I uploaded but it was not meant for that article (Grateful Dead), but for Bill's bio (Bill Kreutzmann is my brother).Please reply on my page. Sincerely, Marcia Wright ( talk) 22:21, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic
Continued Problems Malke 2010: What to do?.
Toddst1 (
talk) 00:56, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Please lend your thoughts at Talk:Lee Harvey Oswald#Lead (again). I hope consensus can be reached without any chalkboard erasers being thrown. EEng ( talk) 15:40, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I'm translating the Sinéad O'Connor article for the czech version of Wikipedia, you added there a ref (back in 2007 [2]) that she was named after Bernadette. I am wondering what have these names in common? Isn't this ref related to the name, which she adopted after her ordination? -- Pan BMP ( talk) 23:45, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello! I hope you and your family are in good health. Please delete this photo because I did not mean to upload it on Wikipedia, I was just testing (yes I do know about the sandbox). There is also NO copyright for the photo so please delete it. The photo is not being used in any articles either. Thank you, ( Aerowikipedian ( talk) 17:23, 19 July 2010 (UTC))
Please do not close and hat talkpage discussions you are involved in, I want that discussion open, thanks. Off2riorob ( talk) 18:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
I see you have followed my edits and moved to another article I have edited, please do not follow my edits around increasing and expanding the dispute between us to other articles, thanks. Off2riorob ( talk) 18:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Please do not
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Talk:John Gibson (political commentator). Such edits are disruptive and appear to be
vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Off2riorob (
talk) 18:46, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Please be aware you are edit warring with the User:Off2riorob at multiple locations, please stop this and move to discussion or dispute resolution. Off2riorob ( talk) 18:49, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, content you have been involved in supporting is under discussion at the BLPN here thanks. Off2riorob ( talk) 19:05, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
I also notice that you are supporting content from media matters and you are a major contributor to that article. Have you got any declared conflict of interests? Off2riorob ( talk) 19:10, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Your personal attacks against me when I have good faith issues with your editing reflect badly on you. Off2riorob ( talk) 19:13, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Whats wrong with asking that, you are one of the top four ever contributors to the media matters article and you are strongly supporting keeping three critical comments and five citations to their website from this article? Off2riorob ( talk) 19:41, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
The article CovertAction Quarterly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Q
T
C 06:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated CovertAction Quarterly, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CovertAction Quarterly (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Q T C 20:17, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing,
Children and minors in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, has been proposed for a
merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going to the article and clicking on the (Discuss) link at the top of the article, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.
Maashatra11 (
talk) 12:15, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Maashatra11 (
talk) 12:15, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Dalemabry.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
-- Kumioko ( talk) 16:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Ellen Hayes at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Rosiestep (
talk) 06:31, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ellen Hayes, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Ellen Hayes was not only a rare 19th-century female mathematics professor but was also the first woman to run for statewide office in Massachusetts? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 06:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Nice work on Mary Frances Winston Newson - I've made a few minor changes and passed your DYK nomination. Any chance you could have a look at my DYK nomination of Seneb, immediately above yours at [3]? Prioryman ( talk) 08:20, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Sorry about that, I hit you on an edit conflict. Please feel free to revert me. Tentontunic ( talk) 00:38, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Seems like you removed all reference to previous Fellowships from the lede - I understand the desire not to overemphasize the controversies, but the fellowships have been in the lede for several years, and ought to remain there; there is some discussion of this on the entry's talk page. [Be kind to the newbie] Knowitall369 ( talk) 19:47, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
It's sufficient to say she's pro-choice? Really? You think her position is so representative of the typical pro-choice position that it doesn't warrant more specificity? Her position seems extreme, is a matter of public/Congressional record, and is so out of the mainstream that it seems baffling that you would not think it warrants further detail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megarian1973 ( talk • contribs)
![]() | On 19 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mary Frances Winston Newson, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 12:18, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 22:11, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello, welcome to my talk page. To leave a new message, click here. Please try to keep it relatively organized by signing your posts, posting new topics on the bottom of the page, making relevant headings about your topic and using subheadings, not new headings, for replies. I will almost always reply on this page to messages. I reserve the right to make minor changes of formatting (headings, bolding, etc.) but not content in order to preserve the readablilty of this page. I will delete without comment rude and/or insulting comments, trolling, threats, comments from people with a history of insults and incivility, and comments posted to the top of this page. Also, I'm much more informal than this disclaimer implies. Thank you. Rock on.
Before you rant, please read tips for the angry new user.
Archives: 3-8/04 | 9-11/04 | 11/04-2/05 | 2-4/05 | 5-7/05 | 8-10/05 | 11/05-2/06 | 3-7/06 | 8/06-1/07 | 2/07-12/07 | 1/08-5/08 | 6/08-2/09 | 2/09-09/09 | 10/09-2/10
If you have any thoughts on this matter, you might want to participate in [ [1]].-- Happysomeone ( talk) 21:44, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Hey. As one of the users who seem to have dealt with at least two of the suspected socks listed on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Showtime2009, you might be aware of other accounts fitting the pattern described in the case. Thanks, Prolog ( talk) 13:50, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Gamaliel,
On Rodhullandemu's talk page, you will find a few recent exchanges between him & me concerning the deletion of a link from the LHO entry's External links section. The link in question is to the 10/20/2009 Jim Fetzer/Jim Marrs article entitled, "The Dartmouth JFK-Photo Fiasco," which can be found at numerous Internet sites.
Being a new Wikipedia user, I am curious as to why this particular link has been scrubbed. My latest exchange with Rodhullandemu, just moments ago, suggests asking you for more info in this regard.
Can you please provide specific details concerning the deletion of this link? If not, could you please suggest someone who would? Also, being a new Wikipedia user, any help in regard to the means of communication with other Wikipedia editors is appreciated.
Thanks,
Monticello1826 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monticello1826 ( talk • contribs) 20:10, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
On Meanie Morgans page I corrected what was not a neutral quote but was very biased and put out of context to show a negative image of her imho...I added the whole Quote to put it in context and feel that if you changed it it was in a biased way.Many wiki pages have very biased or added controversy pages to them that are lies and many others are putting Positive spin and fail to mention the many controversies and in Olbermanns case his HATE Mongering bigotry. I am just saying wiki is far from neutral and very biased by many of it's admins. You may not admit it but it is the truth!!! Kind of like the MSM and not to be trusted as an honest source and taken with a grain of salt. Just my 2 cents and I will not try and correct any of the other lies and half truths that I see as apparently they will just be put back with the current SPIN! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.148.168.43 ( talk) 02:00, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Have a Happy Day, Gamaliel. :D Malke 2010 23:59, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Albums considered the greatest ever, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albums considered the greatest ever. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 06:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Scottmckenziestainedglassreflections.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 15:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi, since I've seen your name in the admin boards in discussions on Fox News and Media Matters, I thought you might like to contribute to the Talk:FNC - intro should include controversy and/or one before at Revisiting "most trusted". The current lead discussion has only received replies from several editors there who've demonstrated what i think is a lack of objectivity --they were all in the previous thread arguing against MMfA as reliable source. Three others who seem more neutral have not chimed in, i feel, because they are regularly patronized, insulted and otherwise dismissed. For the poll section, I've submitted an RFC to get outside opinion. Thanks. PrBeacon ( talk) 23:32, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Template:Vfdvoting has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
The Evil IP address (
talk) 16:54, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Advice or intervention would be appreciated. (i.e., stop me before I revert again) Another editor wants to dilute the existing intro w/o consensus; I'm trying to maintain the status quo until any revision is made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimintheatl ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for uploading File:Mcp.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 06:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
User has asked for an unblock of his IP - seems to have been caught up in a range block you initiated. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:36, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Dear Gamaliel,
Way back when we had a disagreement regarding Helen Thomas, this weird lady I'd seen on TV making outrageously biased statements. I wanted to insert her political creed as a self-avowed liberal after her infamous "I was born a liberal. I'll be one 'til I die. What else should a reporter be?" quote, and you thought this was wrong/bad. Fair enough, I let your edits and deletions stand, backed off and moved on.
And now, this same woman goes out and says Israel is evil, that Jews should go back to Poland and Germany, and so on. God it feels good to be vindicated. All apologies are accepted, feel free to leave them here.
Best regards,
-Johan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.226.133.96 ( talk) 11:24, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
I have no idea what one thing has to do with the other, but please spare me a tedious explanation and return to silently nursing a grudge about something that I'd long since forgotten about. Gamaliel ( talk) 03:41, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
I don't think full protection was necessary; the edit-warring was coming from anons. Maybe consider changing it to semi? I think the regular users should be able to hammer out a suitably neutral version, especially once Etheridge's press release comes out this afternoon.— Chowbok ☠ 16:56, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Dear Gamaliel, I'm here because I see that you provided the art/photo in the infobox for the Skull and Roses album article. Being that I'm honestly ignorant of fair use, I go to an expert like yourself :) my question is: could a photo of the band be allowed under the same license? And do you have any photos that might work? They have used the one I uploaded but it was not meant for that article (Grateful Dead), but for Bill's bio (Bill Kreutzmann is my brother).Please reply on my page. Sincerely, Marcia Wright ( talk) 22:21, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic
Continued Problems Malke 2010: What to do?.
Toddst1 (
talk) 00:56, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Please lend your thoughts at Talk:Lee Harvey Oswald#Lead (again). I hope consensus can be reached without any chalkboard erasers being thrown. EEng ( talk) 15:40, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I'm translating the Sinéad O'Connor article for the czech version of Wikipedia, you added there a ref (back in 2007 [2]) that she was named after Bernadette. I am wondering what have these names in common? Isn't this ref related to the name, which she adopted after her ordination? -- Pan BMP ( talk) 23:45, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello! I hope you and your family are in good health. Please delete this photo because I did not mean to upload it on Wikipedia, I was just testing (yes I do know about the sandbox). There is also NO copyright for the photo so please delete it. The photo is not being used in any articles either. Thank you, ( Aerowikipedian ( talk) 17:23, 19 July 2010 (UTC))
Please do not close and hat talkpage discussions you are involved in, I want that discussion open, thanks. Off2riorob ( talk) 18:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
I see you have followed my edits and moved to another article I have edited, please do not follow my edits around increasing and expanding the dispute between us to other articles, thanks. Off2riorob ( talk) 18:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Please do not
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Talk:John Gibson (political commentator). Such edits are disruptive and appear to be
vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Off2riorob (
talk) 18:46, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Please be aware you are edit warring with the User:Off2riorob at multiple locations, please stop this and move to discussion or dispute resolution. Off2riorob ( talk) 18:49, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, content you have been involved in supporting is under discussion at the BLPN here thanks. Off2riorob ( talk) 19:05, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
I also notice that you are supporting content from media matters and you are a major contributor to that article. Have you got any declared conflict of interests? Off2riorob ( talk) 19:10, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Your personal attacks against me when I have good faith issues with your editing reflect badly on you. Off2riorob ( talk) 19:13, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Whats wrong with asking that, you are one of the top four ever contributors to the media matters article and you are strongly supporting keeping three critical comments and five citations to their website from this article? Off2riorob ( talk) 19:41, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
The article CovertAction Quarterly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Q
T
C 06:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated CovertAction Quarterly, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CovertAction Quarterly (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Q T C 20:17, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing,
Children and minors in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, has been proposed for a
merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going to the article and clicking on the (Discuss) link at the top of the article, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.
Maashatra11 (
talk) 12:15, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Maashatra11 (
talk) 12:15, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Dalemabry.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
-- Kumioko ( talk) 16:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Ellen Hayes at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Rosiestep (
talk) 06:31, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ellen Hayes, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Ellen Hayes was not only a rare 19th-century female mathematics professor but was also the first woman to run for statewide office in Massachusetts? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 06:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Nice work on Mary Frances Winston Newson - I've made a few minor changes and passed your DYK nomination. Any chance you could have a look at my DYK nomination of Seneb, immediately above yours at [3]? Prioryman ( talk) 08:20, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Sorry about that, I hit you on an edit conflict. Please feel free to revert me. Tentontunic ( talk) 00:38, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Seems like you removed all reference to previous Fellowships from the lede - I understand the desire not to overemphasize the controversies, but the fellowships have been in the lede for several years, and ought to remain there; there is some discussion of this on the entry's talk page. [Be kind to the newbie] Knowitall369 ( talk) 19:47, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
It's sufficient to say she's pro-choice? Really? You think her position is so representative of the typical pro-choice position that it doesn't warrant more specificity? Her position seems extreme, is a matter of public/Congressional record, and is so out of the mainstream that it seems baffling that you would not think it warrants further detail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megarian1973 ( talk • contribs)
![]() | On 19 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mary Frances Winston Newson, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 12:18, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 22:11, 19 February 2011 (UTC)