You're "undo"s are unacceptable. The line that you repeatedly keep inserting into the Stavsky article regarding the location of his murder accomplishes absolutely nothing but to sneakily imply that Stavksy killed Arlosoroff. I explained myself in the discussion page while you have done nothing but lazily revert the change without providing an explanation. I am in no way saying that I know for certain that Stavsky did not kill Arlosoroff (though the evidence most definitely leans in favor of his innocence) but you seem to be so certain of his guilt that you'll go and imply some sort of magical retribution of middah kineged middah through the irrelevant detail pertaining to the geography of where Stavsky's life was ended. Because I assume that you're not choosing to be blatantly dishonest I'm keeping my cool about the fact of your flippant vandalism despite the fact that I went out of my way to discuss the matter in the comments section, but you've now done this multiple times and I no longer consider it acceptable or excusable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.55.97.27 ( talk) 23:15, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Ze, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.
I do appreciate your professional and constructive approach to our disagreements. I believe you have summed them up in a fair way, and I accept fully that you request mediation. All the best, Bertilvidet 17:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I'm going to be helping out with the mediation for this dispute. If you agree to allow me to serve as mediator, leave a message on my talk page. -- דניאל - Danie lroc ks123 contribs 02:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Now that both parties have agreed to the mediation, it seems like we will be continuing at Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Ze. I hope to come to a solution that both sides are happy with! -- דניאל - Danie lroc ks123 contribs 22:54, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi - I'm modifying the list of countries tagged to this article, because a significant number of them are not generally considered Central Asian countries. The countries I removed were: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Bangladesh, the Maldives, and Sri Lanka. If you have any concerns or questions about these changes, please send me a message so we can talk about it. Aelfthrytha 14:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
You're right, it's not 93. It's actually over 100. The main reason why I reverted your edits is because of the POV-wording. For example, adding "so-called" is generally something to avoid (in your eyes it's not a state, but other governments disagree). Cheers, Khoi khoi 06:16, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
This [1] might be considered personal attacks. Please delete them from your user page before I ask some admin to look at them. Thanks. --- ALM 11:42, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Yes, that's true. If someone wins someone must loose, that's the story of the life and wikipedia :) Enjoy editing. ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 11:12, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, i dont know why you combined Kadaif and Kinafa together, they are no the same thing Bazel 22:51, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Oh i see, thanks Bazel 02:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
I disagree, particularly with your unilateral decision to effectively delete the Natural Law Party article as they did participate in past elections. The National Bolshevik Party is part of a series of articles on them so also warrants inclusion.
Where exactly is the criteria you refer to for inclusion? I can't find it on either WP:PLT or WP:ORG. Number 5 7 10:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm puzzled what connection you see to the Soviet-Afghan War - which was one (legitimate) government coming to the aid of another (legitimate, recognised?) government. There probably were House demolitions in that conflict too, lets document them. But that doesn't make this article less important - most likely it makes it more important. PalestineRemembered 21:08, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Gabi,
Unfortunately there was a significant misunderstanding in your statement on this AfD discussion. Could you please see my reply at [2]? You may wish to revise your statement in the light of this. -- ChrisO 21:41, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
The whole business of my UserName has been discussed at some length - at one stage I even put in an application to change it, but that was never actioned. I took this name because I didn't want to decieve anyone - I trust it worked for you. I fail to understand why anyone would be uncomfortable with my UserName - would you object to "911remembered"? PalestineRemembered 09:50, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Yes, no big deal. A useful tool, by the way, is the Web Archive, which archives a large part of the web and allows you to access cached copies of pages that are down (e.g., [3] or [4]). You can also use it with the {{ dead link}} template. Next time...-- Doron 13:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jook.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Intercourse (disambiguation), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Intercourse. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 12:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I believe that the text on wikipedia is not in the public domain, but rather is copyrighted and can be licensed under the GFDL. Technically I believe that Orwel and his publisher John Wiley is in violation of the GFDL. I'm busy with other things these days, but would be happy if you could point this out to someone in the Wikipedia community who might follow through on it with Wiley. The text from the book is available on Amazon's search inside this book. Ydorb 23:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Suicide-bomber-baby01.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 08:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Gabi, I made a comment on your edits on the talk page of the 11 December 2007 Algiers bombings. -- rxnd ( t | € | c ) 10:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey Gabi , I’ve put in an official request for Islam and animals to be unprotected here. I thought you might want to know since you expressed an interest. Cheers, -- S.dedalus ( talk) 00:45, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
I was greatly offended by your comment left in the history. If the article is in terrible shape, aim to solve it. Theres literally a million stubs that are worse than this article. Tourskin ( talk) 18:45, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Respectfully, Tourskin ( talk) 23:17, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Merge is complete. [5] -- The Fat Man Who Never Came Back ( talk) 09:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I've replaced the Hebrew language sources you added to this article with English language sources. They are preferred, when available. I'd ask that you be more careful about how you present information. Twice, you attributed bombings to "Muslim extremists" or "Muslim militants" when in fact it is not known if they were behind the attacks. Please be aware of the importance of accuracy in reporting such information. Thanks. Tiamut talk 12:53, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Trivial or not, common knowledge or not, true or not, content in Wikipedia articles can be removed by any editor if it is not cited to a verifiable source ( WP:V). Gwen Gale ( talk) 19:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much for finding a source for al-Wazir's involvement in the Coastal Road massacre. Finally, I had been looking for one before, but only found a ref for the Savoy Operation. -- Al Ameer son ( talk) 23:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Some time ago, you participated in a deletion discussion concerning Allegations of apartheid in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. I thought you might like to know that the parent article, Allegations of apartheid, was recently nominated for deletion. Given that many of the issues that have been raised are essentially the same as those on the article on which you commented earlier, you may have a view on whether Allegations of apartheid should be kept or deleted. If you wish to contribute to the discussion, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination). -- ChrisO ( talk) 17:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
I listed Cite news for deletion, a redirect that you created. The discussion is here. Suntag ( talk) 23:06, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated a redirect to a template for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 14:42, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Please remember it doesn't matter how 'reliable and verifiable' information is particularly on a contentious article. What matters is the information is actually verified by reliable sources. If you don't have the time to find sources then you shouldn't be making additions or changing articles particularly not on a highly contentious subject Nil Einne ( talk) 08:22, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
2008–2009_Israel–Gaza_conflict. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. Blanking half the lead is
WP:Vandalism. Please discuss these sort of impulses with other editors first, on the relevant talk page. Thank you.
RomaC (
talk) 10:07, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi! You're welcome to come over to Talk: Roof knocking to discuss your ideas. Best regards, -- Bob K31416 ( talk) 18:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Gabi, I think I should explain why I reverted your change the other day on Noordin Mohammad Top. It's because the link said "Islamist militant" and then linked to "Islamic terrorism". On the face of it these are two different things. That said, I do actually think that the article Islamic terrorism should be called Islamist militancy. I said as much on the talk page [6]. If the page doesn't get renamed then I am torn on the text of the link on the Noordin Mohammad Top. Logically, if you want to use that link, you would describe him as an Islamic terrorist. Yaris678 ( talk) 17:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
I suppose Muslim political violence is more neutral than Islamic terrorism, but neutrality was never my biggest issue. My issues with Muslim political violence are:
Is there a reason you don’t like the word militancy? Or are you just looking for consistency? Consistency is good, but if I had my way, we would have Zionist militancy and Palestinian militancy too.
Yaris678 ( talk) 18:38, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi Gabi,
I undid a recent edit of yours on
whaling. Looking around a bit, it does seem a universal demand of the
animal rights movement (as opposed to the
animal welfare movement) that animals shouldn't be exploited in any way. If you change the page back, please take care that the source link works and consider using {{
Cite web}}
or its siblings. --
Swift (
talk) 11:19, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
I know that Israel is not muslim country but its in the middle east. The middle east has a lot of countries that has a christian minority and some that have a jewish minority (Yemen, Egypt, Bahrain...ETC) who agree or disagree with the idea of Secularism. Therefore the article will have to discuss Religion and Secularism including Judaism (Whether Israel is involved or not). I agree with you that the article requires a thorough treatment to meet wikipedia standard. -- The Egyptian Liberal ( talk) 16:38, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
The article Tone (signaling) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Dicklyon (
talk) 22:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
The article Tone (signal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Dicklyon (
talk) 22:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tone (signaling). Since you had some involvement with the Tone (signaling) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Dicklyon ( talk) 04:30, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tone (signal). Since you had some involvement with the Tone (signal) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Dicklyon ( talk) 04:31, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello there. I took back your entry here. 1. You haven't mention a serious source for your entry. 2. This man was already honored in 2000. 3. All sources I've found on the net about 2006 and this man are based on this Wikipedia entry. Same entry was in the past already killed with comments.
For the future, do only entry things with serious sources and show the futures to others. If you have one in this case, please show me. Thanks and regards -- KurtR ( talk) 11:24, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited The Satanic Verses controversy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berkeley ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:30, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect History of the Palestinian territories. Since you had some involvement with the History of the Palestinian territories redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Emmette Hernandez Coleman ( talk) 14:09, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Palestinian infiltrators. Since you had some involvement with the Palestinian infiltrators redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew ( talk) 03:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
I've added Palestinian infiltration to the RfD at the redirect discussion for Palestinian infiltrators; you also created this one but it currently goes to a different target than the one you're proposing for that.
By the way I've revised my !vote, I put the delete in as a placeholder without checking the page (while I tied up to previous discussion) and then could not get back to check it and change it. My bad. Si Trew ( talk) 06:54, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Gabi S.. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Gabi S.. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Gabi S.. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human rights in Asia (2nd nomination) Orangejuicedude ( talk) 09:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The article Kol Ha'ir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced. No indication of significance. Fails WP:SIGCOV.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
scope_creep
Talk 14:44, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Gabi S.!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
microbiologyMarcus (
petri dish•
growths) 13:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
|
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
~~ αvírαm| (tαlk) 17:11, 28 November 2023 (UTC)You're "undo"s are unacceptable. The line that you repeatedly keep inserting into the Stavsky article regarding the location of his murder accomplishes absolutely nothing but to sneakily imply that Stavksy killed Arlosoroff. I explained myself in the discussion page while you have done nothing but lazily revert the change without providing an explanation. I am in no way saying that I know for certain that Stavsky did not kill Arlosoroff (though the evidence most definitely leans in favor of his innocence) but you seem to be so certain of his guilt that you'll go and imply some sort of magical retribution of middah kineged middah through the irrelevant detail pertaining to the geography of where Stavsky's life was ended. Because I assume that you're not choosing to be blatantly dishonest I'm keeping my cool about the fact of your flippant vandalism despite the fact that I went out of my way to discuss the matter in the comments section, but you've now done this multiple times and I no longer consider it acceptable or excusable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.55.97.27 ( talk) 23:15, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Ze, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.
I do appreciate your professional and constructive approach to our disagreements. I believe you have summed them up in a fair way, and I accept fully that you request mediation. All the best, Bertilvidet 17:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I'm going to be helping out with the mediation for this dispute. If you agree to allow me to serve as mediator, leave a message on my talk page. -- דניאל - Danie lroc ks123 contribs 02:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Now that both parties have agreed to the mediation, it seems like we will be continuing at Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Ze. I hope to come to a solution that both sides are happy with! -- דניאל - Danie lroc ks123 contribs 22:54, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi - I'm modifying the list of countries tagged to this article, because a significant number of them are not generally considered Central Asian countries. The countries I removed were: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Bangladesh, the Maldives, and Sri Lanka. If you have any concerns or questions about these changes, please send me a message so we can talk about it. Aelfthrytha 14:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
You're right, it's not 93. It's actually over 100. The main reason why I reverted your edits is because of the POV-wording. For example, adding "so-called" is generally something to avoid (in your eyes it's not a state, but other governments disagree). Cheers, Khoi khoi 06:16, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
This [1] might be considered personal attacks. Please delete them from your user page before I ask some admin to look at them. Thanks. --- ALM 11:42, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Yes, that's true. If someone wins someone must loose, that's the story of the life and wikipedia :) Enjoy editing. ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 11:12, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, i dont know why you combined Kadaif and Kinafa together, they are no the same thing Bazel 22:51, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Oh i see, thanks Bazel 02:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
I disagree, particularly with your unilateral decision to effectively delete the Natural Law Party article as they did participate in past elections. The National Bolshevik Party is part of a series of articles on them so also warrants inclusion.
Where exactly is the criteria you refer to for inclusion? I can't find it on either WP:PLT or WP:ORG. Number 5 7 10:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm puzzled what connection you see to the Soviet-Afghan War - which was one (legitimate) government coming to the aid of another (legitimate, recognised?) government. There probably were House demolitions in that conflict too, lets document them. But that doesn't make this article less important - most likely it makes it more important. PalestineRemembered 21:08, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Gabi,
Unfortunately there was a significant misunderstanding in your statement on this AfD discussion. Could you please see my reply at [2]? You may wish to revise your statement in the light of this. -- ChrisO 21:41, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
The whole business of my UserName has been discussed at some length - at one stage I even put in an application to change it, but that was never actioned. I took this name because I didn't want to decieve anyone - I trust it worked for you. I fail to understand why anyone would be uncomfortable with my UserName - would you object to "911remembered"? PalestineRemembered 09:50, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Yes, no big deal. A useful tool, by the way, is the Web Archive, which archives a large part of the web and allows you to access cached copies of pages that are down (e.g., [3] or [4]). You can also use it with the {{ dead link}} template. Next time...-- Doron 13:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jook.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Intercourse (disambiguation), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Intercourse. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 12:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I believe that the text on wikipedia is not in the public domain, but rather is copyrighted and can be licensed under the GFDL. Technically I believe that Orwel and his publisher John Wiley is in violation of the GFDL. I'm busy with other things these days, but would be happy if you could point this out to someone in the Wikipedia community who might follow through on it with Wiley. The text from the book is available on Amazon's search inside this book. Ydorb 23:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Suicide-bomber-baby01.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 08:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Gabi, I made a comment on your edits on the talk page of the 11 December 2007 Algiers bombings. -- rxnd ( t | € | c ) 10:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey Gabi , I’ve put in an official request for Islam and animals to be unprotected here. I thought you might want to know since you expressed an interest. Cheers, -- S.dedalus ( talk) 00:45, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
I was greatly offended by your comment left in the history. If the article is in terrible shape, aim to solve it. Theres literally a million stubs that are worse than this article. Tourskin ( talk) 18:45, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Respectfully, Tourskin ( talk) 23:17, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Merge is complete. [5] -- The Fat Man Who Never Came Back ( talk) 09:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I've replaced the Hebrew language sources you added to this article with English language sources. They are preferred, when available. I'd ask that you be more careful about how you present information. Twice, you attributed bombings to "Muslim extremists" or "Muslim militants" when in fact it is not known if they were behind the attacks. Please be aware of the importance of accuracy in reporting such information. Thanks. Tiamut talk 12:53, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Trivial or not, common knowledge or not, true or not, content in Wikipedia articles can be removed by any editor if it is not cited to a verifiable source ( WP:V). Gwen Gale ( talk) 19:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much for finding a source for al-Wazir's involvement in the Coastal Road massacre. Finally, I had been looking for one before, but only found a ref for the Savoy Operation. -- Al Ameer son ( talk) 23:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Some time ago, you participated in a deletion discussion concerning Allegations of apartheid in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. I thought you might like to know that the parent article, Allegations of apartheid, was recently nominated for deletion. Given that many of the issues that have been raised are essentially the same as those on the article on which you commented earlier, you may have a view on whether Allegations of apartheid should be kept or deleted. If you wish to contribute to the discussion, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination). -- ChrisO ( talk) 17:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
I listed Cite news for deletion, a redirect that you created. The discussion is here. Suntag ( talk) 23:06, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated a redirect to a template for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 14:42, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Please remember it doesn't matter how 'reliable and verifiable' information is particularly on a contentious article. What matters is the information is actually verified by reliable sources. If you don't have the time to find sources then you shouldn't be making additions or changing articles particularly not on a highly contentious subject Nil Einne ( talk) 08:22, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
2008–2009_Israel–Gaza_conflict. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. Blanking half the lead is
WP:Vandalism. Please discuss these sort of impulses with other editors first, on the relevant talk page. Thank you.
RomaC (
talk) 10:07, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi! You're welcome to come over to Talk: Roof knocking to discuss your ideas. Best regards, -- Bob K31416 ( talk) 18:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Gabi, I think I should explain why I reverted your change the other day on Noordin Mohammad Top. It's because the link said "Islamist militant" and then linked to "Islamic terrorism". On the face of it these are two different things. That said, I do actually think that the article Islamic terrorism should be called Islamist militancy. I said as much on the talk page [6]. If the page doesn't get renamed then I am torn on the text of the link on the Noordin Mohammad Top. Logically, if you want to use that link, you would describe him as an Islamic terrorist. Yaris678 ( talk) 17:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
I suppose Muslim political violence is more neutral than Islamic terrorism, but neutrality was never my biggest issue. My issues with Muslim political violence are:
Is there a reason you don’t like the word militancy? Or are you just looking for consistency? Consistency is good, but if I had my way, we would have Zionist militancy and Palestinian militancy too.
Yaris678 ( talk) 18:38, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi Gabi,
I undid a recent edit of yours on
whaling. Looking around a bit, it does seem a universal demand of the
animal rights movement (as opposed to the
animal welfare movement) that animals shouldn't be exploited in any way. If you change the page back, please take care that the source link works and consider using {{
Cite web}}
or its siblings. --
Swift (
talk) 11:19, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
I know that Israel is not muslim country but its in the middle east. The middle east has a lot of countries that has a christian minority and some that have a jewish minority (Yemen, Egypt, Bahrain...ETC) who agree or disagree with the idea of Secularism. Therefore the article will have to discuss Religion and Secularism including Judaism (Whether Israel is involved or not). I agree with you that the article requires a thorough treatment to meet wikipedia standard. -- The Egyptian Liberal ( talk) 16:38, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
The article Tone (signaling) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Dicklyon (
talk) 22:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
The article Tone (signal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Dicklyon (
talk) 22:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tone (signaling). Since you had some involvement with the Tone (signaling) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Dicklyon ( talk) 04:30, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tone (signal). Since you had some involvement with the Tone (signal) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Dicklyon ( talk) 04:31, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello there. I took back your entry here. 1. You haven't mention a serious source for your entry. 2. This man was already honored in 2000. 3. All sources I've found on the net about 2006 and this man are based on this Wikipedia entry. Same entry was in the past already killed with comments.
For the future, do only entry things with serious sources and show the futures to others. If you have one in this case, please show me. Thanks and regards -- KurtR ( talk) 11:24, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited The Satanic Verses controversy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berkeley ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:30, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect History of the Palestinian territories. Since you had some involvement with the History of the Palestinian territories redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Emmette Hernandez Coleman ( talk) 14:09, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Palestinian infiltrators. Since you had some involvement with the Palestinian infiltrators redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew ( talk) 03:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
I've added Palestinian infiltration to the RfD at the redirect discussion for Palestinian infiltrators; you also created this one but it currently goes to a different target than the one you're proposing for that.
By the way I've revised my !vote, I put the delete in as a placeholder without checking the page (while I tied up to previous discussion) and then could not get back to check it and change it. My bad. Si Trew ( talk) 06:54, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Gabi S.. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Gabi S.. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Gabi S.. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human rights in Asia (2nd nomination) Orangejuicedude ( talk) 09:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The article Kol Ha'ir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced. No indication of significance. Fails WP:SIGCOV.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
scope_creep
Talk 14:44, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Gabi S.!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
microbiologyMarcus (
petri dish•
growths) 13:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
|
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
~~ αvírαm| (tαlk) 17:11, 28 November 2023 (UTC)