This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Can you delete this edit from the page history, as it seems to be a BLP violation? Everymorning (talk) 12:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
The block you just made: there's a bit more to than just the username, too- see User_talk:Doug_Weller#Kurdistani_sockfarm, and link to ANI. Expecting more like that to pop up, you see. Cheers, Muffled Pocketed 11:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you GBFan for declining speedy delete. I have contributed some editing to the article which I deemed promotional and provided 2 extra independent links in the External links category. One of it is by SBA, a federal government entity that talks about Avani Tech Solutions Inc as an independent article, so is with OdysseyOnline.
I look forward to your review of the content as of now. While I'll continue to scan Google for more supporting links. Thomaseater ( talk) 12:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
Thank you Thomaseater ( talk) 12:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC) |
Thank you for moving my article to the draft, can you look at it to see if it is coming alone good, I want to do the main foot work then hope people will add onto it.
Street sting Street sting ( talk) 21:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Yes, I know it's not ready yet, i didn't put the references and stuff, I'm still reading the history book and speaking with people ( Old school hip hop rappers). I just wanted to make sure that i'm doing it right the way it looks and the articles i have so far, you should see my desk, all these papers i have and notes.
Street sting Street sting ( talk) 22:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi GB
I think am ready to move it, I spoke with Busy Bee and D.J Jazzy Jay from the old school two of the great Hip hoppers they said it was great and a great meaning of exactly what it is. I feel so honored.
Street sting Street sting ( talk) 22:42, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
I added the references that i read and took my resources from, when speaking to other rap artist that have wikipedia pages (bio) on here they did tell me my first ref's were fine because they have simpler on theirs and ask me why does he think it's not ready because what they saw was great and they been on here for years, but whatever
Street sting Street sting ( talk) 00:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
so can you please help and fix the refs you talking about so i can move it, everything is there for you and it is more then one ref that supports what i said that is in the article, that would be a big help, even Steven Hager that i tracked down to begged him to look at it said it was fine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Street sting ( talk • contribs) 19:39, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
ok I changed it and took other links that i got my sources from and i read the links that you gave me and added This article talks about samples of Hip Hop Movement as the new Civil Rights Movement taking quotes from known authors. which was given to me by a respected hip hop artist who is on wiki as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Street sting ( talk • contribs) 22:44, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
{{
submit}}
to the top of the article and then save the edit. This will alert other experienced editors that you think it it's ready. --
GB
fan 00:12, 6 October 2016 (UTC)ok :) Street sting ( talk) 00:57, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi GB Fan, I saw a complaint on bio deletion [1], and see the deletion was done by you last June.
I see one copy of the bio at web.archive.org in 2014. [2].
There has been a claim this deletion was done for political reasons. [3] Is it possible to show the delete-proposal discussion for this article? What sort of citations would be needed to restore a bio in a way that would be defendable as notable? Tom Ruen ( talk) 14:57, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi GB, you may wish to note 684 is disallowing - there is a new IP to block in the logs -- samtar talk or stalk 12:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, why did you delete this page? The article certainly did contain a claim of notability and some references from national media. If you want to start an AfD, ok, but it's not a speedy case. Axolotl Nr.733 ( talk) 11:56, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi GB Fan, I see you declined the A1 speedy for Eurovision Asia Song Contest. The reason a speedy was placed is because the contest is still only in the "pipework" stage and no official name has been given for the contest. Even the source states it is "speculated" that the contest may be called "Eurovision Asia Song Contest" and even "Asiavision" to "Asia Eurovision". As there is no actual article to be able to redirect the page to, then CSD is the only option. And not only that, the creator has also done the same for other articles in the past for contests that are only at the "drawing board" stage and being discussed with CEOs etc, which is evident from their talk page. The contest albeit looking like an Asian version of Eurovision, cannot be redirected to ABU Song Festivals either, as it is unknown if the Asia-Pacific Broadcasting Union are the organisers or the European Broadcasting Union. There is just not enough sources out there to warrant a standalone article at this WP:TOOSOON stage. Wes Mouse T@lk 12:49, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm not just a normal guy writing about myself. I have founded 3 startups. Selected for Forbes 30 under 30 2017. Have worked with TEDxDelhi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raobharathr ( talk • contribs) 19:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Please can you contact re deletion of this entry, Thanks Kevin@kmilliken.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.71.163 ( talk) 21:14, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Since my nomination was just a joke, recalling the rationale was 08251985, would be appropriate to use a warning template on him for behaving like this, triggering other user unnecessary work. -- Osplace 16:26, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
admittedly advocated for clinton to ag lynch, on tape during congressional hearings — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.175.47.5 ( talk) 13:40, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Yes, I dispute your edit. You and freshacconci seem to be committed to keeping the generative art article as irrelevant as possible. Everything there is ancient history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John alexander greene ( talk • contribs) 00:18, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, you deleted the article I just created on Backer, Spielvogel & Bates. I realize that there was limited content, but I intended to revisit this page shortly to expand content. On inspection this is, IMHO, a notable entity and is subject of numerous academic articles and, as such, IMHO should be part of the content of Wikipedia. Since this organization has, more recently, been acquired by Saatchi & Saatchi (as best I recall), this should be connected to that page as well as various others. As I am sure that you will appreciate, it takes time to build out and fill in a page of notable content ... something that can be done given sufficient time.
I appreciate if you could either restore that page and allow sufficient time to expand the content (and, I am sure augmented wo=ith other constructive input from other Wiki editors) to make this a valuable reference page. I particularly need the EL that I had placed in this page in order to do so. Otherwise I am tempted to give up contributing to Wikipedia. Please note, I am currently in China, and so access to Wikipedia is spotty at best.
Enquire (
talk) 01:50, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! -- Gloumouth1 10:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Confused why you feel the subject of Sandwich Belt High Angle Conveyor has no substance. This is important information given around the world for the mining industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmyDos ( talk • contribs) 17:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, when I first made this a redirect [4], the Pipsy article was in place. Only after it was speedy deleted did I then request deletion of the redirect. Thanks, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 13:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Can you please redirect it to U.S. Russia Foundation now? If I add a merge tag, it could take months and we might as well give up. Zigzig20s ( talk) 11:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Why did you remove James Callaghan from the Big Jim page? He was known by this nickname. Please have a look at List of nicknames of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom#James Callaghan, as to why I added him.-- Nevé – selbert 21:50, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi , I own the company, and would appreciate some degree of accuracy in the contributions of others to this page. The company was founded Circa 1853 by David Magee ( born 1829 in Bolton, Lancashire) {ancestry.co.uk , and Public records} He was the tenant of the Good Samaritan beerhouse on Derby St by 1853 , and moved to the Crown Vaults, Derby St by about 1864/5 . It's not certain at what point the original brewhouse was built , David Magee died in 1875 , with the brewery and other commercial property being inherited by his wife , as stipulated by his will { public records , , copy of his will in my collection} The company amalgamated with Daniel Marshall's Grapes & One Horseshoe Breweries in 1887/8 , , being registered as a limited company on March 22nd 1888 {Companies House} the Magee family owning the majority of shares { companies house ,documents in the possession of the company} Alfred Barnard , in his exellent book , {The Noted Breweries,of Britain and Ireland } described a 'new brewhouse' as being in operation alongside the old brewhouse . The company aquired the Wigan Brewery of Henry Robinson &Co at auction in 1894 it is unsure when this site ceased production , but it was used as a depot by Magee's until circa 1906/7 {company stock records} A new Brewery, designed by William Bradford was built circa 1900 . The brewery of Bell & Co , Burton on Trent was purchased in circa 1902/3 ,with brewing continuing until 1906/7 {company stock records}, after which the company transported water by rail in its own tankers up to the 1960's {company archives } In late 1950's an offer for the company was made by Greenall Whitley & Co , Wilderspool Brewery, Warrington , with Greenall's completing their acquisition by 1959{company archives }. The Crown Brewery mashed for the last time on Monday 21st September 1970 (Best Mild) {company archives, Brewhouse Book} Noted beers included IPA , Crown Ale(bottled), B.B , a mild , NOT a bitter!!(the initials stand for best beer), Oatmeal Stout amongst others .{company archives }
Oddedd76 ( talk) 20:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi, GB fan, I'm Rtrust. If you believe that declining the deletion request on Extension Mobility was the right thing, then great! I was just wondering if you could elaborate on the A7 guidelines. Thanks. en:User:Rtrust ( talk) 17:29, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
maybe I should remove all my articles I've created, I think I can do it. G7. Author requests deletion... I can do it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ford489 ( talk • contribs) 00:25, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
I am the creator of most of my articles and 3,418 editions. I think it's time to leave wikipedia and destroy all my ediiones and pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ford489 ( talk • contribs) 00:49, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Genealogy is not remarkable? I think you're confused. I wonder which who is remarkable for you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ford489 ( talk • contribs) 01:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you very much for correcting my error with shifting the information from Namco Bandai Partners to Bandai Namco Partners. I was unaware of the move page function beforehand. Thank you very much for making me aware of this feature. I did not intend to make a copy and paste move, rather, I was simply unaware of how to best transfer information as I did not know how to rename the article. Iftekharahmed96 ( talk) 14:30, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello GB fan... Just a query. Your deletion here on A1 mentions "Short article without enough context to identify the subject". As much as I can see, the subject is easily identifiable as an individual with the said name. The A1 criteria mentions, "If any information in the title or on the page, including links, allows an editor, possibly with the aid of a web search, to find further information on the subject in an attempt to expand or edit it, A1 is not appropriate." The article in question had a title (the name of the subject) which could have been used to find further information. In my opinion, the A1 tag is not appropriate in such cases, where the title is contextually identifiable, irrespective of whether it is significant or not. However, I'll defer to your judgement on this; and thus the request for clarification from you. Is the A1 appropriate in this particular case? Thanks. Lourdes 17:25, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for protecting this page. But could you also remove the warnings which were repeatedly reinstated without explanation. 112.211.53.157 ( talk) 20:39, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi there,
Ta for the edit here - I've reposted the album that was removed, but now with a non-primary source - I'm a fairly inexperienced Wikipedia editor, so am still learning about reference rules, syntax etc. I left the other one that had been removed as it was by another user, so up to them I guess. Anyhow, just thought I ought to let you know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dshubble ( talk • contribs) 12:50, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
You have the mop so why don't you just block him yourself? EpicMan ( talk) 03:42, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Please don't delete the Philippine subsidiary of Procter & Gamble! Because, this page is appeared from former name like PMC (Philippine Manufacturing Company)! ɔyʀɥs ɴotoʒɑt bulɑɡɑ ( You want to talk to me?) 02:46, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for deleting it. A bit hidden in the deletion template was the request to delete also the subpages Special:PrefixIndex/User:NoclaimsBot/List/. Could you delete these too? Thank you, Multichill ( talk) 09:32, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
I stumbled upon a huge political edit war and helped get the IP vandal blocked. Here's a link to my response to them after the edit war, after they were blocked: [ [5]] Also when you go to this page please scroll up to see their many warnings and block notice. Is it good? I didn't say anything mean, just quoted them and gave them a more detailed description of why they were blocked. I just want to make sure it isn't too harsh or mean. Thanks, Adotchar| reply here 01:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. Mike V • Talk 20:46, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
You suggested that the page Shunno (discography) be moved to Shunno discography... may I know how to do that, since to move an article, we have to create a new one. Since both already exist, i couldn't move it. Do kindly show me a way to do so... thank you! :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akash X Live ( talk • contribs) 16:57, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Not being vulgar - it's an alternative form of sackbutt (which also sounds rather rude). Trombone sounds far more polite. Anyway, they are a well-known group who are heard often on BBC Radio 3. I've tagged it for refimprove and needing independent coverage. Peridon ( talk) 19:35, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Please explain how you see "nothing to do" on this SPI. You have five IPs and one registered account, all editing the same otherwise-rarely-touched page in the same place in almost the same way within weeks of each other. What am I missing? I don't intend to drop the matter without a satisfactory answer. — swpb T 18:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
@ Swpb: This is a warning. If in the future you behave in a similar fashion to the way you have done in this case, you risk being blocked for disruptive conduct.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 20:37, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Swpb, looking even deeper into this, I do not see anything wrong with the way this was handled except by you. You create an SPI, it was correctly closed. You attack the closer on the SPI page. The attack is reverted. You go to their talk page and attack them there. That is reverted. You then create a new SPI naming all the same parties just with a different master. That is deleted as disruptive. You then create it again. It is closed by a clerk. You ask for a reconsideration. The clerk responds and asks you what you would like done but you never respond. You reopen it, I close it. You ask me for an explanation. I give it, you don't like the answer so you reopen it. You don't ever even try to discuss the SPI before reopening it. You think your interpretation is the only logical one and everyone else is wrong. There were mistakes made that could have alleviated all of this and they are on you. In the future if you don't like the answer consider actually having a conversation with people and try to understand why they did things. -- GB fan 20:49, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi GBFan, I am hoping you might be able to help and provide some guidance? it looks from the history of the page that you stepped in a tried to stop PaulSheer from deleting large parts of the page and over tagging.
Is there a mediation process within Wikipeadia when somebody is trying to close/merge the page and removing most of the content. He doesn't agree with the page and I dont agree with his removal and edits, so we are at a bit of a stale mate. I received some emails from him, and based on these, I dont think talking to him is going to be very fruitful, if there anything else that can be done?
Many thanks in advance. Colin barlow 2016 ( talk) 22:14, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
you reverted to a state where an entire section is unsourced and many of the removed players haven't been properly sourced. their links don't mention anything about their race. NFLjunkie22 ( talk) 13:08, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
example, Evander Kane the ref is just a link to players NHL profile, no mention of race [1]. this is false sourcing. NFLjunkie22 ( talk) 13:11, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
References
you probbly didn't even read the noticeboard. User:Marc87 outright REFUSED TO TALK! I bet you can't find a SINGLE instant in which he justified reverting. The information on the page is not properly sourced. A whole section ISN'T SOURCED, and he blatantly said in his last revert that he will keep reverting. NFLjunkie22 ( talk) 13:14, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
just look at what i wrote. of course i'm passionate, User:Marc87 refuses to give justification or proper souring to the edits he made. most links don't even mention the background of the player only his hockey stats, also one section is fully unsourced, that;s why i removed, yet he reverts without explanation. NFLjunkie22 ( talk) 13:30, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
oh.. yes. keep ignoring it, then proceed to tell me to talk about it. I made attempts at least 5 talk pages to talk about it, yet everyone pussyfooting. NFLjunkie22 ( talk) 13:49, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Please understand the history of time zones. A whole wide area using the same time did not happen until the 1870s or the 1880s. Before that every city has its own solar time. Timeanddate.com is not a website authoritative for time zones and time zone boundaries, but it displays the history of standard time for each city (not whole provinces, states or countries). Therefore creating "time zone" articles about a particular city before standard time zones were established is essentially a hoax. Only a few places that refuse to synchronize with Greenwich well into the 20th century get notable mentions and articles as listed in Template:UTC time offsets. Things have been stable for a few years not because of a lack of editors creating extra articles, but because each city's local time before the 1880s is simply not notable. Every city listed in timeanddate.com will probably have a history that traces back to a local time offset. We can't allow every one of these offsets be created as an additional article. HkCaGu ( talk) 04:57, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Am I going mad? I can't find any evidence of a connexion with Bollywood Hungama. A Google search reveals nothing. Adam9007 ( talk) 19:13, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Do you mind taking a look at this again?
I chose what seemed to be the closest reason on the first attempt. It really is a housekeeping issue, since 1) it was created during a move, 2) because the article title did not need to be disambiguated, and 3) it is not plausible that someone would type in Nina Browne (archivist) to get to the article about Nina Browne.
If I've missed the mark again, would you mind telling me what the right tag is that I should apply?
Thanks!-- CaroleHenson (talk) 09:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, could you please suppress the posts I deleted if appropriate? Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 20:04, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for deleting Sadzid Husić but can you please salt it to prevent recreation? Note Sadzid Husic was salted in 2013. This is part of a very elaborate Internet-wide hoax that goes back at least four years. German-language Wikipedia article ( de:Sadzid Husic) was salted for same issue - hoax profile created in 2012. See issue on IMDB from two years ago regarding his hoax profile. Thank you! —Мандичка YO 😜 12:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Please take a look at the edits to my Talk page and take any action you deem appropriate. I left a message on the poster's Talk page. I'm not sure if it was strong enough. Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 15:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, I would like to contest the deletion of article Paradise (A-Reece album). I have read A9. It seems to me that the article has been deleted because the recording artist himself doesn't have a stand alone wiki article which in that case it clearly states that on Wikipedia:NALBUM that an album doesn't have to be by a notable artist. The album has produced 4 singles that have charted on South Africa's musical charts and the album itself also charted at no. 1 on itunes just under 24 hours after its release. Please reconsider your decision for deletion. Thank You Xdigionwiki ( talk) 20:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke talk page access as well.-- Cahk ( talk) 10:02, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
This is the problem of the article List of Unilever brands. It is not use of en dash of some brands in Unilever article brands!!! cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵ3at BULAGA!!! 10:31, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
See WP:ANI#Editor appears to be not here - possible hoax article, calling some religions evil. Doug Weller talk 12:47, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
I see you have deleted User:LieutenantJames22 II for Wikipedia:NOTWEBHOST could you take a look at more of the same at User:LieutenantJames20, User:LieutenantJames22 and User:LieutenantJames30 not sure what's going on, but they are definitely not here to build an encyclopaedia. Theroadislong ( talk) 14:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, I added a sockpuppet investigation for the IP address 92.9.3.159 which was using 92.9.3.159 as its puppet. I believe it is now using 92.9.0.157 as its new puppet. I am not sure how to add a new sockpuppet, do I create a whole new sockpuppet investigation or do I edit the existing (archived) page? Absolutelypuremilk ( talk) 18:33, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
thank you very much Jonnymoon96 ( talk) 00:25, 6 December 2016 (UTC) |
Hi! I noticed you removed my A3 tag on the aforementioned page. Twinkle mentions that A3 covers an article that is just full of links to other pages, and in this case, none of the articles exist, and they all seem to link to the same page anyway, in which the intended county name is actually missing from the link. I'm curious about what actually makes this allowable. -- numbermaniac ( talk) 11:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, you refused the speedy delete for Talin Seik the village as far as I could see doesn't exist or is so small that there are no sources available. What would be the best way to deal with this kind of article. PROD? -- Domdeparis ( talk) 09:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
I was filing a report at aiv but Dr. K keeps deleting it. I tried to go to her talkpage and ask her why she keeps doing that but she just deleted my message. Could you please do something about this? 66.87.77.73 ( talk) 02:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I note that you added the redirect on PaRappa (singer). Having been involved in the case, which is listed at ANI, I can confirm that the 2 subjects are entirely different, and the sharing of a name is coincidental. The user has been removing CSD tags and re-creating the article. I have therefore reverted the redirect - but feel free to discuss further. I feel another block for the user is also warranted to prevent from further recreation of articles. Thanks. TheMagikCow ( talk) 12:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
(cur | prev) 15:16, 22 November 2016 GB fan (talk | contribs) . . (17,179 bytes) (-493) . . (Reverted 4 edits by MultidisciplineSE&D (talk): This looks like someone trying to spam their name into Wikipedia. (TW)) (undo)
GB fan:
Here we go again. I was the one who added a contribution to the List of SEs page - not some hacker trying to spam a webpage. If you know anything about Systems Engineering, you should be cognizant of my Systems Engineering Analysis, Design, sand Development: Concepts, Principles, and Practices textbook published by John Wiley (New York) - not some fly by night publisher - is one of the leading SE textbooks world wide. I have ESEP Certification from INCOSE, and championed paradigm shifts in industry, government, and academia who are still practicing SE that has been outdated seance the 1980's. That is why Engineering projects continue to have cost overruns, slips, and risks.
If you go to the webpage below, you will further find authentication that the 1st Edition of my SE text received the 2006 International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) Engineering Science Book of the Year award. < http://iaaweb.org/content/view/144/244/>
I trust that we can establish these credentials for several Wikipedia SE webpages and move on. Being new to Wikipedia, if there is something I need to do to correct my contributions, please kindly advise. I would sincerely appreciate it.
Respectfully, MultidisciplineSE&D MultidisciplineSE&D ( talk) 15:09, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
GB fan
FURTHER READING - As I am learning to understand the context of Wikipedia and "articles", may I suggest this. Although the 2nd Edition textbook update has only been out for a few months, according to Google Scholar, which tracks academic citations to referenced works, indicates that this text has had 207 citations for references as authoritative work. Additionally, this text is referenced in technical papers accepted by the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) and the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE). What is important is the "acceptance" of this text as an authoritative work world wide. The notion of "writing and article and referencing it" would be self-serving, which seems to conflict with guidance you provided. I find your presumption of me trying to get my name into Wikipedia as inappropriate. Objectively, what do we need to do to correct this issue?
EXTERNAL LINKS - Lastly, the PPI SE Goldmine in a commercial business promoting their courses and collecting login email info. What seems to be the obstacle to removal here?
Best Regards, Multidiscipline SE&D — Preceding unsigned comment added by MultidisciplineSE&D ( talk • contribs) 15:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
for that edit/reversion re: Oluwa2Chainz' archiving someone else's talk page. I was stunned when I saw the edits, thanks for stepping in. Shearonink ( talk) 01:13, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi GB, I'm assuming this is to do with the CSD tagging and AfDs? Snöggletög Nightfury Happy Christmas!! 11:42, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Thank you for messaging me. If you want to help improve the description of their scores, I would gladly welcome that. I believe the issue to which you refer is that I said "voting record." I think that must have been spur of the moment as, at other times, I said "record" more generally as can be seen via the edits I made. It's so easy to connect their records with only "voting", but you are absolutely correct and I thank you for reviewing that and fixing it!. I have read their description and if you can help edit where it is needed, please do! I have also added "publicly available data" upon which they also based that score. So, thank you for the message and for helping to edit. Responding to your question, I think they are fairly notable at least as notable as Americans for Democratic Action and American Conservative Union which are also regularly used to describe how candidates are rated and what ratings they received. I also did not first cite them. Someone had cited them on the "Susan Collins" page and I helped to correct their description of the score. I checked it out and, having heard of them before, felt it was good. In fact, CNN featured Crowdpac scores for 2016 candidates. [1] Again, thank you for your message and if you can help improve a statement or source please do so.
P.S. I have added "watch this page" per your request. Happy Holidays!
Sincerely, SeminarianJohn ( talk) 21:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
References
Thank you for responding again. I did leave a message on my page, but also here for your convenience. I'm only quoting the source itself in how it describes the rating. So, it is not my intent to state something incorrectly. That's a direct quote, but I do not mind one bit if you, or anyone else, wants to paraphrase that quote. That's why this is a community effort and why it works so well! It is definitely a benefit to have multiple editors making sure it can be phrased in the best understood way and helping others. Once more, thank you for the message and edits! I made sure to send thanks via the wiki pages as well. Please feel free to respond on my page as well. I just wanted to make sure to respond in the best way possible. Again, have a Happy Holidays!
Sincerely SeminarianJohn ( talk) 01:18, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I just noticed that you have removed the deletion tag that I added to Phulbani Odia. May I ask why you think that article should exist? Can you share some citations that can explain why this article should exist on Wikipedia? I am a native speaker of the Odia language and I can confirm that there is no such thing called Phulbani Odia. -- Psubhashish ( talk) 06:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello GB fan: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Shearonink ( talk) 17:37, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
It seems to be commonly known that CHC is shorthand for cold hard cash. Is there a good way to add this to the CHC disambiguation page? 205.168.59.134 ( talk) 20:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
How about CI for Car Insurance? You reverted that too. 205.168.59.134 ( talk) 00:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello GB fan. 36hourblock has recently reverted edits that I made to the article Missouri Compromise, which he or she has been working on, with the edit summary: "Qualified editors only: please post comments on talk page". The use of the words "Qualified editors only" once again implies that I am a sock puppet. These accusations continue to be made with no SPI having been filed, and little evidence presented.
Also, I would appreciate you taking a look at the message that I left on 36hourblock's talk page under "Personal Attacks". Thank you for your help. Display name 99 ( talk) 18:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The reason as to why I requested the delete was because all the Bandai Hardware pages are on Template:Bandai Namco as Bandai and Namco have combined as a singular conglomerate for a while now. Surely, there's no purpose of having this template anymore? it's a wasted duplicate. Iftekharahmed96 ( talk) 09:55, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,
I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.
For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."
Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)
CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.
Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉) 13:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Instead of only reverting changes of others, please start talking. Waiting for your points for letting the article stay at Talk:Akshar_Pathak . I get it that you only removed "speedy deletion" request. I want a discussion about its existence on wikipedia. My argument for its deletion still stands. Would love to see your views in articles talk page -- 182.75.175.230 ( talk) 13:58, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
I have seen to be proposed this article Nestlé Bear Brand to make more than 50 languages to make an encyclopedic article, and will back my deleted Bear Brand article from some languages.
Note: it proposed to be 50
| ||
---|---|---|
|
Thank you! -- cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵ3at BULAGA!!! 01:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
what, if any, would be appropriate for Draft:Paxful considering the mainspace article was deleted Paxful by you as A7, and the page draft page creator was blocked UPOL violation? I did some cleanup of the mainspace article, and if left it very empty. Additional research support that it is very unlikely this will reach mainspace status anytime soon. TiggerJay (talk) 23:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi please review User:Tony Brabec/sandbox MassiveYR ( talk) 00:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Sorry my mistake, I had not realised that it was a userspace draft article — Preceding unsigned comment added by MassiveYR ( talk • contribs) 09:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
My logic circuits tell me I am beaten. Time to admit that I am a bot. - SummerPhD v2.0 03:03, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Please could you possibly perform a non-admin closure of This? If you account for votes that should be discounted, delete is slightly ahead but if you don't it should be kept. I would relist, but it would just come to the same conclusion of people making bad arguments on both sides, I don't see a point in continuing it and it has been discussed for over a week now. I ask you because you closed an intertwined article on /r/TheDonald, which had a similar consensus. The reasons I can't close this myself are
1. I have voted in the discussion and created the page originally 2. I don't even know how to do so...
Thanks alot,
AlessandroTiandelli333 ( talk) 20:55, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
GB fan,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (
talk) 07:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Hi GB fan, TW didn't show the page was already protected - apologies. I've undone my change to the protection -- samtar talk or stalk 11:36, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
I tagged U5 / G11; they have now removed the tag twice. I left an explanatory 'note' on their TP. No response. Blanked it again. If I tagged wrong I will apologise. But I don't think so. On a lighter note, Happy New year, GB! Take care, O Fortuna! ...Imperatrix mundi. 15:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for that. I had pinged another admin to take a look. Onel5969 TT me 22:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
You might want to reconsider the speedy deletion of that article. The author of it contacted me on my talk page and said "he had no playing time". WP:NFOOTY requires having actually played. I did a search for this individual, pairing it with "football"...and got nothing. Food for thought. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 01:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Thg099 is vandalized the page like Chandler Parsons was called robbery, you can block this user indefinitely. cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵ3at BULAGA!!! 10:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
hi will like to be confirmed .new user .i submitted my page .thank you Eazzy firstlady ( talk) 05:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Good Afternoon,
I am contacting you regarding article on celebrity Sonya Berg you deleted July 30th, 2014. I am inquiring on the basis of deletion? I am Sonya's assistant and before updating the article with credible sources, I just wanted to verify that was indeed the issue for removal. I appreciate your feedback, and time.
-Taylor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twarfield ( talk • contribs) 22:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Sonya Berg is a TV Host, Fashion Show Production, Stylist, Designer, Inspirational Speaker, Branding Partner, Polo player TV Personality, Self improvement Fashion and Lifestyle blogger, Industrial Engineer & Motivational Speaker
Hi, warm greetings, we been notified that the artiste Eazzy has been deleted and will gladly like you to restore it since fans will like to view stuff about her and kindly notify the reasons for deletion for future validations
www.twitter.com/eazzyfirstladyCite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
www.facebook.com/eazzyfirstladyCite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/kpakposhito-single/id1049035252Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
1 May 2012 GB fan (talk | contribs) deleted page Eazzy (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page)
Eazzy firstlady (
talk) 05:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
I think that the Main Page should be moved to Wikipedia's Home Page to be more consistent with other websites. To ensure that people do not rely on a redirect. I think the original page should be deleted.
However, if I try to request deletion of Main Page via Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion, I see that the page Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Main_Page has been protected from creation by you leaving me unable to begin the discussion.
Therefore I am formally requesting Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection of this page.
Please let me know your decision.
Thanks,
Habster360 ( talk) 08:56, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Please, I want to be an admin because I am active on English Wikipedia. cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵ3at BULAGA!!! 10:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello GB fan,
Is there any other option? I nominated the redirects for deletion because even though the show exist, the seasons don't exist. To me, the redirects don't make much sense. -- 1989 ( talk) 03:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Just dropping by to say warmest cheers and a hello for the new year. Wanted to share a continuing predicament with you. While tagging pages like Ravirawat85, after your detailed guidance, I would have wished to tag the same with no context. Unfortunately, I suspect that some administrators might not understand the no context tag as clearly as you do; therefore, I end up tagging such articles with A7 speedies.... which is ironical, because A7 is almost bipolar to the no context tag, so one can't even use the multiple tag criteria, combining A7 and no-context. Just sharing the predicament :) Hope you're doing well. See you around. Lourdes 09:41, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I was trying to ask a question on some sites and it was a surprise for me that some sites are paid (on transtutors.com I was billed only after asking question, so a lot of time was kelled). I think that at least warning must be in table , if you don't like amounts. 37.52.42.124 ( talk) 14:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi GB fan
I just made a citation of entertaining tattoo website https://tattoozza.com/henna-tattoos. As far as I can see it doesn't offer any commercial services. I've noticed that notes number 8 ( http://tattoo-journal.com/25-nobel-bible-verses-tattoos/) and 62 ( http://www.tattoo-bewertung.de/content/aktuelle-laserbehandlung) cite similar entertaining websites about tattooing. Why those citations are reliable, but the citation which I made is not reliable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henderson87 ( talk • contribs) 21:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello GB fan, long-term disruptive editor Smoore95GAGA looks to be back under various IPs (usually beginning with 73.81), similar editing patterns (targeting recent music releases) and similar edit summaries ( [8] and [9]). They have been reported by Kellymoat, Jennica and myself since earlier this month at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PeopleEater143, but no action has yet been taken. Not exactly a smoking gun, but one of the IPs reported and blocked on Smoore95GAGA's archived SPI begins with 73.81 as well, and as pointed out in the most recent report by Livelikemusic in November of last year, they edit recent music releases, and lately have targeted List of 2017 albums, Ed Sheeran's recent releases, and SweetSexySavage just earlier today. (Just letting you know, I also posted this to Ponyo, who blocked the original account.) Ss 112 07:29, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Can you please redact revision 762747512 on Norman Reedus? The long edit description is messing up the history page on mobile devices.
Thanks
Gamebuster19901 (Talk | Contributions) 15:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
thank u for the info.it helped me a lot.
now how do i put it on wiki? jordan ( talk) 15:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC) |
dear gb fan, thank u for the info. pls tell me how to put it on wiki. thx jordan ( talk) 15:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
A check of his user page shows that it is a copy from [10]. He seems to like pasting this everywhere. Kill the plant from the root by blocking? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arkhaminsanity ( talk • contribs) 17:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your help on the Image consulting page - a redirect does make more sense to be fair!
DrStrauss
talk 22:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for noticing the vandalism on the page Alexander Grande, but i think it is very unnecessary to delete it, and i would therefore tell you to set it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quetal99 ( talk • contribs) 11:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi , I am new to contributing. I linked to a Youtube video to add the trivia information that he plays the violin on Ben Shapiro's page is this against the rules ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loneather ( talk • contribs) 19:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Can you take a look at filter 722? Is it still needed? ~ Rob13 Talk 04:56, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, regarding your removal of the speedy deletion tag from the article, I want to say that the article is a hoax. No such announcement has been made by Karan Johar (you can confirm by gooogling), and the source attached to the article is non-existent, which the author of the article has also done at Anushka Sharma's article. – FrB.TG ( talk) 15:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
There's no part of G4 which says that it doesn't apply with MFDs. There was a discussion about the subject's notability a year ago that decided they were not notable. True it's unusual for notability to be decided at MFD rather than AFD but that was because it was only sent there because of the endless rounds of AFC the article had gone through at the behest of paid editors. None of the sources are new. IMO at least, it's pointless bureaucracy to have an AFD, especially given that the editor who created it is obviously not a new user. SmartSE ( talk) 19:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I was recently contacted by Alberto Frigo. He was not satisfied with the Wikipedia article I wrote about him and asked me to either update it or delete it (which alas is not possible). I am trying to update it more thoroughly now. I noticed you deleted some text yesterday. I understand your point - I will base my future writings on more sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turekka ( talk • contribs) 09:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, most of the article has been created by myself. I am planning similar articles on other media practitioners. We are now in touch so that Frigo can upload images from his own project (e.g. the one with his equipment and so forth and many more to come to explain the various components) and help me with sourcing (which I am now doing on my sandbox). If this, based on your suspicions, cannot occur, you ought to assist him with the total removal of the page as he initially requested and contact him here: http://2004-2040.com/30_we.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turekka ( talk • contribs) 15:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Good, thanks. I will try to improve the page and then move forward proposing new pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turekka ( talk • contribs) 16:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
I figured that they probably would be unrelated, but when I came across this edit filter, titled "CheckUser Sock block", I thought it'd be good for someone to at the very least check it out... Thanks. 172.58.40.66 ( talk) 23:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Greetings,
I came across a sports page to simply correct an edit a friend had jokingly made, but I was not able to successfully retrieve the original information. I believe the page will be reverted in the next few days or so. Therefore, I deeply apologize for the inconvenience. If you could just permanently delete the latest two edits made on 13:49 and 13:34 February 12, 2017 (revisions) on this link below, then that would be great:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_Denver_Broncos_season
Highly appreciate your work. Thanks.
Broncosfan071858 (
talk) 15:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Understood, but there was identifiable information not supposed to be posted in that article (like that IP address), in which, I prefer not to be made public. As I was trying to make a quick fix, and did not intend for any vandalism. Was there somebody else whom I could contact to have the IP address removed from the article?
One criteria I found:
Non-public personal information about a real individual. This could be private information about you or others This includes a telephone number, an address or location, the name of a workplace or school, other online and offline identities, a date of birth, accidentally disclosed IP addresses, and (subject to oversighter judgment) other information of an identifying nature. Broncosfan071858 ( talk) 18:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello; I realized the person was not attempting to be Julian Edelman, but being only one letter off (and pronounced pretty much the same) it could be confused with him and the username policy states "Do not edit under a name that is likely to imply that you are (or are related to) a specific, identifiable person, unless it is your real name. If you have the same name as a well-known person to whom you are unrelated, and are using your real name, you should state clearly on your userpage that you are unrelated to the well-known person." Should they not at least post some sort of notice indicating they are not Julian Edelman? 331dot ( talk) 15:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. This is my first new page creation (previously I only edited existed pages) so I need to figure out how to do citations better. Meanwhile I'd prefer if page be left offline (unpublished). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caliguspedia ( talk • contribs) 21:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
I noticed you deleted the redirect page "Weixinism". Rightly so: "Weixin Shengjiao" did not exist, as it was a draft waiting review. Now "Weixin Shengjiao" has been moved online by an editor. I am recreating the "Weixinism" redirect page. Thank you Aidayoung Aidayoung ( talk) 20:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Sort of jumping between my work here and non-wiki life a bit too hastily today. thanks, Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 21:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
I have no way of reconciling the page that had references and citations to plausible media and credible sources. This seems to be a form of bullying as there's no justification or explanation. Please explain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vizulux ( talk • contribs) 23:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
#REDIRECT [[Mark M. Whelan FRSA]] {{R from move}}
Sorry, for some reason I was looking at an old diff and not the current version and hadn't realized it was already closed. -- Tavix ( talk) 15:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
You deleted my article of 'WorldLink Forums' without explanation. I'd like to ask WHY you deleted it because I went back and added some useful information about why it should be considered important. I would like a valid explanation of why you did it, please. Also you didn't give me enough time to edit it and you could at least have allowed me to keep the information I put in it because I spent a while typing it!!! Thanks and I really hope I get a response, -- Csprime ( talk) 17:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi I noticed you are reverting my edits and keeping spammy content. Just the fact that someone worked for a notable company, doesn't make them notable. References to the publications has been also deleted and not available anymore, which clearly indicates that references has been published only to get someone into the Wikipedia. What are the reasons you are protecting these articles?? Jone Rohne Nester ( talk) 20:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Just seen that this page which I'd speedied was recreated and redeleted. Apologies since I didn't see what happened, but was this by the same editor, Arcticview, or a different one? Arcticview has a warning from me on their page not to edit further without posting a COI disclosure, so they could be sockpuppeting from a different account if it's a new account. 14:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your advice, and sorry for the trouble.
Best,
GAB gab 14:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello GB fan. If you don't mind, could you consider providing a copy of a deleted revision at List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom by date of death? Thank-you.-- Nevé – selbert 17:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Could I take a look at whatever you'd nuked on HB? I think he might be workable into an article, if it's the same fellow. Anmccaff ( talk) 22:31, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello GB-Fan, I created the article " Geshe Tenzin Dhargye". Now I have to delete it because it causes a lot problems for GTD, which I never intended. You have refused my Speedy deletion request, now I added this Proposed Deletion Tag. What can I do to speed up this process? Is there anything you can tell me to help me? Thank you so much! Lucia -- Luzilla Knapp ( talk) 19:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello. At the Help Desk, someone asked about an article on Diane Larsen-Freeman that you deleted on Dec. 13, 2016. That's all I know, but maybe you can respond there and explain what happened. Regards, DonFB ( talk) 08:14, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm not going to template you but you're edit warring and FWIW just because you're an admin it doesn't mean you're exempt from
WP:AN3 - All April Fools AFDs have stayed on all 1st April AFD logs for quite a few years so I don't see why this year needs to be any different however if you want them gone then seek consensus on the talkpage,
As you know edit warring will only go one way,
Thanks, –
Davey2010
Talk 19:01, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello! How are you doing GB fan i please want to know why you deleted the article Atis Constant -- Itilite ( talk) 03:07, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Atis Constant page has been deleted several times, it has been created by other people that may not know if they have to respect the Wikipedia rules and how to create an article please help getting the page back
GB fan.--
Itilite (
talk) 20:35, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
the tag at the front of 'Perth Link precinct' is a misnomer - the CFD is actually about 'Perth City Link precinct' - the first was created accidentally (which why I had tried to make it CSD), the second was intentional - but in the end, considering the mucking around I couldnt give a damn - the splitting hairs over whether a category means one thing or another is equivalent to wandering through talk pages with endless go around conversations - and some seem to enjoy that, I do not. JarrahTree 12:22, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Why did you revert my speedy deletion nomination of User:Khintye/sandbox? The article already exists? -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 17:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Edit: The same goes for
Draft:Sex Roles: Biological Perspective --
TheSandDoctor (
talk) 17:24, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Edit #2: The same goes for
Draft:Alternative Healing Methods --
TheSandDoctor (
talk) 17:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there GB fan, would you restore Anita Rios so I can contest the prod? I only became aware of it when you deleted it. Thank you!-- TM 14:45, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello GB fan,
Reading around you seem to be someone with some authority and knowledge of the Wikipedia phenomenon. I am new to the business and I have a question. I am, or I just made, a Wikipedia lemma about a Dutch musician/composer Laurens van Rooyen. To my surprise somebody (Fortuna imperatrix mundi) added a reference to some publication which has Nothing to do with the subject of the lemma! I then removed it but then later a certain Bonadea informed that my correction was reverted.
What is happening? And can one do something about it?
TIA!
Michiel — Preceding unsigned comment added by MountainR ( talk • contribs) 16:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
MountainR ( talk) 17:05, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
What I am referring to is that the article is of Ivan Artaza, who among other opportunities has said he is familiar with it, therefore it is considered as insignificant and self-promotion (so it is from the same family).
Also the sources are from the official website itself, links that do not mention it and blogs. -- 190.159.238.86 ( talk) 17:59, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
I tagged this for speedy deletion as it is clearly a copy and paste job from another article. This article was speedily deleted by DGG earlier today and this version is no improvement. There is no evidence that this is a University or any sort of college. It may be a hoax or a degree mill. The presumption of notability only relates to institutions that can make a reasonable claim to exist. Velella Velella Talk 12:05, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for this revert. I certainly didn't request the speedy delete. I believe it was the same IP hopper who attacked my talk page a few days ago. - JuneGloom07 Talk 21:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I seen that you decline the delete of these redirects. I completely understand the purpose of a redirect, it's another phrase used to link to an article. My problem is though, not only has all the links to these redirects been eliminated, but it is impossible to type Jikkyō Powerful Pro Yakyū with a standard QWERTY keyboard, thus making that redirect page void. Plus, both phrases have inserted the word title incorrectly. I genuinely believe the best course of action is to delete said redirects as they waste article space on Wikipedia, and are formatted incorrectly to begin with. Iftekharahmed96 ( talk) 08:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
I think EJIDA Studios should be undeleted because it is a great short film company that has been noted in a few independent sources, so that is why I don't think this page should have been deleted. Superpilot123456 ( talk) 11:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi GBfan, Could you explain why you think the timeline is not a timeline? No one else has complained in the past 2 years, so that is why I am writing to you personally. As I explained, the timeline starts with teenage, passes through middle age and ends in atherosclerosis and death. It is not clear to me why you think it is not a timeline. And if it is not clear, I would be grateful if you could make suggestions how we can make it clearer.
Is it for example necessary to revert the changes that Zedshort carried out on March 23, formatting the timeline into a simplistic list of medical conditions? I would be grateful for your advice. And then we can take it to the Talk page for everyone to agree on. 86.158.154.52 ( talk) 13:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
I don't know where to put this request, so I am going to start here. Wikipedia:Editor review is marked as historical, Wikipedia:Administrator review is basically dead and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct is also marked historical. There does not seam to be any place to get a review of edits.
I have been accused of being a "frantic, furious ball of anger" that "can't get through a day without violating WP:BITE, WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, WP:POINT, or any of the other policies and guidelines that you (I) constantly violate." This is "because you'll (I'll) never actually get blocked like you (I) badly deserve." I tried to engage to get more info about how I am doing these things. CityOfSilver does not want to engage at all with me, so I can not get any more info from him.
I would like other editors to look at my history and see if they can point out all these short comings. I am not perfect, no one is. I recently got into a little edit war about the joke AfDs, but I do not know how I violate any policies or guidelines on a daily basis. ~ GB fan 23:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
...trout-slapping myself. Thanks for the revert. Lectonar ( talk) 10:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Btw it's my first time editing and I'm welcomed by blocking I do have my resources you can look it up in google I can't put the link here it gets deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lamis chelbi ( talk • contribs) 13:49, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
I mistook the deletion of the CSD-tag for one by the author. Apologies. Kleuske ( talk) 14:32, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Hey,
Our page TravelTriangle, got deleted. I am looking forward to make another page. Can you pls guide me
Thank You
Why do not belong? There are many list pages with flagicons! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.25.225.166 ( talk) 17:44, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, you should know that I have in the past nominated some draft articles for speedy nomination, but you reverted them since they were all the wrong type of deletion. You put a link on my talk page a couple of times on where to go and put the right type of deletion on. I've looked at them a couple of times but I have failed to find the one I'm looking for. I am looking for a deletion for a "draft" article, specifically the one that has a blank submission or has a couple of words. Can you tell me the template to use for these? Thanks 👊🏻 Plum3600 ( talk) 18:12, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
{{
Db-g13}}
. Please read the instructions on how to use it. There is an additional parameter that needs to be on the template.
~ GB fan a "frantic, furious ball of anger" 18:31, 18 April 2017 (UTC)@ GB fan: FWIW - seems I created the " Genius (2017 film)" article very recently - on April 17, 2017 - after searching for a similar article - but, at the time, not finding one - seems there was a similar article after all - at => " Genius (U.S. TV series)" - my own " Genius (2017 film)" article is a much more complete article that is better referenced and more updated than the older " Genius (U.S. TV series)" article (nearly a stub in comparison at the moment?) - how exactly should this be resolved - should there be a merge of content - a sd template applied to one or the other - or some other procedure - I'm flexible with this, just not clear how best to proceed at the moment - an exact suggested procedure would be welcome - in any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan ( talk) 17:15, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Done - Thank you *very much* for your help with this - it's *greatly* appreciated - all should now be ok - Thanks again - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan ( talk) 18:36, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
You called me "a frantic, flaming ball of anger." I am telling my mother. She will find you. She is justice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graeme296 ( talk • contribs) 15:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Well, looks like you win, I've pulled everything I can. You played fair and square. Sorry if this dragged on longer than it needed to. Iftekharahmed96 ( talk) 16:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for deleting some on my user pages for me, could you also delete this one? User:Mark999/sandbox2 Thank you. Mark999 ( talk) 13:06, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello GB fan,
So pages like this are allowed to be on the site? -- 1989 20:26, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
I do not agree with your decision to close the section on ANI, as it is partly related to User: Calvin999's behavior and edit warring towards anyone that makes opposing contributions to articles he's involved in.
You did not attempt to resolve anything, other than simply shut things down. I did not make my submission at ANI over a content dispute, but moreover to have a neutral party resolve the matter without an edit war. I do not see that you resolved the matter at all.-- Carmaker1 ( talk) 21:07, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
GBfan, thanks for closing the thread on ANI, I also knew it was not the correct or appropriate forum. However, I have since been threatened by Carmaker not to edit the article in question, and I just received a final warning from him on my user talk, without any other prior warnings, for replying to him on the thread. Again, not correct or appropriate. It's becoming tiresome now, and it could have all been avoided if Carmaker had spoken to me first instead of reverting and changing info without a reliable source. Alas, an RS has now been found, though why it was not presented in the first place, I do not know. I'm sorry this has spilled onto your user talk, I won't reply here again unless you address me directly, as it's not the right place. — Calvin999 21:36, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Sorry if this isn't the best way to do this -- it's the first time I've requested a revision deletion. The dif is here [12] and it's the edit summary that I think easily meets the standard of Grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material. Please do let me know if there's a better way to report these if I see them in the future and thanks for looking at it!
Mizike ( talk) 15:18, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi -- I saw your name on the WP:Oversight page. I emailed to oversight earlier today but did not hear back. I am wondering if you are able to check and / or move this forward. Thank you! K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Not sure it matters but a little insight into that speedy tag (it was placed in bad faith) - it was likely the creator of Abhijit Das ( Poet ) and other variations. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:20, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
You said - "an hour ago, you did revert my decline on Head IV. I did notice it and reverted you again within 2 minutes". You are exactly wrong. Read up before you give silly factless opinion like this. I removed red links from the nav box, sadly, which is your achievement. You then took to aruging the toss with me over several hostile edits on my talk page, doubling down on your error. What are you thinking. Ceoil ( talk) 17:09, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
I
requested to undelete
User:ㅂㄱㅇ and move to
User:ㅂㄱㅇ/up without redirect, but you deleted it again. --
Hi there, I picked you at random from the revdel-willing cat. Requesting a precautionary RD3 of the edit summary on Special:Diff/780014457. It might just be spam in the summary, but the content change to "hacked367" makes me question the safety of the URL. I don't have specific info to confirm it's a malicious site. Thanks. Murph9000 ( talk) 12:29, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello GB fan. I have given source to Sudirman Arshad. I hope you removed the PROD tag to his article that tagged by Alexander Iskandar. Several more references I will add to his article later. Thank you. Fandi89 ( talk) 03:07, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for being a voice of reason. Ceoil ( talk)
I'm just gonna leave this right here. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Categories G3, G5, and G10 are applicable in this case. The category was automatically created by banned user ColourWolf (G5) in an effort to disparage me (under my former username, which makes it eligible for G10), and there is no evidence to back that the IPs belong to me whatsoever (the IPs are all Singapore-based, and I have never set foot on that country. G5 fulfilled). Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 23:31, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
I didn't write this article, but I noticed that you deleted the article Arya Permana as A7 ( Meatsgains tagged it originally). I was actually going to remove that tag on grounds that it at least deserves a deletion discussion; it has a claim of significance as "the heaviest child". I wasn't sure if this was credible, so I searched online: I found multiple sources, such as this BBC news source and this Telegraph source, which support the claims made in the article. Because of this coverage, I don't think the article falls under A7, nor do I believe it's an obvious delete at AfD. For these reasons, I think it'd be good to restore the article and allow some time for improvement. Appable ( talk | contributions) 17:38, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, changes on the carnival page are continually erased. My contribution is independent and disinterested, I know the subject closely and the original page only serves to advertise a mafia event. On wikipedia the truth is not the propaganda of the people salaried by the organizers of the festival, who are also ignorant in the matter. Bringing the truth back is not vandalism!-- Dufresne tim ( talk) 12:07, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I was told that you deleted the longstanding article on John Burroughs Middle School. As stated in the article, Los Angeles' John Burroughs Middle School has been featured in many movies, including Pretty in Pink, Waiting for Guffman, Teen Wolf, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Never Been Kissed, Pleantville, Bad Teacher and Teaching Miss Tingle.
Its alumni include Dustin Hoffman, Tyra Banks, Phil Spector, Harry Shearer and Slash from Guns N' Roses.
It's been around for 93 years.
But you wouldn't know that because the school's Wikipedia has vanished.
So, why is John Burroughs Middle School suddenly undeserving of a Wikipedia page?
The original Wikipedia page had been around for many years.
At first, I assumed that it was a new Wikipedia policy that middle schools pages should be deleted. But Virgil Middle School, located 3 miles away, still has its Wikipedia page intact.
It seems bizarre that a noteworthy Wikipedia page can be erased from history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WeNo1 ( talk • contribs) 18:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
I think I've made the case that the school is notable. It has been used as a school representing a "high school" is several iconic films. In fact, I've made the case that the school is more notable than nearby Virgil Middle School, and nobody has opted to redirect that school's Wikipedia page.
John Burroughs Middle School even has a "fan page" devoted to its use as a school in the movies. http://www.iamnotastalker.com/2009/07/02/the-never-been-kissed-high-school/
Let me ask you this: Are regular users searching for info on John Burroughs Middle School better served clicking on a link that will lead to information about that school, or to a general listing of all Los Angeles Unified School District schools?
According to the "WikiProject Schools," "This project aims to improve the quality of school-related articles. Articles within the scope this project should become far more substantial than stubs, and ultimately match the quality of featured articles." /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools#Project_goals
I think that Wikipedia page fit that description -- having more information is better than having less.
Finally, that Wikipedia page had been around for more than a decade. I think that, in and of itself, is an argument for its relevance.
So can I ask you to please restore the John Burroughs Middle School Wikipedia page?
Edit: Sorry: I accidentally deleted your original comment. I'm new to Wikipedia
WeNo1 ( talk) 14:58, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
I have added UrlSave an External Link for Social Bookmarking article. Please do not remove it. I want to spread the word about the service.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.253.198.40 ( talk) 08:11, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
This article has some personal info at the bottom. With thanks. -- QEDK ( 愛) 18:48, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
I believe this should be suppressed. I haven't posted anything on the talk page of the user who made the edit. Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 15:34, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Darushfathi24 ( talk · contribs)
Can delete this one?: click here. Thanks. - Prinsipe Ybarro ( Talk to me) 12:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
I don't understand. Please delete my talk page. "Individual revisions, log entries, and other user space material may be deleted or redacted for privacy reasons, or because of harassment, threats, gross offensiveness and other serious violations." This is my situation. Private/identifying information is still visible in my history. I do not agree to the terms of service; I never did. I want out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VanishedUser sdu9aya9fs787sads ( talk • contribs) 16:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The fastest way to request oversight is to email the oversight team. |
If you are a user who has a request for suppression, please note that details should not be posted in public. Use this form, email oversight-en-wpwikipedia.org or see Wikipedia:Requests for oversight for other ways to request suppression. |
Thank you for the clarification you provided about the use of my userpage. Do you know if there's a way I can promptly resolve the AfD debate underway? Kinda disheartening to have that looming over my head... PvOberstein ( talk) 18:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
What was the claim of significance? I didn't see any. Toddst1 ( talk) 13:37, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
I have redirected cto Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group Redirection to a subsidiary page-- Reliance Industries did not make sense. Why have a redirect that creates duplicity of pages. There is already has a well-established page.
Also, the Reliance Group page is empty. I kind of agree with @ Johnsonwatts: that this page should be deleted. Your thoughts? -- Anrdshr ( talk) 12:57, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
@
GB fan:
Hi,
I get your point. Will try to explain mine as well. Thanks for letting my redirect stay. -- Anrdshr ( talk) 06:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Anrdshr I think GB fan has a protocol point. On introspection I did realize that speedy deletion shouldn't be the way over WP:RFD. Johnsonwatts ( talk) 11:32, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
GB fan without getting into WP:RFD would do a page move on Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group as per WP:MV. Following reasons: The new name subject has come into majority use. Will avoid confusion with the existing Anil Ambani page. Advise me if that's a workable solution. Thanks Johnsonwatts ( talk) 11:51, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
You really shouldn't have done this. It not only justified the disruptive editor's POV pushing, it introduced wildly inaccurate information to what is supposed to be an encyclopedia. (It was also ungrammatical.) I easily found the Census Bureau figures and added them. As you can see, the POV pusher's stats were not even in the ballpark. 32.218.32.137 ( talk) 20:06, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Its back mind deleting again and perhaps blocking with TPA revoked? -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 01:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
For reverting the trolling at Talk:David Duke. Joefromrandb ( talk) 02:10, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
When you refuse deleting for duplicate and filtered categories and articles is a Opposed of what you do as an administrator. If you can not delete, leave the administration aside and search for another career for you in Wikipedia. -- FPP ( talk) 16:29, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi GB fan. I have got a couple of articles which have been made by the same author and haven't got any references. Some do, but only one. Since your an administrator I thought you can delete these articles.
Thanks!
Plum3600 (
talk) 15:35, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
My problem with cleaning up Celtic Thunder (United States) was that it wasn't a completely new article creation. I started it through WP:SPLIT so the contribution history had to be preserved. I didn't know that migrating it through draftspace would do that, so when I couldn't proceed with the cleanup in mainspace I gave up. Thanks for taking up the work! JamesMLane t c 16:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Good afternoon,
After extensive research we have created an updated and thorough 'History' section that we'd like to add to the 'Navy Supply Corps School' wikipedia page. Is this something you can help us with? How can we get the page to reflect the research we've done?
Thank you for your help.
-Ryan aka SC Fan — Preceding unsigned comment added by SC Fan ( talk • contribs) 17:41, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Sir, completely understand your concerns and I am not trying to put the schoolhouse in any type of light. I am simply trying to update the school's history to include all the locations it has been and that's really all. It would be easier to explain over a phone conversation if possible. This is the number to the schoolhouse and public information so there is no violation. The information that I want to update is referenced in two separate publications and annual command history reports, which can be accessed through the naval archives. Thank you for your help with this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SC Fan ( talk • contribs) 17:30, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Hey, re George Michael. I accepted the category because the title CBE had already been added/accepted to the page. I looked up what CBE meant and it checked out with the category so I let it in. Hopefully I wasn't seen to have done anything wrong. Thank you. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ᐁT₳LKᐃ 12:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Good Evening GB,
My name is LT Jason Potvin. I work at the Supply Corps school house in Newport, Rhode Island. I work with SC Fan (Ryan). I've read everything that you've written to Ryan in your back and fourth discussion and i completely understand your concerns. Sir, we are in no way trying to build up the school house or gain something from updating this page that you've taken time creating. We simply want to give a more robust history of the Navy Supply Corps School. Sir, are you a retired Supply Corps Officer or Supply Corps service member? This project means a lot to the staff of the Navy Supply Corps School because we take great pride in where we come from and what we represent in the United States Navy. We have a command historian who has devoted hundreds of man hours to lining the walls of the school house with storied history of the Navy Supply Corps School from the inception until present day. The only thing that we want to accomplish is updating the history you have listed, that is all Sir. Mr. Jim Jacobs has worked very hard in researching the history through "Ready for Sea" The Bicentennial History of the U.S. Navy Supply Corps by RADM Frank J. Allston and "Ready for Sea" The History of the U.S. Navy Supply Corps by Mr. Jeffrey L. Rodengen, as well all the Command History reports that have been recorded since the inception of the school house. In regards to your question to Ryan about "we" and "us", nobody has access to that username/account except Ryan. He speaks the words "we" and "us" because we are a team and trying to work together to make this happen. So i'm asking you, is there anyway we can make this happen? Can we talk via telephone to help communicate this process along so we can discuss concerns back and forth?
Thank you for taking the time to read this.
Have a blessed evening,
LT Jason L. Potvin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brady121212 ( talk • contribs) 01:23, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi - this page was requested to be deleted because there is a non draft (article) by the same name: "SPRFMO". Not sure why we need to keep the draft? Supcmd ( talk) 11:24, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi! I messed up doing a round robin – there is a redirect with older history at Draft:White-faced Black Spanish chicken, which I can't move to article space because the redirect suppression failed (don't know how). Could you kindly clean up – in one way or another – for me? Deleting the existing redirect would do it, I can take it from there. Many thanks, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 11:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Our protection doctrine states--- Talk pages are not usually protected, and are only semi-protected for a limited duration in the most severe cases of vandalism.
Is there any particular reason why
Talk:Raheja Developers shall not fit in this extremely limited criterion?The only edits by IPS/Non-confirmed accounts are issuing legal threats or outing users or indulging in brand-promotion.And this has been going for months!
Winged Blades
Godric 17:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello GB fan, I'm writing to request review and resubmission of page, "Soothe". According to the editing history, you once deleted the page. I've been editing it and many changes have been made. Currently it is saved as a draft page, and ready to be published. Please let me know your concerns, Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Echoasis ( talk • contribs) 21:46, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
{{
Submit}}
to the top and have an independent editor look at it. A quick look tells me it is not right for the mainspace yet. The list of locations served is purely advertising.
~ GB fan 22:45, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Please look to see if the edits I deleted need to be suppressed. Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 15:44, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Specifically, this
[14], where you said I see the exception you are using but I think it completely contradicts the outing policy as it allows us to tie a Wikipedia ID to an offsite name.
I don't believe that Admins (including ArbCom) are permitted to use the Tools against written policy, especially with full knowledge that they are doing so. This is true regardless of what the Oversighters tell you. I know and understand that the new provision was somewhat controversial, but it appears to have consensus behind it. Because this is not a question of different interpretations of policy, but rather a willful and knowing effort to vetoing written policy with the Admin powers, I request that you selfrevert.
Geogene (
talk) 23:33, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Could you have a look here Phase_(band), there's a user malignantly adding removal tags , something you've stop me from doing in the past... Gone through the history and talk page and it was agreed the article is legitimate. Cheers MusicPatrol ( talk) 15:58, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the intevention! He hadn't even notified the Page's author. I can leave them a message if needed... On his contributions list I've noticed more pages might have been vandalized... All the best! MusicPatrol ( talk) 19:45, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
What's your input as to why you removed my reffered deletion to liquid dubstep?? 120.147.37.23 ( talk) 15:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Understood, should've took a look the criterias than placing a speedy deletion or the first deletion page I find. 120.147.37.23 ( talk) 16:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, I was just going to create the article, I have the create page in front of me, and you removed not only the red link from Joker but the whole entry! Fine, if a red link can't wait till I start the article, at least just remove the brackets. The entry is notable BTW. Thank you. Hoverfish Talk 13:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi GB fan. I just wanted to let you know that I have speedily deleted the article No More Arrests per WP:CSD#G3, as it looks to me like a blatant hoax. Without any verification from anyone officially associated with this artist, it is very unlikely that the article is truthful. I wanted to drop you a note since you had changed the CSD tag on the article to a PROD tag beforehand. Thanks, Mz7 ( talk) 02:51, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
I was the same person who posted the wiki content in October and it got deleted. Kindly review my content and make it live Accesstowiki ( talk) 12:20, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
The title mentioned was Borderless Access. Humble request to make it Live as I am trying to create the page from more than a year Accesstowiki ( talk) 12:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Now can you help me in posting the article Accesstowiki ( talk) 12:52, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
I am unable to find the article as it has been deleted Accesstowiki ( talk) 12:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Borderless Access Accesstowiki ( talk) 13:01, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Hey, I'm sorry about that! I meant to tag Talk:Bust of Cristiano Ronaldo, which redirects to the airport's page. I went back to talk but accidentally CSDed the airport page. Apologies ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ᐐT₳LKᐬ 23:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
@ Great Britain Fan, I have visited Bangladesh Army official site a few minutes ago and have come to know that the wiki page List of Bangladesh Army four-star generals 12 men have been shown with the rank of full general, if you visit the Bangladesh Army official page you will be surprised to know that only five men have been full general in the history of Bangladesh. So I urge you to change the writings of that page or delete that page as that is unnecessary because there is already a page about Bangladesh Army generals and that is Chief of Army Staff of the Bangladesh Army. Amar Tushar ( talk) 11:05, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi GB fan,
You recently reverted my addition of a CSD A9 tag as "This is about a character not a musical recording, not eligible for speedy deletion". If you would be so kind and wouldn't mind taking another look at that, I would appreciate it because I see the article as very much being about the musical recording not the character. Thank you, menaechmi ( talk) 13:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello GB Fan, i recently changed my own talk page from my full name to my name without my middle one. Sense it is a rather unique one, and i didnt want people to know my real one, simply regarding privacy. I wanted hear if you could delete the revision history of my talk page. Thanks in Advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magnus2108 ( talk • contribs) 19:46, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello GB fan. A few weeks ago you blocked 69.117.44.133 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) for disruptive editing. They have returned to make the same edits as 67.86.57.216 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Thanks for your time. MarnetteD| Talk 15:42, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
I have just added a reference stating that "On the Rocks" is the title for the debut album from American country music group Midland. Can you please restore the redirect for On the Rocks (Midland album), or explain why you can not? -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 13:34, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
You really need to look into this edit war between Hrodvarsson and Divergence5. In particular, you need to look at their talk pages. Divergence5 has nearly nothing but warnings. He answered one, and his tone was not kind. Hrodvarsson on the other hand has almost nothing but compliments, except for two edit-warring warnings, both of them involving Divergence5, and both on the Magnus Carlsen page. Check out his history. This editor is rabid. Look at his last edit summary here. He doesn't know what a talk page is? He finally answered a June 24 message on the Magnus Carlsen talk page yesterday morning, demonstrating he knows full well what a talk page is. And then he attacked Hrodvarsson. If his "improvements" actually had the value he thinks they do, Hrodvarsson would accept them willing. Divergence5's edits verge on destructive. You really need to read D5's edit history.
Hrodvarsson has acted in good faith. Divergence5 has not. Frankly, I don't see how this can just be let go if Divergence5 insists on adding bad information and won't stop warring. AN/I may be called for. — Myk Streja (beep) 03:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi GB fan
Please can you undelete National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, it was deleted because of 'No substantive coverage by independent secondary sources'. I will be happy to add the following and more which are available.
Many thanks
-- John Cummings ( talk) 10:42, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Can you delete this edit from the page history, as it seems to be a BLP violation? Everymorning (talk) 12:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
The block you just made: there's a bit more to than just the username, too- see User_talk:Doug_Weller#Kurdistani_sockfarm, and link to ANI. Expecting more like that to pop up, you see. Cheers, Muffled Pocketed 11:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you GBFan for declining speedy delete. I have contributed some editing to the article which I deemed promotional and provided 2 extra independent links in the External links category. One of it is by SBA, a federal government entity that talks about Avani Tech Solutions Inc as an independent article, so is with OdysseyOnline.
I look forward to your review of the content as of now. While I'll continue to scan Google for more supporting links. Thomaseater ( talk) 12:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
Thank you Thomaseater ( talk) 12:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC) |
Thank you for moving my article to the draft, can you look at it to see if it is coming alone good, I want to do the main foot work then hope people will add onto it.
Street sting Street sting ( talk) 21:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Yes, I know it's not ready yet, i didn't put the references and stuff, I'm still reading the history book and speaking with people ( Old school hip hop rappers). I just wanted to make sure that i'm doing it right the way it looks and the articles i have so far, you should see my desk, all these papers i have and notes.
Street sting Street sting ( talk) 22:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi GB
I think am ready to move it, I spoke with Busy Bee and D.J Jazzy Jay from the old school two of the great Hip hoppers they said it was great and a great meaning of exactly what it is. I feel so honored.
Street sting Street sting ( talk) 22:42, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
I added the references that i read and took my resources from, when speaking to other rap artist that have wikipedia pages (bio) on here they did tell me my first ref's were fine because they have simpler on theirs and ask me why does he think it's not ready because what they saw was great and they been on here for years, but whatever
Street sting Street sting ( talk) 00:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
so can you please help and fix the refs you talking about so i can move it, everything is there for you and it is more then one ref that supports what i said that is in the article, that would be a big help, even Steven Hager that i tracked down to begged him to look at it said it was fine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Street sting ( talk • contribs) 19:39, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
ok I changed it and took other links that i got my sources from and i read the links that you gave me and added This article talks about samples of Hip Hop Movement as the new Civil Rights Movement taking quotes from known authors. which was given to me by a respected hip hop artist who is on wiki as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Street sting ( talk • contribs) 22:44, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
{{
submit}}
to the top of the article and then save the edit. This will alert other experienced editors that you think it it's ready. --
GB
fan 00:12, 6 October 2016 (UTC)ok :) Street sting ( talk) 00:57, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi GB Fan, I saw a complaint on bio deletion [1], and see the deletion was done by you last June.
I see one copy of the bio at web.archive.org in 2014. [2].
There has been a claim this deletion was done for political reasons. [3] Is it possible to show the delete-proposal discussion for this article? What sort of citations would be needed to restore a bio in a way that would be defendable as notable? Tom Ruen ( talk) 14:57, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi GB, you may wish to note 684 is disallowing - there is a new IP to block in the logs -- samtar talk or stalk 12:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, why did you delete this page? The article certainly did contain a claim of notability and some references from national media. If you want to start an AfD, ok, but it's not a speedy case. Axolotl Nr.733 ( talk) 11:56, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi GB Fan, I see you declined the A1 speedy for Eurovision Asia Song Contest. The reason a speedy was placed is because the contest is still only in the "pipework" stage and no official name has been given for the contest. Even the source states it is "speculated" that the contest may be called "Eurovision Asia Song Contest" and even "Asiavision" to "Asia Eurovision". As there is no actual article to be able to redirect the page to, then CSD is the only option. And not only that, the creator has also done the same for other articles in the past for contests that are only at the "drawing board" stage and being discussed with CEOs etc, which is evident from their talk page. The contest albeit looking like an Asian version of Eurovision, cannot be redirected to ABU Song Festivals either, as it is unknown if the Asia-Pacific Broadcasting Union are the organisers or the European Broadcasting Union. There is just not enough sources out there to warrant a standalone article at this WP:TOOSOON stage. Wes Mouse T@lk 12:49, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm not just a normal guy writing about myself. I have founded 3 startups. Selected for Forbes 30 under 30 2017. Have worked with TEDxDelhi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raobharathr ( talk • contribs) 19:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Please can you contact re deletion of this entry, Thanks Kevin@kmilliken.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.71.163 ( talk) 21:14, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Since my nomination was just a joke, recalling the rationale was 08251985, would be appropriate to use a warning template on him for behaving like this, triggering other user unnecessary work. -- Osplace 16:26, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
admittedly advocated for clinton to ag lynch, on tape during congressional hearings — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.175.47.5 ( talk) 13:40, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Yes, I dispute your edit. You and freshacconci seem to be committed to keeping the generative art article as irrelevant as possible. Everything there is ancient history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John alexander greene ( talk • contribs) 00:18, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, you deleted the article I just created on Backer, Spielvogel & Bates. I realize that there was limited content, but I intended to revisit this page shortly to expand content. On inspection this is, IMHO, a notable entity and is subject of numerous academic articles and, as such, IMHO should be part of the content of Wikipedia. Since this organization has, more recently, been acquired by Saatchi & Saatchi (as best I recall), this should be connected to that page as well as various others. As I am sure that you will appreciate, it takes time to build out and fill in a page of notable content ... something that can be done given sufficient time.
I appreciate if you could either restore that page and allow sufficient time to expand the content (and, I am sure augmented wo=ith other constructive input from other Wiki editors) to make this a valuable reference page. I particularly need the EL that I had placed in this page in order to do so. Otherwise I am tempted to give up contributing to Wikipedia. Please note, I am currently in China, and so access to Wikipedia is spotty at best.
Enquire (
talk) 01:50, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! -- Gloumouth1 10:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Confused why you feel the subject of Sandwich Belt High Angle Conveyor has no substance. This is important information given around the world for the mining industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmyDos ( talk • contribs) 17:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, when I first made this a redirect [4], the Pipsy article was in place. Only after it was speedy deleted did I then request deletion of the redirect. Thanks, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 13:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Can you please redirect it to U.S. Russia Foundation now? If I add a merge tag, it could take months and we might as well give up. Zigzig20s ( talk) 11:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Why did you remove James Callaghan from the Big Jim page? He was known by this nickname. Please have a look at List of nicknames of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom#James Callaghan, as to why I added him.-- Nevé – selbert 21:50, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi , I own the company, and would appreciate some degree of accuracy in the contributions of others to this page. The company was founded Circa 1853 by David Magee ( born 1829 in Bolton, Lancashire) {ancestry.co.uk , and Public records} He was the tenant of the Good Samaritan beerhouse on Derby St by 1853 , and moved to the Crown Vaults, Derby St by about 1864/5 . It's not certain at what point the original brewhouse was built , David Magee died in 1875 , with the brewery and other commercial property being inherited by his wife , as stipulated by his will { public records , , copy of his will in my collection} The company amalgamated with Daniel Marshall's Grapes & One Horseshoe Breweries in 1887/8 , , being registered as a limited company on March 22nd 1888 {Companies House} the Magee family owning the majority of shares { companies house ,documents in the possession of the company} Alfred Barnard , in his exellent book , {The Noted Breweries,of Britain and Ireland } described a 'new brewhouse' as being in operation alongside the old brewhouse . The company aquired the Wigan Brewery of Henry Robinson &Co at auction in 1894 it is unsure when this site ceased production , but it was used as a depot by Magee's until circa 1906/7 {company stock records} A new Brewery, designed by William Bradford was built circa 1900 . The brewery of Bell & Co , Burton on Trent was purchased in circa 1902/3 ,with brewing continuing until 1906/7 {company stock records}, after which the company transported water by rail in its own tankers up to the 1960's {company archives } In late 1950's an offer for the company was made by Greenall Whitley & Co , Wilderspool Brewery, Warrington , with Greenall's completing their acquisition by 1959{company archives }. The Crown Brewery mashed for the last time on Monday 21st September 1970 (Best Mild) {company archives, Brewhouse Book} Noted beers included IPA , Crown Ale(bottled), B.B , a mild , NOT a bitter!!(the initials stand for best beer), Oatmeal Stout amongst others .{company archives }
Oddedd76 ( talk) 20:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi, GB fan, I'm Rtrust. If you believe that declining the deletion request on Extension Mobility was the right thing, then great! I was just wondering if you could elaborate on the A7 guidelines. Thanks. en:User:Rtrust ( talk) 17:29, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
maybe I should remove all my articles I've created, I think I can do it. G7. Author requests deletion... I can do it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ford489 ( talk • contribs) 00:25, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
I am the creator of most of my articles and 3,418 editions. I think it's time to leave wikipedia and destroy all my ediiones and pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ford489 ( talk • contribs) 00:49, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Genealogy is not remarkable? I think you're confused. I wonder which who is remarkable for you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ford489 ( talk • contribs) 01:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you very much for correcting my error with shifting the information from Namco Bandai Partners to Bandai Namco Partners. I was unaware of the move page function beforehand. Thank you very much for making me aware of this feature. I did not intend to make a copy and paste move, rather, I was simply unaware of how to best transfer information as I did not know how to rename the article. Iftekharahmed96 ( talk) 14:30, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello GB fan... Just a query. Your deletion here on A1 mentions "Short article without enough context to identify the subject". As much as I can see, the subject is easily identifiable as an individual with the said name. The A1 criteria mentions, "If any information in the title or on the page, including links, allows an editor, possibly with the aid of a web search, to find further information on the subject in an attempt to expand or edit it, A1 is not appropriate." The article in question had a title (the name of the subject) which could have been used to find further information. In my opinion, the A1 tag is not appropriate in such cases, where the title is contextually identifiable, irrespective of whether it is significant or not. However, I'll defer to your judgement on this; and thus the request for clarification from you. Is the A1 appropriate in this particular case? Thanks. Lourdes 17:25, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for protecting this page. But could you also remove the warnings which were repeatedly reinstated without explanation. 112.211.53.157 ( talk) 20:39, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi there,
Ta for the edit here - I've reposted the album that was removed, but now with a non-primary source - I'm a fairly inexperienced Wikipedia editor, so am still learning about reference rules, syntax etc. I left the other one that had been removed as it was by another user, so up to them I guess. Anyhow, just thought I ought to let you know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dshubble ( talk • contribs) 12:50, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
You have the mop so why don't you just block him yourself? EpicMan ( talk) 03:42, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Please don't delete the Philippine subsidiary of Procter & Gamble! Because, this page is appeared from former name like PMC (Philippine Manufacturing Company)! ɔyʀɥs ɴotoʒɑt bulɑɡɑ ( You want to talk to me?) 02:46, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for deleting it. A bit hidden in the deletion template was the request to delete also the subpages Special:PrefixIndex/User:NoclaimsBot/List/. Could you delete these too? Thank you, Multichill ( talk) 09:32, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
I stumbled upon a huge political edit war and helped get the IP vandal blocked. Here's a link to my response to them after the edit war, after they were blocked: [ [5]] Also when you go to this page please scroll up to see their many warnings and block notice. Is it good? I didn't say anything mean, just quoted them and gave them a more detailed description of why they were blocked. I just want to make sure it isn't too harsh or mean. Thanks, Adotchar| reply here 01:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. Mike V • Talk 20:46, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
You suggested that the page Shunno (discography) be moved to Shunno discography... may I know how to do that, since to move an article, we have to create a new one. Since both already exist, i couldn't move it. Do kindly show me a way to do so... thank you! :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akash X Live ( talk • contribs) 16:57, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Not being vulgar - it's an alternative form of sackbutt (which also sounds rather rude). Trombone sounds far more polite. Anyway, they are a well-known group who are heard often on BBC Radio 3. I've tagged it for refimprove and needing independent coverage. Peridon ( talk) 19:35, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Please explain how you see "nothing to do" on this SPI. You have five IPs and one registered account, all editing the same otherwise-rarely-touched page in the same place in almost the same way within weeks of each other. What am I missing? I don't intend to drop the matter without a satisfactory answer. — swpb T 18:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
@ Swpb: This is a warning. If in the future you behave in a similar fashion to the way you have done in this case, you risk being blocked for disruptive conduct.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 20:37, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Swpb, looking even deeper into this, I do not see anything wrong with the way this was handled except by you. You create an SPI, it was correctly closed. You attack the closer on the SPI page. The attack is reverted. You go to their talk page and attack them there. That is reverted. You then create a new SPI naming all the same parties just with a different master. That is deleted as disruptive. You then create it again. It is closed by a clerk. You ask for a reconsideration. The clerk responds and asks you what you would like done but you never respond. You reopen it, I close it. You ask me for an explanation. I give it, you don't like the answer so you reopen it. You don't ever even try to discuss the SPI before reopening it. You think your interpretation is the only logical one and everyone else is wrong. There were mistakes made that could have alleviated all of this and they are on you. In the future if you don't like the answer consider actually having a conversation with people and try to understand why they did things. -- GB fan 20:49, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi GBFan, I am hoping you might be able to help and provide some guidance? it looks from the history of the page that you stepped in a tried to stop PaulSheer from deleting large parts of the page and over tagging.
Is there a mediation process within Wikipeadia when somebody is trying to close/merge the page and removing most of the content. He doesn't agree with the page and I dont agree with his removal and edits, so we are at a bit of a stale mate. I received some emails from him, and based on these, I dont think talking to him is going to be very fruitful, if there anything else that can be done?
Many thanks in advance. Colin barlow 2016 ( talk) 22:14, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
you reverted to a state where an entire section is unsourced and many of the removed players haven't been properly sourced. their links don't mention anything about their race. NFLjunkie22 ( talk) 13:08, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
example, Evander Kane the ref is just a link to players NHL profile, no mention of race [1]. this is false sourcing. NFLjunkie22 ( talk) 13:11, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
References
you probbly didn't even read the noticeboard. User:Marc87 outright REFUSED TO TALK! I bet you can't find a SINGLE instant in which he justified reverting. The information on the page is not properly sourced. A whole section ISN'T SOURCED, and he blatantly said in his last revert that he will keep reverting. NFLjunkie22 ( talk) 13:14, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
just look at what i wrote. of course i'm passionate, User:Marc87 refuses to give justification or proper souring to the edits he made. most links don't even mention the background of the player only his hockey stats, also one section is fully unsourced, that;s why i removed, yet he reverts without explanation. NFLjunkie22 ( talk) 13:30, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
oh.. yes. keep ignoring it, then proceed to tell me to talk about it. I made attempts at least 5 talk pages to talk about it, yet everyone pussyfooting. NFLjunkie22 ( talk) 13:49, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Please understand the history of time zones. A whole wide area using the same time did not happen until the 1870s or the 1880s. Before that every city has its own solar time. Timeanddate.com is not a website authoritative for time zones and time zone boundaries, but it displays the history of standard time for each city (not whole provinces, states or countries). Therefore creating "time zone" articles about a particular city before standard time zones were established is essentially a hoax. Only a few places that refuse to synchronize with Greenwich well into the 20th century get notable mentions and articles as listed in Template:UTC time offsets. Things have been stable for a few years not because of a lack of editors creating extra articles, but because each city's local time before the 1880s is simply not notable. Every city listed in timeanddate.com will probably have a history that traces back to a local time offset. We can't allow every one of these offsets be created as an additional article. HkCaGu ( talk) 04:57, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Am I going mad? I can't find any evidence of a connexion with Bollywood Hungama. A Google search reveals nothing. Adam9007 ( talk) 19:13, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Do you mind taking a look at this again?
I chose what seemed to be the closest reason on the first attempt. It really is a housekeeping issue, since 1) it was created during a move, 2) because the article title did not need to be disambiguated, and 3) it is not plausible that someone would type in Nina Browne (archivist) to get to the article about Nina Browne.
If I've missed the mark again, would you mind telling me what the right tag is that I should apply?
Thanks!-- CaroleHenson (talk) 09:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, could you please suppress the posts I deleted if appropriate? Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 20:04, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for deleting Sadzid Husić but can you please salt it to prevent recreation? Note Sadzid Husic was salted in 2013. This is part of a very elaborate Internet-wide hoax that goes back at least four years. German-language Wikipedia article ( de:Sadzid Husic) was salted for same issue - hoax profile created in 2012. See issue on IMDB from two years ago regarding his hoax profile. Thank you! —Мандичка YO 😜 12:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Please take a look at the edits to my Talk page and take any action you deem appropriate. I left a message on the poster's Talk page. I'm not sure if it was strong enough. Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 15:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, I would like to contest the deletion of article Paradise (A-Reece album). I have read A9. It seems to me that the article has been deleted because the recording artist himself doesn't have a stand alone wiki article which in that case it clearly states that on Wikipedia:NALBUM that an album doesn't have to be by a notable artist. The album has produced 4 singles that have charted on South Africa's musical charts and the album itself also charted at no. 1 on itunes just under 24 hours after its release. Please reconsider your decision for deletion. Thank You Xdigionwiki ( talk) 20:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke talk page access as well.-- Cahk ( talk) 10:02, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
This is the problem of the article List of Unilever brands. It is not use of en dash of some brands in Unilever article brands!!! cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵ3at BULAGA!!! 10:31, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
See WP:ANI#Editor appears to be not here - possible hoax article, calling some religions evil. Doug Weller talk 12:47, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
I see you have deleted User:LieutenantJames22 II for Wikipedia:NOTWEBHOST could you take a look at more of the same at User:LieutenantJames20, User:LieutenantJames22 and User:LieutenantJames30 not sure what's going on, but they are definitely not here to build an encyclopaedia. Theroadislong ( talk) 14:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, I added a sockpuppet investigation for the IP address 92.9.3.159 which was using 92.9.3.159 as its puppet. I believe it is now using 92.9.0.157 as its new puppet. I am not sure how to add a new sockpuppet, do I create a whole new sockpuppet investigation or do I edit the existing (archived) page? Absolutelypuremilk ( talk) 18:33, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
thank you very much Jonnymoon96 ( talk) 00:25, 6 December 2016 (UTC) |
Hi! I noticed you removed my A3 tag on the aforementioned page. Twinkle mentions that A3 covers an article that is just full of links to other pages, and in this case, none of the articles exist, and they all seem to link to the same page anyway, in which the intended county name is actually missing from the link. I'm curious about what actually makes this allowable. -- numbermaniac ( talk) 11:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, you refused the speedy delete for Talin Seik the village as far as I could see doesn't exist or is so small that there are no sources available. What would be the best way to deal with this kind of article. PROD? -- Domdeparis ( talk) 09:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
I was filing a report at aiv but Dr. K keeps deleting it. I tried to go to her talkpage and ask her why she keeps doing that but she just deleted my message. Could you please do something about this? 66.87.77.73 ( talk) 02:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I note that you added the redirect on PaRappa (singer). Having been involved in the case, which is listed at ANI, I can confirm that the 2 subjects are entirely different, and the sharing of a name is coincidental. The user has been removing CSD tags and re-creating the article. I have therefore reverted the redirect - but feel free to discuss further. I feel another block for the user is also warranted to prevent from further recreation of articles. Thanks. TheMagikCow ( talk) 12:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
(cur | prev) 15:16, 22 November 2016 GB fan (talk | contribs) . . (17,179 bytes) (-493) . . (Reverted 4 edits by MultidisciplineSE&D (talk): This looks like someone trying to spam their name into Wikipedia. (TW)) (undo)
GB fan:
Here we go again. I was the one who added a contribution to the List of SEs page - not some hacker trying to spam a webpage. If you know anything about Systems Engineering, you should be cognizant of my Systems Engineering Analysis, Design, sand Development: Concepts, Principles, and Practices textbook published by John Wiley (New York) - not some fly by night publisher - is one of the leading SE textbooks world wide. I have ESEP Certification from INCOSE, and championed paradigm shifts in industry, government, and academia who are still practicing SE that has been outdated seance the 1980's. That is why Engineering projects continue to have cost overruns, slips, and risks.
If you go to the webpage below, you will further find authentication that the 1st Edition of my SE text received the 2006 International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) Engineering Science Book of the Year award. < http://iaaweb.org/content/view/144/244/>
I trust that we can establish these credentials for several Wikipedia SE webpages and move on. Being new to Wikipedia, if there is something I need to do to correct my contributions, please kindly advise. I would sincerely appreciate it.
Respectfully, MultidisciplineSE&D MultidisciplineSE&D ( talk) 15:09, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
GB fan
FURTHER READING - As I am learning to understand the context of Wikipedia and "articles", may I suggest this. Although the 2nd Edition textbook update has only been out for a few months, according to Google Scholar, which tracks academic citations to referenced works, indicates that this text has had 207 citations for references as authoritative work. Additionally, this text is referenced in technical papers accepted by the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) and the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE). What is important is the "acceptance" of this text as an authoritative work world wide. The notion of "writing and article and referencing it" would be self-serving, which seems to conflict with guidance you provided. I find your presumption of me trying to get my name into Wikipedia as inappropriate. Objectively, what do we need to do to correct this issue?
EXTERNAL LINKS - Lastly, the PPI SE Goldmine in a commercial business promoting their courses and collecting login email info. What seems to be the obstacle to removal here?
Best Regards, Multidiscipline SE&D — Preceding unsigned comment added by MultidisciplineSE&D ( talk • contribs) 15:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
for that edit/reversion re: Oluwa2Chainz' archiving someone else's talk page. I was stunned when I saw the edits, thanks for stepping in. Shearonink ( talk) 01:13, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi GB, I'm assuming this is to do with the CSD tagging and AfDs? Snöggletög Nightfury Happy Christmas!! 11:42, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Thank you for messaging me. If you want to help improve the description of their scores, I would gladly welcome that. I believe the issue to which you refer is that I said "voting record." I think that must have been spur of the moment as, at other times, I said "record" more generally as can be seen via the edits I made. It's so easy to connect their records with only "voting", but you are absolutely correct and I thank you for reviewing that and fixing it!. I have read their description and if you can help edit where it is needed, please do! I have also added "publicly available data" upon which they also based that score. So, thank you for the message and for helping to edit. Responding to your question, I think they are fairly notable at least as notable as Americans for Democratic Action and American Conservative Union which are also regularly used to describe how candidates are rated and what ratings they received. I also did not first cite them. Someone had cited them on the "Susan Collins" page and I helped to correct their description of the score. I checked it out and, having heard of them before, felt it was good. In fact, CNN featured Crowdpac scores for 2016 candidates. [1] Again, thank you for your message and if you can help improve a statement or source please do so.
P.S. I have added "watch this page" per your request. Happy Holidays!
Sincerely, SeminarianJohn ( talk) 21:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
References
Thank you for responding again. I did leave a message on my page, but also here for your convenience. I'm only quoting the source itself in how it describes the rating. So, it is not my intent to state something incorrectly. That's a direct quote, but I do not mind one bit if you, or anyone else, wants to paraphrase that quote. That's why this is a community effort and why it works so well! It is definitely a benefit to have multiple editors making sure it can be phrased in the best understood way and helping others. Once more, thank you for the message and edits! I made sure to send thanks via the wiki pages as well. Please feel free to respond on my page as well. I just wanted to make sure to respond in the best way possible. Again, have a Happy Holidays!
Sincerely SeminarianJohn ( talk) 01:18, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I just noticed that you have removed the deletion tag that I added to Phulbani Odia. May I ask why you think that article should exist? Can you share some citations that can explain why this article should exist on Wikipedia? I am a native speaker of the Odia language and I can confirm that there is no such thing called Phulbani Odia. -- Psubhashish ( talk) 06:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello GB fan: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Shearonink ( talk) 17:37, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
It seems to be commonly known that CHC is shorthand for cold hard cash. Is there a good way to add this to the CHC disambiguation page? 205.168.59.134 ( talk) 20:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
How about CI for Car Insurance? You reverted that too. 205.168.59.134 ( talk) 00:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello GB fan. 36hourblock has recently reverted edits that I made to the article Missouri Compromise, which he or she has been working on, with the edit summary: "Qualified editors only: please post comments on talk page". The use of the words "Qualified editors only" once again implies that I am a sock puppet. These accusations continue to be made with no SPI having been filed, and little evidence presented.
Also, I would appreciate you taking a look at the message that I left on 36hourblock's talk page under "Personal Attacks". Thank you for your help. Display name 99 ( talk) 18:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The reason as to why I requested the delete was because all the Bandai Hardware pages are on Template:Bandai Namco as Bandai and Namco have combined as a singular conglomerate for a while now. Surely, there's no purpose of having this template anymore? it's a wasted duplicate. Iftekharahmed96 ( talk) 09:55, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,
I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.
For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."
Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)
CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.
Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉) 13:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Instead of only reverting changes of others, please start talking. Waiting for your points for letting the article stay at Talk:Akshar_Pathak . I get it that you only removed "speedy deletion" request. I want a discussion about its existence on wikipedia. My argument for its deletion still stands. Would love to see your views in articles talk page -- 182.75.175.230 ( talk) 13:58, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
I have seen to be proposed this article Nestlé Bear Brand to make more than 50 languages to make an encyclopedic article, and will back my deleted Bear Brand article from some languages.
Note: it proposed to be 50
| ||
---|---|---|
|
Thank you! -- cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵ3at BULAGA!!! 01:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
what, if any, would be appropriate for Draft:Paxful considering the mainspace article was deleted Paxful by you as A7, and the page draft page creator was blocked UPOL violation? I did some cleanup of the mainspace article, and if left it very empty. Additional research support that it is very unlikely this will reach mainspace status anytime soon. TiggerJay (talk) 23:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi please review User:Tony Brabec/sandbox MassiveYR ( talk) 00:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Sorry my mistake, I had not realised that it was a userspace draft article — Preceding unsigned comment added by MassiveYR ( talk • contribs) 09:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
My logic circuits tell me I am beaten. Time to admit that I am a bot. - SummerPhD v2.0 03:03, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Please could you possibly perform a non-admin closure of This? If you account for votes that should be discounted, delete is slightly ahead but if you don't it should be kept. I would relist, but it would just come to the same conclusion of people making bad arguments on both sides, I don't see a point in continuing it and it has been discussed for over a week now. I ask you because you closed an intertwined article on /r/TheDonald, which had a similar consensus. The reasons I can't close this myself are
1. I have voted in the discussion and created the page originally 2. I don't even know how to do so...
Thanks alot,
AlessandroTiandelli333 ( talk) 20:55, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
GB fan,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (
talk) 07:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Hi GB fan, TW didn't show the page was already protected - apologies. I've undone my change to the protection -- samtar talk or stalk 11:36, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
I tagged U5 / G11; they have now removed the tag twice. I left an explanatory 'note' on their TP. No response. Blanked it again. If I tagged wrong I will apologise. But I don't think so. On a lighter note, Happy New year, GB! Take care, O Fortuna! ...Imperatrix mundi. 15:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for that. I had pinged another admin to take a look. Onel5969 TT me 22:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
You might want to reconsider the speedy deletion of that article. The author of it contacted me on my talk page and said "he had no playing time". WP:NFOOTY requires having actually played. I did a search for this individual, pairing it with "football"...and got nothing. Food for thought. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 01:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Thg099 is vandalized the page like Chandler Parsons was called robbery, you can block this user indefinitely. cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵ3at BULAGA!!! 10:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
hi will like to be confirmed .new user .i submitted my page .thank you Eazzy firstlady ( talk) 05:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Good Afternoon,
I am contacting you regarding article on celebrity Sonya Berg you deleted July 30th, 2014. I am inquiring on the basis of deletion? I am Sonya's assistant and before updating the article with credible sources, I just wanted to verify that was indeed the issue for removal. I appreciate your feedback, and time.
-Taylor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twarfield ( talk • contribs) 22:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Sonya Berg is a TV Host, Fashion Show Production, Stylist, Designer, Inspirational Speaker, Branding Partner, Polo player TV Personality, Self improvement Fashion and Lifestyle blogger, Industrial Engineer & Motivational Speaker
Hi, warm greetings, we been notified that the artiste Eazzy has been deleted and will gladly like you to restore it since fans will like to view stuff about her and kindly notify the reasons for deletion for future validations
www.twitter.com/eazzyfirstladyCite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
www.facebook.com/eazzyfirstladyCite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/kpakposhito-single/id1049035252Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
1 May 2012 GB fan (talk | contribs) deleted page Eazzy (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page)
Eazzy firstlady (
talk) 05:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
I think that the Main Page should be moved to Wikipedia's Home Page to be more consistent with other websites. To ensure that people do not rely on a redirect. I think the original page should be deleted.
However, if I try to request deletion of Main Page via Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion, I see that the page Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Main_Page has been protected from creation by you leaving me unable to begin the discussion.
Therefore I am formally requesting Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection of this page.
Please let me know your decision.
Thanks,
Habster360 ( talk) 08:56, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Please, I want to be an admin because I am active on English Wikipedia. cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵ3at BULAGA!!! 10:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello GB fan,
Is there any other option? I nominated the redirects for deletion because even though the show exist, the seasons don't exist. To me, the redirects don't make much sense. -- 1989 ( talk) 03:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Just dropping by to say warmest cheers and a hello for the new year. Wanted to share a continuing predicament with you. While tagging pages like Ravirawat85, after your detailed guidance, I would have wished to tag the same with no context. Unfortunately, I suspect that some administrators might not understand the no context tag as clearly as you do; therefore, I end up tagging such articles with A7 speedies.... which is ironical, because A7 is almost bipolar to the no context tag, so one can't even use the multiple tag criteria, combining A7 and no-context. Just sharing the predicament :) Hope you're doing well. See you around. Lourdes 09:41, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I was trying to ask a question on some sites and it was a surprise for me that some sites are paid (on transtutors.com I was billed only after asking question, so a lot of time was kelled). I think that at least warning must be in table , if you don't like amounts. 37.52.42.124 ( talk) 14:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi GB fan
I just made a citation of entertaining tattoo website https://tattoozza.com/henna-tattoos. As far as I can see it doesn't offer any commercial services. I've noticed that notes number 8 ( http://tattoo-journal.com/25-nobel-bible-verses-tattoos/) and 62 ( http://www.tattoo-bewertung.de/content/aktuelle-laserbehandlung) cite similar entertaining websites about tattooing. Why those citations are reliable, but the citation which I made is not reliable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henderson87 ( talk • contribs) 21:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello GB fan, long-term disruptive editor Smoore95GAGA looks to be back under various IPs (usually beginning with 73.81), similar editing patterns (targeting recent music releases) and similar edit summaries ( [8] and [9]). They have been reported by Kellymoat, Jennica and myself since earlier this month at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PeopleEater143, but no action has yet been taken. Not exactly a smoking gun, but one of the IPs reported and blocked on Smoore95GAGA's archived SPI begins with 73.81 as well, and as pointed out in the most recent report by Livelikemusic in November of last year, they edit recent music releases, and lately have targeted List of 2017 albums, Ed Sheeran's recent releases, and SweetSexySavage just earlier today. (Just letting you know, I also posted this to Ponyo, who blocked the original account.) Ss 112 07:29, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Can you please redact revision 762747512 on Norman Reedus? The long edit description is messing up the history page on mobile devices.
Thanks
Gamebuster19901 (Talk | Contributions) 15:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
thank u for the info.it helped me a lot.
now how do i put it on wiki? jordan ( talk) 15:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC) |
dear gb fan, thank u for the info. pls tell me how to put it on wiki. thx jordan ( talk) 15:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
A check of his user page shows that it is a copy from [10]. He seems to like pasting this everywhere. Kill the plant from the root by blocking? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arkhaminsanity ( talk • contribs) 17:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your help on the Image consulting page - a redirect does make more sense to be fair!
DrStrauss
talk 22:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for noticing the vandalism on the page Alexander Grande, but i think it is very unnecessary to delete it, and i would therefore tell you to set it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quetal99 ( talk • contribs) 11:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi , I am new to contributing. I linked to a Youtube video to add the trivia information that he plays the violin on Ben Shapiro's page is this against the rules ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loneather ( talk • contribs) 19:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Can you take a look at filter 722? Is it still needed? ~ Rob13 Talk 04:56, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, regarding your removal of the speedy deletion tag from the article, I want to say that the article is a hoax. No such announcement has been made by Karan Johar (you can confirm by gooogling), and the source attached to the article is non-existent, which the author of the article has also done at Anushka Sharma's article. – FrB.TG ( talk) 15:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
There's no part of G4 which says that it doesn't apply with MFDs. There was a discussion about the subject's notability a year ago that decided they were not notable. True it's unusual for notability to be decided at MFD rather than AFD but that was because it was only sent there because of the endless rounds of AFC the article had gone through at the behest of paid editors. None of the sources are new. IMO at least, it's pointless bureaucracy to have an AFD, especially given that the editor who created it is obviously not a new user. SmartSE ( talk) 19:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I was recently contacted by Alberto Frigo. He was not satisfied with the Wikipedia article I wrote about him and asked me to either update it or delete it (which alas is not possible). I am trying to update it more thoroughly now. I noticed you deleted some text yesterday. I understand your point - I will base my future writings on more sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turekka ( talk • contribs) 09:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, most of the article has been created by myself. I am planning similar articles on other media practitioners. We are now in touch so that Frigo can upload images from his own project (e.g. the one with his equipment and so forth and many more to come to explain the various components) and help me with sourcing (which I am now doing on my sandbox). If this, based on your suspicions, cannot occur, you ought to assist him with the total removal of the page as he initially requested and contact him here: http://2004-2040.com/30_we.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turekka ( talk • contribs) 15:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Good, thanks. I will try to improve the page and then move forward proposing new pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turekka ( talk • contribs) 16:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
I figured that they probably would be unrelated, but when I came across this edit filter, titled "CheckUser Sock block", I thought it'd be good for someone to at the very least check it out... Thanks. 172.58.40.66 ( talk) 23:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Greetings,
I came across a sports page to simply correct an edit a friend had jokingly made, but I was not able to successfully retrieve the original information. I believe the page will be reverted in the next few days or so. Therefore, I deeply apologize for the inconvenience. If you could just permanently delete the latest two edits made on 13:49 and 13:34 February 12, 2017 (revisions) on this link below, then that would be great:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_Denver_Broncos_season
Highly appreciate your work. Thanks.
Broncosfan071858 (
talk) 15:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Understood, but there was identifiable information not supposed to be posted in that article (like that IP address), in which, I prefer not to be made public. As I was trying to make a quick fix, and did not intend for any vandalism. Was there somebody else whom I could contact to have the IP address removed from the article?
One criteria I found:
Non-public personal information about a real individual. This could be private information about you or others This includes a telephone number, an address or location, the name of a workplace or school, other online and offline identities, a date of birth, accidentally disclosed IP addresses, and (subject to oversighter judgment) other information of an identifying nature. Broncosfan071858 ( talk) 18:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello; I realized the person was not attempting to be Julian Edelman, but being only one letter off (and pronounced pretty much the same) it could be confused with him and the username policy states "Do not edit under a name that is likely to imply that you are (or are related to) a specific, identifiable person, unless it is your real name. If you have the same name as a well-known person to whom you are unrelated, and are using your real name, you should state clearly on your userpage that you are unrelated to the well-known person." Should they not at least post some sort of notice indicating they are not Julian Edelman? 331dot ( talk) 15:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. This is my first new page creation (previously I only edited existed pages) so I need to figure out how to do citations better. Meanwhile I'd prefer if page be left offline (unpublished). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caliguspedia ( talk • contribs) 21:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
I noticed you deleted the redirect page "Weixinism". Rightly so: "Weixin Shengjiao" did not exist, as it was a draft waiting review. Now "Weixin Shengjiao" has been moved online by an editor. I am recreating the "Weixinism" redirect page. Thank you Aidayoung Aidayoung ( talk) 20:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Sort of jumping between my work here and non-wiki life a bit too hastily today. thanks, Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 21:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
I have no way of reconciling the page that had references and citations to plausible media and credible sources. This seems to be a form of bullying as there's no justification or explanation. Please explain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vizulux ( talk • contribs) 23:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
#REDIRECT [[Mark M. Whelan FRSA]] {{R from move}}
Sorry, for some reason I was looking at an old diff and not the current version and hadn't realized it was already closed. -- Tavix ( talk) 15:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
You deleted my article of 'WorldLink Forums' without explanation. I'd like to ask WHY you deleted it because I went back and added some useful information about why it should be considered important. I would like a valid explanation of why you did it, please. Also you didn't give me enough time to edit it and you could at least have allowed me to keep the information I put in it because I spent a while typing it!!! Thanks and I really hope I get a response, -- Csprime ( talk) 17:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi I noticed you are reverting my edits and keeping spammy content. Just the fact that someone worked for a notable company, doesn't make them notable. References to the publications has been also deleted and not available anymore, which clearly indicates that references has been published only to get someone into the Wikipedia. What are the reasons you are protecting these articles?? Jone Rohne Nester ( talk) 20:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Just seen that this page which I'd speedied was recreated and redeleted. Apologies since I didn't see what happened, but was this by the same editor, Arcticview, or a different one? Arcticview has a warning from me on their page not to edit further without posting a COI disclosure, so they could be sockpuppeting from a different account if it's a new account. 14:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your advice, and sorry for the trouble.
Best,
GAB gab 14:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello GB fan. If you don't mind, could you consider providing a copy of a deleted revision at List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom by date of death? Thank-you.-- Nevé – selbert 17:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Could I take a look at whatever you'd nuked on HB? I think he might be workable into an article, if it's the same fellow. Anmccaff ( talk) 22:31, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello GB-Fan, I created the article " Geshe Tenzin Dhargye". Now I have to delete it because it causes a lot problems for GTD, which I never intended. You have refused my Speedy deletion request, now I added this Proposed Deletion Tag. What can I do to speed up this process? Is there anything you can tell me to help me? Thank you so much! Lucia -- Luzilla Knapp ( talk) 19:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello. At the Help Desk, someone asked about an article on Diane Larsen-Freeman that you deleted on Dec. 13, 2016. That's all I know, but maybe you can respond there and explain what happened. Regards, DonFB ( talk) 08:14, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm not going to template you but you're edit warring and FWIW just because you're an admin it doesn't mean you're exempt from
WP:AN3 - All April Fools AFDs have stayed on all 1st April AFD logs for quite a few years so I don't see why this year needs to be any different however if you want them gone then seek consensus on the talkpage,
As you know edit warring will only go one way,
Thanks, –
Davey2010
Talk 19:01, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello! How are you doing GB fan i please want to know why you deleted the article Atis Constant -- Itilite ( talk) 03:07, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Atis Constant page has been deleted several times, it has been created by other people that may not know if they have to respect the Wikipedia rules and how to create an article please help getting the page back
GB fan.--
Itilite (
talk) 20:35, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
the tag at the front of 'Perth Link precinct' is a misnomer - the CFD is actually about 'Perth City Link precinct' - the first was created accidentally (which why I had tried to make it CSD), the second was intentional - but in the end, considering the mucking around I couldnt give a damn - the splitting hairs over whether a category means one thing or another is equivalent to wandering through talk pages with endless go around conversations - and some seem to enjoy that, I do not. JarrahTree 12:22, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Why did you revert my speedy deletion nomination of User:Khintye/sandbox? The article already exists? -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 17:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Edit: The same goes for
Draft:Sex Roles: Biological Perspective --
TheSandDoctor (
talk) 17:24, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Edit #2: The same goes for
Draft:Alternative Healing Methods --
TheSandDoctor (
talk) 17:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there GB fan, would you restore Anita Rios so I can contest the prod? I only became aware of it when you deleted it. Thank you!-- TM 14:45, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello GB fan,
Reading around you seem to be someone with some authority and knowledge of the Wikipedia phenomenon. I am new to the business and I have a question. I am, or I just made, a Wikipedia lemma about a Dutch musician/composer Laurens van Rooyen. To my surprise somebody (Fortuna imperatrix mundi) added a reference to some publication which has Nothing to do with the subject of the lemma! I then removed it but then later a certain Bonadea informed that my correction was reverted.
What is happening? And can one do something about it?
TIA!
Michiel — Preceding unsigned comment added by MountainR ( talk • contribs) 16:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
MountainR ( talk) 17:05, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
What I am referring to is that the article is of Ivan Artaza, who among other opportunities has said he is familiar with it, therefore it is considered as insignificant and self-promotion (so it is from the same family).
Also the sources are from the official website itself, links that do not mention it and blogs. -- 190.159.238.86 ( talk) 17:59, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
I tagged this for speedy deletion as it is clearly a copy and paste job from another article. This article was speedily deleted by DGG earlier today and this version is no improvement. There is no evidence that this is a University or any sort of college. It may be a hoax or a degree mill. The presumption of notability only relates to institutions that can make a reasonable claim to exist. Velella Velella Talk 12:05, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for this revert. I certainly didn't request the speedy delete. I believe it was the same IP hopper who attacked my talk page a few days ago. - JuneGloom07 Talk 21:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I seen that you decline the delete of these redirects. I completely understand the purpose of a redirect, it's another phrase used to link to an article. My problem is though, not only has all the links to these redirects been eliminated, but it is impossible to type Jikkyō Powerful Pro Yakyū with a standard QWERTY keyboard, thus making that redirect page void. Plus, both phrases have inserted the word title incorrectly. I genuinely believe the best course of action is to delete said redirects as they waste article space on Wikipedia, and are formatted incorrectly to begin with. Iftekharahmed96 ( talk) 08:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
I think EJIDA Studios should be undeleted because it is a great short film company that has been noted in a few independent sources, so that is why I don't think this page should have been deleted. Superpilot123456 ( talk) 11:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi GBfan, Could you explain why you think the timeline is not a timeline? No one else has complained in the past 2 years, so that is why I am writing to you personally. As I explained, the timeline starts with teenage, passes through middle age and ends in atherosclerosis and death. It is not clear to me why you think it is not a timeline. And if it is not clear, I would be grateful if you could make suggestions how we can make it clearer.
Is it for example necessary to revert the changes that Zedshort carried out on March 23, formatting the timeline into a simplistic list of medical conditions? I would be grateful for your advice. And then we can take it to the Talk page for everyone to agree on. 86.158.154.52 ( talk) 13:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
I don't know where to put this request, so I am going to start here. Wikipedia:Editor review is marked as historical, Wikipedia:Administrator review is basically dead and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct is also marked historical. There does not seam to be any place to get a review of edits.
I have been accused of being a "frantic, furious ball of anger" that "can't get through a day without violating WP:BITE, WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, WP:POINT, or any of the other policies and guidelines that you (I) constantly violate." This is "because you'll (I'll) never actually get blocked like you (I) badly deserve." I tried to engage to get more info about how I am doing these things. CityOfSilver does not want to engage at all with me, so I can not get any more info from him.
I would like other editors to look at my history and see if they can point out all these short comings. I am not perfect, no one is. I recently got into a little edit war about the joke AfDs, but I do not know how I violate any policies or guidelines on a daily basis. ~ GB fan 23:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
...trout-slapping myself. Thanks for the revert. Lectonar ( talk) 10:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Btw it's my first time editing and I'm welcomed by blocking I do have my resources you can look it up in google I can't put the link here it gets deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lamis chelbi ( talk • contribs) 13:49, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
I mistook the deletion of the CSD-tag for one by the author. Apologies. Kleuske ( talk) 14:32, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Hey,
Our page TravelTriangle, got deleted. I am looking forward to make another page. Can you pls guide me
Thank You
Why do not belong? There are many list pages with flagicons! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.25.225.166 ( talk) 17:44, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, you should know that I have in the past nominated some draft articles for speedy nomination, but you reverted them since they were all the wrong type of deletion. You put a link on my talk page a couple of times on where to go and put the right type of deletion on. I've looked at them a couple of times but I have failed to find the one I'm looking for. I am looking for a deletion for a "draft" article, specifically the one that has a blank submission or has a couple of words. Can you tell me the template to use for these? Thanks 👊🏻 Plum3600 ( talk) 18:12, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
{{
Db-g13}}
. Please read the instructions on how to use it. There is an additional parameter that needs to be on the template.
~ GB fan a "frantic, furious ball of anger" 18:31, 18 April 2017 (UTC)@ GB fan: FWIW - seems I created the " Genius (2017 film)" article very recently - on April 17, 2017 - after searching for a similar article - but, at the time, not finding one - seems there was a similar article after all - at => " Genius (U.S. TV series)" - my own " Genius (2017 film)" article is a much more complete article that is better referenced and more updated than the older " Genius (U.S. TV series)" article (nearly a stub in comparison at the moment?) - how exactly should this be resolved - should there be a merge of content - a sd template applied to one or the other - or some other procedure - I'm flexible with this, just not clear how best to proceed at the moment - an exact suggested procedure would be welcome - in any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan ( talk) 17:15, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Done - Thank you *very much* for your help with this - it's *greatly* appreciated - all should now be ok - Thanks again - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan ( talk) 18:36, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
You called me "a frantic, flaming ball of anger." I am telling my mother. She will find you. She is justice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graeme296 ( talk • contribs) 15:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Well, looks like you win, I've pulled everything I can. You played fair and square. Sorry if this dragged on longer than it needed to. Iftekharahmed96 ( talk) 16:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for deleting some on my user pages for me, could you also delete this one? User:Mark999/sandbox2 Thank you. Mark999 ( talk) 13:06, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello GB fan,
So pages like this are allowed to be on the site? -- 1989 20:26, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
I do not agree with your decision to close the section on ANI, as it is partly related to User: Calvin999's behavior and edit warring towards anyone that makes opposing contributions to articles he's involved in.
You did not attempt to resolve anything, other than simply shut things down. I did not make my submission at ANI over a content dispute, but moreover to have a neutral party resolve the matter without an edit war. I do not see that you resolved the matter at all.-- Carmaker1 ( talk) 21:07, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
GBfan, thanks for closing the thread on ANI, I also knew it was not the correct or appropriate forum. However, I have since been threatened by Carmaker not to edit the article in question, and I just received a final warning from him on my user talk, without any other prior warnings, for replying to him on the thread. Again, not correct or appropriate. It's becoming tiresome now, and it could have all been avoided if Carmaker had spoken to me first instead of reverting and changing info without a reliable source. Alas, an RS has now been found, though why it was not presented in the first place, I do not know. I'm sorry this has spilled onto your user talk, I won't reply here again unless you address me directly, as it's not the right place. — Calvin999 21:36, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Sorry if this isn't the best way to do this -- it's the first time I've requested a revision deletion. The dif is here [12] and it's the edit summary that I think easily meets the standard of Grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material. Please do let me know if there's a better way to report these if I see them in the future and thanks for looking at it!
Mizike ( talk) 15:18, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi -- I saw your name on the WP:Oversight page. I emailed to oversight earlier today but did not hear back. I am wondering if you are able to check and / or move this forward. Thank you! K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Not sure it matters but a little insight into that speedy tag (it was placed in bad faith) - it was likely the creator of Abhijit Das ( Poet ) and other variations. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:20, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
You said - "an hour ago, you did revert my decline on Head IV. I did notice it and reverted you again within 2 minutes". You are exactly wrong. Read up before you give silly factless opinion like this. I removed red links from the nav box, sadly, which is your achievement. You then took to aruging the toss with me over several hostile edits on my talk page, doubling down on your error. What are you thinking. Ceoil ( talk) 17:09, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
I
requested to undelete
User:ㅂㄱㅇ and move to
User:ㅂㄱㅇ/up without redirect, but you deleted it again. --
Hi there, I picked you at random from the revdel-willing cat. Requesting a precautionary RD3 of the edit summary on Special:Diff/780014457. It might just be spam in the summary, but the content change to "hacked367" makes me question the safety of the URL. I don't have specific info to confirm it's a malicious site. Thanks. Murph9000 ( talk) 12:29, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello GB fan. I have given source to Sudirman Arshad. I hope you removed the PROD tag to his article that tagged by Alexander Iskandar. Several more references I will add to his article later. Thank you. Fandi89 ( talk) 03:07, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for being a voice of reason. Ceoil ( talk)
I'm just gonna leave this right here. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Categories G3, G5, and G10 are applicable in this case. The category was automatically created by banned user ColourWolf (G5) in an effort to disparage me (under my former username, which makes it eligible for G10), and there is no evidence to back that the IPs belong to me whatsoever (the IPs are all Singapore-based, and I have never set foot on that country. G5 fulfilled). Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 23:31, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
I didn't write this article, but I noticed that you deleted the article Arya Permana as A7 ( Meatsgains tagged it originally). I was actually going to remove that tag on grounds that it at least deserves a deletion discussion; it has a claim of significance as "the heaviest child". I wasn't sure if this was credible, so I searched online: I found multiple sources, such as this BBC news source and this Telegraph source, which support the claims made in the article. Because of this coverage, I don't think the article falls under A7, nor do I believe it's an obvious delete at AfD. For these reasons, I think it'd be good to restore the article and allow some time for improvement. Appable ( talk | contributions) 17:38, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, changes on the carnival page are continually erased. My contribution is independent and disinterested, I know the subject closely and the original page only serves to advertise a mafia event. On wikipedia the truth is not the propaganda of the people salaried by the organizers of the festival, who are also ignorant in the matter. Bringing the truth back is not vandalism!-- Dufresne tim ( talk) 12:07, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I was told that you deleted the longstanding article on John Burroughs Middle School. As stated in the article, Los Angeles' John Burroughs Middle School has been featured in many movies, including Pretty in Pink, Waiting for Guffman, Teen Wolf, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Never Been Kissed, Pleantville, Bad Teacher and Teaching Miss Tingle.
Its alumni include Dustin Hoffman, Tyra Banks, Phil Spector, Harry Shearer and Slash from Guns N' Roses.
It's been around for 93 years.
But you wouldn't know that because the school's Wikipedia has vanished.
So, why is John Burroughs Middle School suddenly undeserving of a Wikipedia page?
The original Wikipedia page had been around for many years.
At first, I assumed that it was a new Wikipedia policy that middle schools pages should be deleted. But Virgil Middle School, located 3 miles away, still has its Wikipedia page intact.
It seems bizarre that a noteworthy Wikipedia page can be erased from history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WeNo1 ( talk • contribs) 18:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
I think I've made the case that the school is notable. It has been used as a school representing a "high school" is several iconic films. In fact, I've made the case that the school is more notable than nearby Virgil Middle School, and nobody has opted to redirect that school's Wikipedia page.
John Burroughs Middle School even has a "fan page" devoted to its use as a school in the movies. http://www.iamnotastalker.com/2009/07/02/the-never-been-kissed-high-school/
Let me ask you this: Are regular users searching for info on John Burroughs Middle School better served clicking on a link that will lead to information about that school, or to a general listing of all Los Angeles Unified School District schools?
According to the "WikiProject Schools," "This project aims to improve the quality of school-related articles. Articles within the scope this project should become far more substantial than stubs, and ultimately match the quality of featured articles." /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools#Project_goals
I think that Wikipedia page fit that description -- having more information is better than having less.
Finally, that Wikipedia page had been around for more than a decade. I think that, in and of itself, is an argument for its relevance.
So can I ask you to please restore the John Burroughs Middle School Wikipedia page?
Edit: Sorry: I accidentally deleted your original comment. I'm new to Wikipedia
WeNo1 ( talk) 14:58, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
I have added UrlSave an External Link for Social Bookmarking article. Please do not remove it. I want to spread the word about the service.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.253.198.40 ( talk) 08:11, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
This article has some personal info at the bottom. With thanks. -- QEDK ( 愛) 18:48, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
I believe this should be suppressed. I haven't posted anything on the talk page of the user who made the edit. Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 15:34, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Darushfathi24 ( talk · contribs)
Can delete this one?: click here. Thanks. - Prinsipe Ybarro ( Talk to me) 12:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
I don't understand. Please delete my talk page. "Individual revisions, log entries, and other user space material may be deleted or redacted for privacy reasons, or because of harassment, threats, gross offensiveness and other serious violations." This is my situation. Private/identifying information is still visible in my history. I do not agree to the terms of service; I never did. I want out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VanishedUser sdu9aya9fs787sads ( talk • contribs) 16:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The fastest way to request oversight is to email the oversight team. |
If you are a user who has a request for suppression, please note that details should not be posted in public. Use this form, email oversight-en-wpwikipedia.org or see Wikipedia:Requests for oversight for other ways to request suppression. |
Thank you for the clarification you provided about the use of my userpage. Do you know if there's a way I can promptly resolve the AfD debate underway? Kinda disheartening to have that looming over my head... PvOberstein ( talk) 18:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
What was the claim of significance? I didn't see any. Toddst1 ( talk) 13:37, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
I have redirected cto Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group Redirection to a subsidiary page-- Reliance Industries did not make sense. Why have a redirect that creates duplicity of pages. There is already has a well-established page.
Also, the Reliance Group page is empty. I kind of agree with @ Johnsonwatts: that this page should be deleted. Your thoughts? -- Anrdshr ( talk) 12:57, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
@
GB fan:
Hi,
I get your point. Will try to explain mine as well. Thanks for letting my redirect stay. -- Anrdshr ( talk) 06:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Anrdshr I think GB fan has a protocol point. On introspection I did realize that speedy deletion shouldn't be the way over WP:RFD. Johnsonwatts ( talk) 11:32, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
GB fan without getting into WP:RFD would do a page move on Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group as per WP:MV. Following reasons: The new name subject has come into majority use. Will avoid confusion with the existing Anil Ambani page. Advise me if that's a workable solution. Thanks Johnsonwatts ( talk) 11:51, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
You really shouldn't have done this. It not only justified the disruptive editor's POV pushing, it introduced wildly inaccurate information to what is supposed to be an encyclopedia. (It was also ungrammatical.) I easily found the Census Bureau figures and added them. As you can see, the POV pusher's stats were not even in the ballpark. 32.218.32.137 ( talk) 20:06, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Its back mind deleting again and perhaps blocking with TPA revoked? -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 01:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
For reverting the trolling at Talk:David Duke. Joefromrandb ( talk) 02:10, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
When you refuse deleting for duplicate and filtered categories and articles is a Opposed of what you do as an administrator. If you can not delete, leave the administration aside and search for another career for you in Wikipedia. -- FPP ( talk) 16:29, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi GB fan. I have got a couple of articles which have been made by the same author and haven't got any references. Some do, but only one. Since your an administrator I thought you can delete these articles.
Thanks!
Plum3600 (
talk) 15:35, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
My problem with cleaning up Celtic Thunder (United States) was that it wasn't a completely new article creation. I started it through WP:SPLIT so the contribution history had to be preserved. I didn't know that migrating it through draftspace would do that, so when I couldn't proceed with the cleanup in mainspace I gave up. Thanks for taking up the work! JamesMLane t c 16:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Good afternoon,
After extensive research we have created an updated and thorough 'History' section that we'd like to add to the 'Navy Supply Corps School' wikipedia page. Is this something you can help us with? How can we get the page to reflect the research we've done?
Thank you for your help.
-Ryan aka SC Fan — Preceding unsigned comment added by SC Fan ( talk • contribs) 17:41, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Sir, completely understand your concerns and I am not trying to put the schoolhouse in any type of light. I am simply trying to update the school's history to include all the locations it has been and that's really all. It would be easier to explain over a phone conversation if possible. This is the number to the schoolhouse and public information so there is no violation. The information that I want to update is referenced in two separate publications and annual command history reports, which can be accessed through the naval archives. Thank you for your help with this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SC Fan ( talk • contribs) 17:30, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Hey, re George Michael. I accepted the category because the title CBE had already been added/accepted to the page. I looked up what CBE meant and it checked out with the category so I let it in. Hopefully I wasn't seen to have done anything wrong. Thank you. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ᐁT₳LKᐃ 12:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Good Evening GB,
My name is LT Jason Potvin. I work at the Supply Corps school house in Newport, Rhode Island. I work with SC Fan (Ryan). I've read everything that you've written to Ryan in your back and fourth discussion and i completely understand your concerns. Sir, we are in no way trying to build up the school house or gain something from updating this page that you've taken time creating. We simply want to give a more robust history of the Navy Supply Corps School. Sir, are you a retired Supply Corps Officer or Supply Corps service member? This project means a lot to the staff of the Navy Supply Corps School because we take great pride in where we come from and what we represent in the United States Navy. We have a command historian who has devoted hundreds of man hours to lining the walls of the school house with storied history of the Navy Supply Corps School from the inception until present day. The only thing that we want to accomplish is updating the history you have listed, that is all Sir. Mr. Jim Jacobs has worked very hard in researching the history through "Ready for Sea" The Bicentennial History of the U.S. Navy Supply Corps by RADM Frank J. Allston and "Ready for Sea" The History of the U.S. Navy Supply Corps by Mr. Jeffrey L. Rodengen, as well all the Command History reports that have been recorded since the inception of the school house. In regards to your question to Ryan about "we" and "us", nobody has access to that username/account except Ryan. He speaks the words "we" and "us" because we are a team and trying to work together to make this happen. So i'm asking you, is there anyway we can make this happen? Can we talk via telephone to help communicate this process along so we can discuss concerns back and forth?
Thank you for taking the time to read this.
Have a blessed evening,
LT Jason L. Potvin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brady121212 ( talk • contribs) 01:23, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi - this page was requested to be deleted because there is a non draft (article) by the same name: "SPRFMO". Not sure why we need to keep the draft? Supcmd ( talk) 11:24, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi! I messed up doing a round robin – there is a redirect with older history at Draft:White-faced Black Spanish chicken, which I can't move to article space because the redirect suppression failed (don't know how). Could you kindly clean up – in one way or another – for me? Deleting the existing redirect would do it, I can take it from there. Many thanks, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 11:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Our protection doctrine states--- Talk pages are not usually protected, and are only semi-protected for a limited duration in the most severe cases of vandalism.
Is there any particular reason why
Talk:Raheja Developers shall not fit in this extremely limited criterion?The only edits by IPS/Non-confirmed accounts are issuing legal threats or outing users or indulging in brand-promotion.And this has been going for months!
Winged Blades
Godric 17:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello GB fan, I'm writing to request review and resubmission of page, "Soothe". According to the editing history, you once deleted the page. I've been editing it and many changes have been made. Currently it is saved as a draft page, and ready to be published. Please let me know your concerns, Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Echoasis ( talk • contribs) 21:46, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
{{
Submit}}
to the top and have an independent editor look at it. A quick look tells me it is not right for the mainspace yet. The list of locations served is purely advertising.
~ GB fan 22:45, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Please look to see if the edits I deleted need to be suppressed. Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 15:44, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Specifically, this
[14], where you said I see the exception you are using but I think it completely contradicts the outing policy as it allows us to tie a Wikipedia ID to an offsite name.
I don't believe that Admins (including ArbCom) are permitted to use the Tools against written policy, especially with full knowledge that they are doing so. This is true regardless of what the Oversighters tell you. I know and understand that the new provision was somewhat controversial, but it appears to have consensus behind it. Because this is not a question of different interpretations of policy, but rather a willful and knowing effort to vetoing written policy with the Admin powers, I request that you selfrevert.
Geogene (
talk) 23:33, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Could you have a look here Phase_(band), there's a user malignantly adding removal tags , something you've stop me from doing in the past... Gone through the history and talk page and it was agreed the article is legitimate. Cheers MusicPatrol ( talk) 15:58, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the intevention! He hadn't even notified the Page's author. I can leave them a message if needed... On his contributions list I've noticed more pages might have been vandalized... All the best! MusicPatrol ( talk) 19:45, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
What's your input as to why you removed my reffered deletion to liquid dubstep?? 120.147.37.23 ( talk) 15:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Understood, should've took a look the criterias than placing a speedy deletion or the first deletion page I find. 120.147.37.23 ( talk) 16:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, I was just going to create the article, I have the create page in front of me, and you removed not only the red link from Joker but the whole entry! Fine, if a red link can't wait till I start the article, at least just remove the brackets. The entry is notable BTW. Thank you. Hoverfish Talk 13:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi GB fan. I just wanted to let you know that I have speedily deleted the article No More Arrests per WP:CSD#G3, as it looks to me like a blatant hoax. Without any verification from anyone officially associated with this artist, it is very unlikely that the article is truthful. I wanted to drop you a note since you had changed the CSD tag on the article to a PROD tag beforehand. Thanks, Mz7 ( talk) 02:51, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
I was the same person who posted the wiki content in October and it got deleted. Kindly review my content and make it live Accesstowiki ( talk) 12:20, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
The title mentioned was Borderless Access. Humble request to make it Live as I am trying to create the page from more than a year Accesstowiki ( talk) 12:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Now can you help me in posting the article Accesstowiki ( talk) 12:52, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
I am unable to find the article as it has been deleted Accesstowiki ( talk) 12:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Borderless Access Accesstowiki ( talk) 13:01, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Hey, I'm sorry about that! I meant to tag Talk:Bust of Cristiano Ronaldo, which redirects to the airport's page. I went back to talk but accidentally CSDed the airport page. Apologies ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ᐐT₳LKᐬ 23:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
@ Great Britain Fan, I have visited Bangladesh Army official site a few minutes ago and have come to know that the wiki page List of Bangladesh Army four-star generals 12 men have been shown with the rank of full general, if you visit the Bangladesh Army official page you will be surprised to know that only five men have been full general in the history of Bangladesh. So I urge you to change the writings of that page or delete that page as that is unnecessary because there is already a page about Bangladesh Army generals and that is Chief of Army Staff of the Bangladesh Army. Amar Tushar ( talk) 11:05, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi GB fan,
You recently reverted my addition of a CSD A9 tag as "This is about a character not a musical recording, not eligible for speedy deletion". If you would be so kind and wouldn't mind taking another look at that, I would appreciate it because I see the article as very much being about the musical recording not the character. Thank you, menaechmi ( talk) 13:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello GB Fan, i recently changed my own talk page from my full name to my name without my middle one. Sense it is a rather unique one, and i didnt want people to know my real one, simply regarding privacy. I wanted hear if you could delete the revision history of my talk page. Thanks in Advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magnus2108 ( talk • contribs) 19:46, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello GB fan. A few weeks ago you blocked 69.117.44.133 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) for disruptive editing. They have returned to make the same edits as 67.86.57.216 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Thanks for your time. MarnetteD| Talk 15:42, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
I have just added a reference stating that "On the Rocks" is the title for the debut album from American country music group Midland. Can you please restore the redirect for On the Rocks (Midland album), or explain why you can not? -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 13:34, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
You really need to look into this edit war between Hrodvarsson and Divergence5. In particular, you need to look at their talk pages. Divergence5 has nearly nothing but warnings. He answered one, and his tone was not kind. Hrodvarsson on the other hand has almost nothing but compliments, except for two edit-warring warnings, both of them involving Divergence5, and both on the Magnus Carlsen page. Check out his history. This editor is rabid. Look at his last edit summary here. He doesn't know what a talk page is? He finally answered a June 24 message on the Magnus Carlsen talk page yesterday morning, demonstrating he knows full well what a talk page is. And then he attacked Hrodvarsson. If his "improvements" actually had the value he thinks they do, Hrodvarsson would accept them willing. Divergence5's edits verge on destructive. You really need to read D5's edit history.
Hrodvarsson has acted in good faith. Divergence5 has not. Frankly, I don't see how this can just be let go if Divergence5 insists on adding bad information and won't stop warring. AN/I may be called for. — Myk Streja (beep) 03:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi GB fan
Please can you undelete National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, it was deleted because of 'No substantive coverage by independent secondary sources'. I will be happy to add the following and more which are available.
Many thanks
-- John Cummings ( talk) 10:42, 17 August 2017 (UTC)