This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The revision in question. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Georges_Sada&type=revision&diff=982016886&oldid=982016070
Please see this policy regarding this: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Proposed_deletion Specifically: "A special case is BLPPROD: an article which has had the BLPPROD-tag removed still can be PRODed via the process described here."
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saucysalsa30 ( talk • contribs) 19:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello
I note that you have deleted the above article. Can you please reinstate the article which is important as it describes the group's activities to promote the Punjabi language and history online thereby engaging people from Punjab Pakistan and Punjab India. The club organises lectures by people from around the world. Given the difficulty in people being able to be physically present in either Punjab, the club provides a platform for people to engage and promote the language and history.
Thank you.
( Malikhpur) 18:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello,
Recently you deleted the draft 'Sahunil Bhatnagar' per G7, which I tagged. Unfortunately, the draft has been part of a wider case. Originally it was created, then deleted per G11 by Stwalkerster. The draft was then recreated, but you deleted per G7. Soon after that, it was recreated by another user at the location Draft:Sahnil Bhatnagar, but also at Draft:Sahnil bhatnagar (Actor). I am not an admin, but because of various edits I made to other pages before the drafts were deleted, I recorded that there were many socks editing, possibly to avoid a WP:NOTHERE block. The users are:
They have made few edits outside of the draft, and all follow the same username pattern. Also, I think the pages should be deleted, and salting might be in order to prevent them from being recreated. If you don't want to/can't do this, I can take this to WP:AN instead. Thanks! Giraffer munch 15:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Why have you declined the speedy deletion, with an explanation that "redirects from moves are eligible for speedy deletion"? Yahballaha V doesn't exist. Someone mistakenly numbered him as the fifth, when actually he is the fourth. -- Governor Sheng ( talk) 14:24, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Wrongly numbered" would be closest to the R3 criterion in the policy. That says that redirects from implausible titles that were recently created are speedy deletable. The policy though does include redirects that are the result of a move it the moved article was also recently created. You recently created the redirect by moving an article that was created in 2011. An article created 9 years ago is not recently created so that criterion does not apply. If you feel the redirect must be deleted because it in some way harms the encyclopedia then you will need to explain that using WP:RFD. I can predict with almost absolute certainty that the result of any discussion at RFD will result in the redirect being kept. ~ GB fan 15:29, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Regarding this page: Monte Carlo (solitaire)
You deleted this on 26 February 2020 on these grounds: Expired PROD, concern was: Non notable card game that has been unsourced since 2009.
I can appreciate the reasons for you making this decision at that time. Unfortunately there are not many contributors about solitaire games who are active editors; I'm working hard to correct that. So in this instance the issue isn't that this solitaire game isn't notable, the issue is rather that people in a position to verify notability aren't active on Wikipedia.
I can confirm that Monte Carlo is included in the following book The Little Book of Solitaire, Running Press, 2002, ISBN 0-7624-1381-6 on page 60. I have the book (and others like it) and will include this reference when the page can be restored, and will also do a general review and clean-up of the article. Monte Carlo is a fairly common solitaire game and is also included in numerous software packages.
I'm currently working on adding references to other solitaire games as well, and it would be good if this one could be restored, since it is covered in the above mentioned book and other similar works. Gregorytopov ( talk) 03:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
hi. who declined the tag A7 for above article? user:Adam9007 first tag was true and he made a mistake for changing that. the article must be deleted in 1st day of creation because didn't cover wp:N and wp:SNG.the medals are not seniors and must be deleted by WP:SPEEDY. i'm sure for that and no need for wp:AFD.-- Mojtaba2361 ( talk) 09:17, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
his medals wasn't seniors medals and it is against the WP:NSPORTand
didn't cover wp:N and wp:SNGboth sound to me like 'non-notable', which isn't a valid speedy deletion criterion (and no, that is not what A7 is about, contrary to popular belief). Adam9007 ( talk) 21:26, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Last I checked AfDs aren't the only way to have articles deleted. Plus, I was pretty clear that it should be deleted due to being promotional. Which last I checked, isn't what AfD is for. Therefore, AfDing it isn't an option IMO. At least not one that was relevant to why the speedy delete was put on the article in the first place. Anyone who disagreed with the speedy deletion, including you, could have said why on the talk page though. Since it's a perfectly policy based way to go about things and there's zero legitimate reason not to do it that way. Especially since, again, AfDs aren't generally for getting of promotional articles. So, do you have an actual reason that you think it shouldn't be deleted and is there a good reason why you didn't just post about it on the talk page like the template guidelines say to do? Or was your removal of the speedy delete more of a JUSTDONTLIKEIT type of thing? -- Adamant1 ( talk) 20:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
GB fan, I'm a bit confused as to the reversion of the BLPPROD with the reasoning that sources were present when the PROD was added, and thus it was ineligible. There are no sources in the article, but only external links. I removed nothing from the article, save for an outdated tag that was no longer relevant, or accurate. IMDB is a user-generated website that has been deprecated for use as a source for any claim; all it can do it show that something (or someone) exists. Regardless, it's still an external link that's essentially no different from a link to a commercial website or social media profile. The remainder of the links all fall under that category as well. I know not all sources have to be in-line, but I'm not sure how any of those qualify as prima facie "sources". Most people have social media, or personal or commercial websites. That doesn't mean they're notable. Symmachus Auxiliarus ( talk) 22:24, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
See https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:37.29.181.13&oldid=986716276. -- 37.29.181.13 ( talk) 16:07, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Please note the typo in Categoy:Female characters in animated series: it's not actually a category. It may have been created as an attempted fork of the actual category with that name, currently in a deletion discussion. Thanks. Captain Calm ( talk) 11:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scintilla Iceland (2nd nomination) needs an official close. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 18:20, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
@ GB fan:, what is the recommended action in these kinds of scenarios where an editor keeps submitting the article for review while it already exists? - The9Man ( Talk) 10:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Hey, what's up with this -> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/992081548?diffmode=source edit? Can't you see the edit summary i provided when i blanked the page? Zoglophie ( talk) 19:10, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello GB fan.
I'm interested in creating a new page describing a concept for composing music for a medical environment: MusiCure. The original page was deleted for lack of notability. I have collected a number of external references, mostly academic journals, and would very much like to have another go at writing a better piece that complies with the requirements.
I have a draft in my sandbox and would be grateful for your guidance. I'm no expert here.
Thanks for your assistance!
Jonathan Cookerid ( talk) 16:49, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello GB fan,
When Paper Excellence was deleted I responded on my talk page to the user I thought had deleted the page. As it turns out, that user only nominated the page and you were the one who deleted it. When I did not receive a response I began building a more robust version of the article in my sandbox. I then went to create a new page and read the message stating that I should first contact you.
I created a page for Paper Excellence after viewing the companies listed on Pulp and paper industry in Canada and Canada paper mills. Paper Excellence is bigger / more significant than a number of these companies. Perhaps my first attempt didn't credibly indicate the company's significance but I thought I was creating a stub that other editors would build out. I have since created a better version at User:MaggieBC/sandbox. Will you please take a look and advise on how to proceed? Thank you in advance. MaggieBC ( talk) 02:11, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Please don't blame this article on me. It was originally created by someone who changed the subject of the B major article; I reverted and copy-pasted the text into the new B major (person) article. (The user is now blocked; if you want to know who the user is, please study recent history of the B major article.) Georgia guy ( talk) 19:19, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Aren't such small articles deleted? -- Алёна Синичкина ( talk) 10:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, misread the A3 criteria, missing the "external" in front of links. I thought it read simply links. Onel5969 TT me 14:43, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi. The talk page is a duplicate of this. --► Sincerely: Sola Virum 20:16, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello GB fan. Thank you for your message.
It is absolutely necessary that Wikipedia has a very strict policy about living people. Thanks.
But I only added proven facts about a person of public interest.
It is fact, that prosperity theology is a controversial religious belief which claims that material prosperity is a sign of God's grace. This is sourced. See Wikipedia "prosperity theology". And it is not negative about Paula White to say that prosperity theology is "controversial". A controversy is a prolonged public dispute or debate, with people having different opinions ans not negative.
And I think that this should be mentioned in the first sentences and not far down, because it is a major content. For example: You would not write about Charlie Parker that he was a musician and mention far down, that he was a jazz musician, saxophonist and composer. You would write in the first sentence that he was American jazz saxophonist and composer.
Best Greetings — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hypodamos ( talk • contribs) 12:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi GB Fan, List of P-Pop Artist is not only grammatically odd, but was literally created by a company account to promote their bands. CMD ( talk) 00:06, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wood & Wire. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 23#Wood & Wire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Robert McClenon ( talk) 15:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, you declined my G5 CSD at Draft:Monk Steppenwolf, but the user was in fact a sock (the second one listed): Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cadeken. They were glocked and hidden, which is why the username has been redacted. Their talk page shows that the draft they created was nominated for deletion. Thanks, Giraffer ( talk· contribs) 11:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Empire AS
Talk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Empire AS Talk! 13:38, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Greetings.
So a while back you decline my request for speedy delete of a redirect. As I understand a redirect works like this:
A link from another article > The redirect (created by the move I did to rename the article) > The main article created.
But I already changed the link from the other articles (which is just edit " The Saga of Tanya the Evil: The Movie" to just " Saga of Tanya the Evil: The Movie", which makes the redirect like this:
No link from any other article that uses the redirect (makes the redirect useless thats why I want to delete it) > The Main Article (created by my move).
What can be done? GoalkeeperCIWS ( talk) 08:43, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, I just stumbled upon a red link to an article about the German band " Brings" you speedy deleted a year ago. I haven't seen the article, therefore I can only speculate on its status, but as a German I can tell you that Brings is a band known across the country, and over the decades they have issued many studio and live albums, so they are clearly notable and they have press coverage probably in the hundreds of articles, including a few books, therefore we are not doing our audience a service having no article about them. For a start, see the articles in other language entities, including the German ones: de:Brings and de:Brings/Diskografie. Given the notability of the topic, the editor who nominated the article for speedy deletion per A7 obviously didn't do the necessary homework before the nomination, because even if the article actually lacked a credible claim of significance, this would have been trivially easy to bring by even for someone not familiar with the band. So, unless the article is total junk, please restore it so that possible issues can be remedied by possibly adding a suitable lede (assuming it is missing from the A7 criteria being used) and/or more references. I guess, contents from the German article and the discography could be translated as well. Thanks. -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 21:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, I am making my articles ready this will be my first articles, can u pls advised me how many references should I insert for the standard of wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zayakg ( talk • contribs) 13:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks a lot User:GB fan your help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zayakg ( talk • contribs) 05:11, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
This article contains nothing of significance that is not in buffer solution. However, when I replace the content by "{{redirect|buffer solution}}" it redirects to itself, not to the article on buffer solutions! It appears therefore that this article was created first, hence the redirect to it.
I am an expert in this field (formerly chemistry lecturer, Leeds University). There is no value in having a separate article on buffering agents; the content is effectively a repeat of some of the content of the more general article cited above.
I placed a request for comments before deletion on the article's talk page a year ago; there have been no responses. Please let me know how to deal with this situation, or, better still, remove the article from WP. Petergans ( talk) 14:21, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
If the article had not been moved to draftspace, it would have been eligible as A10. It is still just a copy made to try to circumvent an AFD discussion. There does not seem to be any reason other than that for it to exist. noq ( talk) 17:04, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi ~ GB fan, I disagree with your revert and feel sad because you wrote "decline speedy delete, not reason given, I don't see any valid reasons" while reasons are given in the talk page. So, what is wrong? -- Wolle1303 ( talk) 13:10, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
~ GB fan, I do not advocate for a speedy delete, my intension was just some type of deletion. Sorry for my fault and my lacking knowledges. Perhaps you can assist me how to proceed? Thanks in advance. One more question if you like (since I saw your nick name): Is the nome "curb" weight instead of "kerb" weight a problem for you? -- Wolle1303 ( talk) 17:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I would like to merge the 2006 Russian march article with Russian march, but I don't know the procedure. I should remove the "Russian march" redirect first? Please, could you help me? Thank you very much.-- Mhorg ( talk) 12:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Draft:KFBG-TV, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:KFBG-TV (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:KFBG-TV during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
I think my ping failed, so I'm notifying you this way in re: the declined speedy.
Hello,
I’m learning how the process works here on Wikipedia. If I’m doing something wrong here I apologize in advance.
I have tried to add content to the page with additional sourcing not used before and it was deleted by sock puppets.
I’ve been advised by the admin @gorillawarfare to try to find consensus on the talk page.
Can you assist me in this, or give me advice? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BomiRustomji ( talk • contribs) 01:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
kindly ask for revdel starting with [1] to [2] for blasphemy and insulting. thanks for the help -- 5.90.187.92 ( talk) 15:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 i don't know if i used correctly the diff template, but these are the edits. i'd be very thankful if you can do it. -- 5.90.182.64 ( talk) 20:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Please revoke everything on that account. It is an LTA impersonating User:Blablubbs. Thanks, Java Hurricane 12:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I'm not sure what the correct deletion request is, but this redirect seems redundant due to this redirect that is already present: Mike O'Brien (Michigan politician) with a lower case. Semper Fi! FieldMarine ( talk) 14:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
OK thanks. That's helpful. Semper Fi! FieldMarine ( talk) 23:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I am Sean Ethan James D. Querubin, a retired Wikipedian editor since February 22, 2021. I will just ask a favor to trim my contributions at my talk page to protect the contributions of the page since you declined my request to delete the page. Thank You!. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin ( talk) 15:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Good morning GB fan,
I am new to contributing to wikipedia and would love to have your expert advice. Following the deletion of OpenHuddle, could you provide a few tips and some directions to get it approved?
Your help would be much appreciated.
Phil — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philyleb ( talk • contribs) 13:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I am curious why you removed the Prod at [3] - I restored the PROD because it was previously not correctly DEPRODed - as stated in the edit comments per WP:DEPROD a DEPROD needs *mandatory* to be explained and the PRODer needs to be informed which both did not happen. Would you please so kind to re-establish the PROD tagging, thank you. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 11:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
You are encouraged, but not required, to also: Explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion" The next step in the deletion process is WP:AFD. ~ GB fan 11:31, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to know more on how to ensure that the article is deleted. The article for the university has been on Wikipedia since 2011 that is Accra Polytechnic prior to its upgrade from a Polytechnic into a Technical University. The creator of the new article that is Accra Technical University created it when it was upgraded instead of rather renaming the initial file into Accra Technical University to reflect the change. I proposed a merger and worked on it, but I guess my proposal for speedy deletion wasn't a good one per the rules and the statements provided after the removal of those tags. Since the merger has been done now, what's the best deletion process that can be used to ensure the initial article is renamed into Accra Technical University. sorry for the long message. Thanks. Ampimd ( talk) 14:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Please can you tell me why you denied a speedy deletion of this page?
Thanks,
Amanda — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amcdhlsch ( talk • contribs) 09:29, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
This applies to pages consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. It does not cover poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, implausible theories, vandalism or hoaxes, fictional material, coherent non-English material, or poorly translated material. Nor does it apply to user sandboxes or other pages in the user namespace. In short, if it is understandable, G1 does not apply.
In short, if it is understandable, G1 does not apply.. ~ GB fan 09:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, can you please move A Classic Horror Story to a draftspace? Bruno Rene Vargas ( talk) 18:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Mohammad Farhad Azimi is notable according to WP:POLITICIAN; He is Governatores and he was member of Afqan parliament. I added ref. to the artical in draft:Mohammad Farhad Azimi would you accept it?-- Reza Amper ( talk) 10:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
What would be the correct speedy then? I couldn't move it to draft space which is what I tried to do first time around! Govvy ( talk) 11:06, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Dear GB fan, a user has emptied Human Face (mathematical artwork) without creating a discussion. Can it be considered as a violation of Wikipedia's deletion policy? As I see a number of users are in a hurry to delete that page. The Big Cowboy ( talk) 17:40, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
This draft contains information taken from Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurashi and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and its citations are all taken from this, also the user which created this draft has committed vandalism on Islamic State of Iraq and Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurashi. Thanks Kiro Bassem ( talk) 22:06, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Nothing, I just don't want wrong information on Wikipedia, I really care about this. Kiro Bassem ( talk) 22:15, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Sorry about the G7 template on that article. I forgot I had uploaded that with my non-personal computer account (I use it for devices that are not my own). Paul Vaurie ( talk) 19:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
GB fan, can you please restore the article Bergkvara, Växjö, which was deleted by you? The article contained some important information about the manor house Bergkvara. Just 'cause it was a "copy" of Bergkvara Castle, it was not reasonable to just delete it. My intention was to replace the article Bergkvara Castle with Bergkvara, Växjö, 'cause Bergkvara is a manor house and not only a ruined castle. BHB95 ( talk) 09:22, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
When you deleted the article Bergkvara, Växjö, you also deleted much information. I think all that information should be included in the article about Bergkvara. Besides that, Bergkvara is also a mansion and not only a ruined castle. Therefore, I think the deleted article Bergkvara, Växjö should be restored, please. You just have to restore it, move all its information to the article Bergkvara Castle and then redirect it to the article Bergkvara Castle, and eventually change name of the article Bergkvara Castle by moving it. BHB95 ( talk) 15:02, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Can you please explain your removal of the tags ive left behind on the Preshaw page? SharkiePaws96 ( talk) 18:01, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Its clearly has been vandalised and your just aiding in it being up SharkiePaws96 ( talk) 18:04, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
I have done and you have removed it too SharkiePaws96 ( talk) 18:17, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
If your so inclined to get people to fix it isnt the a way to say it needs foxed? SharkiePaws96 ( talk) 18:27, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
the draft is a duplicate dont delete the db tag some body copied all the text to main name space and it stuck there Baratiiman ( talk) 13:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Oh sorry me for afd error. I just want propose delete page for Valeria Altobelli
Recently deleted with 'deleting process' for Wikipedia Italy ( https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Pagine_da_cancellare/Valeria_Altobelli)
TY! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.79.203.241 ( talk) 18:29, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Yes. Nominate it. I^m newbie in Wikipedia code :s — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.79.203.241 ( talk) 18:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
So an article about an act of parliament that never existed is not a hoax or vandalism? I'd like to see you explain that. DuncanHill ( talk) 17:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
I noticed this didn’t turn out well which greatly vexed me but I moved it out of mainspace and have insisted that if at all it may be published it must pass through the AFC route due to the overt undisclosed COI. Celestina007 ( talk) 21:29, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, NitroPowerbank here. I noticed that my request for speedy deletion of the Lego art article was reverted/declined. May I know what are the necessary steps I will have to take in order for the article to be deleted as I have not done this before? The reason why I would like to delete the article is because it is a redirect to an article of the same name and therefore serves no purpose in being a redirect. The article it redirects to is the Lego Art article which was moved from the proposed-to-be-deleted Lego art redirect earlier. Do let me know what I can do in order to remove this unnecessary redirect. NitroPowerbank ( talk) 14:04, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
This was done within minutes of launching the article, while still under construction. Perhaps it would be better to wait a few hours, maybe even 24 before tagging it. Just a suggestion - no need to respond. Semper fi! FieldMarine ( talk) 13:51, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Good point. I was just making a suggestion. Thanks! Semper Fi! FieldMarine ( talk) 14:27, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
You contested the BLPPROD template here a few days ago, so I figured you might be interested in the AfD discussion I've started for this article. jp× g 00:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, GB fan,
Since I've seen you working in the PROD area, I thought I'd give you a head's up that there are over 300 PROD'd articles for next Saturday ( Category:Proposed deletion as of 24 April 2021). I posted a note on the nominator's talk page asking them to pace their nominations to maybe 20-30/day. But all hands on deck next weekend if you are available. Liz Read! Talk! 03:23, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Please can you explain your reasoning for deleting the page on Colin Savage, Executive Producer of BBC Television on 20th April 2020. This person is a significant Current Affairs Executive Producer with a biography of Current Affairs programming at the BBC and other broadcasters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwright61 ( talk • contribs) 16:30, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
large amount of unverified information. Over the course of the next 7 days no ne objected to the deletion so I deleted it. If you think it should be restored, let me know and I will restore the article. ~ GB fan 16:37, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Reg my page deletion. Kindly help me to regain it. not sure why you are deleting over and again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandhya Ch1 ( talk • contribs) 12:37, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, The draft has been moved to mainspace now. It is almost verbatim copy of deleted Chanuka Nadun Perera. Can WP:G4 apply now for the new artile?, because I don't see the point of a new AfD. Regards-- Chanaka L ( talk) 13:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
PS: thinking of filing a SPI for the two users.-- Chanaka L ( talk) 13:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Draft:Super Heavy (rocket stage) was requested to be deleted by me under G7. You said that it could not be deleted because I'm not the author. I am the author, but I created it under my IP adress before I registered my account. Please delete it. StarshipSLS ( Talk), ( My Contributions) 15:19, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
If there was "no indication this was not created in violation of block or ban" (your edit summary), that would mean G8 applies? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk)
10:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
What to do in such situations where the article was created via mainspace and later on it was moved to draftspace and again someone created the same article in mainspace? I just want to know to avoid future CSD's in such cases Owlf ( talk) 15:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Dear Administrators . Thank you for the kind corrections. I have edited the contents and tried hard to remove all the advertisement type keywords and sentences. I didn't do that attentionaly. I have researched on him for 3 weeks on news, references. Kindly Don't delete it as I have created both of the contents. Thanks MdEhsanulHaqueTanvir ( talk) 17:29, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello. The person who removed the template told me I could put it back. They had removed it because of a misunderstanding. Is it ok if I put it back? Thank you. Pack My Box ( talk) 02:44, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Can you please explain why it can't be restored? No one has objected to the deletion. Isn't that the point? Pack My Box ( talk) 03:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Can you please explain the logic of that to me? I have read the page about prod templates and I understand if someone objects to the prod template it can't be returned. No one objected in this case. How would it be a problem for anyone if I added a new prod template? Pack My Box ( talk) 14:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Sorry. I am new to Wikipedia. I am trying to understand the process of prod templates. Pack My Box ( talk) 15:54, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello dear colleague GB fan. I recently created Ariana Nabaey article, but after checking the sources, I realized I was wrong and asked to delete it, which was deleted. Now the person has created an account with his real name and wants to publish his draft. Please delete the draft like the article itself. It should be noted that the user insulted me on my talk page in this regard.-- Parizad ( talk) 16:36, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
I made mistakes—my intention was to rename Kapauanuakea to Kapau-a-Nuakea, but “a” was ommited, so the current title’s wrong (worse than before). I think the content should be put into Kapau-a-Nuakea, whilst Kapau-a-Nukea should be deleted. What’s your proposal? V. K. ( talk) 23:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello GB fan! I am deleting the Umiray-Angat Transbasin Project in my sandbox and uploading this in the Draft once more. Anything else I need to know before I upload it? -- Bootkinero ( talk) 08:34, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
hello, happy to discuss the deletion for circa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenhill90 ( talk • contribs) 12:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi, GB fan. I saw that you declined my G5 nomination of User talk:ZekiAlasyaMetinAkpinarr. Was it because it was a user talk page? Or because it was edited by TNT after my nomination? I think it was my first G5 nomination, so would like to know for future reference. Thank you, Sdrqaz ( talk) 17:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, I realized an article I created "Poetry in Ghana" was nominated for speedy deletion and you performed the action. I would like to plead with you to give me more time to improve that article Robertjamal12 ( talk) 08:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Thank you Robertjamal12 ( talk) 00:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi, @ GB fan: Please See User talk:2A02:C7F:A0D6:3D00:5D7:BFBD:A865:9836 . Best Regards ❣MXX8❣ @Talk 15:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
❣MXX8❣ @Talk 03:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi , @ GB fan: I've Created 23+ Article on English Wikipedia. i apologize to you How am I asking for this right from you,I'm not aware about that can this right be how to given member who has created so few articles, I only want this right for one month only for trial .Best Regards ❣MXX8❣ @Talk 03:51, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi , @ GB fan: I've Added a Request Please see [4]. Best Regards ❣MXX8❣ @Talk 10:48, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
❣MXX8❣ @Talk 11:00, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I see that you deleted the "Cleve Haubold" page in July of 2020. By any chance did you save the text of the page somewhere? I would like to take a look at it for some research I am doing. Thank you for getting back to me. Taram ( talk) 23:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Two years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:31, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I see what you mean, but that AFD was 15 years ago (!) and the article has since then unfortunately become a pile of spam. Dr. Vogel ( talk) 19:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks @ GB fan:, I made a right mess of the Raj Gupta page, and absolutely withdraw any intention of PRODing it; I hadn't noticed that the vandal had removed the entire useful content before hijacking the page for his own use. Sorry about that. Elemimele ( talk) 15:40, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi — you just declined my G4 speedy request on Draft:Rejoice Chidinma Iwueze on the basis that it doesn't apply to drafts. Fair enough. I just wasn't sure, because the guidance that pops up on my Twinkle dialogue box only says it doesn't apply to "content that has been userfied", and I didn know if it also meant this. Now I know. :)
Incidentally, I only realised after tagging it that this one was created a few days before, not after, the one deleted at the AfD. I don't suppose you'd care to comment on whether that was technically okay or not; ie., whether G4 can apply (in main space) regardless of which order the articles were created in? Just curious. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 15:41, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, regarding this: the user has already made another draft, and it's obvious that this one has a typo in its title and is therefore irrelevant. I should've stated it in the deletion request. Best, -- Jan Myšák ( talk) 11:45, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi GB fan! I understand your decline of a G4 tag on this draft, since the prior discussion was an AFD, but my concern is that this creates an attribution issue because it now looks like Homer903 is the sole contributor of that draft's text. I don't intend to work on this draft, but I think that in order to comply with licensing requirements, either the deleted article should be restored to draftspace in its place, or a list of all contributors to the deleted article should be supplied. (I can't see the original contributros because I'm not an administrator.) Thanks. DanCherek ( talk) 23:23, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- GB fan
I hope you remeber me, it's been 5 years, you help me when i created Hip Hop Movement page, thank you for all your help it eook a lot of research, I reall need your help, after 5 years this user is trying to remove it, for what i don't know, he going around taking all the things of Ronald Savage as if it's personal, please help me to save and keep the page i did, me and my friends did a lot of work, this user: Piotr Jr. is the one. I even took the notice down off the page like the wiki article said and put it on my talk page and try to send him a note to don't put it on the article and if he had an iisue to put it in the delestion page, sorry i still don't know the wiki talk lol.
I want to oppose it and also send it for approval to wiki like i did 5 years ago and they approval it, thats why i don't understand how can this user do this if hip hop movement as approved already 5 years ago. tommrrow will be 7 days please help me. Street Sting
-- Street sting ( talk) 05:48, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
You removed the BLPprod claiming there was a source. There is an external link but there is no reference. WP:IMDB is not a valid reference anyway. Notfrompedro ( talk) 16:20, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
You did the same thing for Jonathan Tiersten. Neither have any references at all and your basis was that they do. What is up? Notfrompedro ( talk) 16:21, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
no sources in any form (as references, external links, etc.). If an article has an external link, it is not eligible for BLPPROD. Schazjmd (talk) 16:28, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
To be eligible for a BLPPROD tag, the entry must be a biography of a living person and contain no sources in any form (as references, external links, etc., reliable or otherwise) supporting any statements made about the person in the biography." (emphasis in original)
I am the creator of this page. My account was globally blocked that's whi I am not able to login to my account. Kindly delete the page I have created. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.185.65.84 ( talk) 18:22, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my mistake. I've sent it to AfD instead. Usually Twinkle warns me when a page was prodded before, but it seems it didn't catch it this time. I'll be more careful and do a manual check in the future. Thanks again, Isabelle 🔔 19:09, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
{{
oldprod}}
is added to the talk page. A lot of previously prod'd pages do not have it on the talk page.
~ GB fan
21:21, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Hi, I just want to explain seemingly false claim in the revert summary edit Haifa Сentral HaShmona Railway Station (rev. 1037751409). I thought that you mean that that the deletion request was old, while you meant the redir itself. Thanks for the handy RfD link that came afterwards. — Mykhal ( talk) 16:02, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Trying to delete the ESSAR Steel India Limited page because AM/NS India has merged with ESSAR Steel India Limited. So now it's not standing alone anymore. I am wishing to take down all the ESSAR Steel pages linked with the above-mentioned page. For the same, I am facing the issue to delete it by using the Proposed deletion process as it's showing "This page must be substituted" even after following all the steps. I request you to delete the ESSAR Steel India Limited page and the other ESSAR Pages linked with it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AMNS INDIA ( talk • contribs) 14:49, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I need guidance in the selection of speedy deletion category of a page (ESSAR Group) for which I had got a suggestion of redirection of this page to another new page when I had proposed it for deletion but the redirection option does not work for me because the ESSAR Group no longer exists (ESSAR is now AMNS India) so it's now misleading. I need to delete this page. Please guide me with a selection of the speedy deletion process and category. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by AshishKaushikAMNSIndia ( talk • contribs) 05:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Good afternoon! Polly Cannabis is a model from Belarus, who participated in 20 international beauty contests. Among them are such large ones as Miss Earth and Miss Grand. It is well-known and popular in Belarus, therefore it has the right to publish. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.127.198.16 ( talk) 15:07, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
You will presumably see a notification that your edit has been reverted, but I thought I would do you the courtesy of telling you that I have reverted your de-PRODDing of Mehsopuria. BLPPROD and PROD, despite the confusing similarity of names, are quite separate, and the one being removed doesn't prevent the other from being applied. JBW ( talk) 20:54, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The revision in question. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Georges_Sada&type=revision&diff=982016886&oldid=982016070
Please see this policy regarding this: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Proposed_deletion Specifically: "A special case is BLPPROD: an article which has had the BLPPROD-tag removed still can be PRODed via the process described here."
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saucysalsa30 ( talk • contribs) 19:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello
I note that you have deleted the above article. Can you please reinstate the article which is important as it describes the group's activities to promote the Punjabi language and history online thereby engaging people from Punjab Pakistan and Punjab India. The club organises lectures by people from around the world. Given the difficulty in people being able to be physically present in either Punjab, the club provides a platform for people to engage and promote the language and history.
Thank you.
( Malikhpur) 18:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello,
Recently you deleted the draft 'Sahunil Bhatnagar' per G7, which I tagged. Unfortunately, the draft has been part of a wider case. Originally it was created, then deleted per G11 by Stwalkerster. The draft was then recreated, but you deleted per G7. Soon after that, it was recreated by another user at the location Draft:Sahnil Bhatnagar, but also at Draft:Sahnil bhatnagar (Actor). I am not an admin, but because of various edits I made to other pages before the drafts were deleted, I recorded that there were many socks editing, possibly to avoid a WP:NOTHERE block. The users are:
They have made few edits outside of the draft, and all follow the same username pattern. Also, I think the pages should be deleted, and salting might be in order to prevent them from being recreated. If you don't want to/can't do this, I can take this to WP:AN instead. Thanks! Giraffer munch 15:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Why have you declined the speedy deletion, with an explanation that "redirects from moves are eligible for speedy deletion"? Yahballaha V doesn't exist. Someone mistakenly numbered him as the fifth, when actually he is the fourth. -- Governor Sheng ( talk) 14:24, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Wrongly numbered" would be closest to the R3 criterion in the policy. That says that redirects from implausible titles that were recently created are speedy deletable. The policy though does include redirects that are the result of a move it the moved article was also recently created. You recently created the redirect by moving an article that was created in 2011. An article created 9 years ago is not recently created so that criterion does not apply. If you feel the redirect must be deleted because it in some way harms the encyclopedia then you will need to explain that using WP:RFD. I can predict with almost absolute certainty that the result of any discussion at RFD will result in the redirect being kept. ~ GB fan 15:29, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Regarding this page: Monte Carlo (solitaire)
You deleted this on 26 February 2020 on these grounds: Expired PROD, concern was: Non notable card game that has been unsourced since 2009.
I can appreciate the reasons for you making this decision at that time. Unfortunately there are not many contributors about solitaire games who are active editors; I'm working hard to correct that. So in this instance the issue isn't that this solitaire game isn't notable, the issue is rather that people in a position to verify notability aren't active on Wikipedia.
I can confirm that Monte Carlo is included in the following book The Little Book of Solitaire, Running Press, 2002, ISBN 0-7624-1381-6 on page 60. I have the book (and others like it) and will include this reference when the page can be restored, and will also do a general review and clean-up of the article. Monte Carlo is a fairly common solitaire game and is also included in numerous software packages.
I'm currently working on adding references to other solitaire games as well, and it would be good if this one could be restored, since it is covered in the above mentioned book and other similar works. Gregorytopov ( talk) 03:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
hi. who declined the tag A7 for above article? user:Adam9007 first tag was true and he made a mistake for changing that. the article must be deleted in 1st day of creation because didn't cover wp:N and wp:SNG.the medals are not seniors and must be deleted by WP:SPEEDY. i'm sure for that and no need for wp:AFD.-- Mojtaba2361 ( talk) 09:17, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
his medals wasn't seniors medals and it is against the WP:NSPORTand
didn't cover wp:N and wp:SNGboth sound to me like 'non-notable', which isn't a valid speedy deletion criterion (and no, that is not what A7 is about, contrary to popular belief). Adam9007 ( talk) 21:26, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Last I checked AfDs aren't the only way to have articles deleted. Plus, I was pretty clear that it should be deleted due to being promotional. Which last I checked, isn't what AfD is for. Therefore, AfDing it isn't an option IMO. At least not one that was relevant to why the speedy delete was put on the article in the first place. Anyone who disagreed with the speedy deletion, including you, could have said why on the talk page though. Since it's a perfectly policy based way to go about things and there's zero legitimate reason not to do it that way. Especially since, again, AfDs aren't generally for getting of promotional articles. So, do you have an actual reason that you think it shouldn't be deleted and is there a good reason why you didn't just post about it on the talk page like the template guidelines say to do? Or was your removal of the speedy delete more of a JUSTDONTLIKEIT type of thing? -- Adamant1 ( talk) 20:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
GB fan, I'm a bit confused as to the reversion of the BLPPROD with the reasoning that sources were present when the PROD was added, and thus it was ineligible. There are no sources in the article, but only external links. I removed nothing from the article, save for an outdated tag that was no longer relevant, or accurate. IMDB is a user-generated website that has been deprecated for use as a source for any claim; all it can do it show that something (or someone) exists. Regardless, it's still an external link that's essentially no different from a link to a commercial website or social media profile. The remainder of the links all fall under that category as well. I know not all sources have to be in-line, but I'm not sure how any of those qualify as prima facie "sources". Most people have social media, or personal or commercial websites. That doesn't mean they're notable. Symmachus Auxiliarus ( talk) 22:24, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
See https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:37.29.181.13&oldid=986716276. -- 37.29.181.13 ( talk) 16:07, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Please note the typo in Categoy:Female characters in animated series: it's not actually a category. It may have been created as an attempted fork of the actual category with that name, currently in a deletion discussion. Thanks. Captain Calm ( talk) 11:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scintilla Iceland (2nd nomination) needs an official close. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 18:20, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
@ GB fan:, what is the recommended action in these kinds of scenarios where an editor keeps submitting the article for review while it already exists? - The9Man ( Talk) 10:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Hey, what's up with this -> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/992081548?diffmode=source edit? Can't you see the edit summary i provided when i blanked the page? Zoglophie ( talk) 19:10, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello GB fan.
I'm interested in creating a new page describing a concept for composing music for a medical environment: MusiCure. The original page was deleted for lack of notability. I have collected a number of external references, mostly academic journals, and would very much like to have another go at writing a better piece that complies with the requirements.
I have a draft in my sandbox and would be grateful for your guidance. I'm no expert here.
Thanks for your assistance!
Jonathan Cookerid ( talk) 16:49, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello GB fan,
When Paper Excellence was deleted I responded on my talk page to the user I thought had deleted the page. As it turns out, that user only nominated the page and you were the one who deleted it. When I did not receive a response I began building a more robust version of the article in my sandbox. I then went to create a new page and read the message stating that I should first contact you.
I created a page for Paper Excellence after viewing the companies listed on Pulp and paper industry in Canada and Canada paper mills. Paper Excellence is bigger / more significant than a number of these companies. Perhaps my first attempt didn't credibly indicate the company's significance but I thought I was creating a stub that other editors would build out. I have since created a better version at User:MaggieBC/sandbox. Will you please take a look and advise on how to proceed? Thank you in advance. MaggieBC ( talk) 02:11, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Please don't blame this article on me. It was originally created by someone who changed the subject of the B major article; I reverted and copy-pasted the text into the new B major (person) article. (The user is now blocked; if you want to know who the user is, please study recent history of the B major article.) Georgia guy ( talk) 19:19, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Aren't such small articles deleted? -- Алёна Синичкина ( talk) 10:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, misread the A3 criteria, missing the "external" in front of links. I thought it read simply links. Onel5969 TT me 14:43, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi. The talk page is a duplicate of this. --► Sincerely: Sola Virum 20:16, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello GB fan. Thank you for your message.
It is absolutely necessary that Wikipedia has a very strict policy about living people. Thanks.
But I only added proven facts about a person of public interest.
It is fact, that prosperity theology is a controversial religious belief which claims that material prosperity is a sign of God's grace. This is sourced. See Wikipedia "prosperity theology". And it is not negative about Paula White to say that prosperity theology is "controversial". A controversy is a prolonged public dispute or debate, with people having different opinions ans not negative.
And I think that this should be mentioned in the first sentences and not far down, because it is a major content. For example: You would not write about Charlie Parker that he was a musician and mention far down, that he was a jazz musician, saxophonist and composer. You would write in the first sentence that he was American jazz saxophonist and composer.
Best Greetings — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hypodamos ( talk • contribs) 12:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi GB Fan, List of P-Pop Artist is not only grammatically odd, but was literally created by a company account to promote their bands. CMD ( talk) 00:06, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wood & Wire. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 23#Wood & Wire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Robert McClenon ( talk) 15:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, you declined my G5 CSD at Draft:Monk Steppenwolf, but the user was in fact a sock (the second one listed): Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cadeken. They were glocked and hidden, which is why the username has been redacted. Their talk page shows that the draft they created was nominated for deletion. Thanks, Giraffer ( talk· contribs) 11:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Empire AS
Talk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Empire AS Talk! 13:38, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Greetings.
So a while back you decline my request for speedy delete of a redirect. As I understand a redirect works like this:
A link from another article > The redirect (created by the move I did to rename the article) > The main article created.
But I already changed the link from the other articles (which is just edit " The Saga of Tanya the Evil: The Movie" to just " Saga of Tanya the Evil: The Movie", which makes the redirect like this:
No link from any other article that uses the redirect (makes the redirect useless thats why I want to delete it) > The Main Article (created by my move).
What can be done? GoalkeeperCIWS ( talk) 08:43, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, I just stumbled upon a red link to an article about the German band " Brings" you speedy deleted a year ago. I haven't seen the article, therefore I can only speculate on its status, but as a German I can tell you that Brings is a band known across the country, and over the decades they have issued many studio and live albums, so they are clearly notable and they have press coverage probably in the hundreds of articles, including a few books, therefore we are not doing our audience a service having no article about them. For a start, see the articles in other language entities, including the German ones: de:Brings and de:Brings/Diskografie. Given the notability of the topic, the editor who nominated the article for speedy deletion per A7 obviously didn't do the necessary homework before the nomination, because even if the article actually lacked a credible claim of significance, this would have been trivially easy to bring by even for someone not familiar with the band. So, unless the article is total junk, please restore it so that possible issues can be remedied by possibly adding a suitable lede (assuming it is missing from the A7 criteria being used) and/or more references. I guess, contents from the German article and the discography could be translated as well. Thanks. -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 21:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, I am making my articles ready this will be my first articles, can u pls advised me how many references should I insert for the standard of wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zayakg ( talk • contribs) 13:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks a lot User:GB fan your help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zayakg ( talk • contribs) 05:11, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
This article contains nothing of significance that is not in buffer solution. However, when I replace the content by "{{redirect|buffer solution}}" it redirects to itself, not to the article on buffer solutions! It appears therefore that this article was created first, hence the redirect to it.
I am an expert in this field (formerly chemistry lecturer, Leeds University). There is no value in having a separate article on buffering agents; the content is effectively a repeat of some of the content of the more general article cited above.
I placed a request for comments before deletion on the article's talk page a year ago; there have been no responses. Please let me know how to deal with this situation, or, better still, remove the article from WP. Petergans ( talk) 14:21, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
If the article had not been moved to draftspace, it would have been eligible as A10. It is still just a copy made to try to circumvent an AFD discussion. There does not seem to be any reason other than that for it to exist. noq ( talk) 17:04, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi ~ GB fan, I disagree with your revert and feel sad because you wrote "decline speedy delete, not reason given, I don't see any valid reasons" while reasons are given in the talk page. So, what is wrong? -- Wolle1303 ( talk) 13:10, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
~ GB fan, I do not advocate for a speedy delete, my intension was just some type of deletion. Sorry for my fault and my lacking knowledges. Perhaps you can assist me how to proceed? Thanks in advance. One more question if you like (since I saw your nick name): Is the nome "curb" weight instead of "kerb" weight a problem for you? -- Wolle1303 ( talk) 17:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I would like to merge the 2006 Russian march article with Russian march, but I don't know the procedure. I should remove the "Russian march" redirect first? Please, could you help me? Thank you very much.-- Mhorg ( talk) 12:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Draft:KFBG-TV, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:KFBG-TV (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:KFBG-TV during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
I think my ping failed, so I'm notifying you this way in re: the declined speedy.
Hello,
I’m learning how the process works here on Wikipedia. If I’m doing something wrong here I apologize in advance.
I have tried to add content to the page with additional sourcing not used before and it was deleted by sock puppets.
I’ve been advised by the admin @gorillawarfare to try to find consensus on the talk page.
Can you assist me in this, or give me advice? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BomiRustomji ( talk • contribs) 01:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
kindly ask for revdel starting with [1] to [2] for blasphemy and insulting. thanks for the help -- 5.90.187.92 ( talk) 15:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 i don't know if i used correctly the diff template, but these are the edits. i'd be very thankful if you can do it. -- 5.90.182.64 ( talk) 20:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Please revoke everything on that account. It is an LTA impersonating User:Blablubbs. Thanks, Java Hurricane 12:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I'm not sure what the correct deletion request is, but this redirect seems redundant due to this redirect that is already present: Mike O'Brien (Michigan politician) with a lower case. Semper Fi! FieldMarine ( talk) 14:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
OK thanks. That's helpful. Semper Fi! FieldMarine ( talk) 23:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I am Sean Ethan James D. Querubin, a retired Wikipedian editor since February 22, 2021. I will just ask a favor to trim my contributions at my talk page to protect the contributions of the page since you declined my request to delete the page. Thank You!. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin ( talk) 15:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Good morning GB fan,
I am new to contributing to wikipedia and would love to have your expert advice. Following the deletion of OpenHuddle, could you provide a few tips and some directions to get it approved?
Your help would be much appreciated.
Phil — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philyleb ( talk • contribs) 13:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I am curious why you removed the Prod at [3] - I restored the PROD because it was previously not correctly DEPRODed - as stated in the edit comments per WP:DEPROD a DEPROD needs *mandatory* to be explained and the PRODer needs to be informed which both did not happen. Would you please so kind to re-establish the PROD tagging, thank you. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 11:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
You are encouraged, but not required, to also: Explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion" The next step in the deletion process is WP:AFD. ~ GB fan 11:31, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to know more on how to ensure that the article is deleted. The article for the university has been on Wikipedia since 2011 that is Accra Polytechnic prior to its upgrade from a Polytechnic into a Technical University. The creator of the new article that is Accra Technical University created it when it was upgraded instead of rather renaming the initial file into Accra Technical University to reflect the change. I proposed a merger and worked on it, but I guess my proposal for speedy deletion wasn't a good one per the rules and the statements provided after the removal of those tags. Since the merger has been done now, what's the best deletion process that can be used to ensure the initial article is renamed into Accra Technical University. sorry for the long message. Thanks. Ampimd ( talk) 14:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Please can you tell me why you denied a speedy deletion of this page?
Thanks,
Amanda — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amcdhlsch ( talk • contribs) 09:29, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
This applies to pages consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. It does not cover poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, implausible theories, vandalism or hoaxes, fictional material, coherent non-English material, or poorly translated material. Nor does it apply to user sandboxes or other pages in the user namespace. In short, if it is understandable, G1 does not apply.
In short, if it is understandable, G1 does not apply.. ~ GB fan 09:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, can you please move A Classic Horror Story to a draftspace? Bruno Rene Vargas ( talk) 18:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Mohammad Farhad Azimi is notable according to WP:POLITICIAN; He is Governatores and he was member of Afqan parliament. I added ref. to the artical in draft:Mohammad Farhad Azimi would you accept it?-- Reza Amper ( talk) 10:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
What would be the correct speedy then? I couldn't move it to draft space which is what I tried to do first time around! Govvy ( talk) 11:06, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Dear GB fan, a user has emptied Human Face (mathematical artwork) without creating a discussion. Can it be considered as a violation of Wikipedia's deletion policy? As I see a number of users are in a hurry to delete that page. The Big Cowboy ( talk) 17:40, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
This draft contains information taken from Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurashi and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and its citations are all taken from this, also the user which created this draft has committed vandalism on Islamic State of Iraq and Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurashi. Thanks Kiro Bassem ( talk) 22:06, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Nothing, I just don't want wrong information on Wikipedia, I really care about this. Kiro Bassem ( talk) 22:15, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Sorry about the G7 template on that article. I forgot I had uploaded that with my non-personal computer account (I use it for devices that are not my own). Paul Vaurie ( talk) 19:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
GB fan, can you please restore the article Bergkvara, Växjö, which was deleted by you? The article contained some important information about the manor house Bergkvara. Just 'cause it was a "copy" of Bergkvara Castle, it was not reasonable to just delete it. My intention was to replace the article Bergkvara Castle with Bergkvara, Växjö, 'cause Bergkvara is a manor house and not only a ruined castle. BHB95 ( talk) 09:22, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
When you deleted the article Bergkvara, Växjö, you also deleted much information. I think all that information should be included in the article about Bergkvara. Besides that, Bergkvara is also a mansion and not only a ruined castle. Therefore, I think the deleted article Bergkvara, Växjö should be restored, please. You just have to restore it, move all its information to the article Bergkvara Castle and then redirect it to the article Bergkvara Castle, and eventually change name of the article Bergkvara Castle by moving it. BHB95 ( talk) 15:02, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Can you please explain your removal of the tags ive left behind on the Preshaw page? SharkiePaws96 ( talk) 18:01, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Its clearly has been vandalised and your just aiding in it being up SharkiePaws96 ( talk) 18:04, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
I have done and you have removed it too SharkiePaws96 ( talk) 18:17, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
If your so inclined to get people to fix it isnt the a way to say it needs foxed? SharkiePaws96 ( talk) 18:27, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
the draft is a duplicate dont delete the db tag some body copied all the text to main name space and it stuck there Baratiiman ( talk) 13:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Oh sorry me for afd error. I just want propose delete page for Valeria Altobelli
Recently deleted with 'deleting process' for Wikipedia Italy ( https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Pagine_da_cancellare/Valeria_Altobelli)
TY! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.79.203.241 ( talk) 18:29, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Yes. Nominate it. I^m newbie in Wikipedia code :s — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.79.203.241 ( talk) 18:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
So an article about an act of parliament that never existed is not a hoax or vandalism? I'd like to see you explain that. DuncanHill ( talk) 17:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
I noticed this didn’t turn out well which greatly vexed me but I moved it out of mainspace and have insisted that if at all it may be published it must pass through the AFC route due to the overt undisclosed COI. Celestina007 ( talk) 21:29, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, NitroPowerbank here. I noticed that my request for speedy deletion of the Lego art article was reverted/declined. May I know what are the necessary steps I will have to take in order for the article to be deleted as I have not done this before? The reason why I would like to delete the article is because it is a redirect to an article of the same name and therefore serves no purpose in being a redirect. The article it redirects to is the Lego Art article which was moved from the proposed-to-be-deleted Lego art redirect earlier. Do let me know what I can do in order to remove this unnecessary redirect. NitroPowerbank ( talk) 14:04, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
This was done within minutes of launching the article, while still under construction. Perhaps it would be better to wait a few hours, maybe even 24 before tagging it. Just a suggestion - no need to respond. Semper fi! FieldMarine ( talk) 13:51, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Good point. I was just making a suggestion. Thanks! Semper Fi! FieldMarine ( talk) 14:27, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
You contested the BLPPROD template here a few days ago, so I figured you might be interested in the AfD discussion I've started for this article. jp× g 00:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, GB fan,
Since I've seen you working in the PROD area, I thought I'd give you a head's up that there are over 300 PROD'd articles for next Saturday ( Category:Proposed deletion as of 24 April 2021). I posted a note on the nominator's talk page asking them to pace their nominations to maybe 20-30/day. But all hands on deck next weekend if you are available. Liz Read! Talk! 03:23, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Please can you explain your reasoning for deleting the page on Colin Savage, Executive Producer of BBC Television on 20th April 2020. This person is a significant Current Affairs Executive Producer with a biography of Current Affairs programming at the BBC and other broadcasters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwright61 ( talk • contribs) 16:30, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
large amount of unverified information. Over the course of the next 7 days no ne objected to the deletion so I deleted it. If you think it should be restored, let me know and I will restore the article. ~ GB fan 16:37, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Reg my page deletion. Kindly help me to regain it. not sure why you are deleting over and again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandhya Ch1 ( talk • contribs) 12:37, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, The draft has been moved to mainspace now. It is almost verbatim copy of deleted Chanuka Nadun Perera. Can WP:G4 apply now for the new artile?, because I don't see the point of a new AfD. Regards-- Chanaka L ( talk) 13:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
PS: thinking of filing a SPI for the two users.-- Chanaka L ( talk) 13:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Draft:Super Heavy (rocket stage) was requested to be deleted by me under G7. You said that it could not be deleted because I'm not the author. I am the author, but I created it under my IP adress before I registered my account. Please delete it. StarshipSLS ( Talk), ( My Contributions) 15:19, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
If there was "no indication this was not created in violation of block or ban" (your edit summary), that would mean G8 applies? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk)
10:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
What to do in such situations where the article was created via mainspace and later on it was moved to draftspace and again someone created the same article in mainspace? I just want to know to avoid future CSD's in such cases Owlf ( talk) 15:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Dear Administrators . Thank you for the kind corrections. I have edited the contents and tried hard to remove all the advertisement type keywords and sentences. I didn't do that attentionaly. I have researched on him for 3 weeks on news, references. Kindly Don't delete it as I have created both of the contents. Thanks MdEhsanulHaqueTanvir ( talk) 17:29, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello. The person who removed the template told me I could put it back. They had removed it because of a misunderstanding. Is it ok if I put it back? Thank you. Pack My Box ( talk) 02:44, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Can you please explain why it can't be restored? No one has objected to the deletion. Isn't that the point? Pack My Box ( talk) 03:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Can you please explain the logic of that to me? I have read the page about prod templates and I understand if someone objects to the prod template it can't be returned. No one objected in this case. How would it be a problem for anyone if I added a new prod template? Pack My Box ( talk) 14:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Sorry. I am new to Wikipedia. I am trying to understand the process of prod templates. Pack My Box ( talk) 15:54, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello dear colleague GB fan. I recently created Ariana Nabaey article, but after checking the sources, I realized I was wrong and asked to delete it, which was deleted. Now the person has created an account with his real name and wants to publish his draft. Please delete the draft like the article itself. It should be noted that the user insulted me on my talk page in this regard.-- Parizad ( talk) 16:36, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
I made mistakes—my intention was to rename Kapauanuakea to Kapau-a-Nuakea, but “a” was ommited, so the current title’s wrong (worse than before). I think the content should be put into Kapau-a-Nuakea, whilst Kapau-a-Nukea should be deleted. What’s your proposal? V. K. ( talk) 23:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello GB fan! I am deleting the Umiray-Angat Transbasin Project in my sandbox and uploading this in the Draft once more. Anything else I need to know before I upload it? -- Bootkinero ( talk) 08:34, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
hello, happy to discuss the deletion for circa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenhill90 ( talk • contribs) 12:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi, GB fan. I saw that you declined my G5 nomination of User talk:ZekiAlasyaMetinAkpinarr. Was it because it was a user talk page? Or because it was edited by TNT after my nomination? I think it was my first G5 nomination, so would like to know for future reference. Thank you, Sdrqaz ( talk) 17:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, I realized an article I created "Poetry in Ghana" was nominated for speedy deletion and you performed the action. I would like to plead with you to give me more time to improve that article Robertjamal12 ( talk) 08:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Thank you Robertjamal12 ( talk) 00:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi, @ GB fan: Please See User talk:2A02:C7F:A0D6:3D00:5D7:BFBD:A865:9836 . Best Regards ❣MXX8❣ @Talk 15:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
❣MXX8❣ @Talk 03:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi , @ GB fan: I've Created 23+ Article on English Wikipedia. i apologize to you How am I asking for this right from you,I'm not aware about that can this right be how to given member who has created so few articles, I only want this right for one month only for trial .Best Regards ❣MXX8❣ @Talk 03:51, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi , @ GB fan: I've Added a Request Please see [4]. Best Regards ❣MXX8❣ @Talk 10:48, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
❣MXX8❣ @Talk 11:00, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I see that you deleted the "Cleve Haubold" page in July of 2020. By any chance did you save the text of the page somewhere? I would like to take a look at it for some research I am doing. Thank you for getting back to me. Taram ( talk) 23:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Two years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:31, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I see what you mean, but that AFD was 15 years ago (!) and the article has since then unfortunately become a pile of spam. Dr. Vogel ( talk) 19:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks @ GB fan:, I made a right mess of the Raj Gupta page, and absolutely withdraw any intention of PRODing it; I hadn't noticed that the vandal had removed the entire useful content before hijacking the page for his own use. Sorry about that. Elemimele ( talk) 15:40, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi — you just declined my G4 speedy request on Draft:Rejoice Chidinma Iwueze on the basis that it doesn't apply to drafts. Fair enough. I just wasn't sure, because the guidance that pops up on my Twinkle dialogue box only says it doesn't apply to "content that has been userfied", and I didn know if it also meant this. Now I know. :)
Incidentally, I only realised after tagging it that this one was created a few days before, not after, the one deleted at the AfD. I don't suppose you'd care to comment on whether that was technically okay or not; ie., whether G4 can apply (in main space) regardless of which order the articles were created in? Just curious. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 15:41, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, regarding this: the user has already made another draft, and it's obvious that this one has a typo in its title and is therefore irrelevant. I should've stated it in the deletion request. Best, -- Jan Myšák ( talk) 11:45, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi GB fan! I understand your decline of a G4 tag on this draft, since the prior discussion was an AFD, but my concern is that this creates an attribution issue because it now looks like Homer903 is the sole contributor of that draft's text. I don't intend to work on this draft, but I think that in order to comply with licensing requirements, either the deleted article should be restored to draftspace in its place, or a list of all contributors to the deleted article should be supplied. (I can't see the original contributros because I'm not an administrator.) Thanks. DanCherek ( talk) 23:23, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- GB fan
I hope you remeber me, it's been 5 years, you help me when i created Hip Hop Movement page, thank you for all your help it eook a lot of research, I reall need your help, after 5 years this user is trying to remove it, for what i don't know, he going around taking all the things of Ronald Savage as if it's personal, please help me to save and keep the page i did, me and my friends did a lot of work, this user: Piotr Jr. is the one. I even took the notice down off the page like the wiki article said and put it on my talk page and try to send him a note to don't put it on the article and if he had an iisue to put it in the delestion page, sorry i still don't know the wiki talk lol.
I want to oppose it and also send it for approval to wiki like i did 5 years ago and they approval it, thats why i don't understand how can this user do this if hip hop movement as approved already 5 years ago. tommrrow will be 7 days please help me. Street Sting
-- Street sting ( talk) 05:48, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
You removed the BLPprod claiming there was a source. There is an external link but there is no reference. WP:IMDB is not a valid reference anyway. Notfrompedro ( talk) 16:20, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
You did the same thing for Jonathan Tiersten. Neither have any references at all and your basis was that they do. What is up? Notfrompedro ( talk) 16:21, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
no sources in any form (as references, external links, etc.). If an article has an external link, it is not eligible for BLPPROD. Schazjmd (talk) 16:28, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
To be eligible for a BLPPROD tag, the entry must be a biography of a living person and contain no sources in any form (as references, external links, etc., reliable or otherwise) supporting any statements made about the person in the biography." (emphasis in original)
I am the creator of this page. My account was globally blocked that's whi I am not able to login to my account. Kindly delete the page I have created. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.185.65.84 ( talk) 18:22, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my mistake. I've sent it to AfD instead. Usually Twinkle warns me when a page was prodded before, but it seems it didn't catch it this time. I'll be more careful and do a manual check in the future. Thanks again, Isabelle 🔔 19:09, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
{{
oldprod}}
is added to the talk page. A lot of previously prod'd pages do not have it on the talk page.
~ GB fan
21:21, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Hi, I just want to explain seemingly false claim in the revert summary edit Haifa Сentral HaShmona Railway Station (rev. 1037751409). I thought that you mean that that the deletion request was old, while you meant the redir itself. Thanks for the handy RfD link that came afterwards. — Mykhal ( talk) 16:02, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Trying to delete the ESSAR Steel India Limited page because AM/NS India has merged with ESSAR Steel India Limited. So now it's not standing alone anymore. I am wishing to take down all the ESSAR Steel pages linked with the above-mentioned page. For the same, I am facing the issue to delete it by using the Proposed deletion process as it's showing "This page must be substituted" even after following all the steps. I request you to delete the ESSAR Steel India Limited page and the other ESSAR Pages linked with it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AMNS INDIA ( talk • contribs) 14:49, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I need guidance in the selection of speedy deletion category of a page (ESSAR Group) for which I had got a suggestion of redirection of this page to another new page when I had proposed it for deletion but the redirection option does not work for me because the ESSAR Group no longer exists (ESSAR is now AMNS India) so it's now misleading. I need to delete this page. Please guide me with a selection of the speedy deletion process and category. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by AshishKaushikAMNSIndia ( talk • contribs) 05:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Good afternoon! Polly Cannabis is a model from Belarus, who participated in 20 international beauty contests. Among them are such large ones as Miss Earth and Miss Grand. It is well-known and popular in Belarus, therefore it has the right to publish. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.127.198.16 ( talk) 15:07, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
You will presumably see a notification that your edit has been reverted, but I thought I would do you the courtesy of telling you that I have reverted your de-PRODDing of Mehsopuria. BLPPROD and PROD, despite the confusing similarity of names, are quite separate, and the one being removed doesn't prevent the other from being applied. JBW ( talk) 20:54, 7 September 2021 (UTC)