Welcome!
Hello, Feral-Golduck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Ready of Saga, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called
Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{
helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! John Collier ( talk) 01:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Ready of Saga requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
John Collier (
talk)
01:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Slick (album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
John Collier (
talk)
01:56, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ready of Saga, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. John Collier ( talk) 01:59, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Slick (album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
A new name 2008 (
talk)
02:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a
speedy deletion tag from
Slick (album), a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{
hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's
talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.
A new name 2008 (
talk)
02:23, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
David Rolfe (musician). Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Smashville
talk
03:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Manhattan Records. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Steelbeard1 (
talk)
16:25, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be
blocked from editing.
ZimZalaBim
talk
16:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi, None of your edits have sources so it is hard to know if they are reliable and factual. They appear to be non-factual so I am reverting them - but it will save a lot of time if either source them if true or stop if untrue. Regards, Springnuts ( talk) 16:33, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
-- ZimZalaBim talk 16:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Feral-Golduck ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am really sorry
Decline reason:
Good, but this does not address the block reason, see WP:GAB. — Sandstein 19:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Template:Google Inc.. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Ahunt (
talk)
23:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Notorious (2009 film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Lord Sesshomaru (
talk •
edits)
23:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with
this edit to
Viva Piñata (TV series). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.
J.delanoy
gabs
adds
00:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
You were recently blocked for adding improper categories to articles incorrectly asserting (or asking) if they were subsidiaries of Viacom or other larger companies. Now, after your block, you are doing it again diff diff. Stop now, or you will be blocked again, likely for a much longer period. -- ZimZalaBim talk 00:33, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Feral-Golduck ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am really, really sorry
Decline reason:
Which, again, does not address your block. See WP:GAB — Smashville talk 22:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Category:Former Microsoft subsidiaries, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Category:Former Microsoft subsidiaries has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (
CSD C1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Category:Former Microsoft subsidiaries, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk)
20:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Feral-Golduck ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am really, really sorry
Decline reason:
Good, but this does not address the reason for your block. See WP:GAB. — Sandstein 22:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Feral-Golduck ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
better not this let it happen again
Decline reason:
Still doesn't address the reason for the block, and you've pretty much used up the three requests that is our unofficial limit. Since it will expire soon, you can show us you're sorry by editing productively when it expires. — Daniel Case ( talk) 16:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Feral, I've ignored your socking and other odd editing patterns, but you're still adding completely uncited nonsense to many corporate articles despite being asked many, many times not to - it just comes off as simple vandalism at this point. Please, if you'd like to contribute, limit yourself to 'only adding clearly sourced material from here on out when your block expires. If you'd like to be unblocked, please explain your additions over the last few hours in detail. Kuru talk 03:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, there's to truth the rumor to which you alluded here: [1] I should know. I'd never even heard of Turbo Dogs before you mentioned it. However, there is another rumor you should be talking about, but perhaps I've said too much. Itsamike ( talk) 04:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Category:Former Walt Disney Company subsidiaries, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 02:57, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Feral-Golduck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Ready of Saga, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called
Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{
helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! John Collier ( talk) 01:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Ready of Saga requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
John Collier (
talk)
01:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Slick (album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
John Collier (
talk)
01:56, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ready of Saga, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. John Collier ( talk) 01:59, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Slick (album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
A new name 2008 (
talk)
02:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a
speedy deletion tag from
Slick (album), a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{
hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's
talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.
A new name 2008 (
talk)
02:23, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
David Rolfe (musician). Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Smashville
talk
03:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Manhattan Records. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Steelbeard1 (
talk)
16:25, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be
blocked from editing.
ZimZalaBim
talk
16:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi, None of your edits have sources so it is hard to know if they are reliable and factual. They appear to be non-factual so I am reverting them - but it will save a lot of time if either source them if true or stop if untrue. Regards, Springnuts ( talk) 16:33, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
-- ZimZalaBim talk 16:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Feral-Golduck ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am really sorry
Decline reason:
Good, but this does not address the block reason, see WP:GAB. — Sandstein 19:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Template:Google Inc.. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Ahunt (
talk)
23:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Notorious (2009 film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Lord Sesshomaru (
talk •
edits)
23:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with
this edit to
Viva Piñata (TV series). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.
J.delanoy
gabs
adds
00:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
You were recently blocked for adding improper categories to articles incorrectly asserting (or asking) if they were subsidiaries of Viacom or other larger companies. Now, after your block, you are doing it again diff diff. Stop now, or you will be blocked again, likely for a much longer period. -- ZimZalaBim talk 00:33, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Feral-Golduck ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am really, really sorry
Decline reason:
Which, again, does not address your block. See WP:GAB — Smashville talk 22:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Category:Former Microsoft subsidiaries, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Category:Former Microsoft subsidiaries has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (
CSD C1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Category:Former Microsoft subsidiaries, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk)
20:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Feral-Golduck ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am really, really sorry
Decline reason:
Good, but this does not address the reason for your block. See WP:GAB. — Sandstein 22:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Feral-Golduck ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
better not this let it happen again
Decline reason:
Still doesn't address the reason for the block, and you've pretty much used up the three requests that is our unofficial limit. Since it will expire soon, you can show us you're sorry by editing productively when it expires. — Daniel Case ( talk) 16:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Feral, I've ignored your socking and other odd editing patterns, but you're still adding completely uncited nonsense to many corporate articles despite being asked many, many times not to - it just comes off as simple vandalism at this point. Please, if you'd like to contribute, limit yourself to 'only adding clearly sourced material from here on out when your block expires. If you'd like to be unblocked, please explain your additions over the last few hours in detail. Kuru talk 03:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, there's to truth the rumor to which you alluded here: [1] I should know. I'd never even heard of Turbo Dogs before you mentioned it. However, there is another rumor you should be talking about, but perhaps I've said too much. Itsamike ( talk) 04:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Category:Former Walt Disney Company subsidiaries, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 02:57, 30 January 2020 (UTC)