![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller ( talk) 15:13, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello Faizanal-badri, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dougweller ( talk) 15:14, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with
Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the
reversion of clear-cut
vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. You have made a number of edits which are clearly not minor but have marked them minor. Please don't do this anymore, thanks.
Dougweller (
talk)
15:16, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
And thanks for your message on my talk page. Dougweller ( talk) 14:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
for correcting a mistake i did here. Instead of changing the caption, i reverted the edit, and forgot to re-add the image. Thanks again! Anir1uph | talk | contrib 10:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Lahore-Metro-Bus-Service.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:49, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:02, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Faizan ( talk) 11:54, 16 February 2013 (UTC)!
Hello Faizan Al-Badri, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I don't understand your saying you didn't copy this as you clearly did. You could quote it, attributing it to Hassan Abbas (you'd have to attribute it to him however you used it). I'd advise quoting him as it's such a short bit it's hard to paraphrase. You have to attribute it as it's not something we could state as fact. Dougweller ( talk) 12:41, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
You mean that I should use totally my words? Faizan ( talk) 12:56, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nahyan bin Mubarak Al Nahyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miniature ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:51, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
You have been improperly reinserting content to Aligarh Muslim University without providing the appropriate third party reliable sources that are required before challenge materials can be restored. In addition, even if sourced, the majority of the junk is non encylcopedic promotional crap. Wikipedia is not here to provide a free web host for the university. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:41, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Do you have a source/confirmation that this investment is indeed disputed? [1] Mar4d ( talk) 05:44, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Mar4d ( talk) 05:38, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Wa'Alaikumas'Salam, I have fixed the infobox at Urdu article indicating total number of speakers, 'only Urdu' & 'including Hindi'. Was'Salam -- Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider t c s 07:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Google search the actual copies of the Instrument of Surrender, and you will see how distorted the article is. Let me finish my edits with references.-- ArmanJ ( talk) 11:46, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
What I meant to say was that Google search is full of reliable sources which contradict the previous content. The version given from Story of Pakistan was distorted. The technicalities of the topic are important and sensitive, and its crucial that we get them right.-- ArmanJ ( talk) 15:48, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
I didn't see any discussion on the talk page. But I've given my points there, please go and see.-- ArmanJ ( talk) 20:33, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey Faizan Al-Badri; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 23:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I read you message on my talk page. I think, it is nice of you to inform me on this. But vickle1777 left a note in the talk page for Sialkot about the relevcance of the information removed. In no uncertain terms, the historians from both British and Muslim backgrounds have termed the Sikh rule as a constructive and open to the welfare of the entire Punjab. So, it is very difficult to conclude that Muslims faced restrictions during the Sikh rule. I have noticed a similar accusition in the page for Kashmir e.g. it says there was a death sentence as punishment for killing a cow. Well, I am sure the reference provided their belongs to a Hindu/Indian author. And for information, cow doesn't hold any specific position in Sikh culture apart from being a milch cattle.
I hope it makes some sense. Or otherwise, if you still believe the Sikh rule was oppressive upon Muslims, so what can be done about it? Of Teacher ( talk) 06:31, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
I would suggest you to read Punjabi-Poet Shah Mohammad. Of Teacher ( talk) 06:39, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Baloch nationalism stems from lingual roots which is more concentrated in Brohi, Sulemani Makrani and Rukhshani speaking areas of Province Baluchistan. Sindhi (Jadgali Dialect), Saraiki(Khetrani dialect), Dehvari, Pashto, Hazargi and Mix (Punjabi Settlers) belts population dont suppourt Baloch Nationalism which accounts for 50 % of population of Baluchistan Province. So the map puts the background loud and clear for the Baloch nationalism state in Province of Baluchistan. Maria0333 ( talk) 08:40, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Wa alaikum Assalam, thank you brother for your interest in the article! Actually the content I shortened was created by myself. Now come to the main point: when I started editing this article, almost no important material or information was there. I started improving this article by providing the biographic information, and created sections from lead to Badr war. but soon realized that this article requires to show what the Muslims think about our great prophet Muhammad (SW). Biographic information, it was suggested on its talk page, was already included in the Muhammad article. Now the main question is what should be the aim and scope of this article. This is the thing we have to agree on on its talk page. Unfortunately now nobody participates in it.
I've decided to shorten the biographic info created by myself as much as possible, and add Muslim perspectives on our Prophet. I request you to put your comments, on its talkpage, on how this article should be. -- AsceticRosé talk 17:28, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Samar Talk 18:26, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks brother ye hm punjabiyon k dushman haen. hr wqt hm ko tortay haen..ab mea in ko aps mea torungi ta kay aenda kbi PAK zr zameen ko tornay ka na sochen Maria0333 ( talk) 13:41, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Samar Talk 19:11, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I removed the comment regarding Pakistan from the article, and really don't think it ought to be added to the lead again. There are several reasons why. Pakistan did not exist, so there were no Pakistanis for many centuries after bin Qasim. Pakistan itself was never thought of as an actual entity until the Partition in the late 1940s. Calling him the first Pakistani is like calling Christopher Columbus the first citizen of the Dominican Republic. Thanks, dci | TALK 14:50, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
dci | TALK 16:12, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello brother, recently an unknown user named Kabalakhbar is constantly vandalizing this article. Most of the time I remain off-line. If possible, keep a watch on this article! Thanks. AsceticRosé talk 17:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
First, apologies for the whole instrument of surrender episode.
Regarding the Caliphate edits, Chittagong was a major port for the Arabs like Canton in China, Cochin in Kerela and the ports of Somalia. If China, and Somalia can be included on that basis, why not Bangladesh?-- ArmanJ ( talk) 13:57, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
“ | “Think 100 times before you take a decision, But once that decision is taken, stand by it as one man.” | ” |
— Quaid-e-Azam |
Next time keep your nonsense out of my talk page. Ghadaar Maria0333 ( talk) 15:36, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
You should not have reverted Maria0333's blanking of her talk page. She is permitted to do that and it is taken as an acknowledgement that she has read the content that she removed. - Sitush ( talk) 15:21, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
How did you get that? ( Lowkeyvision ( talk) 15:45, 23 March 2013 (UTC))
I am on internet cafe. Block kr do Faizan uncle. Kal kisi or net cafe ko bi close krwa dena. City me 10,000 internet Cafe hain ha ha ha 39.47.79.63 ( talk) 13:05, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
The changes you reverted of mine were me reverting somebody else's changes where they added a one line "use to make methamphetamine" section with no punctuation or capitalization and also pasted the same line under the existing "Sports" section as a sentence fragment. The changes were clearly below the min-bar quality level I expect from Wikipedia. I'd recommend putting my changes back. 204.14.159.137 ( talk) 16:51, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey, You keep putting the birth of Seth as being in 3874, but according to the Torah, the universe and this Adam and Eve were not created until 3761. Seth could not have been born before his parents were made, so the date given is not possible according to Judaism. Thus the source for the 3874 date is either wrong or it is a non-Jewish source, in which case, cite it and link to the proper article, as it is part of a different tradition of biblical exogenisis. (Which is an article I'd want to read.) I'm going to remove the date again, for the reasons above given.
Besides the factual inconsistency, the real issue here is sourcing. I don't care that there are differences of opinion, but I want to see where those ideas come from, not so I can discount them, but because I want to know the history of thought on the subject. Clearly we've stumbled upon area of exogenisis with different traditions, so lets explore where this difference comes from. All the best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.18.142.109 ( talk) 21:51, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
The Warren School. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Stifle (
talk)
22:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Dougweller ( talk) 14:44, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Dear, Saraiki is a language, it is not a dialect. Riasti dialect, Shah puri dialect, Multani dialect, Multani language, Thalochi dialect, Thalochi , Derawali dialect articles. I suggest merging these articles , as the all these are same. And also be Redirected to Saraiki language. Also Jhangvi dialect is dialect of Saraiki. Kindly See these External Links #1 and #2.
Hi, I'm in discussion at User talk:The Rambling Man#Wikipedia:Today's featured list/April 22, 2013, please have your opinion there. Zia Khan 19:25, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account, which contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Maria0333, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and admit to it now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Faizan ( talk) 10:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello Faizan; I hope you are well :)
-What you stated on my talk page is incorrect. There is absolutely no constitutional difference between the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1956-1971 and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1971-the present day, it just happens that 1956-1971, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan included East Pakistan, whereas know it does not. There was no such constitutional entity as 'Pakistan(United)', this was an informal designation that did not officially exist.
East Pakistan and West Pakistan were merely Provinces of Pakistan; they were not sovereign states in their own right, and thus should not be listed as successor states.
Furthermore, Pakistan became a republic in 1956, but the provinces of East Pakistan and West Pakistan were created in 1955. So that means that East Pakistan and West Pakistan could not possibly succeed the Dominion of Pakistan because not only did they exist whilst Pakistan was still a monarchy and dominion, they were parts of it. JWULTRABLIZZARD ( talk) 13:38, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you brother for your recognition! -- AsceticRosé talk 15:04, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Faizan. I saw your contributions and they look good, so I need your help to watch these articles. Would you please?:
Thanks. Zheek ( talk) 17:06, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
please participate here of Muhammad in Islam article. -- AsceticRosé talk 03:56, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm not involved on BLP or other Biography articles very much. Most of my edits on Biography articles are minor. Your article is at a good state, but add 2-3 more sources (at least). You can improve it by comparing to the similar articles. Add necessary sections and relevant templates. Also use "ref name" feature for the parts with the content from same source. More details for your sources (using cite web/cite template) and etc. Anyway, I will watch it. Zheek ( talk) 09:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello brother, about Muhammad in Islam, a similar discussion is going on. Your participation is expected. Check here . (I proposed that the texts in section “Notable early events” should come under sub-sections like “orphanhood: a divine plan”, “God’s protection”, “early sign of Prophethood” etc. But another user (User_talk:Kiatdd) told they look like POV. Check this also for a complete understanding) -- AsceticRosé talk 11:30, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Dear Faizan brother, it seems that there was a misunderstanding about the moving of content. Actually a new Opposition section will be created, but there is already a section named "Opposition and persecution". That's why, first we need to remove the in-between biographic info, and then carefully move the sub-sections with some amendments, and not before that, to avoid confusion. I've reverted recent edit and hope you will not misunderstand me. I'll do that manually.
It is me who created biographic-releted mess, and perhaps it is me who now have to clean all those carefully. And for further improvement, I must need your help. Hope, you will be with me for the sake of our beloved prophet-related important article. And thanks for talk-page participations. That helped a lot. --
AsceticRosé
talk
17:10, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Faizan Al-Badri. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! INeverCry 19:17, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
See WP:JS and read my comment on my talk page. Zheek ( talk) 21:06, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, there is currently a discussion at AN [4] about a disruptive IP editor with whom you have been involved. Jeppiz ( talk) 22:44, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Dear Faizan Al-Badri, You have put only Pakistani view and info on this article. It does not support WP:NPOV. As many of Mukti Bahini members are alive now, it is also WP:BLP vio. You are emphasizing on Bihari issue, but never put a word about Pak army's mass killing. Most of your reference are non-accessible or circularly quoting R.J. Rummel. Please provide me the text, which actually those reference says, as I can verify them. Untill then, I am reverting your edits. Thank you.-- FreemesM (talk) 11:35, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Mukti Bahini. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Darkness Shines ( talk) 13:40, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Faizan Al-Badri, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and TheStrike Σagle 05:14, 31 March 2013 (UTC) |
![]() |
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Islamic Green requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. FreemesM (talk) 07:47, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Dear brother, have a look at Muhammad in Islam article. I've arranged Opposition section as discussed in the article's talk page, and more! -- AsceticRosé talk 09:08, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
As you advised, I've moved the discussion on sub-section naming of the section Muhammad_in_Islam#Early_years to the article's talk page. Your participation is expected. -- AsceticRosé talk 09:08, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islamic Green is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Green until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 09:49, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
— MelbourneStar☆ talk 09:43, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Just seen that you have reverted a sentence of another user, in Bengali language article, which says "It is also a recognized secondary language in the City of Karachi in Pakistan.". As a Bengali, I don't ever hear about that, my be my lack of knowledge. Could you please provide the reference? Please enlighten me.-- FreemesM (talk) 07:23, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Mr Faizan, I am on wikipedia since 2006. I started W.Punjabi WIkipedia, W.Punjabi Wiktionary, W.Punjabi Wikiquotes and I am on W.Commons I am admn at one. I made the map of Punjabi dialects[File:Dialects Of Punjabi.jpg], and this User:Maria0333, in a wrong way changed the map. She is banned now, and I rectified her and pasted the corrwct map. I am really enjoying your comments that I am maria0333. Edit wars are simply waste of time and I dont have have enough time. I request you please delete your message from my page and please think again how I can be maria0333 ? It is a mistake.-- Khalid Mahmood ( talk) 06:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
مینوں تسیں ادھا لہوری کہ سکدے او پر میں ایتھے اسلاماباد وج ریندا واں پر لہور وج کسے نوں کہ کے فوٹو بنوا لنیا واں۔ میں صرف اوتھے مورتاں لایآں جتھے ماریہ نے اپنا نقشہ پایا سی تے مینوں لگ ریا سی جے اوہنے کئی تھانواں تے ایویں ای پادتیاں نیں۔ شکریہ۔ -- Khalid Mahmood ( talk) 07:43, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
My Dear Faizan, i posted only the about Chakwal city. if you seemed that is inappropriate post, so kindly remove links those are also there. then why you have problem with my post ? i need answer!
Regards Ijaz
References |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
References 1. ^ Location of Chakwal – Falling Rain Genomics 2. ^ District Gazeteer of Jhelum 1904 – Ibbetson, D.: "Punjab settlement report", page 87. Punjab Government Press, 1862 3. ^ The International year book and statesmen's who's who. Kelly's Directories, Brill Academic Publishers. 1953. Retrieved 17 July 2011. 4. ^ Pakistan tourism directory. Holiday Weekly. 1992. Retrieved 17 July 2011. 5. ^ Rosen, C. (29 November 2000). World resources 2000–2001: people and ecosystems : the fraying web of life. United Nations Development Programme, Elsevier. p. 184. ISBN 978-0-08-043781-1. Retrieved 17 July 2011. 6. ^ Ibbeyson, D: "Punjab settlement report", page 88. Punjab Government Press, 1862 7. ^ [Gazetteer of the Jhelum District,1904,Page70] 8. ^ Mutiny Report, Punjab Govt. Record, Page386 9. ^ Chakwal-Fondly Remembered 10. ^ Butt, Usama (16 September 2010). Pakistan's Quagmire: Security, Strategy, and the Future of the Islamic-Nuclear Nation. Continuum International Publishing Group. p. 239. ISBN 978-0-8264-3300-8. Retrieved 17 July 2011. 11. ^ "Deadly blast in Pakistani mosque". Al Jazeera. 5 April 2009. Archived from the original on 20 June 2009. Retrieved 2009-04-05. 12. ^ Adamson, Hilary; Shaw, Isobel (1981). A traveller's guide to Pakistan. Asian Study Group. Retrieved 17 July 2011. 13. ^ Tehsils & Unions in the District of Chakwal – Government of Pakistan 14. ^ http://www.chakwal.edu.pk/ 15. ^ http://www.dhudialnews.com 16. ^ http://www.dhudialnama.com/ 17. ^ http://www.voiceofchakwal.com/ 18. ^ http://www.dailychakwalnama.com/ 19. ^ http://www.dhudial2day.com/ |
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazipk99 ( talk • contribs) 07:49, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
IF YOU DON'T ACCEPT THE IMAGES AND EXTERNAL LINK. THEN MENTION ONLY THE WEBSITE NAME: http://www.mychakwal.com IN THE SAME LIST.. I DON'T TRYING TO ADVERTISEMENT ON THE WIKIPEDIA. BUT NEED TO SHOW THEM OF CHAKWALIAN CITIZENS. THAT IS PART OF THOSE CITIZENS.
1. ^ http://www.dhudialnews.com 2. ^ http://www.dhudialnama.com/ 3. ^ http://www.voiceofchakwal.com/ 4. ^ http://www.dailychakwalnama.com/ 5. ^ http://www.dhudial2day.com/
REGARDS
IJAZ — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Jazipk99 (
talk •
contribs)
08:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
We don't use self-published blogs for citations. They potray a hardly fourth generation aircraft as a twenty first generation aircraft with extraordinary capabilities. Get some other reliable sources(NOT BLOGS) if you want the re-add the info. Please get some non-pakistani reference. That would be much better. TheStrike Σagle 12:58, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Psychonaut. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Kindergarten because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Psychonaut ( talk) 15:09, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Dear Faizan, I edited the Colorado Time Systems page to remove personal reference to Anita Sayed as the comments are inaccurate and defamatory. Secondly, the partnerships listed are not accurate. Straighttime ( talk) 14:32, 4 April 2013 (UTC)straighttime
Faizan, I did put a reason in the edit summary? I agree that the partnerships were referenced, but they have since expired. I still stand by my assertion that defamatory remarks should be removed regarding Ms. Sayed. I am new to this, and really want the page to be an accurate reflection of the company and do not believe that personal attacks on the staff should be allowed. Any advise would be greatly appreciated. Straighttime ( talk) 14:56, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
|
Thankyou very much for the welcome. I appreciate it. Love4pakistan ( talk) 14:53, 4 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
You are insisting on something that is completely untrue on the John Fleming Congress page. His district is 2:1 Democratic though his Cook PVI rating is R+11. Please remain with the corrections. http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Louisiana's_4th_congressional_district_elections,_2012 Joapedia ( talk) 14:47, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Yes I did make a mistake but then went back to change it. Thank you for trying to help, because I might have just left it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.189.144.212 ( talk) 15:20, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your politeness; however, I believe that everyone should know that everything was as its opposite in the new Crystal Cove on the alternate timeline. Instead of listing every single difference, just say that everything is as its opposite, which includes characters who died before are alive once more.
I'm assuming that you've seen the final episode, so you saw how it was. Brad and Judy were always Fred's parents, the Blakes approve of Daphne's relationship with Fred now and her sisters aren't overachievers anymore, Cassidy Williams and Ricky Owens are married and are owners of Creationex, the new version of Destroido, and Pericles serves as a promotional icon and lives with Cassidy and Ricky. Not to mention that Ricky is way more robust and muscular with his body structure.
There are much more changes, but I believe that everyone has a right to know that everything was different in the new Crystal Cove. Thanks, and please take it into consideration! -- ScoobyDooIsAmazing ( talk) 15:25, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
This article is trying to be split to match interwiki articles, he put in alot of effort in making all the content stay intact. Please don't revert him ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 15:40, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Pakistani Barnstar of National Merit | |
Awarded to you for your extensive efforts and contributions to Pakistan-related articles. I guess you needed some recognition. You're first barnstar, eh?
![]() |
Yes teaming up! eh. Just 100 more edits, then I am going to follow your tip Mar4d! Faizan ( talk) 07:56, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
you need to revert your mistake-mistake. changing policy is not allowed w/o consensus. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 07:29, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I was trying to type, but I accidently deleted it. Thanks for understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.40.100.91 ( talk) 08:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Gday Faizan
Mate when you say you undid several of my contributions as they didnt seem constructive. Constructive for who do you mean exactly..? As my contributions altered some clear falasies regarding the ongoinging international assault on Syria. That is not a civil war as you have stated, but a war on Syrians by wahabi extremists mercenaries, attempting to destablise the last secular arab state in the middle east. and you make no mention of the numerous police and security personel and civilians killed by snipers and provocatuers, during the initial protests, that led to the violent crasck down by the syrian police in the early protests.. also you neglect to mention the much larger repeated pro-government rallies all over the country one such rally that had an exess of 2 million people. nor do you mention the refurendum held in 2011 that reiterated majority support for president assad. instead your subversion of the truth serves to mislead people into agreeing with the U.S/N.A.T.O, Narative, on the crisis. and your undoing my contribution is only constructive for the vested interests bent on maintaining the lies that justify their aborant agenda, very disapointed in your choice of alegience my misguided friend.
Sincerely Mick mcLennan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.223.18.72 ( talk) 08:22, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for catching Airplane olive, stupid Huggle reverted both edits when I told it to only do one. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 14:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I'd like to ask how exactly my 'contribution' is nonconstructive? The page seems to be written like an advertisement, wherein some sections needs to changed and even deleted. The trivia section, for one, is uncalled-for. What is the need for such section? It is redundant and unhelpful. 203.87.176.19 ( talk) 18:03, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Please stop adding the trivia section. It is redundant and unnecessary. Also, I cannot be blocked simply just because we are disagreeing on a content, as per
Wikipedia's policy. If I ever get blocked, I can always raise the issue to other administrators to undo it. You can also get blocked for not adhering to
Wikipedia's guidelines, so please stop adding the trivia section already. Thank you.
203.87.176.19 (
talk)
18:51, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
I proposed this article for deletion, the only content on the page is personal information and the IP was attempting to blank the information out. As such for now I reverted your reversion and tagged it with WP:CSD. <3 ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 08:25, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
You sure he's Sindhi? This is with regards to your addition of Category:Sindhi people in the article. I think unless if there is a source specifically saying he's Sindhi, we should not add any ethnic categories. He might as well be Urdu-speaking, in which case the current category would be inaccurate. Mar4d ( talk) 13:40, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
This food is also Byzantine... -- 141.237.203.160 ( talk) 14:49, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Dear Faizan--
The article on Culloden is a very biased one probably written by an Englishman and inaccurate in several places. The bit I took out was about desertion of Highland troops being caused by having been forced to fight. This is no more true about Culloden than any other battles clansmen fought. All clansmen owed service to their chief and accepted that as right. Desertion was caused by the fact that it had been a campaign of almost a year already and it was spring and the men were needed at home to plant their crops. The 'deserters' were mostly all locals, who were going home to do the plowing. There is no reference back up to the claim of Highlanders being forced to fight and the Highlands were NEVER feudal. Every clansman was free.
I intend to flag up the whole article actually for bias and inaccuracy.
I'm sure you are very knowledgeable about your own country, but this article is about mine. My ancestor led the first charge (on the Jacobit side) at the battle of Culloden...
Bridget MacGillivray — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.43.65.199 ( talk) 15:08, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Faizan, it is common knowledge that founders of Mughal Empire was great grand children of Timur who was founder of Timurid dynasty Timur means 'iron' in Turkic languages, ruling dynasty spoke Turkic Chagatay dialect. Also word Urdu means 'army' in Turkic languages, hence 'Urdu' ca means 'tongue of [ruling] Army'.
Please restore my edition of article Mughal Empire. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ismet11 ( talk • contribs) 10:39, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
in either case, a little internet search will give you plenty of university papers.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/596358/Timur — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ismet11 ( talk • contribs) 11:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Does it say on the Pakistan and India articles that independence was from the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"? Or does it say on the Algeria article that independence was from the French Republic? The common standard on wikipedia is to refer to the name of the country, not its full name.
And Islam has a special status in Bangladesh's constitution, although the political system is secular.-- ChaudhryAzan ( talk) 10:47, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Dear Faizan,
First, thank you for your time and attention. I presume that some of the changes I have done to the Sudbury Valley School web page were undone not by you, but by a bot you maintain, and so understand if -- as you say on your talk page -- that your ability to respond is delayed due to exams.
Deleting mistaken or outdated information is not un-constructive. If you have a bot roaming certain pages preventing inaccurate information from being deleted, how can those of us trying to correct mis-information do so and have it "stuck?" I expect that you have weighed this problem, and have a reasoned solution; I look forward to hearing it.
Likewise, another edit of mine, undone by your bot, was an effort to put information under the correct heading. To wit, moving the phrase "Students are given complete responsibility for their own education" from the "Government" section to the "Curriculum" section.
At least one of your bot's edits was helpful. A reference to a Facebook page was put under the wrong header, and I am glad that was caught.
Thank you, Scott — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diodotus ( talk • contribs) 14:27, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller ( talk) 15:13, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello Faizanal-badri, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dougweller ( talk) 15:14, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with
Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the
reversion of clear-cut
vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. You have made a number of edits which are clearly not minor but have marked them minor. Please don't do this anymore, thanks.
Dougweller (
talk)
15:16, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
And thanks for your message on my talk page. Dougweller ( talk) 14:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
for correcting a mistake i did here. Instead of changing the caption, i reverted the edit, and forgot to re-add the image. Thanks again! Anir1uph | talk | contrib 10:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Lahore-Metro-Bus-Service.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:49, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:02, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Faizan ( talk) 11:54, 16 February 2013 (UTC)!
Hello Faizan Al-Badri, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I don't understand your saying you didn't copy this as you clearly did. You could quote it, attributing it to Hassan Abbas (you'd have to attribute it to him however you used it). I'd advise quoting him as it's such a short bit it's hard to paraphrase. You have to attribute it as it's not something we could state as fact. Dougweller ( talk) 12:41, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
You mean that I should use totally my words? Faizan ( talk) 12:56, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nahyan bin Mubarak Al Nahyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miniature ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:51, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
You have been improperly reinserting content to Aligarh Muslim University without providing the appropriate third party reliable sources that are required before challenge materials can be restored. In addition, even if sourced, the majority of the junk is non encylcopedic promotional crap. Wikipedia is not here to provide a free web host for the university. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:41, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Do you have a source/confirmation that this investment is indeed disputed? [1] Mar4d ( talk) 05:44, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Mar4d ( talk) 05:38, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Wa'Alaikumas'Salam, I have fixed the infobox at Urdu article indicating total number of speakers, 'only Urdu' & 'including Hindi'. Was'Salam -- Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider t c s 07:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Google search the actual copies of the Instrument of Surrender, and you will see how distorted the article is. Let me finish my edits with references.-- ArmanJ ( talk) 11:46, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
What I meant to say was that Google search is full of reliable sources which contradict the previous content. The version given from Story of Pakistan was distorted. The technicalities of the topic are important and sensitive, and its crucial that we get them right.-- ArmanJ ( talk) 15:48, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
I didn't see any discussion on the talk page. But I've given my points there, please go and see.-- ArmanJ ( talk) 20:33, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey Faizan Al-Badri; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 23:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I read you message on my talk page. I think, it is nice of you to inform me on this. But vickle1777 left a note in the talk page for Sialkot about the relevcance of the information removed. In no uncertain terms, the historians from both British and Muslim backgrounds have termed the Sikh rule as a constructive and open to the welfare of the entire Punjab. So, it is very difficult to conclude that Muslims faced restrictions during the Sikh rule. I have noticed a similar accusition in the page for Kashmir e.g. it says there was a death sentence as punishment for killing a cow. Well, I am sure the reference provided their belongs to a Hindu/Indian author. And for information, cow doesn't hold any specific position in Sikh culture apart from being a milch cattle.
I hope it makes some sense. Or otherwise, if you still believe the Sikh rule was oppressive upon Muslims, so what can be done about it? Of Teacher ( talk) 06:31, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
I would suggest you to read Punjabi-Poet Shah Mohammad. Of Teacher ( talk) 06:39, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Baloch nationalism stems from lingual roots which is more concentrated in Brohi, Sulemani Makrani and Rukhshani speaking areas of Province Baluchistan. Sindhi (Jadgali Dialect), Saraiki(Khetrani dialect), Dehvari, Pashto, Hazargi and Mix (Punjabi Settlers) belts population dont suppourt Baloch Nationalism which accounts for 50 % of population of Baluchistan Province. So the map puts the background loud and clear for the Baloch nationalism state in Province of Baluchistan. Maria0333 ( talk) 08:40, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Wa alaikum Assalam, thank you brother for your interest in the article! Actually the content I shortened was created by myself. Now come to the main point: when I started editing this article, almost no important material or information was there. I started improving this article by providing the biographic information, and created sections from lead to Badr war. but soon realized that this article requires to show what the Muslims think about our great prophet Muhammad (SW). Biographic information, it was suggested on its talk page, was already included in the Muhammad article. Now the main question is what should be the aim and scope of this article. This is the thing we have to agree on on its talk page. Unfortunately now nobody participates in it.
I've decided to shorten the biographic info created by myself as much as possible, and add Muslim perspectives on our Prophet. I request you to put your comments, on its talkpage, on how this article should be. -- AsceticRosé talk 17:28, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Samar Talk 18:26, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks brother ye hm punjabiyon k dushman haen. hr wqt hm ko tortay haen..ab mea in ko aps mea torungi ta kay aenda kbi PAK zr zameen ko tornay ka na sochen Maria0333 ( talk) 13:41, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Samar Talk 19:11, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I removed the comment regarding Pakistan from the article, and really don't think it ought to be added to the lead again. There are several reasons why. Pakistan did not exist, so there were no Pakistanis for many centuries after bin Qasim. Pakistan itself was never thought of as an actual entity until the Partition in the late 1940s. Calling him the first Pakistani is like calling Christopher Columbus the first citizen of the Dominican Republic. Thanks, dci | TALK 14:50, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
dci | TALK 16:12, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello brother, recently an unknown user named Kabalakhbar is constantly vandalizing this article. Most of the time I remain off-line. If possible, keep a watch on this article! Thanks. AsceticRosé talk 17:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
First, apologies for the whole instrument of surrender episode.
Regarding the Caliphate edits, Chittagong was a major port for the Arabs like Canton in China, Cochin in Kerela and the ports of Somalia. If China, and Somalia can be included on that basis, why not Bangladesh?-- ArmanJ ( talk) 13:57, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
“ | “Think 100 times before you take a decision, But once that decision is taken, stand by it as one man.” | ” |
— Quaid-e-Azam |
Next time keep your nonsense out of my talk page. Ghadaar Maria0333 ( talk) 15:36, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
You should not have reverted Maria0333's blanking of her talk page. She is permitted to do that and it is taken as an acknowledgement that she has read the content that she removed. - Sitush ( talk) 15:21, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
How did you get that? ( Lowkeyvision ( talk) 15:45, 23 March 2013 (UTC))
I am on internet cafe. Block kr do Faizan uncle. Kal kisi or net cafe ko bi close krwa dena. City me 10,000 internet Cafe hain ha ha ha 39.47.79.63 ( talk) 13:05, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
The changes you reverted of mine were me reverting somebody else's changes where they added a one line "use to make methamphetamine" section with no punctuation or capitalization and also pasted the same line under the existing "Sports" section as a sentence fragment. The changes were clearly below the min-bar quality level I expect from Wikipedia. I'd recommend putting my changes back. 204.14.159.137 ( talk) 16:51, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey, You keep putting the birth of Seth as being in 3874, but according to the Torah, the universe and this Adam and Eve were not created until 3761. Seth could not have been born before his parents were made, so the date given is not possible according to Judaism. Thus the source for the 3874 date is either wrong or it is a non-Jewish source, in which case, cite it and link to the proper article, as it is part of a different tradition of biblical exogenisis. (Which is an article I'd want to read.) I'm going to remove the date again, for the reasons above given.
Besides the factual inconsistency, the real issue here is sourcing. I don't care that there are differences of opinion, but I want to see where those ideas come from, not so I can discount them, but because I want to know the history of thought on the subject. Clearly we've stumbled upon area of exogenisis with different traditions, so lets explore where this difference comes from. All the best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.18.142.109 ( talk) 21:51, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
The Warren School. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Stifle (
talk)
22:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Dougweller ( talk) 14:44, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Dear, Saraiki is a language, it is not a dialect. Riasti dialect, Shah puri dialect, Multani dialect, Multani language, Thalochi dialect, Thalochi , Derawali dialect articles. I suggest merging these articles , as the all these are same. And also be Redirected to Saraiki language. Also Jhangvi dialect is dialect of Saraiki. Kindly See these External Links #1 and #2.
Hi, I'm in discussion at User talk:The Rambling Man#Wikipedia:Today's featured list/April 22, 2013, please have your opinion there. Zia Khan 19:25, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account, which contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Maria0333, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and admit to it now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Faizan ( talk) 10:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello Faizan; I hope you are well :)
-What you stated on my talk page is incorrect. There is absolutely no constitutional difference between the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1956-1971 and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1971-the present day, it just happens that 1956-1971, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan included East Pakistan, whereas know it does not. There was no such constitutional entity as 'Pakistan(United)', this was an informal designation that did not officially exist.
East Pakistan and West Pakistan were merely Provinces of Pakistan; they were not sovereign states in their own right, and thus should not be listed as successor states.
Furthermore, Pakistan became a republic in 1956, but the provinces of East Pakistan and West Pakistan were created in 1955. So that means that East Pakistan and West Pakistan could not possibly succeed the Dominion of Pakistan because not only did they exist whilst Pakistan was still a monarchy and dominion, they were parts of it. JWULTRABLIZZARD ( talk) 13:38, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you brother for your recognition! -- AsceticRosé talk 15:04, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Faizan. I saw your contributions and they look good, so I need your help to watch these articles. Would you please?:
Thanks. Zheek ( talk) 17:06, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
please participate here of Muhammad in Islam article. -- AsceticRosé talk 03:56, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm not involved on BLP or other Biography articles very much. Most of my edits on Biography articles are minor. Your article is at a good state, but add 2-3 more sources (at least). You can improve it by comparing to the similar articles. Add necessary sections and relevant templates. Also use "ref name" feature for the parts with the content from same source. More details for your sources (using cite web/cite template) and etc. Anyway, I will watch it. Zheek ( talk) 09:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello brother, about Muhammad in Islam, a similar discussion is going on. Your participation is expected. Check here . (I proposed that the texts in section “Notable early events” should come under sub-sections like “orphanhood: a divine plan”, “God’s protection”, “early sign of Prophethood” etc. But another user (User_talk:Kiatdd) told they look like POV. Check this also for a complete understanding) -- AsceticRosé talk 11:30, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Dear Faizan brother, it seems that there was a misunderstanding about the moving of content. Actually a new Opposition section will be created, but there is already a section named "Opposition and persecution". That's why, first we need to remove the in-between biographic info, and then carefully move the sub-sections with some amendments, and not before that, to avoid confusion. I've reverted recent edit and hope you will not misunderstand me. I'll do that manually.
It is me who created biographic-releted mess, and perhaps it is me who now have to clean all those carefully. And for further improvement, I must need your help. Hope, you will be with me for the sake of our beloved prophet-related important article. And thanks for talk-page participations. That helped a lot. --
AsceticRosé
talk
17:10, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Faizan Al-Badri. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! INeverCry 19:17, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
See WP:JS and read my comment on my talk page. Zheek ( talk) 21:06, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, there is currently a discussion at AN [4] about a disruptive IP editor with whom you have been involved. Jeppiz ( talk) 22:44, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Dear Faizan Al-Badri, You have put only Pakistani view and info on this article. It does not support WP:NPOV. As many of Mukti Bahini members are alive now, it is also WP:BLP vio. You are emphasizing on Bihari issue, but never put a word about Pak army's mass killing. Most of your reference are non-accessible or circularly quoting R.J. Rummel. Please provide me the text, which actually those reference says, as I can verify them. Untill then, I am reverting your edits. Thank you.-- FreemesM (talk) 11:35, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Mukti Bahini. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Darkness Shines ( talk) 13:40, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Faizan Al-Badri, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and TheStrike Σagle 05:14, 31 March 2013 (UTC) |
![]() |
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Islamic Green requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. FreemesM (talk) 07:47, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Dear brother, have a look at Muhammad in Islam article. I've arranged Opposition section as discussed in the article's talk page, and more! -- AsceticRosé talk 09:08, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
As you advised, I've moved the discussion on sub-section naming of the section Muhammad_in_Islam#Early_years to the article's talk page. Your participation is expected. -- AsceticRosé talk 09:08, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islamic Green is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Green until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 09:49, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
— MelbourneStar☆ talk 09:43, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Just seen that you have reverted a sentence of another user, in Bengali language article, which says "It is also a recognized secondary language in the City of Karachi in Pakistan.". As a Bengali, I don't ever hear about that, my be my lack of knowledge. Could you please provide the reference? Please enlighten me.-- FreemesM (talk) 07:23, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Mr Faizan, I am on wikipedia since 2006. I started W.Punjabi WIkipedia, W.Punjabi Wiktionary, W.Punjabi Wikiquotes and I am on W.Commons I am admn at one. I made the map of Punjabi dialects[File:Dialects Of Punjabi.jpg], and this User:Maria0333, in a wrong way changed the map. She is banned now, and I rectified her and pasted the corrwct map. I am really enjoying your comments that I am maria0333. Edit wars are simply waste of time and I dont have have enough time. I request you please delete your message from my page and please think again how I can be maria0333 ? It is a mistake.-- Khalid Mahmood ( talk) 06:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
مینوں تسیں ادھا لہوری کہ سکدے او پر میں ایتھے اسلاماباد وج ریندا واں پر لہور وج کسے نوں کہ کے فوٹو بنوا لنیا واں۔ میں صرف اوتھے مورتاں لایآں جتھے ماریہ نے اپنا نقشہ پایا سی تے مینوں لگ ریا سی جے اوہنے کئی تھانواں تے ایویں ای پادتیاں نیں۔ شکریہ۔ -- Khalid Mahmood ( talk) 07:43, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
My Dear Faizan, i posted only the about Chakwal city. if you seemed that is inappropriate post, so kindly remove links those are also there. then why you have problem with my post ? i need answer!
Regards Ijaz
References |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
References 1. ^ Location of Chakwal – Falling Rain Genomics 2. ^ District Gazeteer of Jhelum 1904 – Ibbetson, D.: "Punjab settlement report", page 87. Punjab Government Press, 1862 3. ^ The International year book and statesmen's who's who. Kelly's Directories, Brill Academic Publishers. 1953. Retrieved 17 July 2011. 4. ^ Pakistan tourism directory. Holiday Weekly. 1992. Retrieved 17 July 2011. 5. ^ Rosen, C. (29 November 2000). World resources 2000–2001: people and ecosystems : the fraying web of life. United Nations Development Programme, Elsevier. p. 184. ISBN 978-0-08-043781-1. Retrieved 17 July 2011. 6. ^ Ibbeyson, D: "Punjab settlement report", page 88. Punjab Government Press, 1862 7. ^ [Gazetteer of the Jhelum District,1904,Page70] 8. ^ Mutiny Report, Punjab Govt. Record, Page386 9. ^ Chakwal-Fondly Remembered 10. ^ Butt, Usama (16 September 2010). Pakistan's Quagmire: Security, Strategy, and the Future of the Islamic-Nuclear Nation. Continuum International Publishing Group. p. 239. ISBN 978-0-8264-3300-8. Retrieved 17 July 2011. 11. ^ "Deadly blast in Pakistani mosque". Al Jazeera. 5 April 2009. Archived from the original on 20 June 2009. Retrieved 2009-04-05. 12. ^ Adamson, Hilary; Shaw, Isobel (1981). A traveller's guide to Pakistan. Asian Study Group. Retrieved 17 July 2011. 13. ^ Tehsils & Unions in the District of Chakwal – Government of Pakistan 14. ^ http://www.chakwal.edu.pk/ 15. ^ http://www.dhudialnews.com 16. ^ http://www.dhudialnama.com/ 17. ^ http://www.voiceofchakwal.com/ 18. ^ http://www.dailychakwalnama.com/ 19. ^ http://www.dhudial2day.com/ |
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazipk99 ( talk • contribs) 07:49, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
IF YOU DON'T ACCEPT THE IMAGES AND EXTERNAL LINK. THEN MENTION ONLY THE WEBSITE NAME: http://www.mychakwal.com IN THE SAME LIST.. I DON'T TRYING TO ADVERTISEMENT ON THE WIKIPEDIA. BUT NEED TO SHOW THEM OF CHAKWALIAN CITIZENS. THAT IS PART OF THOSE CITIZENS.
1. ^ http://www.dhudialnews.com 2. ^ http://www.dhudialnama.com/ 3. ^ http://www.voiceofchakwal.com/ 4. ^ http://www.dailychakwalnama.com/ 5. ^ http://www.dhudial2day.com/
REGARDS
IJAZ — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Jazipk99 (
talk •
contribs)
08:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
We don't use self-published blogs for citations. They potray a hardly fourth generation aircraft as a twenty first generation aircraft with extraordinary capabilities. Get some other reliable sources(NOT BLOGS) if you want the re-add the info. Please get some non-pakistani reference. That would be much better. TheStrike Σagle 12:58, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Psychonaut. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Kindergarten because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Psychonaut ( talk) 15:09, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Dear Faizan, I edited the Colorado Time Systems page to remove personal reference to Anita Sayed as the comments are inaccurate and defamatory. Secondly, the partnerships listed are not accurate. Straighttime ( talk) 14:32, 4 April 2013 (UTC)straighttime
Faizan, I did put a reason in the edit summary? I agree that the partnerships were referenced, but they have since expired. I still stand by my assertion that defamatory remarks should be removed regarding Ms. Sayed. I am new to this, and really want the page to be an accurate reflection of the company and do not believe that personal attacks on the staff should be allowed. Any advise would be greatly appreciated. Straighttime ( talk) 14:56, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
|
Thankyou very much for the welcome. I appreciate it. Love4pakistan ( talk) 14:53, 4 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
You are insisting on something that is completely untrue on the John Fleming Congress page. His district is 2:1 Democratic though his Cook PVI rating is R+11. Please remain with the corrections. http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Louisiana's_4th_congressional_district_elections,_2012 Joapedia ( talk) 14:47, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Yes I did make a mistake but then went back to change it. Thank you for trying to help, because I might have just left it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.189.144.212 ( talk) 15:20, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your politeness; however, I believe that everyone should know that everything was as its opposite in the new Crystal Cove on the alternate timeline. Instead of listing every single difference, just say that everything is as its opposite, which includes characters who died before are alive once more.
I'm assuming that you've seen the final episode, so you saw how it was. Brad and Judy were always Fred's parents, the Blakes approve of Daphne's relationship with Fred now and her sisters aren't overachievers anymore, Cassidy Williams and Ricky Owens are married and are owners of Creationex, the new version of Destroido, and Pericles serves as a promotional icon and lives with Cassidy and Ricky. Not to mention that Ricky is way more robust and muscular with his body structure.
There are much more changes, but I believe that everyone has a right to know that everything was different in the new Crystal Cove. Thanks, and please take it into consideration! -- ScoobyDooIsAmazing ( talk) 15:25, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
This article is trying to be split to match interwiki articles, he put in alot of effort in making all the content stay intact. Please don't revert him ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 15:40, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Pakistani Barnstar of National Merit | |
Awarded to you for your extensive efforts and contributions to Pakistan-related articles. I guess you needed some recognition. You're first barnstar, eh?
![]() |
Yes teaming up! eh. Just 100 more edits, then I am going to follow your tip Mar4d! Faizan ( talk) 07:56, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
you need to revert your mistake-mistake. changing policy is not allowed w/o consensus. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 07:29, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I was trying to type, but I accidently deleted it. Thanks for understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.40.100.91 ( talk) 08:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Gday Faizan
Mate when you say you undid several of my contributions as they didnt seem constructive. Constructive for who do you mean exactly..? As my contributions altered some clear falasies regarding the ongoinging international assault on Syria. That is not a civil war as you have stated, but a war on Syrians by wahabi extremists mercenaries, attempting to destablise the last secular arab state in the middle east. and you make no mention of the numerous police and security personel and civilians killed by snipers and provocatuers, during the initial protests, that led to the violent crasck down by the syrian police in the early protests.. also you neglect to mention the much larger repeated pro-government rallies all over the country one such rally that had an exess of 2 million people. nor do you mention the refurendum held in 2011 that reiterated majority support for president assad. instead your subversion of the truth serves to mislead people into agreeing with the U.S/N.A.T.O, Narative, on the crisis. and your undoing my contribution is only constructive for the vested interests bent on maintaining the lies that justify their aborant agenda, very disapointed in your choice of alegience my misguided friend.
Sincerely Mick mcLennan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.223.18.72 ( talk) 08:22, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for catching Airplane olive, stupid Huggle reverted both edits when I told it to only do one. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 14:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I'd like to ask how exactly my 'contribution' is nonconstructive? The page seems to be written like an advertisement, wherein some sections needs to changed and even deleted. The trivia section, for one, is uncalled-for. What is the need for such section? It is redundant and unhelpful. 203.87.176.19 ( talk) 18:03, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Please stop adding the trivia section. It is redundant and unnecessary. Also, I cannot be blocked simply just because we are disagreeing on a content, as per
Wikipedia's policy. If I ever get blocked, I can always raise the issue to other administrators to undo it. You can also get blocked for not adhering to
Wikipedia's guidelines, so please stop adding the trivia section already. Thank you.
203.87.176.19 (
talk)
18:51, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
I proposed this article for deletion, the only content on the page is personal information and the IP was attempting to blank the information out. As such for now I reverted your reversion and tagged it with WP:CSD. <3 ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 08:25, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
You sure he's Sindhi? This is with regards to your addition of Category:Sindhi people in the article. I think unless if there is a source specifically saying he's Sindhi, we should not add any ethnic categories. He might as well be Urdu-speaking, in which case the current category would be inaccurate. Mar4d ( talk) 13:40, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
This food is also Byzantine... -- 141.237.203.160 ( talk) 14:49, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Dear Faizan--
The article on Culloden is a very biased one probably written by an Englishman and inaccurate in several places. The bit I took out was about desertion of Highland troops being caused by having been forced to fight. This is no more true about Culloden than any other battles clansmen fought. All clansmen owed service to their chief and accepted that as right. Desertion was caused by the fact that it had been a campaign of almost a year already and it was spring and the men were needed at home to plant their crops. The 'deserters' were mostly all locals, who were going home to do the plowing. There is no reference back up to the claim of Highlanders being forced to fight and the Highlands were NEVER feudal. Every clansman was free.
I intend to flag up the whole article actually for bias and inaccuracy.
I'm sure you are very knowledgeable about your own country, but this article is about mine. My ancestor led the first charge (on the Jacobit side) at the battle of Culloden...
Bridget MacGillivray — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.43.65.199 ( talk) 15:08, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Faizan, it is common knowledge that founders of Mughal Empire was great grand children of Timur who was founder of Timurid dynasty Timur means 'iron' in Turkic languages, ruling dynasty spoke Turkic Chagatay dialect. Also word Urdu means 'army' in Turkic languages, hence 'Urdu' ca means 'tongue of [ruling] Army'.
Please restore my edition of article Mughal Empire. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ismet11 ( talk • contribs) 10:39, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
in either case, a little internet search will give you plenty of university papers.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/596358/Timur — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ismet11 ( talk • contribs) 11:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Does it say on the Pakistan and India articles that independence was from the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"? Or does it say on the Algeria article that independence was from the French Republic? The common standard on wikipedia is to refer to the name of the country, not its full name.
And Islam has a special status in Bangladesh's constitution, although the political system is secular.-- ChaudhryAzan ( talk) 10:47, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Dear Faizan,
First, thank you for your time and attention. I presume that some of the changes I have done to the Sudbury Valley School web page were undone not by you, but by a bot you maintain, and so understand if -- as you say on your talk page -- that your ability to respond is delayed due to exams.
Deleting mistaken or outdated information is not un-constructive. If you have a bot roaming certain pages preventing inaccurate information from being deleted, how can those of us trying to correct mis-information do so and have it "stuck?" I expect that you have weighed this problem, and have a reasoned solution; I look forward to hearing it.
Likewise, another edit of mine, undone by your bot, was an effort to put information under the correct heading. To wit, moving the phrase "Students are given complete responsibility for their own education" from the "Government" section to the "Curriculum" section.
At least one of your bot's edits was helpful. A reference to a Facebook page was put under the wrong header, and I am glad that was caught.
Thank you, Scott — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diodotus ( talk • contribs) 14:27, 8 April 2013 (UTC)