This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 |
Hi Explicit. You deleted this file per F5, which means it was also licensed as non-free. It was orphaned because someone created File:ABSA Group Limited Logo.svg to use instead. The svg file has been flagged as an NFCC#9 violation, but seems simple enough to be converted to {{ PD-logo}} or at least {{ PD-ineligible-USonly}} if not PD in its country of origin. Can you check to see whether the jpg file which was replaced is the same logo? If the files are the same and the only reason the svg is being licensed as non-free is because it's a user-created svg and not because of its complexity, then it cannot really be kept as non-free per FREER; it's licensing would either need to be converted to PD or the file would need to be deleted and the jpg restored. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 00:27, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
It would help if you didn't only delete old categories from Wikipedia:Database reports/Empty categories but also tagged valid categories for CSD C1 deletion in 7 days. Do you think you could take a second from deleting pages to tag pages for future deletion? Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:46, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Please help. This site deleted is for a provider of Simulation Software. The name of the company is Simio, and it appears to be under constant attack. This time it was (rather suspiciously) again deleted right before its user conference, and because it was deleted other people then (extremely quickly) removed links that pointed to it.
The company (Simio) is one of the largest providers of DES Simulators, and very important in its field. I am a software developer, user of simulators, and (full disclosure) also at the current time a contractor to Simio (although no one at Simio asked me to do this). Its absence in the list of simulator producers is a serious omission from Wikipedia, and I believe this harassment is being done by its competitors.
Please restore it and let me know if you have any questions. Any advice on how this could be prevented in the future would be welcome. Much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Batpox ( talk • contribs) 19:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Explicit I want to recreate that article, I see there is a draft for this deleted page here so I'll fix it and I'll ask you to check and request you to move it in the mainspace if article Passes WP:GNG and has WP:RS also I'll try to comply it with WP:NACTOR -- Siddharth 🤙🏻 Talk To Me!! 20:00, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello Explicit, I have fixed the article please have a look at the sources and if possible move without leaving a redirect. and also marked as review, actresses is highly notable in Marathi (Indian regional) Cinema. I was looking for her latest information I find nothing so created stub, for now, hope other editors will start adding more appropriate information now. -- Siddharth 🤙🏻 Talk To Me!! 19:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, we received an OTRS ticket for this file ( ticket:2019032610005834). Can you please undelete it temporarily, so that I can check it? Thanks Ruthven ( msg) 15:00, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Explicit. You deleted this file per WP:F7, but I'm not sure if that was the result of a PROD or some other tag; usually, you mark a file deleted per PROD with "Expired PROD" so maybe it was a case of a disputed non-free use rationale. Anyway, the same file might have been re-uploaded as File:Philadelphia Soul Helmet.png, but I'm not sure. This "new" file has the same WP:NFCC#3a issues as other similar files uploaded by the uploader since it's essentially no different from the other non-free logo being used in the infobox. This is also the same uploader discussed at User talk:Explicit/Archive 31#Arena Football League logos and is not the first time they've uploaded a file which is essentially the same as one which had been previously deleted. (See User talk:Fastily#File:Rio Grande Valley Dorados Helmet 2019.png and User talk:JJMC89#File:Atlantic City Blackjacks Helmet.png for example). Anyway, if this file is different enough to require an FFD discussion then let me know. At the same time, if PROD is also an option then let me know. Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 21:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
{{
Di-fails NFCC|3a=yes|3a-instances=
File:Philadelphia Soul.png|help=off|date=5 May 2019}}
.You are invited to join the discussion at WT:FOOTY#Bhutan national football team. — Marchjuly ( talk) 09:28, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NostalgiaBuff97501 ( talk • contribs)
You are invited to join the discussion at File talk:India national football team(s) logo (all N teams).png#Not an orphaned image. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 23:19, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you deleted MW 18014 because of reliability / notability concerns. Because I have concerns that the original deletion request was not made under good faith, I wish to challenge that deletion. Are you able to undelete MW 18014 so that I can challenge the editor who requested deletion? TIA. Oshah ( talk) 20:12, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
You deleted
ThebanTomb Where Joseph Smith Papyri Might have come from.jpg
with the reason "F3: File licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", "used with permission", or GFDL 1.2 only"
This file was used WITH permission. Can I please have it undeleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Epachamo ( talk • contribs) 03:01, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Good afternoon,
Yesterday, you removed three copyrighted images of cryptomonads which I had uploaded a few weeks prior, per CSD F7 and NFCC #1. However, I believe this is mistaken in at least two cases,
File:Bjornbergiella hawaiiensis.png represents the only published depiction of the species. There is no free alternative.
Similarly, File:Hemiselmis rufescens.png represents the oldest available depiction of the species, with all other available images also being copyrighted, and with living copyright holders.
As Chroomonas is a much better documented species, I imagine that a free image is likely available, though I have yet to find one.
Thereppy ( talk) 19:41, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Can you explain why you deleted this article in-spite of my improving it and providing an updated external link and removing the intention of deletion notice? The article could quite easily be improved and that is exactly what I was about to do.
The article is indexed quite widely, so you have created an administrative burden which extends beyond Wikipedia. Gregorydavid ( talk) 12:02, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
So, I am here to talk about an article of mine u deleted, but only because I wanted the thanx to b personal, not just automated. I merely hoped for the possibility I was creating a meritorious article. I now intend to delete the dead link on the Wikipedia page from which I thought creating an article might be somehow helpful. No hard feelings, @ all. Slarty1 ( talk) 02:36, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
You deleted a file I uploaded: File:Showdown title screen.JPG. The reason you gave for deleting the file was: (F4: File without a source (TW)). This was correct, I did not add a source to the file when I uploaded it. I do know the source, however. It was a screencapture from the animated short Showdown (1942 film). The image is needed for the related article's infobox. Please undelete. I will make sure I record the source and author this time. Tea and crumpets ( talk) 23:47, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Could you please block user: 92.10.223.166. CLCStudent ( talk) 00:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Could you please undelete File:Detroit Free Press Mitch Albom 9-11 10th anniversary front page Sept 11, 2011.jpg? You deleted it for being orphaned, which requires it be tagged for seven days. If you look at the history of Detroit Free Press, User:MarcelTheHippie was edit warring to remove the file from the article and the file was in the article for the past three days. 19 minutes before it was deleted, MarcelTheHippie reverted and added back the orphaned tag from the 16th to be deleted on the 23rd, when it should have restarted the process with an orphaned fair use template from the 22nd. I started a discussion at MarcelTheHippie's talk page at talk:MarcelTheHippie#Detroit Free Press cover three days ago that instead of edit warring to remove the file, they needed to start a discussion at WP:FFD. Instead they reverted again trying to get around the orphaned fair use rules by replacing an incorrect template before the deadline. I would also appreciate it you could leave a note at their talk page discussion that they should start a discussion at WP:FFD for file removals that are contested. Aspects ( talk) 02:43, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi, not sure why you deleted the article on Hariakhan Baba on 11:48, 25 May 2019, in your notes you describe him as being a "crank" seems like a little prejudice and just a little offensive, He was a respected and historical personality and Hindu saint, I am sure thousands of people in northern India as well the western world will find your attitude a bit insulting,
I am wondering why you are not deleting articles about Christians saints and calling them "Cranks" as you delete them?
I am NOT the author of the article, But I am doing research on the historical person, I have traveled to India twice for research. If you are looking for cranks you should look in the mirror. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:644:600:3520:95BC:B6B8:FC2E:53FB ( talk) 04:37, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
The MotoGP 19 files should NOT be deleted because I even put in "It is under a fair rationale". 99721829Max ( talk) 14:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Motogp19.png 99721829Max ( talk) 01:55, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi Explicit. You removed File:Confederação Brasileira de Futebol (escudo).svg in this this edit Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 18#File:Confederação Brasileira de Futebol (escudo).svg. The same logo had been previously discussed at Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 71#File:Confederação Brasileira de Futebol (escudo).svg, but for a slightly different reason. The Brazilian team last won the World Cup in 2002, which means that most likely the fifth star was added long before either of these two discussions took place. The file wasn't removed because it was being used in both the men's and women's teams. It was removed because it was used in Brazilian Football Confederation and the team articles.
Tvx1 disagrees with this application of UUI#17 and has requested clarification of a previous discussion about it at WP:AN/RFC#Wikipedia talk:Non-free content/Archive 66#Application of WP:NFC#UUI #17. This disagreement about UUI#17 has also recently come up in the now-archived Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 125#Bhutan national football team and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1012#User:Bring back Daz Sampson: NPA and ASPERSIONS as well. Although I've mentioned CLOSECHALLENGE before about this kind of thing with respect to another file removed per an XfD discussion, Tvx1 apparently doesn't seem to think it needs to be followed. They are aware of the previous FFD, but have decided to re-add the file here and the rationale here; so, I'm going to ask you about it. Is this current version of the file the same one which you removed per the FFD? Is your close of the FFD discussion still in effect if it is?
I'm assuming here that previously established consensus for at least this particular file is still in effect until either the application of the NFCC to this type of non-free use is clarified to specifically allow it, or a new consensus for this file is established which allows it. If, however, that's not correct, then please clarify. At the same time, if you feel that enough time has passed and the file can now be used in the men's team article without at least a new FFD discussion, then that's fine as well. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 21:09, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
There, the usage of this file in Brazil national football team has now been "officially" endorsed through a new FFD discussion. I hope that this now settles this specific issue at least. T v x1 21:56, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
The image that was previously in use at Arsenal W.F.C. was incorrect. The club no longer goes by Arsenal Ladies and indeed never used that image as their badge, only as an image on their Twitter account. That Twitter account and the corresponding image no longer exist, thus I have updated the page with the correct image - the normal Arsenal badge. Please reach out to User:Marchjuly and ensure that he stops mistakenly reverting the page based on an outdated and incorrect ruling. Eightball ( talk) 21:41, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
See this is another instance were Marchjuly got involved in a dispute over a football logo and I wasn't involved this time. So this insistence that I was being disruptive in that previous case was just misplaced. The red line through these disputes is Marchjuly. I appreciate that they want to ensure that the right thing is done, but this is just overdoing it. What has happened to " Wikpedia is not a bureaucracy"? There is no rule anywhere that Wikipedia must rigidly follow procedures for each and every change. In this case all of this could have been resolved through a simple discussion on the article talk page or the file's talk page. There is no need to drag a change that is so uncontroversial (evidenced by no one opposing it at WP:FFD). The user turning this into controversy was Marchjuly, not Eightball. Sometimes is just better to use our common sense instead of insisting on rigidly following on each and every possible procedure. The simple fact is that if Marchjuly had not decided to revert the edit would simply have been accepted and no one else would have made a fuss about it. Therefore it would kindly request you, explicit, if you were willing to partially reconsider your aforementioned close and allow this file being used on the women's team based on the newly presented evidence by Eightball and on the simple fact that Marchjuly made a mistake back then by claiming that the women's team is a child entity of the mean's team with the immensely thin evidence of an affiliation. On a side note, this is being discussed at WP:AN, not WP:ANI. T v x1 23:44, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
"The crux of the issue is that you and Eightball attempted to unilaterally overturn consensus of a discussion that resulted in an outcome you didn't agree with. "
You removed my edit because you claimed it was "Single-vendor/single-network charts"
The data I got was from the app store, I don't know why this is not suitable? That is the only information that was released thus far, and there is no reason to remove it.
"They should never be placed in discography tables or tables of charts"
Why?
Another question: If I had data from google play, then can I post it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ygrhmn2 ( talk • contribs) 04:32, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi Explicit. Another file with the same issues as the two mentioned above. — Marchjuly ( talk) 06:02, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Is at AfD, but have applied a G3 speedy to this; from everything I have found, this is an incredibly blatant hoax with completely non-existent information, and two long-gone editors from twelve years ago have managed to avoid our processes for so long. Nate • ( chatter) 19:38, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Explicit. Would you mind keeping a watch on File:Cricket India Crest.svg and India national cricket team? The file was removed by you from that article per Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 18#File:Cricket India Crest.svg. It looks like it's was re-added a few times recently, but was removed by JJMC89's bot for NFCC#10c reasons each time. This last time, however, something was added to the file's page and it showed up on my watchlist. When I checked the uses and saw that it was once again being used in the team article, I removed it and left an edit sum explaining why. If this was improper, please revert. In that case though the file will need a rationale for that particular use to stop the bot from continuing to remove it. The bot is obviously not aware of any previous discussion about the file at FFD/NFCR and will only be checking as to whether there's a rationale. If there is, the bot will leave things alone; if not, it will remove the file, and leave the same generic edit sum each time. If someone wants to discuss the file's use (i.e. that particular non-free use is now justified for some reason, or the close should be reviewed for some reason), then I've got no issues with that at all. In such a case, I will leave it up to your discretion to advise everyone on what needs to be done.
As a side note, I'm wondering if there might be possibly a way to tweak something about a file (perhaps its Wikidata) so that bots working with files are aware when one has been previously discussed and removed per a NFCR/FFD discussion for reasons other than simply NFCC#10c. Perhaps there's a way for such files to be flagged for further review after they're found by a bot. I'm also wondering whether there might be a way for some type of template similar to {{ Oldffdfull}} or {{ non-free reviewed}} to be also added to the talk headers of articles in which the file was specifically removed per one of these discussions; this might help clarify things to those wishing to re-add the file. I'm not sure how many editors actually check a file's page or its talk page before adding a file, but I'd imagine those that do would be in the minority. It probably won't stop some editors, but it might make it a bit easier for others to know that the file had been previously removed and why. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 21:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
I have already completed the steps needed to verify permissions for use of [ image]. See [ talk page]. Can you please undelete the page, or tell me what further steps should be taken? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pheelineerie ( talk • contribs) 10:13, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
The only specific reason that was given for deletion of this image was that it was too large. Some one had scaled down the image dramatically, which in my opinion was too much reduction for the picture in question. So I uploaded a resized version of 640x480 pixels, much smaller than the original and about twice as large as the one I found much too small for the picture in question. What is the upper limit to the acceptable size for this image? For reference, the non-free image was sourced from this press-kit. talk2 siNkarma86—Expert Sectioneer of Wikipedia 07:38, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Explicit, in April 2019, you deleted a page for "Aviareps". I would like to request its resotration, or access to a draft of the page, which I could resumbit for publication. Of course, I would disclose my paid COI, as I am currently an employee of the company. However, I assure you that I do not see the Wikipedia page as a marketing tool. Rather, I would like to make sure the number of employees, offices, clients, history, etc. are up to date and accurate. 80.150.168.110 ( talk) 08:08, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Could you delete User talk:99721829Max/Archive 9 please? Thank you. 99721829Max ( talk) 16:24, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Please undelete File:Thanjai-SriGuru-Logo.jpg. We are authorized to submit the logo since we are the proprietor of the company. Hope you understand. You may find this on the company website as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heartysasi ( talk • contribs) 02:56, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed you reverted edits to Choi Min-ho regarding image overkill so I was hoping you could advise me. The same user, User:노유찬, is adding a mass of images to Lee Tae-min, and ignoring requests not to do so. Alexanderlee ( talk) 15:57, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
I'm currently working on this and was wondering if, when you have time, you could take a look at the translations for the various kor refs used and verify that everything is acceptable or possibly make corrections if needed? Most are pre-existing transl brought over from the current article page, but others were very recently done by me after scouring the internet/cross-checking multiple translators. Would really appreciate it. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 18:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Please restore the page of Jane De Leon she will have a movie which will be her first lead and i would like to add that on the page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcolacson ( talk • contribs) 06:54, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Would you also mind watching India national football team and File:All India Football Federation 2016.png? Pretty much the same situation as above only the discussion was Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 6#File:India FA.svg. The current file is the same as the one discussed at FFD, as was previously mentioned on the file's talk page. Just for reference, this file has come up before at User talk:Explicit/Archive 23#Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 6#File:India FA.svg, User talk:Explicit/Archive 25#How are different of Emblem of CTFA (shield).jpg and India nation football logo.png ?, User talk:Explicit/Archive 27#File:All India Football Federation 2016.png and there have been a couple of instances where the same file had been uploaded under a different name (e.g. File:India national football team(s) logo (all N teams).png) but deleted. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 22:02, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
I thought it was clear that the usage of this screenshot ( File:The_Hitchhiker's_Guide_to_the_Galaxy_(video_game)_screenshot.png) was acceptable. -- Frotz( talk) 01:22, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Is this image similar to File:RINGBELL.jpg, which was deleted per FFD for being just the cover of a compilation album of the same name? If so, can it be deleted per WP:G4? -- George Ho ( talk) 04:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi, you denied my PROD of this article because there was a prevous AfD. However, if you look at that discussion, you'll see that it was about a redirect named "Joo". The discussion was actually not about the journal. I'm not sure how this ended up in the history of the article on the journal, but it's a long time ago and things were sometimes done differently then. If you insist, I'll take it to AfD, but frankly it seems like a waste of time to me. -- Randykitty ( talk) 13:36, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Explicit, In July 2019, you deleted a page for " Ribo (robot)". I would like to request its resotration, or access to a draft of the page, which I could resumbit for publication.
I wanna know why did you delete my article Ribo (robot)?
For clarification, Ribo is the frst humanoid robot in Bangladesh. There are some research papers published on IEEE conference. Not only that I also attached references.
I do not see that this article meets any relevant criteria.
Zinia Sultana (
talk)
17:50, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Concerning [1], what gives? Those were fair use images? Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 01:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
I don’t fully understand how to report someone you suspect of sock puppetry, but I know that you have had some involvement and understanding of recent edits regarding images, such as at Choi Min-ho. I have just reverted an edit by a user who added multiple images very close together, but when I looked back at the edit history noticed that they were the same images repeatedly added to the article by the user who was adding them before. Their edit history also seems to be surrounding images in general and made me wonder if it was the same editor as this was also similar. Could you please take a look? Thanks, Alexanderlee ( talk) 18:35, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Beyoncé - If I Were a Boy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:29, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Is this image the same as File:The Groove Line - Heatwave.jpg, which was deleted per FFD? Shall G4 be enforced? Most people seem to prefer cover arts because they are attractive to most customers and music listeners. I wonder whether removing the image affects the readers' understanding. BTW, I've been thinking about re-using File:Heatwave the groove line 1978 UK vinyl.jpg because the band consisted of American and British members. -- George Ho ( talk) 05:04, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi Explicit, can you undelete File:University of Kansas Health System logo.svg please? I never saw it get deleted from the article University of Kansas Health System two months ago... an IP simply put "The" at the beginning of the file name and that's what removed it. "The" should not be there. Thanks, Corky 02:28, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
You deleted this article a year or so ago based on an expired prod (no refs). I've restarted the article based on the sources I used for The Signpost article I wrote Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2019-07-31/Gallery and a couple of other minor sources. The four pix shown are likely to be named Featured Pictures at Commons. The new article is almost complete IMHO, and might even be worth a B rating, but I just wanted to be sure you know about its recreation.
Thanks,
Smallbones( smalltalk) 13:50, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Hey there, you have deleted those two pages. Those players play for an Indian club Mohun Bagan who play in the I-League, the top tier league of Indian football. I pointed that out because WP:NFOOTY was mentioned as one of the criterias but the I-League is a fully professional league. And the other criteria was it failing to meet WP:GNG but I would like to include sources in those pages as soon as I can (even though I am not the one who created them). As I am an editor who edits using mobile, I was not aware of those articles tagged for deletion. I'll be thankful if you see to it. REALMMB (talk) 10:48, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
99721829Max ( talk) 03:22, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Please restore the image to Wikipedia, as it has been shown as non-replaceable with no free equivalent. Thank you. -- Samotny Wędrowiec ( talk) 15:39, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Explicit! You deleted this logo because it exceeded the amount of time allowed for a logo image to be unused on Wikipedia. The intention for the logo was to replace the existing logo in the Burson Cohn & Wolfe article, since that logo is for the predecessor company (Burson-Marsteller). Since I'm an editor with a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (I'm here on behalf of my employer, BCW) I know I'm not supposed to make changes myself, so I was reaching out to editors to add the logo, but no one has been available to assist. I don't want to cause issues by re-uploading the logo and then having the same issue occur, so I wanted to ask: if I upload the logo again, would you be able to place it in the infobox? Or is it possible for you to restore the image and place it in the infobox? Thank you. BCW Editor ( talk) 17:39, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi Explicit, I was wondering if you could undelete this file: File:Lonely and Horny poster.jpeg. I'm not sure why it was removed from the article in the first place, but I'd like to add it back into the article. – Anne drew 20:23, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Explicit! I am here to ask you something. Would you like to undelete File:Atterbury House.jpg? As it was deleted per WP:NFCC#1, I just got a new image for it. You might want to check it here:
It stated CC-BY-NC on its licensing. So, I want to update the file into the new one here. Thank you. Samuelsp15 ( talk) 14:42, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
The images above were orphaned by Hullaballoo Wolfowitz, claiming them as replaceable. I talked to him about it; he asserted consistency with other articles that don't use cast photos. Well, that was months ago. Recently, I saw an FFD nomination discussing a cast photo of some web series. If you can un-delete the photos, reinsert them, and take them to FFD for discussion, that would be great. Thanks. George Ho ( talk) 20:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Please restore the image for the UAAP Season 82 logo as the article was just moved from the draftspace but is now returned to publication after inclusion of references. Thank you. File:UAAP_Season_82_Logo.jpg Aeron Valderrama ( talk)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 |
Hi Explicit. You deleted this file per F5, which means it was also licensed as non-free. It was orphaned because someone created File:ABSA Group Limited Logo.svg to use instead. The svg file has been flagged as an NFCC#9 violation, but seems simple enough to be converted to {{ PD-logo}} or at least {{ PD-ineligible-USonly}} if not PD in its country of origin. Can you check to see whether the jpg file which was replaced is the same logo? If the files are the same and the only reason the svg is being licensed as non-free is because it's a user-created svg and not because of its complexity, then it cannot really be kept as non-free per FREER; it's licensing would either need to be converted to PD or the file would need to be deleted and the jpg restored. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 00:27, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
It would help if you didn't only delete old categories from Wikipedia:Database reports/Empty categories but also tagged valid categories for CSD C1 deletion in 7 days. Do you think you could take a second from deleting pages to tag pages for future deletion? Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:46, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Please help. This site deleted is for a provider of Simulation Software. The name of the company is Simio, and it appears to be under constant attack. This time it was (rather suspiciously) again deleted right before its user conference, and because it was deleted other people then (extremely quickly) removed links that pointed to it.
The company (Simio) is one of the largest providers of DES Simulators, and very important in its field. I am a software developer, user of simulators, and (full disclosure) also at the current time a contractor to Simio (although no one at Simio asked me to do this). Its absence in the list of simulator producers is a serious omission from Wikipedia, and I believe this harassment is being done by its competitors.
Please restore it and let me know if you have any questions. Any advice on how this could be prevented in the future would be welcome. Much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Batpox ( talk • contribs) 19:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Explicit I want to recreate that article, I see there is a draft for this deleted page here so I'll fix it and I'll ask you to check and request you to move it in the mainspace if article Passes WP:GNG and has WP:RS also I'll try to comply it with WP:NACTOR -- Siddharth 🤙🏻 Talk To Me!! 20:00, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello Explicit, I have fixed the article please have a look at the sources and if possible move without leaving a redirect. and also marked as review, actresses is highly notable in Marathi (Indian regional) Cinema. I was looking for her latest information I find nothing so created stub, for now, hope other editors will start adding more appropriate information now. -- Siddharth 🤙🏻 Talk To Me!! 19:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, we received an OTRS ticket for this file ( ticket:2019032610005834). Can you please undelete it temporarily, so that I can check it? Thanks Ruthven ( msg) 15:00, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Explicit. You deleted this file per WP:F7, but I'm not sure if that was the result of a PROD or some other tag; usually, you mark a file deleted per PROD with "Expired PROD" so maybe it was a case of a disputed non-free use rationale. Anyway, the same file might have been re-uploaded as File:Philadelphia Soul Helmet.png, but I'm not sure. This "new" file has the same WP:NFCC#3a issues as other similar files uploaded by the uploader since it's essentially no different from the other non-free logo being used in the infobox. This is also the same uploader discussed at User talk:Explicit/Archive 31#Arena Football League logos and is not the first time they've uploaded a file which is essentially the same as one which had been previously deleted. (See User talk:Fastily#File:Rio Grande Valley Dorados Helmet 2019.png and User talk:JJMC89#File:Atlantic City Blackjacks Helmet.png for example). Anyway, if this file is different enough to require an FFD discussion then let me know. At the same time, if PROD is also an option then let me know. Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 21:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
{{
Di-fails NFCC|3a=yes|3a-instances=
File:Philadelphia Soul.png|help=off|date=5 May 2019}}
.You are invited to join the discussion at WT:FOOTY#Bhutan national football team. — Marchjuly ( talk) 09:28, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NostalgiaBuff97501 ( talk • contribs)
You are invited to join the discussion at File talk:India national football team(s) logo (all N teams).png#Not an orphaned image. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 23:19, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you deleted MW 18014 because of reliability / notability concerns. Because I have concerns that the original deletion request was not made under good faith, I wish to challenge that deletion. Are you able to undelete MW 18014 so that I can challenge the editor who requested deletion? TIA. Oshah ( talk) 20:12, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
You deleted
ThebanTomb Where Joseph Smith Papyri Might have come from.jpg
with the reason "F3: File licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", "used with permission", or GFDL 1.2 only"
This file was used WITH permission. Can I please have it undeleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Epachamo ( talk • contribs) 03:01, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Good afternoon,
Yesterday, you removed three copyrighted images of cryptomonads which I had uploaded a few weeks prior, per CSD F7 and NFCC #1. However, I believe this is mistaken in at least two cases,
File:Bjornbergiella hawaiiensis.png represents the only published depiction of the species. There is no free alternative.
Similarly, File:Hemiselmis rufescens.png represents the oldest available depiction of the species, with all other available images also being copyrighted, and with living copyright holders.
As Chroomonas is a much better documented species, I imagine that a free image is likely available, though I have yet to find one.
Thereppy ( talk) 19:41, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Can you explain why you deleted this article in-spite of my improving it and providing an updated external link and removing the intention of deletion notice? The article could quite easily be improved and that is exactly what I was about to do.
The article is indexed quite widely, so you have created an administrative burden which extends beyond Wikipedia. Gregorydavid ( talk) 12:02, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
So, I am here to talk about an article of mine u deleted, but only because I wanted the thanx to b personal, not just automated. I merely hoped for the possibility I was creating a meritorious article. I now intend to delete the dead link on the Wikipedia page from which I thought creating an article might be somehow helpful. No hard feelings, @ all. Slarty1 ( talk) 02:36, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
You deleted a file I uploaded: File:Showdown title screen.JPG. The reason you gave for deleting the file was: (F4: File without a source (TW)). This was correct, I did not add a source to the file when I uploaded it. I do know the source, however. It was a screencapture from the animated short Showdown (1942 film). The image is needed for the related article's infobox. Please undelete. I will make sure I record the source and author this time. Tea and crumpets ( talk) 23:47, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Could you please block user: 92.10.223.166. CLCStudent ( talk) 00:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Could you please undelete File:Detroit Free Press Mitch Albom 9-11 10th anniversary front page Sept 11, 2011.jpg? You deleted it for being orphaned, which requires it be tagged for seven days. If you look at the history of Detroit Free Press, User:MarcelTheHippie was edit warring to remove the file from the article and the file was in the article for the past three days. 19 minutes before it was deleted, MarcelTheHippie reverted and added back the orphaned tag from the 16th to be deleted on the 23rd, when it should have restarted the process with an orphaned fair use template from the 22nd. I started a discussion at MarcelTheHippie's talk page at talk:MarcelTheHippie#Detroit Free Press cover three days ago that instead of edit warring to remove the file, they needed to start a discussion at WP:FFD. Instead they reverted again trying to get around the orphaned fair use rules by replacing an incorrect template before the deadline. I would also appreciate it you could leave a note at their talk page discussion that they should start a discussion at WP:FFD for file removals that are contested. Aspects ( talk) 02:43, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi, not sure why you deleted the article on Hariakhan Baba on 11:48, 25 May 2019, in your notes you describe him as being a "crank" seems like a little prejudice and just a little offensive, He was a respected and historical personality and Hindu saint, I am sure thousands of people in northern India as well the western world will find your attitude a bit insulting,
I am wondering why you are not deleting articles about Christians saints and calling them "Cranks" as you delete them?
I am NOT the author of the article, But I am doing research on the historical person, I have traveled to India twice for research. If you are looking for cranks you should look in the mirror. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:644:600:3520:95BC:B6B8:FC2E:53FB ( talk) 04:37, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
The MotoGP 19 files should NOT be deleted because I even put in "It is under a fair rationale". 99721829Max ( talk) 14:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Motogp19.png 99721829Max ( talk) 01:55, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi Explicit. You removed File:Confederação Brasileira de Futebol (escudo).svg in this this edit Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 18#File:Confederação Brasileira de Futebol (escudo).svg. The same logo had been previously discussed at Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 71#File:Confederação Brasileira de Futebol (escudo).svg, but for a slightly different reason. The Brazilian team last won the World Cup in 2002, which means that most likely the fifth star was added long before either of these two discussions took place. The file wasn't removed because it was being used in both the men's and women's teams. It was removed because it was used in Brazilian Football Confederation and the team articles.
Tvx1 disagrees with this application of UUI#17 and has requested clarification of a previous discussion about it at WP:AN/RFC#Wikipedia talk:Non-free content/Archive 66#Application of WP:NFC#UUI #17. This disagreement about UUI#17 has also recently come up in the now-archived Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 125#Bhutan national football team and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1012#User:Bring back Daz Sampson: NPA and ASPERSIONS as well. Although I've mentioned CLOSECHALLENGE before about this kind of thing with respect to another file removed per an XfD discussion, Tvx1 apparently doesn't seem to think it needs to be followed. They are aware of the previous FFD, but have decided to re-add the file here and the rationale here; so, I'm going to ask you about it. Is this current version of the file the same one which you removed per the FFD? Is your close of the FFD discussion still in effect if it is?
I'm assuming here that previously established consensus for at least this particular file is still in effect until either the application of the NFCC to this type of non-free use is clarified to specifically allow it, or a new consensus for this file is established which allows it. If, however, that's not correct, then please clarify. At the same time, if you feel that enough time has passed and the file can now be used in the men's team article without at least a new FFD discussion, then that's fine as well. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 21:09, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
There, the usage of this file in Brazil national football team has now been "officially" endorsed through a new FFD discussion. I hope that this now settles this specific issue at least. T v x1 21:56, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
The image that was previously in use at Arsenal W.F.C. was incorrect. The club no longer goes by Arsenal Ladies and indeed never used that image as their badge, only as an image on their Twitter account. That Twitter account and the corresponding image no longer exist, thus I have updated the page with the correct image - the normal Arsenal badge. Please reach out to User:Marchjuly and ensure that he stops mistakenly reverting the page based on an outdated and incorrect ruling. Eightball ( talk) 21:41, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
See this is another instance were Marchjuly got involved in a dispute over a football logo and I wasn't involved this time. So this insistence that I was being disruptive in that previous case was just misplaced. The red line through these disputes is Marchjuly. I appreciate that they want to ensure that the right thing is done, but this is just overdoing it. What has happened to " Wikpedia is not a bureaucracy"? There is no rule anywhere that Wikipedia must rigidly follow procedures for each and every change. In this case all of this could have been resolved through a simple discussion on the article talk page or the file's talk page. There is no need to drag a change that is so uncontroversial (evidenced by no one opposing it at WP:FFD). The user turning this into controversy was Marchjuly, not Eightball. Sometimes is just better to use our common sense instead of insisting on rigidly following on each and every possible procedure. The simple fact is that if Marchjuly had not decided to revert the edit would simply have been accepted and no one else would have made a fuss about it. Therefore it would kindly request you, explicit, if you were willing to partially reconsider your aforementioned close and allow this file being used on the women's team based on the newly presented evidence by Eightball and on the simple fact that Marchjuly made a mistake back then by claiming that the women's team is a child entity of the mean's team with the immensely thin evidence of an affiliation. On a side note, this is being discussed at WP:AN, not WP:ANI. T v x1 23:44, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
"The crux of the issue is that you and Eightball attempted to unilaterally overturn consensus of a discussion that resulted in an outcome you didn't agree with. "
You removed my edit because you claimed it was "Single-vendor/single-network charts"
The data I got was from the app store, I don't know why this is not suitable? That is the only information that was released thus far, and there is no reason to remove it.
"They should never be placed in discography tables or tables of charts"
Why?
Another question: If I had data from google play, then can I post it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ygrhmn2 ( talk • contribs) 04:32, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi Explicit. Another file with the same issues as the two mentioned above. — Marchjuly ( talk) 06:02, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Is at AfD, but have applied a G3 speedy to this; from everything I have found, this is an incredibly blatant hoax with completely non-existent information, and two long-gone editors from twelve years ago have managed to avoid our processes for so long. Nate • ( chatter) 19:38, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Explicit. Would you mind keeping a watch on File:Cricket India Crest.svg and India national cricket team? The file was removed by you from that article per Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 18#File:Cricket India Crest.svg. It looks like it's was re-added a few times recently, but was removed by JJMC89's bot for NFCC#10c reasons each time. This last time, however, something was added to the file's page and it showed up on my watchlist. When I checked the uses and saw that it was once again being used in the team article, I removed it and left an edit sum explaining why. If this was improper, please revert. In that case though the file will need a rationale for that particular use to stop the bot from continuing to remove it. The bot is obviously not aware of any previous discussion about the file at FFD/NFCR and will only be checking as to whether there's a rationale. If there is, the bot will leave things alone; if not, it will remove the file, and leave the same generic edit sum each time. If someone wants to discuss the file's use (i.e. that particular non-free use is now justified for some reason, or the close should be reviewed for some reason), then I've got no issues with that at all. In such a case, I will leave it up to your discretion to advise everyone on what needs to be done.
As a side note, I'm wondering if there might be possibly a way to tweak something about a file (perhaps its Wikidata) so that bots working with files are aware when one has been previously discussed and removed per a NFCR/FFD discussion for reasons other than simply NFCC#10c. Perhaps there's a way for such files to be flagged for further review after they're found by a bot. I'm also wondering whether there might be a way for some type of template similar to {{ Oldffdfull}} or {{ non-free reviewed}} to be also added to the talk headers of articles in which the file was specifically removed per one of these discussions; this might help clarify things to those wishing to re-add the file. I'm not sure how many editors actually check a file's page or its talk page before adding a file, but I'd imagine those that do would be in the minority. It probably won't stop some editors, but it might make it a bit easier for others to know that the file had been previously removed and why. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 21:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
I have already completed the steps needed to verify permissions for use of [ image]. See [ talk page]. Can you please undelete the page, or tell me what further steps should be taken? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pheelineerie ( talk • contribs) 10:13, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
The only specific reason that was given for deletion of this image was that it was too large. Some one had scaled down the image dramatically, which in my opinion was too much reduction for the picture in question. So I uploaded a resized version of 640x480 pixels, much smaller than the original and about twice as large as the one I found much too small for the picture in question. What is the upper limit to the acceptable size for this image? For reference, the non-free image was sourced from this press-kit. talk2 siNkarma86—Expert Sectioneer of Wikipedia 07:38, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Explicit, in April 2019, you deleted a page for "Aviareps". I would like to request its resotration, or access to a draft of the page, which I could resumbit for publication. Of course, I would disclose my paid COI, as I am currently an employee of the company. However, I assure you that I do not see the Wikipedia page as a marketing tool. Rather, I would like to make sure the number of employees, offices, clients, history, etc. are up to date and accurate. 80.150.168.110 ( talk) 08:08, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Could you delete User talk:99721829Max/Archive 9 please? Thank you. 99721829Max ( talk) 16:24, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Please undelete File:Thanjai-SriGuru-Logo.jpg. We are authorized to submit the logo since we are the proprietor of the company. Hope you understand. You may find this on the company website as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heartysasi ( talk • contribs) 02:56, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed you reverted edits to Choi Min-ho regarding image overkill so I was hoping you could advise me. The same user, User:노유찬, is adding a mass of images to Lee Tae-min, and ignoring requests not to do so. Alexanderlee ( talk) 15:57, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
I'm currently working on this and was wondering if, when you have time, you could take a look at the translations for the various kor refs used and verify that everything is acceptable or possibly make corrections if needed? Most are pre-existing transl brought over from the current article page, but others were very recently done by me after scouring the internet/cross-checking multiple translators. Would really appreciate it. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 18:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Please restore the page of Jane De Leon she will have a movie which will be her first lead and i would like to add that on the page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcolacson ( talk • contribs) 06:54, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Would you also mind watching India national football team and File:All India Football Federation 2016.png? Pretty much the same situation as above only the discussion was Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 6#File:India FA.svg. The current file is the same as the one discussed at FFD, as was previously mentioned on the file's talk page. Just for reference, this file has come up before at User talk:Explicit/Archive 23#Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 6#File:India FA.svg, User talk:Explicit/Archive 25#How are different of Emblem of CTFA (shield).jpg and India nation football logo.png ?, User talk:Explicit/Archive 27#File:All India Football Federation 2016.png and there have been a couple of instances where the same file had been uploaded under a different name (e.g. File:India national football team(s) logo (all N teams).png) but deleted. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 22:02, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
I thought it was clear that the usage of this screenshot ( File:The_Hitchhiker's_Guide_to_the_Galaxy_(video_game)_screenshot.png) was acceptable. -- Frotz( talk) 01:22, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Is this image similar to File:RINGBELL.jpg, which was deleted per FFD for being just the cover of a compilation album of the same name? If so, can it be deleted per WP:G4? -- George Ho ( talk) 04:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi, you denied my PROD of this article because there was a prevous AfD. However, if you look at that discussion, you'll see that it was about a redirect named "Joo". The discussion was actually not about the journal. I'm not sure how this ended up in the history of the article on the journal, but it's a long time ago and things were sometimes done differently then. If you insist, I'll take it to AfD, but frankly it seems like a waste of time to me. -- Randykitty ( talk) 13:36, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Explicit, In July 2019, you deleted a page for " Ribo (robot)". I would like to request its resotration, or access to a draft of the page, which I could resumbit for publication.
I wanna know why did you delete my article Ribo (robot)?
For clarification, Ribo is the frst humanoid robot in Bangladesh. There are some research papers published on IEEE conference. Not only that I also attached references.
I do not see that this article meets any relevant criteria.
Zinia Sultana (
talk)
17:50, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Concerning [1], what gives? Those were fair use images? Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 01:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
I don’t fully understand how to report someone you suspect of sock puppetry, but I know that you have had some involvement and understanding of recent edits regarding images, such as at Choi Min-ho. I have just reverted an edit by a user who added multiple images very close together, but when I looked back at the edit history noticed that they were the same images repeatedly added to the article by the user who was adding them before. Their edit history also seems to be surrounding images in general and made me wonder if it was the same editor as this was also similar. Could you please take a look? Thanks, Alexanderlee ( talk) 18:35, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Beyoncé - If I Were a Boy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:29, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Is this image the same as File:The Groove Line - Heatwave.jpg, which was deleted per FFD? Shall G4 be enforced? Most people seem to prefer cover arts because they are attractive to most customers and music listeners. I wonder whether removing the image affects the readers' understanding. BTW, I've been thinking about re-using File:Heatwave the groove line 1978 UK vinyl.jpg because the band consisted of American and British members. -- George Ho ( talk) 05:04, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi Explicit, can you undelete File:University of Kansas Health System logo.svg please? I never saw it get deleted from the article University of Kansas Health System two months ago... an IP simply put "The" at the beginning of the file name and that's what removed it. "The" should not be there. Thanks, Corky 02:28, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
You deleted this article a year or so ago based on an expired prod (no refs). I've restarted the article based on the sources I used for The Signpost article I wrote Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2019-07-31/Gallery and a couple of other minor sources. The four pix shown are likely to be named Featured Pictures at Commons. The new article is almost complete IMHO, and might even be worth a B rating, but I just wanted to be sure you know about its recreation.
Thanks,
Smallbones( smalltalk) 13:50, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Hey there, you have deleted those two pages. Those players play for an Indian club Mohun Bagan who play in the I-League, the top tier league of Indian football. I pointed that out because WP:NFOOTY was mentioned as one of the criterias but the I-League is a fully professional league. And the other criteria was it failing to meet WP:GNG but I would like to include sources in those pages as soon as I can (even though I am not the one who created them). As I am an editor who edits using mobile, I was not aware of those articles tagged for deletion. I'll be thankful if you see to it. REALMMB (talk) 10:48, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
99721829Max ( talk) 03:22, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Please restore the image to Wikipedia, as it has been shown as non-replaceable with no free equivalent. Thank you. -- Samotny Wędrowiec ( talk) 15:39, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Explicit! You deleted this logo because it exceeded the amount of time allowed for a logo image to be unused on Wikipedia. The intention for the logo was to replace the existing logo in the Burson Cohn & Wolfe article, since that logo is for the predecessor company (Burson-Marsteller). Since I'm an editor with a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (I'm here on behalf of my employer, BCW) I know I'm not supposed to make changes myself, so I was reaching out to editors to add the logo, but no one has been available to assist. I don't want to cause issues by re-uploading the logo and then having the same issue occur, so I wanted to ask: if I upload the logo again, would you be able to place it in the infobox? Or is it possible for you to restore the image and place it in the infobox? Thank you. BCW Editor ( talk) 17:39, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi Explicit, I was wondering if you could undelete this file: File:Lonely and Horny poster.jpeg. I'm not sure why it was removed from the article in the first place, but I'd like to add it back into the article. – Anne drew 20:23, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Explicit! I am here to ask you something. Would you like to undelete File:Atterbury House.jpg? As it was deleted per WP:NFCC#1, I just got a new image for it. You might want to check it here:
It stated CC-BY-NC on its licensing. So, I want to update the file into the new one here. Thank you. Samuelsp15 ( talk) 14:42, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
The images above were orphaned by Hullaballoo Wolfowitz, claiming them as replaceable. I talked to him about it; he asserted consistency with other articles that don't use cast photos. Well, that was months ago. Recently, I saw an FFD nomination discussing a cast photo of some web series. If you can un-delete the photos, reinsert them, and take them to FFD for discussion, that would be great. Thanks. George Ho ( talk) 20:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Please restore the image for the UAAP Season 82 logo as the article was just moved from the draftspace but is now returned to publication after inclusion of references. Thank you. File:UAAP_Season_82_Logo.jpg Aeron Valderrama ( talk)