This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
My edits are not vandalism. MOS:TV says only original dates should be included. Its a Canadian series. If we include the us, then we must include every country. We are not WP:INDISCRIMINATE. 66.87.81.15 ( talk) 20:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
I can't tag the main section if the article is locked down, right? Cheers, 142.204.42.24 ( talk) 03:41, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Talk:Bob's Burgers. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan ( TALK) 18:28, 3 July 2014 (UTC) (DRN volunteer)
I don't think so, if you read WP:REDACT, it says:-
"Under some circumstances, you may entirely remove your comments. For example, if you accidentally posted a comment to the wrong page, and no one has replied to it yet, then the simplest solution is to self-revert your comment." That whole comment wasn't a mistake, but it remained there for over 3 years and it was clearly related with the subject. User can only archive if they don't want their comment to be appeared, they cannot remove.
And "Users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages", but not any other page. OccultZone ( Talk • Contributions • Log) 19:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for helping me clean up! That was my first ever attempt at a revdel. Appreciate your patience.
Zad
68
05:08, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
|
Please see the result of the case at WP:AN3#User:Ericablang reported by User:EvergreenFir (Result: Both warned) which concerns editing at Kevin de León. Both you and the other party have been warned. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 16:20, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
don't post your silly templates on my page again. ta Mosfetfaser ( talk) 05:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
I doubt that you noticed, but this editor] has a COI for the articles he's editing. I suspect it is his job to edit those pages. Dougweller ( talk) 08:26, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your good work at the SPLC list. Although I differ with you on the best way to source this stuff, we agree that it needs to be sourced.
Given that WP can be edited by (almost) anyone at any time, there are various problems, I think, with:
Let's put aside trolls, fools, axe-grinders, and so on for now. Suppose somebody hears in September that the newly emerged "Sovereign Citizens of Wingnuttistan" is on SPLC's list. She looks it up on their website, and yes sure enough it's there. So she wants to add it to the WP article. The only "simple" (ha ha) solution I see is for her to take on the job of checking every other item in the sublist as well, to add this new item, and to update the above to:
Trouble is, a great percentage of well-meaning editors (let alone the others) aren't going to do this. They're more likely (A) to fictionally backdate the addition to July, (B) to lazily/myopically assume that everything that was listed in July is still listed in September, etc.
For this reason I think it's better to avoid the attempt at a source for the lot, and instead to repeat the reference. If necessary, again and again and again:
Etc. Ugly, but more bulletproof. -- Hoary ( talk) 01:37, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Incidentally, on a thread a short distance above: "Editing of other editors' user and user talk pages / If a user asks you not to edit their user pages, it is probably sensible to respect their requests (although a user cannot avoid administrator attention or appropriate project notices and communications by merely demanding their talk page is not posted to)" ( here). If another editor is seriously misbehaving, it doesn't have to be you that informs the editor. Instead, bring up the matter at WP:AN/I. If what you write there is convincing, then an administrator will deal with the matter. -- Hoary ( talk) 01:48, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of organizations designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as hate groups, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christ The King Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For the hard work you put in verifying the story List of organizations designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as hate groups . ta Mosfetfaser ( talk) 04:41, 11 July 2014 (UTC) |
Categories regarding religious beliefs or sexual orientation should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief or orientation in question, and the subject's beliefs or sexual orientation are relevant to their public life or notability, according to reliable published sources.
I noticed you violated our policy on biographies of living people by adding Anthony Rapp to a category he does not publicly self-identify as. Please consider reverting your change. JackSchmidt ( talk) 04:59, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Yes, absolutely. Only once the team itself has officially announced it on their website can we update it i.e. an NBA.com source. For example, Paul Pierce just agreed to signed with the Wizards. That is not official as the Wizards themselves have not announced it. When it is listed here, it is official. Only a few people of Wikipedia keep patrol on NBA articles and revert when unofficial signings are added. It be great for more people to help us out. Cheers. DaHuzyBru ( talk) 06:49, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
I was gong for AfD, but now you've added PROD tag so let's watch. OccultZone ( Talk • Contributions • Log) 04:48, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
I bet the article's been linked on some extremist site. Keep an eye on it - it keeps getting hit by new IPs. Personally, I think it should be permanently semiprotected, as a huge amount of the article's edit history is reverting changes to the cited definition. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 20:08, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Futurama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lrrr. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
About this: reversion: Self-presentation is a behavior. I don't really care what it says, so long as we can get rid of the awkward "what one does oneself" circumlocution. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 03:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
FYI [1]-- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:13, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
I blocked the account, and revision deleted the log entries at Laverne Cox per your request, but will be leaving the log history at UAA alone for transparency. Just wanted to give you the followup regarding the revdel request. Monty 845 23:34, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Sir, I have posted my comments and justified the reason as to why the religious identity should be changed. Please, see it on the talk page of the article. Thank you. Iamgame ( talk) 17:11, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Why that edit is unnecessary? 173.206.37.64 ( talk) 22:36, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- ChrisP2K5 ( talk) 04:45, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
European-American Unity and Rights Organization may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 02:47, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Bisexual pride flag may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 05:14, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi User:Evergreen. Substituting short version of Red Cross MH-17 edit by User:Evergreen. Agree with User:Evergreen that short version is sufficient summary for multi-sentence version. This appears to be a length-of-edit issue. The discussion of Wikipedia applied to recent events in covered in the opening sections of the Wikipedia article. It is the Wikipedia administrator Andrew Lih who is referenced as supporting the use of Wikipedia to keep up with recent events within responsible guidelines of verifiability like the aircraft incident. FelixRosch ( talk) 15:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello.
I am "talking" to you in regards of Nash Grier's correct date on his Wikipedia page.
His birthdate is indeed the 28th of December of 1997. He used to state it on his website and he also said he was born in 1997, I THINK, in one of his videos.
We know he his currently 16 and born in 1997. So, I am going to revert the changes you made back to how I had them expect the month and date, just the year because it's not questionable when he was born --we know when he was born.
Thank you,
Your Wikipedian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frenchman101 ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Sir.
I just wanted to delete Nash's brithdate because we should have a definite date not a confusing one. Don't you agree? And please do NOT block me again.....
If I find a reliable source, may I change his birthdate?
Thank you, Frenchman101— Frenchman101 ( talk) 19:56, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Re your message: I have never used Huggle or AWB, so I really don't know how either works or what the requirements are. Huggle being limited without rollback makes some logical sense to me in that it can probably do things faster with rollback than without. I know AWB requires explicit permission since I read the "so-and-so should have their AWB privilege removed" discussions on WP:AN/WP:ANI from time to time. After that, I have no idea...
I arrived on Wikipedia well before all of these automated tools started to appear, so I do everything old school. The only tool I use to popups (and now I can't do without it). I tried Twinkle once, I think, but I abandoned for some reason.
I can grant you rollback privilege if you want (you'd be the first person I ever granted anything to besides myself!). Even if you don't use Huggle or AWB, you still might find it useful. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 02:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted the changes I made to melatonin page regarding a small-scale study for asthmatics. I know it's only a small-scale primary source but is there subsequent research proving that it's safe for asthmatics? Maybe we can find a way to add at least a caution under the adverse effects section, so asthmatics talk to their doctor before attempting to use melatonin (since it's sold OTC). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.4.144.74 ( talk) 08:11, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Alright, fair enough. The data is for 2013. You're right about that. However, while Ukraine may be in 83rd place this year, last year it was in 78th place, hence my decrease edit in the HDI section, since it dropped a few places on the chart. Look at page 17 for the 2013 report, http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2013_en_summary.pdf, and page 17 of the 2014 report, http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr14-summary-en.pdf, and you will see that the Ukrainian HDI did indeed drop. Thank you. TheBoulderite ( talk • contribs) 03:33, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, I don't think that the Wikipedia list of countries by HDI is completely finished yet, so I've just been comparing both reports for the data of each country, seeing if they improved from last year on the list or if they didn't. To keep the data accurate, I would strongly suggest that you do the same. TheBoulderite ( talk • contribs) 03:33, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Radical feminism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
I think that it would be covered under
WP:NEWSBLOG, in that instance. If a news organization publishes an opinion piece in a blog, attribute the statement to the writer (e.g. "Jane Smith wrote...").
So we would just need to attribute the statement if that was so. I'm not sure if this is possible under the current wording.
Tutelary (
talk)
23:46, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Can you please explain why you removed my edits from that article? In particular why did you remove the edits from the "Modern equality movements" section? I cannot see what can be constructed as WP:COATRACK in listing the international conventions regarding equality between women and men. 2A02:2F0A:508F:FFFF:0:0:BC1A:B68A ( talk) 20:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
2A02:2F0A:508F:FFFF:0:0:BC1A:B68A ( talk) 21:28, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
The new reference may say "race" (I looked at the new reference and it says that genos (γένος) means race, stock or kin) but the existing reference does not, so we need to resolve these conflicting references. Can you provide a reference that clearly says the "genics' in eugenics means "race" instead of "birth". Thanks. Editor2020 18:19, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
I understand if you're too busy to improve these maps but... could you please color Florida gold on this map [3], color Florida gold and add a marriage ring for Boulder County on this map [4], add Colorado (lightest red) to this map [5], remove Florida from this map [6], and add Florida to this map [7]? Also, this gif needs updating [8] as well. I'm sorry, I know it is a lot to ask for..! Prcc twenty-seven ( talk) 06:13, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Hey, looks like Twinkle is fixed... or more accurately, the necessary code for Twinkle to work properly on UAA was fixed. -- Drm310 ( talk) 20:35, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Do not post on my talk page again. Eric Corbett 02:00, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Dear user, you input is required on the question whether adding Israel as 5th belligerent to Syrian Civil War maps is legitimate, due to you previous participation on talk:Syrian Kurdistan#Military map issues. Please discuss it at talk:Syrian Civil War#Adding Israel as belligerent on Syrian Civil War maps. GreyShark ( dibra) 08:39, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
This is a dishonest and non neutral comment and inappropriate canvassing. The discussion is not to ad Israel as 5th belligerent to Syrian Civil War maps, but to show that in a map showing the "Current military situation in Syria" Israel is occupying the Golan heights.-- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 13:47, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
> Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Stefan Molyneux for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room.
I did not do this. Please do not leave weird messages on my talk page, and do not vandalise my edits. Cheers. 94.194.106.107 ( talk) 15:57, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
I see you've warned this IP [9] before. S/he keeps putting up a warning template on my talk page. I've asked them to stay away but it has fallen on deaf ears. Can you semi-protect my talk page or something? Volunteer Marek 20:25, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Resolve by helpful user NeilN -- 71.110.129.100 ( talk) 20:49, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
At this diff. Took me a couple tries to find it. Be more careful since your interrupting mine without a signature looked like I was saying something that I was not. Also, it is WP:Soapbox and starts personal discussions we don't really need to inflame things. You might even remove it. Thanks.
Also, it seems to be it is the transactivists who are calling any feminist (or opinionated woman), radical or not, who seems to disagrees with -- or even misunderstand them -- TERFs. I haven't seen any sources on what most radical feminists think; and perhaps being radical feminist means being "gender critical". Frankly, I think this whole issue is so much in flux that trying to pin down a definitive "truth" is pretty difficult, whether or not you have RS. Tens of thousands of feminists and women who weren't thinking about the issue are now, and in all sorts of ways. It's interesting. Carolmooredc ( Talkie-Talkie) 03:59, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
This [10] was me not CSDarrow. And as a matter of fact there's a big difference between collapsing and archiving. I'm going to leave your revert though - I was probably premature in doing that. But just FYI-- Cailil talk 10:29, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
When you opened the Clarification request, I think you failed to fill in the parameter for the template {{ re}}-- S Philbrick (Talk) 19:32, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
You reverted my revert for the sentence in the Male Privilege page. Could you point me in the direction of the talk page discussion you were referring to?
Thanks,
- A Canadian Toker ( talk) 02:14, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Gender Gap Task Force Issues and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, Robert McClenon ( talk) 16:42, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
So which of the below do you think is preferable in re S. Truett Cathy, a or b, particularly since "anti-gay" is often a shorthand for "opposition to initiatives supported by the LGBT community", including, most recently the issue of same-sex marriage?
a) WinShape has donated, since 2003, over $5 million to organizations or groups described in certain media as "anti-gay", including the Marriage & Family Foundation, Exodus International, and the Family Research Council which strongly oppose same sex marriage and other initiatives supported by the LGBT community.
b) WinShape has donated, since 2003, over $5 million to anti-gay groups including the Marriage & Family Foundation, Exodus International and the Family Research Council which strongly oppose same sex marriage and other initiatives supported by the LGBT community.
Appreciate any insight you can share. Yours, Quis separabit? 22:04, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi EvergreenFir, please do not forget to add User:TheCrimsonSea to the MRMPS notifications ( Talk:Men's rights movement/Article probation#Notifications). Thanks for keeping an eye on the article. It's such a drama fest with new editors coming in every day and citing Wikipedia's article about A Voice for Men as a source. Like, seriously? -- Sonicyouth86 ( talk) 21:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi EvergreenFir. What's wrong with my edits? I'm just trying to remove undue criticism of the SPLC. I haven't added my personal analysis at all. Cute nickname btw. Venusianmyth ( talk) 22:21, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Oh well. Perhaps an RFC/U would work. Frankly I've stayed away from the drama pages because of the endless and feckless controversy lately. I am happier doing my mindless gnomish editing. Thanks. – S. Rich ( talk) 08:12, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting this guy. It's a long term vandal I've been documenting since 2006. He seems to like changing things on Philippine actor pages and he hates Power Rangers for some reason.— Ryūlóng ( 琉竜) 03:19, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
My edits are not vandalism. MOS:TV says only original dates should be included. Its a Canadian series. If we include the us, then we must include every country. We are not WP:INDISCRIMINATE. 66.87.81.15 ( talk) 20:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
I can't tag the main section if the article is locked down, right? Cheers, 142.204.42.24 ( talk) 03:41, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Talk:Bob's Burgers. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan ( TALK) 18:28, 3 July 2014 (UTC) (DRN volunteer)
I don't think so, if you read WP:REDACT, it says:-
"Under some circumstances, you may entirely remove your comments. For example, if you accidentally posted a comment to the wrong page, and no one has replied to it yet, then the simplest solution is to self-revert your comment." That whole comment wasn't a mistake, but it remained there for over 3 years and it was clearly related with the subject. User can only archive if they don't want their comment to be appeared, they cannot remove.
And "Users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages", but not any other page. OccultZone ( Talk • Contributions • Log) 19:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for helping me clean up! That was my first ever attempt at a revdel. Appreciate your patience.
Zad
68
05:08, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
|
Please see the result of the case at WP:AN3#User:Ericablang reported by User:EvergreenFir (Result: Both warned) which concerns editing at Kevin de León. Both you and the other party have been warned. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 16:20, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
don't post your silly templates on my page again. ta Mosfetfaser ( talk) 05:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
I doubt that you noticed, but this editor] has a COI for the articles he's editing. I suspect it is his job to edit those pages. Dougweller ( talk) 08:26, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your good work at the SPLC list. Although I differ with you on the best way to source this stuff, we agree that it needs to be sourced.
Given that WP can be edited by (almost) anyone at any time, there are various problems, I think, with:
Let's put aside trolls, fools, axe-grinders, and so on for now. Suppose somebody hears in September that the newly emerged "Sovereign Citizens of Wingnuttistan" is on SPLC's list. She looks it up on their website, and yes sure enough it's there. So she wants to add it to the WP article. The only "simple" (ha ha) solution I see is for her to take on the job of checking every other item in the sublist as well, to add this new item, and to update the above to:
Trouble is, a great percentage of well-meaning editors (let alone the others) aren't going to do this. They're more likely (A) to fictionally backdate the addition to July, (B) to lazily/myopically assume that everything that was listed in July is still listed in September, etc.
For this reason I think it's better to avoid the attempt at a source for the lot, and instead to repeat the reference. If necessary, again and again and again:
Etc. Ugly, but more bulletproof. -- Hoary ( talk) 01:37, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Incidentally, on a thread a short distance above: "Editing of other editors' user and user talk pages / If a user asks you not to edit their user pages, it is probably sensible to respect their requests (although a user cannot avoid administrator attention or appropriate project notices and communications by merely demanding their talk page is not posted to)" ( here). If another editor is seriously misbehaving, it doesn't have to be you that informs the editor. Instead, bring up the matter at WP:AN/I. If what you write there is convincing, then an administrator will deal with the matter. -- Hoary ( talk) 01:48, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of organizations designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as hate groups, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christ The King Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For the hard work you put in verifying the story List of organizations designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as hate groups . ta Mosfetfaser ( talk) 04:41, 11 July 2014 (UTC) |
Categories regarding religious beliefs or sexual orientation should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief or orientation in question, and the subject's beliefs or sexual orientation are relevant to their public life or notability, according to reliable published sources.
I noticed you violated our policy on biographies of living people by adding Anthony Rapp to a category he does not publicly self-identify as. Please consider reverting your change. JackSchmidt ( talk) 04:59, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Yes, absolutely. Only once the team itself has officially announced it on their website can we update it i.e. an NBA.com source. For example, Paul Pierce just agreed to signed with the Wizards. That is not official as the Wizards themselves have not announced it. When it is listed here, it is official. Only a few people of Wikipedia keep patrol on NBA articles and revert when unofficial signings are added. It be great for more people to help us out. Cheers. DaHuzyBru ( talk) 06:49, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
I was gong for AfD, but now you've added PROD tag so let's watch. OccultZone ( Talk • Contributions • Log) 04:48, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
I bet the article's been linked on some extremist site. Keep an eye on it - it keeps getting hit by new IPs. Personally, I think it should be permanently semiprotected, as a huge amount of the article's edit history is reverting changes to the cited definition. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 20:08, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Futurama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lrrr. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
About this: reversion: Self-presentation is a behavior. I don't really care what it says, so long as we can get rid of the awkward "what one does oneself" circumlocution. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 03:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
FYI [1]-- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:13, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
I blocked the account, and revision deleted the log entries at Laverne Cox per your request, but will be leaving the log history at UAA alone for transparency. Just wanted to give you the followup regarding the revdel request. Monty 845 23:34, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Sir, I have posted my comments and justified the reason as to why the religious identity should be changed. Please, see it on the talk page of the article. Thank you. Iamgame ( talk) 17:11, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Why that edit is unnecessary? 173.206.37.64 ( talk) 22:36, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- ChrisP2K5 ( talk) 04:45, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
European-American Unity and Rights Organization may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 02:47, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Bisexual pride flag may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 05:14, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi User:Evergreen. Substituting short version of Red Cross MH-17 edit by User:Evergreen. Agree with User:Evergreen that short version is sufficient summary for multi-sentence version. This appears to be a length-of-edit issue. The discussion of Wikipedia applied to recent events in covered in the opening sections of the Wikipedia article. It is the Wikipedia administrator Andrew Lih who is referenced as supporting the use of Wikipedia to keep up with recent events within responsible guidelines of verifiability like the aircraft incident. FelixRosch ( talk) 15:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello.
I am "talking" to you in regards of Nash Grier's correct date on his Wikipedia page.
His birthdate is indeed the 28th of December of 1997. He used to state it on his website and he also said he was born in 1997, I THINK, in one of his videos.
We know he his currently 16 and born in 1997. So, I am going to revert the changes you made back to how I had them expect the month and date, just the year because it's not questionable when he was born --we know when he was born.
Thank you,
Your Wikipedian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frenchman101 ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Sir.
I just wanted to delete Nash's brithdate because we should have a definite date not a confusing one. Don't you agree? And please do NOT block me again.....
If I find a reliable source, may I change his birthdate?
Thank you, Frenchman101— Frenchman101 ( talk) 19:56, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Re your message: I have never used Huggle or AWB, so I really don't know how either works or what the requirements are. Huggle being limited without rollback makes some logical sense to me in that it can probably do things faster with rollback than without. I know AWB requires explicit permission since I read the "so-and-so should have their AWB privilege removed" discussions on WP:AN/WP:ANI from time to time. After that, I have no idea...
I arrived on Wikipedia well before all of these automated tools started to appear, so I do everything old school. The only tool I use to popups (and now I can't do without it). I tried Twinkle once, I think, but I abandoned for some reason.
I can grant you rollback privilege if you want (you'd be the first person I ever granted anything to besides myself!). Even if you don't use Huggle or AWB, you still might find it useful. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 02:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted the changes I made to melatonin page regarding a small-scale study for asthmatics. I know it's only a small-scale primary source but is there subsequent research proving that it's safe for asthmatics? Maybe we can find a way to add at least a caution under the adverse effects section, so asthmatics talk to their doctor before attempting to use melatonin (since it's sold OTC). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.4.144.74 ( talk) 08:11, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Alright, fair enough. The data is for 2013. You're right about that. However, while Ukraine may be in 83rd place this year, last year it was in 78th place, hence my decrease edit in the HDI section, since it dropped a few places on the chart. Look at page 17 for the 2013 report, http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2013_en_summary.pdf, and page 17 of the 2014 report, http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr14-summary-en.pdf, and you will see that the Ukrainian HDI did indeed drop. Thank you. TheBoulderite ( talk • contribs) 03:33, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, I don't think that the Wikipedia list of countries by HDI is completely finished yet, so I've just been comparing both reports for the data of each country, seeing if they improved from last year on the list or if they didn't. To keep the data accurate, I would strongly suggest that you do the same. TheBoulderite ( talk • contribs) 03:33, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Radical feminism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
I think that it would be covered under
WP:NEWSBLOG, in that instance. If a news organization publishes an opinion piece in a blog, attribute the statement to the writer (e.g. "Jane Smith wrote...").
So we would just need to attribute the statement if that was so. I'm not sure if this is possible under the current wording.
Tutelary (
talk)
23:46, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Can you please explain why you removed my edits from that article? In particular why did you remove the edits from the "Modern equality movements" section? I cannot see what can be constructed as WP:COATRACK in listing the international conventions regarding equality between women and men. 2A02:2F0A:508F:FFFF:0:0:BC1A:B68A ( talk) 20:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
2A02:2F0A:508F:FFFF:0:0:BC1A:B68A ( talk) 21:28, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
The new reference may say "race" (I looked at the new reference and it says that genos (γένος) means race, stock or kin) but the existing reference does not, so we need to resolve these conflicting references. Can you provide a reference that clearly says the "genics' in eugenics means "race" instead of "birth". Thanks. Editor2020 18:19, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
I understand if you're too busy to improve these maps but... could you please color Florida gold on this map [3], color Florida gold and add a marriage ring for Boulder County on this map [4], add Colorado (lightest red) to this map [5], remove Florida from this map [6], and add Florida to this map [7]? Also, this gif needs updating [8] as well. I'm sorry, I know it is a lot to ask for..! Prcc twenty-seven ( talk) 06:13, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Hey, looks like Twinkle is fixed... or more accurately, the necessary code for Twinkle to work properly on UAA was fixed. -- Drm310 ( talk) 20:35, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Do not post on my talk page again. Eric Corbett 02:00, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Dear user, you input is required on the question whether adding Israel as 5th belligerent to Syrian Civil War maps is legitimate, due to you previous participation on talk:Syrian Kurdistan#Military map issues. Please discuss it at talk:Syrian Civil War#Adding Israel as belligerent on Syrian Civil War maps. GreyShark ( dibra) 08:39, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
This is a dishonest and non neutral comment and inappropriate canvassing. The discussion is not to ad Israel as 5th belligerent to Syrian Civil War maps, but to show that in a map showing the "Current military situation in Syria" Israel is occupying the Golan heights.-- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 13:47, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
> Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Stefan Molyneux for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room.
I did not do this. Please do not leave weird messages on my talk page, and do not vandalise my edits. Cheers. 94.194.106.107 ( talk) 15:57, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
I see you've warned this IP [9] before. S/he keeps putting up a warning template on my talk page. I've asked them to stay away but it has fallen on deaf ears. Can you semi-protect my talk page or something? Volunteer Marek 20:25, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Resolve by helpful user NeilN -- 71.110.129.100 ( talk) 20:49, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
At this diff. Took me a couple tries to find it. Be more careful since your interrupting mine without a signature looked like I was saying something that I was not. Also, it is WP:Soapbox and starts personal discussions we don't really need to inflame things. You might even remove it. Thanks.
Also, it seems to be it is the transactivists who are calling any feminist (or opinionated woman), radical or not, who seems to disagrees with -- or even misunderstand them -- TERFs. I haven't seen any sources on what most radical feminists think; and perhaps being radical feminist means being "gender critical". Frankly, I think this whole issue is so much in flux that trying to pin down a definitive "truth" is pretty difficult, whether or not you have RS. Tens of thousands of feminists and women who weren't thinking about the issue are now, and in all sorts of ways. It's interesting. Carolmooredc ( Talkie-Talkie) 03:59, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
This [10] was me not CSDarrow. And as a matter of fact there's a big difference between collapsing and archiving. I'm going to leave your revert though - I was probably premature in doing that. But just FYI-- Cailil talk 10:29, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
When you opened the Clarification request, I think you failed to fill in the parameter for the template {{ re}}-- S Philbrick (Talk) 19:32, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
You reverted my revert for the sentence in the Male Privilege page. Could you point me in the direction of the talk page discussion you were referring to?
Thanks,
- A Canadian Toker ( talk) 02:14, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Gender Gap Task Force Issues and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, Robert McClenon ( talk) 16:42, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
So which of the below do you think is preferable in re S. Truett Cathy, a or b, particularly since "anti-gay" is often a shorthand for "opposition to initiatives supported by the LGBT community", including, most recently the issue of same-sex marriage?
a) WinShape has donated, since 2003, over $5 million to organizations or groups described in certain media as "anti-gay", including the Marriage & Family Foundation, Exodus International, and the Family Research Council which strongly oppose same sex marriage and other initiatives supported by the LGBT community.
b) WinShape has donated, since 2003, over $5 million to anti-gay groups including the Marriage & Family Foundation, Exodus International and the Family Research Council which strongly oppose same sex marriage and other initiatives supported by the LGBT community.
Appreciate any insight you can share. Yours, Quis separabit? 22:04, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi EvergreenFir, please do not forget to add User:TheCrimsonSea to the MRMPS notifications ( Talk:Men's rights movement/Article probation#Notifications). Thanks for keeping an eye on the article. It's such a drama fest with new editors coming in every day and citing Wikipedia's article about A Voice for Men as a source. Like, seriously? -- Sonicyouth86 ( talk) 21:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi EvergreenFir. What's wrong with my edits? I'm just trying to remove undue criticism of the SPLC. I haven't added my personal analysis at all. Cute nickname btw. Venusianmyth ( talk) 22:21, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Oh well. Perhaps an RFC/U would work. Frankly I've stayed away from the drama pages because of the endless and feckless controversy lately. I am happier doing my mindless gnomish editing. Thanks. – S. Rich ( talk) 08:12, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting this guy. It's a long term vandal I've been documenting since 2006. He seems to like changing things on Philippine actor pages and he hates Power Rangers for some reason.— Ryūlóng ( 琉竜) 03:19, 25 September 2014 (UTC)