This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 |
So exactly why did you restore a large chunk of unsourced "Teen Choice" awards with an edit summary that appears intended to mislead people into believing you had only restored cited "Empire Awards" to the article?— Kww( talk) 02:50, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning America: Imagine the World Without Her, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
TransporterMan (
TALK)
14:07, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Hi, Erik. Thanks for your contributions to that recent discussion and the project. Regarding
the page, would it not be useful to link it in the main project page for better exposure, or at least the talk page bannerspace for the time being? If you ask me, the page should ultimately be a comprehensive reference list of all awards deemed notable on Wikipedia (that of course have their own web site), including the critics awards.
Also, on the reference table, the vertical bar in the title field for the Golden Globe Award reference would create a red "text ignored" value in the citation; it should either be omitted or replaced with a dash. Plus, if editors would be copy/pasting the citations from the page, it'd be best for the accessdate field to be left blank (without today's date). What do you think? --
Lapadite (
talk)
09:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi, would love to get your opinion and peer review for my first wiki article.
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Peer_review/Ain%27t_Them_Bodies_Saints/archive1
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by FilmLover91 ( talk • contribs) 17:44, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
The request can be found here: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case Casprings ( talk) 17:26, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
There is a deletion discussion at Central Ohio Film Critics Association, a topic similar to one in which you participated here. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 18:35, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Central Ohio Film Critics Association, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Safiel ( talk) 20:25, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Please see here David A ( talk) 08:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Trust me, I am generally in favor of simplicity and less clumsy wording, but in my experience with hot button topics like this, wording that is likely to not inflame views, is good a idea in many circumstances. That said, I won't feel the least bit slighted if you remove it. It's just a suggestion. -- Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 22:09, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Erik I am one of the producers of Tiger House - I believe you created the page for that, for which we are very grateful! One of the executive producers asked me to ensure that his name was mentioned, which I did some time ago by adding in all the EPs. I see in your last edit that you had removed this line. I would be really grateful if you would undo that change, or alternatively, add the EPs in the box on the right (my wiwki editing skills are not quite up to it!) I am not going to undo the change as you might simply redo it, which would be pointless! Thanks
Richard — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.110.231.76 ( talk) 13:47, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Erik. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Erik~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
23:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Hey again, I was wondering if I can get your opinion here?
I personally prefer a cast section so I can get a list of who plays who what is the precedence here? Valoem talk contrib 20:02, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
This was facing a review. Trying to salvage it from being demoted. Can you also do anything to improve it? I've overhauled the sourcing and added a lot of new content.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:04, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:A Letter to Momo#Good article push. Thanks. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 20:15, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the thanks. I thought your username was familiar - didn't realise you'd changed it! Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:36, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Could you direct me to where the consensus was made to use that particular poster. Thank you. Also, I just find it strange that a teaser poster would be used instead of the final theatrical one. QuasyBoy (talk) 14:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Category:Deafness, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 01:44, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Erik, I don't think you should be reverting the lede given the ongoing discussion and the concerns of several editors voiced on talk. Please undo your most recent edits and address the issues on talk. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 21:49, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Erik, if you take a look at Punke's book, which the script is based on, you will see that there actually is a character called Andrew Henry and according to IMDb and other sources like e.g. that one specify that Gleeson is playing this role. As we have an article about this person I don't see the problem to link to it. In understand that you are looking for quality sources but honestly this discussion was easily avoidable. Cheers, -- NiTen ( talk) 13:52, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
The same phrasing "generally negative" appears in the lead as well. Perhaps you can apply more of your magic to make this consistent with the changes you made under critical response. I do believe a brief mention of what the aggregators determined should be mentioned in the lead in some capacity, though I could really care less on what the choice of words ends up being. If you have the time, great. If not, I'll take a stab at it later. Thanks! -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 20:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi There. You put the marking there. Just curious, but wouldn't it be better to clean up that part of the article? - Kiraroshi1976 ( talk) 00:35, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Can you expand on where you felt there was informal writing? - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 18:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Hey I deleted the technical on the Martian page because it's something that appears on very few pages and makes the page look non uniform. I understand that there is nothing in the manual of style that states that it shouldn't be there but there's also nothing that says it should either. I think it makes Wikipedia look somewhat sloppy when there are ununiformed pages that seem to do their own thing. I could see maybe talking this over with Wikiproject film and maybe discussing the inclusion of an infobox for the info for the future, but right now it sticks out like a sore thumb. I just wanted to state my opinion the matter. -- Deathawk ( talk) 05:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
We discussed the possibilities of making Wikifilm production guidelines before, but I'm trying to come up with brainstorms for what that should look like. Thought you might like to join the discussion over here-- Deathawk ( talk) 04:44, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Erik - this dab page might be of interest to you:
- Classicfilms ( talk) 19:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Erik - back to the dab question - I like the hatnotes that you placed on all of the pages. I'm now wondering if we should actually change the titles of these two articles: Jobs (film) ->Jobs (2013 film) and Steve Jobs (film) -> Steve Jobs (2015 film). I know these discussions tend to generate a lot of debate which is why I wanted to start on your talk page - do you think it is worth raising? - Classicfilms ( talk) 02:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Classicfilms ( talk) 15:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
and
I am guessing it would replace the hatnotes? Or perhaps the hatnotes could be rewritten to contextualize it? I do think it is worth the effort, it is just a matter of figuring out how all the pieces fit together. Thanks Erik! You have throughout the years always been helpful. - Classicfilms ( talk) 16:04, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=List_of_artistic_depictions_of_Steve_Jobs
I tried to follow a link in an old discussion from your old sig and got this. Is there any reason it shouldn't be a redirect to User talk:Erik II? Thanks, it was bothering me. Viriditas ( talk) 10:47, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Note to self, linking to diff for following up. Erik II ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 18:54, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Viriditas, much appreciated for the push to look into restoring my original handle! Very glad to be back. Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 03:37, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
i did not remove content from gravity film — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.242.92.145 ( talk) 12:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I just signed on as a GA reviewer for Birdman (film), not being aware of the problematic history of this article. I was wondering if you could keep an eye on things (or take a quick look at the current version). No hurry on this. Thanks. Viriditas ( talk) 01:11, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm trying to clean up the references at Draft:Black Panther (film). I believe you were the original author of some of the older content. There is one reference titled "A comics milestone from the action-filled universe of superheroes come new characters, and a new diversity", attributed to Leonard Pitts Jr. and dated March 27, 1994 but there is no source. Do you remember where you found this article?-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 14:53, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hey Erik. Just want to echo Triiiple's thanks for helping with the info originally. Also, since Triiiple started some reworking of the refs, is there any chance (with your database access), we can get any online versions of the early development content? I know there is nothing wrong with offline sources, but was wondering if we could supplement what we have, with online versions. Thanks. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 21:41, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hey, i would really like to thank you for your support of my article. Blisspop ( talk) 15:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
ok I'll add that. Blisspop ( talk) 04:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
For your work on Daniel Torrance which single-handedly saved it from deletion or being merged. Kudos to you! Mww113 (talk) 21:54, 8 October 2015 (UTC) |
It was deleted and per our discussion and the consensus for userfication, I userfied it to you with history at User:Erik/workspace/Resources Development Administration. Do what is necessary and good luck, Schmidt, Michael Q. 06:56, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Dear mister Erik
Please do not undo my changes on that page which boycots the objective essence of Wikipedia, by bringing in Social Justice Warriors on this site, meant for objective information, and not to spread paranoid racist and blaguant lies from Tumblr.
Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Borgoem ( talk • contribs) 11:55, October 10, 2015
Yes, I put a lot of time and research into that. I hope eventually to get it to FA and I appreciate Cirt's review very much and will be making changes this coming week. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:47, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Erik, I would appreciate any feedback for shaping the article. I have been trying to get it as close as possible to the film articles but I have had some challenges, mostly in figuring out the coding and having the time to do the updates. - Kris — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfhound98 ( talk • contribs) 17:15, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, any chance you could give this a review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Marilyn Monroe/archive1? A core article if ever there was one which really needs a good review.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:15, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Lucas is credited with "based on: characters created by" for Force Awakens. They never put that on poster billing, but it is one of those things that is just a given (like Jurassic World or Indiana Jones 4). TropicAces ( talk) 03:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind words about my Quality improvement efforts to Wikipedia, in your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise.
A couple updates:
1. The discussion closed as Keep.
2. The Wikipedia article The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise is now rated Good Article quality.
Thanks again ever so much for acknowledging my efforts to improve the Quality of articles on Wikipedia in this manner.
—
Cirt (
talk)
03:19, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Erik, I left the following note on a DAB admin page and mentioned you - I tried to use wikimarkup to alert you, but for some reason it didn't work. What is the short cut for alerting another editor? Here is the URL for the moment: /info/en/?search=User_talk:BD2412#Steve_Jobs_DAB_question Thanks - Classicfilms ( talk) 17:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
{{ul|Erik}}
. Will check in to see what the editor says unless I am pinged.
Erik (
talk |
contrib) (
ping me)
17:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
You reverted my comments about San Andreas! So if you didn't think they were appropriate for the section then why not make a new section? Because the film is scientifically inaccurate and in mine and many other scientists opinion a waste of resources. So go ahead and make a new section called "Scientific Accuracy." That way I would have more respect for film critics who praise crap films and rip good ones to shreds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Geologist ( talk • contribs) 08:41, October 28, 2015
Mentioned you at Talk:Fifty Shades of Grey/GA1.
Could use your expertise there on the Rotten Tomatoes consensus, and its use (or apparent lack thereof, so far, in the article) as a wider metric.
Thank you,
— Cirt ( talk) 03:04, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Erik,
At Talk:The Truth According to Wikipedia - a user has shown up to question whether this documentary should be called a "film", injecting their own personal opinions and POV about its broadcast and violating No Original Research instead of relying upon sources to support their arguments -- doubting the fair use rationale of a quite detailed image rationale for what is basically a promotional film poster, and more.
Really could use your input and advice and comment on this one, Erik.
For articles I write and improve on Wikipedia, I try very hard to make sure that every single fact and indeed every single sentence is backed up to reliable sources and cited with in-line citations.
I'm not as comfortable debating with someone on the talk page who refuses to back up their POV with cited sources, simply insisting, "this is how it should be, because I know it to be true", kind of attitude, you know what I mean?
Your film expertise and insight here would be most helpful.
Thank you Erik,
— Cirt ( talk) 18:41, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
I noticed you're the one who archived The Martian's talk page. However, if I'm not mistaken that was a manual edit.
Could you set up the bot to do this automatically? Thanks, CapnZapp ( talk) 20:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Erik! It's been a while, I know. I have an offer which maybe you or someone else at WP Film could take up. I just recently moved house, and have been going through my magazines. I was planning on throwing a bunch out, but I figured that some of them might have some good research value to the WikiProject, especially for editors interested in expanding the Production sections of more recent films. In short, I have several years worth of physical copies of the ICG Magazine (International Cinematographers Guild). While I'm aware that some of the articles are online, IIRC most of them are not. Would you or anyone else in the project have any interest in taking these off my hands? They could either be picked up (I live in Southern California) or mailed (if the person receiving is willing to cover minimal shipping costs). Thoughts? Feel free to circulate this offer openly amongst the project, but I wanted to give you the first crack at it, considering the excellent job you have done over the years. Hope you are well! Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 23:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Happy Diwali!!! | ||
Sky full of fireworks, Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous
Diwali.
|
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Don't worry, I won't act the same way I did in early 2012, this time I'm back to help the website out.
I do remember that we used to be good friends back in 2007/2008. I hope we still can be good friends now. So yeah. BlazeTheMovieFan ( talk) 23:14, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Batman & Robin (film)#critical reaction. Thanks. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 03:50, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
I want your honest thoughts. And if I do something wrong you should point it out.
I sure hope I have become a better editor than I was in 2007. Blaze The Movie Fan ( talk) 19:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Erik-- I'm new to Wiki and was hoping to get your help making a few changes to the Viacom page. In the spirit of transparency, I do work for Viacom but noticed a few inaccurate facts on our page I'd like to correct ,starting with how the company was founded. Could I send you a few of my proposed changes for your review? Thanks VIATJ ( talk) 17:49, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to the MOS/Film discussion here, regarding about release dates in year in film articles. BattleshipMan ( talk) 21:48, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga#RfC:_Anime_films_and_production_companies. Thanks. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 01:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 04:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Eric
I have no idea how this talk page works
Mulholland Drive was completely decoded Jan 2015
http://plisskensmovies.blogspot.co.nz/2015_01_01_archive.html
regards
Plissken
plisskenboon@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.155.68.19 ( talk) 21:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
MarnetteD|
Talk is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Christmas,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec15b}} to your friends' talk pages.
Wikiclaus greetings | ||
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2016! | |
Hello Erik, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2016. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2016! | |
Hello Erik, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2016. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
This is a neutral notice for you to join an RfC at Star Wars: The Force Awakens given your work at the Film project. The RfC is regarding if a title including "Episode VII" should be considered an alternate title to the film. The RfC can be found here. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 18:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
I just noticed that you created the stub for I Origins. 'Tis is nice film with an interesting theme (spirituality/athiesm and all that) and ranks amongst my favorites. Many many thanks for that. Dschslava ( talk) 23:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Erik,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Dschslava (
talk)
23:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Dschslava ( talk) 23:53, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Erik,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
North America
1000
01:06, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Happy New Year. Can you offer your opinion in this discussion on the film's talk page? Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 01:08, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the reply. I had that question in mind, I am currently expanding Theeb film... Would you be interested in assisting in expanding it and/or check for any errors I made? Thanks. Makeandtoss ( talk) 22:13, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
pls see Wikipedia talk:Categories, lists, and navigation templates#Banning articles from navigational aids -- Moxy ( talk) 21:12, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
It is a science-fiction fantasy film http://www.metronews.ca/views/in-focus-richard-crouse/2015/10/01/space-fantasy-film-gets-realistic-with-the-martian.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:e68:542d:e235:54e0:9c8f:2840:35e2 ( talk • contribs) 14:28, January 25, 2016
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BD_(%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BC) http://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/841700/ http://kinoprofi.net/5571-marsian-2015.html It's a fantasy film, dude, without any doubt. Just watch it carefully and analyze the events. You can translate Russian into English by google translator. By the way, if you try to reset my p. again, i will show you mine. So, be cool and it's time to sleep to little kids. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uzmaster1 ( talk • contribs) 14:46, January 25, 2016
I changed the redirect per WP:SMALLDETAILS. The town has hyphens; the film doesn't.— Film Fan 15:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
The film is in post production, so it has been shot but hasn't aired.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5320014/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Traciediamond ( talk • contribs) 13:51, January 28, 2016
Hello, Erik. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " List of films featuring fictional films".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Fuddle ( talk) 23:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
I've been trying to clean up the edits by 66.203.20.175 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS), an IP account that just yesterday came off a 6 month block for vandalism. I admit my edits have been a bit hasty in the past day or two, as I'm really overworked in trying to deal with all this disruption going through my watchlist. I posted a little about it on WT:FILM. Anyway, I thought I identified the countries in Walking with Dinosaurs (film) correctly – did I mess up? The BFI website seems to be experiencing trouble, so I used an archived copy of the page.
p.s. Ever thought about running for admin? It'd be nice to have someone else beside Cyphoidbomb that I could hassle when dealing with this stuff. I can't imagine anyone would oppose you. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 15:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects the capitalization of People Like Us, a question in which you previously participated. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — LlywelynII 12:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 |
So exactly why did you restore a large chunk of unsourced "Teen Choice" awards with an edit summary that appears intended to mislead people into believing you had only restored cited "Empire Awards" to the article?— Kww( talk) 02:50, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning America: Imagine the World Without Her, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
TransporterMan (
TALK)
14:07, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Hi, Erik. Thanks for your contributions to that recent discussion and the project. Regarding
the page, would it not be useful to link it in the main project page for better exposure, or at least the talk page bannerspace for the time being? If you ask me, the page should ultimately be a comprehensive reference list of all awards deemed notable on Wikipedia (that of course have their own web site), including the critics awards.
Also, on the reference table, the vertical bar in the title field for the Golden Globe Award reference would create a red "text ignored" value in the citation; it should either be omitted or replaced with a dash. Plus, if editors would be copy/pasting the citations from the page, it'd be best for the accessdate field to be left blank (without today's date). What do you think? --
Lapadite (
talk)
09:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi, would love to get your opinion and peer review for my first wiki article.
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Peer_review/Ain%27t_Them_Bodies_Saints/archive1
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by FilmLover91 ( talk • contribs) 17:44, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
The request can be found here: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case Casprings ( talk) 17:26, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
There is a deletion discussion at Central Ohio Film Critics Association, a topic similar to one in which you participated here. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 18:35, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Central Ohio Film Critics Association, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Safiel ( talk) 20:25, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Please see here David A ( talk) 08:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Trust me, I am generally in favor of simplicity and less clumsy wording, but in my experience with hot button topics like this, wording that is likely to not inflame views, is good a idea in many circumstances. That said, I won't feel the least bit slighted if you remove it. It's just a suggestion. -- Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 22:09, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Erik I am one of the producers of Tiger House - I believe you created the page for that, for which we are very grateful! One of the executive producers asked me to ensure that his name was mentioned, which I did some time ago by adding in all the EPs. I see in your last edit that you had removed this line. I would be really grateful if you would undo that change, or alternatively, add the EPs in the box on the right (my wiwki editing skills are not quite up to it!) I am not going to undo the change as you might simply redo it, which would be pointless! Thanks
Richard — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.110.231.76 ( talk) 13:47, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Erik. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Erik~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
23:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Hey again, I was wondering if I can get your opinion here?
I personally prefer a cast section so I can get a list of who plays who what is the precedence here? Valoem talk contrib 20:02, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
This was facing a review. Trying to salvage it from being demoted. Can you also do anything to improve it? I've overhauled the sourcing and added a lot of new content.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:04, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:A Letter to Momo#Good article push. Thanks. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 20:15, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the thanks. I thought your username was familiar - didn't realise you'd changed it! Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:36, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Could you direct me to where the consensus was made to use that particular poster. Thank you. Also, I just find it strange that a teaser poster would be used instead of the final theatrical one. QuasyBoy (talk) 14:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Category:Deafness, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 01:44, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Erik, I don't think you should be reverting the lede given the ongoing discussion and the concerns of several editors voiced on talk. Please undo your most recent edits and address the issues on talk. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 21:49, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Erik, if you take a look at Punke's book, which the script is based on, you will see that there actually is a character called Andrew Henry and according to IMDb and other sources like e.g. that one specify that Gleeson is playing this role. As we have an article about this person I don't see the problem to link to it. In understand that you are looking for quality sources but honestly this discussion was easily avoidable. Cheers, -- NiTen ( talk) 13:52, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
The same phrasing "generally negative" appears in the lead as well. Perhaps you can apply more of your magic to make this consistent with the changes you made under critical response. I do believe a brief mention of what the aggregators determined should be mentioned in the lead in some capacity, though I could really care less on what the choice of words ends up being. If you have the time, great. If not, I'll take a stab at it later. Thanks! -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 20:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi There. You put the marking there. Just curious, but wouldn't it be better to clean up that part of the article? - Kiraroshi1976 ( talk) 00:35, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Can you expand on where you felt there was informal writing? - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 18:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Hey I deleted the technical on the Martian page because it's something that appears on very few pages and makes the page look non uniform. I understand that there is nothing in the manual of style that states that it shouldn't be there but there's also nothing that says it should either. I think it makes Wikipedia look somewhat sloppy when there are ununiformed pages that seem to do their own thing. I could see maybe talking this over with Wikiproject film and maybe discussing the inclusion of an infobox for the info for the future, but right now it sticks out like a sore thumb. I just wanted to state my opinion the matter. -- Deathawk ( talk) 05:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
We discussed the possibilities of making Wikifilm production guidelines before, but I'm trying to come up with brainstorms for what that should look like. Thought you might like to join the discussion over here-- Deathawk ( talk) 04:44, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Erik - this dab page might be of interest to you:
- Classicfilms ( talk) 19:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Erik - back to the dab question - I like the hatnotes that you placed on all of the pages. I'm now wondering if we should actually change the titles of these two articles: Jobs (film) ->Jobs (2013 film) and Steve Jobs (film) -> Steve Jobs (2015 film). I know these discussions tend to generate a lot of debate which is why I wanted to start on your talk page - do you think it is worth raising? - Classicfilms ( talk) 02:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Classicfilms ( talk) 15:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
and
I am guessing it would replace the hatnotes? Or perhaps the hatnotes could be rewritten to contextualize it? I do think it is worth the effort, it is just a matter of figuring out how all the pieces fit together. Thanks Erik! You have throughout the years always been helpful. - Classicfilms ( talk) 16:04, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=List_of_artistic_depictions_of_Steve_Jobs
I tried to follow a link in an old discussion from your old sig and got this. Is there any reason it shouldn't be a redirect to User talk:Erik II? Thanks, it was bothering me. Viriditas ( talk) 10:47, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Note to self, linking to diff for following up. Erik II ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 18:54, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Viriditas, much appreciated for the push to look into restoring my original handle! Very glad to be back. Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 03:37, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
i did not remove content from gravity film — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.242.92.145 ( talk) 12:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I just signed on as a GA reviewer for Birdman (film), not being aware of the problematic history of this article. I was wondering if you could keep an eye on things (or take a quick look at the current version). No hurry on this. Thanks. Viriditas ( talk) 01:11, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm trying to clean up the references at Draft:Black Panther (film). I believe you were the original author of some of the older content. There is one reference titled "A comics milestone from the action-filled universe of superheroes come new characters, and a new diversity", attributed to Leonard Pitts Jr. and dated March 27, 1994 but there is no source. Do you remember where you found this article?-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 14:53, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hey Erik. Just want to echo Triiiple's thanks for helping with the info originally. Also, since Triiiple started some reworking of the refs, is there any chance (with your database access), we can get any online versions of the early development content? I know there is nothing wrong with offline sources, but was wondering if we could supplement what we have, with online versions. Thanks. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 21:41, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hey, i would really like to thank you for your support of my article. Blisspop ( talk) 15:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
ok I'll add that. Blisspop ( talk) 04:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
For your work on Daniel Torrance which single-handedly saved it from deletion or being merged. Kudos to you! Mww113 (talk) 21:54, 8 October 2015 (UTC) |
It was deleted and per our discussion and the consensus for userfication, I userfied it to you with history at User:Erik/workspace/Resources Development Administration. Do what is necessary and good luck, Schmidt, Michael Q. 06:56, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Dear mister Erik
Please do not undo my changes on that page which boycots the objective essence of Wikipedia, by bringing in Social Justice Warriors on this site, meant for objective information, and not to spread paranoid racist and blaguant lies from Tumblr.
Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Borgoem ( talk • contribs) 11:55, October 10, 2015
Yes, I put a lot of time and research into that. I hope eventually to get it to FA and I appreciate Cirt's review very much and will be making changes this coming week. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:47, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Erik, I would appreciate any feedback for shaping the article. I have been trying to get it as close as possible to the film articles but I have had some challenges, mostly in figuring out the coding and having the time to do the updates. - Kris — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfhound98 ( talk • contribs) 17:15, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, any chance you could give this a review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Marilyn Monroe/archive1? A core article if ever there was one which really needs a good review.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:15, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Lucas is credited with "based on: characters created by" for Force Awakens. They never put that on poster billing, but it is one of those things that is just a given (like Jurassic World or Indiana Jones 4). TropicAces ( talk) 03:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind words about my Quality improvement efforts to Wikipedia, in your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise.
A couple updates:
1. The discussion closed as Keep.
2. The Wikipedia article The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise is now rated Good Article quality.
Thanks again ever so much for acknowledging my efforts to improve the Quality of articles on Wikipedia in this manner.
—
Cirt (
talk)
03:19, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Erik, I left the following note on a DAB admin page and mentioned you - I tried to use wikimarkup to alert you, but for some reason it didn't work. What is the short cut for alerting another editor? Here is the URL for the moment: /info/en/?search=User_talk:BD2412#Steve_Jobs_DAB_question Thanks - Classicfilms ( talk) 17:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
{{ul|Erik}}
. Will check in to see what the editor says unless I am pinged.
Erik (
talk |
contrib) (
ping me)
17:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
You reverted my comments about San Andreas! So if you didn't think they were appropriate for the section then why not make a new section? Because the film is scientifically inaccurate and in mine and many other scientists opinion a waste of resources. So go ahead and make a new section called "Scientific Accuracy." That way I would have more respect for film critics who praise crap films and rip good ones to shreds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Geologist ( talk • contribs) 08:41, October 28, 2015
Mentioned you at Talk:Fifty Shades of Grey/GA1.
Could use your expertise there on the Rotten Tomatoes consensus, and its use (or apparent lack thereof, so far, in the article) as a wider metric.
Thank you,
— Cirt ( talk) 03:04, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Erik,
At Talk:The Truth According to Wikipedia - a user has shown up to question whether this documentary should be called a "film", injecting their own personal opinions and POV about its broadcast and violating No Original Research instead of relying upon sources to support their arguments -- doubting the fair use rationale of a quite detailed image rationale for what is basically a promotional film poster, and more.
Really could use your input and advice and comment on this one, Erik.
For articles I write and improve on Wikipedia, I try very hard to make sure that every single fact and indeed every single sentence is backed up to reliable sources and cited with in-line citations.
I'm not as comfortable debating with someone on the talk page who refuses to back up their POV with cited sources, simply insisting, "this is how it should be, because I know it to be true", kind of attitude, you know what I mean?
Your film expertise and insight here would be most helpful.
Thank you Erik,
— Cirt ( talk) 18:41, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
I noticed you're the one who archived The Martian's talk page. However, if I'm not mistaken that was a manual edit.
Could you set up the bot to do this automatically? Thanks, CapnZapp ( talk) 20:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Erik! It's been a while, I know. I have an offer which maybe you or someone else at WP Film could take up. I just recently moved house, and have been going through my magazines. I was planning on throwing a bunch out, but I figured that some of them might have some good research value to the WikiProject, especially for editors interested in expanding the Production sections of more recent films. In short, I have several years worth of physical copies of the ICG Magazine (International Cinematographers Guild). While I'm aware that some of the articles are online, IIRC most of them are not. Would you or anyone else in the project have any interest in taking these off my hands? They could either be picked up (I live in Southern California) or mailed (if the person receiving is willing to cover minimal shipping costs). Thoughts? Feel free to circulate this offer openly amongst the project, but I wanted to give you the first crack at it, considering the excellent job you have done over the years. Hope you are well! Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 23:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Happy Diwali!!! | ||
Sky full of fireworks, Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous
Diwali.
|
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Don't worry, I won't act the same way I did in early 2012, this time I'm back to help the website out.
I do remember that we used to be good friends back in 2007/2008. I hope we still can be good friends now. So yeah. BlazeTheMovieFan ( talk) 23:14, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Batman & Robin (film)#critical reaction. Thanks. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 03:50, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
I want your honest thoughts. And if I do something wrong you should point it out.
I sure hope I have become a better editor than I was in 2007. Blaze The Movie Fan ( talk) 19:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Erik-- I'm new to Wiki and was hoping to get your help making a few changes to the Viacom page. In the spirit of transparency, I do work for Viacom but noticed a few inaccurate facts on our page I'd like to correct ,starting with how the company was founded. Could I send you a few of my proposed changes for your review? Thanks VIATJ ( talk) 17:49, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to the MOS/Film discussion here, regarding about release dates in year in film articles. BattleshipMan ( talk) 21:48, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga#RfC:_Anime_films_and_production_companies. Thanks. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 01:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 04:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Eric
I have no idea how this talk page works
Mulholland Drive was completely decoded Jan 2015
http://plisskensmovies.blogspot.co.nz/2015_01_01_archive.html
regards
Plissken
plisskenboon@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.155.68.19 ( talk) 21:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
MarnetteD|
Talk is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Christmas,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec15b}} to your friends' talk pages.
Wikiclaus greetings | ||
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2016! | |
Hello Erik, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2016. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2016! | |
Hello Erik, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2016. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
This is a neutral notice for you to join an RfC at Star Wars: The Force Awakens given your work at the Film project. The RfC is regarding if a title including "Episode VII" should be considered an alternate title to the film. The RfC can be found here. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 18:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
I just noticed that you created the stub for I Origins. 'Tis is nice film with an interesting theme (spirituality/athiesm and all that) and ranks amongst my favorites. Many many thanks for that. Dschslava ( talk) 23:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Erik,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Dschslava (
talk)
23:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Dschslava ( talk) 23:53, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Erik,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
North America
1000
01:06, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Happy New Year. Can you offer your opinion in this discussion on the film's talk page? Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 01:08, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the reply. I had that question in mind, I am currently expanding Theeb film... Would you be interested in assisting in expanding it and/or check for any errors I made? Thanks. Makeandtoss ( talk) 22:13, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
pls see Wikipedia talk:Categories, lists, and navigation templates#Banning articles from navigational aids -- Moxy ( talk) 21:12, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
It is a science-fiction fantasy film http://www.metronews.ca/views/in-focus-richard-crouse/2015/10/01/space-fantasy-film-gets-realistic-with-the-martian.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:e68:542d:e235:54e0:9c8f:2840:35e2 ( talk • contribs) 14:28, January 25, 2016
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BD_(%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BC) http://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/841700/ http://kinoprofi.net/5571-marsian-2015.html It's a fantasy film, dude, without any doubt. Just watch it carefully and analyze the events. You can translate Russian into English by google translator. By the way, if you try to reset my p. again, i will show you mine. So, be cool and it's time to sleep to little kids. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uzmaster1 ( talk • contribs) 14:46, January 25, 2016
I changed the redirect per WP:SMALLDETAILS. The town has hyphens; the film doesn't.— Film Fan 15:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
The film is in post production, so it has been shot but hasn't aired.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5320014/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Traciediamond ( talk • contribs) 13:51, January 28, 2016
Hello, Erik. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " List of films featuring fictional films".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Fuddle ( talk) 23:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
I've been trying to clean up the edits by 66.203.20.175 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS), an IP account that just yesterday came off a 6 month block for vandalism. I admit my edits have been a bit hasty in the past day or two, as I'm really overworked in trying to deal with all this disruption going through my watchlist. I posted a little about it on WT:FILM. Anyway, I thought I identified the countries in Walking with Dinosaurs (film) correctly – did I mess up? The BFI website seems to be experiencing trouble, so I used an archived copy of the page.
p.s. Ever thought about running for admin? It'd be nice to have someone else beside Cyphoidbomb that I could hassle when dealing with this stuff. I can't imagine anyone would oppose you. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 15:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects the capitalization of People Like Us, a question in which you previously participated. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — LlywelynII 12:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)