Thanks for uploading File:Hulk (comics character).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NeoBatfreak ( talk) 22:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Can you offer your opinion on which of two photos is preferable in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 15:28, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
I replied. David A ( talk) 16:13, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
I'd like to give you an opportunity to remove this: [1]. I think you know it is inappropriate. Guy ( help!) 08:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
It might be best for you to edit in less contentious areas (and to stop discussing them) if it is causing you stress. Slatersteven ( talk) 09:51, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi David A, no worries: I'm just notifying as many participants as possible to make sure everyone is formally " aware" of these:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in edits about, and articles related to, COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
That said, while I'm here: If you're referring to specific arguments in Special:Diff/1034591985, you may like to expand your comment to directly refer to these arguments. This is because deletion discussions are not simply majority votes and strong arguments increase the effect of your message on the end result. Thank you very much in advance! ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I know you haven't been active for the past couple of months, but my attempts to get others to help regarding an editor blanking content from the Nathan Edmondson article, and refusing to discuss the matter, have only been slightly successful. I've contacted three other admins, and put messages on the WikiComics Project talk page, and only two other editors have so far responded. Since you've participated in such matters in regarding problematic editors before, can you offer your views in the discussions? My analysis of the blanking, which I did at the request of another editor who alerted me to the problem, is here. The subsequent RfC began here. Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 18:14, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for remvoving it, I was about to tell you it was not the right venue to fight that fight. Slatersteven ( talk) 17:18, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
We're very sorry for editing those abilities like that. We thought we put in the right powers this time, but it turns out that we were really wrong. Please forgive us and we'll never ever do it again in the future. 2600:1700:B030:EC0:49A3:C7B8:C051:B884 ( talk) 23:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Interesting. Might be worth mentioning in the article. Reminds me of a similar criticism of Legend of Galactic Heroes (although I diagree with that). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:56, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Speaking as someone who almost exclusively edits political and civics-related articles, I know how tough it can be to separate your own personal beliefs from the topics you're editing. As seen on the campaign talk page, it looks like you might be struggling with that delicate balance as well. When I run into these situations myself, I find it helpful to:
Anyway, just thought I'd offer a few tips that you might find helpful.
All the best! Woko Sapien ( talk) 21:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Using comic books to overrule secondary sources. Thank you. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 22:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 21:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States support for Israel in the Israel–Hamas war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gallup. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Please see this diff. Seems like stalking by the same editor to remove this image. -- Timeshifter ( talk) 21:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
It's worthy of investigation, but I'm not sure there is enough evidence to justify a checkuser and I'm unconvinced they are the same person. It may be tag teaming and it seems not much can be done about that. Sean.hoyland ( talk) 09:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Hulk (comics character).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NeoBatfreak ( talk) 22:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Can you offer your opinion on which of two photos is preferable in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 15:28, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
I replied. David A ( talk) 16:13, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
I'd like to give you an opportunity to remove this: [1]. I think you know it is inappropriate. Guy ( help!) 08:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
It might be best for you to edit in less contentious areas (and to stop discussing them) if it is causing you stress. Slatersteven ( talk) 09:51, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi David A, no worries: I'm just notifying as many participants as possible to make sure everyone is formally " aware" of these:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in edits about, and articles related to, COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
That said, while I'm here: If you're referring to specific arguments in Special:Diff/1034591985, you may like to expand your comment to directly refer to these arguments. This is because deletion discussions are not simply majority votes and strong arguments increase the effect of your message on the end result. Thank you very much in advance! ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I know you haven't been active for the past couple of months, but my attempts to get others to help regarding an editor blanking content from the Nathan Edmondson article, and refusing to discuss the matter, have only been slightly successful. I've contacted three other admins, and put messages on the WikiComics Project talk page, and only two other editors have so far responded. Since you've participated in such matters in regarding problematic editors before, can you offer your views in the discussions? My analysis of the blanking, which I did at the request of another editor who alerted me to the problem, is here. The subsequent RfC began here. Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 18:14, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for remvoving it, I was about to tell you it was not the right venue to fight that fight. Slatersteven ( talk) 17:18, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
We're very sorry for editing those abilities like that. We thought we put in the right powers this time, but it turns out that we were really wrong. Please forgive us and we'll never ever do it again in the future. 2600:1700:B030:EC0:49A3:C7B8:C051:B884 ( talk) 23:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Interesting. Might be worth mentioning in the article. Reminds me of a similar criticism of Legend of Galactic Heroes (although I diagree with that). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:56, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Speaking as someone who almost exclusively edits political and civics-related articles, I know how tough it can be to separate your own personal beliefs from the topics you're editing. As seen on the campaign talk page, it looks like you might be struggling with that delicate balance as well. When I run into these situations myself, I find it helpful to:
Anyway, just thought I'd offer a few tips that you might find helpful.
All the best! Woko Sapien ( talk) 21:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Using comic books to overrule secondary sources. Thank you. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 22:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 21:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States support for Israel in the Israel–Hamas war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gallup. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Please see this diff. Seems like stalking by the same editor to remove this image. -- Timeshifter ( talk) 21:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
It's worthy of investigation, but I'm not sure there is enough evidence to justify a checkuser and I'm unconvinced they are the same person. It may be tag teaming and it seems not much can be done about that. Sean.hoyland ( talk) 09:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)