A tag has been placed on MikeOS, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Pcap
ping
08:10, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove
speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with
Chip carrier drawings. Please use the {{
hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's
talk page. Thank you.
Fabrictramp |
talk to me
18:36, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi I'm grabbing your stub IEEE 802.3az page. IMO, it shouldn't have been PRODed, though I am going to move it to Energy Efficient Ethernet and begin expanding it. Thanks for starting it. -- KelleyCook ( talk) 16:36, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed,
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is on
article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at
Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a
templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. --
TS
20:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
I used to work for Universal Instruments Corporation who is the global leader in the IMT and SMT industry and that is what they refer to as through-hole. In the 16+ years of working in the industry they have always referred to through hole as IMT. Paly 1 (talk) 02:00, 7 April 2010 (UTC) http://www4.uic.com/wcms/wcms2.nsf/9d77f80a90bd656c8525692700744d90/afcd533e93b6d0f1852575e500691418?OpenDocument 3rd Paragraph —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paly 1 ( talk • contribs) 02:15, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
http://news.thomasnet.com/companystory/491560 6th Paragraph http://news.thomasnet.com/companystory/491067 3rd Paragraph —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paly 1 ( talk • contribs) 02:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC) http://www4.uic.com/wcms/WCMS2.nsf/index/News_Events_384.html last paragraph —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paly 1 ( talk • contribs) 02:27, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Through hole: A hole connecting the two surfaces of a printed circuit structure.
Through hole technology: also referred to as "insertion mount," where electronic components are inserted into holes in the PCB.
Tie bars: Polyimide strips, or bars, connecting an inner ring at its corners to the remainder of the TAB tape site. Also referred to as suspenders. From UIC's internal site via customer portal on their glossary of terms page.
IM Host Interface An optional feature on the IM (Insertion Mount) Machine supports the GEMstandard implementation of SECS II. This is an industry standard communications protocol which allows any host computer system that uses the same industry standard protocol to communicate with the IM Machine. From another document on their website.
Insertion Mount (IM) Safety Rules The following rules are specific to IM equipment (also known as Through Hole) : • Whenever powering the IM machine down for maintenance, follow the next two procedures: • On the AC power panel, push the breakers to the OFF position. Also, at the AC power panel, turn the key to the OFF position and remove. • Attach a warning notice to the AC power panel showing the machine is not operational and only the maintenance technician is authorized to restore power. From another document on their website —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paly 1 ( talk • contribs) 02:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC) Paly 1 ( talk) 02:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Hmm, universities that teach about electronic assembly. Nope, there are no such universities. Can't imagine why a university would teach anything about electronic assembly. I have a BSEET degree and they did not teach me anything about electronic assembly. I was hired in by a electronic assembly manufacturer and that is what they call it. Paly 1 ( talk) 14:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Just asking, why are these edits necessary? Using HTML instead of typing a bracket is anything but tidy. SpinningSpark 18:37, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
The article Xilinx ISE has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Blanchardb -
Me•
MyEars•
MyMouth- timed
03:04, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove
speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{
hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you.
69.181.249.92 (
talk)
09:48, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Xilinx ISE, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xilinx ISE. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 13:24, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Please see further discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Xilinx_ISE. Electron9 ( talk) 00:51, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you asked recently at the Village pump what is the total size of images used on the English Wikipedia. According to my counting, 2,197,487 different images are used, totaling 1,197 GB. There was about 188,000 image links I couldn't find any image for, but some of those are image redirects, so the actual total size is probably slightly larger. Svick ( talk) 06:07, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
The article Fiber focus infrared soldering has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Wizard191 (
talk)
22:13, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
So why not add a couple of columns to the big table in Computer display standard instead of starting a content fork article?-- Wtshymanski ( talk) 22:16, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
Hi, now that BPP redirects to a disambig, please don't forget to WP:FIXDABLINKS. This tool makes the job a lot easier. Thanks, -- JaGa talk 05:40, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Display examples is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Display examples until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Whpq ( talk) 17:23, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
The article .cbp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Whpq (
talk)
14:12, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article .cbp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.cbp until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Whpq ( talk) 16:39, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Electron9 !!
Thanks for the interest in the article. The image you've inserted is the same as the one above it ! you were too busy to notice ! anyhow, I'll leave it to you to work out which one you think is better. Please don't forget to put in an alt description for the blind. Thanks. I'm also a fan of the NE555 timer IC, lolz, small world ! Penyulap talk 21:58, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
I started a discussion about the redirect European Installation Bus which redirects to KNX (standard). I just want to inform you because you are quite active at the target article. Merl issimo 17:31, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add machine translations of foreign language articles to Wikipedia. Due to their poor quality, they are generally not useful and can be very difficult to fix. In the future, please follow the instructions laid out at
Wikipedia:Translation.--
Jac16888
Talk
13:49, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
-- Redrose64 ( talk) 08:57, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello. On your revert of my change to Secure Digital: My change summary was not to claim that low price is a deciding factor; rather, the existence of commercial solutions (to the problem of getting SD cards onto a local-area network) means that the reader--the user of SD cards--has a better solution than the "hack" described in the article. The hack is technically innovative, but the average person should not actually do such a thing. Am I missing the point? Spike-from-NH ( talk) 15:44, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Well, the article doesn't make that point; the wording is more a sort of "Look at what we did once." I won't insist but will mention it to possible third parties on the talk page. Spike-from-NH ( talk) 21:23, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, now I see the point of this paragraph. I'll massage the English a bit. Spike-from-NH ( talk) 01:04, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Electron9/2013-01-22! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
It was a nice article link you added to the page. Most of the clarification required for this page is around the reason why some research points to no links to heart disease and some point to clear links. There appear to be two schools of thought: micro-nutrients and the different effect on the body of changes in blood sugar. The article you cite mentions micro-nutrients, but I only have the abstract. One point that would be useful would be to understand in the study what they mean by "sugar". I have amended your contribution slightly to match this, but the definition in the abstract does not state if they differentiated between unrefined sugars (in their natural form) and free sugars. If you have the full article, it would be great to know what is said. I only have easy access to the abstract. Thanks. -- Ged Sparrowhawk ( talk) 07:57, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. I'll check a university copy, since that is where I normally get my articles from in full, but I don't have direct access to this one electronically. I just want to check that the source hasn't been overly summarised by the initial article you read. I don't disagree with what you say, but the wording could create some friction on the page where you added it as it stands, so I want to make sure it stands up to scrutiny before someone tries to remove it. -- Ged Sparrowhawk ( talk) 22:27, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
That is the consensus on the page. The issue is that some sugar appears naturally in food, while some sugar is "added" (the WHO distinguish the added kind as Free Sugar). The abstract doesn't say how they distinguished between free sugar and naturally-occurring sugar, so when I get the full article I'll try and clarify that. I have left your piece in but re-worded it the best I can on that basis from the abstract. -- Ged Sparrowhawk ( talk) 20:04, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:T-pad.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 04:31, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Please try to find some better sources. Thanks! -- Ronz ( talk) 16:42, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
From what I can tell, that mouse was probably made in 1964. If you want to tie it to a date, find a source that does that, and write a sensible caption. Dicklyon ( talk) 01:06, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Rapid Exchange of Information System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmetic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Poly Implant Prothèse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deputy ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:55, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Alcoholic beverage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stress ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:37, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Theobromine poisoning, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.
Riley Huntley (
talk)
00:04, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Electron,
After I saw the extensive Talk page discussion on this, I had pinged UsersManual regarding this section, realizing some discussion was needed. I also want to draw your attention to my comment at the bottom of the Talk page of the Silicon Image article. I generally agree with Zelphar, but from my perspective am more focused on the lack of reliable sources. I agree that the content may be of value, but not that an encyclopedia is the appropriate place for it. There are some tools for us to use when several editors disagree, to get a third party opinion from veteran and uninvolved editors. We can use the Reliable Sources Noticeboard to discuss whether the forum posts could be considered reliable sources or just get a 3PO (third party opinion). User:King4057 14:42, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
88 ata_sii_probe(device_t dev) . . 96 { ATA_SII3512, 0x00, SII_MEMIO, SII_BUG, ATA_SA150, "3512" }, 97 { ATA_SII3112, 0x00, SII_MEMIO, SII_BUG, ATA_SA150, "3112" }, 98 { ATA_SII3112_1, 0x00, SII_MEMIO, SII_BUG, ATA_SA150, "3112" }, . . 325 if (ctlr->chip->cfg2 & SII_BUG) { 326 /* work around errata in early chips */ 327 ch->dma.boundary = 8192; 328 ch->dma.segsize = 15 * DEV_BSIZE; 329 }
I've reviewed the article statements and the referenced code file; while it's clear that there was a bug in some versions of the chip, and there's a workaround in this BSD source file, it also seems clear that this is not what WP means by a WP:RS, and that's it's fair to classify it as WP:OR. If you have to read source code to know about this bug, rather than find a statement by an author who said there's such a bug, then it's not appropriate matter for WP. Dicklyon ( talk) 05:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
XML, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I think you should gain consensus before doing such controvercial page moves as this
[1]. It seems your edit went back to a previous less desirable name.
Widefox (
talk)
14:31, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Electron,
I was suprised to see my answer appearing almost word for word inserted as part of your petrol engine article. I answer questions based on knowledge gained in my career, however probably half my posts on Ref Desk attract refutations and even abuse! Perhaps that is because I have (in good faith) refuted other posts.
I must say I have mixed feelings about my Ref Desk words ending up in a formal article. If I had known that was your intent, I would have crafted my prose more carefully, and I might have even tracked down a citation. Also, the article elsewhere contains or supports some common misconceptions about petrol engines. I answered a Ref Desk question on engines some months ago, and this prompted a post from an editor asking me to register and revise/rework the internal combustion article. I declined because I considered it a mess, with a lot of errors, misconceptions, and poor explanations. I declined because I could see that it would be a at least couple of week's solid work to knock it into shape, and then some peanut could come along later and revert it or mess it all up again.
It seems everyone has equal rights in WP, whether they know anything or not, whether they have good intentions or not. That has been WP's advantage but also its greatest disadvantage. And I can see that squawking on the Administrator's Noticeboard, or inserting suggestions there pretty much only attracts comments about trolls, comments totally inapplicable, discussions on banning me (one reason why I've never registered), and discussions on whether I am the same person as some other poster they don't like.
However, I will monitor your talk page for 3 days, so if you would like some help/discussion on improving the petrol engine article, you can so indicate. I don't think a Ref Desk post is appropriate for this.
Ratbone 121.221.227.92 ( talk) 02:26, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Re: "Sorry if I intrude", I welcome any discussion of Wtshymanski. A while back several people commented that he deletes any criticism from his talk page, so I made a section on my talk page where we can coordinate our responses. Feel free to post there any time (just look for Wtshymanski in my table of contents). -- Guy Macon ( talk) 18:21, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
Regarding this edit, I have a number of concerns. Firstly, you've re-piped unambiguous links to Zorro II and Zorro III: per WP:NOTBROKEN, it is not necessary to pipe working redirects and is discouraged. Secondly, you've re-added a date outside of the {{ cite}} tag for the Amiga Hardware Database link: the date is useless without some context indicating what it is for, so if it is an access or publication date it needs to be added to the citation template properly. (the same with the latter readdition of an "uploaded" statement for a YouTube clip.) Lastly, you've readded a statement regarding the developers knowing Spanish, but the source that is attached to the sentence makes no such statement and I've been unable to find a reliable source which backs it up. Thanks for re-adding the titles to the dead links: I should have done that myself. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 12:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
However, that isn't backed up by any source. We cannot include information in articles that is derived from unsourced HTML comments in the markup, as neither readers nor editors can be expected to know how reliable the person who added said comments was. (I understand that there may be some loss of communication here: the sentiment behind "only knew Spanish" is that a reliable source says the word "Amiga" came from Spanish as opposed to any other language, but that still doesn't mean that the authors spoke Spanish: all it means is that they took the word from the Spanish language.) As for the tagging of the dead links, I am firmly opposed to removal of dead links myself and was planning (in a later run) to find archived copies of the pages in question, but it was important to first go through and tag them so that I knew which sources were dead. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 13:43, 24 August 2012 (UTC)NB yes there are several other languages that use the same word, but the Amiga developers only knew Spanish and so that's the derivation. Please don't add a list of other languages here
I've removed them again. Please see WP:DAB. And at the bottom of the page it says "This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the same title." Dougweller ( talk) 16:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tuner (radio), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Carrier frequency and Bandwidth ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 17:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
So what? They talk about LOTS and LOTS of things during the trilogy. Why should we specifically mention that Doc talks about googolplex? there's nothing special about that. Furthermore, how can that word be relevant to "Cultural references"? -- Lyverbe ( talk) 10:40, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of semiconductor scale examples, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I5 ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:57, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You reverted a change I made to the NiMH page and I wanted to know exactly why. My edit was made because the references I deleted were all basically junk pages or sites parroting information available from reputable manufacturers. One of the links you restored with your copy-paste has been broken since 2009 (looking at archive.org). It is to an obscure reseller of marine batteries. If you look, you will see that the text of the article didn't change significantly with either of our edits. In fact, my edit just removed some repetition and one unsourced (and implausible!) claim.
Your change of reference name to "duracell_charge" seems completely reasonable.
So basically, I'll redo the edit I made in the next couple of days, since I think it improves the article significantly. If you disagree with me about this, could you explain your reasoning here please?
Many thanks, Rswarbrick ( talk) 09:46, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Naegleria fowleri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ablution ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:52, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on .clb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Keφr ( talk) 05:33, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pantalk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page .clb ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 15:07, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DDR2 SDRAM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ATI ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:16, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ZX Interface 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daisy-chain ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on MikeOS, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Pcap
ping
08:10, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove
speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with
Chip carrier drawings. Please use the {{
hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's
talk page. Thank you.
Fabrictramp |
talk to me
18:36, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi I'm grabbing your stub IEEE 802.3az page. IMO, it shouldn't have been PRODed, though I am going to move it to Energy Efficient Ethernet and begin expanding it. Thanks for starting it. -- KelleyCook ( talk) 16:36, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed,
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is on
article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at
Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a
templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. --
TS
20:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
I used to work for Universal Instruments Corporation who is the global leader in the IMT and SMT industry and that is what they refer to as through-hole. In the 16+ years of working in the industry they have always referred to through hole as IMT. Paly 1 (talk) 02:00, 7 April 2010 (UTC) http://www4.uic.com/wcms/wcms2.nsf/9d77f80a90bd656c8525692700744d90/afcd533e93b6d0f1852575e500691418?OpenDocument 3rd Paragraph —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paly 1 ( talk • contribs) 02:15, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
http://news.thomasnet.com/companystory/491560 6th Paragraph http://news.thomasnet.com/companystory/491067 3rd Paragraph —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paly 1 ( talk • contribs) 02:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC) http://www4.uic.com/wcms/WCMS2.nsf/index/News_Events_384.html last paragraph —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paly 1 ( talk • contribs) 02:27, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Through hole: A hole connecting the two surfaces of a printed circuit structure.
Through hole technology: also referred to as "insertion mount," where electronic components are inserted into holes in the PCB.
Tie bars: Polyimide strips, or bars, connecting an inner ring at its corners to the remainder of the TAB tape site. Also referred to as suspenders. From UIC's internal site via customer portal on their glossary of terms page.
IM Host Interface An optional feature on the IM (Insertion Mount) Machine supports the GEMstandard implementation of SECS II. This is an industry standard communications protocol which allows any host computer system that uses the same industry standard protocol to communicate with the IM Machine. From another document on their website.
Insertion Mount (IM) Safety Rules The following rules are specific to IM equipment (also known as Through Hole) : • Whenever powering the IM machine down for maintenance, follow the next two procedures: • On the AC power panel, push the breakers to the OFF position. Also, at the AC power panel, turn the key to the OFF position and remove. • Attach a warning notice to the AC power panel showing the machine is not operational and only the maintenance technician is authorized to restore power. From another document on their website —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paly 1 ( talk • contribs) 02:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC) Paly 1 ( talk) 02:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Hmm, universities that teach about electronic assembly. Nope, there are no such universities. Can't imagine why a university would teach anything about electronic assembly. I have a BSEET degree and they did not teach me anything about electronic assembly. I was hired in by a electronic assembly manufacturer and that is what they call it. Paly 1 ( talk) 14:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Just asking, why are these edits necessary? Using HTML instead of typing a bracket is anything but tidy. SpinningSpark 18:37, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
The article Xilinx ISE has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Blanchardb -
Me•
MyEars•
MyMouth- timed
03:04, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove
speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{
hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you.
69.181.249.92 (
talk)
09:48, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Xilinx ISE, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xilinx ISE. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 13:24, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Please see further discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Xilinx_ISE. Electron9 ( talk) 00:51, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you asked recently at the Village pump what is the total size of images used on the English Wikipedia. According to my counting, 2,197,487 different images are used, totaling 1,197 GB. There was about 188,000 image links I couldn't find any image for, but some of those are image redirects, so the actual total size is probably slightly larger. Svick ( talk) 06:07, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
The article Fiber focus infrared soldering has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Wizard191 (
talk)
22:13, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
So why not add a couple of columns to the big table in Computer display standard instead of starting a content fork article?-- Wtshymanski ( talk) 22:16, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
Hi, now that BPP redirects to a disambig, please don't forget to WP:FIXDABLINKS. This tool makes the job a lot easier. Thanks, -- JaGa talk 05:40, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Display examples is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Display examples until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Whpq ( talk) 17:23, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
The article .cbp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Whpq (
talk)
14:12, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article .cbp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.cbp until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Whpq ( talk) 16:39, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Electron9 !!
Thanks for the interest in the article. The image you've inserted is the same as the one above it ! you were too busy to notice ! anyhow, I'll leave it to you to work out which one you think is better. Please don't forget to put in an alt description for the blind. Thanks. I'm also a fan of the NE555 timer IC, lolz, small world ! Penyulap talk 21:58, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
I started a discussion about the redirect European Installation Bus which redirects to KNX (standard). I just want to inform you because you are quite active at the target article. Merl issimo 17:31, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add machine translations of foreign language articles to Wikipedia. Due to their poor quality, they are generally not useful and can be very difficult to fix. In the future, please follow the instructions laid out at
Wikipedia:Translation.--
Jac16888
Talk
13:49, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
-- Redrose64 ( talk) 08:57, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello. On your revert of my change to Secure Digital: My change summary was not to claim that low price is a deciding factor; rather, the existence of commercial solutions (to the problem of getting SD cards onto a local-area network) means that the reader--the user of SD cards--has a better solution than the "hack" described in the article. The hack is technically innovative, but the average person should not actually do such a thing. Am I missing the point? Spike-from-NH ( talk) 15:44, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Well, the article doesn't make that point; the wording is more a sort of "Look at what we did once." I won't insist but will mention it to possible third parties on the talk page. Spike-from-NH ( talk) 21:23, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, now I see the point of this paragraph. I'll massage the English a bit. Spike-from-NH ( talk) 01:04, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Electron9/2013-01-22! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
It was a nice article link you added to the page. Most of the clarification required for this page is around the reason why some research points to no links to heart disease and some point to clear links. There appear to be two schools of thought: micro-nutrients and the different effect on the body of changes in blood sugar. The article you cite mentions micro-nutrients, but I only have the abstract. One point that would be useful would be to understand in the study what they mean by "sugar". I have amended your contribution slightly to match this, but the definition in the abstract does not state if they differentiated between unrefined sugars (in their natural form) and free sugars. If you have the full article, it would be great to know what is said. I only have easy access to the abstract. Thanks. -- Ged Sparrowhawk ( talk) 07:57, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. I'll check a university copy, since that is where I normally get my articles from in full, but I don't have direct access to this one electronically. I just want to check that the source hasn't been overly summarised by the initial article you read. I don't disagree with what you say, but the wording could create some friction on the page where you added it as it stands, so I want to make sure it stands up to scrutiny before someone tries to remove it. -- Ged Sparrowhawk ( talk) 22:27, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
That is the consensus on the page. The issue is that some sugar appears naturally in food, while some sugar is "added" (the WHO distinguish the added kind as Free Sugar). The abstract doesn't say how they distinguished between free sugar and naturally-occurring sugar, so when I get the full article I'll try and clarify that. I have left your piece in but re-worded it the best I can on that basis from the abstract. -- Ged Sparrowhawk ( talk) 20:04, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:T-pad.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 04:31, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Please try to find some better sources. Thanks! -- Ronz ( talk) 16:42, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
From what I can tell, that mouse was probably made in 1964. If you want to tie it to a date, find a source that does that, and write a sensible caption. Dicklyon ( talk) 01:06, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Rapid Exchange of Information System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmetic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Poly Implant Prothèse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deputy ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:55, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Alcoholic beverage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stress ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:37, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Theobromine poisoning, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.
Riley Huntley (
talk)
00:04, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Electron,
After I saw the extensive Talk page discussion on this, I had pinged UsersManual regarding this section, realizing some discussion was needed. I also want to draw your attention to my comment at the bottom of the Talk page of the Silicon Image article. I generally agree with Zelphar, but from my perspective am more focused on the lack of reliable sources. I agree that the content may be of value, but not that an encyclopedia is the appropriate place for it. There are some tools for us to use when several editors disagree, to get a third party opinion from veteran and uninvolved editors. We can use the Reliable Sources Noticeboard to discuss whether the forum posts could be considered reliable sources or just get a 3PO (third party opinion). User:King4057 14:42, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
88 ata_sii_probe(device_t dev) . . 96 { ATA_SII3512, 0x00, SII_MEMIO, SII_BUG, ATA_SA150, "3512" }, 97 { ATA_SII3112, 0x00, SII_MEMIO, SII_BUG, ATA_SA150, "3112" }, 98 { ATA_SII3112_1, 0x00, SII_MEMIO, SII_BUG, ATA_SA150, "3112" }, . . 325 if (ctlr->chip->cfg2 & SII_BUG) { 326 /* work around errata in early chips */ 327 ch->dma.boundary = 8192; 328 ch->dma.segsize = 15 * DEV_BSIZE; 329 }
I've reviewed the article statements and the referenced code file; while it's clear that there was a bug in some versions of the chip, and there's a workaround in this BSD source file, it also seems clear that this is not what WP means by a WP:RS, and that's it's fair to classify it as WP:OR. If you have to read source code to know about this bug, rather than find a statement by an author who said there's such a bug, then it's not appropriate matter for WP. Dicklyon ( talk) 05:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
XML, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I think you should gain consensus before doing such controvercial page moves as this
[1]. It seems your edit went back to a previous less desirable name.
Widefox (
talk)
14:31, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Electron,
I was suprised to see my answer appearing almost word for word inserted as part of your petrol engine article. I answer questions based on knowledge gained in my career, however probably half my posts on Ref Desk attract refutations and even abuse! Perhaps that is because I have (in good faith) refuted other posts.
I must say I have mixed feelings about my Ref Desk words ending up in a formal article. If I had known that was your intent, I would have crafted my prose more carefully, and I might have even tracked down a citation. Also, the article elsewhere contains or supports some common misconceptions about petrol engines. I answered a Ref Desk question on engines some months ago, and this prompted a post from an editor asking me to register and revise/rework the internal combustion article. I declined because I considered it a mess, with a lot of errors, misconceptions, and poor explanations. I declined because I could see that it would be a at least couple of week's solid work to knock it into shape, and then some peanut could come along later and revert it or mess it all up again.
It seems everyone has equal rights in WP, whether they know anything or not, whether they have good intentions or not. That has been WP's advantage but also its greatest disadvantage. And I can see that squawking on the Administrator's Noticeboard, or inserting suggestions there pretty much only attracts comments about trolls, comments totally inapplicable, discussions on banning me (one reason why I've never registered), and discussions on whether I am the same person as some other poster they don't like.
However, I will monitor your talk page for 3 days, so if you would like some help/discussion on improving the petrol engine article, you can so indicate. I don't think a Ref Desk post is appropriate for this.
Ratbone 121.221.227.92 ( talk) 02:26, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Re: "Sorry if I intrude", I welcome any discussion of Wtshymanski. A while back several people commented that he deletes any criticism from his talk page, so I made a section on my talk page where we can coordinate our responses. Feel free to post there any time (just look for Wtshymanski in my table of contents). -- Guy Macon ( talk) 18:21, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
Regarding this edit, I have a number of concerns. Firstly, you've re-piped unambiguous links to Zorro II and Zorro III: per WP:NOTBROKEN, it is not necessary to pipe working redirects and is discouraged. Secondly, you've re-added a date outside of the {{ cite}} tag for the Amiga Hardware Database link: the date is useless without some context indicating what it is for, so if it is an access or publication date it needs to be added to the citation template properly. (the same with the latter readdition of an "uploaded" statement for a YouTube clip.) Lastly, you've readded a statement regarding the developers knowing Spanish, but the source that is attached to the sentence makes no such statement and I've been unable to find a reliable source which backs it up. Thanks for re-adding the titles to the dead links: I should have done that myself. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 12:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
However, that isn't backed up by any source. We cannot include information in articles that is derived from unsourced HTML comments in the markup, as neither readers nor editors can be expected to know how reliable the person who added said comments was. (I understand that there may be some loss of communication here: the sentiment behind "only knew Spanish" is that a reliable source says the word "Amiga" came from Spanish as opposed to any other language, but that still doesn't mean that the authors spoke Spanish: all it means is that they took the word from the Spanish language.) As for the tagging of the dead links, I am firmly opposed to removal of dead links myself and was planning (in a later run) to find archived copies of the pages in question, but it was important to first go through and tag them so that I knew which sources were dead. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 13:43, 24 August 2012 (UTC)NB yes there are several other languages that use the same word, but the Amiga developers only knew Spanish and so that's the derivation. Please don't add a list of other languages here
I've removed them again. Please see WP:DAB. And at the bottom of the page it says "This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the same title." Dougweller ( talk) 16:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tuner (radio), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Carrier frequency and Bandwidth ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 17:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
So what? They talk about LOTS and LOTS of things during the trilogy. Why should we specifically mention that Doc talks about googolplex? there's nothing special about that. Furthermore, how can that word be relevant to "Cultural references"? -- Lyverbe ( talk) 10:40, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of semiconductor scale examples, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I5 ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:57, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You reverted a change I made to the NiMH page and I wanted to know exactly why. My edit was made because the references I deleted were all basically junk pages or sites parroting information available from reputable manufacturers. One of the links you restored with your copy-paste has been broken since 2009 (looking at archive.org). It is to an obscure reseller of marine batteries. If you look, you will see that the text of the article didn't change significantly with either of our edits. In fact, my edit just removed some repetition and one unsourced (and implausible!) claim.
Your change of reference name to "duracell_charge" seems completely reasonable.
So basically, I'll redo the edit I made in the next couple of days, since I think it improves the article significantly. If you disagree with me about this, could you explain your reasoning here please?
Many thanks, Rswarbrick ( talk) 09:46, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Naegleria fowleri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ablution ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:52, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on .clb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Keφr ( talk) 05:33, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pantalk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page .clb ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 15:07, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DDR2 SDRAM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ATI ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:16, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ZX Interface 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daisy-chain ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)