This archive contains comments posted between October 2006 and December 2006.
|
Thanks for your appreciation on some of my contributions as well as inviting me to contribute to the MK project page. I thought I signed up not too long ago on its talk page, but maybe I should have done that on the main article's page. Buzda 03:41, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the Seigenthaler article. I forgot about that :) Kaldari 16:27, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
I had a little discussion with you a while back about the {{ Film}} tag on character talk pages (the discussion was on Talk:Indiana Jones#WikiProject Films tag). Just so you know, we re-evaluated our scope and we now include film characters also. Thanks, Cbrown1023 19:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
The tags are getting removed if they relate to the article from the books, comics, etc... (anything outside the movies) It is is just that AWB does not distinguish between articles that had the tag and it was just removed and articles that never had the tag. I just finished those articles, so you will not have to worry about AWB reverting those changes. Cbrown1023 15:55, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
please fix the page move vandalism to Persian danceg - Zadsat 17:44, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
came to you when i saw your name in recent changes.please fix other page move vandalism by unit since then also- Zadsat 17:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
no man i mean unit moved other pages to nonsense names as well please fix them.- Zadsat 17:59, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
done it to your userpage...- Zadsat 18:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
your damn userpage was moved man! - Zadsat 18:12, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for ruining the Lion King pages. Go ahead it fuck it up some more. 24.14.120.92 05:41, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you're a pretty dedicated editor for this particular film article... you want to tag-team on this one, see what we can put together to make the article genuine? I cleaned up the structure a bit based on my experience with upcoming film articles, but we still need to develop the content, especially project history. -- Erik ( talk/ contrib) @ 03:44, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
If I may quote you:
"I'd like to point out that, at one point, the article was actually fairly well sourced, and had links to older rumors that helped smooth the transition between conflicting information. However, Wesborland removed it [6]. If someone else would like to restore the information, feel free; he and I have gone back and forth enough times in this article that I don't want to revert him anymore, regardless of the quality. EVula 14:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC)"
It wasn't my intention to vandalize the article when I removed those sources. I just thought they were no longer valid since they were outdated and contradicted by the newer ones. When I saw you didn't revert my edit I figured you agreed with me, but if you don't, please revert me. I'm really not trying to continue the edit war here, I'm just trying to make this article as reliable as possible.
By the way, have you seen the current state of the article? Someone removed the information about the plot and now it's in a certain state of disorganization, what do you think? Wesborland 16:32, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Just wanted to stop by and thank you for your help with my template problems.I'm still a little new at templates. SOADLuver 19:11, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
I wasn't talking about the placement of the names. I understand that, and didn't change it. I was talking about having two seperate links. One to Mortal Kombat, and one to the WikiProject. And thank-you very much for your civility on the matter. :) --- Silent RAGE! 21:49, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Most welcomed. Note that what I stated there is mostly my personal opinion, with some thoughts about what others may consider correct or not. Thus, you may not agree in some points, or you may find later that in your future RFA that all my points are void. Hopefully, others will take their time to review you as well, although I doubt it as there is a big backlog and very few users working there. Good luck! -- ReyBrujo 01:49, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
EVula, thanks for your support on my request for adminship.
The final outcome was a robust 62/1/1, so I am now an administrator. If you ever have any questions about my actions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Hello EVula. In fact, I was already planning to collaborate with your editor's review either later tonight or tomorrow. I saw your funny comment yesterday following my baby remark on User talk:ChrisGriswold. I immediately recognized your username but could not recall from where. I firstly thought that it could be from a recent RfA, but only after spending some time searching for your non-existent RfA I realized that it was from the editors review page. So I decided that I should participate in your review anytime soon. I'll go have dinner now and I'll gladly provide you with some feedback when I return. :-) Best regards.-- Hús ö nd 21:22, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your support. They're certainly not very good at present, but I'm hoping in the long term that we can have stubs for all MPs (well, from the Long Parliament on, say) and that people with the specialized local history to fill in the bios will do so as they can. (There are some frighteningly systematic people working on Parliamentary election results and so on.) Anyway, I mostly dropped by because your humorous example of the legislator-for-an-hour reminded me of a real incident involving two (relative) nonentities, Lord Charles and Rev. Lord Frederick Townshend, younger sons of the 1st Marquess Townshend. The former had just been elected MP for Great Yarmouth, and he and his elder brother (the rector of Stiffkey) took a coach together from Norfolk to London. At the end of the journey, Rev. Lord Frederick got out, hit a post boy, offered to fight the spectators, and wandered away. Inside the coach, Lord Charles had been shot through the head. Lord Frederick claimed his brother had committed suicide and that he had also attempted to do so, but failed; the coroner's jury failed to determine whom the shooter had been, and Lord Frederick was committed for a madman. Much more memorable, I daresay, than anything either could have done in law or religion. Choess 05:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. TheSonofSerenity 07:03, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Regarding AFDs, just a friendly note to point out that the use of "vanity" is now discouraged. Instead please use "apparent Conflict of interest" per WP:COI. Cheers, Jpe| ob 08:15, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
EVula, thank you so much for your support for my RfA. I passed with a vote tally of 61/0/1. Also, thanks for keeping the tally up-to-date when others forgot and coming to my support on my one Neutral vote :-) I am honored that the consensus was to allow me the added privilege of the admin mop. I appreciate your support and complimentary words on my RFA! -- plange 21:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
for fixing my AfD close mistake... By the way, how would I avoid that in the future? What is the correct template?-- Isotope23 19:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Hmm, seems policy just recently changed. [7] I guess Jimbo removed that 48 hours thing about a week ago. I guess I didn't notice the change until you mentioned it. I guess it can be speedied, but it is on WP:CP so it will be deleted anyways. T REX speak 00:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice. :-) Nightscream 11:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
[8] Once again, everything I did has been within wikipedia guidelines. What is illegitimate about me keeping an eye on your edits, as I have noticed that they contain a pattern of behavior with which I disagree and believe to not be in the best interest of wikipedia (eg discussing your personal experiences with video games on talk pages)? Thanks. HTH. Justinpwilsonadvocate 17:59, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I saw you putting the {{ TestTemplatesNotice}} template in a few places, and I would think that it's value is questionable, and it also takes up a lot of room. I would think it would be better for it to show up only in Category:User warning templates, as that's the centralized place for all warning templates. Wonder what you think. You can reply here. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov ( talk) 03:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
subst:
already in place. :-) In all seriousness, though, I like having a standardized layout (for lack of a better term) for all the various warnings. A lot of new users who are just starting to use warnings against errant editors might not know to subst templates (I didn't when I was newb), so I think any service in that manner outweighs its size.
EVula
03:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your support re: Leia captured before or after Luke. I have no idea what this person is thinking! Urania3 12:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello! I think you are a good editor and i proposed you as a candidate for adminship. Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/EVula. Voice your opinion and let us know if you are willing to accept! Canderous Ordo 20:24, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Sure. It wouldn't go unnoticed by me anyway. :-) Good luck with it, I'll participate right away. By the way, I must recommend that you don't tell other users about it, for such action can be deemed as canvass by some editors. Your notice to me, however, is acceptable coz it's more like a friendly notice, as I participated in your editor review. Regards.-- Hús ö nd 23:36, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello there, EVula. Unluckily, I don't participate in RFAs of people with whom I have not treated regularly. However, you have my moral support :-) Good luck! -- ReyBrujo 00:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
I am heavily involved with this project, but since it didn't have a tag until some days ago (as a matter of fact it was in a certain state of abandonment until I joined it) nobody quite knows it yet, so it has a grand total of 6 members and some of them aren't even involved with Uruguay-related pages. I really want this project to grow and I want there to be a wider variety of articles related to it on Wikipedia, but I need someone more experienced than me to help me achieve it, so:
I'd appreciate your help. Wesborland 00:57, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
Your answer to Q4 on your RfA just earned you this barnstar. Mwahaha! Best regards. Hús ö nd 04:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC) |
...I am sure it will be ignored like all the others. Justinpwilsonadvocate 01:16, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
I have replied to your post on my Talk page. -- Slowking Man 11:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
4 users joined the project in 1 day. Good job! Thank you. I'd give you a barnstar, but I haven't made one yet :P Wesborland 15:26, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your response (yeah, the channel does that thing where you have to identify yourself with NickServ before you can /msg anyone). I've always considered "pissed" obscene (along the same level as "asshole"), which is why I couldn't understand why people would vote allow on that WP:RFC/NAME. In the United States pissed either means to be angry (in a vulgar sense) or to urinate (like you might have been holding it for quite a while), like one would say "where's the pisser" when looking for the restroom in a bar, etc. We also don't want children using that word, of course. Tuxide 03:05, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
~Tugs on EVula's coat~
E.. EVula, he's doing it again! B-but I can't stop him, lest I break the wules. The Haunted Angel ( The Forest Whispers My Name) 22:52, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
On behalf of the
Esperanza Barnstar Brigade, I hereby present user EVula the Barnstar Star Award for creating the fabulous
Uruguay Star.
Rosa
00:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 45 | 6 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:10, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
I am pleased to let you know that, consensus reached, you are now an Administrator. You should find the following forums useful:
Congratulations on your promotion and the best of luck with your new charge! Redux 22:03, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations on the mop EVula! :-) Have fun sweeping our beloved Wikipedia. Best regards.-- Hús ö nd 22:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Yay, another
Browncoat is an Admin! Congratulations EVula!!! --
plange
22:48, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GFDL. |
Hey, congratulations. Hope you enjoy the new privs (not too much!) :) riana_ dzasta 05:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
My pleasure, and congratulations! Jayjg (talk) 02:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you so much, EVula, for your support in my RfA, which passed on November 11, 2006, with a final tally of 82/0/2. I am humbled by the kind support of so many fellow Wikipedians, and I vow to continue to work and improve with the help of these new tools. Should you have any request, do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Hús ö nd 19:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC) |
Also thank you for congratulating me, and for all the encouragement/support. :-) Kindest regards.-- Hús ö nd 19:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
To express oneself In seventeen syllables Is very diffic -
Yay! -- weirdoactor t| c -- 02:12, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello EVula, the user that you see leaving the non-notable messages has left them on practically every page I have created and does so under different names. I doubt a page that is apart of a Wiki Novels project (if you refer to its discussion page) is considered non-notable. Just to let you know. I wanted to request if you find it alright for me to remove the tag because I highly doubt its notability is a problem. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 15:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks EVula, I greatly appreciate that. Well after looking at the history of all my articles seems he found his way to all of them:
Sheesh some people have major vendettas :P.... ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 15:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
May the glaciers shine reflected sunlight upon you in the cold, oh more gifted Wikipedia editor than I. Thank you, KP Botany 20:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Do not protect the William Sledd page from being recreated. It was deleted because some...people disputed whether the subject was notable. William Sledd was interviewed by Women's Wear Daily on november 2, 2006, as a rising "youtube star". There's a whole article about him. Unless you believe WWD is on pay from Youtube, then he has finally been reviewed in major independent media and meets notability.-- Arislan 23:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
I second this as I have personally read his article in the magazine.
That is my old username. I wanted to delete those pages.-- DANK 02:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 46 | 13 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of William_Sledd. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arislan ( talk • contribs)
![]() The mop |
Congratulations on becoming an admin!
Enjoy your new-found powers, and remember to use them only for good, and not for evil. If you would like to try out your new mop, here are some spots that always need loving care:
All the best! - Quadell |
![]() The flamethrower |
Just thought I'd let you know, this anonymous user has made another edit to the Shao Kahn edit, after you warned him. I tossed another warning template on there, but I thought I'd let you know what he's up to still. Cheers, The Haunted Angel ( The Forest Whispers My Name) 17:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for de-vandalizing my user page. You think a block is called for? I'd go with a last warning but I'm not sure if i should do it myself. ~ trialsanderrors 18:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
I suspect the semi-protect will have to be there for a long time; as long as the Candle Jack thing is a 4chan in-joke, the people there will try to carry it over here. Jay Maynard 15:23, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Someone has created two more articles on alleged new MK titles. There are no sources, so I've put them up for deletion ( here). Just thought you'd want to know. :) RobWill80 17:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. The thing is that some editors seem to have deleted, without comment, the original David A. Yeagley article in its entirety and substituted a new one, presumably to remove political controversies that surround Yeagley. I've just found this ount, and restored the text under a hidden tag. Badagnani 20:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I submitted the image for speedy deletion because it seemed to me to be an image that was rather unnecessary, however I see now ow it can be used, and please accept my formal apologies for this error. Scienceman123 talk 04:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
i try'd looking for a source of its information, nothings coming up, so i'll just wait for this guy to say something, so until then it'll stay off. Lil'Layzie-One 22:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC) Lil'Layzie-One
I removed your request for a citation - the citation is given. It's in Joss Whedon's commentary in the Firefly DVDs.
Now if you mean to say that Fillion's family, and thus Joss, might be WRONG, I think that's a different matter. It would be simple to rewrite it so that it was expressed as the Fillion family belief, and not as a fact.
Are they wrong? I suspect that any genealogists who are Nathan Fillion fans might be able to settle the question quickly. Zora 01:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Darn. Well, there goes the weekend. Guess I have to watch all the commentaries all over again :) Zora 05:37, 21 November 2006 (UTC) (My score: recruited four Browncoats)
Hello EVula, could you please take care of this speedy delete article. The username who created it also promotes the thing mentioned in the article. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 05:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 47 | 20 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:28, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Are you EVula as in EVula.com and the moderator in AmbrosiaSW forums? I have probably put as much time into that game series as I have into Wikipedia.— WAvegetarian• (talk) 12:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Please edit my user page when i give you permision! You don't have the persmission so please discuss it instead...
-- Storkian 21:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
A few things:
Thanks, Cbrown1023 22:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
i can see why you removed the resident evil stuff, that pretty much didn't belong there, but why did you remove the Mace: The Dark age stuff, to most people it does seem right, sence MK & Mace are both Midway made games, but i just want to know if theres another reason to other than its source. Lil'Layzie-One 14:40, 22 November 2006 (UTC) Lil'Layzie-One
ok Fair enough, i guess i should remove the one from Mace then huh lol. Lil'Layzie-One 15:27, 22 November 2006 (UTC) Lil'Layzie-One
Hey, Glad to have you onboard, there are alot of people 'involved' in the project, but we are certainly looking for proactive people to get stuck in. If you look here and the overview page you'll start to get an idea of where we are. In the next couple of days I'll put together the 4 template models, and then we can start early next week. I'll assign a group of warnings to each of the people who have said they're interested in helping out. We, and this where you might come in handy, will need to put together a checking system to audit the new templates to make sure they meet the criteria setout before we put them into place. Also nice one with the user box, will certainly use that!!! Cheers Khukri ( talk . contribs) 19:39, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Sharkface217 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile at others by adding {{ subst:smile}}, {{ subst:smile2}} or {{ subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
You recently moved several articles about female U.S. Senators into the Category:United States Senators. However, that category should not contain articles about individual Senators. Rather, they should be in its subcategories, such as Category:United States Senators from Montana.— Markles 13:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
IIUC, ChrisGriswold is referring to an editorial guideline specific to the Comics Project, speciffically Uniform cover artwork crediting convention.
Just plopping in 2¢ — J Greb 19:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the cookie (It's now in my awards section). But one problem: How am I supposed to eat it? -- AAA! ( AAAA) 22:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Well done. It seems you are really involved in the MK Project. I am a fan and follower of the game, but I do not have much time to participate. Anyway, congratulations and go ahead! Greetings, -- Gustave - May I help you? 00:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Gosh! Are you turning into a bot? Cbrown1023 01:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Query does not compute. echo $cover_story:
Of course not! Why would you think that? Silly Hi Evula, and thank you for trusting me as a fair reviewer. Well, I don't think that you were uncivil, but I do think that you might be getting a bit carried away in that discussion. Your anger and disbelief are quite evident in your counterarguments, perhaps you could state your positions without using expressions that denote sharp dissatisfaction (such as "what?"). Some editors do not appreciate a defense that is too staunch or too aggressive, and may even distance themselves from your position just because of the way your arguments are stated. My recommendation is to simply say things in the calmest, most reasonable way. Don't lose your temper. Once again, I don't think that you were uncivil. But you know, some editors are just too sensitive. :-) Good luck with that discussion. Best regards.-- Hús ö nd 06:24, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 48 | 27 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 01:35, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Good to see I was chosen as the lab rat :) Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 01:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for doing the TfD close on Template: Free Speech: I should have done it myself, but I forgot (we're all human, after all!) Best wishes, Physchim62 (talk) 13:18, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi Evula, I tried emailing you but it got bounced back saying your mailbox was full so I figured I'd just leave a message here. Thanks for your thoughts on Wikipedia, they were very helpful. One last question I have for you is how you want to be referenced if I quote you in the article. I basically need to have at least a first name and/or username as well as a country of residence (or if you live in the United States, the state). Thanks. FFFearlesss 17:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Not sure if you read the whole thing, but I've been following very closely. The socks of the user who created the article were vandals anyway. But, that was the most fun I've ever had in an afd. Patstuart (talk) (contribs) 02:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I have a question I was hoping you could answer as an admin. If I shouldn't be asking this here I apologise. Having read WP:NPOV and related pages through again, I see that it is expected that use of the {{ POV}} tag is accompanied by a reasonably full explanation on the talk page of the article. I was wondering is there any concensus that such tags can be removed if no explanation is given (or it is only a very basic ie. "I disagree" comment is made without citing problem areas and explaining the discrepancy)? There is a huge backlog of tags which undermine articles. Many seem to just be added when someone reads the topic which does not support their own POV on the subject. Thanks. WJBscribe 01:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
I think you broke it. If you use this code here I am 99.9% certain it will work perfectly. — coelacan talk — 02:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 49 | 4 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
William has been featured in a number of news articles. Please can you unprotect the page, I think it is time. Thanks. FrummerThanThou 16:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by FrummerThanThou ( talk • contribs) 21:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
Thank you for reverting vandalism to my user page, EVula. :-) Strange a registered user vandalize my page as their first contribution, I suspect it might be a user I blocked yesterday. Thanks once again. Best regards.-- Hús ö nd 18:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
the article i've created that was deleted twice was AC/DC's song Little Lover. i've recreated it just in case it deleted again. i've added some notability on the article to keep it from deleted. anyways, go ahead and check why the article was deleted. take care! Jailbreaker22 20:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of The White Rose Society (student group). Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- W.marsh 17:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm deeply saddened by the indefinite banning of user:timecop, but more so I'm troubled by your obvious racial profiling in this incident. I have nothing else to say, in fear of further abuse of power due to your personal biases towards people of color. Skrewler 17:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for banning the trolls! :D You make this place better for everyone! I wouldn't want Wikipe-tan to cry. You wouldn't want the personification of Wikipedia to cry, would you? Jecowa 11:58, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
That was a knee-jerker! (more of a slapper, but w/e) Here you go. Cbrown1023 04:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
That video is hilarious. He sounded like he was getting emotional over that Wikipedia article. Maybe that's why he had to edit part of it out. Jecowa 06:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
I have just ended the fight with Haunted Angel with my last post. I will not carry out a usless rant. BadtoGood 23:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks dude for the warning to BadtoGood, it was getting a bit ridiculous. The Haunted Angel ( The Forest Whispers My Name) 00:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the speedy fix! — SMcCandlish [ talk] [ contrib ツ 04:21, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi! Just wanna asked something about the classment of recurring fatalities. I asked it on talk page, but I couldn't get an answer. Deception fatalities (and Deadly Alliance fatalities of Jax, Frost and Kitana) appears on Unchained too, so are they considered as recurring? Thanks. Master Spider 16:31, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
About your collection of insults (they're quite funny). But, you last one makes it appear that being called Jewish is an insult. You may want to consider revising it. Just so you know, this is totally good faith and I'm just making sure that you don't get in trouble or thought of the wrong way. Thanks, Cbrown1023 01:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 50 | 11 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
For your amusing comment over on WP:AN under Administrator ethics. It made me laugh unless of course it's true... Whisp e ring 00:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC) |
Hi,
You have put yourself as interested in helping out at WikiProject on user warnings. We are now at a stage where we are creating the new templates and are wondering if you are still interested? If so please visit the overview page and choose a warning type you wish to work on. There is a base template available here, which you can copy and use to get you started. Have a look through the redirects and see what old templates are affected and incorporate them into the the new system. Anyway, any questions please don't hesitate to give me a shout. Regards Khukri ( talk . contribs) 09:04, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
It appears User:Ravnatel is restoring the links by 75.41.208.17, who you recently blocked for spamming. -- Ronz 20:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 51 | 18 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:04, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
You know, the problem is, all this is just too much work, and it detracts so much from Wikipedia. Thank you for offering to look into my complaints in an unbiased manner. I will still consider it, as I am watching this administrator more closely now, but still trying to get him to do right by using the talk pages of articles and stop reverting. KP Botany 00:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi there. I started an article about the Warcraft movie, citing blizzard.com's official announcement as a reference. However, someone wants to delete the article based on WP:CRYSTAL or something like that. If that's the case, shouln't Mortal Kombat: Devastation be deleted too according to the rules? Anyway, I need your help to keep this article from being deleted cause I'm not familiarized with Wikipedia's policies. Merry Xmas! -- Wesborland 19:36, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
An editor has expressed to me in email their displeasure at your reverting of their edit. [18]
I understand that indefinitely blocked editors have their editing privileges revoked, and have absolutely no problem with that. But in looking over the removed copy (note: with no knowledge of whether this is part of another situation), it seems to be a moderately worthwhile addition to the article.
*shrug* I'm not sure what proper protocol is in this situation, but I thought I'd at least drop you a line, if for no other reason than to get both sides of the story. EVula // talk // ☯ // 23:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Yup, you're right. That was my mistake. I forgot to check for that. — TKD:: Talk 05:52, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Page is *not* a recreation of the AfDed article
This wasn't originally deleted because of its syntax, it was deleted (twice) because of its content. {{ db-repost}} applies, and if someone wants to bring it back they're going to have to go through WP:DRV first. -- Calton | Talk 08:17, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 52 | 26 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Could you please explain why you put {{ db-author}} on Go God Go XII? [20] EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I object to the speedy closure of Serbophobia DRV, as it lasted mere 4 hours, and I (and anyone else who knew the background) didn't have a chance to comment. Calton, who seems to be the only aware of the issue, came too late. The "incident" was announced and endorsed here.
While I understand your reasons for the DRV closure (and my deletion summary at the time was bad, the reasons being given primarily in the AN/I thread above), and admittedly an out-of-process deletion for the purpose of improving the encyclopedia, it wouldn't have cost too much to leave it open for at least 24 hours, or check "what links here" and/or the article text.
Please don't take this as an... um... rant; from the pure process wonk viewpoint, the deletion was incorrect and thus undeletion might be correct. But, the speedy closure of DRV, from the same process wonk viewpoint, was also uncalled for (may I mildly hint to a bit of lack of WP:AGF for the fellow administrator who IAR-ed the said article?). The sole intention was to get rid of petty little ethnic feud articles, enumerating every chance of evil deeds of them against us. Oh well, guess I'll follow the process this time. Just, please, try to see if there's a bigger picture in the future. Cheers, Duja ► 14:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
(pun intended).
Duja
►
15:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Don't do it again, 'k? One major point of DRV is to draw a line what admins can get away with in their interpretation of policy, and if that itself is done out of process DRV loses much of its credibility. There was no imminient reason to restore the article right away and in all likelihood the consensus would have stood after five days, except in that case with the weight of a procedural decision behind it. ~ trialsanderrors 22:20, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
How can I activate an auto-heading for Template:Drmspeedy? Regards Must TC 21:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for offering your opinion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GabrielF/ConspiracyNoticeboard (2nd mfd). Look forward to seeing you around in 2007 at Conspiracy Central! For a little fun, check out Brad Greux's video blog at The Most Brilliant and Flawlessly Executed Plan, Ever, Ever. Good cheer from The Mad Dog, Morton devonshire 20:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC) |
This guy is always defaming the pages of John Tui and Jason David Frank. I was wondering instead of just giving him a few hours' block if you could just block him indefinitely, as it appears most of the time he "edits" a page it is because he desires to vandalizes it. I am not really familiar with the blocking policy, but since this guy is always vandalizing these pages when his block is up, I just figured if it was possible. I know such a move will make him create a sock puppet perhaps, but at least he may be less inclined to vandalize. Daijinryuu 22:39, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
This archive contains comments posted between October 2006 and December 2006.
|
Thanks for your appreciation on some of my contributions as well as inviting me to contribute to the MK project page. I thought I signed up not too long ago on its talk page, but maybe I should have done that on the main article's page. Buzda 03:41, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the Seigenthaler article. I forgot about that :) Kaldari 16:27, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
I had a little discussion with you a while back about the {{ Film}} tag on character talk pages (the discussion was on Talk:Indiana Jones#WikiProject Films tag). Just so you know, we re-evaluated our scope and we now include film characters also. Thanks, Cbrown1023 19:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
The tags are getting removed if they relate to the article from the books, comics, etc... (anything outside the movies) It is is just that AWB does not distinguish between articles that had the tag and it was just removed and articles that never had the tag. I just finished those articles, so you will not have to worry about AWB reverting those changes. Cbrown1023 15:55, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
please fix the page move vandalism to Persian danceg - Zadsat 17:44, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
came to you when i saw your name in recent changes.please fix other page move vandalism by unit since then also- Zadsat 17:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
no man i mean unit moved other pages to nonsense names as well please fix them.- Zadsat 17:59, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
done it to your userpage...- Zadsat 18:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
your damn userpage was moved man! - Zadsat 18:12, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for ruining the Lion King pages. Go ahead it fuck it up some more. 24.14.120.92 05:41, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you're a pretty dedicated editor for this particular film article... you want to tag-team on this one, see what we can put together to make the article genuine? I cleaned up the structure a bit based on my experience with upcoming film articles, but we still need to develop the content, especially project history. -- Erik ( talk/ contrib) @ 03:44, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
If I may quote you:
"I'd like to point out that, at one point, the article was actually fairly well sourced, and had links to older rumors that helped smooth the transition between conflicting information. However, Wesborland removed it [6]. If someone else would like to restore the information, feel free; he and I have gone back and forth enough times in this article that I don't want to revert him anymore, regardless of the quality. EVula 14:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC)"
It wasn't my intention to vandalize the article when I removed those sources. I just thought they were no longer valid since they were outdated and contradicted by the newer ones. When I saw you didn't revert my edit I figured you agreed with me, but if you don't, please revert me. I'm really not trying to continue the edit war here, I'm just trying to make this article as reliable as possible.
By the way, have you seen the current state of the article? Someone removed the information about the plot and now it's in a certain state of disorganization, what do you think? Wesborland 16:32, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Just wanted to stop by and thank you for your help with my template problems.I'm still a little new at templates. SOADLuver 19:11, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
I wasn't talking about the placement of the names. I understand that, and didn't change it. I was talking about having two seperate links. One to Mortal Kombat, and one to the WikiProject. And thank-you very much for your civility on the matter. :) --- Silent RAGE! 21:49, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Most welcomed. Note that what I stated there is mostly my personal opinion, with some thoughts about what others may consider correct or not. Thus, you may not agree in some points, or you may find later that in your future RFA that all my points are void. Hopefully, others will take their time to review you as well, although I doubt it as there is a big backlog and very few users working there. Good luck! -- ReyBrujo 01:49, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
EVula, thanks for your support on my request for adminship.
The final outcome was a robust 62/1/1, so I am now an administrator. If you ever have any questions about my actions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Hello EVula. In fact, I was already planning to collaborate with your editor's review either later tonight or tomorrow. I saw your funny comment yesterday following my baby remark on User talk:ChrisGriswold. I immediately recognized your username but could not recall from where. I firstly thought that it could be from a recent RfA, but only after spending some time searching for your non-existent RfA I realized that it was from the editors review page. So I decided that I should participate in your review anytime soon. I'll go have dinner now and I'll gladly provide you with some feedback when I return. :-) Best regards.-- Hús ö nd 21:22, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your support. They're certainly not very good at present, but I'm hoping in the long term that we can have stubs for all MPs (well, from the Long Parliament on, say) and that people with the specialized local history to fill in the bios will do so as they can. (There are some frighteningly systematic people working on Parliamentary election results and so on.) Anyway, I mostly dropped by because your humorous example of the legislator-for-an-hour reminded me of a real incident involving two (relative) nonentities, Lord Charles and Rev. Lord Frederick Townshend, younger sons of the 1st Marquess Townshend. The former had just been elected MP for Great Yarmouth, and he and his elder brother (the rector of Stiffkey) took a coach together from Norfolk to London. At the end of the journey, Rev. Lord Frederick got out, hit a post boy, offered to fight the spectators, and wandered away. Inside the coach, Lord Charles had been shot through the head. Lord Frederick claimed his brother had committed suicide and that he had also attempted to do so, but failed; the coroner's jury failed to determine whom the shooter had been, and Lord Frederick was committed for a madman. Much more memorable, I daresay, than anything either could have done in law or religion. Choess 05:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. TheSonofSerenity 07:03, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Regarding AFDs, just a friendly note to point out that the use of "vanity" is now discouraged. Instead please use "apparent Conflict of interest" per WP:COI. Cheers, Jpe| ob 08:15, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
EVula, thank you so much for your support for my RfA. I passed with a vote tally of 61/0/1. Also, thanks for keeping the tally up-to-date when others forgot and coming to my support on my one Neutral vote :-) I am honored that the consensus was to allow me the added privilege of the admin mop. I appreciate your support and complimentary words on my RFA! -- plange 21:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
for fixing my AfD close mistake... By the way, how would I avoid that in the future? What is the correct template?-- Isotope23 19:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Hmm, seems policy just recently changed. [7] I guess Jimbo removed that 48 hours thing about a week ago. I guess I didn't notice the change until you mentioned it. I guess it can be speedied, but it is on WP:CP so it will be deleted anyways. T REX speak 00:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice. :-) Nightscream 11:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
[8] Once again, everything I did has been within wikipedia guidelines. What is illegitimate about me keeping an eye on your edits, as I have noticed that they contain a pattern of behavior with which I disagree and believe to not be in the best interest of wikipedia (eg discussing your personal experiences with video games on talk pages)? Thanks. HTH. Justinpwilsonadvocate 17:59, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I saw you putting the {{ TestTemplatesNotice}} template in a few places, and I would think that it's value is questionable, and it also takes up a lot of room. I would think it would be better for it to show up only in Category:User warning templates, as that's the centralized place for all warning templates. Wonder what you think. You can reply here. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov ( talk) 03:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
subst:
already in place. :-) In all seriousness, though, I like having a standardized layout (for lack of a better term) for all the various warnings. A lot of new users who are just starting to use warnings against errant editors might not know to subst templates (I didn't when I was newb), so I think any service in that manner outweighs its size.
EVula
03:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your support re: Leia captured before or after Luke. I have no idea what this person is thinking! Urania3 12:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello! I think you are a good editor and i proposed you as a candidate for adminship. Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/EVula. Voice your opinion and let us know if you are willing to accept! Canderous Ordo 20:24, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Sure. It wouldn't go unnoticed by me anyway. :-) Good luck with it, I'll participate right away. By the way, I must recommend that you don't tell other users about it, for such action can be deemed as canvass by some editors. Your notice to me, however, is acceptable coz it's more like a friendly notice, as I participated in your editor review. Regards.-- Hús ö nd 23:36, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello there, EVula. Unluckily, I don't participate in RFAs of people with whom I have not treated regularly. However, you have my moral support :-) Good luck! -- ReyBrujo 00:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
I am heavily involved with this project, but since it didn't have a tag until some days ago (as a matter of fact it was in a certain state of abandonment until I joined it) nobody quite knows it yet, so it has a grand total of 6 members and some of them aren't even involved with Uruguay-related pages. I really want this project to grow and I want there to be a wider variety of articles related to it on Wikipedia, but I need someone more experienced than me to help me achieve it, so:
I'd appreciate your help. Wesborland 00:57, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
Your answer to Q4 on your RfA just earned you this barnstar. Mwahaha! Best regards. Hús ö nd 04:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC) |
...I am sure it will be ignored like all the others. Justinpwilsonadvocate 01:16, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
I have replied to your post on my Talk page. -- Slowking Man 11:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
4 users joined the project in 1 day. Good job! Thank you. I'd give you a barnstar, but I haven't made one yet :P Wesborland 15:26, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your response (yeah, the channel does that thing where you have to identify yourself with NickServ before you can /msg anyone). I've always considered "pissed" obscene (along the same level as "asshole"), which is why I couldn't understand why people would vote allow on that WP:RFC/NAME. In the United States pissed either means to be angry (in a vulgar sense) or to urinate (like you might have been holding it for quite a while), like one would say "where's the pisser" when looking for the restroom in a bar, etc. We also don't want children using that word, of course. Tuxide 03:05, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
~Tugs on EVula's coat~
E.. EVula, he's doing it again! B-but I can't stop him, lest I break the wules. The Haunted Angel ( The Forest Whispers My Name) 22:52, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
On behalf of the
Esperanza Barnstar Brigade, I hereby present user EVula the Barnstar Star Award for creating the fabulous
Uruguay Star.
Rosa
00:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 45 | 6 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:10, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
I am pleased to let you know that, consensus reached, you are now an Administrator. You should find the following forums useful:
Congratulations on your promotion and the best of luck with your new charge! Redux 22:03, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations on the mop EVula! :-) Have fun sweeping our beloved Wikipedia. Best regards.-- Hús ö nd 22:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Yay, another
Browncoat is an Admin! Congratulations EVula!!! --
plange
22:48, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GFDL. |
Hey, congratulations. Hope you enjoy the new privs (not too much!) :) riana_ dzasta 05:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
My pleasure, and congratulations! Jayjg (talk) 02:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you so much, EVula, for your support in my RfA, which passed on November 11, 2006, with a final tally of 82/0/2. I am humbled by the kind support of so many fellow Wikipedians, and I vow to continue to work and improve with the help of these new tools. Should you have any request, do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Hús ö nd 19:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC) |
Also thank you for congratulating me, and for all the encouragement/support. :-) Kindest regards.-- Hús ö nd 19:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
To express oneself In seventeen syllables Is very diffic -
Yay! -- weirdoactor t| c -- 02:12, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello EVula, the user that you see leaving the non-notable messages has left them on practically every page I have created and does so under different names. I doubt a page that is apart of a Wiki Novels project (if you refer to its discussion page) is considered non-notable. Just to let you know. I wanted to request if you find it alright for me to remove the tag because I highly doubt its notability is a problem. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 15:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks EVula, I greatly appreciate that. Well after looking at the history of all my articles seems he found his way to all of them:
Sheesh some people have major vendettas :P.... ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 15:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
May the glaciers shine reflected sunlight upon you in the cold, oh more gifted Wikipedia editor than I. Thank you, KP Botany 20:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Do not protect the William Sledd page from being recreated. It was deleted because some...people disputed whether the subject was notable. William Sledd was interviewed by Women's Wear Daily on november 2, 2006, as a rising "youtube star". There's a whole article about him. Unless you believe WWD is on pay from Youtube, then he has finally been reviewed in major independent media and meets notability.-- Arislan 23:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
I second this as I have personally read his article in the magazine.
That is my old username. I wanted to delete those pages.-- DANK 02:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 46 | 13 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of William_Sledd. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arislan ( talk • contribs)
![]() The mop |
Congratulations on becoming an admin!
Enjoy your new-found powers, and remember to use them only for good, and not for evil. If you would like to try out your new mop, here are some spots that always need loving care:
All the best! - Quadell |
![]() The flamethrower |
Just thought I'd let you know, this anonymous user has made another edit to the Shao Kahn edit, after you warned him. I tossed another warning template on there, but I thought I'd let you know what he's up to still. Cheers, The Haunted Angel ( The Forest Whispers My Name) 17:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for de-vandalizing my user page. You think a block is called for? I'd go with a last warning but I'm not sure if i should do it myself. ~ trialsanderrors 18:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
I suspect the semi-protect will have to be there for a long time; as long as the Candle Jack thing is a 4chan in-joke, the people there will try to carry it over here. Jay Maynard 15:23, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Someone has created two more articles on alleged new MK titles. There are no sources, so I've put them up for deletion ( here). Just thought you'd want to know. :) RobWill80 17:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. The thing is that some editors seem to have deleted, without comment, the original David A. Yeagley article in its entirety and substituted a new one, presumably to remove political controversies that surround Yeagley. I've just found this ount, and restored the text under a hidden tag. Badagnani 20:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I submitted the image for speedy deletion because it seemed to me to be an image that was rather unnecessary, however I see now ow it can be used, and please accept my formal apologies for this error. Scienceman123 talk 04:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
i try'd looking for a source of its information, nothings coming up, so i'll just wait for this guy to say something, so until then it'll stay off. Lil'Layzie-One 22:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC) Lil'Layzie-One
I removed your request for a citation - the citation is given. It's in Joss Whedon's commentary in the Firefly DVDs.
Now if you mean to say that Fillion's family, and thus Joss, might be WRONG, I think that's a different matter. It would be simple to rewrite it so that it was expressed as the Fillion family belief, and not as a fact.
Are they wrong? I suspect that any genealogists who are Nathan Fillion fans might be able to settle the question quickly. Zora 01:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Darn. Well, there goes the weekend. Guess I have to watch all the commentaries all over again :) Zora 05:37, 21 November 2006 (UTC) (My score: recruited four Browncoats)
Hello EVula, could you please take care of this speedy delete article. The username who created it also promotes the thing mentioned in the article. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 05:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 47 | 20 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:28, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Are you EVula as in EVula.com and the moderator in AmbrosiaSW forums? I have probably put as much time into that game series as I have into Wikipedia.— WAvegetarian• (talk) 12:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Please edit my user page when i give you permision! You don't have the persmission so please discuss it instead...
-- Storkian 21:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
A few things:
Thanks, Cbrown1023 22:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
i can see why you removed the resident evil stuff, that pretty much didn't belong there, but why did you remove the Mace: The Dark age stuff, to most people it does seem right, sence MK & Mace are both Midway made games, but i just want to know if theres another reason to other than its source. Lil'Layzie-One 14:40, 22 November 2006 (UTC) Lil'Layzie-One
ok Fair enough, i guess i should remove the one from Mace then huh lol. Lil'Layzie-One 15:27, 22 November 2006 (UTC) Lil'Layzie-One
Hey, Glad to have you onboard, there are alot of people 'involved' in the project, but we are certainly looking for proactive people to get stuck in. If you look here and the overview page you'll start to get an idea of where we are. In the next couple of days I'll put together the 4 template models, and then we can start early next week. I'll assign a group of warnings to each of the people who have said they're interested in helping out. We, and this where you might come in handy, will need to put together a checking system to audit the new templates to make sure they meet the criteria setout before we put them into place. Also nice one with the user box, will certainly use that!!! Cheers Khukri ( talk . contribs) 19:39, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Sharkface217 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile at others by adding {{ subst:smile}}, {{ subst:smile2}} or {{ subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
You recently moved several articles about female U.S. Senators into the Category:United States Senators. However, that category should not contain articles about individual Senators. Rather, they should be in its subcategories, such as Category:United States Senators from Montana.— Markles 13:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
IIUC, ChrisGriswold is referring to an editorial guideline specific to the Comics Project, speciffically Uniform cover artwork crediting convention.
Just plopping in 2¢ — J Greb 19:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the cookie (It's now in my awards section). But one problem: How am I supposed to eat it? -- AAA! ( AAAA) 22:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Well done. It seems you are really involved in the MK Project. I am a fan and follower of the game, but I do not have much time to participate. Anyway, congratulations and go ahead! Greetings, -- Gustave - May I help you? 00:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Gosh! Are you turning into a bot? Cbrown1023 01:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Query does not compute. echo $cover_story:
Of course not! Why would you think that? Silly Hi Evula, and thank you for trusting me as a fair reviewer. Well, I don't think that you were uncivil, but I do think that you might be getting a bit carried away in that discussion. Your anger and disbelief are quite evident in your counterarguments, perhaps you could state your positions without using expressions that denote sharp dissatisfaction (such as "what?"). Some editors do not appreciate a defense that is too staunch or too aggressive, and may even distance themselves from your position just because of the way your arguments are stated. My recommendation is to simply say things in the calmest, most reasonable way. Don't lose your temper. Once again, I don't think that you were uncivil. But you know, some editors are just too sensitive. :-) Good luck with that discussion. Best regards.-- Hús ö nd 06:24, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 48 | 27 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 01:35, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Good to see I was chosen as the lab rat :) Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 01:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for doing the TfD close on Template: Free Speech: I should have done it myself, but I forgot (we're all human, after all!) Best wishes, Physchim62 (talk) 13:18, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi Evula, I tried emailing you but it got bounced back saying your mailbox was full so I figured I'd just leave a message here. Thanks for your thoughts on Wikipedia, they were very helpful. One last question I have for you is how you want to be referenced if I quote you in the article. I basically need to have at least a first name and/or username as well as a country of residence (or if you live in the United States, the state). Thanks. FFFearlesss 17:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Not sure if you read the whole thing, but I've been following very closely. The socks of the user who created the article were vandals anyway. But, that was the most fun I've ever had in an afd. Patstuart (talk) (contribs) 02:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I have a question I was hoping you could answer as an admin. If I shouldn't be asking this here I apologise. Having read WP:NPOV and related pages through again, I see that it is expected that use of the {{ POV}} tag is accompanied by a reasonably full explanation on the talk page of the article. I was wondering is there any concensus that such tags can be removed if no explanation is given (or it is only a very basic ie. "I disagree" comment is made without citing problem areas and explaining the discrepancy)? There is a huge backlog of tags which undermine articles. Many seem to just be added when someone reads the topic which does not support their own POV on the subject. Thanks. WJBscribe 01:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
I think you broke it. If you use this code here I am 99.9% certain it will work perfectly. — coelacan talk — 02:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 49 | 4 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
William has been featured in a number of news articles. Please can you unprotect the page, I think it is time. Thanks. FrummerThanThou 16:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by FrummerThanThou ( talk • contribs) 21:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
Thank you for reverting vandalism to my user page, EVula. :-) Strange a registered user vandalize my page as their first contribution, I suspect it might be a user I blocked yesterday. Thanks once again. Best regards.-- Hús ö nd 18:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
the article i've created that was deleted twice was AC/DC's song Little Lover. i've recreated it just in case it deleted again. i've added some notability on the article to keep it from deleted. anyways, go ahead and check why the article was deleted. take care! Jailbreaker22 20:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of The White Rose Society (student group). Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- W.marsh 17:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm deeply saddened by the indefinite banning of user:timecop, but more so I'm troubled by your obvious racial profiling in this incident. I have nothing else to say, in fear of further abuse of power due to your personal biases towards people of color. Skrewler 17:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for banning the trolls! :D You make this place better for everyone! I wouldn't want Wikipe-tan to cry. You wouldn't want the personification of Wikipedia to cry, would you? Jecowa 11:58, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
That was a knee-jerker! (more of a slapper, but w/e) Here you go. Cbrown1023 04:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
That video is hilarious. He sounded like he was getting emotional over that Wikipedia article. Maybe that's why he had to edit part of it out. Jecowa 06:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
I have just ended the fight with Haunted Angel with my last post. I will not carry out a usless rant. BadtoGood 23:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks dude for the warning to BadtoGood, it was getting a bit ridiculous. The Haunted Angel ( The Forest Whispers My Name) 00:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the speedy fix! — SMcCandlish [ talk] [ contrib ツ 04:21, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi! Just wanna asked something about the classment of recurring fatalities. I asked it on talk page, but I couldn't get an answer. Deception fatalities (and Deadly Alliance fatalities of Jax, Frost and Kitana) appears on Unchained too, so are they considered as recurring? Thanks. Master Spider 16:31, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
About your collection of insults (they're quite funny). But, you last one makes it appear that being called Jewish is an insult. You may want to consider revising it. Just so you know, this is totally good faith and I'm just making sure that you don't get in trouble or thought of the wrong way. Thanks, Cbrown1023 01:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 50 | 11 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
For your amusing comment over on WP:AN under Administrator ethics. It made me laugh unless of course it's true... Whisp e ring 00:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC) |
Hi,
You have put yourself as interested in helping out at WikiProject on user warnings. We are now at a stage where we are creating the new templates and are wondering if you are still interested? If so please visit the overview page and choose a warning type you wish to work on. There is a base template available here, which you can copy and use to get you started. Have a look through the redirects and see what old templates are affected and incorporate them into the the new system. Anyway, any questions please don't hesitate to give me a shout. Regards Khukri ( talk . contribs) 09:04, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
It appears User:Ravnatel is restoring the links by 75.41.208.17, who you recently blocked for spamming. -- Ronz 20:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 51 | 18 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:04, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
You know, the problem is, all this is just too much work, and it detracts so much from Wikipedia. Thank you for offering to look into my complaints in an unbiased manner. I will still consider it, as I am watching this administrator more closely now, but still trying to get him to do right by using the talk pages of articles and stop reverting. KP Botany 00:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi there. I started an article about the Warcraft movie, citing blizzard.com's official announcement as a reference. However, someone wants to delete the article based on WP:CRYSTAL or something like that. If that's the case, shouln't Mortal Kombat: Devastation be deleted too according to the rules? Anyway, I need your help to keep this article from being deleted cause I'm not familiarized with Wikipedia's policies. Merry Xmas! -- Wesborland 19:36, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
An editor has expressed to me in email their displeasure at your reverting of their edit. [18]
I understand that indefinitely blocked editors have their editing privileges revoked, and have absolutely no problem with that. But in looking over the removed copy (note: with no knowledge of whether this is part of another situation), it seems to be a moderately worthwhile addition to the article.
*shrug* I'm not sure what proper protocol is in this situation, but I thought I'd at least drop you a line, if for no other reason than to get both sides of the story. EVula // talk // ☯ // 23:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Yup, you're right. That was my mistake. I forgot to check for that. — TKD:: Talk 05:52, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Page is *not* a recreation of the AfDed article
This wasn't originally deleted because of its syntax, it was deleted (twice) because of its content. {{ db-repost}} applies, and if someone wants to bring it back they're going to have to go through WP:DRV first. -- Calton | Talk 08:17, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 52 | 26 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Could you please explain why you put {{ db-author}} on Go God Go XII? [20] EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I object to the speedy closure of Serbophobia DRV, as it lasted mere 4 hours, and I (and anyone else who knew the background) didn't have a chance to comment. Calton, who seems to be the only aware of the issue, came too late. The "incident" was announced and endorsed here.
While I understand your reasons for the DRV closure (and my deletion summary at the time was bad, the reasons being given primarily in the AN/I thread above), and admittedly an out-of-process deletion for the purpose of improving the encyclopedia, it wouldn't have cost too much to leave it open for at least 24 hours, or check "what links here" and/or the article text.
Please don't take this as an... um... rant; from the pure process wonk viewpoint, the deletion was incorrect and thus undeletion might be correct. But, the speedy closure of DRV, from the same process wonk viewpoint, was also uncalled for (may I mildly hint to a bit of lack of WP:AGF for the fellow administrator who IAR-ed the said article?). The sole intention was to get rid of petty little ethnic feud articles, enumerating every chance of evil deeds of them against us. Oh well, guess I'll follow the process this time. Just, please, try to see if there's a bigger picture in the future. Cheers, Duja ► 14:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
(pun intended).
Duja
►
15:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Don't do it again, 'k? One major point of DRV is to draw a line what admins can get away with in their interpretation of policy, and if that itself is done out of process DRV loses much of its credibility. There was no imminient reason to restore the article right away and in all likelihood the consensus would have stood after five days, except in that case with the weight of a procedural decision behind it. ~ trialsanderrors 22:20, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
How can I activate an auto-heading for Template:Drmspeedy? Regards Must TC 21:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for offering your opinion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GabrielF/ConspiracyNoticeboard (2nd mfd). Look forward to seeing you around in 2007 at Conspiracy Central! For a little fun, check out Brad Greux's video blog at The Most Brilliant and Flawlessly Executed Plan, Ever, Ever. Good cheer from The Mad Dog, Morton devonshire 20:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC) |
This guy is always defaming the pages of John Tui and Jason David Frank. I was wondering instead of just giving him a few hours' block if you could just block him indefinitely, as it appears most of the time he "edits" a page it is because he desires to vandalizes it. I am not really familiar with the blocking policy, but since this guy is always vandalizing these pages when his block is up, I just figured if it was possible. I know such a move will make him create a sock puppet perhaps, but at least he may be less inclined to vandalize. Daijinryuu 22:39, 31 December 2006 (UTC)