This archive contains comments posted between January 2010 and March 2010.
|
A bureaucrat discussion has been opened in order to determine the consensus in this request for adminship. Please come participate. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:57, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
I've started a discussion about making sure our guidelines are clear about this at Wikipedia talk:User page. Dougweller ( talk) 21:46, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
After tolling up the votes in the revision proposals, it emerged that 5.4 had the most support, but elements of that support remained unclear, and various comments throughout the polls needed consideration.
A finalisation poll (intended, if possible, to be one last poll before finalising the CDA proposal) has been run to;
Thanks for your interest, It is not a question of ownership. Actually it would be nice if somebody took on some some of my workload on Wikipedia and helped me out - i end up doing far too much. User:Kasaalan has recently been doing quite a few changes to the template and i have left it to him. The template is important to me because i think it helps to compliment the abuse article that i have had to work on single handedly but not through choice.
I made the point many times in the original TFD that there was a valid discussion to be had on the template talk pages about pruning and the idea was discussed here in detail: Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_January_24#Instead_discussing_over_deletion_why_don.27t_we_improve_the_template
-- Penbat ( talk) 21:20, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
You Old Wikibastard...! -- Smashville talk 19:49, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
mheart ( talk) 00:08, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
It seems like just yesterday doesn't it? HighInBC ( talk) 04:15, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi: I know you're busy and I feel a bit silly that I can't figure out how to do this myself, but it looks daunting. I updated Gundremmingen Nuclear Power Plant, which had been based on a December 2007 version of the de.wikipedia page, and there is now a picture there that I'd like to use here on en., but I can't since it's not on Commons. I asked how at the Help Desk and was referred to you. They confirmed my reading of the image license as being acceptable. Absolutely no urgency, and if you can't help I'll ask the uploader/creator in case he/she is willing and able. In case you can't read the description, it's a picture of a model of the plant in the Info Center. Yngvadottir ( talk) 21:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Since I know you are active with user name policy and change (and your stalkers as well, this page is watched more than ANI), I thought I would bring 69 expert ( talk · contribs) to your attention. Seems vulgar, but it may not matter too much since all he's done so far is vandalize Marine Corps Martial Arts Program twice. bahamut0013 words deeds 03:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
A proposal to add a "public interest" clause to Wikipedia:Oversight has started at Wikipedia_talk:Oversight#Proposal_for_new_.27public_interest.27_clause. SilkTork * YES! 10:28, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
bg:Жест. LOL, you are famous in Bulgaria.
How was your production? bahamut0013 words deeds 16:09, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Since you've handled him before, I thought I'd inform you of an ANI thread about him. Check at the bottom. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 02:03, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Another editor has referred me to you. Do you know how to transwiki articles to wiktionary? Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 19:50, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Here's a shit-ton of them!
Happy birthday! --
Smashville
talk 12:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Might interest you Ironholds ( talk) 06:00, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
You participated in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Chicago 3. I thought you might want to sign up for Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Chicago 3.1 from 10:30-11:45 a.m. on Saturday May 1, 2010 at the UIC Student Center West.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 22:38, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
... and you shall receive. Lara 02:34, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
This archive contains comments posted between January 2010 and March 2010.
|
A bureaucrat discussion has been opened in order to determine the consensus in this request for adminship. Please come participate. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:57, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
I've started a discussion about making sure our guidelines are clear about this at Wikipedia talk:User page. Dougweller ( talk) 21:46, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
After tolling up the votes in the revision proposals, it emerged that 5.4 had the most support, but elements of that support remained unclear, and various comments throughout the polls needed consideration.
A finalisation poll (intended, if possible, to be one last poll before finalising the CDA proposal) has been run to;
Thanks for your interest, It is not a question of ownership. Actually it would be nice if somebody took on some some of my workload on Wikipedia and helped me out - i end up doing far too much. User:Kasaalan has recently been doing quite a few changes to the template and i have left it to him. The template is important to me because i think it helps to compliment the abuse article that i have had to work on single handedly but not through choice.
I made the point many times in the original TFD that there was a valid discussion to be had on the template talk pages about pruning and the idea was discussed here in detail: Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_January_24#Instead_discussing_over_deletion_why_don.27t_we_improve_the_template
-- Penbat ( talk) 21:20, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
You Old Wikibastard...! -- Smashville talk 19:49, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
mheart ( talk) 00:08, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
It seems like just yesterday doesn't it? HighInBC ( talk) 04:15, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi: I know you're busy and I feel a bit silly that I can't figure out how to do this myself, but it looks daunting. I updated Gundremmingen Nuclear Power Plant, which had been based on a December 2007 version of the de.wikipedia page, and there is now a picture there that I'd like to use here on en., but I can't since it's not on Commons. I asked how at the Help Desk and was referred to you. They confirmed my reading of the image license as being acceptable. Absolutely no urgency, and if you can't help I'll ask the uploader/creator in case he/she is willing and able. In case you can't read the description, it's a picture of a model of the plant in the Info Center. Yngvadottir ( talk) 21:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Since I know you are active with user name policy and change (and your stalkers as well, this page is watched more than ANI), I thought I would bring 69 expert ( talk · contribs) to your attention. Seems vulgar, but it may not matter too much since all he's done so far is vandalize Marine Corps Martial Arts Program twice. bahamut0013 words deeds 03:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
A proposal to add a "public interest" clause to Wikipedia:Oversight has started at Wikipedia_talk:Oversight#Proposal_for_new_.27public_interest.27_clause. SilkTork * YES! 10:28, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
bg:Жест. LOL, you are famous in Bulgaria.
How was your production? bahamut0013 words deeds 16:09, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Since you've handled him before, I thought I'd inform you of an ANI thread about him. Check at the bottom. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 02:03, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Another editor has referred me to you. Do you know how to transwiki articles to wiktionary? Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 19:50, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Here's a shit-ton of them!
Happy birthday! --
Smashville
talk 12:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Might interest you Ironholds ( talk) 06:00, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
You participated in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Chicago 3. I thought you might want to sign up for Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Chicago 3.1 from 10:30-11:45 a.m. on Saturday May 1, 2010 at the UIC Student Center West.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 22:38, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
... and you shall receive. Lara 02:34, 30 March 2010 (UTC)