|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
Bret Hart, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Fischer.sebastian (
talk)
23:27, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on
Category:World Champion professional wrestlers requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a
repost of material that was previously deleted following a
deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{
hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's
discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use
deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. ––
Lid(
Talk)
05:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
The recent categories you have created are somewhat unneeded. The World Champion category has been deleted twice before. Please do not recreate it. Instead any Category that would affect multiple articles like Royal Rumble winners or World Champions, take it to WT:PW to see if it is a good idea first.-- Will C 07:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
You appear to be ignoring the advice that has been given regarding the categories that have been removed from Chris Benoit. Please do NOT place them on the page again. Another inclusion may result in an assumption of bad faith. Please review the rules of Wikipedia and take the previous advice given. Thank you. !! Justa Punk !! 21:56, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:King of the Ring winners ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Darrenhusted ( talk) 12:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Royal Rumble winners ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Darrenhusted ( talk) 12:34, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
Jessica Alba, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. (
Diff)
Nightscream (
talk)
03:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Two categories you created, Category:National Basketball Association players with retired numbers and Category:Major League Baseball players with retired numbers, have been nominated for deletion. Please respond at the discussion page. — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 22:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
Maia Campbell. Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced or
poorly sourced
defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to
Maia Campbell , you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --
Ronz (
talk)
16:06, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Blocked for 48 hours. The BLP policy is not a joke and it's disturbing that you did not take previous warnings seriously. You may not add someone to the category "courtesans and prostitutes" without at least one reliable source. The fact that you did it twice is simply awful. Enigma msg 03:16, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Maia Campbell. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Pinkadelica
♣
05:43, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
Jeff Hardy. Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
TJ
Spyke
19:14, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Blocked again. I told you to stop it. Enigma msg 16:36, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Dcheagle ( talk) 20:44, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living persons, as you did to
Maia Campbell. Thank you.
Pinkadelica
♣
02:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Nicole Polizzi, you will be
blocked from editing.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
19:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
After your last edit, while you may make some good ones, you will be blocked quickly if you continue throwing in bad edits in between any good ones. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 05:22, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Money Train, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found
here. Thank you.
Whisky drinker |
HJ's sock
01:54, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to
add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to
Mischa Barton, you may be
blocked from editing.
Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (
talk)
23:33, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to
Jim Haslett, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's
categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's
verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Also, please be sure your edits comply with Wikipedia's policies regarding
biographies of living persons.--
Arxiloxos (
talk)
02:39, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Cole Hamels. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. —
KV5 •
Talk •
12:59, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Acroterion
(talk)
00:23, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
Bret Hart, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Fischer.sebastian (
talk)
23:27, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on
Category:World Champion professional wrestlers requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a
repost of material that was previously deleted following a
deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{
hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's
discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use
deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. ––
Lid(
Talk)
05:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
The recent categories you have created are somewhat unneeded. The World Champion category has been deleted twice before. Please do not recreate it. Instead any Category that would affect multiple articles like Royal Rumble winners or World Champions, take it to WT:PW to see if it is a good idea first.-- Will C 07:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
You appear to be ignoring the advice that has been given regarding the categories that have been removed from Chris Benoit. Please do NOT place them on the page again. Another inclusion may result in an assumption of bad faith. Please review the rules of Wikipedia and take the previous advice given. Thank you. !! Justa Punk !! 21:56, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:King of the Ring winners ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Darrenhusted ( talk) 12:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Royal Rumble winners ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Darrenhusted ( talk) 12:34, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
Jessica Alba, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. (
Diff)
Nightscream (
talk)
03:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Two categories you created, Category:National Basketball Association players with retired numbers and Category:Major League Baseball players with retired numbers, have been nominated for deletion. Please respond at the discussion page. — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 22:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
Maia Campbell. Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced or
poorly sourced
defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to
Maia Campbell , you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --
Ronz (
talk)
16:06, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Blocked for 48 hours. The BLP policy is not a joke and it's disturbing that you did not take previous warnings seriously. You may not add someone to the category "courtesans and prostitutes" without at least one reliable source. The fact that you did it twice is simply awful. Enigma msg 03:16, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Maia Campbell. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Pinkadelica
♣
05:43, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
Jeff Hardy. Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
TJ
Spyke
19:14, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Blocked again. I told you to stop it. Enigma msg 16:36, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Dcheagle ( talk) 20:44, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living persons, as you did to
Maia Campbell. Thank you.
Pinkadelica
♣
02:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Nicole Polizzi, you will be
blocked from editing.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
19:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
After your last edit, while you may make some good ones, you will be blocked quickly if you continue throwing in bad edits in between any good ones. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 05:22, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Money Train, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found
here. Thank you.
Whisky drinker |
HJ's sock
01:54, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to
add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to
Mischa Barton, you may be
blocked from editing.
Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (
talk)
23:33, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to
Jim Haslett, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's
categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's
verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Also, please be sure your edits comply with Wikipedia's policies regarding
biographies of living persons.--
Arxiloxos (
talk)
02:39, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Cole Hamels. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. —
KV5 •
Talk •
12:59, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Acroterion
(talk)
00:23, 28 January 2011 (UTC)