![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, Djm-leighpark. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Aaron Bastani".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta ( talk) 13:41, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
I see the discussion is closed. Well, if my actions create a backlog, it just going to have to be dealt with eventually. Backlogs are not a problem per se. Prod notices just like others are an indicator of potential problems and they should not be dismissed "because we have too many [problems]". I appreciate you reviewing them, but don't feel pressured you have to deal with any backlog yourself. Nor will the project suffer if the backlog grows (in fact we have numerous backlogs going for years). Remember to have fun editing Wikipedia, don't let yourself burn out! Personally I like to alternate different tasks here - one week I'll create new articles, another I'll hunt down spam for deletion nominations. Diversity is fun. If dealing with prods is tiring you, try something else for a while. Cheers, -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:17, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
PROD's are time limited. So no it isn't "fun". Bloody disruptive. That number of PRODs is an overload. Turns people off Wikipedia and to the dark side. Anyway you've had you're fun. People in my life have suffered. We both know the the articles had serious issues and most (but not all) of what you raised was reasonable ... but I am probably seeing a failure mostly to checkout reasonable merges. Thanks a bunch ... I'm bound to spread the grumps but that the way it goes. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 13:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Well, since you didn't seem to get better after my prior comment, I will be more frank with you, particularly since you call my edits "bloody disruptive", quite a personal attack (but I know, admins don't need to respect NPA). You should be thanking me for trying to deal with spam, not complaining. Your attitude is not helping others, including me, have a nice experience here. I understand you are exhausted, been there, done that. But you've reached a point your exhaustion is turning into biting other volunteers. Please take a break, play some computer games, or with your cat, or whatever, and come back when you feel other people here are trying to help you, not hurt you and the project. And I strongly recommend you put deletion-related tasks on the side, they are clerly stressing you out. You should be here to have fun, not to be miserable and spread such attitude around (through personal attacks and complains about those that just try to work). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
@ Piotrus
While I obviously wish you to do a WP:BEFORE (and this may be necessary for some where I have pointed at improved references on talk) for practical purposes and as a rule of thumb I can otherwise see no reasonable objection to those being taken to AfD. (I'll probally end up moaning about an inadequate WP:BEFORE on one or two of them at AfD but thats as may be). For practical purposes for this set in terms of light Blue dePROded ones if there is a plausible merge it may work better to pass those by me first to see if I am willing to undertake the merge as that may save 4 or 5 AfD noms. (Not all merges are the same... another long essay) Some of the Blue dePRODs have no plausible or obvious merge however I feel they mostly have a strong chance of AfD survival but should who wish to take to AfD following a proper WP:BEFORE then that is your right, I'd certainly hope we can filter out merges (in out of its many forms ... the most extreme is a WP:MERGEPROP and while we may have at least one of those ... WordWise will be a stonecast merge of some kind but I might prefer WP:MERGETEXT there. Some of this is time. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 10:21, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Thankyou. (If I have said anything in a bad way or offensive of stupid above please realise not meant and due to inadequate proof reading ... ) Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 10:21, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
I think nearly everyone agrees there is a mass of historical articles on wikipedia that fall below any required standard. However we should really be encouraging these to cease in a positive way and NPP is likely key in this. The one on this set that really concerned me was Browsh. Pathway was:
I would really have loved to see the curator drafting and encouraging the user to AfC or Teahouse (somewhat positive pathway) rather than what happened which is a destructive pathway. I'm not rally familiar with NPP ( I've learned to work on the bucket and shovel basis of stick at least one good notability reference on it if it's an (Irish) steam engine with a red link to it or at least two and probably three otherwise and that seems to work well ) ... however I'm not sure whether Blowsh treatment was inside of NPP guidance (in which case I might suggest tweaking it) or a one off outside of guidance ... in which case one off fair enough nobody makes more mistakes than I do. (I've mentioned names here to make them aware of the discussion). Djm-leighpark ( talk) 10:21, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your guidance regarding contributions to Wikipedia. That was very helpful. I am new to this platform and learning what it takes to contribute. I am interested in contributing to the Oracle Database article, but also potentially to the articles for Oracle Exadata and Oracle Zero Data Loss Recovery Appliance. I am an employee of Oracle and have made that discloser on my user page. I am learning how to request edits, so please don't hesitate to give me additional feedback. I enjoy writing in general, and I anticipate I can be a valuable contributor on these topics, including meeting the high standards for accuracy and objectiveness required by Wikipedia. Thanks! Ccraft us ( talk) 23:50, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Dear DJM,
I was putting an effort to contribute on this particular article Zensar Technologies by providing proper content format as the existing one looks very scattered and lots of dead links, Therefore have re-written the same in below formagt along with all available inline citations as per wiki guidelines, however you seems to have undid all my revision. Hence request you to go through the one I have written keeping only available content with proper citations & also help removing dead links from this article.
Here is what I thought of contributing & looking forward to your thoughts on the same if you think it makes sense. Thank you
Deepak HM ( talk) 14:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Zensar Technologies is a multinational technology company headquartered in Pune, India with offices in the US, UK and South Africa. It is a subsidiary of RPG Enterprises. Founded in 2001, the company has an annual revenue of $480 million and employs approximately 9,000 employees. [1] [2]
Zensar Technologies deals in e-commerce, mobile applications, cloud computing, digital transformation and data analytics. Zensar Technologies operates across retail, healthcare, airlines, banking and insurance sectors.
Zensar Technologies is listed on both the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) [3] and the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) [4] and is present on several indices including the NSE's Nifty 500 and the S&P BSE 500.
Ganesh Natarajan became CEO in 2001 for what was to become a 15-year tenure. Sandeep Kishore took over as Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director in 2016. [5] [6] [7]
The following acquisitions have been made by Zensar since 2014. | Venture | Date | Company | Value | Location base | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acquisition | 2014 | Professional Access Inc | New York | [8] | ||
Acquisition | 2016 | Foolproof Inc | London | [9] | ||
Acquisition | 2017 | Keystone Logic | Omnichannel retail order and warehouse management [10] [11] [12] | |||
Acquisition | 2018 | Cynosure INC | US$33m | US | For leverage of insurance and Guidewire practice. [13] | |
Acquisition | 2018 | Indigo Slate | [14] |
References
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |dead-url=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |dead-url=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |dead-url=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Unknown parameter |dead-url=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Unknown parameter |dead-url=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Green Line (Luas), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Milltown ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:16, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi. You have now twice removed a section of this article and the only reason given is referring to a red-link. Please state your reasons clearly here or I will re-inserted the deleted material which under 3rr you may not then remove again. Regards Sarah777 ( talk)
@ Sarah777 ... Thankyou for pointing that out. I should have used WP:Settlement. The purpose was to remove navbars from a WP:SETTLEMENT. As it happens there is a further issue with this particular navbars as Stillorgan tram station is not where Stillorgan Railway station was (that now being just the other side of the current Sandyford station). When I think of some good words to to put I will look to put the explanation in the article talk. I also may try and fix this lot of station and depots with some prose but I make wish to make co-ordinated changes to Luas Green Line and Sandyford as well. As a heads up I may an some point suggest a Dún Laoghaire harbour article ... being a merge of Carlisle Pier and part of Dún Laoghaire ... but I'd like views such as yours first (Technically easiest to Move Carlisle Pier then merge from Dún Laoghaire). Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 19:56, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Good job! Useddenim ( talk) 00:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DWWR 15 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWWR 15 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram ( talk) 09:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating DWWR 13.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Keep up the good work on these articles.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 15:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
I just spent some time adding Version History data to Dorico software's page, and you deleted it because I was anon? So what's the point in allowing anonymous editing if it gets instantly deleted? There was nothing contentious in my Edit. Oh, but you missed the External link to Dorico's Youtube channel, so you might want to delete that too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.147.212.120 ( talk) 09:19, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
The key point is the information was unsourced. I see you have now returned it sourced. As I am aware of the youtube external link which as you say I had missed that will probably be removed by myself or elseone .... External links are often abused. In general it is job of the product website to make that resource visible to those you need it. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 10:17, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi there,
I am not trying to be disruptive by editing this page.
The page states that the name of the operation was chosen randomly - this is not true. The naming was influenced by the call of the bird - The UK Treasury should own up to this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpammyJackson ( talk • contribs) 19:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, there may be be all sorts of reasons and theories about the source of the name, but Wikipedia will when push comes to crunch only accept what can be sourced even if it isn't true. If you look back through history this earlier edit of mine which got reverted to where we are you can probably judge what the community will accept (OK it has a daily mirror source which was unacceptable. I can direct you to WP:Teahouse if you'd like an independent viewpoint. Thankyou. 19:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi,
I just saw your message. I have put the conflict of interest notice as you suggested, but my article is already deleted. I don't know who had created it. Since I usually don't use any surname, they probably didn't realize that it has been years since I changed my surname legally.
My main interest was mainly that it was with a name I no longer use and spoke of coverage of my experiences with domestic violence - which really is not what I am known for beyond what I went through at that time. While not a secret, there is better information about me.
I don't know how to create Wikipedia articles, but if I decide to give it a shot, I will definitely use your suggestions. This is most helpful. Thank you.
Just for my knowledge, how to request change of name of article? Like this one was Vidyut Kale - but my name now is Vidyut Gore.
Vidyutblogger ( talk) 17:50, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
I just saw that someone has recreated a blank page for my article. I will try using your suggestions. Vidyutblogger ( talk) 18:04, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
I have made this space to collect some information User:Vidyutblogger/sandbox/Vidyut Gore - can you copy the earlier content here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vidyutblogger ( talk • contribs) 18:09, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Please do NOT edit that page! Djm-leighpark ( talk) 18:22, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Please do not edit the page Vidyut Kale. It is at WP:DRV ... Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 April 3. Be very extremely careful about entering that discussion. Thankyou. 18:27, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Not touching that page at all. I am just collecting better references here /info/en/?search=User:Vidyutblogger/sandbox/Vidyut_Gore Making articles seems quite complicated, so for now just collecting references. I hope doing that in the sandbox page is all right.
~~~~. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 18:40, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Will do. Thank you very much. This had been so confusing till your messages. Much appreciated.
Vidyutblogger ( talk) 18:48, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
(I wrote this originally half an hour ago but its still useful though it may strike you as a little weird for which I apologise).
@ Vidyutblogger this may amaze you but I cannot be sure if you are Vidyut Kale/Gore or a person impersonating Vidyut Kale/Gore. And for my purposes here it matters not one little bit either way! Here to me you are user account Vidyutblogger who has a declared conflict of interest with articles dealing with Vidyut Kale/Gore. My suggested process (hopefully near right) for requesting a rename is the for any person with a coi.
1: Find one or even two WP:RS indicating Vidyut Kale has changed their name to Vidyut Gore 2: Point to her blog which should indicate that is the name by she now wishes to be known. 3: Use the WP:REQUESTEDIT system on the talk page of the article to request the change 4: If you want to change the name of the article (that is move it) this might be regarded as a potentially controversial move. WP:RM and WP:RM#CM apply. It is
Requestedit will seem a little strange but I can point you at Talk:Imperva where you can see REQUESTEDIT being used. I am not sure if it is the best practice but at least you can see an example. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 19:04, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. I will use WP:REQUESTEDIT - will this do as a RS? https://twitter.com/Vidyut/status/1111952956293894144 - The Vidyut Kale article in its deleted version recognized my Twitter account. Alternatively, I found my correct name listed here /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:UNESCO_Workshop_(2019_New_Delhi)_Lists this links to the Wikidata page for my name, which has all variations of previous names, including Vidyut Kale. Ideally, on my own site, I don't use a surname at all, or at least would prefer to not list Vidyut Kale at all.
Vidyutblogger ( talk) 19:14, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
...for the heads-up. The Longford proposal could lead to many more similar ones and I don't really think any change to the status quo is necessary or helpful. Sarah777 ( talk) 16:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC) ..... Weirdly it was only that a Google search brought up Wikivoyage Longford Town which didn't have a custom banner page. I had a quick search on Commons for anything that had a picture usable for a banner (electing to specifically to avoid anything railway related (unless it was good and last option standing). In the event I chose the swimming pool which sort of worked with a 7:1 crop (I be honest I would have preferred the Canal or someething else but I'll work with what I can find). In the process I happened to note it was your photo and I know your are well opinionated on these matters! As I say I'm now back on the fence. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 16:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Care to explain these edits? – [2], [3]. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 08:25, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
@ Vidyutblogger: In essence Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington was concerned over the technique I used to try ensure you (or friend sparebug!) did not come off black and get into an WP:EDITWAR. There may be some nuances beyond that but its probably best you ignore them. (I've lost exactly what I was going to say here because the following discussion on the Revert discussion below is in many ways more pressing from a Wikipedia viewpoint). Djm-leighpark ( talk) 21:26, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
@ Vidyutblogger : I have run out of window tonight (and more specifically before MOTD) for covering the specific issues with this edit to Supreme leader and related matters so I hope to cover this tomorrow. Please remember at times I inconsistently speak absolute drivel and rubbish so while I try my best efforts I can be wrong. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 21:26, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
The best way to request changes to an article is to use the phrase "Please change x to y using z", as shown below.
Change x to y using z
| ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
I observe Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington has useful comments on events at User talk:Vidyutblogger#Your edits on Supreme Leader and suggested any further commentary on this matter is placed there and I concur people should now follow that suggestion. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 12:28, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I wonder if you intended to add archive links for so many of the Strandhill references? On trying a few, like the CSO 2016 and logainm references, the live links worked fine for me. Thanks Declangi ( talk) 00:47, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
You reverted my merge, but did not revert the source article. Please let me know what your specific objection is, as the article was in much better shape after. I will correct the deficiency and we can move on. Lfstevens ( talk) 19:47, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
I am happy to add them instead of a prod, ex [11]. But if I don't see sources, I don't think that asking for them, or any other rationale, is a problem. A problem is that deprod can be too easily abused by spammers, making us waste time at AfD. A non-spammer editor should have no problem providing a source or a valid rationale. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:22, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
wiki than en, might be a better choice, in light of your linguistic proficiency. Proper communication is necessary esp. when maneuvering in areas of quasi-admin maintenance (CSD, PROD et al) and your machine translated(??) texts are quite difficult to parse.
∯WBG
converse
19:00, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
You basically agree with me, but your insinuations that I have are at best unhelpful and distracting from the real problem here which is dealing with poor quality vanity images. I'm quite happy to WP:DISENGAGE and let editors discuss it out on the talk page - but I'd much rather talk about the relative merits of good photographs rather than the inadequacies of poor ones. I'm quite happy to encourage users to take photographs where those are adequate quality. I think that's brilliant. I hope people like Dave or Hammersfan can improve their photography to useful levels. It's actually something I'm passionate about. Tony May ( talk) 06:49, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Please self-revert your WP:NPA at [15]. Or this is going to be reported to WP:AN. I haven't seen such a NPA violation in quite a while, but I am giving you the chance to remove it - everyone has a bad day or 5 minutes every now and then. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:24, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Djm-leighpark, I do not understand your aggressive attitude towards me at Talk:Gaelic handball. You asked a question of Sky Blu 2 and, knowing that there was a very good chance he would not respond, I offered what I thought was a helpful suggestion, i.e. that you go ahead and close. I could have closed it myself, but I thought that it might look like I was trying to pre-empt you, so I left it as just a suggestion. I got a snotty response from you in return. I tried to explain – foolishly, as it turned out – that I had suggested it because Sky Blu 2 was inactive at that time, and I got "Whoo .... hold the pony". What's that about? Then I say I'm not arguing with you, and you start talking about taking it to ANI. Then, when the matter is actually settled, you come back to me with "DIY advice for bold people", telling me about "rules of engagement" and being left "open to accusations of incitement". Rules of engagement?? Incitement?? We were never in any war, except maybe one in your head! Please, please have a read of Wikipedia:Assume good faith. All my comments were made in good faith, and I don't deserve to be abused like that. Scolaire ( talk) 11:30, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
For your points made here and here; you clearly are working in WP's best interests, ensuring that no abuse of power is ever gotten away with. Thanks! It's appreciated. –– Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 04:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC) |
I just read about the "relist" that you mention I should be trouted for. Which one? I had no involvement in relisting either Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marketing operations management (2nd nomination) or Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enterprise marketing management so I am confused? Regards, Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 10:39, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Hey! I just saw this and I was so confused that I felt it would be best to ask you; what is this supposed to mean? -- MrClog ( talk) 19:44, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Can the revenue be updated within the infobox basis this link: https://www.zensar.com/about-us/media/press-release/zensar-reports-202-growth-pat-and-176-growth-revenue-fy19 to $566.9 Million for Zensar Technologies -- Stevethomas4 ( talk) 14:35, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Any problems with any steps then I'll good faith do them unless I spot a bad problem in the reference source. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 14:50, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited L&YR Class 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Aspinall ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:16, 19 August 2019 (UTC) {{ Done}} Djm-leighpark ( talk) 08:57, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
You tagged me on this entry, so I added a couple of academic references and did a couple of small edits. I rarely edit pages nowadays, hope this helps. Dkechag ( talk) 22:26, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi mate, understand that you have proposed the article, Karikku, for deletion. Just wanted to inform you that I have contested the proposal as the subject of the article, a web channel, has received a notable award and is one of the most popular web channels in Malayalam language (YouTube play buttons, subscriber base and view count of over 180 million attest this). -- jojo@nthony ( talk) 06:18, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Mjs1991 ( talk) 04:12, 15 June 2019 (UTC)This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
∯WBG converse 11:54, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
What a fucking load of twaddle! Djm-leighpark ( talk) 15:08, 17 June 2019 (UTC) What a fucking WP:HOUND !!!
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pig racing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Durrow ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 14:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Brexit – immediate outcome of no-deal exit.
User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Thank you for your new article "Brexit – immediate outcome of no-deal exit". However the existence of this article, along with the "No Deal" section of Brexit negotiations, various portions of European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, and several related articles, adds to a situation that seems a bit messy and redundant. Or in other words. a reader who is exploring the Brexit topic will encounter a whole bunch of different articles that have similar information and possibly some inconsistencies. You might consider discussing this issue with anyone who is active at Talk:Brexit.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
--- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 19:53, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Djm-leighpark ( talk) 14:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Why did you undo my edit? Removing the proposed deletion tag is the correct way to object to deletion as per the official objection procedure. -- Dan Huby ( talk) 07:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Please read the objection procedure Dan Huby ( talk) 07:38, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Your unilateral changing of the target is contested - the place to discuss is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Deal, rather than edit war over it. Widefox; talk 20:53, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
I wish I hadn't started! A huge amount of updating is needed...
Let's call the whole thing off I predict a mass exodus from the civil service because this has all the ingredients of a career-destroying project failure. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 15:41, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brexit – immediate outcome of no-deal exit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cabinet ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:10, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carlisle Pier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Rennie ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a
speedy deletion tag from
Draft:St Antony's Church Machad, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the
talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk)
06:06, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
No-deal Brexit; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. MPS1992 ( talk) 22:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
@ MPS1992. You just reverted cite improvements and reverted back to broken syntax version! Are you mad ??????? + an Iabot run. thats standard stuff. And disruptional. Right Bully tactic that. Drag me to WP:ANI then. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 23:02, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
I don't understand why you have gone to that much trouble? It makes the citations more difficult to navigate. I have only felt it necessary when the original is dead. Have I missed a policy change? -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 11:52, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
I will make a point of not removing 'Under Construction' tags in future. I have felt free to remove (or insert) other tags, such as 'lede too short', and have not received any adverse reactions. Valetude ( talk) 16:15, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
the content is verifiable
please find something worthwhile to do with your time instead of reverting stuff you clearly don't understand — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.228.232.167 ( talk) 19:59, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Thankyou for supplying a reference that I have reFilled. The map did not verify the claim of 2017. The understanding of the signing of the comments I do have but I do forget sometimes. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 20:15, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020! |
Hello Djm-leighpark, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
![]() |
Thank you for continuing to make Wikipedia the greatest project in the world. I hope you have an excellent holiday season. Lightburst ( talk) 03:09, 22 December 2019 (UTC) |
Hello Djm-leighpark: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, DBig Xrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 18:15, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Interstellarity (
talk) is wishing you
Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user
Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
You reverted the sentence: One of the goal of the Oracle Database is to build cutting edge technologies like Multitenancy, JSON, analytics, Machine Learning, Blockchain, and many more, directly within a converged infrastructure to greatly simplify applications' development and deployment. due to incorrect grammar. Can you help me rephrqse it? Thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JFVerrier ( talk • contribs) 17:33, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Yes, indeed I am an Oracle employee. As such, I know what I am talking about and my proposed changes are not marketing information. I just want to make sure that the information is readable and understandable. On this page, there is way too much information that is overloading to understand correctly. My only intent is to make it easier for readers and consistent with other Wikipedia Oracle pages like /info/en/?search=Oracle_Exadata . Even if I have a WP:COI , I should be allowed to at least propose changes. My first request is to add the sentence above as it is a fundamental characteristic of the Oracle Database that is not expressed on the page. How do you want me to proceed for this and other changes going forward ? Many thanks in advance. JFVerrier ( talk) 07:55, 27 September 2019 (UTC)JFVerrier
Thanks for creating James Pim.
User:Onel5969 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Very nice job on this article. Keep up the good work.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 11:02, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
@ onel5969 - ... thanks ... I've hit the buffers and need a coffee ... [21] .. can't leverage as didn't mention James! ... still havn't forgiven you so sabotaging passenger locomotive though ... still you have incentivise me to given Harrison's thesis though but I'd foot a couple of floor of turf before betting through that. James Pim Snr. was brewer and I need a decent ref Junior lived in Monkstown castle and we needs a reliable source for the Pim's starting the Dublin chamber of Commerce as I am not sure yer man talking 2 4fm is a WP:RS. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 13:54, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Djm-leighpark,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
-
Nahal
(T)
23:00, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Theroadislong ( talk) 10:31, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Hi I gather from your removal of my PROD tag that you have an objection to the description of LitwareHR as a piece of fictitious software. This isn't my description, it's the description used in the article itself and in the sources. Mccapra ( talk) 12:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Djm-leighpark!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Theroadislong (
talk)
17:43, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
|
![]() |
The Article Rescue Barnstar | |
Well done. Britishfinance ( talk) 20:06, 17 October 2019 (UTC) |
![]() |
For doing some very good work and improving the article National Informatics Centre. DBig Xrayᗙ 14:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC) |
Appreciated. The quite frankly its more brutal and rough prose going in to re-bulk up the article than any sort of beautiful ... though I would nearly quote Dick Strawbridge how beautiful is THAT! looking at the shapes of the references and names appearing on the sources which would likely scare most from dragging it to AfC if they found it like that in the first place. (That's not the same as deep scrutiny). I'd always suggest peoples consider WP:THREE for those wishing to save articles and maybe checkout Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidyut Kale for seeing hard scrutiny and the DRV on [ [22]] as well. But quite frankly AfD/DRV is not what I cam to WP for, I come to do content and AfD/DRV detracts from that. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 16:10, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
I think you made a good call on looking past the COI issues and recognizing the article's potential. Nice work on improving and rescuing the article. --{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
18:50, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
I think you are overreacting and discriminating users here. First of all, I found that article as a complete mess as it is clearly not a neutral encyclopedia article. Second, I found skillfully inserted negative info in all the sections and it was mostly based on one unreliable blog review. Third, in the Reception section, I found the advertising of the other VPNS: "PC Magazine's Max Eddy wrote, "PureVPN is not a bad service by any measure, but it's not the best."[6] He preferred competitor VPNs Private Internet Access, which "offers a spartan experience at an unbeatable price", and NordVPN, which "costs slightly more than average but packs excellent features into an excellent interface". How that information can be neutral and encyclopedic? I would better suggest to remove the page about PureVPN from Wikipedia than keep it like that. I hope you don't have COI here as it looks like you prevent cleaning the article by all means, and automatically accusing a person in COI without even looking the updates and changes made. I would like to bring it further to other editiors as you are clearly overreacting here.-- 2601:1C0:CB01:2660:6CF1:B29B:6783:9CC5 ( talk) 21:13, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
I'm not so experienced and I have no idea how even to do the [[WP:REQUESTEDIT]. Also, I thought that everyone one this planet has the right to edit Wikipedia in a constructive way (please, correct me, if I'm not right). Once again, I do not have COI and you only discourage new users from editing. My reaction is totally natural and all the reviewers are more than welcome to check my edits on the page. Have a great day.-- 2601:1C0:CB01:2660:6CF1:B29B:6783:9CC5 ( talk) 21:41, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Djm-leighpark! I explicitly confirm that I don't have any WP:COI with PureVPN or a competitor. I already confirmed it in the message above(in my Talk), so I'm surprised to see it again. I also surprised to see that you first put the COI tag on the page and then asked me about COI. I welcome all the constructive changes and I if you explain me how to edit or request to edit next time, I'd be glad to listen to the experienced user like you. Regarding your assumption on my experience. I did a few edits before on different pages and picked up some rules and experience but I still consider myself very inexperienced user. Let me know what rules of Wikipedia I breached by removing the biased information and blog reviews (which are not eligible to be cited on Wikipedia as far as I know). -- 2601:1C0:CB01:2660:6CF1:B29B:6783:9CC5 ( talk) 22:53, 6 November 2019 (UTC) ... Effectively have replied on users talk page and also handling a way forward on the Talk:PureVPN. I really knew my talk page was looking to good today to last! Djm-leighpark ( talk) 00:02, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Conversation collapsed due to uncivil language
|
---|
As you might have lost interest in the AfD of Manuel Bastioni Lab, you might have stopped reading the AfD comments. I would like you to read my response to your neutral vote. At least my "p.s." section. As someone else has said to you: "That BLP AfD almost killed my enthusiam for Wikipedia – much appreciate that you took it on to restore it." You seem like a constructive contributor, who wants to improve wikipedia. Maybe you could look into this Kb03 user and do something about his behavior, bring this to the attention of others on Wikipedia or leave a comment, if I'm gravely misunderstanding his actions. Most people just want to improve Wikipedia and Kb03 seem to be the exact opposite. They are the ones, who demoralize and drive off a bunch of people by rollbacking hard work (e.g. 356 rollbacks in just one day without any comment) or trying to delete articles left and right. -- 82.206.28.74 ( talk) 15:09, 12 November 2019 (UTC) @82.206.28.74 ... Kb03 is a NPP and while I may disagree at times with some of their actions in general they so a good job sometimes under a lot of pressure. 'Tis better if you have a concern with their actions to raise on their talk page as they invite rather than pushing someone else out into the vanguard. In terms on the AfD it is merely of necessity that someone points out the article was improved since initial nomination addressing some/all of the concerns. Some good closers would clock that anyway. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 16:17, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Any admin seeing this will be noting how NOT to get an article rescued! 21:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
|
As such, a failure of WP:NCORP as well as WP:GNG.
∯WBG converse 13:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)@ Winged Blades of Godric: I regard amount of time you have held this locked from edit as unhelpful to say the least and seems to be made only when the article was likely to be brought to WP:DRV. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 13:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Fernihough, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Eastern Railway ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC) {{ Done}} Djm-leighpark ( talk) 13:26, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephenson's Rocket, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC) {{ Done}} Djm-leighpark ( talk) 13:25, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, Djm-leighpark. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Aaron Bastani".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta ( talk) 13:41, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
I see the discussion is closed. Well, if my actions create a backlog, it just going to have to be dealt with eventually. Backlogs are not a problem per se. Prod notices just like others are an indicator of potential problems and they should not be dismissed "because we have too many [problems]". I appreciate you reviewing them, but don't feel pressured you have to deal with any backlog yourself. Nor will the project suffer if the backlog grows (in fact we have numerous backlogs going for years). Remember to have fun editing Wikipedia, don't let yourself burn out! Personally I like to alternate different tasks here - one week I'll create new articles, another I'll hunt down spam for deletion nominations. Diversity is fun. If dealing with prods is tiring you, try something else for a while. Cheers, -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:17, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
PROD's are time limited. So no it isn't "fun". Bloody disruptive. That number of PRODs is an overload. Turns people off Wikipedia and to the dark side. Anyway you've had you're fun. People in my life have suffered. We both know the the articles had serious issues and most (but not all) of what you raised was reasonable ... but I am probably seeing a failure mostly to checkout reasonable merges. Thanks a bunch ... I'm bound to spread the grumps but that the way it goes. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 13:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Well, since you didn't seem to get better after my prior comment, I will be more frank with you, particularly since you call my edits "bloody disruptive", quite a personal attack (but I know, admins don't need to respect NPA). You should be thanking me for trying to deal with spam, not complaining. Your attitude is not helping others, including me, have a nice experience here. I understand you are exhausted, been there, done that. But you've reached a point your exhaustion is turning into biting other volunteers. Please take a break, play some computer games, or with your cat, or whatever, and come back when you feel other people here are trying to help you, not hurt you and the project. And I strongly recommend you put deletion-related tasks on the side, they are clerly stressing you out. You should be here to have fun, not to be miserable and spread such attitude around (through personal attacks and complains about those that just try to work). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
@ Piotrus
While I obviously wish you to do a WP:BEFORE (and this may be necessary for some where I have pointed at improved references on talk) for practical purposes and as a rule of thumb I can otherwise see no reasonable objection to those being taken to AfD. (I'll probally end up moaning about an inadequate WP:BEFORE on one or two of them at AfD but thats as may be). For practical purposes for this set in terms of light Blue dePROded ones if there is a plausible merge it may work better to pass those by me first to see if I am willing to undertake the merge as that may save 4 or 5 AfD noms. (Not all merges are the same... another long essay) Some of the Blue dePRODs have no plausible or obvious merge however I feel they mostly have a strong chance of AfD survival but should who wish to take to AfD following a proper WP:BEFORE then that is your right, I'd certainly hope we can filter out merges (in out of its many forms ... the most extreme is a WP:MERGEPROP and while we may have at least one of those ... WordWise will be a stonecast merge of some kind but I might prefer WP:MERGETEXT there. Some of this is time. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 10:21, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Thankyou. (If I have said anything in a bad way or offensive of stupid above please realise not meant and due to inadequate proof reading ... ) Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 10:21, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
I think nearly everyone agrees there is a mass of historical articles on wikipedia that fall below any required standard. However we should really be encouraging these to cease in a positive way and NPP is likely key in this. The one on this set that really concerned me was Browsh. Pathway was:
I would really have loved to see the curator drafting and encouraging the user to AfC or Teahouse (somewhat positive pathway) rather than what happened which is a destructive pathway. I'm not rally familiar with NPP ( I've learned to work on the bucket and shovel basis of stick at least one good notability reference on it if it's an (Irish) steam engine with a red link to it or at least two and probably three otherwise and that seems to work well ) ... however I'm not sure whether Blowsh treatment was inside of NPP guidance (in which case I might suggest tweaking it) or a one off outside of guidance ... in which case one off fair enough nobody makes more mistakes than I do. (I've mentioned names here to make them aware of the discussion). Djm-leighpark ( talk) 10:21, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your guidance regarding contributions to Wikipedia. That was very helpful. I am new to this platform and learning what it takes to contribute. I am interested in contributing to the Oracle Database article, but also potentially to the articles for Oracle Exadata and Oracle Zero Data Loss Recovery Appliance. I am an employee of Oracle and have made that discloser on my user page. I am learning how to request edits, so please don't hesitate to give me additional feedback. I enjoy writing in general, and I anticipate I can be a valuable contributor on these topics, including meeting the high standards for accuracy and objectiveness required by Wikipedia. Thanks! Ccraft us ( talk) 23:50, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Dear DJM,
I was putting an effort to contribute on this particular article Zensar Technologies by providing proper content format as the existing one looks very scattered and lots of dead links, Therefore have re-written the same in below formagt along with all available inline citations as per wiki guidelines, however you seems to have undid all my revision. Hence request you to go through the one I have written keeping only available content with proper citations & also help removing dead links from this article.
Here is what I thought of contributing & looking forward to your thoughts on the same if you think it makes sense. Thank you
Deepak HM ( talk) 14:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Zensar Technologies is a multinational technology company headquartered in Pune, India with offices in the US, UK and South Africa. It is a subsidiary of RPG Enterprises. Founded in 2001, the company has an annual revenue of $480 million and employs approximately 9,000 employees. [1] [2]
Zensar Technologies deals in e-commerce, mobile applications, cloud computing, digital transformation and data analytics. Zensar Technologies operates across retail, healthcare, airlines, banking and insurance sectors.
Zensar Technologies is listed on both the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) [3] and the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) [4] and is present on several indices including the NSE's Nifty 500 and the S&P BSE 500.
Ganesh Natarajan became CEO in 2001 for what was to become a 15-year tenure. Sandeep Kishore took over as Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director in 2016. [5] [6] [7]
The following acquisitions have been made by Zensar since 2014. | Venture | Date | Company | Value | Location base | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acquisition | 2014 | Professional Access Inc | New York | [8] | ||
Acquisition | 2016 | Foolproof Inc | London | [9] | ||
Acquisition | 2017 | Keystone Logic | Omnichannel retail order and warehouse management [10] [11] [12] | |||
Acquisition | 2018 | Cynosure INC | US$33m | US | For leverage of insurance and Guidewire practice. [13] | |
Acquisition | 2018 | Indigo Slate | [14] |
References
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |dead-url=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |dead-url=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |dead-url=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Unknown parameter |dead-url=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Unknown parameter |dead-url=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Green Line (Luas), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Milltown ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:16, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi. You have now twice removed a section of this article and the only reason given is referring to a red-link. Please state your reasons clearly here or I will re-inserted the deleted material which under 3rr you may not then remove again. Regards Sarah777 ( talk)
@ Sarah777 ... Thankyou for pointing that out. I should have used WP:Settlement. The purpose was to remove navbars from a WP:SETTLEMENT. As it happens there is a further issue with this particular navbars as Stillorgan tram station is not where Stillorgan Railway station was (that now being just the other side of the current Sandyford station). When I think of some good words to to put I will look to put the explanation in the article talk. I also may try and fix this lot of station and depots with some prose but I make wish to make co-ordinated changes to Luas Green Line and Sandyford as well. As a heads up I may an some point suggest a Dún Laoghaire harbour article ... being a merge of Carlisle Pier and part of Dún Laoghaire ... but I'd like views such as yours first (Technically easiest to Move Carlisle Pier then merge from Dún Laoghaire). Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 19:56, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Good job! Useddenim ( talk) 00:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DWWR 15 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWWR 15 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram ( talk) 09:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating DWWR 13.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Keep up the good work on these articles.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 15:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
I just spent some time adding Version History data to Dorico software's page, and you deleted it because I was anon? So what's the point in allowing anonymous editing if it gets instantly deleted? There was nothing contentious in my Edit. Oh, but you missed the External link to Dorico's Youtube channel, so you might want to delete that too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.147.212.120 ( talk) 09:19, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
The key point is the information was unsourced. I see you have now returned it sourced. As I am aware of the youtube external link which as you say I had missed that will probably be removed by myself or elseone .... External links are often abused. In general it is job of the product website to make that resource visible to those you need it. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 10:17, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi there,
I am not trying to be disruptive by editing this page.
The page states that the name of the operation was chosen randomly - this is not true. The naming was influenced by the call of the bird - The UK Treasury should own up to this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpammyJackson ( talk • contribs) 19:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, there may be be all sorts of reasons and theories about the source of the name, but Wikipedia will when push comes to crunch only accept what can be sourced even if it isn't true. If you look back through history this earlier edit of mine which got reverted to where we are you can probably judge what the community will accept (OK it has a daily mirror source which was unacceptable. I can direct you to WP:Teahouse if you'd like an independent viewpoint. Thankyou. 19:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi,
I just saw your message. I have put the conflict of interest notice as you suggested, but my article is already deleted. I don't know who had created it. Since I usually don't use any surname, they probably didn't realize that it has been years since I changed my surname legally.
My main interest was mainly that it was with a name I no longer use and spoke of coverage of my experiences with domestic violence - which really is not what I am known for beyond what I went through at that time. While not a secret, there is better information about me.
I don't know how to create Wikipedia articles, but if I decide to give it a shot, I will definitely use your suggestions. This is most helpful. Thank you.
Just for my knowledge, how to request change of name of article? Like this one was Vidyut Kale - but my name now is Vidyut Gore.
Vidyutblogger ( talk) 17:50, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
I just saw that someone has recreated a blank page for my article. I will try using your suggestions. Vidyutblogger ( talk) 18:04, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
I have made this space to collect some information User:Vidyutblogger/sandbox/Vidyut Gore - can you copy the earlier content here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vidyutblogger ( talk • contribs) 18:09, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Please do NOT edit that page! Djm-leighpark ( talk) 18:22, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Please do not edit the page Vidyut Kale. It is at WP:DRV ... Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 April 3. Be very extremely careful about entering that discussion. Thankyou. 18:27, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Not touching that page at all. I am just collecting better references here /info/en/?search=User:Vidyutblogger/sandbox/Vidyut_Gore Making articles seems quite complicated, so for now just collecting references. I hope doing that in the sandbox page is all right.
~~~~. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 18:40, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Will do. Thank you very much. This had been so confusing till your messages. Much appreciated.
Vidyutblogger ( talk) 18:48, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
(I wrote this originally half an hour ago but its still useful though it may strike you as a little weird for which I apologise).
@ Vidyutblogger this may amaze you but I cannot be sure if you are Vidyut Kale/Gore or a person impersonating Vidyut Kale/Gore. And for my purposes here it matters not one little bit either way! Here to me you are user account Vidyutblogger who has a declared conflict of interest with articles dealing with Vidyut Kale/Gore. My suggested process (hopefully near right) for requesting a rename is the for any person with a coi.
1: Find one or even two WP:RS indicating Vidyut Kale has changed their name to Vidyut Gore 2: Point to her blog which should indicate that is the name by she now wishes to be known. 3: Use the WP:REQUESTEDIT system on the talk page of the article to request the change 4: If you want to change the name of the article (that is move it) this might be regarded as a potentially controversial move. WP:RM and WP:RM#CM apply. It is
Requestedit will seem a little strange but I can point you at Talk:Imperva where you can see REQUESTEDIT being used. I am not sure if it is the best practice but at least you can see an example. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 19:04, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. I will use WP:REQUESTEDIT - will this do as a RS? https://twitter.com/Vidyut/status/1111952956293894144 - The Vidyut Kale article in its deleted version recognized my Twitter account. Alternatively, I found my correct name listed here /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:UNESCO_Workshop_(2019_New_Delhi)_Lists this links to the Wikidata page for my name, which has all variations of previous names, including Vidyut Kale. Ideally, on my own site, I don't use a surname at all, or at least would prefer to not list Vidyut Kale at all.
Vidyutblogger ( talk) 19:14, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
...for the heads-up. The Longford proposal could lead to many more similar ones and I don't really think any change to the status quo is necessary or helpful. Sarah777 ( talk) 16:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC) ..... Weirdly it was only that a Google search brought up Wikivoyage Longford Town which didn't have a custom banner page. I had a quick search on Commons for anything that had a picture usable for a banner (electing to specifically to avoid anything railway related (unless it was good and last option standing). In the event I chose the swimming pool which sort of worked with a 7:1 crop (I be honest I would have preferred the Canal or someething else but I'll work with what I can find). In the process I happened to note it was your photo and I know your are well opinionated on these matters! As I say I'm now back on the fence. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 16:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Care to explain these edits? – [2], [3]. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 08:25, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
@ Vidyutblogger: In essence Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington was concerned over the technique I used to try ensure you (or friend sparebug!) did not come off black and get into an WP:EDITWAR. There may be some nuances beyond that but its probably best you ignore them. (I've lost exactly what I was going to say here because the following discussion on the Revert discussion below is in many ways more pressing from a Wikipedia viewpoint). Djm-leighpark ( talk) 21:26, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
@ Vidyutblogger : I have run out of window tonight (and more specifically before MOTD) for covering the specific issues with this edit to Supreme leader and related matters so I hope to cover this tomorrow. Please remember at times I inconsistently speak absolute drivel and rubbish so while I try my best efforts I can be wrong. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 21:26, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
The best way to request changes to an article is to use the phrase "Please change x to y using z", as shown below.
Change x to y using z
| ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
I observe Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington has useful comments on events at User talk:Vidyutblogger#Your edits on Supreme Leader and suggested any further commentary on this matter is placed there and I concur people should now follow that suggestion. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 12:28, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I wonder if you intended to add archive links for so many of the Strandhill references? On trying a few, like the CSO 2016 and logainm references, the live links worked fine for me. Thanks Declangi ( talk) 00:47, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
You reverted my merge, but did not revert the source article. Please let me know what your specific objection is, as the article was in much better shape after. I will correct the deficiency and we can move on. Lfstevens ( talk) 19:47, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
I am happy to add them instead of a prod, ex [11]. But if I don't see sources, I don't think that asking for them, or any other rationale, is a problem. A problem is that deprod can be too easily abused by spammers, making us waste time at AfD. A non-spammer editor should have no problem providing a source or a valid rationale. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:22, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
wiki than en, might be a better choice, in light of your linguistic proficiency. Proper communication is necessary esp. when maneuvering in areas of quasi-admin maintenance (CSD, PROD et al) and your machine translated(??) texts are quite difficult to parse.
∯WBG
converse
19:00, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
You basically agree with me, but your insinuations that I have are at best unhelpful and distracting from the real problem here which is dealing with poor quality vanity images. I'm quite happy to WP:DISENGAGE and let editors discuss it out on the talk page - but I'd much rather talk about the relative merits of good photographs rather than the inadequacies of poor ones. I'm quite happy to encourage users to take photographs where those are adequate quality. I think that's brilliant. I hope people like Dave or Hammersfan can improve their photography to useful levels. It's actually something I'm passionate about. Tony May ( talk) 06:49, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Please self-revert your WP:NPA at [15]. Or this is going to be reported to WP:AN. I haven't seen such a NPA violation in quite a while, but I am giving you the chance to remove it - everyone has a bad day or 5 minutes every now and then. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:24, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Djm-leighpark, I do not understand your aggressive attitude towards me at Talk:Gaelic handball. You asked a question of Sky Blu 2 and, knowing that there was a very good chance he would not respond, I offered what I thought was a helpful suggestion, i.e. that you go ahead and close. I could have closed it myself, but I thought that it might look like I was trying to pre-empt you, so I left it as just a suggestion. I got a snotty response from you in return. I tried to explain – foolishly, as it turned out – that I had suggested it because Sky Blu 2 was inactive at that time, and I got "Whoo .... hold the pony". What's that about? Then I say I'm not arguing with you, and you start talking about taking it to ANI. Then, when the matter is actually settled, you come back to me with "DIY advice for bold people", telling me about "rules of engagement" and being left "open to accusations of incitement". Rules of engagement?? Incitement?? We were never in any war, except maybe one in your head! Please, please have a read of Wikipedia:Assume good faith. All my comments were made in good faith, and I don't deserve to be abused like that. Scolaire ( talk) 11:30, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
For your points made here and here; you clearly are working in WP's best interests, ensuring that no abuse of power is ever gotten away with. Thanks! It's appreciated. –– Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 04:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC) |
I just read about the "relist" that you mention I should be trouted for. Which one? I had no involvement in relisting either Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marketing operations management (2nd nomination) or Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enterprise marketing management so I am confused? Regards, Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 10:39, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Hey! I just saw this and I was so confused that I felt it would be best to ask you; what is this supposed to mean? -- MrClog ( talk) 19:44, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Can the revenue be updated within the infobox basis this link: https://www.zensar.com/about-us/media/press-release/zensar-reports-202-growth-pat-and-176-growth-revenue-fy19 to $566.9 Million for Zensar Technologies -- Stevethomas4 ( talk) 14:35, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Any problems with any steps then I'll good faith do them unless I spot a bad problem in the reference source. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 14:50, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited L&YR Class 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Aspinall ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:16, 19 August 2019 (UTC) {{ Done}} Djm-leighpark ( talk) 08:57, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
You tagged me on this entry, so I added a couple of academic references and did a couple of small edits. I rarely edit pages nowadays, hope this helps. Dkechag ( talk) 22:26, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi mate, understand that you have proposed the article, Karikku, for deletion. Just wanted to inform you that I have contested the proposal as the subject of the article, a web channel, has received a notable award and is one of the most popular web channels in Malayalam language (YouTube play buttons, subscriber base and view count of over 180 million attest this). -- jojo@nthony ( talk) 06:18, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Mjs1991 ( talk) 04:12, 15 June 2019 (UTC)This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
∯WBG converse 11:54, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
What a fucking load of twaddle! Djm-leighpark ( talk) 15:08, 17 June 2019 (UTC) What a fucking WP:HOUND !!!
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pig racing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Durrow ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 14:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Brexit – immediate outcome of no-deal exit.
User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Thank you for your new article "Brexit – immediate outcome of no-deal exit". However the existence of this article, along with the "No Deal" section of Brexit negotiations, various portions of European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, and several related articles, adds to a situation that seems a bit messy and redundant. Or in other words. a reader who is exploring the Brexit topic will encounter a whole bunch of different articles that have similar information and possibly some inconsistencies. You might consider discussing this issue with anyone who is active at Talk:Brexit.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
--- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 19:53, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Djm-leighpark ( talk) 14:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Why did you undo my edit? Removing the proposed deletion tag is the correct way to object to deletion as per the official objection procedure. -- Dan Huby ( talk) 07:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Please read the objection procedure Dan Huby ( talk) 07:38, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Your unilateral changing of the target is contested - the place to discuss is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Deal, rather than edit war over it. Widefox; talk 20:53, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
I wish I hadn't started! A huge amount of updating is needed...
Let's call the whole thing off I predict a mass exodus from the civil service because this has all the ingredients of a career-destroying project failure. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 15:41, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brexit – immediate outcome of no-deal exit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cabinet ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:10, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carlisle Pier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Rennie ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a
speedy deletion tag from
Draft:St Antony's Church Machad, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the
talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk)
06:06, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
No-deal Brexit; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. MPS1992 ( talk) 22:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
@ MPS1992. You just reverted cite improvements and reverted back to broken syntax version! Are you mad ??????? + an Iabot run. thats standard stuff. And disruptional. Right Bully tactic that. Drag me to WP:ANI then. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 23:02, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
I don't understand why you have gone to that much trouble? It makes the citations more difficult to navigate. I have only felt it necessary when the original is dead. Have I missed a policy change? -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 11:52, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
I will make a point of not removing 'Under Construction' tags in future. I have felt free to remove (or insert) other tags, such as 'lede too short', and have not received any adverse reactions. Valetude ( talk) 16:15, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
the content is verifiable
please find something worthwhile to do with your time instead of reverting stuff you clearly don't understand — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.228.232.167 ( talk) 19:59, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Thankyou for supplying a reference that I have reFilled. The map did not verify the claim of 2017. The understanding of the signing of the comments I do have but I do forget sometimes. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 20:15, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020! |
Hello Djm-leighpark, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
![]() |
Thank you for continuing to make Wikipedia the greatest project in the world. I hope you have an excellent holiday season. Lightburst ( talk) 03:09, 22 December 2019 (UTC) |
Hello Djm-leighpark: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, DBig Xrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 18:15, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Interstellarity (
talk) is wishing you
Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user
Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
You reverted the sentence: One of the goal of the Oracle Database is to build cutting edge technologies like Multitenancy, JSON, analytics, Machine Learning, Blockchain, and many more, directly within a converged infrastructure to greatly simplify applications' development and deployment. due to incorrect grammar. Can you help me rephrqse it? Thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JFVerrier ( talk • contribs) 17:33, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Yes, indeed I am an Oracle employee. As such, I know what I am talking about and my proposed changes are not marketing information. I just want to make sure that the information is readable and understandable. On this page, there is way too much information that is overloading to understand correctly. My only intent is to make it easier for readers and consistent with other Wikipedia Oracle pages like /info/en/?search=Oracle_Exadata . Even if I have a WP:COI , I should be allowed to at least propose changes. My first request is to add the sentence above as it is a fundamental characteristic of the Oracle Database that is not expressed on the page. How do you want me to proceed for this and other changes going forward ? Many thanks in advance. JFVerrier ( talk) 07:55, 27 September 2019 (UTC)JFVerrier
Thanks for creating James Pim.
User:Onel5969 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Very nice job on this article. Keep up the good work.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 11:02, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
@ onel5969 - ... thanks ... I've hit the buffers and need a coffee ... [21] .. can't leverage as didn't mention James! ... still havn't forgiven you so sabotaging passenger locomotive though ... still you have incentivise me to given Harrison's thesis though but I'd foot a couple of floor of turf before betting through that. James Pim Snr. was brewer and I need a decent ref Junior lived in Monkstown castle and we needs a reliable source for the Pim's starting the Dublin chamber of Commerce as I am not sure yer man talking 2 4fm is a WP:RS. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 13:54, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Djm-leighpark,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
-
Nahal
(T)
23:00, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Theroadislong ( talk) 10:31, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Hi I gather from your removal of my PROD tag that you have an objection to the description of LitwareHR as a piece of fictitious software. This isn't my description, it's the description used in the article itself and in the sources. Mccapra ( talk) 12:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Djm-leighpark!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Theroadislong (
talk)
17:43, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
|
![]() |
The Article Rescue Barnstar | |
Well done. Britishfinance ( talk) 20:06, 17 October 2019 (UTC) |
![]() |
For doing some very good work and improving the article National Informatics Centre. DBig Xrayᗙ 14:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC) |
Appreciated. The quite frankly its more brutal and rough prose going in to re-bulk up the article than any sort of beautiful ... though I would nearly quote Dick Strawbridge how beautiful is THAT! looking at the shapes of the references and names appearing on the sources which would likely scare most from dragging it to AfC if they found it like that in the first place. (That's not the same as deep scrutiny). I'd always suggest peoples consider WP:THREE for those wishing to save articles and maybe checkout Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidyut Kale for seeing hard scrutiny and the DRV on [ [22]] as well. But quite frankly AfD/DRV is not what I cam to WP for, I come to do content and AfD/DRV detracts from that. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 16:10, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
I think you made a good call on looking past the COI issues and recognizing the article's potential. Nice work on improving and rescuing the article. --{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
18:50, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
I think you are overreacting and discriminating users here. First of all, I found that article as a complete mess as it is clearly not a neutral encyclopedia article. Second, I found skillfully inserted negative info in all the sections and it was mostly based on one unreliable blog review. Third, in the Reception section, I found the advertising of the other VPNS: "PC Magazine's Max Eddy wrote, "PureVPN is not a bad service by any measure, but it's not the best."[6] He preferred competitor VPNs Private Internet Access, which "offers a spartan experience at an unbeatable price", and NordVPN, which "costs slightly more than average but packs excellent features into an excellent interface". How that information can be neutral and encyclopedic? I would better suggest to remove the page about PureVPN from Wikipedia than keep it like that. I hope you don't have COI here as it looks like you prevent cleaning the article by all means, and automatically accusing a person in COI without even looking the updates and changes made. I would like to bring it further to other editiors as you are clearly overreacting here.-- 2601:1C0:CB01:2660:6CF1:B29B:6783:9CC5 ( talk) 21:13, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
I'm not so experienced and I have no idea how even to do the [[WP:REQUESTEDIT]. Also, I thought that everyone one this planet has the right to edit Wikipedia in a constructive way (please, correct me, if I'm not right). Once again, I do not have COI and you only discourage new users from editing. My reaction is totally natural and all the reviewers are more than welcome to check my edits on the page. Have a great day.-- 2601:1C0:CB01:2660:6CF1:B29B:6783:9CC5 ( talk) 21:41, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Djm-leighpark! I explicitly confirm that I don't have any WP:COI with PureVPN or a competitor. I already confirmed it in the message above(in my Talk), so I'm surprised to see it again. I also surprised to see that you first put the COI tag on the page and then asked me about COI. I welcome all the constructive changes and I if you explain me how to edit or request to edit next time, I'd be glad to listen to the experienced user like you. Regarding your assumption on my experience. I did a few edits before on different pages and picked up some rules and experience but I still consider myself very inexperienced user. Let me know what rules of Wikipedia I breached by removing the biased information and blog reviews (which are not eligible to be cited on Wikipedia as far as I know). -- 2601:1C0:CB01:2660:6CF1:B29B:6783:9CC5 ( talk) 22:53, 6 November 2019 (UTC) ... Effectively have replied on users talk page and also handling a way forward on the Talk:PureVPN. I really knew my talk page was looking to good today to last! Djm-leighpark ( talk) 00:02, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Conversation collapsed due to uncivil language
|
---|
As you might have lost interest in the AfD of Manuel Bastioni Lab, you might have stopped reading the AfD comments. I would like you to read my response to your neutral vote. At least my "p.s." section. As someone else has said to you: "That BLP AfD almost killed my enthusiam for Wikipedia – much appreciate that you took it on to restore it." You seem like a constructive contributor, who wants to improve wikipedia. Maybe you could look into this Kb03 user and do something about his behavior, bring this to the attention of others on Wikipedia or leave a comment, if I'm gravely misunderstanding his actions. Most people just want to improve Wikipedia and Kb03 seem to be the exact opposite. They are the ones, who demoralize and drive off a bunch of people by rollbacking hard work (e.g. 356 rollbacks in just one day without any comment) or trying to delete articles left and right. -- 82.206.28.74 ( talk) 15:09, 12 November 2019 (UTC) @82.206.28.74 ... Kb03 is a NPP and while I may disagree at times with some of their actions in general they so a good job sometimes under a lot of pressure. 'Tis better if you have a concern with their actions to raise on their talk page as they invite rather than pushing someone else out into the vanguard. In terms on the AfD it is merely of necessity that someone points out the article was improved since initial nomination addressing some/all of the concerns. Some good closers would clock that anyway. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 16:17, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Any admin seeing this will be noting how NOT to get an article rescued! 21:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
|
As such, a failure of WP:NCORP as well as WP:GNG.
∯WBG converse 13:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)@ Winged Blades of Godric: I regard amount of time you have held this locked from edit as unhelpful to say the least and seems to be made only when the article was likely to be brought to WP:DRV. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 13:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Fernihough, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Eastern Railway ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC) {{ Done}} Djm-leighpark ( talk) 13:26, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephenson's Rocket, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC) {{ Done}} Djm-leighpark ( talk) 13:25, 12 February 2020 (UTC)