This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Hi, I responded to your message here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:*Kat*/Lingo -- *Kat* ( talk) 00:29, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
The September 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 04:19, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Crohnie,
ChrisO and Polargeo are the only two quality-users who have left over CC-arb that I was aware of. Who are the other three?
ScienceApologist ( talk) 23:30, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
TY Dear One. I have gone to San Francisco. TYTY for your offer. Just read my page. I will take you up on it; thot you were still busy, I am my friend's 'puter and she is already whining, so I need to go. Hopefully things will be better by Wednesday. Fondly, J. DocOfSoc ( talk) 01:24, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
I don't usually do this, but in case my talk page at User talk:Tony Sidaway is not on your watchlist I decided to give you my own interpretation of what Zulu Papa 5 means. It's there now. Tasty monster (= TS ) 18:59, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Good call, and done. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 21:34, 5 October 2010 (UTC).
I'm not sure whose posting you are seeing. There is no original research in using online newspaper articles and an interview with Robert Conrad you cited is a first person source. See WP:Reliability. I've never posted any original research. If you have a fact checked published media source that explains the age discrepancy in the court records. Please provide it. Eudemis ( talk) 20:54, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm going to collapse this thread now as all the speculation is probably not helping this editor disengage. The longer the discussion continues, the longer he will be tempted to return to contribute. This is unlikely to be in his best interests, at least in the short term. Roger Davies talk 10:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 04:01, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for policing and rolling back. Have templated User:Law90650 with a level 1 warning. Hope you don't mind. Regards ( talk) 18:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey, Crohnie! It does indeed appear that SRQ went from "NotASpamBot" to "anklet with the pom pom" over at Wikipedia Review (most likely because of her horrible reception the first time). Aside from knowing me and what she characterizes as a "few whiny females with emotional, mental, late-night-alcohol+editing, and physical disability issues" (I assume this to mean WHL, you and probably Doc #2), she has some knowledge of Sarek. Knowledge that closely mimics the wording of "NotASpamBot", who said, "You end up with a bunch of socially maladjusted people working out their grudges on high-school bullies of yore by swinging their dicks around online." From "anklet with the pom pom": "...uses Wikipedia as his place of "power" by working out old grudges against said bullies of yore on the hapless editors he chooses to target. He's just another of the socially maladjusted who sought to rise to the level of admin so he could swing his dick around online...". "Yore", "socially maladjusted" and the swinging of dicks around online all repeated like this... hmmmm. Is there a policy of no socking over at WP Review, I wonder? Maybe there should be... ;> Doc9871 ( talk) 20:31, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Anklet with a pom pom is such a CUTE name for a sock. I am completely underwhelmed. Interesting reading tho. BRB, I have a note for you. DocOfSoc ( talk) 02:31, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
The last edits today leave NO doubt in my mind that this is SRQ. The name changes are the identical edits she made it the Bouley article. Not something a new editor would do. DocOfSoc ( talk) 06:42, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I'm listing this here so that I can update others that the sock True Crime Reader made lots of edits to that didn't get caught and removed. Per WP:DENY which says to remove the edits of banned users is preferred others may take the edits as their own if they would like. I've been cleaning up after the block but could use some help on the article(s) listed. The first one that the sock edited a lot is:
Well I think this is the last one to do. I did all the rest of them, can someone do this one please? :) Thanks, -- CrohnieGal Talk 16:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Got another one: (Deletion log); 12:49 . . SarekOfVulcan (talk | contribs) deleted "User:Eniskink" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup: unsigned warning placed on non-existent userpage) :-D DocOfSoc ( talk) 13:34, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Per MoS, italic text is discouraged in articles. Natalie Portman and the other women who changed their last names or go under aliases do not have italicized text emphasizing the new name. I've since changed it back to standard. Estheroliver ( talk) 02:19, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I just wanted to thank you again for commenting at the Paul Bern RfC. I feel like I'm banging my head against a wall right now, but your opinion was very helpful. Have a good one! Pinkadelica ♣ 03:39, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
I've moved the needling discussion to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Topic_banned_editors_needling_one_another for general discussion. -- TS 20:22, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, if I said anything I shouldn't have in the discussion here I would like to say I'm sorry. I noticed you removed my comment and another's with a comment yourself, "don't come here again to discuss William M. Connolley or Lar). 19:0654, 21 October 2010". I am assuming that your comment is for me. I didn't mean to cause any problems. I'm going offline now so if you have a response would you ping me so I remember to look here tomorrow? Sorry again, -- CrohnieGal Talk 23:39, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
I was not retired due to the CC case (as I stated on my userpage). I was informed of a pending lawsuit regarding something, and wanted to be sure that I was in the clear with respect to the allegations there-in. Having had council review the complaint, it had nothing to do with me, and as such, I am returning. Hipocrite ( talk) 13:28, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
You asked about the reason for the WMC block. The problems is in User_talk:William_M._Connolley#Misc_breakage. Those are links to CC issues. However, it is my belief that the topic ban did not include user talk pages, and it is my belief that most Arbs agreed. (Carcharoth excepted). However, I have failed to persuade the community, despite trying very hard.-- SPhilbrick T 15:08, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
You might want to remove that embarassing comment. Jimbo didn't sign the list. [1].-- Cube lurker ( talk) 13:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
I do recognize that BoP, TFI, and Griswaldo are being over-zealous about Ronz at ANI, but please don't let their excesses obscure the depth of the problem here. In fact, I suspect that the reason they are so zealous is Ronz' own f-up: he used extensive baiting tactics to rile them up in the hope that he could make them look like ravening idiots, but he miscalculated so that all of the anger he stirred up (which was supposed to make his opponents look bad) now looks like a legitimate response to his behavior.
Serves him right in my opinion; I just want to make sure that the lesson sticks.
This isn't the first time I've been on the receiving end of this kind of thing from Ronz, not to mention from others: it's a common tactic used by skeptical editors. My entire block log is due to one skeptic or another baiting me, which pretty much sucks. I'm personally getting better at dealing with it, of course, but I really don't see why anyone should have to deal with it at all. IMO, the clearer we make the message that this kind of activity is no longer acceptable on project, the sooner people will stop doing it, and the better for the project. That's why I'm pushing for a clearer acknowledgment of wrongdoing from Ronz: the more bad behavior he has to admit, the more collective embarrassment there will be among everyone who uses these kinds of tactics, and embarrassment (for reasons I can explain, if you like) is probably the only effective motivator in this situation.
Sorry this whole thing is uncomfortable. I don't think it's pleasant either, but I do think it's Ronz' own karma snapping back at him, and I think it's wise for that energy to play itself out in full. -- Ludwigs2 16:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Well as you know, we get what we get from editors. The main thing is that he said adjustments would be done. As for the retirement template, he hasn't decided whether he wants to stay or not so why should the template matter to anyone except editors who appreciate the work and time served by Ronz? I hope he stays but have the feeling he won't be back anytime soon. So you all don't need to worry I guess about anything for awhile at least. I've watch listed the article that started all of this and there is still an editor their saying that there are problems with some of the edits. I don't know the article so I need to have time to do some research into the man to know more about him and the sources which I don't have time to do right now. I have watch listed to see how things are going now that Ronz is no longer part of the equation there. Talk soon, need to go check my error below, -- CrohnieGal Talk 22:39, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Yes I agree, I am just finding more and more places this is playing out and it's not being disclosed on AN/i. Want to help me with that? I am going there now to open a new can of worms I think. This whole thread was screaming something was wrong and I accidentially fell on the dif I added and question above. I now have that page on my watch list. I can or won't put all those boards on my watch list. My watch list is bad enough now that my articles have trouble coming through to me. I am going to refer this comment to the AN/i board so it can be seen. Thanks for letting me know more than I already knew since I am trying to some helpful things in the background here. Be well, -- CrohnieGal Talk 13:25, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
I hate to be a pain, but since you aren't an admin, please do not post in the section entitled "Result of the appeal", as per the italic text below that that says, " This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above." Thank you. Courcelles 21:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
The Octoberr 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 00:43, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
The information you put into this page is not factual. It is properly reported in the WaPo article as statements made in a court filing by a plaintiff - meaning it is their opinion, not fact. I'd love to work with you on some proposed way to word it if you disagree, but please don't put it back in for now. 96.247.118.213 ( talk) 16:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
They reverted me once and took it to the talk page. I just reverted because I feel there is a possible problem with their edits violating blp. Are you saying they reverted me a second time? I'll go look again. We can't have gossip from a newspaper used as actuals in a BLP. The paper is usually a reliable source but I believe the IP is taking things out of context and not being true to what the paper is saying. What do you think? -- CrohnieGal Talk 18:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Re your comment at ANI, you can but try. If you've never had any dealings with Mick, he may appreciate a totally neutral, uninvolved admin's attempts at mediation. On the other hand, he may not. Despite what he says, I'm not out to eliminate him from the project, but there needs to be an improvement in his contributions and the way he communicates with other editors. Mjroots ( talk) 05:45, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you did a drive by revert of mine without adding anything to the discussion other than notifying editors there that the IP brought the same discussion to a third location, the BLP notice board. I would appreciate a response to my question at the Tareq Salahi talk page. Thank you in advance, -- CrohnieGal Talk 19:53, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Actually I did some looking at this article and it needs some serious gutting. The sources for what it has to say just isn't strong enough to use plus there is even more copyright problems going on in the article. The copyright problems go on throughout the article I believe. I don't have time to do it myself but if you have the time, go ahead and gut it. If not I may see about just deleting the article though I've never done that before. But this article has become a very bad article. So if you are interested go for it. I'll see if I can help here and there but right now with the time I have here I have myself stretched out too much doing too many things that I promised I'd do and those have to come first with me. I gave my word to do them and I am going to. This article needs work badly, I am hoping you or someone will pick it up and work it. Thanks, -- CrohnieGal Talk 19:43, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
today: 01:13, 4 November 2010 Bluetalonsteel (talk | contribs) (24,379 bytes) (Undid revision 394699042 by DocOfSoc (talk)) (undo) (Tag: section blanking)
For those of you who know and have dealt with the serial sockmaster that has become a nuisance and actually very mean spirited lately, I have decided to go to WP:LTA and ask about whether posting the sockmaster is useful. Please feel free to comment if you like but also remember WP:DENY at this point and don't give too much information which is also stated on the main page. Basically I am just letting everyone know so that they can keep an eye on the answers if any are forth coming. Thanks, -- CrohnieGal Talk 12:28, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
oops LOL DocOfSoc ( talk) 00:31, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Crohnie — I just saw your message of 12:08, 7 November 2010, at the talk page of Doc9871. I mean your message about the new post on the Manson talk page. You might be right that the post is the work of a banned user; in fact, since I'm the banned user who posted it, I'm sure you're right.
I took a lot of trouble there, Crohnie, to identify, transcribe, and link source material, for the good of the article. I think you should just read carefully what I wrote and then carry out the reversion I suggest. The article contains a serious error, which should be eliminated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.242.114.149 ( talk) 05:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
John if that's really you get yourself unblocked. It really is easy for you to do and I will back you up. I'm sure even Doc will back you up. If you want to know how to unblock yourself and don't know how email me. I couldn't think with the edit for personal reasons which is why I passed it to Doc. I was thinking it might be her but it didn't sound like her at all so I didn't do anything. I planned to go back to it when I could focus better on what was being said. I couldn't get it so I backed off of it. Drop me an email, let's talk again. -- CrohnieGal Talk 09:26, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey, when was you diagnosed with Crohns? How old are you (roughly)? If you have an email you can send me these answers privately. Thanks. Genjix ( talk) 19:08, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Doc talk 04:14, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 11:36, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
The Mediation Award | ||
Thanks for your help with the recent Man content dispute. I know a number of people helped, but I think your early contributions and cool head helped to set a constructive tone and shaped the discussion. And I think it's worked out OK for now - socks got blocked, everyone had their say, and the heat was dissipated -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 19:53, 11 November 2010 (UTC) |
Hi Crohnie, I saw your (non-)post on my talk page and I'm glad things worked out OK. I had some really serious doubts about my opposition there, what with how the legs were cut out from underneath my entire premise. :( It's good you got the certainty you were looking for. Unfortunately it seems that my broader concerns are now just dangling in the wind. I suppose it's possible that lack of response means just continue to IAR but we'll nail you if we get the chance. Dunno... Anyway, you know I am available for any help. Franamax ( talk) 00:35, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey, seeing you are involved in articles regarding Cher, could you comment in the good article reassessment of the Love Hurts Tour? Thanks, Xwomanizerx ( talk) 04:12, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Please mind your own business, and don't get involved in other peoples' conversations. -- THE FOUNDERS INTENT PRAISE 17:35, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Listen, don't tell my husband of 35 years, he might get jealous. ;) I have edited with him off and on around the project since I started here which means years not a few months like you. I will step in again if you refuse to stop trying to start a battle, so just stop and save a lot of us the time. Happy editing, -- CrohnieGal Talk 11:39, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Doc and Mathsci, appreciate the back up. The Founders of Intent just needs to learn I guess is that the past is the past and it's best to keep it there. I just didn't want their comments reigniting a bad situation again. I hope the two of you are well and enjoying the weekend. -- CrohnieGal Talk 11:44, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
On the talk page of Man there is at the top the the template for censor. I put a dif that has all the discussions I think about this template. First, I've never seen a template like this used this way and second it looks like it's being used to stifle any conversations that was is the RFC which also was archived and this template put up. It just seems wrong to me so I need others to look at this talk page and give me an opinion. I am asking my talk page watchers to help me out on this one. You can respond here or at the talk page of man but please give me a pointer to the discussion. I am having a problem with the return of the censor template because of the reasons and comments given for it to be returned. Thanks to anyone who helps, -- CrohnieGal Talk 19:30, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
These are the talk pages of the people who took part in the Man discussions, from the RfC onwards - I think I got them all, and there are none of the socks...
-- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 19:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey, Crohnie! Been off a couple of days and just got back on. I noticed a new addition [12] to the sockpuppet list, but I really don't think this is her. It's Verizon, but that's about it - doesn't match the signature of the other ones. The IP has only one edit, and that edit isn't enough for me to be comfortable at all about calling it a SRQ sock. As such, I think the tags should be removed: since we have to go with WP:DUCK, this IP is not quacking. Hope all is well, and I'll be on a little more than I have. Cheers :> Doc talk 00:52, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the suggestion re the deleted comment. I've reverted the change to reinstate the comment made on 25 Oct, but left out the messages below it because I think they really were duplicated (they're at the top of the talk page). Hope that makes sense (yep, I'm also getting confused!). Let me know if I've made a mistake. Best regards, Ben Dawid ( talk) 01:30, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
I've commented on the proposed notification re Man, and explained the duplicated comments I removed (some *post* RfC comments were duplicated *within* the restored RfC), over on my Talk page -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 08:25, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Crohnie, I saw your corrections on Al Capone and wanted to thank you for fixing that vandalism. I just read your story, and wow, I really hope you get well soon, you have overcome alot. I am glad your original biopsy was not cancerous. Stay strong. I hope you feel better, and have a good holiday season. ( Freejohngotti ( talk) 18:25, 28 November 2010 (UTC))
As i stated, i consider Peter Lawford's page incomplete and missing important data, which is mentioned in James Spada's biographical book on the actor. That's why I decided to add some of the important things, but all of my edits, including the one about his debut in Poor Old Bill back in 1931 have been reverted by several people including you.
Will be frank and tell you i consider your reasons completely unserious. What do you consider "gossip"? The fact that Frank Sinatra didn't speak to him, first because he saw him with his wife and then because he wasn't able to get JFK to come visit him, because Robert Kennedy didn't want his brother to have anything to do with Sinatra who had links to the mafia or maybe the fact that he was the last person to speak to Marilyn Monroe and in later years went to be treated agains alcoholism or that he said JFK's murder was higher up or that he was a military brat.
All of the above are Cold Hard Facts. As to whether they are encyclopedic, well i don't since they came from an official biography, why they can't be placed in an internet encyclopedia. Don't you think that biographies are much more reliable than the internet, mainly because half of Wikipedia's references come from biographies like James Spada's reliable book on the life of Peter Lawford.
I will not go to the talk page, simply because i see no reason to do so. I have sourced everything and have put facts not "gossip". So i will kindly ask you to restore my edits. Because these are facts and you and the other two editors, who refuse to accept these facts are driving me crazy goddamit. 89.215.148.48 ( talk) 15:06, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey, there's a link at the top of the page somewhere that gives you a from to fill in to make a report, but it doesn't really matter. It would be helpful if you could link the page where the 3RR vio took place if you have to make a report in future. Anyway, I blocked the editor you reported for 24 hours. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Oi! How's the bionic woman doing? :) I've not been around for a while, so I thought to say hello and ask the state of your world. Vassyana ( talk) 05:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Could you please revisit Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Contents/Outlines. I believe that your opinion there was based on an incorrect impression you may have gotten from reasons that were posted as if they were based on policy, when in fact they were not. After you posted, the claims made by the nominator received a significant degree of analysis. I would appreciate it if you looked at the full discussion and arguments again, and check whether your opinion actually reflects the facts in this case. Sincerely, The Transhumanist 00:48, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I have only to say thanks to you, you really are the first user to thank me for my work on Wikipedia, it really makes me feel good and I say this because I see that some registered users, IP users, only want to attack the talk pages. Again thanks to you. -- D6h What's on your mind? 20:24, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Crohnie, I've semi-protected this page for a week. It won't exactly stop the nonsense, just make it a bit harder to do. If you don't like having protection on your user pages let me know and I'll reverse it. Actually, since I'm heading out soon to say goodbye to a very dear family pet, you might get quicker service elsewhere. :( Franamax ( talk) 17:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi all, I just want to wish everyone a very Happy, Healthy Holiday Season! May the New Year bring good health and happiness to you all.
I would also like to add that so many of you have been so kind to me and helpful that I really don't know what to say other than thank you. My time here at Wikipedia of course has had the normal ups and downs that usually happen on the internet. But when I needed help, advice or really need to vent frustrations, I have so many I can go to to which I have to admit is quite awesome. The editors I have met here have been wonderful. To all of you a big thank you and again Happy Holidays, -- CrohnieGal Talk 11:55, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
{{Resolved|Here's why. ~~~~}}
Cheers! Gwen Gale ( talk) 12:26, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
No bother, i will look into sourcing the awards that are currently listed also. Monkeymanman ( talk) 15:07, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
I combined two discussions at Cher's discussion page both related to Cher's birthname. I placed them all following the time they were posted in. If it's not too much trouble, please emphasize the name of the editor your directing your comments to, which is All Hallow's Wraith, I believe. Currently, it appears as though your comments are directed to my editing. Thank you.-- Harout72 ( talk) 00:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
I just want to wish all of you a very Happy and Healthy New Year! May 2011 bring you all you wish for and for it to be better than this year. Happy New Year, -- CrohnieGal Talk 18:01, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
You removed my CN tag here [13], which I put in here [14]. Why? 69.199.196.246 ( talk) 04:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I saw your page as the result of some browsing, and was struck by your comment that "I guess odd years are not good for me." I know this isn't meant to be a social networking site, but just a quick comment to say I very much hope that 2011 breaks that pattern for you. Regards, Scil100 ( talk) 20:19, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
All Around Amazing Barnstar | ||
For unfailingly good advice and humour. You are truly Amazing in all that you do despite RL intruding. You present an example that all would be wise to follow. Thank you with all my heart. DocOfSoc ( talk) 23:51, 31 December 2010 (UTC) |
The December 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 04:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, after having similar disagreements over awards on other BLP's of actors (as on nicole kidman), i was wondering if there was a specific guideline or policy (perhaps from the project wiki films) that covered which awards were to be included or not? Thanks and happy new year :) Monkeymanman ( talk) 18:52, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the note! I didn't see your note until just now, I have hardly been around at all lately. Hope you had a good holiday and you're doing well, health wise and otherwise! If you want to get a hold of me and I'm not around here, feel free to email any time. Take care, delldot ∇. 19:58, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
If you're not yet heartily sick of Find A Grave, then I wanted to remind you that Wikipedia:External links/Perennial websites exists and that you'd be welcome to help improve it. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 22:40, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
I appreciate that you don't like the find a grave site but if you are going to remove it from articles then replace it with a better reference or wait until there is actually consensus on not using the site. I noticed you removed it as a ref from several articles and then deleted the content it sourced or left CN tags. If you know that the information is wrong or is a copyright problem then thats one thing but other than that I would ask you to leave it. -- Kumioko ( talk) 15:18, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Kumioko, I would like to ask you, in good faith, this is not meant as an attack, what your interest is in F-a-G? I noticed that you keep an active list of articles that you have made. In that list are a lot of stubs using F-a-G. At least the stubs and articles I've come across while looking for Find a Grave were started by you and a lot of the ones I saw were only using the F-a-G link. Please, I am really interested in the reasons you are so strongly pro this site and why you keep the running count of your started articles which seems to be connected to this link. Thank you in advance, -- CrohnieGal Talk 16:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Not sure what you are on about here, but WP:CRYSTAL applies to movies that are in pre-production (see the first paragraph of WP:NFF for the rationale). There is no confusion as to who is involved and not when filming have begun, and even more so if a movie is complete or is in post-production. Nymf hideliho! 16:04, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The January 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 03:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
I thank you for comment and feel that what you said was no harsher than what GD's accusers said. Raul17 ( talk) 01:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
At your comment on the recent AN/I for GoodDay, you seem to also have removed my comment from a related AfD. [15]. As my comment was in the nature of an apology to another editor, I think it's important that it be restored, even though that AfD is now closed. We usually do restore such mistakes. I think it would be considerably better that it be you who does that., but if you authorize me, I will. (However, if you did deliberately remove it, please tell me so & we can discuss it from there.) DGG ( talk ) 21:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Since the time that you have commented at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Unblock_request (where there was some messy brainstorming about what terms are necessary for an unblock), a specific proposal has been made by Doc James about the restrictions/conditions that will come into effect upon the user being unblocked. Your comments/views on this proposal are welcome. Regards, Ncmvocalist ( talk) 09:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
I am currently in the hospital. Been here awhile. Hate using cell phone so see you when I get out. -- CrohnieGal Talk 23:36, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Crohnie,
I saw your input on the discussion about a blog as an external link on WP:ELN. At first it seemed like Reisio ( talk · contribs) was convinced, but I guess not. I've started another discussion concerning Reisio's actions, perhaps you can join in? I appreciate your feedback. Thanks and kind regards, -- Soetermans | drop me a line | what I'd do now? 19:34, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for being one of SuggestBot's users! I hope you have found the bot's suggestions useful.
We are in the process of switching from our previous list-based signup process to using templates and userboxes, and I have therefore added the appropriate template to your user talk page. You should receive the first set of suggestions within a day, and since we'll be automating SuggestBot you will from then on continue to receive them regularly at the desired frequency.
We now also have a userbox that you can use to let others know you're using SuggestBot, and if you don't want to clutter your user talk page the bot can post to a sub-page in your userspace. More information about the userbox and usage of the template is available on User:SuggestBot/Getting Recommendations Regularly.
If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch with me on my user talk page. Thanks again, Nettrom ( talk) 22:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 16:18, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
That's about it really. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 13:03, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
The February 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 03:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 11:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:External links/Perennial websites; it involves an essay that you contributed to. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 02:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 10:46, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Crohnie,
You're of course, free to do what you wish, but I consider it patently transparent that Bittergrey's comments at ELN are both unrelated to the external links, and that his comments only reflect poorly on him, not I. In a rare display of common sense, I'm not going to bother "pointing out the flaws in his arguments" or "trying to improve his interaction with the community" and just let it go. If it ever does come to administrator intervention, there's plenty of evidence there where the problem is but continuing discussion obviously (in my opinion) won't result in anything positive. WAID has been talking me off the "last word ledge" for a while now, and it's "worked" in that there is less drama. So long as Bittergrey stays away from actual editing, the wiki doesn't suffer except for burning out editors. So I'm just letting it go and have closed the section. IMHO there is just no worth created by all this. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 20:21, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
DocOfSoc has given you a breath of Spring to promote
WikiLove gratitude, and Joy ;-)
— DocOfSoc • Talk • 07:46, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
HI ya Dear! Question: How can I tell one of my tsp's that long and critical edit summaries are totally unnecessary. He is a good guy, who lacks a funny bone. He is really helpful but his summaries are really annoying. e.g. "External links don't go in the text of the article. They go in an "External links" section at the bottom, where this particular external link is already listed. We don't need to duplicate links." Hope this finds you well!!! Help! xoxo — DocOfSoc • Talk • 07:46, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
My Friend Cmr are just fine. TY so much for your help! We just had a a small "Failure to communicate..." Feel free to archive this, except your flower of course :-D — DocOfSoc • Talk • 06:02, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
An editor you have been involved with at Nicole Kidman is the subject of a discussion at the Admin Notice Board here. As you have been an editor on the page in question, your comments may prove helpful. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 06:24, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:43, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
The March 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 21:08, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Should be up and running now - good luck! - 2/0 ( cont.) 15:01, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Crohnie. I saw your comments on User talk:Ludwigs2 along with his latest reply. Thank you for being one of the few people to speak up on my behalf.
He has been barred from the arbitration workshop pages for making personal attacks on me. His latest reply to you seems also to be a misrepresentation. As one example, a meatpuppet of two topic-banned users was identified by a large body of evidence provided privately to ArbCom. Of course evidence of meatpuppetry, involving as it does real life identities, cannot be discussed on wikipedia. Ludwigs2 has chosen to misinterpret that in the first point of his reply. As for the rest of my editing patterns, I cannot recognize myself from anything in his description.
I take a wikibreak (from article editing) at the beginning of each year because I give a graduate course in Cambridge for 2 months and so am away from France. That wikibreak has been prolonged by an unexpected bout of bronchitis, which seems to be going the rounds in the UK and, from what I hear, the US.
Any way, thank you again for talking to Ludwigs2.
Regards, Mathsci ( talk) 18:00, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 08:17, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
As an editor at Nicole Kidman affected by the user in question, you may wish to comment at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts#Abusive, edit-warring DeadSend4. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 20:36, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
DeadSend4 ( talk) 20:46, 18 April 2011 (UTC) This contributor has had an unknown issue with me and reverts my edits without any explanation completely disregarding the fact that I sourced and added several bits of information. The only way I can get this contributor to understand is by continuing to repeat my point, but to no avail this person doesn't listen.
I don't understand you reverting the ENTIRE article, rather than taking section by section. You do realize you're reverting some sources and information that were needed in the article you actually reverted right? For example I found three citations for the Far and Away (which the article asked for) yet your reverts delete it and the article goes back to asking for multiple citations, when I MYSELF, went in and reverted it without looking. I think this is the reason why were are constantly going through edit wars YOU ARE NOT READING MY EDITS! Seriously, go and look at my edits you are reverting, your revert goes back to 'citations needed' (when I went back and added them), your revert mentions her auditioning for Ghost and Forrest Gump this was an issue another contributor had with me even though I never added those bits of information to begin with, so with your reverts it's being added back on. I clearly remember that being an issue, so why is it ok all of sudden to add the information back? Considering I was blocked, it seems like I wasn't blocked because of that but for another reason. So I invite you to please look at what exactly you are reverting. There's so many bits of information that was sourced and worded correctly but with your edits you go back and reverse the very thing I was trying to fix. DeadSend4 ( talk) 19:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
I may not have much time over the next few weeks to do detailed reference checking/research on the referencing on Cate Blanchett. However, you might consider raising your concerns at the BLP Noticeboard if you need additional assistance. Dl2000 ( talk) 02:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- I'm starting to get worried about you. Cheers :> Doc talk 04:07, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Just for all of your information, I've been in the hospital since last Thursday so I am not ignoring anything here. I've just been unavailable. I'm still very weak so please be patient and let me catch up slowly with everyhing. Obviously I won't be online that much until I get my strength back. Thanks for understanding. -- CrohnieGal Talk 10:32, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Note to all, I've been real ill since last March now but this last hospital stay was a wake up call of sorts for me. I will be around off and on but overall I am taking it easy and trying to get my strength and breath back. Hopefully in no time I will be back to strength and myself again, thanks for all the kind thoughts...-- CrohnieGal Talk 10:39, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Welcome back. Good edit on the vandalism @ Gotti. I reinserted what I think was a good edit of mine that your reversion took out with garbarge. Good luck with all. Tapered ( talk) 22:29, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 12:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
I couldn't see the reason for your revert of the Sylvia Browne date, so I reverted back to 2011. If there's something I am missing, please re-revert but note why in the edit summary. Moriori ( talk) 22:12, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Hola, I updated your archive dates and mostly am dropping by to see how you're doing. I'll drop you an e-mail too. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 18:25, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
You are one special lady and I hope your road to recovery is uneventful. Be well, you are loved! Namaste.. — DocOfSoc • Talk • 14:21, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
I am having a weird problem that is becoming quite frustrating. First my popups aren't working at all now. That has been bouncing in and out the past few days. Next my editing box shows no toolbar at all when I edit a page. Does anyone know what is going on with this? Needless to say this is becoming quite frustrating having to click on everything I want to see, yea I know I'm spoiled. Plus my memory isn't that good for not having toolbars available. Any help with this would be more than welcomed. I'm about to find a new hobby already. ;) Thanks in advance, CrohnieGal Talk 16:38, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
a:visited {
color: #990099;
}
#bodyContent div span img {
display: none;
}
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 11:20, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi remember me? I'm still waiting for your reply. Not to be rude but you did accuse me of editing while blocked several weeks ago (which you were mistaken) and you never acknowledged that, which is fine that's not the issue at hand. But I do feel you should back up what you say and actually contribute and collaborate with me on this article. You were the one that made the rewrite an issue and put it into the discussion page. After 1 month+ of me waiting for your reply and not touching the article AT ALL, I'd expect some type of answer. Before you answer me with "well I forgot" I would just like to remind one of the many reasons why I was blocked was because of several comments you made towards other admins and whatnot. While that is in the past and I accept all the consequences, I'm actually doing what was told. You should too, or at least follow through with what you told me. I'm glad you are out of the hospital and feeling better, but seeing you collaborating with other people and not me after what you put me through and accused me is just a slap in the face. Honestly, I wouldn't be suprised if you forgot who I was, but I never forget. Especially if I was blocked temporarily for no reason, ESPECIALLY when now I'm following the rules and have not contributed much the past few weeks in hopes that SOMEONE will collaborate with me.
You what upsets me the most. If I were to revert those edits to how they were previously, I can bet within 1 day they will be reverted because they were done by ME. Hope to actually hear from you, it's kind of sad that I had to wait this long for a response don't you think? DeadSend4 ( talk) 00:43, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I have again just gotten out of the hospital. I have some major health issues that have been uncontrollable for me lately that has been sending me to the hospital a lot. I hope to get this settled down with some better preparations for things here in my home. If I haven't gotten back to you well this is the reason. I will be popping in but I won't be online long since I have to get my strength back and have a lot of things to do in RL. Again, I'm sorry if I have not gotten back to you. Thank you in advance for understanding, -- CrohnieGal Talk 10:31, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Also for this record, Tenebrae was not the one who started that argument. Again though, thank you for trying to help and for also apologizing. I really appreciate that. -- CrohnieGal Talk 12:40, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi there. Hope all is well. Just wanted to let you know that I mentioned your name regarding a very old dispute with User:BHillbillies here. For whatever reason, they have decided that I am the only one who objected to the additions they made to the article back in December 2010 (!), and felt the need to leave me two messages on my talk page (that I have since removed). I doubt much will come from it, but I just wanted to let you know I brought you name into the mix (sorry!). Have a good one! Pinkadelica ♣ 18:05, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Chroniegal, I am leaving the below request by the "Benedict Arnold" of the Whitman Article, Bateauxny for you to read. I have always been suspicious of Bateauxny as he/she exclusively edited McCoy references on the Whitman page, that were contributed by me. I will post on the Whitman discussion page as well, though it may be futile with the rollback tag in place. 71.85.120.252 ( talk) 03:44, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Reading the current discussion on the Whitman page, an IP User states As much as I hated to read the article announcing his condition and circumstances, it would be a tribute to McCoy to be able to use his history (and the history of how he was treated by those who could have helped him before I met him (I have documents from clinics where he presented with PTSD issues to professionals, well before I helped him, and they missed the diagnosis), as well as the APD being non respondent and the City of Austin sueing him for the awards I got him. 71.85.120.252 (talk) 09:00, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
The above statement is a strong indication that this IP user is one in the same of the many who have been blocked/banned as he refers to himself helping Mccoy, same as has been stated in the past. I also feel that the statement "I have documents from clinics where he presented with PTSD issues to professionals, well, before I helped him, and they missed the diagnosis" would be personal medical history and does not belong on a public forum discussion page.
I chose to make you aware because you possibly know more history than I do and if it is in fact the same editor, then we went round and round a few months back and I would rather not go that route again because it was not pleasant and IP user 71.85.120.252 already left a message on my talk page stating I appear to have a "bone to pick" so I don't want to make matters worse Bateauxny ( talk) 21:27, 22 May 2011 (UTC) 71.85.120.252 ( talk) 03:44, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
McCoy's illness
Are you going to remove all of the health issue related entries in articles like Zsa Zsa Gabor, and others who are near death? As I stated in the summary, you appear to have a bone to pick, and you mostly edit McCoy and Whitman. What's your problem? Maybe we can work out a compromise.71.85.120.252 (talk) 16:12, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
That was a good edit on the Whitman page. Some of the info was already in the article and I missed it. Good job! 71.85.120.252 (talk) 19:08, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey slick, you could have at least told Gwen Gale something bad about me. You could have even showed her the cruel compliment I paid you above. Hell...you might have even mentioned that I requested to work with you, but no, the "bone to pick" was so obscene and worthy of mentioning, that you must have been literally driven insane by that remark.
I must admit I thought you were McCoy's daughter, she works the same way you do, like...tell something about someone that is a positive and turn it into a negative. Look at your complaints you presented; I helped McCoy; I was his POA, which lasted almost ten years for no pay; I complained about how the medical community failed to see McCoy's PTSD until I came along; how I got him his SSD, Texas Workman's Compensation Award, only to have the City of Austin, after another licensed attorney came on the record, refused to pay McCoy the Award, which may have saved him from his recent diagnosis and given him a few more years. If I hadn't become McCoy's POA when I did, his obituary would have been written several years ago he was in such bad shape. But let's not blame the Hero, let's blame the dirty rotten scoundrel POA! One thing is certain, you know McCoy, and are as evil as he is in keeping a secret. That is not slander, it a fact and I have the proofs, don't test me on that one! At least I was his POA, which stands for Power Of Attorney, since you might not know. At least I am not a POS like you are struck as personal attack.
Franamax (
talk) 04:36, 23 May 2011 (UTC). If you don't know what that means...look it up in the dictionary, it is somewhere between the letters A to Z! Now run along and cry to another admin about this mean old man! 71.85.120.252 (talk) 04:09, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
71.85.120.252 (
talk) 04:20, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi remember me? I'm still waiting for your reply. Not to be rude but you did accuse me of editing while blocked several weeks ago (which you were mistaken) and you never acknowledged that, which is fine that's not the issue at hand. But I do feel you should back up what you say and actually contribute and collaborate with me on this article. You were the one that made the rewrite an issue and put it into the discussion page. After 1 month+ of me waiting for your reply and not touching the article AT ALL, I'd expect some type of answer. Before you answer me with "well I forgot" I would just like to remind one of the many reasons why I was blocked was because of several comments you made towards other admins and whatnot. While that is in the past and I accept all the consequences, I'm actually doing what was told. You should too, or at least follow through with what you told me. I'm glad you are out of the hospital and feeling better, but seeing you collaborating with other people and not me after what you put me through and accused me is just a slap in the face. Honestly, I wouldn't be suprised if you forgot who I was, but I never forget. Especially if I was blocked temporarily for no reason, ESPECIALLY when now I'm following the rules and have not contributed much the past few weeks in hopes that SOMEONE will collaborate with me.
You what upsets me the most. If I were to revert those edits to how they were previously, I can bet within 1 day they will be reverted because they were done by ME. Hope to actually hear from you, it's kind of sad that I had to wait this long for a response don't you think? DeadSend4 ( talk) 00:43, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I have again just gotten out of the hospital. I have some major health issues that have been uncontrollable for me lately that has been sending me to the hospital a lot. I hope to get this settled down with some better preparations for things here in my home. If I haven't gotten back to you well this is the reason. I will be popping in but I won't be online long since I have to get my strength back and have a lot of things to do in RL. Again, I'm sorry if I have not gotten back to you. Thank you in advance for understanding, -- CrohnieGal Talk 10:31, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Also for this record, Tenebrae was not the one who started that argument. Again though, thank you for trying to help and for also apologizing. I really appreciate that. -- CrohnieGal Talk 12:40, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Crohnie/Archive_5. |
This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.
Living with Crohn's disease is a life altering experience for most. For those who do not understand, I live with Crohn's 24/7 and have had four surgeries related to Crohn's. I try to stay away from editing when things are really bad but sometimes coming here when I don't feel well helps me to try and focus on something other then myself. I thank those of you who understand and go out of your way to help, it is very much appreciated.
I have Crohn's disease which is active and gives me a horrendous rash [17] that is hard to deal with. I also have IBS since I was a child, Arthritis, Peripheral vascular disease (from damage from my multiple surgeries) and to top it off as if this wasn't enough I have acute COPD. A growth in and on my mouth was surgically removed April 2, 2009 and again on April 16, 2009. Biopsy of the removed material was shown not to be cancer. This makes 6 surgeries, though this one is considered minor, in an odd year. I also had surgery in 1993 to remove a breast tumor. I guess odd years are not good for me.
I have a partial tear of the supraspinatus tendon and a longitudinal split tear of the long head of the Biceps brachii muscle along with a suspected tear of the anterior glenoid labrum. There is also fluid in the subdeltoid bursa which is Subacromial bursitis . Along with all of this I have multilevel cervical spondylosis and spinal stenosis. The test results explains more about this but I am not sure how to present it so I won't. Needless to say, some of this, like the stenosis and nerve damage I have is being thought to at least partically be caused by my Immune deficiency. I have to deal with acute pain issues and lack of normal functions in my arms. I had no accident or fall. To date there is no understanding why this damage, which is extreme, is happening so quickly. Like I stated above, there is more going on but I don't feel able at this time to explain it. I just know it is extremely frustrating dealing with all the pain and lack of feeling in my arms and my upper back ( neck and shoulder and shoulder blade area).
I think I should also explain that I have a serious problem with chronic pain issues. So I take strong pain medications roxycodone. With such medications I have troubles focusing which shows ocassionally in my editing. I feel this disclosure will help understand my editing better. Due to my medical problems and medications if I make a mistake please correct me. I do not get upset when another editor makes a correction for me or delete what I added. Assume good faith is always appreciated. I also try to follow this myself at all times.
Again I want to thank a lot of you for your patience and help. I am not a perfect editor, this I know, but I do try really hard. Thanks again everyone for being so kind to me! I really do appreciate it.
Update: On September 11, 2009 I had surgery on my back. I had 3 disks in my neck fused together with a titanium implant. The cost of the implant is enough to give someone a heart attack! :) I also had two other locations in my spine cleaned up. I went into the hospital on Friday and amazingly I got out four days later. Though I was partially paralized on my left side, I was able to use a walker. I used the walker for only two weeks. It took a lot of hard work but I got to the point where I only needed a cane which was also only required for two weeks before I was walking on my own. I never got total feeling back but the surgery was quite successful for me. Thanks to all who kept me in their prayers and thoughts during this hard time. I appreciate it more than I can say. Maybe more later, this definintely needs some more clean up but another day. :) -- CrohnieGal Talk 15:40, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Crohnie's Userboxes!
|
Full title | Short cut | Summary |
---|---|---|
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution | WP:DR | The entry page into all types of dispute resolution |
Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal | WP:MED | For mediating between disagreeing editors over content disputes |
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard | WP:AN | For general discussions requiring long-term attention (such as community bans |
Wikipedia:Coordination | WP:CORD | For cooridination of various discussions throughout Wikipedia. **This is like a watchlist for all boards** |
Wikipedia:Content noticeboard | WP:CNB, WP:AWN, & WP:CNOTICE | For discussions pertaining to encyclopedic content and associated issues |
Wikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents | WP:DRAMA, WP:ANI | For incidents which require the attention of an administrator or the use of tools (quick and dirty discussions) |
Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser | WP:RFCU | To request a checkuser, an examination of an editors' IP address, usually due to suspected sockpuppeting |
Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts | WP:WQA | For discussions and outside input into wikiquette and minor issues of editors' behavior; non-binding and informal |
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations | WP:SPI | Discussion over whether specific editors are evading community bans or editorial restrictions |
Wikipedia:Third Opinion | WP:3O (note an "oh", not "zero" | For disputes between two editors, asking a third to give an opinion over article content; informal and non-binding. If the dispute involves more than two editors, seek a request for comment |
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection | WP:RFPP | To restrict editing of specific pages to established editors or administrators due to sustained vandalism of a specific article |
Wikipedia:Requests for comment | WP:RFC | For third-party input when more than two editors are disagreeing; more formal and binding than a 3O, but less than arbitration. Has three sub-sections; content-based, policy based, on users and Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/All. |
WIkipedia:Requests for arbitration | WP:RFARB | The last stage in dispute resolution, generally over user conduct. Very serious! |
Wikipedia:Request for adminship | RFC | Editors applying for and voting for administrators |
Wikipedia:Request for oversight | WP:RFO | Email things that should be removed from the project |
Wikipedia:Abuse filter | WP:AF WP:FILTER | AbuseFilter is a tool used to allow privileged users to set specific controls on user activity and create automated reactions for certain behaviors. |
Full title | Short cut | Summary |
---|---|---|
Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions | WP:ATA | Fallacies that are acknowledged as not convincing during deletion discussions |
ATA sections | WP:IDONTLIKEIT | "This page should be deleted because I don't like it" |
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS | "This page shouldn't be deleted because this related page isn't being deleted" | |
Wikipedia:Don't stuff beans up your nose | WP:BEANS | Don't give vandals ideas |
Wikipedia:The Truth | WP:TRUTH | Remember that you're right, no matter how wrong you actually are (a satirical essay) |
WP:Outlines | None | Outline articles are a type of list article about a subject. An outline is a hierarchical list showing the structure of the subject. Together, outlines form an outline of knowledge. |
Wikipedia:You should not spread your fetish across Wikipedia | WP:SANDWICH | Wikipedia and fetishism shouldn't meet (but often do ) |
Wikipedia:Don't cry wolf | WP:WOLF | Personal attacks and harassment are not accusations to be made idly |
User:WLU/Generic_sandbox | None | Essay for new editors. Fun to read, points to good sources and worth the time! |
User:Jehochman/Umbrage | WP:PIQUE | 'Editors should not take personal offense at healthy disagreements" |
The Special Barnstar | ||
A Special Barnstar for a Special Person. Sometimes the people that work the hardest are the ones that are recognized the least. It's your turn. Thanks for all you do to get the story right. -- Dēmatt (chat) 03:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC) |
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
The editor's barnstar is awarded to Crohnie for providing an excellent suggestion of removing controversial text from Quackwatch completely so as to eliminate controversy. ScienceApologist ( talk) 22:51, 18 December 2007 (UTC) |
The Content Creativity Barnstar | ||
For everyone here - you've done an incredible job working hard at working together. The section is coming together without any edit wars; there've been no personal remarks and in general, everyone has been incredibly civil and helpful. This is a very impressive way to turn things around - feel free to yank this barnstar and put it in your own user space :) Shell babelfish 19:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC) |
momoricks
make my day has given you balloons! Balloons are meant to uplift the morale of people with an illness, and has hopefully made your day a little better. Spread good health by giving someone else who is a bit ill a balloon.
Spread the good health by adding {{ subst:Balloons}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I admire your constantly upbeat attitude and am proud to call you a Wikifriend.
Crohnie has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, |
Vassyana has given you a
Hershey Bar! Hershey bars promote
WikiLove through chololately goodness and hopefully this one has made your day better. Hershey bars are wonderfully delicious! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a Hershey bar, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of Hershey bars by adding {{
subst:Hershey Bar}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
The Purple Star | ||
You deserve a dozen of these for enduring the recent arbitration hullabaloo. momo ricks 21:54, 24 September 2009 (UTC) |
The Good Heart Barnstar | ||
For your consistent kindness, courage and diplomacy; you make Wikipedia a better place. momo ricks 21:54, 24 September 2009 (UTC) |
DocOfSoc (
talk) has given you a
bubble tea! Bubble teas promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!
Spread the awesomeness of bubble teas by adding {{ subst: User:Download/Bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
You are nice even to the horrid vandals! Cheers :> Doc9871 ( talk) 02:21, 13 May 2010 (UTC) |
The Purple Star | ||
you are loved.... DocOfSoc ( talk) 21:34, 19 July 2010 (UTC) |
The Special Barnstar | ||
Just for being You!! Fondly- DocOfSoc ( talk) |
The Real Life Barnstar | ||
Your user page really touched me. I present you this barnstar in recognition for your real life efforts to live a good life, overcoming all your suffering. You are an example to all us. Anna Lincoln 20:15, 9 July 2010 (UTC) |
Crohnie has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
The Your Opinion is More Important than You Think Barnstar | ||
For making respectful, relevant, focused, and helpful comments in relation to the current Wikipedia arbitration case on Climate change. Crohnie, your input has been impressive, and it has certainly not gone unnoticed or unappreciated. Keep it up! Ncmvocalist ( talk) 16:13, 12 September 2010 (UTC) |
The Mediation Award | ||
Thanks for your help with the recent Man content dispute. I know a number of people helped, but I think your early contributions and cool head helped to set a constructive tone and shaped the discussion. And I think it's worked out OK for now - socks got blocked, everyone had their say, and the heat was dissipated -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 19:53, 11 November 2010 (UTC) |
All Around Amazing Barnstar | ||
For unfailingly good advice and humour. You are truly Amazing in all that you do despite RL intruding. You present an example that all would be wise to follow. Thank you with all my heart. DocOfSoc ( talk) 23:51, 31 December 2010 (UTC) |
|
Images uploaded (WARNING: SOME ARE VERY GRAPHIC)-- CrohnieGal Talk 11:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | ||||
|
Hello Crohnie, after your reversion in the Charles Whitman article, I was trying to take your advise and move into the discussion area. However, I found that IP adresses are not allowed, so I am in a catch 22 here. One of the many things I dislike about the WP format is the Moniker system. I choose to be an IP moniker instead. I would prefer real names, as they position parties to be all of the courtesies that WP requires, instead, Monikers allow a veil for anyone with suspicious motives and can always return if banned under a different Moniker. So what is the point really?
To the reversion issues going on with the news of McCoy being terminally ill, there was one objection to relevancy that I modified to be respectful and saw the issue. Then the next reverter, stepped in without a good reason, so I again modified the contribution, hoping that would help. It didn't and the same party used another tactic. Then I tried to communicate with the party about the reversion, and the fact that they appear to edit McCoy's paragraph exclusively [ [18]]. I did not bring up the issue of WP:OWN, as I did not want to be confrontational, except to mention that the party appeared to have a bone to pick. The party did not respond to my message directly, but did so in a summary review, during another reversion. What I decided to do ultimately was to Source the material with a quote from the source. There were no complaints after that. As to why you have reverted the contribution and earmarked it to the talk page, is out of my scope of understanding. Can you fill me in? Thanks! 71.85.120.252 ( talk) 22:07, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Yep, the documentary costs money for equipment, which I now have most of it in cameras and gear. All the documents are ready and shooting has already begun on preleminary issues, like Camp Lejuene, Jacksonville, Savannah, etc. I visited East Carolina where Whitman took a class, they could find no records without going through their archives; too much time and cost for a potentially uninteresting period. I have rearranged the the information andremoved the McCoy and Martinez section as being too autobiograhical within Whitman's article. I put Martinez' sentence in his article. Whatta ya' think?!? If your still up? lol! 71.85.120.252 ( talk) 05:56, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
I'm running on low fuel...Jim Beam is running out...kitchen is next then bed for me. I'll review when my head is clearer. When I visited East Carolina, we were playing out of a bar called "the Attic" which I believe has burned down now. Do you still have my email?
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕)) 06:11, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Hi, I responded to your message here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:*Kat*/Lingo -- *Kat* ( talk) 00:29, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
The September 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 04:19, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Crohnie,
ChrisO and Polargeo are the only two quality-users who have left over CC-arb that I was aware of. Who are the other three?
ScienceApologist ( talk) 23:30, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
TY Dear One. I have gone to San Francisco. TYTY for your offer. Just read my page. I will take you up on it; thot you were still busy, I am my friend's 'puter and she is already whining, so I need to go. Hopefully things will be better by Wednesday. Fondly, J. DocOfSoc ( talk) 01:24, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
I don't usually do this, but in case my talk page at User talk:Tony Sidaway is not on your watchlist I decided to give you my own interpretation of what Zulu Papa 5 means. It's there now. Tasty monster (= TS ) 18:59, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Good call, and done. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 21:34, 5 October 2010 (UTC).
I'm not sure whose posting you are seeing. There is no original research in using online newspaper articles and an interview with Robert Conrad you cited is a first person source. See WP:Reliability. I've never posted any original research. If you have a fact checked published media source that explains the age discrepancy in the court records. Please provide it. Eudemis ( talk) 20:54, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm going to collapse this thread now as all the speculation is probably not helping this editor disengage. The longer the discussion continues, the longer he will be tempted to return to contribute. This is unlikely to be in his best interests, at least in the short term. Roger Davies talk 10:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 04:01, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for policing and rolling back. Have templated User:Law90650 with a level 1 warning. Hope you don't mind. Regards ( talk) 18:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey, Crohnie! It does indeed appear that SRQ went from "NotASpamBot" to "anklet with the pom pom" over at Wikipedia Review (most likely because of her horrible reception the first time). Aside from knowing me and what she characterizes as a "few whiny females with emotional, mental, late-night-alcohol+editing, and physical disability issues" (I assume this to mean WHL, you and probably Doc #2), she has some knowledge of Sarek. Knowledge that closely mimics the wording of "NotASpamBot", who said, "You end up with a bunch of socially maladjusted people working out their grudges on high-school bullies of yore by swinging their dicks around online." From "anklet with the pom pom": "...uses Wikipedia as his place of "power" by working out old grudges against said bullies of yore on the hapless editors he chooses to target. He's just another of the socially maladjusted who sought to rise to the level of admin so he could swing his dick around online...". "Yore", "socially maladjusted" and the swinging of dicks around online all repeated like this... hmmmm. Is there a policy of no socking over at WP Review, I wonder? Maybe there should be... ;> Doc9871 ( talk) 20:31, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Anklet with a pom pom is such a CUTE name for a sock. I am completely underwhelmed. Interesting reading tho. BRB, I have a note for you. DocOfSoc ( talk) 02:31, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
The last edits today leave NO doubt in my mind that this is SRQ. The name changes are the identical edits she made it the Bouley article. Not something a new editor would do. DocOfSoc ( talk) 06:42, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I'm listing this here so that I can update others that the sock True Crime Reader made lots of edits to that didn't get caught and removed. Per WP:DENY which says to remove the edits of banned users is preferred others may take the edits as their own if they would like. I've been cleaning up after the block but could use some help on the article(s) listed. The first one that the sock edited a lot is:
Well I think this is the last one to do. I did all the rest of them, can someone do this one please? :) Thanks, -- CrohnieGal Talk 16:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Got another one: (Deletion log); 12:49 . . SarekOfVulcan (talk | contribs) deleted "User:Eniskink" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup: unsigned warning placed on non-existent userpage) :-D DocOfSoc ( talk) 13:34, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Per MoS, italic text is discouraged in articles. Natalie Portman and the other women who changed their last names or go under aliases do not have italicized text emphasizing the new name. I've since changed it back to standard. Estheroliver ( talk) 02:19, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I just wanted to thank you again for commenting at the Paul Bern RfC. I feel like I'm banging my head against a wall right now, but your opinion was very helpful. Have a good one! Pinkadelica ♣ 03:39, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
I've moved the needling discussion to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Topic_banned_editors_needling_one_another for general discussion. -- TS 20:22, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, if I said anything I shouldn't have in the discussion here I would like to say I'm sorry. I noticed you removed my comment and another's with a comment yourself, "don't come here again to discuss William M. Connolley or Lar). 19:0654, 21 October 2010". I am assuming that your comment is for me. I didn't mean to cause any problems. I'm going offline now so if you have a response would you ping me so I remember to look here tomorrow? Sorry again, -- CrohnieGal Talk 23:39, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
I was not retired due to the CC case (as I stated on my userpage). I was informed of a pending lawsuit regarding something, and wanted to be sure that I was in the clear with respect to the allegations there-in. Having had council review the complaint, it had nothing to do with me, and as such, I am returning. Hipocrite ( talk) 13:28, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
You asked about the reason for the WMC block. The problems is in User_talk:William_M._Connolley#Misc_breakage. Those are links to CC issues. However, it is my belief that the topic ban did not include user talk pages, and it is my belief that most Arbs agreed. (Carcharoth excepted). However, I have failed to persuade the community, despite trying very hard.-- SPhilbrick T 15:08, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
You might want to remove that embarassing comment. Jimbo didn't sign the list. [1].-- Cube lurker ( talk) 13:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
I do recognize that BoP, TFI, and Griswaldo are being over-zealous about Ronz at ANI, but please don't let their excesses obscure the depth of the problem here. In fact, I suspect that the reason they are so zealous is Ronz' own f-up: he used extensive baiting tactics to rile them up in the hope that he could make them look like ravening idiots, but he miscalculated so that all of the anger he stirred up (which was supposed to make his opponents look bad) now looks like a legitimate response to his behavior.
Serves him right in my opinion; I just want to make sure that the lesson sticks.
This isn't the first time I've been on the receiving end of this kind of thing from Ronz, not to mention from others: it's a common tactic used by skeptical editors. My entire block log is due to one skeptic or another baiting me, which pretty much sucks. I'm personally getting better at dealing with it, of course, but I really don't see why anyone should have to deal with it at all. IMO, the clearer we make the message that this kind of activity is no longer acceptable on project, the sooner people will stop doing it, and the better for the project. That's why I'm pushing for a clearer acknowledgment of wrongdoing from Ronz: the more bad behavior he has to admit, the more collective embarrassment there will be among everyone who uses these kinds of tactics, and embarrassment (for reasons I can explain, if you like) is probably the only effective motivator in this situation.
Sorry this whole thing is uncomfortable. I don't think it's pleasant either, but I do think it's Ronz' own karma snapping back at him, and I think it's wise for that energy to play itself out in full. -- Ludwigs2 16:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Well as you know, we get what we get from editors. The main thing is that he said adjustments would be done. As for the retirement template, he hasn't decided whether he wants to stay or not so why should the template matter to anyone except editors who appreciate the work and time served by Ronz? I hope he stays but have the feeling he won't be back anytime soon. So you all don't need to worry I guess about anything for awhile at least. I've watch listed the article that started all of this and there is still an editor their saying that there are problems with some of the edits. I don't know the article so I need to have time to do some research into the man to know more about him and the sources which I don't have time to do right now. I have watch listed to see how things are going now that Ronz is no longer part of the equation there. Talk soon, need to go check my error below, -- CrohnieGal Talk 22:39, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Yes I agree, I am just finding more and more places this is playing out and it's not being disclosed on AN/i. Want to help me with that? I am going there now to open a new can of worms I think. This whole thread was screaming something was wrong and I accidentially fell on the dif I added and question above. I now have that page on my watch list. I can or won't put all those boards on my watch list. My watch list is bad enough now that my articles have trouble coming through to me. I am going to refer this comment to the AN/i board so it can be seen. Thanks for letting me know more than I already knew since I am trying to some helpful things in the background here. Be well, -- CrohnieGal Talk 13:25, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
I hate to be a pain, but since you aren't an admin, please do not post in the section entitled "Result of the appeal", as per the italic text below that that says, " This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above." Thank you. Courcelles 21:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
The Octoberr 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 00:43, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
The information you put into this page is not factual. It is properly reported in the WaPo article as statements made in a court filing by a plaintiff - meaning it is their opinion, not fact. I'd love to work with you on some proposed way to word it if you disagree, but please don't put it back in for now. 96.247.118.213 ( talk) 16:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
They reverted me once and took it to the talk page. I just reverted because I feel there is a possible problem with their edits violating blp. Are you saying they reverted me a second time? I'll go look again. We can't have gossip from a newspaper used as actuals in a BLP. The paper is usually a reliable source but I believe the IP is taking things out of context and not being true to what the paper is saying. What do you think? -- CrohnieGal Talk 18:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Re your comment at ANI, you can but try. If you've never had any dealings with Mick, he may appreciate a totally neutral, uninvolved admin's attempts at mediation. On the other hand, he may not. Despite what he says, I'm not out to eliminate him from the project, but there needs to be an improvement in his contributions and the way he communicates with other editors. Mjroots ( talk) 05:45, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you did a drive by revert of mine without adding anything to the discussion other than notifying editors there that the IP brought the same discussion to a third location, the BLP notice board. I would appreciate a response to my question at the Tareq Salahi talk page. Thank you in advance, -- CrohnieGal Talk 19:53, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Actually I did some looking at this article and it needs some serious gutting. The sources for what it has to say just isn't strong enough to use plus there is even more copyright problems going on in the article. The copyright problems go on throughout the article I believe. I don't have time to do it myself but if you have the time, go ahead and gut it. If not I may see about just deleting the article though I've never done that before. But this article has become a very bad article. So if you are interested go for it. I'll see if I can help here and there but right now with the time I have here I have myself stretched out too much doing too many things that I promised I'd do and those have to come first with me. I gave my word to do them and I am going to. This article needs work badly, I am hoping you or someone will pick it up and work it. Thanks, -- CrohnieGal Talk 19:43, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
today: 01:13, 4 November 2010 Bluetalonsteel (talk | contribs) (24,379 bytes) (Undid revision 394699042 by DocOfSoc (talk)) (undo) (Tag: section blanking)
For those of you who know and have dealt with the serial sockmaster that has become a nuisance and actually very mean spirited lately, I have decided to go to WP:LTA and ask about whether posting the sockmaster is useful. Please feel free to comment if you like but also remember WP:DENY at this point and don't give too much information which is also stated on the main page. Basically I am just letting everyone know so that they can keep an eye on the answers if any are forth coming. Thanks, -- CrohnieGal Talk 12:28, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
oops LOL DocOfSoc ( talk) 00:31, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Crohnie — I just saw your message of 12:08, 7 November 2010, at the talk page of Doc9871. I mean your message about the new post on the Manson talk page. You might be right that the post is the work of a banned user; in fact, since I'm the banned user who posted it, I'm sure you're right.
I took a lot of trouble there, Crohnie, to identify, transcribe, and link source material, for the good of the article. I think you should just read carefully what I wrote and then carry out the reversion I suggest. The article contains a serious error, which should be eliminated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.242.114.149 ( talk) 05:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
John if that's really you get yourself unblocked. It really is easy for you to do and I will back you up. I'm sure even Doc will back you up. If you want to know how to unblock yourself and don't know how email me. I couldn't think with the edit for personal reasons which is why I passed it to Doc. I was thinking it might be her but it didn't sound like her at all so I didn't do anything. I planned to go back to it when I could focus better on what was being said. I couldn't get it so I backed off of it. Drop me an email, let's talk again. -- CrohnieGal Talk 09:26, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey, when was you diagnosed with Crohns? How old are you (roughly)? If you have an email you can send me these answers privately. Thanks. Genjix ( talk) 19:08, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Doc talk 04:14, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 11:36, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
The Mediation Award | ||
Thanks for your help with the recent Man content dispute. I know a number of people helped, but I think your early contributions and cool head helped to set a constructive tone and shaped the discussion. And I think it's worked out OK for now - socks got blocked, everyone had their say, and the heat was dissipated -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 19:53, 11 November 2010 (UTC) |
Hi Crohnie, I saw your (non-)post on my talk page and I'm glad things worked out OK. I had some really serious doubts about my opposition there, what with how the legs were cut out from underneath my entire premise. :( It's good you got the certainty you were looking for. Unfortunately it seems that my broader concerns are now just dangling in the wind. I suppose it's possible that lack of response means just continue to IAR but we'll nail you if we get the chance. Dunno... Anyway, you know I am available for any help. Franamax ( talk) 00:35, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey, seeing you are involved in articles regarding Cher, could you comment in the good article reassessment of the Love Hurts Tour? Thanks, Xwomanizerx ( talk) 04:12, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Please mind your own business, and don't get involved in other peoples' conversations. -- THE FOUNDERS INTENT PRAISE 17:35, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Listen, don't tell my husband of 35 years, he might get jealous. ;) I have edited with him off and on around the project since I started here which means years not a few months like you. I will step in again if you refuse to stop trying to start a battle, so just stop and save a lot of us the time. Happy editing, -- CrohnieGal Talk 11:39, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Doc and Mathsci, appreciate the back up. The Founders of Intent just needs to learn I guess is that the past is the past and it's best to keep it there. I just didn't want their comments reigniting a bad situation again. I hope the two of you are well and enjoying the weekend. -- CrohnieGal Talk 11:44, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
On the talk page of Man there is at the top the the template for censor. I put a dif that has all the discussions I think about this template. First, I've never seen a template like this used this way and second it looks like it's being used to stifle any conversations that was is the RFC which also was archived and this template put up. It just seems wrong to me so I need others to look at this talk page and give me an opinion. I am asking my talk page watchers to help me out on this one. You can respond here or at the talk page of man but please give me a pointer to the discussion. I am having a problem with the return of the censor template because of the reasons and comments given for it to be returned. Thanks to anyone who helps, -- CrohnieGal Talk 19:30, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
These are the talk pages of the people who took part in the Man discussions, from the RfC onwards - I think I got them all, and there are none of the socks...
-- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 19:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey, Crohnie! Been off a couple of days and just got back on. I noticed a new addition [12] to the sockpuppet list, but I really don't think this is her. It's Verizon, but that's about it - doesn't match the signature of the other ones. The IP has only one edit, and that edit isn't enough for me to be comfortable at all about calling it a SRQ sock. As such, I think the tags should be removed: since we have to go with WP:DUCK, this IP is not quacking. Hope all is well, and I'll be on a little more than I have. Cheers :> Doc talk 00:52, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the suggestion re the deleted comment. I've reverted the change to reinstate the comment made on 25 Oct, but left out the messages below it because I think they really were duplicated (they're at the top of the talk page). Hope that makes sense (yep, I'm also getting confused!). Let me know if I've made a mistake. Best regards, Ben Dawid ( talk) 01:30, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
I've commented on the proposed notification re Man, and explained the duplicated comments I removed (some *post* RfC comments were duplicated *within* the restored RfC), over on my Talk page -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 08:25, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Crohnie, I saw your corrections on Al Capone and wanted to thank you for fixing that vandalism. I just read your story, and wow, I really hope you get well soon, you have overcome alot. I am glad your original biopsy was not cancerous. Stay strong. I hope you feel better, and have a good holiday season. ( Freejohngotti ( talk) 18:25, 28 November 2010 (UTC))
As i stated, i consider Peter Lawford's page incomplete and missing important data, which is mentioned in James Spada's biographical book on the actor. That's why I decided to add some of the important things, but all of my edits, including the one about his debut in Poor Old Bill back in 1931 have been reverted by several people including you.
Will be frank and tell you i consider your reasons completely unserious. What do you consider "gossip"? The fact that Frank Sinatra didn't speak to him, first because he saw him with his wife and then because he wasn't able to get JFK to come visit him, because Robert Kennedy didn't want his brother to have anything to do with Sinatra who had links to the mafia or maybe the fact that he was the last person to speak to Marilyn Monroe and in later years went to be treated agains alcoholism or that he said JFK's murder was higher up or that he was a military brat.
All of the above are Cold Hard Facts. As to whether they are encyclopedic, well i don't since they came from an official biography, why they can't be placed in an internet encyclopedia. Don't you think that biographies are much more reliable than the internet, mainly because half of Wikipedia's references come from biographies like James Spada's reliable book on the life of Peter Lawford.
I will not go to the talk page, simply because i see no reason to do so. I have sourced everything and have put facts not "gossip". So i will kindly ask you to restore my edits. Because these are facts and you and the other two editors, who refuse to accept these facts are driving me crazy goddamit. 89.215.148.48 ( talk) 15:06, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey, there's a link at the top of the page somewhere that gives you a from to fill in to make a report, but it doesn't really matter. It would be helpful if you could link the page where the 3RR vio took place if you have to make a report in future. Anyway, I blocked the editor you reported for 24 hours. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Oi! How's the bionic woman doing? :) I've not been around for a while, so I thought to say hello and ask the state of your world. Vassyana ( talk) 05:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Could you please revisit Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Contents/Outlines. I believe that your opinion there was based on an incorrect impression you may have gotten from reasons that were posted as if they were based on policy, when in fact they were not. After you posted, the claims made by the nominator received a significant degree of analysis. I would appreciate it if you looked at the full discussion and arguments again, and check whether your opinion actually reflects the facts in this case. Sincerely, The Transhumanist 00:48, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I have only to say thanks to you, you really are the first user to thank me for my work on Wikipedia, it really makes me feel good and I say this because I see that some registered users, IP users, only want to attack the talk pages. Again thanks to you. -- D6h What's on your mind? 20:24, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Crohnie, I've semi-protected this page for a week. It won't exactly stop the nonsense, just make it a bit harder to do. If you don't like having protection on your user pages let me know and I'll reverse it. Actually, since I'm heading out soon to say goodbye to a very dear family pet, you might get quicker service elsewhere. :( Franamax ( talk) 17:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi all, I just want to wish everyone a very Happy, Healthy Holiday Season! May the New Year bring good health and happiness to you all.
I would also like to add that so many of you have been so kind to me and helpful that I really don't know what to say other than thank you. My time here at Wikipedia of course has had the normal ups and downs that usually happen on the internet. But when I needed help, advice or really need to vent frustrations, I have so many I can go to to which I have to admit is quite awesome. The editors I have met here have been wonderful. To all of you a big thank you and again Happy Holidays, -- CrohnieGal Talk 11:55, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
{{Resolved|Here's why. ~~~~}}
Cheers! Gwen Gale ( talk) 12:26, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
No bother, i will look into sourcing the awards that are currently listed also. Monkeymanman ( talk) 15:07, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
I combined two discussions at Cher's discussion page both related to Cher's birthname. I placed them all following the time they were posted in. If it's not too much trouble, please emphasize the name of the editor your directing your comments to, which is All Hallow's Wraith, I believe. Currently, it appears as though your comments are directed to my editing. Thank you.-- Harout72 ( talk) 00:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
I just want to wish all of you a very Happy and Healthy New Year! May 2011 bring you all you wish for and for it to be better than this year. Happy New Year, -- CrohnieGal Talk 18:01, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
You removed my CN tag here [13], which I put in here [14]. Why? 69.199.196.246 ( talk) 04:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I saw your page as the result of some browsing, and was struck by your comment that "I guess odd years are not good for me." I know this isn't meant to be a social networking site, but just a quick comment to say I very much hope that 2011 breaks that pattern for you. Regards, Scil100 ( talk) 20:19, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
All Around Amazing Barnstar | ||
For unfailingly good advice and humour. You are truly Amazing in all that you do despite RL intruding. You present an example that all would be wise to follow. Thank you with all my heart. DocOfSoc ( talk) 23:51, 31 December 2010 (UTC) |
The December 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 04:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, after having similar disagreements over awards on other BLP's of actors (as on nicole kidman), i was wondering if there was a specific guideline or policy (perhaps from the project wiki films) that covered which awards were to be included or not? Thanks and happy new year :) Monkeymanman ( talk) 18:52, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the note! I didn't see your note until just now, I have hardly been around at all lately. Hope you had a good holiday and you're doing well, health wise and otherwise! If you want to get a hold of me and I'm not around here, feel free to email any time. Take care, delldot ∇. 19:58, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
If you're not yet heartily sick of Find A Grave, then I wanted to remind you that Wikipedia:External links/Perennial websites exists and that you'd be welcome to help improve it. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 22:40, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
I appreciate that you don't like the find a grave site but if you are going to remove it from articles then replace it with a better reference or wait until there is actually consensus on not using the site. I noticed you removed it as a ref from several articles and then deleted the content it sourced or left CN tags. If you know that the information is wrong or is a copyright problem then thats one thing but other than that I would ask you to leave it. -- Kumioko ( talk) 15:18, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Kumioko, I would like to ask you, in good faith, this is not meant as an attack, what your interest is in F-a-G? I noticed that you keep an active list of articles that you have made. In that list are a lot of stubs using F-a-G. At least the stubs and articles I've come across while looking for Find a Grave were started by you and a lot of the ones I saw were only using the F-a-G link. Please, I am really interested in the reasons you are so strongly pro this site and why you keep the running count of your started articles which seems to be connected to this link. Thank you in advance, -- CrohnieGal Talk 16:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Not sure what you are on about here, but WP:CRYSTAL applies to movies that are in pre-production (see the first paragraph of WP:NFF for the rationale). There is no confusion as to who is involved and not when filming have begun, and even more so if a movie is complete or is in post-production. Nymf hideliho! 16:04, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The January 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 03:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
I thank you for comment and feel that what you said was no harsher than what GD's accusers said. Raul17 ( talk) 01:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
At your comment on the recent AN/I for GoodDay, you seem to also have removed my comment from a related AfD. [15]. As my comment was in the nature of an apology to another editor, I think it's important that it be restored, even though that AfD is now closed. We usually do restore such mistakes. I think it would be considerably better that it be you who does that., but if you authorize me, I will. (However, if you did deliberately remove it, please tell me so & we can discuss it from there.) DGG ( talk ) 21:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Since the time that you have commented at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Unblock_request (where there was some messy brainstorming about what terms are necessary for an unblock), a specific proposal has been made by Doc James about the restrictions/conditions that will come into effect upon the user being unblocked. Your comments/views on this proposal are welcome. Regards, Ncmvocalist ( talk) 09:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
I am currently in the hospital. Been here awhile. Hate using cell phone so see you when I get out. -- CrohnieGal Talk 23:36, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Crohnie,
I saw your input on the discussion about a blog as an external link on WP:ELN. At first it seemed like Reisio ( talk · contribs) was convinced, but I guess not. I've started another discussion concerning Reisio's actions, perhaps you can join in? I appreciate your feedback. Thanks and kind regards, -- Soetermans | drop me a line | what I'd do now? 19:34, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for being one of SuggestBot's users! I hope you have found the bot's suggestions useful.
We are in the process of switching from our previous list-based signup process to using templates and userboxes, and I have therefore added the appropriate template to your user talk page. You should receive the first set of suggestions within a day, and since we'll be automating SuggestBot you will from then on continue to receive them regularly at the desired frequency.
We now also have a userbox that you can use to let others know you're using SuggestBot, and if you don't want to clutter your user talk page the bot can post to a sub-page in your userspace. More information about the userbox and usage of the template is available on User:SuggestBot/Getting Recommendations Regularly.
If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch with me on my user talk page. Thanks again, Nettrom ( talk) 22:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 16:18, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
That's about it really. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 13:03, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
The February 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 03:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 11:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:External links/Perennial websites; it involves an essay that you contributed to. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 02:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 10:46, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Crohnie,
You're of course, free to do what you wish, but I consider it patently transparent that Bittergrey's comments at ELN are both unrelated to the external links, and that his comments only reflect poorly on him, not I. In a rare display of common sense, I'm not going to bother "pointing out the flaws in his arguments" or "trying to improve his interaction with the community" and just let it go. If it ever does come to administrator intervention, there's plenty of evidence there where the problem is but continuing discussion obviously (in my opinion) won't result in anything positive. WAID has been talking me off the "last word ledge" for a while now, and it's "worked" in that there is less drama. So long as Bittergrey stays away from actual editing, the wiki doesn't suffer except for burning out editors. So I'm just letting it go and have closed the section. IMHO there is just no worth created by all this. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 20:21, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
DocOfSoc has given you a breath of Spring to promote
WikiLove gratitude, and Joy ;-)
— DocOfSoc • Talk • 07:46, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
HI ya Dear! Question: How can I tell one of my tsp's that long and critical edit summaries are totally unnecessary. He is a good guy, who lacks a funny bone. He is really helpful but his summaries are really annoying. e.g. "External links don't go in the text of the article. They go in an "External links" section at the bottom, where this particular external link is already listed. We don't need to duplicate links." Hope this finds you well!!! Help! xoxo — DocOfSoc • Talk • 07:46, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
My Friend Cmr are just fine. TY so much for your help! We just had a a small "Failure to communicate..." Feel free to archive this, except your flower of course :-D — DocOfSoc • Talk • 06:02, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
An editor you have been involved with at Nicole Kidman is the subject of a discussion at the Admin Notice Board here. As you have been an editor on the page in question, your comments may prove helpful. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 06:24, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:43, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
The March 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 21:08, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Should be up and running now - good luck! - 2/0 ( cont.) 15:01, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Crohnie. I saw your comments on User talk:Ludwigs2 along with his latest reply. Thank you for being one of the few people to speak up on my behalf.
He has been barred from the arbitration workshop pages for making personal attacks on me. His latest reply to you seems also to be a misrepresentation. As one example, a meatpuppet of two topic-banned users was identified by a large body of evidence provided privately to ArbCom. Of course evidence of meatpuppetry, involving as it does real life identities, cannot be discussed on wikipedia. Ludwigs2 has chosen to misinterpret that in the first point of his reply. As for the rest of my editing patterns, I cannot recognize myself from anything in his description.
I take a wikibreak (from article editing) at the beginning of each year because I give a graduate course in Cambridge for 2 months and so am away from France. That wikibreak has been prolonged by an unexpected bout of bronchitis, which seems to be going the rounds in the UK and, from what I hear, the US.
Any way, thank you again for talking to Ludwigs2.
Regards, Mathsci ( talk) 18:00, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 08:17, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
As an editor at Nicole Kidman affected by the user in question, you may wish to comment at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts#Abusive, edit-warring DeadSend4. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 20:36, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
DeadSend4 ( talk) 20:46, 18 April 2011 (UTC) This contributor has had an unknown issue with me and reverts my edits without any explanation completely disregarding the fact that I sourced and added several bits of information. The only way I can get this contributor to understand is by continuing to repeat my point, but to no avail this person doesn't listen.
I don't understand you reverting the ENTIRE article, rather than taking section by section. You do realize you're reverting some sources and information that were needed in the article you actually reverted right? For example I found three citations for the Far and Away (which the article asked for) yet your reverts delete it and the article goes back to asking for multiple citations, when I MYSELF, went in and reverted it without looking. I think this is the reason why were are constantly going through edit wars YOU ARE NOT READING MY EDITS! Seriously, go and look at my edits you are reverting, your revert goes back to 'citations needed' (when I went back and added them), your revert mentions her auditioning for Ghost and Forrest Gump this was an issue another contributor had with me even though I never added those bits of information to begin with, so with your reverts it's being added back on. I clearly remember that being an issue, so why is it ok all of sudden to add the information back? Considering I was blocked, it seems like I wasn't blocked because of that but for another reason. So I invite you to please look at what exactly you are reverting. There's so many bits of information that was sourced and worded correctly but with your edits you go back and reverse the very thing I was trying to fix. DeadSend4 ( talk) 19:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
I may not have much time over the next few weeks to do detailed reference checking/research on the referencing on Cate Blanchett. However, you might consider raising your concerns at the BLP Noticeboard if you need additional assistance. Dl2000 ( talk) 02:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- I'm starting to get worried about you. Cheers :> Doc talk 04:07, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Just for all of your information, I've been in the hospital since last Thursday so I am not ignoring anything here. I've just been unavailable. I'm still very weak so please be patient and let me catch up slowly with everyhing. Obviously I won't be online that much until I get my strength back. Thanks for understanding. -- CrohnieGal Talk 10:32, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Note to all, I've been real ill since last March now but this last hospital stay was a wake up call of sorts for me. I will be around off and on but overall I am taking it easy and trying to get my strength and breath back. Hopefully in no time I will be back to strength and myself again, thanks for all the kind thoughts...-- CrohnieGal Talk 10:39, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Welcome back. Good edit on the vandalism @ Gotti. I reinserted what I think was a good edit of mine that your reversion took out with garbarge. Good luck with all. Tapered ( talk) 22:29, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 12:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
I couldn't see the reason for your revert of the Sylvia Browne date, so I reverted back to 2011. If there's something I am missing, please re-revert but note why in the edit summary. Moriori ( talk) 22:12, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Hola, I updated your archive dates and mostly am dropping by to see how you're doing. I'll drop you an e-mail too. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 18:25, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
You are one special lady and I hope your road to recovery is uneventful. Be well, you are loved! Namaste.. — DocOfSoc • Talk • 14:21, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
I am having a weird problem that is becoming quite frustrating. First my popups aren't working at all now. That has been bouncing in and out the past few days. Next my editing box shows no toolbar at all when I edit a page. Does anyone know what is going on with this? Needless to say this is becoming quite frustrating having to click on everything I want to see, yea I know I'm spoiled. Plus my memory isn't that good for not having toolbars available. Any help with this would be more than welcomed. I'm about to find a new hobby already. ;) Thanks in advance, CrohnieGal Talk 16:38, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
a:visited {
color: #990099;
}
#bodyContent div span img {
display: none;
}
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 11:20, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi remember me? I'm still waiting for your reply. Not to be rude but you did accuse me of editing while blocked several weeks ago (which you were mistaken) and you never acknowledged that, which is fine that's not the issue at hand. But I do feel you should back up what you say and actually contribute and collaborate with me on this article. You were the one that made the rewrite an issue and put it into the discussion page. After 1 month+ of me waiting for your reply and not touching the article AT ALL, I'd expect some type of answer. Before you answer me with "well I forgot" I would just like to remind one of the many reasons why I was blocked was because of several comments you made towards other admins and whatnot. While that is in the past and I accept all the consequences, I'm actually doing what was told. You should too, or at least follow through with what you told me. I'm glad you are out of the hospital and feeling better, but seeing you collaborating with other people and not me after what you put me through and accused me is just a slap in the face. Honestly, I wouldn't be suprised if you forgot who I was, but I never forget. Especially if I was blocked temporarily for no reason, ESPECIALLY when now I'm following the rules and have not contributed much the past few weeks in hopes that SOMEONE will collaborate with me.
You what upsets me the most. If I were to revert those edits to how they were previously, I can bet within 1 day they will be reverted because they were done by ME. Hope to actually hear from you, it's kind of sad that I had to wait this long for a response don't you think? DeadSend4 ( talk) 00:43, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I have again just gotten out of the hospital. I have some major health issues that have been uncontrollable for me lately that has been sending me to the hospital a lot. I hope to get this settled down with some better preparations for things here in my home. If I haven't gotten back to you well this is the reason. I will be popping in but I won't be online long since I have to get my strength back and have a lot of things to do in RL. Again, I'm sorry if I have not gotten back to you. Thank you in advance for understanding, -- CrohnieGal Talk 10:31, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Also for this record, Tenebrae was not the one who started that argument. Again though, thank you for trying to help and for also apologizing. I really appreciate that. -- CrohnieGal Talk 12:40, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi there. Hope all is well. Just wanted to let you know that I mentioned your name regarding a very old dispute with User:BHillbillies here. For whatever reason, they have decided that I am the only one who objected to the additions they made to the article back in December 2010 (!), and felt the need to leave me two messages on my talk page (that I have since removed). I doubt much will come from it, but I just wanted to let you know I brought you name into the mix (sorry!). Have a good one! Pinkadelica ♣ 18:05, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Chroniegal, I am leaving the below request by the "Benedict Arnold" of the Whitman Article, Bateauxny for you to read. I have always been suspicious of Bateauxny as he/she exclusively edited McCoy references on the Whitman page, that were contributed by me. I will post on the Whitman discussion page as well, though it may be futile with the rollback tag in place. 71.85.120.252 ( talk) 03:44, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Reading the current discussion on the Whitman page, an IP User states As much as I hated to read the article announcing his condition and circumstances, it would be a tribute to McCoy to be able to use his history (and the history of how he was treated by those who could have helped him before I met him (I have documents from clinics where he presented with PTSD issues to professionals, well before I helped him, and they missed the diagnosis), as well as the APD being non respondent and the City of Austin sueing him for the awards I got him. 71.85.120.252 (talk) 09:00, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
The above statement is a strong indication that this IP user is one in the same of the many who have been blocked/banned as he refers to himself helping Mccoy, same as has been stated in the past. I also feel that the statement "I have documents from clinics where he presented with PTSD issues to professionals, well, before I helped him, and they missed the diagnosis" would be personal medical history and does not belong on a public forum discussion page.
I chose to make you aware because you possibly know more history than I do and if it is in fact the same editor, then we went round and round a few months back and I would rather not go that route again because it was not pleasant and IP user 71.85.120.252 already left a message on my talk page stating I appear to have a "bone to pick" so I don't want to make matters worse Bateauxny ( talk) 21:27, 22 May 2011 (UTC) 71.85.120.252 ( talk) 03:44, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
McCoy's illness
Are you going to remove all of the health issue related entries in articles like Zsa Zsa Gabor, and others who are near death? As I stated in the summary, you appear to have a bone to pick, and you mostly edit McCoy and Whitman. What's your problem? Maybe we can work out a compromise.71.85.120.252 (talk) 16:12, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
That was a good edit on the Whitman page. Some of the info was already in the article and I missed it. Good job! 71.85.120.252 (talk) 19:08, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey slick, you could have at least told Gwen Gale something bad about me. You could have even showed her the cruel compliment I paid you above. Hell...you might have even mentioned that I requested to work with you, but no, the "bone to pick" was so obscene and worthy of mentioning, that you must have been literally driven insane by that remark.
I must admit I thought you were McCoy's daughter, she works the same way you do, like...tell something about someone that is a positive and turn it into a negative. Look at your complaints you presented; I helped McCoy; I was his POA, which lasted almost ten years for no pay; I complained about how the medical community failed to see McCoy's PTSD until I came along; how I got him his SSD, Texas Workman's Compensation Award, only to have the City of Austin, after another licensed attorney came on the record, refused to pay McCoy the Award, which may have saved him from his recent diagnosis and given him a few more years. If I hadn't become McCoy's POA when I did, his obituary would have been written several years ago he was in such bad shape. But let's not blame the Hero, let's blame the dirty rotten scoundrel POA! One thing is certain, you know McCoy, and are as evil as he is in keeping a secret. That is not slander, it a fact and I have the proofs, don't test me on that one! At least I was his POA, which stands for Power Of Attorney, since you might not know. At least I am not a POS like you are struck as personal attack.
Franamax (
talk) 04:36, 23 May 2011 (UTC). If you don't know what that means...look it up in the dictionary, it is somewhere between the letters A to Z! Now run along and cry to another admin about this mean old man! 71.85.120.252 (talk) 04:09, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
71.85.120.252 (
talk) 04:20, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi remember me? I'm still waiting for your reply. Not to be rude but you did accuse me of editing while blocked several weeks ago (which you were mistaken) and you never acknowledged that, which is fine that's not the issue at hand. But I do feel you should back up what you say and actually contribute and collaborate with me on this article. You were the one that made the rewrite an issue and put it into the discussion page. After 1 month+ of me waiting for your reply and not touching the article AT ALL, I'd expect some type of answer. Before you answer me with "well I forgot" I would just like to remind one of the many reasons why I was blocked was because of several comments you made towards other admins and whatnot. While that is in the past and I accept all the consequences, I'm actually doing what was told. You should too, or at least follow through with what you told me. I'm glad you are out of the hospital and feeling better, but seeing you collaborating with other people and not me after what you put me through and accused me is just a slap in the face. Honestly, I wouldn't be suprised if you forgot who I was, but I never forget. Especially if I was blocked temporarily for no reason, ESPECIALLY when now I'm following the rules and have not contributed much the past few weeks in hopes that SOMEONE will collaborate with me.
You what upsets me the most. If I were to revert those edits to how they were previously, I can bet within 1 day they will be reverted because they were done by ME. Hope to actually hear from you, it's kind of sad that I had to wait this long for a response don't you think? DeadSend4 ( talk) 00:43, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I have again just gotten out of the hospital. I have some major health issues that have been uncontrollable for me lately that has been sending me to the hospital a lot. I hope to get this settled down with some better preparations for things here in my home. If I haven't gotten back to you well this is the reason. I will be popping in but I won't be online long since I have to get my strength back and have a lot of things to do in RL. Again, I'm sorry if I have not gotten back to you. Thank you in advance for understanding, -- CrohnieGal Talk 10:31, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Also for this record, Tenebrae was not the one who started that argument. Again though, thank you for trying to help and for also apologizing. I really appreciate that. -- CrohnieGal Talk 12:40, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Crohnie/Archive_5. |
This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.
Living with Crohn's disease is a life altering experience for most. For those who do not understand, I live with Crohn's 24/7 and have had four surgeries related to Crohn's. I try to stay away from editing when things are really bad but sometimes coming here when I don't feel well helps me to try and focus on something other then myself. I thank those of you who understand and go out of your way to help, it is very much appreciated.
I have Crohn's disease which is active and gives me a horrendous rash [17] that is hard to deal with. I also have IBS since I was a child, Arthritis, Peripheral vascular disease (from damage from my multiple surgeries) and to top it off as if this wasn't enough I have acute COPD. A growth in and on my mouth was surgically removed April 2, 2009 and again on April 16, 2009. Biopsy of the removed material was shown not to be cancer. This makes 6 surgeries, though this one is considered minor, in an odd year. I also had surgery in 1993 to remove a breast tumor. I guess odd years are not good for me.
I have a partial tear of the supraspinatus tendon and a longitudinal split tear of the long head of the Biceps brachii muscle along with a suspected tear of the anterior glenoid labrum. There is also fluid in the subdeltoid bursa which is Subacromial bursitis . Along with all of this I have multilevel cervical spondylosis and spinal stenosis. The test results explains more about this but I am not sure how to present it so I won't. Needless to say, some of this, like the stenosis and nerve damage I have is being thought to at least partically be caused by my Immune deficiency. I have to deal with acute pain issues and lack of normal functions in my arms. I had no accident or fall. To date there is no understanding why this damage, which is extreme, is happening so quickly. Like I stated above, there is more going on but I don't feel able at this time to explain it. I just know it is extremely frustrating dealing with all the pain and lack of feeling in my arms and my upper back ( neck and shoulder and shoulder blade area).
I think I should also explain that I have a serious problem with chronic pain issues. So I take strong pain medications roxycodone. With such medications I have troubles focusing which shows ocassionally in my editing. I feel this disclosure will help understand my editing better. Due to my medical problems and medications if I make a mistake please correct me. I do not get upset when another editor makes a correction for me or delete what I added. Assume good faith is always appreciated. I also try to follow this myself at all times.
Again I want to thank a lot of you for your patience and help. I am not a perfect editor, this I know, but I do try really hard. Thanks again everyone for being so kind to me! I really do appreciate it.
Update: On September 11, 2009 I had surgery on my back. I had 3 disks in my neck fused together with a titanium implant. The cost of the implant is enough to give someone a heart attack! :) I also had two other locations in my spine cleaned up. I went into the hospital on Friday and amazingly I got out four days later. Though I was partially paralized on my left side, I was able to use a walker. I used the walker for only two weeks. It took a lot of hard work but I got to the point where I only needed a cane which was also only required for two weeks before I was walking on my own. I never got total feeling back but the surgery was quite successful for me. Thanks to all who kept me in their prayers and thoughts during this hard time. I appreciate it more than I can say. Maybe more later, this definintely needs some more clean up but another day. :) -- CrohnieGal Talk 15:40, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Crohnie's Userboxes!
|
Full title | Short cut | Summary |
---|---|---|
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution | WP:DR | The entry page into all types of dispute resolution |
Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal | WP:MED | For mediating between disagreeing editors over content disputes |
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard | WP:AN | For general discussions requiring long-term attention (such as community bans |
Wikipedia:Coordination | WP:CORD | For cooridination of various discussions throughout Wikipedia. **This is like a watchlist for all boards** |
Wikipedia:Content noticeboard | WP:CNB, WP:AWN, & WP:CNOTICE | For discussions pertaining to encyclopedic content and associated issues |
Wikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents | WP:DRAMA, WP:ANI | For incidents which require the attention of an administrator or the use of tools (quick and dirty discussions) |
Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser | WP:RFCU | To request a checkuser, an examination of an editors' IP address, usually due to suspected sockpuppeting |
Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts | WP:WQA | For discussions and outside input into wikiquette and minor issues of editors' behavior; non-binding and informal |
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations | WP:SPI | Discussion over whether specific editors are evading community bans or editorial restrictions |
Wikipedia:Third Opinion | WP:3O (note an "oh", not "zero" | For disputes between two editors, asking a third to give an opinion over article content; informal and non-binding. If the dispute involves more than two editors, seek a request for comment |
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection | WP:RFPP | To restrict editing of specific pages to established editors or administrators due to sustained vandalism of a specific article |
Wikipedia:Requests for comment | WP:RFC | For third-party input when more than two editors are disagreeing; more formal and binding than a 3O, but less than arbitration. Has three sub-sections; content-based, policy based, on users and Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/All. |
WIkipedia:Requests for arbitration | WP:RFARB | The last stage in dispute resolution, generally over user conduct. Very serious! |
Wikipedia:Request for adminship | RFC | Editors applying for and voting for administrators |
Wikipedia:Request for oversight | WP:RFO | Email things that should be removed from the project |
Wikipedia:Abuse filter | WP:AF WP:FILTER | AbuseFilter is a tool used to allow privileged users to set specific controls on user activity and create automated reactions for certain behaviors. |
Full title | Short cut | Summary |
---|---|---|
Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions | WP:ATA | Fallacies that are acknowledged as not convincing during deletion discussions |
ATA sections | WP:IDONTLIKEIT | "This page should be deleted because I don't like it" |
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS | "This page shouldn't be deleted because this related page isn't being deleted" | |
Wikipedia:Don't stuff beans up your nose | WP:BEANS | Don't give vandals ideas |
Wikipedia:The Truth | WP:TRUTH | Remember that you're right, no matter how wrong you actually are (a satirical essay) |
WP:Outlines | None | Outline articles are a type of list article about a subject. An outline is a hierarchical list showing the structure of the subject. Together, outlines form an outline of knowledge. |
Wikipedia:You should not spread your fetish across Wikipedia | WP:SANDWICH | Wikipedia and fetishism shouldn't meet (but often do ) |
Wikipedia:Don't cry wolf | WP:WOLF | Personal attacks and harassment are not accusations to be made idly |
User:WLU/Generic_sandbox | None | Essay for new editors. Fun to read, points to good sources and worth the time! |
User:Jehochman/Umbrage | WP:PIQUE | 'Editors should not take personal offense at healthy disagreements" |
The Special Barnstar | ||
A Special Barnstar for a Special Person. Sometimes the people that work the hardest are the ones that are recognized the least. It's your turn. Thanks for all you do to get the story right. -- Dēmatt (chat) 03:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC) |
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
The editor's barnstar is awarded to Crohnie for providing an excellent suggestion of removing controversial text from Quackwatch completely so as to eliminate controversy. ScienceApologist ( talk) 22:51, 18 December 2007 (UTC) |
The Content Creativity Barnstar | ||
For everyone here - you've done an incredible job working hard at working together. The section is coming together without any edit wars; there've been no personal remarks and in general, everyone has been incredibly civil and helpful. This is a very impressive way to turn things around - feel free to yank this barnstar and put it in your own user space :) Shell babelfish 19:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC) |
momoricks
make my day has given you balloons! Balloons are meant to uplift the morale of people with an illness, and has hopefully made your day a little better. Spread good health by giving someone else who is a bit ill a balloon.
Spread the good health by adding {{ subst:Balloons}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I admire your constantly upbeat attitude and am proud to call you a Wikifriend.
Crohnie has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, |
Vassyana has given you a
Hershey Bar! Hershey bars promote
WikiLove through chololately goodness and hopefully this one has made your day better. Hershey bars are wonderfully delicious! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a Hershey bar, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of Hershey bars by adding {{
subst:Hershey Bar}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
The Purple Star | ||
You deserve a dozen of these for enduring the recent arbitration hullabaloo. momo ricks 21:54, 24 September 2009 (UTC) |
The Good Heart Barnstar | ||
For your consistent kindness, courage and diplomacy; you make Wikipedia a better place. momo ricks 21:54, 24 September 2009 (UTC) |
DocOfSoc (
talk) has given you a
bubble tea! Bubble teas promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!
Spread the awesomeness of bubble teas by adding {{ subst: User:Download/Bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
You are nice even to the horrid vandals! Cheers :> Doc9871 ( talk) 02:21, 13 May 2010 (UTC) |
The Purple Star | ||
you are loved.... DocOfSoc ( talk) 21:34, 19 July 2010 (UTC) |
The Special Barnstar | ||
Just for being You!! Fondly- DocOfSoc ( talk) |
The Real Life Barnstar | ||
Your user page really touched me. I present you this barnstar in recognition for your real life efforts to live a good life, overcoming all your suffering. You are an example to all us. Anna Lincoln 20:15, 9 July 2010 (UTC) |
Crohnie has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
The Your Opinion is More Important than You Think Barnstar | ||
For making respectful, relevant, focused, and helpful comments in relation to the current Wikipedia arbitration case on Climate change. Crohnie, your input has been impressive, and it has certainly not gone unnoticed or unappreciated. Keep it up! Ncmvocalist ( talk) 16:13, 12 September 2010 (UTC) |
The Mediation Award | ||
Thanks for your help with the recent Man content dispute. I know a number of people helped, but I think your early contributions and cool head helped to set a constructive tone and shaped the discussion. And I think it's worked out OK for now - socks got blocked, everyone had their say, and the heat was dissipated -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 19:53, 11 November 2010 (UTC) |
All Around Amazing Barnstar | ||
For unfailingly good advice and humour. You are truly Amazing in all that you do despite RL intruding. You present an example that all would be wise to follow. Thank you with all my heart. DocOfSoc ( talk) 23:51, 31 December 2010 (UTC) |
|
Images uploaded (WARNING: SOME ARE VERY GRAPHIC)-- CrohnieGal Talk 11:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | ||||
|
Hello Crohnie, after your reversion in the Charles Whitman article, I was trying to take your advise and move into the discussion area. However, I found that IP adresses are not allowed, so I am in a catch 22 here. One of the many things I dislike about the WP format is the Moniker system. I choose to be an IP moniker instead. I would prefer real names, as they position parties to be all of the courtesies that WP requires, instead, Monikers allow a veil for anyone with suspicious motives and can always return if banned under a different Moniker. So what is the point really?
To the reversion issues going on with the news of McCoy being terminally ill, there was one objection to relevancy that I modified to be respectful and saw the issue. Then the next reverter, stepped in without a good reason, so I again modified the contribution, hoping that would help. It didn't and the same party used another tactic. Then I tried to communicate with the party about the reversion, and the fact that they appear to edit McCoy's paragraph exclusively [ [18]]. I did not bring up the issue of WP:OWN, as I did not want to be confrontational, except to mention that the party appeared to have a bone to pick. The party did not respond to my message directly, but did so in a summary review, during another reversion. What I decided to do ultimately was to Source the material with a quote from the source. There were no complaints after that. As to why you have reverted the contribution and earmarked it to the talk page, is out of my scope of understanding. Can you fill me in? Thanks! 71.85.120.252 ( talk) 22:07, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Yep, the documentary costs money for equipment, which I now have most of it in cameras and gear. All the documents are ready and shooting has already begun on preleminary issues, like Camp Lejuene, Jacksonville, Savannah, etc. I visited East Carolina where Whitman took a class, they could find no records without going through their archives; too much time and cost for a potentially uninteresting period. I have rearranged the the information andremoved the McCoy and Martinez section as being too autobiograhical within Whitman's article. I put Martinez' sentence in his article. Whatta ya' think?!? If your still up? lol! 71.85.120.252 ( talk) 05:56, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
I'm running on low fuel...Jim Beam is running out...kitchen is next then bed for me. I'll review when my head is clearer. When I visited East Carolina, we were playing out of a bar called "the Attic" which I believe has burned down now. Do you still have my email?
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕)) 06:11, 21 May 2011 (UTC)