Case | Created | Last volunteer edit | Last modified | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Title | Status | User | Time | User | Time | User | Time |
RRR | Closed | SaibaK ( t) | 5 days, 14 hours | Robert McClenon ( t) | 20 minutes | Robert McClenon ( t) | 20 minutes |
Cyril Ramaphosa | Closed | JoshuaJ28 ( t) | 8 hours | Kovcszaln6 ( t) | 5 hours | Kovcszaln6 ( t) | 5 hours |
If you would like a regularly-updated copy of this status box on your user page or talk page, put {{
DRN case status}} on your page. Click on that link for more options.
Last updated by
FireflyBot (
talk) at
20:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi Craffael.09! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Nick Moyes ( talk) 15:51, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Adakiko. I noticed that in
this edit to
Breakingviews, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Adakiko (
talk)
10:36, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Craffael.09! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
![]() |
Hi Craffael.09! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Hey Wikidad! Lets start with my first issue: User talk:Mccapra#Copyediting tag, Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests#Muhyi al-Din Faris-Idris Jamma'. Ruwaym ( talk) 14:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
I believe I've fixed the bug that causes some of your recent edits to be blocked by the edit filter, apologies for the inconvenience. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I was just reading the noticeboard (as a lurker) and came across your username at ' Bailey Zappe'. As I have not seen you around before, I decided to check at the volunteering section as you claimed to be a volunteer. It seems like you have typed your username wrongly at the section, that's why it does not show up in the 'Last volunteer edit' in the DRN status that you have above. I'm just going to go ahead and correct it, if you don't mind. Jolly1253 ( talk) 13:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Please do not jump into an active role when there is already a volunteer handling the dispute. If there is already a moderator, any other volunteer is welcome to join the case as another editor. But if two volunteers both appear to be acting as leaders or moderators, it will probably confuse the editors. Please continue working on the Herzegovina dispute. Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:30, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Please disclose the username of your prior account that you allege was hacked. Curbon7 ( talk) 20:10, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Requesting adminship is a kind of
test on Wikipedia to identify those who
don't get it. You failed that test.
Your RfA isn't even
transcluded correctly. Asking for the watchlist notice is proof you are nowhere in position for this. The best thing you can do is ask to have that RfA deleted and forget about adminship until you can rack up 10000 more edits and get a
good article or two. Don't take this personally. Wikipedia has a steep learning curve and you are not even approaching the point you would need to. The good news is, the best thing about being a Wikipedian is editing articles. No adminship is required for that.
Chris Troutman (
talk)
23:30, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
I suggest that you add a {{db-user}} to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Craffael.09 and reconsider an RFA some years in the future. There are a lot more things for you to try out first. Including uploading a picture, checking new pages, renaming a page, tagging pages for speedy delete, adding categories, actually add text to existing articles, and correct spelling mistakes in articles. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 11:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Short Description Barnstar | |
I award you this, arguably way too late, for helping clean up long short descriptions. Luxtay the IInd ( talketh to me) 14:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC) |
First of all- welcome to the team- you have no idea how happy I, personally, am to have you here. I just wanted to give you a bit of advice based on what I've seen of the two cases you are mediating. I think you may want to engage a bit more. The editors come here because they can't solve things on their own. The editors on Mary, Queen of Scotts are being pretty rough on each other. Sometimes, we have to step in kinda like a kindergarten teacher and remind them to be nice. When they get particularly hostile- sometimes we have to tell them to talk only to us as mediators and not interact with the other editors. Like the one I'm tackling at the bottom of the page. I think the Mary Queen of Scotts case is getting close to that point. Our purpose is to impose structure and calm on tense situations. Letting them talk it out themselves has failed already. Its okay to step in.
Again- I'm glad you are here- Its great to have more volunteers. Nightenbelle ( talk) 19:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Craffael, thank you for helping out with GAN reviews. With regards to Talk:Morgoth/GA1, reviews should explain how the article meets each criteria. For example, by noting which sources were checked to ensure the article does not have original research or plagiarism. This helps other editors looking at the GAN at later points to understand what went into the review and the state of the article at the time of the assessment, and can also provide pointers for the nominator to further improve the article if they wish to do so. Best, CMD ( talk) 00:58, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Maybe you can make the lead section shorter by removing the 2nd paragraph as most of the info said is also stated further in the article, per MOS:LEAD,
The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents, you should expand on why it's a problem if info in the lead is later repeated in the article, which is normal practice. Besides, per stats the page has 20,858 characters, per MOS:LEADLENGTH, a two or three paragraph lead is fine.
Relatedly, I have removed your two(?) GANs at Talk:Nuri Ja'far. You do not appear to have edited that article, nor based on your userpage do you speak Arabic, so I don't see how you could effectively deal with a GA review. CMD ( talk) 10:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. VickKiang (talk) 08:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Adopters should have a good understanding of the encyclopedia and its policies and guidelines.It would be great if you can get some experience, starting with remember to sign your posts, re-reading how the criteria for good articles work, and have some solid content creation or anti-vandalism work.
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
User:Craffael.09. Thank you.
~Swarm~
{sting}
20:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Floquenbeam (
talk)
00:42, 8 November 2022 (UTC)I have blocked you from editing, site-wide, indefinitely, after the discussion at WP:ANI noted in the thread above. This is intended as a block on you, personally, so you are not allowed to simply use another account. The reason for the block is general disruption, over a long time, using several accounts. This time around, you have:
This is on top of your long-term use of a multitude of alternate accounts to evade scrutiny. Basically, you have been using WP as a playground, with little to no concern for the people whose experience you made worse in your playing around. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 00:46, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Talk:Morgoth/GA1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Per Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Craffael.09 there seem to be consensus that this review is inappropriate. ( User:Chiswick Chap, User:Floquenbeam, User:Robert McClenon: revert if you disagree)
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. VickKiang (talk) 09:24, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
Case | Created | Last volunteer edit | Last modified | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Title | Status | User | Time | User | Time | User | Time |
RRR | Closed | SaibaK ( t) | 5 days, 14 hours | Robert McClenon ( t) | 20 minutes | Robert McClenon ( t) | 20 minutes |
Cyril Ramaphosa | Closed | JoshuaJ28 ( t) | 8 hours | Kovcszaln6 ( t) | 5 hours | Kovcszaln6 ( t) | 5 hours |
If you would like a regularly-updated copy of this status box on your user page or talk page, put {{
DRN case status}} on your page. Click on that link for more options.
Last updated by
FireflyBot (
talk) at
20:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi Craffael.09! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Nick Moyes ( talk) 15:51, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Adakiko. I noticed that in
this edit to
Breakingviews, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Adakiko (
talk)
10:36, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Craffael.09! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
![]() |
Hi Craffael.09! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Hey Wikidad! Lets start with my first issue: User talk:Mccapra#Copyediting tag, Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests#Muhyi al-Din Faris-Idris Jamma'. Ruwaym ( talk) 14:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
I believe I've fixed the bug that causes some of your recent edits to be blocked by the edit filter, apologies for the inconvenience. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I was just reading the noticeboard (as a lurker) and came across your username at ' Bailey Zappe'. As I have not seen you around before, I decided to check at the volunteering section as you claimed to be a volunteer. It seems like you have typed your username wrongly at the section, that's why it does not show up in the 'Last volunteer edit' in the DRN status that you have above. I'm just going to go ahead and correct it, if you don't mind. Jolly1253 ( talk) 13:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Please do not jump into an active role when there is already a volunteer handling the dispute. If there is already a moderator, any other volunteer is welcome to join the case as another editor. But if two volunteers both appear to be acting as leaders or moderators, it will probably confuse the editors. Please continue working on the Herzegovina dispute. Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:30, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Please disclose the username of your prior account that you allege was hacked. Curbon7 ( talk) 20:10, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Requesting adminship is a kind of
test on Wikipedia to identify those who
don't get it. You failed that test.
Your RfA isn't even
transcluded correctly. Asking for the watchlist notice is proof you are nowhere in position for this. The best thing you can do is ask to have that RfA deleted and forget about adminship until you can rack up 10000 more edits and get a
good article or two. Don't take this personally. Wikipedia has a steep learning curve and you are not even approaching the point you would need to. The good news is, the best thing about being a Wikipedian is editing articles. No adminship is required for that.
Chris Troutman (
talk)
23:30, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
I suggest that you add a {{db-user}} to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Craffael.09 and reconsider an RFA some years in the future. There are a lot more things for you to try out first. Including uploading a picture, checking new pages, renaming a page, tagging pages for speedy delete, adding categories, actually add text to existing articles, and correct spelling mistakes in articles. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 11:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Short Description Barnstar | |
I award you this, arguably way too late, for helping clean up long short descriptions. Luxtay the IInd ( talketh to me) 14:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC) |
First of all- welcome to the team- you have no idea how happy I, personally, am to have you here. I just wanted to give you a bit of advice based on what I've seen of the two cases you are mediating. I think you may want to engage a bit more. The editors come here because they can't solve things on their own. The editors on Mary, Queen of Scotts are being pretty rough on each other. Sometimes, we have to step in kinda like a kindergarten teacher and remind them to be nice. When they get particularly hostile- sometimes we have to tell them to talk only to us as mediators and not interact with the other editors. Like the one I'm tackling at the bottom of the page. I think the Mary Queen of Scotts case is getting close to that point. Our purpose is to impose structure and calm on tense situations. Letting them talk it out themselves has failed already. Its okay to step in.
Again- I'm glad you are here- Its great to have more volunteers. Nightenbelle ( talk) 19:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Craffael, thank you for helping out with GAN reviews. With regards to Talk:Morgoth/GA1, reviews should explain how the article meets each criteria. For example, by noting which sources were checked to ensure the article does not have original research or plagiarism. This helps other editors looking at the GAN at later points to understand what went into the review and the state of the article at the time of the assessment, and can also provide pointers for the nominator to further improve the article if they wish to do so. Best, CMD ( talk) 00:58, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Maybe you can make the lead section shorter by removing the 2nd paragraph as most of the info said is also stated further in the article, per MOS:LEAD,
The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents, you should expand on why it's a problem if info in the lead is later repeated in the article, which is normal practice. Besides, per stats the page has 20,858 characters, per MOS:LEADLENGTH, a two or three paragraph lead is fine.
Relatedly, I have removed your two(?) GANs at Talk:Nuri Ja'far. You do not appear to have edited that article, nor based on your userpage do you speak Arabic, so I don't see how you could effectively deal with a GA review. CMD ( talk) 10:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. VickKiang (talk) 08:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Adopters should have a good understanding of the encyclopedia and its policies and guidelines.It would be great if you can get some experience, starting with remember to sign your posts, re-reading how the criteria for good articles work, and have some solid content creation or anti-vandalism work.
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
User:Craffael.09. Thank you.
~Swarm~
{sting}
20:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Floquenbeam (
talk)
00:42, 8 November 2022 (UTC)I have blocked you from editing, site-wide, indefinitely, after the discussion at WP:ANI noted in the thread above. This is intended as a block on you, personally, so you are not allowed to simply use another account. The reason for the block is general disruption, over a long time, using several accounts. This time around, you have:
This is on top of your long-term use of a multitude of alternate accounts to evade scrutiny. Basically, you have been using WP as a playground, with little to no concern for the people whose experience you made worse in your playing around. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 00:46, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Talk:Morgoth/GA1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Per Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Craffael.09 there seem to be consensus that this review is inappropriate. ( User:Chiswick Chap, User:Floquenbeam, User:Robert McClenon: revert if you disagree)
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. VickKiang (talk) 09:24, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |