![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
Hi,
I don't think neutrality is breached when you classify Crimea as a occupied area by Russia. It is classified as such by the United Nations and has passed through the general assembly. The term "disputed" gives undue legitimacy to illegal actions and legality has no measure of opinion. I was wondering if you could clarify your insistence on using "disputed" rather than "occupied"? Lukakach ( talk) 14:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm not sure why you suspect my edits are libelous as I've provided several valid sources. "Shais Taub" is actually an alias for Seth Thompson of Pittsburgh, PA - you can verify this through a quick internet search. His parents are in fact Guy W. and Rhea S. Thompson of Chicago and they both obtained doctorate degrees from Heed University, a known diploma mill now based in Milwaukee. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:C5B5:5190:A078:D4DB:47F3:ADAE ( talk) 22:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Compassionate727, you may wish to comment. Kind regards -- Marek. 69 talk 06:58, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Could I get something constructive instead of "this is very poorly written" and a wipe. No Fault Found is a distinct and unique topic that should not just redirect to Failure Analysis. JPelham ( talk) 16:25, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
The first section was actually a quote and I've now rewritten it to make it make more sense. I've put the article in my sandbox User:JPelham/sandbox and improved it. The funny thing is No Fault Found has never been a possible result of failure analysis. It is a maintenance investigation outcome where no failure is identified. Failure analysis only comes after a failure has been found and the cause is in question. I hope I have gone some way to alleviating your concerns and that you no agree this should be de merged. JPelham ( talk) 09:02, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Now moved from sandbox to Draft space No Fault Found JPelham ( talk) 09:10, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Compassionate727 could you explain why you have redirected the newly accepted NFF article? The article you have redirected to contains no peer reviewed research. The NFF article you removed did and was intended to become a much more expansive article. As a researcher the proper name for this phenomenon with the widest acceptance is NFF and has become accepted across the electronics, automotive, and aerospace sectors. JPelham ( talk) 13:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I believe you put the "more footnotes" tag on Waldheim–Rochlitz railway back in September 2015. I've changed a few things, is it better now? -- Schlosser67 ( talk) 12:38, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello !
Saw your post for Copy Editing on Jankovský of Vlašim. I did my best but will take another look at it and see were it could be improved. I am open to any sugegestion you may have to make it better. Thanks ! -- Vlasime ( talk) 13:59, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello again ! Vlasime ( talk) 16:28, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your improvements to Jankovský z Vlašimi.
Regarding reference "brother or cousin was perhaps Jan z Kamenice, the father of Cardinal Jan Očko z Vlašime" there is no one document that states either bother or cousin but of the same family, the House of Vlasim. That is why I used the word "perhaps" Several documents show direct relationship and also books: Zrcadlo slavného Markrabí Moravského by Bartosz Paprocki published in 1593 and Tajemstvi Jankovskych z Vlasimi a na Bitove- 2008.
I have reseached the family for 20 plus yaers. I will e-mail you some notes.
Hi Compassionate727, you added {{ close paraphrasing}} tag to the article Marc-Christian Riebe. This article was edited and rewrited many times (look at the history), it can't be paraphrased. Buhram ( talk) 09:58, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
The article is a stub and will expand over time. There is a wikilink to Cannonlake. The article is a stand alone as it is a separate CPU. Please stop reverting it. IQ125 ( talk) 18:34, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. For the past few weeks, I have tried to edit this article so that the article is up-to-date. But some anonymous users keeps reverting my edits with reasons that does not make sense. I have also tried to tak with these anonymous user about this issue in their talk page, but they would not respond. I would like to ask for your help to solve this issue in the article. If you would like to help, I would really appreciate it. Thank you. Calvin Wisanto ( talk) 05:26, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
I noticed the article History of Libya under Muammar Gaddafi has part of the content similar to Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. Can you help me to have a look at it, thanks! -- Hongqilim ( talk) 15:24, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
I noticed you deleted the Letters Rogatory page and redirected it to the Letter Rogatory Page. The reason I created the "Letters Rogatory Page" is because it is the correct spelling/usage. Like "Letters Patent", not "Letter Patent" Please also use the talk page where the issue is explained and discuss there rather than just reverting or undoing Suastiastu ( talk) 14:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
I've taken this to AfD. I am not sure this editor and Wikipedia are a good fit, but guidance might help. Doug Weller talk 20:03, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
01:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thakor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saurastra. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:39, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
I removed the speedy deletion tag from this page as it appears to contain different useful information that should be merged with the other article, not simply deleted. Rmhermen ( talk) 19:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Just a note to let you know that I constantly see you doing wise and helpful things all over teh wiki. Here is a kitten in appreciation for your contributions. Glad to have you aboard.
—
Diannaa (
talk)
18:29, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey! I see that you have made an
on talk page of
User talk: 14.139.38.11 that the ip address is registered to Krishna Kant Pramod Kumar. I have a question: How do you know that the ip is registered to the aforementioned person? Thanks.
-
Iamvaibhavkumar (
talk)
08:51, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey! You have reverted my edit on User talk:14.139.38.11. The reason given was "You got it backwards. India Institute is providing the Internet, not receiving it". I am very sorry for being too naive here, but firstly, I didn't get all this providing-receiving thing. Secondly, as we have talked before, you told me to go at the bottom of that talk page and look for the geolocation links. I did that and I don't find any description giving me the name "Krishna Kant Pramod Kumar". Please explain. Iamvaibhavkumar ( talk) 11:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Aromatization must not be redirected to aromatic hydrocarbon. Many aromatization reactions make heterocycles.-- CxHy ( talk) 06:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I added "#" in front of your striked comment so that other folks can vote under you with "#" and the numbered list doesn't start back at 1. Did you really mean to change "#" to ":"? — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 18:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Please discontinue deleting this article on your own. Submit it to Articles for deletion if you wish. - JonathanDP81 ( talk | contribs)
Is there a reason that you are undoing the page "Marinette Catholic Central High School (Wisconsin)"? It is for a school project, if I am violating any rules please let me know so I can correct them instead of just undoing and leaving me in the dark. If you are going to say it violates rule "G11" that is false, then maybe you should take down pages such as "Xavier High School" or "Notre Dame Academy". Please just let me know what is going on. Thanks, Eric — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.102.205.87 ( talk) 14:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Good evening Thank you for your pleasant message. I apologize beforehand for my level of English. But my experience as researcher taught me that it is from the early childhood, from the day-nursery that begins the process of the education, a kind of "programming". Cordialement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wondermarvel ( talk • contribs) 21:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Agbolade Omowole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New World Order. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed your comment at ANI about SwisterTwister's retirement tag. While I appreciate this might look like someone trying to be "manipulative", bear in mind that some people just don't deal well with criticism of their work, and would rather not be on Wikipedia than be criticised for what they're doing, regardless of whether that criticism is constructive or well-founded. Indeed, SwisterTwister took a long break the last time their work was criticised, clearly not through trying to be manipulative. Just a thought. Sam Walton ( talk) 18:01, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
I asking you please self-revert on
The Lying Game (book series). I added that article's first sourcing, and chose both author format and date format deliberately.
MOS:DATERET says "The date format chosen by the first major contributor in the early stages of an article should continue to be used, unless there is reason to change it based on strong national ties to the topic or consensus on the article's talk page."
– in this case, the first major contributor of refs is me.
MOS:DATEUNIFY is also clear that ref accessdate can use ISO date formats even if other date formats are in 'mdy dates' format (note also that Wikipedia doesn't have a "house" refs style format). Changing date formats on
WP:IDONTLIKEIT basis is disrespectful to the authors who first chose whatever date format they chose. So I'm asking you to self-revert. Thanks. --
IJBall (
contribs •
talk)
16:04, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
12:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
I didn't make any mistakes, the remark from Crowley was intended that way (it was obvious reference to the Donald Trump slogan), it was humorous. Since when does Wikipedia, or Wikipedians have issues with humor?. P.S. There's also this section: /info/en/?search=Make_America_Great_Again#In_popular_culture -- ReordCræft ( talk) 06:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics. Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:16, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
You have no right to remove the topic being discussed. People are going to keep reverting it, and that's inappropriate.
It seems, given that you are American, and that these families are essentially responsible for the health of your country, you are going to revert anything that may have truth in it.
Do you honestly believe that the Rockefeller Rothschild relationship is new? Do you feel that the news article provided by FT.com was reporting a relationship that was previously non-existent? If so, I have a bridge to sell you.
Next: To suggest that Relations between Nazi Germany and the Arab world are not relevant to the topic being discussed (familial alliances), you are mistaken.
User:Johnbod wanted to make the argument that the Rockefeller Rothschild relationship is one among many, which is a half-truth. It may be one among many (like the Rothschild's relationship with the Arabs), however it is the most prominent.
Evelyn de Rothschild is the Queen's financial advisor, for Goodness' sake. Don't you understand that the Crown owns all the property within the Commonwealth Realms, and thus the sale of natural energy reserves falls under this family's jurisdiction?
The Rockefellers are a BIG beneficiary of this relationship. Have you ever wondered why the energy being extracted is not refined, but is instead piped down halfway across the continent to Texas? Many excuses will be given, all of which are false.
My claims are not incorrect or ridiculous, but true. This relationship has existed for quite some time, and their unwelcome influence is palpable throughout the region where this energy comes from.
Maybe you need to be a bit more understanding of how things operate in other countries, because your comments are baseless denigration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.208.7.22 ( talk) 19:03, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback on Draft:Reproductive rights in the United States. I will consider either making it into an article or simply a category. Waters.Justin ( talk) 00:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Is it possible to retrieve the recently deleted article so that I can use it in the draft format? Swimmingguy2016 ( talk) 23:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
I have created many pages on renumbered highways.. I don't understand why you reverted the highways. Are you trying to give people wrong information or mislead people as "the highways haven't renumbered" If I have done something improper, you kindly fix those problems instead of reverting the facts Kichanz ( talk) 17:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Let's consider an example, you reverted my edit on National Highway 35 (India). What I did here is I removed the redirect and added information about the new National Highway 35, I haven't copied anything from any page. But you reverted the edit. This is the case for most of the pages you reverted. Kichanz ( talk) 18:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
I understood the problem you said. Since most of the highways in India are renumbered combining two or more old highways. In this case what can I do? How can I move or request to move an article to new name. Another case is about articles like National Highway 60 (India), here there's no existing article page to be moved to this page. I will have to create new article ( have already done but reverted). This is the case, DO yu have any suggestions to give?
First, I want to thank you for your patience throughout these past few arduous days.
Secondly, I am hoping you send that warning to Johnbod as well, because I am not a "crank" or "conspiracy theorist".
I find such disparaging terms to be the equal of "Rothschild sycophant" or "Rothschild dependent" (or similar terms), but your opinion may differ.
Nonetheless I think I've been very civil throughout this process, and my recent frustration is mostly caused by others refusal of facts.
I appreciate your cooperation in this matter and will try my best to continually demonstrate my "can't look away" ( ;;))) ) wikipedia conduct :) 31.208.7.22 ( talk) 18:19, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Sorry if I've been a little grumpy - but "adieu" has been for many, many years used as a "normal" English word, with its own "English" pronunciation. Although it is of patently French origin and is (as a noun) sometimes spelled with its French plural "adieux" - it does not fall under the definition of French words and phrases in that article. Some "allegedly French" words used in English are not, and have never been "good" French. If you can think of a neater way of saying this - by all means. Otherwise - the article does have a talk page where we can thrash out this kind of thing. -- Soundofmusicals ( talk) 23:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Liberalism you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tim riley --
Tim riley (
talk)
22:00, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
The article
Liberalism you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Liberalism for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tim riley --
Tim riley (
talk)
07:40, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors July 2016 News
![]() Hello everyone, and welcome to the July 2016 GOCE newsletter. June Blitz: this one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 12 through 18 June; the themes were video games and Asian geography. Of the 18 editors who signed up, 11 removed 47 articles from the backlog. Barnstars and rollover totals are located here. Thanks to all editors who took part. Coordinator elections: The second tranche of Guild coordinators for 2016, who will serve a six-month term until 23:59 UTC on 31 December, have been elected. Jonesey95 remains as your drama-free Lead Coordinator, and Corinne and Tdslk are your new assistant coordinators. For her long service to the Guild, Miniapolis has been enrolled in the GOCE Hall of Fame. Thanks to everyone who voted in the election; our next scheduled one occurs in December 2016. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are eligible; self-nominations are welcome and encouraged. July Drive: Our month-long July Copy Editing Backlog Elimination Drive is now underway. Our aim is to remove articles tagged for copy-edit in April, May and June 2015, and to complete all requests on the GOCE Requests page from June 2016. The drive ends at 23:59 on 31 July 2016 (UTC). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Corinne and Tdlsk. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
12:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Dark Side of the Moon. Legobot ( talk) 04:32, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Just a small request - when you create new categories such as Category:Women artists articles needing infoboxes, please can you put categories on them? Otherwise noone can find them and so it doesn't really help. And it's one less thing for people like me to do, who put categories on uncat cats.... Le Deluge ( talk) 13:49, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
The article
Liberalism you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Liberalism for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tim riley --
Tim riley (
talk)
14:02, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
Hi,
I don't think neutrality is breached when you classify Crimea as a occupied area by Russia. It is classified as such by the United Nations and has passed through the general assembly. The term "disputed" gives undue legitimacy to illegal actions and legality has no measure of opinion. I was wondering if you could clarify your insistence on using "disputed" rather than "occupied"? Lukakach ( talk) 14:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm not sure why you suspect my edits are libelous as I've provided several valid sources. "Shais Taub" is actually an alias for Seth Thompson of Pittsburgh, PA - you can verify this through a quick internet search. His parents are in fact Guy W. and Rhea S. Thompson of Chicago and they both obtained doctorate degrees from Heed University, a known diploma mill now based in Milwaukee. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:C5B5:5190:A078:D4DB:47F3:ADAE ( talk) 22:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Compassionate727, you may wish to comment. Kind regards -- Marek. 69 talk 06:58, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Could I get something constructive instead of "this is very poorly written" and a wipe. No Fault Found is a distinct and unique topic that should not just redirect to Failure Analysis. JPelham ( talk) 16:25, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
The first section was actually a quote and I've now rewritten it to make it make more sense. I've put the article in my sandbox User:JPelham/sandbox and improved it. The funny thing is No Fault Found has never been a possible result of failure analysis. It is a maintenance investigation outcome where no failure is identified. Failure analysis only comes after a failure has been found and the cause is in question. I hope I have gone some way to alleviating your concerns and that you no agree this should be de merged. JPelham ( talk) 09:02, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Now moved from sandbox to Draft space No Fault Found JPelham ( talk) 09:10, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Compassionate727 could you explain why you have redirected the newly accepted NFF article? The article you have redirected to contains no peer reviewed research. The NFF article you removed did and was intended to become a much more expansive article. As a researcher the proper name for this phenomenon with the widest acceptance is NFF and has become accepted across the electronics, automotive, and aerospace sectors. JPelham ( talk) 13:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I believe you put the "more footnotes" tag on Waldheim–Rochlitz railway back in September 2015. I've changed a few things, is it better now? -- Schlosser67 ( talk) 12:38, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello !
Saw your post for Copy Editing on Jankovský of Vlašim. I did my best but will take another look at it and see were it could be improved. I am open to any sugegestion you may have to make it better. Thanks ! -- Vlasime ( talk) 13:59, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello again ! Vlasime ( talk) 16:28, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your improvements to Jankovský z Vlašimi.
Regarding reference "brother or cousin was perhaps Jan z Kamenice, the father of Cardinal Jan Očko z Vlašime" there is no one document that states either bother or cousin but of the same family, the House of Vlasim. That is why I used the word "perhaps" Several documents show direct relationship and also books: Zrcadlo slavného Markrabí Moravského by Bartosz Paprocki published in 1593 and Tajemstvi Jankovskych z Vlasimi a na Bitove- 2008.
I have reseached the family for 20 plus yaers. I will e-mail you some notes.
Hi Compassionate727, you added {{ close paraphrasing}} tag to the article Marc-Christian Riebe. This article was edited and rewrited many times (look at the history), it can't be paraphrased. Buhram ( talk) 09:58, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
The article is a stub and will expand over time. There is a wikilink to Cannonlake. The article is a stand alone as it is a separate CPU. Please stop reverting it. IQ125 ( talk) 18:34, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. For the past few weeks, I have tried to edit this article so that the article is up-to-date. But some anonymous users keeps reverting my edits with reasons that does not make sense. I have also tried to tak with these anonymous user about this issue in their talk page, but they would not respond. I would like to ask for your help to solve this issue in the article. If you would like to help, I would really appreciate it. Thank you. Calvin Wisanto ( talk) 05:26, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
I noticed the article History of Libya under Muammar Gaddafi has part of the content similar to Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. Can you help me to have a look at it, thanks! -- Hongqilim ( talk) 15:24, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
I noticed you deleted the Letters Rogatory page and redirected it to the Letter Rogatory Page. The reason I created the "Letters Rogatory Page" is because it is the correct spelling/usage. Like "Letters Patent", not "Letter Patent" Please also use the talk page where the issue is explained and discuss there rather than just reverting or undoing Suastiastu ( talk) 14:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
I've taken this to AfD. I am not sure this editor and Wikipedia are a good fit, but guidance might help. Doug Weller talk 20:03, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
01:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thakor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saurastra. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:39, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
I removed the speedy deletion tag from this page as it appears to contain different useful information that should be merged with the other article, not simply deleted. Rmhermen ( talk) 19:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Just a note to let you know that I constantly see you doing wise and helpful things all over teh wiki. Here is a kitten in appreciation for your contributions. Glad to have you aboard.
—
Diannaa (
talk)
18:29, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey! I see that you have made an
on talk page of
User talk: 14.139.38.11 that the ip address is registered to Krishna Kant Pramod Kumar. I have a question: How do you know that the ip is registered to the aforementioned person? Thanks.
-
Iamvaibhavkumar (
talk)
08:51, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey! You have reverted my edit on User talk:14.139.38.11. The reason given was "You got it backwards. India Institute is providing the Internet, not receiving it". I am very sorry for being too naive here, but firstly, I didn't get all this providing-receiving thing. Secondly, as we have talked before, you told me to go at the bottom of that talk page and look for the geolocation links. I did that and I don't find any description giving me the name "Krishna Kant Pramod Kumar". Please explain. Iamvaibhavkumar ( talk) 11:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Aromatization must not be redirected to aromatic hydrocarbon. Many aromatization reactions make heterocycles.-- CxHy ( talk) 06:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I added "#" in front of your striked comment so that other folks can vote under you with "#" and the numbered list doesn't start back at 1. Did you really mean to change "#" to ":"? — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 18:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Please discontinue deleting this article on your own. Submit it to Articles for deletion if you wish. - JonathanDP81 ( talk | contribs)
Is there a reason that you are undoing the page "Marinette Catholic Central High School (Wisconsin)"? It is for a school project, if I am violating any rules please let me know so I can correct them instead of just undoing and leaving me in the dark. If you are going to say it violates rule "G11" that is false, then maybe you should take down pages such as "Xavier High School" or "Notre Dame Academy". Please just let me know what is going on. Thanks, Eric — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.102.205.87 ( talk) 14:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Good evening Thank you for your pleasant message. I apologize beforehand for my level of English. But my experience as researcher taught me that it is from the early childhood, from the day-nursery that begins the process of the education, a kind of "programming". Cordialement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wondermarvel ( talk • contribs) 21:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Agbolade Omowole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New World Order. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed your comment at ANI about SwisterTwister's retirement tag. While I appreciate this might look like someone trying to be "manipulative", bear in mind that some people just don't deal well with criticism of their work, and would rather not be on Wikipedia than be criticised for what they're doing, regardless of whether that criticism is constructive or well-founded. Indeed, SwisterTwister took a long break the last time their work was criticised, clearly not through trying to be manipulative. Just a thought. Sam Walton ( talk) 18:01, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
I asking you please self-revert on
The Lying Game (book series). I added that article's first sourcing, and chose both author format and date format deliberately.
MOS:DATERET says "The date format chosen by the first major contributor in the early stages of an article should continue to be used, unless there is reason to change it based on strong national ties to the topic or consensus on the article's talk page."
– in this case, the first major contributor of refs is me.
MOS:DATEUNIFY is also clear that ref accessdate can use ISO date formats even if other date formats are in 'mdy dates' format (note also that Wikipedia doesn't have a "house" refs style format). Changing date formats on
WP:IDONTLIKEIT basis is disrespectful to the authors who first chose whatever date format they chose. So I'm asking you to self-revert. Thanks. --
IJBall (
contribs •
talk)
16:04, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
12:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
I didn't make any mistakes, the remark from Crowley was intended that way (it was obvious reference to the Donald Trump slogan), it was humorous. Since when does Wikipedia, or Wikipedians have issues with humor?. P.S. There's also this section: /info/en/?search=Make_America_Great_Again#In_popular_culture -- ReordCræft ( talk) 06:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics. Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:16, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
You have no right to remove the topic being discussed. People are going to keep reverting it, and that's inappropriate.
It seems, given that you are American, and that these families are essentially responsible for the health of your country, you are going to revert anything that may have truth in it.
Do you honestly believe that the Rockefeller Rothschild relationship is new? Do you feel that the news article provided by FT.com was reporting a relationship that was previously non-existent? If so, I have a bridge to sell you.
Next: To suggest that Relations between Nazi Germany and the Arab world are not relevant to the topic being discussed (familial alliances), you are mistaken.
User:Johnbod wanted to make the argument that the Rockefeller Rothschild relationship is one among many, which is a half-truth. It may be one among many (like the Rothschild's relationship with the Arabs), however it is the most prominent.
Evelyn de Rothschild is the Queen's financial advisor, for Goodness' sake. Don't you understand that the Crown owns all the property within the Commonwealth Realms, and thus the sale of natural energy reserves falls under this family's jurisdiction?
The Rockefellers are a BIG beneficiary of this relationship. Have you ever wondered why the energy being extracted is not refined, but is instead piped down halfway across the continent to Texas? Many excuses will be given, all of which are false.
My claims are not incorrect or ridiculous, but true. This relationship has existed for quite some time, and their unwelcome influence is palpable throughout the region where this energy comes from.
Maybe you need to be a bit more understanding of how things operate in other countries, because your comments are baseless denigration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.208.7.22 ( talk) 19:03, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback on Draft:Reproductive rights in the United States. I will consider either making it into an article or simply a category. Waters.Justin ( talk) 00:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Is it possible to retrieve the recently deleted article so that I can use it in the draft format? Swimmingguy2016 ( talk) 23:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
I have created many pages on renumbered highways.. I don't understand why you reverted the highways. Are you trying to give people wrong information or mislead people as "the highways haven't renumbered" If I have done something improper, you kindly fix those problems instead of reverting the facts Kichanz ( talk) 17:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Let's consider an example, you reverted my edit on National Highway 35 (India). What I did here is I removed the redirect and added information about the new National Highway 35, I haven't copied anything from any page. But you reverted the edit. This is the case for most of the pages you reverted. Kichanz ( talk) 18:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
I understood the problem you said. Since most of the highways in India are renumbered combining two or more old highways. In this case what can I do? How can I move or request to move an article to new name. Another case is about articles like National Highway 60 (India), here there's no existing article page to be moved to this page. I will have to create new article ( have already done but reverted). This is the case, DO yu have any suggestions to give?
First, I want to thank you for your patience throughout these past few arduous days.
Secondly, I am hoping you send that warning to Johnbod as well, because I am not a "crank" or "conspiracy theorist".
I find such disparaging terms to be the equal of "Rothschild sycophant" or "Rothschild dependent" (or similar terms), but your opinion may differ.
Nonetheless I think I've been very civil throughout this process, and my recent frustration is mostly caused by others refusal of facts.
I appreciate your cooperation in this matter and will try my best to continually demonstrate my "can't look away" ( ;;))) ) wikipedia conduct :) 31.208.7.22 ( talk) 18:19, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Sorry if I've been a little grumpy - but "adieu" has been for many, many years used as a "normal" English word, with its own "English" pronunciation. Although it is of patently French origin and is (as a noun) sometimes spelled with its French plural "adieux" - it does not fall under the definition of French words and phrases in that article. Some "allegedly French" words used in English are not, and have never been "good" French. If you can think of a neater way of saying this - by all means. Otherwise - the article does have a talk page where we can thrash out this kind of thing. -- Soundofmusicals ( talk) 23:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Liberalism you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tim riley --
Tim riley (
talk)
22:00, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
The article
Liberalism you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Liberalism for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tim riley --
Tim riley (
talk)
07:40, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors July 2016 News
![]() Hello everyone, and welcome to the July 2016 GOCE newsletter. June Blitz: this one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 12 through 18 June; the themes were video games and Asian geography. Of the 18 editors who signed up, 11 removed 47 articles from the backlog. Barnstars and rollover totals are located here. Thanks to all editors who took part. Coordinator elections: The second tranche of Guild coordinators for 2016, who will serve a six-month term until 23:59 UTC on 31 December, have been elected. Jonesey95 remains as your drama-free Lead Coordinator, and Corinne and Tdslk are your new assistant coordinators. For her long service to the Guild, Miniapolis has been enrolled in the GOCE Hall of Fame. Thanks to everyone who voted in the election; our next scheduled one occurs in December 2016. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are eligible; self-nominations are welcome and encouraged. July Drive: Our month-long July Copy Editing Backlog Elimination Drive is now underway. Our aim is to remove articles tagged for copy-edit in April, May and June 2015, and to complete all requests on the GOCE Requests page from June 2016. The drive ends at 23:59 on 31 July 2016 (UTC). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Corinne and Tdlsk. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
12:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Dark Side of the Moon. Legobot ( talk) 04:32, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Just a small request - when you create new categories such as Category:Women artists articles needing infoboxes, please can you put categories on them? Otherwise noone can find them and so it doesn't really help. And it's one less thing for people like me to do, who put categories on uncat cats.... Le Deluge ( talk) 13:49, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
The article
Liberalism you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Liberalism for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tim riley --
Tim riley (
talk)
14:02, 12 July 2016 (UTC)