![]() |
Hi Camille1019! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Dathus ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 17:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC) |
Greetings. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
Nica (toponym), did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Presumably this was accidental - please take care.
Pam
D
00:34, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BilCat. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
White Ensign without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. -
BilCat (
talk)
01:12, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from
Guyanese people without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
Dcirovic (
talk)
03:39, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Camille,
do not used fixed width (a specific amount of pixels, like "350px" for pictures, please. This sets a width for all devices and thus makes the article unreadable on some. What looks good on a PC does not look good on a tablet or smartphone. Just let the pictures adjust to the size determinded for the respective device.
Thanks and kind regards,
Grueslayer
Let's talk.
04:17, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Hop tf off of my dick bitch. I'll do whatever the fuck I want to & please. If you have a problem with it I will keep on making my edits and you'll have to do nothing but give up. Bye
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Trinidad and Tobago, without citing a
reliable source using an
inline citation that clearly supports the material. The
burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
01:50, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Stop vandalizing Trinidadians. 4.3 million is wildly exaggerated and completely unfounded. 89.164.186.170 ( talk) 19:16, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Despite being warned, you continue to make edits like this, this and this. Given your response above, I can only interpret this as intentionally disruptive behaviour. Please stop. Guettarda ( talk) 17:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Nicki Minaj shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 07:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Please stop
making disruptive edits, as you did at
Cardi B.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Ss 112 19:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
ferret (
talk)
22:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Pink Friday, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
TJH2018
talk
02:42, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Acroterion
(talk)
02:50, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Trinidadians.
Karst (
talk)
05:55, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Widr (
talk)
06:00, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Camille1019! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Dathus ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 17:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC) |
Greetings. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
Nica (toponym), did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Presumably this was accidental - please take care.
Pam
D
00:34, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BilCat. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
White Ensign without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. -
BilCat (
talk)
01:12, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from
Guyanese people without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
Dcirovic (
talk)
03:39, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Camille,
do not used fixed width (a specific amount of pixels, like "350px" for pictures, please. This sets a width for all devices and thus makes the article unreadable on some. What looks good on a PC does not look good on a tablet or smartphone. Just let the pictures adjust to the size determinded for the respective device.
Thanks and kind regards,
Grueslayer
Let's talk.
04:17, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Hop tf off of my dick bitch. I'll do whatever the fuck I want to & please. If you have a problem with it I will keep on making my edits and you'll have to do nothing but give up. Bye
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Trinidad and Tobago, without citing a
reliable source using an
inline citation that clearly supports the material. The
burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
01:50, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Stop vandalizing Trinidadians. 4.3 million is wildly exaggerated and completely unfounded. 89.164.186.170 ( talk) 19:16, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Despite being warned, you continue to make edits like this, this and this. Given your response above, I can only interpret this as intentionally disruptive behaviour. Please stop. Guettarda ( talk) 17:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Nicki Minaj shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 07:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Please stop
making disruptive edits, as you did at
Cardi B.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Ss 112 19:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
ferret (
talk)
22:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Pink Friday, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
TJH2018
talk
02:42, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Acroterion
(talk)
02:50, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Trinidadians.
Karst (
talk)
05:55, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Widr (
talk)
06:00, 25 October 2017 (UTC)