Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at Carrie Prejean. Thank you. Rico 02:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC) (Using {{ Please see}})
An article that you have been involved in editing, Traditional marriage movement , has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traditional marriage movement. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - Schrandit ( talk) 07:07, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
{{adminhelp}} Could an admin warn User:KeltieMartinFan to stop making personal attacks? Please check his talk page and edit summary. I'm not asking that he be blocked. A warning should do. Also, I've noticed he edits any article to do with NBC which leaves me feeling there could be a COI here? Is it possible he's employed by NBC? Just for the record, I've had problems with Keltie in the past. Again, I'm not asking for a block. Please just read what I've said and look into it. Thanks. Ned ac 12:45, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Good call on turning the computer off and going for a run rather than speaking from anger. I take that back: excellent call. I'm actually going to do the same pretty soon, though I'm going for a ride on bike (the weather here is amazing today). When you get back to editing, try not to come from the prospective of "Caden vs. the gays" or "Caden vs. the liberals." It's not productive and can and will lead to more conflict. Instead, if you feel your voice isn't being heard try asking for a neutral opinion. WP:3O is a great place to start. If you're not satisfied, try going to the Wikipedia:Content noticeboard. If you're still not satisfied, you can always file an article WP:RfC. These are all great alternatives to airing past grievances you've had with editors in the past and are more productive than simply saying a conservative or heterosexual has no voice at Wikipedia. Finally, if none of that works, you can always take your complaints to the admin noticeboards. I would link to them, but I'm fairly certain you know where they are. ;) AniMate draw 23:06, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
{{adminhelp}}Can an admin please delete my sandbox for me? Thanks. Caden cool 16:29, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey dude. (BTW, do you prefer Ned or Caden?)
To continue our discussion on BLP. Check out the arguments I used in Talk:E.O. Green School shooting about the article having been moved to "Murder of Lawrence King". Essentially I was saying that we can't use "murder" in the title since that implies an intent to kill by McInerney that's speculation, and therefore is a BLP violation. If and when McInerney is found guilty of murder, then it can be discussed. The article was moved back to the E.O. Green title. Anyway, let me know what you think. — Becks Talk to me 22:00, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
I had a 71 Chevy Malibu 350 in a kinda metallic Green with a black fabric roof, and a Turbo 350 tranny, bucket seats, and console shift bar rather than a stick. Loved that car. Unfortunately never took pictures that I can remember. Why don't you post your car pictures somewhere, like FLickr. I'm not saying if I can dance better or worse that those in the video, but it was laugh. And thanks for those kind words about my writing. Becks Talk to me 16:07, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello Caden. I hope I haven't given you wrong information on the source of the quotation, but after reading this [1] I am less sure that Plato said it. Cheers. Cuddlyable3 ( talk) 13:45, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
And I will take your advice. Seriously. Respectfully -- what would you do if someone posted a pack of noxious lies about you on a public noticeboard? I'm sorry I lost my cool, but I'm only human. Sometimes you need to stand up and say "bullshit." Anyway, thanks, I'm going to chill out now, and I'm quite serious. All the best -- Antandrus (talk) 00:43, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Please use reliable sources. That article is already littered with enough unsourced trivia. k.i.a.c ( talktome - contribs) 06:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Lets assume good faith here, please. Not every single fact or sentence in an article needs reliable sources. From WP:VERIFY "...material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation." That Ritter was injured does not seem highly likely to be challenged, at least to me, and it isn't controversial. However, once challenged, RS are required. The references there now seem sufficient to establish an injury by Ritter, so I assume this issue can be put to bed. However, it would have been better to work this out on the talk page collaboratively. — Becksguy ( talk) 09:49, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey thanks Caden. Nice to hear off you. I've kind of retired actually, haven't edited properly in a while. Kind of lost my fire with the passing of Michael Jackson. Hope everything is going well though. Kind regards. — Please comment R 2 11:00, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
User:SheffieldSteel/Admin, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SheffieldSteel/Admin and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:SheffieldSteel/Admin during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Law Lord ( talk) 18:10, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Caden, don't ever agree with me. Aren't things much easier when we're at each others throats? </sarcasm> Seriously, thanks for the back up. And for the record, does this look anywhere in the neighborhood of 30? I'm kind of stunned that anyone would do this and think it was okay. AniMate 09:59, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! I really was about to quit until I saw everyone coming in on my side all of a sudden. Maybe you're not in on that yet and you don't know what I'm talking about. But thanks! Daniel Christensen ( talk) 06:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Caden cool 07:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Are you actually getting blocked here? What is going on? Daniel Christensen ( talk) 06:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I moved Caden/my shit-list to User:Caden/my shit-list, since that seemed to have been where you intended it to go. Best, MuffledThud ( talk) 14:14, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Attack_coatrack_we_discussed. -- Rico 19:14, 18 March 2010 (UTC) (Using {{ Please see}})
Well sure. I'll get to it sometime today, hopefully. EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( talk) 16:18, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
This user clearly has behavioral issues, considering that he has repeatedly reverted pages against consensus and sources, refuses to behave in a civil manner with other users, and does not want to listen to the rules and guidelines of Wikipedia. For you to take his side and claim that I made some kind of personal attacks I never made is, quite frankly, an insult to my intelligence and the intellect of anyone who would read these pages and look at my edits, where I have never done anything wrong, and RG's edits, where he has never done anything right. ( Sugar Bear ( talk) 20:28, 30 March 2010 (UTC))
All done. I've added in a new section, "Digital singles". The song charted on the Hot Digital Songs chart, which is a component chart. But since it was the only chart it charted on the time of the digital release, it's acceptable. EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( talk) 22:04, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
I formatted it whenever I added the Irish peak to the table. It's not showing up on your screen? It is on mine. EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( talk) 20:32, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, Caden! :) EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( talk) 00:19, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
I've added the Australian Recording Industry Association certified awards to the singles table. However, I also do not know where to get the Recording Industry Association of New Zealand certifications, either. The only place I know to get them, only has them from 2007 to now. EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( talk) 00:00, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Saw your question on another editor's talk page. Any reliable certification archive I've been able to locate (including a partial one for Ireland) is listed at WP:GOODCHARTS.— Kww( talk) 00:23, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Sure. I'll start when I have some extra time. Probably tomorrow or so. EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( talk) 23:08, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Apparently, I've done something really horrible to you. I have no idea what it is, but apparently it's " one of the worst, deliberate exhibitions of bad faith (Rico has) ever seen on Wikipedia." I've no clue what he's talking about, as you and I get on rather well these days despite our ideological differences. Little help? AniMate 21:32, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
incident from May 19, 2009, where you took my words out of context and turned my joke into a threat. In this diff [5] you will see that I had stated I was only joking when I mentioned I'd kick Keltie's ass. For some reason, you chose to not reveal this and decided to make me look bad. Here's what you chose to say on ANI: "As usual, Caden complains about a user being a bully, and he goes on to threaten to kick Keltie's ass". You then went on to say, :"Frankly, I don't think Caden is an asset to the project at all." Not only where you assuming bad faith, but you were deliberately being dishonest on ANI. I took offense to your posts back then, and felt attacked by you. At that specific period I was accused of edit warring with Keltiemartinfan and was blocked at the time of your comments to ANI, and therefore was unable to defend myself. It's all in the past now but I believe this is what Rico was referring to. Hope this clears it up for you. Caden cool 23:16, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Re. Talk:Saw_VII#Dean_Armstrong
Thank you for your input.
I would be grateful if you could kindly clarify where I have failed to remain calm, civil, or exhibited any negative behavior, if indeed this is your assertion.
Also, could you please reconsider your statement, Chzz, posting a block threat on Jordan's talk page when you very well know he's done nothing wrong, is not acceptable behavior.
I posted the warning for uncivil behaviour in accordance to WP:NPA, having checked my logic with several other very experienced editors in good standing. It clearly stated in the warning that the concern was over their comments on the talk page; specifically it was concerning the statement "You are just a troll".
I believe this is in accordance with Wikipedia policy, and if you do reconsider, I would be grateful if you would strike your comments on my alleged behaviour.
Many thanks, Chzz ► 06:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Quick heads-up that I just dealt with a {{helpme}} shout from blocked user Codedon ( talk · contribs) - the similarity in names, I thought it worth mentioning to you. Chzz ► 06:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi iam unblocked now. I guess your words had a significant impact. So i wanted to thank u. Cheers Blablaaa ( talk) 08:39, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm afraid that edit-warring on behalf of your friend EnDaLeCoMpLeX does not make it a consensus, and if you persist in doing this I will report you both for sock/meatpuppetry (you have chatted on each other's talk pages and have intersecting edits on almost 30 pages so it will not be hard to prove a connection between you both). Furthermore, not only does the version of the intro that you keep reverting to merely duplicate information that is already in the discography tables below it (which is pointless), it is also wrong and has many inaccuracies. It was seemingly written from an American standpoint whereas TFF are a British band and the band's history begins there and should be maintained from that viewpoint. Now please leave it alone. 80.47.10.75 ( talk) 11:10, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
i added 2 diffs, when u look them u will see it so undisputable.... . but please dont raise the issue, i only wanted to show u because u are interessted Blablaaa ( talk) 11:45, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Done. Eric444 ( talk) 06:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
wiki guidelines say that a reliable historian ( he is one) needs no back up. So he has to be included. If u or i dont like it, doesnt madder :-D . We have to accept, cheers Blablaaa ( talk) 11:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar, and for helping with the issues. Chzz ► 15:31, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Becks has given you a
c
ookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Hey Caden....Sorry I haven't been here much recently. I should have placed a Wikibreak notice on my user page. It isn't that I'm too busy in RL, it's that a really good friend of mine died in his sleep and another has cancer. So it was hard to focus on Wikipedia for a while and I needed a break. But I'm back. I hope you have been working on keeping out of trouble, and I hope you know that you are more than welcome to email me whenever, anytime you need to chat. Thanks for the message you left.
{{subst:if|||
{{{message}}}
||subst=subst:}}
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{
subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{
subst:munch}}!
I noticed you were supporting my case on the WA 2000 page, and as a more experienced user than I, I have a question for you.
I have a question for you. If pop culture information is unimportant, as is argued by the editor on the WA 2000 page, then why is this up on The Model 1887 page. "The Model 1887 was famously featured in Terminator 2: Judgment Day when it was carried by Arnold Schwarzenegger as the T-800. In the film, the T-800 is seen spin-cocking a version of the shotgun with an enlarged lever loop. It has also made an appearance in the widely popular first-person shooter game Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2." Seems like almost the exact same thing I was brow beaten for in the WA 2000 article. Does the user who did this have some sort of problem with people editing his page? I also noticed that he reported you for edit warring to the same Admin he reported me to. Nick-D LIGHT DINAMITE 19:36, 23 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lbrad2001 ( talk • contribs)
Hi Caden.
I've just offered replies to some 'help' requests from a relatively new editor Cimicifugia ( talk · contribs), who is having a few difficulties. Given the general subject area, I remembered that you had kindly assisted Blablaa previously, and wondered if you might be able to help this one, too.
If this is not appropriate, or not your thing at all, then apologies - it was a passing thought, that a more experienced user with some topic knowledge might be able to help them understand the way Wikipedia works, in addition to the advice I have already provided.
Like many new users, they are struggling to understand how BRD, consensus, etc. works.
Thanks, Chzz ► 04:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
I've mentioned you here [8]. Bali ultimate ( talk) 23:21, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your contribution of sources on the Eve's Plum page, I've been working on it for years. LoveLaced ( talk) 18:09, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
In a recent edit to the page FIFA World Cup, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Nasnema Chat 22:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Yeah I'll get to it probably sometime tomorrow because right now I'm not feeling too great. EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( talk) 02:28, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Marcus Qwertyus has a valid point, and he's not censoring you he's moving the discussion to what he considers a more appropriate forum, ie: Blablaaa's talk page [9]. I suggest you take the issue up with Marcus Qwertyus directly rather than edit warring. MILHIST is for discussing articles, if you are going to discuss editors it probably belongs somewhere else, such as WP:RFC/U or if it's directly actionable by an admin WP:ANI. Nev1 ( talk) 18:43, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Sorry that u got involved in this "problem" ( dont know if it is a real problem :-) ). Blablaaa ( talk) 19:16, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
somebody bring stuff to an article and has no reliable sources for it and u want us to let it stay until we proved that his stuff is not ok ? Blablaaa ( talk) 16:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi caden i appreciate your support but i guess u bring yourself problems. The normandy "lobby" is very strong and active. If u start "moaning" ( like i do ) about status quo there u will be attacked at one time or another. Your link to me is perfect base for enigmas ad hominem style. So spare yourself of stress. But thanks for the support Blablaaa ( talk) 07:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Caden, remarks like these: 1, 2, and 3 are totally unacceptable. If I see you make another one, I'll add to your already lengthy block log. Consider this your only warning. Parsecboy ( talk) 12:42, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
First problem: you are not being civil. Second problem: you are arguing, both here and on the Kursk talk page, with ad hominem attacks. If I see posts that fall into either category from you again, I will block you immediately. You are lashing out at those who are trying to rein you in before you are blocked, and you are taking Wikipedia personally, treating it like a battleground. Step away from the computer for a day; go out and cool down a bit. Thanks, — Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:17, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Yeah I'll get to it eventually. I've just been so busy lately that I've only been doing between one and five edits a day for about the past week or so. EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( talk) 20:28, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
He says beevor said it is partial but this was the objectives. But then we look the objectives ( which are also written by him ) we see that he simply lies. IT so emberrasing , cant deal with this anylonger i hope and admi will see it finally. He contradicts himself so heavy every third sentence. But if you show this he immediatly leaves this topic and raises another unimportant point to distract. Is there a board for such things? Blablaaa ( talk) 00:31, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I see nothing wrong with what I have added, especially as it is an 'Outsider's View' and not in the primary section of the RfC. You are free to rebutt the accusations made in that section by all means, but I will not strike them as I do not see them as personal attacks, but merely as my view of the situation from the outside. I'm sure the Arbitrators will be able to consider any bias present in my statement and evaluate it accordingly. Skinny87 ( talk) 11:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Hm there is no need to contact all people who participate in this because it will become more ^^. I will try that they wait a bit with this or that at least i get not blocked. At friday i will start to study the books by reynolds. I also will order hastings. ( by the way iam no psychopath who orders books to refute a online guy i planed to read them anyway :D) I cant know what enigma does exactly until i read same books like him. Studying his general editing behaviour iam 80% sure that he edits heavly selective and will avoid to use pro german statements/numbers by reynolds. If this true and i present a comprehensive overview the situation will immediatly look different and all people who applaud the subtle biaseditor will also look different. Until this i see no value in engaging in quibble. The situation is easy, what would you do if you are member of milhist? the people spend some time in www they will no risk their "friendships" with other editors. I guess the discussion about the infoboxes is proof of this. the method is simply bias towards allies, i can proove it easly with primary data, but no one of milhist had balls to admit this. Until nobody is able to speak his opinion against "friends" the whole system is seriously damaged. When enigmas selective editing is proofed then the rest of the system which so heavly supports him, falls also. Iam not sure but there is a diff out there where he claims the british army performed well and was one of the best armies. No serious historian will claim this, i guess thats a good introduction ^^. Its a matter of time .... . Blablaaa ( talk) 12:03, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
caden can you do me favor? Blablaaa ( talk) 13:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
he caden did you notice that enigma does not work at articles which were lost by british army? Blablaaa ( talk) 20:42, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
I've been rereading the comment you may concerning my quote and it finally dawned on me why you would bring that up: I regret to inform that I left out a very important word here; it currently reads "..the last time an indefinite block was imposed it was lifted three days later due to complaints that ran contrary to consensus," but it should read "..the last time an indefinite block was imposed it was lifted three days later due to complaints that it [the block] ran contrary to consensus." I was not criticizing the block, I was actually commenting that the block was lifted on grounds that editors had determined it to be wrongly applied and this was in turn the opinion which resulted in the block being lifted in accordance with consensus. I offer no excuse for this oversight, and will continue to endeavor to improve my spelling and grammar to help avoid instances like this in the future. Respectfully, TomStar81 ( Talk) 10:44, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Re this, in case you are unaware, "~" means "approximately" (as in maybe more, maybe less). Reynolds is on the "maybe more" side of that but other sources differ (such as Ellis who says "about 80 tanks"). You've reverted to the highest figure supported by the sources. I have no intention of edit warring but I'm sure it's not your intention to mislead our readers, so it would be much appreciated if you could return the infobox to a state where it properly reflects the range of sourced opinion. Thanks and best regards, EyeSerene talk 07:02, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TomStar81 ( Talk) 00:37, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
he tries to tell me what the book says which he never saw and i have in front of me. Dont know what to say this... Blablaaa ( talk) 00:05, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
he caden thanks for your help, finally i guess i will leave, i totally get rage if this continues. I will go to a committe soon with some diffs and so one to achieve a change. But iam not able to discuss every edit away from allied bias. Especially when the people here not even try to be neutral. They lie to avoid admiting there failures, its disgusting. Chaosdruid for example, getting mad with this guy. But thanks for your help anyways. Eventually the amount of english contributors will always push the foreigners. A neutral admin is needed. But iam interessted to see what happens after committe. Blablaaa ( talk) 01:42, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Blablaaa and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, Kirill [talk] [prof] 22:14, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, have noted your interest in WW2 and also freedom of expression. So, here's an invitation to participate in open discussion after taking a look at the current dispute discussion at World War II discussion page. Concerns my ongoing hassles with the user HoHum and some others. With regards. Communicat ( talk) 19:38, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
I think the image thing happened again. Look at my talk page. One of the images was even one that was already here I just cropped it. I think that even though they were all properly licensed for use here I don't think I did it right here. Probably why they were deleted. Daniel Christensen ( talk) 21:35, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
When I get the chance I will. EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( contributions) • ( let's chat) 19:21, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Caden, your edit today was unfortunate. For starters, you restored a comment that had zero to do with improving the article; my removal of it was fully in compliance with talk page guidelines. For another thing, I removed it seven months ago, and it was not your comment. If the editor who made it wanted to restore it, they had seven months to do so, but they did not. You cannot know whether it even reflects the current views of that editor, and it is unfair to reinsert a comment like that without the express permission of the other editor. And you didn't even use an edit summary.
Except to defend you on a minor point during a talk page discussion long ago, I have had no interactions with you, so I hope you'll take it in the constructive spirit it's intended when I remind you that your history at Talk:E.O. Green School shooting was marked by contention and drama. I thought (and hoped) all that was in the past. In any event, I am reverting your revert one time but will not engage in an edit war. If you believe I am wrong, I am willing to discuss it. Thanks for understanding. Rivertorch ( talk) 18:58, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Please accept this
invite to join the
Conservatism WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to conservatism. Simply click here to accept! Lionel ( talk) 01:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC) |
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their
user talk page. |
Hi.I was adding many sources to the Jill Gibson article but I don't know what went wrong? I can't see the many different pages on the 5 books that I used for references. I also added sources from old print magazines. I'm not sure why the page numbers are not displaying? Caden cool 02:24, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Hey there buddy! Long time no talk! How's things going? EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( contributions) • ( let's chat) 19:07, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their
user talk page. |
On the log in page I get "Log me in globally". What does this mean? Caden cool 22:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Reaper Eternal ( talk) 01:26, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi - thanks for the message. At the moment I'm just adding bits here and there (especially where articles are sparse on references /full of uncited stuff). I've been unpacking boxes and wallowing in books and music papers after a move. Can only find one ref to S.F. in Roxxon - for 'Johnny Loves Me' as 11th best Cashbox single of '62. I'll add it this weekend. As for Fever Tree - I bought the first album when it came out all those centuries ago! Still got it! Brieflysentient ( talk) 15:16, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey buddy ole pal! :) Life's descent, just rather busy with school and such. Hope things are good your way, as well. EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( contributions) • ( let's chat) 20:49, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
For the reason it was deleted see this discussion. The admin, User:Fastily, that deleted it knows much more about the appropriate use of non-free images than I do, sorry. J04n( talk page) 01:41, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
1. Fill in the reason you want the file undeleting and put it in the "reason=" section. Then copy the whole section below ...
{{subst:drv2 |page=File:JesseDirkhising.jpg |xfd_page=Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 July 17 |article=Murder of Jesse Dirkhising |reason=put the reason for undeleting the file here }} ~~~~
2. ...and paste it into Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 November 7, below the line that says "Add a new entry..."
3. Paste the following; {{subst:DRVNote|File:JesseDirkhising.jpg}} ~~~~ onto the talkpage of the admin who deleted the image.
Can I suggest that, as I mentioned at WT:NFC, that you don't suggest that this image was deleted because the victim was white and heterosexual (as you implied there). If you look at the deletion log for July 17, you will see that plenty of murder victim images were deleted that day, regardless of colour or sexual orientation. Best, Black Kite (t) 00:06, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I'm a regular user at the East Germany article and have seen that you have made contributions. I have put massive scholarly evidence involving sources that state that East Germany was a satellite state, but Mewulwe keeps reverting the inclusion of the term satellite state - including your edit to include it. He contends that the term is "biased" - I have demonstrated that massive numbers of source it acknowledge that its satellite state status is widely accepted. A discussion on the matter is needed at the Talk:East Germany page to sort this out, I would appreciate your help.-- R-41 ( talk) 13:25, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting me in the inaccurate accusations of canvassing and the one personal attack TFD made against me. In normal circumstances I would report, however I have worked cooperatively with TFD in the past, TFD's recent behaviour is just frustration, normally he/she is very factual and dedicated to the policies of Wikipedia. I will let her/his recent behaviour pass, and only report if it continues.-- R-41 ( talk) 19:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
As far as I know, we haven't met yet. If we did, and I forgot, I'm sorry. I wanted to tell you that I really appreciated what you said in my defense. No one summed the entire situation better than you did and your words were very kind and fair. Thank you very much, Caden. -- Lecen ( talk) 02:26, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Just fyi, no big. There seems to be confusion about which year Vitamin C is born. I changed 1969 to 1972 on the French and German articles but got reverted here. Slight Smile 03:55, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Re this, you've got it backwards: the pages we have both participated on recently are Galtung and Tertoger, and you began posting on both after I did, not vice versa. Please amend or strike the comment on Tertoger's talkpage. Nomoskedasticity ( talk) 20:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Communicating through edit summaries is generally a bad idea, as is reverting comments with a threat. If you see something you find offensive or possibly violates BLP, consider going to the user's talk page and asking them to revert or redact. Dealing with someone in a friendly non-confrontational manner will always get better results. Also, edit summaries aren't discussion. They're edit summaries. AniMate 21:05, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
You are requested to comment on the talk page about reverting an edit, which had removed content violating WP:V. Please add your inputs there based on wiki policies. 16:08, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
As the thread where you asked was closed before I could respond to you, I'll respond here. Yes, I was saying exactly that. It's unfortunate but true. Being an administrator on this site is a free pass to be a thug and a bully. The fact that Toddst1 is not being held accountable for his bullying speaks for itself. Joefromrandb ( talk) 19:51, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Caden. Is easy to add covers! You should go here: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard ; after click on "Click here to Start the Upload Form", after:
Step 1: Choose your file (the pic must be little,no more than 500 pxl)
Step 2: Describe your file Please provide a clear, descriptive name by which your file will be known on Wikipedia. (put something like that: Shirley Jones Silent Strength album cover)
Please provide a brief description of the contents of this file.
(put something like that: Shirley Jones Silent Strength album cover)
Step 3: Provide source and copyright information
(if you will upload a cover album ,you have to choose this one: This is a copyrighted, non-free work, but I believe it is Fair Use. I have read the Wikipedia rules on Non-Free Content, and I am prepared to explain how the use of this file will meet the criteria set out there.
after...
This file will be used in the following article: (put the name of the article,like: Then & Now (Shirley Jones album) )
after...
Non-free use rationale
(choose the option This is the official cover art of a work. This is the titlepage of a book, the cover of a CD or video, the official release poster of a movie, or a comparable item. It will be included as that work's primary means of visual identification, at the top of the article about the book, movie, etc. in question.
after... Which of these options describes this item best? (select Cover of a sound record (album,single,sound, CD)
Source: put the name of the site where you find the photo
after... (click on "This image will be shown as a primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the work in question."
after... In view of this, please explain how the use of this file will be minimal. (write this: Cover of the album that the article is about)
after... click on Upload.
The end!! jajajaja
Sorry for my english,I'm from Brazil,if you don't understand something or can not upload the photos,write to me again and I upload them to you.-- 88marcus ( talk) 19:34, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
– Pee Jay 17:08, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Exactly. The lede of the article, as you've revised it, isn't a summary, it's a regurgitation.-- Laun chba ller 13:08, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Oh, and please read WP:INVOLVED which says "that an administrator who has interacted with an editor or topic area purely in an administrative role, ... is not involved and is not prevented from acting in an administrative capacity". De728631 ( talk) 22:40, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Please. Can you play nice with SchroCat ( talk · contribs)??-- RandomLittleHelper talk 16:36, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I saw how you helped User:Metropolitan last month when he was unfairly banned following the controversy with Dr. Blofeld and his friends at the Paris talk page. User:ThePromenader, a friend of Dr. Blofeld, opened at the same time a case in the administrators' noticeboard to have me banned (basically, all the people disagreeing with them in the Paris article must be banned or silenced). This case against me was eventually closed by an admin and moved to the archives: [14], but ThePromander has resurrected this case today by removing it from the archive and pasting it again in the administrators' noticeboard.
Do you have any idea what I could do about it? The Promenader has for years been engaged in WP:HARASS against the people disagreeing with his vision of Paris, and this has pushed many knowledgeable editors away from Wikipedia. He's obviously trying to do the same here with me. Any ideas to help me? Thanks. Der Statistiker ( talk) 21:48, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Please note that ThePromenader has now moved the case demanding my banishment to the Incidents sub-board of the Administrators' noticeboard: [16]. The harassment continues. Yeeha! Der Statistiker ( talk) 16:14, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
You may not be aware but the Persondata template has been deprecated. Its removal from the Jesse Dirkhising article was part of the effort to migrate to Wikidata i.e. general tidying. The template and categories that were removed are administrative and used for data extraction so should only be used on specific biographical articles. i.e. It is ambiguous whether the dates apply to the murderer or the victim. Periglio ( talk) 17:29, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
I corrected her page to show this actual spelling used by the band at the time ("Stilettos"). You seem to agree with me that they didn't spell their name in the conventional way in which English would have shown a plural of the singular stiletto (stilletoes). But wiktionary shows three acceptable plural spellings: stilettos, stilettoes, and stiletti. So, once again, I only showed the spelling actually used by the band.
Caden, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt... YOU'RE WELCOME! It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! Musdan77 ( talk) |
18:48, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the added information. Please feel free to add it to the image page. The user I'm dealing with is having a very difficult time with the idea of sourcing images, and multiple users have tried to help him/her understand that google.com, itunes.com, etc. are not really what we mean when we ask for the source of an image. You're probably right though, and the better note to use would be {{ Bsr}}. ( ESkog)( Talk) 23:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
DES (talk) 01:13, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
I happened to see your comments at Cassianto's page. It's important to keep in mind that he's a member of a clique which I like to call the Cadre of Malcontents. They consider themselves immune from the rules, because they are such great contributors. They will defend each other to the death, and attack anyone who tries to stand up to them, often with a barrage of lowlife-language. So it's pretty much a hopeless cause. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 10:09, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
LOL that's a good name Bugs. But yeah I'm aware of the clique and have been the target of their street like colorful language on many occasions. I know how they work and you're right it's a lost cause. I don't think Cass likes Denis Leary much. I thought he would enjoy this [19] but he responded by doing this [20] instead. Anyway I found it funny that he called it a "personal attack" and claimed it was "copyright infringement" when the video came from Leary's official channel on VEVO. And then he threatened to take me to ANI which made me laugh because ANI is like the guy's second home. Anyway thanks for the message Bugs. Caden cool 17:21, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
The purpose of my comment on your talk page was inherent in its explicit message about leaving multiple thanks. Are you reading something else into it? Viriditas ( talk) 21:40, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Please, all the terrorism-related works have been moved to their separate category, even all the movies and novels. Please let me change Kings and Desperate Men. I removed all the other movies that said "terrorism in fiction" to make it only in the "films about terrorism" category, why do you want Kings and Desperate Men to stay in the "terrorism in fiction" category? All the movies have been removed from that category, please don't let it stay there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ebb1993 ( talk • contribs) 23:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
In my view, your use of the term "cover version" in that article is meaningless and unnecessary. I've raised the point at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 07:17, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Struck warning
samtar (
msg) 17:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
I don't know that I've ever seen edit warring at ANI itself, but it honestly looks like that is what you are doing. I very strongly suggest that you let the edit warring stop now. I have a feeling if it continues the results might not be in your favor. John Carter ( talk) 17:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Caden, without speaking to the merits, or lack thereof, of your An/I report, I strongly suggest you give up and walk away. Not necessarily from Wikipedia, but from Dr. B and Co. You are out-numbered, and you cannot win. That's how this place is controlled; by superior numbers, and there is nothing you can do to seek justice for insults, as only one group of people is allowed to speak their mind here, and you aren't part of that clique. I'd also offer the unsolicited opinion that once you cross this particular group of editors you really cannot recover, not even long-term. You've encountered an immovable object, and unless you are an unstoppable force, the best thing for you is to avoid those people who you feel have insulted you. RO (talk) 17:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
I hope you learned your lesson today and don't need to repeat this, but in fairness to Blofeld and Co., you did come to Sinatra with harsh criticism. That can be seen as baiting or antagonizing, which, in their eyes at least, immediately undermines your position as someone who deserves respect, which of course you do, even if you like porn! I think it was wise to remove those userboxes though, even if self-censorship isn't always the best response to intolerance. I hope you can find some interesting projects to keep you here. Good luck! RO (talk) 22:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The first of these is based on number of edits and length of service combined:
The Invisible Barnstar | ||
It is more than a little difficult to believe you have gone unnoticed for so long. Thanks for having labored so long unnoticed and continuing to develop the project anyway. I sincerely hope that you get a bit more of the deserved recognition you have earned in the future. John Carter ( talk) 00:18, 13 October 2015 (UTC) |
I know a lot of us, including most of the people involved in this conversation other than you, are extremely frequent editors. Many of us know each others' names by sight, and sometimes we know the history of conduct of at least some of the others involved. And, yes, for better or worse, there is a bit of a tendency on the part of some editors to look the other way when someone is an extremely prolific contributor at some level. I could name a few names of such individuals, and believe you might know, for better or worse, might recognize a few yourself. There has been a history of that, I think for better or worse, since I started editing, or, at least, I remember one name, of someone whom I'm not at all sure you would recognize, which, when I first remember seeing it, was someone who had been blocked, came back as a sock, got blocked again (I think), and has been tolerated for years because of his being an extremely valuable editor in developing content in a specific subject area. In the eyes of some others, he was, and may still be, to many of them an insufferable bastard otherwise. And there is at least one other editor whom I am aware of who has been an extremely useful developer in a particular subject area whose conduct is such that there is perhaps a very real chance that he may be seriously sanctioned shortly.
I personally regret both of those instances I specifically named. Other people, with more knowledge of this situation than I have, might count you as being in a similar case. They might be right, I don't know. I know I've been a bastard myself once in a while. It is truly regrettable (he said, after removing the much stronger first words he typed), that you seem to have been targeted by others for less than acceptable reasons.
I know that in at least some ways you have probably done more for the encyclopedia than some others. I regret that this situation arose, and I sincerely hope it never repeats. You don't deserve that. John Carter ( talk) 01:20, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
For what it might be worth, not having the slightest idea what the dispute with Blofeld is about, if it is a matter of content, WP:DRN or WP:Third opinion and similar tend to be available for the purpose of resolving them. Otherwise, there tend to be in some areas, particularly those you've indicated you primarily work in, WikiProjects of various degrees of activity which you might contact for input, or maybe you could start an RfC on the matter if it is a content dispute.
Blofeld is a good and active article reviewer, particularly for GA, and on that basis I would at least consider any concerns he might have relating to content as it relates to policies and guidelines. I know as someone who chimes in a lot of the religion and specifically Christianity related disputes that the problems often aren't about whether the content is encyclopedic, but issues of WEIGHT and POV. In the cases I know, many of them can and probably should be most easily resolved by creating spinout articles. One recent example is a discussion about inclusion of material on Jesus's canonical interactions with angels in the Jesus article, as can be seen on that article's talk page. I honestly have no doubt whatever that some such material is relevant in some article, but at the same time I haven't seen any really good indicator that it meets WEIGHT requirements to be discussed in that particular article, given the number of other things related to the same topic which get greater coverage in encyclopedic sources than Jesus' alleged interaction with angels does. Given the level of development we already have, speaking as someone who doesn't know the particular point of dispute here at all, I guess maybe the same thing might be true here, maybe. But if there does seem to be a content dispute at the heart of the argument, getting further input is generally a good idea. John Carter ( talk) 15:06, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
RicoCorinth has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
You may or may not know that I've been finally banned indefinitely yesterday from editing the Paris article and all related articles after ThePromenader moved heaven and earth to achieve that long goal of his, which of course explains ThePromenader's latest section in the Paris talk page, plus his archiving of all discussions from the past 3 weeks ( [24]), which shows that the discussions weren't meant to improve the article but just to have me banned. Also, it's no coincidence that just as I'm banned there is this edit in the article of course: [25]. The amount of bad faith, off-wiki contacts, and exchange of favors displayed here makes a farce of Wikipedia. Copy to User:Future Perfect at Sunrise, Steve Summit, User:Minato ku. Der Statistiker ( talk) 14:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Is there a grammar noticeboard here on wiki? If so, can someone let me know. Thanks. Caden cool 17:04, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for all your wikipedia contributions! Your work has not gone unnoticed! I hope the kitty makes you feel warm and fuzzy!
Tea with toast
(話) 23:24, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
7&6=thirteen (
☎) has given you a
Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 19:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
I notice you have not activated the e-mail option. I would send you one, but that door is presently closed. You could contact me. Best regards. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 19:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Caden, I appreciate your words of thanks very much, as well as the beer and the barnstar too! That's my first one. :-) And I'm sorry about your altercation with Synthwave94. He's a sharp and prolific editor, but he can be quite the jerk sometimes too. Don't let editors like him get under your skin. - JGabbard ( talk) 04:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Caden. I fixed your four references with the cite template. If you click the "Cite" link above the edit box and fill out the form, it will generate the template for you. Eric444 ( talk) 03:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Hello, I just wanted to say the video on your User page is unavailable. Ilovebeaniebabies8804! ( talk) 17:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC) |
Thanks for HJ Discography Feedback | |
Thanks for the positive feedback on the new Harry James discography page. Bubbatex ( talk) 02:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC) |
I understand both your frustration and irritation. But Wikipedia:Deny recognition and Wikipedia:Do not insult the vandals. They want recognition. Extinction is recommended by therapists. Wikipedia is a rat lab; Dr. Skinner had an answer. FWIW. Good luck to you. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 15:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Could an admin do me a favor and add protection to the Vitamin C article? Several IP's (who I think is the same person) has been repeatedly vandalizing the article for the last 2 or 3 years with a false birth date. For the longest time they kept removing 1972 and inserting 1969. I reverted them many times and left edit summaries stating the references did not support 1969. The sources used support year of birth as 1972. Recently these IP's have turned to a new method by removing the reliable refs supporting her correct 1972 date of birth and replaced them with unreliable sources for 1969, such as Imdb (which is not reliable) or People magazine (this source never mentions her date of birth). The edits by the IP's are obvious vandalism and I have been completely alone in reverting that IP for years by myself. I'm currently serving a block and will not be able to protect the Vitamin C article from being damaged by this persistent IP. Now I will admit there is confusion in regards to the singer/actress Vitamin C and Colleen Fitzpatrick the actress/singer. Both share the same birth name, both are American, both are caucasian, and both act and sing. However, they are two completely different women. It's possible the confusion stems from this. On the article talk page there is an entire thread devoted to this confusion if you are interested in reading it. I don't have the time to dig up all of the diffs throughout the years regarding this matter but if you have a quick look at the article history, you will see that this has been occurring for too long. Thanks. Caden cool 21:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi @ Liz: can you help? @ Bishonen:?. Anybody? @ Floquenbeam: where are you?? Caden cool 17:50, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey Caden, it's been a while. How can I help? - Becksguy ( talk) 02:35, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
You hate him too? He deleted my Norm of the North edit. I just said it was panned by critics. I did the same with Gods of Egypt, only using a negative reception instead of it being panned. The Critical Biscuit ( talk) 02:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Third opinion#Possible sneaky vandalism from SummerPhDv2.0 regarding Jim.27s Steaks and Dalessandro.27s Steaks I see you've dealt with the editor in the past. Do you think this is vandalism or good faith? Valoem talk contrib 02:14, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Caden. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Don't fight fire with fire.
Wikipedia:Do not insult the vandals I know you are experienced and that you are legitimately frustrated and very tired. Your recent edit summary was (IMO) a lapse. But we can use
Extinction to get rid of this pest.
I would have sent you an e-mail, but I don't think that door is open.
And please don't take this is criticism. We all have our crosses to bear ... and our bears to cross.
7&6=thirteen (
☎) 21:21, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the acknowledgement on the Harry James discography edit. I'm glad to see you're still active. Bubbatex ( talk) 17:13, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for thanks. Del Barber is alt-country. It's not based on knowing him personally. If you follow his music, you'll see the progression from folk and Americana to alt-country. I left Synthwave a message to not revert again. Hopefully there won't be anymore issues.
The Civility Barnstar | |
I don't usually give people barnstars, but this is warrented. Mr. C.C. Hey yo! I didn't do it! 22:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC) |
I figured this would happen someday.
I only work on noncontroversial articles and never defend my changes because in the years before I was old enough to participate, I saw people banned for doing essentially nothing. There was a newspaper article about it which really opened my eyes. That led me to academic research about this and to wikiwatch.com. Both helped me understand how things work here.
All someone needs is an admin friend and literally any excuse at all. WP even bans people when it's in violation of their own rules for admins. Arbcom is a pro-forma rubber stamp to make it look legitimate. The other admins go along with it so they can also ban people without being challenged by anyone but the unwashed, inferior editor community.
But I am curious, since I spent all day researching the song. Was anything I said false, was my grammar bad, do you not like what Stewart said about his own song's origin, or what? I was careful to source everything. Are you the guy that wrote the stuff I changed?
If you have an admin friend, I WILL be banned, even if I correct whatever you think the problem was. I can't create a new account because they ban your IP address, and I can't leave my house to register from somewhere else.
Since I'm exceedingly polite even IRL, I wonder what excuse you'll use. Probably something on my user page. Verdana♥Bold 18:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC) --Verdana♥Bold 18:22, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, Caden. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at Carrie Prejean. Thank you. Rico 02:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC) (Using {{ Please see}})
An article that you have been involved in editing, Traditional marriage movement , has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traditional marriage movement. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - Schrandit ( talk) 07:07, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
{{adminhelp}} Could an admin warn User:KeltieMartinFan to stop making personal attacks? Please check his talk page and edit summary. I'm not asking that he be blocked. A warning should do. Also, I've noticed he edits any article to do with NBC which leaves me feeling there could be a COI here? Is it possible he's employed by NBC? Just for the record, I've had problems with Keltie in the past. Again, I'm not asking for a block. Please just read what I've said and look into it. Thanks. Ned ac 12:45, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Good call on turning the computer off and going for a run rather than speaking from anger. I take that back: excellent call. I'm actually going to do the same pretty soon, though I'm going for a ride on bike (the weather here is amazing today). When you get back to editing, try not to come from the prospective of "Caden vs. the gays" or "Caden vs. the liberals." It's not productive and can and will lead to more conflict. Instead, if you feel your voice isn't being heard try asking for a neutral opinion. WP:3O is a great place to start. If you're not satisfied, try going to the Wikipedia:Content noticeboard. If you're still not satisfied, you can always file an article WP:RfC. These are all great alternatives to airing past grievances you've had with editors in the past and are more productive than simply saying a conservative or heterosexual has no voice at Wikipedia. Finally, if none of that works, you can always take your complaints to the admin noticeboards. I would link to them, but I'm fairly certain you know where they are. ;) AniMate draw 23:06, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
{{adminhelp}}Can an admin please delete my sandbox for me? Thanks. Caden cool 16:29, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey dude. (BTW, do you prefer Ned or Caden?)
To continue our discussion on BLP. Check out the arguments I used in Talk:E.O. Green School shooting about the article having been moved to "Murder of Lawrence King". Essentially I was saying that we can't use "murder" in the title since that implies an intent to kill by McInerney that's speculation, and therefore is a BLP violation. If and when McInerney is found guilty of murder, then it can be discussed. The article was moved back to the E.O. Green title. Anyway, let me know what you think. — Becks Talk to me 22:00, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
I had a 71 Chevy Malibu 350 in a kinda metallic Green with a black fabric roof, and a Turbo 350 tranny, bucket seats, and console shift bar rather than a stick. Loved that car. Unfortunately never took pictures that I can remember. Why don't you post your car pictures somewhere, like FLickr. I'm not saying if I can dance better or worse that those in the video, but it was laugh. And thanks for those kind words about my writing. Becks Talk to me 16:07, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello Caden. I hope I haven't given you wrong information on the source of the quotation, but after reading this [1] I am less sure that Plato said it. Cheers. Cuddlyable3 ( talk) 13:45, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
And I will take your advice. Seriously. Respectfully -- what would you do if someone posted a pack of noxious lies about you on a public noticeboard? I'm sorry I lost my cool, but I'm only human. Sometimes you need to stand up and say "bullshit." Anyway, thanks, I'm going to chill out now, and I'm quite serious. All the best -- Antandrus (talk) 00:43, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Please use reliable sources. That article is already littered with enough unsourced trivia. k.i.a.c ( talktome - contribs) 06:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Lets assume good faith here, please. Not every single fact or sentence in an article needs reliable sources. From WP:VERIFY "...material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation." That Ritter was injured does not seem highly likely to be challenged, at least to me, and it isn't controversial. However, once challenged, RS are required. The references there now seem sufficient to establish an injury by Ritter, so I assume this issue can be put to bed. However, it would have been better to work this out on the talk page collaboratively. — Becksguy ( talk) 09:49, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey thanks Caden. Nice to hear off you. I've kind of retired actually, haven't edited properly in a while. Kind of lost my fire with the passing of Michael Jackson. Hope everything is going well though. Kind regards. — Please comment R 2 11:00, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
User:SheffieldSteel/Admin, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SheffieldSteel/Admin and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:SheffieldSteel/Admin during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Law Lord ( talk) 18:10, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Caden, don't ever agree with me. Aren't things much easier when we're at each others throats? </sarcasm> Seriously, thanks for the back up. And for the record, does this look anywhere in the neighborhood of 30? I'm kind of stunned that anyone would do this and think it was okay. AniMate 09:59, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! I really was about to quit until I saw everyone coming in on my side all of a sudden. Maybe you're not in on that yet and you don't know what I'm talking about. But thanks! Daniel Christensen ( talk) 06:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Caden cool 07:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Are you actually getting blocked here? What is going on? Daniel Christensen ( talk) 06:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I moved Caden/my shit-list to User:Caden/my shit-list, since that seemed to have been where you intended it to go. Best, MuffledThud ( talk) 14:14, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Attack_coatrack_we_discussed. -- Rico 19:14, 18 March 2010 (UTC) (Using {{ Please see}})
Well sure. I'll get to it sometime today, hopefully. EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( talk) 16:18, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
This user clearly has behavioral issues, considering that he has repeatedly reverted pages against consensus and sources, refuses to behave in a civil manner with other users, and does not want to listen to the rules and guidelines of Wikipedia. For you to take his side and claim that I made some kind of personal attacks I never made is, quite frankly, an insult to my intelligence and the intellect of anyone who would read these pages and look at my edits, where I have never done anything wrong, and RG's edits, where he has never done anything right. ( Sugar Bear ( talk) 20:28, 30 March 2010 (UTC))
All done. I've added in a new section, "Digital singles". The song charted on the Hot Digital Songs chart, which is a component chart. But since it was the only chart it charted on the time of the digital release, it's acceptable. EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( talk) 22:04, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
I formatted it whenever I added the Irish peak to the table. It's not showing up on your screen? It is on mine. EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( talk) 20:32, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, Caden! :) EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( talk) 00:19, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
I've added the Australian Recording Industry Association certified awards to the singles table. However, I also do not know where to get the Recording Industry Association of New Zealand certifications, either. The only place I know to get them, only has them from 2007 to now. EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( talk) 00:00, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Saw your question on another editor's talk page. Any reliable certification archive I've been able to locate (including a partial one for Ireland) is listed at WP:GOODCHARTS.— Kww( talk) 00:23, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Sure. I'll start when I have some extra time. Probably tomorrow or so. EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( talk) 23:08, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Apparently, I've done something really horrible to you. I have no idea what it is, but apparently it's " one of the worst, deliberate exhibitions of bad faith (Rico has) ever seen on Wikipedia." I've no clue what he's talking about, as you and I get on rather well these days despite our ideological differences. Little help? AniMate 21:32, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
incident from May 19, 2009, where you took my words out of context and turned my joke into a threat. In this diff [5] you will see that I had stated I was only joking when I mentioned I'd kick Keltie's ass. For some reason, you chose to not reveal this and decided to make me look bad. Here's what you chose to say on ANI: "As usual, Caden complains about a user being a bully, and he goes on to threaten to kick Keltie's ass". You then went on to say, :"Frankly, I don't think Caden is an asset to the project at all." Not only where you assuming bad faith, but you were deliberately being dishonest on ANI. I took offense to your posts back then, and felt attacked by you. At that specific period I was accused of edit warring with Keltiemartinfan and was blocked at the time of your comments to ANI, and therefore was unable to defend myself. It's all in the past now but I believe this is what Rico was referring to. Hope this clears it up for you. Caden cool 23:16, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Re. Talk:Saw_VII#Dean_Armstrong
Thank you for your input.
I would be grateful if you could kindly clarify where I have failed to remain calm, civil, or exhibited any negative behavior, if indeed this is your assertion.
Also, could you please reconsider your statement, Chzz, posting a block threat on Jordan's talk page when you very well know he's done nothing wrong, is not acceptable behavior.
I posted the warning for uncivil behaviour in accordance to WP:NPA, having checked my logic with several other very experienced editors in good standing. It clearly stated in the warning that the concern was over their comments on the talk page; specifically it was concerning the statement "You are just a troll".
I believe this is in accordance with Wikipedia policy, and if you do reconsider, I would be grateful if you would strike your comments on my alleged behaviour.
Many thanks, Chzz ► 06:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Quick heads-up that I just dealt with a {{helpme}} shout from blocked user Codedon ( talk · contribs) - the similarity in names, I thought it worth mentioning to you. Chzz ► 06:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi iam unblocked now. I guess your words had a significant impact. So i wanted to thank u. Cheers Blablaaa ( talk) 08:39, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm afraid that edit-warring on behalf of your friend EnDaLeCoMpLeX does not make it a consensus, and if you persist in doing this I will report you both for sock/meatpuppetry (you have chatted on each other's talk pages and have intersecting edits on almost 30 pages so it will not be hard to prove a connection between you both). Furthermore, not only does the version of the intro that you keep reverting to merely duplicate information that is already in the discography tables below it (which is pointless), it is also wrong and has many inaccuracies. It was seemingly written from an American standpoint whereas TFF are a British band and the band's history begins there and should be maintained from that viewpoint. Now please leave it alone. 80.47.10.75 ( talk) 11:10, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
i added 2 diffs, when u look them u will see it so undisputable.... . but please dont raise the issue, i only wanted to show u because u are interessted Blablaaa ( talk) 11:45, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Done. Eric444 ( talk) 06:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
wiki guidelines say that a reliable historian ( he is one) needs no back up. So he has to be included. If u or i dont like it, doesnt madder :-D . We have to accept, cheers Blablaaa ( talk) 11:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar, and for helping with the issues. Chzz ► 15:31, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Becks has given you a
c
ookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Hey Caden....Sorry I haven't been here much recently. I should have placed a Wikibreak notice on my user page. It isn't that I'm too busy in RL, it's that a really good friend of mine died in his sleep and another has cancer. So it was hard to focus on Wikipedia for a while and I needed a break. But I'm back. I hope you have been working on keeping out of trouble, and I hope you know that you are more than welcome to email me whenever, anytime you need to chat. Thanks for the message you left.
{{subst:if|||
{{{message}}}
||subst=subst:}}
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{
subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{
subst:munch}}!
I noticed you were supporting my case on the WA 2000 page, and as a more experienced user than I, I have a question for you.
I have a question for you. If pop culture information is unimportant, as is argued by the editor on the WA 2000 page, then why is this up on The Model 1887 page. "The Model 1887 was famously featured in Terminator 2: Judgment Day when it was carried by Arnold Schwarzenegger as the T-800. In the film, the T-800 is seen spin-cocking a version of the shotgun with an enlarged lever loop. It has also made an appearance in the widely popular first-person shooter game Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2." Seems like almost the exact same thing I was brow beaten for in the WA 2000 article. Does the user who did this have some sort of problem with people editing his page? I also noticed that he reported you for edit warring to the same Admin he reported me to. Nick-D LIGHT DINAMITE 19:36, 23 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lbrad2001 ( talk • contribs)
Hi Caden.
I've just offered replies to some 'help' requests from a relatively new editor Cimicifugia ( talk · contribs), who is having a few difficulties. Given the general subject area, I remembered that you had kindly assisted Blablaa previously, and wondered if you might be able to help this one, too.
If this is not appropriate, or not your thing at all, then apologies - it was a passing thought, that a more experienced user with some topic knowledge might be able to help them understand the way Wikipedia works, in addition to the advice I have already provided.
Like many new users, they are struggling to understand how BRD, consensus, etc. works.
Thanks, Chzz ► 04:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
I've mentioned you here [8]. Bali ultimate ( talk) 23:21, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your contribution of sources on the Eve's Plum page, I've been working on it for years. LoveLaced ( talk) 18:09, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
In a recent edit to the page FIFA World Cup, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Nasnema Chat 22:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Yeah I'll get to it probably sometime tomorrow because right now I'm not feeling too great. EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( talk) 02:28, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Marcus Qwertyus has a valid point, and he's not censoring you he's moving the discussion to what he considers a more appropriate forum, ie: Blablaaa's talk page [9]. I suggest you take the issue up with Marcus Qwertyus directly rather than edit warring. MILHIST is for discussing articles, if you are going to discuss editors it probably belongs somewhere else, such as WP:RFC/U or if it's directly actionable by an admin WP:ANI. Nev1 ( talk) 18:43, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Sorry that u got involved in this "problem" ( dont know if it is a real problem :-) ). Blablaaa ( talk) 19:16, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
somebody bring stuff to an article and has no reliable sources for it and u want us to let it stay until we proved that his stuff is not ok ? Blablaaa ( talk) 16:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi caden i appreciate your support but i guess u bring yourself problems. The normandy "lobby" is very strong and active. If u start "moaning" ( like i do ) about status quo there u will be attacked at one time or another. Your link to me is perfect base for enigmas ad hominem style. So spare yourself of stress. But thanks for the support Blablaaa ( talk) 07:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Caden, remarks like these: 1, 2, and 3 are totally unacceptable. If I see you make another one, I'll add to your already lengthy block log. Consider this your only warning. Parsecboy ( talk) 12:42, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
First problem: you are not being civil. Second problem: you are arguing, both here and on the Kursk talk page, with ad hominem attacks. If I see posts that fall into either category from you again, I will block you immediately. You are lashing out at those who are trying to rein you in before you are blocked, and you are taking Wikipedia personally, treating it like a battleground. Step away from the computer for a day; go out and cool down a bit. Thanks, — Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:17, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Yeah I'll get to it eventually. I've just been so busy lately that I've only been doing between one and five edits a day for about the past week or so. EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( talk) 20:28, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
He says beevor said it is partial but this was the objectives. But then we look the objectives ( which are also written by him ) we see that he simply lies. IT so emberrasing , cant deal with this anylonger i hope and admi will see it finally. He contradicts himself so heavy every third sentence. But if you show this he immediatly leaves this topic and raises another unimportant point to distract. Is there a board for such things? Blablaaa ( talk) 00:31, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I see nothing wrong with what I have added, especially as it is an 'Outsider's View' and not in the primary section of the RfC. You are free to rebutt the accusations made in that section by all means, but I will not strike them as I do not see them as personal attacks, but merely as my view of the situation from the outside. I'm sure the Arbitrators will be able to consider any bias present in my statement and evaluate it accordingly. Skinny87 ( talk) 11:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Hm there is no need to contact all people who participate in this because it will become more ^^. I will try that they wait a bit with this or that at least i get not blocked. At friday i will start to study the books by reynolds. I also will order hastings. ( by the way iam no psychopath who orders books to refute a online guy i planed to read them anyway :D) I cant know what enigma does exactly until i read same books like him. Studying his general editing behaviour iam 80% sure that he edits heavly selective and will avoid to use pro german statements/numbers by reynolds. If this true and i present a comprehensive overview the situation will immediatly look different and all people who applaud the subtle biaseditor will also look different. Until this i see no value in engaging in quibble. The situation is easy, what would you do if you are member of milhist? the people spend some time in www they will no risk their "friendships" with other editors. I guess the discussion about the infoboxes is proof of this. the method is simply bias towards allies, i can proove it easly with primary data, but no one of milhist had balls to admit this. Until nobody is able to speak his opinion against "friends" the whole system is seriously damaged. When enigmas selective editing is proofed then the rest of the system which so heavly supports him, falls also. Iam not sure but there is a diff out there where he claims the british army performed well and was one of the best armies. No serious historian will claim this, i guess thats a good introduction ^^. Its a matter of time .... . Blablaaa ( talk) 12:03, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
caden can you do me favor? Blablaaa ( talk) 13:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
he caden did you notice that enigma does not work at articles which were lost by british army? Blablaaa ( talk) 20:42, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
I've been rereading the comment you may concerning my quote and it finally dawned on me why you would bring that up: I regret to inform that I left out a very important word here; it currently reads "..the last time an indefinite block was imposed it was lifted three days later due to complaints that ran contrary to consensus," but it should read "..the last time an indefinite block was imposed it was lifted three days later due to complaints that it [the block] ran contrary to consensus." I was not criticizing the block, I was actually commenting that the block was lifted on grounds that editors had determined it to be wrongly applied and this was in turn the opinion which resulted in the block being lifted in accordance with consensus. I offer no excuse for this oversight, and will continue to endeavor to improve my spelling and grammar to help avoid instances like this in the future. Respectfully, TomStar81 ( Talk) 10:44, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Re this, in case you are unaware, "~" means "approximately" (as in maybe more, maybe less). Reynolds is on the "maybe more" side of that but other sources differ (such as Ellis who says "about 80 tanks"). You've reverted to the highest figure supported by the sources. I have no intention of edit warring but I'm sure it's not your intention to mislead our readers, so it would be much appreciated if you could return the infobox to a state where it properly reflects the range of sourced opinion. Thanks and best regards, EyeSerene talk 07:02, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TomStar81 ( Talk) 00:37, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
he tries to tell me what the book says which he never saw and i have in front of me. Dont know what to say this... Blablaaa ( talk) 00:05, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
he caden thanks for your help, finally i guess i will leave, i totally get rage if this continues. I will go to a committe soon with some diffs and so one to achieve a change. But iam not able to discuss every edit away from allied bias. Especially when the people here not even try to be neutral. They lie to avoid admiting there failures, its disgusting. Chaosdruid for example, getting mad with this guy. But thanks for your help anyways. Eventually the amount of english contributors will always push the foreigners. A neutral admin is needed. But iam interessted to see what happens after committe. Blablaaa ( talk) 01:42, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Blablaaa and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, Kirill [talk] [prof] 22:14, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, have noted your interest in WW2 and also freedom of expression. So, here's an invitation to participate in open discussion after taking a look at the current dispute discussion at World War II discussion page. Concerns my ongoing hassles with the user HoHum and some others. With regards. Communicat ( talk) 19:38, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
I think the image thing happened again. Look at my talk page. One of the images was even one that was already here I just cropped it. I think that even though they were all properly licensed for use here I don't think I did it right here. Probably why they were deleted. Daniel Christensen ( talk) 21:35, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
When I get the chance I will. EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( contributions) • ( let's chat) 19:21, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Caden, your edit today was unfortunate. For starters, you restored a comment that had zero to do with improving the article; my removal of it was fully in compliance with talk page guidelines. For another thing, I removed it seven months ago, and it was not your comment. If the editor who made it wanted to restore it, they had seven months to do so, but they did not. You cannot know whether it even reflects the current views of that editor, and it is unfair to reinsert a comment like that without the express permission of the other editor. And you didn't even use an edit summary.
Except to defend you on a minor point during a talk page discussion long ago, I have had no interactions with you, so I hope you'll take it in the constructive spirit it's intended when I remind you that your history at Talk:E.O. Green School shooting was marked by contention and drama. I thought (and hoped) all that was in the past. In any event, I am reverting your revert one time but will not engage in an edit war. If you believe I am wrong, I am willing to discuss it. Thanks for understanding. Rivertorch ( talk) 18:58, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Please accept this
invite to join the
Conservatism WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to conservatism. Simply click here to accept! Lionel ( talk) 01:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC) |
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their
user talk page. |
Hi.I was adding many sources to the Jill Gibson article but I don't know what went wrong? I can't see the many different pages on the 5 books that I used for references. I also added sources from old print magazines. I'm not sure why the page numbers are not displaying? Caden cool 02:24, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Hey there buddy! Long time no talk! How's things going? EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( contributions) • ( let's chat) 19:07, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their
user talk page. |
On the log in page I get "Log me in globally". What does this mean? Caden cool 22:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Reaper Eternal ( talk) 01:26, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi - thanks for the message. At the moment I'm just adding bits here and there (especially where articles are sparse on references /full of uncited stuff). I've been unpacking boxes and wallowing in books and music papers after a move. Can only find one ref to S.F. in Roxxon - for 'Johnny Loves Me' as 11th best Cashbox single of '62. I'll add it this weekend. As for Fever Tree - I bought the first album when it came out all those centuries ago! Still got it! Brieflysentient ( talk) 15:16, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey buddy ole pal! :) Life's descent, just rather busy with school and such. Hope things are good your way, as well. EnDaLeCoMpLeX ( contributions) • ( let's chat) 20:49, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
For the reason it was deleted see this discussion. The admin, User:Fastily, that deleted it knows much more about the appropriate use of non-free images than I do, sorry. J04n( talk page) 01:41, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
1. Fill in the reason you want the file undeleting and put it in the "reason=" section. Then copy the whole section below ...
{{subst:drv2 |page=File:JesseDirkhising.jpg |xfd_page=Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 July 17 |article=Murder of Jesse Dirkhising |reason=put the reason for undeleting the file here }} ~~~~
2. ...and paste it into Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 November 7, below the line that says "Add a new entry..."
3. Paste the following; {{subst:DRVNote|File:JesseDirkhising.jpg}} ~~~~ onto the talkpage of the admin who deleted the image.
Can I suggest that, as I mentioned at WT:NFC, that you don't suggest that this image was deleted because the victim was white and heterosexual (as you implied there). If you look at the deletion log for July 17, you will see that plenty of murder victim images were deleted that day, regardless of colour or sexual orientation. Best, Black Kite (t) 00:06, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I'm a regular user at the East Germany article and have seen that you have made contributions. I have put massive scholarly evidence involving sources that state that East Germany was a satellite state, but Mewulwe keeps reverting the inclusion of the term satellite state - including your edit to include it. He contends that the term is "biased" - I have demonstrated that massive numbers of source it acknowledge that its satellite state status is widely accepted. A discussion on the matter is needed at the Talk:East Germany page to sort this out, I would appreciate your help.-- R-41 ( talk) 13:25, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting me in the inaccurate accusations of canvassing and the one personal attack TFD made against me. In normal circumstances I would report, however I have worked cooperatively with TFD in the past, TFD's recent behaviour is just frustration, normally he/she is very factual and dedicated to the policies of Wikipedia. I will let her/his recent behaviour pass, and only report if it continues.-- R-41 ( talk) 19:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
As far as I know, we haven't met yet. If we did, and I forgot, I'm sorry. I wanted to tell you that I really appreciated what you said in my defense. No one summed the entire situation better than you did and your words were very kind and fair. Thank you very much, Caden. -- Lecen ( talk) 02:26, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Just fyi, no big. There seems to be confusion about which year Vitamin C is born. I changed 1969 to 1972 on the French and German articles but got reverted here. Slight Smile 03:55, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Re this, you've got it backwards: the pages we have both participated on recently are Galtung and Tertoger, and you began posting on both after I did, not vice versa. Please amend or strike the comment on Tertoger's talkpage. Nomoskedasticity ( talk) 20:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Communicating through edit summaries is generally a bad idea, as is reverting comments with a threat. If you see something you find offensive or possibly violates BLP, consider going to the user's talk page and asking them to revert or redact. Dealing with someone in a friendly non-confrontational manner will always get better results. Also, edit summaries aren't discussion. They're edit summaries. AniMate 21:05, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
You are requested to comment on the talk page about reverting an edit, which had removed content violating WP:V. Please add your inputs there based on wiki policies. 16:08, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
As the thread where you asked was closed before I could respond to you, I'll respond here. Yes, I was saying exactly that. It's unfortunate but true. Being an administrator on this site is a free pass to be a thug and a bully. The fact that Toddst1 is not being held accountable for his bullying speaks for itself. Joefromrandb ( talk) 19:51, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Caden. Is easy to add covers! You should go here: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard ; after click on "Click here to Start the Upload Form", after:
Step 1: Choose your file (the pic must be little,no more than 500 pxl)
Step 2: Describe your file Please provide a clear, descriptive name by which your file will be known on Wikipedia. (put something like that: Shirley Jones Silent Strength album cover)
Please provide a brief description of the contents of this file.
(put something like that: Shirley Jones Silent Strength album cover)
Step 3: Provide source and copyright information
(if you will upload a cover album ,you have to choose this one: This is a copyrighted, non-free work, but I believe it is Fair Use. I have read the Wikipedia rules on Non-Free Content, and I am prepared to explain how the use of this file will meet the criteria set out there.
after...
This file will be used in the following article: (put the name of the article,like: Then & Now (Shirley Jones album) )
after...
Non-free use rationale
(choose the option This is the official cover art of a work. This is the titlepage of a book, the cover of a CD or video, the official release poster of a movie, or a comparable item. It will be included as that work's primary means of visual identification, at the top of the article about the book, movie, etc. in question.
after... Which of these options describes this item best? (select Cover of a sound record (album,single,sound, CD)
Source: put the name of the site where you find the photo
after... (click on "This image will be shown as a primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the work in question."
after... In view of this, please explain how the use of this file will be minimal. (write this: Cover of the album that the article is about)
after... click on Upload.
The end!! jajajaja
Sorry for my english,I'm from Brazil,if you don't understand something or can not upload the photos,write to me again and I upload them to you.-- 88marcus ( talk) 19:34, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
– Pee Jay 17:08, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Exactly. The lede of the article, as you've revised it, isn't a summary, it's a regurgitation.-- Laun chba ller 13:08, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Oh, and please read WP:INVOLVED which says "that an administrator who has interacted with an editor or topic area purely in an administrative role, ... is not involved and is not prevented from acting in an administrative capacity". De728631 ( talk) 22:40, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Please. Can you play nice with SchroCat ( talk · contribs)??-- RandomLittleHelper talk 16:36, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I saw how you helped User:Metropolitan last month when he was unfairly banned following the controversy with Dr. Blofeld and his friends at the Paris talk page. User:ThePromenader, a friend of Dr. Blofeld, opened at the same time a case in the administrators' noticeboard to have me banned (basically, all the people disagreeing with them in the Paris article must be banned or silenced). This case against me was eventually closed by an admin and moved to the archives: [14], but ThePromander has resurrected this case today by removing it from the archive and pasting it again in the administrators' noticeboard.
Do you have any idea what I could do about it? The Promenader has for years been engaged in WP:HARASS against the people disagreeing with his vision of Paris, and this has pushed many knowledgeable editors away from Wikipedia. He's obviously trying to do the same here with me. Any ideas to help me? Thanks. Der Statistiker ( talk) 21:48, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Please note that ThePromenader has now moved the case demanding my banishment to the Incidents sub-board of the Administrators' noticeboard: [16]. The harassment continues. Yeeha! Der Statistiker ( talk) 16:14, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
You may not be aware but the Persondata template has been deprecated. Its removal from the Jesse Dirkhising article was part of the effort to migrate to Wikidata i.e. general tidying. The template and categories that were removed are administrative and used for data extraction so should only be used on specific biographical articles. i.e. It is ambiguous whether the dates apply to the murderer or the victim. Periglio ( talk) 17:29, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
I corrected her page to show this actual spelling used by the band at the time ("Stilettos"). You seem to agree with me that they didn't spell their name in the conventional way in which English would have shown a plural of the singular stiletto (stilletoes). But wiktionary shows three acceptable plural spellings: stilettos, stilettoes, and stiletti. So, once again, I only showed the spelling actually used by the band.
Caden, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt... YOU'RE WELCOME! It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! Musdan77 ( talk) |
18:48, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the added information. Please feel free to add it to the image page. The user I'm dealing with is having a very difficult time with the idea of sourcing images, and multiple users have tried to help him/her understand that google.com, itunes.com, etc. are not really what we mean when we ask for the source of an image. You're probably right though, and the better note to use would be {{ Bsr}}. ( ESkog)( Talk) 23:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
DES (talk) 01:13, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
I happened to see your comments at Cassianto's page. It's important to keep in mind that he's a member of a clique which I like to call the Cadre of Malcontents. They consider themselves immune from the rules, because they are such great contributors. They will defend each other to the death, and attack anyone who tries to stand up to them, often with a barrage of lowlife-language. So it's pretty much a hopeless cause. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 10:09, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
LOL that's a good name Bugs. But yeah I'm aware of the clique and have been the target of their street like colorful language on many occasions. I know how they work and you're right it's a lost cause. I don't think Cass likes Denis Leary much. I thought he would enjoy this [19] but he responded by doing this [20] instead. Anyway I found it funny that he called it a "personal attack" and claimed it was "copyright infringement" when the video came from Leary's official channel on VEVO. And then he threatened to take me to ANI which made me laugh because ANI is like the guy's second home. Anyway thanks for the message Bugs. Caden cool 17:21, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
The purpose of my comment on your talk page was inherent in its explicit message about leaving multiple thanks. Are you reading something else into it? Viriditas ( talk) 21:40, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Please, all the terrorism-related works have been moved to their separate category, even all the movies and novels. Please let me change Kings and Desperate Men. I removed all the other movies that said "terrorism in fiction" to make it only in the "films about terrorism" category, why do you want Kings and Desperate Men to stay in the "terrorism in fiction" category? All the movies have been removed from that category, please don't let it stay there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ebb1993 ( talk • contribs) 23:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
In my view, your use of the term "cover version" in that article is meaningless and unnecessary. I've raised the point at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 07:17, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Struck warning
samtar (
msg) 17:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
I don't know that I've ever seen edit warring at ANI itself, but it honestly looks like that is what you are doing. I very strongly suggest that you let the edit warring stop now. I have a feeling if it continues the results might not be in your favor. John Carter ( talk) 17:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Caden, without speaking to the merits, or lack thereof, of your An/I report, I strongly suggest you give up and walk away. Not necessarily from Wikipedia, but from Dr. B and Co. You are out-numbered, and you cannot win. That's how this place is controlled; by superior numbers, and there is nothing you can do to seek justice for insults, as only one group of people is allowed to speak their mind here, and you aren't part of that clique. I'd also offer the unsolicited opinion that once you cross this particular group of editors you really cannot recover, not even long-term. You've encountered an immovable object, and unless you are an unstoppable force, the best thing for you is to avoid those people who you feel have insulted you. RO (talk) 17:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
I hope you learned your lesson today and don't need to repeat this, but in fairness to Blofeld and Co., you did come to Sinatra with harsh criticism. That can be seen as baiting or antagonizing, which, in their eyes at least, immediately undermines your position as someone who deserves respect, which of course you do, even if you like porn! I think it was wise to remove those userboxes though, even if self-censorship isn't always the best response to intolerance. I hope you can find some interesting projects to keep you here. Good luck! RO (talk) 22:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
The first of these is based on number of edits and length of service combined:
The Invisible Barnstar | ||
It is more than a little difficult to believe you have gone unnoticed for so long. Thanks for having labored so long unnoticed and continuing to develop the project anyway. I sincerely hope that you get a bit more of the deserved recognition you have earned in the future. John Carter ( talk) 00:18, 13 October 2015 (UTC) |
I know a lot of us, including most of the people involved in this conversation other than you, are extremely frequent editors. Many of us know each others' names by sight, and sometimes we know the history of conduct of at least some of the others involved. And, yes, for better or worse, there is a bit of a tendency on the part of some editors to look the other way when someone is an extremely prolific contributor at some level. I could name a few names of such individuals, and believe you might know, for better or worse, might recognize a few yourself. There has been a history of that, I think for better or worse, since I started editing, or, at least, I remember one name, of someone whom I'm not at all sure you would recognize, which, when I first remember seeing it, was someone who had been blocked, came back as a sock, got blocked again (I think), and has been tolerated for years because of his being an extremely valuable editor in developing content in a specific subject area. In the eyes of some others, he was, and may still be, to many of them an insufferable bastard otherwise. And there is at least one other editor whom I am aware of who has been an extremely useful developer in a particular subject area whose conduct is such that there is perhaps a very real chance that he may be seriously sanctioned shortly.
I personally regret both of those instances I specifically named. Other people, with more knowledge of this situation than I have, might count you as being in a similar case. They might be right, I don't know. I know I've been a bastard myself once in a while. It is truly regrettable (he said, after removing the much stronger first words he typed), that you seem to have been targeted by others for less than acceptable reasons.
I know that in at least some ways you have probably done more for the encyclopedia than some others. I regret that this situation arose, and I sincerely hope it never repeats. You don't deserve that. John Carter ( talk) 01:20, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
For what it might be worth, not having the slightest idea what the dispute with Blofeld is about, if it is a matter of content, WP:DRN or WP:Third opinion and similar tend to be available for the purpose of resolving them. Otherwise, there tend to be in some areas, particularly those you've indicated you primarily work in, WikiProjects of various degrees of activity which you might contact for input, or maybe you could start an RfC on the matter if it is a content dispute.
Blofeld is a good and active article reviewer, particularly for GA, and on that basis I would at least consider any concerns he might have relating to content as it relates to policies and guidelines. I know as someone who chimes in a lot of the religion and specifically Christianity related disputes that the problems often aren't about whether the content is encyclopedic, but issues of WEIGHT and POV. In the cases I know, many of them can and probably should be most easily resolved by creating spinout articles. One recent example is a discussion about inclusion of material on Jesus's canonical interactions with angels in the Jesus article, as can be seen on that article's talk page. I honestly have no doubt whatever that some such material is relevant in some article, but at the same time I haven't seen any really good indicator that it meets WEIGHT requirements to be discussed in that particular article, given the number of other things related to the same topic which get greater coverage in encyclopedic sources than Jesus' alleged interaction with angels does. Given the level of development we already have, speaking as someone who doesn't know the particular point of dispute here at all, I guess maybe the same thing might be true here, maybe. But if there does seem to be a content dispute at the heart of the argument, getting further input is generally a good idea. John Carter ( talk) 15:06, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
RicoCorinth has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
You may or may not know that I've been finally banned indefinitely yesterday from editing the Paris article and all related articles after ThePromenader moved heaven and earth to achieve that long goal of his, which of course explains ThePromenader's latest section in the Paris talk page, plus his archiving of all discussions from the past 3 weeks ( [24]), which shows that the discussions weren't meant to improve the article but just to have me banned. Also, it's no coincidence that just as I'm banned there is this edit in the article of course: [25]. The amount of bad faith, off-wiki contacts, and exchange of favors displayed here makes a farce of Wikipedia. Copy to User:Future Perfect at Sunrise, Steve Summit, User:Minato ku. Der Statistiker ( talk) 14:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Is there a grammar noticeboard here on wiki? If so, can someone let me know. Thanks. Caden cool 17:04, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for all your wikipedia contributions! Your work has not gone unnoticed! I hope the kitty makes you feel warm and fuzzy!
Tea with toast
(話) 23:24, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
7&6=thirteen (
☎) has given you a
Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 19:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
I notice you have not activated the e-mail option. I would send you one, but that door is presently closed. You could contact me. Best regards. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 19:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Caden, I appreciate your words of thanks very much, as well as the beer and the barnstar too! That's my first one. :-) And I'm sorry about your altercation with Synthwave94. He's a sharp and prolific editor, but he can be quite the jerk sometimes too. Don't let editors like him get under your skin. - JGabbard ( talk) 04:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Caden. I fixed your four references with the cite template. If you click the "Cite" link above the edit box and fill out the form, it will generate the template for you. Eric444 ( talk) 03:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Hello, I just wanted to say the video on your User page is unavailable. Ilovebeaniebabies8804! ( talk) 17:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC) |
Thanks for HJ Discography Feedback | |
Thanks for the positive feedback on the new Harry James discography page. Bubbatex ( talk) 02:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC) |
I understand both your frustration and irritation. But Wikipedia:Deny recognition and Wikipedia:Do not insult the vandals. They want recognition. Extinction is recommended by therapists. Wikipedia is a rat lab; Dr. Skinner had an answer. FWIW. Good luck to you. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 15:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Could an admin do me a favor and add protection to the Vitamin C article? Several IP's (who I think is the same person) has been repeatedly vandalizing the article for the last 2 or 3 years with a false birth date. For the longest time they kept removing 1972 and inserting 1969. I reverted them many times and left edit summaries stating the references did not support 1969. The sources used support year of birth as 1972. Recently these IP's have turned to a new method by removing the reliable refs supporting her correct 1972 date of birth and replaced them with unreliable sources for 1969, such as Imdb (which is not reliable) or People magazine (this source never mentions her date of birth). The edits by the IP's are obvious vandalism and I have been completely alone in reverting that IP for years by myself. I'm currently serving a block and will not be able to protect the Vitamin C article from being damaged by this persistent IP. Now I will admit there is confusion in regards to the singer/actress Vitamin C and Colleen Fitzpatrick the actress/singer. Both share the same birth name, both are American, both are caucasian, and both act and sing. However, they are two completely different women. It's possible the confusion stems from this. On the article talk page there is an entire thread devoted to this confusion if you are interested in reading it. I don't have the time to dig up all of the diffs throughout the years regarding this matter but if you have a quick look at the article history, you will see that this has been occurring for too long. Thanks. Caden cool 21:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi @ Liz: can you help? @ Bishonen:?. Anybody? @ Floquenbeam: where are you?? Caden cool 17:50, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey Caden, it's been a while. How can I help? - Becksguy ( talk) 02:35, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
You hate him too? He deleted my Norm of the North edit. I just said it was panned by critics. I did the same with Gods of Egypt, only using a negative reception instead of it being panned. The Critical Biscuit ( talk) 02:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Third opinion#Possible sneaky vandalism from SummerPhDv2.0 regarding Jim.27s Steaks and Dalessandro.27s Steaks I see you've dealt with the editor in the past. Do you think this is vandalism or good faith? Valoem talk contrib 02:14, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Caden. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Don't fight fire with fire.
Wikipedia:Do not insult the vandals I know you are experienced and that you are legitimately frustrated and very tired. Your recent edit summary was (IMO) a lapse. But we can use
Extinction to get rid of this pest.
I would have sent you an e-mail, but I don't think that door is open.
And please don't take this is criticism. We all have our crosses to bear ... and our bears to cross.
7&6=thirteen (
☎) 21:21, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the acknowledgement on the Harry James discography edit. I'm glad to see you're still active. Bubbatex ( talk) 17:13, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for thanks. Del Barber is alt-country. It's not based on knowing him personally. If you follow his music, you'll see the progression from folk and Americana to alt-country. I left Synthwave a message to not revert again. Hopefully there won't be anymore issues.
The Civility Barnstar | |
I don't usually give people barnstars, but this is warrented. Mr. C.C. Hey yo! I didn't do it! 22:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC) |
I figured this would happen someday.
I only work on noncontroversial articles and never defend my changes because in the years before I was old enough to participate, I saw people banned for doing essentially nothing. There was a newspaper article about it which really opened my eyes. That led me to academic research about this and to wikiwatch.com. Both helped me understand how things work here.
All someone needs is an admin friend and literally any excuse at all. WP even bans people when it's in violation of their own rules for admins. Arbcom is a pro-forma rubber stamp to make it look legitimate. The other admins go along with it so they can also ban people without being challenged by anyone but the unwashed, inferior editor community.
But I am curious, since I spent all day researching the song. Was anything I said false, was my grammar bad, do you not like what Stewart said about his own song's origin, or what? I was careful to source everything. Are you the guy that wrote the stuff I changed?
If you have an admin friend, I WILL be banned, even if I correct whatever you think the problem was. I can't create a new account because they ban your IP address, and I can't leave my house to register from somewhere else.
Since I'm exceedingly polite even IRL, I wonder what excuse you'll use. Probably something on my user page. Verdana♥Bold 18:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC) --Verdana♥Bold 18:22, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, Caden. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)