![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
@ Umakant Bhalerao: It is strange without me asking some one else putting for review ? Rather than wasting time ** on reviewing why can't one join improving the article. Unfortunately your name sounds to be South Asian and any one in touch with South Asian news with common sense can tell that topic article can grow better in article namespace with better attention than prison of drafts.
Bookku ( talk) 08:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Are you still getting the technical error? It looks like you have successdully started the page, I would be glad to help.-- Pharos ( talk) 04:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi. These are generally frowned upon, especially when it involves editors whose editing history regarding the article/s seem largely tangential. Thanks. El_C 11:48, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Expressions of Muslim and Ex-Muslim Women through media interactions, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 09:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Bookku I’m just looking at your new article and it shows up as having a high likelihood of being a copyright violation (see here). I suppose that the online materials that it closely resembles may themselves gave been copied from earlier Wikipedia articles, but I thought I’d better point it out in case there was anything you wanted to modify in the article text. All the best Mccapra ( talk) 12:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello Bookku,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged
Black Sea climate and ecology for deletion, because it seems to be
copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can
contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on
my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
John B123 (
talk)
20:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
The content was copied from Black Sea. You can help patrollers by proper attribution when copying within Wikipedia in the future. In fact it's required by the terms of our license.— Diannaa ( talk) 14:44, 20 March 2021 (UTC) @ Diannaa: Thanks, most of Copy paste edits I do take care as you can see I mentioned the attribution in later three edits but some how missed in one unfortunately. Still I will make point to be more vigilant next time. Regards Bookku ( talk) 14:53, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Civil life in conflict zones, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 01:04, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Honestly, with the class assignment tags placed on the discussion page, the effort to clean up this page may be optimized if we wait until the classes are done. Gender Roamer ( talk) 22:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Bookku, it looks like this draft will be finished quicker than other drafts you're working on. Maybe we should focus on this one for now? Is there anything you can advise me on for expansion in terms of the draft? Gender Roamer ( |talk) 21:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
In any case I would work on the topics let them separate or merged either way.
Many thanks and warm regards
Bookku ( talk) 01:43, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Yes, merging is a good idea Banksboomer ( talk) 07:04, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
I think "Forced conversion of minority girls in Pakistan" should be kept as a separate page... because it is about a gross human rights violation happening only to girls in Pakistan. The Draft "Forced conversion to Islam in Pakistan" may be merged with the page "Religious discrimination in Pakistan" or "Human rights in Pakistan". Banksboomer ( talk) 07:12, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Comparison of rights and limitations of Muslim wives, female slaves and concubines, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 09:02, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Criticism of Edward Said's Orientalism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 18:04, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Superstitions in Buddhist societies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 11:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
I wish I have an additional user name User:ArticleExpansionPropeller
Bookku ( talk) 16:32, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
testing I am looking for article expansion volunteers. ( talk) 10:19, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Slavery in Mecca and Medina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
When you want to give a Third Opinion, just remove the listing from the listing page giving an edit summary like "Took Talk:Narendra_Modi; list is empty". "Took" will be understood to mean "took to give an opinion". But the 3O instructions say to remove the listing when you take it, not after you give the opinion. I've removed Talk:Narendra_Modi for you, so be sure to give an opinion since you've indicated on that talk page that you intend to do so. If you change your mind about giving an opinion, please restore that listing and inform the disputants at the article talk page. Thank you for helping out at 3O! Regards, TransporterMan ( TALK) 19:13, 4 July 2021 (UTC) (long-time 3O volunteer)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Inter-Services Intelligence has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 12:48, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article British Pakistanis has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
I see you intend to update the article. Having gone through it, there is a massive amount of work to be done and, it turns out, it would probably have been more useful to do a copy edit after that work is done, since so much of the current article will be revised. I should probably have suggested this earlier.
Good luck with the article moving forward.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 20:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 03:49, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey. Just noting that you should feel free to let me know if in, say, a few days your comments regarding #En masse public molestation and sexual violence against women don't get a reply from disputant/s of the opposite camp. In that event, I'm likely to just convert the full protection into a longer semiprotection (per WP:COMMUNICATE). BTW, Bookku, your sig is exceedingly long, to the point of distraction. Please consider shortening it. Thanks. El_C 13:38, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Another comment: the sources all talk about the assault as taking place in Greater Iqbal Park, with no mention of the tower, so it appears that the assault should either be mentioned in the article about the park, or should be a separate article, mentioned and linked from the park article. It certainly appears to be an incident which ought to be described in the encyclopedia, somewhere. Pam D 19:12, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and sorry to intrude, but you just used one of my favorite words in a way that is unfamiliar to me! On the Fringe Theories noticeboard, you mentioned "alarmist defenestration." I feel like this word is having quite a moment, though it is likely just me noticing it. That said, I am curious--what does it mean to you here? Note, I am very much a language descriptivist, so I am NOT saying your usage is incorrect. But for me, who pretty strictly associates this word with "something thrown from a window," I am genuinely interested in this use. Do you mean it here as "throwing aside?" Thanks for putting up with my silly question. Cheers. Dumuzid ( talk) 14:58, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Bookku, an article on " Irrational beliefs" would be an important topic for an encyclopedia article. In fact, Wikipedia is a particularly good example of an encyclopedia which could be improved by having such an article. Looking at the draft article, I can see that the complexities of organizing an article on "Irrational beliefs" is proving to be complicated. However, I have a good and useful idea here. Particularly looking at the section "Evolutionary and cultural determinants": here we have two (and I'm certain that there are at least a few more than few more) categories proposed, "anthropological views" and "epistemic rationality". What has worked for me on Wikipedia sometimes in the past is to approach a complex topic by developing a hierarchically arranged group of articles. "Irrational beliefs" would be the main article, the other articles would be supportive and more specialized. Simultaneously developing articles such as (something like) "Anthropological views on irrational beliefs" or "Epistemic rationality and irrational beliefs" or so on would likely be a useful technique as part of a process of an the overall goal of creating a good "Irrational beliefs" article. The approach of doing an major article and several more specialized articles would help to distribute the work in a more efficient way, rather than trying to just do one major and comprehensive article. It may seem counter intuitive that more articles would be easier than one; however, in my experience the best approach may be to simultaneously develop several articles that will link together and support each other, while also allowing somewhat independent development of the topic according to differing disciplinary approaches or other specialized aspects of the general topic. The subject of irrational beliefs should not be ignored, and I look forward toward seeing the fruit of our efforts towards developing a good and useful encyclopedia. Dcattell ( talk) 21:17, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft talk:Aroosa Alam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Maniik 🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me. 04:13, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi there's a Request for Comment at Talk:Islam in Finland#Survey, please provide input since you have been involved in the discussion around Islamic radicalization in Finlan on the article talk page. Regards, A Thousand Words ( talk) 07:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
I've restored this to draft space at Draft:Holiest sites in Sufi Islam, per your request at Deletion Review. If you'd like to change the title of the draft then you can move it to a new title the same way as you would move any other page. For future reference you don't actually need to go to deletion review to get an article like this restored to draft space, WP:REFUND will handle uncontroversial requests like that and they are done much more quickly (within a day or two instead of a week). Deletion Review is generally for when you think the page was incorrectly deleted in the first place. Hut 8.5 11:22, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Muslim and Islamic Feminism in India, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Female slavery in Al-Andalus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Sexual politics in south Asia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Hey Bookku,
I find that sometimes your comments are not indented properly and it kinda breaks the flow of conversation. I would appreciate it, if you could take greater care with that, especially in long conversations. Thanks! VR talk 14:59, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
@ Vice regent: Thanks for pointing out if I have missed out this time. I shall take care. Rgds Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' ( talk) 15:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Women's rights in Muslim societies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Its a concern over an accusation upon respectful Prime Minister of Pakistan, Imran Khan. Booku has published non researched reason for the increased rate of divorces in Pakistan. Prime Minister could be a reason for making marriages (Nikkah) more easy as he follows a respectful religion(Deen e Islam) but there's nothing to do with the divorce rate among population of Pakistan. Its people personal wish and always there are some personal reasons behind such deciaions. You are welcome to visit Pakistan, and research over this issue with honesty. Thank You! 59.103.24.109 ( talk) 10:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, can you check the situation in
this article? I think we really need a third opinion to edit an edit war. You might want to check
User talk:Каракорум#Please use English in edit summaries first. This user has been making Russian nationalist edits and calling people who revert his edits as his "opponents". Now they reverted my and other editors' edits at attempting to fix that horrible nationalist POV article calling them "strange edits", and when I undid this act of vandalism it seems they have blamed me for WP:EDITWAR and WP:BATTLEGROUND, which I say is ironic since that's exactly what they have been doing. I think we need a third opinion to avoid an edit war, so can you check that?
Adigabrek
Talk
18:28, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
User Adigabrek accuses me of Russian nationalism, although he himself does not actually hide that he is a Circassian nationalist. I would like to thank colleague Bookku for his adequate understanding of the situation. If there is something to discuss, I am ready to do it. But this must be done before adding or deleting any information. Каракорум ( talk) 05:24, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
"User Adigabrek accuses me of Russian nationalism, although he himself does not actually hide that he is a Circassian nationalist."
My identity in real life is irrelevant, I don't make POV nationalist edits on Wikipedia, someone neutral to this discussion can check. With this logic, we must blame Gay people who write about LGBT, as they support LGBT organisation in real life. This is foolish, we judge by actions and not identities. (unless it's a conflict of interest) There are rules here and you and I should follow them. My accusations are based on your actions. Peace and I hope you're sincere that you don't intend POV nationalism.
Adigabrek
Talk
09:43, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
@
Каракорум: please explain the reasoning behind your actions instead of trying to Ad hominem at me, so we can solve the issue.
Adigabrek
Talk
09:46, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Amina Dawood Al-Mufti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 06:02, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that https://www.un.org/en/ga/sixth/75/pdfs/statements/int%20terrorism/01mtg%20nordic.pdf is no longer active. Do you have the exact title of the document so I can search for it? In the future it's safest to post link into The Wayback Machine (see this link) so the PDF or webpage is archived. Have a nice day, A Thousand Words ( talk) 05:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I think your suggestion on writing about violent extremism in the Nordic countries is a sound one - do you have sources that treat the Nordic countries or Scandinavia as a whole? I was already thinking about creating the Violent extremism in Sweden article where I know of a few sources to use. Like this one by Swedish Security Service although written in Swedish. In the past, I fleshed out the Terrorism in Denmark article from a redirect into a standalone article. So far, I've been pursuing a bottom-up method by writing about individual countries as I found sources for those. If you have sources for a top-down method I am happy to do it that way instead. What do you think? A Thousand Words ( talk) 06:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Aurat (Malaysian and Indonesian nomenclature for Intimate parts in Islam). The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 9#Aurat (Malaysian and Indonesian nomenclature for Intimate parts in Islam) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
VR
talk
09:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
When you add more information to old posts like this, please could you add a note with a signature. That is useful because:
-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello:
In July, I undertook an extensive copy edit of British Pakistanis in response to your request at the Guild of Copy Editors. Today, I handled your second request, barely four months later, differently. I have gone through and checked that every edit made since July is okay and made a few minor changes. The copy edit is now up to date.
As I mentioned in my note to you in July, there are many sections of the article that need updating. Until this work is done, further copy edits are largely pointless.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 20:37, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Dear User:Bookku, thanks for letting me know about your recent article creation. I had a look and am impressed with the amount of work that you put into it. Keep up the good work. With regards, Anupam Talk 16:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Superstitions in Buddhist societies".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:11, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Sexual politics in south Asia".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:21, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
COI seems very likely, their edits are certainly all promoting Jabbar. Your source here [1] is an opinion piece, does all that belong in the article at all? I've reverted almost all of this IP's edits. Doug Weller talk 13:36, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Doug Weller:,
I already shifted one edit to Draft:Ex-Muslims of Kerala and notified accordingly to the IP. But did not do the same for second to avoid breach of 3 R from my side and IP also did not revert my removal of the content. And previous removals are also not reinstated by previously active ids (or those are same Idk). So may be initial enthusiasm, we can afford to see as good faith. (I am usually bit liberal too all sides)
Kerala atheism and communist traditions are decades old, since past some months some audio apps on social media have become popular in Kerala and with increased discussions regarding atheism (Most of that is in Malayalam language) and some intermittent new coverage in English media is there . But we will need to see is there any credible coverage in Malayalam language media. Once my get through my travel I will ask for Malayalam assistance from India project talk and Malayalam Wikipedia to ease the issues around. (Since discussion can take lot of time I will do that as I get time from travel)
As far ToI ref, if we keep IP's enthusiasm, and technicalities of opinion piece outside, it seems to be a balanced report taking both sides of the debate into account. (ToI opinion columns are not open to any one but weighted before allowing them to write).
Even Picture file does not show only Jabbar but his debate opponent too so Image plus ref at least do not have neutrality issues, merit wise not too bad. In any case I would have acted after discussing issue @ India project talk If you wish to do it early you can go ahead just taking care of 3R because I do not like any one getting bans in haste.
Thanks for contacting
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' ( talk) 14:47, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of the Black Sea, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of the Black Sea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Aroosa Alam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It lacks basic biographical information. She's a journalist; who published her work? It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Vexations (
talk)
20:12, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Hey Bookku,
Couple of points about this comment. May I ask why you pinged Andrewa only in it? This comment is of interest to plenty of users (like me). Please see WP:CANVAS.
Regarding systemic bias in general, I do want to point out a few things. We now have two articles on the intersection between slave concubinage and Islam, but not a single article on its intersection with Christianity. Why is there such a focus on Islam? We also have no articles on slavery in Hinduism or Buddhism (let alone female slavery in these religions). We also have no article on slavery and communism (even though many communist states have practiced forced labor, like USSR, China and North Korea). Are these not examples of systemic bias? VR talk 05:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Thanks
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' ( talk) 05:43, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Following me around and challenging every edit that I make that removes undue negative information from articles is called WP:WikiHounding, and it may well get you blocked. I've asked to cease interactions with you, and I will stay away from articles you have an interest in. You are under no obligation to do the same, but if your point is merely to continue picking arguments with me, that will not be tolerated. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 13:41, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Edits in article SEPTA | Edit in article talk page | ||
---|---|---|---|
Bookku | None | 20 October 2021, 11 December 2021 | |
. WikiDan61 | 2021-12-07 | 2021-11-30 , 2021-12-03, 2021-12-12 | |
Who is first to come to Article about untoward incidence? | Bookku right in the month of October 20 | ||
Difference of response in days from Bookku | 40 days prior WikiDan61's first edit and 8 days after 3rd December edit, as such response is not reserved for, WikiDan61, but is general discussion trend |
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Hermeneutics of feminism in Sikhism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 09:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Quick question Bookku: are you able to read and translate Urdu sources? You don't have to answer this question if you don't feel comfortable doing so. VR talk 06:49, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
hi this article Ex-Muslims of Kerala has been tagged for speedy deletion , can you please help here to maintain the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atheist kerala ( talk • contribs) 15:45, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
on my talk page Rlink2 ( talk) 18:11, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
| Hello, Bookku. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Nika riots at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Tdslk ( talk) 04:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC) |
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:List of erstwhile slave trading townships, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 19:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin ( talk) 15:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC) Your edit to
Turkish textbook controversies has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa (
talk)
23:08, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Some of the content you copied from Historical negationism is copyright material copied from the New York Times and elsewhere. It's been present in that article since 2016.— Diannaa ( talk) 23:13, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
@ Umakant Bhalerao: It is strange without me asking some one else putting for review ? Rather than wasting time ** on reviewing why can't one join improving the article. Unfortunately your name sounds to be South Asian and any one in touch with South Asian news with common sense can tell that topic article can grow better in article namespace with better attention than prison of drafts.
Bookku ( talk) 08:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Are you still getting the technical error? It looks like you have successdully started the page, I would be glad to help.-- Pharos ( talk) 04:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi. These are generally frowned upon, especially when it involves editors whose editing history regarding the article/s seem largely tangential. Thanks. El_C 11:48, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Expressions of Muslim and Ex-Muslim Women through media interactions, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 09:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Bookku I’m just looking at your new article and it shows up as having a high likelihood of being a copyright violation (see here). I suppose that the online materials that it closely resembles may themselves gave been copied from earlier Wikipedia articles, but I thought I’d better point it out in case there was anything you wanted to modify in the article text. All the best Mccapra ( talk) 12:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello Bookku,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged
Black Sea climate and ecology for deletion, because it seems to be
copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can
contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on
my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
John B123 (
talk)
20:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
The content was copied from Black Sea. You can help patrollers by proper attribution when copying within Wikipedia in the future. In fact it's required by the terms of our license.— Diannaa ( talk) 14:44, 20 March 2021 (UTC) @ Diannaa: Thanks, most of Copy paste edits I do take care as you can see I mentioned the attribution in later three edits but some how missed in one unfortunately. Still I will make point to be more vigilant next time. Regards Bookku ( talk) 14:53, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Civil life in conflict zones, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 01:04, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Honestly, with the class assignment tags placed on the discussion page, the effort to clean up this page may be optimized if we wait until the classes are done. Gender Roamer ( talk) 22:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Bookku, it looks like this draft will be finished quicker than other drafts you're working on. Maybe we should focus on this one for now? Is there anything you can advise me on for expansion in terms of the draft? Gender Roamer ( |talk) 21:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
In any case I would work on the topics let them separate or merged either way.
Many thanks and warm regards
Bookku ( talk) 01:43, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Yes, merging is a good idea Banksboomer ( talk) 07:04, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
I think "Forced conversion of minority girls in Pakistan" should be kept as a separate page... because it is about a gross human rights violation happening only to girls in Pakistan. The Draft "Forced conversion to Islam in Pakistan" may be merged with the page "Religious discrimination in Pakistan" or "Human rights in Pakistan". Banksboomer ( talk) 07:12, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Comparison of rights and limitations of Muslim wives, female slaves and concubines, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 09:02, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Criticism of Edward Said's Orientalism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 18:04, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Superstitions in Buddhist societies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 11:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
I wish I have an additional user name User:ArticleExpansionPropeller
Bookku ( talk) 16:32, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
testing I am looking for article expansion volunteers. ( talk) 10:19, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Slavery in Mecca and Medina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
When you want to give a Third Opinion, just remove the listing from the listing page giving an edit summary like "Took Talk:Narendra_Modi; list is empty". "Took" will be understood to mean "took to give an opinion". But the 3O instructions say to remove the listing when you take it, not after you give the opinion. I've removed Talk:Narendra_Modi for you, so be sure to give an opinion since you've indicated on that talk page that you intend to do so. If you change your mind about giving an opinion, please restore that listing and inform the disputants at the article talk page. Thank you for helping out at 3O! Regards, TransporterMan ( TALK) 19:13, 4 July 2021 (UTC) (long-time 3O volunteer)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Inter-Services Intelligence has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 12:48, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article British Pakistanis has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
I see you intend to update the article. Having gone through it, there is a massive amount of work to be done and, it turns out, it would probably have been more useful to do a copy edit after that work is done, since so much of the current article will be revised. I should probably have suggested this earlier.
Good luck with the article moving forward.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 20:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 03:49, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey. Just noting that you should feel free to let me know if in, say, a few days your comments regarding #En masse public molestation and sexual violence against women don't get a reply from disputant/s of the opposite camp. In that event, I'm likely to just convert the full protection into a longer semiprotection (per WP:COMMUNICATE). BTW, Bookku, your sig is exceedingly long, to the point of distraction. Please consider shortening it. Thanks. El_C 13:38, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Another comment: the sources all talk about the assault as taking place in Greater Iqbal Park, with no mention of the tower, so it appears that the assault should either be mentioned in the article about the park, or should be a separate article, mentioned and linked from the park article. It certainly appears to be an incident which ought to be described in the encyclopedia, somewhere. Pam D 19:12, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and sorry to intrude, but you just used one of my favorite words in a way that is unfamiliar to me! On the Fringe Theories noticeboard, you mentioned "alarmist defenestration." I feel like this word is having quite a moment, though it is likely just me noticing it. That said, I am curious--what does it mean to you here? Note, I am very much a language descriptivist, so I am NOT saying your usage is incorrect. But for me, who pretty strictly associates this word with "something thrown from a window," I am genuinely interested in this use. Do you mean it here as "throwing aside?" Thanks for putting up with my silly question. Cheers. Dumuzid ( talk) 14:58, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Bookku, an article on " Irrational beliefs" would be an important topic for an encyclopedia article. In fact, Wikipedia is a particularly good example of an encyclopedia which could be improved by having such an article. Looking at the draft article, I can see that the complexities of organizing an article on "Irrational beliefs" is proving to be complicated. However, I have a good and useful idea here. Particularly looking at the section "Evolutionary and cultural determinants": here we have two (and I'm certain that there are at least a few more than few more) categories proposed, "anthropological views" and "epistemic rationality". What has worked for me on Wikipedia sometimes in the past is to approach a complex topic by developing a hierarchically arranged group of articles. "Irrational beliefs" would be the main article, the other articles would be supportive and more specialized. Simultaneously developing articles such as (something like) "Anthropological views on irrational beliefs" or "Epistemic rationality and irrational beliefs" or so on would likely be a useful technique as part of a process of an the overall goal of creating a good "Irrational beliefs" article. The approach of doing an major article and several more specialized articles would help to distribute the work in a more efficient way, rather than trying to just do one major and comprehensive article. It may seem counter intuitive that more articles would be easier than one; however, in my experience the best approach may be to simultaneously develop several articles that will link together and support each other, while also allowing somewhat independent development of the topic according to differing disciplinary approaches or other specialized aspects of the general topic. The subject of irrational beliefs should not be ignored, and I look forward toward seeing the fruit of our efforts towards developing a good and useful encyclopedia. Dcattell ( talk) 21:17, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft talk:Aroosa Alam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Maniik 🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me. 04:13, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi there's a Request for Comment at Talk:Islam in Finland#Survey, please provide input since you have been involved in the discussion around Islamic radicalization in Finlan on the article talk page. Regards, A Thousand Words ( talk) 07:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
I've restored this to draft space at Draft:Holiest sites in Sufi Islam, per your request at Deletion Review. If you'd like to change the title of the draft then you can move it to a new title the same way as you would move any other page. For future reference you don't actually need to go to deletion review to get an article like this restored to draft space, WP:REFUND will handle uncontroversial requests like that and they are done much more quickly (within a day or two instead of a week). Deletion Review is generally for when you think the page was incorrectly deleted in the first place. Hut 8.5 11:22, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Muslim and Islamic Feminism in India, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Female slavery in Al-Andalus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Sexual politics in south Asia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Hey Bookku,
I find that sometimes your comments are not indented properly and it kinda breaks the flow of conversation. I would appreciate it, if you could take greater care with that, especially in long conversations. Thanks! VR talk 14:59, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
@ Vice regent: Thanks for pointing out if I have missed out this time. I shall take care. Rgds Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' ( talk) 15:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Women's rights in Muslim societies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Its a concern over an accusation upon respectful Prime Minister of Pakistan, Imran Khan. Booku has published non researched reason for the increased rate of divorces in Pakistan. Prime Minister could be a reason for making marriages (Nikkah) more easy as he follows a respectful religion(Deen e Islam) but there's nothing to do with the divorce rate among population of Pakistan. Its people personal wish and always there are some personal reasons behind such deciaions. You are welcome to visit Pakistan, and research over this issue with honesty. Thank You! 59.103.24.109 ( talk) 10:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, can you check the situation in
this article? I think we really need a third opinion to edit an edit war. You might want to check
User talk:Каракорум#Please use English in edit summaries first. This user has been making Russian nationalist edits and calling people who revert his edits as his "opponents". Now they reverted my and other editors' edits at attempting to fix that horrible nationalist POV article calling them "strange edits", and when I undid this act of vandalism it seems they have blamed me for WP:EDITWAR and WP:BATTLEGROUND, which I say is ironic since that's exactly what they have been doing. I think we need a third opinion to avoid an edit war, so can you check that?
Adigabrek
Talk
18:28, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
User Adigabrek accuses me of Russian nationalism, although he himself does not actually hide that he is a Circassian nationalist. I would like to thank colleague Bookku for his adequate understanding of the situation. If there is something to discuss, I am ready to do it. But this must be done before adding or deleting any information. Каракорум ( talk) 05:24, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
"User Adigabrek accuses me of Russian nationalism, although he himself does not actually hide that he is a Circassian nationalist."
My identity in real life is irrelevant, I don't make POV nationalist edits on Wikipedia, someone neutral to this discussion can check. With this logic, we must blame Gay people who write about LGBT, as they support LGBT organisation in real life. This is foolish, we judge by actions and not identities. (unless it's a conflict of interest) There are rules here and you and I should follow them. My accusations are based on your actions. Peace and I hope you're sincere that you don't intend POV nationalism.
Adigabrek
Talk
09:43, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
@
Каракорум: please explain the reasoning behind your actions instead of trying to Ad hominem at me, so we can solve the issue.
Adigabrek
Talk
09:46, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Amina Dawood Al-Mufti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 06:02, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that https://www.un.org/en/ga/sixth/75/pdfs/statements/int%20terrorism/01mtg%20nordic.pdf is no longer active. Do you have the exact title of the document so I can search for it? In the future it's safest to post link into The Wayback Machine (see this link) so the PDF or webpage is archived. Have a nice day, A Thousand Words ( talk) 05:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I think your suggestion on writing about violent extremism in the Nordic countries is a sound one - do you have sources that treat the Nordic countries or Scandinavia as a whole? I was already thinking about creating the Violent extremism in Sweden article where I know of a few sources to use. Like this one by Swedish Security Service although written in Swedish. In the past, I fleshed out the Terrorism in Denmark article from a redirect into a standalone article. So far, I've been pursuing a bottom-up method by writing about individual countries as I found sources for those. If you have sources for a top-down method I am happy to do it that way instead. What do you think? A Thousand Words ( talk) 06:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Aurat (Malaysian and Indonesian nomenclature for Intimate parts in Islam). The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 9#Aurat (Malaysian and Indonesian nomenclature for Intimate parts in Islam) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
VR
talk
09:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
When you add more information to old posts like this, please could you add a note with a signature. That is useful because:
-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello:
In July, I undertook an extensive copy edit of British Pakistanis in response to your request at the Guild of Copy Editors. Today, I handled your second request, barely four months later, differently. I have gone through and checked that every edit made since July is okay and made a few minor changes. The copy edit is now up to date.
As I mentioned in my note to you in July, there are many sections of the article that need updating. Until this work is done, further copy edits are largely pointless.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 20:37, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Dear User:Bookku, thanks for letting me know about your recent article creation. I had a look and am impressed with the amount of work that you put into it. Keep up the good work. With regards, Anupam Talk 16:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Superstitions in Buddhist societies".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:11, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Bookku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Sexual politics in south Asia".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:21, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
COI seems very likely, their edits are certainly all promoting Jabbar. Your source here [1] is an opinion piece, does all that belong in the article at all? I've reverted almost all of this IP's edits. Doug Weller talk 13:36, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Doug Weller:,
I already shifted one edit to Draft:Ex-Muslims of Kerala and notified accordingly to the IP. But did not do the same for second to avoid breach of 3 R from my side and IP also did not revert my removal of the content. And previous removals are also not reinstated by previously active ids (or those are same Idk). So may be initial enthusiasm, we can afford to see as good faith. (I am usually bit liberal too all sides)
Kerala atheism and communist traditions are decades old, since past some months some audio apps on social media have become popular in Kerala and with increased discussions regarding atheism (Most of that is in Malayalam language) and some intermittent new coverage in English media is there . But we will need to see is there any credible coverage in Malayalam language media. Once my get through my travel I will ask for Malayalam assistance from India project talk and Malayalam Wikipedia to ease the issues around. (Since discussion can take lot of time I will do that as I get time from travel)
As far ToI ref, if we keep IP's enthusiasm, and technicalities of opinion piece outside, it seems to be a balanced report taking both sides of the debate into account. (ToI opinion columns are not open to any one but weighted before allowing them to write).
Even Picture file does not show only Jabbar but his debate opponent too so Image plus ref at least do not have neutrality issues, merit wise not too bad. In any case I would have acted after discussing issue @ India project talk If you wish to do it early you can go ahead just taking care of 3R because I do not like any one getting bans in haste.
Thanks for contacting
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' ( talk) 14:47, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of the Black Sea, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of the Black Sea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Aroosa Alam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It lacks basic biographical information. She's a journalist; who published her work? It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Vexations (
talk)
20:12, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Hey Bookku,
Couple of points about this comment. May I ask why you pinged Andrewa only in it? This comment is of interest to plenty of users (like me). Please see WP:CANVAS.
Regarding systemic bias in general, I do want to point out a few things. We now have two articles on the intersection between slave concubinage and Islam, but not a single article on its intersection with Christianity. Why is there such a focus on Islam? We also have no articles on slavery in Hinduism or Buddhism (let alone female slavery in these religions). We also have no article on slavery and communism (even though many communist states have practiced forced labor, like USSR, China and North Korea). Are these not examples of systemic bias? VR talk 05:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Thanks
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' ( talk) 05:43, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Following me around and challenging every edit that I make that removes undue negative information from articles is called WP:WikiHounding, and it may well get you blocked. I've asked to cease interactions with you, and I will stay away from articles you have an interest in. You are under no obligation to do the same, but if your point is merely to continue picking arguments with me, that will not be tolerated. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 13:41, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Edits in article SEPTA | Edit in article talk page | ||
---|---|---|---|
Bookku | None | 20 October 2021, 11 December 2021 | |
. WikiDan61 | 2021-12-07 | 2021-11-30 , 2021-12-03, 2021-12-12 | |
Who is first to come to Article about untoward incidence? | Bookku right in the month of October 20 | ||
Difference of response in days from Bookku | 40 days prior WikiDan61's first edit and 8 days after 3rd December edit, as such response is not reserved for, WikiDan61, but is general discussion trend |
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Hermeneutics of feminism in Sikhism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 09:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Quick question Bookku: are you able to read and translate Urdu sources? You don't have to answer this question if you don't feel comfortable doing so. VR talk 06:49, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
hi this article Ex-Muslims of Kerala has been tagged for speedy deletion , can you please help here to maintain the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atheist kerala ( talk • contribs) 15:45, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
on my talk page Rlink2 ( talk) 18:11, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
| Hello, Bookku. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Nika riots at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Tdslk ( talk) 04:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC) |
Hello, Bookku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:List of erstwhile slave trading townships, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 19:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin ( talk) 15:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC) Your edit to
Turkish textbook controversies has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa (
talk)
23:08, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Some of the content you copied from Historical negationism is copyright material copied from the New York Times and elsewhere. It's been present in that article since 2016.— Diannaa ( talk) 23:13, 1 February 2022 (UTC)