![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 |
Betty Logan,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See
this for background context.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡ 16:58, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 16:58, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Kindly explain your revert. Highwatermark1 ( talk) 04:29, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Betty sorry for the bothering but I am huge fans of Pirates of the Caribbean films series and I am was wondering why you changed the budget of fourth and five movies. I m explaining. Pirates of the Caribbean 4: On Stranger Tides cost only $250 millions and Pirates of the Caribbean 5 - Dead Men Tell No Tales only $230 millions. Where Wikipedia take $378 millions and $320 millions? I know you take 378 budget from that fake news article of Forbes written by that troll of Christian Sylt that write that fake news of McLaren and Ojeh of Formulas One. He is not reliable source. If the movie budget was $378 million the movie probably was a flop at the box office but wasn't infant Disney did Pirates 5 and the same thing of Pirates 5 that cost only 230 infact Pirates 6 is in development. I don't understand why Pirates 4 cost so many money. Ho menys money Disney gets in return? 87.1.231.179 ( talk) 21:50, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi, just for let you know there is a new (big) issue with BOM, this time with Thor: Love and Thunder. They added $215 million more than the correct gross-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 17:18, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I just want to let you know that I have updated this page with new issues for Jurassic Park and now also Rogue One. So if somebody will try to update Rogue One the gross from BOM is not correct now-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 22:27, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
There are multiple issues again, this time with Colombia grosses, take a look at Avatar, No Way Home, Top Gun, Thor, Minions, all of them are so incorrect, beacause there is a problem with Colombia box office, I hope they will fix it as soon as possible-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 23:19, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I just want to let you know that I found new issues-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 22:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, happy new year (I'm late, I know), and BOM made a present for us, they fixed something, included the 1994 Lion King!-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 11:10, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, now there are so many movies (almost half of the top 50) with 1, 2 or 3 million more than the usual, look at the grosses, for example Avatar, Infinity War, Star Wars VII..... now I think also Avengers Endgame is wrong-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 22:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I fixed 13 movies, I changed their url, so now the sources show the correct gross-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 20:29, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Well, now we know that BOM is not the only one with issues, also The Numbers have issues, with the italian gross of Quantumania..... so now BOM is correct and The Numbers is wrong, a few days ago was the opposite-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 19:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Betty, sorry for the change I made for the Star Wars films. In the article I read I mistook the gross budget as net budget and imputed the incorrect information. Glad it was changed back to the correct information. Sorry that a tag had to be put on the edit page to let people know what not to do. Name13013 ( talk) 16:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello I have a question for you please ?. can you reply when you are free please ?. Thank you 178.167.159.53 ( talk) 13:34, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Betty I have an important question for you please ?. can you help out ?.
Ok Thank you, Can you tell how do I upload a photo that I have on a DM on twitter onto a wikipedia page please ?. I haven't a clue what to do I can view the photo obviously but how do I upload it onto a wikipedia page please ?. Many Thanks
If snooker Wikipedia doesn't want my edits, I won't be making any more of them. HurricaneHiggins ( talk) 19:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Betty, I think there are too may franchises in the table, do you think it is a good idea to reduce them to a top 20? (or a top 15, I don't know)-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 20:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Here is the information confirming the information you claimed was untrue ( https://filmic-light.blogspot.com/2016/02/1938-uk-snow-white-pressbook.html). This is sourced in the Evil Queen's own Wikipedia article FYI. Kind regards. RedSorcery16 ( talk) 14:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Can u pls tell what are the latest collections of the film...as it has not been updated since days.🙂 Harshit Kumar ( talk) 08:08, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Hey, Betty! I wanted you to know that even though I have always preferred to do gnomish types of editing to article work, I've also always greatly benefited from advice you have to give me so I am proud to let you know that I have done some article work, and completed two articles at LinuxConsole and Protection Court as me newest one. They aren't Featured articles or anything, but they are still my own accomplishments, and I want to make you feel like you did make the right decision to support me, so as always thank you for your support! Huggums537 ( talk) 02:01, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for your message and I had hoped you would reach out to me over you repeatedly reverting my additional information on television coverage of this tournament as I would like to avoid an edit war. I have tried to accommodate you by re-wording the information and have included an independent and reliable reference, but you seem unwilling to give any ground here. If we can't compromise then we'll have to begin to get others involved in this potential dispute beginning with a third opinion. Rillington ( talk) 00:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi Betty Logan,
I don't understand what you mean by "Source fails corroboration".
I've inserted the same link source (
www.allmovie.com) that is at every other point of the list.
Please explain me this problem, so I can learn and finally add to the list the two movies.
Thanks,
JiunoLujo ::
Talk 16:18, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that in the list there are movies with wrong grosses, Monsters, Inc., Brave and WALL-E have fake grosses, and also Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse and The Grinch have issues (with BOM). I don't know if there are other wrong grosses-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 17:02, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:Fantastic Four (2015 film) § Summary of reviews in the lead.
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions) 07:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, you reversed my "citation needed" for the statement that Georg Trapp was offered a position by the German Navy before the Anschluss, claiming that it was already there. However, reference 153 only shows Trapp's WW1 statistics, on p. 98 of this Hungarian source there is no mention of any offer to Trapp, as far as I can see. So this reference doesn't extend back to the claim about the German offer which, in any case, is always said to have been made after the Anschluss. 2003:EC:9729:5E8:3D5F:1707:5CA2:F370 ( talk) 10:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi I have the Snooker scene edition of the event which dates back to the early 90's. It gives the result of the event and the winner. I also have a newspaper article giving the result after the event. If I could produce the Snooker scene article with photos of the article on the event. Would that be enough to get the event added in the career finals section on wikipedia please ?. I hope you can help out ?. Thank you 80.233.25.10 ( talk) 21:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Yes Betty is was a snooker challenge akin to the Centenary Challenge played between just two players Davis and Hendry in 1990. The one i have uncovered is a similar challenge match between two players in the early 90's. It says in Snooker Scene that it was sanctioned by the WPBSA at the last minute because Sky Sports wanted to show this event featuring two top players. When the WPBSA sanctioned the event and it was shown live on Sky Sports with the winner takes all first prize purse. This is not an exhibition where both players get paid for their night's work. This event is no different to the tournament mentioned above, infact it is similar to the 1975 Irish Masters which was first played as a one off challenge match, The 2019 Macau Masters where Barry Hawkins had to beat Mark Williams in a one off match in the 6 reds final. Joe Davis won the 1928 World Championship playing one other player in a challenge for money. May i point out the Irish professional championship, the Australian Proffessional and the Canadian Professional championships were played under challenge match conditions are were not regarded as exhibitions. The world championship was played as challenges in the 50's and 60's. Now people just presume the WST have run every event the same since day one, this is nonsense this only really stopped when Hearn told over in 2010 it became more professional. Can you help me with this info for this tournament if i send it to you please ?. Massive thanks. A lot of reading there. Thank you 178.167.146.242 ( talk) 21:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
How did it not pass verifications? And if it does pass verifications, can I re-add it? Firekong1 ( talk) 12:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi Betty, I have spent several years at Wikipedia reviewing articles, finding errors or adding missing information. I have decided to write to you since you are a user with extensive experience as an editor of information about films. A few years ago I found out that the movie "I Still Know What You Did Last Summer" is a co-production, I added the information to the article but it was recently vandalized and upon resetting the information Mexico was removed as a co-producing country. I tried to add this information but it was reverted without the reference I added being checked. The reliable source American Film Institute establishes that the film is a co-production between the United States, Germany and Mexico. You can see what I'm telling you when you enter the aforementioned website. I come to you in the hope that you will add the missing information in the "country" section where the three co-producing countries should appear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.168.135.194 ( talk) 07:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
"stylized as" doesn't seem to make much sense in regards to the context either way, even more less than "also known", because that term implies stylization of the same and only text of the leading title. In this particular case, would it be better accepted if the term was "marketed as"? GalaxyFighter55 ( talk) 08:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted all my edits, adding "Please add sources if you are going to alter sourced content". First of all, the contents you reverted are not linked to any source at all... my edits add a source, which is a Wikipedia article, and it's linked Cabiria.
I can make the link more specific (directly to the paragraph about the topic: /info/en/?search=Cabiria#Distribution,_remake_and_restorations. Does that work for you? I'm asking because your reversions cannot be undone and I will need to rewrite them manually, so before that I want to be sure you are not going to delete them again.
I'm doing this because this film is glorified more than necessary. While it is true that it was technically innovative, some alleged records are either exaggerated or completely false (like that it was the first 12-reel film ever made) Alessandro.balbiano ( talk) 21:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
I do notice that users have been attempting to put this as well as several other movies (including Elemental, Indiana Jones 5 and Ruby Gillman) on the list of Biggest Box Office Bombs before they have left theaters. I personally think it's safest to add them afterwards and I believe at least some eventually should be added as this summer is quite possibly becoming the "summer of flops". What are your thoughts on adding these later rather than now? Also, what do you think is the safest estimate for how much The Flash lost, because my current estimate is around 100 million if they spent 150 million on marketing (a typical marketing budget for most blockbusters WB releases iirc). SuperBrowser243 ( talk) 02:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
How do you do Ms. Logan.
What type of credit would you suggest as a reference for Desmond Llewelyn's (an actor of enough renown) appearance in 'Cleopatra'? TCM or IMDB? Page 257 of Joseph L. Mankiewicz: Critical Essays with an Annotated Bibliography and a Filmography? Interesting, he is listed twice in that work as a Senator AND as Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus (consul 54 BC); I find no other reference for his name. Interestingly I have recently found that Dewey Martin ("43 International Stars?") was listed in many credits for The Longest Day at Private Wilder, but a British road show promotion book shows his photo wear a helmet with Staff Sergeant rank, my theory is he is the dead body next to Roddy McDowell in the final release print. Sadly, I can no longer find the interview of Douglas Wilmer declaring he walked off the film, it is only a theory that he replaced Wilmer. Foofbun ( talk) 02:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello Betty how are you ?. Can you add a runners-up finish to the above section on Higgins page please ?. Judd Trump beat Higgins 5-1 in the final of the Huangguoshu open in china this morning. It is in the other events section on the 23/24 snooker season Can you add this result as Higgins page is locked please ?. Kind Regards 92.251.146.50 ( talk) 14:21, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
You were warned by me not to revert these changes to support your own point of view. You have breached this warning and are now undoing my work with no basis other than your own point of view. The objective reader will note that I have not altered the lede section which is what the disagreement was over on the Talk Page. It is clear that you have an agenda to gatekeep a specific date range despite available evidence to the contrary freely in the public domain. Richie wright1980 ( talk) 23:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi Betty, you normally have a good mind for this, I'm working on Mission Impossible Fallout and I have two sources, both from Deadline here and here
One has a figure of 140M for global distribution expenses which I thought was marketing and the other 135 for promotional partner support. Are either of these marketing budgets? Re-reading it maybe global distribution is just literally distributing the film? Although that seems very high, and promotional partners is people paying the studio to have their merch featured? Just wondering if you understand these terms more than I do. Darkwarriorblake ( talk) 18:34, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Let It Be (film) has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 29 § Let It Be (film) until a consensus is reached.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 22:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello there, I noticed that you reverted my edits and claimed that the source didn't pass verification. But it did last time I checked. Can you please explain why you think it did not pass verification? Firekong1 ( talk) 20:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Here we go again, now they have problems with DCEU movies.... I have already fixed with the archivied versions of the sources in the highest grossing film page-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 12:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Betty. Just in case you missed it, see this report. Alan ( talk) 06:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Do you think we really need all the sources archivied? I don't think so, expecially the sources in the top 50, the grosses from the archivied sources don't match with the actual grosses, for example the archivied version of Avatar 2 says $434.5 million.... So for me they are useless. By the way, there are new issues....-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 00:27, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Betty, was hoping to lean on your expertise over a concern regarding two recent edits here and here. BOM reports the total box office haul as $668 mil, while NUM reports $670.1 mil. How is it typically worded in prose when there's a conflict like that, and would we insert a range in the infobox? -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 10:16, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
I was combing through the biggest bomb list and came across Pixels, which is listed at $75 million. So I added this to the article. However, after taking a closer look at the source, it was published before the China release when the film was sitting at $182 million gross. The film ended up grossing $244 million, so wouldn't we need a more recent source to rely on this figure? -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 00:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello Betty, how are you doing ?. I have noticed a change to the above only yesterday. In the infobox where it says Tournament Wins in green, it used to say ranking and the number (of wins across from it) and minor-ranking and the number (of wins across from it) below. In the last week or so it has been changed under the banner Tournament Wins it now says ranking wins and the number and minor-ranking Wins and the number. There is no need to add the word wins underneath as it is used in the line above in Tournament Wins. This was not approved on the talkpage or even mentioned. So who decided to change it and why was it changed please ?. Hope you can help. 178.167.150.13 ( talk) 21:04, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for changing it back. it looked pathetic with the change he made. Can you block him for disruption if he keeps it up ?. I will keep an eye on it incase he changes it again. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.167.150.13 ( talk) 00:24, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! |
![]() |
|
Have a great Christmas, and may 2024 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls, vandals or visits from
Krampus!
|
Hello Betty how are you doing ?. Betty can you update the above page please ?. It still says Ronnie has 39 ranking titles and 21 triple crowns. Nobody updated the page after the UK. Can you change this please ?. Thank you 178.167.188.7 ( talk) 16:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday!
Whether you celebrate
Christmas,
Hanukkah,
Kwanzaa,
Hogmanay,
Festivus or your hemisphere's
Solstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here.
★Trekker (
talk) 12:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Coffee/Holidays}} to your fellow editors' talk pages.
★Trekker ( talk) 12:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
Hello Betty Logan, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Trailblazer101 ( talk) 20:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello Betty, I'm Horrorlover1026, and I hope you're having a good day. I found a credible link to a Film Industry Act of Bulgaria at the Film Center's website which was put into effect in May 2020, which I translated into English. On page 28, it states that persons under the age limit for the categories "C, C+, and D+" must be accompanied in order to view the film. I'm telling you this because I don't know how to add a link myself. Here's the link: file:///C:/Users/seths/Downloads/ZFI_02032021.pdf Horrorlover1026 ( talk) 05:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions) is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Christmas,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec19b}} to your friends' talk pages.
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions) 06:31, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 |
Betty Logan,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See
this for background context.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡ 16:58, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 16:58, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Kindly explain your revert. Highwatermark1 ( talk) 04:29, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Betty sorry for the bothering but I am huge fans of Pirates of the Caribbean films series and I am was wondering why you changed the budget of fourth and five movies. I m explaining. Pirates of the Caribbean 4: On Stranger Tides cost only $250 millions and Pirates of the Caribbean 5 - Dead Men Tell No Tales only $230 millions. Where Wikipedia take $378 millions and $320 millions? I know you take 378 budget from that fake news article of Forbes written by that troll of Christian Sylt that write that fake news of McLaren and Ojeh of Formulas One. He is not reliable source. If the movie budget was $378 million the movie probably was a flop at the box office but wasn't infant Disney did Pirates 5 and the same thing of Pirates 5 that cost only 230 infact Pirates 6 is in development. I don't understand why Pirates 4 cost so many money. Ho menys money Disney gets in return? 87.1.231.179 ( talk) 21:50, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi, just for let you know there is a new (big) issue with BOM, this time with Thor: Love and Thunder. They added $215 million more than the correct gross-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 17:18, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I just want to let you know that I have updated this page with new issues for Jurassic Park and now also Rogue One. So if somebody will try to update Rogue One the gross from BOM is not correct now-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 22:27, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
There are multiple issues again, this time with Colombia grosses, take a look at Avatar, No Way Home, Top Gun, Thor, Minions, all of them are so incorrect, beacause there is a problem with Colombia box office, I hope they will fix it as soon as possible-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 23:19, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I just want to let you know that I found new issues-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 22:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, happy new year (I'm late, I know), and BOM made a present for us, they fixed something, included the 1994 Lion King!-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 11:10, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, now there are so many movies (almost half of the top 50) with 1, 2 or 3 million more than the usual, look at the grosses, for example Avatar, Infinity War, Star Wars VII..... now I think also Avengers Endgame is wrong-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 22:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I fixed 13 movies, I changed their url, so now the sources show the correct gross-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 20:29, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Well, now we know that BOM is not the only one with issues, also The Numbers have issues, with the italian gross of Quantumania..... so now BOM is correct and The Numbers is wrong, a few days ago was the opposite-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 19:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Betty, sorry for the change I made for the Star Wars films. In the article I read I mistook the gross budget as net budget and imputed the incorrect information. Glad it was changed back to the correct information. Sorry that a tag had to be put on the edit page to let people know what not to do. Name13013 ( talk) 16:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello I have a question for you please ?. can you reply when you are free please ?. Thank you 178.167.159.53 ( talk) 13:34, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Betty I have an important question for you please ?. can you help out ?.
Ok Thank you, Can you tell how do I upload a photo that I have on a DM on twitter onto a wikipedia page please ?. I haven't a clue what to do I can view the photo obviously but how do I upload it onto a wikipedia page please ?. Many Thanks
If snooker Wikipedia doesn't want my edits, I won't be making any more of them. HurricaneHiggins ( talk) 19:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Betty, I think there are too may franchises in the table, do you think it is a good idea to reduce them to a top 20? (or a top 15, I don't know)-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 20:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Here is the information confirming the information you claimed was untrue ( https://filmic-light.blogspot.com/2016/02/1938-uk-snow-white-pressbook.html). This is sourced in the Evil Queen's own Wikipedia article FYI. Kind regards. RedSorcery16 ( talk) 14:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Can u pls tell what are the latest collections of the film...as it has not been updated since days.🙂 Harshit Kumar ( talk) 08:08, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Hey, Betty! I wanted you to know that even though I have always preferred to do gnomish types of editing to article work, I've also always greatly benefited from advice you have to give me so I am proud to let you know that I have done some article work, and completed two articles at LinuxConsole and Protection Court as me newest one. They aren't Featured articles or anything, but they are still my own accomplishments, and I want to make you feel like you did make the right decision to support me, so as always thank you for your support! Huggums537 ( talk) 02:01, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for your message and I had hoped you would reach out to me over you repeatedly reverting my additional information on television coverage of this tournament as I would like to avoid an edit war. I have tried to accommodate you by re-wording the information and have included an independent and reliable reference, but you seem unwilling to give any ground here. If we can't compromise then we'll have to begin to get others involved in this potential dispute beginning with a third opinion. Rillington ( talk) 00:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi Betty Logan,
I don't understand what you mean by "Source fails corroboration".
I've inserted the same link source (
www.allmovie.com) that is at every other point of the list.
Please explain me this problem, so I can learn and finally add to the list the two movies.
Thanks,
JiunoLujo ::
Talk 16:18, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that in the list there are movies with wrong grosses, Monsters, Inc., Brave and WALL-E have fake grosses, and also Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse and The Grinch have issues (with BOM). I don't know if there are other wrong grosses-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 17:02, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:Fantastic Four (2015 film) § Summary of reviews in the lead.
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions) 07:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, you reversed my "citation needed" for the statement that Georg Trapp was offered a position by the German Navy before the Anschluss, claiming that it was already there. However, reference 153 only shows Trapp's WW1 statistics, on p. 98 of this Hungarian source there is no mention of any offer to Trapp, as far as I can see. So this reference doesn't extend back to the claim about the German offer which, in any case, is always said to have been made after the Anschluss. 2003:EC:9729:5E8:3D5F:1707:5CA2:F370 ( talk) 10:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi I have the Snooker scene edition of the event which dates back to the early 90's. It gives the result of the event and the winner. I also have a newspaper article giving the result after the event. If I could produce the Snooker scene article with photos of the article on the event. Would that be enough to get the event added in the career finals section on wikipedia please ?. I hope you can help out ?. Thank you 80.233.25.10 ( talk) 21:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Yes Betty is was a snooker challenge akin to the Centenary Challenge played between just two players Davis and Hendry in 1990. The one i have uncovered is a similar challenge match between two players in the early 90's. It says in Snooker Scene that it was sanctioned by the WPBSA at the last minute because Sky Sports wanted to show this event featuring two top players. When the WPBSA sanctioned the event and it was shown live on Sky Sports with the winner takes all first prize purse. This is not an exhibition where both players get paid for their night's work. This event is no different to the tournament mentioned above, infact it is similar to the 1975 Irish Masters which was first played as a one off challenge match, The 2019 Macau Masters where Barry Hawkins had to beat Mark Williams in a one off match in the 6 reds final. Joe Davis won the 1928 World Championship playing one other player in a challenge for money. May i point out the Irish professional championship, the Australian Proffessional and the Canadian Professional championships were played under challenge match conditions are were not regarded as exhibitions. The world championship was played as challenges in the 50's and 60's. Now people just presume the WST have run every event the same since day one, this is nonsense this only really stopped when Hearn told over in 2010 it became more professional. Can you help me with this info for this tournament if i send it to you please ?. Massive thanks. A lot of reading there. Thank you 178.167.146.242 ( talk) 21:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
How did it not pass verifications? And if it does pass verifications, can I re-add it? Firekong1 ( talk) 12:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi Betty, I have spent several years at Wikipedia reviewing articles, finding errors or adding missing information. I have decided to write to you since you are a user with extensive experience as an editor of information about films. A few years ago I found out that the movie "I Still Know What You Did Last Summer" is a co-production, I added the information to the article but it was recently vandalized and upon resetting the information Mexico was removed as a co-producing country. I tried to add this information but it was reverted without the reference I added being checked. The reliable source American Film Institute establishes that the film is a co-production between the United States, Germany and Mexico. You can see what I'm telling you when you enter the aforementioned website. I come to you in the hope that you will add the missing information in the "country" section where the three co-producing countries should appear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.168.135.194 ( talk) 07:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
"stylized as" doesn't seem to make much sense in regards to the context either way, even more less than "also known", because that term implies stylization of the same and only text of the leading title. In this particular case, would it be better accepted if the term was "marketed as"? GalaxyFighter55 ( talk) 08:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted all my edits, adding "Please add sources if you are going to alter sourced content". First of all, the contents you reverted are not linked to any source at all... my edits add a source, which is a Wikipedia article, and it's linked Cabiria.
I can make the link more specific (directly to the paragraph about the topic: /info/en/?search=Cabiria#Distribution,_remake_and_restorations. Does that work for you? I'm asking because your reversions cannot be undone and I will need to rewrite them manually, so before that I want to be sure you are not going to delete them again.
I'm doing this because this film is glorified more than necessary. While it is true that it was technically innovative, some alleged records are either exaggerated or completely false (like that it was the first 12-reel film ever made) Alessandro.balbiano ( talk) 21:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
I do notice that users have been attempting to put this as well as several other movies (including Elemental, Indiana Jones 5 and Ruby Gillman) on the list of Biggest Box Office Bombs before they have left theaters. I personally think it's safest to add them afterwards and I believe at least some eventually should be added as this summer is quite possibly becoming the "summer of flops". What are your thoughts on adding these later rather than now? Also, what do you think is the safest estimate for how much The Flash lost, because my current estimate is around 100 million if they spent 150 million on marketing (a typical marketing budget for most blockbusters WB releases iirc). SuperBrowser243 ( talk) 02:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
How do you do Ms. Logan.
What type of credit would you suggest as a reference for Desmond Llewelyn's (an actor of enough renown) appearance in 'Cleopatra'? TCM or IMDB? Page 257 of Joseph L. Mankiewicz: Critical Essays with an Annotated Bibliography and a Filmography? Interesting, he is listed twice in that work as a Senator AND as Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus (consul 54 BC); I find no other reference for his name. Interestingly I have recently found that Dewey Martin ("43 International Stars?") was listed in many credits for The Longest Day at Private Wilder, but a British road show promotion book shows his photo wear a helmet with Staff Sergeant rank, my theory is he is the dead body next to Roddy McDowell in the final release print. Sadly, I can no longer find the interview of Douglas Wilmer declaring he walked off the film, it is only a theory that he replaced Wilmer. Foofbun ( talk) 02:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello Betty how are you ?. Can you add a runners-up finish to the above section on Higgins page please ?. Judd Trump beat Higgins 5-1 in the final of the Huangguoshu open in china this morning. It is in the other events section on the 23/24 snooker season Can you add this result as Higgins page is locked please ?. Kind Regards 92.251.146.50 ( talk) 14:21, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
You were warned by me not to revert these changes to support your own point of view. You have breached this warning and are now undoing my work with no basis other than your own point of view. The objective reader will note that I have not altered the lede section which is what the disagreement was over on the Talk Page. It is clear that you have an agenda to gatekeep a specific date range despite available evidence to the contrary freely in the public domain. Richie wright1980 ( talk) 23:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi Betty, you normally have a good mind for this, I'm working on Mission Impossible Fallout and I have two sources, both from Deadline here and here
One has a figure of 140M for global distribution expenses which I thought was marketing and the other 135 for promotional partner support. Are either of these marketing budgets? Re-reading it maybe global distribution is just literally distributing the film? Although that seems very high, and promotional partners is people paying the studio to have their merch featured? Just wondering if you understand these terms more than I do. Darkwarriorblake ( talk) 18:34, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Let It Be (film) has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 29 § Let It Be (film) until a consensus is reached.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 22:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello there, I noticed that you reverted my edits and claimed that the source didn't pass verification. But it did last time I checked. Can you please explain why you think it did not pass verification? Firekong1 ( talk) 20:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Here we go again, now they have problems with DCEU movies.... I have already fixed with the archivied versions of the sources in the highest grossing film page-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 12:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Betty. Just in case you missed it, see this report. Alan ( talk) 06:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Do you think we really need all the sources archivied? I don't think so, expecially the sources in the top 50, the grosses from the archivied sources don't match with the actual grosses, for example the archivied version of Avatar 2 says $434.5 million.... So for me they are useless. By the way, there are new issues....-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 00:27, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Betty, was hoping to lean on your expertise over a concern regarding two recent edits here and here. BOM reports the total box office haul as $668 mil, while NUM reports $670.1 mil. How is it typically worded in prose when there's a conflict like that, and would we insert a range in the infobox? -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 10:16, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
I was combing through the biggest bomb list and came across Pixels, which is listed at $75 million. So I added this to the article. However, after taking a closer look at the source, it was published before the China release when the film was sitting at $182 million gross. The film ended up grossing $244 million, so wouldn't we need a more recent source to rely on this figure? -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 00:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello Betty, how are you doing ?. I have noticed a change to the above only yesterday. In the infobox where it says Tournament Wins in green, it used to say ranking and the number (of wins across from it) and minor-ranking and the number (of wins across from it) below. In the last week or so it has been changed under the banner Tournament Wins it now says ranking wins and the number and minor-ranking Wins and the number. There is no need to add the word wins underneath as it is used in the line above in Tournament Wins. This was not approved on the talkpage or even mentioned. So who decided to change it and why was it changed please ?. Hope you can help. 178.167.150.13 ( talk) 21:04, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for changing it back. it looked pathetic with the change he made. Can you block him for disruption if he keeps it up ?. I will keep an eye on it incase he changes it again. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.167.150.13 ( talk) 00:24, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! |
![]() |
|
Have a great Christmas, and may 2024 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls, vandals or visits from
Krampus!
|
Hello Betty how are you doing ?. Betty can you update the above page please ?. It still says Ronnie has 39 ranking titles and 21 triple crowns. Nobody updated the page after the UK. Can you change this please ?. Thank you 178.167.188.7 ( talk) 16:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday!
Whether you celebrate
Christmas,
Hanukkah,
Kwanzaa,
Hogmanay,
Festivus or your hemisphere's
Solstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here.
★Trekker (
talk) 12:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Coffee/Holidays}} to your fellow editors' talk pages.
★Trekker ( talk) 12:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
Hello Betty Logan, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Trailblazer101 ( talk) 20:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello Betty, I'm Horrorlover1026, and I hope you're having a good day. I found a credible link to a Film Industry Act of Bulgaria at the Film Center's website which was put into effect in May 2020, which I translated into English. On page 28, it states that persons under the age limit for the categories "C, C+, and D+" must be accompanied in order to view the film. I'm telling you this because I don't know how to add a link myself. Here's the link: file:///C:/Users/seths/Downloads/ZFI_02032021.pdf Horrorlover1026 ( talk) 05:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions) is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Christmas,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec19b}} to your friends' talk pages.
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions) 06:31, 27 December 2023 (UTC)