Unprotected talk page
User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive019
User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive020
User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive021
Commons
Wiktionary
Simple English Wikipedia
Wikipedia:Legal disclaimer
Wikipedia:Medical disclaimer
Wikipedia:General disclaimer
Hoo boy. So, after entering - nay, dominating - the debate 3 times, you announce that the debate should never have happened. I trust you were addressing that remark to your good self, good sir. These publicly released entries from your private diary make fascinating reading. You ought to consider publishing all of them. Happy days. :) -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 17:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
I am not a troll. JungleBook11231 ( talk) 01:56, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Reported. Dwest25 ( talk) 23:49, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
User:Brandon 3233 doesn't seem to fit the modus operandi of the Nazi Refdesk troll. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayron ' s alternate account ( talk • contribs) 00:57, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Noticed your report on AIV regarding the above account. Don't have time to look into this in detail right now, but is there an LTA page to go over the usual behaviour of this individual to make it easier for administrators to verify for themselves whether an account is actually being operated by this person? I know that some feel that creating such pages is "giving in" to long term vandals, but I think that anything that helps in identifying and despatching the accounts of unusually persistent delinquents like this more quickly is of value to the project. Such a page could then be linked to in the AIV report to give administrators not familiar with the pattern guidance in what to do. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 01:03, 8 January 2018 (UTC).
( [1]) -- Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 09:50, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Church of Baseball
Thank you for quality articles around baseball such as countless lists of baseball parks in towns, illustrated, for even more redirects, for service from 2007, for "I am perfectly happy with better writers improving on my writing style", for adding advice and the salt of humor, - repeating (25 September 2009): you are an awesome Wikipedian!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 11:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
If you even so much as hint at the kind of PA [2] you did here, again, I'll fight my last breath to see you blocked. Take that as a warning. Cassianto Talk 00:35, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Would you consent have your name on as a co-plaintiff in my ArbCom request against Cassianto? It would help the case. -- Volvlogia ( talk) 02:26, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case
I was pondering the recent disagreements we have had, mostly regarding the reference desks which I finally decided to unsubscribe from so I won't see any of the disputes between participants and be tempted to weigh in (I may still occasionally answer or ask a question in the computer area, but I am now trying to avoid any drama by withdrawing when I see it starting.)
I remember that previously we had a pretty collegial relationship and were able to work together on various pages, and in general I respect your attitude and ability. So I would like to extend an olive branch and ask that we both make a fresh start.
I am a high-functioning autistic (Asperger's, diagnosed by a qualified M.D., not self-diagnosed as many are), so you may see me purposely withdrawing from conflict when my brain is telling me "just post another paragraph and they will see the light" despite abundant evidence that that is not going to happen. Please try to understand why I might do this. It isn't personal.
So, peace treaty? Or maybe we should just have a dance fight like they did in West Side Story? [3] :) -- Guy Macon ( talk) 22:37, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
You were recently listed as a party to or recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 17, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 11:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello BB. I suspect you've seen the newsreel footage from game one of the 1919 World Series. The story of the serendipitous recovery of that footage, in 1978 in Dawson City, is told in Dawson City: Frozen Time. I found it a fascinating documentary so I thought I would make you aware of it. Best regards. MarnetteD| Talk 20:34, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Baseball Bugs.
I've seen you editing recently and you seem like an experienced Wikipedia editor. |
Hello BB. On Tom's 90th birthday I thought I'd leave you this version of The Elements (song) to celebrate. Cheers. MarnetteD| Talk 17:34, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
When you say highly offensive things about people for no reason, I will not take a chill pill. Your behaviour in that discussion is highly disgusting! If you have a dispute with Cullen328 you take it up with them. You don't bring other people into it for no reason. As long as you continue behave in such a highly offensive manner, I will continue to call you out on it. Nil Einne ( talk) 04:09, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Why don't we all have a cup of tea or some other nice beverage and move on? I supported closing down the reference desks but the community disagreed. But there is consensus that "ref desk regulars" should provide answers based on links to Wikipedia articles or relevant external links. So, Bugs, please avoid speculative or flip comments at the ref desks and all will be well. Thank you. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:46, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
I peeked at your pie chart & have figured out why you're currently in trouble. Nearly over 47% of your edits are to RefDesk/AN/ANI type pages & merely (less then) 16% of your edits are to 'main space'. Basically, you're showing up 'too often' at 'too many' discussions & it's apparently annoying many editors, while doing very little to actual article editing. Personally, I don't mind this. But, if you want to get the others off of your back? then it's best to begin tipping the percentage in opposite directions. BTW: I was once a talkpage junkie, myself. GoodDay ( talk) 14:06, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Baseball Bugs. I closed the AN/I discussion about you. As per your own suggestion, I believe there is a consensus that you should be banned from editing AN and AN/I. You are permitted to open a section if you need to or to respond if someone opens a section about you. Per usual practice, you may appeal in six months if you wish. Best regards, -- John ( talk) 16:05, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Dear Baseball Bugs/Archive022,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman ( talk) 22:14, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Knock it off. I mean it. Knock it off! Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:09, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
I'm back... Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 19:36, 28 May 2018 (UTC) |
I just happened to land on Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Language] checking a new user's edits and was surprised to note your "contributions" from May 27-May 31 range from downright stupid to completely confusing. Please stop posting stupid misleading unresearched "answers" based on whatever nonsense pops into your head. You might remember we had a serious discussion about banning you from the Ref desk recently. Based on my quick review of this portion of Ref desk over the visable questions I see that proposed ban is well justified. Remember we are here to build an encyclopedia - find something useful to do in mainspace. Legacypac ( talk) 11:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Since you can't understand I've raised this at ANi [4]. You have now been notified. I'm off to do something more interesting to improve mainspace. Legacypac ( talk) 22:05, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Why would you delete an answer one of us posted with the note WP:DENY? My understanding, though I am in no way a Wikipedia expert, is that WP:DENY is used to remove answers given by banned users. I don't think that anyone here has been banned. If so, I don't think that they would be answering questions. 209.149.113.5 ( talk) 11:19, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
See here. Count Iblis ( talk) 23:22, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Newhart episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Reilly ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
I'm glad that I was able to fix that Roe v. Wade typo for you at the Wikipedia Reference Desk! :) Futurist110 ( talk) 06:03, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Is that arc like Noah's arc? And if so the is it biblical Noah or another Noah? It's the heat, it's freezing my brain. Slight Smile 17:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
As I said on the RDS, if you are unable to understand simple discussions, I urge you to stay away from the RDS as a responder. It is very difficult to contribute productively when your ability to understand simple discussions is so limited. I'm not sure why your ability is so weak, since as I said it's clearly not an English problem. It's your choice if you want to do something about it, but it may be worth considering since it seems likely something that would make life hard in general.. Nil Einne ( talk) 10:55, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Remind you of anyone? A prolific and argumentative RD editor who suddenly stopped contributing? Well, you know what I think. -- Viennese Waltz 21:20, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Well, the first reason I rolled your edit back was because the sentence didn't make sense. The first word of the sentence should not have been "I". Go back and look. The second reason was because it was just trivia. Whether Ebsen outlived other members of the cast of a movie is unimportant in the larger scheme of a persons life. The third reason I rolled your edit back was because the nonsensical statement isn't referenced. Cuprum17 ( talk) 18:39, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
Your responses to a request to identify a photographer at the Humanities Reference Desk are flat-out amazing. You have my eternal admiration, and this barnstar. › Mortee talk 15:27, 16 August 2018 (UTC) |
Reported. 24.111.133.85 ( talk) 03:01, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for bringing up the sad news on Medeis on the RD. I think it was something that many of us missed. Nil Einne ( talk) 21:12, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Please do not remove my post again. If you want to discuss the legitmacy of it then please do so here or on my talk page or even under the post. It is not reasonable to have to try to communicate in edit summaries. I notice wp:deny discusses a way to deal with trolling but it's only one person's accussation that I'm trolling rather than trying to find an answer to a legitimate question. You should also be familiar with Wikipedia's policy on assuming good faith. 185.230.100.66 ( talk) 10:19, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For your diligence and helping out at the refdesk.— Mythdon ( talk • contribs) 07:01, 28 October 2018 (UTC) |
The person known as 'ADolph was right' is not me but somebody else. The last time I showed up at the Refdesks was more than 3 months ago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.12.45.187 ( talk) 23:22, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
I'm very confused as to what the hell is going on over there- to the point I'm debating if I should just Remove them all? Geartooth Friendship is Magic! 12:28, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
I'm no fan of Vote (X) for Change, but he had a point here. Why did you make this edit? Would you still have deleted it if it had been in French or German? -- Viennese Waltz 15:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Baseball Bugs. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
There's an IP post there. VXFC? Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 05:13, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Template:Annotated image and Template:CSS image crop
Hello Baseball Bugs: From high in the Canadian Arctic I hope you enjoy the holiday season, the Winter or Summer solstice, Quviahugvik, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah or even the Saturnalia, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:56, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Unprotected talk page
User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive019
User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive020
User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive021
Commons
Wiktionary
Simple English Wikipedia
Wikipedia:Legal disclaimer
Wikipedia:Medical disclaimer
Wikipedia:General disclaimer
Hoo boy. So, after entering - nay, dominating - the debate 3 times, you announce that the debate should never have happened. I trust you were addressing that remark to your good self, good sir. These publicly released entries from your private diary make fascinating reading. You ought to consider publishing all of them. Happy days. :) -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 17:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
I am not a troll. JungleBook11231 ( talk) 01:56, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Reported. Dwest25 ( talk) 23:49, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
User:Brandon 3233 doesn't seem to fit the modus operandi of the Nazi Refdesk troll. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayron ' s alternate account ( talk • contribs) 00:57, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Noticed your report on AIV regarding the above account. Don't have time to look into this in detail right now, but is there an LTA page to go over the usual behaviour of this individual to make it easier for administrators to verify for themselves whether an account is actually being operated by this person? I know that some feel that creating such pages is "giving in" to long term vandals, but I think that anything that helps in identifying and despatching the accounts of unusually persistent delinquents like this more quickly is of value to the project. Such a page could then be linked to in the AIV report to give administrators not familiar with the pattern guidance in what to do. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 01:03, 8 January 2018 (UTC).
( [1]) -- Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 09:50, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Church of Baseball
Thank you for quality articles around baseball such as countless lists of baseball parks in towns, illustrated, for even more redirects, for service from 2007, for "I am perfectly happy with better writers improving on my writing style", for adding advice and the salt of humor, - repeating (25 September 2009): you are an awesome Wikipedian!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 11:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
If you even so much as hint at the kind of PA [2] you did here, again, I'll fight my last breath to see you blocked. Take that as a warning. Cassianto Talk 00:35, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Would you consent have your name on as a co-plaintiff in my ArbCom request against Cassianto? It would help the case. -- Volvlogia ( talk) 02:26, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case
I was pondering the recent disagreements we have had, mostly regarding the reference desks which I finally decided to unsubscribe from so I won't see any of the disputes between participants and be tempted to weigh in (I may still occasionally answer or ask a question in the computer area, but I am now trying to avoid any drama by withdrawing when I see it starting.)
I remember that previously we had a pretty collegial relationship and were able to work together on various pages, and in general I respect your attitude and ability. So I would like to extend an olive branch and ask that we both make a fresh start.
I am a high-functioning autistic (Asperger's, diagnosed by a qualified M.D., not self-diagnosed as many are), so you may see me purposely withdrawing from conflict when my brain is telling me "just post another paragraph and they will see the light" despite abundant evidence that that is not going to happen. Please try to understand why I might do this. It isn't personal.
So, peace treaty? Or maybe we should just have a dance fight like they did in West Side Story? [3] :) -- Guy Macon ( talk) 22:37, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
You were recently listed as a party to or recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 17, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 11:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello BB. I suspect you've seen the newsreel footage from game one of the 1919 World Series. The story of the serendipitous recovery of that footage, in 1978 in Dawson City, is told in Dawson City: Frozen Time. I found it a fascinating documentary so I thought I would make you aware of it. Best regards. MarnetteD| Talk 20:34, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Baseball Bugs.
I've seen you editing recently and you seem like an experienced Wikipedia editor. |
Hello BB. On Tom's 90th birthday I thought I'd leave you this version of The Elements (song) to celebrate. Cheers. MarnetteD| Talk 17:34, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
When you say highly offensive things about people for no reason, I will not take a chill pill. Your behaviour in that discussion is highly disgusting! If you have a dispute with Cullen328 you take it up with them. You don't bring other people into it for no reason. As long as you continue behave in such a highly offensive manner, I will continue to call you out on it. Nil Einne ( talk) 04:09, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Why don't we all have a cup of tea or some other nice beverage and move on? I supported closing down the reference desks but the community disagreed. But there is consensus that "ref desk regulars" should provide answers based on links to Wikipedia articles or relevant external links. So, Bugs, please avoid speculative or flip comments at the ref desks and all will be well. Thank you. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:46, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
I peeked at your pie chart & have figured out why you're currently in trouble. Nearly over 47% of your edits are to RefDesk/AN/ANI type pages & merely (less then) 16% of your edits are to 'main space'. Basically, you're showing up 'too often' at 'too many' discussions & it's apparently annoying many editors, while doing very little to actual article editing. Personally, I don't mind this. But, if you want to get the others off of your back? then it's best to begin tipping the percentage in opposite directions. BTW: I was once a talkpage junkie, myself. GoodDay ( talk) 14:06, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Baseball Bugs. I closed the AN/I discussion about you. As per your own suggestion, I believe there is a consensus that you should be banned from editing AN and AN/I. You are permitted to open a section if you need to or to respond if someone opens a section about you. Per usual practice, you may appeal in six months if you wish. Best regards, -- John ( talk) 16:05, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Dear Baseball Bugs/Archive022,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman ( talk) 22:14, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Knock it off. I mean it. Knock it off! Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:09, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
I'm back... Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 19:36, 28 May 2018 (UTC) |
I just happened to land on Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Language] checking a new user's edits and was surprised to note your "contributions" from May 27-May 31 range from downright stupid to completely confusing. Please stop posting stupid misleading unresearched "answers" based on whatever nonsense pops into your head. You might remember we had a serious discussion about banning you from the Ref desk recently. Based on my quick review of this portion of Ref desk over the visable questions I see that proposed ban is well justified. Remember we are here to build an encyclopedia - find something useful to do in mainspace. Legacypac ( talk) 11:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Since you can't understand I've raised this at ANi [4]. You have now been notified. I'm off to do something more interesting to improve mainspace. Legacypac ( talk) 22:05, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Why would you delete an answer one of us posted with the note WP:DENY? My understanding, though I am in no way a Wikipedia expert, is that WP:DENY is used to remove answers given by banned users. I don't think that anyone here has been banned. If so, I don't think that they would be answering questions. 209.149.113.5 ( talk) 11:19, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
See here. Count Iblis ( talk) 23:22, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Newhart episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Reilly ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
I'm glad that I was able to fix that Roe v. Wade typo for you at the Wikipedia Reference Desk! :) Futurist110 ( talk) 06:03, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Is that arc like Noah's arc? And if so the is it biblical Noah or another Noah? It's the heat, it's freezing my brain. Slight Smile 17:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
As I said on the RDS, if you are unable to understand simple discussions, I urge you to stay away from the RDS as a responder. It is very difficult to contribute productively when your ability to understand simple discussions is so limited. I'm not sure why your ability is so weak, since as I said it's clearly not an English problem. It's your choice if you want to do something about it, but it may be worth considering since it seems likely something that would make life hard in general.. Nil Einne ( talk) 10:55, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Remind you of anyone? A prolific and argumentative RD editor who suddenly stopped contributing? Well, you know what I think. -- Viennese Waltz 21:20, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Well, the first reason I rolled your edit back was because the sentence didn't make sense. The first word of the sentence should not have been "I". Go back and look. The second reason was because it was just trivia. Whether Ebsen outlived other members of the cast of a movie is unimportant in the larger scheme of a persons life. The third reason I rolled your edit back was because the nonsensical statement isn't referenced. Cuprum17 ( talk) 18:39, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
Your responses to a request to identify a photographer at the Humanities Reference Desk are flat-out amazing. You have my eternal admiration, and this barnstar. › Mortee talk 15:27, 16 August 2018 (UTC) |
Reported. 24.111.133.85 ( talk) 03:01, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for bringing up the sad news on Medeis on the RD. I think it was something that many of us missed. Nil Einne ( talk) 21:12, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Please do not remove my post again. If you want to discuss the legitmacy of it then please do so here or on my talk page or even under the post. It is not reasonable to have to try to communicate in edit summaries. I notice wp:deny discusses a way to deal with trolling but it's only one person's accussation that I'm trolling rather than trying to find an answer to a legitimate question. You should also be familiar with Wikipedia's policy on assuming good faith. 185.230.100.66 ( talk) 10:19, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For your diligence and helping out at the refdesk.— Mythdon ( talk • contribs) 07:01, 28 October 2018 (UTC) |
The person known as 'ADolph was right' is not me but somebody else. The last time I showed up at the Refdesks was more than 3 months ago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.12.45.187 ( talk) 23:22, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
I'm very confused as to what the hell is going on over there- to the point I'm debating if I should just Remove them all? Geartooth Friendship is Magic! 12:28, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
I'm no fan of Vote (X) for Change, but he had a point here. Why did you make this edit? Would you still have deleted it if it had been in French or German? -- Viennese Waltz 15:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Baseball Bugs. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
There's an IP post there. VXFC? Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 05:13, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Template:Annotated image and Template:CSS image crop
Hello Baseball Bugs: From high in the Canadian Arctic I hope you enjoy the holiday season, the Winter or Summer solstice, Quviahugvik, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah or even the Saturnalia, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:56, 21 December 2018 (UTC)