![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Vey pleased indeed and kudos for seeing it through. What a page it turned into; hope you are proud. It's certainly of your usual standard. Ceoil ( talk) 22:44, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi Aza24, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.
Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.
Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 01:14, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
The article cites "Harper 1999" but no such source is listed in the bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]]
to
your common.js page. Thanks,
Renata•
3 02:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
I have made some small additions to the article. [2] Do not expect much. The reasons are A) that Buddhism and Taoism are new to me and it was really hard to comprehend their core values and connection to humanism. B)I felt it is somehow Undue to expand further since contemporary humanism is a manifestation of "european-made" humanism (and that is a strong criticism of contemporary humanism). Can you have a look though? I am not sure if I grasp things correctly. Also, if you want to add something yourself, you are more than welcomed. I can provide you with sources I already used in the article. Cheers! Cinadon 36 18:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Today is Erntedank in Germany, thanksgiving, and we celebrated our village's 650th anniversary, and had the dress rehearsal for Verdi's Requiem with an interesting band of marimba, piano, horn, bass, timpani and drum, - concert tomorrow, our national holiday. Seeing a pic I took on the Main page was also a nice harvest. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:12, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
new day, another pictured DYK (but not pictured by me this time): look at power work tensions (if you translate) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 11:36, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Would you be kind enough to do yet another source review? At one point, you said "Heh, rather routine now, isn't it?" ... and I hope it will be ... there's a lot of overlap with the sources from your (many!) previous source reviews (see my user page for links to all of them). Giants has listed this one in the "source review needed" box, but I'm not holding my breath that that will help ... getting source reviews for science-y lists at FLC hasn't gotten any easier. (But I'm hoping if you do one, then it will be easier for me to pick up future source reviews for lists in this series, since the sources will usually be nearly identical.) - Dank ( push to talk) 20:52, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Aza24! I see you've discovered my edits on Lars-Erik Larsson. Have you heard God in Disguise? It's lovely. (May I recommend to you the most recent recording, by Gustaf Sjökvist ? ... it's easily the best one, in my opinion.) Thanks for making the Larsson navbox; how funny that I had made one (similar to those I made for Wirén, Madetoja, and Sallinen) but hadn't yet hit publish! Haha. :) Do you have a preferred template for these? That is, are the yellow-bar ones I have been making in need of an update? Also, while on Larsson, you must hear that Symphony No. 3 of his! Oh, and I must have this picture... do you think it can be uploaded? I'll burn down all of Wikipedia if the answer is no! Ha! Warmly, ~ Silence of Järvenpää 14:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Writer's Barnstar |
nice job my dude Justyouraveragelechuga ( talk) 23:59, 7 November 2022 (UTC) |
This Ukrainian composer has been up for a pre-FA peer review for several weeks now, without any responses. Are you able to take a look? Regards, Amitchell125 ( talk) 22:30, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Personally, I think that the article is ripe for WP:GAN. Do you feel comfortable nominate the article for GA? CactiStaccingCrane ( talk) 03:07, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Hey, Aza! I sometimes lurk through sandboxes looking for a way to improve my writing, and I saw that you marked this book as "don't have access": "Füssel, Stephan. Gutenberg and the Impact of Printing". You can find it here [4]. Artem.G ( talk) 17:59, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi there,
I was wondering if you could do a source review for List of accolades received by CODA (2021 film) regarding its featured list promotion.
Hello, Aza - I'm the person who waded in to make corrections to my own bio, on which you clearly have put in so much careful work; most of all I would just like to thank you. I apologize if I violated protocol in trying to fix the few factual errors; I thought I was doing it right; and now, I hope I'm doing it right by weighing in here. I'm not trying to rewrite my own bio to make it the way I want it; I just wanted to eradicate factual errors. Is the best thing to post my changes here, with citations/reasons, and let you review them, or is there a better way to do it? 73.250.37.15 ( talk) 21:54, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
On 21 November 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ned Rorem, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 12:00, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello dearheart, I am wondering if you are terrifically busy right now, or if you are available to help bail me out on this article. I have nominated it for GA and now I am afraid that when someone picks it up, they will dun it for its mixed reference styles. That is the part of WP I am worst at, so I was wondering if you could help in converting any of them to Harvard style. It's perfectly okay if you are not interested or able, so don't worry about saying no, but I had to ask! Hope you are well. We are getting ready for the holidays here. Jenhawk777 ( talk) 18:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
On behalf of the FAR coordinators, thank you, Aza24! Your work on Josquin des Prez has allowed the article to retain its featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. I hereby award you this Featured Article Save Award, or FASA. You may display this FA star upon your userpage. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Nikkimaria ( talk) 04:50, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Aza! It's nice to have you have you back. Welcome! I wanted your thoughts on something. Having recently written new articles on several violin concertos ( Violin Concerto (Larsson), Violin Concerto (Wirén), and Violin Concerto (Klami)), I ended up poking around the corresponding category; I noticed quickly that the every article is written differently in terms of its formatting, i.e., there is no standardization, despite the classical music MOS. In particular, I found great variation with the titles in the lede section, the formatting of the movements (i.e., when to italicize, linking to tempo marking, Arabic vs. Roman numerals, etc.). Do you think it's worth trying to standardize? Is there a Wikignome you know who would be up to the task? I am sure the piano concertos category and the symphonies category is just as bad, although I haven't inspected. When I write articles, I certainly have a particular style that I stick to and it is, to my knowledge, consistent with MOS (although perhaps I am mistaken). Anyway, your thoughts would be welcome! PS: Of late, you may have noticed, my efforts have been at start-class to C-class content creation/development, rather than working at GA's or FA's... I guess I'm feeling like coverage and moderate improvement (of existing articles) is more important than chasing shiny objects. (I remember you expressing something similar on this page to another user, but now I cannot seem to find the entry.) ~ Silence of Järvenpää 21:31, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
celebrating GW60 with a new works list, at least a start - enjoy your time away! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:09, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
I have nominated Witold Lutosławski to be today's featured article for Jan. 25. As a major contributor to the article, you are invited to share your thoughts by joining the discussion here. Z1720 ( talk) 16:55, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Aza! We didn't met here before, but I saw your impressive work on History of Music and Josquin. I never wrote FA-class article before, and the arts are not my usual theme (one of my GAs is indeed an arts biography, but it was much easier to write about Franzisca Baruch given small number of sources available), but some time ago I've decided to save El Lissitzky at FARC. I thought it would be easier, but ended up with complete article overhaul, built on a ton of new sources not used before. I know that's a lot to ask for, but you're the only experienced editor I know who's good both in FAs and in arts, and if you are interested in Lissitzky or in early Russian avant-garde art I would be grateful if you can take a look! It's not fully done (I think it's ~60-70% now), I still need to rewrite several (large) sections, but here it is: draft. Please let me know what do you think. Warmly, Artem.G ( talk) 15:35, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi Aza! Thanks for your first comments on the draft, I tried to address them. I have a lot of real life work this week, though I'll try to work on the draft too. (I have a lot of sources to read, both Nisbet's and Birnholz thesises are 500+ pages!)
Meanwhile, I have one more question for you, that's one on copyright. I'm not the biggest fan of modern copyright laws, but almost always I can at least understand them. Not this time. Lissitzky died in 1941, and it's 70+ years. Many of his works are done and published before 1927, so should also be PD. But how this can happen? MOMA says that this photo [6] is "© 2022 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn", and here they say [7] "© 2015 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn". But this work is from 1926: it's before 1927 and more than 70 years passed after the author's death! And the same question about all other MOMA images - Prouns are definetily done (published and exhibited too) before 1927, though they somehow copyrighted all of them. Can we upload such files to commons? How is it even possible to copyright the work done in 1926 to 2022? Artem.G ( talk) 06:58, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Hey, Aza, nice to see you are back! I think that my draft looks much better now - though I still need to finish Nisbet's and Birnholz's theses - it started to look as a thing. I would be very grateful if you'll have a look - do you think it can be moved to the article? I would also appreciate if you'll copyedit it a bit, as I'm not an English native speaker I write sometimes with abominable mistakes; it's also a reason why I use so many quotes - I'm aware of "close paraphrasing" and try to avoid it by quoting real experts in their own words. The hardest sections are legacy and scholarly assessment - though being a famous avantgardist, Lissitzky is rarely credited for his work at the level of his contemporaries (Chagall, Malevich, Kandinsky (and, by the way, wiki articles on them are not good at all, to say nothing)), and usually being credited as author of just a few works (The Constructor, Beat the Whites! poster, sometimes Prouns, sometimes Unovis, sometimes his Jewish works). I think the article will be the best Lissitzky overview available online (after some copyedit and polishing, incorporating the quotes, etc, etc), especially given that most books are out-of-print, PhD theses are hard to find, grove and many articles are paywalled.
How do I cite the Houhanshu commentary? I asked on the WikiProject China talk but no one answered my question. So, I guess I'm going to ask you. Mucube ( talk) 22:42, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Your work is dazzlingly beautiful. It takes my breath away. You are so wonderful - there are no words. Thank you.
Jenhawk777 ( talk) 04:50, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Milwaukee Symphony Orchestra Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Aza, if you've got time for a request, could I get a source review for this at FLC? It already has three full (ish) supports. About half the sources are ones you've already covered in previous source reviews for me. (The bizarre name is sort of explained at WP:Featured list candidates/List of lilioid family names with etymologies/archive1.) - Dank ( push to talk) 05:07, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
If so, then I wish you a merry Christmas, and if not, I wish you happy holidays, and if you don't celebrate anything, I still wish you all good things! You are deeply appreciated and valued here on WP - especially by me. Bless you, Jenhawk777 ( talk) 23:47, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
I have been waiting for a GA review for Handan Chun for quite a while now, so could you review it? Mucube ( talk • contribs) 01:45, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Merry Yuletide to you! (And a happy new year!)
~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 13:41, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension.
![]() |
Sorry for the trouble. I thought I was helping at Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors and can clearly see that I wasn't. I will do my best to not repeat my mistake and make it so that this will not occur again. -- Super Goku V ( talk) 16:07, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Sorry for delay in sending a seasons greeting, wishing the best an do follow your trials here; here is something endlessly amusing to help get past January. It's an interpretation that we in alt-rock communities might call "challenging". Ceoil ( talk) 10:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
I have nominated Chinua Achebe to be today's featured article on March 21. Please join the conversation by clicking here. Thanks, Z1720 ( talk) 02:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
... now has 3 supports at FLC, and the sources are largely the same as last time ... if you're interested in taking a look. Let me know if I can help with anything. - Dank ( push to talk) 04:38, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest, a good topic that you nominated, is at risk of being demoted due to it now requiring the article San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2022, a B-Class article. I recommend that you improve the aforementioned article, or the topic may be demoted. QuicoleJR ( talk) 23:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
The same applies to EFL Championship Play-Offs and 2022 EFL Championship Play-Off final. Please improve both articles to retain the good topics. QuicoleJR ( talk) 00:02, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() | |
happy new year |
---|
Today's featured article is Osbert Parsley, not by me but Amitchell125 where I commented, including the beginning of my songs. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 17:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
I'm on vacation, - click on songs! I tell my own stories now, instead of relying on DYK. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:12, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() | |
my daily stories |
yesterday's cantata, 300 years later -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Aza24. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Jeremy Noble (musicologist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Re this reversion of my edit. The quote well fitted the heading re the period of neglect of Mahler's music. It is a very strong polemic indeed - "paucity of ideas" - that is spectacularly at odds with more recent appraisals of Mahler's music. This is worth documenting in my opinion. The book is very rare and so this will not be visible otherwise. Yes, there are other quotes possible, some are given in the previous article sentences, but this one more example is very noteworthy. Please consider undoing your revert. Walton22 ( talk) 04:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Aza24, you deleted a well sourced and longly discussed information. Please read the RFC, and if you have nothing substantive to add, please undo your deletion. Smearus was the only one who raised discussable concerns. But in the end we found out that there are significantly more reliable sources in favour. Talk:Franz Schubert#Unsinnsgesellschaft Chip-chip-2020 ( talk) 06:51, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Aza! Just wanted to say hello and to see how you've been. Missing our chats... ~ Silence of Järvenpää 16:56, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
wow, I'm really impressed with what you did with List of Chinese monarchs! Great list, and nice to see you here again :) Artem.G ( talk) 13:28, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
I came here to say the same thing! HUGE thanks for the work you did here. You've inspired me to try and tackle the History of the administrative divisions of China before 1912 page. SilverStar54 ( talk) 20:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Chinese monarchs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emperor Shao.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() | |
my story today |
On IWD, I remember a 2016 DYK: Hana Blažíková, a Czech who sang German music in Japan. Girls and women sang how Bach arranged Pergolesi's Stabat Mater to a new text paraphrasing Psalm 51, last Sunday. - I loved improving Mary Bauermeister - on the Main page until yesterday. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi there @ Aza24, and thank you for your edits over at Igor Stravinsky. I saw your response on the talk page and realize I forgot to respond. I've since expanded the lead and made a number of changes per requests at the GAN. As for the music section, I was curious what you think can be improved. I feel that a lot of the unique and influential aspects of his music are covered under "Influence", and "Music" exists to highlight his phases of composition. Additionally, I see that you cut a chunk of information about the unique orchestration of his works. Do you think this would fit better under "Music" rather than "Influence"? MyCatIsAChonk ( talk) 00:23, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Military history reviewers' award | |
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between January and March 2023.
Hawkeye7 (
talk) via
MilHistBot (
talk) 19:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{
WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|
I read up on the contest's rationale, and I'm thoroughly convinced. I created a preliminary template to be placed on other editors' talk pages to invite them to participate. However, I've never created a template before, so I'd love some help and feedback. Check it out in my sandbox. 〜 Festucalex • talk 22:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
~~<noinclude />~
. Three tildes produces your username without a timestamp, and the noinclude prevents it from substituting until the message is substituted. Good luck with this work! Cheers, {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk 22:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
{{subst<noinclude />:REVISIONUSER}}
if you don't want custom signature formatting or talk page links. Cheers, {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk 22:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | |
my story today |
My story today is about the Alchymic Quartet, - I went away from DYK but it's the last one from last year. - The songs are about vacation, continued. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:34, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
On behalf of the FAR coordinators, thank you, Aza24! Your work on Diocletian has allowed the article to retain its featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. I hereby award you this Featured Article Save Award, or FASA. You may display this FA star upon your userpage. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Nikkimaria ( talk) 13:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | |
Three years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi there,
I was wondering if you could do a source review for 2022 Winter Olympics medal table regarding it's featured list nomination? I would appreciate the feedback.
Flowering plant families ( APG IV) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
Early-diverging flowering plants | |||||
Monocots: Alismatids • Commelinids • Lilioids | |||||
|
|||||
Eudicots
|
Hypothetically (actually not so hypothetically): If I'm trying to get an FT covering flowering plant families, and those families are generally grouped into: long-list-1, long-list-2, long-list-3, and Vitales, an order with just one family that doesn't belong to any of the first 3 lists. ... what's the best way to get the single family approved for membership in the FT? Or could the FT just consist of the 3 long lists, ignoring the one family? Or should I create a list called "List of families in long-list-3 and Vitales", even if those two groups don't have much to do with each other (aside from the fact that they're both members of the same large group called the rosids)? - Dank ( push to talk) 21:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I want to thank you for the articles about Armenian women composers. Thanks for your work. I want to translate them into Ukrainian, but I ran into a misunderstanding in the preamble.
Though her piece did not join the general šarakan liturgy, Sahakdukht's oeuvre as a whole is thought to have exerted considerable influence on subsequent šarakans; they introduced certain phrases into popular use and according to ethnomusicologist Şahan Arzruni they "helped to shape the development of the genre during subsequent centuries".
Who or what they? The subsequent šarakans? Or Sahakdukht and her brother? Or is it such a feature of the word oeuvre (like this noun is automatically plural)? Or oeuvre implies all of the šarakans of Sahakdukht? Please help me understand this fragment of text. With respect. Smpad ( talk) 17:57, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Ned Rorem you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Theepicosity --
Theepicosity (
talk) 20:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
I have nominated Concerto delle donne for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:08, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Aza24. I'm just posting to let you know that List of sculptures of Ludwig van Beethoven – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for June 2. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 00:07, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
The article
Ned Rorem you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Ned Rorem for comments about the article, and
Talk:Ned Rorem/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Theepicosity --
Theepicosity (
talk) 01:01, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
I saw your question at WP:VPT. Have a look at my js for the skin User:Nthep/vector-2022.js. The first two add links to my contributions and my talk page to the header at the top of the page (watchlist is already in that header).
The last two lines add watchlist and contribution link to the sticky header that you see as you scroll down an article. Nthep ( talk) 19:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() | |
my story today |
---|
I had a good story on coronation day: a Te Deum we sang that day. And the following day we sang it for the composer ;) - And today we remember a composer who created music especially for us! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:58, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello Aza24:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long
Good Article Editathon event in June 2023!
Running from June 1 to 30, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – another Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female climate scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning book or film by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Vey pleased indeed and kudos for seeing it through. What a page it turned into; hope you are proud. It's certainly of your usual standard. Ceoil ( talk) 22:44, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi Aza24, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.
Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.
Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 01:14, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
The article cites "Harper 1999" but no such source is listed in the bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]]
to
your common.js page. Thanks,
Renata•
3 02:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
I have made some small additions to the article. [2] Do not expect much. The reasons are A) that Buddhism and Taoism are new to me and it was really hard to comprehend their core values and connection to humanism. B)I felt it is somehow Undue to expand further since contemporary humanism is a manifestation of "european-made" humanism (and that is a strong criticism of contemporary humanism). Can you have a look though? I am not sure if I grasp things correctly. Also, if you want to add something yourself, you are more than welcomed. I can provide you with sources I already used in the article. Cheers! Cinadon 36 18:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Today is Erntedank in Germany, thanksgiving, and we celebrated our village's 650th anniversary, and had the dress rehearsal for Verdi's Requiem with an interesting band of marimba, piano, horn, bass, timpani and drum, - concert tomorrow, our national holiday. Seeing a pic I took on the Main page was also a nice harvest. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:12, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
new day, another pictured DYK (but not pictured by me this time): look at power work tensions (if you translate) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 11:36, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Would you be kind enough to do yet another source review? At one point, you said "Heh, rather routine now, isn't it?" ... and I hope it will be ... there's a lot of overlap with the sources from your (many!) previous source reviews (see my user page for links to all of them). Giants has listed this one in the "source review needed" box, but I'm not holding my breath that that will help ... getting source reviews for science-y lists at FLC hasn't gotten any easier. (But I'm hoping if you do one, then it will be easier for me to pick up future source reviews for lists in this series, since the sources will usually be nearly identical.) - Dank ( push to talk) 20:52, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Aza24! I see you've discovered my edits on Lars-Erik Larsson. Have you heard God in Disguise? It's lovely. (May I recommend to you the most recent recording, by Gustaf Sjökvist ? ... it's easily the best one, in my opinion.) Thanks for making the Larsson navbox; how funny that I had made one (similar to those I made for Wirén, Madetoja, and Sallinen) but hadn't yet hit publish! Haha. :) Do you have a preferred template for these? That is, are the yellow-bar ones I have been making in need of an update? Also, while on Larsson, you must hear that Symphony No. 3 of his! Oh, and I must have this picture... do you think it can be uploaded? I'll burn down all of Wikipedia if the answer is no! Ha! Warmly, ~ Silence of Järvenpää 14:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Writer's Barnstar |
nice job my dude Justyouraveragelechuga ( talk) 23:59, 7 November 2022 (UTC) |
This Ukrainian composer has been up for a pre-FA peer review for several weeks now, without any responses. Are you able to take a look? Regards, Amitchell125 ( talk) 22:30, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Personally, I think that the article is ripe for WP:GAN. Do you feel comfortable nominate the article for GA? CactiStaccingCrane ( talk) 03:07, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Hey, Aza! I sometimes lurk through sandboxes looking for a way to improve my writing, and I saw that you marked this book as "don't have access": "Füssel, Stephan. Gutenberg and the Impact of Printing". You can find it here [4]. Artem.G ( talk) 17:59, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi there,
I was wondering if you could do a source review for List of accolades received by CODA (2021 film) regarding its featured list promotion.
Hello, Aza - I'm the person who waded in to make corrections to my own bio, on which you clearly have put in so much careful work; most of all I would just like to thank you. I apologize if I violated protocol in trying to fix the few factual errors; I thought I was doing it right; and now, I hope I'm doing it right by weighing in here. I'm not trying to rewrite my own bio to make it the way I want it; I just wanted to eradicate factual errors. Is the best thing to post my changes here, with citations/reasons, and let you review them, or is there a better way to do it? 73.250.37.15 ( talk) 21:54, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
On 21 November 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ned Rorem, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 12:00, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello dearheart, I am wondering if you are terrifically busy right now, or if you are available to help bail me out on this article. I have nominated it for GA and now I am afraid that when someone picks it up, they will dun it for its mixed reference styles. That is the part of WP I am worst at, so I was wondering if you could help in converting any of them to Harvard style. It's perfectly okay if you are not interested or able, so don't worry about saying no, but I had to ask! Hope you are well. We are getting ready for the holidays here. Jenhawk777 ( talk) 18:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
On behalf of the FAR coordinators, thank you, Aza24! Your work on Josquin des Prez has allowed the article to retain its featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. I hereby award you this Featured Article Save Award, or FASA. You may display this FA star upon your userpage. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Nikkimaria ( talk) 04:50, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Aza! It's nice to have you have you back. Welcome! I wanted your thoughts on something. Having recently written new articles on several violin concertos ( Violin Concerto (Larsson), Violin Concerto (Wirén), and Violin Concerto (Klami)), I ended up poking around the corresponding category; I noticed quickly that the every article is written differently in terms of its formatting, i.e., there is no standardization, despite the classical music MOS. In particular, I found great variation with the titles in the lede section, the formatting of the movements (i.e., when to italicize, linking to tempo marking, Arabic vs. Roman numerals, etc.). Do you think it's worth trying to standardize? Is there a Wikignome you know who would be up to the task? I am sure the piano concertos category and the symphonies category is just as bad, although I haven't inspected. When I write articles, I certainly have a particular style that I stick to and it is, to my knowledge, consistent with MOS (although perhaps I am mistaken). Anyway, your thoughts would be welcome! PS: Of late, you may have noticed, my efforts have been at start-class to C-class content creation/development, rather than working at GA's or FA's... I guess I'm feeling like coverage and moderate improvement (of existing articles) is more important than chasing shiny objects. (I remember you expressing something similar on this page to another user, but now I cannot seem to find the entry.) ~ Silence of Järvenpää 21:31, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
celebrating GW60 with a new works list, at least a start - enjoy your time away! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:09, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
I have nominated Witold Lutosławski to be today's featured article for Jan. 25. As a major contributor to the article, you are invited to share your thoughts by joining the discussion here. Z1720 ( talk) 16:55, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Aza! We didn't met here before, but I saw your impressive work on History of Music and Josquin. I never wrote FA-class article before, and the arts are not my usual theme (one of my GAs is indeed an arts biography, but it was much easier to write about Franzisca Baruch given small number of sources available), but some time ago I've decided to save El Lissitzky at FARC. I thought it would be easier, but ended up with complete article overhaul, built on a ton of new sources not used before. I know that's a lot to ask for, but you're the only experienced editor I know who's good both in FAs and in arts, and if you are interested in Lissitzky or in early Russian avant-garde art I would be grateful if you can take a look! It's not fully done (I think it's ~60-70% now), I still need to rewrite several (large) sections, but here it is: draft. Please let me know what do you think. Warmly, Artem.G ( talk) 15:35, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi Aza! Thanks for your first comments on the draft, I tried to address them. I have a lot of real life work this week, though I'll try to work on the draft too. (I have a lot of sources to read, both Nisbet's and Birnholz thesises are 500+ pages!)
Meanwhile, I have one more question for you, that's one on copyright. I'm not the biggest fan of modern copyright laws, but almost always I can at least understand them. Not this time. Lissitzky died in 1941, and it's 70+ years. Many of his works are done and published before 1927, so should also be PD. But how this can happen? MOMA says that this photo [6] is "© 2022 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn", and here they say [7] "© 2015 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn". But this work is from 1926: it's before 1927 and more than 70 years passed after the author's death! And the same question about all other MOMA images - Prouns are definetily done (published and exhibited too) before 1927, though they somehow copyrighted all of them. Can we upload such files to commons? How is it even possible to copyright the work done in 1926 to 2022? Artem.G ( talk) 06:58, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Hey, Aza, nice to see you are back! I think that my draft looks much better now - though I still need to finish Nisbet's and Birnholz's theses - it started to look as a thing. I would be very grateful if you'll have a look - do you think it can be moved to the article? I would also appreciate if you'll copyedit it a bit, as I'm not an English native speaker I write sometimes with abominable mistakes; it's also a reason why I use so many quotes - I'm aware of "close paraphrasing" and try to avoid it by quoting real experts in their own words. The hardest sections are legacy and scholarly assessment - though being a famous avantgardist, Lissitzky is rarely credited for his work at the level of his contemporaries (Chagall, Malevich, Kandinsky (and, by the way, wiki articles on them are not good at all, to say nothing)), and usually being credited as author of just a few works (The Constructor, Beat the Whites! poster, sometimes Prouns, sometimes Unovis, sometimes his Jewish works). I think the article will be the best Lissitzky overview available online (after some copyedit and polishing, incorporating the quotes, etc, etc), especially given that most books are out-of-print, PhD theses are hard to find, grove and many articles are paywalled.
How do I cite the Houhanshu commentary? I asked on the WikiProject China talk but no one answered my question. So, I guess I'm going to ask you. Mucube ( talk) 22:42, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Your work is dazzlingly beautiful. It takes my breath away. You are so wonderful - there are no words. Thank you.
Jenhawk777 ( talk) 04:50, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Milwaukee Symphony Orchestra Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Aza, if you've got time for a request, could I get a source review for this at FLC? It already has three full (ish) supports. About half the sources are ones you've already covered in previous source reviews for me. (The bizarre name is sort of explained at WP:Featured list candidates/List of lilioid family names with etymologies/archive1.) - Dank ( push to talk) 05:07, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
If so, then I wish you a merry Christmas, and if not, I wish you happy holidays, and if you don't celebrate anything, I still wish you all good things! You are deeply appreciated and valued here on WP - especially by me. Bless you, Jenhawk777 ( talk) 23:47, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
I have been waiting for a GA review for Handan Chun for quite a while now, so could you review it? Mucube ( talk • contribs) 01:45, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Merry Yuletide to you! (And a happy new year!)
~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 13:41, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension.
![]() |
Sorry for the trouble. I thought I was helping at Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors and can clearly see that I wasn't. I will do my best to not repeat my mistake and make it so that this will not occur again. -- Super Goku V ( talk) 16:07, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Sorry for delay in sending a seasons greeting, wishing the best an do follow your trials here; here is something endlessly amusing to help get past January. It's an interpretation that we in alt-rock communities might call "challenging". Ceoil ( talk) 10:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
I have nominated Chinua Achebe to be today's featured article on March 21. Please join the conversation by clicking here. Thanks, Z1720 ( talk) 02:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
... now has 3 supports at FLC, and the sources are largely the same as last time ... if you're interested in taking a look. Let me know if I can help with anything. - Dank ( push to talk) 04:38, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest, a good topic that you nominated, is at risk of being demoted due to it now requiring the article San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2022, a B-Class article. I recommend that you improve the aforementioned article, or the topic may be demoted. QuicoleJR ( talk) 23:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
The same applies to EFL Championship Play-Offs and 2022 EFL Championship Play-Off final. Please improve both articles to retain the good topics. QuicoleJR ( talk) 00:02, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() | |
happy new year |
---|
Today's featured article is Osbert Parsley, not by me but Amitchell125 where I commented, including the beginning of my songs. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 17:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
I'm on vacation, - click on songs! I tell my own stories now, instead of relying on DYK. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:12, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() | |
my daily stories |
yesterday's cantata, 300 years later -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Aza24. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Jeremy Noble (musicologist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Re this reversion of my edit. The quote well fitted the heading re the period of neglect of Mahler's music. It is a very strong polemic indeed - "paucity of ideas" - that is spectacularly at odds with more recent appraisals of Mahler's music. This is worth documenting in my opinion. The book is very rare and so this will not be visible otherwise. Yes, there are other quotes possible, some are given in the previous article sentences, but this one more example is very noteworthy. Please consider undoing your revert. Walton22 ( talk) 04:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Aza24, you deleted a well sourced and longly discussed information. Please read the RFC, and if you have nothing substantive to add, please undo your deletion. Smearus was the only one who raised discussable concerns. But in the end we found out that there are significantly more reliable sources in favour. Talk:Franz Schubert#Unsinnsgesellschaft Chip-chip-2020 ( talk) 06:51, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Aza! Just wanted to say hello and to see how you've been. Missing our chats... ~ Silence of Järvenpää 16:56, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
wow, I'm really impressed with what you did with List of Chinese monarchs! Great list, and nice to see you here again :) Artem.G ( talk) 13:28, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
I came here to say the same thing! HUGE thanks for the work you did here. You've inspired me to try and tackle the History of the administrative divisions of China before 1912 page. SilverStar54 ( talk) 20:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Chinese monarchs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emperor Shao.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() | |
my story today |
On IWD, I remember a 2016 DYK: Hana Blažíková, a Czech who sang German music in Japan. Girls and women sang how Bach arranged Pergolesi's Stabat Mater to a new text paraphrasing Psalm 51, last Sunday. - I loved improving Mary Bauermeister - on the Main page until yesterday. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi there @ Aza24, and thank you for your edits over at Igor Stravinsky. I saw your response on the talk page and realize I forgot to respond. I've since expanded the lead and made a number of changes per requests at the GAN. As for the music section, I was curious what you think can be improved. I feel that a lot of the unique and influential aspects of his music are covered under "Influence", and "Music" exists to highlight his phases of composition. Additionally, I see that you cut a chunk of information about the unique orchestration of his works. Do you think this would fit better under "Music" rather than "Influence"? MyCatIsAChonk ( talk) 00:23, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Military history reviewers' award | |
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between January and March 2023.
Hawkeye7 (
talk) via
MilHistBot (
talk) 19:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{
WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|
I read up on the contest's rationale, and I'm thoroughly convinced. I created a preliminary template to be placed on other editors' talk pages to invite them to participate. However, I've never created a template before, so I'd love some help and feedback. Check it out in my sandbox. 〜 Festucalex • talk 22:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
~~<noinclude />~
. Three tildes produces your username without a timestamp, and the noinclude prevents it from substituting until the message is substituted. Good luck with this work! Cheers, {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk 22:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
{{subst<noinclude />:REVISIONUSER}}
if you don't want custom signature formatting or talk page links. Cheers, {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk 22:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | |
my story today |
My story today is about the Alchymic Quartet, - I went away from DYK but it's the last one from last year. - The songs are about vacation, continued. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:34, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
On behalf of the FAR coordinators, thank you, Aza24! Your work on Diocletian has allowed the article to retain its featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. I hereby award you this Featured Article Save Award, or FASA. You may display this FA star upon your userpage. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Nikkimaria ( talk) 13:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | |
Three years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi there,
I was wondering if you could do a source review for 2022 Winter Olympics medal table regarding it's featured list nomination? I would appreciate the feedback.
Flowering plant families ( APG IV) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
Early-diverging flowering plants | |||||
Monocots: Alismatids • Commelinids • Lilioids | |||||
|
|||||
Eudicots
|
Hypothetically (actually not so hypothetically): If I'm trying to get an FT covering flowering plant families, and those families are generally grouped into: long-list-1, long-list-2, long-list-3, and Vitales, an order with just one family that doesn't belong to any of the first 3 lists. ... what's the best way to get the single family approved for membership in the FT? Or could the FT just consist of the 3 long lists, ignoring the one family? Or should I create a list called "List of families in long-list-3 and Vitales", even if those two groups don't have much to do with each other (aside from the fact that they're both members of the same large group called the rosids)? - Dank ( push to talk) 21:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I want to thank you for the articles about Armenian women composers. Thanks for your work. I want to translate them into Ukrainian, but I ran into a misunderstanding in the preamble.
Though her piece did not join the general šarakan liturgy, Sahakdukht's oeuvre as a whole is thought to have exerted considerable influence on subsequent šarakans; they introduced certain phrases into popular use and according to ethnomusicologist Şahan Arzruni they "helped to shape the development of the genre during subsequent centuries".
Who or what they? The subsequent šarakans? Or Sahakdukht and her brother? Or is it such a feature of the word oeuvre (like this noun is automatically plural)? Or oeuvre implies all of the šarakans of Sahakdukht? Please help me understand this fragment of text. With respect. Smpad ( talk) 17:57, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Ned Rorem you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Theepicosity --
Theepicosity (
talk) 20:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
I have nominated Concerto delle donne for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:08, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Aza24. I'm just posting to let you know that List of sculptures of Ludwig van Beethoven – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for June 2. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 00:07, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
The article
Ned Rorem you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Ned Rorem for comments about the article, and
Talk:Ned Rorem/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Theepicosity --
Theepicosity (
talk) 01:01, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
I saw your question at WP:VPT. Have a look at my js for the skin User:Nthep/vector-2022.js. The first two add links to my contributions and my talk page to the header at the top of the page (watchlist is already in that header).
The last two lines add watchlist and contribution link to the sticky header that you see as you scroll down an article. Nthep ( talk) 19:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() | |
my story today |
---|
I had a good story on coronation day: a Te Deum we sang that day. And the following day we sang it for the composer ;) - And today we remember a composer who created music especially for us! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:58, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello Aza24:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long
Good Article Editathon event in June 2023!
Running from June 1 to 30, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – another Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female climate scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning book or film by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)