![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Arcadian! First I want to thank you for uploading images from Grey's. I'm a first year student (my final gross anatomy exam is on friday) and they've been a tremendous help in learning the material. I have a few things I wanted to ask you about:
Thanks! Robotsintrouble 02:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Arcadian, I've noticed you doing a lot of useful edits to various anatomy pages. They vastly imrove the article, so I'd just like to congratulate you and ask that you keep up the great work! Please accept this cookie for your latest submission ;) -- Serephine ♠ talk - 14:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
I, Serephine, give Arcadian this cookie for excellent work on the Seminal vesicle article. 16 November 2006 (UTC) |
Hi Arcadian, reckon the squamous cell article is superfluous? They exist only in squamous epithelia and this article covers all there is to know about them. Both are stubs so why not combine them? I'll get onto it with your suggestion. -- Serephine ♠ talk - 01:38, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Is the different spelling of "vesicle" in the title and "vesical" in the actual dab entries correct? I have no idea, as I'm not a specialist, but if so, it seems odd that there's no entry at vesical arteries. Loganberry ( Talk) 03:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
A while ago I consolidated all the articles on colon subsections and redirected to colon. The intent was to put all the colon articles in one place. Why did you recreate the colon subsection sections? I am concerned that having all the sections separate will lead to the sections getting various editorial treatments and add to the work it takes to keep all the sections up to date. Steve Kd4ttc 22:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I've have some proposals to upgrade functionality and wider (less US-centric) scope of the Template:Infobox Hospital (with then a merge in of the UK-centric Template:Infobox NHS hospital). I think the additional optional parameter names are as generic and succint as I am likely to get - but I would be grateful if you could have a quick glance at the list of parameters and let me know if there are any obvious problems in the proposal. Thanks, yours David Ruben Talk 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
On a separate issue, can you advise me on how US hospitals are classified in terms of
health care system provision. Have a look at
Massachusetts General Hospital. I've set the HealthCare parameter to "Medicare" in as much as it takes Medicare patients. I suspect though that this shows my lack of understanding. For Canadian hospitals they are either Private or part of the "Public
Medicare (Canada)" system. Likewise hospitals are (or at least until the Labour giovernment started its love-affair with private hospitals) either purely Private or Public
NHS (which may have a few private beds to help support the hospital). However for US I suspect that most hospitals would be considered Private with it then up to the individual patient to arrange to pay themselves, claim on their health insurance policy, or be eligible under
Medicare (United States) - or are there quite distinct hospitals which only deal with Medicare cases ? I shall hold off updating further US Hospital articles until I can gain a better understanding of this (e.g. does HealthCare=Medicare need to show up as "Private, accepts Medicare")
David Ruben
Talk
23:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you changed the Satellite cell page to a disambiguation page. Personally I think that it should have been left as referring to muscle satellite cells. Perhaps you could have just added a disambiguation link at the top of the page to Satellite cell (glial).
The muscle cell usage is by far the most common - do a PubMed search for "satellite cell" and you'll see what I mean. Also, the intro to the new Satellite cell (muscle) page is less technically correct than the old version. Dr Aaron 02:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi again. I like the work you're doing on the embryology infobox and what appears to be a new lymphatic system template... I was wondering if there's anyplace listing the infoboxes, templates, blue boxes and so on that are relevant to the various medicine wikiprojects. I couldn't find any details about them on WP:Anatomy or WP:PCM, an expanded list of relevant templates on one of those wikiprojects would be useful but I don't know how to make such a list. Robotsintrouble 20:15, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Template:EmbryologyTemple has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Swpb talk contribs 03:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I'd appreciate your thoughts over at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Clinical_medicine#Getting_Image_Permissions_from_a_Med_School Robotsintrouble 19:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
RNA interference The
Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject's current
Collaboration of the Month article is
RNA interference. |
A colleague and I are conducting a study on health wikis. We are looking at how wikis co-construct health information and create communities. We noticed that you are a frequent contributor to Wikipedia on health topics.
Please consider taking our survey here.
This research will help wikipedia and other wikis understand how health information is co-created and used.
We are from James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Virginia. The project was approved by our university research committee and members of the Wikipedia Foundation.
Thanks, Corey 15:51, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For no less than 120 edits in the past 24 hours; and all of your hard work before — and in hope of continued aid to Wikipedia. Surely you deserve it by now. — Scouter Sig 18:05, 18 December 2006 (UTC) |
Hello Arcadian! (maybe may english isnt good-my apologise) Of course i can do that I upload to the "universal commons"". You know a mathematican said the i create good articles about muscles but an average man who know anything about anatomy cant find the muscle etc on the picture. So he said me to create arrows. I use this "technology" in every area of anatomy (muscules nerves arteris bones etc) http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Engusz
Hi again. I know you are busy with anatomy articles, but a merge between WikiProject Drugs and the newly-created WikiProject Pharmacology has been proposed on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Drugs#WikiProject Pharmacology. I would appreciate it if you could weigh in. Thanks, Fvasconcellos 01:55, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for catching those embarrassing spelling mistakes. Spent one two many hours working on that diagram :P...I will upload the corrected version at once. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 07:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello Arcadian! Its me Engusz from huwiki. Ive got some questions. Which images will you have? Only the muscles or all (nerves tubercules of bones etc)? And please create a category for the images (i dont know how to do and i dont want to create wrong categories) You can give a name for it (maybe anatomy help) And when you finish whit it please tell me the category name and i will start to upload the images. http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_vita:Engusz 20:39 Friday
Hey! Considering your involvement with merging the article Alveolar process with Alveolar process of maxilla, I would love to hear your comments about the issues I raised on the talk page. Thanks in advance. - Dozenist talk 16:26, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you just added this to the Cystic fibrosis article, {{Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic pathology}}. I just wanted to let you know that the template is redlinked and nothing shows up when you add it. I'm not sure if this is intentional (eg you plan on making it later) or not but I thought I would let you know. -- ImmortalGoddezz 23:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the edit on the {{ Food chemistry}}. As the creator of this template, it looks good! Much appreciated. Chris 21:01, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
You removed the end picture of the side lying abduction on the rotator cuff article. Your cited reason for removing this was that this picture didn't match the description or title of the exercise.
Looking back at the picture now, my arm is raise a little too high (30ish degrees) but this seems like a poor reason to remove the picture. Was there another reason for removing the picture? If not then I'll just reshoot that pic and add it soon. Porco-esphino 07:22, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The E=mc² Barnstar | |
I hereby award you this EMC² Barnstar for your numerous, high-quality contributions to biology and medicine-related articles. How you manage this while in med school baffles and awes me! delldot | talk 20:24, 10 January 2007 (UTC) |
Please add Ensembl Link: It is an important and very good european resource.
as in de:Vorlage:Infobox Protein -> Seite bearbeiten (edit this page)
and
de:Vorlage:Infobox Protein at the bottom for the link
Thank you. TraumB 00:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Peripheral membrane protein The
Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject's current
Collaboration of the Month article is
Peripheral membrane protein. |
– Clockwork Soul 18:48, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi there Arcadian. Would it be possible for an extra field to be added to {{
Protein}} that would account for more than one
PDB link, like the CAS_supplemental
field in {{
Drugbox}}?
Clostridium perfringens alpha toxin has several PDB links, and they're presently messing up the syntax. Thanks again,
Fvasconcellos
22:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Thought I did. Sorry. -- Selket 19:59, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
|
The Template Barnstar | |
Your many, many navigation templates related to human anatomy and physiology have exponentially increased the usefulness of the subjects on wikipedia. Robotsintrouble 13:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC) |
I've made an attempt to update and sort the listing of medicine navigation templates to reflect your contributions. Could you look over it? There are one or two duplicates in the mix.
I've seen other navigation templates that have links to related topics or back to a top level template in the title bar... for example, a small link at the top of "arteries of head and neck" that returns you to the template for "circulatory system". I think something along those lines to make moving around between templates easier would be really helpful... I'll try to find an existing example of what I mean. Robotsintrouble 13:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi! Its me Engusz! I uploaded some images to Gray's anatomy plates with help. I use latin names. But some images dont work. I dont know why? I continue the uploadig. I will upload all of the images what ive got. http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Engusz 2007. 01. 26. 19:03
Hi, thanks for the greeting. I have made a few changes to some articles related to inborn errors of metabolism, my area of expertise. However, I have not yet completely formated them so that they respect the medicine manual of style. What would you like me to change more precisely? Thanks. pcampeau 12:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello! Its me Engusz! All of the anatomy articles of the huwiki are from the enwiki which turn into hungarian. After this i put it to the right category. I see in lot of articales in the enwiki that it hasnt got right category. It has got only anatomy stubs. Why? And the enwiki's anatomy navigation temples havent got all the articles which are rate there. muscles of the head in huwiki huwiki 75 > enwiki 63 (I calculated fast so maybe the numbers incorrects) Engusz Thursday 01.02.2006. 23:07 (UTC)
The Encephalon Cross
For astonishing quantity of handy anatomical images added to many pages, I hearby (enviously) bequeath upon Arcadian the Encephalon Cross!
WLU
16:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you worked on Cardiac action potential, I hope you can help me with someting. An IP removed two sections a while ago with this edit. Was that a good edit or vandalism? If vandalism, should it be restored? It's not my topic at all, so I don't know part of it is already rewritten or not. Garion96 (talk) 01:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I see you are adding the chembox new to articles, thanks for that. I have been working on upgrading the chembox new, it has a new format and new fields now (and more fields to come). In the new version you can just leave the fields that you don't fill in, empty fields will simply not appear in the document. Please have a look at {{ chembox new}}. Thanks again, and hope to see you around! -- Dirk Beetstra T C 18:16, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Arcadian, could you try to (re)write the text in {{ chembox new}} on the subst-ing/transclusion in such a way that it is clear? To me it is completely transparent, but by now I am too deep into templates that I may not be able to explain it clearly anymore. Thanks! -- Dirk Beetstra T C 20:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
How did you come to the conclusion the latter was the more common spelling? - Mgm| (talk) 10:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you much! Selket Talk 23:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
I've been busy sorting through the anatomy stubs (since there are now three new stub types) and whilst doing so I noticed two things that I'd like to bring to your attention.
1. The text of duodenal bulb cuts off abruptly, but as far as I can tell it's always been that way since you first created it. I was tempted to just remove the cut-off sentence at the end, but I wasn't certain why it cut off, I thought I'd mention it to you.
2. Since you seem to do a fair bit of editing in this field, and I was leaving you the first note, I thought I'd let you know that since some of those nav templates are bit long in the tooth I've been changing some of them to default as collapsed nav boxes.
Let me know if the latter is a problem and I'll stop doing that. Caerwine Caer’s whines 23:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Why redirect strains to strain (injury) when the very title of the latter article suggests the existence of the strain disambiguation page? If someone is looking for one of the many other topics under "strain", you'd prevent them from finding it. (I've altered it so that "strains" redirects to "strain".) Michael Hardy 19:48, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Dear Arcadian, I read the solar plexus article and I was just wondering if you could please explain to me what the main function of the solar plexus is (what it does in the body). I couldn't figure it out from the article, and I apologize if my question is somehow answered in the article. Thank you. Question101 02:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
And while we are on the subject could you please tell me what nerve nodes are (or even point me to a wiki article)Thank you Question101 02:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you recently left a comment at the embryo discussion page. I'm curious. You say that the term "embryology" is usually restricted to apply to early vertebrate development, whereas an embryo is a life cycle stage found in all animals, land plants, and some algae and protists. Do you have any cite for this distinction? I had never heard of such a distinction before.
There are quite a few books and articles about "vertebrate embryology", but there are also plenty of books and articles about "invertebrate embryology". Ferrylodge 23:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for furnishing the infobox on the DAB1 page. -- CopperKettle 15:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
you replaced the free Image:Lung.png with the fairly clearnly not free Image:Lung volume.JPG. Please don't do this it makes the baby wikipe-tan cry. Geni 03:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello, there. As you may or may not know, the Miami Herald recently revealed that professional golfer Fuzzy Zoeller has filed a lawsuit against Josef Silny & Associates, Inc. for adding false statements to his Wikipedia biography.
For data gathering purposes, an SRS of 20 administrators has been created, you being one of them. I would like you to comment on this situation and its possible implications to Wikipedia, the accused company, and the general welfare of the community in general. (To what extent will this impact Wikipedia? To what extent will this impact those who use Wikipedia often? To what extent is the company guilty? Who do you believe is at fault?) Feel free to comment however you wish. I ask that you email me your responses via my emailuser page so as to reduce bias in your responses. (Again, don't post your responses on my talk page.)
The following are articles from various news agencies that you may use to inform yourself about the situation: Miami Herald, Herald Tribune, Web Pro News, The Smoking Gun.
I thank you for taking your time to express your opinion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at any time. └ Jared┘┌ talk┐ 18:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi Arcadia. Thank you for putting this nice p53 wiki. I have several questions and comments
Comments 1
As I never use any pseudo, you can see what is my name. I am professor of molecular biology ad work on p53 since 1985. I have published more than 200 papers on p53. As a matter of fact, I was a graduate student in the laboratory of P. May when he discovered p53 in the same time that Lane, Levine and Loyd. As a matter of fact, the four papers were published the same year. Although Levine, Lane and May knew that they were working on the same protein (named p53 by Lionel Crawford in 1985), it took several years to understand that the protein discovered by Old was also p53 as he had used a totally different strategy for its identification.
Perhaps it will be nice (and more accurate) to add P. May in the list of those who discovered p53.
Comments 2
Some information in the article are either too simplistic or quite outdated and could be improved:
« In unstressed cells, p53 levels are kept low through a continuous degradation of p53. A protein called Mdm2 binds to p53 and thereby transports it from the nucleus to the cytosol where it becomes degraded by the proteasome » It is now well known that at least 5 proteins regulates p53 stability
« Human p53 is 393 amino acids long and has three domains: » The current model is that p53 contains 5 domains
« increasing the amount of p53, which may initially seem a good way to treat tumors or prevent them from spreading, is in actuality not a useable method of treatment, since it can cause premature aging » This is based on one observation in an animal model. A large-scale gene therapy program has been launched in China in Head and Neck cancer. Results are very promising.
Comments 3 A picture of the p53 pathway could be included
Question 1 Last week, I made a small change to your wiki page (I add a link to the p53 web site). This web site is the most visited site on p53. I did not understand why you delete this entry?
Question 2
Do you allow commercial links in wiki pages? The last link in the p53 wiki page is exactantigen, a web page sponsored by multiple privates companies with links to their web site
Question 3 To what degree, would you allow modifications of the p53 wiki page?
Thank you again for you nice work
Thierry
Greetings, as a courtesy I'm writing to inform you of my submission for deletion these two uncessary breakout articles from the stubbish Melanotan article. ( → Netscott) 10:41, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Template:PotentialVanity has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --– Tivedshambo (talk) 16:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that your userboxes say that you speak some Spanish. I had cleaned up the article about the Seville Fair a few months ago, recently User:Saeta added several long paragraphs of raw Babelfish translation. I moved the additions to the talk page and notified the user, who subsequently asked me to translate my comments into Spanish. I don't speak enough Spanish to do this, could you translate my comments User talk:Saeta? Or just get the gist across? And let her(?) know that I did keep the map in the article, and will attempt to translate the raw Babelfish. Thanks a bunch!!!-- DO11.10 17:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
I have added a "{{
prod}}" template to the article
Blogebrity, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
RJASE1
Talk
02:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
I was wondering if I could have your assistance on something, being that you're both a med student and an admin.
I feel that the template navigation box for oral pathology is, objectively, a little skewed in terms of its content. It seems to focus on things that lay people would tend to focus on, and veers from actually including anything that would be taught in any real depth in an oral path course. Yes, User:Dozenist peppered in some technical terms that are anomoly highlights of a dental anatomy course, but in reality, it seems a little silly that the nav box categorizes and lists things in such an unsually unencyclopedic fashion. I mean the staples of dental pathology, like odontogenic keratocysts, eosinophilic ulcer, candidiasis, fibrous dysplasia and Kaposi sarcoma are either absent or put in a day or so ago by myself. However, these entities are focused on in oral path because of their extreme, diagnostic or even pathognomonic oral symptoms. At the same time, many can occur anywhere in the body. What are your thoughts about this? DRosenbach ( Talk | Contribs) 20:52, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the help. I didn't even have time to ask at WikiProject Neuroscience... :) Fvasconcellos 21:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi again. I have an issue regarding verifiability. I would like to enter some information about the relationship of a pentagram and a magic square, but the people who watch and constantly edit pentagram are being, what I feel as, too strict. So, I would instead like to place this information in the Lionel Ziprin article. However, because my information is only verified by a private personal tutorial that occurred in 1962, and I could no find anything similar on the web, I was told that this was not enough. However, I feel that this information is objectively related, whether or not the reasoning behind the relationship is to be believed; the steps to completing the magic square do in fact follow the pentagram. As I am the editor of the Ziprin page for this information, I feel that this information is not controversial enough, such that I can support it with perhaps a less than entirely adequate verifiability requirement, as most pages and bits of information fall under as well. Please let me know what you think after checking out the part about the Jewish/magic square relationship to the pentagram at the bottom of the Talk:pentagram page. DRosenbach ( Talk | Contribs) 14:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
== ERM transcription factor==
A tag has been placed on ERM transcription factor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that
administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{
hangon}}
to the page and state your intention on the article's
talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
SyBerWoLff
21:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Is your picture at Holliday junction correct? It's like this:
v^ v^ v^ / \ <<< <<< >>> >>> \ / v^ v^ v^
How do the 2 strands of each double helix move against each other?
Perhaps it should be like this:
vv vv vv / \ <<< >>> <<< >>> \ / ^^ ^^ ^^
-- Occultations 10:22, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for adding it. I was going to, but my spouse woke up right after I left the message on the talk page, so I had to tear myself away from Wikipedia for a bit. Cheers. -- Selket Talk 03:30, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
so my glycoside template I was adding to the glycoside articles in the glycoside category have been reverted.
I believe you could have discussed the possible irrelevance of the glycoside template I made on some talk page before reverting them.
ok I should have pasted just the template name in the parentheses but I have seen other articles where the entire code of a template has been pasted so I don't think that that would be a reason for reverting them either. Okyea 00:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for picking up some of my slack on Dopamine receptor. I'm slowly chipping away at the article; hopefully I can get it up to the comprehensive, useful level such a topic deserves... -- Scientizzle 19:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
I love you for starting that page. I'm a big asimov fan and had a list similar to this on my old computer. This list can now be found in a local dumpster. so thanks again.
Greetings Arcadian, I just wanted to let you know that I've reintegrated your content back into the article and I invite you to verify the reintegration. See you. ( → Netscott) 05:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
-- Carabinieri 19:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
I note that you changed the image on Biliverdin from the .jpg to the .png on the grounds that it is a better image. I am afraid I must strongly disagree. Although the .png does indeed better have better composition than the .jpg, it is inferior to the .jpg in at least three respects:
Even without the first two points, the last is enough to make the .png an image of lesser quality. DS 21:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
162.129.70.42 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
filter log ·
WHOIS ·
RDNS ·
RBLs ·
http ·
block user ·
block log)
As your aware
WP:SPAM is considered a guideline on Wikipedia. Recent
WP:SPA anon spam only account has recently inserted multiple links to the same URL, over multiple articles. Adding external links to an article for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam. Although the specific links may be allowed under some circumstances, repeatedly adding links will in most cases result in all of them being removed. Edits by
162.129.70.42 have been removed. --
Hu12
23:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I notice you do quite a few edits concerning anatomy, and so this would be a perfect question to someone who knows a lot about anatomy-related articles. On the tooth article, I have written a substantial amount of information, and I finally have gotten to the "teeth in animals" section and started wondering what I should do. Should there be a separate "teeth in animals" article that the section should show as the main article or should the majority of the content in the tooth article be moved to a "human tooth" article? What do you think? My initial instinct was to keep the article as is and make a new article about animal teeth for the section to refer to, but I did not know if most anatomy articles try to keep a certain format when addressing that issue. Your input would be appreciated. - Dozenist talk 01:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed you used to contribute to Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. I recently nominated it as the Wikipedia:Improvement Drive. I feel that it needs urgent improvement, and if you agree please vote at the Improvement Drive project page. Thanks! Thedreamdied 02:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
I just left a stronger message at Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder about the need to return the article to FAS. Prob is, it will need admin help. The original article was at FAS, and was moved to FASD. I copied most back to FAS about a month ago, but I can't solve the talk page. That is, FAS was awarded Good article *before* the move to FASD, and now FASD is incorrectly listed at Good article. I'm not sure I can get the talk page and those pieces back without admin help ? Maybe I should just manually fix the Good article, and copy the templates, but then there will be no talk page history of the GA. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:36, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
In case you want to have a look at work so far: pause for status check. I'm definitely over my head on this, but want to get it done. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 23:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
For creating lipstatin, which I just expanded a bit. I'm curious as to how you were so fast... are you, in fact, a med/chem article-creating bot? :) Best, Fvasconcellos 22:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
I, Ciar, share this tasty cookie from Serephine with Arcadian for diligent work in putting navigation templates on articles within the Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject. I couldn't get around MCB so fast without them!! Ciar 18:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC) |
re Template:Diseases of the nervous system - Wow, very impressive. It will take me a little time to work my way through such a comprehensive & extensive navigation box :-) David Ruben Talk 00:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
I agree. I note that this template isn't in a category, or mentioned on any Wikipedia/Project page. I'd like to add it to the "Navigation templates" section in WP:MEDMOS but it would be good link to a list of medical navigation templates. Colin° Talk 12:32, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
I've discovered there are categories for drug and medical navigation templates. Some of those templates weren't in the category, so I've added them. I've linked to both those categories from the WP:MEDMOS guidelines. I wonder if there is any need for Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology/Templates if we also have Category:Drug navigational boxes? (Colin)
I fixed the odd "x = y + z" bit in the above article. Now reads: The term "professional phagocytes" is sometimes used to describe macrophages and neutrophils, because these cells are considered to have phagocytosis as their primary function. [1]. I assume you intended it as a temporary marker or something and it got lost amongst all your other concerns. You're busy. It happens! Secret Squïrrel 06:50, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Let's see... first, on Wikipedia such issues are not decided by vote count - but if they were, you should take into account the debate about other eponyms on the same page, which has several more people stating that this is not useful categorization. Second, I didn't disregard your point about language, but note in counterpoint that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and that we do categorize terms in wiktionary. Third, the people who commented that you didn't recognize are people who frequently work on categories, not on medical articles. That does not, of course, give them extra weight, but it certainly isn't grounds for discounting them.
It actually boils down to what the categorization system is for: if you look up, say, Adams-Stokes syndrome in an encyclopedia, and there is a section for "related articles", would you expect that section to point you to (1) other cardiac syndromes, or (2) people named " Adams"? >Radiant< 10:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
You are waaaay too fast. :-) [2] -- David Iberri ( talk) 00:03, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi Arcadian,
I found an issue on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hormone, you actually deleted an external link: http://www.hormone.org/, this is a quote from your comments on February
"(outline long opening. also removed dead link, unrelated link, and journal reference which was not tied to article)"
well this is a recognized authoritative source related to the topic.
I'd really appreciate to see your point of view, but I strongly believe that http://www.hormone.org/ is not an "unrelated link", instead is a good source for further guidance to this topic.
Regards, Jennifer. JenniferFisher 14:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Thought you might like to know: I submitted a Featured List Nomination for this list, of which you seem to be a major author. I did some tinkering around the edges (lead, references, section headers, etc.) first. Cheers! — Turangalila talk 01:02, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
at least note protection, and the talk page should not be protected.
Hey, Arcadian! It'd be great! Boxes that need a continuous update: News, Selected image, Selected article, quotes, to-dos and projects. What are you interested in? And do you need any kind of help? Thanks in advance. NCurse work 06:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on NADH or NADPH oxidoreductases, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that
administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{
hangon}}
to the page and state your intention on the article's
talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Boricuaeddie
Talk •
Contribs •
Spread
the love!
18:33, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi there Arcadian. Is there any "easy" way to populate {{ Infobox Disease}}? I'd like to add on to aggressive NK-cell leukemia, and maybe, if there is an easy way (something similar to Diberri's template filler, or a single website where one can find the relevant information to fill in the fields) it might be worth mentioning on WP:MEDMOS, as we do for {{ Drugbox}}. Best, Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 14:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, sorry to bother you again, but could you merge Uridine diphosphate glucuronic acid and UDP glucuronic acid? They are the same compound :) Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 01:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I liked the additions to the Internal_carotid_artery article. A small point that I wondered about, really a semantic issue that I didn't want to clutter the Talk page with, and, as the same time I wanted to thank you for your additions to the article: Your wording of 'Traditional' classification I thought was interesting, but perhaps a bit unclear. Are you basing that on older anatomic texts, or a tradition of usage? I am unfamiliar with either, but that doesn't really mean anything and perhaps there are regional/national differences in teaching. Your 'traditional' classification seems similar, but not identical to the Fischer classification scheme, and I wonder if that is what you are referring to. It is an academic point, I admit. I am curious, what do the neurosurgeons/neurologists/neuroradiologists, etc, use at your institution? As an aside, and illustrative example, I was taught to call the LAD the 'anterior interventricular artery' in medical school....perhaps technically correct, but I've never heard or seen it referred to as such since then. Cheers, Felgerkarb 18:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I cannot find an article that I began a while back, Rabbi Baruch Pesach Mendelson; I am thoroughly convinced that it has been erased from existance. Could you please tell me when it was deleted, and how it was deleted without a note being placed on my talk page? Thank you. DRosenbach ( Talk | Contribs) 13:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Kindly explain why you made the revert on the additions I made to the tea tree oil page. Darladeer 09:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)darladeer
But the the BDCA-2 is a redir to a red link. Was that a goof on your part, or have you not gotten to the page it goes to?-- Whs tc hy 01:44, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I was just wondering why you decided to change this to a different format - I rather liked the old one. Is there some general guideline for how these are supposed to be designed, or did you just like that appearance better? - Rustavo Talk/ Contribs 16:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Affinity and Avidity award | |
I, Ciar, give this award to Arcadian for uniting countless immunology and immune system-related articles with wonderful navigational templates. Thanks! |
NCurse work 06:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey again. I was just curious about your effort (not that you're the only one involved) to codify disease-oriented pages and headings according to ICD-10. Is there some discussion or Wikiproject which describes the scope and guidelines of the effort? I'm not opposed or anything - it seems quite helpful - but since seems to involve a lot of changes to a lot of pages, I was just curious how it had been planned. Thanks. - Rustavo Talk/ Contribs 18:15, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
would you be mortally offended if i modified the ARR RRR template to look something more like the worked example on number needed to harm? I think its a more typical table-format for the data, followed by calculations for the statistics. Bakerstmd 05:20, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Since you obviously know more about neuroscience than I do, I wonder if you have had a look about my page of missing topics about neurology? - Skysmith 10:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks so much — I like it much better! I do have one concern, though, and I may be forced to revert back to the old one if I can't address this. The Tourette series of articles get vandalized like crazy; is it possible to make the v-d-e line go away on the collapsible template on this application, so I don't have to worry about people hitting edit there and inserting vandalism? I have enough vandalism to watch already, and this gives vandals direct access to the template on numerous articles ... if I can get rid of the v-d-e, I'd like to keep the template; otherwise, I'll go back to uncollapsible. Thanks again, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 19:12, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi there again, just thought I'd give you a heads-up that I've redirected thioctic acid to lipoic acid, as they are the same compound. I've also merged the relevant content from thioctic acid's chembox into the lipoic acid one, and noted that "thioctic acid" is an alternate name. Keep up the good work :) Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 23:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi there! Thanks for complimenting such a simple diagram!! :-D Take care, Ciar 02:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
I changed the redirect you made into an article. However, I have it written about both cation-dependent and cation-independent MPRs. Thinking about things, it might be better to move "my" CI-MPR info to Insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor, cut down what's left to a minimal bit and use {{ mainarticle}} (for example) to link to IGF-2R. There are other ways to do things, but this might be the best. What are your thoughts? Flyguy649 talk contribs 05:48, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, why the revert on Asperger's? We are hard at work preparing this article for FAR, it is frustrating when changes get reverted. CeilingCrash 20:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey, please vote in the infobox jersey number poll at Template talk:Infobox NFL player. Chris Nelson 00:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey there! Have you ever stumbled into WikiProject Viruses? I just started editing there after I found it - it would really benefit from some of your great Navboxes if you're up the the challenge! Best wishes, Ciar 22:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello Arcadian, Just wondered why you have removed all my edits? They are useful links. angelairena
Hello again,
Why do you link that they didnt relate to the "topic" of CLN3 Juvenile Batten Disease? They all had very relevant information about the symptoms and care of young people who actual suffer from Batten disease.I think some of the info on the present Wikipedia about Batten disease is very mixed up. It would be really great if somebody could spend some time getting the different forms correctly documented. Thanks
Hi Arcadian I would like to add noncompaction cardiomyopathy to the Template:Circulatory system pathology. I see other types of specific cardiomyopathies have been listed as well. Would you be ok with this.
Cheers Philbentley 09:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanx for the reformat...where can I figure out how to do this myself? I usually just copy and paste an already existing navbox from some unrelated article and change all the linked words...pretty backwards, eh? Haha...thanx. DRosenbach ( Talk | Contribs) 21:58, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Arcadian. I noticed that you performed a move and disambiguation on the page Fusion protein, a few months ago, moving that content to the page Recombinant fusion protein. I'd have to say that I don't agree with the usefulness of the current arrangement. I think the concept of a "fusion protein", as in a polypeptide whose sequence is derived from the "fusion" of sequences from two originally separate proteins, can and should be discussed on a single page. That page could include separate sections for discussing the various contexts in which fusion proteins appear (recombinant technology, naturally occurring translocations in cancer, evolution, etc) Since you created the disambig page and restricted the scope of the page to recombinant fusion protein, there really isn't an obvious page for me to link to in discussing fusion proteins in the context of translocations, and the meaningful page is now harder for others to find and link to. I've never heard of membrane fusion proteins being referred to as simply "fusion proteins", but if that is a concern, it would be simple to put an {{ otheruses4}} link to that page at the top of a restored unitary fusion protein page. Let me know if you would be amenable to the change. Thanks. - Rustavo Talk/ Contribs 04:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, when you get time could you add an info box to the HB-EGF article I just created, like you did for RET proto-oncogene. I'll expand HB-EGF some more when I get a chance cheers K.murphy 15:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you've contributed to the National Institutes of Health pages; I've started WikiProject NIH, and thought you might be interested. Check it out if you are! Cmw4117 22:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi! Can you tell me how does it looks like in latin? I can't find it anywhere and i don't learn latin. Thank you-- Engusz 01:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, please stop by Talk:Migraine if you can. We are discussing the classification of migraine as a disease or a disorder. Thank you, Postoak 01:19, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
I hate categorizing and I'm guessing you know which would be most appropriate for this article. Would you mind? WLU 18:37, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Actually, my stupid - there's already a cat on the page (pain); I think it's not the best cat but at least there's one there. Thanks! WLU 23:23, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Lipid metabolism enzymes, by
GregorB (
talk ·
contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Lipid metabolism enzymes is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see
Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Lipid metabolism enzymes, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Lipid metabolism enzymes itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
16:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
I've nominated CBIZ, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that CBIZ satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CBIZ and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of CBIZ during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BPMullins | Talk 03:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi there Arcadian. I recently stumbled across Coomassie blue in Category:Chemical pages needing a structure drawing, and wondered whether you were aware of Coomassie? I haven't redirected Coomassie blue because I thought maybe Coomassie should be merged into it. Any thoughts? Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 18:00, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I just thought I should let you know that I have proposed that Vogliatemi bene, an article you created be merged with the Butterfly article. The translation will have to be removed, as its copyright status is uncertain, and there is already a link to the libretto and a Ricordi piano score. I also disagree with many of the unsourced claims made in the article. If you wish to retain them, please add references. Regards, Alexs letterbox 09:24, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello Arcadian, it is a pleasure to see your outstanding work with so many articles. I just would like to note that proteins like Aquaporin 1 can be classified simply as "Transmembrane protein". There is no need to also include a category "Membrane biology", because all "TM proteins" belong to "Membrane proteins" who belong to "Membrane biology" anyway. The double classification seems to be redundant. Biophys 00:44, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Arcadian, are you converting inline citations by hand? If not, what is your trick? -- Una Smith 03:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
FWIW, I like the references in "vertical" format. That makes it easier to spot where the reference ends and the text begins again, so it is easier to read. -- Una Smith 14:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
In case it fell off your watchlist: Wikipedia talk:MeSH. Carcharoth 01:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
PS. Any pics or infoboxes for bulbar sheath? :-) Carcharoth 01:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi! It's been a while since the article pupilometer was written. The original user that was the author no longer exists. I don't see any references to validate the nomenclature, although there is use of it as an Ophthalmic Instrument to measure the distance between of the PD, or pupillary distance from eye to eye when fitting eyeglasses to align the optic centers of a prescription. Would you concur to changing the content of the article? I don't know what your original contribution was, but found this link to your user_talk page in the history. StationNT5Bmedia 02:16, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi! I've exhausted my knowledge on the topic for now. It's been broken down to three distinct uses for the name "pupilometer" that I know of. The third is not very common. Anyway, I arranged your contribution on top, becuase it looks the best. StationNT5Bmedia 03:19, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi Arcadian, would you mind if I indefinitely semi-protected {{ ATC}}? It's currently linked to from over 200 pages, and it just struck me that, were it vandalized, there could be some serious damage. Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 20:53, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Want to help peer review an article for me? I re wrote it in a day, obtained a GA the next, and I need much help to get it to FA status. So, want to help me and peer review Dookie for me? Thanks :) Xihix 23:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your edits to the article on Darier's Disease. Whitetrashpalace 22:50, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
I am questioning links I re-added last night to the Hodgkin's Lymphoma pages and the very next day, you deleted them. I checked with Wikipedia and they assured me the links are not against any rules. I have readded them and I would appreciate it that they remain as is. hopedreams
Hi Arcadian, thanks for adding {{Reflist|2}}
to
5-HT3 antagonist—sorry if the list was getting a bit unwieldy. I've reverted your removal of the book references because, although they had no footnotes tied to them, they actually formed the "backbone" of the article; they were used as background. Let me know if you object to this; I'll try to cite some specific facts to these sources later, but I don't have them with me right now. Best wishes,
Fvasconcellos (
t·
c)
00:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
All the diseases in your template are human diseases. Now that you've added HFM, should we remove foot and mouth, which I think is a bovine disease. Didn't want to do this without checking with you first.-- G716 14:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
NCurse work 15:58, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Your work is immensely appreciated. Wikipedia is amazing. 128.91.33.103 05:37, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
I do appreciate you adding the box, and inlines. You doing well, keep it up. Regards, Navou banter 02:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations on your templates about medicine and anatomy. I'm a medicine student from Porto Alegre, Brazil and I think they're very useful. Besides, I've translated some of them to Wikipedia in portuguese. Keep the good work, you are helping people here in Brazil, too. =) Rhcastilhos 19:11, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Do you think that ion channels and pumps should be in the "Structures of the cell membrane" template? -- Simpsons contributor 16:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Can you also shade the 3rd column of the Template:Anabolic steroids to a yet darker color than the 2nd one? I think that would look better. I'm not sure exactly how to do it. Thanks. Wikidudeman (talk) 21:12, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Hey Arcadian... tired of me yet? I was wondering if you'd mind merging CDP choline into citicoline, as they're the same compound and citicoline is the INN. You may of course replace the drugbox with {{ chembox new}} if you feel it's more appropriate. Best, Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 01:25, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I need an administrators opinion: the Peter Tishler article is written like eulogy and doesn't have the right tone. I'm pretty sure its a relative of his writing it and I think the page should be toned down a LOT. I left an NPOV notice on the author's talk page ( User:Ltishler) but they've continued to expand the page since then. How to proceed? Thanks! Roadnottaken 14:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Why did you remove summaries of many scientific studies on the Stuttering page on July 29? I can't find your Edit summary explaining why you did this.-- Tdkehoe 15:56, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
A template you created,
Template:Anatomica, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection
here and feel free to remove the {{
deprecated}}
tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Cheers. --
MZMcBride
22:42, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm banned from editing the page, and don't know what I might do in any case, but what do you think of this edit? WLU 17:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
THANK YOU for getting ride of the external links junk. I have been trying to shorten the page and this is a big step toward getting back to 50k. -- Chrispounds 14:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Dear Arcadian,
I noticed you recently moved Polynucleotide Phosphorylase to Polynucleotide phosphorylase. I have no objections to the move, but would like to ask you to check next time if there are any redirects to the article and also change those accordingly, to avoid Wikipedia:Double redirects. In this case there where 3 that I fixed now.
Cheers, -- Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 09:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Dear editor:
Given your extensive experience here on Wikipedia, I would greatly appreciate your input on the following topic:
Wikipedia: Village pump (policy)#Proposal to make a policy or guideline for lists
Thank you in advance for any thoughts you may have on the topic.
Regards,
Sidatio 15:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
hello, you've undone the changes i did to the article which were based on the fact that
14 umol bilirubin/L IS NOT 1.9 mg/dL, it's 0.82 mg/dL
that's why i changed it...
n = m/M => 14x10-6 mol x 584.7 g/mol = 8186x10-6 g = 8.19 mg/L = 0.82 mg/dL
blood chemistry reference values:
i guess there's a typo here...
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
cheers
Tomifly
10:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, could you add an infobox (and molecular structure image, if possible) for Magnesium trisilicate? Badagnani 21:58, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
Could you review my recent changes to Vein for accuracy? I'm going on my 10-year old memory of anatomy and physiology. Thanks! WLU 17:44, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. It's on my unofficial to-do list. Which never gets shorter. WLU 01:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Re: ganciclovir entry. There are many errors in the ganciclovir entry. To begin, GCV was synthesized by John Martin and Julian Verheyden at Syntex in Palo Alto. I corrected the entry to reflect this but you edited it back. Why did you do this? Ganciclovir was developed at Syntex by Julian Verheyden and myself and a team of capable people. This was likely done while you were still in diapers.
Now that I've got you wondering what the other errors are (admit it, I do don't I?) - well, one is that thymidine kinase is not involved in the metabolism of ganciclovir. This pearl will keep you busy for hours while you madly look up just how it IS metabolized, but it ain't TK, friend.
Other errors lurk .......—Preceding unsigned comment added by Cato92 ( talk • contribs)
Hi. I notice that you've recently added a lot of antiseptic stubs to WP. I had a quick look, and it seems that many of them already have articles under their correct chemical names. For example, mercuric iodide is actually Mercury(II) iodide and cetylpyridinum is actually Cetylpyridinium chloride. I've turned these two into redirects to the correct articles, but could I get you to go back and check the others? Thanks, Chris 20:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, is it normal practice to remove lists of references en bloc? That list was added to the article to demonstrate the references—as opposed to direct citations—used. I had made use of every single one of those references and had read them all. — BillC talk 16:51, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Dorsal metatarsal arteries, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.bartleby.com/107/161.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 04:49, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
For us non-doctor types, about 90% of the world, which side is which? You need to help us out:
I am guessing because I have NO idea.
Someone needs to add this to the articles.
Thanks, IP4240207xx 20:37, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
PS: My knee hurts!
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Hereditary Sensory and Autonomic Neuropathy, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Hereditary Sensory and Autonomic Neuropathy is a redirect to a non-existent page (
CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Hereditary Sensory and Autonomic Neuropathy, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.
CSDWarnBot
14:04, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
I've put the article on Oxidative phosphorylation up for FA. As this seems to be within your area of interest, any comments or suggestions at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Oxidative phosphorylation would be very welcome. All the best Tim Vickers 20:22, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
For your contributions regarding sulfonamide antibacterials. Nen yedi • ( Deeds• Talk) 23:45, 26 August 2007 (UTC) |
I could not figure out which section in Wikipedia talk:Navigational templates, in regards to Template:Sex. Thanks for being considerate in keeping my preference, but still this generic has one problem. The gap between two lines(of list) of same group is wider in "navbox generic", this makes template look cluttered. Maybe we should find a place to discuss, maybe Wikipedia:WikiProject Templates? Thanks. Lara_bran 03:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Why have you reverted the edit of the Hepatitis Australia link, and on some hepatitis pages removed the link completely? (unsigned comment from User talk:Hepatitis Australia)
Arcadian, what did this person just do, and do I want this? [8] Thanks, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:34, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support -- I look forward to working with you.
Incidentally, I have fond memories of your user name. "Arcadia" was the name we (lovingly) gave our cadaver during 1st year, precisely b/c of Et in Arcadia Ego. :-)
Djma12 ( talk) 02:05, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, following your edits on Clobutinol and being a new user please could you help. I know of a great resource related to TdP and QT/QTc but do not know if it is appropriate to add and if so how or in fact where. www.qtdrugs.org. Thanks
The page listed at gallocatechol is shown as a redirect from epigallocatechin. Ideally, this should be the other way round, because the chemical shown is the epi- form (gallocatechin would have opposite stereocenters). Epigallocatechin is the more common name. As you are an admin, please move these pages appropriately. MatthewEHarbowy 14:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Greg Kuperberg has moved Tendonitis and Achilles Tendonitis to Tendinitis for both. As a layperson I'm not sure about the difference, I'd never spell it as tendinitis but I know both spellings are accepted medically. Is there a policy, appropriate spelling, anything? Thanks, WLU 02:05, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification, much obliged. WLU 18:37, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
For the love of god, if you're going to contribute (e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Choroid_plexus&oldid=42259430), at least learn to spell the pertinent terms. It's "Magendie", not "Majendie." 130.102.42.97 02:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
The external link spammer just reverted your revert. I have issued spam warning #3. -- Una Smith 18:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Oops, spammer did it again. Spam warning #4. -- Una Smith 19:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for outlining levosalbutamol. Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 01:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, as someone who has contributed to Neuroblastoma, could you tell me what to do... my contribution was removed without debate. Should I just accept this as a fact of life, that in Wikipedia merciless edits abound? Hovea 03:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Potassium canrenoate, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/309/3/1160. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 02:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
User:Hkiessecker has added some pretty interesting stuff ( contribs), and I thought you might have something to say about it. I've already raised some of the issues I see just as an editor on his talk page, I thought you might have some medical objections to raise as well. He may also be editing anonymously, probably through ignorance rather than malice. The anon contribs are from Germany, and it looks like english is a second language. WLU 19:39, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
JFW | T@lk 11:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for the edit conflict. Feel free to remove those sources again if you like; I leave them in even if not tied to the text, but that's just me :) Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 17:24, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your excellent work exhibited on the medical pages. Hovea 14:46, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up on the PMID template - I imagine it will save me a lot of time in the future Able editor 21:06, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
You started the article Digoxin antitoxin, which I moved to a more appropriate name. I added some information to it, and I was wondering if you could check it. Thanks! bibliomaniac 1 5 23:10, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
there's a discussion going on at Talk:Muscle_contraction#Eccentric_redux and above regards the use of eccentric contraction. Could you have a gander at it? The discussion doesn't seem to be making much progress. Thanks, WLU 13:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
This permission is not compatible with GFDL: However no publisher may change content or structure of the classifcation We should not use that on Wikipedia! Look at the bottom of your screen: All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details.). ICD-10 should be removed as it is a copyvio! -- ro|3ek 23:13, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm enjoying your "stub flood" (oh it rhymes!), as I'm doing NP patrol, a welcome sight after constantly seeing test pages. Phgao 00:55, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Is there a particular reason for the choice of yellow / grey in this navbox? I thought the idea of standardising on template:navbox was to avoid having custom boxes for every subject. Is this a WikiPorject decision? Chris Cunningham 13:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
I saw there was no page which really summarized all the muscles of the human body, so I made this Table of muscles of the human body. The closest I could find before were your templates on the subject. Furthermore, I also see you've done a lot of work on templates on other organ systems, and that's exactly what I'd like to have summary pages on too, e.g. Table of arteries/veins/nerves/bones of the human body. However, before I start such a project, I was wondering if you know any such article in Wikipedia already? If there is one already, it would be pretty pointless to have another one. Your templates are kind of summarizing them, but I was rather looking for something detailed enough to be worth studying itself, and not linking to the main articles. Sure if I had time I'd like to learn everything in them, but unfortunately it's rather limited, so I'd rather have a summary. For arteries, for instance, I'd like to know just where they've come from and to where they branch or terminate. So, are there any such articles already, or do I have another project? Mikael Häggström 17:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
I deleted again this article. It was listed on Wikipedia:Copyright problems and multiple people, including some admins, agreed it was a copyright violation. You obviously don't agree with the deletion so please take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review instead of restoring it yourself without even bothering to notify the deleting admin. Garion96 (talk) 21:33, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm a new Wikipedia user and am trying to expand the article on Non-Mendelian Inheritance. I noticed that you have worked on this article in the past and was hoping you could look over my edits and offer some suggestions. Bretsam 04:21, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
75.44.207.24 22:54, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
75.44.207.24 23:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC) Arcadian - why do you continue to undo other people's edits? Seems that goes against the entire point of Wikipedia. If you are an administrator of some type, what are your professional qualifications to hold that position? Or is the required qualification only that you're willing to do it? I don't know much about how Wikipedia works but this all seems fishy to me, the result being that collegues and I do not use Wikipedia for lack of trust.
Arcadian - I would like to start to help contributing to this topic. I am on the board of directors for a charity hailey's wish and CEO of Columbus medical corporation. Why do you continue to delete a link to a charitable organization. This oranization's seol purpose is to help advance the research and treatment of this disease. Please help me here. Tell me why this is wrong. -- (from User talk:Pangaeamed, unsigned)
I think you should be very careful and cross-check the ICD-9 codes you are adding to articles with someone else (the one added to postperfusion syndrome was stunningly wrong). It's far better to have no code than an erroneous one. - Nunh-huh 00:21, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Arcadian. Thanks for removing the vandalism from the EDS page. My question to you is actually just a technical one concerning how to assess the importance of medical topics. I tried to do this for Chlamydia trachomatis, but couldn't figure out what symbols to use where, so gave up and put it under assessment of microbiology importance. Would you please be so kind as to give me a step-by-step tutorial? I've added myself to the Wiki Medicine project, and I've found the link that shows you what text you're supposed to add for creating assessments concerning pages identified as medical topics, but I must not be doing it correctly. One spot I'm probably messing up in is in the replacement of the ambigous characters. I'm assuming "Chlamydia" (without the quotation marks) goes in place of the ellipses, and "High" goes in place of the question marks. However, please note that I would be fine with your just going ahead and moving my Chlamydia assessment to the proper place immediately and waiting a bit to give me the tutorial. Frankly, I should be studying for boards at the moment, not doing this! Thanks. Walking Softly 20:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Arcardian- A professor for whom I created an extensive website on a particular (and somewhat rare) disease is interested in trying to rewrite the Wiki page on this same subject. I fear he may wish to include some of his amazing images, original figures and snippets of the text that we already created for our own site (which is presently part of the Johns Hopkins web). We also used images from the NEI, NIH (which are both free use if given proper acknowledgment) and from other authors' journal articles (for which we got permission). Though all these images, the quotations from his own journal articles, etc., make our website quite strong, I imagine that they might make copyright issues on Wiki a nightmare. In addition, even though the images and text are copyrighted elsewhere, I'm wondering if the copyright protection would be lost if they were used on Wikipedia. Should we have links to standalone pages containing the images (perhaps housed on the Johns Hopkins Web)? Should we simply write what we can and then have a single image with a link to our page so they can see they full range of images there? Your input or a redirect to someone better suited to this issue would be most appreciated. By the by, what you tell me here will be of great value in the future, as well; I would like to work on creating such pages for other diseases that are of particular interest to me. If I know how to safely use the primary research of professors and therefore am allowed to place it on Wikipedia, the quality of the resultant work will be that much higher. And don't worry; my main goal is to make ivory-tower advanced level research and clinical knowledge accessible to the common layperson, assuming an 8th-grade reading level, not a post-graduate one. Walking Softly 17:07, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Good day. I tried to add a new picture and increase the width of the infobox in Hair cell, but it's in a format I'm not familiar with. Do you know how to do it? Mikael Häggström 10:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Could you add a protein box to the Bile Salt Stimulated Lipase article? K.murphy 12:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
I changed the spelling, thanks for pointing this out to a neurological amateur like me. Could you now remove the horrible picture from which i copied the misspelling? It is Image:VexedLamina.jpg and I can see no reason for it still being displayed in the article on Rexed laminae. Thanks.-- ExpImp talk con 22:54, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
A new list of the most prolific article writers is out and you're in the top 10. See description here Raul654 16:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Template:McGrawHillAnimation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 11:39, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Template:NormanAnatomy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Collectonian 17:40, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey Arcadian. Would you mind if I removed the drugbox from this article? As it's a class article, I honestly don't see what could be placed in the drugbox—surely any individual info is better suited to individual articles, such as Lithium carbonate and Lithium orotate? :) Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 22:48, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I am so sorry right now. I saw your move of Artery of the urethral bulb to Artery of bulb of penis, and both the subject matter and the apparent grammatical mistake in the title immediately made me think of that Grawp ( talk · contribs) page move vandal which was wreaking havoc a few days ago, and blocked immediately, guessing it was one of his accounts. I'm so sorry about this. Picaroon (t) 04:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Arcadian, I was wondering if you could help me out with a template of the "vertical" kind for the Polio series of articles? I have created a mock-up version ( here), but it obviously needs to be adjusted for this series. I have no idea how to do this, and you seem to have a lot of experience in template making. I don't have any strong attachment to the design, just so long as the information is all there. Can you give me a hand? Thanks-- DO11.10 ( talk) 23:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Arcadian, could you fix Template:Pervasive_developmental_disorders for me? It makes a bunch of Mainspace pages appear in the medical navboxes category. I don't know what the proper syntax is, nor how long updates take to propagate, so maybe I fixed and maybe I didn't... -- Una Smith ( talk) 22:16, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Finally fixed the problem. It was being caused by several templates, all relating to autism. -- Una Smith ( talk) 18:23, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Question that's been kicked around before, but I was told would be best asked here: Why does {{ ICD9}} use a .com site when {{ ICD10}} uses the WHO's site? Are their ICD9 pages impossible to systematically link to, or something similar? 68.39.174.238 ( talk) 00:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Arcadian. IMHO methanol does not belong to the primary alcohols, as the carbon, where the OH-group is attached to, has no bond to another carbon (unlike e.g. ethanol). -- Leyo ( talk) 18:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Do you think you could indef block User:Basicsharingwatuknow!? They haven't improved since your last block. P4k ( talk) 10:22, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of MT-TL1, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.geneclinics.org/profiles/melas/details.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 23:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your addition to the reference to the history of trigonocephaly. I have a question...do you know where I can get a copy of the medical journal you referenced? You see, the girl they operated on in 1962 was actually my mother. We have been trying to find anything about her surgery, since my grandparents don't remember much, especially since my grandfather was in the military. Thanks!!!
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Arcadian! First I want to thank you for uploading images from Grey's. I'm a first year student (my final gross anatomy exam is on friday) and they've been a tremendous help in learning the material. I have a few things I wanted to ask you about:
Thanks! Robotsintrouble 02:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Arcadian, I've noticed you doing a lot of useful edits to various anatomy pages. They vastly imrove the article, so I'd just like to congratulate you and ask that you keep up the great work! Please accept this cookie for your latest submission ;) -- Serephine ♠ talk - 14:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
I, Serephine, give Arcadian this cookie for excellent work on the Seminal vesicle article. 16 November 2006 (UTC) |
Hi Arcadian, reckon the squamous cell article is superfluous? They exist only in squamous epithelia and this article covers all there is to know about them. Both are stubs so why not combine them? I'll get onto it with your suggestion. -- Serephine ♠ talk - 01:38, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Is the different spelling of "vesicle" in the title and "vesical" in the actual dab entries correct? I have no idea, as I'm not a specialist, but if so, it seems odd that there's no entry at vesical arteries. Loganberry ( Talk) 03:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
A while ago I consolidated all the articles on colon subsections and redirected to colon. The intent was to put all the colon articles in one place. Why did you recreate the colon subsection sections? I am concerned that having all the sections separate will lead to the sections getting various editorial treatments and add to the work it takes to keep all the sections up to date. Steve Kd4ttc 22:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I've have some proposals to upgrade functionality and wider (less US-centric) scope of the Template:Infobox Hospital (with then a merge in of the UK-centric Template:Infobox NHS hospital). I think the additional optional parameter names are as generic and succint as I am likely to get - but I would be grateful if you could have a quick glance at the list of parameters and let me know if there are any obvious problems in the proposal. Thanks, yours David Ruben Talk 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
On a separate issue, can you advise me on how US hospitals are classified in terms of
health care system provision. Have a look at
Massachusetts General Hospital. I've set the HealthCare parameter to "Medicare" in as much as it takes Medicare patients. I suspect though that this shows my lack of understanding. For Canadian hospitals they are either Private or part of the "Public
Medicare (Canada)" system. Likewise hospitals are (or at least until the Labour giovernment started its love-affair with private hospitals) either purely Private or Public
NHS (which may have a few private beds to help support the hospital). However for US I suspect that most hospitals would be considered Private with it then up to the individual patient to arrange to pay themselves, claim on their health insurance policy, or be eligible under
Medicare (United States) - or are there quite distinct hospitals which only deal with Medicare cases ? I shall hold off updating further US Hospital articles until I can gain a better understanding of this (e.g. does HealthCare=Medicare need to show up as "Private, accepts Medicare")
David Ruben
Talk
23:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you changed the Satellite cell page to a disambiguation page. Personally I think that it should have been left as referring to muscle satellite cells. Perhaps you could have just added a disambiguation link at the top of the page to Satellite cell (glial).
The muscle cell usage is by far the most common - do a PubMed search for "satellite cell" and you'll see what I mean. Also, the intro to the new Satellite cell (muscle) page is less technically correct than the old version. Dr Aaron 02:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi again. I like the work you're doing on the embryology infobox and what appears to be a new lymphatic system template... I was wondering if there's anyplace listing the infoboxes, templates, blue boxes and so on that are relevant to the various medicine wikiprojects. I couldn't find any details about them on WP:Anatomy or WP:PCM, an expanded list of relevant templates on one of those wikiprojects would be useful but I don't know how to make such a list. Robotsintrouble 20:15, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Template:EmbryologyTemple has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Swpb talk contribs 03:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I'd appreciate your thoughts over at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Clinical_medicine#Getting_Image_Permissions_from_a_Med_School Robotsintrouble 19:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
RNA interference The
Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject's current
Collaboration of the Month article is
RNA interference. |
A colleague and I are conducting a study on health wikis. We are looking at how wikis co-construct health information and create communities. We noticed that you are a frequent contributor to Wikipedia on health topics.
Please consider taking our survey here.
This research will help wikipedia and other wikis understand how health information is co-created and used.
We are from James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Virginia. The project was approved by our university research committee and members of the Wikipedia Foundation.
Thanks, Corey 15:51, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For no less than 120 edits in the past 24 hours; and all of your hard work before — and in hope of continued aid to Wikipedia. Surely you deserve it by now. — Scouter Sig 18:05, 18 December 2006 (UTC) |
Hello Arcadian! (maybe may english isnt good-my apologise) Of course i can do that I upload to the "universal commons"". You know a mathematican said the i create good articles about muscles but an average man who know anything about anatomy cant find the muscle etc on the picture. So he said me to create arrows. I use this "technology" in every area of anatomy (muscules nerves arteris bones etc) http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Engusz
Hi again. I know you are busy with anatomy articles, but a merge between WikiProject Drugs and the newly-created WikiProject Pharmacology has been proposed on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Drugs#WikiProject Pharmacology. I would appreciate it if you could weigh in. Thanks, Fvasconcellos 01:55, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for catching those embarrassing spelling mistakes. Spent one two many hours working on that diagram :P...I will upload the corrected version at once. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 07:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello Arcadian! Its me Engusz from huwiki. Ive got some questions. Which images will you have? Only the muscles or all (nerves tubercules of bones etc)? And please create a category for the images (i dont know how to do and i dont want to create wrong categories) You can give a name for it (maybe anatomy help) And when you finish whit it please tell me the category name and i will start to upload the images. http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_vita:Engusz 20:39 Friday
Hey! Considering your involvement with merging the article Alveolar process with Alveolar process of maxilla, I would love to hear your comments about the issues I raised on the talk page. Thanks in advance. - Dozenist talk 16:26, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you just added this to the Cystic fibrosis article, {{Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic pathology}}. I just wanted to let you know that the template is redlinked and nothing shows up when you add it. I'm not sure if this is intentional (eg you plan on making it later) or not but I thought I would let you know. -- ImmortalGoddezz 23:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the edit on the {{ Food chemistry}}. As the creator of this template, it looks good! Much appreciated. Chris 21:01, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
You removed the end picture of the side lying abduction on the rotator cuff article. Your cited reason for removing this was that this picture didn't match the description or title of the exercise.
Looking back at the picture now, my arm is raise a little too high (30ish degrees) but this seems like a poor reason to remove the picture. Was there another reason for removing the picture? If not then I'll just reshoot that pic and add it soon. Porco-esphino 07:22, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The E=mc² Barnstar | |
I hereby award you this EMC² Barnstar for your numerous, high-quality contributions to biology and medicine-related articles. How you manage this while in med school baffles and awes me! delldot | talk 20:24, 10 January 2007 (UTC) |
Please add Ensembl Link: It is an important and very good european resource.
as in de:Vorlage:Infobox Protein -> Seite bearbeiten (edit this page)
and
de:Vorlage:Infobox Protein at the bottom for the link
Thank you. TraumB 00:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Peripheral membrane protein The
Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject's current
Collaboration of the Month article is
Peripheral membrane protein. |
– Clockwork Soul 18:48, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi there Arcadian. Would it be possible for an extra field to be added to {{
Protein}} that would account for more than one
PDB link, like the CAS_supplemental
field in {{
Drugbox}}?
Clostridium perfringens alpha toxin has several PDB links, and they're presently messing up the syntax. Thanks again,
Fvasconcellos
22:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Thought I did. Sorry. -- Selket 19:59, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
|
The Template Barnstar | |
Your many, many navigation templates related to human anatomy and physiology have exponentially increased the usefulness of the subjects on wikipedia. Robotsintrouble 13:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC) |
I've made an attempt to update and sort the listing of medicine navigation templates to reflect your contributions. Could you look over it? There are one or two duplicates in the mix.
I've seen other navigation templates that have links to related topics or back to a top level template in the title bar... for example, a small link at the top of "arteries of head and neck" that returns you to the template for "circulatory system". I think something along those lines to make moving around between templates easier would be really helpful... I'll try to find an existing example of what I mean. Robotsintrouble 13:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi! Its me Engusz! I uploaded some images to Gray's anatomy plates with help. I use latin names. But some images dont work. I dont know why? I continue the uploadig. I will upload all of the images what ive got. http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Engusz 2007. 01. 26. 19:03
Hi, thanks for the greeting. I have made a few changes to some articles related to inborn errors of metabolism, my area of expertise. However, I have not yet completely formated them so that they respect the medicine manual of style. What would you like me to change more precisely? Thanks. pcampeau 12:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello! Its me Engusz! All of the anatomy articles of the huwiki are from the enwiki which turn into hungarian. After this i put it to the right category. I see in lot of articales in the enwiki that it hasnt got right category. It has got only anatomy stubs. Why? And the enwiki's anatomy navigation temples havent got all the articles which are rate there. muscles of the head in huwiki huwiki 75 > enwiki 63 (I calculated fast so maybe the numbers incorrects) Engusz Thursday 01.02.2006. 23:07 (UTC)
The Encephalon Cross
For astonishing quantity of handy anatomical images added to many pages, I hearby (enviously) bequeath upon Arcadian the Encephalon Cross!
WLU
16:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you worked on Cardiac action potential, I hope you can help me with someting. An IP removed two sections a while ago with this edit. Was that a good edit or vandalism? If vandalism, should it be restored? It's not my topic at all, so I don't know part of it is already rewritten or not. Garion96 (talk) 01:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I see you are adding the chembox new to articles, thanks for that. I have been working on upgrading the chembox new, it has a new format and new fields now (and more fields to come). In the new version you can just leave the fields that you don't fill in, empty fields will simply not appear in the document. Please have a look at {{ chembox new}}. Thanks again, and hope to see you around! -- Dirk Beetstra T C 18:16, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Arcadian, could you try to (re)write the text in {{ chembox new}} on the subst-ing/transclusion in such a way that it is clear? To me it is completely transparent, but by now I am too deep into templates that I may not be able to explain it clearly anymore. Thanks! -- Dirk Beetstra T C 20:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
How did you come to the conclusion the latter was the more common spelling? - Mgm| (talk) 10:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you much! Selket Talk 23:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
I've been busy sorting through the anatomy stubs (since there are now three new stub types) and whilst doing so I noticed two things that I'd like to bring to your attention.
1. The text of duodenal bulb cuts off abruptly, but as far as I can tell it's always been that way since you first created it. I was tempted to just remove the cut-off sentence at the end, but I wasn't certain why it cut off, I thought I'd mention it to you.
2. Since you seem to do a fair bit of editing in this field, and I was leaving you the first note, I thought I'd let you know that since some of those nav templates are bit long in the tooth I've been changing some of them to default as collapsed nav boxes.
Let me know if the latter is a problem and I'll stop doing that. Caerwine Caer’s whines 23:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Why redirect strains to strain (injury) when the very title of the latter article suggests the existence of the strain disambiguation page? If someone is looking for one of the many other topics under "strain", you'd prevent them from finding it. (I've altered it so that "strains" redirects to "strain".) Michael Hardy 19:48, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Dear Arcadian, I read the solar plexus article and I was just wondering if you could please explain to me what the main function of the solar plexus is (what it does in the body). I couldn't figure it out from the article, and I apologize if my question is somehow answered in the article. Thank you. Question101 02:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
And while we are on the subject could you please tell me what nerve nodes are (or even point me to a wiki article)Thank you Question101 02:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you recently left a comment at the embryo discussion page. I'm curious. You say that the term "embryology" is usually restricted to apply to early vertebrate development, whereas an embryo is a life cycle stage found in all animals, land plants, and some algae and protists. Do you have any cite for this distinction? I had never heard of such a distinction before.
There are quite a few books and articles about "vertebrate embryology", but there are also plenty of books and articles about "invertebrate embryology". Ferrylodge 23:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for furnishing the infobox on the DAB1 page. -- CopperKettle 15:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
you replaced the free Image:Lung.png with the fairly clearnly not free Image:Lung volume.JPG. Please don't do this it makes the baby wikipe-tan cry. Geni 03:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello, there. As you may or may not know, the Miami Herald recently revealed that professional golfer Fuzzy Zoeller has filed a lawsuit against Josef Silny & Associates, Inc. for adding false statements to his Wikipedia biography.
For data gathering purposes, an SRS of 20 administrators has been created, you being one of them. I would like you to comment on this situation and its possible implications to Wikipedia, the accused company, and the general welfare of the community in general. (To what extent will this impact Wikipedia? To what extent will this impact those who use Wikipedia often? To what extent is the company guilty? Who do you believe is at fault?) Feel free to comment however you wish. I ask that you email me your responses via my emailuser page so as to reduce bias in your responses. (Again, don't post your responses on my talk page.)
The following are articles from various news agencies that you may use to inform yourself about the situation: Miami Herald, Herald Tribune, Web Pro News, The Smoking Gun.
I thank you for taking your time to express your opinion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at any time. └ Jared┘┌ talk┐ 18:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi Arcadia. Thank you for putting this nice p53 wiki. I have several questions and comments
Comments 1
As I never use any pseudo, you can see what is my name. I am professor of molecular biology ad work on p53 since 1985. I have published more than 200 papers on p53. As a matter of fact, I was a graduate student in the laboratory of P. May when he discovered p53 in the same time that Lane, Levine and Loyd. As a matter of fact, the four papers were published the same year. Although Levine, Lane and May knew that they were working on the same protein (named p53 by Lionel Crawford in 1985), it took several years to understand that the protein discovered by Old was also p53 as he had used a totally different strategy for its identification.
Perhaps it will be nice (and more accurate) to add P. May in the list of those who discovered p53.
Comments 2
Some information in the article are either too simplistic or quite outdated and could be improved:
« In unstressed cells, p53 levels are kept low through a continuous degradation of p53. A protein called Mdm2 binds to p53 and thereby transports it from the nucleus to the cytosol where it becomes degraded by the proteasome » It is now well known that at least 5 proteins regulates p53 stability
« Human p53 is 393 amino acids long and has three domains: » The current model is that p53 contains 5 domains
« increasing the amount of p53, which may initially seem a good way to treat tumors or prevent them from spreading, is in actuality not a useable method of treatment, since it can cause premature aging » This is based on one observation in an animal model. A large-scale gene therapy program has been launched in China in Head and Neck cancer. Results are very promising.
Comments 3 A picture of the p53 pathway could be included
Question 1 Last week, I made a small change to your wiki page (I add a link to the p53 web site). This web site is the most visited site on p53. I did not understand why you delete this entry?
Question 2
Do you allow commercial links in wiki pages? The last link in the p53 wiki page is exactantigen, a web page sponsored by multiple privates companies with links to their web site
Question 3 To what degree, would you allow modifications of the p53 wiki page?
Thank you again for you nice work
Thierry
Greetings, as a courtesy I'm writing to inform you of my submission for deletion these two uncessary breakout articles from the stubbish Melanotan article. ( → Netscott) 10:41, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Template:PotentialVanity has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --– Tivedshambo (talk) 16:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that your userboxes say that you speak some Spanish. I had cleaned up the article about the Seville Fair a few months ago, recently User:Saeta added several long paragraphs of raw Babelfish translation. I moved the additions to the talk page and notified the user, who subsequently asked me to translate my comments into Spanish. I don't speak enough Spanish to do this, could you translate my comments User talk:Saeta? Or just get the gist across? And let her(?) know that I did keep the map in the article, and will attempt to translate the raw Babelfish. Thanks a bunch!!!-- DO11.10 17:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
I have added a "{{
prod}}" template to the article
Blogebrity, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
RJASE1
Talk
02:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
I was wondering if I could have your assistance on something, being that you're both a med student and an admin.
I feel that the template navigation box for oral pathology is, objectively, a little skewed in terms of its content. It seems to focus on things that lay people would tend to focus on, and veers from actually including anything that would be taught in any real depth in an oral path course. Yes, User:Dozenist peppered in some technical terms that are anomoly highlights of a dental anatomy course, but in reality, it seems a little silly that the nav box categorizes and lists things in such an unsually unencyclopedic fashion. I mean the staples of dental pathology, like odontogenic keratocysts, eosinophilic ulcer, candidiasis, fibrous dysplasia and Kaposi sarcoma are either absent or put in a day or so ago by myself. However, these entities are focused on in oral path because of their extreme, diagnostic or even pathognomonic oral symptoms. At the same time, many can occur anywhere in the body. What are your thoughts about this? DRosenbach ( Talk | Contribs) 20:52, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the help. I didn't even have time to ask at WikiProject Neuroscience... :) Fvasconcellos 21:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi again. I have an issue regarding verifiability. I would like to enter some information about the relationship of a pentagram and a magic square, but the people who watch and constantly edit pentagram are being, what I feel as, too strict. So, I would instead like to place this information in the Lionel Ziprin article. However, because my information is only verified by a private personal tutorial that occurred in 1962, and I could no find anything similar on the web, I was told that this was not enough. However, I feel that this information is objectively related, whether or not the reasoning behind the relationship is to be believed; the steps to completing the magic square do in fact follow the pentagram. As I am the editor of the Ziprin page for this information, I feel that this information is not controversial enough, such that I can support it with perhaps a less than entirely adequate verifiability requirement, as most pages and bits of information fall under as well. Please let me know what you think after checking out the part about the Jewish/magic square relationship to the pentagram at the bottom of the Talk:pentagram page. DRosenbach ( Talk | Contribs) 14:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
== ERM transcription factor==
A tag has been placed on ERM transcription factor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that
administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{
hangon}}
to the page and state your intention on the article's
talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
SyBerWoLff
21:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Is your picture at Holliday junction correct? It's like this:
v^ v^ v^ / \ <<< <<< >>> >>> \ / v^ v^ v^
How do the 2 strands of each double helix move against each other?
Perhaps it should be like this:
vv vv vv / \ <<< >>> <<< >>> \ / ^^ ^^ ^^
-- Occultations 10:22, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for adding it. I was going to, but my spouse woke up right after I left the message on the talk page, so I had to tear myself away from Wikipedia for a bit. Cheers. -- Selket Talk 03:30, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
so my glycoside template I was adding to the glycoside articles in the glycoside category have been reverted.
I believe you could have discussed the possible irrelevance of the glycoside template I made on some talk page before reverting them.
ok I should have pasted just the template name in the parentheses but I have seen other articles where the entire code of a template has been pasted so I don't think that that would be a reason for reverting them either. Okyea 00:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for picking up some of my slack on Dopamine receptor. I'm slowly chipping away at the article; hopefully I can get it up to the comprehensive, useful level such a topic deserves... -- Scientizzle 19:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
I love you for starting that page. I'm a big asimov fan and had a list similar to this on my old computer. This list can now be found in a local dumpster. so thanks again.
Greetings Arcadian, I just wanted to let you know that I've reintegrated your content back into the article and I invite you to verify the reintegration. See you. ( → Netscott) 05:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
-- Carabinieri 19:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
I note that you changed the image on Biliverdin from the .jpg to the .png on the grounds that it is a better image. I am afraid I must strongly disagree. Although the .png does indeed better have better composition than the .jpg, it is inferior to the .jpg in at least three respects:
Even without the first two points, the last is enough to make the .png an image of lesser quality. DS 21:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
162.129.70.42 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
filter log ·
WHOIS ·
RDNS ·
RBLs ·
http ·
block user ·
block log)
As your aware
WP:SPAM is considered a guideline on Wikipedia. Recent
WP:SPA anon spam only account has recently inserted multiple links to the same URL, over multiple articles. Adding external links to an article for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam. Although the specific links may be allowed under some circumstances, repeatedly adding links will in most cases result in all of them being removed. Edits by
162.129.70.42 have been removed. --
Hu12
23:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I notice you do quite a few edits concerning anatomy, and so this would be a perfect question to someone who knows a lot about anatomy-related articles. On the tooth article, I have written a substantial amount of information, and I finally have gotten to the "teeth in animals" section and started wondering what I should do. Should there be a separate "teeth in animals" article that the section should show as the main article or should the majority of the content in the tooth article be moved to a "human tooth" article? What do you think? My initial instinct was to keep the article as is and make a new article about animal teeth for the section to refer to, but I did not know if most anatomy articles try to keep a certain format when addressing that issue. Your input would be appreciated. - Dozenist talk 01:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed you used to contribute to Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. I recently nominated it as the Wikipedia:Improvement Drive. I feel that it needs urgent improvement, and if you agree please vote at the Improvement Drive project page. Thanks! Thedreamdied 02:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
I just left a stronger message at Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder about the need to return the article to FAS. Prob is, it will need admin help. The original article was at FAS, and was moved to FASD. I copied most back to FAS about a month ago, but I can't solve the talk page. That is, FAS was awarded Good article *before* the move to FASD, and now FASD is incorrectly listed at Good article. I'm not sure I can get the talk page and those pieces back without admin help ? Maybe I should just manually fix the Good article, and copy the templates, but then there will be no talk page history of the GA. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:36, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
In case you want to have a look at work so far: pause for status check. I'm definitely over my head on this, but want to get it done. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 23:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
For creating lipstatin, which I just expanded a bit. I'm curious as to how you were so fast... are you, in fact, a med/chem article-creating bot? :) Best, Fvasconcellos 22:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
I, Ciar, share this tasty cookie from Serephine with Arcadian for diligent work in putting navigation templates on articles within the Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject. I couldn't get around MCB so fast without them!! Ciar 18:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC) |
re Template:Diseases of the nervous system - Wow, very impressive. It will take me a little time to work my way through such a comprehensive & extensive navigation box :-) David Ruben Talk 00:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
I agree. I note that this template isn't in a category, or mentioned on any Wikipedia/Project page. I'd like to add it to the "Navigation templates" section in WP:MEDMOS but it would be good link to a list of medical navigation templates. Colin° Talk 12:32, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
I've discovered there are categories for drug and medical navigation templates. Some of those templates weren't in the category, so I've added them. I've linked to both those categories from the WP:MEDMOS guidelines. I wonder if there is any need for Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology/Templates if we also have Category:Drug navigational boxes? (Colin)
I fixed the odd "x = y + z" bit in the above article. Now reads: The term "professional phagocytes" is sometimes used to describe macrophages and neutrophils, because these cells are considered to have phagocytosis as their primary function. [1]. I assume you intended it as a temporary marker or something and it got lost amongst all your other concerns. You're busy. It happens! Secret Squïrrel 06:50, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Let's see... first, on Wikipedia such issues are not decided by vote count - but if they were, you should take into account the debate about other eponyms on the same page, which has several more people stating that this is not useful categorization. Second, I didn't disregard your point about language, but note in counterpoint that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and that we do categorize terms in wiktionary. Third, the people who commented that you didn't recognize are people who frequently work on categories, not on medical articles. That does not, of course, give them extra weight, but it certainly isn't grounds for discounting them.
It actually boils down to what the categorization system is for: if you look up, say, Adams-Stokes syndrome in an encyclopedia, and there is a section for "related articles", would you expect that section to point you to (1) other cardiac syndromes, or (2) people named " Adams"? >Radiant< 10:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
You are waaaay too fast. :-) [2] -- David Iberri ( talk) 00:03, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi Arcadian,
I found an issue on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hormone, you actually deleted an external link: http://www.hormone.org/, this is a quote from your comments on February
"(outline long opening. also removed dead link, unrelated link, and journal reference which was not tied to article)"
well this is a recognized authoritative source related to the topic.
I'd really appreciate to see your point of view, but I strongly believe that http://www.hormone.org/ is not an "unrelated link", instead is a good source for further guidance to this topic.
Regards, Jennifer. JenniferFisher 14:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Thought you might like to know: I submitted a Featured List Nomination for this list, of which you seem to be a major author. I did some tinkering around the edges (lead, references, section headers, etc.) first. Cheers! — Turangalila talk 01:02, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
at least note protection, and the talk page should not be protected.
Hey, Arcadian! It'd be great! Boxes that need a continuous update: News, Selected image, Selected article, quotes, to-dos and projects. What are you interested in? And do you need any kind of help? Thanks in advance. NCurse work 06:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on NADH or NADPH oxidoreductases, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that
administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{
hangon}}
to the page and state your intention on the article's
talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Boricuaeddie
Talk •
Contribs •
Spread
the love!
18:33, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi there Arcadian. Is there any "easy" way to populate {{ Infobox Disease}}? I'd like to add on to aggressive NK-cell leukemia, and maybe, if there is an easy way (something similar to Diberri's template filler, or a single website where one can find the relevant information to fill in the fields) it might be worth mentioning on WP:MEDMOS, as we do for {{ Drugbox}}. Best, Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 14:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, sorry to bother you again, but could you merge Uridine diphosphate glucuronic acid and UDP glucuronic acid? They are the same compound :) Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 01:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I liked the additions to the Internal_carotid_artery article. A small point that I wondered about, really a semantic issue that I didn't want to clutter the Talk page with, and, as the same time I wanted to thank you for your additions to the article: Your wording of 'Traditional' classification I thought was interesting, but perhaps a bit unclear. Are you basing that on older anatomic texts, or a tradition of usage? I am unfamiliar with either, but that doesn't really mean anything and perhaps there are regional/national differences in teaching. Your 'traditional' classification seems similar, but not identical to the Fischer classification scheme, and I wonder if that is what you are referring to. It is an academic point, I admit. I am curious, what do the neurosurgeons/neurologists/neuroradiologists, etc, use at your institution? As an aside, and illustrative example, I was taught to call the LAD the 'anterior interventricular artery' in medical school....perhaps technically correct, but I've never heard or seen it referred to as such since then. Cheers, Felgerkarb 18:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I cannot find an article that I began a while back, Rabbi Baruch Pesach Mendelson; I am thoroughly convinced that it has been erased from existance. Could you please tell me when it was deleted, and how it was deleted without a note being placed on my talk page? Thank you. DRosenbach ( Talk | Contribs) 13:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Kindly explain why you made the revert on the additions I made to the tea tree oil page. Darladeer 09:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)darladeer
But the the BDCA-2 is a redir to a red link. Was that a goof on your part, or have you not gotten to the page it goes to?-- Whs tc hy 01:44, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I was just wondering why you decided to change this to a different format - I rather liked the old one. Is there some general guideline for how these are supposed to be designed, or did you just like that appearance better? - Rustavo Talk/ Contribs 16:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Affinity and Avidity award | |
I, Ciar, give this award to Arcadian for uniting countless immunology and immune system-related articles with wonderful navigational templates. Thanks! |
NCurse work 06:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey again. I was just curious about your effort (not that you're the only one involved) to codify disease-oriented pages and headings according to ICD-10. Is there some discussion or Wikiproject which describes the scope and guidelines of the effort? I'm not opposed or anything - it seems quite helpful - but since seems to involve a lot of changes to a lot of pages, I was just curious how it had been planned. Thanks. - Rustavo Talk/ Contribs 18:15, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
would you be mortally offended if i modified the ARR RRR template to look something more like the worked example on number needed to harm? I think its a more typical table-format for the data, followed by calculations for the statistics. Bakerstmd 05:20, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Since you obviously know more about neuroscience than I do, I wonder if you have had a look about my page of missing topics about neurology? - Skysmith 10:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks so much — I like it much better! I do have one concern, though, and I may be forced to revert back to the old one if I can't address this. The Tourette series of articles get vandalized like crazy; is it possible to make the v-d-e line go away on the collapsible template on this application, so I don't have to worry about people hitting edit there and inserting vandalism? I have enough vandalism to watch already, and this gives vandals direct access to the template on numerous articles ... if I can get rid of the v-d-e, I'd like to keep the template; otherwise, I'll go back to uncollapsible. Thanks again, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 19:12, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi there again, just thought I'd give you a heads-up that I've redirected thioctic acid to lipoic acid, as they are the same compound. I've also merged the relevant content from thioctic acid's chembox into the lipoic acid one, and noted that "thioctic acid" is an alternate name. Keep up the good work :) Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 23:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi there! Thanks for complimenting such a simple diagram!! :-D Take care, Ciar 02:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
I changed the redirect you made into an article. However, I have it written about both cation-dependent and cation-independent MPRs. Thinking about things, it might be better to move "my" CI-MPR info to Insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor, cut down what's left to a minimal bit and use {{ mainarticle}} (for example) to link to IGF-2R. There are other ways to do things, but this might be the best. What are your thoughts? Flyguy649 talk contribs 05:48, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, why the revert on Asperger's? We are hard at work preparing this article for FAR, it is frustrating when changes get reverted. CeilingCrash 20:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey, please vote in the infobox jersey number poll at Template talk:Infobox NFL player. Chris Nelson 00:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey there! Have you ever stumbled into WikiProject Viruses? I just started editing there after I found it - it would really benefit from some of your great Navboxes if you're up the the challenge! Best wishes, Ciar 22:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello Arcadian, Just wondered why you have removed all my edits? They are useful links. angelairena
Hello again,
Why do you link that they didnt relate to the "topic" of CLN3 Juvenile Batten Disease? They all had very relevant information about the symptoms and care of young people who actual suffer from Batten disease.I think some of the info on the present Wikipedia about Batten disease is very mixed up. It would be really great if somebody could spend some time getting the different forms correctly documented. Thanks
Hi Arcadian I would like to add noncompaction cardiomyopathy to the Template:Circulatory system pathology. I see other types of specific cardiomyopathies have been listed as well. Would you be ok with this.
Cheers Philbentley 09:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanx for the reformat...where can I figure out how to do this myself? I usually just copy and paste an already existing navbox from some unrelated article and change all the linked words...pretty backwards, eh? Haha...thanx. DRosenbach ( Talk | Contribs) 21:58, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Arcadian. I noticed that you performed a move and disambiguation on the page Fusion protein, a few months ago, moving that content to the page Recombinant fusion protein. I'd have to say that I don't agree with the usefulness of the current arrangement. I think the concept of a "fusion protein", as in a polypeptide whose sequence is derived from the "fusion" of sequences from two originally separate proteins, can and should be discussed on a single page. That page could include separate sections for discussing the various contexts in which fusion proteins appear (recombinant technology, naturally occurring translocations in cancer, evolution, etc) Since you created the disambig page and restricted the scope of the page to recombinant fusion protein, there really isn't an obvious page for me to link to in discussing fusion proteins in the context of translocations, and the meaningful page is now harder for others to find and link to. I've never heard of membrane fusion proteins being referred to as simply "fusion proteins", but if that is a concern, it would be simple to put an {{ otheruses4}} link to that page at the top of a restored unitary fusion protein page. Let me know if you would be amenable to the change. Thanks. - Rustavo Talk/ Contribs 04:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, when you get time could you add an info box to the HB-EGF article I just created, like you did for RET proto-oncogene. I'll expand HB-EGF some more when I get a chance cheers K.murphy 15:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you've contributed to the National Institutes of Health pages; I've started WikiProject NIH, and thought you might be interested. Check it out if you are! Cmw4117 22:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi! Can you tell me how does it looks like in latin? I can't find it anywhere and i don't learn latin. Thank you-- Engusz 01:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, please stop by Talk:Migraine if you can. We are discussing the classification of migraine as a disease or a disorder. Thank you, Postoak 01:19, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
I hate categorizing and I'm guessing you know which would be most appropriate for this article. Would you mind? WLU 18:37, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Actually, my stupid - there's already a cat on the page (pain); I think it's not the best cat but at least there's one there. Thanks! WLU 23:23, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Lipid metabolism enzymes, by
GregorB (
talk ·
contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Lipid metabolism enzymes is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see
Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Lipid metabolism enzymes, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Lipid metabolism enzymes itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
16:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
I've nominated CBIZ, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that CBIZ satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CBIZ and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of CBIZ during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BPMullins | Talk 03:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi there Arcadian. I recently stumbled across Coomassie blue in Category:Chemical pages needing a structure drawing, and wondered whether you were aware of Coomassie? I haven't redirected Coomassie blue because I thought maybe Coomassie should be merged into it. Any thoughts? Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 18:00, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I just thought I should let you know that I have proposed that Vogliatemi bene, an article you created be merged with the Butterfly article. The translation will have to be removed, as its copyright status is uncertain, and there is already a link to the libretto and a Ricordi piano score. I also disagree with many of the unsourced claims made in the article. If you wish to retain them, please add references. Regards, Alexs letterbox 09:24, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello Arcadian, it is a pleasure to see your outstanding work with so many articles. I just would like to note that proteins like Aquaporin 1 can be classified simply as "Transmembrane protein". There is no need to also include a category "Membrane biology", because all "TM proteins" belong to "Membrane proteins" who belong to "Membrane biology" anyway. The double classification seems to be redundant. Biophys 00:44, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Arcadian, are you converting inline citations by hand? If not, what is your trick? -- Una Smith 03:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
FWIW, I like the references in "vertical" format. That makes it easier to spot where the reference ends and the text begins again, so it is easier to read. -- Una Smith 14:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
In case it fell off your watchlist: Wikipedia talk:MeSH. Carcharoth 01:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
PS. Any pics or infoboxes for bulbar sheath? :-) Carcharoth 01:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi! It's been a while since the article pupilometer was written. The original user that was the author no longer exists. I don't see any references to validate the nomenclature, although there is use of it as an Ophthalmic Instrument to measure the distance between of the PD, or pupillary distance from eye to eye when fitting eyeglasses to align the optic centers of a prescription. Would you concur to changing the content of the article? I don't know what your original contribution was, but found this link to your user_talk page in the history. StationNT5Bmedia 02:16, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi! I've exhausted my knowledge on the topic for now. It's been broken down to three distinct uses for the name "pupilometer" that I know of. The third is not very common. Anyway, I arranged your contribution on top, becuase it looks the best. StationNT5Bmedia 03:19, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi Arcadian, would you mind if I indefinitely semi-protected {{ ATC}}? It's currently linked to from over 200 pages, and it just struck me that, were it vandalized, there could be some serious damage. Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 20:53, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Want to help peer review an article for me? I re wrote it in a day, obtained a GA the next, and I need much help to get it to FA status. So, want to help me and peer review Dookie for me? Thanks :) Xihix 23:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your edits to the article on Darier's Disease. Whitetrashpalace 22:50, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
I am questioning links I re-added last night to the Hodgkin's Lymphoma pages and the very next day, you deleted them. I checked with Wikipedia and they assured me the links are not against any rules. I have readded them and I would appreciate it that they remain as is. hopedreams
Hi Arcadian, thanks for adding {{Reflist|2}}
to
5-HT3 antagonist—sorry if the list was getting a bit unwieldy. I've reverted your removal of the book references because, although they had no footnotes tied to them, they actually formed the "backbone" of the article; they were used as background. Let me know if you object to this; I'll try to cite some specific facts to these sources later, but I don't have them with me right now. Best wishes,
Fvasconcellos (
t·
c)
00:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
All the diseases in your template are human diseases. Now that you've added HFM, should we remove foot and mouth, which I think is a bovine disease. Didn't want to do this without checking with you first.-- G716 14:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
NCurse work 15:58, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Your work is immensely appreciated. Wikipedia is amazing. 128.91.33.103 05:37, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
I do appreciate you adding the box, and inlines. You doing well, keep it up. Regards, Navou banter 02:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations on your templates about medicine and anatomy. I'm a medicine student from Porto Alegre, Brazil and I think they're very useful. Besides, I've translated some of them to Wikipedia in portuguese. Keep the good work, you are helping people here in Brazil, too. =) Rhcastilhos 19:11, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Do you think that ion channels and pumps should be in the "Structures of the cell membrane" template? -- Simpsons contributor 16:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Can you also shade the 3rd column of the Template:Anabolic steroids to a yet darker color than the 2nd one? I think that would look better. I'm not sure exactly how to do it. Thanks. Wikidudeman (talk) 21:12, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Hey Arcadian... tired of me yet? I was wondering if you'd mind merging CDP choline into citicoline, as they're the same compound and citicoline is the INN. You may of course replace the drugbox with {{ chembox new}} if you feel it's more appropriate. Best, Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 01:25, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I need an administrators opinion: the Peter Tishler article is written like eulogy and doesn't have the right tone. I'm pretty sure its a relative of his writing it and I think the page should be toned down a LOT. I left an NPOV notice on the author's talk page ( User:Ltishler) but they've continued to expand the page since then. How to proceed? Thanks! Roadnottaken 14:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Why did you remove summaries of many scientific studies on the Stuttering page on July 29? I can't find your Edit summary explaining why you did this.-- Tdkehoe 15:56, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
A template you created,
Template:Anatomica, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection
here and feel free to remove the {{
deprecated}}
tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Cheers. --
MZMcBride
22:42, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm banned from editing the page, and don't know what I might do in any case, but what do you think of this edit? WLU 17:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
THANK YOU for getting ride of the external links junk. I have been trying to shorten the page and this is a big step toward getting back to 50k. -- Chrispounds 14:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Dear Arcadian,
I noticed you recently moved Polynucleotide Phosphorylase to Polynucleotide phosphorylase. I have no objections to the move, but would like to ask you to check next time if there are any redirects to the article and also change those accordingly, to avoid Wikipedia:Double redirects. In this case there where 3 that I fixed now.
Cheers, -- Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 09:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Dear editor:
Given your extensive experience here on Wikipedia, I would greatly appreciate your input on the following topic:
Wikipedia: Village pump (policy)#Proposal to make a policy or guideline for lists
Thank you in advance for any thoughts you may have on the topic.
Regards,
Sidatio 15:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
hello, you've undone the changes i did to the article which were based on the fact that
14 umol bilirubin/L IS NOT 1.9 mg/dL, it's 0.82 mg/dL
that's why i changed it...
n = m/M => 14x10-6 mol x 584.7 g/mol = 8186x10-6 g = 8.19 mg/L = 0.82 mg/dL
blood chemistry reference values:
i guess there's a typo here...
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
cheers
Tomifly
10:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, could you add an infobox (and molecular structure image, if possible) for Magnesium trisilicate? Badagnani 21:58, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
Could you review my recent changes to Vein for accuracy? I'm going on my 10-year old memory of anatomy and physiology. Thanks! WLU 17:44, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. It's on my unofficial to-do list. Which never gets shorter. WLU 01:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Re: ganciclovir entry. There are many errors in the ganciclovir entry. To begin, GCV was synthesized by John Martin and Julian Verheyden at Syntex in Palo Alto. I corrected the entry to reflect this but you edited it back. Why did you do this? Ganciclovir was developed at Syntex by Julian Verheyden and myself and a team of capable people. This was likely done while you were still in diapers.
Now that I've got you wondering what the other errors are (admit it, I do don't I?) - well, one is that thymidine kinase is not involved in the metabolism of ganciclovir. This pearl will keep you busy for hours while you madly look up just how it IS metabolized, but it ain't TK, friend.
Other errors lurk .......—Preceding unsigned comment added by Cato92 ( talk • contribs)
Hi. I notice that you've recently added a lot of antiseptic stubs to WP. I had a quick look, and it seems that many of them already have articles under their correct chemical names. For example, mercuric iodide is actually Mercury(II) iodide and cetylpyridinum is actually Cetylpyridinium chloride. I've turned these two into redirects to the correct articles, but could I get you to go back and check the others? Thanks, Chris 20:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, is it normal practice to remove lists of references en bloc? That list was added to the article to demonstrate the references—as opposed to direct citations—used. I had made use of every single one of those references and had read them all. — BillC talk 16:51, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Dorsal metatarsal arteries, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.bartleby.com/107/161.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 04:49, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
For us non-doctor types, about 90% of the world, which side is which? You need to help us out:
I am guessing because I have NO idea.
Someone needs to add this to the articles.
Thanks, IP4240207xx 20:37, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
PS: My knee hurts!
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Hereditary Sensory and Autonomic Neuropathy, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Hereditary Sensory and Autonomic Neuropathy is a redirect to a non-existent page (
CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Hereditary Sensory and Autonomic Neuropathy, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.
CSDWarnBot
14:04, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
I've put the article on Oxidative phosphorylation up for FA. As this seems to be within your area of interest, any comments or suggestions at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Oxidative phosphorylation would be very welcome. All the best Tim Vickers 20:22, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
For your contributions regarding sulfonamide antibacterials. Nen yedi • ( Deeds• Talk) 23:45, 26 August 2007 (UTC) |
I could not figure out which section in Wikipedia talk:Navigational templates, in regards to Template:Sex. Thanks for being considerate in keeping my preference, but still this generic has one problem. The gap between two lines(of list) of same group is wider in "navbox generic", this makes template look cluttered. Maybe we should find a place to discuss, maybe Wikipedia:WikiProject Templates? Thanks. Lara_bran 03:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Why have you reverted the edit of the Hepatitis Australia link, and on some hepatitis pages removed the link completely? (unsigned comment from User talk:Hepatitis Australia)
Arcadian, what did this person just do, and do I want this? [8] Thanks, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:34, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support -- I look forward to working with you.
Incidentally, I have fond memories of your user name. "Arcadia" was the name we (lovingly) gave our cadaver during 1st year, precisely b/c of Et in Arcadia Ego. :-)
Djma12 ( talk) 02:05, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, following your edits on Clobutinol and being a new user please could you help. I know of a great resource related to TdP and QT/QTc but do not know if it is appropriate to add and if so how or in fact where. www.qtdrugs.org. Thanks
The page listed at gallocatechol is shown as a redirect from epigallocatechin. Ideally, this should be the other way round, because the chemical shown is the epi- form (gallocatechin would have opposite stereocenters). Epigallocatechin is the more common name. As you are an admin, please move these pages appropriately. MatthewEHarbowy 14:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Greg Kuperberg has moved Tendonitis and Achilles Tendonitis to Tendinitis for both. As a layperson I'm not sure about the difference, I'd never spell it as tendinitis but I know both spellings are accepted medically. Is there a policy, appropriate spelling, anything? Thanks, WLU 02:05, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification, much obliged. WLU 18:37, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
For the love of god, if you're going to contribute (e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Choroid_plexus&oldid=42259430), at least learn to spell the pertinent terms. It's "Magendie", not "Majendie." 130.102.42.97 02:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
The external link spammer just reverted your revert. I have issued spam warning #3. -- Una Smith 18:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Oops, spammer did it again. Spam warning #4. -- Una Smith 19:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for outlining levosalbutamol. Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 01:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, as someone who has contributed to Neuroblastoma, could you tell me what to do... my contribution was removed without debate. Should I just accept this as a fact of life, that in Wikipedia merciless edits abound? Hovea 03:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Potassium canrenoate, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/309/3/1160. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 02:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
User:Hkiessecker has added some pretty interesting stuff ( contribs), and I thought you might have something to say about it. I've already raised some of the issues I see just as an editor on his talk page, I thought you might have some medical objections to raise as well. He may also be editing anonymously, probably through ignorance rather than malice. The anon contribs are from Germany, and it looks like english is a second language. WLU 19:39, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
JFW | T@lk 11:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for the edit conflict. Feel free to remove those sources again if you like; I leave them in even if not tied to the text, but that's just me :) Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 17:24, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your excellent work exhibited on the medical pages. Hovea 14:46, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up on the PMID template - I imagine it will save me a lot of time in the future Able editor 21:06, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
You started the article Digoxin antitoxin, which I moved to a more appropriate name. I added some information to it, and I was wondering if you could check it. Thanks! bibliomaniac 1 5 23:10, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
there's a discussion going on at Talk:Muscle_contraction#Eccentric_redux and above regards the use of eccentric contraction. Could you have a gander at it? The discussion doesn't seem to be making much progress. Thanks, WLU 13:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
This permission is not compatible with GFDL: However no publisher may change content or structure of the classifcation We should not use that on Wikipedia! Look at the bottom of your screen: All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details.). ICD-10 should be removed as it is a copyvio! -- ro|3ek 23:13, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm enjoying your "stub flood" (oh it rhymes!), as I'm doing NP patrol, a welcome sight after constantly seeing test pages. Phgao 00:55, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Is there a particular reason for the choice of yellow / grey in this navbox? I thought the idea of standardising on template:navbox was to avoid having custom boxes for every subject. Is this a WikiPorject decision? Chris Cunningham 13:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
I saw there was no page which really summarized all the muscles of the human body, so I made this Table of muscles of the human body. The closest I could find before were your templates on the subject. Furthermore, I also see you've done a lot of work on templates on other organ systems, and that's exactly what I'd like to have summary pages on too, e.g. Table of arteries/veins/nerves/bones of the human body. However, before I start such a project, I was wondering if you know any such article in Wikipedia already? If there is one already, it would be pretty pointless to have another one. Your templates are kind of summarizing them, but I was rather looking for something detailed enough to be worth studying itself, and not linking to the main articles. Sure if I had time I'd like to learn everything in them, but unfortunately it's rather limited, so I'd rather have a summary. For arteries, for instance, I'd like to know just where they've come from and to where they branch or terminate. So, are there any such articles already, or do I have another project? Mikael Häggström 17:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
I deleted again this article. It was listed on Wikipedia:Copyright problems and multiple people, including some admins, agreed it was a copyright violation. You obviously don't agree with the deletion so please take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review instead of restoring it yourself without even bothering to notify the deleting admin. Garion96 (talk) 21:33, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm a new Wikipedia user and am trying to expand the article on Non-Mendelian Inheritance. I noticed that you have worked on this article in the past and was hoping you could look over my edits and offer some suggestions. Bretsam 04:21, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
75.44.207.24 22:54, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
75.44.207.24 23:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC) Arcadian - why do you continue to undo other people's edits? Seems that goes against the entire point of Wikipedia. If you are an administrator of some type, what are your professional qualifications to hold that position? Or is the required qualification only that you're willing to do it? I don't know much about how Wikipedia works but this all seems fishy to me, the result being that collegues and I do not use Wikipedia for lack of trust.
Arcadian - I would like to start to help contributing to this topic. I am on the board of directors for a charity hailey's wish and CEO of Columbus medical corporation. Why do you continue to delete a link to a charitable organization. This oranization's seol purpose is to help advance the research and treatment of this disease. Please help me here. Tell me why this is wrong. -- (from User talk:Pangaeamed, unsigned)
I think you should be very careful and cross-check the ICD-9 codes you are adding to articles with someone else (the one added to postperfusion syndrome was stunningly wrong). It's far better to have no code than an erroneous one. - Nunh-huh 00:21, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Arcadian. Thanks for removing the vandalism from the EDS page. My question to you is actually just a technical one concerning how to assess the importance of medical topics. I tried to do this for Chlamydia trachomatis, but couldn't figure out what symbols to use where, so gave up and put it under assessment of microbiology importance. Would you please be so kind as to give me a step-by-step tutorial? I've added myself to the Wiki Medicine project, and I've found the link that shows you what text you're supposed to add for creating assessments concerning pages identified as medical topics, but I must not be doing it correctly. One spot I'm probably messing up in is in the replacement of the ambigous characters. I'm assuming "Chlamydia" (without the quotation marks) goes in place of the ellipses, and "High" goes in place of the question marks. However, please note that I would be fine with your just going ahead and moving my Chlamydia assessment to the proper place immediately and waiting a bit to give me the tutorial. Frankly, I should be studying for boards at the moment, not doing this! Thanks. Walking Softly 20:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Arcardian- A professor for whom I created an extensive website on a particular (and somewhat rare) disease is interested in trying to rewrite the Wiki page on this same subject. I fear he may wish to include some of his amazing images, original figures and snippets of the text that we already created for our own site (which is presently part of the Johns Hopkins web). We also used images from the NEI, NIH (which are both free use if given proper acknowledgment) and from other authors' journal articles (for which we got permission). Though all these images, the quotations from his own journal articles, etc., make our website quite strong, I imagine that they might make copyright issues on Wiki a nightmare. In addition, even though the images and text are copyrighted elsewhere, I'm wondering if the copyright protection would be lost if they were used on Wikipedia. Should we have links to standalone pages containing the images (perhaps housed on the Johns Hopkins Web)? Should we simply write what we can and then have a single image with a link to our page so they can see they full range of images there? Your input or a redirect to someone better suited to this issue would be most appreciated. By the by, what you tell me here will be of great value in the future, as well; I would like to work on creating such pages for other diseases that are of particular interest to me. If I know how to safely use the primary research of professors and therefore am allowed to place it on Wikipedia, the quality of the resultant work will be that much higher. And don't worry; my main goal is to make ivory-tower advanced level research and clinical knowledge accessible to the common layperson, assuming an 8th-grade reading level, not a post-graduate one. Walking Softly 17:07, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Good day. I tried to add a new picture and increase the width of the infobox in Hair cell, but it's in a format I'm not familiar with. Do you know how to do it? Mikael Häggström 10:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Could you add a protein box to the Bile Salt Stimulated Lipase article? K.murphy 12:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
I changed the spelling, thanks for pointing this out to a neurological amateur like me. Could you now remove the horrible picture from which i copied the misspelling? It is Image:VexedLamina.jpg and I can see no reason for it still being displayed in the article on Rexed laminae. Thanks.-- ExpImp talk con 22:54, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
A new list of the most prolific article writers is out and you're in the top 10. See description here Raul654 16:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Template:McGrawHillAnimation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 11:39, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Template:NormanAnatomy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Collectonian 17:40, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey Arcadian. Would you mind if I removed the drugbox from this article? As it's a class article, I honestly don't see what could be placed in the drugbox—surely any individual info is better suited to individual articles, such as Lithium carbonate and Lithium orotate? :) Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 22:48, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I am so sorry right now. I saw your move of Artery of the urethral bulb to Artery of bulb of penis, and both the subject matter and the apparent grammatical mistake in the title immediately made me think of that Grawp ( talk · contribs) page move vandal which was wreaking havoc a few days ago, and blocked immediately, guessing it was one of his accounts. I'm so sorry about this. Picaroon (t) 04:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Arcadian, I was wondering if you could help me out with a template of the "vertical" kind for the Polio series of articles? I have created a mock-up version ( here), but it obviously needs to be adjusted for this series. I have no idea how to do this, and you seem to have a lot of experience in template making. I don't have any strong attachment to the design, just so long as the information is all there. Can you give me a hand? Thanks-- DO11.10 ( talk) 23:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Arcadian, could you fix Template:Pervasive_developmental_disorders for me? It makes a bunch of Mainspace pages appear in the medical navboxes category. I don't know what the proper syntax is, nor how long updates take to propagate, so maybe I fixed and maybe I didn't... -- Una Smith ( talk) 22:16, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Finally fixed the problem. It was being caused by several templates, all relating to autism. -- Una Smith ( talk) 18:23, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Question that's been kicked around before, but I was told would be best asked here: Why does {{ ICD9}} use a .com site when {{ ICD10}} uses the WHO's site? Are their ICD9 pages impossible to systematically link to, or something similar? 68.39.174.238 ( talk) 00:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Arcadian. IMHO methanol does not belong to the primary alcohols, as the carbon, where the OH-group is attached to, has no bond to another carbon (unlike e.g. ethanol). -- Leyo ( talk) 18:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Do you think you could indef block User:Basicsharingwatuknow!? They haven't improved since your last block. P4k ( talk) 10:22, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of MT-TL1, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.geneclinics.org/profiles/melas/details.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 23:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your addition to the reference to the history of trigonocephaly. I have a question...do you know where I can get a copy of the medical journal you referenced? You see, the girl they operated on in 1962 was actually my mother. We have been trying to find anything about her surgery, since my grandparents don't remember much, especially since my grandfather was in the military. Thanks!!!