Welcome to my talk page, the requests must be done here.
Hello, Aquinasthomes1,
Thank you for creating Mardarije Uskoković.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
*
- This page does not have enough references
- This page does not have inline links to substantiate information. There is too much text w/o sources.
- The first link is a dead link.
- Kindly attend to these matters
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru ( talk) 10:52, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Aquinasthomes1! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Curbon7 ( talk) 04:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Slavski kolač, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
John B123 (
talk)
21:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
On 4 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sevastijan Dabović, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that bishop Nikolaj Velimirović called Sevastijan Dabović the greatest Serbian missionary of modern times? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sevastijan Dabović. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Sevastijan Dabović), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 00:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Vanjagenije
(talk)
14:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Aquinasthomes1, on Sept 11, you called InNeed95 a vandal [who] is an albanian neonazi anti-Serb racist
(
ANI diff). If you have proof of that, you may submit it in the form of
WP:DIFFs below, with a concise summary attached. Otherwise, I've set the duration of your block not to expire. Please note that I will view a lengthy reply that isn't pointed and condensed as effectively evading scrutiny and will therefore disregard. Thank you.
El_C
16:56, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
About the "analbanian" summary, I really apologize because I didn't want to do this, I edit using the tablet, and when I put "an albanian vandalism" the orthography corrector itself corrected it to "analbanian vandalism" I don't know how and why. sorry. I disabilited the correctorAquinasthomes1 ( talk) 07:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
@ Aquinasthomes1: You are blocked for two weeks for edit warring, but you are also blocked indefinitely for calling other user neonazi racist without proper evidence. The evidence you provided above is useless. There is zero proof that the editor is either neonazi or racist. So, you have to address that issue in your unblock request in order to be unblocked. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:41, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Aquinasthomes1 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I will stop edit warring, because i dont want (and I don't like it because it's causes me anguish) edit warring, I was just edit warring that because he (InNeed95) literally do edit warring and violate the rules immediately after his unblock. I understand now how that is wrong and how violate the wiki rules, I will allow InNeed95 edit warring and put his bias (per his history), because for now I dont care. I for sure will stop making accusations, because it is wrong and that violates wiki rules. I clearly want to contribute to wikipedia. I made 33 useful pages (1 that go to DYK), and I want to make more pages as I propose. The indefinite block is injust. Aquinasthomes1 ( talk) 17:22, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Making a personal attack when you were blocked for, in part, making a personal attack is a gutsy move. Unfortunately, it didn't work out here. Yamla ( talk) 20:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Aquinasthomes1 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Ok, I will stop edit warring because i dont want (and I don't like it because it's causes me anguish and agony) edit warring, I was just edit warring that because he (InNeed95) literally do edit warring and violate the rules immediately after his unblock (he was blocked too for edit warring), I understand now how that is violate the wiki rules. I will stop making accusations, because, again, violates wiki rules. I clearly want to contribute to wikipedia. I made 34 useful pages (1 that go to DYK), and I want to make more pages as I propose. The indefinite block is indeed injust. Aquinasthomes1 ( talk) 21:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You're a sock of User:JohnGotten. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 23:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, Aquinasthomes1,
Thank you for creating Prousos Monastery.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
We require independent reliable sources for this article to meet notabililty. Kindly do the needful and add references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru ( talk) 21:48, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Prousos Monastery, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Mccapra (
talk)
04:27, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Simeon Stylites Monastery, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Mccapra (
talk)
04:28, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Lelic Monastery, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Mccapra (
talk)
13:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Gospel of St. Nicholas of Rošci, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Mccapra (
talk)
13:08, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Aquinasthomes1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Prousos Monastery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Aquinasthomes1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Simeon Stylites Monastery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Aquinasthomes1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Prousos Monastery".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:27, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Aquinasthomes1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Simeon Stylites Monastery".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:28, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Aquinasthomes1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Gospel of St. Nicholas of Rošci, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:03, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Aquinasthomes1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Lelić Monastery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 21:02, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Aquinasthomes1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Lelić Monastery".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:38, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to my talk page, the requests must be done here.
Hello, Aquinasthomes1,
Thank you for creating Mardarije Uskoković.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
*
- This page does not have enough references
- This page does not have inline links to substantiate information. There is too much text w/o sources.
- The first link is a dead link.
- Kindly attend to these matters
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru ( talk) 10:52, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Aquinasthomes1! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Curbon7 ( talk) 04:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Slavski kolač, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
John B123 (
talk)
21:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
On 4 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sevastijan Dabović, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that bishop Nikolaj Velimirović called Sevastijan Dabović the greatest Serbian missionary of modern times? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sevastijan Dabović. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Sevastijan Dabović), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 00:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Vanjagenije
(talk)
14:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Aquinasthomes1, on Sept 11, you called InNeed95 a vandal [who] is an albanian neonazi anti-Serb racist
(
ANI diff). If you have proof of that, you may submit it in the form of
WP:DIFFs below, with a concise summary attached. Otherwise, I've set the duration of your block not to expire. Please note that I will view a lengthy reply that isn't pointed and condensed as effectively evading scrutiny and will therefore disregard. Thank you.
El_C
16:56, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
About the "analbanian" summary, I really apologize because I didn't want to do this, I edit using the tablet, and when I put "an albanian vandalism" the orthography corrector itself corrected it to "analbanian vandalism" I don't know how and why. sorry. I disabilited the correctorAquinasthomes1 ( talk) 07:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
@ Aquinasthomes1: You are blocked for two weeks for edit warring, but you are also blocked indefinitely for calling other user neonazi racist without proper evidence. The evidence you provided above is useless. There is zero proof that the editor is either neonazi or racist. So, you have to address that issue in your unblock request in order to be unblocked. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:41, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Aquinasthomes1 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I will stop edit warring, because i dont want (and I don't like it because it's causes me anguish) edit warring, I was just edit warring that because he (InNeed95) literally do edit warring and violate the rules immediately after his unblock. I understand now how that is wrong and how violate the wiki rules, I will allow InNeed95 edit warring and put his bias (per his history), because for now I dont care. I for sure will stop making accusations, because it is wrong and that violates wiki rules. I clearly want to contribute to wikipedia. I made 33 useful pages (1 that go to DYK), and I want to make more pages as I propose. The indefinite block is injust. Aquinasthomes1 ( talk) 17:22, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Making a personal attack when you were blocked for, in part, making a personal attack is a gutsy move. Unfortunately, it didn't work out here. Yamla ( talk) 20:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Aquinasthomes1 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Ok, I will stop edit warring because i dont want (and I don't like it because it's causes me anguish and agony) edit warring, I was just edit warring that because he (InNeed95) literally do edit warring and violate the rules immediately after his unblock (he was blocked too for edit warring), I understand now how that is violate the wiki rules. I will stop making accusations, because, again, violates wiki rules. I clearly want to contribute to wikipedia. I made 34 useful pages (1 that go to DYK), and I want to make more pages as I propose. The indefinite block is indeed injust. Aquinasthomes1 ( talk) 21:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You're a sock of User:JohnGotten. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 23:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, Aquinasthomes1,
Thank you for creating Prousos Monastery.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
We require independent reliable sources for this article to meet notabililty. Kindly do the needful and add references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru ( talk) 21:48, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Prousos Monastery, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Mccapra (
talk)
04:27, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Simeon Stylites Monastery, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Mccapra (
talk)
04:28, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Lelic Monastery, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Mccapra (
talk)
13:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Gospel of St. Nicholas of Rošci, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Mccapra (
talk)
13:08, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Aquinasthomes1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Prousos Monastery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Aquinasthomes1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Simeon Stylites Monastery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Aquinasthomes1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Prousos Monastery".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:27, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Aquinasthomes1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Simeon Stylites Monastery".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:28, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Aquinasthomes1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Gospel of St. Nicholas of Rošci, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:03, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Aquinasthomes1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Lelić Monastery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 21:02, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Aquinasthomes1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Lelić Monastery".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:38, 26 September 2022 (UTC)