This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This the archive of messages posted on Anne Delong's talk page, July to September, 2013.
The Helping Hand Barnstar | ||
Hiya Anne
the
one
sean here, from AfC. I was |
Morning Anne,
I'm new to Wiki so thank you very much for taking the time to check my terrible first article attempt and for pointing me in the right direction. I will continue to edit the article, apply your advise, and add better references.
If I get stuck, would it be ok if I harassed you a bit ?
Thanks again,
Kate Audie Info ( talk) 05:17, 2 July 2013 (UTC) 2013.07.02 @ 07:16
Dear Audie Info: Sure, you can ask me for help any time. However, since I am not always on line, you can also ask questions at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, where there's always someone watching for new questions from beginning editors.
Here are some tips to start off with:
I hope this helps. Good luck with your article. — Anne Delong ( talk) 12:52, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne. Thank you for your comment at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/thoughtform_thought-form_ThoughtForms_(disambiguation). I wasn't sure if you were monitoring that page so I'm placing this message on your talk page. (I'm new to all this, so my apologies in advance if this is not the proper protocol). As you will see, I think your comment was fair and I certainly appreciate the hard work you are putting into wikipedia. I did have a few questions for you at that page if you have the time. Thank you. [[User:Peter Baum|Peter Baum].] ( talk) 20:46, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne,
I submitted the article "Earnings Call Transcript" for review dated July 2, 2013. I appreciate the suggestions provided by you to add more reference sources and valuable feedback. It would be helpful if you could provide any expected numbers for references and help out on the kind of references that would suit and add value to article, that I could source them and incorporate them for resubmission?
Best Regards, SamXtal. SamXtal ( talk) 10:29, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear [User:SamXtal|SamXtal]]: It is difficult to specify an exact number of references, because it depends on how extensive the information in the references is. The main thing is that the references must be independent (that is, not written by or for any person or organization that may be mentioned), reliable and published (not somebody's personal blog, for example), and that they specifically confirm the information. Not being a business person, the only things that come to my mind are business journals and economics textbooks, or maybe published government documents that specify guidelines for company activities. It also depends on how much information is in the article. A long article will have more facts to be supported than a short one.
Before you do that, though, I have noticed that most of your article is not actually about the earnings call transcripts. Is that because it's a simple concept and there isn't much to say about it? Wikipedia already has an article called Earnings call, which is in danger of being deleted because it doesn't have proper source citations. In my opinion (remembering that I am not a business person), you should do one of two things:
In either case, unless I am misunderstanding, the information at the bottom of your article about other calls doesn't seem to be about earnings calls and doesn't belong in the article about them. Are you describing the activities of a certain kind of business, perhaps Real Team Systems Pvt. Ltd., that transcribes various types of calls? If so, perhaps you need a more general topic, such as "business call transcript" or whatever is appropriate.
Also, keep in mind that your article should be written for the general public, not just for business experts. Rather than "form 654-Tx" or some such thing, which refer only to a specific situation, it is better to say something like "Many governments, including ___, require companies to complete forms declaring ___ in order to ___ and the transcripts provide valuable ____ which can be used to ___".
Keep in mind once more that my business experience is limited to one economics course and for a time running a small business out of my house, where hopefully no one was transcribing my calls. I hope this is helpful, but if you would like another perhaps more informed opinion, you could ask at the Teahouse. — Anne Delong ( talk) 11:42, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Since my canvass on WT:AFC didn't work too well so far, I figured I might ask a few editors very involved in the project for help -
I'm (trying) to work on a redo of the Article Wizard, the current one is old, clunky, and not very efficient. There's a few tools that can be used to do this, namely mw:GuidedTour, which could help (with some funky buttons and stuff) it look like Special:GettingStarted. Other ideas include just making it look nicer, etc.
If you'd like to help, just ping me here (I'll watch this page) or on IRC (nick=Charmlet) for more info :) I'd appreciate it! Thanks ~ Charmlet -talk- 02:49, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Why did you delete my page [Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ORTEC]? What copywrite information was present? Can you please explain?
Hello Anne, Regarding article that I am writing and which you have rejected on copyright grounds. I'd be grateful if you could advise me why as I am new to this. All the words are my own taken from previous articles and her website - which I wrote.
Dear editors: Neither of you have signed your posts, so I don't know your names, but you both have the same question. The ORTEC article had extensive text copied and pasted from the ORTEC web site, and the Kendra Haste article had text copied from her web site and from other sources. Wikipedia cannot accept text that is published elsewhere for copyright reasons, even if the text was originally written by the same person. People who edit Wikipedia must do so as individuals, and not as representatives of companies, so they can't make use of any text which has been written for the company (which in any case is almost always too promotional for an encyclopedia article). Similarly, someone who is acting as a representative of a public personality such as an author, musician, actor, etc., can't use text which was written for that person's use, say on their web site or in press releases. Also text which has been published in other places such as magazines or newspapers is copyright and can't be used, no matter who originally wrote it. At any rate, Wikipedia is a publication (a very large one), not a web hosting service, so including text that is posted elsewhere on the web is not appropriate. Imagine if you went to a book or magazine publisher and asked them to publish a book with the exact same text that you had used in your last book!
Both of these topics appear worthy of an article, so, please, I hope you will each write an article about your topic, using Wikipedia:Manual of Style as your guide, in sentences which are specially created for the encyclopedia, in a neutral tone rather than a promotion, and then submit it again. Thanks! — Anne Delong ( talk) 14:46, 5 July 2013 (UTC) (I have figured out that ORTEC question was from Shyamutty and the Kendra Haste question was from Patrickgdavies. — Anne Delong ( talk) 15:16, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne,
My article on Jess Michaels was deleted and I'm trying to get it back to edit it and clean it up. Can you help me get it back? Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jess Michaels I linked directly to the author page as the source, I'm happy to remove that and re-work it. I see I need to get more feedback from editors before submitting an article.
Thanks in Advance,
Fredsbro ( talk) 14:56, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MartinPoulter ( talk) 15:19, 7 July 2013 (UTC)Anne, I am sorry if the comment I made at the Teahouse or on my talk page made you feel bad in any way. From all that I have seen, you are an outstanding editor and a real asset to this great project. I remember you coming to the Teahouse in your early days of contributing here, and I have been very pleased that you have stuck around, gained your confidence and made real, valuable contributions. Please accept my apologies if I've hurt your feelings. - Jim Cullen328 Let's discuss it 07:11, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
This is not copyvio, because the site is a US government site., and the text on such sites is US-PD -- not that's it;'s a satisfactory article yet 'DGG (at NYPL) ( talk) 16:39, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
"This first paragraph "Second pragraph "Third paragraph" Where each paragraph begins with a quotation mark, but an ending one is used only at the end of the quoted material.
I got your message about our submitted page for C Ronald Kahn. According to you, someone else is creating a page called Carl Ronald Kahn. Is there any way to get in touch with whoever is doing this? I am Dr. Kahn's official biographer and I don't want anyone else trying to post sub-standard information about this important person. Thanks. Joslin735
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
the one sean 15:19, 10 July 2013 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
(chat) techatology 02:09, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Hi Anne,
You recently reviewed an article I wrote about Dr. Susan Pick and suggested that I make better, more reliable references to prove her notability as well as remove some of the elements that were based a bit more in social commentary rather than the dates and facts about her life and accomplishments. I have gone back and edited in a way that I thought was suitable, but, before resubmitting it, I wanted to ensure that these edits were suitable for Wikipedia. I'm new to Wikipedia and don't know if this is the correct space to ask for this kind of assistance, but I'd really appreciate it if you could see my corrections and give me more feedback (positive or negative) so that I avoid further rejection. The link is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Susan_Pick
Thank you!
Mereditharra ( talk) 18:33, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Mereditharra: I will be leaving the next review of your article to someone else, but I can give you a couple of tips:
1) The lead paragraph should be a summary. Right now it just has one item, a red-linked organization. The name of the organization should come first, then the acronym. You should add to this paragraph, maybe that she is a Mexican (political scientist? social psychologist? I can't tell), and also if she is a professor that should be mentioned there too.
2) Is the Autonomous University different from the National Autonomous University?
3) There is still too much promotion of ideas and theories. This article should just be actual facts, no "suspicions" and "suggestions": She founded an organization with this purpose, she wrote a book on this topic, she worked at this University in this capacity, etc. Explanations of theories should be in an article about the specific theory, details about a book should be in an article about the book (provided that it is notable). For example Amartya Sen has his own article, so it's not necessary to explain his theory, just link his name to his Wikipedia page.
4) You have a lot of references, but they are mostly just URLs. Eventually all of these will have to be properly formatted in the way that the first one on the list is done. Before submitting the article for review, at least pick out several of the independent book reviews, news articles, etc., and format them properly so that the reviewer can see that they are written by journalists or other independent authors are in publications with editorial oversight.
I hope this helps. — Anne Delong ( talk) 20:08, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
I've been participating in the backlog drive and am attempting to get my totals to show up on the page, but think I've messed something up. Is there something I need to do other than what I have on the sign-up section? The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 ( talk) 14:08, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80. I see that you have made yourself a blank drive page; that's good. You should leave a note on Excirial's talk page. He updates the pages manually, and he may not have your name on his update list yet. He's been updating every day or two, so then you will have to wait until his next update to see any change. — Anne Delong ( talk) 14:32, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. We're organizing an office hours session with the Teahouse to bring in mentors from across the wiki to try out Snuggle and discuss it's potential to support mentorship broadly. The Snuggle team would appreciate it if you would come and participate in the discussion. We'll be having it in #wikimedia-office connect on Wed. July 17th @ 1600 UTC. See the agenda for more info. -- EpochFail( talk • work), Technical 13 ( talk), TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 17:09, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne, Thank you for the work you are doing for bluegrass music at Wikipedia. I'm not sure if this is the correct forum to use to contact you. The BNL page is in danger of deletion. If you are able to contribute to the page and remove the objectionable material, you will be continuing to help the presence of bluegrass music at Wikipedia. I was not able to meet the guidelines for submitting material though I interviewed the magazine's owners directly. Your work will be much appreciated. Thanks, Tom. E19S24cr ( talk) 20:23, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
FYI. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 03:44, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for accepting my article on Savannah Phillips. have a nice day.
Debrafir (
talk)
23:49, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your edit to Channel Orange. I worked a while getting it to GA. If it's no bother, would you like to comment/vote at my nomination for FA here? It's a relatively short article to review. Dan56 ( talk) 04:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne, There is a question at the teahouse that would benefit from your perspective if you have time. Flat Out let's discuss it 13:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne, thanks for the helpful tips, i have made the changes that you suggested. I really appreciate your help with this. I haven't resubmitted the article yet, just sending to you as requested. Thanks again. Michaelleach 16/07/13 Michaelleach ( talk) 21:07, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Thanks Anne, would never have got this article live without you! Michaelleach ( talk) 21:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC) |
Dear Anne I stumbled across the proposed article on Renana Peres and was left flabbergasted that here an article is put through proper quality assessment criteria, whereas elsewhere pages are being added willy-nilly. I would appreciate if you could spare a minute to have a look at an article recently created that I proposed for deletion just so I can see what someone with your level of assessment makes of it. You can find the article here. I should add that a lot of work has been added since it was nominated for deletion. I would be most grateful. Best regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 01:26, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne, you marked the submission as "under review" yesterday, did some work on it and then... nothing! Have you forgotten about this one? Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 09:25, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
The Techweek (conference) page should have no capital 'w' in the title. The company doesn't capitalize the w anywhere that I can find. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robsefer ( talk • contribs) 19:37, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry for the mistakes that I've been making. I'm quite new to the AfC reviewing, especially the fact that I'm on summer vacation from school and kind of in need of something. It's only one week since I've been reviewing AfC, so I have to acknowledge that. Sometimes I go a bit too fast...so is there any tips for me to improve my skills and get more "pass" reviews? -- みんな空の下 ( トーク) 20:58, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne Delong,
Thank you for making some changes to the cylinder fuse page. I submitted the changes.
Sincerely, Jbuehle — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbuehle ( talk • contribs) 17:45, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne,
Thank you for reviewing the post. The suggested edits and additional references will be made to get the article posted.
The reference link where you have mentioned that couple of links don't talk about Mobiveil: Those were added to trace back the story of formation of Mobiveil and the executives' background. I took that as a cue from other companies listing history of formation.
Thanks for suggesting icicitrinity as a good source. I would also urge you to consider SEC filings and the few more links under External links. These can't be directly referenced in the content but have just been included to provide an authentic reference that the company exists and is acknowledged by neutral entities.
Please advice how many links should I share to get the article approved.
Thanks again for taking time out to review.
Regards,
Mg.Chakravarthi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mg.chakravarthi ( talk • contribs) 17:47, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Mg.chakravarthi: It is okay to have those other references that don't mention Mobiveil, to support specific information as you have noted. It would be better to make citations and add these next to the specific information to which they relate (see Help:Referencing for beginners). However, Wikipedia requires as well sources which have information specifically about the subject, in this case Mobiveil. It is hard to say exactly how many, because it depends on in what depth each one covers the subject. Probably two more with several paragraphs of information would be okay (about Mobiveil), or more if each one has only one paragraph - I am estimating, because each subject and each source is different. The main thing is to have a neutral and rounded picture of the company.
About external links: The main thing to remember is that Wikipedia is not to be used to promote a business, but only to provide information. Links to sites that are intended to promote sales or investment, other than one to the company web site, may be considered to be promotional. You would probably be a better judge of that than I, since I am not a business person. Don't forget that once the article is published in the encyclopedia, other editors will be adding to and changing it. Good luck with your article. — Anne Delong ( talk) 21:41, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to write your response at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#WikiProject Articles for creation Threatens to Ruin Wikipedia. Your careful analysis of what you see when you are working on AfC articles, and your calm analysis of the person who raised the issue really help. You've chosen to work in a difficult, often tedious, area and many, many of us appreciate it. StarryGrandma ( talk) 18:05, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For all your hard work at AfC for defending the encyclopedia against not only unwanted content, but also defending new users against inappropriate rejections.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk)
00:35, 23 July 2013 (UTC) Seconded. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 12:54, 10 August 2013 (UTC) |
I have noted your interest in Bkue Grass. Do you have any data on a man named Orville Jenks??? I believe he is one of the original folks who sang, Sprinkle Coal Dust on My Grave Coal town guy ( talk) 13:27, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/How_It_Should_Have_Ended Hey thanks for your advice, I have added some reviews and links. Kindly, check them and further help me. Thank you again. Sudhansu94 ( talk) 04:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello Anne, Thank you for informing me that my proposed article about Councilwoman Dorothy Goosby is about to be deleted. In fact, I was not aware that it was still in the pipeline. In my last conversation with a Wikipedia editor, I was made aware of the reasons why my article could not be accepted, and I understood. I thought the article would automatically be deleted at that time. I appreciate your effort on my behalf. -Michael Weingarten — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.188.213.148 ( talk) 13:24, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 ( talk) 01:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Andrew 327 14:20, 26 July 2013 (UTC)✉→ Arctic Kangaroo ←✎ 15:02, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne - you left a comment about the proper use of titles on the article I submitted on Dana Beth Ardi. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Dr._Dana_Ardi - I got rid of the "Dr." everyhere except in the opening paragraph, but it's still in the title. Should I move and retitle the article, or is that something that would be done in a general cleanup by an AfC reviewer? Thanks! JSFarman ( talk) 16:28, 26 July 2013 (UTC))
Hi, Thank you for your advice, I will re-write my article in sentence and paragraphs form! Concerning the sources, all my sources are from newspapers, magazines and reports. They are all independant, what am I supposed to change about it? Thank you for your help again!-- Mmarraas ( talk) 13:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
1) Good source - I added some detail; people outside Belgium wouldn't know what RTBF was.
2) This looks like a business listing web site; not considered independent?
3) Good source - One sentence about AS. Tthe article title you gave it was incorrect and somewhat misleading, so I changed it.
4) If Automatic Systems is part of this larger company, this isn't an independent source.
5) Okay source Bold text– although it looks like AS is a member of this organization, it's likely that so is every business in the area, so if they have been selected for an award that's legit
6) Good source, good article; I fixed the title.
7) This sure reads like a press release, and the web site invites suppliers to submit them, and the site doesn't attribute its material to anyone in particular.
8) Another association of which the company is a member
I hope this helps. As you can see, some of the sources weren't totally independent. It's all right to have these dependent sources there, to back up non-controversial details. The result is a bit marginal. Can you find one more news or magazine source to push it over the top? — Anne Delong ( talk)
Dear Anne, thank you very much for your help! I removed the wrong sources and added a new one that I found in a specialist magazine. I hope it will be ok this time, Thanks again! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Mmarraas (
talk •
contribs)
07:27, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Anne, This is my first time on creating articles on Wikipedia. The article created was all written by me which is also available on the official website of 'Speak Kuwaiti' book. As the author of this new book, all the text written belongs to me. How can I repost the article for Wikipedia to accept it?
K. Ahmad Ali — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kam965 ( talk • contribs) 18:10, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
Hi Anny, this was my first attempt at an article and I am already frustrated. I am a Rotarian in Guatemala and wondered what would come up when somebody would want to find out about our organization. So, when I typed ¨Rotary Guatemala¨ as search words, the first option I was offered was an article about a guy by the name of Edmund Baroch who happens to be a friend but which had very little to do with what Rotary does in Guatemala and how it is organized. So I thought that something more to the point could help, and wrote the small article. Now, I am being told that copyrighted work was included and I wonder which part you refer to, so I can delete that part and rewrite it. Next, I am told that I need to put references to the statements from outside of the Rotary organization. Frankly, I don´t know where to look for them, and secondly, this information is factual and corresponds to the real situation of how Rotary is organized in this part of the world. Best regards, Michael Bostelmann, Michael ( talk) 05:28, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello Anne, thank you for taking a look at my page "Carl Ronald Kahn". As stated in your message, this was a duplicate submission. I submitted the original under the account "JoslinCommunications". The JoslinCommunications account is locked due to issues with the name, which means I can not edit the original submission. I would very much like to make your edits and then resubmit this page, but I am at a loss with how to proceed. Can you please advise me how to resubmit this page or how to unlock my other account?
Thanks in advance, Emily
Joslin735 ( talk) 19:25, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Emily: Unfortunately, in between the time that I left the message and today, the older article was deleted, so I guess you should continue to work on this one Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carl Ronald Kahn (2). For future information, anyone can work on any article, so even if you had to change your username, you could still have typed the name of the original article into the search engine and continued to edit it.
Mr. Kahn is obviously a noted biologist. Here are some comments that should help to get the article accepted:
I hope this helps. — Anne Delong ( talk) 20:32, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
You posted the declining of an AfC on my talk page but I simply pressed the submit button for another user who had created the draft then moved it to article space himself. I've moved your post over to his page for reference at User talk:DanielAmzallag. This is just an FYI message. Cheers, Cabe 6403 ( Talk• Sign) 15:03, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Anne -- I'm trying to find out how to make an article in my sandbox into an AfC article submission. I posted on the AfC help desk but haven't received a response. Can you give me some instruction? My article isn't finished (I'm working on it in microsoft word), but I want to make sure I'll be able to submit it when I'm done. Thanks. Evelenfiftyseven ( talk) 18:52, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello Re your message..Hello! Tassie Wombat, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined Can you please tell me why? What did I not do? Tassie Wombat ( talk) 21:52, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Tassie Wombat: As I wrote in my comment on the Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gemmological Association of Australia. Tasmania Division page, to have an article in Wikipedia a topic has to be notable. This means that it has to be written about in news reports, magazine articles or books that are not written by members of the organization, but by journalists and other authors. None of the references that you supplied were about the Tasmanian division. I suggested that you take the information that you have gathered and instead write it in the Gemmological Association of Australia article, because it is in bad shape and needs more references. The alternative is to find some news reports, etc., that ARE about the Tasmanian division. I hope this helps. — Anne Delong ( talk) 01:57, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne,
It was very helpful and kind of you to offer such a prompt reply to our question about what to do about making a new contribution to Wikipedia. We post the question to the Tea Room on July 25 about requesting what to do about the contribution and the need for outside review of the contribution "Lao Veterans of America" It still seems that no independent person has reviewed it for final publication, but your prompt response was very helpful and appreciated.
Thank you for your important work and helping to educated new users and contributors to Wikipedia. We really appreciate it and are sorry for the delay in thanking you.
We would like to make more contributions to Wikipedia and it is encouraging to hear from people like you.
Sincerely,
Publico2020 ( talk) 02:08, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks Anne we have members of The association looking for articles so hopefully we can find some and re visit
Tassie Wombat Tassie Wombat ( talk) 02:18, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Anne,
I submitted an entry on Algeco Scotsman for review. I'm new to Wikipedia, so it took me a while to figure out how to create, edit and submit, but I finally did it. I received a message that it was rejected but when I searched to find out why, I saw a note that said blank submissions are not accepted. The entry wasn't blank, but I fear I may have done something incorrectly when I submitted it that hid the contents. Now I'm unable to find the draft submission anywhere. I'd hate to think I have to start from scratch since it took me so long to input etc. I tried looking in my history but nothing showed up. I hope you can help me!
Thank you, Lisa Lgtrapani ( talk) 19:47, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Lisa: I think I may have bad news for you. I have looked at your contributions (you can see them by clicking on "Contributions" at the top right side of the page, and you will see
this), and as far as I can see, you sent only a blank page for review. You can click on the very first version of the article. It's hard to imagine what may have happened. Were you logged into the same account when you typed the article? If so, then somehow you must not have saved your text. Did you work on your article, saving it as you went along from time to time, or did you type the whole thing and just save it at the end? —
Anne Delong (
talk)
20:09, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne,
I saved as I went along and also viewed previews along the way. So there's no way to look at a history of drafts I was editing? I was able to go back and edit my drafts before I submitted, so I assume it was saved somewhere...
Lisa Lgtrapani ( talk) 20:27, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Lisa: When you click on the Show Preview button, your work is not saved, only when you press the Save button. When you look at the preview, you will see the following at the top of the page:
This is only a preview; your changes have not yet been saved! in red letters, and when you try to leave the page without saving, it will ask you if you are sure that you want to leave. Until you click on the Save button, the text is just in your browser, and doesn't go from your computer to the Wikipedia server.
The submit of the blank page was the very first edit that you made under the name Lgtrapani. I have even checked to see if any edit that you made was deleted, and there were none. So the only hope for the text to still exist is if you had been using another login at the time. I am sorry, but I don't think there is anything to be done about it. — Anne Delong ( talk) 21:16, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Anne Delong, thank you very much that is very clear. I will do just that. In addition, how do I request a new article on the sister pageant which is just as notable. Please advise. I am very new as you can see to wikipedia and it is so much to learn, but I want to learn. So I will go back and make mention of the sister pageant on the Miss International Page, and request a separate article or venture to write it myself. Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrsilintl2004 ( talk • contribs) 02:49, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Anne Delong,
Thank you very much for your help. I am very new to Wikipedia as you can see and there is a lot to learn. I am willing to learn though. Your explanation was very clear and so I will do just that. I will also add that there is a sister pageant and the name of the sister pageant. How do I request a separate article be written about the sister pageant as it is just as notable. As a matter of fact, Bob Eubanks, former host of the newly wed game was the host of the pageant for years. I think it should have a separate article. I mentioned that in the notes. Please advise as you have been very helpful. Thank you. Mrsilintl2004 ( talk) 02:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Anne, would it be possible to block this IP address (206.194.127.112) from making edits. This is a business computer and, while I have occasionally used it to correct minor issues in articles (such as misspellings), it should not be being used for article creation or major edits and especially not for vandalism. If you wish to contact me use my talk page divingpetrel 206.194.127.112 ( talk) 13:06, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear divingpetrel : IP addresses often change from time to time, unless your business computer has arranged with its service provider for a fixed IP address. If this is your business, you may know. If the IP is fixed to one computer, blocking it will prevent your computer being used for vandalism unless the person creates a login and password. If it is not fixed, you may just be blocking other random people who are using other computers elsewhere. Please check out the contributions of this IP by clicking HERE. If the constructive edits are all yours, and you are sure that the others are being made by someone using the same computer when you are not there, you can make your request for blocking at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. The administrators there will decide whether to block the IP address (I don't have the authority to do it). — Anne Delong ( talk) 15:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. Divingpetrel ( talk) 23:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm new to reviewing articles for AfC, and I keep coming across articles that you've previously reviewed - I'm inspired by the thoroughness of your reviews and the thoughtfulness of your comments. JSFarman ( talk) 00:55, 7 August 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks, JSFarman, I just keep thinking about how each article has a hopeful person behind it who may become a regular Wikipedia contributor. If you need any help with your reviews, please feel free to ask me for help, or, if you prefer, ask at the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation forum. I know that I asked dozens of questions there when I first started reviewing. Good luck! — Anne Delong ( talk) 03:29, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne, I'm unsure how to use this 'talk' page, or how to respond to your message. You asked for me to confirm whether I'd wanted the article on Andrew Fitton artist to be submitted. I can confirm that I had intended for it to be submitted... I simply didn't know how to do it. Please could you advise me how to do so? Or give me any tips? thanks Rosie Oxley Impressions of Cardiff and Swansea User name ImpressionsCardiffandSwansea (daughter of Andrew fitton)
Hello, I would like to retire this account and all content associated with it:
Joslin735 ( talk) 19:42, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
{{ admin help}} The above appeared on my talk page here after I had tried to help a user who had made two versions of an article under two usernames. I'm not sure how to deal with this, so I am requesting that an admin take over. Thanks! — Anne Delong ( talk) 20:00, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Nyttend ( talk) 00:14, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne,
I´ve found you on the teahouse page and would appreciate your guidance and advice. I`m quite a newby in editing. I would like to edit an english version of "my" article about an acapella vocal group Klangbezirk Klangbezirk
At first I´dont know how/where to start to translate an existing german article in order to contribute to the englisch wikipedia. I´ve read the German help pages but I did not find a satisfying answer, but warnings, that it would be difficult. I´ve heard about teahouse and that´s why I decided to look for a mentor there. Can you help me discovering the universe of wikipedia? Best regards -- Manuela2012 ( talk) 04:39, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Manuela2012. Well, here goes:
Good luck! — Anne Delong ( talk) 05:24, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
The article i am editing at present in my sandbox looks like this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Amellondon/sandbox
Please could you review and could you kindly advise how the article formats in to Wikipedia layout ie: with a picture etc? is this something that's done once my article is finalised and ready to go live?
Regards Amellondon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amellondon ( talk • contribs) 22:13, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello I don't understand how to talk on your page, please advise, and thanks for the invite to the teahouse, look forward to being apart-- Amellondon ( talk) 22:20, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Amellondon: You have used the talk page the right way - you'll get used to it. Your article is not ready to go into the encyclopedia yet. First, only one of the sources listed looks like it may be a news story. All of the rest appear to be press releases, announcement, and material made by the person himself or organizations connected to him. What's needed to show that he is well known enough for an article in Wikipedia are several sources such as news reports, reviews (not blogs, wordpress, facebook, but in real publications), magazine articles, etc. that are written totally independently by journalists and other authors. Also, unfortunately because your first article is about a living person, Wikipedia requires "inline citations" to back up facts about the person (not surprisingly, people are annoyed when incorrect information is published about them). There is a help page that shows how to do this at wp:Referencing for beginners. If you get stuck you can ask me or the Teahouse hosts for help.
As soon as you have done this, type this at the top of your article: {{subst:submit}} and save the page. This will put it in the queue to be reviewed for the encyclopedia. It may be declined, but if it is the reviewers will tell you what to fix, and you can submit it again. By the time it passes it will be a good article and your second article will be easier.
Thanks for pointing that out. I've restored all three of them and notified the editors concerned. Unfortunately it looks as if only one of them is still editing. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather ( talk) 13:01, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
Few questions Have I reached 10 edits yet? and when will my account be fully confirmed for me to be able to submit my article? Now I've submitted my article for review in the sandbox section what's the next procedure going forward? do I now wait or do I also submit it in another section? How do I upload a picture it is to go with the article?I accidently posted 2 articles in the sandbox area for review however it is only the most recent 1 that I want to keep, how do I get rid of the others? could you delete for me please. Also the article once reviewed and active on Wikipedia id like called nicky slimting walker, so when you type it in google it comes up. -- Amellondon ( talk) 14:26, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Look forward hear from you
email: amelun
username amellondon--Amellondon
Dear Amellondon: Your article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nicky Slim Ting Walker is now correctly submitted. (The others have been removed.) In the future, please don't make more than one copy of an article. If an article is in the wrong place it can be moved instead of another one made; that way there are no abandoned old drafts to clean up.
At the top of the screen you will see on the right a row of options, one of which says "Contributions". If you click on it you can see everything that you have done so far. There seem to be more than ten items on the list, and your account is four days old, so you should be autoconfirmed.
Your article should be reviewed soon, but it will be declined because it doesn't have any references. I have added a references section for you. All articles on Wikipedia have to have references to news reports, magazine articles, books, music reviews, etc., to demonstrate that the subject has been covered in the media and is well known enough to be in an encyclopedia. Blogs, facebook, etc., don't count - the reports have to be in recognized publications with editors, and can't have been written up by the subject or people connected to him. You should start looking for these press write-ups and add them to the article. If the article is declined before you can add them, don't worry, there will be a "resubmit" button on the page; just continue adding the sources and then click on it. Good luck with your article. — Anne Delong ( talk) 15:35, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne. I was told that my article for Walker's Auctions was okay and it was kindly moved to the mainspace with a tag that it needs to be reviewed. Since I know you do "Articles for Creation" (Hannah Franklin), I am hoping that you could take a look at it and let me know if there were any issues or remove the tag if it's okay. Also I'd like to know if it's okay for me to ask you directly or would you prefer that I use the Teahouse? The coverage of Montreal artists and art institutions is very spotty, so I am trying to improve the situation. I know wikipedia likes auction houses and Walker's is the largest reseller of Inuit Art in Canada and hence the world. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walker%27s_Auctions Thanks again. HeatherBlack ( talk) 20:41, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks Anne. I haven't quite figured out all the ins and outs of submitting articles and I was more concerned that an administrator or someone with the right authority reviewed it than I was with time. But yes I do like Teahouse for common and immediate problems. You are all great! Thanks again. HeatherBlack ( talk) 21:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Heather: Actually, most of the people who review articles aren't administrators. There are over 100,000 active editors on Wikipedia, and fewer than 2,000 are administrators. With over four million articles, they can't look at them all. They are there for us to call on in case of a dispute or a tricky problem, but the rest of us are just editors like you who have been around a bit longer. I hope you continue to make articles about arts topics, and maybe after a while you will be helping out the new editors yourself. — Anne Delong ( talk) 22:21, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
The AFC Backlog Buster Barnstar
|
||
Congratulations, Anne Delong! You're receiving The AFC and Teamwork Barnstars because you reviewed 250 articles during the recent AFC Backlog elimination drive! Thank you for you contributions to Wikipedia at-large and helping to keep the backlog down. We hope you continue reviewing submissions and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! Mdann52 ( talk) 16:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC) |
Hi, Anne! I don't know if you saw my comment on this article at the Help Desk, where I expressed concerns about copyright. I've looked at it again this morning, and it seems clear that (1) the French wp article was created by one of the many Franks on 16 October 2012 by copying more or less verbatim from here (2009 archive) or somewhere else carrying the same content; and that (2) our page was created on 18 October 2012 by one of the many Franks either by translation of the French article or by copying from here. I believe it should be blanked as a full-scale copyvio, but do not want to tag it without seeing what you think. Best, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 12:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello... Will you please tell me how did you decide about her so fast? Did you research on the internet? If you did so, how can you judge websites as being no reliable independent sources to show notability or to verify the information although you don't know Turkish? There are also English websites which gives information about her, that you may find unreliable! It's really hard to understand your approach. You're living in Canada and qualifying someone -that you know nothing about - of being not notable. I wonder why you chose to be destructive instead of constructive. (like Ssilvers) Will you enlighten me how did you come to the conclusion that her information must be deleted? What's your purpose of sending message to Wikipedia-TURKEY? (Türkiye) Are you trying to prove that you know better than them? Thanks in advance. Movericks ( talk) 18:52, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Good luck, and thank you for taking part in making the encyclopedia. — Anne Delong ( talk) 03:54, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I would like to kindly ask you is asking another editor to edit my article for an option? if so i'd-- Amellondon ( talk) 19:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC) like to kindly ask can you edit my article for me so it meets the Wikipedia criteria, it was in the queue for review however i have been asked to continue editing it and to resubmit it.
I'd if appreciate your help and assistance if possible.
Kind regards
Amellondon
Dear Amellondon: I see that your article about Nicky Slim Ting Walker has been declined because it doesn't have any references to reliable, independent sources. This means that to have a Wikipedia page Mr. Walker must have been written about extensively in news reports, magazine articles, movie revies, books, etc. I checked on the internet, and all I could find about him were a casting call, a couple of press releases, a mention on a facebook page, etc., all of which appear to be closely connected to him or his film. I would gladly help add the sources to the article if I could find any. Since the film has not yet been released, this may be the reason that it has not yet had any film reviews or other articles written about it or about Mr. Walker by journalists. Unless you know of several of these, your article will not be accepted into the encyclopedia at this time. Perhaps you could try again after the film is released in the theatres. At that time, if you do get some independent press coverage, and have trouble adding the information to your article, ask me again and I will help. Sorry! — Anne Delong ( talk) 10:13, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne,
I submitted a page for The Swan Gallery but it was rejected for note having third party references to it. I have added a few others but most of the articles that we have been linked to have been for newspapers/magazines & don't have links to them online.
Regards,
Chris
Chrislamb33 ( talk) 10:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
I have deleted the contact information section from your article, since this is totally promotional and not appropriate. Those interested can go to the gallery web site for that information. Please remember that Wikipedia is not a free advertising web site.
Wikipedia only has articles on notable subjects. This means that the subject has to have been written about extensively by journalists or other authors not connected with the subject, who then published the information in established, reliable publications. Not all businesses fall into this category, and if no one has written about the Swan Gallery your article will not be accepted. However, the references do not have to be on line. If newspapers or magazines which are published only on paper have written about the gallery, you can add references to that as long as you are specific (article title, date, name of author, etc.) so that it can be checked, and as long as the writer was not connected to the gallery. I changed your one reference into a citation - you can see how I did it by looking at the source code.
I hope this helps. — Anne Delong ( talk) 12:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Palmetto Education Association, Anne Delong!
Wikipedia editor Rinnenadtrosc just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Palmetto Education Association is a great new article. Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment on Rinnenadtrosc's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Khim Borey may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 02:31, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
I notice that you are tagging articles for CSD G13. Are you aware that there is a bot approved to search for these and add to the cat?
There are two reason why you might consider doing other tasks:
BTW, after glancing around this page. I see you are doing great work with AfCs and the Teahouse. Thanks.-- SPhilbrick (Talk) 11:51, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Ali Award for you | |
« There is no
wealth like
knowledge, no
poverty like
ignorance ».
« People have either a brother of you in the religion, or brother of you in the creation». . Ali ( talk) 01:19, 24 August 2013 (UTC) |
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC Reviewer permission. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 08:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kalattiyur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mettupalayam ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:50, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Please see my response at WT:X. John Carter ( talk) 16:26, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne,
Thank you for sending me the message about this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Ulysses_Owens
It would be great it you could help me! I have tried to get this article up to snuff for some time, and it has been a little discouraging that it hasn't been accepted. I am also somewhat unfamiliar with the format for messages, so hopefully this finds you.
Thanks, Nick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicktgrinder1 ( talk • contribs) 18:48, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne, I really appreciate you adding the reviews, yet the article was still declined. I believe you found some great articles on Ulysses, and I am slightly unsure of where to go from here. Any help you can offer is greatly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicktgrinder1 ( talk • contribs) 05:43, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello Anne,
I recently submitted an article for submission and it was rejected. I am intending on re-submitting it. How do I do this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andreavictoria91 ( talk • contribs) 14:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Andreavictoria91! (Don't forget to sign your posts by typing for tildas (~).). Just click on the blue "Resubmit button" in the pink decline box. This should make a large yellow box appear either at the top or the bottom of the page. Then you will know that it is resubmitted. Good luck! — Anne Delong ( talk) 14:29, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne,
You may recall my article Algeco Scotsman never appeared. I'm not sure what I did wrong and I'd like to try again. Could you assist me with that? Any common mistakes you think I may have made in submitting?
Thank you for your help.
Lisa 68.54.252.53 ( talk) 16:59, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Lisa: Hello again! The first thing you should do is log in. Then you will see at the top of the page your sandbox. You can write the article there, but remember to save (not just preview!) at least after each paragraph or new section that you add. If you are not sure it's working, you can send me an e-mail and I will tell you if I can see it.
When you are ready to have your article reviewed, add {{subs:submit}} at the top of the page and save.
Common mistakes: Not writing from a neutral point of view, not including references to reliable sources, and using mainly closely connected sources instead of independent ones such as news reports, magazine articles and books. Also, it's not necessary to create a long involved article to be accepted. Just some basic facts and enough independent sources to show that it's a notable (widely written about) subject, then submit. You can always add more after it's accepted, or even while it's in the queue. — Anne Delong ( talk) 17:20, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Tito☸ Dutta 03:48, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mac & Devin Go to High School may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:44, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Jon Charles Altman which you marked for deletion as " an incorrectly left-over redirect," was rather a redirect that erroneously redirected to the article , instead of to the article talk p (which I fixed). As I understand it, the procedure there is that such redirects to the article talk p. are deliberate as a way of tracking what happens to the AfCs. Personally, I think the whole AfC structure is absurdly confusing and in need of redesign, at least based upon the frequency of my own errors-- I know I get the various steps mixed up at least 5 or 10% of the time when I work there, and I have been known to skip steps and just move pages where they ought to go if I can't figure out what is supposed to be done. Fortunately, the needed resign is probably about to happen. DGG ( talk ) 04:59, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
There's already a page for 24 Indian Version TV series: 24_(Indian_TV_series)
The page 24 - Indian version (2013) is unnecessary and should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pathak.ab ( talk • contribs) 08:20, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne, Thanks very much for your interest in joining IEG Com - we'd love to have you as a member! I left some info about setup for the committee in a longer message on your meta talk page, hope you check that page too. Cheers! Siko (WMF) ( talk) 23:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
the one sean 03:08, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne,
We submitted a stub contribution for the organization "Lao Human Rights Council" which you reviewed and rejected. You mentioned that the article was not and encyclopedic article. How can we fix it to make it encylopedic ? There are literally dozens of independent news articles referencing the organization, including the New York Times (Associated Press, Fresno Bee,Star Tribune, Agence France Press, etc.) . I was submitting a stub, so I did not have time to reference these at the time. What should I do to resubmit and make the article encyclopedic ? I would be grateful if you could advise, so we do not make this mistake again and waste our time and effort with submissions that do not meet wikipedia standards. If possible, we would like to resubmit. Thanks for your help.
Publico2020 (
talk)
15:35, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Publico2020 : Don't worry! The page that I declined was just the one on which you had posted a question. You submitted it, so I had to decline it to get it out of the review list because it wasn't an article. I moved the text to your talk page, so it was just an empty page. Your submission is still up for review at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Lao Human Rights Council. You can delete the large blue box from your talk page if you want to. Sorry to have confused you. — Anne Delong ( talk) 15:49, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Anne,
Thanks. But, I think that I messed up again. Before getting your good message, I posted a question again on the Lao Human Rights Council page again to you. I guess I am a little confused about how things work with the talk pages, etc., and am still learning.
Maybe I messed the page up again that you mentioned because I posted a question again, etc.
I also added more newspaper reference sources to the submission stub, which I do not know if they went through or not for the review list article "Lao Human Rights Council"
Thanks a lot for taking the time to reply and explain things to me, I am learning (slowly) the process. What you explained to me is helpful. Is it possible for you to double check what you mentioned above in your previous reply. Because I think I made mistake in posting a question to the empty page that you mentioned (once again--my mistake). I apologize. I do not know how to correct this. Publico2020 ( talk) 16:10, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne, I recently submitted an article on Prof. Lim Keuky, the founder of the Cambodian Diabetes Association. It was declined on the basis of transgression of the copyright laws. I am new to Wikipedia. I am the Deputy Director of CDA Siem Reap Branch and created and wrote the website from which I have taken most of the content of the article I submitted. Is it possible to reconsider the article given this information? I appreciate your time. Thank you. CDA Siem Reap ( talk) 03:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne I regret the extra work I caused by accidentally submitting an article ( Ticks of domestic animals) that I had already submitted, and had been accepted in December 2011. (This article now seems well regarded by its readers.) However, it was still in my Sandbox when I submitted two new and related articles on September 9, 2013, titled Mites of domestic animals, and Insects of domestic animals. As a fairly new contributor to Wikipedia, I have found all procedures well enough explained, except for a clear procedure of how to finally submit an article, so my actions yesterday were a bit uncertain. Thank you for all your hard work as an editor. Wadudu ( talk) 16:13, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne Repeated message with Subject inserted!
I regret the extra work I caused by accidentally submitting an article ( Ticks of domestic animals) that I had already submitted, and had been accepted in December 2011. (This article now seems well regarded by its readers.) However, it was still in my Sandbox when I submitted two new and related articles on September 9, 2013, titled Mites of domestic animals, and Insects of domestic animals. As a fairly new contributor to Wikipedia, I have found all procedures well enough explained, except for a clear procedure of how to finally submit an article, so my actions yesterday were a bit uncertain. Thank you for all your hard work as an editor. Wadudu ( talk) 16:27, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne Delong,
Good day!
I would like your help on how to get approval?
This person is a known person - http://act-holdings.com.sg/about-us/our-founder/ and the company as well here in Singapore.
What would be the arrangement? Do you like to communicate with the owner of the company?
My email is rybaxs@yahoo.com
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rybaxs ( talk • contribs) 02:01, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Rybaxs: Wikipedia is not an advertising web site. It only has articles about companies, people, etc., that are so well known that they have been written about in news reports, magazine articles or books. Also, if an article is written about this person, it would have to be written in a neutral, factual way, not as a tribute. References to the news reports and other articles written by journalists or authors not connected with him or his company must be included. Once it is written, the text can be changed by other editors if they find reports to back up their information. Also, you will have to write the article in your own words, not using the text that is published on the web site above. If, after you have found the references, you want to make the article, you should try this link: Wikipedia:Your first article
Hello Anne Re: Bradwardine and District entry submission. Yes, the information I submitted was adapted from a book published by the Bradwardine History Committee in 2003. They listed an extensive timeline; I took out only the information applying directly to Bradwardine and District (my home town and district). This is a first time (probably the only time :-) submission to Wiki for me. Ghost towns have a history. I figured people ought to know Bradwardine was once a lively, vibrant, thriving town and district.
Dilys Collier Tyndalstone ( talk) 18:50, 11 September 2013 (UTC) Red Deer AB
DEar Anne,
Thank you for your message
It is my intention to complete this entry - when I can find time to negotiate all the protocols.
Please leave it for editing for the moment it you do not mind. I also have another one proposed for Our Dogs - the same problems apply
Best wishes 86.181.68.197 ( talk) 14:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
David
Hello Anne, I'm new and beginner. But I learned this morning how can I write "title"... I think that it's better now. Thanks-- 77.251.14.186 ( talk) 15:05, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello Anne, I'm beginner here. But I learned this morning how can I write the "title". Thanks-- Tarasyani ( talk) 15:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
-- Redrose64 ( talk) 20:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Could you advise why the article was declined please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ukpayroll ( talk • contribs) 16:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
By all means you have my permission to delete anything you want. I am not much of a writer and that article needs a lot of help. I went to the same High School as he did and have always admired his talent. Anyway have fun and do not wait for my approval for any sort of rewrite. I am extremely easy to get along with but I do not own a computer. I accept your conditions and am very happy that you have shown interest. Michaelgossett ( talk) 02:36, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
I see that you have already started making changes to the article. Thanks for the help. You are making it a much better article than it was. God bless you and yours. Michaelgossett ( talk) 03:05, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
I have added the citations as well as I could now. But I will later work on it more thoroughly as I get a hang of how to use Wikipedia more adroitly. Meanwhile how do I resubmit it?
It is still in the talk page...
Regards
Anthony — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdass ( talk • contribs) 05:51, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne, So first time I'm trying to add to wiki and received your comment that my Kat Rocket item was a copyright violation. The link you provided as the source CBC is a site I started and the wording is mine. I managed Kat Rocket and co-owned our record label "Hoodwink Records Inc." from 1995. In fact most of the Kat Rocket online content is mine and created to promote the band with full support from Darren Donaghey and Stella Panacci of Kat Rocket and my business partners. See this link as example of other wording i created and used in my wiki post - please note my name and creation date: http://www.canadianmusicwiki.com/%28S%28ghmicsrgu23amgrdsotghz55%29%29/Kat-Rocket.ashx. Also our art licensing company now owns all the Kat Rocket masters as part of the Hoodwink Records Inc. shareholders dissolution agreement we signed a few years back.
I'd really love to include the Kat Rocket story on wiki but am also happy to withdraw it if wiki doesn't feel it meets copyright standards.
Thanks for your help and I look forward to your reply.
My best Mariopanacci ( talk) 16:11, 18 September 2013 (UTC).
Hi Anne, Wow I had no idea what wikipedia was all about and I've been a regular reader for many years. I totally accept your positions and will now attempt a total rewrite. The web is full of Kat Rocket published sources with reviewer and magazine tags so I should be able to contribute them rather than my existing text. Thanks so much for pointing out all my errors. Do I win the prize for the worst, most self serving, vain attempt at "puffery" ever to attempt inclusion into wikipedia (: ). My very best 70.31.156.243 ( talk) 18:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne I recently submitted an article about the village I grew up named 'Perumpillichira'. It was rejected in the initial review due to lack of references. Unfortunately, I'm not able to find enough reference material as this village is so small and not at all famous. I wrote this tiny article based on my own experience living there for 20 years. Please let me know how can I help you to make the review effective
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
John.valen (
talk •
contribs)
20:19, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anish: Luckily, Wikipedia doesn't require many references for a small article about a village. Mainly, we require proof that it is a village recognized by the government. So, if it has a post office designation, or a has census report, is marked on a published map, is on the local municipality's list of villages, anything like that will suffice. How about * http://yellowpages.sulekha.com/idukki_perumpillichira_area_pin-code.htm
— Anne Delong ( talk) 20:52, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks Anne
I looked at the links you provided and they are all accurate.So, I added them under reference. Please let me know if this is sufficient — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
John.valen (
talk •
contribs)
22:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear John.valen: The article still needs work, and should have sources about some of the facts, but you have added enough to show that it is a notable topic, so I have passed it. I removed some adjectives that would be considered opinion rather than fact. I hope that you will continue to improve it, and maybe make articles about other topics that interest you. Good luck, and remember to sign your posts by typing four tildas (~). — Anne Delong ( talk) 08:49, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Anne, I took the information from the previous article and re-wrote it, adding additional sourced material that I had. Feel free to combine their histories...thanks! Rozehawk ( talk) 17:41, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne, Just a 'heads up' as I've only just noticed you left a message at User talk:DavidCavill re the above asking if he intended to move it over to main space. I've been watching the draft as I suspect the 'history' section looks to have been substantially copied from here; and the intro, profile and politics sections seem to be from this article with just company details altered and no attribution given. COI (and possibly promotion?) may also come into the equation (David Cavill owns Our Dogs - see third line from the bottom of the draft; he also owns Animal Care College, which incidentally it looks like the editor had created an article for previously but was deleted). SagaciousPhil - Chat 19:03, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for helping me reach the first step in my first submission AfC. 112SU Stornoway
112SU Stornoway (
talk)
21:34, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:La Luz del Mundo. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:14, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
The Articles for Creation barnstar | ||
Thanks for explaining the inline citation proceedures to me. Zach Vega ( talk to me) 13:12, 20 September 2013 (UTC) |
Thank you for telling me that my article was deficient. What do I do now? Kiwanis2015 ( talk) 14:24, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
(This message was moved from the bottom of Anne's user page, where unfortunately it was not seen until weeks later.)
Hi, Anne,
whoops, looks like I screwed up. I'd be pleased if you re-did my article in the correct format. Also, if you have any suggestions with the overall references, categories and URLs I've added, I'd appreciate it greatly. Thanks, again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnzodrow ( talk • contribs) 15:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
^ Quote from Gina MacDonald, Contributor, in Biographical Dictionary Of Contemporary Catholic Writing,
ISBN
0-313-24585-1, p. 307
^ SEE ISBN NUMBERS, Amazon Kindle Book Store, Amazon.com, Barnes & Noble Nook Store, Barnesandnoble.com ^ Amazon, Amazon Kindle, Barnes & Noble, Nook store]
^ IBDB,(International Broadway Data Base), IBDB.com, Dramatic Publishing Catalog, 2012, p. 181
^ IMDB, (International Movie Data Base) IMDB.com, Leonard Maltin's TV Movies, p. 579, p. 684, Writers Guild Of America Awards, 1976, WGAW.org
^ IMDB, IMDB.com
^ Biographical Dictionary Of Contemporary Catholic American Writing, Edited by Daniel J. Tynan, Greenwood Pres, ISBN 0-313-24585-1, pp.307-309
^ See Ya Publishing
Remember, when the reviewers are deciding on the notability of the author (you, I guess), they only consider what has been written by other authors and journalists. The IMBD and IBDB are user-contributed; the publishers and sales sites don't have a neutral point of view. It would be helpful if you could find some reviews to add as references.
I hope this helps. — Anne Delong ( talk) 17:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you, Anne for all your input. I'm on it.
It's the clearest best advice I've ever had. Many thanks again. Johnzodrow ( talk) 23:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne
Thank you for your inputs on an article for creation for Ang Jolie Mei. Special thanks for directing me to the Singapore Wiki Project page. I am new to Wiki and was unaware of this. Thanks for the help again
Regards Petson Peter AKA Writer Wrench Writerwrench ( talk) 04:22, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Would a userspace list of the "What submission/who" ordered by how the bot is going to nominate be useful? I could see a userspace task where the bot updates the list to move a indicator to show what the last submission that was nominated was and add to the list each time a new set of AfC pages became eligible for G13 (and the bot served notice on them). Would that be useful for the AfC rescue crew? Hasteur ( talk) 18:53, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
2011 November
2011 December
This would not need any software intervention. After a while we should be well ahead of the bot. The user box could be in the top corner. In fact, I am going to set up such a page in my user space today and start using it, and see if anyone else is interested.
If it's not too much work, an announcement to put on the page that says "The G13 bot has reached this date, and has nominated submissions up to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation.submission name" (so that we can see what letter of the alphabet it is working on) would be helpful. — Anne Delong ( talk) 19:57, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Hasteur: Okay, I'm not sure why the order of nomination is being changed, but why not change the order of the sort of the category to match? Having two different sorts laying around of the same list, one of which is misleading, doesn't seem to make sense. However, I don't really care about all that. I am interested in trying not to waste my time by looking over ones that have already been looked at. I presume since you didn't say anything about it that this is an unrelated problem, the answer is no. SI am unaware of anything particular about the words "rescue" and "squad", but I will happily change my language if it is mysteriously charging people with emotion. — Anne Delong ( talk) 21:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Anne,
I followed your instructions closely. So feel I've added specific sources, full URLs and reviews you wanted. The article is up. Would you be so kind as to take a quick look at it? Isn't the reference reflist supposed to automatically generate?
Thanks.
Johnzodrow ( talk) 23:55, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
When looking at the references, the number of IMDB references are overwhelming the others. Isn't there one page at IMDB that summarizes everything connected with a certain person? I don't usually see individual references for each item. Remember that IMDB is not considered to be a reliable source, since people input their own information. You can still link the one reference to a number of spots in the article, Like this:<ref name=John's IMDb page>[http://URLHERE TITLE]</ref> for the first one, and then <ref name=John's IMDb. page /> after that.
I see that you have found a couple of book reviews.
Reading over the text of your article, I see that there is a lot of material that isn't written in your own words. Quotations should only be a small part of an article, not the main part. Here's something to read: WP:QUOTEFARM
Some articles to look at for examples:
I will be leaving you now to another reviewer, because although I am fairly good with references, I am not an expert in either writing or Catholicism. Good luck. — Anne Delong ( talk) 03:29, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Zach Vega ( talk to me) 12:07, 24 September 2013 (UTC)See my talk p. for my response DGG ( talk ) 00:53, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne,
thank you again for the insight and help. I'm on it. Can I ask who is the new reviewer you are recommending?
very best to you,
John
Johnzodrow ( talk) 23:57, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear John: I really don't know the strengths of the various reviewers. If your article is submitted and is in the queue, someone will pick it out to review. However, there are a couple of things that you can do in the meantime: (1) You could leave a message at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk, asking if there's anything that should be fixed up before the review. You could also ask for help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism and maybe find someone who has worked on similar articles and would be willing to help. — Anne Delong ( talk) 01:11, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Glad to get your comment "Add citation" to my query to the Help Desk a few days ago. An article ( David G. Benner), now newly in mainspace after Roger(Dodger67) moved it, needed more references in two of the four paragraphs under Careers. I've added a couple today and could put in more but would love to know the sensible WP approach for citing CVs. It's pretty clear in admins' and editors' postings and other guidelines that pseudo-promo sources like Facebook, LInkedIn and blogs aren't reliable sources. Yup, can see that. Now, an APA stylebook guideline, one of the few, says to handle things like this: to write that the text's info comes from a CV (of a certain date if listed), then record where the info is accessible online. I've done it that way for one of the newest reference notes. While researching the article, I was finding short snibs of career info mentioned in solid sources, and those could be compiled and referenced (lumpy solution), but the plainest and most orderly outline of Benner's worklife is on his own website. I like the APA solution (Chicago Manual of Style wasn't useful) but still feel antsy about the situation for future editing. What think? JaneFaber ( talk) 06:53, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear JaneFaber: There is nothing to prevent you from citing a person's own web site, but this type of citation is extremely weak, and should be accompanied by other, more independent sources. A biography written by the person himself tells what he would like the world to know about him, whereas an encyclopedia is a synopsis of what independent authors and journalists have written about him. Making a point of disclosing that the information is from a CV is good, but it is a weaselly way of not finding proper verification. You see this in news articles when the reporters don't want to bother to check their facts, so instead of writing "John Smith was innnocent of the crime", they write "According to his mother, John Smith was innocent of the crime" (perfectly true). The style guides for professional organizations are intended to be used to allow the reader to judge the level of expertise of a person cited as corroboration of someone else's work in an essay or a paper published in a journal. A person shouldn't be used to verify information about himself.
Let me give you an imaginary example: Mr. X is the CEO of an oil company. It's important for the stockholders' confidence in the company that he appear capable and reliable. He lists on the company web site what he sees as his most positive accomplishments, a glowing report of education completed, positions held, committees worked on, involvement in charitable works, etc. He says nothing about the time he spent in alcohol rehab, the fact that two of his previous companies went bankrupt, his arrest years before for tax evasion, or the fact that he led the company in an efficiency drive, cutting back on pipeline inspections, leading to an oil spill and protests by angry fishermen. Yet all of these things, if written about in the media, would end up in his Wikipedia article (if he existed).
Anyway, I guess my point is to keep looking for independent corroboration, and if you do use the CV as a source, be prepared for other editors to remove it or replace it with an independent one, and to add and change the information in the article to better match the independent source if it differs from the CV Sorry; I know that this is likely not what you wanted to hear. — Anne Delong ( talk) 11:56, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Hey Anne, just thought I'd let you know about https://github.com/WPAFC/afch/issues/184 to see if you support such a thing or if you think it should be an off by default option. Thanks! Technical 13 ( talk) 13:15, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Anne, hi! My article on the Holy Incense was rejected on grounds that it sounded more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. I do not deny that it has an essay-like style, but this is larger due to my past writing experiences on other venues. In short, I am asking your advice on how to change the style and make the current article acceptable to the set-requirements of Wikipedia. Can you please suggest areas in which I can change the style and make it acceptable? Here is my article: User:Davidbena/draft article on Holy Incense . Thank you in advance. Davidbena ( talk) 17:45, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear David: I have read the first part of your article, although not all of the detailed bits about the spices, and I have some suggestions:
Now keep in mind that I am only one of 120,000 people who have edited Wikipedia in the past month, and my opinion is only an opinion. Feel free to disregard any section which doesn't make sense to you. Good luck! — Anne Delong ( talk) 19:49, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Raging Bull. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:13, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Hey Anne please do feel free to join me and or expedite the process as you did with the Hoot Hester article. I know that Hoot Hester was a friend of one of Lonnie Peerce's but I don't know how long the band stayed in Louisville after I left there in December of 1969. I also don't know too much about what happened after Peerce retired. Anyway feel free to join in on any article I am either creating or editing. The Jim Kweskin article needs help and I am thinking of starting an Article on Subway Elvis. He was an Elvis impersonator long before Elvis died. He if from Toronto. Michaelgossett ( talk) 02:35, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne. I have moved the G13 rescue backlog to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/G13 rescue and done all the Os for December 2011. If I can find coverage in one reliable source for the article's subject quickly, I have postponed it as salvageable (and for a few left links to the source in question). Please advise if I should use the same procedure for AfDs and find as many sources as possible. Where a submission is duplicated in mainspace, I have redirected the submission to there.
Once I know what the procedure is, I can document it and we can get everyone to tackle the backlog. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:36, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, Ritchie333. I will skip the O's. The December 2011's are disappearing before I can check them, because the bot is no longer doing them by the alphabet, but by date, so my procedure will only work if we can stay a month ahead. About the duplicates: These will either have to be dealt with by history merge if appropriate or content from them moved to the the other article if there's enough to be worth the effort, or just let go if they really are duplicates. Because there's a rush, your temporary solution should give some time to do that later. I've been checking any I thought worth saving for copyvios before postponing them. I haven't been as thorough as you at checking for new sources; if there aren't any at all, or if they are all primary sources such as twitter or a band's web site I've been letting them go unless they fall under one of those inherently notable categories, such as a town or a professor. — Anne Delong ( talk) 13:51, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anee! I edited Muhammad Sharif (cosmologist). Please check it and include it as an article in Wikipedia. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeeshan313b ( talk • contribs) 16:09, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Zeeshan313b. I will look at your submission, but before I do you should remove the personal comments at the top. They belong instead on your personal user page, which would be at User talk:Zeeshan313b. Also, you won't have to worry about trying to organize people interested in Relativity; they are already organized at:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/Relativity
...and you can add your name there and start participating in discussions on the talk page. I'm sure you'll meet some kindred spirits there. — Anne Delong ( talk) 17:14, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anee! I removed the personal comments from the top. Thanks fopr your help. Muhammad Sharif (Cosmologist) is my beloved teacher. That's why i am excited and want to see him in Wikipedia. So please make Muhammad Sharif (cosmologist) as an article in Wikipedia. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeeshan313b ( talk • contribs) 17:52, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne! I made the changes as you said. I use neutral words and remove the External links from the main body. The revised version of the proposed article is https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Muhammad_Sharif_%28cosmologist%29&action=submit
So please make Muhammad Sharif (cosmologist) as an article in Wikipedia. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeeshan313b ( talk • contribs) 10:26, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Dear Zeeshan313b: I looked at the article again, and it appears to be exactly the same as it was. In fact, the article history shows that it has not been edited since I left my message. Perhaps you forgot to click on the "Save page" button. Please try again! — Anne Delong ( talk) 13:48, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne! I am so sorry as I may not be able to save the page. Thanks for your patience. Now I made changes accordingly again. I hope this will not disappoint you. link is /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Muhammad_Sharif_%28cosmologist%29
So please make Muhammad Sharif (cosmologist) as an article in Wikipedia. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeeshan313b ( talk • contribs) 15:19, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne! I am agree, you can make some changes to make it even more neutral, and can fix grammatical problems too. Make it ready to move for the encyclopedia. Thanks a lot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeeshan313b ( talk • contribs) 19:16, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne. FYI - You posted a G12 speedy deletion notice on ClopperAlmon's talk page and he/she then posted at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Article_on_Alfred_H._Bartles. -- Jreferee ( talk) 03:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello Anne, Thank you for taking the time to write to me at some length about the article I submitted on Alfred H. Bartles. As far as I can see from the material you sent, I was never given the opportunity to DELETE the submission which you had decided not to use. Thus, when it later appeared elsewhere, you deleted it for copyright reasons. I regard this mixup as a result of the difficulty and complexity of communicating with Wikipedia. Please understand that I long WANTED IT DELETED from Wikipedia and could find no way to do so.
When I got your message, I wanted to reply but could find no way to do so. After a lot of poking around on Wikipedia, I found this channel. At the top, it says "Put new text under old" but it does not say how to do so. It could simply add "by clicking the word [Edit] after the title."
Probably there is a better way to reply, but I failed to find it. Just another instance of how difficult it is to communicate with Wikipedia.
I see that someone has put a brief notice on Bartles on Wikipedia. Perhaps I can edit it to provide links and more information.
ClopperAlmon ( talk) 15:33, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
( ←) Hello, Anne Delong! I followed this from ANI. Since you deal with new users frequently, and they might need to contact you on your talk page, can I ask you you start archiving your talk page? You see, it took me 3 tries and about 12 minutes to get your talk page to load (I have lowly dial-up still). Some new users are put off by inconveniences and long talk pages is one. Can I ask you to set up an auto-archive using one of the bots? Thanks, (Dynamic IP, will change when I log off.) -- 64.85.216.33 ( talk) 11:30, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This the archive of messages posted on Anne Delong's talk page, July to September, 2013.
The Helping Hand Barnstar | ||
Hiya Anne
the
one
sean here, from AfC. I was |
Morning Anne,
I'm new to Wiki so thank you very much for taking the time to check my terrible first article attempt and for pointing me in the right direction. I will continue to edit the article, apply your advise, and add better references.
If I get stuck, would it be ok if I harassed you a bit ?
Thanks again,
Kate Audie Info ( talk) 05:17, 2 July 2013 (UTC) 2013.07.02 @ 07:16
Dear Audie Info: Sure, you can ask me for help any time. However, since I am not always on line, you can also ask questions at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, where there's always someone watching for new questions from beginning editors.
Here are some tips to start off with:
I hope this helps. Good luck with your article. — Anne Delong ( talk) 12:52, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne. Thank you for your comment at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/thoughtform_thought-form_ThoughtForms_(disambiguation). I wasn't sure if you were monitoring that page so I'm placing this message on your talk page. (I'm new to all this, so my apologies in advance if this is not the proper protocol). As you will see, I think your comment was fair and I certainly appreciate the hard work you are putting into wikipedia. I did have a few questions for you at that page if you have the time. Thank you. [[User:Peter Baum|Peter Baum].] ( talk) 20:46, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne,
I submitted the article "Earnings Call Transcript" for review dated July 2, 2013. I appreciate the suggestions provided by you to add more reference sources and valuable feedback. It would be helpful if you could provide any expected numbers for references and help out on the kind of references that would suit and add value to article, that I could source them and incorporate them for resubmission?
Best Regards, SamXtal. SamXtal ( talk) 10:29, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear [User:SamXtal|SamXtal]]: It is difficult to specify an exact number of references, because it depends on how extensive the information in the references is. The main thing is that the references must be independent (that is, not written by or for any person or organization that may be mentioned), reliable and published (not somebody's personal blog, for example), and that they specifically confirm the information. Not being a business person, the only things that come to my mind are business journals and economics textbooks, or maybe published government documents that specify guidelines for company activities. It also depends on how much information is in the article. A long article will have more facts to be supported than a short one.
Before you do that, though, I have noticed that most of your article is not actually about the earnings call transcripts. Is that because it's a simple concept and there isn't much to say about it? Wikipedia already has an article called Earnings call, which is in danger of being deleted because it doesn't have proper source citations. In my opinion (remembering that I am not a business person), you should do one of two things:
In either case, unless I am misunderstanding, the information at the bottom of your article about other calls doesn't seem to be about earnings calls and doesn't belong in the article about them. Are you describing the activities of a certain kind of business, perhaps Real Team Systems Pvt. Ltd., that transcribes various types of calls? If so, perhaps you need a more general topic, such as "business call transcript" or whatever is appropriate.
Also, keep in mind that your article should be written for the general public, not just for business experts. Rather than "form 654-Tx" or some such thing, which refer only to a specific situation, it is better to say something like "Many governments, including ___, require companies to complete forms declaring ___ in order to ___ and the transcripts provide valuable ____ which can be used to ___".
Keep in mind once more that my business experience is limited to one economics course and for a time running a small business out of my house, where hopefully no one was transcribing my calls. I hope this is helpful, but if you would like another perhaps more informed opinion, you could ask at the Teahouse. — Anne Delong ( talk) 11:42, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Since my canvass on WT:AFC didn't work too well so far, I figured I might ask a few editors very involved in the project for help -
I'm (trying) to work on a redo of the Article Wizard, the current one is old, clunky, and not very efficient. There's a few tools that can be used to do this, namely mw:GuidedTour, which could help (with some funky buttons and stuff) it look like Special:GettingStarted. Other ideas include just making it look nicer, etc.
If you'd like to help, just ping me here (I'll watch this page) or on IRC (nick=Charmlet) for more info :) I'd appreciate it! Thanks ~ Charmlet -talk- 02:49, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Why did you delete my page [Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ORTEC]? What copywrite information was present? Can you please explain?
Hello Anne, Regarding article that I am writing and which you have rejected on copyright grounds. I'd be grateful if you could advise me why as I am new to this. All the words are my own taken from previous articles and her website - which I wrote.
Dear editors: Neither of you have signed your posts, so I don't know your names, but you both have the same question. The ORTEC article had extensive text copied and pasted from the ORTEC web site, and the Kendra Haste article had text copied from her web site and from other sources. Wikipedia cannot accept text that is published elsewhere for copyright reasons, even if the text was originally written by the same person. People who edit Wikipedia must do so as individuals, and not as representatives of companies, so they can't make use of any text which has been written for the company (which in any case is almost always too promotional for an encyclopedia article). Similarly, someone who is acting as a representative of a public personality such as an author, musician, actor, etc., can't use text which was written for that person's use, say on their web site or in press releases. Also text which has been published in other places such as magazines or newspapers is copyright and can't be used, no matter who originally wrote it. At any rate, Wikipedia is a publication (a very large one), not a web hosting service, so including text that is posted elsewhere on the web is not appropriate. Imagine if you went to a book or magazine publisher and asked them to publish a book with the exact same text that you had used in your last book!
Both of these topics appear worthy of an article, so, please, I hope you will each write an article about your topic, using Wikipedia:Manual of Style as your guide, in sentences which are specially created for the encyclopedia, in a neutral tone rather than a promotion, and then submit it again. Thanks! — Anne Delong ( talk) 14:46, 5 July 2013 (UTC) (I have figured out that ORTEC question was from Shyamutty and the Kendra Haste question was from Patrickgdavies. — Anne Delong ( talk) 15:16, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne,
My article on Jess Michaels was deleted and I'm trying to get it back to edit it and clean it up. Can you help me get it back? Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jess Michaels I linked directly to the author page as the source, I'm happy to remove that and re-work it. I see I need to get more feedback from editors before submitting an article.
Thanks in Advance,
Fredsbro ( talk) 14:56, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MartinPoulter ( talk) 15:19, 7 July 2013 (UTC)Anne, I am sorry if the comment I made at the Teahouse or on my talk page made you feel bad in any way. From all that I have seen, you are an outstanding editor and a real asset to this great project. I remember you coming to the Teahouse in your early days of contributing here, and I have been very pleased that you have stuck around, gained your confidence and made real, valuable contributions. Please accept my apologies if I've hurt your feelings. - Jim Cullen328 Let's discuss it 07:11, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
This is not copyvio, because the site is a US government site., and the text on such sites is US-PD -- not that's it;'s a satisfactory article yet 'DGG (at NYPL) ( talk) 16:39, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
"This first paragraph "Second pragraph "Third paragraph" Where each paragraph begins with a quotation mark, but an ending one is used only at the end of the quoted material.
I got your message about our submitted page for C Ronald Kahn. According to you, someone else is creating a page called Carl Ronald Kahn. Is there any way to get in touch with whoever is doing this? I am Dr. Kahn's official biographer and I don't want anyone else trying to post sub-standard information about this important person. Thanks. Joslin735
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
the one sean 15:19, 10 July 2013 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
(chat) techatology 02:09, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Hi Anne,
You recently reviewed an article I wrote about Dr. Susan Pick and suggested that I make better, more reliable references to prove her notability as well as remove some of the elements that were based a bit more in social commentary rather than the dates and facts about her life and accomplishments. I have gone back and edited in a way that I thought was suitable, but, before resubmitting it, I wanted to ensure that these edits were suitable for Wikipedia. I'm new to Wikipedia and don't know if this is the correct space to ask for this kind of assistance, but I'd really appreciate it if you could see my corrections and give me more feedback (positive or negative) so that I avoid further rejection. The link is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Susan_Pick
Thank you!
Mereditharra ( talk) 18:33, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Mereditharra: I will be leaving the next review of your article to someone else, but I can give you a couple of tips:
1) The lead paragraph should be a summary. Right now it just has one item, a red-linked organization. The name of the organization should come first, then the acronym. You should add to this paragraph, maybe that she is a Mexican (political scientist? social psychologist? I can't tell), and also if she is a professor that should be mentioned there too.
2) Is the Autonomous University different from the National Autonomous University?
3) There is still too much promotion of ideas and theories. This article should just be actual facts, no "suspicions" and "suggestions": She founded an organization with this purpose, she wrote a book on this topic, she worked at this University in this capacity, etc. Explanations of theories should be in an article about the specific theory, details about a book should be in an article about the book (provided that it is notable). For example Amartya Sen has his own article, so it's not necessary to explain his theory, just link his name to his Wikipedia page.
4) You have a lot of references, but they are mostly just URLs. Eventually all of these will have to be properly formatted in the way that the first one on the list is done. Before submitting the article for review, at least pick out several of the independent book reviews, news articles, etc., and format them properly so that the reviewer can see that they are written by journalists or other independent authors are in publications with editorial oversight.
I hope this helps. — Anne Delong ( talk) 20:08, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
I've been participating in the backlog drive and am attempting to get my totals to show up on the page, but think I've messed something up. Is there something I need to do other than what I have on the sign-up section? The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 ( talk) 14:08, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80. I see that you have made yourself a blank drive page; that's good. You should leave a note on Excirial's talk page. He updates the pages manually, and he may not have your name on his update list yet. He's been updating every day or two, so then you will have to wait until his next update to see any change. — Anne Delong ( talk) 14:32, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. We're organizing an office hours session with the Teahouse to bring in mentors from across the wiki to try out Snuggle and discuss it's potential to support mentorship broadly. The Snuggle team would appreciate it if you would come and participate in the discussion. We'll be having it in #wikimedia-office connect on Wed. July 17th @ 1600 UTC. See the agenda for more info. -- EpochFail( talk • work), Technical 13 ( talk), TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 17:09, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne, Thank you for the work you are doing for bluegrass music at Wikipedia. I'm not sure if this is the correct forum to use to contact you. The BNL page is in danger of deletion. If you are able to contribute to the page and remove the objectionable material, you will be continuing to help the presence of bluegrass music at Wikipedia. I was not able to meet the guidelines for submitting material though I interviewed the magazine's owners directly. Your work will be much appreciated. Thanks, Tom. E19S24cr ( talk) 20:23, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
FYI. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 03:44, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for accepting my article on Savannah Phillips. have a nice day.
Debrafir (
talk)
23:49, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your edit to Channel Orange. I worked a while getting it to GA. If it's no bother, would you like to comment/vote at my nomination for FA here? It's a relatively short article to review. Dan56 ( talk) 04:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne, There is a question at the teahouse that would benefit from your perspective if you have time. Flat Out let's discuss it 13:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne, thanks for the helpful tips, i have made the changes that you suggested. I really appreciate your help with this. I haven't resubmitted the article yet, just sending to you as requested. Thanks again. Michaelleach 16/07/13 Michaelleach ( talk) 21:07, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Thanks Anne, would never have got this article live without you! Michaelleach ( talk) 21:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC) |
Dear Anne I stumbled across the proposed article on Renana Peres and was left flabbergasted that here an article is put through proper quality assessment criteria, whereas elsewhere pages are being added willy-nilly. I would appreciate if you could spare a minute to have a look at an article recently created that I proposed for deletion just so I can see what someone with your level of assessment makes of it. You can find the article here. I should add that a lot of work has been added since it was nominated for deletion. I would be most grateful. Best regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 01:26, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne, you marked the submission as "under review" yesterday, did some work on it and then... nothing! Have you forgotten about this one? Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 09:25, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
The Techweek (conference) page should have no capital 'w' in the title. The company doesn't capitalize the w anywhere that I can find. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robsefer ( talk • contribs) 19:37, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry for the mistakes that I've been making. I'm quite new to the AfC reviewing, especially the fact that I'm on summer vacation from school and kind of in need of something. It's only one week since I've been reviewing AfC, so I have to acknowledge that. Sometimes I go a bit too fast...so is there any tips for me to improve my skills and get more "pass" reviews? -- みんな空の下 ( トーク) 20:58, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne Delong,
Thank you for making some changes to the cylinder fuse page. I submitted the changes.
Sincerely, Jbuehle — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbuehle ( talk • contribs) 17:45, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne,
Thank you for reviewing the post. The suggested edits and additional references will be made to get the article posted.
The reference link where you have mentioned that couple of links don't talk about Mobiveil: Those were added to trace back the story of formation of Mobiveil and the executives' background. I took that as a cue from other companies listing history of formation.
Thanks for suggesting icicitrinity as a good source. I would also urge you to consider SEC filings and the few more links under External links. These can't be directly referenced in the content but have just been included to provide an authentic reference that the company exists and is acknowledged by neutral entities.
Please advice how many links should I share to get the article approved.
Thanks again for taking time out to review.
Regards,
Mg.Chakravarthi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mg.chakravarthi ( talk • contribs) 17:47, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Mg.chakravarthi: It is okay to have those other references that don't mention Mobiveil, to support specific information as you have noted. It would be better to make citations and add these next to the specific information to which they relate (see Help:Referencing for beginners). However, Wikipedia requires as well sources which have information specifically about the subject, in this case Mobiveil. It is hard to say exactly how many, because it depends on in what depth each one covers the subject. Probably two more with several paragraphs of information would be okay (about Mobiveil), or more if each one has only one paragraph - I am estimating, because each subject and each source is different. The main thing is to have a neutral and rounded picture of the company.
About external links: The main thing to remember is that Wikipedia is not to be used to promote a business, but only to provide information. Links to sites that are intended to promote sales or investment, other than one to the company web site, may be considered to be promotional. You would probably be a better judge of that than I, since I am not a business person. Don't forget that once the article is published in the encyclopedia, other editors will be adding to and changing it. Good luck with your article. — Anne Delong ( talk) 21:41, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to write your response at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#WikiProject Articles for creation Threatens to Ruin Wikipedia. Your careful analysis of what you see when you are working on AfC articles, and your calm analysis of the person who raised the issue really help. You've chosen to work in a difficult, often tedious, area and many, many of us appreciate it. StarryGrandma ( talk) 18:05, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For all your hard work at AfC for defending the encyclopedia against not only unwanted content, but also defending new users against inappropriate rejections.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk)
00:35, 23 July 2013 (UTC) Seconded. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 12:54, 10 August 2013 (UTC) |
I have noted your interest in Bkue Grass. Do you have any data on a man named Orville Jenks??? I believe he is one of the original folks who sang, Sprinkle Coal Dust on My Grave Coal town guy ( talk) 13:27, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/How_It_Should_Have_Ended Hey thanks for your advice, I have added some reviews and links. Kindly, check them and further help me. Thank you again. Sudhansu94 ( talk) 04:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello Anne, Thank you for informing me that my proposed article about Councilwoman Dorothy Goosby is about to be deleted. In fact, I was not aware that it was still in the pipeline. In my last conversation with a Wikipedia editor, I was made aware of the reasons why my article could not be accepted, and I understood. I thought the article would automatically be deleted at that time. I appreciate your effort on my behalf. -Michael Weingarten — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.188.213.148 ( talk) 13:24, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 ( talk) 01:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Andrew 327 14:20, 26 July 2013 (UTC)✉→ Arctic Kangaroo ←✎ 15:02, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne - you left a comment about the proper use of titles on the article I submitted on Dana Beth Ardi. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Dr._Dana_Ardi - I got rid of the "Dr." everyhere except in the opening paragraph, but it's still in the title. Should I move and retitle the article, or is that something that would be done in a general cleanup by an AfC reviewer? Thanks! JSFarman ( talk) 16:28, 26 July 2013 (UTC))
Hi, Thank you for your advice, I will re-write my article in sentence and paragraphs form! Concerning the sources, all my sources are from newspapers, magazines and reports. They are all independant, what am I supposed to change about it? Thank you for your help again!-- Mmarraas ( talk) 13:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
1) Good source - I added some detail; people outside Belgium wouldn't know what RTBF was.
2) This looks like a business listing web site; not considered independent?
3) Good source - One sentence about AS. Tthe article title you gave it was incorrect and somewhat misleading, so I changed it.
4) If Automatic Systems is part of this larger company, this isn't an independent source.
5) Okay source Bold text– although it looks like AS is a member of this organization, it's likely that so is every business in the area, so if they have been selected for an award that's legit
6) Good source, good article; I fixed the title.
7) This sure reads like a press release, and the web site invites suppliers to submit them, and the site doesn't attribute its material to anyone in particular.
8) Another association of which the company is a member
I hope this helps. As you can see, some of the sources weren't totally independent. It's all right to have these dependent sources there, to back up non-controversial details. The result is a bit marginal. Can you find one more news or magazine source to push it over the top? — Anne Delong ( talk)
Dear Anne, thank you very much for your help! I removed the wrong sources and added a new one that I found in a specialist magazine. I hope it will be ok this time, Thanks again! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Mmarraas (
talk •
contribs)
07:27, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Anne, This is my first time on creating articles on Wikipedia. The article created was all written by me which is also available on the official website of 'Speak Kuwaiti' book. As the author of this new book, all the text written belongs to me. How can I repost the article for Wikipedia to accept it?
K. Ahmad Ali — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kam965 ( talk • contribs) 18:10, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
Hi Anny, this was my first attempt at an article and I am already frustrated. I am a Rotarian in Guatemala and wondered what would come up when somebody would want to find out about our organization. So, when I typed ¨Rotary Guatemala¨ as search words, the first option I was offered was an article about a guy by the name of Edmund Baroch who happens to be a friend but which had very little to do with what Rotary does in Guatemala and how it is organized. So I thought that something more to the point could help, and wrote the small article. Now, I am being told that copyrighted work was included and I wonder which part you refer to, so I can delete that part and rewrite it. Next, I am told that I need to put references to the statements from outside of the Rotary organization. Frankly, I don´t know where to look for them, and secondly, this information is factual and corresponds to the real situation of how Rotary is organized in this part of the world. Best regards, Michael Bostelmann, Michael ( talk) 05:28, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello Anne, thank you for taking a look at my page "Carl Ronald Kahn". As stated in your message, this was a duplicate submission. I submitted the original under the account "JoslinCommunications". The JoslinCommunications account is locked due to issues with the name, which means I can not edit the original submission. I would very much like to make your edits and then resubmit this page, but I am at a loss with how to proceed. Can you please advise me how to resubmit this page or how to unlock my other account?
Thanks in advance, Emily
Joslin735 ( talk) 19:25, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Emily: Unfortunately, in between the time that I left the message and today, the older article was deleted, so I guess you should continue to work on this one Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carl Ronald Kahn (2). For future information, anyone can work on any article, so even if you had to change your username, you could still have typed the name of the original article into the search engine and continued to edit it.
Mr. Kahn is obviously a noted biologist. Here are some comments that should help to get the article accepted:
I hope this helps. — Anne Delong ( talk) 20:32, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
You posted the declining of an AfC on my talk page but I simply pressed the submit button for another user who had created the draft then moved it to article space himself. I've moved your post over to his page for reference at User talk:DanielAmzallag. This is just an FYI message. Cheers, Cabe 6403 ( Talk• Sign) 15:03, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Anne -- I'm trying to find out how to make an article in my sandbox into an AfC article submission. I posted on the AfC help desk but haven't received a response. Can you give me some instruction? My article isn't finished (I'm working on it in microsoft word), but I want to make sure I'll be able to submit it when I'm done. Thanks. Evelenfiftyseven ( talk) 18:52, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello Re your message..Hello! Tassie Wombat, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined Can you please tell me why? What did I not do? Tassie Wombat ( talk) 21:52, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Tassie Wombat: As I wrote in my comment on the Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gemmological Association of Australia. Tasmania Division page, to have an article in Wikipedia a topic has to be notable. This means that it has to be written about in news reports, magazine articles or books that are not written by members of the organization, but by journalists and other authors. None of the references that you supplied were about the Tasmanian division. I suggested that you take the information that you have gathered and instead write it in the Gemmological Association of Australia article, because it is in bad shape and needs more references. The alternative is to find some news reports, etc., that ARE about the Tasmanian division. I hope this helps. — Anne Delong ( talk) 01:57, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne,
It was very helpful and kind of you to offer such a prompt reply to our question about what to do about making a new contribution to Wikipedia. We post the question to the Tea Room on July 25 about requesting what to do about the contribution and the need for outside review of the contribution "Lao Veterans of America" It still seems that no independent person has reviewed it for final publication, but your prompt response was very helpful and appreciated.
Thank you for your important work and helping to educated new users and contributors to Wikipedia. We really appreciate it and are sorry for the delay in thanking you.
We would like to make more contributions to Wikipedia and it is encouraging to hear from people like you.
Sincerely,
Publico2020 ( talk) 02:08, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks Anne we have members of The association looking for articles so hopefully we can find some and re visit
Tassie Wombat Tassie Wombat ( talk) 02:18, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Anne,
I submitted an entry on Algeco Scotsman for review. I'm new to Wikipedia, so it took me a while to figure out how to create, edit and submit, but I finally did it. I received a message that it was rejected but when I searched to find out why, I saw a note that said blank submissions are not accepted. The entry wasn't blank, but I fear I may have done something incorrectly when I submitted it that hid the contents. Now I'm unable to find the draft submission anywhere. I'd hate to think I have to start from scratch since it took me so long to input etc. I tried looking in my history but nothing showed up. I hope you can help me!
Thank you, Lisa Lgtrapani ( talk) 19:47, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Lisa: I think I may have bad news for you. I have looked at your contributions (you can see them by clicking on "Contributions" at the top right side of the page, and you will see
this), and as far as I can see, you sent only a blank page for review. You can click on the very first version of the article. It's hard to imagine what may have happened. Were you logged into the same account when you typed the article? If so, then somehow you must not have saved your text. Did you work on your article, saving it as you went along from time to time, or did you type the whole thing and just save it at the end? —
Anne Delong (
talk)
20:09, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne,
I saved as I went along and also viewed previews along the way. So there's no way to look at a history of drafts I was editing? I was able to go back and edit my drafts before I submitted, so I assume it was saved somewhere...
Lisa Lgtrapani ( talk) 20:27, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Lisa: When you click on the Show Preview button, your work is not saved, only when you press the Save button. When you look at the preview, you will see the following at the top of the page:
This is only a preview; your changes have not yet been saved! in red letters, and when you try to leave the page without saving, it will ask you if you are sure that you want to leave. Until you click on the Save button, the text is just in your browser, and doesn't go from your computer to the Wikipedia server.
The submit of the blank page was the very first edit that you made under the name Lgtrapani. I have even checked to see if any edit that you made was deleted, and there were none. So the only hope for the text to still exist is if you had been using another login at the time. I am sorry, but I don't think there is anything to be done about it. — Anne Delong ( talk) 21:16, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Anne Delong, thank you very much that is very clear. I will do just that. In addition, how do I request a new article on the sister pageant which is just as notable. Please advise. I am very new as you can see to wikipedia and it is so much to learn, but I want to learn. So I will go back and make mention of the sister pageant on the Miss International Page, and request a separate article or venture to write it myself. Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrsilintl2004 ( talk • contribs) 02:49, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Anne Delong,
Thank you very much for your help. I am very new to Wikipedia as you can see and there is a lot to learn. I am willing to learn though. Your explanation was very clear and so I will do just that. I will also add that there is a sister pageant and the name of the sister pageant. How do I request a separate article be written about the sister pageant as it is just as notable. As a matter of fact, Bob Eubanks, former host of the newly wed game was the host of the pageant for years. I think it should have a separate article. I mentioned that in the notes. Please advise as you have been very helpful. Thank you. Mrsilintl2004 ( talk) 02:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Anne, would it be possible to block this IP address (206.194.127.112) from making edits. This is a business computer and, while I have occasionally used it to correct minor issues in articles (such as misspellings), it should not be being used for article creation or major edits and especially not for vandalism. If you wish to contact me use my talk page divingpetrel 206.194.127.112 ( talk) 13:06, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear divingpetrel : IP addresses often change from time to time, unless your business computer has arranged with its service provider for a fixed IP address. If this is your business, you may know. If the IP is fixed to one computer, blocking it will prevent your computer being used for vandalism unless the person creates a login and password. If it is not fixed, you may just be blocking other random people who are using other computers elsewhere. Please check out the contributions of this IP by clicking HERE. If the constructive edits are all yours, and you are sure that the others are being made by someone using the same computer when you are not there, you can make your request for blocking at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. The administrators there will decide whether to block the IP address (I don't have the authority to do it). — Anne Delong ( talk) 15:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. Divingpetrel ( talk) 23:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm new to reviewing articles for AfC, and I keep coming across articles that you've previously reviewed - I'm inspired by the thoroughness of your reviews and the thoughtfulness of your comments. JSFarman ( talk) 00:55, 7 August 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks, JSFarman, I just keep thinking about how each article has a hopeful person behind it who may become a regular Wikipedia contributor. If you need any help with your reviews, please feel free to ask me for help, or, if you prefer, ask at the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation forum. I know that I asked dozens of questions there when I first started reviewing. Good luck! — Anne Delong ( talk) 03:29, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne, I'm unsure how to use this 'talk' page, or how to respond to your message. You asked for me to confirm whether I'd wanted the article on Andrew Fitton artist to be submitted. I can confirm that I had intended for it to be submitted... I simply didn't know how to do it. Please could you advise me how to do so? Or give me any tips? thanks Rosie Oxley Impressions of Cardiff and Swansea User name ImpressionsCardiffandSwansea (daughter of Andrew fitton)
Hello, I would like to retire this account and all content associated with it:
Joslin735 ( talk) 19:42, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
{{ admin help}} The above appeared on my talk page here after I had tried to help a user who had made two versions of an article under two usernames. I'm not sure how to deal with this, so I am requesting that an admin take over. Thanks! — Anne Delong ( talk) 20:00, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Nyttend ( talk) 00:14, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne,
I´ve found you on the teahouse page and would appreciate your guidance and advice. I`m quite a newby in editing. I would like to edit an english version of "my" article about an acapella vocal group Klangbezirk Klangbezirk
At first I´dont know how/where to start to translate an existing german article in order to contribute to the englisch wikipedia. I´ve read the German help pages but I did not find a satisfying answer, but warnings, that it would be difficult. I´ve heard about teahouse and that´s why I decided to look for a mentor there. Can you help me discovering the universe of wikipedia? Best regards -- Manuela2012 ( talk) 04:39, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Manuela2012. Well, here goes:
Good luck! — Anne Delong ( talk) 05:24, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
The article i am editing at present in my sandbox looks like this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Amellondon/sandbox
Please could you review and could you kindly advise how the article formats in to Wikipedia layout ie: with a picture etc? is this something that's done once my article is finalised and ready to go live?
Regards Amellondon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amellondon ( talk • contribs) 22:13, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello I don't understand how to talk on your page, please advise, and thanks for the invite to the teahouse, look forward to being apart-- Amellondon ( talk) 22:20, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Amellondon: You have used the talk page the right way - you'll get used to it. Your article is not ready to go into the encyclopedia yet. First, only one of the sources listed looks like it may be a news story. All of the rest appear to be press releases, announcement, and material made by the person himself or organizations connected to him. What's needed to show that he is well known enough for an article in Wikipedia are several sources such as news reports, reviews (not blogs, wordpress, facebook, but in real publications), magazine articles, etc. that are written totally independently by journalists and other authors. Also, unfortunately because your first article is about a living person, Wikipedia requires "inline citations" to back up facts about the person (not surprisingly, people are annoyed when incorrect information is published about them). There is a help page that shows how to do this at wp:Referencing for beginners. If you get stuck you can ask me or the Teahouse hosts for help.
As soon as you have done this, type this at the top of your article: {{subst:submit}} and save the page. This will put it in the queue to be reviewed for the encyclopedia. It may be declined, but if it is the reviewers will tell you what to fix, and you can submit it again. By the time it passes it will be a good article and your second article will be easier.
Thanks for pointing that out. I've restored all three of them and notified the editors concerned. Unfortunately it looks as if only one of them is still editing. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather ( talk) 13:01, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
Few questions Have I reached 10 edits yet? and when will my account be fully confirmed for me to be able to submit my article? Now I've submitted my article for review in the sandbox section what's the next procedure going forward? do I now wait or do I also submit it in another section? How do I upload a picture it is to go with the article?I accidently posted 2 articles in the sandbox area for review however it is only the most recent 1 that I want to keep, how do I get rid of the others? could you delete for me please. Also the article once reviewed and active on Wikipedia id like called nicky slimting walker, so when you type it in google it comes up. -- Amellondon ( talk) 14:26, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Look forward hear from you
email: amelun
username amellondon--Amellondon
Dear Amellondon: Your article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nicky Slim Ting Walker is now correctly submitted. (The others have been removed.) In the future, please don't make more than one copy of an article. If an article is in the wrong place it can be moved instead of another one made; that way there are no abandoned old drafts to clean up.
At the top of the screen you will see on the right a row of options, one of which says "Contributions". If you click on it you can see everything that you have done so far. There seem to be more than ten items on the list, and your account is four days old, so you should be autoconfirmed.
Your article should be reviewed soon, but it will be declined because it doesn't have any references. I have added a references section for you. All articles on Wikipedia have to have references to news reports, magazine articles, books, music reviews, etc., to demonstrate that the subject has been covered in the media and is well known enough to be in an encyclopedia. Blogs, facebook, etc., don't count - the reports have to be in recognized publications with editors, and can't have been written up by the subject or people connected to him. You should start looking for these press write-ups and add them to the article. If the article is declined before you can add them, don't worry, there will be a "resubmit" button on the page; just continue adding the sources and then click on it. Good luck with your article. — Anne Delong ( talk) 15:35, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne. I was told that my article for Walker's Auctions was okay and it was kindly moved to the mainspace with a tag that it needs to be reviewed. Since I know you do "Articles for Creation" (Hannah Franklin), I am hoping that you could take a look at it and let me know if there were any issues or remove the tag if it's okay. Also I'd like to know if it's okay for me to ask you directly or would you prefer that I use the Teahouse? The coverage of Montreal artists and art institutions is very spotty, so I am trying to improve the situation. I know wikipedia likes auction houses and Walker's is the largest reseller of Inuit Art in Canada and hence the world. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walker%27s_Auctions Thanks again. HeatherBlack ( talk) 20:41, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks Anne. I haven't quite figured out all the ins and outs of submitting articles and I was more concerned that an administrator or someone with the right authority reviewed it than I was with time. But yes I do like Teahouse for common and immediate problems. You are all great! Thanks again. HeatherBlack ( talk) 21:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Heather: Actually, most of the people who review articles aren't administrators. There are over 100,000 active editors on Wikipedia, and fewer than 2,000 are administrators. With over four million articles, they can't look at them all. They are there for us to call on in case of a dispute or a tricky problem, but the rest of us are just editors like you who have been around a bit longer. I hope you continue to make articles about arts topics, and maybe after a while you will be helping out the new editors yourself. — Anne Delong ( talk) 22:21, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
The AFC Backlog Buster Barnstar
|
||
Congratulations, Anne Delong! You're receiving The AFC and Teamwork Barnstars because you reviewed 250 articles during the recent AFC Backlog elimination drive! Thank you for you contributions to Wikipedia at-large and helping to keep the backlog down. We hope you continue reviewing submissions and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! Mdann52 ( talk) 16:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC) |
Hi, Anne! I don't know if you saw my comment on this article at the Help Desk, where I expressed concerns about copyright. I've looked at it again this morning, and it seems clear that (1) the French wp article was created by one of the many Franks on 16 October 2012 by copying more or less verbatim from here (2009 archive) or somewhere else carrying the same content; and that (2) our page was created on 18 October 2012 by one of the many Franks either by translation of the French article or by copying from here. I believe it should be blanked as a full-scale copyvio, but do not want to tag it without seeing what you think. Best, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 12:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello... Will you please tell me how did you decide about her so fast? Did you research on the internet? If you did so, how can you judge websites as being no reliable independent sources to show notability or to verify the information although you don't know Turkish? There are also English websites which gives information about her, that you may find unreliable! It's really hard to understand your approach. You're living in Canada and qualifying someone -that you know nothing about - of being not notable. I wonder why you chose to be destructive instead of constructive. (like Ssilvers) Will you enlighten me how did you come to the conclusion that her information must be deleted? What's your purpose of sending message to Wikipedia-TURKEY? (Türkiye) Are you trying to prove that you know better than them? Thanks in advance. Movericks ( talk) 18:52, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Good luck, and thank you for taking part in making the encyclopedia. — Anne Delong ( talk) 03:54, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I would like to kindly ask you is asking another editor to edit my article for an option? if so i'd-- Amellondon ( talk) 19:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC) like to kindly ask can you edit my article for me so it meets the Wikipedia criteria, it was in the queue for review however i have been asked to continue editing it and to resubmit it.
I'd if appreciate your help and assistance if possible.
Kind regards
Amellondon
Dear Amellondon: I see that your article about Nicky Slim Ting Walker has been declined because it doesn't have any references to reliable, independent sources. This means that to have a Wikipedia page Mr. Walker must have been written about extensively in news reports, magazine articles, movie revies, books, etc. I checked on the internet, and all I could find about him were a casting call, a couple of press releases, a mention on a facebook page, etc., all of which appear to be closely connected to him or his film. I would gladly help add the sources to the article if I could find any. Since the film has not yet been released, this may be the reason that it has not yet had any film reviews or other articles written about it or about Mr. Walker by journalists. Unless you know of several of these, your article will not be accepted into the encyclopedia at this time. Perhaps you could try again after the film is released in the theatres. At that time, if you do get some independent press coverage, and have trouble adding the information to your article, ask me again and I will help. Sorry! — Anne Delong ( talk) 10:13, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne,
I submitted a page for The Swan Gallery but it was rejected for note having third party references to it. I have added a few others but most of the articles that we have been linked to have been for newspapers/magazines & don't have links to them online.
Regards,
Chris
Chrislamb33 ( talk) 10:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
I have deleted the contact information section from your article, since this is totally promotional and not appropriate. Those interested can go to the gallery web site for that information. Please remember that Wikipedia is not a free advertising web site.
Wikipedia only has articles on notable subjects. This means that the subject has to have been written about extensively by journalists or other authors not connected with the subject, who then published the information in established, reliable publications. Not all businesses fall into this category, and if no one has written about the Swan Gallery your article will not be accepted. However, the references do not have to be on line. If newspapers or magazines which are published only on paper have written about the gallery, you can add references to that as long as you are specific (article title, date, name of author, etc.) so that it can be checked, and as long as the writer was not connected to the gallery. I changed your one reference into a citation - you can see how I did it by looking at the source code.
I hope this helps. — Anne Delong ( talk) 12:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Palmetto Education Association, Anne Delong!
Wikipedia editor Rinnenadtrosc just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Palmetto Education Association is a great new article. Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment on Rinnenadtrosc's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Khim Borey may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 02:31, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
I notice that you are tagging articles for CSD G13. Are you aware that there is a bot approved to search for these and add to the cat?
There are two reason why you might consider doing other tasks:
BTW, after glancing around this page. I see you are doing great work with AfCs and the Teahouse. Thanks.-- SPhilbrick (Talk) 11:51, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Ali Award for you | |
« There is no
wealth like
knowledge, no
poverty like
ignorance ».
« People have either a brother of you in the religion, or brother of you in the creation». . Ali ( talk) 01:19, 24 August 2013 (UTC) |
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC Reviewer permission. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 08:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kalattiyur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mettupalayam ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:50, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Please see my response at WT:X. John Carter ( talk) 16:26, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne,
Thank you for sending me the message about this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Ulysses_Owens
It would be great it you could help me! I have tried to get this article up to snuff for some time, and it has been a little discouraging that it hasn't been accepted. I am also somewhat unfamiliar with the format for messages, so hopefully this finds you.
Thanks, Nick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicktgrinder1 ( talk • contribs) 18:48, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne, I really appreciate you adding the reviews, yet the article was still declined. I believe you found some great articles on Ulysses, and I am slightly unsure of where to go from here. Any help you can offer is greatly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicktgrinder1 ( talk • contribs) 05:43, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello Anne,
I recently submitted an article for submission and it was rejected. I am intending on re-submitting it. How do I do this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andreavictoria91 ( talk • contribs) 14:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Andreavictoria91! (Don't forget to sign your posts by typing for tildas (~).). Just click on the blue "Resubmit button" in the pink decline box. This should make a large yellow box appear either at the top or the bottom of the page. Then you will know that it is resubmitted. Good luck! — Anne Delong ( talk) 14:29, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne,
You may recall my article Algeco Scotsman never appeared. I'm not sure what I did wrong and I'd like to try again. Could you assist me with that? Any common mistakes you think I may have made in submitting?
Thank you for your help.
Lisa 68.54.252.53 ( talk) 16:59, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Lisa: Hello again! The first thing you should do is log in. Then you will see at the top of the page your sandbox. You can write the article there, but remember to save (not just preview!) at least after each paragraph or new section that you add. If you are not sure it's working, you can send me an e-mail and I will tell you if I can see it.
When you are ready to have your article reviewed, add {{subs:submit}} at the top of the page and save.
Common mistakes: Not writing from a neutral point of view, not including references to reliable sources, and using mainly closely connected sources instead of independent ones such as news reports, magazine articles and books. Also, it's not necessary to create a long involved article to be accepted. Just some basic facts and enough independent sources to show that it's a notable (widely written about) subject, then submit. You can always add more after it's accepted, or even while it's in the queue. — Anne Delong ( talk) 17:20, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Tito☸ Dutta 03:48, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mac & Devin Go to High School may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:44, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Jon Charles Altman which you marked for deletion as " an incorrectly left-over redirect," was rather a redirect that erroneously redirected to the article , instead of to the article talk p (which I fixed). As I understand it, the procedure there is that such redirects to the article talk p. are deliberate as a way of tracking what happens to the AfCs. Personally, I think the whole AfC structure is absurdly confusing and in need of redesign, at least based upon the frequency of my own errors-- I know I get the various steps mixed up at least 5 or 10% of the time when I work there, and I have been known to skip steps and just move pages where they ought to go if I can't figure out what is supposed to be done. Fortunately, the needed resign is probably about to happen. DGG ( talk ) 04:59, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
There's already a page for 24 Indian Version TV series: 24_(Indian_TV_series)
The page 24 - Indian version (2013) is unnecessary and should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pathak.ab ( talk • contribs) 08:20, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne, Thanks very much for your interest in joining IEG Com - we'd love to have you as a member! I left some info about setup for the committee in a longer message on your meta talk page, hope you check that page too. Cheers! Siko (WMF) ( talk) 23:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
the one sean 03:08, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne,
We submitted a stub contribution for the organization "Lao Human Rights Council" which you reviewed and rejected. You mentioned that the article was not and encyclopedic article. How can we fix it to make it encylopedic ? There are literally dozens of independent news articles referencing the organization, including the New York Times (Associated Press, Fresno Bee,Star Tribune, Agence France Press, etc.) . I was submitting a stub, so I did not have time to reference these at the time. What should I do to resubmit and make the article encyclopedic ? I would be grateful if you could advise, so we do not make this mistake again and waste our time and effort with submissions that do not meet wikipedia standards. If possible, we would like to resubmit. Thanks for your help.
Publico2020 (
talk)
15:35, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Publico2020 : Don't worry! The page that I declined was just the one on which you had posted a question. You submitted it, so I had to decline it to get it out of the review list because it wasn't an article. I moved the text to your talk page, so it was just an empty page. Your submission is still up for review at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Lao Human Rights Council. You can delete the large blue box from your talk page if you want to. Sorry to have confused you. — Anne Delong ( talk) 15:49, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Anne,
Thanks. But, I think that I messed up again. Before getting your good message, I posted a question again on the Lao Human Rights Council page again to you. I guess I am a little confused about how things work with the talk pages, etc., and am still learning.
Maybe I messed the page up again that you mentioned because I posted a question again, etc.
I also added more newspaper reference sources to the submission stub, which I do not know if they went through or not for the review list article "Lao Human Rights Council"
Thanks a lot for taking the time to reply and explain things to me, I am learning (slowly) the process. What you explained to me is helpful. Is it possible for you to double check what you mentioned above in your previous reply. Because I think I made mistake in posting a question to the empty page that you mentioned (once again--my mistake). I apologize. I do not know how to correct this. Publico2020 ( talk) 16:10, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne, I recently submitted an article on Prof. Lim Keuky, the founder of the Cambodian Diabetes Association. It was declined on the basis of transgression of the copyright laws. I am new to Wikipedia. I am the Deputy Director of CDA Siem Reap Branch and created and wrote the website from which I have taken most of the content of the article I submitted. Is it possible to reconsider the article given this information? I appreciate your time. Thank you. CDA Siem Reap ( talk) 03:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne I regret the extra work I caused by accidentally submitting an article ( Ticks of domestic animals) that I had already submitted, and had been accepted in December 2011. (This article now seems well regarded by its readers.) However, it was still in my Sandbox when I submitted two new and related articles on September 9, 2013, titled Mites of domestic animals, and Insects of domestic animals. As a fairly new contributor to Wikipedia, I have found all procedures well enough explained, except for a clear procedure of how to finally submit an article, so my actions yesterday were a bit uncertain. Thank you for all your hard work as an editor. Wadudu ( talk) 16:13, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne Repeated message with Subject inserted!
I regret the extra work I caused by accidentally submitting an article ( Ticks of domestic animals) that I had already submitted, and had been accepted in December 2011. (This article now seems well regarded by its readers.) However, it was still in my Sandbox when I submitted two new and related articles on September 9, 2013, titled Mites of domestic animals, and Insects of domestic animals. As a fairly new contributor to Wikipedia, I have found all procedures well enough explained, except for a clear procedure of how to finally submit an article, so my actions yesterday were a bit uncertain. Thank you for all your hard work as an editor. Wadudu ( talk) 16:27, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne Delong,
Good day!
I would like your help on how to get approval?
This person is a known person - http://act-holdings.com.sg/about-us/our-founder/ and the company as well here in Singapore.
What would be the arrangement? Do you like to communicate with the owner of the company?
My email is rybaxs@yahoo.com
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rybaxs ( talk • contribs) 02:01, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Rybaxs: Wikipedia is not an advertising web site. It only has articles about companies, people, etc., that are so well known that they have been written about in news reports, magazine articles or books. Also, if an article is written about this person, it would have to be written in a neutral, factual way, not as a tribute. References to the news reports and other articles written by journalists or authors not connected with him or his company must be included. Once it is written, the text can be changed by other editors if they find reports to back up their information. Also, you will have to write the article in your own words, not using the text that is published on the web site above. If, after you have found the references, you want to make the article, you should try this link: Wikipedia:Your first article
Hello Anne Re: Bradwardine and District entry submission. Yes, the information I submitted was adapted from a book published by the Bradwardine History Committee in 2003. They listed an extensive timeline; I took out only the information applying directly to Bradwardine and District (my home town and district). This is a first time (probably the only time :-) submission to Wiki for me. Ghost towns have a history. I figured people ought to know Bradwardine was once a lively, vibrant, thriving town and district.
Dilys Collier Tyndalstone ( talk) 18:50, 11 September 2013 (UTC) Red Deer AB
DEar Anne,
Thank you for your message
It is my intention to complete this entry - when I can find time to negotiate all the protocols.
Please leave it for editing for the moment it you do not mind. I also have another one proposed for Our Dogs - the same problems apply
Best wishes 86.181.68.197 ( talk) 14:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
David
Hello Anne, I'm new and beginner. But I learned this morning how can I write "title"... I think that it's better now. Thanks-- 77.251.14.186 ( talk) 15:05, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello Anne, I'm beginner here. But I learned this morning how can I write the "title". Thanks-- Tarasyani ( talk) 15:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
-- Redrose64 ( talk) 20:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Could you advise why the article was declined please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ukpayroll ( talk • contribs) 16:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
By all means you have my permission to delete anything you want. I am not much of a writer and that article needs a lot of help. I went to the same High School as he did and have always admired his talent. Anyway have fun and do not wait for my approval for any sort of rewrite. I am extremely easy to get along with but I do not own a computer. I accept your conditions and am very happy that you have shown interest. Michaelgossett ( talk) 02:36, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
I see that you have already started making changes to the article. Thanks for the help. You are making it a much better article than it was. God bless you and yours. Michaelgossett ( talk) 03:05, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
I have added the citations as well as I could now. But I will later work on it more thoroughly as I get a hang of how to use Wikipedia more adroitly. Meanwhile how do I resubmit it?
It is still in the talk page...
Regards
Anthony — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdass ( talk • contribs) 05:51, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne, So first time I'm trying to add to wiki and received your comment that my Kat Rocket item was a copyright violation. The link you provided as the source CBC is a site I started and the wording is mine. I managed Kat Rocket and co-owned our record label "Hoodwink Records Inc." from 1995. In fact most of the Kat Rocket online content is mine and created to promote the band with full support from Darren Donaghey and Stella Panacci of Kat Rocket and my business partners. See this link as example of other wording i created and used in my wiki post - please note my name and creation date: http://www.canadianmusicwiki.com/%28S%28ghmicsrgu23amgrdsotghz55%29%29/Kat-Rocket.ashx. Also our art licensing company now owns all the Kat Rocket masters as part of the Hoodwink Records Inc. shareholders dissolution agreement we signed a few years back.
I'd really love to include the Kat Rocket story on wiki but am also happy to withdraw it if wiki doesn't feel it meets copyright standards.
Thanks for your help and I look forward to your reply.
My best Mariopanacci ( talk) 16:11, 18 September 2013 (UTC).
Hi Anne, Wow I had no idea what wikipedia was all about and I've been a regular reader for many years. I totally accept your positions and will now attempt a total rewrite. The web is full of Kat Rocket published sources with reviewer and magazine tags so I should be able to contribute them rather than my existing text. Thanks so much for pointing out all my errors. Do I win the prize for the worst, most self serving, vain attempt at "puffery" ever to attempt inclusion into wikipedia (: ). My very best 70.31.156.243 ( talk) 18:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne I recently submitted an article about the village I grew up named 'Perumpillichira'. It was rejected in the initial review due to lack of references. Unfortunately, I'm not able to find enough reference material as this village is so small and not at all famous. I wrote this tiny article based on my own experience living there for 20 years. Please let me know how can I help you to make the review effective
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
John.valen (
talk •
contribs)
20:19, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anish: Luckily, Wikipedia doesn't require many references for a small article about a village. Mainly, we require proof that it is a village recognized by the government. So, if it has a post office designation, or a has census report, is marked on a published map, is on the local municipality's list of villages, anything like that will suffice. How about * http://yellowpages.sulekha.com/idukki_perumpillichira_area_pin-code.htm
— Anne Delong ( talk) 20:52, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks Anne
I looked at the links you provided and they are all accurate.So, I added them under reference. Please let me know if this is sufficient — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
John.valen (
talk •
contribs)
22:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear John.valen: The article still needs work, and should have sources about some of the facts, but you have added enough to show that it is a notable topic, so I have passed it. I removed some adjectives that would be considered opinion rather than fact. I hope that you will continue to improve it, and maybe make articles about other topics that interest you. Good luck, and remember to sign your posts by typing four tildas (~). — Anne Delong ( talk) 08:49, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Anne, I took the information from the previous article and re-wrote it, adding additional sourced material that I had. Feel free to combine their histories...thanks! Rozehawk ( talk) 17:41, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne, Just a 'heads up' as I've only just noticed you left a message at User talk:DavidCavill re the above asking if he intended to move it over to main space. I've been watching the draft as I suspect the 'history' section looks to have been substantially copied from here; and the intro, profile and politics sections seem to be from this article with just company details altered and no attribution given. COI (and possibly promotion?) may also come into the equation (David Cavill owns Our Dogs - see third line from the bottom of the draft; he also owns Animal Care College, which incidentally it looks like the editor had created an article for previously but was deleted). SagaciousPhil - Chat 19:03, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for helping me reach the first step in my first submission AfC. 112SU Stornoway
112SU Stornoway (
talk)
21:34, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:La Luz del Mundo. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:14, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
The Articles for Creation barnstar | ||
Thanks for explaining the inline citation proceedures to me. Zach Vega ( talk to me) 13:12, 20 September 2013 (UTC) |
Thank you for telling me that my article was deficient. What do I do now? Kiwanis2015 ( talk) 14:24, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
(This message was moved from the bottom of Anne's user page, where unfortunately it was not seen until weeks later.)
Hi, Anne,
whoops, looks like I screwed up. I'd be pleased if you re-did my article in the correct format. Also, if you have any suggestions with the overall references, categories and URLs I've added, I'd appreciate it greatly. Thanks, again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnzodrow ( talk • contribs) 15:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
^ Quote from Gina MacDonald, Contributor, in Biographical Dictionary Of Contemporary Catholic Writing,
ISBN
0-313-24585-1, p. 307
^ SEE ISBN NUMBERS, Amazon Kindle Book Store, Amazon.com, Barnes & Noble Nook Store, Barnesandnoble.com ^ Amazon, Amazon Kindle, Barnes & Noble, Nook store]
^ IBDB,(International Broadway Data Base), IBDB.com, Dramatic Publishing Catalog, 2012, p. 181
^ IMDB, (International Movie Data Base) IMDB.com, Leonard Maltin's TV Movies, p. 579, p. 684, Writers Guild Of America Awards, 1976, WGAW.org
^ IMDB, IMDB.com
^ Biographical Dictionary Of Contemporary Catholic American Writing, Edited by Daniel J. Tynan, Greenwood Pres, ISBN 0-313-24585-1, pp.307-309
^ See Ya Publishing
Remember, when the reviewers are deciding on the notability of the author (you, I guess), they only consider what has been written by other authors and journalists. The IMBD and IBDB are user-contributed; the publishers and sales sites don't have a neutral point of view. It would be helpful if you could find some reviews to add as references.
I hope this helps. — Anne Delong ( talk) 17:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you, Anne for all your input. I'm on it.
It's the clearest best advice I've ever had. Many thanks again. Johnzodrow ( talk) 23:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne
Thank you for your inputs on an article for creation for Ang Jolie Mei. Special thanks for directing me to the Singapore Wiki Project page. I am new to Wiki and was unaware of this. Thanks for the help again
Regards Petson Peter AKA Writer Wrench Writerwrench ( talk) 04:22, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Would a userspace list of the "What submission/who" ordered by how the bot is going to nominate be useful? I could see a userspace task where the bot updates the list to move a indicator to show what the last submission that was nominated was and add to the list each time a new set of AfC pages became eligible for G13 (and the bot served notice on them). Would that be useful for the AfC rescue crew? Hasteur ( talk) 18:53, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
2011 November
2011 December
This would not need any software intervention. After a while we should be well ahead of the bot. The user box could be in the top corner. In fact, I am going to set up such a page in my user space today and start using it, and see if anyone else is interested.
If it's not too much work, an announcement to put on the page that says "The G13 bot has reached this date, and has nominated submissions up to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation.submission name" (so that we can see what letter of the alphabet it is working on) would be helpful. — Anne Delong ( talk) 19:57, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Hasteur: Okay, I'm not sure why the order of nomination is being changed, but why not change the order of the sort of the category to match? Having two different sorts laying around of the same list, one of which is misleading, doesn't seem to make sense. However, I don't really care about all that. I am interested in trying not to waste my time by looking over ones that have already been looked at. I presume since you didn't say anything about it that this is an unrelated problem, the answer is no. SI am unaware of anything particular about the words "rescue" and "squad", but I will happily change my language if it is mysteriously charging people with emotion. — Anne Delong ( talk) 21:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Anne,
I followed your instructions closely. So feel I've added specific sources, full URLs and reviews you wanted. The article is up. Would you be so kind as to take a quick look at it? Isn't the reference reflist supposed to automatically generate?
Thanks.
Johnzodrow ( talk) 23:55, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
When looking at the references, the number of IMDB references are overwhelming the others. Isn't there one page at IMDB that summarizes everything connected with a certain person? I don't usually see individual references for each item. Remember that IMDB is not considered to be a reliable source, since people input their own information. You can still link the one reference to a number of spots in the article, Like this:<ref name=John's IMDb page>[http://URLHERE TITLE]</ref> for the first one, and then <ref name=John's IMDb. page /> after that.
I see that you have found a couple of book reviews.
Reading over the text of your article, I see that there is a lot of material that isn't written in your own words. Quotations should only be a small part of an article, not the main part. Here's something to read: WP:QUOTEFARM
Some articles to look at for examples:
I will be leaving you now to another reviewer, because although I am fairly good with references, I am not an expert in either writing or Catholicism. Good luck. — Anne Delong ( talk) 03:29, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Zach Vega ( talk to me) 12:07, 24 September 2013 (UTC)See my talk p. for my response DGG ( talk ) 00:53, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne,
thank you again for the insight and help. I'm on it. Can I ask who is the new reviewer you are recommending?
very best to you,
John
Johnzodrow ( talk) 23:57, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear John: I really don't know the strengths of the various reviewers. If your article is submitted and is in the queue, someone will pick it out to review. However, there are a couple of things that you can do in the meantime: (1) You could leave a message at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk, asking if there's anything that should be fixed up before the review. You could also ask for help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism and maybe find someone who has worked on similar articles and would be willing to help. — Anne Delong ( talk) 01:11, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Glad to get your comment "Add citation" to my query to the Help Desk a few days ago. An article ( David G. Benner), now newly in mainspace after Roger(Dodger67) moved it, needed more references in two of the four paragraphs under Careers. I've added a couple today and could put in more but would love to know the sensible WP approach for citing CVs. It's pretty clear in admins' and editors' postings and other guidelines that pseudo-promo sources like Facebook, LInkedIn and blogs aren't reliable sources. Yup, can see that. Now, an APA stylebook guideline, one of the few, says to handle things like this: to write that the text's info comes from a CV (of a certain date if listed), then record where the info is accessible online. I've done it that way for one of the newest reference notes. While researching the article, I was finding short snibs of career info mentioned in solid sources, and those could be compiled and referenced (lumpy solution), but the plainest and most orderly outline of Benner's worklife is on his own website. I like the APA solution (Chicago Manual of Style wasn't useful) but still feel antsy about the situation for future editing. What think? JaneFaber ( talk) 06:53, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear JaneFaber: There is nothing to prevent you from citing a person's own web site, but this type of citation is extremely weak, and should be accompanied by other, more independent sources. A biography written by the person himself tells what he would like the world to know about him, whereas an encyclopedia is a synopsis of what independent authors and journalists have written about him. Making a point of disclosing that the information is from a CV is good, but it is a weaselly way of not finding proper verification. You see this in news articles when the reporters don't want to bother to check their facts, so instead of writing "John Smith was innnocent of the crime", they write "According to his mother, John Smith was innocent of the crime" (perfectly true). The style guides for professional organizations are intended to be used to allow the reader to judge the level of expertise of a person cited as corroboration of someone else's work in an essay or a paper published in a journal. A person shouldn't be used to verify information about himself.
Let me give you an imaginary example: Mr. X is the CEO of an oil company. It's important for the stockholders' confidence in the company that he appear capable and reliable. He lists on the company web site what he sees as his most positive accomplishments, a glowing report of education completed, positions held, committees worked on, involvement in charitable works, etc. He says nothing about the time he spent in alcohol rehab, the fact that two of his previous companies went bankrupt, his arrest years before for tax evasion, or the fact that he led the company in an efficiency drive, cutting back on pipeline inspections, leading to an oil spill and protests by angry fishermen. Yet all of these things, if written about in the media, would end up in his Wikipedia article (if he existed).
Anyway, I guess my point is to keep looking for independent corroboration, and if you do use the CV as a source, be prepared for other editors to remove it or replace it with an independent one, and to add and change the information in the article to better match the independent source if it differs from the CV Sorry; I know that this is likely not what you wanted to hear. — Anne Delong ( talk) 11:56, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Hey Anne, just thought I'd let you know about https://github.com/WPAFC/afch/issues/184 to see if you support such a thing or if you think it should be an off by default option. Thanks! Technical 13 ( talk) 13:15, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Anne, hi! My article on the Holy Incense was rejected on grounds that it sounded more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. I do not deny that it has an essay-like style, but this is larger due to my past writing experiences on other venues. In short, I am asking your advice on how to change the style and make the current article acceptable to the set-requirements of Wikipedia. Can you please suggest areas in which I can change the style and make it acceptable? Here is my article: User:Davidbena/draft article on Holy Incense . Thank you in advance. Davidbena ( talk) 17:45, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear David: I have read the first part of your article, although not all of the detailed bits about the spices, and I have some suggestions:
Now keep in mind that I am only one of 120,000 people who have edited Wikipedia in the past month, and my opinion is only an opinion. Feel free to disregard any section which doesn't make sense to you. Good luck! — Anne Delong ( talk) 19:49, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Raging Bull. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:13, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Hey Anne please do feel free to join me and or expedite the process as you did with the Hoot Hester article. I know that Hoot Hester was a friend of one of Lonnie Peerce's but I don't know how long the band stayed in Louisville after I left there in December of 1969. I also don't know too much about what happened after Peerce retired. Anyway feel free to join in on any article I am either creating or editing. The Jim Kweskin article needs help and I am thinking of starting an Article on Subway Elvis. He was an Elvis impersonator long before Elvis died. He if from Toronto. Michaelgossett ( talk) 02:35, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne. I have moved the G13 rescue backlog to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/G13 rescue and done all the Os for December 2011. If I can find coverage in one reliable source for the article's subject quickly, I have postponed it as salvageable (and for a few left links to the source in question). Please advise if I should use the same procedure for AfDs and find as many sources as possible. Where a submission is duplicated in mainspace, I have redirected the submission to there.
Once I know what the procedure is, I can document it and we can get everyone to tackle the backlog. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:36, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, Ritchie333. I will skip the O's. The December 2011's are disappearing before I can check them, because the bot is no longer doing them by the alphabet, but by date, so my procedure will only work if we can stay a month ahead. About the duplicates: These will either have to be dealt with by history merge if appropriate or content from them moved to the the other article if there's enough to be worth the effort, or just let go if they really are duplicates. Because there's a rush, your temporary solution should give some time to do that later. I've been checking any I thought worth saving for copyvios before postponing them. I haven't been as thorough as you at checking for new sources; if there aren't any at all, or if they are all primary sources such as twitter or a band's web site I've been letting them go unless they fall under one of those inherently notable categories, such as a town or a professor. — Anne Delong ( talk) 13:51, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anee! I edited Muhammad Sharif (cosmologist). Please check it and include it as an article in Wikipedia. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeeshan313b ( talk • contribs) 16:09, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Zeeshan313b. I will look at your submission, but before I do you should remove the personal comments at the top. They belong instead on your personal user page, which would be at User talk:Zeeshan313b. Also, you won't have to worry about trying to organize people interested in Relativity; they are already organized at:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/Relativity
...and you can add your name there and start participating in discussions on the talk page. I'm sure you'll meet some kindred spirits there. — Anne Delong ( talk) 17:14, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anee! I removed the personal comments from the top. Thanks fopr your help. Muhammad Sharif (Cosmologist) is my beloved teacher. That's why i am excited and want to see him in Wikipedia. So please make Muhammad Sharif (cosmologist) as an article in Wikipedia. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeeshan313b ( talk • contribs) 17:52, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne! I made the changes as you said. I use neutral words and remove the External links from the main body. The revised version of the proposed article is https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Muhammad_Sharif_%28cosmologist%29&action=submit
So please make Muhammad Sharif (cosmologist) as an article in Wikipedia. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeeshan313b ( talk • contribs) 10:26, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Dear Zeeshan313b: I looked at the article again, and it appears to be exactly the same as it was. In fact, the article history shows that it has not been edited since I left my message. Perhaps you forgot to click on the "Save page" button. Please try again! — Anne Delong ( talk) 13:48, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne! I am so sorry as I may not be able to save the page. Thanks for your patience. Now I made changes accordingly again. I hope this will not disappoint you. link is /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Muhammad_Sharif_%28cosmologist%29
So please make Muhammad Sharif (cosmologist) as an article in Wikipedia. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeeshan313b ( talk • contribs) 15:19, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne! I am agree, you can make some changes to make it even more neutral, and can fix grammatical problems too. Make it ready to move for the encyclopedia. Thanks a lot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeeshan313b ( talk • contribs) 19:16, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Anne. FYI - You posted a G12 speedy deletion notice on ClopperAlmon's talk page and he/she then posted at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Article_on_Alfred_H._Bartles. -- Jreferee ( talk) 03:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello Anne, Thank you for taking the time to write to me at some length about the article I submitted on Alfred H. Bartles. As far as I can see from the material you sent, I was never given the opportunity to DELETE the submission which you had decided not to use. Thus, when it later appeared elsewhere, you deleted it for copyright reasons. I regard this mixup as a result of the difficulty and complexity of communicating with Wikipedia. Please understand that I long WANTED IT DELETED from Wikipedia and could find no way to do so.
When I got your message, I wanted to reply but could find no way to do so. After a lot of poking around on Wikipedia, I found this channel. At the top, it says "Put new text under old" but it does not say how to do so. It could simply add "by clicking the word [Edit] after the title."
Probably there is a better way to reply, but I failed to find it. Just another instance of how difficult it is to communicate with Wikipedia.
I see that someone has put a brief notice on Bartles on Wikipedia. Perhaps I can edit it to provide links and more information.
ClopperAlmon ( talk) 15:33, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
( ←) Hello, Anne Delong! I followed this from ANI. Since you deal with new users frequently, and they might need to contact you on your talk page, can I ask you you start archiving your talk page? You see, it took me 3 tries and about 12 minutes to get your talk page to load (I have lowly dial-up still). Some new users are put off by inconveniences and long talk pages is one. Can I ask you to set up an auto-archive using one of the bots? Thanks, (Dynamic IP, will change when I log off.) -- 64.85.216.33 ( talk) 11:30, 1 October 2013 (UTC)