This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Kashmir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nizam Uddin ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:28, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
FYI: I moved your outdent in PROUT so that the thread was a bit more obvious for my comments. Cheers! Location ( talk) 16:36, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello! I noticed you've been active around the Chach Nama articles today; thanks very much for contributing. I've gone ahead and created a task force from WikiProject History; hopefully, it can serve as a sort of guide for people interested in improving WP's coverage of this area. Thanks again for your help. dci | TALK 04:23, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Uttar Pradesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashi ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Not as bad as Joshi's. In the right side column, there is a list of "most popular etc thread, start with that here -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 21:05, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Ongoing battle over Prabhat Rainjan Sarkar-related articles. Thank you. Mangoe ( talk) 04:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Hi, Thanks a lot for taking up and completing the comprehensive review of Vedaranyam with such precision. The comments were very constructive and i am taking this as an input for other articles i am editing. Once again, thanks a lot. Ssriram mt ( talk) 12:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC) |
The Special Barnstar | |
For getting Vedaranyam up to GA. Lovely to see quality for a smaller town in India! Keep up the good work and may we see many more! ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 14:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC) |
This message is given to you because you took part in a RfC not so long ago on this page about pretty much the same topic. That RfC was allegedly closed too soon.
See
Request for comment III on
Rape culture talk. Please comment if you'd like.
Mr T
(Talk?)
(New thread?) 06:41, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Work has been started in the theme section. You can intermittently check. -- Dwaipayan ( talk) 23:24, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
FYI. Modified some formatting of your vote so that Wikipedia:Nominations Viewer does not see oppose. Redtigerxyz Talk 17:52, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Just read the quote about freedom on your talk page, awesome !! -- sarvajna ( talk) 14:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for helping in Mother India. The comments in fac were incredibly good.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 14:59, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
An RfC concerning addition of a subsection to Philosophy can be found at this location. Please comment upon its inclusion and any modifications you think would help make it better. Brews ohare ( talk) 20:40, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
I have replied at my talk, could you independently review this please Template:Did you know nominations/All I Want Is Everything (film)? -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 09:17, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
The information added in the Date, Place and Context section of the Manusmṛti page was replaced during this edit and the factual information was replaced with mythological dates and content. These do not belong to a historical section. Please remove it and replace it with its original content which was
The reasons given by the user who did this edit for replacing the information in that section are ideologically/politically biased, not supported by any archaeological and historical evidence, and are either completely unproven or any conclusive evidence supporting these claims is absent.
This user has also done many similar edits on pages relating to Indian mythology and history by adding mythological content and dates to historical content, and by adding unproven archaeological/historical contents to pages relating to Indian mythology, especially to pages relating to Bhrigu and Dhosi Hill, as can be seen from this user's contributions. Most of the information added is either directly cited from mythological texts or is politically biased, non-factual and contrary to any information obtained from archaeological, geological and historical evidence.
Something must be done to remove the misleading non-factual information from all these pages and to prevent this user from non-factual information to more pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.225.253.207 ( talk) 01:13, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
I please request for the
Manusmṛti page to be reviewed to remove non-factual and misleading content presenting mythological content as being factual, and for other misleading content with the intention of presenting it as reality and glorifying it using unproven claims.
The user User:Sudhirkbhargava has made many misleading edits to that page that present mythological events unproven by archaeology as real historical events, and also provides other misleading information presenting the mythological figure Manu as a historical person whose laws were followed in South-East Asia before the rise of Buddhism in India, although no credible evidence for all these claims exist that are accepted by mainstream archaeology and historical sources.
Here is a compilation of all the misleading edits made to this page.
Please do something to remove these edits which are very misleading and also make people lose faith in Wikipedia's reliability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.224.81.231 ( talk • contribs) 01:06, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
FYI: I saw your post a few minutes after I posted this. Location ( talk) 06:39, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
See the article Parents' Worship Day -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 06:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maithil Brahmin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mughal ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:37, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
-- sarvajna ( talk) 18:24, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Tito Dutta ( contact) 08:50, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Oh wow! Great! i was just thinking to clean up the nominations page, and found you just did it! Great men think alike.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 18:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Have a look at Tarakeswar affair, which is currently a GA nominee.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 19:43, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
Keep an eye Asaram Bapu. most recently Single event misinterpreted as general information, Unnecessary use of capiatl H in "His" etc! -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 19:39, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
That is very flattering. :) Done.— indopug ( talk) 04:57, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
I got very much puzzled, I hope you can give a better answer! Tito Dutta ( contact) 17:20, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Sholay is in peer review.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 04:38, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
I do not want to revert your edits(might revert after your explanation) , but I do see some merits in YKs changes, he did not remove the mention of 2002 violence from the article, 2002 violence was the biggest section in the article which is completely undue. Would you like to tell us your rationale on the talk page ?-- sarvajna ( talk) 17:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Sayeen Itna Deejiye, Ja Mein Kutumb Samaye
Main Bhi Bhookha Na Rahun, Sadhu Na Bhookha Jaye.
Good work at Kabir. In case you are alive and kicking, could you review Template:Did you know nominations/Paoli Dam's article? -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 07:10, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
I have recently 5x expanded Ajit Singh of Khetri and submitted for DYK. Could you help to expand Alasinga Perumal a bit? Specially the section which discussed how Perumal's relation with Vivekananda? this might be helpful -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 18:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Important Tito Dutta ( contact) 18:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you are receiving this message because your name is listed at Wikipedia:INCOTM/Members, where people indicate their interest in the India Project Collaboration of the Month (INCOTM).
INCOTM is restarting and you are welcome to nominate articles for collaborative improvement during July 2013. - Sitush ( talk) 12:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Tito Dutta ( talk • contributions • email) 12:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
On 18 July 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bibliography of Swami Vivekananda, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that The Monk As Man: The Unknown Life of Swami Vivekananda is one of the many books written on Swami Vivekananda? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bibliography of Swami Vivekananda. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 12:02, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey Correct Knowledge. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.
We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.
Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 18:58, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
v/r - T P 20:02, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gulmarg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mughal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding this edit. Agree of course that they are not by any stretch part of the Himalayas. The thing is, every one of the 1,515 ultra prominent peaks in the world was listed among the collection of ultras lists, but not now. So we should either put the peaks you have removed into another ultra list, or put them back where they were and rename the page to something that makes more sense. -- RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 22:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Done, with our temporary solution. -- RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 23:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, you're right. I don't know what I was hoping to accomplish with that one. Indeed there seems to be no ideal fit for these four peaks.
And because they do not neatly fit, I think creating the separate ultra list article for them is a better idea than you give yourself credit for. We already have List of ultras of the Caribbean which contains only 7 peaks. I think it would be better than what we have now, and it wouldn't be much work at all. Title not bad, List of non–Himalayan Ultras in South Asia, but can it be improved? What do you think? -- RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 01:07, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Also, I forgot, there is overlap among the ultras lists: The Papua, Indonesia peaks on both List of Ultras of Malay Archipelago and List of Ultras of Oceania. So for the moment anyway, I drop my objection to creating overlap. -- RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 01:22, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
This user was the winner of Round 48 of the India Quiz. |
You are the winner of round 48 of the India quiz along with Dwaipayan. Congratulations! -- Suresh Purohit (Su_hit) ( talk) 06:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
welcome Amitrochates!-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 22:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Tito Dutta ( talk) 12:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Dear Amitrochates. I want to appreciate role played by in WIPQ. The forum is witnessing new level of energy and knowledge. keep it going ! -- Suresh Purohit (Su_hit) ( talk) 04:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 08:15, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I am Ssven2. I had recently taken this film article starring Rajinikanth and Aishwarya Rai to GA status and nominated it for FAC, but it was withdrwan due to WP:PUNC and MOS:LQ issues, most of which have been resolved. Do let me know if you are interested in leaving additional comments at the article's 2nd PR. Thanks. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 01:14, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dnyaneshwar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ovi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Interesting: "Shri Chakradhar Swami propagated a religious movement, as well as social movement, in which all members were accepted irrespective of their castes, and the traditional ritualistic religion was rejected." I'll read the Dnyaneshwar-article; thanks for your work there. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:04, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Thank you ...for your contributions and interest for the Sant Dnyaneshwar page... Swapniladitya — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.176.222.228 ( talk) 11:58, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Sompura Brahmin is a fairly short article on a topic related to Shaivism that needs editing by someone knowledgeable on the subject. Please see Wikipedia talk:Hinduism-related topics notice board § Sompura Brahmin. Thanks. -- Thnidu ( talk) 16:27, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Great username! Ogress smash! 16:36, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your diligent work on the Samkhya page, and your ability to stay more even-tempered than I when rebuffing fringers. Iṣṭa Devatā ( talk) 07:38, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
We are happy to inform you that WikiProject Indian Collaborations of the month is going to be restarted this month and we want your active support here.
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Amitrochates. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Amitrochates. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Kashmir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nizam Uddin ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:28, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
FYI: I moved your outdent in PROUT so that the thread was a bit more obvious for my comments. Cheers! Location ( talk) 16:36, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello! I noticed you've been active around the Chach Nama articles today; thanks very much for contributing. I've gone ahead and created a task force from WikiProject History; hopefully, it can serve as a sort of guide for people interested in improving WP's coverage of this area. Thanks again for your help. dci | TALK 04:23, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Uttar Pradesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashi ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Not as bad as Joshi's. In the right side column, there is a list of "most popular etc thread, start with that here -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 21:05, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Ongoing battle over Prabhat Rainjan Sarkar-related articles. Thank you. Mangoe ( talk) 04:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Hi, Thanks a lot for taking up and completing the comprehensive review of Vedaranyam with such precision. The comments were very constructive and i am taking this as an input for other articles i am editing. Once again, thanks a lot. Ssriram mt ( talk) 12:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC) |
The Special Barnstar | |
For getting Vedaranyam up to GA. Lovely to see quality for a smaller town in India! Keep up the good work and may we see many more! ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 14:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC) |
This message is given to you because you took part in a RfC not so long ago on this page about pretty much the same topic. That RfC was allegedly closed too soon.
See
Request for comment III on
Rape culture talk. Please comment if you'd like.
Mr T
(Talk?)
(New thread?) 06:41, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Work has been started in the theme section. You can intermittently check. -- Dwaipayan ( talk) 23:24, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
FYI. Modified some formatting of your vote so that Wikipedia:Nominations Viewer does not see oppose. Redtigerxyz Talk 17:52, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Just read the quote about freedom on your talk page, awesome !! -- sarvajna ( talk) 14:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for helping in Mother India. The comments in fac were incredibly good.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 14:59, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
An RfC concerning addition of a subsection to Philosophy can be found at this location. Please comment upon its inclusion and any modifications you think would help make it better. Brews ohare ( talk) 20:40, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
I have replied at my talk, could you independently review this please Template:Did you know nominations/All I Want Is Everything (film)? -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 09:17, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
The information added in the Date, Place and Context section of the Manusmṛti page was replaced during this edit and the factual information was replaced with mythological dates and content. These do not belong to a historical section. Please remove it and replace it with its original content which was
The reasons given by the user who did this edit for replacing the information in that section are ideologically/politically biased, not supported by any archaeological and historical evidence, and are either completely unproven or any conclusive evidence supporting these claims is absent.
This user has also done many similar edits on pages relating to Indian mythology and history by adding mythological content and dates to historical content, and by adding unproven archaeological/historical contents to pages relating to Indian mythology, especially to pages relating to Bhrigu and Dhosi Hill, as can be seen from this user's contributions. Most of the information added is either directly cited from mythological texts or is politically biased, non-factual and contrary to any information obtained from archaeological, geological and historical evidence.
Something must be done to remove the misleading non-factual information from all these pages and to prevent this user from non-factual information to more pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.225.253.207 ( talk) 01:13, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
I please request for the
Manusmṛti page to be reviewed to remove non-factual and misleading content presenting mythological content as being factual, and for other misleading content with the intention of presenting it as reality and glorifying it using unproven claims.
The user User:Sudhirkbhargava has made many misleading edits to that page that present mythological events unproven by archaeology as real historical events, and also provides other misleading information presenting the mythological figure Manu as a historical person whose laws were followed in South-East Asia before the rise of Buddhism in India, although no credible evidence for all these claims exist that are accepted by mainstream archaeology and historical sources.
Here is a compilation of all the misleading edits made to this page.
Please do something to remove these edits which are very misleading and also make people lose faith in Wikipedia's reliability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.224.81.231 ( talk • contribs) 01:06, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
FYI: I saw your post a few minutes after I posted this. Location ( talk) 06:39, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
See the article Parents' Worship Day -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 06:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maithil Brahmin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mughal ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:37, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
-- sarvajna ( talk) 18:24, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Tito Dutta ( contact) 08:50, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Oh wow! Great! i was just thinking to clean up the nominations page, and found you just did it! Great men think alike.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 18:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Have a look at Tarakeswar affair, which is currently a GA nominee.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 19:43, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
Keep an eye Asaram Bapu. most recently Single event misinterpreted as general information, Unnecessary use of capiatl H in "His" etc! -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 19:39, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
That is very flattering. :) Done.— indopug ( talk) 04:57, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
I got very much puzzled, I hope you can give a better answer! Tito Dutta ( contact) 17:20, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Sholay is in peer review.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 04:38, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
I do not want to revert your edits(might revert after your explanation) , but I do see some merits in YKs changes, he did not remove the mention of 2002 violence from the article, 2002 violence was the biggest section in the article which is completely undue. Would you like to tell us your rationale on the talk page ?-- sarvajna ( talk) 17:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Sayeen Itna Deejiye, Ja Mein Kutumb Samaye
Main Bhi Bhookha Na Rahun, Sadhu Na Bhookha Jaye.
Good work at Kabir. In case you are alive and kicking, could you review Template:Did you know nominations/Paoli Dam's article? -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 07:10, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
I have recently 5x expanded Ajit Singh of Khetri and submitted for DYK. Could you help to expand Alasinga Perumal a bit? Specially the section which discussed how Perumal's relation with Vivekananda? this might be helpful -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 18:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Important Tito Dutta ( contact) 18:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you are receiving this message because your name is listed at Wikipedia:INCOTM/Members, where people indicate their interest in the India Project Collaboration of the Month (INCOTM).
INCOTM is restarting and you are welcome to nominate articles for collaborative improvement during July 2013. - Sitush ( talk) 12:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Tito Dutta ( talk • contributions • email) 12:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
On 18 July 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bibliography of Swami Vivekananda, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that The Monk As Man: The Unknown Life of Swami Vivekananda is one of the many books written on Swami Vivekananda? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bibliography of Swami Vivekananda. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 12:02, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey Correct Knowledge. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.
We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.
Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 18:58, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
v/r - T P 20:02, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gulmarg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mughal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding this edit. Agree of course that they are not by any stretch part of the Himalayas. The thing is, every one of the 1,515 ultra prominent peaks in the world was listed among the collection of ultras lists, but not now. So we should either put the peaks you have removed into another ultra list, or put them back where they were and rename the page to something that makes more sense. -- RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 22:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Done, with our temporary solution. -- RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 23:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, you're right. I don't know what I was hoping to accomplish with that one. Indeed there seems to be no ideal fit for these four peaks.
And because they do not neatly fit, I think creating the separate ultra list article for them is a better idea than you give yourself credit for. We already have List of ultras of the Caribbean which contains only 7 peaks. I think it would be better than what we have now, and it wouldn't be much work at all. Title not bad, List of non–Himalayan Ultras in South Asia, but can it be improved? What do you think? -- RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 01:07, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Also, I forgot, there is overlap among the ultras lists: The Papua, Indonesia peaks on both List of Ultras of Malay Archipelago and List of Ultras of Oceania. So for the moment anyway, I drop my objection to creating overlap. -- RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 01:22, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
This user was the winner of Round 48 of the India Quiz. |
You are the winner of round 48 of the India quiz along with Dwaipayan. Congratulations! -- Suresh Purohit (Su_hit) ( talk) 06:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
welcome Amitrochates!-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 22:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Tito Dutta ( talk) 12:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Dear Amitrochates. I want to appreciate role played by in WIPQ. The forum is witnessing new level of energy and knowledge. keep it going ! -- Suresh Purohit (Su_hit) ( talk) 04:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 08:15, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I am Ssven2. I had recently taken this film article starring Rajinikanth and Aishwarya Rai to GA status and nominated it for FAC, but it was withdrwan due to WP:PUNC and MOS:LQ issues, most of which have been resolved. Do let me know if you are interested in leaving additional comments at the article's 2nd PR. Thanks. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 01:14, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dnyaneshwar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ovi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Interesting: "Shri Chakradhar Swami propagated a religious movement, as well as social movement, in which all members were accepted irrespective of their castes, and the traditional ritualistic religion was rejected." I'll read the Dnyaneshwar-article; thanks for your work there. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:04, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Thank you ...for your contributions and interest for the Sant Dnyaneshwar page... Swapniladitya — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.176.222.228 ( talk) 11:58, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Sompura Brahmin is a fairly short article on a topic related to Shaivism that needs editing by someone knowledgeable on the subject. Please see Wikipedia talk:Hinduism-related topics notice board § Sompura Brahmin. Thanks. -- Thnidu ( talk) 16:27, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Great username! Ogress smash! 16:36, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your diligent work on the Samkhya page, and your ability to stay more even-tempered than I when rebuffing fringers. Iṣṭa Devatā ( talk) 07:38, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
We are happy to inform you that WikiProject Indian Collaborations of the month is going to be restarted this month and we want your active support here.
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Amitrochates. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Amitrochates. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)