I blocked Cun2 before and seemed to have blocked an IP range too, (eek!). Could you help me, I have absolutely no idea how to fix it. Thanks in advance. Rudget . 18:27, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
wtf is wrong with u? I didnt vandalise, It was a constructive edit. proof it. -- Kraasbouerg ( talk) 20:11, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
What I did was constructive. Tell me how it wasnt constructive please. -- Kraasbouerg ( talk) 20:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
I use Twinkle, which has the rollback function. Thanks for your offer, though. KJS 77 22:06, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for going ahead and granting me rollback. I am generally happy with old fashioned reverting, but had thought about looking into it whenever I had the time, which was probably going to be this very weekend. Warm regards, and happy editing. SorryGuy Talk 01:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Can i request something called Rollback? Pretty Please with cherries and sprinkles and chocolate flakes on top! Thanks!
Thanks for the unexpected barnstar. Walton One 14:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for giving me the rollback. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 19:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello! How are you? I'm fine :) Okay, i'll cut straight to the chase: can i request the rollback? Thanks! -- Party ( talk) 20:31, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for giving me the rollback tool. I still prefer TWINKLE because it gives a more detailed edit summary but rollback is a lot faster. Later, -- Hdt83 Chat 00:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I did not even know there was an ability to give rollback status. I have not really been around since November:-)-- SJP ( talk) 01:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for informing. -- BritandBeyonce ( talk) 02:00, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Remember the dot, I have granted rollback rights to your account. The reason for this is that, after a review of some of your contributions, I can trust you to use rollback correctly. You know the difference between a good-faith edit and vandalism, so therefore, I can trust you not to use rollback abusively by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. If you don't want rollback, let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck. Acalamari 04:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Adding my Thanks for the rollback! to the list. :) ♠ TomasBat 13:49, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the offer and i will think about it. Simply south ( talk) 17:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't know what's rollback? Sorry, I'm new to that. -- Esanchez( Talk 2 me or Sign here) 00:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Acalamari - thanks for your participation in my request for adminship. It passed 52/0/0, and I'm now in possession of a shiny new mop. If I can ever help you with anything, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sarcasticidealist ( talk) 09:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Are you a crat now?-- SJP ( talk) 12:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
I have to say that that's rather unexpected...just wanted to say thanks for the rights and I promise to use them well. -- tennis man 14:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
|
...for your support in my recently closed Request for Adminship. I am more than a bit stunned by the outcome, which appears to have finished at 146 supports, no opposes, and one abstention. I am particularly grateful to Keilana and Kingboyk for their recent encouragement, and most specifically to Pastordavid, for having seen fit to nominate me. I also want to make it very clear to everyone that I have no intentions of changing my name again, so the servers should be safe for a while.
In the event you ever believe that I would ever able to assist in the future, I would be honored if you were to contact me regarding the matter. I can't guarantee results, unfortunately, but I will do what I can. Thank you again.
By the way, I know the image isn't necessarily appropriate, but I am rather fond of it, and it at least reflects the degree of honor I feel at the result. And it's hard to go wrong with a Picture of the Year candidate.
Now, off to a few last tasks before starting work in earnest on the various templates I promised I'd work on.
John Carter ( talk) 17:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
My thanks for the addition of the rollback facility to my account; looks like I've got some reading to do! -- Kateshort forbob 19:48, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. Yes I'm verging on 100,000 edits, although I will have to reduce my editing more in the future. I refused adminship before, and many people know that I don't wish to become an admin although I practically function as one. Certain admin tools I could have would be useful particularly wen you know how constructive an editor I am. One of the things was when I create new articles often in bulk it clogs up the new pages meaning they have to be patrolled when I always create decent content ans mos toften with a number of references. Is there some way my new articles could be unhiglighted like an admin? -it would save other editor s alot of effort in checking. Thanks -I too need to read up on it regards ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ Talk? 19:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Glad you noticed!!! However I;d like to nominate a user who I think wikipedia would benefit from having the roll back feature even more so than myself. Please check the editing history of User:Shshshsh. A lot of his editing time involved having to revert the bad edits of vandals and IP address on the Bollywood film star pages. I would strongly recommend that he is given this feature - I think he can be trsued and would only use it in good faith - as it would make his protection of many of the core Bollywood pages easier. Just see how many reverts he has to do on a daily basis from vandals . Regards ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ Talk? 20:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes, although I don't think I will be using it often; I needed a new account for class demonstration. PS. Plus I thought I should reserve the bot account for some future use.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
My request for adminship was successful at 64/1/2! Many thanks for your participation and I will endeavor to meet your expectations. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 09:21, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks So Much!!!, Acalamari. You were always one of my favorite Wikipedians. :) Quasy Boy 16 January 2008 10:39 (UTC)
Well, it looks like I'm here for the same purpose as the person above me, but that doesn't diminish how I feel! Thanks for the tool!! I just recently discovered what "recent changes" meant, and I have been patrolling it a lot. I will be very nice be able to use Rollback. Thanks again, J.delanoy gabs adds 19:02, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
I, too, would like to thank you for offering me Rollback, which saves me having to request it. I've been looking forward to having that tool, since it's done me a world of good reverting vandalism on my own wiki. It's nice to see someone being proactive about helping people get the tools they need to benefit Wikipedia. DOSGuy ( talk) 13:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the recognition and granting of rollback privileges. I didn't even ask for it. It's better than Santa Claus giving presents because everyone expects him to come. I think I'll only use it rarely but it's nice of you to give it to me. Mrs.EasterBunny ( talk) 19:42, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi, could you recover Talk:Challenge ProMode Arena/to do. It's a todo task list for the article. Thanks ;) Visor ( talk) 22:04, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
I have been nominated for an RfA. If you haven't done so already I would appreciate if you could go and comment on this page: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Alexf. Thanks and happy wiking! -- Alexf( Talk/ Contribs) 12:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Here, pussy. PUH-see. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.223.238 ( talk) 16:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Acalamari,
Thanks for granting me rollback capabilities. I was interested in it, but felt guilting asking!... Now to go on a rampage rolling back the whole of Wikipedia!!... I'm joking of course. Thanks again however. I will use it sparingly. -- Jza84 · ( talk) 20:34, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Acalamari, thank you for the rollback capabilities, I'll use it as best that I can. Appreciated. Modernist ( talk) 22:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
For reasons that I will not, lest your eyes should glaze over, recite here, but that I have set forth on occasion elsewhere, I have a few objections to the conferrence of rollback under the current schema, and, so, I should appreciate your -rollbacking me whenever you have a moment. Many thanks, Joe 22:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Responded on my talkpage. Cirt ( talk) 23:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC).
Thanks for granting my rollback request! Anti-vandalism is one of the many things I am willing to take part in; I'm partially in it right now. Schfifty Three 23:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure if you are getting annoyed by all the Thank You messages you have been getting, but I can't imagine why you would get annoyed. Anyway, thanks for giving me rollback! Glacier Wolf 00:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the grantation (is that a word?.. oh well) Anyway, in case you saw my "bad" edit, please check here for what happened. Sorry about that edit. Again, thanks for the "grantation". Thingg ⊕ ⊗ 01:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
The Fried calamari for Acalamari | ||
Thanks for giving me the rollback; I am giving you the fried calamari in return. NHRHS 2010 03:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC) |
Hehehe :D Do you have a link to your story? Dihydrogen Monoxide ( party) 06:58, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the administrator rollback function. I appreciate it. Cheers :) King Lopez Contribs 10:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you so much for granting me rollback rights. Since I am new to this, I may have to check the diff with popups or something before I use it. If I think there is a chance it isn't vandalism, I'll either not revert, use popups, or use the undo or edit links in the diffs. I frequently notice vandalism in my watchlist, so I think it should be quite helpful. However, I can't seem to quite grasp the idea of how it could revert subsequent edits by a single user if someone has editted after that or something. Well, I have to go now. Thanks. ~ A H 1( T C U) 13:50, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi, could you please check my request for rollback and let me know what you think? Thanks a lot!! Dustihowe Talk 18:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
You had your own article and you never told me :O.. I'am really very very Jealous ..Good Job :P ..-- Comet styles 21:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Cheers, replied! - Zeibura ( Talk) 03:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
The user continues to change the genre. Charmed36 ( talk) 03:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Well someone needs to stop that user. Charmed36 ( talk) 04:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
The problem is not only with the ones you have blocked. There are other new editors too who are changing genres. But they are doing so with IP address. Are there any guidelines on wikipedia for genres? If there are, then i would be glad if you could inform me. Thank you. Indianescence ( talk) 05:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
AAAAH! It has started all over again. This user is again changing genres. I AM TIRED OF REVERTING THEM!! Even s/he doesnt get tired of chaging genres. If i source a particular genre, then this person has a different genre with a different source for it. It is getting on my nerve. Help required. Indianescence ( talk) 17:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Would you be okay if I seconded your nomination? Or would you prefer me to add as a "support"? FT2 ( Talk | email) 05:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the welcome, I will do my best to make wikipedia a safer place and it was a nice birthday pressie for me!!!-- Teenage wikian v2 ( talk) 12:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
A belated thanks for granting me rollback. Zginder ( talk) ( Contrib) 15:16, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, just so you know, I think this probably is Mary Anne Hobbs, she's edited her article under several different user names (see the page history). I've reverted back to the first of her three recent edits (changing the date of the Pete Tong show) as it says the same thing on her myspace, I know it's not really a reliable source, but it makes it better supported that the show's on 07/02 than 30/01, which is probably factually inaccurate. This could potentially be a really nasty COI case though (i'm still not convinced by the birth date) so I have been keeping watch on it and thanks for doing so yourself too. - Zeibura ( Talk) 20:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
I blocked Cun2 before and seemed to have blocked an IP range too, (eek!). Could you help me, I have absolutely no idea how to fix it. Thanks in advance. Rudget . 18:27, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
wtf is wrong with u? I didnt vandalise, It was a constructive edit. proof it. -- Kraasbouerg ( talk) 20:11, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
What I did was constructive. Tell me how it wasnt constructive please. -- Kraasbouerg ( talk) 20:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
I use Twinkle, which has the rollback function. Thanks for your offer, though. KJS 77 22:06, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for going ahead and granting me rollback. I am generally happy with old fashioned reverting, but had thought about looking into it whenever I had the time, which was probably going to be this very weekend. Warm regards, and happy editing. SorryGuy Talk 01:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Can i request something called Rollback? Pretty Please with cherries and sprinkles and chocolate flakes on top! Thanks!
Thanks for the unexpected barnstar. Walton One 14:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for giving me the rollback. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 19:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello! How are you? I'm fine :) Okay, i'll cut straight to the chase: can i request the rollback? Thanks! -- Party ( talk) 20:31, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for giving me the rollback tool. I still prefer TWINKLE because it gives a more detailed edit summary but rollback is a lot faster. Later, -- Hdt83 Chat 00:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I did not even know there was an ability to give rollback status. I have not really been around since November:-)-- SJP ( talk) 01:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for informing. -- BritandBeyonce ( talk) 02:00, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Remember the dot, I have granted rollback rights to your account. The reason for this is that, after a review of some of your contributions, I can trust you to use rollback correctly. You know the difference between a good-faith edit and vandalism, so therefore, I can trust you not to use rollback abusively by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. If you don't want rollback, let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck. Acalamari 04:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Adding my Thanks for the rollback! to the list. :) ♠ TomasBat 13:49, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the offer and i will think about it. Simply south ( talk) 17:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't know what's rollback? Sorry, I'm new to that. -- Esanchez( Talk 2 me or Sign here) 00:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Acalamari - thanks for your participation in my request for adminship. It passed 52/0/0, and I'm now in possession of a shiny new mop. If I can ever help you with anything, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sarcasticidealist ( talk) 09:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Are you a crat now?-- SJP ( talk) 12:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
I have to say that that's rather unexpected...just wanted to say thanks for the rights and I promise to use them well. -- tennis man 14:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
|
...for your support in my recently closed Request for Adminship. I am more than a bit stunned by the outcome, which appears to have finished at 146 supports, no opposes, and one abstention. I am particularly grateful to Keilana and Kingboyk for their recent encouragement, and most specifically to Pastordavid, for having seen fit to nominate me. I also want to make it very clear to everyone that I have no intentions of changing my name again, so the servers should be safe for a while.
In the event you ever believe that I would ever able to assist in the future, I would be honored if you were to contact me regarding the matter. I can't guarantee results, unfortunately, but I will do what I can. Thank you again.
By the way, I know the image isn't necessarily appropriate, but I am rather fond of it, and it at least reflects the degree of honor I feel at the result. And it's hard to go wrong with a Picture of the Year candidate.
Now, off to a few last tasks before starting work in earnest on the various templates I promised I'd work on.
John Carter ( talk) 17:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
My thanks for the addition of the rollback facility to my account; looks like I've got some reading to do! -- Kateshort forbob 19:48, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. Yes I'm verging on 100,000 edits, although I will have to reduce my editing more in the future. I refused adminship before, and many people know that I don't wish to become an admin although I practically function as one. Certain admin tools I could have would be useful particularly wen you know how constructive an editor I am. One of the things was when I create new articles often in bulk it clogs up the new pages meaning they have to be patrolled when I always create decent content ans mos toften with a number of references. Is there some way my new articles could be unhiglighted like an admin? -it would save other editor s alot of effort in checking. Thanks -I too need to read up on it regards ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ Talk? 19:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Glad you noticed!!! However I;d like to nominate a user who I think wikipedia would benefit from having the roll back feature even more so than myself. Please check the editing history of User:Shshshsh. A lot of his editing time involved having to revert the bad edits of vandals and IP address on the Bollywood film star pages. I would strongly recommend that he is given this feature - I think he can be trsued and would only use it in good faith - as it would make his protection of many of the core Bollywood pages easier. Just see how many reverts he has to do on a daily basis from vandals . Regards ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ Talk? 20:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes, although I don't think I will be using it often; I needed a new account for class demonstration. PS. Plus I thought I should reserve the bot account for some future use.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
My request for adminship was successful at 64/1/2! Many thanks for your participation and I will endeavor to meet your expectations. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 09:21, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks So Much!!!, Acalamari. You were always one of my favorite Wikipedians. :) Quasy Boy 16 January 2008 10:39 (UTC)
Well, it looks like I'm here for the same purpose as the person above me, but that doesn't diminish how I feel! Thanks for the tool!! I just recently discovered what "recent changes" meant, and I have been patrolling it a lot. I will be very nice be able to use Rollback. Thanks again, J.delanoy gabs adds 19:02, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
I, too, would like to thank you for offering me Rollback, which saves me having to request it. I've been looking forward to having that tool, since it's done me a world of good reverting vandalism on my own wiki. It's nice to see someone being proactive about helping people get the tools they need to benefit Wikipedia. DOSGuy ( talk) 13:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the recognition and granting of rollback privileges. I didn't even ask for it. It's better than Santa Claus giving presents because everyone expects him to come. I think I'll only use it rarely but it's nice of you to give it to me. Mrs.EasterBunny ( talk) 19:42, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi, could you recover Talk:Challenge ProMode Arena/to do. It's a todo task list for the article. Thanks ;) Visor ( talk) 22:04, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
I have been nominated for an RfA. If you haven't done so already I would appreciate if you could go and comment on this page: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Alexf. Thanks and happy wiking! -- Alexf( Talk/ Contribs) 12:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Here, pussy. PUH-see. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.223.238 ( talk) 16:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Acalamari,
Thanks for granting me rollback capabilities. I was interested in it, but felt guilting asking!... Now to go on a rampage rolling back the whole of Wikipedia!!... I'm joking of course. Thanks again however. I will use it sparingly. -- Jza84 · ( talk) 20:34, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Acalamari, thank you for the rollback capabilities, I'll use it as best that I can. Appreciated. Modernist ( talk) 22:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
For reasons that I will not, lest your eyes should glaze over, recite here, but that I have set forth on occasion elsewhere, I have a few objections to the conferrence of rollback under the current schema, and, so, I should appreciate your -rollbacking me whenever you have a moment. Many thanks, Joe 22:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Responded on my talkpage. Cirt ( talk) 23:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC).
Thanks for granting my rollback request! Anti-vandalism is one of the many things I am willing to take part in; I'm partially in it right now. Schfifty Three 23:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure if you are getting annoyed by all the Thank You messages you have been getting, but I can't imagine why you would get annoyed. Anyway, thanks for giving me rollback! Glacier Wolf 00:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the grantation (is that a word?.. oh well) Anyway, in case you saw my "bad" edit, please check here for what happened. Sorry about that edit. Again, thanks for the "grantation". Thingg ⊕ ⊗ 01:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
The Fried calamari for Acalamari | ||
Thanks for giving me the rollback; I am giving you the fried calamari in return. NHRHS 2010 03:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC) |
Hehehe :D Do you have a link to your story? Dihydrogen Monoxide ( party) 06:58, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the administrator rollback function. I appreciate it. Cheers :) King Lopez Contribs 10:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you so much for granting me rollback rights. Since I am new to this, I may have to check the diff with popups or something before I use it. If I think there is a chance it isn't vandalism, I'll either not revert, use popups, or use the undo or edit links in the diffs. I frequently notice vandalism in my watchlist, so I think it should be quite helpful. However, I can't seem to quite grasp the idea of how it could revert subsequent edits by a single user if someone has editted after that or something. Well, I have to go now. Thanks. ~ A H 1( T C U) 13:50, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi, could you please check my request for rollback and let me know what you think? Thanks a lot!! Dustihowe Talk 18:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
You had your own article and you never told me :O.. I'am really very very Jealous ..Good Job :P ..-- Comet styles 21:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Cheers, replied! - Zeibura ( Talk) 03:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
The user continues to change the genre. Charmed36 ( talk) 03:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Well someone needs to stop that user. Charmed36 ( talk) 04:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
The problem is not only with the ones you have blocked. There are other new editors too who are changing genres. But they are doing so with IP address. Are there any guidelines on wikipedia for genres? If there are, then i would be glad if you could inform me. Thank you. Indianescence ( talk) 05:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
AAAAH! It has started all over again. This user is again changing genres. I AM TIRED OF REVERTING THEM!! Even s/he doesnt get tired of chaging genres. If i source a particular genre, then this person has a different genre with a different source for it. It is getting on my nerve. Help required. Indianescence ( talk) 17:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Would you be okay if I seconded your nomination? Or would you prefer me to add as a "support"? FT2 ( Talk | email) 05:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the welcome, I will do my best to make wikipedia a safer place and it was a nice birthday pressie for me!!!-- Teenage wikian v2 ( talk) 12:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
A belated thanks for granting me rollback. Zginder ( talk) ( Contrib) 15:16, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, just so you know, I think this probably is Mary Anne Hobbs, she's edited her article under several different user names (see the page history). I've reverted back to the first of her three recent edits (changing the date of the Pete Tong show) as it says the same thing on her myspace, I know it's not really a reliable source, but it makes it better supported that the show's on 07/02 than 30/01, which is probably factually inaccurate. This could potentially be a really nasty COI case though (i'm still not convinced by the birth date) so I have been keeping watch on it and thanks for doing so yourself too. - Zeibura ( Talk) 20:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)